MONDAY, FEBRUARY 8, 2021                                                                2:41 P.M.

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  THE HOUSE WILL COME TO

                    ORDER.

                                 REVEREND ELIA WILL OFFER A PRAYER.

                                 REVEREND DONNA ELIA:  LET US PRAY.  ETERNAL

                    GOD, WE COME BEFORE YOU, THANK YOU TO BE FELT TO BE IN YOUR

                    PRESENCE.  HUMBLE AS WE SEEK YOUR BLESSING, HOPEFUL AS WE ANTICIPATE

                    THE WORK AHEAD.  IN TIMES OF JOY AND OF SORROW, YOU, OUR GOD, POUR

                    OUT A GENEROUS MEASURE OF YOUR BLESSING UPON ALL LEGISLATORS AND

                    STAFF, WORKING FOR THE WELL-BEING OF OUR COMMUNITIES AND OUR STATE.

                    EMPOWER THEM, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE TASKS ARE CHALLENGING.  HELP THEM

                    TO FIND THE WAY FORWARD, ESPECIALLY IN TIMES OF DISAGREEMENT.  GIVE

                    THEM CLARITY IN SPEAKING, AND HELP THEM TO HAVE AN OPEN MIND IN

                    LISTENING.  THANK YOU FOR THEIR WILLINGNESS ONCE AGAIN TO TAKE ON THE

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    MANTLE OF PUBLIC SERVICE, AND BLESS THEIR FAMILIES AND ALL THEIR DEAR

                    ONES.  GIVE HEALING TO ANY WHO STRUGGLE WITH ILLNESS, AND STRENGTHEN

                    THOSE WHO ARE WEARY.  WE ARE GRATEFUL, O GOD, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO

                    CELEBRATE BLACK HISTORY MONTH.  THANK YOU FOR THE GIFTS OF BLACK

                    LEADERS, THOSE WHOM WE CAN NAME AND THOSE WHOSE NAMES ARE LOST TO

                    HISTORY BUT WHO STRUGGLED FOR JUSTICE AND AN END TO OPPRESSION.  CURE

                    OUR LAND AND THE WORLD OF THE SCOURGE OF RACISM.  HELP US ALL, PEOPLE OF

                    EVERY RACE AND ETHNICITY, TO COMMIT TO THE WORK OF ANTIRACISM.  GRANT

                    US PEACE WITH JUSTICE.  IN YOUR HOLY NAME WE PRAY.  AMEN.

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  VISITORS ARE INVITED TO JOIN THE

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, SPEAKER HEASTIE LED VISITORS AND

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 5TH.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I MOVE TO

                    DISPENSE WITH THE JOURNAL OF FRIDAY, FEBRUARY THE 5TH, AND ASK THAT THE

                    SAME STAND APPROVED.

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  WITHOUT OBJECTION, SO

                    ORDERED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I'M PLEASED TO BE BACK IN CHAMBERS TODAY WITH MEMBERS

                    WHO ARE BOTH HERE WITH US AND THOSE WHO ARE PARTICIPATING REMOTELY.  I

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WILL PROVIDE AGAIN THE SCHEDULE FOR TODAY, BUT I DO WANT TO LEAVE US

                    WITH A QUOTE.  WE ENDED LAST WEEK WITH THE ENTIRE STANZA FROM "LIFT

                    EVERY VOICE AND SING" THAT WAS DESIGNED BY THE JEFF -- THE JOHNSON

                    BROTHERS.  TODAY WE'RE JUST GOING TO GO WITH A STANZA OF IT, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IT'S, LIFT EVERY VOICE AND SING, TILL EARTH AND HEAVEN RING.

                    RING WITH THE HARMONIES OF LIBERTY.  LET OUR REJOICING RISE, HIGH AS THE

                    LISTENING SKIES.  LET IT RESOUND LOUD AS THE ROLLING SEA.  AGAIN, MR.

                    SPEAKER, THAT IS A VERSE FROM "LIFT EVERY VOICE AND SING."

                                 THE MEMBERS DO HAVE ON THEIR DESKS A -- THE MAIN

                    CALENDAR.  IT HAS NINE BILLS ON IT.  THESE NEW BILLS BEGIN ON PAGE 4 WITH

                    CALENDAR NO. 78 AND IT GOES THROUGH CALENDAR NO. 86.  WE WILL START

                    OUR WORK TODAY BY TAKING UP A RESOLUTION BY YOU, MR. SPEAKER,

                    COMMEMORATING BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.  WE

                    WILL THEN CONTINUE WITH THE CONSENT ON THE MAIN CALENDAR WHERE WE

                    LEFT OFF ON PAGE 10 WITH CALENDAR NO. 58.  THEN WE WILL TAKE UP

                    CALENDAR NO. 50 BY MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT

                    ON THE RIGHT TO CLEAR AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.

                    FOLLOWING TODAY'S SESSION THERE WILL BE A NEED FOR AN IMMEDIATE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE AND, MR. SPEAKER, AS ALWAYS WE WILL CONSULT WITH

                    OUR COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE TO DETERMINE WHAT THEIR NEEDS MAY BE.

                                 THAT IS A GENERAL OUTLINE, MR. SPEAKER.  NOW IT WOULD

                    BE APPROPRIATE IF WE HAVE ANY HOUSEKEEPING AND/OR RESOLUTIONS, WHICH

                    YOU DO.

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  NO HOUSEKEEPING.  BUT I

                    WOULD LIKE TO SAY GOOD AFTERNOON AND IN JUST A MOMENT WE WILL

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    CONTINUE OUR LONGSTANDING ASSEMBLY TRADITION RECOGNIZING FEBRUARY AS

                    BLACK HISTORY MONTH WITH A LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION.  FOR MANY YEARS,

                    SOCIETY HISTORY BOOKS OFTEN OVERLOOKED OR MINIMIZED THE VITAL

                    CONTRIBUTIONS MADE BY PEOPLE OF COLOR.  BUT HERE IN THE PEOPLE'S

                    HOUSE, I AM PROUD THAT WE CELEBRATE THE ACCOMPLISHMENTS OF OUR

                    ANCESTORS BECAUSE WE KNOW WE STAND ON THEIR SHOULDERS.  AS THE FIRST

                    AFRICAN-AMERICAN SPEAKER OF THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE, I'VE ALWAYS SAID THAT

                    IF I DID THIS JOB RIGHT THAT -- THAT DETAIL WOULD BE A FOOTNOTE IN HISTORY.

                    BUT INSTEAD WE RECOGNIZE OUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

                    BECAUSE BLACK HISTORY IS AMERICAN HISTORY.  TODAY WE CELEBRATE THE

                    HISTORY MADE BY THOSE THAT CAME BEFORE US, AND WE COMMIT TO

                    HONORING THAT HISTORY BY BUILDING ON IT RIGHT HERE IN THE PEOPLE'S

                    HOUSE.  AND ALTHOUGH FEBRUARY IS BLACK HISTORY MONTH, I BELIEVE

                    EVERY DAY AND EVERY MONTH IS BLACK HISTORY MONTH.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ THE TITLE OF THE RESOLUTION.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 45, MR.

                    HEASTIE.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM FEBRUARY 2021 AS BLACK HISTORY

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. AUBRY ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING

                    ME TO SPEAK ON THIS RESOLUTION.  I OFTEN STOOD IN FRONT OF THIS AUGUST

                    BODY AND TALKED A BIT ABOUT MY HISTORY AS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN IN THIS

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    COUNTRY AND A SON OF THE SOUTH, BORN IN NEW ORLEANS, LOUISIANA.  AND

                    SO I THINK IT'S APPROPRIATE FOR A MINUTE LET ME TAKE YOU PLACES MAYBE

                    YOU HAVEN'T BEEN AND MAYBE YOU HAVEN'T HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO

                    CONSIDER.  IN THE SOUTH WHERE -- WHEN SEPARATE BUT UNEQUAL WAS

                    ESTABLISHED, THERE WERE BLACK SCHOOLS.  BLACK COLLEGES, BLACK HIGH

                    SCHOOLS, BECAUSE WE COULDN'T GO TO SCHOOL WITH OUR WHITE NEIGHBORS.

                    IT WAS NOT ALLOWED.  IT WAS AGAINST THE LAW.  BUT IN THAT PROCESS IN A

                    SEGREGATED SOUTH, THE HISTORY OF AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN THIS COUNTRY

                    WAS TAUGHT.  IT WAS TAUGHT BECAUSE WE WERE TAUGHT FOR THE MOST PART BY

                    AFRICAN-AMERICAN TEACHERS.  AND THERE WAS BOTH AN ORAL AND A WRITTEN

                    HISTORY SO THAT YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND WHO YOU WERE AND WHERE YOU

                    CAME FROM.  NOW, THIS MIGHT NOT HAVE BEEN UNIVERSAL, BUT AT LEAST

                    EXISTED WITHIN THE SOUTHERN CULTURE AMONG THE, AT THOSE TIMES, NEGRO

                    COMMUNITIES THAT EXISTED.  BUT THAT WAS NOT EVERYWHERE.  AND NOR WAS

                    IT UNIVERSALLY UNDERSTOOD.  SO WHEN I WAS RAISED AND SCHOOLED IN THE

                    NORTH, AS MY PARENTS BROUGHT ME UP HERE AT A VERY YOUNG AGE, THERE

                    WAS VERY LITTLE HISTORY TAUGHT ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED TO

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS.  THERE WAS A MILD REFERENCE TO THE SLAVERY, BUT IT

                    WAS NOT EXEMPLIFIED IN ANY WAY THAT YOU MIGHT UNDERSTAND IT.  FOR

                    INSTANCE, I HEARD OF THE 100-YEAR WAR [SIC] IN EUROPE, THE HABSBURGS

                    AND THE STRUGGLES THAT HAPPENED BETWEEN ENGLAND AND FRANCE AND

                    SPAIN.  THAT WAS FULLY TALKED ABOUT.  AND THE HISTORY OF ITALY, OF

                    COURSE, THE BOOT, WHERE THAT WENT ON.  AND EVEN WHAT HAPPENED IN THE

                    URALS IN RUSSIA.  THOSE THINGS -- AND I WAS A HISTORY MAJOR WHEN I

                    WENT TO COLLEGE -- EVEN IN COLLEGE THERE WAS NO RECOGNITION OF WHAT

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS HAD CONTRIBUTED TO THIS COUNTRY.  AND SO, SAME

                    THINGS I'M SURE YOU WERE TAUGHT.  SO THE IDEA THAT WE WERE THIS

                    POWERFUL FORCE IN THIS COUNTRY, PROVIDING ALL KINDS OF ENHANCEMENTS,

                    HELPING THE COUNTRY, BUILDING THE COUNTRY, CULTURALLY MAKING THIS

                    COUNTRY RICH, WERE LEFT OUT.  AND SO GENERATIONS WOULD GROW UP NOT

                    KNOWING WHO THEY WERE.  AND OF COURSE FROM SLAVERY, THAT WAS THE

                    PLAN.  WHEN YOU WERE BROUGHT FROM THE SHORES OF AFRICA HERE, YOU

                    WERE TAKEN TO PLACES WHERE THEY CALLED "BREAKING IN."  AND IN THE

                    PROCESS OF BREAKING IN, TO MAKE A GOOD SLAVE YOU HAVE TO REMOVE ANY

                    OF HIS HISTORY AND HIS CULTURE AND HAVE HIM ACCEPT THE CULTURE OF BEING

                    A SLAVE.  IT WAS IN MY MIND OF ALL THE THINGS THAT I COULD THINK OF THAT

                    WAS MOST HORRIBLE ABOUT SLAVERY WAS THE DENIAL OF YOUR CULTURE, OF YOUR

                    HUMANITY, OF YOURSELF, BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT THAT.  THAT MADE YOU A

                    VERY POOR SLAVE IF YOU HELD ON TO THIS SENSE OF SELF AND INDEPENDENCE.

                    OF COURSE LIKE ANYBODY ELSE, IF YOU ARE INDEPENDENT WITH YOUR OWN

                    RESOURCES, WITH YOUR OWN MIND, WITH YOUR OWN FEELINGS, YOU WILL

                    REBEL.  AND OF COURSE, REBELLION WAS MOST FEARED IN THIS COUNTRY

                    BECAUSE OF THE MILLIONS OF SLAVES THAT WERE BROUGHT ACROSS TO WORK THE

                    COTTON FIELDS AND WORK IN THE HOUSES AND ALL THE PART OF THE TRIANGLE

                    TRADE THAT MADE THIS COUNTRY AN ECONOMIC POWER.  SO THE CREATION OF

                    BLACK HISTORY MONTH WAS DONE TO HELP THOSE WHO HAD NOT GOTTEN THAT

                    EDUCATION TO GET IT, BECAUSE IT WASN'T GOING TO BE BROUGHT -- BROUGHT TO

                    YOU IN SCHOOLS BECAUSE TEACHERS COMING OUT OF PARTICULARLY WHITE

                    INSTITUTIONS WEREN'T TAUGHT THAT, RIGHT, THEY DIDN'T KNOW.  THEY WEREN'T

                    TAUGHT IT.  IT WASN'T A COURSE OF STUDY AS YOU MIGHT FIND NOW TODAY IN

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THESE MORE MODERN TIMES, BUT IN THOSE DAYS, NOT SO MUCH.  AND SO WE

                    ALL WANDERED AROUND IN THE DARK, THINKING WHAT WE WERE TAUGHT TO

                    THINK AND ACTING WHAT -- THE WAY WE WERE TAUGHT TO ACT.  SO THE

                    DEVELOPMENT OF THIS DAY -- IT WAS A DAY, IT BECAME A WEEK, WE WANTED

                    -- IT IS A MONTH -- ALL WAS ESTABLISHED IN RECOGNITION OF THAT MISSING

                    PIECE IN THESE HUMAN BEINGS' LIVES THAT THEY COULD NOT CONNECT.  MANY

                    OF YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO SAY, MY PARENTS WERE BORN IN ITALY IN A LITTLE

                    SMALL TOWN OUTSIDE OF ROME.  OR IN POLAND IN WARSAW IN RZESZÓW.  IN

                    ENGLAND OR IN FRANCE, SOMEWHERE ON THE RIVER SEINE.  BUT

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN THE UNITED STATES, ONLY UNTIL VERY RECENTLY,

                    COULD NEVER POINT TO A PLACE IN AFRICA WHERE THEY KNEW THEIR FAMILY

                    CAME FROM.  KNEW THAT THEY HAD -- KNEW THAT THERE WAS A HISTORY.

                    KNEW THAT THERE WAS A VILLAGE, A TRIBE, A CITY THAT THEY BELONGED TO.  SO

                    THE VICIOUSNESS OF SLAVERY AND THE DENIAL OF YOUR HUMANITY AND YOUR

                    CONNECTION, BOTH CULTURAL AND HUMAN-WISE, WAS VERY COMPLETE.  AND

                    SO WE CELEBRATE TODAY THE RECONNECTION OF THAT.  AND WE CELEBRATE WITH

                    YOU BECAUSE IT'S IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND THOSE PEOPLE WHO YOU

                    LIVE NEXT TO, WORK NEXT TO, SEE ON THE STREET, WATCH ON TELEVISION.

                    WHERE THEY CAME FROM.  WHO THEY WERE.  WHAT THEY BRING AS A PART OF

                    OUR CULTURE AND THE MANY ACCOMPLISHMENTS, ALL THE LISTS OF INVENTORS

                    THAT WERE A PART OF THE UNITED STATES.  ALL OF THE GREAT MILITARY MINDS

                    THAT WERE A PART OF THIS COUNTRY.  IT IS IMPORTANT FOR THIS COUNTRY TO

                    UNDERSTAND WHAT THE ORIGINAL SIN WAS, AND TO HELP US AND TO HELP

                    YOURSELF AND TO HELP THIS COUNTRY RECOVER.

                                 SO I SALUTE YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR BRINGING THIS

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    RESOLUTION.  I THANK YOU FOR THE WORK THAT YOU'VE DONE.  I THANK YOU FOR

                    YOUR LEADERSHIP, AND I THANK THE MEMBERS OF THIS HOUSE FOR ENJOYING

                    THIS OPPORTUNITY TO CELEBRATE TOGETHER.  AND I'M EVEN MORE HAPPY

                    BECAUSE THIS IS THE ANNIVERSARY OF MY 73RD BIRTHDAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 AND THEY'RE GETTING TO BE NOT SO MANY OF US AROUND.

                    SO I WANT TO THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH, MR. SPEAKER, MY MEMBERS.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  THANK YOU, MR. AUBRY.

                                 MR. BARRON ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. BARRON:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SPEAKER.

                    WHEN WE SPEAK OF BLACK HISTORY, AFRICAN HISTORY, WE MUST NOT START

                    OUR HISTORY IN ENSLAVEMENT.  WE ARE AN AFRICAN PEOPLE, TORN US UNDER

                    FROM OUR CONTINENT.  THE RICHEST CONTINENT KNOWN TO THE WORLD.  WE

                    ARE AN AFRICAN PEOPLE THAT GAVE THE WORLD MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE,

                    ASTROLOGY, ASTRONOMY.  WE GAVE THE WORLD THE MIGHTY SPHINX, THE

                    PYRAMIDS, THE ROCK-HEWN CHURCHES OF ETHIOPIA.  WE ARE AN AFRICAN

                    PEOPLE THAT GAVE THE WORLD IMHOTEP, THE REAL FATHER OF MEDICINE.  WE

                    ARE AN AFRICAN PEOPLE.  SO WHENEVER YOU START YOUR HISTORY IN

                    ENSLAVEMENT, YOU MISSED THE GLORIOUS AFRICAN ANCESTRY.  YOU MISSED

                    THE PRE-COLONIAL TIMES IN AFRICA WHEN WE WERE KINGS, QUEENS,

                    PRINCESSES AND WHEN AFRICA WAS ROLLING WITH DIAMONDS AND GOLD AND

                    THEY'RE SHARED AMONGST THE MASSES OF AFRICAN PEOPLE.  SO WE MUST NOT

                    START OUR HISTORY DURING ENSLAVEMENT HERE IN AMERICA.  WE ARE AN

                    AFRICAN PEOPLE.

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 SECONDLY, WE MUST BEGIN TO TELL OUR HISTORY OF

                    RESISTANCE, NOT ONLY THE HISTORY OF REPRESSION.  WE SEEM TO ALWAYS TALK

                    ABOUT HOW BAD PEOPLE DID US, AND BELIEVE ME, THEY DID AND THAT MUST

                    BE BROUGHT UP.  BUT WE HAD A HISTORY OF RESISTANCE.  FROM THE SHORES OF

                    AFRICA, THE INLAND RESISTANCE, MANY AFRICANS WERE NEVER CONQUERED

                    BECAUSE THEY RESISTED EUROPEAN INVADERS.  DURING THE GREAT SO-CALLED

                    "MIDDLE PASSAGE" WHERE MILLIONS OF US DIED, THE AFRICAN HOLOCAUST

                    WAS THE WORST HOLOCAUST KNOWN TO HUMANKIND.  BUT THERE WERE

                    MUTINIES.  MANY OF THE SHIPS NEVER MADE IT TO AMERICA BECAUSE

                    AFRICANS ROLLS UP ON THOSE SHIPS AND THEY KILLED THE CREW THAT WAS

                    ENSLAVING THEM AND TURNED THE SHIPS BACK TO AFRICA, NEVER TO BE

                    ENSLAVED.  OH, THEY'LL SHOW YOU THE AMISTAD WITH JOSEPH CINQUÉ

                    BECAUSE A WHITE MAN, JOHN QUINCY ADAMS, WHEN THEY TOOK OVER THEIR

                    SHIP, THEY GUIDED IT NOT BACK TO AFRICA, THEY LEFT THE CREW ALIVE, THE

                    AFRICANS DID, AND THEY GUIDED IT TO AMERICA, LONG ISLAND.  AND JOHN

                    QUINCY ADAMS, THE GREAT WHITE SAVIOR, SAVED THEM AND THEY WENT

                    BACK TO AFRICA.  OH, THEY WON'T TELL YOU ABOUT THE FACT THAT WE FIRST

                    CAME HERE IN 1526, NOT 1619 WHEN THE SPANISH -- SPANIARDS BROUGHT

                    200 AFRICANS TO THE PEE DEE RIVER IN SOUTH CAROLINA, IN THAT AREA, AND

                    COLONIZED US THERE.  WE UNITED WITH THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE.  AND THEY

                    WON, THEY REBELLED, REVOLTED, TORE DOWN THE COLONY, SENT THE EUROPEANS

                    BACK TO SAN DOMINGO, WHERE THEY CAME FROM, AND THEY WERE ABLE TO

                    LIVE FREELY WITH THE INDIGENOUS PEOPLE, SO-CALLED INDIANS.  THE

                    AFRICANS, THEY UNITED.  THEY WON'T TELL YOU ABOUT THE REBELLION OF CATO

                    IN 1763 IN SOUTH CAROLINA, ROSE UP AND WENT FROM PLANTATION TO

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PLANTATION FREEING AFRICANS UNTIL THEY WERE FINALLY CAUGHT.  THEY WON'T

                    TELL YOU ABOUT THE 1811 REBELLION IN LOUISIANA WHEN WE ROSE UP ONCE

                    AGAIN, HAVING BEEN INSPIRED BY THE HAITIAN REVOLUTION, THE FIRST

                    LIBERATION OF INSULATED PEOPLE IN THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE.  WE WERE

                    MOTIVATED BY THAT, AND THEY RAN FROM PLANTATION TO PLANTATION ON THEIR

                    WAY TO NEW ORLEANS TO START A NEW INDEPENDENT AFRICAN STATE OF NEW

                    ORLEANS, SAYING, LIBERTY, LIBERTY AT LAST.  THEY DON'T TELL YOU ABOUT THAT

                    STORY.  THEY DON'T TELL YOU THE STORY ABOUT MADISON WASHINGTON, WHO

                    DURING THE MIDDLE PASSAGE AND AFTER HE CAME HERE AND HE WAS

                    ENSLAVED, HE FREED HIMSELF IN VIRGINIA.  AND THEN WANTING TO GO BACK

                    TO GET HIS WIFE, HE WENT BACK.  THEY ENSLAVED HIM AGAIN.  HE TOOK OVER

                    A SHIP AND TOOK THE SHIP BACK TO AFRICA AND FOUND OUT THAT HIS WIFE WAS

                    ON THAT SHIP.  TELL US THAT STORY OF AFRICAN LIBERATION.

                                 SO WHEN WE CELEBRATE AFRICAN OR BLACK HISTORY

                    MONTH, IT'S JUST NOT DATES AND PERSONALITIES.  HISTORY TEACHES OF WHAT

                    CAN BE DONE, WHAT IS POSSIBLE.  SO IF IT'S POSSIBLE FOR HARRIET TUBMAN

                    TO FREE OVER 400 OF US, THEN IT'S POSSIBLE FOR US TO DO THAT TODAY.  IF IT'S

                    POSSIBLE FOR NAT TURNER TO GO FROM PLANTATION TO PLANTATION FREEING OUR

                    PEOPLE, WE CAN GO FROM BLACK COMMUNITY TO BLACK COMMUNITY,

                    FREEING OUR PEOPLE FROM THE ECONOMIC, RACIST, PARASITIC, CAPITAL

                    OPPRESSION THAT KEEPS POVERTY IN OUR COMMUNITIES.  AND WE SHOULD NOT

                    ALLOW THEM TO FRONT BLACK LEADERSHIP, PUT BLACK FACES IN HIGH PLACES

                    AND YOU SAY THAT'S PROGRESS.  UNTIL THE MASSES OF US ARE PROGRESSING,

                    THERE IS NO PROGRESS.  THE STRUGGLE CONTINUES.  WE WILL CELEBRATE BLACK

                    HISTORY, BUT LIKE THE SPEAKER SAID, BLACK HISTORY IS EVERY DAY AND WE

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    SHOULD HONOR THAT EVERY DAY, NOT JUST THE COLDEST AND SHORTEST MONTH ON

                    THE CALENDAR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. BICHOTTE

                    HERMELYN.

                                 YOU NEED TO -- THANK YOU.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING

                    FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR AS BLACK HISTORY MONTH IN OUR STATE.  DURING

                    BLACK HISTORY MONTH WE CELEBRATE AND WE PAY TRIBUTE TO OUR CULTURE,

                    HISTORY WHICH UNFORTUNATELY CONTINUES TO BE FORGOTTEN IN HISTORY BOOKS

                    AND TEACHINGS.  AS YOU KNOW, A UTAH SCHOOL EARLIER THIS MONTH EVEN

                    ALLOWED PARENTS TO OPT THEIR CHILDREN OUT OF TAKING IN BLACK HISTORY

                    MONTH LEARNING.  NOT UNDERSTANDING THAT BLACK HISTORY IS AMERICAN

                    HISTORY, IS WORLD HISTORY, IS GLOBAL HISTORY.  I REMEMBER WHEN I WAS IN

                    HIGH SCHOOL AT -- AT LAGUARDIA HIGH SCHOOL OF THE PERFORMING ARTS

                    WHERE THE BLACK STUDENT UNION, WHICH I WAS PART OF, DID A BLACK

                    HISTORY PROGRAM WHERE WE EDUCATED OUR CLASS WHERE MATH AND SCIENCE

                    CAME FROM.  IT CAME FROM THE AFRICAN PEOPLE.  THE TEACHERS -- SOME OF

                    THE TEACHERS IN THE SCHOOL WANTED TO BAN OUR PROGRAM AND WANTED TO

                    WITHHOLD EDUCATING THINGS LIKE SOCRATES AND PLATO, AGAIN, STUDENTS OF

                    AFRICAN PEOPLE.  SO I JOIN MY COLLEAGUES IN MAKING SURE THAT AS WE

                    CELEBRATE BLACK HISTORY MONTH, WE CELEBRATE, WE PAY TRIBUTE, BUT IT'S

                    SO THAT WE DO NOT FORGET WHERE WE COME FROM.  AND OUR HISTORY AND ALL

                    THE THINGS THAT MADE AMERICA AMERICA BECAUSE OF BLACK PEOPLE.  THE

                    PANDEMIC HAS ALSO SHINED A LIGHT ON THE EGREGIOUS RACIAL DISPARITIES

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THAT HAVE LONG PLAGUED OUR STATE AND CITY, PARTICULARLY IN DISTRICTS LIKE

                    MINE WHERE WE HAVE STRUGGLED WITH HEALTHCARE, EDUCATION, HOUSING

                    INEQUITIES.  DURING THIS PANDEMIC, AFRICAN-AMERICANS, BLACK PEOPLE,

                    BORE A GREATER BURDEN FROM THE VIRUS AS RATES OF INFECTION AND FATALITY

                    SURGED IN OUR COMMUNITIES FAR BEYOND THAT OF OTHER COMMUNITIES.

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS SERVED AS FRONTLINE WORKERS, AS HEALTHCARE

                    PROFESSIONALS, TEACHERS, TRANSPORTATION WORKERS.  AND DESPITE THIS, WE

                    ARE SEEING DISPARITIES IN THE VACCINE DISTRIBUTION AS WELL.  HOW CAN WE

                    SOLVE THESE INEQUITIES?  OUR STATE LEGISLATURE CAN TAKE THIS STEP BY, OF

                    COURSE, NOT ONLY PASSING THIS RESOLUTION TODAY, BUT CONTINUOUSLY

                    HONORING AFRICAN-AMERICAN HEROES AND TEACHING FUTURE GENERATIONS

                    ABOUT OUR HISTORY AND OUR PROGRESS.  BUT WE CANNOT STOP THERE.  WE

                    MUST CONTINUE TO DEMAND EQUITY IN EVERY ASPECT OF OUR SOCIETY.  WE

                    MUST BUILD ON THIS FOUNDATION FOR DESEGREGATING OUR INNER-CITY SCHOOLS,

                    TAXING THE RICH TO FUND EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING FOR OUR YOUNG, AND

                    FIXING OUR BROKEN -- OUR VERY BROKEN CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM.  WE MUST

                    HONOR BLACK MOTHERS BY PASSING LEGISLATION THAT HELPS BLACK WOMEN

                    AND BABIES RECEIVE THE SAME STANDARD OF CARE AS EVERYONE ELSE, AND

                    IMPROVE ON THAT STANDARD OF CARE FOR EVERYONE.  SHIRLEY CHISHOLM, THE

                    FIRST BLACK WOMAN ELECTED TO THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS, LIVED RIGHT

                    HERE IN BROOKLYN NEAR THE DISTRICT I NOW REPRESENT.  IN ADDITION TO

                    REPRESENTING THE NEW YORK'S 12TH CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT FOR SEVEN

                    YEARS, CHISHOLM BECAME THE FIRST BLACK CANDIDATE TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT

                    OF THE UNITED STATES AS WELL AS THE FIRST WOMAN TO RUN FOR HER PARTY'S

                    PRESIDENTIAL NOMINATION.

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 TODAY I PROUDLY PRESENT -- REPRESENT MY DISTRICT AS A

                    BLACK WOMAN.  MY COUNTY AS A BLACK WOMAN.  A BLACK WOMAN WHO IS

                    OF HAITIAN DESCENT.  THE KIN OF THE REVOLUTIONIST, DESSALINES.  AND THAT

                    SPIRIT IN IT -- IN ME KEEPS ME GOING.  THAT IS THE RESISTANT SPIRIT.  AND

                    THIS YEAR WE CELEBRATE AN ENORMOUS VICTORY WITH THE SWEARING-IN OF OUR

                    FIRST BLACK FEMALE VICE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, KAMALA HARRIS.

                    OUR FUTURE IS WITH HOPE -- IS WITH HOPE TO LOOK BRIGHT WITH THE SIGNS OF

                    PROGRESS.  WE STILL GOT A LONG WAY TO GO.

                                 I ACKNOWLEDGE AND THANK OUR SPEAKER FOR INTRODUCING

                    THIS, AND MY COLLEAGUES IN THE ASSEMBLY FOR SUPPORTING THIS BLACK

                    HISTORY MONTH RESOLUTION.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 MS. FRONTUS.

                                 MS. FRONTUS:  THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. SPEAKER.

                    THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS RESOLUTION TO RECOGNIZE THE

                    MONTH OF FEBRUARY AS BLACK HISTORY MONTH.  I WANTED TO TAKE JUST A

                    VERY BRIEF MOMENT TO ECHO THE SENTIMENTS OF MY COLLEAGUES WHO SPOKE

                    BEFORE ME, AND TO SAY HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THAT ALL OF US TODAY REALIZE

                    THAT BLACK HISTORY IS AMERICAN HISTORY, AND BLACK HISTORY IS NOT JUST A

                    MONTH.  IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE NEED TO CELEBRATE EVERY SINGLE DAY.

                                 I WANTED TO SHARE A FEW THOUGHTS ABOUT THE LAST 400

                    YEARS OF OUR HISTORY HERE AND THE PLIGHT OF THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN.  I

                    DON'T KNOW THAT I CAN SAY IT BETTER THAN ASSEMBLYMEMBER AUBRY WHO

                    SHARED SOME VERY ELOQUENT WORDS ABOUT WHAT AFRICAN-AMERICANS HAD

                    TO ENDURE OVER THE YEARS.  ESSENTIALLY, AS WE KNOW, ASSEMBLYMEMBER

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    BARRON MENTIONED, OUR HISTORY ACTUALLY DOESN'T BEGIN IN 1619 WITH

                    SLAVERY.  I'D LIKE TO SAY THAT WE WERE A PROUD AFRICAN PEOPLE WHO WERE

                    FORMALLY ENSLAVED.  WE WERE FORMALLY ENSLAVED, BUT WE WERE GREAT

                    BEFORE SLAVERY AND WE CONTINUE TO BE GREAT TODAY.  ONE OF THE THINGS

                    THAT I SHARED DURING MY INAUGURATION WAS THE REASON WHY I RAN FOR

                    OFFICE IS WHEN I THINK ABOUT JUSTICE AND WHAT JUSTICE MEANS TO ME, IT

                    MEANS USING THE HALLS OF GOVERNMENT TO REDRESS THE WRONGS OF THE PAST.

                    WHEN WE LOOK AT THE INSTITUTIONALIZED RACISM THAT WE'VE HAD TO ENDURE

                    OVER THE YEARS, WHEN WE LOOK AT THE INSIDIOUSNESS OF ANTI-BLACKNESS

                    WHICH IS PRESENT IN EVERY SEGMENT OF OUR SOCIETY.  BLACKS HAVE HAD TO

                    ENDURE PHYSICAL, EMOTIONAL, MENTAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL VIOLENCE.

                    MESSAGING IN EVERY SINGLE WAY FROM OUR SCHOOLS, FROM OUR

                    ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY, THAT BLACKS ARE INFERIOR, WHICH HAS CAUSED

                    GREAT HARM TO THE PSYCHOLOGY AND THE MENTAL HEALTH OF BLACK CHILDREN

                    ACROSS THE U.S.  A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T REALIZE THAT OUR GOVERNMENT AND

                    OUR POLICIES LITERALLY SHAPED THE TWO AMERICAS THAT WE SEE TODAY.  IT

                    SHAPED THE PLIGHT OF THE AFRICAN-AMERICAN AND THE SEGREGATION AND ALL

                    OF THE ILLS THAT WE OFTEN COMPLAIN ABOUT IN OUR URBAN COMMUNITIES.

                    THEY DIDN'T FALL FROM THE SKY.  WE HAD A HAND IN IT.  AND SO ONE OF THE

                    THINGS THAT I WANT TO SAY TODAY IS JUST AS WE USE OUR HALLS OF

                    GOVERNMENT TO CREATE THESE INJUSTICES IN THE PAST TO OPPRESS THE

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS WHICH WERE BROUGHT HERE AGAINST THEIR WILL, WE

                    NOW HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO USE THESE SAME CHAMBERS OF GOVERNMENT TO

                    REDRESS THE WRONGS OF THE PAST AND TO REALLY ECHO IN A NEW ERA OF

                    EQUALITY AND DIGNITY NOT ONLY FOR AFRICAN-AMERICANS, BUT FOR ALL

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    MINORITIES WHO HAVE BEEN TREATED AS SECOND-CLASS CITIZENS.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 MR. LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, AND THANK

                    YOU FOR SHARING YOUR REMARKS EARLIER.  I RISE JUST TO SAY I -- I SUPPORT

                    THIS RESOLUTION.  I THINK AS YOU MENTIONED EARLIER, BLACK HISTORY IS

                    AMERICAN HISTORY.  AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD NOT BE TAUGHT IN A

                    SINGLE DAY OR A SINGLE MONTH, BUT EVERY DAY AND EVERY MONTH

                    THROUGHOUT THE YEAR.  AND WHEN WE TALK ABOUT HISTORY, WE'RE OBVIOUSLY

                    TALKING IN LARGE PART ABOUT EDUCATION AND EDUCATING OUR POPULOUS AND

                    EDUCATING YOUNG PEOPLE ABOUT OUR HISTORY AND WHAT HAS OCCURRED IN

                    THE UNITED STATES OVER -- OVER THE COURSE OF OUR COUNTRY AND ITS

                    FOUNDING.  AND IT'S WHY I BELIEVE SO STRONGLY THAT EDUCATION IS TODAY

                    THE CIVIL RIGHTS ISSUE OF OUR GENERATION, AND EVERY CHILD, REGARDLESS OF

                    THEIR RACE, REGARDLESS OF THEIR ZIP CODE OR THEIR PARENTS' INCOME

                    DESERVES ACCESS TO A QUALITY EDUCATION.  AND SO AS WE EMBRACE BLACK

                    HISTORY MONTH, LET US WORK TOWARDS ENSURING THAT EVERY CHILD HAS

                    OPPORTUNITY AND HAS ACCESS TO A QUALITY EDUCATION IN THIS STATE AND IN

                    THIS COUNTRY, AND SO THAT THEY ARE NEVER LEFT IN A FAILING SCHOOL SYSTEM

                    OR LEFT BEHIND.  THAT IS THE BEST WAY TO ENSURE EQUALITY AND JUSTICE IN

                    OUR STATE AND IN OUR COUNTRY, AND THE BEST WAY TO HONOR BLACK HISTORY

                    MONTH.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MR. GOODELL ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WHEN WE REFLECT

                    BACK ON BLACK HISTORY, AS YOU YOURSELF SO ELOQUENTLY POINTED OUT, THERE

                    IS SUCH A NEED TO RECOGNIZE AND APPRECIATE THE INCREDIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS

                    THAT HAVE BEEN MADE OVER HISTORY, BOTH PRE THE FORMATION OF THE UNITED

                    STATES, DURING SLAVERY AND AFTERWARDS.  AND JUST REFLECTING JUST FOR A

                    MOMENT ABOUT SOME OF THE BLACKS THAT MADE SUCH A DIFFERENCE IN THE

                    UNITED STATES.  PEOPLE LIKE FREDERICK DOUGLASS OR HARRIET TRUMAN [SIC]

                    OR BOOKER T. WASHINGTON.  OR IN THE MUSIC FIELD.  I MEAN, THINK ABOUT

                    THE INCREDIBLE CONTRIBUTIONS WE GOT FROM SCOTT JOPLIN OR DUKE

                    ELLINGTON, WHOM I ACTUALLY SAW PERFORM.  MAYBE THAT TELLS YOU THAT MY

                    AGE IS CLOSER TO YOURS THAN SOME OF OUR FRESHMEN.  LOUIS ARMSTRONG,

                    COUNT BASIE.  AND OF COURSE THERE ARE SO MANY EXTRAORDINARY ATHLETES

                    THAT WE DON'T HAVE TIME TO LIST THEM.  BUT SATCHEL PAIGE OR JACKIE

                    ROBINSON OR WHAT ABOUT THAT PHENOMENAL WORLD-CHANGING

                    PERFORMANCE BY JESSIE OWENS IN THE 1930'S.  BUT IT'S -- IT'S NOT JUST

                    SPORTS OR ENTERTAINMENT OR -- OR MUSIC.  THE HIGHEST, HIGHEST LEVEL OF

                    ACCOMPLISHMENT FOR ANY ATTORNEY IS SITTING ON THE SUPREME COURT, LIKE

                    THURGOOD MARSHALL OR CLARENCE THOMAS.  AND ON THE POLITICS SIDE, WE

                    HAVE PRESIDENT OBAMA AND VICE PRESIDENT HARRIS.  IN THE MILITARY WE

                    HAD COLIN POWELL, WHO ROSE TO THE VERY TOP.  OR CONDOLEEZZA RICE.  I

                    MEAN THESE ARE INCREDIBLE PEOPLE WHO ARE MAKING INCREDIBLE

                    CONTRIBUTIONS.  AND I JUST WANTED TO HIGHLIGHT ONE THAT MAY NOT BE ON

                    THE TOP OF THE HISTORY BOOKS, BUT AN INDIVIDUAL NAMED WALTER

                    WASHINGTON, WHO CAME FROM MY DISTRICT AND WENT ON TO BECOME THE

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    FIRST ELECTED MAYOR IN THE CITY OF WASHINGTON, D.C.  WE HAVE SO MUCH

                    TO CELEBRATE AND SO MUCH TO LEARN.  AND I'M THANKFUL THAT WE HAVE THIS

                    RESOLUTION AS WE DEVELOP A GREATER UNDERSTANDING OF THE INCREDIBLE

                    CONTRIBUTIONS ON EVERY LEVEL OF SOCIETY THAT ARE REFLECTED BY OUR BLACK

                    FRIENDS AND NEIGHBORS, POLITICAL LEADERS, PERFORMERS, SPORTS HEROES,

                    LEGISLATORS, INCLUDING THOSE IN OUR VERY CHAMBER WITH SPEAKER HEASTIE

                    AND OUR MAJORITY LEADER CRYSTAL PEOPLES-STOKES AND YOURSELF.

                                 SO THANK YOU FOR MOVING THIS RESOLUTION FORWARD, AND

                    I LOOK FORWARD TO SUPPORTING IT ENTHUSIASTICALLY.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I RISE TODAY TO, LIKE MY COLLEAGUES, SUPPORT THIS REALLY

                    IMPORTANT RESOLUTION THAT HONORS BLACK HISTORY MONTH.  CLEARLY, AS IT

                    -- AS IT HAS BEEN SAID, A MONTH IS NOT LONG ENOUGH, A DAY IS NOT LONG

                    ENOUGH.  IT REALLY DOES TAKE A LIFETIME TO PAY ATTENTION TO THE

                    CONTRIBUTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN MADE BY AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN THIS GREAT

                    COUNTRY OF OURS.  TODAY, HOWEVER, THOUGH, I'D LIKE TO FOCUS ON DR.

                    KIZZMEKIA CORBETT.  SHE IS AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN SCIENTIST THAT HAS

                    BEEN LAUDED FOR THE KEY SCIENCE BEHIND COVID-19 VACCINES.  DR.

                    CORBETT IS A RESEARCH FELLOW AND A SCIENTIFIC LEAD FOR THE CORONAVIRUS

                    AND VACCINES TEAM.  IN FACT, SHE WAS ACTUALLY MEETING AT THE NATIONAL

                    INSTITUTE OF HEALTH WITH THE FORMER PRESIDENT WHEN A LOT OF THESE

                    CONVERSATIONS BEGAN.  DR. CORBETT WAS APPOINTED TO THE VRC, VACCINE

                    RESEARCH CENTER, TO USE HER TRAINING AND EXPERTISE TO PROPEL THE NOVEL

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    VACCINE DEVELOPMENT FOR THE PANDEMIC PREPAREDNESS.  HER WORK

                    FOCUSES ON DEVELOPING THIS VIRUS, INCLUDING MRNA 112, 1273, WHICH

                    WAS DESIGNATED BY HER TEAM AND DEPLOYED BY INDUSTRY TO MODERNA.  IN

                    RESPONSE TO THIS ONGOING GLOBAL PANDEMIC, MANY OF US KNOW

                    MANDERMA -- MODERNA IS ONE OF THE TWO MOST WELL-KNOWN VACCINES

                    THAT ARE BEING USED.  WE FIRST LEARNED ABOUT DR. CORBETT, MR. SPEAKER,

                    IN MARCH OF '20, AGAIN, AS I SAID WHEN SHE WAS MEETING WITH THIS TEAM

                    OF SCIENTISTS AND THE FORMER PRESIDENT.  AT THE TIME, THE U.S. HAD NOT

                    FELT THE REAL IMPACT OF COVID QUITE YET BECAUSE IT WAS MARCH '20.  BUT

                    WHEN ASKED ABOUT HER PARTICIPATION, SHE COMMENTED THAT IT WAS

                    IMPORTANT -- A VERY IMPORTANT STEP FORWARD FOR YOUNG SCIENTISTS AND FOR

                    PEOPLE OF COLOR.  SHE FURTHERMORE STATED THAT SHE FELT LIKE IT WAS

                    NECESSARY TO BE SEEN AND NOT TO BE A HIDDEN FIGURE, SO-TO-SPEAK.  SHE

                    FELT IT WAS IMPORTANT TO DO THAT BECAUSE THE LEVEL OF HER VISIBILITY

                    ALLOWS YOUNG LADIES AND YOUNG MEN WHO LOOK LIKE HER TO SEE

                    THEMSELVES IN THAT SAME KIND OF WORK.  MR. SPEAKER, DR. CORBETT'S

                    STATEMENT IS ABOUT BEING -- ABOUT IT BEING NECESSARY TO BE SEEN AND NOT

                    A HIDDEN FIGURE RESONATED WITH ME VERY, VERY STRONGLY.  IN FACT, I

                    REMEMBER BEING AT PUBLIC SCHOOL NUMBER 31 WHEN THE ENTIRE COUNTRY

                    WAS HERALDING THE FACT THAT THE ASTRONAUT JOHN GLENN HAD GOTTEN TO THE

                    MOON.  YET, MR. SPEAKER, I WAS WELL OVER 50 YEARS OLD BEFORE I EVER

                    HEARD THAT IT WAS A BLACK WOMAN MATHEMATICIAN, A BLACK WOMAN

                    ENGINEER, AND A BLACK WOMAN WHO SUPERVISED THE AREA'S COMPUTER THAT

                    THEY USED.  NO ONE EVER TOLD ME THAT WHEN I WAS AT PUBLIC SCHOOL

                    NUMBER 31.  MR. SPEAKER, THIS INFORMATION WAS NOT TAUGHT TO US THEN,

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AND IN MANY CASES IT'S NOT TAUGHT TO US NOW.  IF IT HAD NOT BEEN

                    PUBLICATED IN A BOOK AND THEN LATER MADE INTO A MOVIE, WE WOULD STILL

                    NOT KNOW THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THESE WOMEN.  SO BACK IN 2005, A

                    RELATIVELY NEW MEMBER IN THIS CHAMBER, I GOT A CHANCE TO VOTE FOR

                    SOME LEGISLATION THAT WAS SPONSORED BY OUR FORMER COLLEAGUE KEITH

                    WRIGHT CALLED THE AMISTAD COMMISSION.  AND THE AMISTAD

                    COMMISSION WAS A PRETTY SIMPLE MISSION.  IT WAS PASSED OVER TO SED,

                    STATE EDUCATION.  THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO COME UP WITH SOME

                    STRATEGIES TO FIGURE OUT TO INFUSE THE COMPLETE HISTORY OF

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS IN AMERICAN HISTORY.  I REMEMBER WITH SOME

                    EXCITEMENT THAT MY PREDECESSOR BROUGHT THEN-GOVERNOR PATAKI INTO

                    BUFFALO TO THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD CHURCH WHERE HE SAT AND SIGNED

                    THAT LEGISLATION INTO LAW.  AND HERE WE ARE, MR. SPEAKER, IN 2021.  AND

                    ASK ME IF SED HAS IMPLEMENTED AMISTAD.  OR ASK ANYBODY.  THE

                    ANSWER TO THAT IS NO.  THAT'S THE PROBLEM, MR. SPEAKER.  AND SO TODAY

                    AS WE CELEBRATE BLACK HISTORY - AND I THANK YOU FOR BRINGING UP THIS

                    RESOLUTION AND I THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO DO THIS - WE NEED

                    AMISTAD TO BE IMPLEMENTED.  AND WE NEED STATE EDUCATION TO BEGIN

                    WORKING WITH US TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT ACT HAPPENS.  NOT JUST TO HONOR

                    BLACK HISTORY, BUT TO HONOR OUR FORMER COLLEAGUE KEITH WRIGHT, AND TO

                    HONOR MY PREDECESSOR, ARTHUR O. EVE, AND QUITE HONESTLY, TO HONOR

                    GOVERNOR PATAKI, WHO SIGNED IT INTO LAW.  THAT WASN'T JUST A FRIVOLOUS

                    METHOD OF MEANS THAT THEY TOOK.  THEY WERE SERIOUS.  THEY WANTED TO

                    SEE SOMETHING HAPPEN.  IT'S 2021.  LET'S MAKE IT HAPPEN.

                                 HAPPY BLACK HISTORY MONTH.

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MAJORITY

                    LEADER.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, WE'RE

                    GOING TO GO RIGHT TO PAGE 10 AND START WITH CALENDAR NO. 58 BY MR.

                    GOTTFRIED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00190, CALENDAR NO.

                    58, GOTTFRIED, PAULIN, L. ROSENTHAL, ABINANTI, COLTON, SAYEGH, GALEF.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO HOSPITAL

                    ESTABLISHMENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00213, CALENDAR NO.

                    59, PAULIN, GALEF, ABINANTI, OTIS, JACOBSON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW, IN RELATION TO VOTING REQUIREMENTS OF

                    THE BOARD OF CERTAIN CORPORATIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 90TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON CALENDAR NO. 59, BILL A.213.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00254, CALENDAR NO.

                    60, PERRY, VANEL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW, IN RELATION

                    TO THE UNAUTHORIZED RELEASE OF SEALED RECORDS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00297, CALENDAR NO.

                    61, GOTTFRIED, DINOWITZ, COLTON, CAHILL, WEPRIN, OTIS, GALLAGHER,

                    SAYEGH.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE UNIFORM CITY COURT ACT, THE UNIFORM

                    DISTRICT COURT ACT, THE UNIFORM JUSTICE COURT ACT AND THE NEW YORK

                    CITY CIVIL COURT ACT, IN RELATION TO OBTAINING JURISDICTION OVER CERTAIN

                    DEFENDANTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00413, CALENDAR NO.

                    62, L. ROSENTHAL, LUPARDO, SAYEGH.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC

                    HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO ADDING DYSMENORRHEA TO THE LIST OF

                    CONDITIONS COVERED FOR LAWFUL MEDICAL USE OF MARIHUANA.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00563, CALENDAR NO.

                    63, PAULIN, DE LA ROSA, GALEF, JEAN-PIERRE, ABINANTI, DINOWITZ,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, EPSTEIN, HUNTER, GOTTFRIED, PICHARDO, MCDONOUGH,

                    REILLY, COOK, STECK, GRIFFIN, OTIS, VANEL, SAYEGH.  AN ACT TO AMEND

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING CERTAIN NOTICES TO BE

                    PROVIDED TO CUSTOMERS RECEIVING TELEPHONE SERVICE THROUGH FIBER

                    OPTIC-BASED TELEPHONE LINES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00744, CALENDAR NO.

                    64, WALLACE, ABINANTI, VANEL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO THE REQUIREMENT THAT CERTAIN HEALTH CLUBS SHALL HAVE

                    AT LEAST ONE AUTOMATED EXTERNAL DEFIBRILLATOR AVAILABLE UPON THE

                    PREMISES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00879, CALENDAR NO.

                    65, GOTTFRIED, DINOWITZ, GALEF, PAULIN, L. ROSENTHAL, COLTON, ABINANTI,

                    RAJKUMAR.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE INSURANCE

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO THE DEFINITION OF CLINICAL PEER REVIEWER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00964, CALENDAR NO.

                    66, ZEBROWSKI.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    VIOLATIONS OF THE UNIFORM FIRE PREVENTION AND BUILDING CODE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    ZEBROWSKI, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00970, CALENDAR NO.

                    67, CYMBROWITZ.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PRIVATE HOUSING FINANCE LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO THE MEMBERSHIP OF THE NEW YORK STATE HOUSING FINANCE

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AGENCY, THE HOUSING TRUST FUND CORPORATION AND THE AFFORDABLE

                    HOUSING CORPORATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    CYMBROWITZ, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT JANUARY 1ST.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    VOTE ON SENATE PRINT S.871.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBER PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THIS CHAPTER

                    AMENDMENT CHANGES SOME OF THE APPOINTMENTS TO THE MEMBERS OF THE

                    NEW YORK STATE HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, AND THE CHANGE IN THE

                    NUMBER OF APPOINTMENTS IS -- IS NOT AN ISSUE FOR ME.  HOWEVER, I

                    WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT THAT WHEN WE CREATED THIS GROUP WE MADE SURE

                    THERE WAS AN APPOINTMENT FROM THE MAJORITY MEMBERS IN THIS HOUSE

                    AND IN THE SENATE, BUT NOT A SINGLE APPOINTMENT FROM THE MINORITY.

                    AND THE MINORITY CONFERENCE REPRESENTS A SUBSTANTIAL PORTION OF NEW

                    YORK STATE.  OUR PERSPECTIVE IS SOMETIMES DIFFERENT, BUT STILL VALUABLE.

                    AND I THINK EVERYONE IN THIS CHAMBER RECOGNIZES THE IMPORTANCE OF

                    LISTENING TO MINORITIES INCLUDING, I HOPE, THE REPUBLICAN MINORITY.  SO

                    I WOULD URGE THAT AS WE GO FORWARD WITH NEW COMMISSIONS AND NEW

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AGENCIES THAT WE LOOK TO INCLUDE A DIVERSITY OF OPINIONS ACROSS THE

                    STATE REFLECTING BOTH THE MAJORITY AND THE MINORITY.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD THE

                    FOLLOWING REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLYMEMBERS IN THE NEGATIVE:  MR. BYRNE,

                    MR. SCHMITT AND MR. WALCZYK.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01150, CALENDAR NO.

                    68, ABINANTI, SOLAGES, TAYLOR, GRIFFIN, FAHY, HEVESI, DICKENS, THIELE,

                    SIMON, ENGLEBRIGHT, SEAWRIGHT, MCDONOUGH, ASHBY, PICHARDO,

                    MORINELLO, PAULIN, GOTTFRIED, BARRON, SAYEGH, RODRIGUEZ, M. MILLER,

                    CRUZ, LUPARDO, FERNANDEZ, DINOWITZ, WEPRIN, STIRPE, BRONSON.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO ADDING AUTISM TO

                    THE LIST OF CONDITIONS COVERED FOR LAWFUL MEDICAL USE OF MARIHUANA.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01253, CALENDAR NO.

                    69, GOTTFRIED, ABINANTI, BARRON, COLTON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC

                    HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO THE CONFIDENTIALITY OF CONTACT TRACING

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    INFORMATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    GOTTFRIED, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT S.900.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01523, CALENDAR NO.

                    70, PRETLOW.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PROHIBITING APPROVED ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CHILD HEALTH INSURANCE PLAN

                    FROM LIMITING THE PARTICIPATION OF CERTAIN HEALTHCARE PROVIDERS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01615, CALENDAR NO.

                    71, PERRY, BARRON, COLTON, COOK, TAYLOR, WEPRIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING PHYSICIANS AND HOSPITALS TO

                    OBTAIN THE NAME OF THE SCHOOL ATTENDED BY SCHOOL-AGED PATIENTS AND TO

                    INCLUDE THIS INFORMATION IN THEIR ADMISSION REGISTRATION FORMS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01899, CALENDAR NO.

                    72, DINOWITZ, GOTTFRIED, VANEL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO PROVIDING FOR THE AWARD OF ATTORNEY'S FEES AND EXPERT

                    WITNESS FEES IN APPROPRIATE CASES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01920, CALENDAR NO.

                    73, BARRETT, BUTTENSCHON, THIELE, STERN, ABINANTI, TAYLOR, GUNTHER,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, JONES, GALEF, NOLAN, BURDICK, JACOBSON, CUSICK,

                    MORINELLO, MONTESANO, SALKA, HAWLEY, SIMPSON, DESTEFANO,

                    MCDONOUGH, LEMONDES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO NEW YORK STATE VETERANS' CEMETERIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                    BARRETT, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY [SIC] PRINT S.866.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. ANDERSON TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. ANDERSON:  GOOD AFTERNOON.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I'M VOICING MY SUPPORT FOR THIS BILL, AS IT HELPS TO ENSURE THAT

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    NEW YORK STATE VETERANS RECEIVE THE PROPER BENEFITS AND SERVICES THAT

                    THEY DESERVE WITHOUT CERTAIN RESTRICTIONS.  SOME OF OUR VETS DON'T OR

                    CANNOT RECEIVE STATE BENEFITS AND SERVICES AS THEY'RE NOT QUALIFIED TO

                    RECEIVE VETERAN'S BENEFITS DUE TO THEIR INELIGIBILITY ON THE FEDERAL LEVEL.

                    SO THIS BILL BEING PASSED ALLOWS FOLKS WHO HAVE SERVED AND HAVE --

                    HAVE GIVEN THEIR DUTY TO, YOU KNOW, TO OUR STATE AND TO THIS NATION, THE

                    HELP THAT THEY NEED.  IT'S VITALLY IMPORTANT.  I WANT TO THANK

                    ASSEMBLYMEMBER BARRETT FOR INTRODUCING THIS BILL AND MY FELLOW

                    COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE COSPONSORED THIS VERY IMPORTANT BILL.

                                 I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ANDERSON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02014, CALENDAR NO.

                    74, BARRETT, GRIFFIN, LAVINE, MCDONOUGH.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO DEFINING CERTAIN QUALIFYING CONDITIONS

                    FOR VETERANS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT A.2014.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02203, CALENDAR NO.

                    75, BARRETT, WALLACE, MCDONOUGH.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO DIRECTING THE DIVISION OF VETERANS' SERVICES TO

                    PROVIDE INFORMATION TO VETERANS WHO EXPERIENCE POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS

                    DISORDER AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 60TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT A.2203.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. ANGELINO ON THE BILL.  TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE, I'M

                    SORRY.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I

                    APPRECIATE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I WANT TO THANK THE

                    VETERANS COMMITTEE FOR UNANIMOUSLY PASSING THIS AND BRINGING THIS

                    FORWARD.  I RISE TODAY TO ASK MEMBERS AND ANYBODY WHO HEARS MY

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    VOICE THAT AS WE DISCUSS VETERANS ISSUES, SOMETIMES WE SEND YOUNG

                    MEN AND WOMEN FAR FROM HOME INTO HARM'S WAY TO DO THE BUSINESS

                    THAT WE ASK THEM TO DO, AND IN SO DOING THEY SOMETIMES HAVE TO DO

                    UNTHINKABLE THINGS ON OUR BEHALF.  IF WE REALLY WANT A DISTRAUGHT

                    VETERAN TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF ALL OF THESE PROGRAMS OF WHICH WE'RE

                    OFFERING, I WOULD ASK THAT WE DROP THE LETTER D FROM PTS.  THIS SHOULD

                    NOT BE CONSIDERED A DISORDER THAT BRINGS WITH IT A NEGATIVE CONNOTATION.

                    WHAT WE ASK THESE YOUNG PEOPLE TO DO SHOULDN'T BE CONSIDERED A

                    DISORDER, IT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED EXPECTED WHEN WE -- WHEN WE

                    WELCOME THEM BACK HOME.  IN THE FUTURE, WHEN WE CAN - I KNOW THE

                    FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CALLS IT PTS WITH THE D - I WOULD LIKE THAT D

                    DROPPED AND JUST BE CONSIDERED POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS.

                                 WITH THAT SAID, I WILL SUPPORT THIS AND I'LL BE VOTING IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.  MR.

                    ANGELINO IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02679, CALENDAR NO.

                    76, CYMBROWITZ.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HOUSING LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO DIRECTING THE COMMISSIONER OF HOUSING AND COMMUNITY

                    RENEWAL TO PROMULGATE RULES AND REGULATIONS REGARDING THE USE OF

                    ELECTRONIC RECORDS AND SIGNATURES FOR CERTAIN RESIDENTIAL LEASES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT A.2679.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF WE COULD

                    NOW GO BACK TO PAGE 9, WE'RE GOING TO TAKE UP CALENDAR NO. 50 ON

                    DEBATE BY MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.  THIS IS REGARDING THE SECOND PASSAGE OF

                    THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S00528, CALENDAR NO. 50,

                    SENATOR JACKSON (A01368, ENGLEBRIGHT, GRIFFIN, COLTON, GOTTFRIED,

                    SANTABARBARA, DINOWITZ, GLICK, FAHY, ABINANTI, OTIS, JEAN-PIERRE,

                    LAVINE, SIMON, GALEF, COOK, HUNTER, STECK, BICHOTTE HERMELYN,

                    RAMOS, WEPRIN, HYNDMAN, SEAWRIGHT, LUPARDO, L. ROSENTHAL,

                    WALKER, CARROLL, DE LA ROSA, THIELE, GUNTHER, DAVILA, AUBRY, CRUZ,

                    BRONSON, BARRETT, KELLES, BURDICK, ZINERMAN, NOLAN, LUNSFORD,

                    EPSTEIN, WILLIAMS, DICKENS, ROZIC, SAYEGH, MAGNARELLI,

                    GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, JACKSON, RAJKUMAR, BENEDETTO).  CONCURRENT

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO

                    ARTICLE I OF THE CONSTITUTION, IN RELATION TO THE RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND

                    WATER AND A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AN EXPLANATION, PLEASE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  CAN YOU

                    HEAR ME?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ABSOLUTELY, SIR.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  THIS

                    IS A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO ENABLE SOMETHING THAT

                    EVERYONE BELIEVES IN MANY CASES IS ALREADY A RIGHT BUT HAS NEVER

                    PREVIOUSLY BEEN FORMALIZED.  AND THAT RIGHT IS TO A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT,

                    CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER, AND A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.  IT'S IN THE LARGEST

                    SENSE A PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT IS AN EXPRESSION OF

                    OPTIMISM.  IT IS INTENDED TO ASSURE OUR CITIZENS THAT THEY WILL NOT BE

                    BETRAYED CIRCUMSTANTIALLY BY ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION, AND THAT THE

                    HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF THEY AND THEIR FAMILIES WILL NOT BE

                    COMPROMISED DUE TO GOVERNMENTAL INACTION OR NEGLIGENCE THAT MAY

                    OTHERWISE DAMAGE OUR AIR, LAND OR WATER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR KINDLY YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, WILL

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I YIELD.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MEMBER ENGLEBRIGHT.

                    I REALLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE A DIALOGUE HERE IN PUBLIC

                    TODAY ABOUT THIS MOST IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.  I THINK

                    IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE GET THE TERMS AND THE CONDITIONS OF THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT THAT ARE CLEAR AND PUBLIC.  WE PASSED IT

                    ONCE BEFORE, AND I BELIEVE THIS IS A -- THE SECOND PASSAGE PRIOR TO WHEN

                    IT HAS TO GO BEFORE THE VOTERS THIS NOVEMBER; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THAT IS CORRECT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND WILL THIS BE THE SECOND

                    AMENDMENT BEFORE THE VOTERS THIS FALL, IN ADDITION TO THE ELECTION

                    REDISTRICTING COMMISSION?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I HAVEN'T BEEN TRYING TO KEEP

                    TRACK OF THAT FULL CALENDAR, SO I'LL TAKE YOUR WORD FOR IT.  I -- I AM ONLY

                    FOCUSED ON THIS ONE BECAUSE IT COMES THROUGH MY COMMITTEE AND I'M

                    THE SPONSOR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SURE, AND I REALLY APPRECIATE THAT.

                    BECAUSE I THINK CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, WHETHER AT THE FEDERAL

                    LEVEL OR AT THE STATE LEVEL, ARE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT.  SO I WANTED TO ASK

                    YOU, I LOOKED THROUGH OUR CONSTITUTION IN PREPARATION FOR THIS

                    DISCUSSION, AND I NOTICED THAT A LOT OF THE ARTICLE I RIGHTS IN THE NEW

                    YORK STATE CONSTITUTION ARE, IN FACT, POLITICAL RIGHTS.  WOULD YOU

                    AGREE?

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I DON'T HAVE ANY REASON TO

                    DISAGREE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, I'M -- JUST FOR INSTANCE,

                    THERE'S THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH, TO ASSEMBLY, TO THE VARIOUS PROCEDURAL

                    MECHANISMS THAT ALLOW PEOPLE TO ADDRESS THEIR GRIEVANCES AND IN

                    WHICH -- FROM WHICH FURTHER LAWS ARE MADE.  IS THAT FAIR IN HOW THE

                    CONSTITUTION IS SUPPOSED TO WORK?  IS IT -- IT'S A FOUNDATIONAL DOCUMENT

                    FROM WHICH FURTHER LAWS FLOW?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  IT CAN WORK THAT WAY.  AS I

                    UNDERSTAND IT, THE BILL OF RIGHTS IN OUR CONSTITUTION IS NOT JUST FOR

                    POLITICAL PURPOSES OR PROCEDURAL PURPOSES.  THAT CAN FLOW FROM IT, I

                    SUPPOSE.  BUT THAT IT IS INTENDED TO BE PRIMARILY A DEFINITION OF THE

                    RIGHTS OF BEING A CITIZEN OF THE STATE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  CERTAINLY.  AND I -- I WOULD HARDLY

                    AGREE WITH THAT AS THE INTERPRETATION OF IT.  SO I HAVE TO ASK YOU, IN THIS

                    CONTEXT, WHAT DOES "CLEAN" -- THE WORD "CLEAN" MEAN IN THIS PROPOSED

                    AMENDMENT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  WELL, CLEAN BASICALLY MEANS

                    THAT THE ENVIRONMENT SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMPROMISE THE HEALTH

                    OR WELL-BEING OF ANY CITIZEN, AND THAT THERE SHOULD BE NO HARM, NO

                    SICKNESS, NO DISEASE, NO CONVULSION, NO INJURY FROM SIMPLY BEING A

                    CITIZEN LIVING IN THIS STATE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, ABSOLUTELY.  I THINK THAT'S

                    SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD CERTAINLY ALL ASPIRE TO.  BUT OBVIOUSLY, WORDS

                    HAVE MEANING IN A LEGAL CONTEXT.  WHAT DOES THE WORD "HEALTHFUL"

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    MEAN IN THIS LEGISLATION BEFORE US TODAY?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  HEALTHFUL MEANS THERE WILL

                    BE NO BIOLOGICAL SICKNESS OR HARM.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  AND I'LL -- I'LL TAKE THAT TO

                    INCLUDE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT ARE COVERED BY THE CLEAN AIR ACT, THE

                    FEDERAL CLEAN AIR ACT OF 1970 AND THE FEDERAL CLEAN WATER ACT OF

                    1972, ALMOST 50 YEARS AGO, WHICH HAVE BEEN WONDERS IN MAKING SURE

                    THAT OUR -- OUR COUNTRY AND OUR STATE REMAINS CLEAN.  DOES THIS -- IN ANY

                    WAY DOES THIS AFFECT ANY OF THE LAWS OF NEW YORK STATE IN THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL AREA WHICH YOU -- WHICH YOU LOOK AFTER?  WHAT DOES IT

                    DO TO THOSE LAWS THAT ARE IN EFFECT TODAY?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  IT DOESN'T CHANGE ANY OTHER

                    LAW, BUT WHAT RATHER IT DOES IS IT OFFERS CONTEXT, GUIDANCE AND

                    INSTRUCTION TO THE VARIOUS ORGANS OF STATE GOVERNMENT.  I'D LIKE TO THINK

                    OF IT AS -- THAT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS THE FRAME FOR A

                    COLLAGE OF STATE AGENCIES AND INSTITUTIONS THAT ARE ALL SUPPOSED TO BE

                    WORKING IN THE SAME DIRECTION TO PROTECT THE HEALTH AND WELL-BEING OF

                    OUR CITIZENS.  SO I SEE THIS, BASICALLY, AS THE FRAME OF CONTEXT THAT WILL

                    GIVE A GREATER SENSE OF EXPECTATION, A SHARPER RENDERING OF THE

                    EXPECTATION OF BEING A -- A MEMBER OF OUR SOCIETY IN NEW YORK,

                    VIS-À-VIS WHAT WILL IT MEAN TO YOU AND YOUR LOVED ONES' HEALTH.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT, BECAUSE I

                    -- I HAVE SOME CONCERNS.  WOULD YOU AGREE THAT NEW YORK IS ONE OF

                    THE MOST LITIGIOUS STATES IN THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  IT HAS THAT REPUTATION.

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I -- I KNOW IT HAS THAT REPUTATION.

                    IN -- IN FACT, IT'S ONE OF THE MOST LITIGIOUS STATES.  SO ONE OF THE

                    CONCERNS ABOUT THIS AMENDMENT WHICH IS ALREADY COVERED BY FEDERAL

                    LAW AND BY STATE LAW, IS THAT THIS AMENDMENT WILL ACTUALLY PROVIDE

                    LEGAL STANDING FOR CIVIL ACTIONS.  WOULD YOU SAY IN YOUR FRAMEWORK THAT

                    YOU'VE DESCRIBED, WOULD THAT BE THE CASE?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO PREDICT

                    HOW THAT WOULD TRANSLATE.  I WOULD POINT OUT THAT THE AMOUNT OF

                    LITIGIOUS ACTIVITY IS ALSO A REFLECTION OF THE DENSITY OF POPULATION OF ANY

                    GIVEN STATE, AS WELL AS THE -- THE LEVEL OF SOPHISTICATION OF ITS CITIZENS.

                    THAT WE HAVE A -- AN ACT BEFORE US OR TO PLACE THIS BEFORE THE PEOPLE OF

                    THE STATE DOES NOT CHANGE, HOWEVER, ANY OF THE EXISTING LAWS OF THE

                    STATE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND SO THE DEPARTMENT OF

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, WHICH IS, WOULD YOU AGREE, IS THE

                    PRIMARY REGULATOR OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW IN NEW YORK?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I WOULD AGREE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO IS THE -- AS THE PRIMARY

                    ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATOR, IS THAT NOW GOING TO BE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

                    AS THE PRIMARY PROTECTOR OF RIGHTS IN TERMS OF THE LEGAL PROCESS HERE IN

                    NEW YORK?  WILL THE ATTORNEY GENERAL TAKE OVER THAT ROLE IN OUR -- IN

                    OUR SYSTEM?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  CERTAINLY NOT.  NOTHING

                    CHANGES EXCEPT PERCEPTION.  YOU'RE ASKING WHETHER OR NOT THIS IS AN

                    INITIATIVE THAT WOULD COMPLETELY REFORM AND REDIRECT THE ENERGY OF

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION.  IT DOES NOT DO THAT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR

                    TIME AND ANSWERING --

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  (INAUDIBLE/CROSS-TALK)

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  -- YOUR QUESTIONS.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I THINK MR. ENGLEBRIGHT HAD

                    SOMETHING HE WANTED TO SAY.  I DIDN'T WANT TO CUT HIM OFF.  I DIDN'T

                    MEAN TO INADVERTENTLY, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  IF I COULD JUST FINISH MY

                    THOUGHT.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I APPRECIATE YOUR COURTESY.  I WAS JUST

                    GOING TO SAY TRY NOT TO READ TOO MUCH INTO THIS IN TERMS OF INTENT, OTHER

                    THAN TO ENABLE OUR CITIZENS TO EMPOWER THEMSELVES AND TO HAVE A -- A

                    CRISPER UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND

                    A HEALTHFUL TIME WHILE LIVING AND BEING A PART OF OUR STATE.

                                 THANK YOU FOR YOUR COURTESY.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU.  ON THE BILL.

                                 AND I APPRECIATE THE ASPIRATIONAL NATURE OF THIS BILL,

                    BUT THEREIN LIES THE CONCERN, IN MY MIND.  THIS BILL IS GOING TO PROVIDE

                    LEGAL STANDING FOR PEOPLE THAT DO NOT LIKE AN OUTCOME THAT MAY BE

                    PRESENT IN -- IN OUR PROCESS OF GOVERNANCE, WHETHER IT'S HAVING TO DO

                    WITH LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, WITH INDUSTRY.  IT'S GOING TO PROVIDE THEM

                    LEGAL STANDING IN WHICH TO LITIGATE.  AND THEY CAN USE THAT LITIGATION AS

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    -- BASICALLY AS A CUDGEL TO BEAT WHOMEVER THEY WANT TO INTO SUBMISSION

                    ON A VARIETY OF -- OF THINGS.  AND THE REASON IS THAT THIS BILL AND THIS

                    AMENDMENT IS NOT SPECIFIC ENOUGH.  IT SOUNDS GOOD, IT FEELS GOOD, BUT

                    THE REALITY IS IS THAT IT HAS TO BE ADJUDICATED IN COURT.  AND THERE'LL BE

                    LOTS OF -- I SUSPECT -- I SUSPECT THAT THERE'LL BE LOTS OF ACTIONS IN COURT

                    RELATED TO THIS LEGISLATION, PARTICULARLY WITH REGARDS TO PROPERTY.

                    THERE'S A TERM OF ART CALLED NIMBY, WHICH IS "NOT IN MY BACKYARD."

                    WHEN SOMEONE DOESN'T WANT SOMETHING TO HAPPEN, THEN THEY -- THEY

                    FILE SUIT.  AND HERE'S -- HERE'S A PRIME LEVER IN WHICH I BELIEVE THAT

                    CITIZENS WILL NOW HAVE THE ABILITY TO -- TO FILE CIVIL ACTIONS AGAINST THEIR

                    FELLOW CITIZENS.  CONTRARY TO 50 YEARS -- IT'S BEEN 50 YEARS SINCE THE

                    CLEAN AIR ACT AND THE CLEAN WATER ACT HAVE BEEN ESTABLISHED.  NEW

                    YORK HAS A ROBUST ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY STRUCTURE.  I'M NOT REALLY

                    SURE WHAT THIS BILL AND WHAT THIS AMENDMENT IS GOING TO DO TO OUR

                    CONSTITUTION THAN WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN DONE BEFORE.

                                 FOR THOSE AND FOR A HOST OF MANY OTHER REASONS, I WILL

                    BE VOTING AGAINST THIS BILL TODAY, AS I DID IN THE PAST, BUT I WILL ALSO

                    ENCOURAGE VOTERS TO LOOK VERY CAREFULLY AT THIS TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY --

                    THEY SEE WHAT IS PRESENT AND WHAT THE WORDS ACTUALLY MEAN AND WHAT

                    WILL HAPPEN GOING FORWARD WHEN THEY CONSIDER THIS AT THE BALLOT BOX IN

                    -- IN NOVEMBER.

                                 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I YIELD.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU, STEVE.  I APPRECIATE

                    YOUR TIME, GOOD TO SEE YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS I WANTED

                    TO ADDRESS ON THIS ISSUE, PARTICULARLY AROUND THE ENERGY SIDE OF THINGS.

                    FIRST OF ALL, I THINK -- I KNOW YOU'LL WILL PROBABLY AGREE THAT ALL OF US

                    WANT TO SUPPORT AND PROVIDE CLEAN WATER AND CLEAN AIR FOR OUR

                    RESIDENTS; WOULDN'T YOU AGREE WITH THAT ABSOLUTELY?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I WOULD HOPE THAT THAT WOULD

                    BE THE CASE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ME, TOO.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  -- BUT IF SOME PEOPLE END UP

                    FINDING A WAY TO VOTE NO, WHICH I'M PUZZLED BY --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND THAT.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  -- BUT MAYBE THAT'LL CHANGE

                    TODAY AND WE'LL HAVE A UNANIMOUS CONSENT AT THE END OF THIS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  MAYBE NOT, THOUGH.

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 STEVE, RIGHT NOW, UNDER THE LAW RIGHT NOW WE HAVE

                    FEDERAL AND STATE REGULATIONS.  WE ADDRESS A LOT OF THESE ISSUES

                    THROUGH STATE LEGISLATION, THROUGH DEC REGULATION AND REVIEW, WE PASS

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    BOND ACTS, ENVIRONMENTAL BOND ACTS.  WE DO THINGS LIKE THAT RIGHT NOW

                    TO HELP PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT, DON'T WE?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  WE DO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I GUESS -- I THINK WHERE

                    I'M TRYING TO GET AT WITH THIS AMENDMENT, THIS CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT, THIS WOULD CREATE AN INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT OF PRIVATE ACTION

                    UNDER CONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSES, CORRECT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  NOT CORRECT.  THIS DOES NOT

                    CREATE ANYTHING NEW IN TERMS OF RIGHTS OF ACTION.  ANYONE WHO WANTS

                    TO USE THE LEGAL SYSTEM TO BRING AN ACTION NOW CAN DO THAT.  NO, THAT'S

                    NOT THE PURPOSE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY --

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THE PURPOSE IS TO FRAME THE

                    EXPECTATIONS OF THE STATE GOVERNMENT AND TO ENABLE OUR CITIZENS TO PUT

                    PEOPLE WHO LOOK A LOT LIKE YOU AND ME, LEGISLATORS, MORE -- MORE

                    PRECISELY INTO THE PATHWAY OF EXPECTATION TO PROTECT THE CITIZENS' HEALTH

                    AND WELL-BEING.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH, STEVE, I UNDERSTAND

                    YOU'RE SAYING IT DOESN'T CREATE A RIGHT OF PRIVATE ACTION AND THAT'S NOT

                    THE INTENT BEHIND IT, BUT IT CERTAINLY, WITH ANY PIECE OF LEGISLATION, THERE

                    ARE CONSEQUENCES TO IT AND CERTAINLY IF AN INDIVIDUAL WANTS TO FILE AN

                    ACTION THAT THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT IS BEING VIOLATED IF THIS BECOMES

                    PART OF THE CONSTITUTION, THEY'LL HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO THAT, AND THAT CAN

                    ALSO APPLY TO -- AND WHERE I'M CONCERNED ON THAT FRONT OF IT, ON THE

                    ENERGY SIDE OF THINGS, OUR ABILITY IN NEW YORK STATE TO, YOU KNOW, TO

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PRODUCE ENERGY, OUR ENERGY SECTOR, THE ABILITY TO GENERATE ELECTRICITY.

                    NOW, CERTAINLY, THAT COULD APPLY TO, LET'S SAY A NATURAL GAS PLANT.  I

                    KNOW A LOT OF PEOPLE DON'T LIKE NATURAL GAS, AND I GET THAT, BUT IF

                    SOMEONE WANTS TO BRING SUIT BECAUSE THEY FEEL EVEN THOUGH WE HAVE

                    THE REGULATORY PROCESS WITH THE DEC AND OTHERS, IF SOMEONE FEELS

                    UNDER THIS LEGISLATION, THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, IF THEIR

                    CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ARE BEING VIOLATED, THEY WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO

                    BRING SUIT AS AN INDIVIDUAL, CORRECT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  JUST LIKE I AM A GEOLOGIST NOT

                    A LAWYER, I WILL LEAVE THAT TO THE LAWYERS TO DETERMINE.  I CAN TELL YOU

                    THIS:  THERE IS NO -- THERE'S VERY SHORT LANGUAGE IN THE PROPOSED

                    AMENDMENT AND IT DOES NOT ADDRESS RIGHTS OF LEGAL ACTION; IT DOESN'T

                    EVEN SPEAK TO THAT ISSUE.  WHAT I BELIEVE THE PRIMARY CONSEQUENCE OF

                    ITS PASSAGE WILL BE IS TO ENABLE OUR CITIZENS TO HOLD LEGISLATURE

                    ACTIVITIES, SUCH AS THE LIST THAT YOU MENTIONED, TO A HIGHER STANDARD AND

                    TO HAVE A HIGHER EXPECTATION OF PERFORMANCE FROM US.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT, AND I GUESS, STEVE,

                    WHERE I GET ALSO CONCERNED IS MAYBE NOT JUST ON THE, SAY NOT ON NATURAL

                    GAS AND I SEE IT'S NOT INTENDED TO DO THAT, BUT AGAIN, THIS CAN ALSO HAVE

                    AN IMPACT ON OUR RENEWABLE PROJECTS THAT ARE GOING ON IN PLACE, AS

                    WELL, IF SAY WE GO THROUGH THE REGULATORY PROCESS, AGAIN, AN INDIVIDUAL

                    WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT UNDER THE CONSTITUTION IF THEY FEEL FOR WHATEVER

                    REASON THESE PROJECTS, WHETHER IT'S RENEWABLE, WHETHER IT'S NATURAL GAS,

                    HAVE A VIOLATION OF THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, THEY WOULD HAVE THAT

                    OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT.  SO, I KNOW YOU KEEP SAYING THAT YOU DON'T HAVE

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    LAWSUITS AND I UNDERSTAND THAT, SO I DON'T WANT TO BELABOR THAT POINT

                    WITH YOU, SO I APPRECIATE -- I APPRECIATE THE INTENT OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING

                    TO DO WITH THE BILL, SO I'LL JUST GO ON THE BILL, THEN, STEVE.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, MY

                    COLLEAGUES.  AND I UNDERSTAND THE INTENTION BEHIND THIS LEGISLATION.  I --

                    I -- KNOWING THE SPONSOR, HIS INTENTIONS ARE WELL CONCEIVED,

                    WELL-MEANING AS ALWAYS IS WHEN HE PUTS LEGISLATION FORWARD.  I THINK

                    MY CONCERN IS THE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF WHAT THIS LEGISLATION

                    WILL DO.  THIS WILL CERTAINLY CREATE A RIGHT OF PRIVATE ACTION FOR

                    INDIVIDUALS TO BRING -- FILE FOR LAWSUITS AS AN INDIVIDUAL PERSON FROM A

                    CONSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE.  AND I THINK WHERE I HAVE CONCERN ON THIS,

                    CERTAINLY IS WHAT I WAS TALKING ABOUT AS FAR AS OUR ENERGY GENERATION

                    SIDE OF THINGS, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WE ALREADY HAVE IN PLACE A REGULATORY

                    PROCESS WITH THE DEC, WE PASSED LEGISLATION, WE HAVE BOND ACTS AND I

                    THINK -- I GUESS I GET CONCERNED THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE ALSO GOING TO BE

                    SHIFTING MORE FROM THE GOVERNMENTAL SIDE, YOU KNOW, WHERE POWERS

                    ARE BESTOWED ON THE LEGISLATURE AND THE EXECUTIVE TO HANDLE SOME OF

                    THOSE REGULATORY PROCESSES, YOU'RE GOING TO CREATE -- SHIFT MORE OF THAT

                    TO THE JUDICIARY WHICH IS GOING TO ALLOW THE COURTS TO HAVE MORE SAY

                    BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO HAVE SAY BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO

                    OPEN UP THIS SYSTEM TO MORE LITIGATION, MORE PRIVATE ACTIONS ACROSS THE

                    BOARD ON A CONSTITUTIONAL BASIS VERSUS, YOU KNOW, THE REGULATORY

                    PROCESS THAT WE HANDLE THESE PROJECTS.  AND THIS IS GOING TO -- AND I

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    MENTIONED NUCLEAR -- NATURAL GAS PLANTS.  I KNOW, AGAIN, SOME PEOPLE

                    THINK THAT NATURAL GAS, ANYTHING WE CAN DO TO STOP NATURAL GAS, THAT'S A

                    GOOD THING.  I DISAGREE WITH THAT.  I THINK NATURAL GAS SHOULD BE A PART

                    OF -- OF OUR PORTFOLIO, OUR ENERGY PORTFOLIO.  BUT WITH THIS PROCESS,

                    WE'RE NOT JUST TALKING ABOUT NATURAL GAS, WE'RE OPENING THIS RIGHT OF

                    ACTION, PRIVATE ACTION ON RENEWABLE PROJECTS AS WELL, BECAUSE I THINK

                    IT'S GOING TO CAUSE SOME CONSTITUTIONAL PROBLEMS.  I MEAN, YOU CAN

                    HAVE PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTIONS AND LAWSUITS AGAINST WIND FARMS THAT ARE

                    BEING DEVELOPED.  YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN ISSUES BROUGHT UP ABOUT

                    WIND FARMS.  THERE'S NOT A LOT OF SUPPORT IN THE PUBLIC, IN CERTAIN AREAS,

                    FOR WIND FARMS AND SOLAR FARMS.  THE FLICKER, THAT SHADOW WHEN THE

                    SUN IS LOW IN THE SKY AND IT'S JUST BEHIND THE TURBINE, THE ROTATING

                    TURBINE, WHICH HAS PRODUCED PROBLEMS FOR PEOPLE WITH PHOTO

                    SENSITIVITY TO -- WITH EPILEPSY AND SEIZURE DISORDERS BECAUSE OF THESE

                    TRIGGERS.  THE OTHER ISSUES WITH WIND FARMS, THE NOISE AND WHAT'S GOING

                    TO HAPPEN TO THE BLADES.  I MEAN, THOSE ARE ISSUES THAT COULD BE BROUGHT

                    FORWARD.  YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE SUITS ON THAT RELATIVE THAN JUST

                    DEALING WITH THE PROCESS THAT WE HAVE, WHETHER IT'S ARTICLE 10 OR THE

                    OFFICE OF RENEWABLE ENERGY -- YOU KNOW, WHERE THEY ARE SITING THESE

                    PROJECTS NOW WHETHER IT'S WIND FARMS OR SOLAR FARMS, WITHOUT ANY LOCAL

                    PUBLIC INPUT, WITHOUT ANY FEEDBACK OR PARTICIPATION FROM THE LOCAL

                    GOVERNMENT BECAUSE THE STATE JUST SAYS WHERE IT'S GOING TO GO, SO...

                                 YOU ALSO HAVE THIS SITUATION ON THE SOLAR FARMS, YOU

                    KNOW, THERE'S MATERIAL IN THE SOLAR PANELS, LEAD AND CADMIUM, WHAT'S

                    GOING TO HAPPEN WITH THE DISPOSAL WHEN THERE'S -- WHEN THERE'S

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WASHOUT AND HOW THIS CAN TRANSPOSE -- YOU KNOW, WHEN THERE'S

                    RAINWATER AND WHAT THAT -- AFFECTS THAT GETTING INTO THE GROUND WATER,

                    INTO THE GROUND AND RAINWATER.  THAT'S -- THAT'S GOING TO BE IMPACTFUL.

                    THAT'S GOING TO OPEN UP THIS ACTION FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF ACTION BY

                    INDIVIDUALS, AS WELL, WHICH IS CERTAINLY GOING TO HAVE A CHALLENGE TO,

                    YOU KNOW, A POSSIBLE SLOWING DOWN THE GOALS A LOT OF PEOPLE HAVE IN

                    SUPPORT OF THE CLCPA, WHICH I HAVE VOICED MY CONCERNS ABOUT AS A

                    WHOLE, BUT YOU ALSO HAVE THE ISSUE ABOUT THE -- WHAT ARE WE GOING TO

                    DO ABOUT THE UNDERWATER HYDROELECTRIC ELECTRIC LINES THAT ARE GOING TO

                    BE COMING FROM CANADA DOWN TO NEW YORK CITY.  I MEAN, THEY GO

                    THROUGH AN EXTENSIVE REVIEW PROCESS AND APPROVAL PROCESS, BUT NOW

                    YOU'RE GOING TO ADD ON TOP OF THAT MORE FROM PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION

                    THAT CAN HAPPEN AND WILL HAPPEN BECAUSE YOU'RE OPENING UP THIS FOR

                    FURTHER LITIGATION.  I MEAN, I KNOW WHEN THERE'S LITIGATION THAT HAPPENS

                    UP WHEN THERE'S REGULATORY PROCESS, IT GOES THROUGH AN ARTICLE 78, BUT

                    THIS IS TALKING ABOUT A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT AND THEN WHEN PEOPLE

                    FALLING ON OUR CONSTITUTIONAL PURPOSES, I THINK THAT CAN BE VERY

                    PROBLEMATIC.

                                 WHAT ABOUT SOMEONE, YOU KNOW, WHO HAS A WOOD

                    STOVE?  IS THAT GOING TO ALLOW A NEIGHBOR TO FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST

                    SOMEONE IF THEY HAVE A WOOD STOVE?  THAT'S GOING TO BE INFRINGING

                    UPON THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, OR A NATURAL GAS BOILER?  I MEAN, FROM

                    THAT PROCESS -- I MEAN, WE HAVE A PROCESS RIGHT NOW IN PLACE THAT WE

                    USE WITH OPEN LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT, AND I THINK A CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT OPENS UP THAT WINDFALL OF LAWSUITS THAT IS JUST GOING TO

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    COST MORE, IT'S GOING TO PROVIDE A GREAT DEAL OF UNCERTAINTY TO OUR

                    ENERGY MARKETS, AS WELL.  YOU KNOW, THE GOALS, AS I MENTIONED, OF THE

                    CLCPA, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, PEOPLE CAN FIND WAYS TO FILE LAWSUITS ON

                    THESE THINGS, AND THEY WILL IF YOU'RE CREATING THAT TYPE OF CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT.

                                 AGAIN, WE ALL WANT CLEAN WATER, CLEAN AIR, BUT I THINK

                    BY DOING THIS, I THINK WE'RE JUST GOING TO OPEN THIS UP MORE, AGAIN, FOR

                    UNCERTAINTY AND CHALLENGES WITH THE ENERGY MARKETS, WITH THE BUSINESS

                    COMMUNITY.  YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY THE GOAL OF HAVING AFFORDABLE AND

                    RELIABLE ENERGY SUPPLY FOR OUR FAMILIES, OUR FARMERS, OUR BUSINESSES,

                    AND OUR MANUFACTURERS, I THINK THAT'S GOING TO CAUSE A PROBLEM FOR

                    THEM, AS WELL, BECAUSE OF THE LAWSUITS AND HOW THIS IS GOING TO

                    CONTINUE TO FESTER AND CARRY ON.  I JUST THINK IT'S GOING TO LEAD TO COSTLY

                    AND EXPENSIVE LITIGATION, IT'S GOING TO BE DUPLICATIVE ISSUES THAT RIGHT

                    NOW CAN BE HANDLED THROUGH THE REGULATORY PROCESS WITH THE DEC,

                    WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS AND THE

                    LAWS THAT WE PASS AND CREATE IN THE REGULATIONS WE HAVE.  I JUST -- I JUST

                    THINK WE'RE -- WHAT THIS ACTION IS GOING TO CAUSE IS NOT THE WAY WE NEED

                    TO BE.

                                 WE'RE ALL FOR CLEAN WATER AND CLEAN AIR.  I JUST THINK

                    THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS JUST GOING TO TAKE US DOWN THE

                    WRONG PATH.  IT'S GOING TO, AGAIN, CREATE COSTLY LITIGATION, IT'S GOING TO

                    HAVE AN IMPACT ON OUR ENERGY MARKETS AND OUR ENERGY PORTFOLIO.  IT'S

                    GOING TO BE -- IT COULD CAUSE PROBLEMS FOR THE CLCPA.  I KNOW MANY

                    PEOPLE SUPPORT THE CLCPA.  I THINK THAT'S SOMETHING THAT COULD BE

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PROBLEMATIC, AS WELL, BECAUSE YOU ARE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE THAT CAN

                    CHALLENGE WIND FARMS, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE PEOPLE THAT CAN CHALLENGE

                    SOLAR FARMS BECAUSE OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS THAT CAN CREATE, TOO,

                    WHETHER IMMEDIATELY OR DOWN THE ROAD.  SO I JUST THINK THAT'S

                    SOMETHING TO KEEP IN MIND AS WE MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.  SO, FOR

                    THOSE REASONS, MR. SPEAKER, I'LL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS AND

                    I'M GOING TO ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I YIELD, YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN.  THANK

                    YOU, SPEAKER; THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN.  JUST A FEW QUESTIONS.  I KNOW WE

                    -- WE WENT THROUGH THIS BILL A FEW YEARS AGO ON THE FLOOR AND ONE OF THE

                    QUESTIONS I HAD ASKED THEN WAS WHY -- OR IS THERE AN EXEMPTION FOR AG

                    IN THIS BILL THIS YEAR?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THERE'S NO EXEMPTIONS.

                    THERE'S NO REASON TO HAVE EXEMPTIONS BECAUSE THERE IS NO DIRECT

                    REFERENCE TO AG.  THERE IS NO ANTICIPATED NEGATIVE IMPACT OR POSITIVE

                    IMPACT EITHER WAY TOWARD AGRICULTURE.  IT SPEAKS TO THE GENERAL PREMISE

                    THAT LIVING IN NEW YORK SHOULD BE SOMETHING THAT YOU CAN DO WITHOUT

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    APPREHENSION THAT IT'S GOING TO COMPROMISE YOUR HEALTH, AND THAT

                    SHOULDN'T BE -- THAT SHOULDN'T BE INTERPRETED THROUGH THE LENS OF

                    TRANSPORTATION OR AGRICULTURE, RECREATION OR ANY OF THE OTHER ACTIVITIES OF

                    -- OF OUR COMPLEX STATE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU,

                    STEVE, FOR THAT.  ONE OF MY CONCERNS IS WITH THE SHIFT OF POPULATION, WE

                    SEE MANY INDIVIDUALS MOVING OUT OF THE CITY AREAS OUT TO THE SUBURBS

                    AND THE RURAL AREAS, AND I KNOW AS A FARMER FOR MANY YEARS, AND I THINK

                    WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS, STEVE, THAT WHEN WE HARVEST SOYBEANS AND WE

                    HARVEST GRAIN AND WE HARVEST WHEAT, THERE'S A LOT OF DUST THAT'S INVOLVED

                    IN THAT AND IT HAS TO BE THAT WAY, OTHERWISE YOU CAN'T HARVEST THE -- THE

                    PRODUCT.  AND ONE OF THE CONCERNS I HAVE IS IF WE HAVE A NEIGHBOR

                    MOVE IN FROM THE CITY THAT'S NOT USED TO THIS AND I'M OUT -- I'M OUT

                    HARVESTING WHEAT AND ALL OF A SUDDEN THIS PERSON HAS AN ASTHMA ATTACK

                    BECAUSE OF THE DUST, YOU KNOW, WHAT HAPPENS AT THAT POINT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THAT IS NOT SOMETHING THAT

                    WE WOULD, FROM READING OR ENACTING THIS, HAVE ANY WAY OF PREDICTING.

                    IF THERE IS A WAY TO CORRECT THAT, I WOULD HOPE THAT IT WOULD BE

                    CORRECTED LOCALLY THROUGH THE ACTION OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT.  YOU KNOW, I

                    LIVE IN A COUNTY THAT WAS AND STILL IS THE NUMBER ONE AGRICULTURAL

                    COUNTY IN THE STATE, AND AS GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT HAS TAKEN PLACE IN

                    MY COMMUNITY AND OTHERS, WE HAVE HAD SUBDIVISIONS BUILT RIGHT NEXT

                    TO FARMS AND THE -- THE CONFLICTS OF THAT -- OF LAND USE ACTIVITIES HAVE

                    SOMETIMES MANIFESTED THEMSELVES.  THOSE ARE THE TYPES OF PROBLEMS

                    THAT REALLY NEED TO BE ADDRESSED WITH LAND USE SETBACKS FOR NEW

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    SUBDIVISIONS.  THAT'S SOMETHING THAT SHOULD BE PART OF THE PLANNING

                    PROCESS AT LOCAL GOVERNMENT.  IT IS NOT SOMETHING, THOUGH, THAT'S

                    DIRECTLY WITHIN THE SCOPE OF THIS PARTICULAR RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ALL RIGHT.  STEVE, SO IF IT GOES

                    BACK TO THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT, IS THERE -- I SAW IN THE SPONSOR'S MEMO

                    THAT THERE WOULD BE NO FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR STATE OR LOCAL

                    MUNICIPALITIES.  SO IF THIS HAPPENS, THERE WILL DEFINITELY BE EXPENSES TO

                    THE LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES IF THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DEAL WITH THIS

                    LOCALLY, AND I'VE GOT GRAVE CONCERN AS PEOPLE MOVE INTO THESE AREAS

                    AND THE DUST IS FLYING, WHETHER IT'S, YOU KNOW, HARVESTING OR IN THE

                    SPRING WHEN WE HAVE A DRY SPELL AND THE DUST WILL FLY AND GO FOR A LONG

                    WAYS.  IF AN INDIVIDUAL PUTS A STOP TO A FARMING OPERATION OR DECIDES TO

                    BRING A LAWSUIT AGAINST MANKTELOW FARMS, FOR INSTANCE, WHAT HAPPENS

                    TO -- WHAT HAPPENS TO ME?  DO I HAVE TO STOP?  DO I HAVE TO WAIT FOR AN

                    ANSWER FROM THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT?  HOW IS THAT GOING TO BE

                    ADDRESSED?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  IT WOULD BE ADDRESSED IN THE

                    SAME WAY THAT IT'S ADDRESSED NOW.  NOTHING IN THIS PARTICULAR MEASURE

                    CHANGES OR ADDRESSES THE TYPE OF CIRCUMSTANCE THAT -- THAT YOU POINT

                    TOWARD.  AGAIN -- AND THESE ARE IMPORTANT CONSIDERATIONS, BUT THERE ARE

                    MECHANISMS AND PRECEDENTS AND RECOMMENDED ACTIVITIES SUCH AS

                    HAVING SETBACKS AND ROWS OF TREE PLANTINGS AND OTHER ACTIVITIES TO TAKE

                    CARE OF DUST.  THIS IS NOT, AGAIN, WITHIN THE SCOPE OF A PRECISE

                    EXPECTATION OF THIS MEASURE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  STEVE, I THINK WITH ALL DUE

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    RESPECT -- AND I AGREE WITH SOME OF YOUR POINTS ON THIS.  I THINK THAT

                    WITHOUT THOSE SPECIFICS BEING IN HERE THAT WE'RE REALLY OPENING UP A

                    CAN OF WORMS FOR A LOT OF LOCAL LAWSUITS.  I JUST DON'T SEE HOW THAT WILL

                    NOT HAPPEN, WHETHER IT'S SPRING OR FALL, YOU KNOW, WHETHER IT'S SMELL.

                    YOU KNOW, WE HAVE FERTILIZERS AND I KNOW OUR FARMERS ARE DOING A

                    GREAT JOB WITH THE NEW FERTILIZERS THAT WE HAVE, KEEPING OUR WATER

                    SYSTEMS CLEAN.  YOU KNOW, WE WANT CLEAN WATER, WE WANT CLEAN AIR

                    JUST AS WELL.  IS SMELL GOING TO BE PART OF CLEAN AIR?  IF THERE'S A HOG

                    OPERATION OR A CHICKEN OPERATION OR A COW OPERATION, HOW DO WE DEAL

                    WITH THAT WITH TREES AND BUFFERS, BECAUSE THAT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE.

                    THAT SMELL IS GOING TO GO THROUGH THOSE TREES.  IS THAT GOING TO BE PART

                    OF THIS?  WILL THE CITIZEN HAVE THE RIGHT TO STOP THAT OPERATION AT THAT

                    POINT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THIS DOES NOT EMPOWER ANY

                    PARTICULAR LAWSUIT OR ANY PARTICULAR FINE GRAINED ACTIONS SUCH AS WHAT

                    YOU DESCRIBED.  I WILL SAY IT SETS THE EXPECTATION THAT THOSE WHO ARE

                    ELECTED, THOSE ARE WHO IN ELECTED OFFICE HAVE A SHARPENED

                    RESPONSIBILITY AND EXPECTATION TO ANTICIPATE AND TO ACT WISELY TO HELP

                    PREVENT THE KINDS OF CONFLICTS YOU'VE GIVEN A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES; WE

                    CAN GO ON FOR MANY HOURS LISTING POTENTIAL SUCH CONFLICTS.  THAT DOESN'T

                    MEAN THAT WE SHOULD ABANDON THE GENERAL PREMISE OF MAKING IT

                    POSSIBLE FOR PEOPLE TO LIVE IN A COMMUNITY AND KNOW THAT THEY WILL NOT

                    HAVE THEIR HEALTH COMPROMISED, THAT THEIR LUNGS WILL NOT BE DISEASED,

                    THAT THEY WILL NOT SUFFER FROM ENVIRONMENTAL POISONING, THAT THEY

                    SHOULD NOT HAVE TO JUST SAY, OH WELL, WHEN THERE IS A CONTAMINATION

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    EVENT SUCH AS THE GRUMMAN BETHPAGE PLUME, OR THE KINDS OF

                    POISONINGS THAT HAVE OCCURRED IN SOME UPSTATE COMMUNITIES THAT THE

                    CITIZENS HAVE BEEN VICTIMIZED BY.  THOSE WHO ARE IN ELECTED OFFICE

                    NEED TO DO BETTER AND TO MAKE SURE THAT THE CITIZENS HAVE A RIGHT TO THAT

                    EXPECTATION WE HAVE PUT FORWARD THIS MEASURE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO, YOU KNOW, GOING BACK TO

                    THE LOCAL -- LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS.  SO IN A SITUATION HERE, ARE WE GOING

                    TO PUT THE ONUS BACK TO THE LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS TO, AGAIN, FIX A

                    PROBLEM THAT WE'RE GOING TO CREATE AT THE STATE LEVEL?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THIS SPEAKS PRIMARILY TO THE

                    STATE TO THE EXTENT THAT ALL OF THE OTHER UNITS OF GOVERNMENT, THE COUNTY,

                    TOWN, VILLAGE, ET CETERA, ARE SUBSETS THAT HAVE BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE

                    STATE LEGISLATURE IS REASONABLE, BUT REALLY IT PUTS THE ONUS REALLY ON US

                    AT THE STATE LEVEL.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY, AND I THINK THAT'S WHY

                    WE'RE, AGAIN, ADDRESSING SOME OF THESE QUESTIONS.  I THINK IN THE

                    SITUATION WHERE WE HAVE AG, AG IS PREDOMINANTLY THE BUSINESS OF NEW

                    YORK STATE, ESPECIALLY IN THE UPSTATE AREAS.  I THINK THERE NEEDS TO BE

                    LANGUAGE IN THIS BILL THAT DOES ALLOW AG EXEMPTIONS.  I WAS HOPING TO

                    SEE THAT WITH THE SECOND TIME AROUND.  WE PASSED IT TWO YEARS AGO, OF

                    COURSE IN APRIL, OF '19 AND I WAS HOPING TO SEE THAT, BUT WE DIDN'T.

                                 BUT ANOTHER BIG ISSUE THAT I'M HEARING IN MY DISTRICT IS

                    SMELL, OKAY.  WE HAVE TWO VERY LARGE LANDFILLS IN MY DISTRICT, SEVERAL

                    AROUND THE DISTRICT, AND I KNOW IN NEW YORK STATE THE GOVERNOR IS

                    PUSHING FOR A BETTER, CLEANER, GREEN NEW YORK STATE.  SO THE SITUATION

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WITH A LOT OF THE LANDFILL MATERIAL COMING OUT OF NEW YORK CITY/LONG

                    ISLAND AREA, GOING TO OUR LANDFILLS HERE A FEW MILES FROM WHERE I LIVE,

                    THE SMELL IS ATROCIOUS, IT'S ABSOLUTELY DISGUSTING.  SO IF WE GET A BUNCH

                    OF PEOPLE TOGETHER, AND IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, AND THEY BRING A LAWSUIT,

                    WHAT HAPPENS IF THAT LANDFILL GETS SHUT DOWN?  WHERE DOES THE -- WHERE

                    DOES THE MATERIAL FROM NEW YORK CITY AND LONG ISLAND GO?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THE QUESTION YOU POSE IS ONE

                    THAT HAS AN INFINITE NUMBER OF POSSIBLE ANSWERS, BUT I CAN TELL YOU THIS:

                    THE -- WHEN YOU HAVE A CIRCUMSTANCE IN WHICH ODOR FROM A LANDFILL OR

                    FROM ANY ACTIVITY THAT IS AUTHORIZED BY -- BY GOVERNMENT, REALLY

                    CAUSING GREAT DISCOMFORT, THAT'S A WARNING SIGN.  THAT'S WHY WE HAVE

                    OLFACTORY CAPABILITY, TO WARN US WHEN WE ARE IN HARM'S WAY FROM

                    HAVING BIOLOGICAL HARM TO THE TISSUES AND FUNCTIONS OF OUR ORGANS.  SO

                    IT'S A SERIOUS MATTER YOU RIGHTLY RAISE, AND ALL I CAN SAY IS THAT ISN'T

                    CHANGED BY THIS MEASURE, BUT IN TERMS OF THE EXPECTATION TO THE EXTENT

                    THAT STATE AGENCIES MAY HELP OVERSEE THESE LANDFILLS OR -- OR DUMPS,

                    THERE -- THEY WOULD BE PUT ON A HIGHER LEVEL, I WOULD HOPE, A HIGHER

                    LEVEL OF PERFORMANCE EXPECTATION.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WELL, YOU KNOW, I'VE BEEN TO

                    THESE LANDFILLS, I'VE BEEN TO THEIR -- THEIR OPERATIONS AND I SEE THAT

                    THEY'RE DOING EVERYTHING BASICALLY THEY POSSIBLY CAN.  ONE OF THE ISSUES

                    IS BRINGING ALL THE MATERIAL UP AND THE COST THAT IT COSTS TO GET HERE,

                    HOW MUCH FUEL ARE WE USING, WHETHER IT'S DIESEL FUEL, DIESEL FUEL

                    THROUGH A TRAIN.  AGAIN, WE'RE OPENING -- OPENING UP SOMETHING THAT I

                    THINK NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED IN THIS BILL BEFORE WE GO AHEAD AND PUT IT

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ON THE BALLOT BECAUSE WE REALLY NEED TO KNOW THOSE ANSWERS BEFORE ALL

                    OF A SUDDEN SOMEONE COMES UP AND SAYS, WELL, I DON'T WANT TO SMELL

                    THIS ANYMORE.  AND IN MY DISTRICT, EVERY DAY WE GET CALLS ABOUT THE

                    SMELL FROM THESE LANDFILLS AND I'VE GOT CONCERN THAT WE NEED TO HAVE A

                    GAME PLAN OF WHAT WE'RE GOING TO DO IF -- IF SOMEONE DOES BRING SUIT TO

                    THIS BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, JUST LIKE SOME OF THE OTHER COLLEAGUES

                    HAVE SPOKE ALREADY.  THINGS ARE GOING TO HAPPEN BECAUSE WE'RE GIVING

                    THE PEOPLE THE RIGHT TO DO SO.  AND WE DO A GOOD JOB WITH DEALING WITH

                    IT NOW, BUT IT'S GOING TO GET WORSE AND I JUST WANT TO KNOW WHY WE

                    DON'T HAVE AN ANSWER FOR THAT IN THIS, OR WHAT IS YOUR ANSWER, I GUESS,

                    HOW ARE WE GOING TO DEAL WITH THIS?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  MAKE YOUR QUESTION A LITTLE

                    MORE SPECIFIC.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SURE, OKAY.  SO, STEVE, AS WE

                    WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE LANDFILLS, RIGHT.  THERE'S GOING TO BE PEOPLE THAT

                    ARE GOING TO BAN TOGETHER AND THEY'RE GOING TO ASK FOR THESE LANDFILLS TO

                    BE SHUT DOWN BECAUSE THEY'RE SICK AND TIRED OF THE SMELL, ESPECIALLY

                    WHEN ALL THE LANDFILL MATERIAL ARE COMING FROM DOWNSTATE.  PEOPLE ARE

                    NOT HAPPY ABOUT IT, DOESN'T MATTER WHAT LETTER THEY HAVE BEHIND THEIR

                    NAME.  WHEN THEY -- WHEN THEY DO THIS, WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO AS A

                    STATE WHEN SOME OF THESE LANDFILLS GET HELD UP BY THE COURTS AND SAY,

                    WE'VE GOT TO STOP THIS UNTIL WE FIGURE THIS OUT.  WHAT ARE WE GOING TO

                    DO?  WHO'S GOING TO FIGURE IT OUT AND WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  PART OF THE ANSWER, OF COURSE,

                    IS THE STATE AGENCIES, MOST PARTICULARLY THE DEPARTMENT OF

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION WILL HAVE TO MAKE RECOMMENDED NEW

                    LAW WHICH WE WILL PASS, OR WE WILL HOLD HEARINGS AND ASK ALL OF THE

                    STAKEHOLDERS TO SHARE THEIR INFORMATION AND INSIGHTS, AND WE WILL PUSH

                    FOR A NEW POLICY THAT IS APPROPRIATE TO MEET THE CHALLENGE OF THE

                    MOMENT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  I THINK YOU MAY BE --

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  YOU CAN'T HAVE - LET ME JUST

                    FINISH MY THOUGHT IF I COULD - YOU CAN'T HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT ANTICIPATE EVERY SPECIFIC CONCERN IN EVERY PARTICULAR AREA

                    AND EXPECT TO SPELL THAT OUT; IN FACT, WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO DO HERE IS

                    JUST FRAME THE EXPECTATION FOR EVERY CITIZEN THAT IF THEY LIVE IN NEW

                    YORK, THAT THEY KNOW THAT THEY CAN RAISE THEIR FAMILY HERE AND THEIR

                    LOVED ONES AND BE IN AN ENVIRONMENT THAT IS SAFE TO DO THAT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  I TOTALLY AGREE WITH YOU, AND I

                    THINK THAT SHOULD BE FRAMED THROUGH OUR AGENCIES OF NEW YORK STATE,

                    NOT THROUGH A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BECAUSE THERE'S SO MUCH

                    VAGUENESS IN THIS IT CAN GO IN ANY DIRECTION.  IF WE PUT THE ONUS BACK

                    ON OUR -- ON OUR DEPARTMENTS OF NEW YORK STATE TO COME UP WITH THE

                    THINGS THAT WE WANT TO SEE DONE, WE COULD DO IT AT A MUCH BETTER --

                    CHEAPER COST AND A MUCH BETTER SOLUTION.  THIS -- THIS JUST LEAVES US

                    WIDE OPEN AND I HAVE GRAVE CONCERN FOR OUR AG COMMUNITIES, I REALLY

                    DO, AND FOR -- FOR EVERYONE BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, YOU MIGHT BE

                    BARBECUING NEXT DOOR AND I DON'T LIKE THE SMELL OF YOUR BARBECUE

                    SAUCE.  IS THAT GOING TO BE AN ISSUE?  I HOPE NOT --

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  YOU MENTION SMELL.  YOU

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    KNOW, SMELL SOMETIMES IS A WARNING OF HARM.  IN OTHER CASES, SOME

                    PEOPLE DON'T LIKE THE SMELL OF ONIONS, BUT THEY LIKE THE TASTE OF THEM.

                    SO, SMELL BY ITSELF IS -- IS VERY DIFFICULT TO QUANTIFY AND TO WRITE IN,

                    WHICH IS WHY YOU DON'T SEE IT IN OUR EXISTING ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS VERY

                    MUCH, BUT THERE ARE OTHER BIOLOGICAL INDICATORS THAT ARE MORE ACCURATE

                    THAT ARE MORE FREQUENTLY ADDRESSED.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WELL THANK YOU, I'M GLAD YOU

                    SAID THAT BECAUSE I THOUGHT SMELL SHOULDN'T BE IN THERE BUT HEARING IT

                    FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE, IT JUST REASSURES ME THAT YOU'RE

                    ON THE SAME PAGE WITH ME ABOUT THE SMELL.  THE SMELL SHOULD NOT BE

                    AN ISSUE WITH THIS BILL -- WITH THIS PIECE OF -- THIS CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT.  SO, AGAIN, MR. CHAIRMAN, I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, I

                    THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENCE IN ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.

                                 ON THE BILL, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE -- WELL, I'M

                    AFRAID YOU EXHAUSTED YOUR TIME.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  I'M SORRY?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  I'M AFRAID YOUR TIME

                    IS UP.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YES.  YOUR TIME HAS

                    BEEN EXPENDED WITH THE QUESTION AND ANSWER EVEN IF YOU WANTED TO GO

                    ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  I'LL GO -- I'LL GO ON MY

                    VOTE THEN.  THANK YOU, SIR.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. GIGLIO.

                                 MR. BROWN.

                                 MR. BROWN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I WILL YIELD, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. BROWN:  FIRST OFF, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, IT IS MY

                    DISTINCT HONOR AND PLEASURE TO BE SPEAKING TO YOU ABOUT THIS BILL.  YOUR

                    REPUTATION AS AN ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIVE STALWART FOR THE STATE OF

                    NEW YORK AND ON LONG ISLAND IS UNSURPASSED AND I, FOR ONE, HAVE

                    WATCHED YOUR CAREER FOR QUITE SOME TIME, SO IT IS A PLEASURE.  BUT I RISE

                    TODAY TO TALK ABOUT THIS PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BECAUSE

                    I'M IN FAVOR, BUT I HAVE SOME SEVERE CONCERNS.  I'M SOMEWHAT

                    CONFLICTED BECAUSE AS MUCH AS I THINK IT'S A LAUDABLE GOAL AND

                    ASPIRATIONAL, I -- I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT WHEN IT COMES TO PROTECTING THE

                    ENVIRONMENT, IT'S ONE OF THOSE RARE INSTANCES WHERE WE HAVE LEGISLATION

                    THAT CUTS ACROSS BOTH AISLES OF THIS BODY.  I THINK, THOUGH, THAT THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT RAISES MORE ISSUES THAN IT ANSWERS.  AND

                    MY FIRST QUESTION, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, IS I'M SURE YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THE

                    NEW YORK STATE CONSERVATION LAW AND WHEN THEY WERE PASSED; THEY

                    WERE PASSED BACK IN THE 1970S BY GOVERNOR CAREY AND THE THEN

                    LEGISLATURE, CORRECT?

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  MANY OF THEM WERE.  WE

                    HAVE SOME ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS THAT GO BACK TO THE 19TH CENTURY, BUT

                    THERE WAS A, AS YOU RIGHTLY POINT OUT, A -- A POINT IN TIME CENTERED IN

                    THE '70S WHICH IS CALLED THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVOLUTION.

                                 MR. BROWN:  RIGHT, AND THERE WAS A BIG PUSH AT

                    THAT TIME TO PASS SEVERAL PIECES OF LEGISLATION FOR -- FOR THE CLEAN AIR

                    ACT, THE CLEAN WATER ACT, THE NEW YORK STATE NAVIGATION LAW, ET

                    CETERA, CORRECT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THAT'S CORRECT.

                                 MR. BROWN:  AND DURING THIS TIME, THE LEGISLATURE

                    AND THE GOVERNOR SAW FIT TO PASS THIS LEGISLATION IN ORDER TO PROTECT THE

                    ENVIRONMENT BUT YET, AT THAT TIME, THEY DID NOT CHOOSE TO PASS A

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I DON'T BELIEVE THE

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WAS EVEN CONSIDERED.

                                 MR. BROWN:  RIGHT.  SO DO WE KNOW WHAT THE

                    IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WILL BE ON, SAY,

                    BUSINESSES OR INDUSTRY, OR PERHAPS EVEN LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR STATE

                    AGENCIES, FOR THAT MATTER?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I BELIEVE IT WILL BE POSITIVE TO

                    THE EXTENT THAT WE CAN HAVE A HEIGHTENED AWARENESS IN OUR CITIZENS OF

                    POWERS THAT WE, AS LEGISLATORS, HAVE AND EXPECT FOR US TO DO OUR JOB TO

                    PREVENT THE KIND OF CONFLICT AND NEGATIVITY THAT THEORETICALLY MIGHT --

                    MIGHT BE IN THE FUTURE IS SOMETHING THAT EMPOWERS OUR CITIZENS AND

                    SHOULD HELP EMPOWER ALSO ALL OF THE ACTIVITIES OF OUR SOCIETY, INCLUDING

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    OUR ENTERPRISING ACTIVITIES.

                                 MR. BROWN:  SO ON THAT NOTE, DO YOU THINK THIS

                    PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WILL GIVE A RISE TO CITIZEN SUITS

                    AGAINST THE STATE, THE COUNTY OR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE NOT

                    PROVIDED -- IF THEY DO NOT PROVIDE A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  NO, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THAT'S

                    THE CASE, AND I SAY THAT BECAUSE WE HAVE EXAMINED THE -- THE ISSUE THAT

                    YOU RAISE.  WE CALLED THE NATIONAL CONFERENCE OF STATE LEGISLATURES.

                    AS YOU MAY KNOW, THERE ARE SIX OTHER STATES THAT HAVE ALREADY PASSED

                    SIMILAR CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS AND HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF TIME TO SEE IF

                    THERE WAS ANY NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCE IN TERMS OF LITIGATION.  WE HAVE

                    BEEN FOLLOWING THIS AND TO DATE, WE HAVE NOT SEEN ANY INCREASE IN

                    CITIZEN LAWSUITS.

                                 MR. BROWN:  SO LET ME CUT TO THE CHASE.  I

                    APOLOGIZE, BUT I ONLY HAVE A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME.  USING THE MOST

                    EXTREME EXAMPLE, DO YOU THINK THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT COULD

                    GIVE A RISE TO A CITIZEN LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THAT THE STATE GOVERNMENT

                    HAS NOT PROVIDED A COVID-FREE ENVIRONMENT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  LISTEN, ANYONE CAN BRING A

                    LAWSUIT FOR ANY TIME THAT -- THAT THEY TALK TO A LAWYER.

                                 MR. BROWN:  WELL, THAT'S TRUE.  WELL, THAT'S TRUE.

                    WE ARE CREATING, BY VIRTUE OF THIS CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT, A RIGHT WHICH

                    ALSO CORRESPONDS WITH EXPECTATIONS, DOES IT NOT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  IF -- IF YOU'RE TRYING TO

                    SUGGEST THAT PLACING THIS BEFORE THE VOTERS OF THE STATE IS IN SOME WAY

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    GOING TO PREDICTABLY CAUSE MAYHEM, I WOULD RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH

                    THAT.  I DON'T SEE THAT --

                                 MR. BROWN:  I CAN FEEL MY TIME TICKING AWAY SO

                    I'M GOING TO GET TO SOME MORE QUESTIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BROWN.

                                 MR. BROWN:  YES, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SLOW DOWN.

                                 MR. BROWN:  I'M SORRY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  LET THE MAN ANSWER

                    -- THE MEMBER TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.  YOU STILL HAVE A SIGNIFICANT

                    AMOUNT OF TIME.

                                 MR. BROWN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YOU'RE WELCOME.

                                 MR. BROWN:  SO WITH RESPECT TO MANY OF THE

                    EXPECTATIONS THAT YOU CITED TO BEFORE, YOU STATED THAT MANY OF THESE

                    THINGS WE ALREADY HAVE THE RIGHT FOR UNDER STATE LAW AND FEDERAL LAW,

                    DO WE NOT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  CAN YOU REPEAT THE QUESTION?

                    I'M SORRY.

                                 MR. BROWN:  I SAID WE ALREADY HAVE MANY OF THESE

                    RIGHTS UNDER STATE LAW THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER,

                    RIGHT, PROTECTING OUR ENVIRONMENT.  WE HAVE MANY OF THESE RIGHTS

                    ALREADY UNDER STATE LAW AND FEDERAL LAW CURRENTLY ON THE BOOKS.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  WE DO NOT HAVE THESE FRAMED

                    AND GIVEN CONTEXT IN A MANNER THAT THIS WILL PROVIDE, AND WE HAVE NOT

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    GONE TO THE VOTERS THEMSELVES TO INVOLVE THEM IN -- IN THE PROCESS OF

                    MAKING SUCH A DETERMINATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR LEGISLATIVE

                    ACTIVITIES, THAT'S NEW; HOWEVER, AS YOU RIGHTLY POINT OUT, ON SPECIFIC

                    SUBJECT MATTERS, WE DO HAVE A LOT OF ENVIRONMENTAL LAW ALREADY IN

                    PLACE.

                                 MR. BROWN:  OKAY, AND I APPRECIATE THAT AND I

                    FULLY RESPECT THAT, ASSEMBLYMAN ENGLEBRIGHT.  I JUST WANT TO -- ON THE

                    BILL, I GUESS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. BROWN:  SO, MR. SPEAKER, I APPRECIATE

                    ASSEMBLYMAN ENGLEBRIGHT'S ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS, BUT I JUST WANT

                    TO POINT OUT FOR THE FELLOW MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY JUST SOME

                    CONTEXT.  THE CURRENT NEW YORK STATE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION

                    LAW SECTION 1-0101, DECLARATION OF POLICY STATES AND I QUOTE, "THE

                    QUALITY OF OUR ENVIRONMENT IS FUNDAMENTAL TO OUR CONCERN FOR THE

                    QUALITY OF LIFE.  IT IS HEREBY DECLARED THE POLICY OF THE STATE OF NEW

                    YORK TO CONSERVE, IMPROVE, AND PROTECT ITS NATURAL RESOURCES AND

                    ENVIRONMENT TO PREVENT AND ABATE AND CONTROL WATER, LAND, AND AIR

                    POLLUTION IN ORDER TO ENHANCE," AND THIS IS THE IMPORTANT PART, "ENHANCE

                    THE HEALTH, SAFETY, AND WELFARE OF THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE AND THEIR

                    OVERALL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL WELL-BEING."  FURTHERMORE, SECTION

                    47-0103 HAS A SIMILAR DECLARATION OF POLICY WHERE IT STATES, "LOCAL,

                    COUNTY, AND REGIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE IMPORTANCE OF ALL ASPECTS OF

                    THE ENVIRONMENT IS NECESSARY FOR THE MOST BALANCED USE OF NATURAL

                    RESOURCES."

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 THE POINT BEING, MR. SPEAKER, AND TO THE CHAIRMAN OF

                    THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION COMMITTEE AND THE SPONSOR OF THIS

                    BILL, IS THAT WE, AS A STATE, ALREADY HAVE THE PROCESS IN PLACE FOR

                    BALANCE IN OUR LAW, A BALANCE BETWEEN PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT AND

                    ALSO CREATING AN ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO THRIVE IN THIS STATE

                    WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT.  AND AS MUCH AS I -- I APPRECIATE

                    AND APPLAUD THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, I FEEL IT'S -- IT'S JUST A

                    "FEEL GOOD" BILL.  IT -- IT DOESN'T, HOWEVER, STRIKE THE PROPER BALANCE.  IT

                    IS TOO VAGUE AND IT'S UNCLEAR AS TO ENFORCEMENT, AND IT'S TOO

                    OPEN-ENDED.  AND I DON'T BELIEVE IT'S NECESSARY GIVEN THE CURRENT

                    FEDERAL, STATE AND ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS.  I FEEL LIKE IT'S GOING TO BOG

                    DOWN THE ALREADY OVERWHELMED STATE COURT SYSTEM WITH ADDITIONAL --

                    ADDITIONAL LAWSUITS AND AS MUCH AS I APPRECIATE THE ENDEAVOR, I AM

                    GOING TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT TO GIVE THE PEOPLE THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE

                    ON THE AMENDMENT.  SO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. BURDICK.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I STRONGLY

                    SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN PLACING THIS ON THE BALLOT.

                    AS THE CHAIR HAD INDICATED, YOU KNOW, WE CAN COME UP WITH SCORES

                    AND SCORES OF THEORETICAL AND REMOTE CONCERNS.  IT'S ALWAYS EASY TO SAY

                    NO ON A MEASURE SUCH AS THIS.  IT WOULD TAKE WEEKS, AS THE CHAIR

                    INDICATED, TO ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS EACH ONE OF THEM.  THERE'S NOTHING

                    INSIDIOUS OR MENACING HERE.  OTHER STATES HAVE ADOPTED THIS FORM OF

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND THE SKY DID NOT FALL; IN FACT, 43 STATES

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    HAVE SOME FORM OF EXPRESSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES IN THEIR

                    CONSTITUTIONS.  OUR NEIGHBORS IN PENNSYLVANIA ARE AMONG THEM.

                    ARTICLE 1, SECTION 27 OF THE PENNSYLVANIA CONSTITUTION ACTUALLY GOES

                    FURTHER:  NOT ONLY CLEAN AIR AND PURE WATER, BUT ALSO THE "PRESERVATION

                    OF THE NATURAL, SCENIC, HISTORIC, AND ESTHETIC VALUES OF THE

                    ENVIRONMENT," END QUOTE.

                                 RATHER THAN THE MAYHEM THAT IS FEARED, THIS ACTUALLY

                    WILL BE THE CONTRARY.  IT WILL PROVIDE A TREMENDOUS BOOST TO THE

                    OBJECTIVES OF THE CLCPA AND, YES, IT WILL PUT AN ONUS ON THE

                    LEGISLATURE TO DELIVER TO THE RESIDENTS OF THIS STATE.  THE CHAIR STATED IT

                    WOULD SHARPEN OUR RESPONSIBILITY, AND THAT'S RIGHT.  WE SHOULD BE HELD

                    ACCOUNTABLE.  WE SHOULD BE ACCOUNTABLE TO EVERYONE IN THE STATE FOR

                    PROVIDING THIS BASIC HUMAN RIGHT, AND I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH THE

                    MINORITY THAT IT WOULD TAKE US DOWN THE WRONG PATH.  I THINK IT WILL

                    TAKE US DOWN THE RIGHT PATH.  I WILL VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MS. KELLES.

                                 MS. KELLES:  YES, I JUST WANTED TO THANK THE

                    CHAIRMAN ENGLEBRIGHT FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD.  I THINK THIS IS AN

                    INCREDIBLY POSITIVE MOVE TO GIVE THE RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER TO THE

                    CITIZENS OF THIS STATE.  I DID WANT TO MAKE ONE CLARIFICATION AS I SEE THIS.

                    THIS -- THIS GIVES THE STATE AND ELECTED OFFICIALS A MANDATE TO ENSURE

                    CLEAN AIR AND WATER.  THIS IS A MANDATE NOT ONLY TO ENSURE CLEAN AIR AND

                    WATER, BUT TO USE THE EXISTING SCIENCE THAT WOULD DICTATE WHEN WE ARE

                    OR ARE NOT LEADING IN A DIRECTION OF CONTAMINATING AIR AND WATER, AND I

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THINK THAT THIS IS A -- THIS IS A WIN FOR SCIENCE IN THAT RIGHT.

                                 ONE THING THAT I WANTED TO JUST ADD HERE THAT I'M

                    FINDING A BIT CONCERNING IS THE DISCUSSION OF A RIGHT OF PRIVATE ACTION,

                    SPECIFICALLY AS IT PERTAINS TO ACTIONS OF ONE PRIVATE CITIZEN TO THE OTHER.

                    THIS IS A MANDATE TO OUR GOVERNMENT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER.  THIS IS

                    NOT A STIPULATION SPECIFIC TO ACTIONS BETWEEN PRIVATE CITIZENS.  AND SO, I

                    JUST WANTED TO MAKE THAT CLARIFICATION BECAUSE IT'S A BIT CONCERNING, I

                    THINK, THAT IT CAN BE MISLEADING TO THE PUBLIC, AND I THINK THAT THIS IS

                    REALLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT IS TELLING US, IT IS A GUIDANCE FOR US AND OUR

                    REGULATIONS TO ENSURE THAT WE ARE MOVING IN THE DIRECTION OF CLEAN AIR

                    AND WATER.

                                 I ALSO WANT TO POINT OUT THAT WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT

                    HISTORY AND ACTIONS THAT WERE TAKEN HISTORICALLY WITH RESPECT TO WHETHER

                    OR NOT THIS WAS ADDED OR NOT ADDED TO THE CONSTITUTION, AND I WOULD

                    HOPE THAT WE WOULD BE ALLOWED TO GROW AS HUMANS WITH NEW

                    KNOWLEDGE, AND RIGHT NOW WE ARE IN A TIME OF PROFOUND CLIMATE

                    CHANGE.  WE ARE NOT LOOKING AT SOMETHING IN THE FUTURE, WE ARE LOOKING

                    AT SOMETHING THAT IS PASSING US BY, THAT WE ARE IN RIGHT NOW.  SO

                    ESTABLISHING THIS IN THE MIDDLE OF THE PROFOUND CLIMATE CRISIS THAT WE'RE

                    IN IS THE RIGHT MOVE NOT ONLY FOR OUR CURRENT GENERATION, BUT FUTURE

                    GENERATIONS OF ALL CITIZENS, WHETHER THEY BE FARMERS, NOT FARMERS, LIVING

                    IN RURAL AREAS, LIVING IN URBAN AREAS.  THIS IS A MOVE BECAUSE OF THE

                    SCIENCE THAT WE HAVE SEEN IN CLIMATE CHANGE.  SO I JUST WANTED TO POINT

                    OUT THAT DISTINCTION, LEGALLY SPEAKING.  THIS IS A MANDATE TO STATES NOT

                    INTERFERING BETWEEN PRIVATE INDIVIDUALS.  SO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    BRINGING THIS FORWARD AND I AM ABSOLUTELY IN SUPPORT.  THANK YOU SO

                    MUCH, CHAIRMAN ENGLEBRIGHT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 MS. GALLAGHER.

                                 MS. GALLAGHER:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.  I AM ALSO

                    SPEAKING ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MA'AM.

                                 MS. GALLAGHER:  THANK YOU.  I LIVE IN

                    GREENPOINT, BROOKLYN, AND MY APARTMENT IS JUST A FEW BLOCKS FROM

                    NEWTOWN CREEK WHICH DURING THE GILDED AGE WAS NICKNAMED "THE

                    LITTLE MISSISSIPPI OF THE NORTH," WHICH WAS HOME TO MANY PRACTICES

                    THAT HAVE SINCE BEEN MADE ILLEGAL, BUT WE ARE STILL CLEANING UP THOSE

                    INDUSTRIES' MESS.  OUR WATER IS STILL NOT SWIMMABLE, OUR SEWAGE

                    OVERFLOW CONCERNS MAKE THIS A NEVER-ENDING COMMITMENT FOR CLEANUP.

                    THE LONG HISTORY OF ENVIRONMENTAL DEGRADATION AT THE HANDS OF INDUSTRY

                    IN THIS COMMUNITY HAS LASTED FOR OVER 100 YEARS, AND MY DISTRICT HAS

                    SUFFERED FROM ONE OF THE LARGEST OIL SPILLS IN THE COUNTRY'S HISTORY.  BOTH

                    IN THE AIR AND UNDER THE GROUND, WE SUFFER FROM EXTRA POLLUTION.  FROM

                    ABOVE, WE HAVE TRUCKS AND CARS SPEWING LEAD AND OTHER CHEMICALS INTO

                    OUR LUNGS FROM THE WILLIAMSBURG BRIDGE AND FROM THE

                    BROOKLYN/QUEENS EXPRESSWAY.  FROM UNDERGROUND, WE HAVE LEAD IN

                    THE SOIL AND A MULTITUDE OF PLUMES THAT INCLUDE AUTOIMMUNE

                    DISRUPTORS, CANCER-CAUSING AGENTS, AND HEAVY METALS.

                                 FOR GENERATIONS, MY COMMUNITY HAS FOUGHT BIG

                    INDUSTRY.  WE DID NOT NEED THIS BILL TO DO IT.  WE FOUGHT WITH LAWSUITS.

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AND WE'VE ALSO FOUGHT WITH ACTION AND WITH OUR OWN ELBOW GREASE.

                    SOMETIMES WE WIN, BUT THE STRUGGLE IS SO MUCH BIGGER AND SO MUCH

                    MORE -- FEELING INSURMOUNTABLE AT TIMES.  THE DEC IS UNDERFUNDED,

                    OUR WATER QUALITY STANDARDS ARE WELL BEHIND MODERN STANDARDS IN THE

                    REST OF THE COUNTRY, AND WE ARE IN CLIMATE CRISIS.  IT TAKES A GREAT DEAL OF

                    WILLPOWER TO STAND UP FOR YOUR RIGHT TO LIVE HEALTHFULLY, ESPECIALLY IF

                    YOU ARE STRUGGLING WITH POVERTY AND STRUCTURAL RACISM ON TOP OF ALL

                    ELSE.  THIS AMENDMENT WILL GRANT THAT BIT OF COURAGE THAT WE ALL NEED TO

                    SAY THAT THIS LAND IS OUR LAND AND THIS LAND IS YOUR LAND, THAT WE AND OUR

                    FAMILIES HAVE A RIGHT TO SURVIVE WITH THE BASIC NECESSITIES OFFERED BY A

                    CLEAN ENVIRONMENT.

                                 I AM IN FULL SUPPORT OF THIS BILL AND I WOULD LIKE TO

                    THANK CHAIRMAN ENGLEBRIGHT FOR BRINGING IT TO THE FLOOR.  MY

                    COMMUNITY NEEDS THIS BILL AND WE NEED THE SUPPORT OF THE

                    CONSTITUTION.  THANK YOU.  I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. GOTTFRIED.

                                 MR. GOTTFRIED:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  YOU

                    KNOW, IN 1776 THE FIRST DRAFT OF THE DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE SAID

                    THAT WE ARE ENDOWED WITH THE RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY, AND PROPERTY.

                    FORTUNATELY, THOMAS JEFFERSON HAD THE GOOD SENSE TO CHANGE THAT TO

                    LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.  OUR RIGHTS ARE MORE THAN --

                    THAN THE RIGHT TO PROPERTY, AND THIS AMENDMENT RECOGNIZES SOME RIGHTS

                    THAT MIGHT HAVE BEEN EXPRESSED IN SOME OF OUR STATUTES, BUT I THINK THE

                    RIGHT TO A CLEAN ENVIRONMENT IS SOMETHING THAT IS IMPORTANT ENOUGH

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THAT IT OUGHT TO BE RECOGNIZED IN OUR CONSTITUTION.  AND THAT'S WHAT THIS

                    DOES.

                                 NOW, WHAT IS A RIGHT?  YOU KNOW, IF YOU CAN'T ENFORCE

                    SOMETHING, YOU REALLY CAN'T CALL IT A "RIGHT."  YOU KNOW, I MIGHT THINK I

                    HAVE THE RIGHT TO VANILLA ICE CREAM, BUT THERE'S REALLY NO WAY FOR ME TO

                    ENFORCE THAT RIGHT.  SO IT ISN'T REALLY A "RIGHT."  AND OUR RIGHTS SHOULD

                    NOT, IN AMERICA, SHOULD NOT BE SEEN AS SOMETHING THAT IS GRACIOUSLY

                    ENFORCED ON OUR BEHALF BY THE LEGISLATURE.  YES, THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD

                    BE PROTECTING OUR -- OUR RIGHTS, BUT WE SHOULDN'T BE TOTALLY BEHOLDEN TO

                    THE LEGISLATURE TO BE PROTECTING OUR RIGHTS.

                                 YOU KNOW, WE'VE HAD A LOT OF TALK HERE TODAY ABOUT

                    WHETHER, OH MY GOODNESS, CAN WE -- DOES THIS GIVE US A RIGHT NOT TO

                    HAVE BAD SMELLS COMING OVER FROM OUR NEIGHBORHOOD -- OUR NEIGHBOR'S

                    PROPERTY.  WELL, I DON'T THINK ANYONE REALLY DOUBTS WHETHER IF YOUR

                    NEIGHBORHOOD -- IF YOUR NEIGHBOR IS PRODUCING POLLUTED WATER THAT

                    MIGRATES TO YOUR PROPERTY THAT THAT POLLUTED WATER IS A VIOLATION OF YOUR

                    RIGHTS FOR WHICH YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO HAVE LEGAL RECOURSE.  WHY

                    SHOULD IT BE DIFFERENT IF YOUR NEIGHBOR IS SENDING AIR AS OPPOSED TO

                    WATER ONTO YOUR PROPERTY THAT CAN SICKEN YOU?

                                 NOW, A BAD SMELL IS NOT NECESSARILY UNCLEAN OR

                    UNHEALTHY, AND IN MANY CASES IT WOULDN'T BE RECOGNIZED AS ANY KIND OF

                    RIGHT TO BE FREE OF A -- OF A SMELL YOU DON'T LIKE.  BUT A BAD SMELL MIGHT

                    BE INDICATIVE OF SOMETHING REALLY SERIOUS.  AND A BAD SMELL COMING

                    FROM YOUR NEIGHBOR'S PROPERTY MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT IS SO SEVERE

                    THAT IT IS ESSENTIALLY DEPRIVING YOU OF THE USE OF YOUR PROPERTY, IN

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WHICH CASE ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'VE HAD COURTS FOR THE LAST, I

                    DON'T KNOW, THOUSAND OR SO YEARS OF ANGLO-SAXON AMERICAN HISTORY IS

                    TO PROTECT US IN CIRCUMSTANCES LIKE THAT.  THAT'S AMONG THE REASONS WHY

                    WE HAVE COURTS TO PROTECT OUR RIGHTS, AND IT'S ALSO WHY OCCASIONALLY WE

                    NEED TO TAKE ACTION TO ADD TO THE BUNDLE OF RIGHTS THAT WE, AS NEW

                    YORKERS, ARE ENTITLED TO.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. FORREST.

                                 MS. SOUFFRANT FORREST:  THANK YOU.  MR.

                    SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MA'AM.

                                 MS. SOUFFRANT FORREST:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER AND THANK YOU, CHAIRMAN ENGLEBRIGHT.  I ABSOLUTELY LOVE THIS

                    BILL.  THIS BILL SETS THE EXPECTATION FOR ALL CITIZENS, CORPORATIONS,

                    GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, THAT THE ENVIRONMENT SHOULD BE SAFE.  EVERY

                    NEW YORKER SHOULD EXPECT AND TRUST THAT THE WATER THAT THEY'RE

                    DRINKING IS CLEAN AND SAFE FROM TOXIN.  THE EXPECTATION AND TRUST THAT

                    EVERYONE IS HELD ACCOUNTABLE, THAT THE AIR IS SAFE AND CLEAN, AND THAT

                    YOU SHOULD EXPECT THAT THE AIR THAT YOU'RE BREATHING WILL NOT TRIGGER

                    ASTHMA, COPD OR ANYTHING ELSE.

                                 THIS BILL SAYS THAT NEW YORK STATE, THAT ITS VALUE --

                    THAT IT VALUES ITS ENVIRONMENT AND BELIEVE THAT IT'S A RESOURCE THAT

                    SHOULD BE AVAILABLE TO ALL REGARDLESS OF WHERE YOU LIVE, THE COLOR OF

                    YOUR SKIN, OR YOUR SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS.  VOTERS SHOULD UNDERSTAND

                    AND BE EDUCATED THROUGH THIS CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE THAT THEIR -- THAT

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THEIR -- THAT THEIR STATE VALUES THEIR HEALTH AND ACCESS TO QUALITY OF LIFE.

                    NEW YORKERS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO FIGHT AND DEFEND WHAT -- THOSE

                    VALUES.  WE FIGHT FOR SPEECH, WE FIGHT FOR GUNS; THIS BILL SAYS THAT YOU

                    HAVE THE RIGHT TO FIGHT FOR CLEAN SPACE, PERIOD.  AS A LEGISLATOR, I DON'T

                    CONCERN MYSELF TOO MUCH ABOUT POTENTIAL COURTS -- EXCUSE ME,

                    POTENTIAL TORTS OR LEGAL CASES.  I, AS A LEGISLATOR, MY JOB IS TO DEFEND

                    RIGHTS FOR PEOPLE.  I -- I VOTE FIRMLY AND PROUDLY IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. GLICK.

                                 MS. GLICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I WAS NOT

                    GOING TO SPEAK ON THIS BILL, BUT LISTENING TO THE DEBATE CAUSED ME TO

                    FEEL LIKE I WANTED TO WEIGH IN JUST A LITTLE BIT.  CURRENTLY, UNDER CURRENT

                    LAW, PEOPLE CAN, IN FACT, BRING SUITS.  THE A -- THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

                    CAN INTERVENE IN CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES UNDER CURRENT LAW.  THIS DOES

                    NOT CHANGE THE LAW.  WHAT IT DOES IS THAT IT CREATES A CONSTITUTIONAL

                    MARKER THAT ENSURES THAT WHILE LAWS CAN CHANGE, THE BASIC

                    UNDERPINNING OF THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT.

                                 ONE OF OUR COLLEAGUES REFERENCED THE FACT THAT MANY

                    PEOPLE MOVE FROM THE CITY TO SUBURBAN OR -- OR RURAL AREAS, AND I

                    WOULD SIMPLY SAY AS SOMEONE WHO HAS DONE THAT FOR WEEKENDS AND

                    SUMMER, THE SWEET SMELL OF MANURE IS A MARKER OF A CERTAIN TIME OF THE

                    YEAR, AND IT REALLY IS INCUMBENT UPON REAL ESTATE AGENTS TO POINT OUT TO

                    PEOPLE, AS DID OUR REAL -- REALTOR THAT WE WERE MOVING INTO AN

                    AGRICULTURAL COMMUNITY; THAT THERE WOULD BE NOISES AT SOME TIME THAT

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WOULD INVOLVE MAYBE QUARRYING, WHICH IS JUST DOWN THE ROAD; THAT

                    THERE MIGHT BE SMELLS THAT WE WERE UNACCUSTOMED TO; THERE IS A SLURRY

                    DOWN THE -- JUST DOWN THE ROAD AND THERE ARE TIMES WHEN THE FIELD IS

                    FERTILIZED THAT THERE IS A -- AN ODOR CARRIED ON THE BREEZE, BUT IT

                    DISSIPATES.  THIS IS, YOU KNOW, LIVING IN THE COUNTRY IS NOT SOMETHING

                    THAT PEOPLE FROM THE CITY ARE ANXIOUS TO DO IN ORDER TO DISRUPT THE LIVES

                    OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN LIVING FOR GENERATIONS PROVIDING FOOD TO

                    OTHER NEW YORKERS.  SO I THINK SOME OF THIS IS A BIT OVERBLOWN, AND I

                    UNDERSTAND THERE'S ANXIETY, BUT IT'S, I THINK, NOT SOMETHING THAT IS LIKELY,

                    BY PASSING THIS, TO CREATE GREATER CONFUSION OR GREATER SENSE OF

                    DISRUPTION TO THE LIVES OF PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN LIVING IN RURAL

                    COMMUNITIES.

                                 I WOULD ALSO JUST LIKE TO POINT OUT, MR. SPEAKER, THAT

                    SINCE WE ARE NOT IN THE CHAMBER AND WE ARE OPERATING REMOTELY, IT IS A

                    LITTLE MORE DIFFICULT FOR THE DEBATE TO OCCUR, AND PERHAPS AT SOME POINT

                    WE SHOULD REMIND MEMBERS, ESPECIALLY NEW MEMBERS, THAT THIS IS NOT A

                    COURT OF LAW, BUT RATHER AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO HAVE AN EXCHANGE OF

                    IDEAS BETWEEN COLLEAGUES, AND THAT WE GIVE EACH OTHER A CHANCE TO

                    ANSWER AND THAT WE ARE NOT DEFENDANTS ON -- IN A COURT, OR WITNESSES AT

                    -- IN A COURTROOM.

                                 SO WITH THAT, MR. SPEAKER, I WANT TO JUST THANK MR.

                    ENGLEBRIGHT FOR HIS CONSTANCY IN TRYING TO PROTECT NEW YORK'S

                    ENVIRONMENT, AND THAT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WHICH WILL GO

                    BEFORE THE PUBLIC WILL BE SOMETHING THAT WILL CREATE A FRAMEWORK IN THE

                    CONSTITUTION AND THAT THE VAGARIES OF LAWMAKING WILL NOT UNDERMINE.

                                         67



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AND WITH THAT, I LEND MY SUPPORT TO THE MEASURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THANK YOU.  LIKE MY COLLEAGUE, I

                    -- I HAD ALSO NOT PLANNED TO SPEAK ON THIS BILL, BUT I'VE BEEN INSPIRED.

                    THERE'S NOTHING IN THIS AMENDMENT THAT CREATES A PRIVATE RIGHT OF

                    ACTION.  I KNOW SEVERAL OF US HAVE SAID THAT, BUT I FEEL IT BEARS

                    REPEATING:  A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION MUST BE AFFIRMATIVELY CONVEYED.

                    IT CANNOT BE READ BACKWARDS INTO A LAW.  THERE IS NOTHING THAT GIVES A

                    CITIZEN AN EXPLICIT RIGHT TO SUE ANOTHER PRIVATE CITIZEN OR PRIVATE

                    CORPORATION, A LANDFILL, A FARM, A WIND TURBINE MANUFACTURER, UNDER THIS

                    LAW.  IF TWITTER BANS SOMEONE FOR VIOLATING THEIR COMMUNITY STANDARDS,

                    THE BANNED PERSON DOES NOT SUE THE GOVERNMENT BECAUSE TWITTER

                    VIOLATED THEIR RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH.  IT'S NOT HOW THESE LAWS WORK.  AND

                    I THINK THAT THERE HAS BEEN A LOT OF DISCUSSION AROUND THE MANY

                    SCENARIOS THAT LITIGATION CAN ARISE IN WITHOUT CONTEMPLATING, AS SEVERAL

                    OF MY OTHER COLLEAGUES HAVE POINTED OUT, THAT OTHER AREAS OF LITIGATION

                    ARE ALREADY OPEN AND EXIST FOR ATTENDING TO THESE ISSUES.

                                 I, TOO, HAVE A LANDFILL IN MY DISTRICT.  THERE ARE

                    CURRENTLY TWO LAWSUITS PENDING SURROUNDING THE SMELL AND OTHER

                    ATTENDANT ISSUES OF THIS LANDFILL.  PUBLIC NUISANCE, LAND USE LAWS,

                    NEGLIGENCE, WE HAVE ANY NUMBER OF AVENUES FOR PEOPLE TO BRING SUIT

                    FOR EXACTLY THE KIND OF PROBLEMS CONTEMPLATED BY MY COLLEAGUES

                    TODAY.  THIS AMENDMENT DOES NOT CONVEY UPON THE CITIZENRY ANY

                    ADDITIONAL RIGHTS OF ACTION AGAINST OTHER BUSINESSES, AGAINST OTHER

                                         68



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PEOPLE, AGAINST THEIR NEIGHBORS.  WHAT IT DOES DO IS EXPRESSLY VEST IN

                    THE PEOPLE AN AFFIRMATIVE RIGHT.  IT TAKES FROM US, AS A GOVERNMENT, THE

                    POWER TO HARM OUR PEOPLE WITHOUT REPERCUSSION.  IT ALLOWS THE PEOPLE

                    TO HOLD TO ACCOUNT NOT JUST THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY, BUT ALL FUTURE

                    LEGISLATIVE BODIES, IF WE ATTEMPT TO ROLL BACK THE GOOD ENVIRONMENTAL

                    PROGRESS THAT WE HAVE MADE.  IT HOLDS US ACCOUNTABLE BY GIVING THE

                    POWER BACK TO THE PEOPLE.  AND THAT'S WHAT THIS AMENDMENT IS ABOUT.

                                 THIS ISN'T A GESTURE.  THIS AMENDMENT ENSURES THAT OUR

                    PLANET, OUR HEALTH, AND OUR CHILDREN'S FUTURES WILL NOT BE SUBJECT TO THE

                    WHIM OF POLITICS OR THE FASHION OF THE DAY.  IT REAFFIRMS OUR

                    COMMITMENT TO MAKING NEW YORK A CLIMATE ACTION LEADER THROUGHOUT

                    THE COUNTRY AND THE WORLD.  I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, AND THANK YOU

                    VERY MUCH TO THE CHAIR AND TO ALL THE ADVOCATES WHO HAVE FOUGHT FOR

                    THIS BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. SEPTIMO.

                                 MS. SEPTIMO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MA'AM.

                                 MS. SEPTIMO:  SO RIGHT NOW WE'RE DEBATING A

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO GUARANTEE THE RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND

                    CLEAN WATER TO EVERY NEW YORKER.  AND SOME COLLEAGUES HAVE

                    MENTIONED THAT THEY BELIEVE THE FEDERAL REGULATIONS GO FAR ENOUGH TO

                    GUARANTEE THIS.  WELL, I WANTED TO POINT OUT FIRST THAT THE FIRST FEDERAL

                    CLEAN WATER REGULATIONS BEGAN IN 1948, BUT IN YEAR 2000, A RUSTED CAR

                                         69



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    WAS PULLED OUT OF THE BRONX RIVER.  AND FEDERAL CLEAN AIR REGULATIONS

                    BEGAN IN 1950, BUT TODAY, IN 2021, CHILDREN WHERE I GREW UP IN THE

                    NEIGHBORHOOD OF HUNTS POINT IN THE BRONX STILL HAVE ASTHMA ATTACKS AS

                    THE NUMBER ONE REASON THEY MISS SCHOOL EACH YEAR.  THE SOUTH BRONX

                    HAS MORE THAN 30,000 TRACTOR TRAILER TRUCKS DRIVE THROUGH THE AREA EACH

                    DAY, AND THOUSANDS MORE CARS.  AND THE EFFECT OF THIS IS THAT THE SOUTH

                    BRONX HAS THE HIGHEST ASTHMA RATE IN THE ENTIRE NATION - THE HIGHEST

                    ASTHMA RATE IN THE ENTIRE NATION - AND, YET, WE ARE HERE DEBATING

                    WHETHER OR NOT TO GUARANTEE THE RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND CLEAR WATER TO

                    EVERY NEW YORKER.

                                 I HEAR COLLEAGUES DISCUSSING SOME OF THE UNCERTAINTY

                    THEY THINK WILL ARISE WITH THE PASSAGE OF THIS AMENDMENT BECAUSE THEY

                    ARE CONCERNED ABOUT LITIGATION AND HEIGHTENED RESPONSIBILITY, AND HAVE

                    EVEN GONE AS FAR AS SUGGESTING EXEMPTIONS.  AND I WANT TO CENTER WHAT

                    WE'RE REALLY TALKING ABOUT:  EXEMPTIONS ABOUT A GUARANTEED RIGHT TO

                    CLEAN AND CLEAN WATER.  THAT WOULD BE A LIST OF TIMES OR SITUATIONS

                    WHERE WE BELIEVE PEOPLE ARE NOT ENTITLED TO LIVE WITH CLEAN AIR AND

                    CLEAN WATER.

                                 THIS MEASURE WILL SIMPLY MAKE IT SO THAT COMPANIES,

                    DEVELOPERS, GOVERNMENTS, AND EVERYONE IN BETWEEN MUST BE THOUGHTFUL

                    ABOUT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND HOW THAT IMPACT RELATES TO REAL LIVING,

                    BREATHING PEOPLE.  THERE'S A -- ACTUALLY, A COMMON PHRASE TO DISCUSS

                    THE SOUTH BRONX'S HISTORY THAT YOU MAY HAVE HEARD THAT SAYS, THE

                    BRONX IS BURNING, BUT THANKS TO THE WORK OF ORGANIZATIONS LIKE THE

                    POINT CDC, YOUTH MINISTRIES FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE, MOTHERS ON THE

                                         70



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    MOVE, THE NEW YORK CITY ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE ALLIANCE, ROCKING

                    THE VOTE, THE BRONX RIVER ALLIANCE, AND SO MANY OTHERS, THAT PHRASE

                    HAS BECOME THAT, THE BRONX IS BREATHING.  TODAY WE HAVE BEAVERS AND

                    SCHOOLS OF FISH REGULARLY IN THE BRONX RIVER, AND ORGANIZATIONS WHO

                    USE RIVER WORK AS A TOOL FOR DEVELOPMENT FOR YOUNG PEOPLE.  AND WHILE

                    THIS SPEAKS TO REMARKABLE DEVELOPMENT, AS LONG AS PEOPLE ARE

                    UNHEALTHIER DUE TO THE AIR THEY BREATHE, AS LONG AS POLLUTING INDUSTRIES

                    ARE ALLOWED TO THRIVE AT THE EXPENSE OF INDIVIDUALS, AND AS LONG AS

                    ASTHMA COULD EVER BE THE NUMBER ONE REASON CHILDREN MISS SCHOOL, WE

                    HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO DO.

                                 I'M SO PROUD TO SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION THAT FINALLY

                    GUARANTEES WHAT WE, IN THE BRONX, KNOW TO BE TRUE, WHICH IS THAT CLEAN

                    AIR AND CLEAN WATER ARE RIGHTS THAT SHOULD BE FIERCELY PROTECTED,

                    DEFENDED, AND EXPANDED.  AND I LOOK FORWARD TO CONTINUING TO SET HIGH

                    STANDARDS FOR AIR QUALITY AND CONTINUE -- CONTINUING TO EXPAND

                    WATERFRONT ACCESS FOR COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT NEW YORK.  BUT FOR

                    NOW, I STRONGLY SUPPORT THIS MEASURE FOR PROVIDING THE SPACE FOR ALL OF

                    US TO BREATHE A BIT MORE FREELY.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. EPSTEIN.

                                 MR. EPSTEIN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. EPSTEIN:  I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR

                    BRINGING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT FORWARD, AND I'M PROUD TO BE

                                         71



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    A COSPONSOR OF THIS.  FIRST, WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT PEOPLE OVER PROFITS.

                    THIS BILL CENTERS AROUND THE NEEDS OF NORMAL HUMAN BEINGS, NORMAL

                    NEW YORKERS.  THE IMPACT IT WILL HAVE TO PROVIDE CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN

                    WATER IS IMMEASURABLE.  WE'VE SEEN TIME AND TIME AGAIN INCIDENTS OF

                    PEOPLE DENIED ACCESS TO CLEAN WATER, THE RISK OF EXPOSURE, THE RISK OF

                    LEAD PAINT, THE RISK OF HEALTHY AIR.  WHETHER IT'S ASTHMA THAT WE'VE SEEN

                    WITH MY CHILDREN IN THE LOWER EAST SIDE, OR WE'VE HEARD CHILDREN IN

                    THE BRONX, THE RISK IS TOO HIGH.  THE RISK OF WATER POLLUTION THROUGHOUT

                    THE STATE, WHERE MY MOTHER LIVES ON LONG ISLAND, WHERE OTHER CITIZENS

                    UPSTATE WE'VE HEARD TIME AND TIME AGAIN, THE RISK IS HIGH.

                                 THE QUESTION BEFORE YOU AND BEFORE US ALL IS:  WHEN IS

                    IT TOO LATE FOR NEW YORK TO ACT?  TODAY IS A DAY FOR NEW YORK TO ACT.

                    WE MUST STAND TOGETHER, STAND FOR THE ENVIRONMENT, STAND FOR OUR

                    CHILDREN, STAND FOR THE NEW YORKERS TO COME AND SAY WE, AS A

                    LEGISLATURE, BELIEVE YOU HAVE A RIGHT, A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AIR AND

                    WATER, AND WE'RE GOING TO FIGHT FOR THAT FOR YOU FOR GENERATIONS TO

                    COME.  I'M DEEPLY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS.  I APPLAUD THE SPONSOR AND

                    ENCOURAGE US TO DO AS MUCH AS WE CAN TO GET THIS PASSED, GET IT OUT OF

                    THE LEGISLATURE, AND GET IT PASSED ON THE BALLOT IN NOVEMBER.  THANK

                    YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I'M GLAD TO COSPONSOR AND SUPPORT THIS BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.

                                 MS. GIGLIO.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, WILL

                                         72



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I YIELD.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  GOOD AFTERNOON, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  GOOD AFTERNOON.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  I JUST HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.  I

                    WANTED TO KNOW IF THERE WAS ANY FUNDING FOR ANY OF THE PLUMES THAT

                    HAVE COME OUT OF THE GRUMMAN FACILITIES.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THE FUNDING IS SOMETHING

                    THAT IS CONTEMPLATED FOR -- WITHIN OUR CURRENT BUDGET AS PROPOSED BY

                    THE EXECUTIVE.  WHAT WE HAVE DONE THERE IS ADVANCE APPROXIMATELY

                    $26 MILLION OF STATE FUNDS.  WE'RE LOOKING TO HAVE A SETTLEMENT WITH

                    NORTHROP GRUMMAN AND THE U.S. NAVY THAT WOULD RETURN THAT MONEY

                    TO US.  WE'RE PRESENTLY USING THE FUNDS -- OR ANTICIPATING IF WE PASS THE

                    BUDGET WITH THIS AS PROPOSED, USING ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES ACCOUNT

                    FUNDS.  AS YOU KNOW, ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGES ACCOUNT, IT HAS A SOLE

                    TRUSTEE, IT'S THE COMMISSIONER OF THE DEC.  SO THE ANSWER IS YES, WE

                    ARE PLANNING TO USE SOME STATE MONEY, WE'RE HOPING TO BE REIMBURSED.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  WELL, THAT'S WONDERFUL NEWS.  AND MY

                    SECOND QUESTION IS:  DO YOU THINK THAT IT IS HEALTHY OR HEALTHFUL TO SELL

                    RECREATIONAL MARIHUANA WITHIN 500 FEET OF A SCHOOL DISTRICT WHEN

                    SCHOOL DISTRICTS OFTEN LEAVE THEIR WINDOWS OPEN AND IN THE SPRING AND

                    IN THE SUMMER, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR THE SMOKING OF MARIHUANA IN

                    CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE SCHOOLS COULD HAVE A HEALTH RISK TO THOSE

                    STUDENTS?

                                         73



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THAT -- MY OWN PARTICULAR

                    OPINION IS THAT THAT'S NOT RELEVANT NECESSARILY TO THE MEASURE BEFORE US,

                    BUT I DON'T -- I WOULD NOT FAVOR THAT PERSONALLY.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  OKAY.  THANK YOU TO THE SPONSOR.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MA'AM.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  I THINK EVERYONE IN THE CHAMBER AND

                    ALL THE ASSEMBLY AND SENATE AND ALL OF OUR ELECTED LEADERS AGREE THAT

                    EVERYBODY SHOULD HAVE A RIGHT TO CLEAN WATER AND A HEALTHFUL

                    ENVIRONMENT.  THE GRUMMAN FACILITY IN MY DISTRICT DOES HAVE A PLUME

                    THAT HAS AFFECTED SEVERAL DRINKING WATER WELLS WITHIN THE VICINITY.  THE

                    STATE LOWERED THE STANDARDS OF THE PARTS PER TRILLION FROM 70 PARTS PER

                    TRILLION TO 10 PARTS PER TRILLION, AND THE NAVY IS NOT ACKNOWLEDGING

                    THAT.  SO, A SMALL MUNICIPALITY LIKE THE TOWN OF RIVERHEAD WITH THEIR

                    OWN WATER DISTRICT COULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING NEARLY $5 MILLION IN

                    CONNECTING THESE PEOPLE TO PUBLIC WATER.  SO, I HOPE THAT THE FUNDING

                    DOES GET PASSED AND THE RIVERHEAD MUNICIPALITY DOES GET THE MONEY TO

                    EXTEND PUBLIC WATER TO THOSE PEOPLE WHOSE WELLS HAVE BEEN TESTED AND

                    HAVE CONTAMINANTS IN THEM, NUMBER ONE.

                                 NUMBER TWO, THE -- THE FARMERS AND THE DUST IN A VERY

                    HEAVY AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT AND SEEING THE OPPOSITION LETTERS FROM ALL OF

                    THE FARM BUREAUS IN THE -- IN UPSTATE, IT'S A CONCERN THAT FARMERS

                    WOULD HAVE TO, IF THERE WAS AN ACTION BROUGHT AGAINST THEM BECAUSE IT

                    IS A RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR UNDER THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION, IF THIS

                    SHOULD PASS, TO SELL THEIR PROPERTIES AND CREATE RESIDENTIAL DWELLINGS ON

                                         74



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THOSE FARMS, WHICH WOULD HEAVILY IMPACT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT.

                                 I COME FROM THE NORTH FORK OF LONG ISLAND, WHICH IS

                    A -- A TOURISM DISTRICT.  PEOPLE COME OUT FOR THE FARMS.  PEOPLE COME

                    OUT TO GO OUT ON THE FERRY, TO GO TO GREENPORT, TO ENJOY THE WATERFRONT

                    COMMUNITY, SO CLEAN WATER IS OF UTMOST IMPORTANCE.  WHEN IT COMES TO

                    JOB CREATION AND MANUFACTURING AND TRUCKS CARRYING FINISHED GOODS TO

                    OTHER DESTINATIONS EITHER IN THE STATE OR OUTSIDE OF THE STATE, I -- I -- I'M

                    CONCERNED THAT SOMEBODY COULD SAY THERE'S TOO MANY TRUCKS COMING

                    OUT OF THAT FACILITY THAT'S CREATING THOUSANDS OF JOBS FOR THE NEIGHBORING

                    RESIDENTS.  SO THERE ARE A LOT OF THINGS THAT CONCERN ME WITH THIS.  I -- I

                    SAID I AGREE, WE ALL BELIEVE IN CLEAN AIR, WATER, AND A HEALTHY

                    ENVIRONMENT.  AND I WILL LEAVE IT UP TO THE VOTERS IN MY DISTRICT TO

                    DECIDE ON THE BALLOT AND REFERENDUM AS TO WHAT THE COSTS ARE ASSOCIATED

                    WITH THIS AND THE RIGHTS UNDER THE NEW NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION AS

                    AMENDED.  SO, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, BUT I WILL BE TALKING

                    TO MY CONSTITUENTS ABOUT ALL OF MY CONCERNS, AND I WILL BE LISTENING TO

                    THEIRS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. PHILLIP STECK.

                                 MR. STECK:  VERY BRIEFLY ON THE BILL, MR. CHAIRMAN

                    -- MR. SPEAKER, I MEAN.  OF COURSE EVERYONE IS FOR CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN

                    WATER, BUT FOR SOME, LAWS ARE ONLY SYMBOLIC OF OUR ASPIRATIONS.  I

                    DISAGREE.  I FAVOR ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW.  LAWS ARE MEANT TO BE REAL

                    AND REALLY ACCOMPLISH THINGS, NOT JUST TO BE AVOIDED EVERY TIME

                    SOMEONE CONJURES UP A DOOMSDAY SCENARIO.  STEP TWO IS TO ACTUALLY

                                         75



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PROVIDE FUNDING SO WE CAN HAVE CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER.  THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS A CRITICAL STEP IN THAT PROCESS, THEREFORE,

                    I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. ANDERSON.

                                 MR. ANDERSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, AND

                    THANK YOU TO MY COLLEAGUES WHO ARE JOINING ME TODAY IN SUPPORT OF

                    THIS CRITICALLY, CRITICALLY IMPORTANT AMENDMENT TO OUR STATE'S

                    CONSTITUTION.  OUR RESIDENTS HERE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAVE THE

                    RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT.  AND TODAY

                    WE'RE AFFIRMING THAT RIGHT, MR. SPEAKER, BY PASSING THIS VERY, VERY

                    CRITICAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.  AND WE ARE MAKING SURE THAT IN

                    THIS MOMENT, INSTANCES WHERE COMMUNITIES OF COLOR WHO ARE

                    PREDOMINANTLY IMPACTED BY AIR POLLUTION AND WATER POLLUTION ARE

                    PRIORITIZED AND REMEMBERED IN THIS RIGHT THAT ALL OF OUR RESIDENTS HERE

                    IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAVE, HERE IN -- OR WILL HAVE.

                                 HERE IN SOUTHEAST QUEENS AND PARTS OF THE DISTRICT THAT

                    I REPRESENT, THERE HAS BEEN A HISTORY OF CHEMICALS BEING USED, THE SAME

                    CHEMICALS THAT ARE USED IN DRY CLEANING -- DRY CLEANERS AND AUTO REPAIR

                    SHOPS DETECTED IN OUR WATER SUPPLY JUST TEN TO 15 SHORT YEARS AGO.  WE

                    HAVE CONSISTENT AIRPLANE FLYOVERS AS JFK AIRPORT IS IN THE HEART OF MY

                    ASSEMBLY DISTRICT.  AND SO, THIS MOMENT BY PASSING THIS AMENDMENT,

                    WE ARE SAYING TO THOSE PEOPLE, TO THOSE RESIDENTS, TO THOSE FAMILIES, TO

                    THOSE COMMUNITIES THAT BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS OF CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN

                    WATER ARE A PRIORITY FOR THE STATE, AND I LOOK FORWARD TO VOTING IN THE

                                         76



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS BILL, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS BILL.  I FIRST WANT TO THANK THE

                    SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL, WHICH IS A GREAT BILL THAT RELATES TO THE

                    CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTH -- HEALTHY

                    ENVIRONMENT.  THIS BILL WILL GUARANTEE OUR LEGAL AND CONSTITUTIONAL

                    RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT.  A FEW YEARS

                    AGO, WE WITNESSED THE FLINT WATER CRISIS.  BETWEEN 6,000 AND 12,000

                    CHILDREN WERE EXPOSED TO DRINKING WATER WITH HIGH LEVELS OF LEAD.  THIS

                    IS UNACCEPTABLE FOR ANY STATE IN OUR NATION.  UNFORTUNATELY, NEW

                    YORKERS ARE FREQUENTLY LEFT QUESTIONING WHAT IS IN OUR WATER.  IN MY

                    APARTMENT IN BROOKLYN, MY OWN TAP WATER IS FREQUENTLY BROWN AND

                    MURKY.  MY CONSTITUENTS ARE ALSO OFTEN CONCERNED BY THE QUALITY AND

                    COLOR OF THEIR WATER.

                                 WITH MANY HOMES SO CLOSE TO HIGHWAYS AND MAJOR

                    EXPRESSWAYS IN BROOKLYN, ASTHMA IS A CONCERN FOR MANY RESIDENTS OF

                    OUR BOROUGH.  HEALTHY AIR QUALITY IS MORE IMPORTANT NOW THAN EVER.

                    WITH HEALTH CARE DISPARITIES EXPOSED, OUR CENTRAL BROOKLYN NEIGHBORS

                    MUST BE PROTECTED FROM THE ENDLESS POLLUTANTS IN OUR CITY'S AIR AND

                    WATER.  I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER RIGHTS MUST

                    BE PROTECTED.  WE DESERVE THE RIGHT TO PROTECT OUR HEALTH.  THANK YOU,

                    MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                         77



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MR. SIMPSON.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  MR. SPEAKER, I REPRESENT PROBABLY

                    ONE OF THE MOST RESOURCE-RICH DISTRICTS IN NEW YORK STATE.  AND, YOU

                    KNOW, IT'S OUR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS IN THE ADIRONDACKS THAT HAS

                    PROVIDED FOR MUCH NEEDED REVENUE TO ALL OF OUR COMMUNITIES.  AND

                    OUR ENVIRONMENT IS ONE OF OUR HIGHEST PRIORITIES.  WE'VE SEEN WHERE

                    CURRENT REGULATIONS HAVE FAILED.  THE HUDSON RIVER, WHICH IS A MIGHTY

                    RIVER THAT RUNS THROUGH OUR DISTRICT, IS FOREVER POLLUTED.  WE CANNOT EAT

                    MORE THAN A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF FISH OUT OF THAT RIVER.  NOW, THAT MAY BE

                    MINOR, BUT THAT'S HUNDREDS OF YEARS OF TRYING TO RECTIFY THAT IN THE FUTURE

                    BEFORE THAT CAN BE CORRECTED.

                                 AND I JUST WANT TO ASK EVERYONE A SIMPLE QUESTION:  IF

                    NOT WHEN -- IF NOT NOW, WHEN ARE WE GOING TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES IN

                    THE ENVIRONMENT AND PROTECT THIS FOR THE FUTURE GENERATIONS?  I WILL BE

                    VOTING AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS BILL, AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL TO CLOSE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  YES, I YIELD.

                                         78



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.

                    EVERY YEAR, WE HAVE A NUMBER OF ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS AND

                    STATUTES THAT GO THROUGH OUR ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE, OF WHICH

                    YOU'RE THE CHAIR - I THINK YOU'VE DONE A -- A GREAT JOB FOR MANY YEARS -

                    HAS IT EVER BEEN BROUGHT INTO QUESTION OUR AUTHORITY TO ENACT

                    ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  NOT THAT I'M AWARE OF.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AS YOU KNOW, THIS YEAR, FOR

                    EXAMPLE, WE'VE HAD A NUMBER OF CHAPTER AMENDMENTS.  SOME OF

                    THOSE CHAPTER AMENDMENTS RELATED TO ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION THAT

                    WE PASSED EARLIER AND THE GOVERNOR SIGNED THE ORIGINAL LEGISLATION BUT

                    POINTED OUT THERE WERE COUNTERVAILING CONSIDERATIONS.  AND SO, WE

                    PASSED LEGISLATION IN ONE INSTANCE TO MOVE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF -- OF

                    ONE BILL OUT A YEAR.  WE PASSED ANOTHER CHAPTER AMENDMENT THAT SAID

                    THAT YOU COULD USE CERTAIN CHEMICALS UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES OR

                    HERBICIDES WHEN THE ALTERNATIVES WERE NOT AS GOOD.  IT SEEMS TO ME THAT

                    THE LEGISLATURE IS GOING THROUGH THAT CONSTANT BALANCING ACT.  IS THERE

                    ANY REFLECTION OF THAT TYPE OF BALANCING ACT IN THIS PROPOSED

                    AMENDMENT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  NO, NOT SPECIFICALLY.  THIS

                    AMENDMENT IS NOT INTENDED TO SPEAK TO ANY PARTICULAR MEASURE, RATHER

                    IT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE CONTEXT, AND THE METAPHOR I'VE USED IS TO

                    PROVIDE A FRAME AROUND ALL OF THE MANY UNITS OF GOVERNMENT, INCLUDING

                    US, THAT ARE SUPPOSED TO BE ACTING IN CONCERT WITH ONE ANOTHER TO

                                         79



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    PROTECT THE AIR AND WATER AND ENVIRONMENT OF THE STATE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND I APPRECIATE THAT.  I LOOK AT THE

                    PENNSYLVANIA AMENDMENT WHICH IS WORDED DIFFERENTLY BUT HAS THE

                    SAME GENERAL CONTEXT, AND ONE OF OUR COLLEAGUES BROUGHT THAT UP.  IN

                    PENNSYLVANIA, EVEN THOUGH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LANGUAGE WAS SIMILAR TO

                    OURS, THE PENNSYLVANIA COURTS ENACTED A THREE-PART STANDARD IN

                    REVIEWING ANY LITIGATION BROUGHT UNDER IT.  AND THE FIRST ONE WAS

                    WHETHER OR NOT THERE WAS COMPLIANCE WITH APPLICABLE RULES AND

                    REGULATIONS.  THE SECOND IS WHETHER THERE'S A REASONABLE EFFORT TO

                    REDUCE THE ENVIRONMENTAL INCURSION, AND THE THIRD WAS A BALANCING ACT,

                    BALANCING THE ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE WITH THE BENEFIT THAT'S BEING

                    CLAIMED BY THE PROPOSED ACTION.  WOULD YOU ENVISION THAT THE NEW

                    YORK STATE COURTS WOULD LIKEWISE -- LIKEWISE ENACT SUCH A BALANCING

                    ACT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I DON'T SEE THESE AS DIRECTLY

                    ANALOGOUS AND SO, I DON'T SEE THAT AS A LIKELIHOOD.  IN THE PENNSYLVANIA

                    CASE, YOU KNOW, MUCH OF THE LITIGATION WAS INDEPENDENT OF THE

                    CONSTITUTION AND INVOLVED A FRACKING ISSUE SPECIFICALLY.  AND AS WE'VE

                    SEEN IN GASLAND, THE MOVIE, AND TESTIMONY THAT WE'VE RECEIVED OVER

                    THE YEARS, OUR NEIGHBORING STATE, IN THE OPINION OF MANY, HAS BEEN

                    RECKLESS IN THE WAY THAT THEY'VE GONE ABOUT TAPPING THEIR GAS RESERVES.

                    SO, I'M NOT SURE THAT ONE CAN DERIVE FROM THAT A PREDICTIVE MODEL FOR

                    NEW YORK AT ALL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WELL, WOULD YOU ENVISION THAT THE

                    NEW YORK COURTS IN EVALUATING THE MEANING AND INTENT OF THIS

                                         80



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    LEGISLATION WOULD LOOK AT WHETHER OR NOT THE ACTION WAS CONSISTENT WITH

                    OUR ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND REGULATIONS, OUR LAND USE REQUIREMENTS,

                    FOR EXAMPLE, AND ALL THE OTHER EXISTING STATUTORY AND REGULATORY

                    PROVISIONS, IS THAT A FACTOR YOU THINK THE NEW YORK COURTS SHOULD LOOK

                    AT IN EVALUATING THE MEANING AND THE INTENT OF THIS STATUTE -- OR THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  WE'RE DIFFERENT FROM

                    PENNSYLVANIA AND THE COURTS IN OUR STATE, AS WELL AS IN PENNSYLVANIA,

                    ARE SEPARATE FROM THE LEGISLATURE.  AGAIN, I DON'T SEE ANY WAY TO DRAW

                    HIGHLY PREDICTIVE MODELING FROM WHAT HAS OCCURRED THERE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  -- TO APPLY IT TO NEW YORK.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OF COURSE AS YOU KNOW, OUR CURRENT

                    CONSTITUTION, ARTICLE XIV, PARTICULARLY SECTION 4 AND 5, ALREADY HAVE

                    SPECIFIC PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE ENVIRONMENT, THE PROVISIONS THAT

                    HAVE BEEN IN PLACE I THINK SINCE AT LEAST 1969, SOME OF IT GOES BACK TO

                    AS EARLY AS 1938.  AND LOOKING AT THAT SECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION, IT

                    SAYS, THE POLICY OF THE STATE SHALL BE TO CONSERVE AND PROTECT THE -- THE

                    NATURAL RESOURCES AND SCENIC BEAUTY, AND ENCOURAGE THE DEVELOPMENT

                    AND IMPROVEMENT OF AGRICULTURAL LANDS FOR THE PRODUCTION OF FOOD AND

                    OTHER AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTS.  WOULD IT BE YOUR UNDERSTANDING THAT IF

                    THE PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS ENACTED THAT BOTH SECTIONS

                    WOULD BE READ HARMONIOUSLY SO THAT THEY BOTH HAVE MEANING, OR IS IT

                    YOUR INTENT THAT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WOULD IN SOME WAY

                    REPEAL OR REPLACE THE CURRENT CONSTITUTIONAL LANGUAGE THAT'S IN ARTICLE

                                         81



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    XIV?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  JUST A SECOND, I'M GETTING A

                    PHONE CALL THAT I DON'T WANT TO HAVE -- INTERRUPT OUR COLLOQUY HERE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OH, YOU CAN GO AHEAD AND TAKE IT IF

                    YOU WISH.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  NO, NO, I DON'T -- I DON'T WANT

                    TO TAKE IT, I JUST HAD TO TURN IT OFF.  THOSE PROVISIONS AREN'T

                    CONTRADICTORY.  I ANTICIPATE THAT THE VOTERS WILL BE FAVORABLE TO THIS IF

                    WE PLACE THIS BEFORE THEM, AND THAT THEY WOULD EXPECT THAT THE VARIOUS

                    PARTS OF OUR CONSTITUTION WILL, IN FACT, HARMONIZE WITH ONE ANOTHER.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO YOU WOULD ENVISION --

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I SHOULD ALSO POINT --

                                 MR. GOODELL: -- I'M SORRY.  YOU WOULD ENVISION IT

                    THEN AS SUPPLEMENTING RATHER THAN REPLACING THE CURRENT CONSTITUTION?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  WELL, IT BEING RATHER THAN

                    SUPPLANTING AND COMPLEMENTING -- I SHOULD ALSO -- LET ME JUST, IF I

                    COULD, MAKE TWO OTHER OBSERVATIONS.  NUMBER ONE, THE ARTICLE XIV,

                    SECTION 4 THAT YOU REFER TO IS ATTEMPTING TO DIRECTLY RELATE TO THE

                    FOREVER WILD PROVISIONS OF THE ADIRONDACKS SPECIFICALLY, BUT IN THE

                    LARGER SENSE IT SPEAKS TO CONSERVATION RESOURCES, WHEREAS OUR INITIATIVE,

                    THE ONE -- THE MATTER BEFORE US THIS INSTANT MOMENT, REALLY SPEAKS TO

                    THE RIGHTS OF PEOPLE.  AND THEY'RE DIFFERENT, BUT THEY COMPLIMENT AND

                    THEY'RE NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE IF THEY'RE BOTH PASSED.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.  I

                    WOULD POINT OUT THAT ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 4 GOES ON TO SAY THAT, THE

                                         82



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    LEGISLATURE, IN IMPLEMENTING THIS POLICY, SHALL INCLUDE ADEQUATE

                    PROVISIONS FOR THE ABATEMENT OF AIR AND WATER POLLUTION, AND OF

                    EXCESSIVE AND UNNECESSARY NOISE AND THE PROTECTION OF AGRICULTURAL

                    LANDS, AND THE DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATION OF WATER RESOURCES.  WHAT

                    STRUCK ME ABOUT THE CURRENT LANGUAGE IN THE CONSTITUTION IS THAT IT'S

                    CLEAR THAT IT'S THE LEGISLATURE THAT HAS THE RESPONSIBILITY.  IN YOUR

                    PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, IT DOESN'T PUT THE RESPONSIBILITY

                    ON THE LEGISLATURE, RIGHT?  IT SAYS, EACH PERSON SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT TO

                    CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.  SO IT -- IT DROPS THE

                    ROLE OF THE LEGISLATURE; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THAT IS NOT CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THE LEGISLATURE'S ROLE IS

                    CONTINUING AND IMPORTANT, AND THE RESPONSIBILITY IS SOMETHING THAT IS

                    MAINTAINED AND NECESSARY.  WHAT IT DOES, HOWEVER, IS FRAME THE

                    EXPECTATIONS OF THE ACTIONS OF THE LEGISLATURE AND THE OTHER UNITS OF

                    GOVERNMENT SO THAT THEY ARE ALL ACTING IN CONCERT WITH ONE ANOTHER

                    TOWARD THE GOAL OF PROTECTING THE AIR AND WATER AND LAND AND

                    ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES OF THE STATE FOR THE PEOPLE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND I VERY MUCH APPRECIATE THAT

                    ANSWER AND -- AND I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.  THERE'S BEEN SOME

                    DISCUSSION WHETHER OR NOT THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT WOULD CREATE A

                    PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION OR WHETHER IT IS INSTEAD INTENDED TO HELP GUIDE

                    AND DIRECT THE LEGISLATURE.  WOULD -- IS IT YOUR INTENT THAT THIS

                    LEGISLATION WOULD CREATE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION, OR DO YOU ENVISION

                                         83



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    THAT THE LEGISLATURE WOULD STILL MAINTAIN A PREDOMINANT ROLE?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I SEE THE LEGISLATURE AS THE

                    VOICE OF THE PEOPLE.  WE ARE DULY-ELECTED TO REPRESENT THEIR THOUGHTS

                    AND THIS INITIATIVE IS, AGAIN, TO ENSURE THAT PEOPLE HAVE THE RIGHT TO

                    CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.  THAT IS ITS PRIMARY

                    PURPOSE.  IT SHOULD PUT US IN MORE OF A SELF-CONSCIOUS POSITION, THOUGH,

                    EACH TIME THAT WE TOUCH UPON ISSUES GOING FORWARD AFTER THIS PASSES.

                    WE SHOULD BE MUCH MORE SELF-CONSCIOUS ABOUT THE OUTCOME OF OUR

                    DEBATES, AND WE SHOULD MEASURE OUR EFFECTIVENESS AGAINST THE

                    EXPECTATIONS OF OUR PUBLIC.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IF AN INDIVIDUAL OR GROUP OF

                    INDIVIDUALS FEEL THAT WE HAVE NOT MET THAT EXPECTATION, IS IT YOUR

                    UNDERSTANDING THAT THIS WOULD CREATE A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION?

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  I'M, AGAIN, A GEOLOGIST, NOT A

                    LAWYER.  I WOULD LEAVE THAT TO THE LAWYERS TO DECIDE.  THAT IS CERTAINLY

                    NOT A INTENT BECAUSE WE HAVE NOT SPOKEN TO IT AND WE HAVE NOT

                    ATTEMPTED IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE MEASURE TO CREATE A -- A RIGHT OF

                    ACTION.  BUT I WOULD -- IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING, I WOULD POINT OUT, THAT

                    ANYONE CAN SUE ANYBODY FOR ANYTHING.  SO, IT DOESN'T PREVENT THAT, BUT

                    IT DOESN'T CREATE ANYTHING NEW EITHER.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR.

                    ENGLEBRIGHT.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  AS

                                         84



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ALL OF OUR COLLEAGUES HAVE SAID ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, WE ALL

                    SUPPORT CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER AND A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT.  BUT AS

                    OFTEN IS SAID, THE DEVIL IS IN THE DETAILS, AND IN THE PAST, PRIOR TO THIS

                    PROPOSED AMENDMENT, THOSE DETAILS WERE HAMMERED OUT IN THE

                    LEGISLATIVE PROCESS.  AND SO IN THE PAST, WE HAVEN'T SAID THAT YOU'RE

                    ENTITLED TO DISTILLED WATER THROUGH YOUR PUBLIC MUNICIPAL SYSTEM, WE'RE

                    -- WE SAID YOU'RE ENTITLED TO SAFE WATER.  AND THE WORD "CLEAN" AND THE

                    WORD "SAFE" ARE DIFFERENT.  AND SO, OF COURSE, OUR LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES

                    OFTEN ADD CHLORINE TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO BACTERIAL INFECTION.

                    SOMETIMES THEY ADD FLUORIDE.  THEY CERTAINLY DON'T -- THEY SURELY DON'T

                    HAVE DISTILLED WATER.  AND NEW YORK CITY, BY THE WAY, ITS WATER

                    SUPPLY COMES FROM UPSTATE IN OPEN RESERVOIRS.  DON'T WANT TO BREAK IT

                    TO MY NEW YORK CITY COLLEAGUES TOO MUCH, BUT THERE'S A LOT OF STUFF

                    THAT FLOWS INTO THOSE RESERVOIRS FROM ANIMALS AND FISH, AND WE DON'T

                    NEED TO GO INTO ALL THE GORY DETAILS BECAUSE IT'S ALL TOO MUCH TO KNOW.

                    BUT WHILE THE NEW YORK CITY WATER SUPPLY IS SAFE, IT MOST ASSUREDLY IS

                    NOT PURE.  AND, LIKEWISE, WHEN IT COMES TO AIR, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE

                    THE AIR WE BREATHE IS SAFE, BUT "SAFE" AND "CLEAN" ARE TWO DIFFERENT

                    THINGS.  WE DON'T FILTER THE AIR THAT WE BREATHE HERE IN THE CHAMBERS,

                    MAYBE WE SHOULD, BUT WE DON'T.

                                 AND SO, WE'RE ASKED TO VOTE ON LANGUAGE THAT NOBODY

                    REALLY KNOWS WHAT IT MEANS.  WE DO KNOW, THOUGH, THAT IF A PRIVATE

                    RIGHT OF ACTION IS AVAILABLE, AND SOME PEOPLE HAVE EXPRESSED CONCERNS

                    ABOUT IT, THEN OUR MUNICIPALITIES MAY SEE EXTRAORDINARILY EXPENSIVE

                    LITIGATION WHERE PEOPLE WHO ARE CLAIMING THE WATER IS NOT CLEAN, OR THE

                                         85



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    AIR IS NOT CLEAN, OR CLEAN ENOUGH.  SO, WHEN WE CHANGE THE

                    CONSTITUTION, WHICH ALREADY GIVES THIS LEGISLATURE AN EXPRESS DIRECTIVE

                    TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE ENVIRONMENT, THAT'S ALREADY IN THERE, AND

                    WHEN WE CHANGE THE CONSTITUTION TO SAY THAT EVERY PERSON HAS A

                    PERSONAL RIGHT, WE TRANSFER POWER AND RESPONSIBILITY FOR THAT LEGISLATIVE

                    BALANCING ACT FROM THE LEGISLATURE AND FROM THE EXPERTS AT THE DEC

                    AND ELSEWHERE TO THE COURTS, AND WE GIVE NO GUIDANCE TO THE COURTS ON

                    WHAT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT MEANS.

                                 SO INSTEAD OF US DEBATING WHETHER OR NOT WE SHOULD

                    RESTRICT GLYPHOSATE, FOR EXAMPLE, OR -- OR WHETHER OR NOT WE SHOULD PUT

                    OTHER RESTRICTIONS IN, OR WHAT THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS ARE, RATHER THAN

                    US DOING IT, RATHER THAN YOUR LOCAL LEGISLATURE DOING IT, WHETHER YOUR

                    LOCAL TOWN BOARD DECIDING ON WHAT THE RIGHT SETBACKS ARE AND WHAT THE

                    RIGHT RESTRICTIONS ARE, WE DELEGATE IT TO THE COURTS.  AND, UNFORTUNATELY,

                    I THINK THAT'S A MISTAKE BECAUSE WHEN WE LOOK AT ECONOMIC

                    DEVELOPMENT THROUGHOUT OUR STATE, WE RECOGNIZE THE IMPORTANCE OF

                    BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE GUIDANCE TO THOSE WHO ARE COMING TO THE STATE

                    AND INVESTING MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS, AND THEY NEED TO KNOW

                    IF THEY MEET EVERY ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARD AND EVERY ENVIRONMENTAL

                    LAW CAN THEY MOVE FORWARD, AND THE ANSWER WITH THIS AMENDMENT IS

                    MAYBE NOT.

                                 SO, I APPRECIATE VERY MUCH THE DESIRE TO HAVE CLEAN

                    AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, A DESIRE THAT I FULLY SUPPORT,

                    BUT I THINK WE NEED TO DEFINE THIS AND MAINTAIN THAT CHECKS AND

                    BALANCES THAT ARE SO IMPORTANT, AND FOR US TO RETAIN THE ROLE THAT WE

                                         86



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    HAVE REPRESENTING OUR CONSTITUENTS IN MAKING THOSE -- THOSE DIFFICULT

                    DECISIONS.  THANK YOU AGAIN VERY MUCH, MR. SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING ME

                    TO SPEAK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT S.528.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE POSITION

                    IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THIS WILL BE A

                    PARTY VOTE.  THE REPUBLICAN CAUCUS WILL BE GENERALLY IN THE NEGATIVE,

                    ALTHOUGH I ANTICIPATE SOME SUPPORT WITHIN OUR CAUCUS, AS WELL.  SO,

                    THOSE WHO WISH TO VOTE FOR THIS AMENDMENT, PLEASE CALL THE MINORITY

                    LEADER'S OFFICE AND ADVISE THEM.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE

                    ON THIS MEASURE.  MEMBERS DECIDING TO GO -- HAVE AN EXCEPTION TO THAT,

                    THEY CAN PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT MY OFFICE, WE'LL BE HAPPY TO RECORD

                    YOUR VOTE.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  TO EXPLAIN YOUR VOTE,

                                         87



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I WANT TO

                    COMMEND THE CHAIR OF THIS COMMITTEE, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT FOR -- FOR THE

                    SECOND YEAR OF, YOU KNOW, GOING THROUGH A -- A DEBATE ON AN IDEAL THAT

                    CAN NOT ONLY BRING US TO AN OPPORTUNITY WHERE WE'RE LITERALLY LIVING IN A

                    CLEANER, FRESHER SOCIETY, BOTH AIR AND THE WATER, BUT IT ALSO BRINGS US TO

                    THE OPPORTUNITY TO SAY TO THE PEOPLE WHO ELECTED US, WE NEED YOUR

                    OPINION HERE.  IT BRINGS US AN OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE TO THE ELECTORATE -- I'LL

                    WAIT UNTIL THESE GENTLEMEN ARE FINISHED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  OKAY.

                                 GENTLEMEN, YOU WILL -- THANK YOU, YOU...

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, GENTLEMEN.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, I WANT TO REITERATE HOW VALUABLE I THINK

                    IT IS FOR US TO, ONE, BE PAYING ATTENTION TO THE ENVIRONMENT IN THE

                    MANNER THAT WE ARE; BUT TWO, BE PAYING ATTENTION TO THE FACT THAT

                    SOMETIMES WE SHOULD LET THE VOTERS SPEAK OTHER THAN JUST ELECTING US

                    HERE.  AND SO I'M GRATEFUL FOR THIS AS AN OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE THIS

                    MEASURE FORWARD.  AND I DO WANT TO THANK MR. ENGLEBRIGHT FOR HIS

                    WORK ON THIS ISSUE, FOR HIS DILIGENCE IN THE DEBATE, AND FOR ALL OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES WHO CAN AGREE THAT THIS IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO AND IT'S THE

                    RIGHT TIME TO GET IT DONE.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. NIOU.

                                 MS. NIOU:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING

                    ME TO SPEAK ABOUT MY VOTE AND EXPLAINING IT.  I JUST WANTED TO THANK

                    THE SPONSOR FOR HIS DILIGENT FIGHT FOR OUR ENVIRONMENT.  HE IS AN

                                         88



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    INCREDIBLE CHAIR AND ONE THAT HAS FOUGHT FOR ALL OF OUR RIGHTS FOR A VERY

                    LONG TIME.

                                 I WANTED TO ALSO NOTE THAT, YOU KNOW, NEW YORK IS A

                    STATE THAT HAS BROKEN TREATY AFTER TREATY WITH OUR NATIVE -- WITH OUR

                    NATIVE TRIBES AND I JUST WANTED TO SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, JUST BECAUSE

                    SOME OF THESE TREATIES ARE OLD, IT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THEY ARE NOT MORE

                    IMPORTANT AND HOLD EVEN MORE SWAY THAN OUR OWN CONSTITUTION AND

                    EVEN THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.  THESE ARE RIGHTS THAT WE

                    HAVE GRANTED ARE -- THE -- THE TRIBES THAT WE HAVE STOLEN OUR LAND FROM,

                    AND I JUST WANT TO REMIND FOLKS THAT, YOU KNOW, EVEN WITH THIS -- EVEN

                    WITH THIS LAW IN PLACE, WE WILL STILL BE FAR FROM THE RIGHTS THAT WE -- AND

                    -- AND THE PROTECTIONS THAT WE OWE THEM.  SO, I JUST WANTED TO NOTE

                    THAT, AND I THINK THAT THIS IS A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION IN MAKING SURE

                    THAT WE CAN PROTECT AND HONOR THOSE TREATIES.

                                 AND I JUST WANTED TO SAY A COUPLE OF THINGS FROM, YOU

                    KNOW, FROM SOME OF OUR DIFFERENT TRIBES AROUND THE NATION:  WHEN ALL

                    THE TREES HAVE BEEN CUT DOWN, WHEN ALL THE ANIMALS HAVE BEEN HUNTED,

                    WHEN ALL THE WATERS ARE POLLUTED, WHEN ALL THE AIR IS UNSAFE TO BREATHE,

                    ONLY THEN WILL YOU DISCOVER YOU CANNOT EAT MONEY.  AND THAT IS A CREE

                    PROPHECY THAT -- YOU KNOW, THE CREE PEOPLE WERE HERE.  SO JUST WANTED

                    TO NOTE THAT.  AND THE OTHER ONE IS A NATIVE AMERICAN PROVERB WHICH

                    IS, THE FROG DOES NOT DRINK UP THE POND IN WHICH HE LIVES.  AND I WANT

                    US ALL TO REMEMBER THAT AS WELL.  AND THEN THE LAST ONE IS MY OWN --

                    MY OWN -- CHIEF SEATTLE, BACK IN SEATTLE, WE DO NOT OWN THE FRESHNESS

                    OF THE AIR OR THE SPARKLE OF THE WATER.  HOW CAN YOU BUY THEM FROM US.

                                         89



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 SO, I JUST WANTED TO HAVE FOLKS REMEMBER THOSE

                    BEAUTIFUL WORDS AND TO REMEMBER THEM EVERY STEP OF THE WAY WHEN WE

                    ARE TRYING TO PROTECT OUR ENVIRONMENT.  THANK YOU, AGAIN, TO THE

                    SPONSOR OF THIS --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. NIOU:  -- INCREDIBLE BILL AND FOR HELPING US --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  RIGHT.  THANK YOU,

                    MS. NIOU.

                                 MS. SIMON.

                                 MS. SIMON:  THANK YOU.  TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                    TODAY WE VOTE ON A SIMPLE BUT POWERFUL AMENDMENT TO OUR STATE

                    CONSTITUTION.  THE AMENDMENT VERY SIMPLY SAYS THAT EACH PERSON SHALL

                    HAVE A RIGHT TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER AND A HEALTHY ENVIRONMENT, A

                    HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT.  QUITE SIMPLY, THERE CAN BE NO MORE

                    FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT THAN THE RIGHT TO BREATHE FREE OF ENVIRONMENTAL

                    POLLUTANTS AND TO DRINK, COOK WITH, BATHE AND/OR SWIM IN CLEAN WATER.

                    WHATEVER COULD BE THE OBJECTION TO CLEAN AIR AND WATER.  WE'VE HEARD

                    SEVERAL, INCLUDING AN ASSUMPTION OF A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR

                    ENVIRONMENTAL DAMAGE.  I CAN ASSURE MY COLLEAGUES THAT THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT DOES NOT DO THAT.  I KNOW BECAUSE I HAVE

                    CARRIED A BILL TO PROVIDE FOR A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION FOR ENVIRONMENTAL

                    DAMAGE FOR SEVERAL YEARS.

                                 WE ALL KNOW THAT AIR AND WATER ARE THE MEANS BY

                    WHICH TOXINS FIND THEIR WAY INTO OUR BODIES.  LIKE MY COLLEAGUE FROM

                    GREENPOINT, I, TOO, REPRESENT A SUPERFUND SITE, THE GOWANUS CANAL AND

                                         90



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ITS UPLANDS, WHICH WERE HEAVILY POLLUTED FROM COLONIAL TIMES UNTIL JUST

                    RECENTLY WITH AN ENORMOUS ARRAY OF CHEMICALS AND METALS AND NOXIOUS

                    COMBINATIONS THEREOF.  MY DISTRICT, AS WELL AS OTHERS, ARE ALSO HOME TO

                    INTERSTATE I-278, A/K/A, THE BROOKLYN QUEENS EXPRESSWAY OR BQE,

                    WHICH CARRIES 175,000 CARS AND TRUCKS A DAY, RAVAGING THE HEALTH AND

                    SAFETY OF A MILLION RESIDENTS IN ITS ORBIT WITH EXTREMELY HIGH RATES OF

                    ASTHMA AND PULMONARY DISORDERS.

                                 SO I AM VERY PLEASED THAT WE ARE VOTING ON THIS BILL

                    TODAY.  I WANT TO COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR HIS LEADERSHIP AND HIS

                    CLARITY AND CONSTANCY OF PURPOSE, AND I WILL BE VOTING IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  MS.

                    SIMON IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  AS I TALKED ABOUT EARLIER TODAY ON THIS BILL IN REGARDS

                    TO AGRICULTURE, WE AS FARMERS, WE AS AGRICULTURAL PRODUCERS DO

                    EVERYTHING WE POSSIBLY CAN TO DO WHAT'S BEST FOR OUR ENVIRONMENT.  WE

                    HAVE NOW PUT IN GRASS FILTER STRIPS TO MAKE SURE NO CHEMICALS, FERTILIZER

                    OR ANYTHING ELSE THAT'S ON THE GROUND GETS INTO OUR WATER SYSTEMS.  WE

                    -- WE ARE USING TECHNOLOGY BEYOND BELIEF:  GPS, GLOBAL POSITIONING

                    SERVICES THAT ALLOWS US TO SPRAY AND SPREAD OUR FERTILIZERS WITHIN JUST A

                    FEW INCHES OF THE LAST PASS, THINGS THAT WE ARE DOING TO IMPROVE OUR

                                         91



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ENVIRONMENT.  WE, OF ALL PEOPLE, ARE STEWARDS OF THIS GREAT LAND, OF THE

                    LAND THAT WE PRODUCE OUR CROPS ON, WHETHER IT'S FEED FOR OUR ANIMALS,

                    WHETHER IT'S CROPS, WHETHER IT'S FRUIT FOR OUR -- FOR OUR PRODUCERS, WE DO

                    EVERYTHING WE POSSIBLY CAN.

                                 I TRULY WANT TO SUPPORT THIS BILL, BUT THERE NEEDS TO BE

                    SOME CARVE-OUTS BECAUSE WHAT I'M AFRAID OF IS WITH OUR AGRICULTURAL

                    PRODUCTION HERE IN NEW YORK STATE, EVERYTHING THAT GO -- THAT WE'RE UP

                    AGAINST, WE'RE GOING TO, AGAIN, STALL AGRICULTURE PRODUCTION.  LET US DO

                    WHAT WE DO WELL, LET THE FARMERS DO THIS.  WE DON'T ALWAYS NEED

                    GOVERNMENT TO FIX THINGS.  SOMETIMES WE FIX OUR OWN THINGS, AND WE

                    CAN DO A REALLY GOOD JOB AT IT.  SO, PLEASE, ALLOW OUR FARMERS TO DO THIS,

                    ALLOW THEM TO GROW, AND WE CAN MAKE A BETTER NEW YORK.  AND, AGAIN,

                    I -- I'M SORRY I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS BILL TONIGHT.  IF WE HAD SOME

                    CARVE-OUTS, I COULD ABSOLUTELY DO THAT, BUT UNTIL WE DO THAT, I'M GOING

                    TO BE IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    I, FIRST OF ALL, WANT TO THANK CHAIRMAN ENGLEBRIGHT FOR HIS WORK ON THIS

                    -- ON THIS BILL.  AS A CIVIL ENGINEER, CHAIRMAN ENGLEBRIGHT AND I HAVE

                    TALKED ABOUT A NUMBER OF PROJECTS I'VE BEEN ABLE TO WORK ON IN THE

                    PAST, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROJECTS, AND THEY'VE ALL BEEN IMPORTANT

                    TO THE COMMUNITIES I REPRESENT AND COMMUNITIES THROUGHOUT NEW

                    YORK STATE, JUST AS THIS BILL WILL BE IMPORTANT TO THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                    IT'S GREAT TO SEE THIS RE -- SUCH A RENEWED INTEREST IN PROTECTING OUR

                                         92



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    ENVIRONMENT, AND I THINK IT'S BECAUSE MORE AND MORE COMMUNITIES

                    HAVE SEEN JUST HOW DAMAGE CAUSED TO THE ENVIRONMENT PUTS OUR NATURAL

                    RESOURCES AT RISK, THINGS LIKE CLEAN AIR, CLEAN WATER, RENEWABLE ENERGY.

                    IF WE'RE SERIOUS ABOUT SAFEGUARDING PUBLIC HEALTH, WE SIMPLY CANNOT

                    COMPROMISE ON THESE IMPORTANT ISSUES.

                                 I'M SUPPORTING THIS BILL HERE TODAY BECAUSE IT MAKES A

                    COMMITMENT TO PROTECTING OUR ENVIRONMENT AND THE PRECIOUS NATURAL

                    RESOURCES THAT WE ALL DEPEND ON.  THERE IS NOTHING MORE IMPORTANT

                    THAN THE HEALTH OF OUR FAMILIES AND I'M PROUD TO BE A COSPONSOR ON THIS

                    BILL AND I'LL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SANTABARBARA IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT.

                                 MR. ENGLEBRIGHT:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    THIS SIMPLE LANGUAGE PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS ABOUT

                    EMPOWERING PEOPLE.  IT'S ALSO ABOUT FORMALIZING CITIZENSHIP

                    EXPECTATIONS FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK.  AND IT'S ALSO TRUE THAT EVERY

                    REFERENDUM IS A TEACHABLE MOMENT AND AN OPPORTUNITY FOR AN OBJECT

                    LESSON IN PARTICIPATORY DEMOCRACY.  AND WITHIN THIS CONTEXT FOR NEW

                    YORKERS, THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY FOR THEM, THROUGH THEIR VOTE IN THIS

                    PROPOSED REFERENDUM, TO FORMALIZE THE PRESUMPTION THAT

                    ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND HUMAN HEALTH IN NEW YORK ARE INEXTRICABLY

                    LINKED, THAT THEY ARE LINKED SUCH THAT EVERY CITIZEN HAS A RIGHT TO CLEAN

                    AIR, WATER, AND A HEALTHFUL ENVIRONMENT, AND THAT THIS UNDERSTANDING

                    SHALL HENCEFORTH BE CONSTITUTIONALLY-RECOGNIZED AS BEING PART OF THE

                                         93



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                    RIGHT OF CITIZENSHIP IN OUR GREAT STATE.

                                 I WANT TO TAKE THIS MOMENT TO SAY THANK YOU TO

                    SPEAKER CARL HEASTIE FOR HIS VISION, HIS SUPPORT, AND GUIDANCE IN THIS

                    IMPORTANT INITIATIVE AND I'M PLEASED TO VOTE YES.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD THE

                    FOLLOWING REPUBLICANS VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS PROPOSED AMENDMENT:

                    MR. ASHBY, MR. BROWN, MR. DESTEFANO, MR. DURSO, MR. GANDOLFO, MR.

                    MIKULIN, MR. MILLER, MS. MILLER, MR. RA, MR. REILLY, MR. SMITH, MR.

                    TANNOUSIS, AND MR. WALCZYK.  I APOLOGIZE, MR. MILLER HAS BEEN

                    EXCUSED TODAY SO HE DIDN'T VOTE EITHER WAY YET.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, DO WE

                    HAVE ANY FURTHER HOUSEKEEPINGS AND/OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  NO RESOLUTIONS, BUT A

                    PIECE OF HOUSEKEEPING.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MR. BRONSON, PAGE 5, CALENDAR NO.

                    85, BILL NO. A01052-A, AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                         94



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                              FEBRUARY 8, 2021

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU.  COULD YOU

                    PLEASE CALL ON MS. HUNTER FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. HUNTER FOR THE

                    PURPOSE OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT.

                                 MS. HUNTER:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  THERE WILL BE A

                    NEED FOR A MAJORITY CONFERENCE AT THE CONCLUSION OF OUR SESSION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  IMMEDIATE MAJORITY

                    CONFERENCE AT THE CONCLUSION OF SESSION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I NOW

                    MOVE THAT THE ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED UNTIL 12:30 P.M., TUESDAY,

                    JANUARY [SIC] THE 9TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE ASSEMBLY STANDS

                    ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 5:37 P.M., THE ASSEMBLY STOOD

                    ADJOURNED UNTIL TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9TH AT 12:30 P.M., TUESDAY BEING A

                    SESSION DAY.)

















                                         95