MONDAY, MARCH 21, 2022                                                                       2:52 P.M.



                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE HOUSE WILL COME

                    TO ORDER.

                                 IN THE ABSENCE OF CLERGY, LET US PAUSE FOR A MOMENT OF

                    SILENCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, A MOMENT OF SILENCE WAS OBSERVED.)

                                 VISITORS ARE INVITED TO JOIN THE MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE

                    OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY LED VISITORS AND

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF FRIDAY, MARCH 18TH.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I MOVE

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THAT WE DISPENSE WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF FRIDAY,

                    MARCH THE 18TH AND ASK THAT THE SAME STAND APPROVED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WITHOUT OBJECTION, SO

                    ORDERED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF I COULD HAVE COLLEAGUES' AND GUESTS' IN THE CHAMBERS

                    ATTENTION FOR A FEW MOMENTS.  I WANT TO SHARE A QUOTE TODAY.  THIS ONE

                    COMES FROM HARRIET TUBMAN, WHO WAS AN AMERICAN POLITICAL ACTIVIST

                    THAT WAS BORN INTO SLAVERY.  TUBMAN ESCAPED AND SUBSEQUENTLY MADE

                    13 MISSIONS TO RESCUE APPROXIMATELY 70 ENSLAVED PEOPLE INCLUDING

                    FAMILY AND FRIENDS USING A NETWORK OF ANTI-SLAVERY ACTIVISTS AND

                    SAFEHOUSES KNOWN AS THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD.  HER WORDS FOR US

                    TODAY, MR. SPEAKER, EVERY GREAT DREAM BEGINS WITH A DREAMER.

                    ALWAYS REMEMBER, YOU HAVE WITHIN YOU THE STRENGTH, THE PATIENCE AND

                    THE PASSION TO REACH FOR THE STARS TO CHANGE THE WORLD.  MR. SPEAKER,

                    WE ARE IN SOME WAYS CHANGE-MAKERS.  I HOPE WE ALL UNDERSTAND THAT

                    AND YOU CAN MAKE THE CHANGES THAT IMPACT PEOPLE'S LIVES IN THE

                    MEANINGFUL WAYS.

                                 COLLEAGUES HAVE ON YOUR DESK A MAIN CALENDAR.  IT

                    HAS TWO NEW BILLS IN IT AND THERE'S ALSO A DEBATE LIST.  SO, MR. SPEAKER,

                    AFTER THERE'S ANY HOUSEKEEPING WE WILL TAKE UP RESOLUTIONS ON PAGE 3,

                    SOME OF OUR COLLEAGUES MAY DESIRE TO SPEAK ON THOSE RESOLUTIONS, THEN

                    WE WILL TAKE UP THE NEW BILLS ON CONSENT BEGINNING WITH CALENDAR NO.

                    493 ON PAGE 4.  AGAIN, ON CONSENT, MR. SPEAKER.  THEN WE'RE GOING TO

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    GO RIGHT TO THE DEBATE LIST, AND ON DEBATE TODAY WE'LL HAVE MR.

                    DINOWITZ.  HE'S GOING TO TAKE UP CALENDAR NO. 74.  MR. SANTABARBARA

                    IS GOING TO TAKE UP CALENDAR NO. 75.  MR. SAYEGH IS GOING TO TAKE UP

                    CALENDAR NO. 123.  MR. DINOWITZ IS GOING TO TAKE UP CALENDAR NO.

                    360.  AND MR. EPSTEIN IS GOING TO TAKE UP CALENDAR NO. 364.  THERE

                    MAY BE A NEED TO ANNOUNCE FURTHER FLOOR ACTIVITY, MR. SPEAKER, BUT FOR

                    RIGHT NOW FOR SURE THERE WILL BE A NEED FOR A MAJORITY CONFERENCE

                    IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING OUR WORK ON THE FLOOR TODAY.  AND AS ALWAYS, I

                    WILL CONSULT WITH OUR COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE TO

                    DETERMINE WHAT THEIR NEEDS MAY BE.

                                 THAT IS A GENERAL OUTLINE, MR. SPEAKER.  IF YOU HAVE

                    HOUSEKEEPING, NOW WOULD BE A GREAT TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  WE DO

                    HAVE HOUSEKEEPING.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MR. SAYEGH, PAGE 47, CALENDAR NO.

                    480, BILL NO. 8934-A, AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 AND WE ALSO HAVE AN INTRODUCTION BY MR. STERN.

                                 MR. STERN FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. STERN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WE

                    WELCOME SO MANY FROM ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW YORK, MANY WHO HAVE

                    EXPERIENCED CHALLENGES, MANY WHO HAVE OVERCOME THEM AND HAVE A

                    COMPELLING STORY TO TELL.  SO MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS THAT HAVE ACHIEVED

                    GREAT SUCCESS AND OTHERS WHO ARE MODELS FOR ALL OF US TO FOLLOW.

                    TODAY, MR. SPEAKER, WE WELCOME SOMEONE WHO IS LITERALLY ALL OF THE

                    ABOVE.  I'M SO PROUD TO BE CELEBRATING WORLD DOWN SYNDROME DAY IN

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    NEW YORK STATE ALONGSIDE MY COLLEAGUE FROM LONG ISLAND,

                    ASSEMBLYMAN JARETT GANDOLFO, TO WELCOME MY NEIGHBOR FROM

                    HUNTINGTON, JOHN AND MARK CRONIN.  JOHN IS THE CHIEF HAPPINESS

                    OFFICER OF JOHN'S CRAZY SOCKS, A VERY SUCCESSFUL BUSINESS THAT ALSO

                    ADVOCATES FOR THOSE WITH DIFFERENT ABILITIES AND PROVIDES OPPORTUNITY

                    FOR SO MANY OF OUR LOVED ONES TO ACHIEVE THEIR HIGHEST POTENTIAL.  I

                    WOULD LIKE TO THANK JOHN, AS I KNOW MY COLLEAGUES DO AS WELL, AND HIS

                    OUTSTANDING TEAM FOR THE WORK THEY DO EACH AND EVERY DAY TO SPREAD

                    HAPPINESS.  AND I WAS HONORED EARLIER TODAY TO JOIN THEM IN DELIVERING

                    THE SPECIAL UNITY SOCKS TO ALL OF OUR COLLEAGUES TODAY IN THE NEW YORK

                    STATE ASSEMBLY.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THIS WORLD DOWN SYNDROME DAY,

                    JOHN CRONIN IS AN INSPIRATION AND TRULY A TREASURE FOR OUR ENTIRE

                    COMMUNITY.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MR. STERN, MR. GANDOLFO, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, JOHN

                    AND MARK, WE WELCOME YOU HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY.

                    WE EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR.  OUR GRATITUDE FOR THE

                    WORK THAT YOU DO TO HELP OTHERS AND TO MAKE THEIR LIVES AS MEANINGFUL

                    AS I'M SURE YOUR LIFE IS, AND WE CONTINUE TO ADMIRE THAT WORK.  KNOW

                    THAT YOU WILL ALWAYS BE WELCOME HERE.  PLEASE, THANK YOU SO VERY

                    MUCH FOR SHARING WITH US.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 PAGE 3, ASSEMBLY PRINT 646, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. A00646,

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    MS. REYES.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO DECLARE MARCH 11, 2022 TO APRIL 12, 2022 AS

                    GARIFUNA-AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. REYES ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. REYES:  THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR. SPEAKER.  I'M

                    HONORED TO INTRODUCE THIS RESOLUTION COMMEMORATING GARIFUNA-

                    AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.  THE GARIFUNA

                    PEOPLE ARE THE AFRO-CARIBBEAN DESCENDANTS OF ARAWAK AND CARIB

                    INDIANS AND THE WEST AFRICAN PEOPLE WHO WERE BROUGHT TO THE

                    CARIBBEAN DURING THE SLAVE TRADE TO ST. VINCENT.  THEY WERE EXILED BY

                    THE BRITISH TROOPS IN ST. VINCENT AT THE END OF THE 17TH CENTURY AND

                    SHIPPED TO HONDURAS.  THE GARIFUNA PEOPLE SET ROOTS IN COASTAL

                    VILLAGES IN BELIZE, GUATEMALA, HONDURAS AND NICARAGUA.  THE

                    GARIFUNA PEOPLE ARE UNIQUE IN THAT THEY ARE -- IN THAT THEY HAVE

                    PRESERVED THE LANGUAGE, RELIGION AND TRADITIONS OF THEIR AFRICAN

                    ANCESTORS.  THAT, AS DECLARED BY THE UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL,

                    SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION, UNESCO, AS A MASTERPIECE OF

                    THE ORAL AND INTANGIBLE HERITAGE OF HUMANITY.  CURRENTLY NEW YORK

                    CITY IS HOME TO ROUGHLY 200,000 GARIFUNA AND OVER 100,000 CALL THE

                    BRONX THEIR HOME.  THE COUNTRIES OF HONDURAS AND NICARAGUA ARE STILL

                    REELING FROM THE TWO CATEGORY 4 HURRICANES THAT MADE LANDFALL IN LATE

                    2019 IN A SPAN OF TWO WEEKS.  THE GARIFUNA PEOPLE ARE CURRENTLY LIVING

                    A HUMANITARIAN CRISIS UNDERPINNED BY A LONG HISTORY OF RACISM,

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    CONSTANT DISPLACEMENT AND THE WORLDWIDE PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS.  IN LIGHT

                    OF THIS WE TAKE THIS OPPORTUNITY TO CELEBRATE THE CONTRIBUTIONS AND

                    RESILIENT SPIRIT OF THE GARIFUNA PEOPLE AND SUPPORT THEIR EFFORTS FOR

                    RENEWED TPS.  IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, GARIFUNA GROUPS HAVE

                    FOUNDED SEVERAL COMMUNITY-BASED ORGANIZATIONS THAT ADDRESS THE

                    UNIQUE SOCIAL AND CULTURAL NEEDS OF THE GARIFUNA PEOPLE AND GRACIOUSLY

                    EXTEND THEIR REACH TO THE BROADER IMMIGRANT COMMUNITY.  THE SOCIAL

                    IMPACT OF THEIR WORK, AS WELL AS THE DEEP AND RICH CULTURAL HISTORY OF

                    THE GARIFUNA PEOPLE, IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE FABRIC OF THE BRONX.

                                 I AM HONORED TO INTRODUCE THIS RESOLUTION DECLARING

                    MARCH 11 THROUGH APRIL 12TH AS GARIFUNA-AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH

                    IN OUR STATE NOT ONLY TO HIGHLIGHT THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF THE GARIFUNA

                    PEOPLE, BUT TO EXTEND A MEANINGFUL COMMITMENT TO THE GARIFUNA

                    COMMUNITY AND OUR SHARED INTERESTS.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 661, MR.

                    SANTABARBARA.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 13, 2022 AS K9 VETERANS DAY IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 662, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 20, 2022 AS BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS DAY

                    IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE OF

                    WORLD BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO BRING COMMENTS ON THIS RESOLUTION THAT

                    IS MAJORLY IMPORTANT IN THE LIVES OF PEOPLE ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW

                    YORK.  THE PROFESSION OF BEHAVIOR ANALYST WAS FIRST DEVELOPED IN 1930

                    AND ADDRESSES THE QUESTION OF HOW HUMAN BEHAVIOR WORKS AND HOW IT

                    COULD BE CHANGED TO WORK BETTER IN PEOPLE'S LIVES.  APPLIED BEHAVIOR

                    ANALYSTS HAVE DEMONSTRATED EXPERIENCE FOR BUILDING USEFUL SKILLS AND

                    REDUCING BEHAVIORS THAT IMPEDE HEALTHY, SUCCESSFUL FUNCTIONING IN

                    MANY CLINICAL AND NON-CLINICAL POPULATIONS RACING -- RANGING FROM

                    DEVELOPMENTAL DELAYS, AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDERS, PSYCHIATRIC

                    DISORDERS, SUBSTANCE ABUSE DISORDERS, SENSORY PROCESSING DISORDERS,

                    ANOREXIA, ALZHEIMER'S, ADHD, DOWN SYNDROME AND REACTIVE

                    ATTACHMENT DISORDERS AS WELL AS BRAIN INJURIES AND MORE.  THIS

                    PROFESSION, MR. SPEAKER, HAS FINALLY BEEN RECOGNIZED FOR THE PROFESSION

                    THAT IT IS AS A RESULT OF LEGISLATION THAT WAS PASSED IN '21.  WE ARE

                    GRATEFUL TO HAVE HAD THAT OPPORTUNITY TO DO THAT, AND IT IS MY PLEASURE

                    TO STAND IN RECOGNIZING AND HONORING THE BEHAVIOR ANALYSTS IN THE GREAT

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 663, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 21, 2022 AS DOWN SYNDROME

                    AWARENESS DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE

                    OBSERVANCE OF WORLD DOWN SYNDROME DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TODAY WE

                    WILL BE PASSING A RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR HOCHUL TO

                    PROCLAIM MARCH 21, 2022 AS DOWN SYNDROME AWARENESS DAY IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE OF WORLD

                    DOWN SYNDROME AWARENESS DAY.  WORLD DOWN SYNDROME AWARENESS

                    DAY IS A GLOBAL AWARENESS DAY WHICH HAS BEEN OFFICIALLY OBSERVED BY

                    THE UNITED NATIONS SINCE 2012, SO TODAY WOULD BE THE 10TH ANNIVERSARY

                    OF THAT.  THE DATE FOR WORLD DOWN SYNDROME DAY BEING THE 21ST DAY

                    OF THE THIRD MONTH WAS SELECTED TO SIGNIFY THE UNIQUENESS OF THE

                    TRIPLICATION -- TRISOMY -- OF THE 21ST CHROMOSOME, WHICH CAUSES DOWN

                    SYNDROME.  DOWN SYNDROME TRISOMY IS A NATURALLY-OCCURRING

                    CHROMOSOMAL ARRANGEMENT THAT HAS ALWAYS BEEN A PART OF THE HUMAN

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    CONDITION, BEING UNIVERSALLY PRESENT ACROSS RACIAL, GENDER OR

                    SOCIO-ECONOMIC LINES IN APPROXIMATELY ONE IN 800 LIVE BIRTHS, ALTHOUGH

                    THERE IS CONSIDERABLE VARIATION WORLDWIDE.  DOWN SYNDROME USUALLY

                    CAUSES VARYING DEGREES OF INTELLECTUAL OR PHYSICAL DISABILITY AND

                    ASSOCIATED MEDICAL ISSUES.  OVER TIME, DOWN SYNDROME AWARENESS HAS

                    BEEN PROMOTED THROUGH THE LOTS OF SOCKS CAMPAIGN DUE TO

                    CHROMOSOMES BEING SHAPED LIKE SOCKS, AND PEOPLE WITH DOWN

                    SYNDROME HAVE AN EXTRA CHROMOSOME.  MANY OF YOU ARE WEARING OR

                    HAVE RECEIVED A PAIR OF JOHN'S CRAZY SOCKS FROM JOHN CRONIN, WHO

                    WAS JUST INTRODUCED A FEW MOMENTS AGO, HIS FATHER MARK AND BY -- ON

                    BEHALF OF OUR COLLEAGUES ASSEMBLYMEN GANDOLFO AND STERN.

                                 SO TODAY ON WORLD DOWN SYNDROME DAY I WANT TO

                    PUT FORWARD THIS QUESTION:  WHAT DOES INCLUSION MEAN TO YOU AND TO

                    THE COMMUNITIES THAT YOU REPRESENT?  WHAT IS A GOOD LIFE?  IS IT A JOB,

                    HOME, THE LOVE OF FAMILY, FRIENDS?  FOR JOHN CRONIN AND HIS FATHER, IT'S

                    ABOUT SPREADING HAPPINESS.  AND CERTAINLY FROM MEETING JOHN A LITTLE

                    BIT EARLIER TODAY, JOHN IS ONE OF THE HAPPIEST PEOPLE THAT I'VE MET WHO

                    IS ABSOLUTELY DETERMINED THAT ALTHOUGH HE HAS DOWN SYNDROME, IT DOES

                    NOT DEFINE HIM OR DEFINE WHAT HIS POTENTIAL IS OR GET IN THE WAY OF HIS

                    LIFE ONE BIT.

                                 THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECOGNIZE THE

                    IMPORTANCE OF RAISING AWARENESS OF THIS COMMON GENETIC CONDITION

                    THAT AFFECTS THE LIVES OF MANY RESIDENTS THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE,

                    AND I HOPE THAT THIS BODY WILL CONTINUE TO WORK ON MANY INITIATIVES TO

                    TRY TO SUPPORT INCLUSION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DIFFERING ABILITIES IN THE

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    WORKPLACE AND IN OUR DAILY LIVES IN THIS STATE.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 664, MS.

                    LUPARDO.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 21-25, 2022 AS AGRICULTURE WEEK IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. LUPARDO ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. LUPARDO:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  AS WAS JUST MENTIONED, WE ARE RECOGNIZING MARCH 21ST

                    THROUGH THE 25TH AS AGRICULTURE WEEK IN NEW YORK STATE IN

                    CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE OF NATIONAL -- NATIONAL AGRICULTURE

                    WEEK.  I'D LIKE TO READ ONE SENTENCE FROM THE RESOLUTION WHICH I THINK

                    COVERS THE BROADER INTENT OF THIS -- OF THIS RECOGNITION.  WE ARE

                    CELEBRATING THE ABUNDANCE PROVIDED BY AGRICULTURE.  EVERY YEAR

                    PRODUCERS, AGRICULTURAL ASSOCIATIONS, CORPORATIONS, UNIVERSITIES,

                    GOVERNMENT AGENCIES AND COUNTLESS OTHERS ACROSS AMERICA JOIN

                    TOGETHER TO RECOGNIZE THE CONTRIBUTIONS OF AGRICULTURE.  AS A QUICK

                    REMINDER, IN NEW YORK STATE WE ARE LOOKING AT A $5 BILLION INDUSTRY,

                    OVER 33,000 FARMS EMPLOYING OVER 50,000 PEOPLE.  WE ARE THE NUMBER

                    ONE PRODUCER OF DAIRY PRODUCTS SUCH AS COTTAGE CHEESE, SOUR CREAM,

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    YOGURT.  NUMBER TWO FOR APPLIES, MAPLE SYRUP, PUMPKINS AND CABBAGE.

                    WE HAVE AN OBLIGATION, MY COLLEAGUES, TO HONOR AND RESPECT THE

                    CONTRIBUTIONS OF NEW YORK AGRICULTURE DURING THIS WEEK AND DURING

                    EVERY WEEK OF THE YEAR.  THEY ARE VITAL TO NEW YORK'S ECONOMY, EVERY

                    REGION OF THE STATE, AND THEY ARE VITAL TO OUR WAY OF LIFE.

                                 DURING THIS WEEK AND THROUGHOUT THE YEAR, PLEASE

                    THANK A FARMER FOR THEIR SERVICE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.

                                 MR. REILLY FOR AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THANK YOU

                    TO MY COLLEAGUES FOR ALLOWING ME TO INTERRUPT OUR PROCEEDINGS TO

                    WELCOME SOME MEMBERS TO THE ASSEMBLY, SOME FAMILY MEMBERS.  OUR

                    DISTINGUISHED COLLEAGUE ASSEMBLYMAN MIKE CUSICK, THE DEAN OF OUR

                    STATEN ISLAND DELEGATION, THE REAL BOSSES OF THE FAMILY ARE HERE, LED BY

                    HIS WIFE YASMIN, AND MOST OF ALL THE REAL BOSS, VIOLET, WHO WE ARE

                    TRAINING TO TAKE OVER.  WE SHOWED HER WHICH BUTTONS TO PRESS.  BUT WE

                    WANT TO THANK THEM FOR JOINING US HERE TODAY, THANK THEM FOR ALLOWING

                    US TO SHARE SOME TIME WITH HER DAD, YASMIN'S HUSBAND, AND FOR LOANING

                    HIM TO US.  WE THANK YOU FOR COMING, AND YOU'LL ALWAYS BE A PART OF

                    OUR FAMILY.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MR. REILLY, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, MISS CUSICK AND MRS.

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    CUSICK, WE WELCOME YOU HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY

                    CHAMBER.  WE EXTEND TO YOU AS FAMILY THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR.

                    WE'RE ALWAYS GREAT AND HAPPY TO SEE YOU BOTH.  AND I NOW WILL HAVE

                    TWO PICTURES OF YOU AT THE ROSTRUM SINCE YOU TOOK A PICTURE AGAIN

                    TODAY.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH, AND WE HOPE YOU ENJOY YOUR TIME

                    HERE AND BE WELL.  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 PAGE 4, CALENDAR NO. 393 [SIC], THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A08932, CALENDAR NO.

                    493, STIRPE, JONES, SEAWRIGHT, HEVESI, THIELE, DICKENS, ABBATE, GALEF,

                    MCDONALD, SAYEGH, CAHILL, BRAUNSTEIN, L. ROSENTHAL, SMULLEN,

                    MCDONOUGH, LAWLER, BRABENEC, MONTESANO, J.A. GIGLIO, TAGUE, J.M.

                    GIGLIO, SILLITTI, SIMON, GUNTHER, DAVILA, FAHY.  AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE

                    EMPIRE STATE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO DEVELOP A PUBLIC AWARENESS

                    CAMPAIGN PROMOTING BUSINESSES LOCATED IN NEW YORK STATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 8932.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. PALMESANO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES.  MR. SPEAKER AND MY

                    COLLEAGUES, I'M GOING TO BE VOTING NO ON THIS BILL THAT THINK THAT WE

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    NEED TO HAVE TAXPAYER DOLLARS GOING OUT TO PROMOTE BUSINESSES IN NEW

                    YORK STATE SAYING WE'RE OPEN FOR BUSINESS.  I REMEMBER THE OPEN FOR

                    BUSINESS CAMPAIGN.  NEW YORK IS NOT OPEN FOR BUSINESS.  BUSINESSES

                    KNOW IT.  TAXPAYERS KNOW IT.  SO WE'RE GOING TO SPEND TAXPAYER DOLLARS

                    TO SAY BUSINESSES ARE OPEN?  A BETTER THOUGHT WOULD BE LET'S -- LET'S TRY

                    TO CUT TAXES, LET'S CUT REGULATIONS.  LET'S ADDRESS SOME OF THESE

                    MANDATES THAT ARE COMING DOWN THE LINE -- DOWN THE LINES THAT ARE

                    GOING TO IMPACT THE BUSINESSES, LIKE THE GREEN NEW DEAL FOR NEW

                    YORK, THE CLCPA, WHICH IS GOING TO DRAMATICALLY INCREASE ENERGY

                    COSTS FOR BUSINESSES ACROSS THE STATE, WHICH IS DRAMATICALLY GOING TO

                    BANKRUPT FAMILIES BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO REQUIRE THEM TO CONVERT

                    THEIR HOMES OVER TO ELECTRIC, BUSINESS TO CONVERT THEIR HOMES OVER TO

                    ELECTRIC.  SO WHY DON'T YOU RUN A CAMPAIGN AND LET THE PUBLIC NOW

                    WHAT YOU'RE ABOUT TO SHOVE DOWN THE THROAT WITH THE CLCPA THAT'S

                    GOING TO BE DISASTROUS FOR TAXPAYERS AND DISASTROUS FOR UTILITY PAYERS,

                    DISASTROUS FOR FARMERS, DISASTROUS FOR MANUFACTURERS, DISASTROUS FOR ALL

                    BUSINESSES.

                                 SO FOR THAT REASON I'M GOING TO VOTE NO.  WE DON'T

                    NEED TO SPEND MORE TAXPAYER DOLLARS ON AN OPEN FOR BUSINESS

                    CAMPAIGN WHEN WE KNOW WE'RE NOT OPEN FOR BUSINESS IN NEW YORK

                    STATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. PALMESANO IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    REMEMBER BACK IN 2014 THE WONDERFUL START-UP NEW YORK CAMPAIGN

                    IN WHICH WE WASTED MILLIONS UPON MILLIONS OF DOLLARS ON TELEVISION

                    ADVERTISING EXPLAINING THAT BUSINESSES WERE GOING TO COME TO NEW

                    YORK AND THEY WERE GOING TO RECEIVE TAX BREAKS FOR TEN YEARS.  AND NOT

                    MANY BUSINESSES CAME AND NOT MANY JOBS WERE CREATED AND A LOT OF

                    MONEY WAS WASTED.  THIS SEEMS LIKE MORE OF THE SAME.  AND SO WHILE

                    WE KEEP DOING THE AD CAMPAIGNS, TRYING TO BAMBOOZLE THE VOTERS AND

                    THE RESIDENTS OF NEW YORK INTO THINKING THAT OUR STATE IS OPEN FOR

                    BUSINESS WITH THE HIGH COST OF DOING BUSINESS, THE HIGH TAXES, THE

                    BURDENSOME REGULATIONS, FLORIDA, NORTH CAROLINA, TENNESSEE, TEXAS

                    AND A WHOLE HOST OF OTHER STATES KEEP EATING OUR LUNCH BECAUSE WE

                    HAVE SOME OF THE MOST BACKWARDS ECONOMIC POLICIES IN THIS STATE.  WE

                    SPEND MORE MONEY TRYING TO ATTRACT BUSINESS THAN ACTUALLY GENERATING

                    BUSINESS.  AND WE SHOULD BE CUTTING TAXES, CUTTING REGULATIONS, AND YET

                    NEXT WEEK WE'LL BE VOTING ON A BUDGET THAT I'M SURE WILL BE HIGHER THAN

                    IT'S EVER BEEN BEFORE, CEMENTING OUR PLACE AS THE LEAST ECONOMICALLY-

                    FREE AND COMPETITIVE STATE IN AMERICA.

                                 SO I VOTE NO ON THIS LEGISLATION AND CERTAINLY

                    ENCOURAGE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES TO VOTE NO ON ANOTHER WASTE OF

                    TAXPAYER MONEY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAWLER IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I'M

                    VOTING NO ON THIS BILL.  IN ADDITION TO THE REASONS MENTIONED BY MY

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    COLLEAGUE, I THINK THERE'S AN OLD SAYING THAT SAYS, ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER

                    THAN WORDS.  AND IF WE'RE SERIOUS ABOUT HELPING OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES,

                    AND I HOPE WE ARE, THEN WE SHOULD SHOW THAT THROUGH OUR ACTION.

                    DURING COVID, AS YOU KNOW, OUR GOVERNOR SHUT DOWN MANY

                    BUSINESSES ALL ACROSS THE STATE.  LITERALLY HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS OF

                    BUSINESSES WERE SHUT DOWN.  AND THEY INCURRED MASSIVE

                    UNEMPLOYMENT EXPENSES NOT BECAUSE THEY WERE LAYING OFF PEOPLE ON

                    THEIR OWN WILL, BUT BECAUSE THE STATE (INAUDIBLE) ITSELF WAS ORDERING

                    THEM TO BE CLOSED.  WE NOW HAVE A $9 BILLION SHORTFALL IN OUR

                    UNEMPLOYMENT ACCOUNTS, CREATED BY STATE GOVERNMENT.  SO LET'S PUT

                    OUR -- OUR GOODWILL TOWARDS BUSINESSES INTO PLAY AND ADD MONEY FROM

                    THE FEDERAL STIMULUS FUNDS TO OFFSET THAT HUGE DEFICIT SO WE CAN

                    PROVIDE REAL RELIEF TO OUR BUSINESSES, HELPING THEM THEN TO COMPETE

                    MORE SUCCESSFULLY WITH BUSINESSES THAT ARE OUTSIDE NEW YORK STATE

                    AND ENABLE THEM TO KEEP THEIR COSTS LOWER FOR OUR OWN RESIDENTS.  AND

                    IF ANYONE DOESN'T THINK THAT OUR LOCAL BUSINESSES AREN'T COMPETING WITH

                    EVERYONE ELSE ACROSS THE NATION, YOU HAVEN'T MET SOMETHING CALLED

                    AMAZON OR THE INTERNET.  AND SO WE NEED TO RECOGNIZE THAT IF WE WANT

                    TO HELP LOCAL BUSINESS SUCCEED, WE NEED TO STEP UP TO THE PLATE.  AND

                    PUTTING NOTHING IN THE BUDGET TO PAY DOWN THAT $9 BILLION DEFICIT IS NOT

                    THE RIGHT APPROACH TO GO.

                                 SO I SUPPORT HELPING LOCAL BUSINESSES.  LET'S PUT THE

                    MONEY WHERE IT CAN BEST BE USED.  FOR THAT REASON I'LL BE VOTING AGAINST

                    THIS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. RA.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  JUST TO BRIEFLY

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  YOU KNOW, I VOTED AGAINST THIS IN THE PAST, BUT I'M

                    ACTUALLY TORN BECAUSE I READ THE VETO MESSAGE FROM THE FORMER

                    GOVERNOR WHO TALKED ABOUT ESD HAS FOUND THE MOST SUCCESS

                    PROMOTING NEW YORK BUSINESSES THROUGH AN INDUSTRY-SPECIFIC TAILORED

                    APPROACH SUCH -- SUCH AS IN ITS START-UP NEW YORK, WHICH I FIND

                    PUZZLING BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT THAT PROGRAM HAS BEEN A COMPLETE

                    BOONDOGGLE FOR -- FOR MANY, MANY YEARS.  AND IT MAKES ME TORN

                    BECAUSE I KNOW THE JUDGMENT OF OUR FORMER GOVERNOR WHEN IT COMES

                    TO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WAS SPEND MONEY, SEND IT TO YOUR CRONIES

                    AND HOPE THAT THE MONEY TRAIL DOESN'T LEAD BACK TO YOU.  BUT IT MAKES

                    ME WONDER, SHOULD I VOTE FOR A BILL BECAUSE HE DISAGREED WITH IT AND,

                    YOU KNOW, IF HE THOUGHT IT WAS BAD FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IT

                    MAKES ME THINK MAYBE IT COULD BE GOOD FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT.

                    BUT I -- BUT I DO KIND OF END UP BACK ON THE SIDE WITH MANY OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES THAT, YOU KNOW, THESE TYPES OF PROGRAMS -- WE -- WE

                    PROPOSED LEGISLATION THAT WOULD TAKE SOMETHING LIKE THIS.  WE NEED TO

                    WORK WITH OUR LOCAL BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS.  WE NEED TO PROMOTE OUR

                    LOCAL BUSINESSES.  THE APPROACH AT THE STATE LEVEL REALLY JUST HAS NOT

                    WORKED OVER TIME, AND FOR THAT REASON I'M GOING TO BE VOTING NO.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RA IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. MCDONOUGH.

                                 MR. MCDONOUGH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I

                    AM ORIGINALLY SPONSORED -- COSPONSORED THIS BILL, BUT BASED ON THE

                    COMMENTS THAT YOU'VE ALREADY HEARD AND LOOKING AT THE PREVIOUS VETO

                    MESSAGE THAT THE PREVIOUS GOVERNOR DID AND THE FAILURE OF THE, YOU

                    KNOW, BUSINESS PROGRAMS THAT WE'VE HAD IN THE PAST, I'M GOING TO

                    CHANGE MY VOTE TO NO FOR THE REASONS THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN STATED BY

                    SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. MCDONOUGH IN

                    THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. STIRPE TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  IT'S FUNNY

                    THAT SO MANY PEOPLE GET UP AND SPEAK AGAINST THIS THAT WERE

                    COSPONSORS.  I MEAN, THE IDEA BEHIND THIS BILL WAS CREATING A DATABASE

                    THAT NEW YORK STATE BUSINESSES COULD USE TO FIND OTHER NEW YORK

                    STATE BUSINESSES THAT PRODUCE STUFF THAT THEY USE.  THE, YOU KNOW, VETO

                    MESSAGE SAID THAT THEY WERE ALREADY DOING THIS, BUT WHEN I WAS SHOWN

                    WHAT THE DATABASE DID IT PROVED THAT THAT WAS NOT TRUE.  SO IF YOU WANT

                    TO CRITICIZE THE PREVIOUS ADMINISTRATION FOR ALL THE BAD THINGS THEY DID,

                    YOU PROBABLY SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS BILL BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T WANT THE BILL

                    EITHER.  SO THIS WILL DEFINITELY HELP NEW YORK STATE BUSINESSES SHOP

                    WITHIN THEIR OWN NEIGHBORS, AND I'M HAPPY TO SPONSOR THE BILL AND I

                    WAS HAPPY THAT SO MANY PEOPLE COSPONSORED IT.

                                 SO THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. STIRPE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD THE

                    FOLLOWING COLLEAGUES IN OPPOSITION TO THIS LEGISLATION:  MR. DIPIETRO,

                    COSPONSOR MR. MCDONOUGH --

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 -- AND MR. WALCZYK.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SOME ALREADY

                    IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES, BUT WE WILL NOTE THE OTHERS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A09406, CALENDAR NO.

                    494, PAULIN, FAHY.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE TRANSPORTATION LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO INFORMATION CONCERNING SERVICES FOR HUMAN TRAFFICKING

                    VICTIMS IN COMMERCIAL SERVICE AIRPORTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 60TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 9406.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN

                    INTRODUCTION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTERRUPT OUR PROCEEDINGS FOR THE

                    PURPOSES OF INTRODUCING SOMEONE WHO IS NOT UNFAMILIAR WITH OUR

                    CHAMBERS.  SHE IS THE -- A FORMER ASSEMBLYMEMBER FROM 1994 TO '99.

                    SHE WENT ON TO BE A NEW YORK CITY COUNCIL MEMBER AND SHE IS NOW

                    THE QUEENS DA.  PLEASE WELCOME MELINDA KATZ.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON BEHALF OF THE

                    SPEAKER, THE MAJORITY LEADER, THE ENTIRE QUEENS DELEGATION, MELINDA,

                    WE WELCOME YOU BACK.  ONCE A MEMBER, ALWAYS A MEMBER.  I NOTICED

                    THAT YOU'RE JUST AS IMPATIENT NOW AS YOU WERE IN '94.  SO, IT'S HAPPY TO

                    HAVE YOU HERE TODAY.  I HOPE YOUR TRIP TO ALBANY WILL BE BENEFICIAL.

                    KNOW THAT YOU'RE ALWAYS WELCOME HERE.  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 CALENDAR NO. 31 -- PAGE 13, CALENDAR NO. 74, THE

                    CLERK WILL READ.  ON DEBATE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01450, CALENDAR NO.

                    74, DINOWITZ, GALEF, WILLIAMS, COLTON, DICKENS, GOTTFRIED, SEAWRIGHT,

                    ZEBROWSKI, REYES, ABINANTI.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING NOTICE OF MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    CERTAIN CONSUMER CONTRACTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. DINOWITZ, WHO I BELIEVE IS ON ZOOM.

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  YOU ARE CORRECT.  THE PURPOSE OF

                    THIS BILL IS TO REQUIRE COMPANIES RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING A

                    CONTRACT FOR CONSUMER GOODS, SERVICES OR EMPLOYMENT TO DISCLOSE THE

                    EXISTENCE OF ANY MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE CONTAINED WITHIN THE

                    CONTRACT, AND TO CLEARLY EXPLAIN WHAT A MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. DINOWITZ, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  YES, I WILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. DINOWITZ.  AND

                    THANK YOU FOR THAT EXPLANATION.  SO IF I UNDERSTAND IT CORRECTLY, IF THIS

                    BILL PASSES AND SIGNED INTO LAW, IT WOULD REQUIRE THE INDIVIDUAL THAT'S

                    PROPOSING THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO DISCLOSE IT TO THE

                    CONSUMER, CLEARLY EXPLAINED IN PLAIN LANGUAGE WHAT IT MEANS.  AND IF

                    THE CONSUMER IS SIGNING THAT ELECTRONICALLY TO PROVIDE A LINK THAT

                    PROVIDES A PLAIN ENGLISH EXPLANATION.  THAT'S PRETTY MUCH WHAT YOU

                    JUST DESCRIBED, ISN'T IT?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IF SAY AN EMPLOYER OR A SELLER

                    OF GOODS AND SERVICES FOLLOWS THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE THAT YOU PROPOSED

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    AND EXPLAINS IN PLAIN ENGLISH WHAT THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE

                    MEANS AND THE CONSUMER THEN SIGNS THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE,

                    WOULD THAT MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE THEN BE VALID?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  IT WOULD SEEM SO.  IF -- IT WOULD

                    NOT BE OTHERWISE INVALID.  IN OTHER WORDS, IF IT'S OTHERWISE VALID THEN

                    IT'S OTHERWISE VALID.  BUT IN ORDER TO TAKE EFFECT IT WOULD HAVE TO BE

                    EXPLAINED IN PLAIN LANGUAGE AND THIS -- AND DISCLOSED AND EXPLAINED,

                    YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WELL, I'M -- I'M NOT ENTIRELY SURE I

                    UNDERSTAND YOUR ANSWER.  IF THEY FOLLOW EVERYTHING THAT YOU CALL FOR IN

                    THIS LAW, WOULD THAT MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE BE VALID?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  WELL, LET ME TRY TO REPHRASE WHAT I

                    SAID IN PLAINER ENGLISH.  IF THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS OTHERWISE VALID AND

                    THEY FOLLOW THIS, THEN THE ANSWER WOULD BE YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND OTHER THAN OTHER PROVISIONS

                    THAT A -- AN EMPLOYER OR A SELLER OF GOODS WOULD HAVE TO COMPLY WITH

                    FOR THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO BE VALID IN ADDITION TO WHAT YOU'RE

                    PROPOSING HERE.

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  THERE -- THERE MAY BE OTHER

                    REASONS WHY IT MIGHT NOT BE VALID.  BUT THE ONLY THING THIS BILL

                    ADDRESSES IS THE ISSUE OF DISCLOSURE AND EXPLANATION.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND THIS ISSUE OF DISCLOSURE AND

                    EXPLANATION, THAT IS INTENDED TO APPLY SPECIFICALLY TO CONSUMER

                    CONTRACTS AND EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS, CORRECT?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  IT APPLIES TO CONTRACTS REGARDING

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    EMPLOYMENT, CONSUMER GOODS AND SERVICES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND WOULD THAT APPLY, THEN, TO

                    BOTH THE SELLER OF GOODS AND SERVICES AS WELL AS THE PURCHASER, THEN?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  IT APPLIES TO -- IT REQUIRES

                    COMPANIES RESPONSIBLE FOR ADMINISTERING A CONTRACT FOR CONSUMER

                    GOODS, SERVICES AND EMPLOYMENT TO DISCLOSE.  THE PERSON AT THE OTHER

                    END OF THE CONTRACT IS NORMALLY NOT THE PERSON REQUIRING A MANDATORY

                    ARBITRATION CLAUSE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, AS YOU KNOW, A LOT OF

                    EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS HAVE MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES IN IT.

                    COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS OFTEN HAVE MANDATORY ARBITRATION.

                    WOULD THE PERSONNEL DEPARTMENT, IF YOU WILL, OF AN EMPLOYER THAT HAS A

                    COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT WITH MANDATORY ARBITRATION BE

                    REQUIRED TO EXPLAIN IT TO EVERY NEW EMPLOYEE THAT THEY AUTOMATICALLY

                    ARE COVERED BY MANDATORY ARBITRATION, OR WOULD THIS ONLY APPLY TO

                    THOSE CONTRACTS WHERE THE CONSUMER ACTUALLY SIGNS THE CONTRACT ITSELF?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  I -- I DON'T THINK THIS IS RELEVANT IN

                    -- IN THE CASE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WELL, IN THE PAST IT WASN'T --

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  IT HAS TO DO WITH CONTRACTS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  -- BECAUSE -- WELL, IN THE PAST IT

                    WASN'T BECAUSE THE MANDATORY ARBITRATION LANGUAGE YOU'RE TALKING

                    ABOUT ONLY APPLIED TO CONSUMER GOODS.  BUT THIS BILL ADDS "OR

                    EMPLOYMENT."  SO IT WOULD APPLY NOT ONLY TO CONSUMER GOODS BUT

                    EMPLOYMENT.  SO MY QUESTION, THEN, IN THE EMPLOYMENT CONTEXT IS

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THERE A CARVEOUT IN THIS LANGUAGE FOR COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS

                    THAT CONTAIN A MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSE?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  THIS BILL DOES NOT MAKE ANY

                    REFERENCE TO COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO NEITHER AN EXCEPTION NOR AN

                    INCLUSION, IT'S JUST SILENT; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. DINOWITZ:  I -- THE BILL IS PRETTY SHORT.  I DON'T

                    SEE ANYTHING IN HERE ABOUT COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS, SO THE

                    ANSWER WOULD BE IT DOES NOT MAKE REFERENCE TO THAT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. DINOWITZ.  I

                    ALWAYS APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  YOU KNOW, AS LEGISLATORS WE -- WE

                    VOTE ON ACTUAL BILL LANGUAGE.  WE DON'T VOTE ON CONCEPTS, WE VOTE ON

                    BILL LANGUAGE.  AND THIS BILL HAS TWO THINGS THAT ARE SOMEWHAT CURIOUS:

                    FIRST, IT DEFINES CONSUMER GOOD -- CONSUMER GOODS TO MEAN

                    EMPLOYMENT.  SO, PROVISIONS DEALING WITH MANDATORY ARBITRATION UNDER

                    THE TERMS OF THIS AMENDMENT WOULD AUTOMATICALLY APPLY TO EVERY

                    EMPLOYMENT SITUATION WHICH WOULD INCLUDE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING

                    AGREEMENTS.  AND THAT'S A PROBLEM, OF COURSE, BECAUSE THIS SAYS THE ACT

                    WILL TAKE EFFECT IN 180 DAYS.  AND SO ONCE AGAIN WE'RE BEING ASKED TO

                    PASS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD IMPAIR THE VALIDITY OF AN EXISTING CONTRACT

                    OR IMPOSE A NEW OBLIGATION ON PERSONNEL DEPARTMENTS TO EXPLAIN THAT

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    EVEN THOUGH THE INDIVIDUAL MAY NOT BE SIGNING A CONTRACT BECAUSE IT'S

                    COVERED BY COLLECTIVE BARGAINING, THAT THERE'S A MANDATORY ARBITRATION

                    CLAUSE.  BUT THE MORE INTERESTING ISSUE FROM MY PERSPECTIVE AS AN

                    ATTORNEY IS THAT THE EXISTING LAW HAS AN ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION ON

                    MANDATORY ARBITRATION CLAUSES AND CONSUMER -- CONSUMER TRANSACTIONS.

                    THERE'S AN ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION IN EXISTING LAW.  SO THEN WE SAY EVEN

                    THOUGH THERE'S AN ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION IN EXISTING LAW, WHEN IT COMES

                    TO CONSUMER CONTRACTS YOU'RE SUPPOSED TO EXPLAIN WHAT IT MEANS?

                    NOW, FOR THE LAWYERS HERE, WE ALL KNOW THAT COURTS WHEN FACED WITH

                    WHAT APPEARS TO BE AN ABSOLUTE CONTRADICTION ON ONE HAND BARRING ALL

                    MANDATORY CONTRACTS AND ON THE OTHER HAND SAYING, AND BY THE WAY,

                    WHEN YOU HAVE A MANDATORY CONTRACT YOU'VE GOT TO EXPLAIN IT IN PLAIN

                    ENGLISH, THEY WOULD READ THE LATER LEGISLATION AS AMENDING THE EARLIER

                    LEGISLATION.  SO THE IRONY IS I THINK THIS LANGUAGE REMOVES THE ABSOLUTE

                    PROHIBITION AND REPLACES IT WITH A DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENT.  THIS -- I

                    DON'T THINK THERE'S ANY OTHER WAY TO READ THIS.  BECAUSE IF IT'S ABSOLUTELY

                    PROHIBITED YOU MOST ASSUREDLY DON'T NEED TO EXPLAIN IT.  THE ONLY TIME

                    YOU NEED TO EXPLAIN IT IN PLAIN ENGLISH IS IF IT'S ALLOWED.  AND THAT'S

                    EXACTLY WHAT THIS LANGUAGE WOULD DO.

                                 NOW, FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HATE ARBITRATION CLAUSES,

                    YOU SHOULD PROBABLY VOTE AGAINST THIS BECAUSE I THINK IT REPLACES THE

                    ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION WITH AN EXPLANATION.  FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO LOVE

                    OR SUPPORT ARBITRATION CLAUSES, I WOULD RECOMMEND YOU VOTE FOR THIS

                    BECAUSE IT ALLOWS AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE TO BE IN THE CONSUMER CONTEXT

                    AS LONG AS IT'S EXPLAINED IN PLAIN ENGLISH.  FOR THOSE OF US WHO ACTUALLY

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    PRACTICE LAW, WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE COURT SYSTEM IS EXTRAORDINARILY

                    SLOW AND EXPENSIVE.  YOUR FILING FEES JUST TO WALK THROUGH THE FRONT

                    DOOR IN SUPREME COURT IS OVER $300.  JUST YOUR FILING FEES.  SO THEN

                    YOU MIGHT ASK, IF YOU HAVE A CONSUMER COMPLAINT WOULD YOU RATHER

                    HAVE ARBITRATION WHICH IS FAST AND EFFICIENT, OR IF YOU'RE A CONSUMER

                    WOULD YOU RATHER BE FORCED TO GO INTO THE SMALL CLAIMS COURT -- WHICH

                    IN MY COUNTY IS NOW BACKED UP BY MONTHS -- OR MAYBE IN SUPREME

                    COURT WHERE IT'S GOING TO COST YOU A SMALL FORTUNE IN LEGAL FEES AND

                    FILING FEES?  AND SO MOST COMPANIES THAT USE MANDATORY ARBITRATION

                    CLAUSES CORRECTLY POINT OUT THAT FOR THE VAST MAJORITY OF CONSUMERS,

                    ARBITRATION IS LESS EXPENSIVE AND MUCH FASTER THAN GOING TO COURT.

                                 SO THERE'S THE DILEMMA.  IF YOU LIKE ARBITRATION THEN I

                    THINK YOU SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS BECAUSE IT EXPANDS IT.  AND IF YOU DON'T

                    LIKE ARBITRATION YOU SHOULD PROBABLY VOTE AGAINST THIS BILL BECAUSE IT

                    APPEARS TO CARVE OUT AN EXCEPTION FOR THE ABSOLUTE PROHIBITIONS AND

                    ALLOW ARBITRATION IN THOSE CASES WHERE THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IS

                    EXPLAINED IN PLAIN ENGLISH.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 1450.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED -- OR WISHES TO

                    BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  I THINK THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  I'M

                    ABOUT TO FIND OUT.  THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT SHOULD CERTAINLY CALL THE

                    MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE.  AND AS I MENTIONED, IN A MOMENT -- AS I

                    WILL MENTION IN A MOMENT, I WILL BE SUPPORTING IT.  BUT IT IS -- JUST SO

                    THERE'S NO CONFUSION -- WE WILL START WITH A NO VOTE AND THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT CAN VOTE YES ON THE FLOOR OR CALL THE MINORITY LEADER'S

                    OFFICE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I WOULD LIKE TO REMIND MY COLLEAGUES THAT THIS IS A PARTY VOTE

                    IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE SOME

                    COLLEAGUES WHO WOULD CHOOSE TO BE AN EXCEPTION.  FEEL FREE TO CONTACT

                    THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND YOUR VOTE WILL PROPERLY BE RECORDED.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU MA'AM.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  I -- I SUSPECT MY

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    PRIOR COMMENTS MAY HAVE JUST CONFUSED MANY MEMBERS MORE THAN

                    ILLUMINATED THEM.  BUT LET ME MAKE IT CLEAR.  I THINK THAT ARBITRATION

                    CLAUSES ARE OFTEN A GREAT BENEFIT TO THE CONSUMER.  AS A PRACTICING

                    ATTORNEY I CAN ASSURE YOU THAT TAKING A CASE TO COURT IS EXTRAORDINARILY

                    TIME-CONSUMING AND EXPENSIVE.  AND ARBITRATION IS A FAST AND EFFICIENT

                    ALTERNATIVE.  AND AS I READ THIS BILL, AS I MENTIONED, IT TAKES WHAT IS

                    CURRENTLY AN ABSOLUTE PROHIBITION AND OPENS IT UP TO ALLOW THESE

                    ARBITRATION CLAUSES AS LONG AS THEY'RE PROPERLY EXPLAINED.  I LIKE THE

                    CONCEPT OF ALLOWING ARBITRATION PROVISIONS TO BE AVAILABLE IF THEY'RE

                    PROPERLY EXPLAINED, AND THAT'S WHY I WILL BE VOTING FOR THIS.  FOR THOSE

                    WHO ARE WONDERING WHY, THEN, WOULD I SUGGEST THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS AGAINST IT, AND THAT'S BECAUSE THE LAST TIME THIS BILL CAME

                    UP THERE WERE A LOT OF REPUBLICAN VOTES AGAINST IT.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.  I WILL BE IN FAVOR OF ALLOWING MORE

                    ARBITRATION CLAUSES TO BE VALID IN AN EFFORT TO SAVE MONEY FOR

                    CONSUMERS.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU FOR

                    CLEARING THAT UP.

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE.  I WILL CONTINUE TO BE VOTING NO ON THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION

                    BECAUSE I THINK THAT THIS WHOLE ENTIRE AREA OF THE LAW REGARDING

                    ARBITRATION HAS BECOME SO MUDDLED BY BILLS SEQUENTIALLY BROUGHT THAT

                    MAKE LITTLE CHANGES.  BUT HOLISTICALLY, I THINK WE HAVE TO LOOK AT THIS

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    AREA OF THE LAW AND FIGURE IT OUT.  SO I DON'T THINK THAT THIS ONE BILL IS

                    GOING TO MAKE OR BREAK THIS AREA OF THE LAW, BUT I THINK THAT OVERALL, AS

                    WE DO THESE LITTLE BILLS ONE AFTER ANOTHER AFTER ANOTHER, I THINK IT JUST --

                    IT JUST CONFUSES US TO THE POINT WHERE EVEN MY COLLEAGUE TO MY RIGHT

                    CAN'T EXPLAIN IT IN A WAY THAT IS MAYBE SATISFYING TO ALL OF US.

                                 I'M GOING TO VOTE NO.  I DO BELIEVE IN ARBITRATION.  I

                    THINK IT IS A -- IT IS A POSITIVE THING TO DIRECT INDIVIDUALS TO ARBITRATION IN

                    APPROPRIATE CIRCUMSTANCES.  BUT I -- I CAN'T CONTINUE TO -- I CAN'T

                    SUPPORT A BILL THAT I THINK MAKE THINGS MORE CONFUSING.  WE DO ENOUGH

                    OF THAT ALREADY IN ALBANY.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 13, CALENDAR NO. 75, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01451-A, CALENDAR

                    NO. 75, SANTABARBARA, STECK, J. RIVERA, BRONSON, GALEF, DICKENS,

                    CAHILL, ABINANTI, MONTESANO, BRABENEC, LEMONDES, LAWLER,

                    J.A. GIGLIO, DESTEFANO, SILLITTI, STIRPE.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS LAW, IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE DELIVERY OF

                    LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS IN TIMES OF EMERGENCY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. SANTABARBARA.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THANK YOU.  YES, THIS BILL

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    ALLOWS HOMEOWNERS LEASING PROPANE TANKS TO RECEIVE EMERGENCY

                    DELIVERIES FROM ANY SUPPLIER DURING (INAUDIBLE) NEED AND PERIODS OF

                    HIGH DEMAND REGARDLESS OF CUSTOMER STATUS.  THOSE THAT RELY ON

                    PROPANE GAS TO HEAT THEIR HOMES ARE UNFORTUNATELY MET WITH LONG WAIT

                    TIMES AND SOME HAVE GONE WITHOUT HEAT BECAUSE DELIVERIES WERE

                    UNABLE TO MAKE IT TO THEIR DESTINATION FOR A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT

                    REASONS.  THIS BILL WOULD CLARIFY THAT IN THOSE SITUATIONS, THOSE

                    CUSTOMERS CAN GO TO AN ALTERNATE -- ALTERNATE SUPPLIER TO RECEIVE THE

                    FUEL THEY NEED TO HEAT THEIR HOMES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SANTABARBARA,

                    WILL YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU, ANGELO.  I KNOW

                    WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS BILL IN THE PAST.  I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THE

                    INTENTIONS BEHIND THE LEGISLATION, BUT I DO HAVE A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS I

                    WANT TO GET INTO REGARDING CONTRACT ISSUES, PROPERTY RIGHT ISSUES AND

                    LIABILITY ISSUES.  I KNOW THIS LEGISLATION KIND OF ORIGINATED, IF I'M NOT

                    MISTAKEN, BACK IN 2018 WHEN THERE WAS SOME PROBLEMS WITH

                    PARTICULARLY ONE PROPANE COMPANY ISSUES AND THAT WAS ULTIMATELY

                    SETTLED WITH A SUIT WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S OFFICE; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I THINK YOUR NUMBERS ARE

                    CORRECT, 2018.  JUST TO CLARIFY, SINCE THEN THE PROBLEM HAS CONTINUED

                    AND THIS YEAR THERE WAS A SPIKE AGAIN DURING THE COLD MONTHS WHERE

                    DELIVERIES WERE NOT MADE AND PEOPLE WERE IN THE SAME SITUATION.  THEY

                    WERE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I'M HAVING A HARD TIME HEARING

                    YOU.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  OH, SORRY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THAT'S ALL RIGHT.  THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WHERE WERE WE AGAIN?

                    JUST TO CLARIFY, THAT THE PROBLEM STILL HAS PERSISTED SINCE THEN.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  IT HAS NOT GONE AWAY.

                    AND THIS YEAR IT SPIKED UP AGAIN.  WE GOT SOME MORE CALLS THAT PEOPLE

                    WEREN'T RECEIVING THEIR PROPANE DELIVERIES, SOMETIMES WAITING AS MUCH

                    AS A WEEK, AND IT WAS DURING A VERY COLD TIME.  AND THERE WERE SOME

                    OTHER THINGS GOING ON WITH SUPPLY AND DELIVERY ISSUES, BUT THIS BILL'S

                    INTENDED TO CLARIFY, YOU KNOW, WHAT CAN HAPPEN DURING THOSE

                    SITUATIONS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  SO IT IS FOR RIGHT NOW --

                    FOR, LIKE, ANYONE WHO HAS PROPANE THERE ARE TWO OPTIONS:  ONE, THEY

                    WOULD BUY THEIR OWN TANKS AND WITH THAT THEY CAN -- THEY CAN HAVE

                    ANYONE COME IN AND FILL THOSE TANKS BECAUSE THEY'RE AN OWNER OF THE

                    TANK.  THEY CAN HAVE ANYONE COME IN, OR THEY CAN LEASE A TANK FROM A

                    COMPANY WITH A CONTRACT THAT THEY CAN EITHER -- THAT THE -- THEY PAY FOR

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THE COST OF THAT TANK THROUGH THE -- THROUGH THE DELIVERY AND THE SERVICE

                    OF THE PROPANE THAT'S PROVIDED BY THAT -- THAT SUPPLIER, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  EXACTLY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY, GREAT.  AND SOMETIMES

                    THESE -- THESE TANKS ARE AT NO COST BECAUSE IT'S RECOUPED AS PART OF THAT

                    -- IT IS RECOUPED AS PART OF THOSE REIMBURSEMENTS THROUGH -- THROUGH

                    THE LEASE --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I THINK THERE'S A NUMBER OF

                    DIFFERENT ARRANGEMENTS THAT EXIST OUT -- OUT THERE.  ONE IS PROBABLY

                    WHAT YOU JUST DESCRIBED, BUT THERE MIGHT BE A FEW OTHERS AS WELL, AS

                    HOW THEY ARRANGE, HOW THEY PAY, WHETHER THEY RENT THE TANK OR IF IT'S

                    PAID FOR OVER TIME.  SO THERE'S A PROBABLY A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT

                    SITUATIONS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IN THE BILL WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT

                    SEVERE WHETHER IN -- IN (INAUDIBLE) DECLARING AN EMERGENCY, DOES A

                    CUSTOMER HAVE A RIGHT TO -- TO DECLARE AN EMERGENCY BASED ON THE

                    SITUATION INVOLVED OR DOES IT HAVE TO DEPEND ON WHAT THE MUNICIPALITY

                    OR THE STATE DOES?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I'M SORRY, I'M GOING TO

                    HAVE TO HAVE YOU REPEAT THAT.  OKAY, GO AHEAD.  CAN YOU REPEAT THAT,

                    PLEASE?

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 I DIDN'T HEAR THAT.  CAN YOU SAY THAT AGAIN?

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH, I'M SORRY ABOUT THAT.

                    RIGHT NOW DOES (INAUDIBLE) -- I MEAN, AN EMERGENCY DECLARED BY THE

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    STATE OR LOCAL, DOES THE CUSTOMER HAVE THE RIGHT TO DECLARE AN

                    EMERGENCY BASED ON THE SITUATION OR IS THAT TO BE DEFINED BY THE -- THE

                    LOCAL MUNICIPALITY TO MAKE THAT DECISION?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THERE'S A NUMBER OF WAYS.

                    PART -- PART OF IT IS IT CAN BE DEFINED BY LOCAL -- BY A -- A LOCAL BODY, OR

                    THERE CAN BE SITUATIONS WHERE THE SUPPLIER -- YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THESE

                    PEOPLE ARE ON AUTO DELIVERY WHERE THEY JUST -- A CERTAIN TIME OF THE

                    MONTH THEY COME AND THEY DELIVER.  THEY DO HAVE TO MAKE THE CALL TO

                    THEIR SUPPLIER TO ATTEMPT TO GET A FUEL DELIVERY AND I THINK THEY HAVE 24

                    HOURS TO RESPOND.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO THERE ARE SOME -- SOME

                    SAFEGUARDS IN IT TO ALLOW THAT PRIMARY SUPPLIER TO BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT

                    DELIVERY, BUT THE TRUTH IS SOMETIMES THEY JUST CAN'T DO IT.  AND THERE'S

                    BEEN A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT SITUATIONS.  YOU KNOW, DURING THE

                    PANDEMIC THERE WERE, YOU KNOW, SUPPLY AND DELIVERY ISSUES.

                    SOMETIMES IT'S WEATHER.  SOMETIMES YOU GET HIT WITH SNOWSTORMS AND

                    YOU JUST CAN'T -- ONE COMPANY CAN'T MAKE IT, BUT ANOTHER COMPANY MAY

                    BE ABLE TO COVER THAT DELIVERY, AND I THINK THIS IS INTENDED TO BE ABLE TO

                    CLARIFY HOW THESE COMPANIES CAN ACTUALLY HELP EACH OTHER OUT SO THAT

                    WE DON'T LEAVE SOMEONE WITHOUT HEAT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  SO RIGHT NOW MY

                    UNDERSTANDING IS 45 STATES HAVE CONTAINER LAWS, WHICH BASICALLY MEANS

                    THAT SOMEONE ELSE CAN'T REFILL A PROPANE TANK OF -- OF ANOTHER COMPANY;

                    IS THAT CORRECT?  THERE'S 45 STATES THAT HAVE HAD THOSE LAWS WHERE YOU

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    CAN'T --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I KNOW -- I KNOW THERE ARE

                    OTHER STATES.  THE EXACT NUMBER, I'M GOING TO --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  AND NEW YORK --

                    BUT NEW YORK --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I'LL TAKE YOUR WORD FOR IT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NEW YORK IS NOT ONE OF THEM,

                    CORRECT, THOUGH?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WE'RE NOT -- YEAH, WE'RE

                    NOT IN IT, NO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  BUT RIGHT NOW UNDER THE

                    LAW CAN'T YOU TECHNICALLY -- CAN'T AN INDIVIDUAL -- IS THERE NOTHING IN THE

                    LAW PROHIBITING SOMEONE FROM HAVING ANOTHER PROVIDER COME IN TO FILL

                    THEIR TANK ANYWAY UNDER THE LAW, BUT USUALLY IT'S JUST NOT COMMON

                    PRACTICE BECAUSE OF THE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION.  BUT THERE'S NOTHING IN

                    THE LAW RIGHT NOW PROHIBITING THAT FROM HAPPENING, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  MOST PROPANE COMPANIES

                    WILL NOT DO IT WITHOUT -- WITHOUT THE PROCEDURE AND CLARIFICATION ON THE

                    BOOKS AS TO WHAT THEY CAN AND CANNOT DO.  THEY DON'T -- THEY WON'T DO

                    IT.  SOME MAY DO IT, I DON'T KNOW.  SOME ARE DOING IT.  THE PEOPLE THAT

                    I'VE TALKED TO, THE COMPANIES ARE NOT WILLING TO DO IT UNTIL SOMETHING

                    WAS -- YOU KNOW, UNTIL THIS CLARIFICATION IS PASSED AND THEN THEY'D BE

                    WILLING TO DO IT.  BUT THERE ARE, YOU KNOW, INSPECTIONS AND PROCEDURES

                    --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA: -- THAT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW

                    ANYWAY, SO IT'S -- IT'S -- YOU KNOW, THEY'RE -- THEY'RE ALL UNDER THE SAME

                    UMBRELLA OF RULES AND REGULATIONS.  SO THEY'RE -- WHATEVER TANK THEY

                    ARRIVE AT, WHETHER IT'S -- IT'S THEIR OWN OR A LEASED TANK, THEY HAVE TO GO

                    THROUGH THE SAME PROCEDURE TO ENSURE SAFETY, AND ONCE THEY'VE DONE

                    THAT THEY'VE DONE THEIR DUTY, THEIR DUE DILIGENCE TO BE ABLE TO FILL THAT

                    TANK.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO LIKE IF SOMEONE -- I KNOW

                    YOU TALKED ABOUT IF THEY'RE NOT FILLING THE TANK, WOULDN'T THAT BE

                    ULTIMATELY VIOLATING THE CONTRACT SO THEN THAT WOULD (INAUDIBLE) UNDER

                    THE LAW -- IF THEY'RE NOT FILLING THE TANK THEY'RE VIOLATING THE CONTRACT

                    BUT THEN NOT GIVE THE ABILITY FOR THAT INDIVIDUAL THEN TO GO OUT AND HAVE

                    SOMEONE FILL THE TANK FOR THEM.  SO WHY IS THIS LEGISLATION NEEDED IF

                    THAT'S THE CASE?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO RIGHT NOW I DON'T THINK

                    THAT'S THE CASE.  I DON'T THINK THAT THEY HAVE TO GO FILL ANOTHER TANK.

                    THIS WOULD -- WOULD CLARIFY THAT THEY -- THEY COULD FILL ANOTHER TANK.

                    SO RIGHT NOW THAT'S NOT THE CASE.  AND THERE IS -- I'M SURE THERE'S

                    RECOURSE ON THIS.  OKAY, SOMEONE DOESN'T FILL A TANK, THEY -- THEY

                    VIOLATE THE CONTRACT.  THE ISSUE IS, YOU KNOW, WHEN DOES THAT HAPPEN?

                    SO WE GET A COLD SNAP, YOU KNOW, DAYS, WEEKS LATER.  EVENTUALLY IT MAY

                    SHOW UP OR THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO FILL THAT TANK.  BUT WHAT WE'RE

                    TRYING TO PREVENT HERE IS THAT PERIOD IN BETWEEN WHEN THERE IS JUST NO

                    HEAT IN THE HOUSE AND PEOPLE HAVE HAD TO LEAVE THEIR HOUSE OR ABANDON

                    IT AND GO SOMEWHERE ELSE BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT SURE WHEN THAT DELIVERY

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    IS GOING TO ARRIVE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  BUT RIGHT NOW A

                    CONSUMER CAN CHANGE SUPPLIERS UPON NOTICE AND INVITE ANOTHER

                    COMPANY TO COME AND SUPPLY THEM AND -- AND SERVICE THEIR SUPPLY --

                    SERVICE THEM IF THEY SO CHOOSE UNDER THE LAW RIGHT NOW.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WELL, A SAME ISSUE IS THAT

                    THAT COULD HAPPEN AND THAT HAS HAPPENED.  I'VE -- I'VE GONE TO PEOPLE'S

                    HOMES WHERE, YOU KNOW, WE CALLED ANOTHER COMPANY AND THEY

                    DELIVERED ANOTHER TANK.  THAT'S A LENGTHY PROCEDURE.  PEOPLE WERE

                    ALREADY WAITING FOR A DELIVERY THAT NEVER ARRIVED.  SO DAYS TURN INTO

                    WEEKS.  BY THE TIME YOU GET ANOTHER TANK ON SITE, SWITCH -- SWITCH

                    COMPANIES, THERE'S A PERIOD OF TIME WHERE THE TEMPERATURE DROPS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  AND THIS WAS A -- THIS WAS

                    A COUPLE THAT WAS AN ELDERLY COUPLE, YOU KNOW, AND WE DON'T WANT

                    THEM TO HAVE TO BE IN THAT HOME WITHOUT HEAT WHEN THERE IS AN

                    ALTERNATIVE -- THERE'S A PROCEDURE IN PLACE -- THAT WE CAN PUT IN PLACE TO

                    ALLOW JUST FOR THAT ONE -- MAYBE THAT ONE DELIVERY TO SAY, HEY, YOU

                    KNOW, THIS COMPANY CAN'T MAKE IT.  I'M GOING TO FILL THAT TANK SO THEY --

                    THEY CAN CONTINUE TO HAVE HEAT AND THEN WHEN THEY GET BACK ONLINE AND

                    CAN MAKE THAT DELIVERY, THEY CAN STEP BACK IN AND -- AND -- CONTINUE --

                    CONTINUE FILLING IF THEY'RE DOING BUSINESS WITH THEM AT THAT POINT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.  IS THIS A -- A RAMPANT

                    PROBLEM THAT'S HAPPENED WITH A LOT OF DIFFERENT COMPANIES?  I KNOW WE

                    TALKED ABOUT THE ONE COMPANY THAT WAS CITED BY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    IS THIS A NUMBER OF COMPANIES?  HOW MANY COMPANIES ARE WE TALKING

                    ABOUT ARE HAVING THESE ISSUES THAT ARE CAUSING INDIVIDUALS TO HAVE THESE

                    PROBLEMS?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I GUESS -- I GUESS I DON'T

                    REALLY HAVE, YOU KNOW, THE EXACT NUMBER.  I KNOW THAT I HAVE GOTTEN

                    CALLS SINCE I FIRST INTRODUCED THE BILL BACK IN 2018.  THIS YEAR THERE

                    HAVE BEEN MORE CALLS THAT THERE -- WHERE DELIVERIES WEREN'T MADE FOR A

                    NUMBER OF REASONS.  SO THE PROBLEM KIND OF SURFACED AGAIN, THAT IT'S

                    STILL OUT THERE AND HASN'T GONE AWAY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IS IT MORE THAT THEY'RE, ONE,

                    RUNNING OUT OF PROPANE OR, TWO, THAT THEY ARE AFRAID THEY'RE GOING TO

                    RUN OUT OF PROPANE -- PROPANE TO MAKE THAT CALL BECAUSE THEY WANTED

                    THAT DELIVERY, OR IS IT A COMBINATION OF BOTH?  ARE YOU SEEING PEOPLE

                    WHO ACTUALLY RUN OUT OF PROPANE OR IS IT MORE THAT THEY'RE AFRAID THAT

                    THEY'RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF PROPANE BECAUSE THEY'RE -- THEY'RE THE WILL

                    CALL, THEY'RE NOT THE ONES THAT HAVE THE AUTO FILL.  IS IT THAT THEY'RE AFRAID

                    THAT THEY'RE GOING TO RUN OUT OF PROPANE SO THEN THEY'RE CALLING -- IS THAT

                    MORE OF THE PROBLEM OF THE CASE?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I -- I CAN SAY THIS, IS THAT

                    MORE PEOPLE THIS YEAR ARE ON AUTO FILL BECAUSE OF WHAT HAPPENED.

                    MAYBE THEY WEREN'T, BUT I THINK ALMOST EVERYBODY THAT I TALKED TO THIS

                    YEAR, EVEN IF THEY WEREN'T ON AUTO FILL BEFORE THEY ARE NOW.  SO THERE'S

                    REALLY -- IT'S JUST A MISSED DELIVERY.  YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST PEOPLE DIDN'T

                    SHOW UP AND DIDN'T -- DIDN'T DELIVER THE FUEL.  THAT'S WHAT IT COMES

                    DOWN TO.

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IT'S HAPPENING MORE AND MORE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  AND, YOU KNOW, I -- I CALL

                    THE PROPANE COMPANIES, TOO, AND THERE'S A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT REASONS

                    AND EXCUSES THAT I GET.  AND, YOU KNOW, THE -- THE ANSWER IS WE CAN'T

                    LEAVE PEOPLE, YOU KNOW --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  IF YOU CAN'T GET THERE,

                    SOMEONE HAS TO GET THERE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I -- I -- AND I UNDERSTAND THAT,

                    TOO.  BECAUSE THE REASON I'M ASKING THIS QUESTION IS YOU'RE REALLY

                    TALKING ABOUT FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGING CONTRACTS THAT ARE ESTABLISHED

                    AND SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT I'M GETTING AT IN THESE QUESTIONS.  IN THE BILL I

                    KNOW IT TALKS ABOUT A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO -- TO REALLY -- IF THEY

                    REASONABLY BELIEVE THEY'RE IN DANGER TO MAKE A NOTIFICATION TO THE

                    PROPANE SUPPLIER AND THEN -- SO I MAKE THAT NOTIFICATION TO YOU AND YOU

                    CAN'T SUPPLY ME WITHIN 24 HOURS, THEN NOW I -- NOW I HAVE A RIGHT TO GO

                    TO ANOTHER PROPANE DEALER ON THAT -- IN THAT SITUATION?  I GUESS WHAT

                    ABOUT THE REASON -- WHAT ABOUT THE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE INDIVIDUAL?

                    DO THEY HAVE TO NOTIFY THEM WITHIN A CERTAIN PERIOD OF TIME?

                    ESPECIALLY ON THE WILL CALL WHO ARE ON AUTO FILL WHERE IT'S MY

                    UNDERSTANDING THEY'RE NOTIFIED BY THE PROPANE SUPPLIER, YOU CAN'T JUST

                    CALL US 24 HOURS AHEAD.  YOU HAVE TO GIVE US A FEW DAYS SO WE CAN GET

                    YOU ON THE SCHEDULE.  SO HOW DOES THAT -- HOW DOES THAT -- IS THERE ANY

                    RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEM TO HAVE TO DO IT WITHIN A CERTAIN PERIOD OF

                    NOTIFICATION?

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YES.  SO THE LANGUAGE IN

                    THE BILL HAS LANGUAGE IN IT THAT INDICATES YOU DO HAVE TO TRY AND GET THE

                    DELIVERY FROM YOUR PROPANE SUPPLIER.  BUT A LOT OF TIMES WHEN THEY DO

                    CALL THE COMPANY AND THEY CAN'T DELIVER -- I MEAN, I'VE CALLED MYSELF,

                    TOO, AND THEY WILL SAY, WE CAN'T MAKE THIS DELIVERY OR, IT'S ON THE WAY

                    AND IT MAY BE LATE.  BUT THEY MAY SAY SOMETHING LIKE IT'S ON THE WAY OR

                    IT'S COMING BUT WE -- WE REALLY HAVE -- WE'VE HAD NO INDICATION AS TO

                    WHEN.  SO WHEN I -- WHEN I CALL ON BEHALF OF A CONSTITUENT AND SAY,

                    HEY, WHEN IS THIS DELIVERY SUPPOSED TO BE THERE, IT'S HARD TO GET AN

                    ANSWER BECAUSE SOMETHING'S HAPPENED WHERE -- BECAUSE THEY WANT TO

                    DELIVER.  THEY WANT TO DELIVER THE PROPANE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  NO QUESTION ABOUT IT.

                    THEY WANT TO SELL THE FUEL.  SOMETHING'S HAPPENED AND IT'S STOPPING

                    THEM FROM DOING IT.  IT'S NOT THAT THEY DON'T WANT TO SHOW UP,

                    SOMETHING'S STOPPING THEM.  AND IT COULD BE A NUMBER OF THINGS.  WE

                    JUST WANT TO HAVE THE SAFEGUARD IN PLACE TO SAY, HEY, OKAY, WE'RE GOING

                    TO GO -- YOU KNOW, THIS CONSTITUENT'S GOING TO GO TO AN ALTERNATE

                    SUPPLIER NOW BECAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T DELIVER.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO IF A -- A CUSTOMER SAY THAT

                    THEY'RE THE WILL CALL, THAT THEY CALL AT WILL, AND THEY'RE DOWN AND THEY

                    REALIZE, OKAY, I'M DOWN TO MAYBE FIVE OR TEN GALLONS AND THEY CALL THE

                    PROVIDER AND THE PROVIDER SAYS, WELL, LISTEN, I CAN'T PROVIDE TO YOU NOW

                    BECAUSE I HAVE A ROUTE, I HAVE A SITUATION THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH.  I

                    DON'T -- YOU KNOW, I CAN GET TO YOU IN A COUPLE DAYS.  IS THAT -- IN THAT

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    SITUATION, IF IT'S BEYOND 24 HOURS DOES THAT -- DOES THAT INDIVIDUAL, EVEN

                    THOUGH THE PROVIDER SAYS, I WILL DELIVER TO YOU BUT I CAN'T GET DELIVERY

                    TO YOU TOMORROW BECAUSE YOU'RE JUST LETTING ME KNOW, SO DOES THAT --

                    DOES THAT --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, ON THE NORMAL --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  DOES THAT CUSTOMER HAVE THE

                    RIGHT TO GO TO ANOTHER PROVIDER AT THAT POINT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO I GUESS -- TO ANSWER

                    YOUR QUESTION, UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES, EVEN IF THEY WERE DOWN TO

                    FIVE PERCENT THE DELIVERY COULD BE MADE UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES.

                    THERE'S NOTHING STOPPING -- YOU KNOW, PEOPLE GO DOWN TO REALLY LOW

                    NUMBERS AND PEOPLE HAVE BEEN ABLE TO DELIVER.  THE PROBLEM IS WHEN

                    THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE, WHETHER IF IT'S A TIME OF HIGH DEMAND OR IF

                    THERE'S A SHORTAGE, IF THERE'S A SNOWSTORM --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  -- AND THEY MAY SAY, I

                    CAN'T GET THERE.  NOW WE DO HAVE AN EMERGENCY BECAUSE THEY'RE ABOUT

                    TO RUN OUT OF FUEL.  SO, YOU KNOW, THAT QUALIFIED -- RUNNING -- THE WHOLE

                    IDEA OF THE BILL IS TO PREVENT PEOPLE FROM BEING OUT IN THE COLD,

                    LITERALLY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I UNDERSTAND.  I'M NOT

                    DISAGREEING WITH YOU.  I'M JUST TRYING TO GET SOME TECHNICAL --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YEAH.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  -- AND LEGAL QUESTIONS --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THAT'S FINE.

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  -- WHAT THE BILL BRINGS UP THAT I

                    WANTED TO POINT OUT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I UNDERSTAND.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WHAT IF -- WHAT IF I -- I'M THE

                    CUSTOMER AND I CALL YOU AND YOU SAY TO ME, WELL, PHIL, YOU OWE ME FOR

                    THIS AMOUNT OF MONEY, DO I -- YOU KNOW, I NEED TO BE FILLED UP.  CAN

                    YOU -- IF YOU DON'T COME OUT AND YOU SAY -- YOU'RE TELLING ME, I NEED

                    YOU TO PAY BEFORE I COME OUT.  IF YOU TELL ME THAT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO

                    COME OUT AND FILL UP UNTIL I PAY AND IT'S GOING TO BE MORE THAN 24

                    HOURS AND I DON'T PAY YOU, DO I HAVE THE RIGHT TO GO TO ANOTHER

                    PROVIDER AT THAT POINT IN TIME EVEN THOUGH I HAVE THE CONTRACT WITH YOU

                    AND I HAVEN'T PAID YOU?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  LET ME -- I'M NOT SURE I

                    UNDERSTAND WHAT YOUR QUESTION IS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  YOU'RE -- YOU'RE THE

                    PROPANE COMPANY AND I'M THE -- I'M THE CUSTOMER AND THEN I CALL YOU

                    AND I SAY, ANGELO, I NEED MORE PROPANE FOR MY HOUSE.  AND YOU GO,

                    PHIL, I'D LOVE TO BRING IT TO YOU, BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU STILL HAVE AN

                    OUTSTANDING BILL OF $500, $1,000.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  OH, I SEE.  OKAY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NOW DO YOU, AS THE PROPANE

                    COMPANY, HAVE TO COME OUT WITHIN 24 HOURS AND FILL THAT TANK WITHOUT

                    ME PAYING FOR THAT, OR IF YOU DON'T, DO I, AS A CUSTOMER, GET TO -- IF

                    YOU'RE NOT GOING TO COME OUT IN 24 HOURS AS YOUR BILL SAYS, 24 HOURS,

                    DO I HAVE THE RIGHT TO GO OUT TO ANOTHER PROPANE SUPPLIER AND HAVE

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THEM DELIVER HEAT -- DELIVER PROPANE TO ME?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO I THINK THE ANSWER TO

                    THAT FROM WHAT I UNDERSTAND FROM THE BILL LANGUAGE, IF THERE IS AN

                    EMERGENCY AND THEY DO NEED A FILL TO HEAT THEIR HOME, THE SUPPLIER STILL

                    HAS AN OBLIGATION TO GO DELIVER THAT FUEL.  JUST LIKE OTHER SOURCES OF

                    FUEL, YOU DON'T JUST CUT PEOPLE OFF AND LEAVE THEM OUT IN THE COLD.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO THE SUPPLIER WOULDN'T BE

                    ABLE TO ASK FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE FUEL TO COME OUT THERE THAT THEY OWE,

                    BUT THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO GO OUT THERE AND FILL IT AND IF THEY DON'T

                    THEN THEY CAN GO TO SOMEONE ELSE, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, I -- PHIL, I DON'T KNOW

                    IF THE BILL PROGRESSES THE PAYMENT (INAUDIBLE).  IS THAT --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  ARE YOU FINDING THAT

                    SOMEWHERE IN THE BILL?  I DON'T KNOW IF THIS -- THIS REALLY CHANGES ANY

                    OF THE -- IT DOESN'T CHANGE THAT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE CUSTOMER AND

                    THE PROPANE COMPANY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WHATEVER PAYMENT

                    ARRANGEMENT THEY HAVE WILL CONTINUE, JUST AS ANY INSPECTIONS OR

                    PROCEDURES THAT NEED TO BE DONE.  THAT DOESN'T CHANGE ANY OF THAT.

                    THIS JUST ALLOWS THAT WINDOW TO OPEN UP FOR ANOTHER SUPPLIER TO BE ABLE

                    TO DELIVER, AND HOPEFULLY IT'S IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE OTHER PROPANE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA: -- COMPANY THAT CAN'T

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    DELIVER (INAUDIBLE) TO HELP THEM OUT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  GOT IT.  I WANT TO TALK

                    ABOUT LIABILITY A LITTLE BIT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YEAH.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO, ANGELO, I -- I'M THE -- THE

                    CUSTOMER AND I HAVE A CONTRACT WITH YOU AS THE PROPANE DEALER.  NOW,

                    YOU'RE NOT COMING OUT -- YOU CAN'T COME OUT IN 24 HOURS.  I CALL

                    SOMEONE ELSE.  NOW, YOU OWN THE TANK.  IT'S YOUR PROPERTY.  AND WHEN

                    PEOPLE COME OUT TO CHECK THE TANK THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DO A VALVE

                    CHECK, PRESSURE CHECK, LEAKS CHECK.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YEP.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NOW, I AM A -- A NEW -- IF

                    SOMEONE ELSE COMES IN AND A -- AND A NEW DEALER COMES IN THERE TO

                    DEAL WITH THAT, ISN'T THERE -- WHO'S THE -- WHERE DOES THE LIABILITY FALL

                    BECAUSE YOU, AS THE PROPANE OWNER -- DEALER, THE TANK -- WHO OWNS THE

                    TANK, NOW YOU DON'T HAVE NO IDEA WHAT THE OTHER PERSON'S DOING.

                    WHERE DOES THAT LIABILITY FALL?  YOU STILL, AS THE PROPANE TANK OWNER,

                    HAVE THE LIABILITY OF THE TANK IF A TRAGEDY HAPPENED, IF IT EXPLODES, EVEN

                    THOUGH YOUR PEOPLE WHO AREN'T THE ONES WHO CAME OUT AND SERVICED IT.

                    SOMEONE ELSE FROM ANOTHER COMPANY CAME OUT.  BECAUSE WE'VE HEARD

                    STORIES OF ROGUE DEALERS WHO JUST GO OUT AND SERVICE TANKS.  ESPECIALLY

                    I'VE HEARD IT ON LONG ISLAND.  I DON'T KNOW IF IT'S TRUE OR IF I'M JUST

                    HEARING SOME STORIES.  WHERE DOES THE LIABILITY FALL?  DOES THE LIABILITY

                    STILL FALL WITH YOU, THE -- THE OWNER OF THE TANK, OR DOES IT FALL WITH THE

                    PERSON WHO WORKED ON IT AND HOW DOES THAT GET RECONCILED?

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, LET ME JUST CLARIFY.

                    THIS DOESN'T CHANGE -- THIS BILL DOESN'T CHANGE LIABILITY.  BUT TO ANSWER

                    YOUR QUESTION, THERE --

                                 (BUZZER SOUNDS.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  I'M TOLD, MR.

                    PALMESANO, THAT YOU'RE GOING TO TAKE A SECOND 15.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  HOPEFULLY NOT THE WHOLE 15,

                    MR. SPEAKER.  I JUST WANT TO -- THIS WAY I'M NOT TALKING 100 MILES AN

                    HOUR BECAUSE I KNOW I GET CRITICIZED FOR THAT AND JOKE ABOUT THAT.  SO I

                    HOPE THAT -- I APPRECIATE --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AT YOUR PLEASURE, MR.

                    PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I'M -- I'M -- I'M NEARING THE

                    END, I THINK, SO I JUST WANT TO GET -- JUST FOLLOW BACK UP ON THE LINE --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO

                    REPEAT THE QUESTION.  I'LL JUST PICK UP FROM WHERE I --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO ON THE LIABILITY FACTOR, SO THE

                    LIABILITY -- SO THE LIABILITY (INAUDIBLE).  SO THE OWNER OF THE TANK STILL

                    HAS LIABILITY IF SOMETHING HAPPENS EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE NOT THE ONE

                    SERVICING THE TANK, EVEN THOUGH SOME OTHER COMPANY CAME IN, WE

                    DON'T KNOW THE HISTORY OF THEM.  THEY WENT IN AND THEY MESSED WITH

                    THE TANK.  THEY COULD HAVE MESSED WITH THE VALVE, THE REGULATOR AND

                    CAUSED DAMAGE, A LEAK.  ALL OF THAT, AND THEN A TRAGEDY HAPPENS.  THE

                    OWNER OF THE TANK WHO DID NOT DO THE WORK ON IT, THE OTHER PERSON HAS

                    LIABILITY, YOU WOULD HAVE -- YOU WOULD HAVE LIABILITY, YOU, AS THE

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    OWNER, BUT THE ROLE -- THE OTHER COMPANY THAT CAME AND FILLED IT,

                    THERE'D BE NO LIABILITY WITH THEM.  HOW DO YOU RECONCILE THAT?

                    BECAUSE IT'S PERSONAL PROPERTY.  IT'S PROPERTY THAT YOU OWN, NOW YOU'RE

                    BEING HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO THERE'S ALWAYS -- SO

                    PROPANE COMPANIES, THEY ALL HAVE A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF LIABILITY WHEN

                    THEY FILL TANKS, WHETHER THEY'RE LEASED OR WHETHER THEY'RE -- THEY'RE

                    OWNED.  WHEN THE TANKS ARE NOT LEASED AND THEY'RE OWNED, TECHNICALLY

                    THOSE TANKS ARE NOT THEIR OWN PROPERTY.  SO THEY'RE FILLING SOMEONE

                    ELSE'S TANK ANYWAY BECAUSE THEY DON'T OWN IT.  SO THERE'S PROCEDURES IN

                    PLACE FOR FILLING A TANK.  SO THERE'S THINGS THAT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO DO.

                    AND I THINK THAT COVERS THEM ONCE THEY'VE GONE THROUGH THOSE AND THEY

                    CAN SHOW THAT THEY DID WHAT THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO DO, ALL THE SAFETY

                    CHECKS IN PLACE TO BE ABLE TO FILL THAT TANK, THAT'S THE PART THAT THEY'RE

                    REQUIRED TO DO.  THAT'S THE PART THAT THEIR INSURANCE COMPANIES OR

                    WHATEVER COVERS THEM IS GOING TO WANT THEM TO DO WHETHER IT'S A LEASED

                    TANK OR IT'S A TANK THAT SOMEONE ELSE OWNS BESIDES THE PROPANE

                    COMPANY.  WHEN I -- WHEN I OWN MY OWN TANKS, YOU KNOW, A

                    COMPANY -- I -- THAT'S MY PROPERTY AND THEY'RE COMING TO FILL MY TANK.

                    SO WHAT'S THEIR LIABILITY?  THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO CHECK THAT TANK.  IT

                    DOESN'T MATTER IF THEY DON'T OWN IT, THEY'VE STILL GOT TO CHECK IT AND

                    MAKE SURE THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING WRONG.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.  AND I THINK THAT'S THE

                    THING, THE CONCERN I HAVE.  BECAUSE THE OWNER OF THE TANK, WHO HAS THE

                    OBLIGATION TO COME IN AND RECERTIFY AND HAS THE OBLIGATION TO COME IN

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    AND EXAMINE IT, DO THE LEAK TESTS, DO THE VALVE REGULATOR TEST

                    EXAMINATIONS OF -- OF THEIR TANK BECAUSE IT'S THEIR PROPERTY.  IF SOMEONE

                    ELSE COMES IN THERE AND MAYBE -- WHAT IF THEY DON'T DO THOSE THINGS

                    AND THEN DAMAGE HAPPENS?  NOW THAT RESPONSIBILITY, THAT LIABILITY STILL

                    FALLS ON THE OWNER OF THE TANK EVEN THOUGH THEY WEREN'T THE ONES WHO

                    DID THE WORK.  THAT'S -- THAT'S THE CONCERN I THINK WE'RE GETTING TO, A

                    LIABILITY ISSUE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THE ANSWER TO THAT IS

                    THEY'RE REQUIRED TO DO IT.  THEY HAVE NO CHOICE, THEY HAVE TO DO IT.  IF

                    THEY DON'T DO IT AND THEY MISS SOMETHING, THEN CERTAINLY I THINK THEY DO

                    HAVE LIABILITY IF THEY JUST GO FILL THE TANK WITHOUT DOING THINGS THAT

                    THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO DO.  YOU KNOW, EVERYBODY HAS -- EVERY COMPANY

                    HAS PROCEDURES, YOU KNOW, WHETHER IT'S PROPANE OR SOME OTHER SORT OF

                    FUEL, THEY HAVE PROCEDURES THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW BECAUSE THERE'S --

                    THERE'S SAFETY CHECKS IN PLACE TO MAKE SURE THINGS DON'T GO WRONG.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  WHAT ABOUT ON -- THE

                    LIABILITY ISSUE FOR THE OWNER?  SO -- THE -- THE OWNER OF THE HOME, THE

                    PROPERTY OWNER.  IF THEY'RE PROVIDING ACCESS TO SOMEONE WHO DOESN'T

                    OWN THE TANK, ISN'T THERE A POSSIBILITY -- IF THEY'RE -- ESPECIALLY IF THEY'RE

                    NOT NOTIFYING THEIR INSURANCE COMPANY THAT THEY'RE HAVING SOMEONE

                    ELSE COME IN AND WORK ON THE TANK THAT THEY RUN THE RISK OF HAVING A

                    PROBLEM WITH THEIR INSURANCE COMPANY COVERING ISSUES OR VOIDING THEIR

                    CONTRACT BECAUSE IT'S NOT THE OWNER OF THAT?  ISN'T THERE -- ISN'T THERE A

                    POSSIBILITY OF A LIABILITY ISSUE BEING TRANSFERRED TO THE HOMEOWNER OR

                    LOSING THEIR HOMEOWNER'S INSURANCE BECAUSE THEY'RE LETTING SOMEONE

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    ELSE COME IN AND WORK ON PROPERTY THAT'S NOT THEIRS THAT -- WHO ARE

                    CERTIFIED TO OWN THAT AND WORK ON THAT TANK.  ISN'T THERE IN THAT CASE AN

                    ISSUE IF THEY'RE NOT LETTING THAT INSURANCE COMPANY KNOW?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THAT IS AN INSURANCE

                    QUESTION.  I DON'T KNOW WHAT EVERYBODY'S HOMEOWNER'S POLICY HAS IN IT,

                    BUT I -- I MEAN, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IF I HAVE SOMEBODY COME ON MY

                    PROPERTY TO FILL A PROPANE TANK, WHETHER IT'S LEASED OR I OWN IT, I HAVE

                    HOMEOWNER'S -- HOMEOWNER'S INSURANCE FOR THESE SITUATIONS.  I DON'T

                    THINK THIS CHANGES ANY -- ANY INSURANCE ISSUES.  I THINK WHATEVER'S IN

                    PLACE NOW WOULD BE IN PLACE AFTER.  AGAIN, THE BILL IS LIMITED AS TO

                    WHAT IT DOES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH, BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S AN

                    ISSUE I THINK THAT SHOULD BE EXAMINED BECAUSE IF THERE'S -- IF THERE

                    COULD BE ANY POSSIBILITY THAT AN INSURANCE COMPANY COULD SAID, HEY,

                    YOU KNOW WHAT?  YOU ALLOWED SOMEONE TO COME OVER --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I -- I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S

                    A POSSIBILITY.  YOU'RE SAYING THAT, BUT I DON'T KNOW.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO YOU DON'T KNOW IF THERE IS A

                    POSSIBILITY, BUT YOU DON'T KNOW IF THERE ISN'T A POSSIBILITY.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  AGAIN --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THAT'S FAIR, THAT'S FAIR, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WELL, IT DEPENDS -- IT

                    DEPENDS.  YOU KNOW, LOOK.  PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT HOMEOWNER'S

                    INSURANCE POLICIES.  IT DEPENDS WHAT'S IN IT.  SOME THINGS ARE COVERED,

                    SOME THINGS ARE NOT.  SITUATIONS LIKE THIS WHERE PEOPLE COME ON YOUR

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    PROPERTY, CERTAINLY HOMEOWNER'S -- A HOMEOWNER'S POLICY WOULD COVER

                    DAMAGE OR ANYTHING THAT WOULD HAPPEN ON THE PROPERTY LIKE ANY OTHER

                    SITUATION.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I WANTED TO ASK YOU ANOTHER

                    QUESTION FROM A PROPERTY RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE.  YOU KNOW, WE TALKED

                    ABOUT THE LIABILITY.  NOW ISN'T IT BY -- BY ALLOWING A CUSTOMER TO ALLOW

                    SOMEONE TO COME IN AND SERVICE A TANK THAT THEY DON'T OWN, THAT'S

                    OWNED BY SOMEONE ELSE AND THE GOVERNMENT VALIDATING THAT, ISN'T IT

                    POSSIBLE -- POSSIBLE A TAKING BECAUSE IT'S THAT PROPERTY OWNER, IT

                    BELONGS TO THAT INDIVIDUAL, THAT TANK IS OWNED BY THAT PROPANE

                    COMPANY BUT NOW YOU'RE SAYING OK, SOMEONE ELSE CAN COME WORK ON

                    YOUR PROPERTY AND -- AND MAKE CHANGES TO IT, POSSIBLY WORK WITH THE

                    (INAUDIBLE) AND CAUSE PROBLEMS.  ISN'T THERE A POSSIBLE TAKING BECAUSE

                    IT'S PRIVATE PROPERTY THAT COULD BE LOOKED AT IN THIS SITUATION WHICH THE

                    GOVERNMENT MIGHT HAVE AN OBLIGATION OR THE CUSTOMER FROM THAT

                    PERSPECTIVE IF THEY'RE -- IF THEY'RE BASICALLY ALLOWING SOMEONE ELSE TO

                    WORK ON SOMEONE ELSE'S PROPERTY?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WHETHER A TANK IS OWNED

                    OR LEASED BY AN INDIVIDUAL, THAT TANK IS ON THAT PROPERTY FOR A SPECIFIC

                    PURPOSE AND THAT IS TO PROVIDE SOMETHING ESSENTIAL, WHICH IS HEAT.  SO I

                    DON'T THINK THIS BILL CHANGES -- YOU KNOW, GOES INTO THAT AREA OR

                    CHANGES ANY SORT OF RELATIONSHIP WITH THEIR -- THEIR OWNERSHIP STATUS OF

                    THE TANK.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  THE OTHER THING I -- KIND

                    OF GOING BACK TO THE ISSUE OF THE OWNING VERSUS LEASING.  YOU KNOW, IF

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    PEOPLE WANT TO BUY THEIR OWN TANK -- WE TALKED ABOUT THEY WANT TO BUY

                    THEIR OWN TANK, I CAN GO OUT AND PAY A COUPLE -- $2- OR $3,000 TO HAVE

                    MY OWN TANK AND I GET TO CHOOSE ANYONE TO COME FILL IT UP.  BUT AGAIN,

                    IF I LEASE IT, THAT -- WITH THAT CONTRACT THAT'S SIGNED, THAT (INAUDIBLE) IS

                    DONE, BROUGHT BACK IN THROUGH THE PROPANE THAT'S SERVICED OVER THE

                    PERIOD OF THAT CONTRACT.  THAT'S KIND OF THE THEORY BEHIND IT, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I GUESS I -- I'M SORRY, I

                    MISSED THE QUESTION.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NO, I'M SORRY.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I KNOW YOU EXPLAINED IT,

                    BUT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU ASKED A QUESTION.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NO. THAT'S ALL RIGHT.  I'M KIND OF

                    GLAD I'VE GOT NINE MINUTES LEFT.  SO --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  OKAY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AS WE SAID BEFORE THAT IF A -- IF

                    I -- A CUSTOMER WANTS TO GO OUT -- THE TWO THINGS, THEY CAN BUY THEIR

                    OWN TANK, GO OUT AND PAY $2- OR $3,000 FOR IT AND GET -- AND THEN HAVE

                    IT FILLED BY WHOEVER THEY WANT, WHENEVER THEY WANT.  THEY DON'T HAVE

                    TO DEAL WITH CONTRACTS NECESSARILY, UNLESS THEY SET THAT UP.  BUT -- OR

                    THEY LEASE IT.  THEY SET UP A CONTRACT WITH ANOTHER COMPANY AND THEY

                    RECOUP THE COST OF THAT TANK -- THE PRICE OF -- THE COST OF THAT TANK

                    THROUGH THE PROPANE THAT'S DELIVERED.  IT'S PART OF THE FUEL COST AND

                    DELIVERY.  IT'S ALL PART OF THAT CHARGE, RIGHT?  SO THE CUSTOMER BASICALLY

                    MIGHT NOT HAVE TO PAY TWO TO THREE GRAND OUT-OF-POCKET BECAUSE THEY'RE

                    LEASING IT AND THERE MIGHT NOT BE ANY CHARGE OR A SMALL CHARGE,

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    NEGLIGIBLE CHARGE AND THEY'RE GETTING THAT MONEY, PAYING BACK AS THEY

                    RECOUP -- ALMOST LIKE A RENT-TO-OWN LEASE BUT IT'S NOT OWNED.  SO IN THAT

                    CASE RIGHT THERE THAT'S HOW THE SITUATION WORKS NOW, BUT MY QUESTION IS

                    IF SOMETHING LIKE THIS WERE TO GO THROUGH AND -- AND -- AND THE PROPANE

                    COMPANIES SEE THAT NOW THEY'RE ALLOWING INDIVIDUALS TO BASICALLY HAVE

                    WHOEVER THEY WANT TO COME AND FILL A TANK EVEN IF THEY DON'T OWN IT,

                    THEY GET TO THE POINT WHERE, YOU KNOW, THIS ISN'T OUR PROPERTY.  WE --

                    YOU KNOW, WE DON'T KNOW WHO'S WORKING ON IT.  THEY MIGHT -- THEY'RE

                    SUPPOSED TO BE (INAUDIBLE) CERTIFIED, THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING THE

                    RIGHT THING ON THE LEAK TEST, THE -- THE REGULATORS.  BUT IF THEY'RE NOT, IF

                    YOU'RE GOING TO PUT THIS BAND-AID ON ME NOW, WHY WOULD I WANT TO DO

                    THE LEASE IF, YOU KNOW, IF THERE'S THAT POSSIBILITY, COULDN'T -- COULDN'T

                    THEY -- SPECIFICALLY IF THEY WANTED TO GO OUT THERE AND DO THAT AND JUST

                    SAID I'M NOT GOING TO LEASE THEM, I'M JUST GOING TO CHARGE AND YOU'RE

                    GOING TO HAVE TO PAY $2- TO $3,000 FOR A TANK IF THEY WANT, WHERE MOST

                    PEOPLE CAN'T REALLY AFFORD THAT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  WELL, LET ME START BY

                    SAYING, AGAIN, IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP.  WHAT IT

                    DOES IS IT PROVIDES AN OPPORTUNITY TO DO SOMETHING THAT THAT PRIMARY

                    COMPANY CAN'T DO.  YOU KNOW, PROPANE COMPANIES THAT AREN'T FILLING

                    TANKS AND LEAVING PEOPLE IN THE COLD.  AND, YOU KNOW, THERE'S -- THERE'S

                    HEALTH AND SAFETY, THERE'S PROPERTY DAMAGE.  THERE'S A NUMBER OF THINGS

                    THAT MOUNT UP WHEN YOU DON'T SHOW UP AND YOU HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO

                    FILL IN ANY CASE.  SO WHAT MOST PROPANE COMPANIES I THINK ARE GOING TO

                    SEE THAT THIS IS SOMETHING THAT CAN HELP THEM.  IF THEY CAN'T GET THERE,

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THEY DON'T WANT PROPERTY DAMAGE, THEY DON'T WANT PEOPLE HAVING TO

                    LEAVE OR MOVE LITTLE KIDS HAVING TO GO TO GRANDMA AND GRANDPA'S --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OF COURSE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA: -- HOUSE BECAUSE THERE'S NO

                    -- NO HEAT IN THE HOME.  SO I THINK THIS -- THIS ADDRESSES A -- A LIABILITY

                    THAT'S OCCURRING RIGHT NOW WHERE THEY'RE FACING, YOU KNOW, PROBLEMS

                    BECAUSE IF THEY CAN'T GET THERE, THERE'S A LOT OF DAMAGE AND THEY COULD

                    END UP -- THEY COULD END UP HAVING TO PAY FOR A -- A NUMBER OF

                    DIFFERENT ITEMS THAT -- AS A RESULT OF NOT DELIVERING PROPANE FUEL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  ONE MORE ISSUE ON THE

                    PART OF THE LIABILITY ISSUE.  LIKE, I KNOW BACK IN 2018 WHEN WE WERE

                    TALKING ABOUT THE ONE COMPANY, THEY WERE WORKING WITH A CO-OP.  HOW

                    DOES THAT -- YOU KNOW, IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING LIKE A CO-OP, THEY MIGHT

                    NOT NECESSARILY DO THE DELIVERIES BUT THEY CONTRACT THAT TO HAVE OTHER

                    PEOPLE COME IN. HOW -- WHAT ROLE DOES A CO-OP -- LIKE IN THAT SITUATION,

                    WHAT RESPONSIBILITY OR LIABILITY FALLS ON THE CO-OP IN THIS WHOLE PROCESS

                    OR NOT, OR IS THAT NOT ADDRESSED IN THIS BILL OR IS THE SAME AS IT WAS?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, IT'S THE -- IT'S THE SAME,

                    PHIL.  IT'S -- IT'S -- YOU KNOW, IT'S -- THE LIABILITY IS THE SAME FOR ALL

                    PROPANE COMPANIES.  THEY'RE ALL UNDER THE SAME UMBRELLA.  AG AND

                    MARKETS IS GOING TO COME UP WITH REGULATIONS AND PROCEDURES TO

                    ADDRESS THIS.  YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE DOING WHEN THIS

                    SITUATION KICKS IN.  SO THEY'RE GOING TO SPELL THAT OUT FOR THEM.  YOU

                    KNOW, WHAT -- IF -- IF YOU'RE THIS TYPE OF COMPANY -- IF YOU'RE -- THEY'RE

                    GOING TO SPELL OUT EXACTLY WHAT THEY NEED TO DO TO COVER THEMSELVES.

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  ANGELO, THANKS FOR YOUR

                    TIME.  I APPRECIATE IT.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU.  CERTAINLY, I -- I

                    KNOW THE SPONSOR IS WELL-INTENDED BEHIND THIS LEGISLATION.  I KNOW HE'S

                    COMMITTED.  YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY WHEN PEOPLE AREN'T HAVING HEAT THEY

                    WANT TO DO EVERYTHING THEY CAN TO MAKE SURE THEY GET THE HEAT THEY

                    NEED.  I KNOW HE'S WELL-INTENTIONED BUT I BELIEVE THIS FLAWED BILL IS

                    EQUALLY FLAWED IN CERTAIN CATEGORIES I THINK THAT REALLY NEED TO BE

                    WORKED OUT AND ADDRESSED BEFORE MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS, FROM

                    SEVERAL DIFFERENT AREAS.  ONE ON THE CON -- CONTRACTUAL ISSUES, SECOND

                    ON THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUES AND THIRD, AND PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST

                    IMPORTANT ISSUE, ON THE LIABILITY ISSUES.  ON THE CONTRACTUAL ISSUES, THIS

                    REALLY DOES KIND OF ALMOST FUNDAMENTALLY CHANGE CONTRACTUAL

                    RELATIONSHIPS BY -- YOU KNOW, WHEN SOMEONE SIGNS A CONTRACT, THEY

                    SIGN A CONTRACT, SOMEONE WILL SERVICE THAT AND THEN IF THERE'S ISSUES AND

                    THE RESPONSIBILITY'S ON THEM, ON THE PERSON WHO'S SIGNING, THE

                    CUSTOMER.  AND I KNOW WITH THE AT WILL, IF THEY'RE NOT CALLING, IF THEY'RE

                    NOT ON AUTO FILL -- AND THE AUTO FILL DOESN'T SEEM TO HAVE THESE PROBLEMS

                    AS MUCH, BUT WHEN THEY'RE AT WILL AND THEY'RE CALLING, THERE NEEDS TO BE

                    SOME RESPONSIBILITY ON WHEN THAT CONTRACT -- CONTACT IS BEING MADE.

                    AND I THINK -- AND WHEN -- WHEN THERE IS A CONTRACT, THE LEASE IS

                    BASICALLY THEY'RE PAYING BACK THE COST OF THOSE THINGS.  THOSE TANKS ARE

                    EXPENSIVE.  THE COMPANY INVESTS IN THOSE, THEY PAY THOUSANDS OF

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    DOLLARS TO DO THEM.  THEY SET THEM UP ON THE PROPERTY, AND PART OF THAT

                    LEASE AGREEMENT IS TO RECOUP SOME OF THE COSTS OF THAT TANK THROUGH THE

                    LEASE PAYMENTS AND IN PAYING FOR THOSE SERVICES.  BUT IN THE SAME

                    SITUATION WE WERE DISCUSSING THAT EVEN IF SOMEONE WASN'T MAKING THEIR

                    PAYMENT, THEY WOULD STILL BE -- HAVE TO MAKE THE DELIVERY OR THEY

                    WOULD ASK SOMEONE ELSE, FIND A DELIVERY, EVEN IF THEY WERE -- OWED

                    MONEY (INAUDIBLE).  THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUE, I BELIEVE, MR. SPEAKER

                    AND MY COLLEAGUES, IS AN ISSUE THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED.  I THINK -- I

                    HAVE TO LOOK AT THIS.  I MEAN, WHEN THE COMPANY OWNS THOSE TANKS,

                    THEY INVESTED IN THOSE TANKS.  IT'S THEIR PROPERTY.  BUT NOW LETTING A

                    CUSTOMER OR SOMEONE WHO HAS SIGNED WITH SOMEONE ELSE WHERE YOU

                    DON'T KNOW IF THEY HAVE THE BACKGROUND OR EXPERTISE BECAUSE WE'VE

                    HEARD STORIES OF ROGUE DEALERS OUT THERE JUST GOING AROUND FILLING TANKS,

                    DON'T KNOW IF THEY'RE MESSING UP THE REGULATOR, THE VALVES OR IF THEY'RE

                    CAUSING PROBLEMS TO THE TANK.  AND THEN THAT RESPONSIBILITY -- YOU

                    KNOW, THE -- THE COMPANY IS THE ONE THAT'S SUPPOSED TO COME IN AND DO

                    THE INSPECTION, CHECK THOSE THINGS, RECERTIFY IT.  THAT'S WHAT THE -- WHAT

                    THE LEASE AGREEMENT IS SUPPOSED TO DO IF YOU DON'T HAVE THOSE

                    ASSURANCES WHEN SOMEONE ELSE COMES IN TO FILL THAT UP.  ON THE

                    LIABILITY ISSUE, THOUGH, I THINK IS A -- IS A MAJOR, MAJOR ISSUE.  THE FACT

                    THAT SOMEONE COULD GO IN AND BASICALLY HAVE SOMEONE ELSE FILL A TANK

                    THAT IS OWNED AND THE PROPERTY OF SOMEONE ELSE, NOT KNOWING -- THAT

                    COMPANY DOESN'T KNOW WHO THE PEOPLE ARE THAT ARE WORKING ON IT.

                    THEY DON'T WORK FOR THE COMPANY THAT OWNS THE THING.  IT'S SOMEONE

                    ELSE.  IT COULD BE A FLY-BY-NIGHT, IT COULD BE A ROGUE.  HOPEFULLY IT'S A

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    GOOD PERSON AND WILL DO THE RIGHT THING.  BUT THEY DON'T KNOW.  AND IF

                    THERE'S A TRAGEDY THAT HAPPENS, THIS BILL DOESN'T ADDRESS FOR THAT.  THE

                    SPONSOR SAYS THE -- THE LIABILITY SHOULD REMAIN THE SAME, AND THAT

                    WOULD FALL BACK ON THE OWNER OF THE TANK EVEN THOUGH THEY WEREN'T THE

                    ONES THAT WORKED ON THIS ISSUE.  AND I THINK THAT'S VERY, VERY

                    PROBLEMATIC FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE.  I THINK THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED

                    BEFORE GOING FORWARD.  I DO THINK THE -- I DO THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, THE

                    ISSUE OF THE CONTAINER LAW, AS WE TALKED ABOUT, RIGHT ABOUT 45 -- THERE'S

                    45 STATES THAT DON'T ALLOW IT.  WE ALREADY RECOGNIZED THAT REALLY UNDER

                    THE LAW THERE'S NOTHING STOPPING SOMEONE FROM MAKING THE CALL TO HAVE

                    SOMEONE COME FILL IT UP ANYWAY.  THERE'S NOTHING PRECLUDING THAT FROM

                    HAPPENING.  SO REALLY EVEN ON THAT SIDE OF IT, I DO HAVE SOME CONCERNS

                    RELATIVE TO, AGAIN, ON THE PROPERTY -- THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUE OF THE

                    TAKING.  BECAUSE WHEN YOU'RE ALLOWING SOMEONE TO TAKE SOMEONE'S

                    PRIVATE PROPERTY AND NOT -- AND DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH IT AND NOT

                    BEING COMPENSATED FOR IT, I THINK THERE'S A LIABILITY ISSUE AND A TAKING

                    ISSUE THAT COULD CREATE A LIABILITY FOR THE -- THE HOMEOWNER OR THE

                    GOVERNMENT BY ALLOWING THIS TAKING WHICH I THINK THIS BILL WOULD

                    ULTIMATELY DO.  AND I DO THINK ON THE LIABILITY ISSUE, THE OTHER AREA THAT

                    CONCERNS ME IS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE IF THEY'RE FILLING UP THE TANK AND --

                    AND THEY'RE NOT NOTIFYING THEIR INSURANCE COMPANY AND THEY'RE LETTING

                    SOMEONE ELSE COME IN TO FILL UP THE TANK WHO ISN'T THE OWNER OF THE

                    TANK, ISN'T CERTIFIED BY THE TANK OWNERS, COME IN TO WORK ON IT AND GOD

                    FORBID A TRAGEDY WERE TO HAPPEN, I THINK THAT THAT COULD POSE AN ISSUE

                    THAT MIGHT POSSIBLY RESULT IN THAT INDIVIDUAL LOSING THEIR HOMEOWNER'S

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    INSURANCE TO COVER ANY TYPE OF DAMAGE BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT NOTIFYING

                    THE INSURANCE COMPANY THAT THEY'RE LETTING SOMEONE ELSE COME IN TO

                    WORK ON THE TANK THAT DOESN'T BELONG TO THEM.  AND I GUESS THAT'S A REAL

                    -- THAT'S A REAL RISK.  THAT'S A REAL RESPONSIBILITY.  I KNOW THE SPONSOR

                    SAID YOU CAN'T SAY THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, BUT WE CAN ALSO SAY -- WE

                    CAN'T SAY IT'S GONNA -- NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.

                                 AND I JUST THINK THESE ARE JUST SOME OF THE THINGS THAT

                    I WANTED TO POINT OUT REGARDING CONTRACT ISSUES, PERSONAL PROPERTY RIGHT

                    ISSUES AND, SIGNIFICANTLY, THE LIABILITY ISSUE THAT REALLY, I THINK, NEED TO

                    BE ADDRESSED ON THIS BILL.  I UNDERSTAND THE INTENTION BEHIND THE

                    LEGISLATION.  I APPLAUD THE SPONSOR FOR WHAT HE'S TRYING TO DO.  HE'S

                    TRYING TO HELP PEOPLE TO MAKE SURE THEY GET HEAT.  WE ALL WANT PEOPLE

                    TO HAVE HEAT.  I HAVEN'T HEARD RAMPANT ISSUES ON THIS, BUT WE WANT TO

                    MAKE SURE THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO MOVE FORWARD IN THIS -- THIS WAY, WE

                    NEED TO MAKE SURE IT'S DONE PROPERLY AND THE CONTRACT ISSUES ARE -- ARE

                    ADDRESSED PROPERLY, THE PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUES ARE ADDRESSED PROPERLY,

                    AND CERTAINLY THE LIABILITY ISSUES.  I THINK WE NEED TO RESOLVE THOSE

                    ISSUES BEFORE MOVING FORWARD WITH THIS TYPE OF LEGISLATION BECAUSE OF

                    THE RAMIFICATIONS IT'S GOING TO HAVE ON CONTRACT LAW, ON PERSONAL

                    PROPERTY RIGHTS AND CERTAINLY THE IMPACT OF THE LIABILITY AND WHAT THIS

                    LEGISLATION WOULD DO.  SO, MR. SPEAKER, FOR THAT REASON I'M GOING TO BE

                    VOTING NO ON THIS LEGISLATION AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE SOME OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES TO JOIN ME IN VOTING NO AS WELL.  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU TO

                    THE SPONSOR AGAIN FOR YOUR TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  YOU

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    GAVE US BACK 18 SECONDS.

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 MR. GALLAHAN.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SANTABARBARA,

                    WILL YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SANTABARBARA

                    YIELDS, SIR.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU, SIR.  A COUPLE QUICK

                    QUESTIONS.  FIRST, I WANT TO PREFACE THIS WITH I BOUGHT MY OWN TANKS.  I

                    OWN MY OWN TANKS, AND THE REASON I DID THAT WAS BECAUSE THE CONTRACT,

                    THE PRICING WAS -- WAS -- WAS WAY -- WAY -- WAY TOO HIGH.  SO WHEN I

                    BOUGHT MY OWN TANKS I HAD TO HAVE INSPECTIONS DONE BEFORE ANY

                    COMPANY WOULD COME AND SERVICE MY TANKS.  SO THEY COME DO THE

                    INSPECTION AND THEN THEY COME AND REPLACE THE FUEL WHEN IT WAS LOW.

                    SO THE DIFFERENCE IN -- IN PRICING IS SOMETIMES 50 TO 75 PERCENT IN

                    DIFFERENCE.  I'LL GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE.  THREE WEEKS AGO I GOT -- I

                    BOUGHT PROPANE THREE -- THREE-AND-A-HALF WEEKS AGO FOR $2.20 A GALLON.

                    MY NEXT-DOOR NEIGHBOR WHO USES THE SAME COMPANY AND HAS A

                    CONTRACT PAID OVER $4.00.  THE SAME WEEK.  SO THERE'S A DEFINITE

                    ADVANTAGE THERE.  SO, MY QUESTION.  I DON'T SEE ANYTHING -- I READ THE

                    BILL.  I DON'T SEE ANYTHING IN THE BILL WHERE IT WOULD PROTECT THE

                    CONSUMER IF I WERE TO RUN LOW.  AND I WOULD -- AND I HAVE A CONTRACT.

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    AND I WOULD CALL MY PROPANE COMPANY, SANTABARBARA, INCORPORATED,

                    AND SAY, MR. SANTABARBARA, I NEED -- WELL, YOU CAN'T GET THERE.  I CAN'T

                    GET THERE, JEFF.  I'M SORRY, I CAN'T GET THERE.  SO I CALL MR. PALMESANO'S

                    COMPANY AND -- AND HE SAYS, YEAH, I CAN BE RIGHT THERE.  BUT HIS PRICE

                    IS $8.00 A GALLON.  I MEAN, ISN'T THIS A PRIME SITUATION WHERE GOUGING

                    CAN OCCUR?  AND -- AND I CAN SEE THAT HAPPENING, ESPECIALLY IN

                    EMERGENCY SITUATIONS.  WE ALL KNOW THAT GENERATORS -- YOU KNOW, WE

                    HAD AN ICE STORM AND GENERATORS DOUBLED, TRIPLED IN PRICE.  SO I'M

                    CURIOUS AS TO HOW -- HOW YOU WOULD REGULATE GOUGING FROM HAPPENING

                    TO THE -- TO THE CONSUMER.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, THE -- THE FEES, YOU

                    KNOW, THAT THEY -- THAT THE PROPANE COMPANIES CHARGE UNDER WHATEVER

                    -- YOU KNOW, WHATEVER THOSE FEES ARE SET AT, IF DIFFERENT COMPANIES

                    CHARGE DIFFERENT RATES OR DIFFERENT -- DIFFERENT PRICES FOR -- FOR THE

                    PROPANE, WHATEVER THOSE FEES ARE THOSE REMAIN THE SAME.  I BELIEVE

                    THERE WAS SOMETHING IN THE BILL THAT YOU CAN'T CHARGE ABOVE -- SO YOU --

                    SO THEY -- THEY CAN'T CHARGE -- THEY -- THEY CAN'T CHARGE ANYTHING THAT

                    THEY NORMALLY WOULDN'T CHARGE.  SO IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING, IF THEY

                    CAN TACK ON ANOTHER FEE BECAUSE OF AN EMERGENCY DELIVERY?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  NO, JUST -- JUST -- JUST CHARGE AN

                    EXTRA $4.00 A GALLON FOR THE -- THE PRODUCT.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THEY -- SO --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  BECAUSE IF YOU'RE NOT ONE OF OUR

                    CUSTOMERS, WE'RE GOING TO CHARGE -- WE'RE GOING TO CHARGE YOU $8.40 A

                    GALLON.

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THE ANSWER TO THAT, OF

                    COURSE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S -- THIS BILL -- THERE'S GOING TO BE REGULATIONS

                    FOR THAT.  AG AND MARKETS, THEY'RE GOING TO WORK WITH THE AG'S OFFICE

                    TO MAKE THOSE REGULATIONS.  THE ANSWER TO THAT IS THEY CAN CHARGE WHAT

                    THEY NORMALLY CHARGE.  AND I DON'T KNOW IF THERE WAS A PROVISION --

                    THERE IS A PROVISION SOMEWHERE IN THE BILL THAT SAYS THEY CAN'T TACK ON

                    AN ADDITIONAL, YOU KNOW, EMERGENCY -- BECAUSE YOU'RE CALLING ME I'M

                    GOING TO BILL YOU THIS MUCH MORE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  SURE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO THERE IS A SAFEGUARD FOR

                    THAT.  BUT IF -- IF THEY WERE NORMALLY CHARGING MORE FOR THE PROPANE,

                    THEY COULD CHARGE -- YOU KNOW, YOU SHOP AROUND WHEN YOU BUY

                    PROPANE AND TRY AND GET THE LOWEST PRICE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  SURE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  IF YOU HAVE TO GO TO

                    ANOTHER SUPPLIER BECAUSE IT'S AN EMERGENCY AND -- AND THEY DO CHARGE

                    MORE, IF THEY NORMALLY CHARGE MORE TO OTHER CUSTOMERS, CERTAINLY THAT'S

                    WHAT THEY -- THEY ARE ALLOWED TO CHARGE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU.  ALSO -- I DON'T KNOW

                    HOW TO PUT THIS.  LET ME THINK ABOUT THIS FOR A MINUTE.  IF -- THAT'S ALL

                    RIGHT.  THAT'S OKAY.  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

                    THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SANTABARBARA,

                    WILL YOU YIELD, SIR?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SANTABARBARA.  I

                    UNDERSTAND THAT THIS LAW WOULD BE TRIGGERED AND WOULD ALLOW A

                    CONSUMER TO PURCHASE PROPANE FROM ANY SUPPLIER THEY WANT IF -- IF THE

                    CONSUMER REASONABLY BELIEVES THAT THE AMOUNT OF PROPANE THEY HAVE IS

                    NOT SUFFICIENT.  IS THERE ANY QUALIFICATION ON VERIFICATION, AND IS IT JUST A

                    SELF-CERTIFICATION OR IS THERE ANY CERTIFICATION AT ALL?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO I GUESS THERE'S A COUPLE

                    OF PARTS TO THIS.  SO THERE HAS TO BE AN EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCE AS

                    DEFINED BY THE BILL, AND THERE HAS TO BE AN ATTEMPT TO -- THERE HAS TO BE

                    AN ATTEMPT TO GET -- TO GET THE DELIVERY MADE FROM YOUR PRIMARY

                    SUPPLIER.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT THEN --

                                 (CROSS-TALK/INAUDIBLE)

                                 -- BUT FOR THIS TO TRIGGER, THE CUSTOMER HAS TO HAVE A

                    BELIEF THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH PROPANE; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, IF YOU'RE ON

                    AUTO-DELIVERY AND THAT DELIVERY IS MISSED.  SO THEN THERE -- IF THEY

                    MAKE A CALL AND THEY DON'T -- AND THEY STILL DON'T GET THAT DELIVERY, THAT

                    WOULD TRIGGER THIS BILL UNDER AN EMERGENCY CIRCUMSTANCE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, ONCE A CUSTOMER ON THEIR

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    OWN BELIEVES THERE'S -- THAT THEY MIGHT RUN OUT OF GAS, IS THERE ANY

                    CERTIFICATION THAT THE CUSTOMER HAS TO MAKE?  ANY TYPE OF -- OR IS IT

                    SIMPLY SUBJECTIVE ON WORRIED ABOUT RUNNING OUT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, THE ANSWER TO THAT IS

                    THE -- IF THERE'S A MISSED DELIVERY, IF A DELIVERY WAS SUPPOSED TO SHOW

                    UP AND THEY MISSED THAT DELIVERY, THAT IS WHAT WOULD QUALIFY THE -- THE

                    -- THAT IS WHAT WOULD TRIGGER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE BILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WELL, THE -- THE STATUTORY LANGUAGE

                    SAYS,"...FAILED TO MAKE A SCHEDULED DELIVERY OR -- OR -- FULFILL A

                    CUSTOMER'S REQUEST," RIGHT?  SO IT'S -- LET'S SAY THE SUPPLIER IS MAKING ALL

                    OF THE SCHEDULED DELIVERIES.  UNDER THIS LANGUAGE A CUSTOMER COULD

                    STILL GO WITH SOMEONE ELSE, CORRECT?  IF THEY THOUGHT, ON A SUBJECTIVE

                    BASIS, THAT THEY MIGHT NOT HAVE ENOUGH PROPANE TO MAKE IT TO THE NEXT

                    SCHEDULED DELIVERY; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO THERE HAS TO BE A

                    WEATHER EMERGENCY OR SOME SORT OF -- SO THERE'S DIFFERENT -- THERE'S

                    THREE DIFFERENT -- THERE'S DIFFERENT PARTS ON THIS.  SO THERE HAS TO BE AN

                    EMERGENCY SITUATION HAPPENING.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I -- I UNDERSTAND THAT.  I'M JUST

                    GETTING BACK TO THE QUESTION OF WHAT'S -- WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY "A

                    CUSTOMER REASONABLY BELIEVES?"  IS THERE ANY QUANTIFIABLE OBJECTIVE

                    STANDARD OR IS IT JUST SUBJECTIVE?  I UNDERSTAND THERE'S A NUMBER OF OTHER

                    FACTORS, BUT IS THIS JUST A SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION BY THE CUSTOMER THAT

                    THEY DON'T HAVE ENOUGH GAS TO MAKE IT TO THE NEXT SCHEDULED DELIVERY?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I GUESS IT COULD BE.  THERE

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    ARE -- YOU KNOW, DEPENDING ON THE SIZE OF THE HOME, HOW MUCH FUEL IT

                    BURNS, THE RATE IT BURNS AT.  THERE'S A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT REASONS

                    PEOPLE SCHEDULE THEIR DELIVERIES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY IT'S A

                    SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION BY THE CUSTOMER?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO I GUESS THEY -- SO

                    YOU'RE -- YOU'RE ASKING ME IF THE CUSTOMER -- WHEN THE CUSTOMER CALLS

                    FOR A DELIVERY WHAT THEIR REASONING IS FOR THAT?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  YEAH.  I MEAN, THERE'S NO

                    OBLIGATION HERE, RIGHT, FOR THE CUSTOMER TO SAY, I DON'T HAVE ENOUGH GAS

                    TO MAKE IT TO MY NEXT SCHEDULED DELIVERY.  THERE'S NO REQUIREMENT FOR

                    THAT, RIGHT?  IT'S JUST A SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION BY THE CUSTOMER THAT THEY

                    WANT TO GO WITH A LOWER-COST SUPPLIER WHO'S NOT RENTING THEM THE TANK.

                    I -- MAYBE I PUT IT IN A DIFFERENT WAY.  THAT THEY WANT TO GO WITH A

                    LOWER COST -- I'M SORRY.  THEY JUST DON'T WANT TO WAIT, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO, I -- I MEAN, IF YOU GO

                    THROUGH THE BILL, THERE HAS TO BE AN EMERGENCY HAPPENING.  THERE'S A

                    REASON WHY A PROPANE COMPANY CANNOT DELIVER.  AS FAR AS THE HEATING

                    NEEDS OF THE INDIVIDUAL, THEY -- THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DETERMINE THAT

                    AND TO SAY, HEY, I NEED -- IF I DON'T GET A DELIVERY BY THIS TIME I'M GOING

                    TO RUN OUT OF FUEL.  SO THERE'S SOME ATTEMPT TO CONTACT THE COMPANY AND

                    TO EXPLAIN WHY THEY NEED THAT DELIVERY.  AND THERE COULD BE A NUMBER

                    OF DIFFERENT THINGS.  YOU KNOW, AGAIN, SOMETIMES SMALL HOMES BURN

                    FUEL LESS.  SOMETIMES THERE'S BIGGER HOMES.  SOMETIMES THERE'S A --

                    EVERYTHING IN BETWEEN.  SO, YOU KNOW, SOMEONE COULD BE AT A DIFFERENT

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    LEVEL AND ONLY HAVE A FEW DAYS LEFT, AND IF IT'S A SMALLER HOME AT THAT

                    SAME PERCENTAGE ON YOUR TANK IT COULD GO FOR A VERY LONG TIME.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, THIS WOULD APPLY EVEN IF ALL

                    THE SCHEDULED DELIVERIES --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO TO ANSWER YOUR

                    QUESTION, THERE'S SOME -- I GUESS SOME -- I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE WORD

                    IS.  THERE IS SOME -- SOME LEEWAY THERE AS TO WHAT THE CUSTOMER'S

                    NEEDS WOULD BE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.  NOW THIS IS TRIGGERED EVEN

                    IF ALL SCHEDULED DELIVERIES ARE BEING DELIVERED EXACTLY ON TIME; AM I

                    CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO IF THE DELIVERY IS --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  RIGHT ON TIME.  LET'S SAYS IT'S A

                    SCHEDULED DELIVERY -- A HYPOTHETICAL -- A SCHEDULED DELIVERY DELIVERED

                    RIGHT ON TIME, NEVER MISSED A SCHEDULED DELIVERY.  THIS BILL WOULD STILL

                    ALLOW A CUSTOMER TO GO WITH A DIFFERENT SUPPLIER, CORRECT, IF THE

                    CUSTOMER DIDN'T THINK THEY HAD ENOUGH GAS TO MAKE IT TO THE NEXT

                    SCHEDULED DELIVERY; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  I THINK THE POINT WE'RE

                    MISSING THOUGH, THIS IS JUST FOR THAT PERIOD OF TIME WHEN THERE IS AN

                    EMERGENCY IN PLACE.  SO IF MY PROPANE COMPANY -- IF I CALL --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NO, I UNDERSTAND ALL THAT.  BUT AM I

                    CORRECT, THOUGH, THAT --

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  BUT IT'S RELEVANT, THOUGH.

                    IT'S RELEVANT TO WHAT YOU'RE ASKING.

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. GOODELL:  IT CAN BE --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  GENTLEMEN,

                    GENTLEMEN.  WE WERE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE'RE NOT IN COURT, SO

                    WE DON'T CROSS-EXAMINE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.  TO CLARIFY MY

                    QUESTION.  THIS BILL SAYS EITHER YOU MISSED A SCHEDULED DELIVERY OR -- OR

                    THE CUSTOMER NEEDS -- THINKS THEY NEED GAS EVEN THOUGH YOU MEET THE

                    SCHEDULED DELIVERY, RIGHT?  I'M LOOKING ON PAGE 2, LINE 13.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  TO MEET THEIR HEATING

                    NEEDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  RIGHT.  SO EVEN THOUGH YOU MEET

                    EVERY DELIVERY RIGHT ON TIME, THIS COULD BE TRIGGERED IF THE CUSTOMER,

                    USING A SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION, THINKS THEY NEED GAS BEFORE THE

                    SCHEDULED DELIVERY, CORRECT?  AND -- AND THERE'S ALL THESE OTHER FACTORS

                    GOING ON.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  IF THERE IS AN EMERGENCY

                    SITUATION.  IF THERE IS A SUPPLY AND DEMAND PROBLEM.  IF THEIR PROPANE

                    COMPANY CANNOT DELIVER AND THE CUSTOMER NEEDS A FILL TO MEET THEIR

                    HEATING NEEDS, THE LANGUAGE OF THE BILL -- THEN THAT WOULD TRIGGER THIS --

                    THIS TEMPORARY PROVISION TO GO TO AN ALTERNATE SUPPLIER.  IT DOESN'T MEAN

                    THEY CAN GO TO AN ALTERNATE SUPPLIER FOR THE REST OF THEIR CONTRACT, IT JUST

                    MEANS THEY CAN GET THAT DELIVERY AND THEN WHEN THE EMERGENCY IS OVER

                    THEY GO BACK TO THEIR PRIOR -- IT DOESN'T ELIMINATE THE PRIMARY PROVIDER.

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    SO THERE'S NO WAY TO SAY I'M GOING TO SWITCH COMPANIES AND USE THIS

                    EMERGENCY PROVISION TO DO IT.  IF THEY WANTED TO SWITCH COMPANIES

                    THEY COULD DO THAT RIGHT NOW.  THEY COULD JUST SWITCH -- SWITCH

                    COMPANIES.  THEY COULD (INAUDIBLE) TANKS.  THERE'S A NUMBER OF -- OF

                    WAYS TO SWITCH PROPANE COMPANIES AS IT IS.  WHY WOULD THEY USE AN

                    EMERGENCY PROVISION AND MAKE UP A REASON TO GET A PROPANE DELIVERY

                    TO SWITCH SUPPLIERS?  IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  UNLESS, OF COURSE, THE COST OF THE

                    EMERGENCY DELIVERY IS ONE-THIRD LESS EXPENSIVE AS NOTED BY MY

                    COLLEAGUE, IN WHICH CASE THEY'VE GOT A LOT OF FINANCIAL INCENTIVES.  OR

                    IN CASE THE ORIGINAL COMPANY WON'T DELIVER ANYMORE BECAUSE THEY

                    HAVEN'T BEEN PAID.  I MEAN, THERE'S A LOT OF GREAT FINANCIAL REASONS WHY

                    SOMEONE COULD HAVE USED THIS, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  FOR ONE DELIVERY?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WHAT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  IT WOULD AMOUNT TO ONE

                    DELIVERY.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OH, SO LET'S ASK ABOUT THAT.  WHEN

                    THEY COME ON THIS EMERGENCY DELIVERY, ARE THEY LIMITED TO PUTTING JUST

                    THE AMOUNT OF PROPANE NEEDED TO COVER THAT EMERGENCY OR ARE THEY

                    AUTHORIZED TO FILL THE TANK COMPLETELY?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THAT -- I'VE GOTTEN MY

                    PROPANE TANKS FILLED ON BOTH SITUATIONS.  SOMETIMES I WANT IT HALFWAY.

                    SOMETIMES I WANT THE FULL DELIVERY.  I -- I GUESS IT'S WHATEVER THE

                    CUSTOMER REQUESTS AND IT'S WHATEVER THEY REQUEST UNDER NORMAL

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    RECURRING CIRCUMSTANCES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, IF THE CUSTOMER CALLS FOR AN

                    ALTERNATIVE DELIVERY -- AND AS NOTED BY MY COLLEAGUE, THAT COST COULD BE

                    ONE-THIRD LESS EXPENSIVE BECAUSE IT DOESN'T INCLUDE THE LEASE PAYMENT

                    -- CAN THE OWNER OF THE TANK SUE THE CUSTOMER FOR THE BALANCE NEEDED

                    FOR THE LEASE PAYMENT?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THIS BILL DOES NOT ADDRESS

                    THE CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP WITH -- THAT EXISTS.  THIS JUST ALLOWS THE

                    CUSTOMER TO GO TO AN ALTERNATE SOURCE WHEN THEIR PROPANE PROVIDER

                    CAN'T DELIVER.  IT DOESN'T CHANGE THE TERMS OF THEIR CONTRACT.  IT ALLOWS

                    FOR A WINDOW TO OPEN UP FOR AN EMERGENCY DELIVERY, AGAIN, BECAUSE

                    THE ALTERNATIVE IS THE SUPPLIER JUST CAN'T DELIVER FOR WHATEVER REASON.

                    THIS ALLOWS THEM TO GO SOMEWHERE ELSE.  I MEAN, IF IT'S -- SOMETIMES

                    EVEN A FEW DAYS COULD BE DISASTROUS.  AND THERE'S -- THERE'S PEOPLE THAT

                    ARE -- THAT HAVE GONE WEEKS WITHOUT PROPANE DELIVERIES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, YOU -- WE KEEP TALKING ABOUT

                    THIS ONLY APPLIES DURING A QUALIFIED EMERGENCY, AND THERE'S TWO

                    CRITERIA.  THE ONE IS REALLY EASY, A STATE OF EMERGENCY DECLARED BY AN

                    ELECTED OFFICIAL, RIGHT?  A FEDERAL OR STATE OFFICIAL, RIGHT?  THAT'S ONE.

                    BUT THE OTHER ONE IS SEVERE WEATHER.  SO IS THIS SEVERE WEATHER IN THE

                    EYES OF THE CUSTOMER WHO'S LOOKING AT GETTING HIS TANK FILLED UP FOR

                    ONE-THIRD LESS, OR IS IT A CERTAIN LEVEL LIKE A DECLARED HURRICANE,

                    SUPERSTORM, CODE BLUE FOR AN EXTENDED TIME PERIOD OF TIME?  IS THERE

                    ANY DEFINITION OF WHAT YOU MEAN BY SEVERE WEATHER?

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  SO THE CIRCUMSTANCE OF

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    WHATEVER THE SITUATION IS, WHETHER IT'S WEATHER OR SOMETHING ELSE, IT

                    WOULD BE SOMETHING THAT WOULD PREVENT THE PROPANE COMPANY FROM

                    BEING ABLE TO FULFILL THEIR OBLIGATION AND DELIVER THAT FUEL.  SO WHETHER

                    IT'S A THUNDERSTORM OR A SNOWSTORM, IT COULD BE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT

                    THINGS.  SOMETHING IS STOPPING THEM FROM DELIVERING THAT FUEL.  SO, YOU

                    KNOW, SECTION B, SEVERE WEATHER OR ANY OTHER SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCE

                    EXISTS THAT MAY RESULT IN AN INDIVIDUAL BEING PLACED IN IMMINENT

                    DANGER OR DEATH OR INJURY OR MAY -- MAY RESULT IN A BUILDING STRUCTURE

                    AND/OR ITS FIXTURES MAY PUT THOSE -- THOSE ITEMS AT RISK.  SO, IT'S SECTION

                    B.  I DON'T KNOW, YOU CAN -- SO...

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SANTABARBARA.  I

                    APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 SIR, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AS HAS BEEN NOTED BY MY

                    COLLEAGUE, UNDER CURRENT LAW ANYONE WHO WANTS TO CAN BUY THEIR OWN

                    TANK.  AND IF THEY BUY THEIR OWN TANK THEY CAN HAVE IT FILLED BY ANYONE

                    THEY WANT, WHENEVER THEY WANT.  AND THE ADVANTAGE OF OWNING YOUR

                    OWN TANK IS THAT THE COST OF THE NATURAL GAS IS ABOUT A THIRD LESS BECAUSE

                    THAT COST DOES NOT INCLUDE THE LEASE PAYMENT THAT YOU'D OTHERWISE HAVE

                    TO PAY.  SO THIS BILL ALLOWS YOU TO CIRCUMVENT THAT LEASE PAYMENT IN THE

                    EVENT OF SEVERE WEATHER, WHICH IS NOT TRIGGERED BY A STATE OF

                    EMERGENCY.  SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SEVERE WEATHER THAT IS NOT A STATE OF

                    EMERGENCY -- THAT WOULD QUALIFY -- WHERE THE CUSTOMER REASONABLY

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    BELIEVES THEY NEED MORE FUEL.  BUT THAT'S NOT DEFINED.  AND YOU CAN GET

                    IT EVEN THOUGH EVERY SCHEDULED DELIVERY HAS BEEN ON TIME.  IT'S JUST

                    FUNDAMENTALLY UNFAIR.  UNDER CURRENT LAW YOU CAN DECIDE TO LEASE A

                    TANK AND THEN YOU AGREE TO BUY THE PROPANE FROM THAT SUPPLIER.  AND IF

                    THIS WERE JUST LIMITED TO THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE THE SUPPLIER CAN'T

                    SUPPLY, I WOULDN'T HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT.  WHY?  BECAUSE THAT'S

                    EXISTING LAW.  IN EXISTING LAW, IF YOUR SUPPLIER CAN'T GIVE YOU GAS YOU

                    HAVE A DUTY TO MITIGATE DAMAGES, WHICH MEANS UNDER EXISTING LAW IF

                    THEY'RE MISSING A DELIVERY YOU CAN COVER IT.  SO WHERE'S THIS DIFFER FROM

                    EXISTING LAW?  IT DIFFERS BECAUSE IT SAYS -- IT GIVES A BLANK CHECK, IF YOU

                    WILL, FOR CONSUMERS USING A SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION OF WHETHER OR NOT

                    THEY MIGHT NEED GAS TO CALL UP THEIR SUPPLIER AND SAY, GET HERE WITHIN

                    24 HOURS.  NOW, IMAGINE IF THE SUPPLIER SAYS, WELL, WHAT'S -- HOW MUCH

                    PROPANE DO YOU HAVE IN THAT TANK?  I GOT A QUARTER OF A TANK.  WELL,

                    THAT LASTS YOU TWO WEEKS.  DOES IT MATTER UNDER THIS BILL?  NOT REALLY,

                    BECAUSE IT'S A SUBJECTIVE EVALUATION BY THE CUSTOMER.  SO BEFORE THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK STARTS REWRITING CONTRACTS ALL ACROSS THE STATE AND

                    DISRUPT AN EXISTING SITUATION WHICH HAS CHECKS AND BALANCES ALREADY, I

                    THINK WE SHOULD RESPECT CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS, RESPECT THE OPTIONS THAT

                    CONSUMERS HAVE, AND DON'T LEGALIZE A WAY FOR CONSUMERS TO STICK IT TO A

                    COMPANY THAT'S PROVIDING THEM WITH A TANK BY ENABLING TO BUY PROPANE

                    AT ONE-THIRD OFF BY NOT PAYING THE LEASE PAYMENT.

                                 FOR THAT REASON AND FOR THE REASONS MENTIONED BY MY

                    COLLEAGUE IN HIS SHORT QUESTIONING, I WILL BE OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION

                    AND RECOMMEND THAT MY COLLEAGUES VOTE AGAINST IT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    AND AGAIN, THANK YOU TO MY COLLEAGUE.  I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 1451-A.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT ARE ENCOURAGED TO VOTE ON THE FLOOR IN FAVOR OR CALL THE

                    MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE WILL RECORD YOUR VOTE ACCORDINGLY.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  MAJORITY COLLEAGUES ARE GENERALLY GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  HOWEVER, SHOULD THERE BE COLLEAGUES WHO DESIRE

                    TO BE IN THE NEGATIVE, THEY CAN FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY

                    LEADER'S OFFICE AND THEIR VOTE WILL BE PROPERLY RECORDED.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                         67



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    JUST TO EXPLAIN MY -- MY VOTE.  THIS BILL SIMPLY ALLOWS PEOPLE THAT

                    HAVE NO -- HAVE NO ALTERNATIVE WHEN THEY ARE LEASING THEIR PROPANE

                    TANKS WITH NOWHERE TO GO AND LITERALLY BEING LEFT OUT IN THE COLD.

                    THESE ARE CONSTITUENTS OF MINE, BUT IT'S HAPPENED ACROSS THE STATE.

                    PEOPLE THAT HAVE BEEN MET WITH LONG DELIVERY TIMES, SOMETIMES GOING

                    WEEKS WITHOUT HEAT IN THEIR HOMES.  PEOPLE THAT HAVE HAD TO LEAVE THEIR

                    HOMES AND GO TO A FRIEND OR RELATIVE BECAUSE THEY CAN NO LONGER STAY IN

                    THEIR HOMES AND THEY WERE EITHER GETTING NO RESPONSE FROM THEIR

                    PROPANE COMPANIES OR A RESPONSE WITH NO DEFINITE TIME ON WHEN THAT

                    FUEL WAS GOING TO ARRIVE.  WHAT THIS DOES IS WHEN TEMPERATURES DROP

                    REALLY LOW, THESE DELIVERIES BECOME CRITICAL.  THEY'RE CRUCIAL.  AND

                    VULNERABLE RESIDENTS -- I'VE SEEN PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, I'VE SEEN

                    FAMILIES WITH LITTLE ONES THAT HAVE GONE THROUGH THIS.  THIS GIVES THESE

                    FAMILIES AN OPPORTUNITY TO GO TO ANOTHER SUPPLIER WHEN THEIR SUPPLIER

                    CANNOT DELIVER.  THAT'S WHAT TRIGGERS THIS BILL, WHEN YOUR SUPPLIER

                    CANNOT DELIVER.  THAT IS THE KEY COMPONENT OF THIS BILL.  YOUR SUPPLIER

                    CAN'T MAKE IT?  CAN I GO SOMEWHERE ELSE?  THE BILL WILL SPELL OUT HOW

                    YOU CAN DO THAT, HOW THAT PROCEDURE WORKS.  IT WILL BE UNDERSTOOD BY

                    CUSTOMERS AND BY PROPANE COMPANIES.  THIS MAKES THE INDUSTRY

                    STRONGER, ESPECIALLY IN SOME OF THESE RURAL AREAS.  THIS IS THEIR ONLY

                    SOURCE OF HEAT.  SO TO DENY THEM AN OPPORTUNITY TO FIND ANOTHER

                    SUPPLIER WHEN TEMPERATURES DROP LOW IS SOMETHING THAT WE -- WE

                    CANNOT DO.  AND THAT'S WHAT THIS BILL DOES.  IT CORRECTS -- IT CORRECTS

                                         68



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    SOMETHING THAT IS NOT WORKING RIGHT NOW.  AND I KNOW IT'S NOT WORKING

                    BECAUSE PEOPLE CALL MY OFFICE AND TELL ME THAT THEY HAVE NO HEAT.  AND

                    WHEN I CALL PROPANE COMPANIES, JUST AS THEY DO, THEIR RESPONSE IS NOT

                    GOOD.  SO THIS WILL CORRECT THAT.  NO HOUSEHOLD SHOULD BE FORCED TO GO

                    WITHOUT HEAT, ESPECIALLY WHEN WE'RE SEEING DANGEROUSLY COLD

                    TEMPERATURES AND WHEN FAMILIES ARE FORCED TO ABANDON THEIR HOMES

                    BECAUSE DELIVERIES NEVER COME.

                                 THANK YOU, AND I ENCOURAGE EVERYBODY TO JOIN ME IN

                    -- IN SUPPORTING THIS BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SANTABARBARA IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. WOERNER TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WOERNER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, TO -- FOR

                    ALLOWING ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE TODAY.  I WOULD LIKE TO

                    THANK THE SPONSOR FOR BRINGING THIS ISSUE FORWARD AND FOR HIS

                    PERSISTENCE IN -- IN MAKING SURE THAT IT GOT A HEARING AND A VOTE ON THE

                    FLOOR TODAY.  I, TOO, HAVE BEEN TROUBLED BY THE NUMBER OF CONSTITUENT

                    CALLS I RECEIVED THIS WINTER OF PEOPLE WHO CONTACTED THEIR -- THEIR

                    PROPANE PROVIDER AND WERE UNABLE TO REACH THEM, OR IF THEY REACHED

                    THEM WERE -- WERE UNABLE TO SECURE A DELIVERY OF -- OF CRITICAL HEATING

                    FUEL.  AND, YOU KNOW, IT IS -- IT IS -- IT IS TRUE THAT COMPANIES COULD DO A

                    BETTER JOB OF ANTICIPATING WHAT THE DEMAND IS, GIVEN THAT THEY KNOW

                    WHAT THE TEMPERATURE IS BETTER THAN WE DO SOMETIMES.  AND THEY COULD

                    PUT IN PLACE COOPERATING AGREEMENTS IF THEY ARE CONCERNED THAT THEY

                    WON'T HAVE ENOUGH SUPPLY OR THEY WON'T HAVE ENOUGH DRIVERS TO MEET

                                         69



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THE DEMAND.  SO I THINK THAT THIS BILL WILL NOT ONLY PROVIDE CONSUMERS

                    WITH PROTECTIONS AND TOOLS, BUT HOPEFULLY IT WILL ALSO ENCOURAGE THE

                    INDUSTRY AS A WHOLE TO TAKE A BETTER -- A BETTER LOOK AT THEIR PROCESSES TO

                    ENSURE THAT THEY CAN MEET CUSTOMER DEMAND, PARTICULARLY IN THE MOST

                    COLD WEATHER THAT WE HAVE.

                                 SO AGAIN, THANK YOU TO THE SPONSOR, AND WITH THAT I

                    VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WOERNER IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I, TOO, WANT TO

                    APPLAUD MY COLLEAGUE FOR INTRODUCING LEGISLATION THAT IS PRO-CONSUMER.

                    IT SUPPORTS CONSUMERS WHEN THEY HAVE ISSUES.  WE ARE HERE AS

                    REPRESENTATIVES OF THE PEOPLE, AND QUITE HONESTLY, WHEN OUR PEOPLE

                    HAVE PROBLEMS WE NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO FIX THEM.  SO I ADMIRE HIS

                    STRATEGY IN TRYING TO FIGURE THAT OUT.  AND I DON'T WANT TO NECESSARILY

                    SUGGEST THAT PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS FIND A WAY TO SCAM A BUSINESS.  PEOPLE

                    ARE NOT INTERESTED IN SCAMMING, THEY'RE INTERESTED IN LIVING.  AND THEY

                    WANT TO HAVE HEAT.  THEY WANTED TO BE COMFORTABLE IN THEIR HOMES.

                    AND SO WHEN THERE ARE BUSINESSES WHO ACT DISINGENUOUS AS IT RELATES TO

                    CONSUMERS, THEY NEED TO BE CALLED TO TASK AND I THINK THIS IS THE RIGHT

                    WAY TO DO IT.

                                 SO I COMMEND MY COLLEAGUE AND VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    CONSUMER-FRIENDLY LEGISLATION.

                                         70



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD MY

                    COLLEAGUE MR. BRABENEC IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS BILL.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  SO NOTED.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 19, CALENDAR NO. 123, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03318-B, CALENDAR

                    NO. 123, SAYEGH, DICKENS, GRIFFIN, SIMON, GALEF, BUTTENSCHON,

                    MONTESANO, SEAWRIGHT, DESTEFANO, GOTTFRIED, OTIS, THIELE,

                    SANTABARBARA, TAGUE, LAWLER, RA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC SERVICE

                    LAW AND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING ELECTRIC

                    CORPORATIONS AND THE LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY SERVICE PROVIDER TO

                    PRIORITIZE RESTORING SERVICES TO POLICE DEPARTMENTS, FIRE DEPARTMENTS

                    AND AMBULANCE SERVICES WHEN ELECTRIC SERVICES ARE INTERRUPTED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER LUNSFORD:  AN EXPLANATION

                    HAS BEEN REQUESTED, MR. SAYEGH.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  YES, SURE.  THIS LEGISLATION REQUIRES

                    UTILITY COMPANIES, ELECTRIC COMPANIES, COMPANIES LIKE CONED, LIKE

                    LONG ISLAND POWER AUTHORITY, TO SET A PRIORITY WHEN THERE IS AN

                                         71



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    INTERRUPTION OF POWER.  AND OVER THE LAST NUMBER OF YEARS, RATHER THAN

                    TALKING ABOUT THE STORM OF THE CENTURY, WE'RE NOW HAVING ONGOING

                    OCCURRENCES WHERE THE STORMS ARE HURRICANES, THAT THERE'S POWER

                    OUTAGES.  AND WE KNOW WHEN THERE IS A POWER OUTAGE, SOME

                    ORGANIZATIONS AND SOME INDIVIDUALS ON LIFE SUPPORT SYSTEMS REQUIRE A

                    MORE ADVANCED PRIORITY TO GET THEIR SERVICE RESTORED.  THREE VERY

                    IMPORTANT ENTITIES THAT EACH AND EVERY ONE OF US RELIES ON IS POLICE, FIRE

                    AND AMBULANCE SERVICES.  AND WE KNOW THAT WHEN SERVICE IS

                    INTERRUPTED AND THE POLICE CAN'T GET TO YOU OR THE FIRE DEPARTMENT CAN'T

                    GET TO YOU OR AMBULANCE SERVICE THAT CAN BE A LIFE AND DEATH SITUATION

                    CAN'T GET TO YOU, THEN THERE'S A TRAGIC LOSS OF LIFE.  ALTHOUGH UTILITY

                    COMPANIES DO SET PRIORITIES, MANY DON'T DO PRIORITIES AS REQUIRED OR AS

                    NECESSITATED.  AND SOME COUNTIES ACROSS THE STATE AND MY COUNTY OF

                    WESTCHESTER HAS AN EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, AND CON EDISON

                    AND ALL THE UTILITY COMPANIES ALSO HAVE EMERGENCY RESPONSE TEAMS.

                    THERE'S ALREADY LIAISONS IN PLACE TO ADDRESS THESE EMERGENCIES, AND

                    THERE IS COMPLIANCE TO A LARGE EXTENT.  BUT THERE'S ALSO MANY INSTANCES

                    WHERE THERE IS NOT PROPER COMPLIANCE.  THIS LEGISLATION REQUIRES THESE

                    UTILITY COMPANIES TO SET UP A LIST OF PRIORITY THAT RESTORES WITHIN A 24-

                    HOUR TIME PERIOD ELECTRIC AND OTHER POWER SOURCES TO POLICE, FIRE AND

                    AMBULANCE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER LUNSFORD:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  OF COURSE.

                                         72



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 ACTING SPEAKER LUNSFORD:  THE SPONSOR

                    YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  YOU'RE WELCOME.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW AS YOU MENTIONED, A LOT OF

                    POLICE AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS ALREADY HAVE THEIR OWN EMERGENCY --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  -- GENERATOR, CORRECT?  AND OF

                    COURSE IF YOU HAVE YOUR OWN EMERGENCY GENERATOR IT'S ALREADY

                    HARDWIRED IN YOUR SYSTEM.  IT'S ALREADY PROPERLY SIZED.  IT'S ALREADY

                    AVAILABLE IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WHY SHOULDN'T WE JUST SIMPLY

                    ENCOURAGE OTHERS THAT HAVEN'T YET INSTALLED ONE TO INSTALL THEIR OWN?

                    WOULDN'T THAT BE A MORE APPROPRIATE RESPONSE?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  AND CORRECT, YOU'RE RIGHT.  MANY --

                    MANY POLICE, FIRE, AMBULANCE DO HAVE THEIR BACKUP GENERATORS, AND

                    MANY THAT ARE IN DEPRESSED COMMUNITIES DON'T HAVE IT.  AND THE

                    CONCERN WE HAVE IS THAT THIS SHOULD BE MANDATORY.  EVERY POLICE, FIRE

                    AND AMBULANCE SERVICE SHOULD HAVE A BACKUP GENERATOR AVAILABLE

                    WITHIN 24 HOURS.  IT IS HISTORICALLY FINE FOR THOSE THAT HAVE, BUT EVEN

                    LOOKING AT AN EXAMPLE WE HAD IN WESTCHESTER COUNTY WHEN WE HAD

                    HURRICANE -- A TWIN -- A "TWIN PUNCH", AS THEY SAY, WITH HURRICANE

                    QUINN AND RILEY BACK IN 2018, POWER IN A GENERATOR AT ONE OF THE LOCAL

                    MUNICIPALITY, SUCH SERVICE WAS CUT AND FAILED TO OPERATE AND, THEREFORE,

                                         73



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THERE HAD TO BE AN OUTREACH AT THAT TIME TO CON EDISON TO COME AND

                    FUEL AND PUT THE POWER BACK ON.  SO IT DOES HELP TO HAVE THESE IN PLACE,

                    AND MANY, YOU'RE RIGHT, ARE IN PLACE.  BUT THIS REQUIRES A SYSTEM IN

                    PLACE THAT IF FOR WHATEVER REASON THERE ISN'T A GENERATOR OR YOU HAVE A

                    GENERATOR THAT DOES NOT FUNCTION, THAT THE CON EDISON OR THE UTILITIES OR

                    LONG ISLAND POWER, WORKING WITH THE EMERGENCY TEAMS, HAS THE

                    AVAILABLE GENERATOR ON SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, WITH YOUR PERMISSION I

                    WANTED TO WALK THROUGH SOME OF THE LANGUAGE OF THE BILL JUST SO WE'RE

                    ALL UNDERSTANDING.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO THE FIRST THING IS THAT IT'S NOT

                    TRIGGERED UNLESS THE UTILITY THINKS THE POWER WILL BE OUT FOR MORE THAN

                    24 HOURS, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND SO IS THERE -- SO THE UTILITY, IN

                    THEORY, COULD WAIT 24 HOURS, HOPING TO GET THE POWER BACK UP BEFORE

                    THIS IS TRIGGERED.  ONCE IT'S TRIGGERED -- LET'S SAY IT'S GOING BEYOND THE

                    24-HOUR PERIOD -- DOES THIS BILL INCLUDE ANY LANGUAGE ON HOW QUICKLY

                    THE UTILITY IS TO DELIVER THE BACKUP GENERATORS?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  WELL, THE UNDERSTANDING IS THE BILL

                    REQUIRES THAT AFTER 24 HOURS -- YOU KNOW, THE UNDERSTANDING WITH THE

                    LANGUAGE OF THE BILL IS THAT IT WOULD BE AN IMMEDIATE RESPONSE.  THAT'S

                    WHY WE HAVE THE REQUIREMENT OF A PRIORITY AS FAR AS (INAUDIBLE).

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I APPRECIATE THE UNDERSTANDING, BUT

                                         74



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THERE'S NO ACTUAL LANGUAGE THAT REQUIRES A RESPONSE AFTER THE 24 HOURS,

                    CORRECT?  THERE'S NO LANGUAGE.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  IT JUST URGES AN IMMEDIATE RESPONSE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO THEN THE NEXT QUESTION I HAVE IS

                    PRESUMABLY IF THERE'S A POWER OUTAGE, WE WANT THE UTILITY COMPANY

                    FOCUSED ON RESTORING POWER TO EVERYONE AS FAST AS POSSIBLE, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  DO WE HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY

                    STAFF MEMBERS WOULD BE TAKEN AWAY FROM THAT PROCESS IN ORDER TO

                    DELIVER THESE GENERATORS?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  WELL, PRESENTLY THESE UTILITY

                    COMPANIES HAVE LIAISONS IN PLACE AS A RESULT OF THE NORM THAT HAS

                    OCCURRED WITH HURRICANES AND STORMS IN MANY PARTS OF THE STATE, AND

                    PART OF THE EMERGENCY TEAMS THAT ARE IN PLACE.  UTILITY COMPANIES

                    ALREADY HAVE LIAISONS WORKING CLOSELY WITH THESE MANAGEMENT TEAMS.

                    SO I DON'T BELIEVE AT THIS STAGE IT WOULD REQUIRE ADDITIONAL STAFFING.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT, I MEAN, YOU NEED STAFF TO

                    ACTUALLY TIE THE GENERATOR ON THE BACK OF A TRUCK, MAKE ARRANGEMENTS,

                    DELIVER IT, PICK UP THE NEXT GENERATOR, DELIVER THAT.  RIGHT?  AND THESE

                    GENERATORS COULD RUN --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  -- FROM SMALL UP TO, LIKE, A SEMI

                    TRACTOR TRAILER --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  -- (INAUDIBLE) IN POWER.  SO HOW

                                         75



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    MANY STAFF MEMBERS DO YOU ENVISION THE UTILITY WOULD HAVE TO HAVE TO

                    MAKE THESE DELIVERIES, KEEPING IN MIND THAT THESE DELIVERIES WOULD

                    OCCUR RIGHT AFTER A MAJOR STORM?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO HOW MANY STAFF MEMBERS

                    WOULD YOU ENVISION?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT WHEN YOU

                    HAVE THE EMERGENCY TEAMS IN PLACE, THE -- THE NORM -- AND IT DEPENDS

                    ON THE SIZE OF THE VILLAGE, IF IT'S A TOWN, IF IT'S A CITY.  IT DEPENDS ON HOW

                    LARGE THE FIRE STATION IS, THE AMBULANCE SERVICE, THE POLICE DEPARTMENT

                    IS.  HOW MANY GENERATORS, MAYBE THE SIZE OF A GENERATOR.  SO ALL THAT IS

                    TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION.  AND I BELIEVE THERE'S A LOT OF PLANNING

                    PRESENTLY TAKING PLACE THAT ASSURES THAT THEY'RE PUT IN BACKUP.  AND A

                    LOT OF THIS LEGISLATION HAS REALLY COME INTO EXISTENCE MORE RECENTLY, THE

                    LAST DECADE OR SO, BECAUSE WE'VE WITNESSED, WHETHER IT WAS INTENTIONAL

                    OR NOT, UTILITY COMPANIES NOT RESPONDING AS QUICK AS THEY DID.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND I APPRECIATE THAT PLANNING.

                    MY QUESTION WAS VERY SPECIFIC.  DO YOU HAVE AN ESTIMATE OF THE

                    NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES THAT WOULD BE NEEDED, SAY, IN A SUPERSTORM

                    SANDY SITUATION, TO DELIVER THESE GENERATORS?  AND I MIGHT BACK UP AND

                    SAY HOW MANY GENERATORS WOULD BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO MEET THIS BILL --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL: -- AND HOW MANY STAFF MEMBERS

                    WOULD BE NEEDED?  AND THIS IS A NUMBER.  DO YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF

                    STAFF?

                                         76



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  NO, THERE ISN'T A NUMBER.  AND --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND DO YOU HAVE A NUMBER OF HOW

                    MANY GENERATORS WOULD BE NEEDED?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THE GENERATOR DEPENDS ON THE SIZE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  RIGHT.  BUT HOW MANY?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  -- AND WHETHER THEY EXIST OR NOT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  RIGHT.  BUT THIS IS A --

                                 (CROSS-TALK)

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  (INAUDIBLE).

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I'M SORRY.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  (INAUDIBLE) LEGISLATION WOULD BE TO

                    REQUIRE THE PLANNING AND THE NETWORK AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF -- OF

                    THESE PRIORITIES SO THAT WE -- WE'RE NOT CAUGHT IN A SITUATION WHERE WE

                    DON'T HAVE ADEQUATE STAFF.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  LET ME ASK A COROLLARY QUESTION.

                    DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY -- AND THIS WOULD BE A NUMBER -- HOW MANY

                    FIRE DEPARTMENTS, VOLUNTEER FIRE SERVICES, AMBULANCE COMPANIES OR

                    POLICE DEPARTMENTS CURRENTLY DO NOT HAVE A BACKUP GENERATOR?  DO YOU

                    KNOW THAT NUMBER?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  EXACTLY, NO.  BUT WHETHER THEY DO OR

                    NOT --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  DO YOU HAVE A COST ESTIMATE OF

                    WHAT IT WOULD COST FOR A UTILITY COMPANY TO BUY ENOUGH GENERATORS TO

                    COVER ALL OF THOSE ENTITIES?  DO WE HAVE A COST ESTIMATE?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  AN ESTIMATE AS OF NOW, NO.  BUT THIS

                                         77



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    WILL PROVIDE A SYSTEM IN PLACE BECAUSE OF THE SAFETY -- THE SAFETY FACTOR

                    IS SO CRUCIAL THAT TO PUT A PRICE TAG ON LOSING A LIFE OR HAVING A BUILDING

                    BURN IS -- IS SUCH WHERE THIS FIXES THAT PROBLEM AND AUTHORIZES OR

                    REQUIRES UTILITY COMPANIES TO MAKE SURE THAT PART OF THEIR EMERGENCY

                    PLANNING IS TO KNOW EXACTLY WHO HAS A GENERATOR, WHO DOES NOT.  WHAT

                    NEEDS TO HAPPEN TO ASSURE THAT SERVICE IS RESTORED AFTER THE 24 HOURS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW I UNDERSTAND YOU DON'T KNOW

                    HOW MANY GENERATORS WOULD BE REQUIRED OR WHAT THE SIZE WOULD BE OR

                    WHAT THE COST WOULD BE, BUT I SEE THIS PROVIDES BY STATUTE THAT THE

                    SERVICE PROVIDER SHALL NOT INCREASE CHARGES.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO HOW WOULD THE UTILITY PAY FOR

                    THESE IF THEY CAN'T CHARGE FOR THEM?  I MEAN, I ASSUME THAT THEY DON'T

                    HAVE A GOLD -- A VAULT OF GOLD IN THE BASEMENT, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  GOOD QUESTION.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO HOW DO THEY PAY FOR IT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  AND WHEN I LOOKED AT THE DATA,

                    FEDERAL FUNDS AMOUNT TO NEARLY $20 BILLION.  NEW YORK STATE PUTS

                    NEARLY $1.6 BILLION IN SUBSIDIES, IN TAX CREDITS, ENERGY CREDITS TO UTILITY

                    COMPANIES IN OUR STATE THAT ALLOWS THEM -- AND -- AND MIND YOU, WE

                    LOOKED AT THE PROFIT MARGINS OF UTILITY COMPANIES.  I THINK NOW MORE

                    THAN EVER, I THINK WE'VE LEARNED THE URGENCY OF MAKING SURE THAT WE

                    NEED TO SET PRIORITIES TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE SAFE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, ASSUMING THAT THE UTILITY

                    COMPANY DELIVERS A GENERATOR, AND LET'S SAY IT'S A BIG MUNICIPALITY SO IT

                                         78



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    WOULD BE A BIG GENERATOR.  AND YOU'VE SEEN THEM, I'M SURE, WHERE

                    THEY'RE AS LARGE AS A TRACTOR TRAILER.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THAT'S RIGHT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING

                    THAT GENERATOR FUELED?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THE UTILITY REPRESENTATIVE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  DOES THAT STATE THAT IN THIS BILL?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THE UTILITY COMPANIES ARE REQUIRED.

                    WE WOULDN'T WANT THE FIRST RESPONDERS, OF COURSE, TO GET AWAY FROM --

                    WHETHER THEY'RE A FIREMAN OR POLICE OFFICER OR AN AMBULANCE, TO BE

                    WORRIED.  SO THIS WILL BE THE REQUIREMENT OF UTILITY COMPANIES TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT THE POWER IS ON OR OFF, TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S ADEQUATE

                    FUEL, TO MAKE SURE THAT THE PROCESS IS SET TO GO WHERE THERE'S NO ISSUES

                    WITH THE GENERATOR.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, I APPRECIATE YOUR DESIRE, BUT

                    LOOKING AT THE ACTUAL BILL LANGUAGE ALL IT SAYS IS THAT THE UTILITY HAS TO

                    PROVIDE A GENERATOR.  THERE'S NO MENTION OF FUEL OR MAINTENANCE; AM I

                    CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  NO, IT DOES -- THE BILL DOES PROVIDE

                    FOR A POWER SOURCE.  SO I THINK --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SOURCE, RIGHT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  (INAUDIBLE).

                                 (CROSS-TALK)

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THAT WOULD BE GENERATOR, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  EXCUSE ME?

                                         79



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THAT'S THE GENERATOR, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THE GENERATOR -- THE POWER SOURCE IS

                    THE GENERATOR AND THE FUEL AND MAKING SURE IT GOES ON AND OFF.  I MEAN,

                    YOU -- DO YOU GET SPECIFIC OR DO YOU TALK ABOUT MAKING SURE THERE'S

                    ADEQUATE POWER?  BECAUSE THE WHOLE ISSUE HERE IS POWER OUTAGES AND

                    MAKING SURE THAT THEY ADDRESS THESE OUTAGES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I

                    APPRECIATE -- APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 ON THE BILL, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER LUNSFORD:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO I -- I TRULY APPRECIATE MY

                    COLLEAGUE'S DESIRE TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S EMERGENCY BACKUP POWER

                    FOR FIRE, AMBULANCE AND POLICE.  WHICH IS EXACTLY WHY MOST OF THOSE

                    ORGANIZATIONS ALREADY HAVE THEIR OWN BACKUP POWER.  AND INDEED, THAT

                    IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY SHOULD DO.  SO THIS IS A BAD SOLUTION TO A SITUATION

                    WHERE YOU MIGHT HAVE AN INDIVIDUAL POLICE DEPARTMENT OR FIRE

                    DEPARTMENT THAT DOESN'T HAVE ITS OWN BACKUP.  AND HERE'S THE PROBLEM.

                    THE POWER -- POWER IS OFF FOR 24 HOURS.  THIS BILL REQUIRES THE UTILITY TO

                    PROVIDE BACKUP POWER.  SO, FIRST QUESTION:  WHAT SIZE OF A GENERATOR

                    SHOULD THEY DELIVER?  LET'S ASSUME THE UTILITY COMPANY DOES THE

                    ALGORITHM AND FIGURES IT OUT FROM PAST USAGE.  THEY NOW SHOW UP AT THE

                    FRONT DOOR OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH A GENERATOR.  HOW DO THEY

                    CONNECT IT?  YOU KNOW, YOU MAY HAVE NOTICED, BUILDINGS DON'T HAVE A

                    PLUG-IN LIKE A PRIUS MIGHT WHERE YOU JUST PLUG IT IN.  IF YOU HAVE AN

                    EMERGENCY GENERATOR, YOU HAVE TO DO ALL OF THE ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS

                                         80



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    INSIDE THE BUILDING TO ACCEPT THE POWER.  THAT'S WHY IT SHOULD BE DONE

                    BY THE PERSON WHO OWNS THE BUILDING AND NOT BY THE UTILITY COMPANY.

                                 LET'S MOVE TO THE NEXT ISSUE.  THE UTILITY COMPANY

                    SHOWS UP, THEY DROP OFF A GENERATOR.  THEY SAY, HERE'S HOW YOU START

                    IT.  GOOD LUCK.  IT'S UP TO YOU TO CONNECT IT.  THE ABILITY OF A FIRE

                    DEPARTMENT OR A POLICE DEPARTMENT TO GET A CONTRACTOR IN THE

                    EMERGENCY OF A -- IN THE MIDDLE OF AN EMERGENCY TO FIGURE OUT ALL THE

                    CONNECTIONS AND START IT UP IS NEAR ZERO.  THAT'S WHY IT SHOULD BE DONE

                    IN ADVANCE.  THEN THE SPONSOR SAYS IN ADDITION TO TAKING ALL THEIR STAFF

                    OFF FROM THE EMERGENCY EFFORTS TO RESTORE POWER, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE

                    THEM RUNNING AROUND DELIVERING GENERATORS AND THEN KEEP THEM FUELED.

                    WELL, THOSE WHO HAVE GENERATORS KNOW THE AMOUNT OF FUEL THAT'S

                    BURNED IS DIRECTLY RELATED TO POWER DRAW.  I LOVE IT WHEN I LOOK AT

                    INDIVIDUAL GENERATORS AND THEY SAY THAT THEY'LL RUN UP TO 80 HOURS ON A

                    TANK.  UNLESS, OF COURSE, YOU'RE ACTUALLY USING THE POWER IN WHICH CASE

                    IT'S ONLY THREE-AND-A-HALF HOURS.  SO NOW WHAT?  THE UTILITY COMPANY IS

                    GOING TO HIRE A FLEET OF GASOLINE OR DIESEL TRUCKS TO DRIVE AROUND AND

                    REFUEL THESE?  ON THE OTHER HAND, BY THE WAY, IF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT OR

                    POLICE DEPARTMENT IS PLANNING IN ADVANCE, AS THEY SHOULD, THEY'LL HOOK

                    UP THEIR EMERGENCY GENERATOR TO NATURAL GAS SO THEY HAVE AN

                    UNINTERRUPTED SUPPLY.  AND BY THE WAY, THOSE WHO WENT THROUGH

                    SUPERSTORM SANDY, THEY KNEW THAT JUST FINDING AND DELIVERING FUEL IS A

                    CHALLENGE, ISN'T IT?  GOOD CONCEPT, BAD IMPLEMENTATION.  THE SOLUTION

                    IS SIMPLE.  INSTEAD OF REQUIRING UTILITIES TO HAVE A WAREHOUSE OF

                    GENERATORS OF VARYING SIZE AND A STANDBY CREW OF USING, YOU KNOW, OF

                                         81



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    USING HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF EMPLOYEES TO DRIVE AROUND TO DELIVER

                    GENERATORS THAT CAN'T BE CONNECTED WITHOUT ELECTRICAL WIRING, THAT CAN'T

                    BE FUEL -- FUELED ON A REGULAR BASIS AND DON'T PROVIDE RELIABLE POWER IN

                    ANY EVENT, THE SOLUTION IS SIMPLE.  LET'S ENCOURAGE FIRE DEPARTMENTS

                    AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS AND AMBULANCES TO PUT IN THEIR OWN BACKUP

                    GENERATORS.  AND IF WE REALLY WANT TO DO IT AND WE WANT TO ENCOURAGE

                    THEM, WE CAN PROVIDE FUNDING IN THE STATE BUDGET THAT WE'RE ABOUT TO

                    ADOPT.  MY COLLEAGUE INDICATED THERE MAY BE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN

                    FEDERAL FUNDING AVAILABLE.  LET'S PROVIDE A GRANT OR A FINANCIAL

                    INCENTIVE.  LET'S DO THIS RIGHT.  AND OF COURSE I LOVE THE PROVISION THAT

                    SAYS AND THE UTILITY CAN'T CHARGE ANYONE.  NOW WOULDN'T IT BE SWEET IF

                    UTILITIES JUST HAD AN UNLIMITED SUPPLY OF MONEY AND THEY COULD DO

                    WHATEVER WE WANT.  BUT WE ALL KNOW THAT'S NOT THE CASE.  AND SO

                    ULTIMATELY, SOMEONE'S GOING TO HAVE TO PAY.  AND AT THE END OF THE DAY

                    IT'S THE RATEPAYERS ONE WAY OR THE OTHER THAT ARE GOING TO END UP

                    PAYING.  AND THAT MEANS EVERY RESPONSIBLE POLICE AND FIRE AND

                    AMBULANCE SERVICE THAT MADE THE COMMITMENT TO HAVE THEIR OWN

                    EMERGENCY GENERATOR, PROPERLY SIZED, PROPERLY CONNECTED TO THEIR

                    ELECTRICAL SYSTEM AND A FUEL SOURCE, ALL OF THEM ULTIMATELY END UP

                    PAYING MORE TO COVER THE COST OF THOSE WHO DIDN'T PLAN AHEAD.  LET'S

                    STOP TREATING THE UTILITY LIKE IT'S AN UNLIMITED SOURCE OF STAFFING, OF

                    POWER, OF MONEY, AND INSTEAD ENCOURAGE RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOR ON THE

                    PART OF ALL OF OUR EMERGENCY SERVICES SO THAT THEY CAN PROVIDE THAT

                    BACKUP GENERATION WITHOUT CREATING CHAOS.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                         82



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL MR.

                    SAYEGH YIELD FOR A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SAYEGH, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  OF COURSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU.  MY COLLEAGUE

                    COVERED A LOT OF WHAT I WAS GOING TO TALK ABOUT, BUT I JUST WANTED TO

                    KIND OF ADDRESS A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS, IF I COULD.  ISN'T AFTER A STORM,

                    ESPECIALLY WHAT WE -- SOME OF THE STORMS WE SEE DOWN ON THE ISLAND,

                    THE CITY, ACROSS THE STATE, THE NUMBER ONE PRIORITY AFTER THE STORM IS FOR

                    THE UTILITY COMPANY TO MAKE, SAY, MAKE SURE THE WIRES, THE TREES, THE

                    DOWNED -- THE DOWNED TREES, THE BRANCH -- EVERYTHING IS ALL CLEARED UP

                    AND TO MAKE SURE THERE'S NO IMMEDIATE DANGER TO THE PUBLIC.  THAT'S THE

                    FIRST AND FOREMOST, AND THEN TO MOVE FORWARD TO RESTORE POWER AS SOON

                    AS POSSIBLE.  THAT'S THE NUMBER ONE GOAL AND RESPONSIBILITY OF THE

                    UTILITY COMPANY, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  NOW, THAT'S TRUE, BUT ALSO COUPLED

                    WITH -- ACCORDING TO THE LEGISLATION -- REQUIRING PART OF THAT PRIORITY IS

                    TO MAKE SURE THAT POLICE, FIRE AND AMBULANCE -- BECAUSE IF YOU'RE TRYING

                    TO RESTORE OR FIXED A DOWNED TREE AND MEANWHILE YOUR LOCAL POLICE, FIRE

                    DEPARTMENT OR AMBULANCE DOESN'T HAVE POWER, THEN AGAIN, LIVES COULD

                    BE AT RISK.  SO IT'S REALLY A COUPLE --

                                         83



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH.  WELL, FIRST THEY HAVE TO

                    MAKE SURE IT'S SAFE SO THEY CAN --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  WELL, IT'S A COMBINATION (INAUDIBLE)

                    --

                                 (CROSS-TALK)

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  (INAUDIBLE).

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  AND I'M SAYING YOU REALLY HAVE TO

                    TAKE THE INITIATIVE OF MAKING SURE YOU DEAL WITH THE EMERGENCY AT

                    HAND.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NOW, THIS WOULD APPLY TO ALL

                    POLICE DEPARTMENTS, ALL FIRE DEPARTMENTS.  SO ALL VOLUNTEER FIRE

                    DEPARTMENTS.  SO THERE'S 866 INDEPENDENT FIRE DISTRICTS, 1,200 FIRE --

                    FIRE COMPANIES.  THIS WOULD APPLY -- THEY WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE, YOU

                    KNOW, TO ALL IF THERE'S A NEED FOR IT, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  CORRECT.  IF -- IF THEY DON'T HAVE ONE

                    ALREADY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO AS MY COLLEAGUE SAID,

                    WOULDN'T IT BE -- I MEAN, TO REQUIRE THE UTILITY COMPANY TO GO OUT AND

                    BUY AND HAVE THESE, WOULDN'T IT MAKE MORE SENSE FOR THE -- THE

                    MUNICIPALITY TO -- TO HANDLE THAT?  OR THE FIRE COMPANY THEMSELVES TO

                    BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DEALING WITH PURCHASING THE GENERATION -- GENERATORS

                    THEY NEED?  YOU KNOW, WHY -- WHY SHOULD THAT FALL ON THE UTILITIES

                    WHEN THEIR GOAL WAS TO RESTORE POWER AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  BECAUSE THE LEGISLATION REQUIRES WITH

                    -- AFTER THE 24-HOUR PERIOD.  I'M SURE MOST -- AS I WOULD WANT TO MAKE

                                         84



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    SURE THAT I GET MY POWER RESTORED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE, SO HAVING A

                    GENERATOR ASSURES YOU THAT YOU DON'T HAVE TO WAIT 24 HOURS.  SO YES, IT'S

                    TRUE THAT THE INCENTIVE IS THERE FOR THEM TO PRESENTLY HAVE GENERATORS.

                    THIS IS REALLY AN ASSURANCE.  IT'S ALMOST AN ASSURANCE TO MAKE SURE THAT

                    IF YOUR GENERATOR -- AS I STATED EARLIER, IT HAPPENED IN MY COUNTY WHERE

                    THIS MUNICIPALITY HAD A GENERATOR THAT FAILED TO FUNCTION AND THEN CON

                    ED WAS REQUIRED TO BACK UP AND SUPPORT AND ASSURE THAT THE SERVICE

                    WAS RESTORED.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO, THESE -- THESE GENERATORS,

                    THEY'RE NOT REALLY JUST EASY AND QUICK TO INSTALL.  YOU NEED SOMEBODY

                    LIKE A LICENSED ELECTRICIAN.  WHAT ABOUT THE -- THE -- THE FACILITY ITSELF?

                    YOU KNOW, WHAT IF THEY NEED TO UPGRADE THEIR VOLTAGE OR THEY NEED TO

                    UPGRADE THEIR AMPS NEEDED TO -- TO HANDLE IT?  WHO WOULD -- THE BILL

                    SAYS THE UTILITY COMPANY.  IS IT THE UTILITY COMPANY'S RESPONSIBILITY TO

                    MAKE SURE THAT THEY HAVE WHAT THEY NEED TO ACCEPT THAT GENERATOR AND

                    THEY HAVE TO STAY THERE THROUGH THAT WHOLE PROCESS?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  ACCORDING TO THE BILL, UTILITY

                    COMPANY.  IN MY COMMUNICATION WITH REPRESENTATIVES OF THE UTILITY

                    COMPANIES, YOU KNOW, TO THE POINT OF LABOR AND EXTRA THEY HAVE

                    PRESENTLY A STAFF OF LABOR.  IS THERE A STORM OR HURRICANE ON A DAILY

                    BASIS?  NO.  SO THE REQUIREMENT WOULD BE WITH THIS PLAN AND IN THIS

                    PRIORITY NETWORK IS TO MAKE SURE THAT RATHER THAN SITTING IN OFFICES,

                    THEY'RE GOING AROUND TO ALL THE POLICE, FIRE, AMBULANCE SERVICES AND

                    MAKING SURE TO BE A LITTLE BIT MORE PROACTIVE.  I THINK OUR CONCERN IS,

                    YOU KNOW, IT FORCES -- IT FORCES THE LEGISLATIVE BODY TO LOOK AT

                                         85



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    INITIATIVES AND LEGISLATIVE PIECES TO MAKE SURE THE JOB IS DONE RIGHT.

                    FOR EXAMPLE -- JUST TO GIVE YOU AN EXAMPLE, THE LAST STORM, BECAUSE OF

                    LEGISLATION PASSED IN THIS HOUSE REQUIRING UTILITY COMPANIES, I WAS

                    PASSING A DAY BEFORE STORM IDA RECENTLY OVER THE CUOMO, ALSO KNOWN

                    AS THE TAPPAN ZEE BRIDGE, AND THE NIGHT BEFORE BECAUSE THEY KNEW

                    THERE WAS A STORM COMING.  THERE WAS UTILITY COMPANY TRUCKS, REPAIR

                    TRUCKS COMING ACROSS THE -- THE BRIDGE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND THAT.  BUT YOU'RE

                    SAYING THE UTILITY COMPANY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOT JUST BRINGING THE

                    GENERATOR AND TRANSFERRING WITH THEIR STAFF THERE, THEN THEY'RE

                    RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING SURE THE BUILDING IS SET UP TO TAKE CARE OF IT AND

                    BE ABLE, YOU KNOW, TO HANDLE THE GENERATOR THAT'S THERE.  THAT'S PUTTING

                    ALL OF THIS ON THE UTILITY, BUT YET YOUR BILL SAYS YOU'RE GOING TO PUT ALL

                    THIS COST ON TO THE UTILITY COMPANY BUT THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO RECOUP THAT

                    THROUGH THE -- THE STORM AND EXPENSES THAT COME THROUGH THE STORMS

                    (INAUDIBLE).

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  LIKE I SAID, THEY -- THEY HAVE STORM

                    INCENTIVES, THEY HAVE SUBSIDIES.  THEY HAVE -- AS I STATED EARLIER, THEY

                    HAVE THE SOURCES TO ASSURE THAT WHEN THESE DIASTERS, WHEN THESE

                    EMERGENCIES OCCUR, THERE'S SOURCES AND GRANTS AND SUBSIDIES AND

                    CREDITS THAT THEY APPLY FOR.  AND TRUST ME, THEY'VE BEEN APPLYING AND

                    THEY'VE BEEN RECEIVING THEM.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  SO WHAT HAPPENS

                    AFTER THAT 24-HOUR PERIOD?  THE UTILITIES COMPANIES DON'T HAVE AN

                    ABUNDANCE OF GENERATORS AT THEIR DISPOSAL.  SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY

                                         86



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    DON'T GET THE GENERATORS THERE?  IS THERE GOING TO BE FINES, IS THERE

                    GOING TO BE PENALTIES AND SANCTIONS ON THE UTILITY COMPANY AS WELL?  IS

                    THAT WHAT COULD HAPPEN WITH THIS PROCESS IF THEY DON'T --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, IT'S

                    UP TO THEM TO ENFORCE WHETHER THERE'S PENALTIES APPLIED.  THEY'LL MAKE

                    THE DETERMINATION.  OUR CONCERN THROUGH LEGISLATION IS TO MAKE SURE

                    THAT THERE'S A SYSTEM IN PLACE WHERE THESE SERVICES ARE RESTORED.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WELL, IN THAT -- IN THAT SAME

                    MANNER, THE RESPONSIBILITY -- THE UTILITY COMPANIES HAVE TO PROVIDE

                    STORM PLANS AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLANS TO THE PSC THAT THEY NEED

                    TO APPROVE.  AND THE PSC -- YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THESE UTILITY COMPANIES

                    DO PRIORITIZE POLICE, FIRE AND EMERGENCY RESPONDERS.  BUT IF THE PSC

                    REVIEWS IT, IF THEY THINK ANYTHING NEEDED TO BE CHANGED, THE PSC HAS

                    THE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THAT OR MODIFY THAT.  SO WHY ARE WE ASKING -- IF

                    THEY HAVE TO SUBMIT A PLAN THAT'S BEING APPROVED BY THE PSC, THEN

                    WE'RE GOING TO ASK FOR MORE AND ASK FOR MORE COSTS PUT ON UPON THEM?

                    AND THEN YOU'RE SAYING THE PSC CAN ADD OTHER THINGS ON THE BACK END.

                    SO WHERE ARE WE GOING WITH THAT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  WELL, WE'VE LEARNED WITH THE PUBLIC

                    SERVICE COMMISSION THERE'S BEEN ISSUES WHERE THE -- THE AMOUNT OF

                    COMPLIANCE OR THE AMOUNT OF, YOU KNOW, LEGISLATIVE DECISIONS ARE

                    MERELY SUCH WHERE, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE TO MANDATE.  AND WE HAVE TO

                    MANDATE THROUGH LEGISLATION.  AND I GOT TO TELL YOU, THROUGH THE

                    ESTABLISHED EMERGENCY -- FOR, YOU KNOW, MANAGEMENT TEAMS THAT

                    PRESENTLY EXIST, THE RISK PLAN.  BUT WE'RE SAYING MAKE IT MANDATORY SO

                                         87



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THAT'S IT'S NOT A -- YOU KNOW, ONE COUNTY DOES IT AND THE OTHER COUNTY

                    DOESN'T DO IT.  LET THEM BE MORE PREVENTIVE.  LET THEM BE MORE

                    PROACTIVE.  LET THEM PUT THE EFFORT IN BEFORE A STORM COMES, WHEN

                    THERE'S A CALM AND THERE'S A QUIET, WHERE THEY NEED TO FOCUS AND ASSURE

                    AND SEND DOWN LIAISONS AND SEND THEIR ELECTRICIANS AND THEIR SPECIALISTS

                    TO MAKE SURE THEY VISIT --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  GOTCHA.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  -- EVERY FACILITY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ISN'T THE -- BUT THIS YEAR IN THE

                    GOVERNOR'S STATE OF THE STATE, SHE DIRECTED THE NEW YORK POWER

                    AUTHORITY TO COMMENCE RESILIENCY INSTALLATIONS, INCLUDING SOLAR

                    STORAGE, BACKUP GENERATORS FOR POLICE AND FIRE STATIONS.  SO SHE'S

                    ALREADY GOT THROUGH HER PROPOSAL TO ASK THE POWER AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS

                    THIS ISSUE, SO IT'S DUPLICATIVE OF THAT.  PLUS, AFTER HURRICANE --

                    SUPERSTORM SANDY, THE STATE BOUGHT A BUNCH OF GENERATORS.  WHY AREN'T

                    WE JUST UTILIZING THOSE OR FOLLOWING THE PLAN FOR THE -- INSTEAD OF GOING

                    TO PUT THE MANDATE ONTO THE UTILITY COMPANIES, WHICH ULTIMATELY WILL

                    BE BORNE BY THE RATEPAYER, YOU'RE NOT GOING TO -- THEY'RE GOING TO FIGURE

                    OUT A WAY TO DO THAT.  AND HOW DO YOU -- HOW DO YOU -- WE'VE GOT THE

                    NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY WITH THE GOVERNOR'S PROPOSAL AND THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE THAT HAS GENERATORS IN THEIR POSSESSION, HUNDREDS

                    UPON HUNDREDS OF GENERATORS IN THEIR POSSESSION AFTER SUPERSTORM

                    SANDY, WHY AREN'T WE UTILIZING THOSE INSTEAD OF, YOU KNOW, ASKING THE

                    UTILITIES TO PURCHASE THEM?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  WELL, IF THEY -- IF THEY -- IF A

                                         88



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    GENERATOR IS PROVIDED, THEN THAT SAVES EVERYBODY A HEADACHE.  I MEAN,

                    THIS IS TO ASSURE THAT THERE'S GENERATORS AND THERE'S POWER, BACKUP

                    SYSTEMS AVAILABLE.  IN CASES WHERE THEY HAVE ONE, FINE AND DANDY.  BUT

                    IN CASES THAT THEY DON'T, AND WE APPRECIATE THE GOVERNOR'S INITIATIVE TO

                    RECOGNIZE THE SAFE CONCERN, THIS GOES A STEP FURTHER BY MAKING SURE THAT

                    THEY'RE EACH GOING TO BE POLICE, FIRE, AND AN AMBULANCE SERVICE HAS THE

                    POWER --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IT CERTAINLY --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  -- BACKUP.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IT GOES -- IT GOES MORE THAN A

                    STEP FURTHER.  IT GOES A FEW HOPS, SKIPS, AND A JUMP FURTHER BECAUSE

                    YOU'RE PUTTING A MANDATE ON THESE UTILITY COMPANIES.  THEIR SOLE

                    PURPOSE IS REALLY TO RESTORE POWER AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE, TO PUT THE

                    TEAMS ON THE FIELD.  NOW YOU'RE GOING TO DIVERT IMPORTANT RESOURCES

                    DELIVERING GENERATORS TO -- TO FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS,

                    NOW YOU'RE GOING TO DIVERT IMPORTANT RESOURCES TO -- TO MONITOR AND

                    HAVE TO FILL UP THE GENERATORS WITH GAS, MAKE SURE IF THERE'S GAS, MAKE

                    SURE THERE'S PEOPLE THERE AND ELECTRICIANS TO MAKE SURE THAT BUILDING

                    CAN HANDLE IT.  YOU'RE DIVERTING IMPORTANT RESOURCES FROM RESTORING THE

                    POWER FROM THE STORM AND BY HAVING THEM RUN AROUND THE STATE AND

                    DEAL WITH THESE MANDATES.  WHY -- WHAT IS THE PURPOSE?  WHAT ARE WE

                    ACCOMPLISHING OTHER THAN PUTTING MORE OF A MANDATE AND -- AND

                    SLOWING DOWN THE STORM RESTORATION PROCESS?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  WELL, YOU KNOW, I'D RATHER -- I'D

                    RATHER HAVE THE UTILITY COMPANIES TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY, THAT'S THEIR

                                         89



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    EXPERTISE, THAN TAKING AWAY --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  BUT WHAT ABOUT THE

                    RESPONSIBILITY OF THE -- THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE MUNICIPALITY.

                    THEY'RE THEIR RESPONSIBILITY.  THAT'S THE POINT THEY'RE --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  BUT WHY THE FIRST RESPONDERS?  YOU

                    DON'T WANT THEM WORRYING ABOUT HOW TO PUT POWER BACK ON.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  NO, MAKE SURE THAT THEY HAVE --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  TO WORRY ABOUT WHAT'S IN THE FUEL.

                    YOU WANT THEM TO BE FOCUSED ON IF THEY NEED A FIRE PUT OUT OR IF THEY

                    NEED TO SAVE A LIFE, OR ESPECIALLY DURING STORMS OR EMERGENCY, YOU

                    DON'T WANT THEM WORRYING ABOUT THEY DON'T HAVE POWER AND THEY HAVE

                    TO WORRY ABOUT PUTTING THE POWER BACK ON.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  ONE MORE QUESTION.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  SURE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO THESE -- THESE GENERATORS ARE

                    USING FOSSIL FUEL, THEY'RE USING NATURAL GAS TO GENERATE.  WHAT ABOUT THE

                    CLCPA THAT YOU TALK ABOUT AND YOU ADVOCATE THAT YOU WON'T WANT TO --

                    YOU DON'T WANT TO SEE MORE NATURAL GAS AND FOSSIL FUELS BEING USED SO

                    WHY NOT IN THAT SITUATION?  IS IT -- IT'S OKAY FOR THIS PURPOSE, BUT NOT IN

                    OTHER PURPOSES, CORRECT?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  YEAH, BUT THIS IS REALLY FOR

                    EMERGENCY --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  -- PURPOSES SO IT REALLY DOESN'T APPLY

                    --

                                         90



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WELL --

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  -- WHEN THE SITUATION'S TAKEN CARE OF

                    AND THEY HAVE THEIR GENERATORS AND THEY'RE WORKING.  THIS IS REALLY TO

                    ASSURE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  -- THAT EMERGENCY SERVICES ARE TAKEN

                    CARE OF.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  YOU'RE WELCOME.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                    THANK YOU.  ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  LISTEN, THE NUMBER ONE JOB OF A

                    UTILITY COMPANY IS MAKE SURE THE SITUATION IS SAFE, TO CLEAR THE WIRES,

                    CLEAR THE DEBRIS, MAKE SURE THE WIRES ARE OUT OF THE WAY, TREES ARE

                    DOWN.  THAT'S NUMBER ONE.  MANY ALREADY PRIORITIZE POLICE AND FIRE AND

                    EMERGENCY SERVICES WHEN THEY'RE DOING THEIR EMERGENCY RESPONSE

                    PLANS, WHICH HAVE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE PSC AND HAVE TO BE APPROVED

                    BY THE PSC.  MAKING THE -- THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE UTILITY TO HAVE TO

                    PROVIDE GENERATORS FOR EVERY FIRE COMPANY, POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK, THERE'S 860 -- THERE'S 90,000 VOLUNTEER FIRE --

                    EMERGENCY WORKERS IN THE STATE, 18,000 PAID.  THERE'S 866 FIRE --

                    INDEPENDENT FIRE DISTRICTS AND OVER 1,200 FIRE DEPARTMENTS.  THAT'S A

                    GREAT DEAL OF RESPONSIBILITY THAT THIS BILL WILL MANDATE AND PLACE ON THE

                    UTILITIES.  AND TO THINK THAT NONE OF THIS IS GOING TO COME BACK TO THE

                                         91



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    RATEPAYER, THAT OBLIGATION REALLY FALLS AND FALLS ON THE (INAUDIBLE) OF THE

                    MUNICIPALITY, THE -- THE ORGANIZATION TO HAVE THE EXPERTISE, THE

                    ELECTRICIANS THAT DEAL WITH THAT.  IT SHOULDN'T FALL ON THE UTILITY WHO HAS

                    TO DIVERT RESOURCES.  AND WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THAT 24-HOUR PERIOD IF

                    THEY CAN'T PROVIDE IT, ARE WE GOING TO ALLOW THE PSC TO PENALIZE THEM

                    AND FINE THEM EVEN MORE LIKE WE SEE IN OTHER -- OTHER INSTANCES?

                                 THIS IS VERY DUPLICATIVE BECAUSE THE GOVERNOR, IN HER

                    STATE OF THE STATE, TALKED ABOUT USING THE NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY

                    TO COME FORWARD AND PUT -- PUT A PLAN IN PLACE FOR FIRE AND POLICE

                    COMPANIES TO MAKE SURE THERE'S BACKUP GENERATORS THERE, SO THAT'S IN

                    PLACE.  THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE ALREADY HAS HUNDREDS OF GENERATORS AT

                    THEIR DISPOSAL THAT THEY HAVE AFTER SUPERSTORM SANDY.  WHY AREN'T WE

                    USING THEM, GETTING THOSE OUT, LETTING THEM WORK WITH THE EMERGENCY

                    MANAGEMENT OFFICES?  THERE'S A STATE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT,

                    WORKING WITH COUNTY EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, WORKING WITH THE FIRE

                    COMPANIES, POLICE.  IT SHOULD NOT FALL ON THE UTILITIES' LAP BECAUSE THEY

                    DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES TO JUST GO OUT AND PAY FOR ALL THIS.  ULTIMATELY,

                    WHAT THIS BILL IS GOING TO DO IS IT'S GOING TO INCREASE COSTS FOR

                    RATEPAYERS, THERE'S NO WAY AROUND IT.  EVEN THOUGH THIS BILL SAYS THEY

                    CAN'T DO IT, THERE'S NO WAY TO CIRCUMVENT THAT.  THIS IS GOING INCREASE

                    COSTS TO THE RATEPAYER.  ULTIMATELY, YOU'RE DIVERTING IMPORTANT --

                    DIVERTING IMPORTANT ATTENTION AND RESOURCES AWAY FROM THEIR MAIN

                    RESPONSIBILITY, WHICH IS TO MAKE SAFE AND RESTORE POWER AS QUICKLY AS

                    POSSIBLE.  THEY SHOULDN'T -- THE UTILITY COMPANIES SHOULDN'T BE

                    DELIVERING GENERATORS AROUND THE STATE, HAVE TO SIT THERE TO FILL THEM UP

                                         92



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    WITH GAS AND MAKE SURE THEY'RE FILLED AND WATCH THEM AND MONITOR

                    THEM WHILE THEY COULD BE OUT IN THE COMMUNITY RESTORING THE POWER TO

                    OUR FARMERS, TO OUR MUNICIPALITIES, TO OUR SMALL BUSINESSES.

                                 WE -- THIS IS NOT THE APPROPRIATE WAY TO HANDLE THIS

                    SITUATION.  IT'S JUST GOING TO, AGAIN, JUST DIVERT THESE IMPORTANT RESOURCES

                    AWAY FROM THEIR MAIN GOALS:  RESTORING SERVICE AND GETTING PEOPLES'

                    POWER BACK ON, AND THIS IS GOING TO INCREASE COSTS FOR UTILITY -- FOR OUR

                    CUSTOMERS AROUND THE STATE BECAUSE THESE COSTS WILL ULTIMATELY BE

                    BORNE BY THE UTILITY PAYER.  THIS RESPONSIBILITY SHOULDN'T FALL ON THEIR

                    LAP, IT SHOULD FALL ON THE -- THE COMPANY OR THE MUNICIPALITY TO MAKE

                    SURE THEY HAVE THE PROPER POWER.  WHAT'S NEXT?  ARE WE GOING TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT THEY PROVIDE GENERATORS FOR ALL PEOPLE AROUND THE STATE JUST

                    BECAUSE WE WANT TO?  I MEAN, THIS IS COSTLY, IT'S -- IT'S AN -- IT HAS AN

                    IMPACT ON EVERYONE, AND THERE'S A BETTER WAY TO GO ABOUT THIS.  I THINK

                    WE SHOULD WORK AND LOOK AT -- REEXAMINE THIS BILL BEFORE WE MOVE

                    FORWARD WITH IT.

                                 BUT FOR THOSE REASONS, MR. SPEAKER, I'M GOING TO BE

                    VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE AND I URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. MONTESANO.

                                 MR. MONTESANO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL, PLEASE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE, SIR.

                                 MR. MONTESANO:  SO AS A COSPONSOR OF THIS BILL,

                    I'M KIND OF PUT IN A PREDICAMENT HERE WHERE I HAVE TO VOICE SOME

                    ISSUES, A LITTLE BIT CONTRARY TO THOSE OF MY COLLEAGUE'S.  I UNDERSTAND --

                                         93



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTIONS.  I WAS GOING TO SPEAK ON

                    THE BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 IS -- YOU KNOW, THIS IS A -- THIS IS A VERY TOUGH ISSUE

                    FOR EVERYONE THAT'S INVOLVED.  NOW, SINCE SUPERSTORM SANDY, AND WE

                    SUFFERED AS WELL AS A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE DID, DRAMATICALLY IN NASSAU

                    COUNTY, SUFFOLK COUNTY IT WAS VERY BAD, AND I WAS A REGULAR DOWN ON

                    THE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE IN BETHPAGE.  AND I WATCHED

                    EVERYTHING BROUGHT IN FROM OUT OF STATE, WE HAD TO BRING IN BUSES, WE

                    HAD TO BRING IN 100-SOME-ODD AMBULANCES HAD TO BE TRUCKED IN, AND

                    THE MILITARY CAME IN TO BRING US FUEL.  AND -- BECAUSE MOST OF OUR

                    SERVICE STATIONS WERE OUT.  WHAT'S INTERESTING WAS, WHEN THEY BROUGHT

                    THE FUEL TRUCKS IN, AND THERE WAS PLENTY OF THEM, THEY CAME TO REALIZE

                    THAT THE NOZZLE ON THEIR FUEL TRUCKS DO NOT FIT REGULAR COMMERCIAL

                    VEHICLES, CARS, AMBULANCES, FIRE TRUCKS.  SO IT TOOK AN EXTRA TWO DAYS TO

                    GET THE NOZZLES CHANGED SO THEY COULD EVEN FIT INTO THE VEHICLES THAT

                    WERE NEEDED.

                                 NOW, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TALK ABOUT THE POLICE

                    DEPARTMENTS AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND THE AMBULANCE DEPARTMENTS

                    SHOULD BE GETTING THEIR OWN GENERATORS.  AND THE FACT IS, ON LONG

                    ISLAND WHERE THEY ALL ENJOY A GOOD TAX REVENUE AND SUPPORT, THAT THEY

                    DO HAVE GENERATORS.  MOST NASSAU COUNTY POLICE STATIONS HAVE

                    GENERATORS, ESPECIALLY THE ONES THAT HAVE BEEN REMODELED.  ALL NEW

                    HOMES IN NASSAU COUNTY FOR THE MOST PART WHEN THEY'RE BUILT HAVE

                    GENERATORS, AND IT'S -- IT'S A VERY COMMON OCCURRENCE TODAY.  SO THE

                    PERCENTAGE OF THESE EMERGENCY PLACES ARE GOING TO NEED ASSISTANCE, IT'S

                                         94



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    REALLY NOT GOING TO FALL SO MUCH ON LONG ISLAND EXCEPT IN THOSE SMALLER

                    VILLAGES OUT EAST IN SUFFOLK COUNTY.

                                 BUT LET'S LOOK AT THE REST OF THE STATE WHERE THOSE FIRE

                    DEPARTMENTS AND POLICE DEPARTMENTS THAT CONSIST OF 20 PEOPLE, 30

                    PEOPLE, THEY DON'T HAVE THAT KIND OF REVENUE TO PUT IN THESE

                    COMMERCIAL GENERATORS.  THEY JUST DON'T.  AND I KNOW A LOT OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES ARE ALREADY DETECTIVE OF THE UTILITIES, AND I'M VERY

                    CONSIDERATE OF THE UTILITIES ALSO BECAUSE LIKE EVERYBODY ELSE, I PAY.

                    BUT I ALSO KNOW THAT UTILITIES ALREADY HAVE EMERGENCY PLANS IN PLACE.

                    THEY ALREADY HAVE TO PROVIDE EMERGENCY SERVICES TO PEOPLE'S

                    RESIDENCES WHO ARE ON LIFE-DEPENDENT MACHINERY, ALL RIGHT.  AND I'VE

                    HAD MANY A CONSTITUENT THAT -- THAT ARE ON THE LIST THAT GETS SERVICED

                    IMMEDIATELY WHEN THERE'S AN OUTAGE, WHEN THEY KNOW THEY CAN'T

                    CORRECT IT IN SEVERAL HOURS, THEY HAVE TO GO THERE AND HOOK UP.  MOST OF

                    THESE PLACES, WHEN WE TALK ABOUT A HOOKUP, HAVE HOOKUPS.  AND IF NOT,

                    THEN MAYBE THEY'VE GOT TO GO OUT AND PUT THEIR OWN HOOKUP READY FOR

                    WHEN THE UTILITY COMPANY COMES.  AND I'VE SEEN THE SIZE OF THOSE

                    GENERATORS.  AND -- AND THEY'RE BASED ON THE NEED.  BUT THE UTILITY

                    COMPANIES DON'T TRUCK THOSE -- FOR THE MOST PART, DO NOT TRUCK THOSE

                    GENERATORS ANYWHERE.  THEY HAVE A CONTRACT WITH PROVIDERS THAT GO OUT

                    THERE AND PUT THOSE GENERATORS AND DELIVER THEM TO THE DIFFERENT SPOTS

                    WHERE THEY'RE NEEDED.  WE HAD THEM AT THE HOSPITALS, WE HAD THEM ALL

                    OVER.  EVEN HOSPITALS THAT HAVE THEIR OWN GENERATORS SOMETIMES DON'T

                    HAVE ENOUGH TO COVER EVERYTHING.  MOST HOSPITALS ARE GENERATED FOR THE

                    OPERATING ROOMS AND FOR THE EMERGENCY ROOMS.  THAT'S IT.

                                         95



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 SO WHEN WE'RE GOING TO NEED THESE EMERGENCY

                    SERVICES, AT THE MOST, WHEN SOMETHING GOES BAD, REALLY BAD, WE NEED

                    OUR EMERGENCY SERVICES FUNCTIONING FULLY BECAUSE THEY'RE GOING TO BE

                    COMING TO US, YOU KNOW, WHEN WE CALL THEM.  THEY HAVE TO BE ABLE TO

                    GET OUT.  SO WHILE THIS BILL IS -- IS GOING TO CAUSE MAYBE SOME FRICTION

                    WITH THE UTILITY COMPANIES, MAYBE SOME UPGRADE IN COSTS THAT OF

                    COURSE THEY ALWAYS PASS ALONG TO EVERYBODY, NO MATTER WHAT IT IS,

                    ESPECIALLY ON LONG ISLAND, THEY DO A GREAT JOB OF DOING THAT, BUT ALSO

                    THE UTILITY COMPANY ON THE ISLAND, PSE&G WHO'S THE CONTRACTOR FOR

                    LIPA, HAS A LOT OF THESE CONTINGENCIES ADDRESSED.  I THINK THEY DO A

                    PHENOMENAL JOB WHEN WE HAVE AN EMERGENCY IN RESTORING POWER.  THE

                    THINGS THAT I DID LEARN IN OUR LAST COUPLE OF MAJOR STORMS THAT WE HAD IS

                    THAT IT'S NOT EASY AS WE THINK FOR THE MECHANICS TO GO OUT THERE AND

                    RESTORE THE POWER BECAUSE OF OSHA REGULATIONS.  IF THE WIND IS ABOVE

                    A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF KNOTS, THEY CAN'T GO INTO BUCKETS AND FIX THE LINE.

                    IF THERE'S THUNDER OR LIGHTENING THEY CAN'T GO UP, AND DEPENDING ON THE

                    NATURE OF THE RAIN, HOW HEAVY IT IS, THEY CAN'T GO UP.  SO THERE'S A LOT OF

                    THINGS THAT STOP THESE THINGS FROM BEING IMPLEMENTED.

                                 BUT I THINK TOGETHER, EVERYBODY WILL WORK TOGETHER.

                    WE ALSO PASSED LEGISLATION THAT ALL NEW SERVICE STATIONS THAT ARE LOCATED

                    IN THE PROXIMITY OF THE WATER HAVE TO HAVE GENERATORS NOW.  SO LITTLE BY

                    LITTLE THROUGH PIECES OF LEGISLATION WE CAN REMEDY A LOT OF THIS, BUT WE

                    HAVE TO STOP -- WE HAVE TO START SOMEWHERE AND, YOU KNOW, PROVOKE

                    THESE PEOPLE TO COME FORWARD AND DO WHAT THEY NEED TO DO.  YOU

                    KNOW, I DON'T LOOK TO PUT BURDENS ON UTILITY COMPANIES, BUT THEY HAVE A

                                         96



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    JOB TO DO, THEY GET PAID TO DO IT, YOU KNOW, AND THEY SHOULD BE OUT

                    THERE DOING IT.  WE ALWAYS BRING IN PEOPLE FROM CANADA, FROM EVERY

                    INTERSTATE IN THIS COUNTRY TO HELP US THE WAY WE GO TO THEM WITH THE

                    INTERAGENCY MUTUAL AGREEMENTS THAT WE HAVE, BUT SOMEWHERE ALONG

                    THE LINE THEY HAVE TO, YOU KNOW, HELP US.  AND THEY HAVE TO GET THE

                    POWER BACK WHEN IT HAS TO BE.  AND ONE OF THE THINGS I FOUND OUT IN

                    OUR LAST BIG STORM, SO I GET A PHONE CALL THAT THE UTILITY COMPANY FROM

                    TEXAS RESTORED POWER IN GARDEN CITY ALONG THE WHOLE STRIP IN GARDEN

                    CITY, WHICH IS NOT MY DISTRICT.  SO THEY GET THIS WHOLE STRIP PUT UP.

                    UNDER THE AGREEMENT THAT THE UNION REPRESENTING LIPA HAS AND

                    PSE&G IS IF AN OUT-OF-STATE UTILITY RESTORES THE POWER TO THE LINE, THEY

                    CANNOT ENERGIZE THE LINE UNTIL THE PSE&G UNION WORKER GOES THERE AND

                    REVIEWS THEIR WORK TO PASS ON IT THAT IT'S OKAY.  SO EVEN THOUGH THE

                    GUYS BROKE THEIR BANANAS TO GET THAT LINE UP AND EVERYTHING RESTORED, IT

                    TOOK EIGHT HOURS MORE FOR SOMEBODY TO GO THERE AND CHECK OFF THE BOX

                    TO SAY, OKAY, YOU CAN ENERGIZE THE LINE.

                                 SO WHEN THIS STUFF GOES ON, THERE'S A LOT OF INTERPLAY

                    THAT GETS DONE AND NONE OF IT HAS TO DO WITH THE NEED OF THE PEOPLE; IN

                    FACT, IF THE PEOPLE RECALL BACK IN SUPERSTORM SANDY AND WE HAD ONE

                    OTHER STORM WITH THAT, OKAY, THE THEN-GOVERNOR HAD TO GO MAKE A VISIT

                    TO THAT UNION AND MAKE A SUBSTANTIAL CONTRIBUTION TO THE HEALTH AND

                    WELFARE FUND FOR THEM TO GET OFF THEIR DUFF BECAUSE THEY SAID THE

                    OVERTIME BEING PAID TO THE OUT-OF-TOWN MECHANICS WAS THEIR OVERTIME

                    THAT THEY SHOULD BE GETTING.  I MEAN, HOW MUCH MORE COULD THEY WORK?

                    THEY WERE WORKING ALMOST 24 HOURS A DAY THEMSELVES.  SO THAT JUST

                                         97



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    GOES TO SHOW YOU THE NONSENSE THAT GOES ON WHEN WE HAVE

                    EMERGENCIES, WHEN WE HAVE POWER DOWN AND STUFF LIKE THAT.

                                 SO WHILE I'M SYMPATHETIC TO SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT

                    WERE RAISED BY MY COLLEAGUES AND SOME OF THE CONCERNS, WE ALSO HAVE

                    TO SOMETIMES LOOK ON THE OTHER SIDE TO SEE, YOU KNOW, WHAT WE DO FOR

                    THE PEOPLE -- WHAT WE DO FOR OUR -- THE PUBLIC AGENCIES THAT WE'RE SO

                    DEPENDENT ON.  SO FOR THAT REASON, I'LL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND I

                    WOULD ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER,

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SAYEGH, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  GOOD AFTERNOON.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  HELLO, HOW ARE YOU?

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  GOOD, HOW ARE YOU?  JUST A

                    COUPLE -- JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.  WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GENERATORS,

                    I'VE HEARD BOTH SIDES, OKAY?  HAVE YOU EVER BEEN AROUND A DAIRY FARM

                    WHEN THERE'S A POWER OUTAGE?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  I DID -- I'M SURE I PASSED BY -- DAIRY

                    FARMS?

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  YES.

                                         98



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  I'M SURE OVER THE YEARS I DID A

                    NUMBER OF TIMES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO MOST OF THE DAIRY FARMERS

                    THAT I KNOW OF HAVE THEIR OWN GENERATORS BECAUSE A LOT OF OUR RURAL

                    DAIRY FARMS ARE AWAY FROM THE TOWN CENTRAL OR THE -- THEIR POPULATED

                    AREAS SO IT TAKES AWHILE FOR ELECTRICITY TO GO OUT THERE IF THERE ARE POWER

                    OUTAGES.  SOME OF OUR APPLE COLD STORAGES UP IN OUR AREA, AS WELL, THEY

                    ALSO HAVE THEIR OWN GENERATORS BECAUSE THEY KNOW THEY'RE NOT GOING TO

                    GET POWER BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO GO TO OUR HOSPITALS, TO OUR FIRST

                    RESPONDERS, TO OUR AMBULANCES, TO OUR NURSING HOMES.  GROCERY STORES

                    ALSO AS WELL, MOST OF THEM HAVE ENOUGH POWER TO KEEP THE FROZEN STUFF

                    FROZE AND THE COLD STUFF COLD.  EVEN OUR COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENTS

                    HAVE GENERATORS ON HAND, ESPECIALLY WE'VE SEEN THIS THROUGH THE

                    PANDEMIC OF THE COVID-19, KEEPING THE VACCINES COMPLETELY COLD.

                    WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ABOUT THE EMERGENCY -- THE EMOS, THE

                    EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICES OF OUR COUNTY, A LOT OF THE STUFF THAT

                    YOU'RE ASKING THE UTILITY COMPANIES TO DO IS ALREADY ROAD MAPPED OUT

                    FOR EVERY SINGLE SCENARIO THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN WITHIN THE COUNTY.

                    HAVE YOU EVER LOOKED AT ONE OF THOSE TO SEE WHAT THAT -- WHAT THAT

                    LOOKS LIKE?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  NO, I MEAN, I -- BACK TO THE EARLIER

                    STATEMENTS, THE EMPHASIS IS ON HOLDING UTILITY COMPANIES RESPONSIBLE.

                    I'M SURE THERE'S MANY OTHER SITUATIONS WHERE WE CAN GET INTO THE

                    QUESTION OF WHO WOULD BE ENTITLED AND WHO'S -- WHO'S NOT ENTITLED, BUT

                    AS A -- AS AN INITIAL RESPONSIBILITY, I THINK AS A SOCIETY, AS A NECESSITY IN

                                         99



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    OUR COMMUNITIES, YOU HAVE TO FIRST OF ALL MAKE SURE THAT THOSE AGENCIES

                    AND THOSE ENTITIES THAT ARE THERE TO PROTECT US ARE GIVEN THE RESOURCES

                    AND, IN THIS CASE, THE ENERGY AND THE POWER TO MAKE SURE THEY DO THEIR

                    JOB.  YOU KNOW, WE CAN GET INTO WHO DOES AND WHO DOESN'T, AND WHO

                    COMPLIES AND WHO DOESN'T COMPLY, BUT AT THIS POINT THE MATTER IS

                    MAKING SURE THAT THESE UTILITY COMPANIES PUT THE ENERGY, THE TIME, THE

                    PLANNING, WORKING WITH COUNTY AND LOCAL AND STATEWIDE AGENCIES TO

                    ASSURE THAT THESE COMPLIANCES ARE ADDRESSED.  TOO OFTEN WE WAIT FOR

                    EMERGENCIES TO OCCUR.  THIS REQUIRES MORE PROACTIVE AND MORE

                    PLANNING.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  I LIKE THOSE WORDS, PROACTIVE

                    AND MORE PLANNING.  I AGREE WITH SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES THAT -- LET'S BE

                    PROACTIVE, LET'S MAKE SURE THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN.  BUT I'M GOING TO GIVE

                    YOU AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT HAPPENED BACK IN UPSTATE NEW YORK, I

                    BELIEVE IT WAS 1992.  WE HAD PROBABLY ONE OF THE MOST SEVERE ICE

                    STORMS IN HISTORY AND A LOT OF OUR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT -- OR

                    EMERGENCY RESPONDERS COULDN'T GET THROUGH.  A LOT OF OUR UTILITY

                    COMPANIES COULDN'T GET THROUGH.  NOT FOR ONE DAY, NOT FOR TWO DAYS,

                    NOT FOR THREE DAYS, SOMETIMES SEVEN TO TEN DAYS.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THAT'S TERRIBLE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO IN -- IN THIS BILL THAT YOU'RE

                    BRINGING FORWARD, IN THAT CASE, HOW ON EARTH ARE WE GOING TO HOLD THE

                    UTILITY COMPANY RESPONSIBLE IF THEY CANNOT GET THROUGH?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  I THINK, YOU KNOW, IT'S -- IT'S A -- IT'S A

                    COMBINATION.  WE SPOKE ABOUT A COUPLE SYSTEM WHERE THEY HAVE IN

                                         100



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    PLACE THEIR TEAMS, THEY -- ESPECIALLY IF THERE'S A FORECAST OF A STORM, AS

                    WE SAID EARLIER, WE NOW HOLD THEM MORE ACCOUNTABLE TO MAKE SURE,

                    AGAIN, THE PLANNING ASPECTS, NOT TO WAIT FOR A STORM AND THEN HAVE

                    TRUCKS COME FROM OHIO AND CANADA AND PENNSYLVANIA THAT WE WITNESS

                    WHERE PEOPLE STAYED IN YOUR COMMUNITY AND ELSEWHERE THROUGH THE

                    STATE WEEKS SOMETIMES WITHOUT POWER BECAUSE OF THESE DELAYS.  SO

                    THIS IS A MAJOR PIECE OF ADDRESSING THE CONCERNS WE ALL HAVE.  AND

                    MAYBE WE NEED TO GO STEPS FURTHER WITH OTHER LEGISLATION, BUT THE

                    BOTTOM LINE IS YOU'VE GOT TO PRESERVE THOSE THAT ARE SAFEGUARDING US TO

                    MOVE FORWARD TO OTHER INITIATIVES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  HAVE YOU SPOKE WITH ANY OF

                    THE UTILITY COMPANIES?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  I'VE SPOKEN TO REPRESENTATIVES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AND WHAT ARE THEIR THOUGHTS

                    ON THIS?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  EXCUSE ME?

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WHAT ARE THEIR THOUGHTS ON

                    THIS?

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THEIR THOUGHTS -- IF -- IF THE

                    MAINSTREAM OR THE LEADERSHIP OF UTILITY COMPANIES WAS REQUIRED TO PUT

                    A LITTLE MORE EFFORT INTO WORKING CLOSELY WITH EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT

                    TEAMS AND TO REALLY BE MORE PROACTIVE, THEY FEEL IT WOULD BE A WIN-WIN.

                    AND THIS IS INDIVIDUALS THAT WORK FOR UTILITY COMPANIES THAT SAID, YOU

                    KNOW WHAT?  A LOT OF WHAT SHOULD TAKE PLACE DOESN'T TAKE PLACE.  AND

                    MAYBE IN A LOT OF SITUATIONS IT DOES TAKE PLACE.  SO WE'RE NOT SAY SAYING

                                         101



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    THE SYSTEM IS TOTALLY A FAILURE, WE'RE SAYING WE NEED TO MANDATE AND SET

                    GUIDELINES AND RULES AND PROCEDURES, ESPECIALLY TO ADDRESS THOSE THAT

                    SHOULD BE PROVIDED EMERGENCY SERVICES FIRST.  AND THEN IT DOESN'T TAKE

                    AWAY, IT'S NOT DO ONE AND NOT DO THE OTHER, AND IT SHOULDN'T BE PACKAGED

                    AS, WELL, IF YOU PRESERVE AND PROTECT AND RESTORE ENERGY TO FIRST

                    RESPONDERS, YOU'RE THEREFORE TAKING AWAY EMERGENCY SERVICES FOR THE

                    COMMUNITY-AT-LARGE.  THAT'S NOT THE INTENT OF THIS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO I KNOW IN OUR COUNTY, OUR

                    EMO OFFICE, OUR EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT OFFICE, I HAVE BEEN

                    INVOLVED WITH THOSE DRILLS THAT WE HAVE.  AND IN OUR COMMAND CENTER

                    AROUND THAT TABLE ARE MEMBERS FROM NYSEG, NEW YORK STATE ELECTRIC

                    AND GAS; RG&E, ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC.  THEY'RE A PART, THEY

                    HAVE BOOTS ON THE GROUND IN THAT OFFICE AS SOON AS THAT DISASTER

                    HAPPENS.  SO THEY ARE DOING THEIR PART.  ONE OF THE PROBLEMS IS THEY ARE

                    ON SUCH A FINE LINE OF PEOPLE BECAUSE THEY ONLY HAVE SO MUCH -- SO

                    MUCH MONEY.  AND WE ALL KNOW IN BUSINESS, YOU CAN'T HAVE TEN PEOPLE

                    JUST STANDING AROUND IF THERE'S AN EMERGENCY, IT JUST DOESN'T WORK LIKE

                    THAT.  SO I THINK THAT'S IT FOR MY QUESTIONS, SIR.  I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AND MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  HAVING DEALT WITH THESE

                    SITUATIONS FIRSTHAND AT THE COUNTY LEVEL, AT THE TOWN LEVEL, THE LOCAL

                    LEVEL, WE HAVE TO BE PROACTIVE AND NOT REACTIVE, MR. SPEAKER.  I -- I

                    APPLAUD YOU FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD AND THE THOUGHTS OF DOING IT THAT

                                         102



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    WAY, BUT IN REALITY WHEN THE ROADS ARE CLOSED, THE POWER IS NOT THERE,

                    THOSE GENERATORS NEED TO BE ON LOCATION WITH FUEL, ELECTRIC LINES RUN,

                    ALREADY HOOKED UP AND READY TO GO AT THE ONSET OF THE DISASTER.  AND

                    AGAIN, TO PUT THAT RESPONSIBILITY BACK ON A PRIVATE COMPANY TO DO THIS --

                    SO I'D LIKE TO SAY LET'S HOLD OFF ON THIS BILL, LET'S TAKE ANOTHER LOOK AT IT,

                    LET'S GET ALL THE PLAYERS AROUND THE TABLE SO WE CAN SEE WHAT'S THE BEST

                    APPROACH IS.  IN THE ASSEMBLYMAN'S AREA, THAT MAY BE THE BEST

                    APPROACH THERE, BUT I KNOW IN UPSTATE, IN RURAL NEW YORK STATE, THE

                    GAME IS TOTALLY DIFFERENT.  AND IF WE'RE GOING TO PASS LEGISLATION ACROSS

                    THE BOARD, WE REALLY NEED TO SLOW IT BACK, BRING IT BACK AND TAKE OUR

                    TIME.  ABSOLUTELY WE NEED TO BE PROACTIVE AND NOT REACTIVE.

                                 AND -- AND MY LAST THOUGHT WAS, ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES

                    HAD TALKED ABOUT THE OVERTIME AND HOW MUCH THE WORKERS ARE MAKING

                    THAT CAME IN FROM OUT-OF-STATE TO HELP US.  THAT'S PRETTY SAD.  OUR

                    FRONTLINE WORKERS, OUR UNION WORKERS FROM NEW YORK STATE SHOULD BE

                    GETTING THAT MONEY, NOT PEOPLE FROM OUT-OF-STATE.  AND I'VE HEARD THIS

                    FROM OUR LOCAL NURSES OVER THIS PAST WEEK THAT OUR NURSES COMING IN TO

                    HELP ARE MAKING MORE MONEY THAN OUR NURSES THAT ARE -- THAT LIVE HERE

                    AND -- AND WORK FOR US AND ARE PART OF OUR UNIONS, PART OF OUR MAKEUP.

                    WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT HAPPENS.

                                 SO LET'S PUT THESE WORKERS TO WORK, MR. SPEAKER, LET'S

                    GET THESE GENERATORS OUT THERE NOW, LET'S GET THE FUEL SET UP NOW AND

                    LET'S MAKE ALL OF OUR FIRST RESPONDERS PREPARED AND READY TO GO AND,

                    AGAIN, LET OUR UTILITY COMPANIES WORK ON FINDING OUT HOW MANY LINES

                    THEY NEED, HOW MANY POLES THEY NEED, WHO'S GOING TO PUT THEM IN THE

                                         103



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    GROUND.  OH, AND BY THE WAY, WHERE ARE WE GOING TO SOURCE ALL THIS

                    STUFF BECAUSE THE STORM THAT WE THOUGHT WAS ONLY GOING TO AFFECT ONE

                    OR TWO COUNTIES IN NEW YORK STATE AFFECTED HALF THE STATE, HALF THE

                    POLES ARE GONE.  THEY ARE THE EXPERTS FOR RUNNING THE LINES, GETTING THE

                    POLES.  LET THEM DO THEIR JOB.  AGAIN, LET'S BE PROACTIVE AND GET THOSE

                    NECESSARY GENERATORS AND FUEL ON HAND SO IT'S ALWAYS THERE.  IT TAKES

                    THAT RISK OUT OF THE PICTURE.

                                 SO AS MUCH AS I'D LIKE TO SUPPORT THIS, I WILL NOT

                    BECAUSE I THINK THERE ARE BETTER WAYS OF DOING THIS, AT LEAST IN OUR AREA

                    AND IN MOST OF THE STATE.  SO THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 3318-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN MY COUNTY OUR

                    COUNTY BUILDINGS, OUR MAJOR CITIES, OUR HOSPITALS, OUR ESSENTIAL

                    EMERGENCY SERVICES ALREADY HAVE EMERGENCY GENERATORS.  AND THE

                    REASON IS BECAUSE AS SOON AS THE POWER GOES OUT, THOSE EMERGENCY

                    GENERATORS KICK ON.  AND THAT'S THE WAY IT SHOULD BE.  AND THEY'RE ALL

                    TIED INTO NATURAL GAS, IT HASN'T YET BEEN BANNED FROM THE STATE OF NEW

                                         104



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    YORK, THEY'RE ALL TIED INTO NATURAL GAS SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO REFUEL THEM.

                    AND THEY'RE ROUTINELY TESTED SO WE KNOW THEY'RE RELIABLE.  AND THEY'RE

                    HARDWIRED INTO THE EMERGENCY SYSTEM BECAUSE ALL OF THESE REQUIRE A

                    LICENSED ELECTRICIAN TO WIRE THEM IN.  AND SO THEY'RE PROPERLY WIRED,

                    THEY'RE ON STANDBY, THEY'RE READY TO GO AT A MOMENT'S NOTICE.

                                 AND WHAT THIS BILL SAYS IS IF YOU HAPPEN TO BE ONE OF

                    THOSE FIRE DEPARTMENTS THAT HASN'T PLANNED PROACTIVELY, THEN DON'T

                    SPEND THE MONEY TO BE READY AT A MOMENT'S NOTICE, INSTEAD HOPE THAT A

                    UTILITY COMPANY WILL COME WITHIN 24 HOURS AND HELP SET YOU UP.

                    IGNORING FOR THE FACT THAT WHEN A UTILITY COMPANY DELIVERS A GENERATOR,

                    THEY CAN'T TIE IT INTO YOUR BUILDING.  IT'S THE BUILDING OWNER THAT HAS TO

                    GET THE LICENSED ELECTRICIAN, THAT HAS TO RUN THE WIRING TO THE OUTSIDE,

                    WHO HAS TO PUT IN A SEPARATE FUSE BOX.  SO WHAT THIS BILL SAYS IS THOSE

                    WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE, YOU'RE SUCKERS; THOSE WHO ARE IRRESPONSIBLE AND

                    HAVEN'T DONE IT, WE'LL DELIVER A GENERATOR THAT YOU CAN'T CONNECT

                    ANYWAY.  NOT A GOOD APPROACH.

                                 LET'S ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO BE PROACTIVE.  LET'S

                    ENCOURAGE EVERYONE TO INSTALL A GENERATOR.  LET'S ENSURE THAT OUR

                    EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT SERVICES HAVE THE POWER THEY NEED WHEN

                    THEY NEED IT, NOT DAYS OR WEEKS LATER WHEN THEY FINALLY GET AN

                    ELECTRICIAN TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO HOOK THE GENERATOR UP.  FOR THAT

                    REASON, I'LL BE VOTING NO AND URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO VOTE NO AS WELL.

                    THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                         105



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 MR. SAYEGH TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE, MR. SPEAKER.  I

                    APPRECIATE THE COMMENTS OF MY COLLEAGUES AND THE CONCERNS ADDRESSED

                    AND -- AND -- BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS IN TIMES OF EMERGENCY, I KNOW

                    MYSELF, I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT LOVED ONES AND -- AND PEOPLE THAT I

                    CARE ABOUT ARE SAFEGUARDED.  WHEN WE LOOK AT MUNICIPALITIES, WE LOOK

                    AT OUR COMMUNITIES-AT-LARGE, YOU KNOW, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE

                    PEOPLE THAT ARE RESPONSIBLE TO PROTECT US ARE PROTECTED AND THEY'RE

                    SHIELDED FROM POWER OUTAGES THAT LAST MORE THAN 24 HOURS.  THIS

                    LEGISLATION MAY HAVE QUESTIONS AS TO WHO SHOULD AND WHO SHOULDN'T,

                    BUT THESE TIMES OF EMERGENCIES REQUIRE THAT PEOPLE BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

                    TO PLAN BETTER AND TO ASSURE US THAT WHETHER IT'S THEIR EMERGENCY

                    COMMAND TEAMS OR THE LIAISONS THAT WORK FOR UTILITY COMPANIES ARE

                    COMMUNICATING, THAT THEY'RE PLANNING, THAT THEY'RE ASSURING THAT THE

                    GENERATORS AND THE POWER AND THE ELECTRICAL SERVICE IS UP TO PAR.  THIS

                    REQUIRES MORE PLANNING AND MORE RESPONSIBILITY.  AND THOSE OF US THAT

                    HAVE WITNESSED PEOPLE THAT LOST THEIR LIVES, THE SUFFERING THAT WAS

                    UNNECESSARY BECAUSE THERE WAS A LACK OF ADEQUATE RESOURCE AND

                    RESPONSE IS -- IS -- IS SOMETHING THAT SHOULDN'T BE LOOKED UPON IN A

                    MINOR WAY.  SO MR. SPEAKER, I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND URGE MY

                    COLLEAGUES TO DO SO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. SAYEGH IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                                         106



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I UNDERSTAND THAT WE

                    LIVE IN VERY CHANGING TIMES, I'LL CALL THEM CHANGING TIMES.  IT SEEMS

                    LIKE OF RECENT YEARS WE'VE EXPERIENCED A NUMBER OF STORMS ALL OVER THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK, RAINSTORMS, SNOWSTORMS, AND WE HAVE TO REACT

                    DIFFERENTLY WHEN THESE THINGS HAPPEN BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY WE

                    ALL HAVE LOVED ONES AND CONSTITUENTS THAT WE WANT TO BE PROTECTED IN

                    THE MIDST OF A STORM.  AND IF THIS IS THE WAY TO GET THAT DONE THEN I

                    THINK IT'S THE RIGHT THING THAT WE SHOULD BE DOING.

                                 CLEARLY THE BIGGEST STORM THAT WE'VE ALL HAD TO

                    EXPERIENCE HAS BEEN THE PANDEMIC, AND EVERYBODY'S LIFE HAS CHANGED

                    TO SOME EXTENT.  AND I THINK IT'S INCUMBENT UPON ALL UTILITY COMPANIES

                    THAT OFFER PEOPLE OPPORTUNITIES FOR POWER TO BE -- GET PREPARED.  IF

                    YOU'RE NOT ALREADY FIGURING OUT HOW TO DO THESE THINGS SO THAT SHOULD

                    SOMEONE'S MOTHER NEED AN AMBULANCE THEY CAN GET TO HER.  THEY

                    SHOULD BE FIGURING THESE THINGS OUT NOW AND IF THEY HAVEN'T ALREADY

                    FIGURED THEM OUT, I THINK IT MAKES SENSE FOR US AS LEGISLATORS TO START

                    LAYING OUT SOME STRATEGIES THAT THEY CAN USE.  THEY -- THEY COULD TURN

                    THAT DOWN AND DECIDE TO DO IT A DIFFERENT WAY, BUT RIGHT NOW WE NEED

                    TO HAVE SOME RESULTS BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY, WE NEED PEOPLE TO

                    BE PROTECTED AND TAKEN CARE OF IN THE MIDST OF THE MULTIPLE STORMS THAT

                    WE COULD STILL YET TO SEE.  WITH THAT, I'M PLEASED TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    LEGISLATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                         107



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, DO YOU ANY

                    FURTHER HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE HAVE BOTH.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MS. WALKER, PAGE 33, CALENDAR NO.

                    244, BILL NO. A-7480, AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MR. EICHENSTEIN, PAGE 50 -- 45,

                    CALENDAR NO. 448, BILL NO. 8809-A, THE AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND

                    ADOPTED.

                                 ON BEHALF OF MR. ABINANTI, ASSEMBLY BILL RECALLED

                    FROM THE SENATE.  THE CLERK WILL READ THE TITLE OF THE BILL.

                                 THE CLERK:  AN ACT TO AMEND THE MENTAL HYGIENE

                    LAW.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THERE IS A MOTION TO

                    RECONSIDER THE VOTE BY WHICH THE BILL PASSED THE HOUSE.  THE CLERK

                    WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 THE CLERK WILL ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE AND THE AMENDMENTS ARE

                    RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 RESOLUTION NO. 669, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 669, MR.

                                         108



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                    LAWLER.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION CONGRATULATING THE SUFFERN

                    BOYS HOCKEY TEAM UPON THE OCCASION OF WINNING THE DIVISION 1 NEW

                    YORK STATE HOCKEY CHAMPIONSHIP.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK -- EXCUSE

                    ME.  MR. LAWLER ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  AS A

                    PROUD GRADUATE OF THE CLASS OF 2005 OF SUFFERN HIGH SCHOOL, I WANT TO

                    CONGRATULATE THE SUFFERN MEN'S HOCKEY TEAM UPON WINNING THE

                    DIVISION 1 NEW YORK STATE HOCKEY CHAMPIONSHIP.  THE SUFFERN

                    MOUNTIES FINISHED THE SEASON 21-1, DEFEATING WEST GENESEE, SORRY MR.

                    LEMONDES, 5-2 IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP GAME.  THIS IS THE THIRD STATE

                    CHAMPIONSHIP IN HOCKEY FOR THE SUFFERN MOUNTIES AND I WANT TO

                    CONGRATULATE COACH ROB SCHELLING AND THE ENTIRE TEAM, OUR SCHOOL

                    DISTRICT, AND COMMUNITY IN SUFFERN.  THIS IS A TREMENDOUS VICTORY FOR A

                    TEAM THAT HAS BATTLED THROUGH OVER THE LAST MANY YEARS DEALING WITH

                    COVID AND OTHER -- OTHER SUCH CHALLENGES, AND WE'RE VERY PROUD OF

                    THEM AND I WANT TO CONGRATULATE THEM ON A GREAT VICTORY.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES, WE HAVE NUMEROUS OTHER FINE

                    RESOLUTIONS WHICH WE WILL TAKE UP WITH ONE VOTE.  ON THE RESOLUTIONS,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTIONS

                    ARE ADOPTED.

                                         109



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                            MARCH 21, 2022

                                 (WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 665-668 AND

                    670 WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, WOULD YOU

                    PLEASE CALL ON MS. HUNTER FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. HUNTER FOR THE

                    PURPOSES OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT.

                                 MS. HUNTER:  YES, MR. SPEAKER, WE'RE NOT DONE

                    YET.  THERE WILL BE AN IMMEDIATE NEED FOR A MAJORITY CONFERENCE AT THE

                    CONCLUSION OF OUR SESSION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MAJORITY CONFERENCE

                    IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING SESSION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I NOW

                    MOVE THAT THE ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED UNTIL 1:00 P.M., TUESDAY,

                    MARCH THE 22ND, TUESDAY BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE ASSEMBLY STANDS

                    ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 5:48 P.M., THE ASSEMBLY STOOD

                    ADJOURNED UNTIL TUESDAY, MARCH 22ND AT 1:00 P.M., TUESDAY BEING A

                    SESSION DAY.)









                                         110