TUESDAY, MAY 11, 2021                                                                           2:43 P.M.



                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE HOUSE WILL COME

                    TO ORDER.

                                 THE REVEREND ELIA WILL OFFER A PRAYER.

                                 REVEREND DONNA ELIA:  LET US PRAY.  O GOD,

                    WHOM WE CALL BY MANY NAMES, THANK YOU FOR THE BEAUTY OF THIS DAY

                    AND FOR THOSE WE HOLD DEAR.  RECEIVE OUR GRATITUDE.  AS THE ASSEMBLY

                    GATHERS FOR TODAY'S WORK, FILL THEM WITH ENERGY AND EVERY ABILITY THEY

                    NEED TO BUILD MORE VIBRANT COMMUNITIES AND A BETTER STATE.  THANK

                    YOU THAT ONCE AGAIN, ON THIS DAY, THEY TAKE UP THE MANTLE OF PUBLIC

                    SERVICE.  REMIND THEM TO HOLD ON TO THEIR MOST INTEGROUS IDEALS AND TO

                    BRING THEIR VERY BEST TO THE TABLE.  BE IN THEIR THINKING, IN THEIR

                    SPEAKING, IN THEIR LISTENING AND DECISION-MAKING, AND LET THEIR

                    COLLECTIVE WISDOM SERVE THE COMMON GOOD.  THANK YOU FOR ALL STAFF,

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                        MAY 11, 2021

                    FOR THOSE WHOSE WORK IS VISIBLE AND FOR THOSE WHOSE WORK IS UNSEEN

                    BUT ESSENTIAL TO THE TASKS AT HAND.  THANK YOU FOR UNSUNG HEROES ON

                    WHOSE SHOULDERS WE STAND.  WE PRAY FOR THOSE IN HARM'S WAY THAT THEY

                    MAY BE KEPT SAFE.  WE PRAY FOR THOSE AROUND THE WORLD STRICKEN BY

                    COVID THAT THEY MAY HAVE THE EQUIPMENT AND VACCINES THEY NEED,

                    BRING ABOUT THE DAY WHEN ALL WILL BE MADE WELL.  WE THINK OF PLACES

                    NEAR AND FAR TORN APART BY VIOLENCE, AND WE PRAY FOR THE COMING OF

                    PEACE, EQUITY, JUSTICE AND WHOLENESS.  IN YOUR HOLY NAME WE PRAY.

                                 AMEN.

                                 MEMBERS:  AMEN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  VISITORS ARE INVITED

                    TO JOIN THE MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY LED VISITORS AND

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF MONDAY, MAY 10TH.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I MOVE TO

                    DISPENSE WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF MONDAY, MAY THE

                    10TH AND ASK THAT THE SAME WOULD STAND APPROVED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WITHOUT OBJECTION,

                    SO ORDERED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I WOULD LIKE TO BEGIN OUR PROCEEDINGS, AS USUAL, WITH A QUOTE

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    FOR TODAY.  THIS ONE IS COMING FROM ELIZABETH BERG.  SHE IS ALSO A NEW

                    YORK TIMES BEST-SELLING AUTHOR OF MANY NOVELS, INCLUDING OPEN HOUSE,

                    WHICH WAS ON OPRAH WINFREY'S BOOK CLUB LIST IN 2000.  HER WORDS FOR

                    US TODAY THAT, "THERE IS AN INCREDIBLE VALUE IN BEING OF SERVICE TO

                    OTHERS."

                                 WITH THAT, MR. SPEAKER, I WOULD CERTAINLY WELCOME

                    MY COLLEAGUES, BOTH THOSE IN CHAMBERS AND THOSE THAT ARE WITH US

                    REMOTELY TO THE SECOND DAY OF THE 19TH WEEK OF THE 244TH LEGISLATIVE

                    SESSION.  I WOULD LIKE TO ANNOUNCE OUR SCHEDULE FOR THE DAY.  MEMBERS

                    DO HAVE ON THEIR DESKS A CALENDAR AND A DEBATE LIST.  OUR PRINCIPAL

                    WORK TODAY WILL COME FROM TAKING UP THE RESOLUTIONS ON PAGE 3

                    IMMEDIATELY.  AND THEN WE WILL WORK OFF OF THAT DEBATE LIST, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  WE'RE GOING TO BEGIN WITH PAGE 16, CALENDAR NO. 175, AND

                    THEY WE'RE GOING TO GO TO PAGE 23 AND TAKE CALENDAR NO. 279,

                    IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWED BY PAGE 24, CALENDAR NO. 285 AND THEN PAGE 28,

                    CALENDAR NO. 312.  IN THAT ORDER, MR. SPEAKER.  THAT -- THAT'S A GENERAL

                    OUTLINE.  OF COURSE THERE WILL BE MORE -- MORE DEBATES TO GO.  AND IF

                    YOU HAVE ANY HOUSEKEEPING AND/OR INTRODUCTIONS, NOW WOULD BE AN

                    APPROPRIATE TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  NO HOUSEKEEPING,

                    MADAM MAJORITY LEADER.


                                 WE WILL GO DIRECTLY TO PAGE 3, ASSEMBLY NO. 276 ON

                    RESOLUTIONS.  THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 276, MS.

                    SOLAGES.

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM MAY 9-15, 2021, AS FIBROMYALGIA

                    AWARENESS WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. SOLAGES TO SPEAK

                    ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 277, MRS.

                    BARRETT.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM MAY 2021, AS MILITARY APPRECIATION

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE

                    OF NATIONAL MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. BARRETT ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MRS. BARRETT:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THE

                    MONTH OF MAY ENCOMPASSES MULTIPLE COMMEMORATIONS THAT RECOGNIZE,

                    HONOR AND THANK OUR VETERANS AND MILITARY FAMILIES, TOO MANY OF WHOM

                    WHO HAVE GIVEN THEIR LIVES FOR OUR COUNTRY OR CONTINUE TO LIVE WITH

                    PROFOUND PHYSICAL AND MENTAL WOUNDS FROM THEIR TIME IN THE SERVICE.

                    WE THANK ALL WHO HAVE SERVED, AND MAKE IT OUR GOAL TO PAUSE AND

                    SHOW GRATITUDE THIS MONTH AND EVERY MONTH.  THE OBSERVANCES THAT

                    TOGETHER MAKE UP MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING:

                    PUBLIC SERVICE RECOGNITION WEEK, WHICH WAS -- HAS BEEN CELEBRATED

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THE FIRST WEEK OF MAY SINCE 1985 TO HONOR ALL THE PEOPLE WHO SERVE OUR

                    NATION AS FEDERAL, STATE, COUNTY, LOCAL AND TRIBAL GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

                    - PRETTY MUCH ALL OF US HERE IN THE CHAMBER, TOO - AND IT REMINDS US THE

                    IMPORTANCE OF SERVICE.  MILITARY SPOUSE APPRECIATION DAY, WHICH IS

                    CELEBRATED MAY 7TH AND RECOGNIZES THE SACRIFICES AND DEDICATION MADE

                    BY MILITARY SPOUSES WHO IN THEIR OWN WAY SERVE.  CONGRESS MADE

                    MILITARY SPOUSE APPRECIATION DAY OFFICIAL IN 1999 AS PART OF MILITARY

                    APPRECIATION MONTH.  ON MAY 8TH WE OBSERVE V-E DAY, MARKING MAY

                    8, 1945, WHICH COMMEMORATES THE END OF WORLD WAR II IN EUROPE.

                    ARMED FORCES DAY IS CELEBRATED ON THE THIRD SATURDAY IN MAY.

                    PRESIDENT HARRY S. TRUMAN LED THE EFFORT TO ESTABLISH THIS HOLIDAY TO

                    PAY SPECIAL TRIBUTE TO THE MEN AND WOMEN OF THE ARMED FORCES, AND

                    THE FIRST ARMED FORCES DAY WAS CELEBRATED MAY 20, 1050.  THIS YEAR IT

                    WILL BE HELD ON MAY 15, 2021, A JOINT CELEBRATION HONORING ALL PEOPLE

                    SERVING IN ALL SIX BRANCHES OF THE U.S. MILITARY; AIR FORCE, ARMY, COAST

                    GUARD, MARINE, NAVY AND THE NEWLY-CREATED SPACE FORCE.  MEMORIAL

                    DAY MAY BE THE MOST FAMILIAR.  OBSERVED ON THE LAST MONDAY OF MAY,

                    MEMORIAL DAY HONORS THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO DIED WHILE IN THE

                    MILITARY SERVICE OF OUR COUNTRY OR THOSE WHO DIED IN BATTLE OR AS A RESULT

                    OF WOUNDS SUSTAINED IN BATTLE, MOST PARTICULARLY.  THE HOLIDAY, ONCE

                    CALLED DECORATION DAY, CAN BE TRACED BACK TO THE CIVIL WAR PERIOD, AND

                    IT IS LONG ASSOCIATED WITH THE RED POPPIES OF THE WORLD WAR I-ERA POEM

                    IN FLANDERS FIELDS.  BUT IT WASN'T ACTUALLY UNTIL 1971 THAT MEMORIAL

                    DAY OFFICIALLY BECAME A FEDERAL HOLIDAY INTENDED TO OBSERVE AND HONOR

                    THE PEOPLE WHO LOST THEIR LIVES WHILE SERVING IN THE U.S. MILITARY.  THE

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    CELEBRATION THAT I ADMIT WAS -- I WAS THE LEAST FAMILIAR WITH IS LOYALTY

                    DAY, WHICH IS MAY 1ST.  BUT I LEARNED OF ITS RELEVANCE BY READING

                    PRESIDENT JOE BIDEN'S RECENT PROCLAMATION OF MAY 1, 2021 AS LOYALTY

                    DAY.  IT SAYS, QUOTE, "ON LOYALTY DAY WE CELEBRATE OUR ALLEGIANCE TO

                    THE PROJECT OF THIS GREAT NATION AND THE DEMOCRATIC IDEALS WOVEN INTO

                    THE FABRIC OF OUR CONSTITUTION.  AS AMERICANS, WE DO NOT COMMAND

                    LOYALTY, BUT SEEK TO EARN IT THROUGH OUR ACTIONS, INCLUDING BY LIVING UP

                    TO THE PRINCIPLES ENSHRINED IN OUR CONSTITUTION AND RESPECTING THE WILL

                    OF THE PEOPLE AS REFLECTED IN THE DEMOCRATIC PROCESS.  DRAWN TOGETHER

                    BY THE PROMISE OF EQUALITY, FREEDOM AND JUSTICE, WE ARE A NATION OF

                    SHARED IDEALS AND STRONG, RESILIENT PEOPLE.  HERE IN AMERICA, LOYALTY

                    DOES NOT MEAN FEALTY TO ANY ONE LEADER OR POLITICAL PARTY, NOR DOES IT

                    MEAN UNTHINKING PRAISE OR WILLFUL IGNORANCE OF OUR SHORTCOMINGS.  IT

                    MEANS LOYALTY TO OUR COMMON IDEALS AND TO ONE ANOTHER.  IT MEANS

                    STANDING UNITED AS ONE PEOPLE, EVEN AS WE CHERISH OUR DIFFERENCES AND

                    RESPECT DISSENT."

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. BARRON.

                                 MR. BARRON:  HONESTY COMPELS ME TO SPEAK TODAY.

                    I CERTAINLY AM VERY SENSITIVE TO ALL OF THOSE WHO LOST THEIR LIVES AND THE

                    FAMILIES WHO SUFFERED.  BUT I MUST SAY THAT I'M ALSO CONCERNED ABOUT

                    THE ROLE OF THE AMERICAN MILITARY ACROSS THE DECADES IN COUNTRIES AND

                    CONTINENTS LIKE AFRICA AND PLACES LIKE LATIN AMERICA AND THE

                    CARIBBEAN.  THEY SERVED AS AN IMPERIALISTIC COLONIAL FORCE, AND TODAY

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    AS WE SPEAK, THE AFRICA COMMAND IS IN JUST ABOUT EVERY COUNTRY IN

                    AFRICA, THE MILITARY BASES.  NOT HUMANITARIAN AID, BUT MILITARY AID IN

                    THE AFRICAN COUNTRIES AND THEY ARE OPPRESSING AFRICAN PEOPLE AND

                    ALLOWING FOR CAPITALISTIC REGIMES THAT ARE SUPPORTED BY THE WEST TO

                    CONTINUE TO DO THE THINGS THAT THEY DO IN AFRICA.  SO THE AMERICAN

                    MILITARY ACROSS THE WORLD -- SO SOME OF US HAVE BEEN SEEN AS A VERY

                    IMPERIALISTIC MILITARY.  EVEN THE ROLE OF AMERICA IN THE MIDDLE EAST IN

                    TERMS OF THE PALESTINIANS ARE BEING OPPRESSED.  THE AMERICAN MILITARY

                    HAS BEEN THERE.

                                 SO I JUST HAD TO BE HONEST TODAY, AND I KNOW IT'S NOT

                    COMFORTABLE FOR PEOPLE AND IT'S NOT REALLY COMFORTABLE FOR ME BECAUSE I

                    KNOW SOME PEOPLE LOST THEIR LOVED ONES.  BUT THERE ALSO OTHER PEOPLE

                    AROUND THE WORLD THAT LOST LOVED ONES AS WELL -- AS WELL, AT THE HAND OF

                    THE AMERICAN MILITARY.  THE PEOPLE OF HAITI ARE BEING OPPRESSED BY THE

                    AMERICAN MILITARY.  THEY TOOK OVER HAITI.  SO I -- I JUST THINK THAT

                    WHEN WE SPEAK OF THE AMERICAN MILITARY, IF WE ARE TO BE HONEST AND

                    OPEN ABOUT ITS ROLE IN THE WORLD, IT'S BEEN VERY, VERY IMPERIALISTIC.  AND

                    SO IT'S VERY DIFFICULT FOR ME TO HONOR THE AMERICAN MILITARY, EVEN AS FAR

                    BACK AS THE VIETNAM WAR.  IN THE 1960'S, THIS NATION, MANY OF THE

                    PEOPLE ROSE UP AGAINST THE MILITARY'S ROLE IN VIETNAM AND WHAT IT DID TO

                    THE VIETNAMESE PEOPLE.  SO I JUST WANTED TO BE HONEST.  I KNOW IT'S

                    GOING TO PROVOKE SOME OTHERS TO SPEAK, BUT SO BE IT.  I'M HERE TO SPEAK

                    TRUTH TO POWER AND TO BE HONEST.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAVINE ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO BE SURE,

                    HISTORY IS ALWAYS FULL OF CONTRADICTIONS.  BUT I THINK IT IS EXTRAORDINARILY

                    AND CRITICALLY IMPORTANT FOR EACH AND EVERY ONE US TO REALIZE AND

                    ACKNOWLEDGE THAT AMERICA IS AND REMAINS AN ASPIRATIONAL NATION.  ON

                    THE SUBJECT OF THE MILITARY.  NO MILITARY IN ALL OF HISTORY HAS EXISTED

                    WITHOUT SOME ABERRATION.  BUT AMERICA IS VERY, VERY DIFFERENT.  NOW, I

                    SAY THIS AS THE NEPHEW OF A GOLD STAR MOTHER.  MY AUNT LIL'S

                    JUST-TURNED-18-YEAR-OLD SON, WILLIAM KIER WAS KILLED IN ACTION IN -- IN

                    SANTA MARIA, LUZON, PHILIPPINES IN -- AT THE VERY CLOSE OF THE SECOND

                    WORLD WAR.  SHE HELPED BRING ME UP.  AND I -- I ALSO SAY THIS IN --

                    WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBJECT OF VIETNAM VETERANS.  MANY OF MY

                    CHILDHOOD FRIENDS DID NOT COME HOME FROM VIETNAM.  THEY WENT TO

                    VIETNAM WITH THE BEST OF INTENTIONS, AS DID MY COUSIN WILLIAM KIER.  I

                    THINK THAT IT'S ONLY FITTING THAT WE RECOGNIZE THAT THOSE WHO SERVE OUR

                    NATION DESERVE OUR SUPPORT, THEY DESERVE OUR PROTECTION AND THEY

                    DESERVE OUR LOVE.  AND THAT'S WHAT I'VE GOT TO SAY BECAUSE I ALSO LIKE TO

                    SPEAK TRUTH TO POWER.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. ASHBY.

                                 MR. ASHBY:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I WANT TO

                    THANK THE SPONSOR FOR PRESENTING THIS RESOLUTION, AND I OFFER MY FULL

                    SUPPORT OF IT.  AND I ALSO WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO -- A BIT ON ONE OF THE

                    PRIOR -- PRIOR SPEAKERS' INCEPTIONS, AND THAT BEING A PRIOR SERVICE

                    MEMBER AND A VETERAN AND SOMEONE WHO SERVED IN AFRICA, I CAN TELL

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    YOU THAT WHAT WE DID THERE WAS PROVIDE 100 PERCENT HUMANITARIAN AID,

                    PROVIDING MEDICAL CARE TO NOT HUNDREDS, BUT THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE THERE.

                    ANTI-MALARIA, CATARACT SURGERY, DENTAL CARE, MATERNITY CARE FOR AN

                    EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME.  AND THE RELATIONSHIPS THAT WE FORGED -- I STILL

                    HAVE FRIENDS THAT ARE LIVING THERE.  I STILL COMMUNICATE WITH THEM TODAY

                    AND, YOU KNOW, THOSE RELATIONSHIPS ARE LIFELONG.  THEY'RE -- THEY'RE NOT

                    -- THEY'RE NOT GOING AWAY.  AND I THINK THAT IF WE'RE GOING TO BE TALKING

                    ABOUT THAT, WE NEED TO HEAR BOTH SIDES OF THAT.  AND THEN WE ALSO NEED

                    TO RECOGNIZE THAT BECAUSE OF OUR VETERANS AND OUR SERVICE MEMBERS, WE

                    ARE ABLE TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY AND FREELY EXPRESS BOTH SIDES, TO HEAR BOTH

                    SIDES ON A REGULAR BASIS.  AND THAT IS IMPERATIVE.  AND IT IS BECAUSE OF

                    OUR VETERANS THAT THAT REALITY EXISTS.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I'D REALLY

                    LIKE TO COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR THE SERIES OF RESOLUTIONS THAT HAVE

                    COME IN THIS MONTH FOR NATIONAL MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH.  I DIDN'T

                    GET A CHANCE TO SPEAK WHEN IT WAS TO TALK ABOUT OUR MILITARY FAMILIES,

                    BUT I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT WE RECOGNIZE THEM FOR ALL THAT THEY

                    DO FOR ALL OF THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY THAT SUPPORT THEIR MILITARY AS IT

                    GOES ABOUT DOING THE WILL OF THIS NATION.  THAT'S -- THAT'S NOT ONLY WHAT

                    OUR -- WHAT OUR COUNTRY ASKS THOSE IN THE MILITARY TO DO, BUT REQUIRES

                    THEM TO DO SO UNDER OATH TO THE UNITED STATES.  AND I -- AND I THINK THIS

                    WHOLE SERIES OF EVENTS IS VERY IMPORTANT BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, SOME

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    FAMILIES LOSE THEIR LOVED ONES.  IN -- ON APRIL 8TH OF 1945 MY

                    GREAT-UNCLE, PAUL ROWLEY, MY GRANDMOTHER'S BROTHER WHO HAD THREE

                    CHILDREN, WAS KILLED IN GERMANY IN 1945 IN THE INVASION OF THE THIRD

                    REICH, PUTTING AN END TO NAZISM.  AND HE IS BURIED TODAY IN MARGRATEN

                    CEMETERY IN THE NETHERLANDS WHERE A DUTCH FAMILY LOOKS AFTER HIM AND

                    HIS MEMORY BECAUSE HIS -- MY GREAT-UNCLE PAUL, HIS -- MY

                    GREAT-GRANDMOTHER CHOSE NOT TO BRING HIM HOME BUT LEFT HIM WHERE HE

                    FELL, WHERE HE GAVE THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE FOR AMERICAN VALUES IN

                    RIDDING NAZISM FROM EUROPE.

                                 SO AGAIN, TO THE SPONSOR, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE

                    RESOLUTIONS, AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR KEEPING OUR MILITARY IN HIGH

                    ESTEEM IN THIS GREAT COUNTRY THAT WE CALL THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I RISE TO APPLAUD THE SPONSOR OF THIS RESOLUTION AS WELL.  AS

                    THE DAUGHTER OF A WORLD WAR II VETERAN, A GRANDDAUGHTER OF A VETERAN,

                    AND I WANT TO SAY A NIECE OF AT LEAST FOUR OR FIVE VETERANS, I HONOR THEIR

                    LIVES, I HONOR THEIR SERVICES, AND I HONOR THE SERVICES OF THE PEOPLE WHO

                    SERVED WITH THEM.  IT'S NOT -- OR AT LEAST IT WASN'T THEN, A CHOICE TO

                    NECESSARILY BE IN THE SERVICE.  BUT IT IS NOW.  AND SO I WANT TO HONOR

                    THE LIVES OF THE YOUNG MEN AND WOMEN WHO ARE VOLUNTARILY CHOOSING

                    TO GO SERVE IN THE MILITARY OF THIS COUNTRY.  THERE ARE CLEARLY SOME

                    THINGS THAT SOME PEOPLE DON'T LIKE, BUT THERE ARE STILL TONS OF PEOPLE

                    WHO ON A REGULAR BASIS ARE STRIVING TO GET TO AMERICA.  WHY IS THAT, MR.

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    SPEAKER?  I WANT TO THINK BECAUSE IT IS ONE OF THE GREATEST COUNTRIES IN

                    THE WORLD.  EVEN WITH ITS DOWNSIDES IT'S ONE OF THE GREATEST COUNTRIES IN

                    THE WORLD.

                                 I WOULD END WITH THE FACT THAT IN THE GREAT CITY OF

                    BUFFALO, WE ARE BUILDING SOMETHING THAT HASN'T HAPPENED ANYWHERE YET

                    IN AMERICA.  IT'S A MONUMENT THAT HONORS VETERANS, AFRICAN-AMERICAN

                    VETERANS, MEN AND WOMEN IN EVERY BRANCH OF THE SERVICE, FOR EVERY WAR

                    THAT WE'VE EVER SERVED IN.  AND BY THE WAY, THERE HASN'T BEEN A WAR IN

                    AMERICA THAT AFRICAN-AMERICANS HAVEN'T SERVED IN.  HOPEFULLY, MR.

                    SPEAKER, I WILL BE ABLE TO INVITE THIS ENTIRE DELEGATION OF MEMBERS

                    SOMETIME IN THE LATE SPRING OR EARLY FALL TO THE OPPORTUNITY TO CELEBRATE

                    THE LIVES OF THESE VETERANS, MUCH LIKE OUR COLLEAGUE HAS DECIDED TO

                    CELEBRATE THEIR LIVES IN THE MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH.

                                 SO AGAIN, I WANT TO COMMEND THE SPONSOR OF THE

                    RESOLUTION, AND HOPE THAT WE WILL ALL BE VOTING IN SUPPORT OF IT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LEMONDES.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I DID

                    NOT INTEND TO SPEAK TODAY, BUT FEEL COMPELLED TO.  WITH THE ISSUE OF

                    AFRICA, THE COLONIZATION OF AFRICA IS BEING DONE BY THE CHINESE, IF

                    ANYBODY WANTS TO CHECK HISTORY.  WITH RESPECT TO THE MILITARY AND OUR

                    SERVICE, I WANT TO SAY TO THE SPONSOR THANK YOU SO MUCH.  IT WAS -- IT

                    WAS AN HONOR TO LISTEN TO SOMETHING SO POSITIVE FOR SOMETHING THAT

                    IMPACTS US ALL IN SUCH A VISCERAL WAY, OUR VERY SURVIVAL IN MANY TIMES

                    IN OUR HISTORY.  FOR THOSE OF US THAT ARE VETERANS - AND I WILL ONLY SPEAK

                    FOR MYSELF; I'M SURE MY COLLEAGUES WOULD AGREE - I WISH I COULD SHOW

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    YOU SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE HAD TO DO.  I WISH YOU COULD HEAR

                    SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE'VE HAD TO HEAR.  AND I WISH YOU WERE THERE

                    WITH ME SO YOU'D KNOW WHAT IT ENTAILS TO BE FREE TO EXPRESS THAT HERE IN

                    THIS HOUSE, IN THIS CHAMBER, ON BEHALF OF ALL OF OUR PEOPLE AND

                    FAMILIES.  TOO MANY PEOPLE DON'T KNOW THIS TODAY AND THEY'RE AFRAID TO

                    SAY SO.  WHEN I LOOK AT SOMEBODY AND EVALUATE THEIR CHARACTER, I LOOK

                    AT WHETHER OR NOT I'M LOOKING AT AN AMERICAN RENTER OR BUYER.  HAVE

                    THEY BOUGHT PART OF OUR HUMANITY AND A PART OF OUR SOUL?  AND DO THEY

                    HAVE A STAKE IN OUR COUNTRY AND MOVING OUR -- OUR -- FROM THE LOCAL

                    COMMUNITY DOWN TO THE NATIONAL LEVEL.  ARE THEY MOVING THAT FORWARD

                    IN A POSITIVE WAY, OR ARE THEY JUST A RENTER, A BYSTANDER, SITTING BY,

                    TAKING CHEAP SHOTS AT EVERYTHING EVERYONE HAS DONE OVER THE COURSE OF

                    OUR HISTORY AS A NATION.  I LOOKED UP TODAY - AND I'LL SPARE YOU THE

                    NUMBERS - THE NUMBER OF DEAD THAT WE'VE -- THAT WE'VE HAD ACROSS TIME

                    SINCE OUR FOUNDING, AND IT'S A BIG NUMBER.  AND IT'S UNFORTUNATE.  AND I

                    -- I WANT TO SAY ONE LITTLE FACT THAT WAS VERY APPARENT IF YOU - IF YOU

                    TAKE A MOMENT TO LOOK.  NEW YORK ITSELF, OUR OWN STATE, HAS GIVEN UP

                    MORE WAR DEAD SINCE WORLD WAR II THAN ANY OTHER STATE IN THE NATION.

                    HOW MANY PEOPLE KNEW THAT?  NEW YORK HAS ANSWERED THE CALL.  WE

                    NEW YORKERS HAVE ANSWERED THE CALL FOR A LONG TIME, AND WILL CONTINUE

                    TO DO SO.  AND I ASK THAT THIS BODY HONORS IN A POSITIVE WAY THE

                    SACRIFICES OF SO FEW FOR SO MANY.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I AM SO

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THANKFUL THAT I HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE MY RESIDENTS HERE ON THE

                    FLOOR OF THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY.  BUT I AM DEEPLY MINDFUL THAT

                    MY OPPORTUNITY TO BE HERE ON THE FLOOR OF THE ASSEMBLY, LIKE ALL OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES, REFLECTS THE INCREDIBLE AMOUNT OF SACRIFICE, EFFORT AND

                    COMMITMENT MADE BY THOSE WHO WENT AHEAD OF ME.  MY COUNTY WAS

                    FORMED IN THE EARLY 1800'S, AND IT WAS ALMOST EXCLUSIVELY AGRICULTURAL.

                    BUT WHEN THE CIVIL WAR CAME, MY COUNTY CONTRIBUTED 4,000 YOUNG

                    MEN TO THAT EFFORT.  AND BACK THEN THERE WAS NO SOCIAL SAFETY NET.

                    THERE WAS NO WELFARE PROVISIONS.  THERE WAS NO SOCIAL SECURITY

                    SURVIVOR BENEFITS.  WHEN THESE YOUNG MEN LEFT THE FARM IT WAS A HUGE

                    COMMITMENT AND A HUGE SACRIFICE FOR THE ENTIRE FAMILY.  AND ABOUT

                    ONE-QUARTER OF THOSE YOUNG MEN NEVER CAME HOME.  I'M MINDFUL THAT

                    DURING WORLD WAR II IT WAS THE UNITED STATES THAT STOOD UP WITH OUR

                    ALLIES AND STOPPED THE SYSTEMATIC SLAUGHTER OF MILLIONS OF INNOCENT

                    CIVILIANS.  IF IT WEREN'T FOR OUR MILITARY, MILLIONS MORE WOULD HAVE DIED.

                    AND WHILE WE MAY SOMETIMES DISAGREE HERE IN THIS CHAMBER OR ACROSS

                    OUR COUNTRY OVER WHETHER WE SHOULD BE ENGAGED AND AT WHAT LEVEL AND

                    WHICH COUNTRIES, I'M MINDFUL OF THE FACT THAT OUR MILITARY, THROUGHOUT

                    THE ENTIRE COURSE OF OUR COUNTRY'S HISTORY, HAS BEEN RUN BY CIVILIANS.

                    OUR MILITARY IS NOT ENGAGED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE SECRETARY OF

                    DEFENSE, WHO IS A CIVILIAN, AND IT'S ALWAYS UNDER A

                    COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF, WHO IS ELECTED.  AND SO IF WE THINK WE SHOULD

                    HAVE GOTTEN INTO A CONFLICT SOONER OR SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN OUT OF A

                    CONFLICT SOONER, IT'S NOT THE MILITARY TO BLAME.  IT'S THE ELECTED OFFICIALS

                    WHO MADE THOSE CALLS.

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 AND SO I'M DEEPLY THANKFUL TO THE SPONSOR AND FOR OUR

                    MILITARY FOR ENABLING ALL OF US TO BE HERE TODAY IN THE GREATEST COUNTRY

                    IN THE WORLD AND THE GREAT STATE OF NEW YORK.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. ANGELINO.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW, I'M SORRY.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  FIRST OF ALL, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE SPONSOR OF THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION -- OR THIS -- THIS -- YEAH, THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION, FOR

                    BRINGING THIS FORWARD.  THIS PAST WEEKEND I ATTENDED A MEMORIAL

                    SERVICE FOR A WORLD WAR II VETERAN.  AND TO SEE THE PRIDE ON THAT -- SEE

                    THE PRIDE ON THAT FAMILY AND THEIR CHILDREN OF WHAT HE GAVE WAS

                    REMARKABLE, AND I'LL NEVER FORGET THAT.  AND THE OTHER THING I THOUGHT

                    ABOUT IS SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WERE SAID, FAMILIES ENDURE A LOT.  THEY

                    DON'T KNOW WHERE THEIR LOVED ONE IS.  THEY DON'T TALK TO THEM FOR QUITE

                    SOME TIME.  AND IT JUST MAKES ME THINK OF THE SACRIFICES THAT OUR MEN

                    AND WOMEN GIVE, NOT ONLY FOR THEIR FAMILIES, FOR OUR COUNTRY, BUT FOR

                    THE WORLD.  AND I ALWAYS GO BACK TO THIS.  IF YOU THINK ABOUT ALL THE

                    CONFLICTS WE'VE BEEN IN, THE VIETNAM WAR, THE KOREAN WAR, WORLD

                    WAR II, AFGHANISTAN, IRAQ, EUROPE, AFRICA, GRENADA -- GRENADA, OF ALL

                    OF THESE CONFLICTS THE UNITED STATES HAS EVER BEEN IN, WE HAVE NEVER

                    ONCE TAKEN A PIECE OF PROPERTY TO BELONG TO THE UNITED STATES.  YOU

                    CAN'T SAY THAT ABOUT A LOT OF MILITARIES THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.  BUT WE GO

                    IN THERE, THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO WERE GIVEN THE DIRECTIVE TO DO WHAT

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WE'RE ORDERED TO DO.  WE DO IT NOT BECAUSE WE WANT TO BUT BECAUSE WE

                    LOVE OUR NATION.  AND LET'S -- LET'S NEVER FORGET THAT.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. TAGUE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO COMMEND THE

                    SPONSOR OF THIS RESOLUTION.  I'M A PROUD COSPONSOR, AND I CAN'T THANK

                    YOU ENOUGH, MEMBER BARRETT, FOR PUTTING THIS RESOLUTION TO THE FLOOR.

                    I'M THE GRANDSON OF A WORLD WAR II UNITED STATES ARMY VETERAN, A

                    SURVIVOR OF PEARL HARBOR, SCHOFIELD BARRACKS, A SURVIVOR OF D-DAY AND

                    A SURVIVOR OF THE BATTLE OF THE BULGE.  MY TWO UNCLES WERE MARINE AND

                    NAVY VETERANS DURING KOREA, AND MY FATHER A VIETNAM VETERAN IN THE

                    UNITED STATES AIR FORCE.  I WANT TO THANK ALL THE VETERANS, ALL THE

                    VETERANS FOR THEIR SERVICE TO THIS GREAT NATION, AND FOR MOST IMPORTANTLY

                    FOR THEIR SACRIFICES.  AND THANK YOU AGAIN TO THE SPONSOR FOR HER

                    THOUGHTFULNESS AND HER PATRIOTISM.

                                 I WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT THIS RESOLUTION, AND I SAY

                    GOD BLESS OUR VETERANS AND GOD BLESS THESE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. JACKSON.

                                 MS. JACKSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I WOULD

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    LIKE TO THANK THE SPONSOR OF THIS RESOLUTION.  I'M THE GRANDDAUGHTER OF

                    LEROY MEYERS, SR., WHO PROUDLY SERVED IN WORLD WAR II.  HE WAS ABLE

                    TO GET A JOB WHEN HE CAME BACK HOME AND TAKE CARE OF HIS FAMILY.  SO I

                    AM GRATEFUL FOR OUR -- OUR MILITARY MEN AND WOMEN.  I'M GRATEFUL FOR

                    MY SISTER, CASSANDRA JACKSON, WHO SERVED ALMOST A DECADE AND WAS

                    ABLE TO TOUR THE WORLD BECAUSE OF HER SERVICE TO THIS COUNTRY.

                    HOWEVER, I THINK MY DISAPPOINTMENT ALWAYS COMES WITH OUR ELECTED

                    OFFICIALS AND PEOPLE WHO SEND US INTO PLACES THAT WE DON'T BELONG, AND

                    WHEN OUR MEN AND WOMEN HAVE TO COME HOME AND REDLINING AND

                    RACISM.  THAT -- THAT'S SOMETHING THAT OUR COUNTRY CANNOT ACT LIKE IT

                    DOESN'T -- IT DOESN'T HAPPEN.  IT HAPPENS.  AND SO WHILE WE ARE GRATEFUL

                    FOR OUR MILITARY FAMILIES AND THE PEOPLE -- THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO

                    CHOOSES TO SERVE, THAT BE MINDFUL OF THE PEOPLE WHO SENT US INTO PLACES

                    THAT WE HAVE NO BUSINESS BELONGING, AND MAKING SURE THAT WE TAKE CARE

                    OF THEM WHEN THEY COME BACK HOME, LIKE WE DID FOR MY GRANDFATHER,

                    MR. LEROY MEYERS AND MY SISTER CASSANDRA JACKSON.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. GANDOLFO?

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 WE WILL MOVE ON TO MR. SANTABARBARA.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    I WANT TO ALSO THANK THE SPONSOR OF THIS RESOLUTION.  MILITARY

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    APPRECIATION MONTH HONORS THE HEROES FROM OUR COMMUNITY, ACROSS

                    THE COUNTRY WHO HAVE SERVED OUR COUNTRY.  OUR NATION'S ARMED FORCES

                    ACT AS A GLOBAL FORCE FOR GOOD AROUND THE WORLD AROUND THE CLOCK AND

                    THEY ALSO ASSURE THAT OUR COUNTRY IS SAFE.  SO I RISE TO THANK THE BRAVE

                    MEN AND WOMEN WHO HAVE ANSWERED THE CALL OF DUTY AND HAVE MADE

                    OUR ARMED FORCES THE MOST RESPECTED IN THE ENTIRE WORLD.  FOR THOSE IN

                    NEED OF PROTECTING THE -- OUR NATION'S MILITARY BRINGS A SENSE OF SAFETY.

                    FOR THOSE IN NEED OF HUMANITARIAN AID, WE BRING A SENSE OF RELIEF.  AND

                    IN TIMES WHEN DISASTER STRIKES, AMERICAN TROOPS ARE NEVER FAR BEHIND,

                    OFFERING SUPPORT WHEN IT'S NEEDED THE MOST.  THIS IS THE HONOR AND

                    RESPECT THAT THESE BRAVE MEN AND WOMEN AND ALL OF THOSE WHO HAVE

                    SERVED BEFORE THEM HAVE BROUGHT OUR COUNTRY.  MILLIONS OF AMERICANS

                    HAVE FOUGHT AND DIED ON BATTLEFIELDS HERE AND ABROAD TO DEFEND OUR

                    FREEDOMS AND OUR WAY OF LIFE.  MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH IS A WAY

                    FOR US TO SAY THANK YOU.  A WAY FOR US TO SAY THAT WE REMEMBER.

                                 MAY GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS, AND MAY GOD BLESS THE

                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS

                    MORNING WHEN I WOKE UP I READ ABOUT ROCKET FIRE GOING INTO TEL AVIV

                    IN ISRAEL.  AND ONE OF THE THINGS I THOUGHT WAS HOW FORTUNATE WE ARE

                    THAT THAT DOES NOT HAPPEN IN THE UNITED STATES.  THAT WE ARE ABLE HERE

                    TODAY IN THIS BODY TO CONDUCT OUR BUSINESS WITHOUT FEAR OF THAT

                    HAPPENING HERE.  AND THAT IS BECAUSE OF THE MEN AND WOMEN IN OUR

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MILITARY WHO SERVE OUR COUNTRY, NOT JUST HERE BUT AROUND THE WORLD, TO

                    PROTECT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND ITS CITIZENS.  WE ARE

                    FORTUNATE.  MOST OF THE MEMBERS OF THE MILITARY ARE YOUNG.  THEY'RE

                    18-, 19-, 20-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN.  AND THEY GO TO WAR, AS SOME OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES HAVE POINTED OUT, AT THE DIRECTION OF THE POLITICIANS AND THE

                    ELECTED OFFICIALS.  ONE SUCH PERSON WAS A YOUNG MAN NAMED JOHNATHAN

                    BENSON FROM NORTH BRANCH, MINNESOTA.  I WEAR HIS BRACELET EVERY DAY

                    AS A REMINDER OF THE SACRIFICE THAT HE MADE AND THAT SO MANY OF THE

                    MEN AND WOMEN IN OUR ARMED FORCES MAKE EVERY YEAR, AND IT'S A

                    PAINFUL REMINDER OF THE COST OF FREEDOM.  AND SO WE, AS A BODY,

                    SHOULD ALWAYS, ALWAYS BE GRATEFUL TO THE MEN AND WOMEN WHO SERVE

                    OUR COUNTRY, KEEP US SAFE, ALLOW US TO DO THE PEOPLE'S WORK IN THIS

                    CHAMBER AND IN CHAMBERS ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY.

                                 AND SO I THANK THE SPONSOR FOR PUTTING THIS RESOLUTION

                    FORWARD, AND I'M PROUD TO SUPPORT THE MEN AND WOMEN IN OUR ARMED

                    FORCES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BURDICK.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THANK YOU.  AS THE SON OF A WORLD

                    WAR II VETERAN AND AS A MEMBER OF THE VETERANS' COMMITTEE, I WISH TO

                    THANK THE SPONSOR FOR BRINGING THIS RESOLUTION.  THE FIRST OBLIGATION OF

                    GOVERNMENT IS TO PROTECT THE LIFE AND THE SAFETY OF EVERY CITIZEN, AND

                    THAT'S THE PRINCIPAL ROLE OF OUR MILITARY.  VIRTUALLY EVERY CONFLICT AND

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WAR IN THIS NATION'S HISTORY HAS ENGENDERED SOME CONTROVERSY.

                    INCLUDING WORLD WAR II WHERE MANY HISTORIANS BELIEVE THAT HAD THERE

                    NOT BEEN THE DAY OF INFAMY, WE MIGHT HAVE NOT TRIED TO BE ALLIES IN

                    FIGHTING AGAINST FASCISM, MASS GENOCIDE AND TOTALITARIANISM.  NOT ONLY

                    WOULD WE LIKELY NOT BE HERE TODAY, BUT THIS WORLD WOULD BE VASTLY

                    DIFFERENT HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THOSE BRAVE WOMEN AND MEN WHO GAVE

                    THEIR LIVES TO PROTECT OUR WAY OF LIFE.

                                 SO I AM INCREDIBLY GRATEFUL AND FEEL THAT THIS IS THE

                    VERY LEAST WE CAN DO TO SHOW A TREMENDOUS DEBT OF GRATITUDE TO THOSE

                    WHO HAVE PROTECTED OUR NATION.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. HUNTER TO CLOSE.

                                 MS. HUNTER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR

                    ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS RESOLUTION.  I'M ALWAYS HONORED TO STAND

                    IN FRONT OF THIS BODY, ESPECIALLY MEMORIALIZING TODAY AND THIS MONTH

                    AS MILITARY APPRECIATION MONTH.  AS MANY OF MY COLLEAGUES KNOW -

                    AND I SAY THIS PROUDLY EVERY YEAR - I AM A FEMALE ARMY VETERAN.  AND I

                    ACTUALLY AM THE ONLY FEMALE VETERAN IN THE ENTIRE STATE LEGISLATURE.  FOR

                    THE 20 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, I, FOR ONE, AM THE ONLY

                    FEMALE VETERAN REPRESENTING YOU IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK AND I SAY

                    THAT PROUDLY.  I -- I'D LIKE TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR PUTTING THIS IN EVERY

                    -- EVERY YEAR.  IT'S ALWAYS IMPORTANT TO PAUSE, MR. SPEAKER.  MANY

                    TIMES WE HEAR PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY DURING TIMES WHEN

                    MEMORIAL DAY IS COMING SOON AND VETERAN'S DAY, AND WE HEAR PEOPLE

                    SAY, THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICE.  AND WHILE I ALWAYS APPRECIATE WHEN

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    SOMEONE SAYS THAT TO ME, I USUALLY COUNTER AND SAY, BUT WHAT ARE YOU

                    DOING TO HELP A VETERAN?  SO I WOULD JUST LIKE TO PUT THAT OUT TO MANY

                    PEOPLE OUT HERE IN THE -- THE UNIVERSE WATCHING ON ZOOM AND AT HOME

                    TODAY, THAT IF YOU'RE THANKING A VETERAN, MAYBE NEXT TIME ASK THEM

                    WHAT THEY NEED.  BECAUSE THERE ARE A LOT OF SERVICES REQUIRED FOR MANY

                    OF OUR VETERANS.  MANY ARE HOMELESS, MANY ARE FOOD UNSTABLE AND

                    MANY JUST ARE COMING BACK AND MANY NEED HELP RELATIVE TO PTSD.

                                 SO PLEASE MAKE SURE TO OFFER SOMETHING AS YOU'RE

                    THANKING VETERANS, AND AGAIN, I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE SPONSOR.

                    THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION --

                    MAY WE ALL STAND TO HONOR THE VETERANS THAT WE HONOR TODAY.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 278, MR.

                    THIELE.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM MAY 2021, AS LUPUS AWARENESS

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. THIELE ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. THIELE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  AND IT IS

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    AGAIN THIS YEAR MY HONOR TO SPONSOR THIS RESOLUTION CALLING UPON THE

                    GOVERNOR TO PROCLAIM MAY AS LUPUS AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF

                    NEW YORK.  EACH YEAR WE DESIGNATE MAY AS LUPUS AWARENESS MONTH

                    TO SHOW SUPPORT FOR THE MORE THAN 100,000 NEW YORKERS, 1.5 MILLION

                    AMERICANS AND 5 MILLION PEOPLE WORLDWIDE WHO SUFFER FROM THE OFTEN

                    DEBILITATING EFFECTS OF LUPUS, A CHRONIC AUTOIMMUNE DISEASE THAT CAN

                    CAUSE SEVERE DAMAGE TO THE TISSUE AND ORGANS IN THE BODY, AND IN SOME

                    CASES, DEATH.  THE GREAT MAJORITY OF THOSE DIAGNOSED ARE YOUNG PEOPLE

                    IN THE PRIMES OF THEIR LIVES, AND 90 PERCENT ARE WOMEN.  MY DAUGHTER

                    JOSEPHINE IS ONE OF THOSE YOUNG WOMEN.  LUPUS IS MOST PREVALENT

                    AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS, HISPANICS, NATIVE AMERICANS AND ASIANS.

                    TRAGICALLY, THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE DIE FROM LUPUS EACH YEAR BECAUSE A

                    CURE REMAINS ELUSIVE.  THE MOST COMMON SYMPTOMS OF LUPUS ARE JOINT

                    SWELLING, JOINT AND MUSCLE PAIN, EXTREME -- EXTREME FATIGUE, FEVER AND

                    SKIN RASHES ON THE FACE, NECK AND SCALP.  MANY HEALTH PROFESSIONALS ARE

                    UNAWARE OF SYMPTOMS AND THE HEALTH EFFECTS OF LUPUS, CAUSING PEOPLE

                    WITH LUPUS TO SUFFER FOR MANY YEARS BEFORE THEY OBTAIN A CORRECT

                    DIAGNOSIS AND MEDICAL TREATMENT, DEMONSTRATING THE NEED FOR INCREASED

                    PUBLIC AND PROFESSIONAL AWARENESS OF LUPUS.  AND AS I MENTIONED, MY

                    DAUGHTER JOSEPHINE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH LUPUS ABOUT TEN YEARS AGO.

                    AND SHE WAS OUT TO VISIT THIS LAST WEEKEND AND WE WERE TALKING ABOUT

                    WHEN SHE WAS DIAGNOSED JUST ABOUT TEN YEARS AGO, AND I TOLD HER IT WAS

                    THE SCARIEST PERIOD IN MY LIFE.  ONE OF THE MOST TIMES -- AT TIME I WAS

                    MORE AFRAID THAN EVER FOR MY DAUGHTER'S FUTURE.  IT TOOK A WHILE FOR HER

                    TO BE -- TO BE DIAGNOSED, AND SHE WENT THROUGH SO MANY TESTS.  THERE

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WAS SO MUCH UNCERTAINTY.  BUT FINALLY, YOU KNOW, BY PROCESS OF

                    ELIMINATION SHE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH LUPUS.  YOU KNOW, FOUND GOOD

                    TREATMENT AND RECOVERED AND HAS LIVED A -- A VERY, VERY PRODUCTIVE LIFE.

                    SHE -- IT CHANGED HER -- HER DIRECTION IN LIFE.  SHE WAS A BIOCHEMISTRY

                    MAJOR IN COLLEGE WHEN SHE WAS DIAGNOSED, AND SHE SWITCHED, WENT TO

                    GRADUATE SCHOOL FOR NUTRITION BECAUSE SHE REALIZED HOW IMPORTANT

                    NUTRITION WAS TO DEALING WITH HER PARTICULAR DISEASE.  AND NOW SHE

                    SERVES WITH -- AS THE HEAD OF NUTRITION FOR GMHC IN NEW YORK CITY.

                    MEDICAL EFFORTS INTO LUPUS AND THE DISCOVERY OF SAFE OR MORE EFFECTIVE

                    TREATMENTS FOR LUPUS PATIENTS ARE UNDERFUNDED.  INCREASING COMMUNITY

                    AWARENESS AND FOCUSING PUBLIC ATTENTION ON LUPUS AND ITS DEVASTATING

                    IMPACT ON PATIENTS' LIVES WILL PROVIDE HOPE FOR A BETTER FUTURE FOR THOSE

                    AFFECTED.

                                 FINALLY, I JUST WANT TO THANK THE LUPUS AGENCIES OF THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.  THEY ARE DEDICATED TO IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF

                    LIFE FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH LUPUS AND THEIR LOVED ONES BY PROVIDING

                    EDUCATION, SUPPORT, OUTREACH SERVICES AND PROMOTING PROGRAMS OF

                    AWARENESS, ADVOCACY AND RESEARCH.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, I THANK ALL OF THOSE WHO -- WHO ARE

                    GOING TO SUPPORT THIS RESOLUTION AND I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                    THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE -- OH, I'M SORRY.  MS. MILLER ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. MILLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I JUST WANT

                    TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR INTRODUCING THIS RESOLUTION.  I'M FAIRLY QUIET

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ABOUT IT, BUT I'VE HAD LUPUS FOR MANY YEARS.  BUT LIKE ASSEMBLYMAN

                    THIELE SAID, YOU KNOW, THESE -- THE DOCTORS TOO OFTEN ARE UNAWARE OF ALL

                    THE SYMPTOMS, MISDIAGNOSE OTHER CONDITIONS.  FOR YEARS I WAS

                    MISDIAGNOSED.  IT WASN'T UNTIL I HAD PARACARDIAL EFFUSION, I HAD FLUID

                    AROUND MY HEART AND I WAS HAVING A LOT OF SYMPTOMS.  AND WHEN THEY

                    POINT -- PUT ALL THE PIECES TOGETHER AND DID A FEW MORE TESTS AND FINALLY

                    DIAGNOSED ME WITH LUPUS AND I WAS ABLE TO GET TREATMENT ACCORDINGLY,

                    ACCORDING TO THAT DIAGNOSIS.  AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, HAD THE RIGHT

                    DOCTORS HAD THE RIGHT INFORMATION WE JUST -- WE DESPERATELY DO NEED

                    MORE AWARENESS.  YOU KNOW AT THE TIME WHEN YOU -- WHEN YOU HAVE

                    THESE THINGS GOING ON, ESPECIALLY ME WITH -- WITH MY SON, WITH OLIVER,

                    WITH ALL OF HIS MEDICAL NEEDS, IT WAS, YOU KNOW, EXTREMELY SCARY TO BE

                    DIAGNOSED WITH SOMETHING THAT HAD THE POTENTIAL TO REALLY HURT ME AND

                    TO GET -- YOU KNOW, HAVE TO GET HOSPITALIZED.  ALL OF THAT STUFF IS -- YOU

                    KNOW, IT STOPS PEOPLE IN THEIR TRACKS.  SO IF WE CAN GET SOME MORE

                    AWARENESS AND SOME BETTER FUNDING, IT'S REALLY SOMETHING ONCE

                    DIAGNOSED AND TREATED BETTER, YOU HAVE A GOOD CHANCE FOR A FULL QUALITY

                    LIFE.  I'M CERTAINLY -- I'VE BEEN VERY PRODUCTIVE SINCE I'VE BEEN

                    DIAGNOSED.  YOU KNOW, LOOK -- LOOK AT ME HERE.  SO I THINK, YOU KNOW,

                    IT'S DEFINITELY SOMETHING THAT'S NEEDED AND SO I THANK THE SPONSOR FOR

                    THIS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. BARRON ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. BARRON:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR. SPEAKER.

                    I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR OF THIS RESOLUTION BECAUSE IT AFFECTS SO

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MANY PEOPLE AND IT'S NOT -- THERE'S NOT ENOUGH EDUCATION OR FINANCIAL

                    SUPPORT FOR IT, AND PARTICULARLY IN THE BLACK COMMUNITY.  IT REMINDS ME

                    OF SICKLE CELL ANEMIA, WHICH WAS ANOTHER KIND OF DISEASE THAT WAS

                    PECULIAR TO OUR COMMUNITY.  SO I WANT TO THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR

                    BRINGING ATTENTION TO THIS, AND I WANT TO ENCOURAGE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES

                    TO NOT ONLY SUPPORT THIS RESOLUTION BUT SUPPORT THE EDUCATION OF IT AND

                    THE PROPER FUNDING OF IT AND RESEARCH SO THAT THIS CAN BE PROPERLY DEALT

                    WITH FOR EVERYBODY THAT'S AFFECTED BY IT.

                                 I'LL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 279, MS.

                    ROSENTHAL.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM MAY 2021, AS BE KIND TO ANIMALS --

                    ANIMALS MONTH -- BE KIND TO ANIMALS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW

                    YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 280, MR.

                    CYMBROWITZ.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM MAY 2021, AS STROKE AWARENESS

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 281, MS.

                    MCMAHON.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM MAY 16-23, 2021, AS FAMILY PHYSICIAN

                    WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 282, MS.

                    SEAWRIGHT.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER AS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

                    AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. SEAWRIGHT ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. SEAWRIGHT:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  IT'S

                    MY HONOR TO SPONSOR THIS LEGISLATION TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER AS DOMESTIC

                    VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.  AS CHAIR OF THE

                    TASK FORCE ON WOMEN'S ISSUES, I'M PRIVILEGED TO CALL ATTENTION TO THIS

                    ISSUE THAT PLAGUES COMMUNITIES ACROSS NEW YORK STATE.  DOMESTIC

                    VIOLENCE CAN HAPPEN TO ANYONE.  PEOPLE OF ANY AND EVERY AGE, RACE,

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    GENDER, SEXUAL ORIENTATION, INCOME AND OCCUPATION.  ONE IN FOUR

                    WOMEN AND ONE IN SEVEN MEN OVER THE AGE OF 18 WILL EXPERIENCE

                    SEVERE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THROUGHOUT THEIR LIFETIME.  EVERY 24 PEOPLE --

                    EVERY MINUTE, 24 PEOPLE ARE VICTIMS OF RAPE, PHYSICAL VIOLENCE OR

                    STALKING BY AN INTIMATE PARTNER IN THE UNITED STATES.  SURVIVORS OF THE

                    VIOLENCE WILL EXPERIENCE HEALTH AND MENTAL HEALTH-RELATED

                    CONSEQUENCES.  NEW YORK STATE HAS BEEN A LEADER IN SUPPORTING

                    SURVIVORS.  THE OFFICE OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES REPORTED THAT

                    OVER 53,000 SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THEIR CHILDREN RECEIVED

                    HOUSING SUPPORTS.  PROVIDING FUNDING AND SOCIAL SUPPORT TO SURVIVORS

                    AND CHILDREN PREVENT ADVERSE OUTCOMES LIKE CHRONIC DISEASE, SUBSTANCE

                    ABUSE, DROPPING OUT OF SCHOOL AND EMPLOYMENT AND RELATIONSHIP

                    CHALLENGES.  WE HONOR THE WORK OF THE NEW YORK STATE COALITION

                    AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WORK TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THROUGHOUT

                    THE COMMUNITY OUTREACH, EDUCATION, TRAINING, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND

                    POLICY DEVELOPMENT.  THANK YOU TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, CONNIE

                    NEAL, AND JOAN GERHARDT, POLICY DIRECTOR, ON THEIR SUCCESSFUL LOBBY

                    DAY.  BY PROCLAIMING OCTOBER TO BE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS

                    MONTH, WE ARE AMPLIFYING THE VOICES OF SURVIVORS TO HELP THOSE WHO

                    ARE STILL STRUGGLING TODAY AND MAKING THE PUBLIC AWARE OF THE RESOURCES

                    AVAILABLE TO AID VICTIMS.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I RISE

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    TODAY AS COSPONSOR OF THIS RESOLUTION TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2021 AS

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PREVENTION MONTH.  WE ARE ADOPTING THIS

                    RESOLUTION TODAY IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE NEW YORK STATE COALITION

                    AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE'S ANNUAL LEGISLATIVE DAY OF ACTION.  SINCE

                    1978, NYSCADV HAS WORKED TO PROVIDE SERVICES FOR VICTIMS OF

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND THEIR CHILDREN AROUND THE STATE, INCLUDING

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINES, COMMUNITY OUTREACH PROGRAMS, TRAINING

                    PROGRAMS AND SO MUCH MORE.  NEW YORK STATE HAS ONE OF THE HIGHEST

                    NEEDS FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SERVICES IN THE COUNTRY, AND SINCE THE

                    BEGINNING OF COVID-19 THAT NEED HAS ONLY GROWN AS MANY SURVIVORS

                    HAVE BEEN QUARANTINED AT HOME WITH AN ABUSER.  NATIONWIDE IT IS

                    ESTIMATED THAT ONE IN THREE WOMEN AND ONE AND FOUR MEN HAVE

                    EXPERIENCED PHYSICAL VIOLENCE BY AN INTIMATE PARTNER.  THIS PROBLEM

                    CONTINUES TO GROW, AND IT IS IMPERATIVE THAT WE PROVIDE ROBUST FUNDING

                    AND STRONG POLICY SOLUTIONS TO HELP PROTECT SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC

                    VIOLENCE AND THEIR CHILDREN.  WITH THE PROPER RESOURCES, ORGANIZATIONS

                    CAN CONTINUE THE WORK IN OUR COMMUNITIES AND MAKE CERTAIN THAT

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE DOES NOT CONTINUE TO OCCUR AT THE RAMPANT LEVELS IT IS

                    OCCURRING AT TODAY.

                                 THE WORK OF OUR DV PREVENTION ORGANIZATIONS

                    STATEWIDE CONTINUES TO HELP PEOPLE ESCAPE HARM EACH AND EVERY DAY

                    AND SAVES LIVES.  I COULD NOT BE PROUDER TO WORK WITH NYSCADV AND

                    THE OTHER ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS FIELD AS THE CHAIR OF THE SOCIAL SERVICES

                    COMMITTEE, AND I COMMEND THE CHAIR OF THE WOMEN'S LEGISLATIVE

                    TASK FORCE FOR BRINGING THIS FORWARD.  THANK YOU.

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. KELLES.

                                 MS. KELLES:  I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR OF

                    PRESENTING THIS, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AWARENESS MONTH.  I FELT IT VERY

                    IMPORTANT TO SPEAK TODAY.  AS A PREVIOUS COUNTY LEGISLATOR, I WANTED TO

                    SHARE THE EXPERIENCE THAT I HAD COMING FROM A SMALL COUNTY.  I WAS ON

                    THE CORRECTIONS COMMITTEE, AND VERY EARLY ON IN THE COVID PANDEMIC

                    WE SAW A 30 PERCENT INCREASE IN CASES, 9/11 CASES REPORTED OF DOMESTIC

                    VIOLENCE.  AND I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THIS REALLY BROUGHT TO LIGHT

                    SOMETHING THAT HAS EXISTED, CONTINUES TO EXIST AND IS SOMETHING THAT WE

                    HAVE NOT FULLY ADDRESSED TO THE NEED THAT EXISTS.  SO I JUST WANT TO READ

                    YOU SOME STATISTICS THAT I GOT FROM THIS LAST YEAR.  JUST THIS LAST YEAR IN A

                    ONE-DAY SURVEY -- THIS IS A ONE-DAY SURVEY IN NEW YORK STATE -- 8,313

                    TOTAL VICTIMS WERE SERVED IN ONE 24-HOUR PERIOD.  OVER 4,000 ADULTS

                    AND CHILDREN, VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, FOUND SHELTER IN EMERGENCY

                    SHELTERS.  OVER 4,300 ADULTS AND CHILDREN RECEIVED COUNSELING, LEGAL

                    ADVOCACY AND CHILDREN SUPPORT GROUPS.  OVER 2,100 CONTACTS TO

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE HOTLINES, AND JUST UNDER 2,000 UNMET REQUESTS FOR

                    SERVICES.  WHY DO I BRING THIS UP?  WHY IS THIS SO IMPORTANT?

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WE KNOW CAUSES PERPETUAL DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.  IF

                    WE WANT TO ADDRESS THIS, IF WE WANT TO STOP THIS FROM CONTINUING, THEN

                    WE NEED TO ACKNOWLEDGE THAT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN A HOUSEHOLD IS ONE

                    OF THE PRIMARY, PRIMARY OF THE TEN POINTS -- WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE

                    ACE SCORE -- WE'VE ALL TALKED ABOUT THIS, THE ADOLESCENT ADVERSE

                    CHILDHOOD EXPERIENCES -- THAT HAS THAT HAS BEEN ONE OF THE ESTIMATES

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THAT IS THE MOST HIGHLY CORRELATED WITH THE GREATEST RANGE OF ADVERSE

                    NEGATIVE CONSEQUENCES IN PUBLIC HEALTH.  ONE OF THE MOST PROFOUND

                    WE'VE EVER SEEN.  AND ONE OF THE FACTORS THAT INCREASES YOUR ACE SCORE

                    IS DOMESTIC VIOLENCE MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE.  SO NOT ONLY DO WE

                    KNOW THAT IT CAUSES MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES, THAT IT CAUSES PHYSICAL ISSUES,

                    BUT IT ALSO LEADS TO INCREASED RISK OF PERPETUATION OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

                    THERE'S A SIGNIFICANT INCREASED NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO BECOME

                    PERPETRATORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE WHO THEMSELVES EXPERIENCED

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AS A CHILD.  WE POINT A FINGER AND CALL THEM

                    MONSTERS, BUT THEY STARTED AS A VICTIM.  WE HAVE NOT PUT OUR BEST FOOT

                    FORWARD TO MINIMIZE AND ELIMINATE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN OUR STATE.  SO

                    I JUST WANT TO POINT OUT THAT COVID HAS BROUGHT TO LIGHT THE MAGNITUDE

                    THAT WE HAVE IN OUR COUNTRY, BUT IT HAS NOT STARTED WITH COVID.  WE

                    HAD NOT SOLVED THIS PROBLEM.

                                 SO I JUST WANTED TO BRING THESE NUMBERS TO LIGHT, AND I

                    HOPE THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO FIGHT TO REDUCE THIS TREMENDOUS ILL THAT

                    WE HAVE IN OUR STATE AND OUR COUNTRY AND ALL ACROSS THE WORLD.  THANK

                    YOU SO MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.

                                 PAGE 16, CALENDAR NO. 175 -- LET ME REMIND THE

                    HOUSE, EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE NOT THAT MANY OF US IN THE HOUSE, WE STILL

                    DO NOT WANT YOU TALKING WHILE PEOPLE ARE SPEAKING.  IT DISTURBS THE

                    SPEAKER, AND WE ALSO -- IT DOESN'T ALLOW US TO HEAR WHAT THEY'RE SAYING

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    AND CONCENTRATE ON.  SO EVEN THOUGH THERE ARE A FEW OF US, THE REALITY IS

                    IS THAT THE LESS WE HEAR, THE MORE OUR VOICES CARRY.  PLEASE BE MINDFUL

                    AND RESPECTFUL FOR YOUR FELLOW MEMBERS AS THEY EITHER EXPLAIN THEIR

                    VOTE OR DEBATE OR ON THE BILL.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05765-B, CALENDAR

                    NO. 175, PRETLOW.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PARI-MUTUEL WAGERING AND

                    BREEDING LAW, IN RELATION TO HEALTH INSURANCE FOR NEW YORK TRAINERS AT

                    FRANCHISED CORPORATION RACETRACKS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 5765-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 FIRST VOTE OF THE DAY, MEMBERS.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 23, CALENDAR NO. 279, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07120-A, CALENDAR

                    NO. 279, JACKSON.  AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 352 OF THE LAWS OF 2005,

                    AMENDING THE EDUCATION LAW RELATING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2004; TO

                    AMEND CHAPTER 430 OF THE LAWS OF 2006, AMENDING THE EDUCATION LAW

                    RELATING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES

                    EDUCATION IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2004; AND TO AMEND CHAPTER 378 OF THE

                    LAWS OF 2007, AMENDING THE EDUCATION LAW RELATING TO THE

                    IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FEDERAL INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES EDUCATION

                    IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 2004, IN RELATION TO THE EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 7120-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 MS. JACKSON, YOU HAVE JUST PASSED YOUR FIRST VOTE.

                    HIGHLIGHT OF THE YEAR, MAYBE THE CAREER.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 PAGE 24, CALENDAR NO. 285.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. A00517, CALENDAR NO.

                    285, SENATOR GIANARIS (A00502, CARROLL, CAHILL, ENGLEBRIGHT,

                    JACOBSON, LUPARDO, ANDERSON, JACKSON, GALEF, MITAYNES,

                    L. ROSENTHAL, BURDICK, OTIS).  CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ASSEMBLY PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 5 OF ARTICLE II OF THE

                    CONSTITUTION, IN RELATION TO THE TEN-DAY ADVANCE REGISTRATION

                    REQUIREMENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. CARROLL.

                                 MR. CARROLL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS IS A

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TO STRIKE THE TEN-DAY REQUIREMENT OF BEFORE

                    -- THAT THERE BE AT LEAST TEN DAYS -- YOU MUST GIVE AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR

                    TO NOTICE TO CHANGE -- TO REGISTER TO VOTE IN THE STATE CONSTITUTION.  WE

                    PASSED THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN 2019.  WE ARE PASSING IT

                    AGAIN SO THAT IT CAN BE PUT BEFORE THE VOTERS IN NOVEMBER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RA.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. CARROLL, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  YES, AND I'LL TRY TO BE --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. CARROLL YIELDS.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MR. CARROLL.  SO AS YOU

                    MENTIONED, WE PASSED THIS -- OR WE DID FIRST PASSAGE OF THIS AMENDMENT

                    A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO -- FOR MY COLLEAGUES PARTICULARLY WHO WEREN'T

                    HERE -- AND NOW WE WILL DO SECOND PASSAGE AND THEN THIS WOULD GO TO

                    THE VOTERS.  BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE OFTEN LOOK AT WHEN WE DO

                    SECOND PASSAGE OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IS, YOU KNOW, THE THINGS

                    THAT AREN'T IN THE DETAIL OF THE CONSTITUTION.  WE TALKED ABOUT TWO YEARS

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    AGO PERHAPS WHAT THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK MIGHT BE FOR THIS, AND -- AND

                    I KNOW AT THE TIME WE SAID, OKAY THAT -- THAT'S MORE OF AN

                    IMPLEMENTATION ISSUE THAN A CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUE.  BUT I'M JUST

                    WONDERING IF YOU COULD PROVIDE ANY -- OR GIVE -- ARE OTHER BILLS

                    INTRODUCED THAT MIGHT CREATE THE STATUTORY FRAMEWORK FOR THIS GOING

                    FORWARD ONCE IT'S ADOPTED?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  I BELIEVE THERE ARE A NUMBER OF

                    BILLS THAT WOULD BE INTRODUCED TO CREATE ENACTING LEGISLATION SO THAT

                    NEW YORKERS COULD REGISTER PRIOR TO TEN DAYS BEFORE AN ELECTION.  BUT

                    THERE IS NO SPECIFIC BILL FOR ENACTING LEGISLATION THAT WOULD SAY WOULD IT

                    BE SAME DAY REGISTRATION, WOULD IT BE TEN DAYS, WOULD IT BE SEVEN DAYS.

                    I DON'T BELIEVE THAT LEGISLATION EXISTS CURRENTLY.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  SO -- SO JUST FOR, YOU KNOW, FOR

                    CLARIFICATION.  YOU KNOW, AS YOU SAID, THIS JUST STRIKES THE TEN DAYS.  A

                    VERY SIMPLE, I THINK, CHANGE IN WHAT IT DOES.  AND, YOU KNOW, FOR MY

                    COLLEAGUES WHO MAYBE WEREN'T HERE LAST TIME, WE DEBATED THIS.  THINGS

                    LIKE, YOU KNOW, WHAT THE PROCEDURES WOULD BE.  WOULD YOU GO TO THE

                    BOARD OF ELECTIONS?  WOULD YOU GO TO YOUR LOCAL POLLING PLACE?  WHAT

                    TYPE OF VERIFICATION MIGHT -- MIGHT BE REQUIRED?  YOU KNOW, WHETHER

                    IT'S IDENTIFICATION, WHETHER IT'S PROVIDING, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE

                    INFORMATION WE CURRENTLY PROVIDE WHEN WE REGISTER, WHICH IS PART OF --

                    A SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OR -- OR A DRIVER'S ID AND ALL OF THAT TYPE OF

                    STUFF.  OR EVEN PERHAPS THE FORM AND FORMAT IN WHICH YOU WOULD VOTE,

                    WHETHER IT MIGHT BE A -- ON A MACHINE OR WHETHER IT MIGHT BE IN AN

                    AFFIDAVIT OR PROVISIONAL BALLOT FORM WOULD ONLY BE SOMETHING THAT

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WOULD BE DONE OUTSIDE OF THIS AMENDMENT BUT BE DONE BY -- BY

                    LEGISLATION, CORRECT?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  YES.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 THE LAST THING, HAVE WE MADE ANY CHANGES SINCE THIS

                    TIME IN TERMS OF REGISTRATION?  I KNOW, YOU KNOW, IT SAYS WE HAVE TEN

                    DAYS IN THE CONSTITUTION THAT WE'RE STRIKING, BUT THERE'S ALSO -- I GUESS

                    BY STATUTE WE'VE HAD FOR YEARS A 25-DAY REQUIREMENT.  IS THAT TO YOUR

                    KNOWLEDGE STILL THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT THAT WE HAVE IN NEW YORK

                    STATE?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  I BELIEVE THE STATUTORY REQUIREMENT

                    IS 25 DAYS.  I BELIEVE YOU'RE CORRECT.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MR. CARROLL.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU.  SO, YOU KNOW, AS I MENTIONED

                    WHEN WE DISCUSSED THIS BILL A COUPLE YEARS AGO, ONE OF THE ISSUES THAT

                    WE BROUGHT UP WAS HOW EXACTLY ARE WE GOING TO DO THIS.  NOW, I KNOW

                    THERE ARE STATES THAT -- THAT HAVE DONE THIS, BUT ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I

                    THINK GIVES ME PAUSE AND GIVES MANY -- MANY OF US ON OUR SIDE OF THE

                    AISLE PAUSE ON THIS IS THAT WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT STATUTORY FRAMEWORK

                    LOOKS LIKE.  YOU KNOW, THESE THINGS MAY BE, YOU KNOW, CLERICAL AND

                    PROCEDURAL THINGS THAT HAVE TO HAPPEN, BUT THEY DO HAVE TO HAPPEN.

                    AND AS MANY OF US KNOW, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A SYSTEM WHERE THERE ARE

                    SO MANY OVERLAPPING OFFICES, BUT WE HAVE, YOU KNOW, COUNTIES THAT

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MAY HAVE -- ESPECIALLY THE LARGER COUNTIES -- THEY MAY HAVE TEN, 12 OR

                    MORE ASSEMBLYMEMBERS.  THEY MAY HAVE, YOU KNOW, FOUR OR FIVE

                    STATE SENATORS.  THEY MAY HAVE SEVERAL DIFFERENT COUNTY LEGISLATORS OR

                    TOWN MEMBERS.  OR IN SOME PARTS OF THE STATE WHERE THERE'S, YOU KNOW,

                    FIRE DISTRICTS AND ALL KINDS OF DIFFERENT ELECTIONS THAT TAKE PLACE ON

                    ELECTION DAY.  SO I THINK AND I HOPE THAT WE CAN UTILIZE SOME OF THE

                    TECHNOLOGY THAT'S COME ABOUT OVER THE PAST COUPLE OF YEARS.  ONE THING

                    THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN WHEN WE DID THIS LAST TIME, WE'VE NOW SEEN A

                    COUPLE OF YEARS OF THE SUCCESSFUL IMPLEMENTATION OF EARLY VOTING.  AND

                    ONE OF THE, YOU KNOW, JUST REALLY PROCEDURAL THINGS WE NEEDED WAS THE

                    ABILITY TO PRINT THE BALLOT.  TO BE ABLE -- RATHER THAN HAVING PERHAPS

                    HUNDREDS OF DIFFERENT BALLOTS AT EVERY SITE, THE ABILITY TO PRINT ON -- ON

                    DEMAND A BALLOT THAT CORRESPONDED TO SOMEBODY'S PROPER, YOU KNOW,

                    LEGISLATIVE DISTRICT OR ASSEMBLY DISTRICT SO THAT THEY WERE VOTING FOR

                    THE PROPER OFFICES SO THAT THEY COULD GO TO ANY ONE -- LIKE, I KNOW IN

                    MY COUNTY -- AND I KNOW THIS ISN'T NECESSARILY THE CASE EVERYWHERE --

                    BUT IN MY COUNTY YOU COULD GO TO ANY ONE OF THESE EARLY VOTING SITES

                    AND THEY LOOK UP YOUR INFORMATION, FIND YOUR REGISTRATION AND PRINT YOU

                    OUT THE BALLOT.  SO EVEN IF YOU WERE, YOU KNOW, CLOSER TO WHERE YOU

                    WORK THAN WHERE YOU LIVE, YOU COULD GET THE PROPER BALLOT THAT HAD THE

                    PROPER DISTRICTS.  SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT I HOPE THAT AS THIS -- IF IT

                    GOES OUT ON THE REFERENDUM, THE PUBLIC APPROVES IT, THAT WE NEED TO DO

                    IN IMPLEMENTING THIS IS MAKE SURE THAT WE DO GIVE PROPER PROCEDURES

                    AND ABILITY FOR OUR BOARDS OF ELECTIONS TO VERIFY AN INDIVIDUAL WHEN

                    THEY COME IN TO REGISTER.  I MEAN, I WOULD'VE RATHER SEEN US PERHAPS

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MAKE THE STATUTORY CHANGE THAT -- THE CURRENT CONSTITUTION WOULD HAVE

                    ALLOWED US TO GO FROM 25 TO TEN DAYS, WHICH I THINK STILL WOULD HAVE

                    WENT INTO OUR EARLY VOTING PERIOD THAT WE HAVE NOW, BUT IT WOULD HAVE

                    GIVEN A LITTLE BIT MORE TIME FOR THE BOARDS OF ELECTIONS TO MAKE A

                    VERIFICATION.  BECAUSE DON'T FORGET, WHEN SOMEBODY NOW REGISTERS, YOU

                    KNOW, THERE'S -- THERE'S THE CARDS THAT GET MAILED OUT, THERE'S DIFFERENT

                    CHECKS AND ABILITY TO -- TO LOOK UP AN INDIVIDUAL.  AND THANKFULLY,

                    TECHNOLOGY IS MAKING THIS A LITTLE SIMPLER AND I HOPE THAT WILL CONTINUE

                    TO.  BUT WE NEED TO KEEP THAT IN MIND AS WE'RE IMPLEMENTING THIS.

                    HOW DO WE ENSURE THAT AN INDIVIDUAL WHO COMES IN NOT ONLY IS

                    PROPERLY, YOU KNOW, QUALIFIED TO VOTE IN TERMS OF CITIZENSHIP AND

                    THINGS LIKE THAT, BUT ALSO THAT THEY'RE GIVEN THE BALLOT FOR THE -- FOR THE

                    PROPER DISTRICT BECAUSE WE HAVE SO MANY DIFFERENT LAYERS OF

                    GOVERNMENT AND DIFFERENT -- DIFFERENT BALLOT FORMS THAT WE HAVE IN EACH

                    AND EVERY ONE OF OUR COUNTIES.  AND I HAD HOPED THAT WHEN WE WERE

                    VOTING ON THIS A SECOND TIME THAT WE WOULD HAVE A LITTLE BIT CLEARER OF A

                    PICTURE, BECAUSE ONE OF THE THINGS WE ALL KNOW, YOU KNOW, WE SAW LAST

                    YEAR WITH COUNTING ABSENTEE BALLOTS, AND WE HAD A CONGRESSIONAL RACE

                    IN THIS STATE THAT WASN'T DECIDED UNTIL FEBRUARY.  THIS COULD POTENTIALLY

                    BE MORE BALLOTS THAT NEED TO BE VERIFIED AFTER THE FACT.  SO WE NEED TO

                    BOTH ENSURE THAT THERE'S ADEQUATE TIME TO VERIFY AND THEN COUNT THOSE

                    BALLOTS AT OUR BOARDS OF ELECTIONS.  AND WE'VE DONE AN UNPRECEDENTED

                    AMOUNT OF CHANGES TO OUR ELECTION LAWS IN THE LAST THREE YEARS.  SO I

                    HOPE AS WE MOVE FORWARD THAT WE MAKE SURE WE PUT THE STATUTORY

                    FRAMEWORK IN PLACE SO THAT THOSE NEEDED VERIFICATIONS CAN HAPPEN, BUT

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THAT WE ALSO CONTINUE TO PROVIDE FUNDING TO OUR -- OUR LOCAL

                    GOVERNMENTS BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE -- THEY'RE DEALING WITH

                    IMPLEMENTING ALL OF THESE DIFFERENT CHANGES THAT HAVE COME ABOUT IN --

                    IN RECENT YEARS.  AND I THINK THEY'RE GOING TO BE TASKED WITH DOING EVEN

                    MORE AS WE'RE NOW LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, SPEEDING UP THE COUNTING OF

                    -- OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS AND PERHAPS STARTING TO COUNT THEM EARLIER ON

                    ELECTION DAY AND ALL THESE DIFFERENT THINGS.  THAT WOULD BE SOMETHING

                    THAT WOULD BE HAPPENING ON ELECTION DAY.  YOU KNOW, THEY'RE --  IF

                    THEY'RE COUNTING ABSENTEE BALLOTS, THEN THEY'RE ALSO GOING TO HAVE

                    STAFFING NEEDS TO BE VERIFYING THAT SOMEBODY WHO WALKS INTO A POLLING

                    PLACE, PERHAPS, OR INTO THEIR BOARD OF ELECTION OFFICES FOR THE FIRST TIME

                    TO REGISTER THAT THEY CAN MAKE NEEDED VERIFICATIONS THERE.

                                 SO I HOPE THAT -- THAT STATUTORY FRAMEWORK TAKES ALL OF

                    THIS INTO ACCOUNT, BUT WITHOUT HAVING THAT CLEAR PICTURE, I AM -- I'M NOT

                    COMFORTABLE VOTING IN THE FAVOR -- IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION

                    AND I'LL BE CASTING MY VOTE IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER BURDICK:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    RA.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER BURDICK:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 517.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, ONE OF OUR

                    COLLEAGUES HAS HIS LIGHT ON.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER BURDICK:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  IT DIDN'T SHOW UP HERE,

                    BUT HE'S GOT IT ON, SO IF YOU'LL ALLOW HIM TO SPEAK ON THE BILL, PLEASE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER BURDICK:  I'M SORRY, MR.

                    LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  YES.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU.  CURRENTLY HOW MANY

                    DAYS PRIOR TO ELECTION DAY DOES SOMEBODY HAVE TO REGISTER IN ORDER TO

                    BE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  TWENTY-FIVE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO THIS BILL, THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WOULD NOT CHANGE THAT, IT JUST WOULD ALLOW

                    IT TO COME CLOSER TO ELECTION DAY, POTENTIALLY, CORRECT?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO IF SOMEBODY REGISTERS ON

                    ELECTION DAY, HOW WOULD THEY BE VOTING?  WOULD THEY BE VOTING ON

                    THE MACHINE?  WOULD THEY BE VOTING BY ABSENTEE?  WOULD THEY BE

                    VOTING BY AFFIDAVIT?  WHAT IS THE MECHANISM BY WHICH THEY MIGHT

                    VOTE?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  WELL, CURRENT LAW, THEY WOULD NOT

                    BE ABLE TO VOTE BECAUSE YOU MUST REGISTER 25 DAYS PRIOR TO THE ELECTION.

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    IF WE PASS THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT TODAY AND THE VOTERS OF THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK AFFIRM THAT, THEY STILL WON'T BE ABLE TO VOTE ON

                    ELECTION DAY.  IF WE DECIDE TO DRAFT A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT THEN

                    CHANGES THE LAW TO MEET THE NEW CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, BE IT

                    SAME-DAY REGISTRATION OR WE PICK SOME OTHER DAY, WELL, THEN WE CAN

                    HAVE THAT DISCUSSION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  GENERALLY SPEAKING, HOW DO YOU

                    VERIFY IF SOMEONE IS LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO VOTE?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  THERE ARE MANY DIFFERENT WAYS THAT

                    THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS VERIFIES IF SOMEONE IS LEGALLY ALLOWED TO VOTE,

                    BE IT THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER, BE IT A DRIVER'S LICENSE OR SOME

                    OTHER VERIFICATION THAT THEY USE WHEN A PERSON REGISTERS.  AND THERE ARE

                    49 OTHER STATES IN THE UNION THAT ALSO VERIFY INDIVIDUALS' ELIGIBILITY TO

                    VOTE, AND SOME OF THOSE STATES ARE ABLE TO DO IT ON THE SAME DAY OR

                    WITHIN A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME BEFORE THE ELECTION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO, WE HAVE BILLS BEFORE THIS HOUSE

                    THAT ARE INTENDING TO EXPEDITE THE COUNTING PROCESS OF BALLOTS, THAT ARE

                    INTENDING TO COUNT ABSENTEE BALLOTS, FOR INSTANCE, ON ELECTION DAY, THAT

                    ARE INTENDING TO ENSURE THAT EARLY VOTING IS ALL COUNTED ON ELECTION

                    DAY.  IF SOMEBODY ENDS UP REGISTERING TO VOTE ON THE SAME DAY, DO YOU

                    THINK THERE SHOULD BE A -- A MECHANISM BY WHICH WE CAN VERIFY THAT

                    THAT PERSON WAS, IN FACT, ABLE TO -- TO VOTE OR SHOULD IT BE COUNTED ON

                    THE SAME DAY?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  WHAT I DO OR DON'T THINK ISN'T

                    GERMANE TO THIS AMENDMENT.

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. LAWLER:  WELL, I DISAGREE BECAUSE THIS BILL IS

                    OPENING THE DOOR FOR THE SAME-DAY VOTING AND REGISTRATION.

                                 MR. CARROLL:  THIS AMENDMENT PURELY STRIKES THE

                    REQUIREMENT THAT YOU MUST REGISTER TEN -- AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO AN

                    ELECTION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  RIGHT.  WHICH --

                                 MR. CARROLL:  WE'RE ASKING (INAUDIBLE) --

                                 MR. LAWLER:  WHICH MEANS IT DOES NOT PROHIBIT

                    FOR THE FUTURE THIS BODY COMING AND CHANGING THE LAW, CORRECT?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  SURE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  RIGHT.  SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS, DO

                    YOU THINK THAT YOU SHOULD BE ALLOWED -- THIS IS YOUR BILL.  YOU'RE --

                    YOU'RE OPENING THE DOOR FOR SAME-DAY REGISTRATION.  SO THE QUESTION IS,

                    DO YOU THINK THAT SOMEBODY SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO VOTE ON THE MACHINE

                    ON THE SAME DAY THAT THEY REGISTER?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  WHAT I THINK IS NOT GERMANE TO THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.  THE ONLY THING THAT IS GERMANE TO THIS

                    DEBATE IS WHETHER OR NOT THIS BODY BELIEVES WE SHOULD STRIKE THE PART

                    OF THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION THAT SAYS YOU MUST REGISTER TO VOTE

                    AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO AN ELECTION.  AND TO THAT QUESTION I WOULD SAY

                    YES, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD HAVE A REQUIREMENT IN OUR

                    CONSTITUTION THAT SAYS YOU MUST REGISTER TO VOTE AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR

                    TO AN ELECTION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  WHY DO YOU THINK WE SHOULD NOT

                    HAVE A CONSTITUTIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT YOU REGISTER AT LEAST TEN DAYS

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    PRIOR?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT NEW YORK

                    STATE, LIKE MANY OTHER STATES IN OUR COUNTRY, SHOULD MAKE IT AS EASY AS

                    POSSIBLE FOR ELIGIBLE VOTERS TO REGISTER TO VOTE AND TO BE ABLE TO VOTE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO YOU BELIEVE, ULTIMATELY, THAT WE

                    SHOULD POTENTIALLY HAVE SAME-DAY REGISTRATION AS ELECTION DAY,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  AGAIN, THAT IS NOT GERMANE TO THIS

                    DEBATE BECAUSE THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE DISCUSSING.  WE'RE DISCUSSING

                    WHETHER OR NOT THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION SHOULD PUT AN

                    IMPEDIMENT BEFORE THIS LEGISLATURE TO WHETHER OR NOT WE DECIDE HOW

                    LONG IT SHOULD -- HOW LONG ONE MUST WAIT -- OR HOW LONG ONE MUST

                    REGISTER PRIOR TO AN ELECTION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  DO WE CURRENTLY HAVE LAWS THAT

                    PROHIBIT SOMEBODY FROM REQUESTING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT WITHIN TEN DAYS

                    OF AN ELECTION?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  I BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF

                    REQUIREMENTS TO HOW ONE IS SUPPOSED TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT,

                    WHEN AND FOR WHAT CAUSE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  IN FACT, WE -- WE ACTUALLY EXPANDED

                    THE TIME FRAME THIS YEAR IN THIS BODY.

                                 MR. CARROLL:  I BELIEVE WE DID.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO IF IT WAS OKAY IN TERMS OF

                    REQUESTING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT, WHY WOULD HAVING A TIME FRAME IN TERMS

                    OF REGISTERING TO VOTE BE A PROBLEM?

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. CARROLL:  I DIDN'T SAY THAT.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  WELL, YOU'RE SAYING THERE SHOULD BE

                    NO IMPEDIMENT.  WHY SHOULD THERE BE NO IMPEDIMENT?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  I SAID THAT WE ARE -- WHAT THIS

                    AMENDMENT DOES IS IT STRIKES IN THE NEW YORK CONSTITUTION THE CLAUSE

                    THAT SAYS ONE MUST REGISTER TO VOTE AT LEAST TEN DAYS PRIOR TO AN ELECTION.

                    AND SO, YES, I DO BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD STRIKE THAT CLAUSE AND WE

                    SHOULD, LIKE MANY OTHER STATES IN OUR NATION, FIGURE OUT A WAY TO ALLOW

                    PEOPLE TO REGISTER TO VOTE AS EASILY AS POSSIBLE WITH AS FEW

                    IMPEDIMENTS AS POSSIBLE.  HOWEVER, THAT IS NOT BEFORE US TODAY.  THAT

                    WILL BE DECIDED BY FUTURE LEGISLATURES WHEN THEY CREATE ENACTING

                    LEGISLATION.  AND I AM SURE THAT WHOEVER IS THE SPONSOR OF THAT BILL

                    WOULD BE HAPPY TO DEBATE YOU ON THE MERITS OF THAT BILL.  BUT OF COURSE

                    THAT BILL DIDN'T EXIST SO IT'S VERY HARD FOR ME TO DEBATE YOU ON THE MERITS

                    OF A BILL THAT IS COMPLETELY THEORETICAL.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  WOULD THIS -- IF WE DID NOT PASS

                    YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, WOULD IT PREVENT SAME-DAY VOTER

                    REGISTRATION IF WE DID NOT PASS YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT?

                                 MR. CARROLL:  CURRENTLY, THE STATE CONSTITUTION

                    DOES NOT ALLOW FOR SAME-DAY REGISTRATION.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  VERY CLEARLY, DESPITE THE ATTEMPTS BY

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MY COLLEAGUE NOT TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS, THIS IS NOTHING MORE THAN AN

                    ATTEMPT TO ALLOW FOR SAME-DAY VOTER REGISTRATION.  IT IS THERE TO OPEN THE

                    DOOR SO THAT PEOPLE CAN SHOW UP AT THE POLLS AND VOTE.  AND NOT

                    NECESSARILY THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OR THE STATE OF NEW YORK KNOW

                    WHETHER OR NOT THEY ARE LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO VOTE.  AND THIS SESSION

                    ALREADY EXTENDED THE WINDOW TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT TO 15 DAYS.

                    WHY?  BECAUSE WE SAW LAST YEAR THE DISASTER THAT OCCURS WHEN YOU

                    HAVE MASS APPLICATIONS COMING THROUGH TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT.

                    THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS NEEDS TIME TO VERIFY THAT THE APPLICATION ITSELF

                    IS VALID AND IS LEGITIMATE.  THAT SHOULD BE SOMETHING WE ALL EMBRACE.  I

                    DON'T KNOW WHY WE WOULD WANT TO LIFT A TEN-DAY REQUIREMENT TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT SOMEBODY WHO APPLIES FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE IN THE STATE

                    OF NEW YORK, WHY WE WOULDN'T WANT TO GIVE THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS

                    THE TIME TO ENSURE THAT THAT PERSON IS LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO VOTE.  IT REALLY

                    IS NOT AN OBSTRUCTION TO SOMEBODY'S ABILITY TO VOTE.  YOU NEED TO LIVE

                    WITHIN THE STATE FOR A CERTAIN NUMBER OF DAYS TO BE A RESIDENT OF THE

                    STATE, SO IT WOULD SEEM THAT IT WOULD MAKE SENSE TO ENSURE THAT

                    SOMEBODY IS LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO VOTE.  TEN DAYS IS NOT AN IMPEDIMENT TO

                    THAT.  AND ANY SUGGESTION TO -- TO OTHERWISE IS A RED HERRING.  THIS BILL

                    IS VERY CLEARLY DESIGNED TO ENSURE THAT ANYONE AND EVERYONE WHO WANTS

                    TO VOTE IN OUR ELECTIONS, WHETHER THEY'RE ELIGIBLE OR NOT, WILL HAVE THE

                    OPPORTUNITY TO DO SO.

                                 SO I CANNOT IN GOOD CONSCIENCE SUPPORT THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH.

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO I WAS -- WE'RE -- WE'RE TAKING UP A

                    PACKAGE OF DIFFERENT VOTING MEASURES TODAY, AND I WAS THINKING ABOUT

                    HIGH SCHOOL SCIENCE CLASS.  WHAT'S THE FIRST THING THAT WE LEARNED WHEN

                    WE'RE DOING AN EXPERIMENT?  YOU HAVE TO CONTROL YOUR VARIABLES, RIGHT?

                    YOU GOT TO -- YOU'VE GOT TO MAYBE CHANGE ONE THING AT A TIME,

                    OTHERWISE YOUR WHOLE EXPERIMENT IS JUST NOT GOING TO BE VALID.  AND I

                    JUST THINK ABOUT THAT WHEN IT COMES TO ALL OF THE DIFFERENT VARIOUS

                    THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS.  AS MY COLLEAGUE SAID,

                    OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS WE'VE MADE A LOT OF CHANGES -- SOME

                    COVID-RELATED, SOME NOT -- IN THE WAY THAT PEOPLE ARE -- ARE VOTING.

                    AND I JUST THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, EARLY VOTING, WHICH HONESTLY, I WAS

                    KIND OF PLEASANTLY SURPRISED WITH HOW THAT HAS GONE, HOW IT WENT LAST

                    YEAR.  THE LINES WERE PRETTY LONG UP IN MY DISTRICT.  SOMETIMES A

                    COUPLE OF HOURS LONG.  AND IT WAS KIND OF IRONIC BECAUSE WHEN

                    ELECTION DAY FINALLY ROLLED AROUND, YOU COULD WALK RIGHT IN AND VOTE.

                    IT SEEMED LIKE ALL THE LINES REALLY HAPPENED IN ADVANCE.  BUT IT RAN MORE

                    SMOOTHLY THAN I THOUGHT IT WOULD.  THE NO-EXCUSE ABSENTEE VOTING BILL

                    WE'LL BE TAKING UP LATER.  THAT'S ANOTHER VARIABLE.  THIS SAME-DAY --

                    EFFECTIVELY ALLOWING SAME-DAY VOTER REGISTRATION THAT WE'RE TALKING

                    ABOUT RIGHT NOW.  I THINK THROWING OUT ALL OF THIS STUFF AT ONCE IN THE

                    NAME OF ENCOURAGING PEOPLE TO GO OUT TO VOTE, IT MIGHT BE JUST TOO

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MUCH.  I THINK THAT -- I THINK THAT THERE'S A REAL BALANCE THAT WE'RE TRYING

                    TO ACHIEVE HERE.  IT'S A DELICATE BALANCE, RIGHT?  WE WANT TO TRY TO

                    ENCOURAGE OR FACILITATE GOOD VOTER TURNOUT, BUT WE ALSO HAVE TO TAKE A

                    LOOK, AS ANOTHER ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES HAS STATED, TAKE A LOOK AT A

                    CAUTIONARY TALE, THE CONGRESSIONAL RACE IN THE MIDDLE PART OF OUR STATE

                    LAST YEAR WHERE, YOU KNOW, IT CAME DOWN TO 109 VOTES BETWEEN THE

                    TWO, AND THE DECISION WASN'T MADE UNTIL I THINK AROUND, YOU KNOW,

                    EARLY FEBRUARY BEFORE WE EVEN HAD ANYBODY IN THAT SEAT.  WE HAVE TO

                    TAKE A LOOK AT THE BROADER LANDSCAPE WHERE RACES ARE GETTING CLOSER AND

                    CLOSER.  WE'RE VERY -- ALMOST EVENLY DIVIDED.  MAYBE NOT IN ENROLLMENT

                    IN OUR STATE, BUT IN SOME OF THESE RACES WE'RE COMING DOWN TO JUST A

                    HANDFUL OF VOTES, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GET DOWN TO SOME OF OUR MORE

                    LOCAL RACES.  I HAVE THE -- THE DISTINCT PLEASURE - AND I USE THAT TERM

                    VERY, VERY LOOSELY - OF HAVING BEEN IN A -- IN A THREE-WAY TIE ONE TIME

                    FOR WHEN I WAS RUNNING FOR TOWN GOVERNMENT ON A -- ON A MINOR PARTY

                    LINE.  A TIE.  IT WAS MISERABLE.  IN-PERSON VOTING SHOULD ALWAYS BE

                    PREFERRED, AND WE DO NEED TIMELY CERTIFICATIONS OF WINNERS.  IT'S

                    IMPORTANT TO OUR PROCESS.  IT'S IMPORTANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE

                    PEOPLE WHO KNOW THAT THEY'RE WINNING, THAT THEY'RE READY TO ASSUME THE

                    DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THEIR OFFICE.  WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT

                    WE'RE GOING TO HAVE ADEQUATE FUNDING AND STAFFING TO BE ABLE TO WORK

                    WHATEVER PROGRAMS WE HAVE IN PLACE.  SO I JUST FEEL, OVERALL, THAT, YOU

                    KNOW, WE NEED TO -- WE NEED TO SHOW -- EXERCISE SOME CAUTION, I THINK,

                    IN THE WAY THAT WE MOVE FORWARD.  OF COURSE WE WANT PEOPLE TO COME

                    OUT AND VOTE.  IT IS REALLY ONE OF THE ONLY THINGS THAT WE ASK THE PEOPLE

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    OF OUR STATE TO DO.  IT'S ONE OF THE MOST FUNDAMENTAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF

                    PEOPLE WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE.  WE WANT THEM TO COME OUT AND VOTE.

                    WE EXPECT IT AS A -- AS A BASIC MATTER OF CITIZENSHIP.  AND, YOU KNOW, I

                    JUST THINK THAT IF WE JUST ALLOW TOO MANY OF THESE VARIABLES TO GO

                    THROUGH AT ONCE I THINK WE COULD END UP REALLY MESSING THE WHOLE

                    THING UP.

                                 SO, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 517.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS AMENDMENT.  THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    PIECE OF LEGISLATION, THIS VERY WELL-DONE PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  HOWEVER,

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    COLLEAGUES DECIDING TO BE AN EXCEPTION SHOULD FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE WILL BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO PROPERLY

                    RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL TO

                    EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  JUST THIS YEAR WE

                    WITNESSED ONE OF THE EMBARRASSING SITUATIONS WHERE NEW YORK STATE

                    WAS ONE OF THE LAST STATES IN THE ENTIRE NATION TO CERTIFY A CONGRESSIONAL

                    ELECTION.  IT WENT BEYOND THREE MONTHS.  AND AMONGST THE ISSUES THAT

                    THE PARTIES WERE LITIGATING EXTENSIVELY IS THE DIFFICULTY OF IMPLEMENTING

                    AUTOMATIC VOTER REGISTRATION AND THEN MAKING SURE THAT THE VOTER ROLES

                    ARE UPDATED AND EVERYONE HAS AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE.  WE ALL WANT AS

                    MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE TO VOTE.  IT'S AN IMPORTANT CIVIC RESPONSIBILITY.

                    BUT AT THE SAME TIME WE ALSO WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERY VOTER

                    REGISTRATION IS PROPERLY PROCESSED, THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE SUBMITTING

                    THE REGISTRATION ARE PROPERLY AUTHORIZED AND QUALIFIED TO VOTE IN AN

                    ELECTION.  AND THOSE ARE NOT ALWAYS EASY ISSUES, WHETHER IN A PRIMARY

                    OR IN A GENERAL ELECTION.  AND I HAD CASES THAT I'VE TAKEN ALL THE WAY TO

                    THE COURT OF APPEALS, CHALLENGING THE VALIDITY OF VOTERS WHO HAD

                    MOVED TO A DIFFERENT COUNTY AND WHOSE VOTE COULD HAVE DECIDED AN

                    ELECTION THAT DECIDED WHICH PARTY CONTROLLED THE ENTIRE COUNTY

                    LEGISLATURE.  SO WE HAVE AUTOMATIC VOTER REGISTRATION.  THAT'S AN ISSUE.

                    WE HAVE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION.  THAT TAKES TIME.  WE USED TO LOOK AT,

                    AND STILL DO, SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBERS AND DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBERS, BUT

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WE NOW ISSUE DRIVER'S LICENSE NUMBERS TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS OR THOSE

                    WHO ARE UNDOCUMENTED THAT ARE NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE.  WE HAVE MULTIPLE

                    BALLOT FORMATS BECAUSE IN EVERY GENERAL ELECTION -- THERE'S LITERALLY IN

                    MY DISTRICT 50 TO 75 DIFFERENT BALLOT FORMATS, DEPENDING ON WHICH LOCAL

                    GOVERNMENT YOU'RE IN.  AND WHEN YOU ALLOW FOR SAME-DAY REGISTRATION

                    THAT MEANS THOSE WHO ARE VOTING ARE PROBABLY NOT ON ANY DATABASE THAT

                    WE WOULD USE TO HELP MAKE SURE THE VOTERS ARE EDUCATED OVER THE

                    ISSUES BY MAILERS AND OTHER CONTACT FORMS.  SO THERE'S A LOT OF ISSUES.

                    AND AS MY COLLEAGUE POINTED OUT, UNDER CURRENT CONSTITUTIONAL

                    PROVISIONS IF WE WANT, WE COULD MOVE IT UP TO TEN DAYS, THEN THAT WAY

                    A CONGRESSIONAL ELECTION INSTEAD OF TAKING THREE MONTHS MIGHT TAKE

                    FOUR.  BUT WE COULD TRY IT.

                                 FOR THESE REASONS I WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING IT.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I WANT

                    TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR BRINGING THIS IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT FORWARD.  YOU KNOW, THE CONSTITUTION IS ONLY A BLUEPRINT.

                    IT DOESN'T TELL US HOW THE STATE IS RUN EVERY DAY.  THAT'S WHY WE'RE HERE.

                    WE PASS LAWS ALL THE TIME TO CARRY OUT THE MANDATE OF THE NEW YORK

                    STATE CONSTITUTION.  AND I -- I REALLY DON'T SEE THE FEAR.  I DON'T SEE THE

                    PROBLEM.  I DON'T SEE WHY THERE'S THESE CONCERNS.  THERE'S ALWAYS

                    CONCERNS BUT, YOU KNOW, WE -- WE'VE NEVER HAD STATEWIDE REGISTRATION

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    BEFORE.  AND WE DO NOW BECAUSE OF THE TECHNOLOGY THAT'S INVOLVED.

                    AND WE -- AND WE SET UP A PROCESS SO THAT THERE WOULD NOT BE DOUBLE

                    VOTING AND -- AND THAT EVERYONE WOULD HAVE A CHANCE.  AND WE'LL DO

                    THE SAME THING HERE.  IF IT'S NECESSARY TO PASS LEGISLATION, I'M SURE WE

                    WILL.  VOTING SHOULD BE SIMPLE AND EASY.  THAT SHOULD BE THE ULTIMATE

                    GOAL ALL THE TIME.

                                 SO I'M HAPPY THAT THIS IS THE SECOND VOTE ON THIS

                    CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND THAT IT WILL GO BEFORE THE VOTERS THIS

                    NOVEMBER.  SO I PROUDLY VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. JACOBSON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. GLICK TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. GLICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE.  I THINK THAT WE HAVE SEEN ACROSS THE COUNTRY A DIVERGENCE

                    BETWEEN THE PERSPECTIVES OF THE TWO PARTIES.  WE, ON OUR SIDE, I THINK

                    BELIEVE THAT THE MORE PEOPLE WHO VOTE, THE BETTER IT IS.  MAKING IT

                    EASIER, REMOVING BARRIERS THAT MIGHT HAVE EXISTED IN PART BECAUSE OF A

                    LACK OF TECHNOLOGY NEED TO BE ADJUSTED AND CHANGED, AND I VERY MUCH

                    APPRECIATE THE AMENDMENT BEFORE US.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. GLICK.

                                 MS. GLICK:  DID THAT -- DID THAT NOT GET REGISTERED?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE -- WE GOT SOME

                    OF IT, MS. GLICK, BUT NOT ALL.  YOU MIGHT WANT TO TURN YOUR CAMERA OFF.

                    OFTEN BECAUSE OF YOUR CONNECTIVITY WE HAVE THAT PROBLEM.

                                 MS. GLICK:  WELL, I WILL BE IN THE LOB STARTING NEXT

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WEEK, SO WE WON'T HAVE THE SAME ISSUES.  SO HOPEFULLY -- SO I JUST

                    BELIEVE THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO REMOVE WHATEVER BARRIERS WE CAN TO

                    ENSURE THAT THE LARGEST NUMBER OF PEOPLE HAVE ACCESS TO THE FRANCHISE

                    AND I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  MS.

                    GLICK IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. CARROLL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. CARROLL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TODAY

                    WITH THE PASSAGE OF THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND HOPEFULLY WITH

                    ITS RATIFICATION BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WE WILL DO

                    AWAY WITH AN ANTIQUATED TIME PERIOD AND ALLOW FOR THIS BODY TO DEBATE

                    HOW BEST TO MAKE SURE ALL NEW YORKERS WHO ARE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE ARE

                    ABLE TO VOTE.  AND THAT DEBATE SHOULD BE CENTERED AROUND 21ST CENTURY

                    TECHNOLOGY AND BEST PRACTICES FROM AROUND OUR COUNTRY.  AND IT

                    HAPPENS TO BE WITH 21ST CENTURY TECHNOLOGY AND BEST PRACTICES FROM

                    AROUND OUR COUNTRY, WE WILL SEE THAT MAKING IT POSSIBLE FOR NEW

                    YORKERS TO REGISTER AND VOTE AS CLOSE TO THE ELECTION AS POSSIBLE IS THE

                    BEST POLICY.  THEY DO IT IN OTHER STATES.  THEY DO IT DURING EARLY VOTING

                    IN OTHER STATES.  THERE'S NO REASON THAT NEW YORK CAN'T DO IT.  THERE'S

                    NO REASON WHY WE CAN'T MAKE SURE THAT WE SECURE AND VERIFY THOSE

                    VOTES.  SO I LOOK FORWARD TO WORKING WITH MY COLLEAGUES IN THE FUTURE

                    TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT HAPPENS, AND TODAY WE TAKE ONE STEP CLOSER TO

                    MAKING SURE THAT EVERY NEW YORKER WHO IS ELIGIBLE TO VOTE IS ABLE TO

                    VOTE AND ABLE TO EXERCISE THE FRANCHISE AND ABLE TO EXERCISE THEIR

                    CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND I HOPE MY

                    COLLEAGUES DO THE SAME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. CARROLL IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE --

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 DO WE HAVE EXCEPTIONS, MR. GOODELL?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NO, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES?

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  NO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 28, CALENDAR NO. 312, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S00360, CALENDAR NO.

                    312, SENATOR COMRIE (A04431, VANEL, JACOBSON, STIRPE, GALEF,

                    BURDICK, HYNDMAN).  CONCURRENT RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND

                    ASSEMBLY PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION 2 OF ARTICLE II OF THE

                    CONSTITUTION, IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING BALLOT BY MAIL BY REMOVING

                    CAUSE FOR ABSENTEE BALLOT VOTING.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. VANEL.

                                 MR. VANEL:  THIS BILL IS FOR A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY WHICH PROPOSES AN AMENDMENT TO SECTION

                    2, ARTICLE II OF THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION IN RELATION TO

                    AUTHORIZING BALLOT BY MAIL BY REMOVING CAUSE FOR ABSENTEE BALLOT

                    VOTING.  THE RESOLUTION SHALL PROPOSED TO AMEND THE CONSTITUTION TO

                    ALLOW FOR AN ELIGIBLE REQUEST WITHOUT DECLARING A REASON FOR DOING SO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. VANEL, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. VANEL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. VANEL YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.  UNDER CURRENT LAW YOU

                    HAD TO FILE AN APPLICATION AND ASK THEM FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT AND IT

                    REQUIRES THAT THE PERSON WHO IS APPLYING FOR IT CERTIFY THAT THEY MEET

                    CERTAIN CRITERIA, CORRECT?

                                 MR. VANEL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IF THIS AMENDMENT PASSES THEN

                    THERE WOULD NO LONGER BE ANY NEED TO CERTIFY FOR ANYTHING, CORRECT?

                                 MR. VANEL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND SINCE THERE WOULD NO LONGER

                    BE ANY NEED TO CERTIFY FOR ANYTHING, AM I CORRECT, THEN, THAT THE

                    APPLICATION FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT WILL NO LONGER REQUIRE A SIGNATURE?

                                 MR. VANEL:  THAT IS NOT CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO WHY WOULD YOU HAVE A

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT IF -- IF THERE'S NOTHING FOR THE SIGNATURE TO ATTEST

                    TO?

                                 MR. VANEL:  SO, THIS -- WITH RESPECT TO THIS -- THIS

                    AMENDMENT IN RELATION TO ABSENTEE BALLOT VOTING, THERE'S GOING TO BE

                    ENACTING LEGISLATION TO REQUIRE WHAT OTHER REQUIREMENTS THERE ARE, WHAT

                    NEEDS TO BE WITH RESPECT TO AN ABSENTEE BALLOT.  CURRENTLY, SECTION 2,

                    ARTICLE II OF THE CONSTITUTION STATES THAT IN ORDER TO BE QUALIFIED FOR AN

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT YOU EITHER HAVE TO BE ABSENT FROM THE -- FROM THE

                    COUNTY ON THE DAY OF THE ELECTION, OR -- OR ILL.  AND WE FIND THAT WE

                    MUST MAKE IT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO -- TO VOTE.  BUT THERE ARE

                    GOING TO BE SOME OTHER ENACTING REGULATIONS IN ORDER -- YOU KNOW, AFTER

                    THIS -- IF AND WHEN THIS -- THIS AMENDMENT TO THE CONSTITUTION IS

                    RATIFIED.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND AM I -- I'M CORRECT, RIGHT,

                    CALENDAR 206, FOR EXAMPLE, IT ELIMINATES SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS BY

                    ALLOWING AN ELECTRONIC APPLICATION, RIGHT?  SO THAT WOULD FIT RIGHT INTO

                    THIS.

                                 MR. VANEL:  EXCUSE ME?  I DIDN'T HEAR WHAT YOU

                    SAID.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.  IT'S NOT YOUR BILL SO I KNOW

                    YOU DIDN'T COME PREPARED TO DEBATE ON THE LEGISLATION.  BUT THANK YOU,

                    MR. VANEL.  I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.  MR. SPEAKER, WHEN

                    THIS LEGISLATION WAS INTRODUCED A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO I SUPPORTED IT AS

                    AN ALTERNATIVE TO EARLY VOTING.  I THOUGHT IT WAS A PREFERABLE METHOD OF

                    MAXIMIZING THE VOTER OPPORTUNITY.  BUT THE LEGISLATURE WENT AHEAD

                    WITH EARLY VOTING, AND AS A RESULT THE RESIDENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW

                    YORK CAN VOTE FOR A COUPLE WEEKS BEFORE THE ELECTION.  AND WITH THE

                    ADVENT OF EARLY VOTING, THE NEED FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS WENT DOWN

                    DRAMATICALLY BECAUSE YOU HAD TWO WEEKS TO SCHEDULE A TIME FOR YOU TO

                    VOTE.  AND SO THE LIKELIHOOD THAT YOU WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO VOTE IN A

                    TWO-WEEK PERIOD WAS DRAMATICALLY REDUCED.  MY CONCERN, OF COURSE, IS

                    THAT AS WE ELIMINATE ANY EXCUSE AND AS WE LOOK AT OTHER LEGISLATION

                    THAT'S ACTUALLY ON OUR CALENDAR TODAY, WE CAN SEE THE MOVE IS TO

                    ELIMINATE ANY SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS, BUT NO

                    REQUIREMENT THAT VOTER ROLLS BE PURGED OF PEOPLE WHO ARE NO LONGER

                    ALIVE OR ARE NO LONGER RESIDING WHERE THEY SHOULD BE RESIDED --

                    RESIDING.  AND SO WE'RE SEEING A SUBSTANTIAL EROSION IN ALL OF THE

                    PROVISIONS THAT WE NORMALLY WOULD LOOK TO TO HELP ENSURE VOTER

                    INTEGRITY.  AND THIS IS THE LAST CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT ON THIS

                    SUBJECT.  AND AS FOR THE OTHER ONES, IT MAKES IT EASIER FOR THOSE WHO ARE

                    NOT ELIGIBLE TO VOTE OR SHOULDN'T BE VOTING OR ARE TAKING ADVANTAGE OF

                    OUR SYSTEM TO OBTAIN AN ABSENTEE BALLOT WITH NO EXCUSE WHATSOEVER,

                    WITH NO JUSTIFICATION WHATSOEVER, EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE TWO WEEKS TO

                    VOTE, AND THEREBY CIRCUMVENT OUR VOTER INTEGRITY PROVISIONS.

                                 SO WHILE I SUPPORTED IT IN THE PAST, WITH THE ADVENT OF

                    EARLY VOTING I CANNOT SUPPORT IT TODAY.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 360.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, BUT

                    THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT ARE ENCOURAGED TO CALL THE MINORITY LEADER'S

                    OFFICE SO WE CAN PROPERLY RECORD THEIR VOTE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS

                    ONE.  THOSE DESIRING TO BE IN THE NEGATIVE FOR AN EXCEPTION SHOULD FEEL

                    FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT THE PREVIOUSLY GIVEN

                    NUMBER AND YOUR VOTE WILL BE PROPERLY RECORDED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. LAWLER TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I SUPPORT

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ALLOWING ANY LEGALLY ELIGIBLE VOTER THE OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE HOW THEY

                    CHOOSE TO.  WHETHER IT'S BY MAIL, BY EARLY VOTING OR ON ELECTION DAY.  I

                    HAVE IN THE PAST AND TODAY SUPPORT THE OPPORTUNITY FOR SOMEBODY TO

                    VOTE BY MAIL WITHOUT A REASON.  I DO BELIEVE PEOPLE HAVE THAT RIGHT SO

                    LONG AS THEY ARE LEGALLY ELIGIBLE.  AND THAT IS THE KEY.  AS WE MAKE

                    SOME OF THESE CHANGES, WHAT WILL BE CRITICALLY IMPORTANT IS ENSURING

                    THAT ANYBODY WHO APPLIES TO VOTE BY ABSENTEE BALLOT IS LEGALLY ELIGIBLE

                    TO DO SO, AND THAT IT IS, IN FACT, THEY, THE INDIVIDUAL WHO IS REQUESTING

                    THAT BALLOT.  WHAT WE CANNOT ALLOW IS FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS TO BE MAILED

                    EN MASSE TO THOSE WHO HAVE NOT REQUESTED IT.  AND SO WHILE I DO

                    SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION, I THINK IT IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO GET ON THE

                    RECORD THAT WE MUST, AS A BODY, SAFEGUARD AGAINST THE ABILITY OF BALLOTS

                    TO JUST GO OUT THE DOOR WILLY-NILLY.  WE NEED TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE

                    REQUESTING THAT BALLOT ARE, IN FACT, THE ONES LEGALLY ELIGIBLE TO VOTE ON

                    THAT BALLOT.

                                 SO I SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION AND HOPE THAT MY

                    COLLEAGUES WILL JOIN ME IN SAFEGUARDING AGAINST ANY ATTEMPT TO MISUSE

                    THE ABSENTEE BALLOT PROCESS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAWLER IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  JUST BRIEFLY

                    TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I HAD SUPPORTED THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION THE LAST

                    TIME IT CAME UP.  BUT FOR THE REASONS THAT ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES JUST

                    RECENTLY EXPRESSED, I DON'T THINK IT'S NECESSARY ANYMORE.  I -- I ALWAYS

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    HAD FELT THAT -- I DIDN'T WANT TO MAKE A LIAR OUT OF SOMEBODY WHO JUST

                    HAD TO SAY THAT THEY WERE GOING TO BE OUT OF THE COUNTY AND UNAVAILABLE

                    IN ORDER TO GET AN ABSENTEE BALLOT.  I NEVER LIKED THAT IDEA.  BUT NOW

                    THAT WE'VE GOT THE EARLY VOTING OPTION, AND THAT'S -- AND THAT'S IN-PERSON

                    VOTING WHICH I THINK IS REALLY THE GOLD STANDARD BECAUSE WE WANT TO GET

                    PEOPLE IN PERSON, ABLE TO VOTE, WHENEVER POSSIBLE.  AND WE -- WE ARE

                    STILL -- WE WOULD STILL BE ALLOWING, OBVIOUSLY, THE ABSENTEE BALLOTING

                    PROCESS FOR THOSE WHO STILL REQUIRED IT.  YOU KNOW, AGAIN, I'VE JUST GOT

                    TO GO BACK TO THE RACE, THE CONGRESSIONAL RACE THAT WE TALKED ABOUT.

                    THE -- THE EGREGIOUS MISHANDLING OF THE TENS OF THOUSANDS OF ABSENTEE

                    BALLOTS IN THAT CASE REALLY MADE ME START TO WORRY ABOUT HAVING A LOT OF

                    PAPER BEING SUBMITTED ON ELECTION DAY.  AND JUST, YOU KNOW, BATCHES

                    OF BALLOTS THAT WEREN'T COUNTED OR LOST.  THE "STICKYGATE" SCANDAL WHERE

                    THERE WERE STICKY NOTES THAT THEY COULDN'T FIGURE OUT WHAT THE SIGNATURE

                    MATCHING WAS ABOUT.  IT WAS JUST A BIG MESS.  I THINK IF WE WANT TO

                    ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO COME IN PERSON TO VOTE, I'M GOING TO VOTE NO THIS

                    YEAR ON THIS AND I THINK THAT -- I THINK THAT THAT'S THE RIGHT THING TO DO

                    FOR ME ANYWAY.  SO, THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  MS.

                    WALSH IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  FIRST, I

                    WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS LEGISLATION FOR THE CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT.  WE HAVE SLOWLY CHIPPED AWAY AT ALL THE PHONY

                    RESTRICTIONS ON ABSENTEE BALLOTS.  IT USED TO BE YOU HAD TO GET A DOCTOR'S

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    NOTE.  IT USED TO BE THAT YOU -- IF YOU WERE OUT OF THE AREA FOR A CERTAIN

                    PERIOD OF TIME AND YOU DIDN'T -- AND -- BUT YOU WERE BACK AT QUARTER TO

                    NINE, WELL THEN YOU COULD HAVE VOTED WHEN THAT REALLY WASN'T THE CASE.

                    AND I DO BELIEVE MY -- THE FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLE IS THAT VOTING SHOULD

                    BE SIMPLE AND EASY.  WE SHOULD REMOVE ALL BARRIERS.  AND UNLIKE SOME

                    OF OUR FRIENDS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE, LET'S NOT LOOK FOR RED

                    HERRINGS.  LET'S NOT LOOK FOR REASONS WHY TO DENY PEOPLE AN EASIER WAY

                    TO VOTE.  WE SHOULD MAKE IT SIMPLE.  WE SHOULD MAKE IT EASY.  AND BY

                    DOING THIS, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A RADICAL TRANSFORMATION.  IT'S GOING TO

                    BE, I WANT A BALLOT.  PLEASE MAIL IT TO ME.  OR, I WANT TO PICK UP A

                    BALLOT.  PLEASE GIVE IT TO ME.  I DON'T THINK THAT'S RADICAL AT ALL, TO COME

                    DOWN TO IT.  IT'S REALLY A MATTER OF COMMON SENSE.

                                 SO I'M SO HAPPY THAT WE'RE DOING THIS SO WE DON'T

                    HAVE TO PLAY THE GAMES, SO PEOPLE AREN'T GOING TO COURT, THEY DIDN'T

                    CHECK THE BOX.  NOW, WE -- WE'VE MADE REFORMS LAST YEAR.  WE'RE GOING

                    TO CONTINUE TO MAKE REFORMS THIS YEAR, AND THIS IS A FUNDAMENTAL REFORM

                    THAT'S LONG OVERDUE AND I PROUDLY SUPPORT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL

                    AMENDMENT.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. JACOBSON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. JENSEN.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO ECHO THE

                    -- THE REMARKS OF ONE OF MY EARLIER COLLEAGUES, I DO BELIEVE THAT EVERY

                    NEW YORKER WHO'S ELIGIBLE TO VOTE SHOULD HAVE ACCESS TO VOTE.  SO I

                    WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.  HOWEVER, I -- I DO

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    NOT BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD BE DOING ANYTHING IN ADDITION THAT WOULD

                    ELIMINATE THE VOTERS' NEED TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT, ELIMINATE ANY

                    SIGNATURE REQUIREMENTS OR SIGNATURE MATCHING OR ANY SORT OF BALLOT

                    HARVESTING.

                                 SO WHILE I SUPPORT THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT, I

                    STILL BELIEVE THAT THERE SHOULD BE SAFEGUARDS IN PLACE TO ENSURE THAT THE

                    VOTER WHO'S REQUESTING THE ABSENTEE BALLOT IS THE VOTER CASTING THE

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I WANT TO BEGIN BY, OF

                    COURSE, THANKING THE SPONSOR OF THIS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT AND TO

                    SAY THAT I THINK ANY OPPORTUNITIES WE HAVE AS ELECTED OFFICIALS, WE

                    SHOULD BE ENCOURAGING AS MANY PEOPLE TO VOTE AS POSSIBLE.  AND SO

                    THIS OPPORTUNITY I THINK IS AN AWESOME ONE.  BUT THE BEST THING I THINK

                    ABOUT THIS ONE IS THAT WE'RE NOT JUST GOING TO MAKE THE DECISION FOR THE

                    ELECTORATE.  WE'RE GOING TO PUT THIS ON THE BALLOT AND ALLOW THEM TO

                    MAKE IT.  AND I THINK ALL TOO OFTEN AS ELECTEDS, WE WOULD LIKE TO THINK

                    WE HAVE ALL THE ANSWERS AND CAN GET THIS DONE BY JUST WHAT WE SAY.

                    SOMETIMES I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO BRING IT BACK TO THE PEOPLE, AND I

                    WANT TO APPLAUD THE SPONSOR FOR DOING THAT AND I LOOK FORWARD TO THE

                    RESULTS OF IT.  IT'S MY PLEASURE TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF THIS LEGISLATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. VANEL TO CLOSE.

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. VANEL:  WE'RE VERY -- YOU KNOW, WE'RE

                    WORKING VERY HARD TO MAKE SURE THAT WE EXPAND THE FRANCHISE OF

                    VOTING.  WE HAVE TO MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE -- THAT WE MAKE IT EASIER FOR

                    PEOPLE TO VOTE.  TODAY, UNDER ARTICLE II, SECTION 2 OF THE CONSTITUTION

                    YOU HAVE TO BE EITHER ABSENT OR SICK IN ORDER TO -- TO VOTE ABSENTEE

                    BALLOT VOTING.  EVEN WITH EARLY VOTING, FOR SOME OF MY MEMBERS THAT

                    ARE -- THAT ARE UPSTATE -- FOR SOME OF MY MEMBERS THAT ARE UPSTATE,

                    THEIR -- SOME OF THEIR EARLY VOTING SITES ARE VERY FAR FROM WHERE PEOPLE

                    LIVE.  SO WE HAVE TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO GO AND VOTE.

                    SO NOW WHAT DOES THIS -- WHAT DOES THIS AMENDMENT DO?  THIS

                    AMENDMENT REMOVES THE REASON FOR BEING ABLE TO HAVE TO FILE AN

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT, MAKING IT EASIER FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE.  NOW KEEP IN

                    MIND, I REALLY BELIEVE THAT NEW YORKERS, ALL OF US ON BOTH SIDES,

                    BELIEVE THAT THE PROPER AUTHENTICATION MUST HAPPEN WHEN IT COMES TO

                    ABSENTEE BALLOTS.  PROPER AUTHENTICATION MUST HAPPEN WHEN IT COMES TO

                    VOTING.  EVEN WITH THAT, WE MUST MAKE SURE THAT THE FRANCHISE OF VOTING

                    IS EASIER, PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO VOTE, AND ON NOVEMBER OF THIS YEAR THE

                    PEOPLE OF NEW YORK WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY IN A REFERENDUM TO VOTE

                    ON WHETHER OR NOT TO REMOVE THE BLOCKAGE OF HAVING AN EXCUSE TO BE

                    ABLE TO VOTE.

                                 I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. VANEL IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THOSE WHO ARE VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS BILL ON THE FLOOR OF THE ASSEMBLY,

                    PLEASE RECORD THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL MEMBERS:  MR. ASHBY, MR.

                    GANDOLFO, MR. GIGLIO, MS. MILLER, MR. MORINELLO, MR. NORRIS AND MR.

                    SCHMITT.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, COLLEAGUES,

                    WE CAN NOW TURN OUR ATTENTION TO PAGE 26, CALENDAR NO. 299 BY MR.

                    RODRIGUEZ, FOLLOWED BY PAGE 19, CALENDAR NO. 226 BY MR. ABBATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CALENDAR NO. 299,

                    THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03213-A, CALENDAR

                    NO. 299, RODRIGUEZ, MONTESANO, FAHY, PEOPLES-STOKES, WOERNER,

                    WEPRIN, BARRON, GOTTFRIED, PALMESANO, SANTABARBARA, RAMOS,

                    PICHARDO, JOYNER, EPSTEIN, AUBRY, DESTEFANO, CRUZ, LAVINE, GLICK,

                    SIMON, CARROLL, FERNANDEZ, JACOBSON, GALEF, MCDONALD, DICKENS,

                    QUART, KELLES, LUPARDO, COOK, MITAYNES, SEPTIMO, BRAUNSTEIN, TAYLOR,

                    DE LA ROSA, SEAWRIGHT, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, O'DONNELL, REYES,

                    RICHARDSON, ABBATE, GRIFFIN, BURDICK.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL

                    BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO THE SECURE CHOICE SAVINGS PROGRAM.

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. RODRIGUEZ.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  (INAUDIBLE) ENACTS THE NEW

                    YORK STATE SECURE CHOICE SAVINGS PROGRAM ACT TO PROVIDE A

                    STATE-ADMINISTERED RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN FOR PRIVATE-SECTOR

                    EMPLOYEES WORKING FOR COMPANIES WHO DO NOT OFFER RETIREMENT PLANS.

                    THE ACT ESTABLISHES THE SECURE CHOICE PROGRAM IN THE FORM OF A

                    PAYROLL DEDUCTION IRA FOR EMPLOYEES, AND A BOARD TO ADMINISTER AND

                    OVERSEE THE PROGRAM.  ADDITIONALLY, PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAM IS

                    VOLUNTARY FOR BOTH EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES SUCH THAT EMPLOYERS CAN

                    CHOOSE TO OFFER THE PROGRAM TO EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYEES MUST OPT IN.

                    HOWEVER, STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT THE AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT OF

                    EMPLOYEES BOOST PARTICIPATION IN RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLANS, AND WE

                    HAVE SEEN THIS PROGRAM ENACTED IN THREE DIFFERENT STATES, CALIFORNIA,

                    OREGON AND ILLINOIS, ALLOWING FOR AUTOMATIC ENROLLMENT BY THE

                    EMPLOYEES WITH AN OPTION TO OPT OUT.  THEREFORE, THE AMENDMENTS THAT

                    ARE BEING PROPOSED IN THIS LEGISLATION WOULD ALLOW FOR EMPLOYERS TO

                    PARTICIPATE AND EMPLOYEES TO BE AUTOMATICALLY ENROLLED WITH AN OPT-OUT

                    PROVISION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES, I WILL YIELD.

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.  AND THAT WAS A

                    VERY -- A -- A GOOD DETAILED EXPLANATION, SO THAT CUTS DOWN MY

                    QUESTIONING CONSIDERABLY AND I APPRECIATE THAT.  SO, AS YOU -- AS YOU

                    JUST EXPLAINED, THE -- THE CURRENT LAW HAS A PLAN WHERE IT IS OPTIONAL FOR

                    EMPLOYERS TO OFFER THIS, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  IT'S OPTIONAL FOR EMPLOYERS TO OFFER IT

                    AND IT'S OPTIONAL FOR EMPLOYEES TO PARTICIPATE IN IT.  THIS BILL WOULD --

                    WOULD CHANGE IT AROUND SO THAT IT BE -- WOULD BECOME MANDATORY FOR

                    FOR EMPLOYERS OF A CERTAIN SIZE.  I THINK -- WHAT IS IT, TEN EMPLOYEES OR

                    MORE, THEY'D HAVE TO OFFER THIS AND THE EMPLOYEES WOULD THEN HAVE TO

                    OPT OUT OF IT, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  AND --  I MEAN, I -- I THINK WE

                    ALL CAN APPRECIATE THAT IT'S IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO HAVE RETIREMENT

                    SAVINGS, AND SO -- SO MANY DO NOT.  AND OF COURSE PEOPLE ARE LIVING

                    LONGER, TOO, SO I -- I CAN APPRECIATE THE NEED FOR THIS BILL.  WAS THERE --

                    WHAT WAS THE THOUGHT PROCESS AS FAR AS THE THRESHOLD OF EMPLOYEES THAT

                    THE EMPLOYER WOULD THEN HAVE -- BE MANDATED TO CREATE THIS PROGRAM?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  SURE.  I THINK WHEN WE THOUGHT

                    ABOUT THE -- THE IDEA OF TEN EMPLOYEES, IT WAS MAKING SURE THAT, ONE,

                    THEY HAD A SUFFICIENT AMOUNT OF SIZE.  IF THEY WERE TRULY A MICRO

                    BUSINESS OR SOME SORT OF SMALLER-BASED ENTITY THAT DOESN'T HAVE THE

                    CAPACITY OR -- OR UTILIZE DIFFERENT SYSTEMS FOR PAYROLL.  THAT

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    TEN-EMPLOYEE THRESHOLD ANECDOTALLY IS WHEN PEOPLE START TO -- TO UTILIZE

                    TECHNOLOGY, ADP AND DIFFERENT KIND OF WITHHOLDINGS IN A MORE FORMAL

                    WAY, QUICKBOOKS.  SO WE THOUGHT VERY MUCH THAT THAT WOULD BE THAT

                    TIPPING POINT WHERE A BUSINESS WOULD TAKE ON SOME SYSTEMS THAT WOULD

                    BE BEST ABLE TO ACCOMMODATE THE -- THE -- THE WITHHOLDINGS THAT WE'RE

                    TALKING ABOUT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  VERY GOOD.  SO, ARE YOU -- ARE YOU

                    SAYING THAT PART OF THE REASON WHY THE EMPLOYERS WITH TEN OR MORE

                    EMPLOYEES WOULD BE REQUIRED THROUGH THIS LEGISLATION IS THAT IT'S SORT OF

                    IMPLIED OR ASSUMED THAT IF YOU'VE GOT TEN EMPLOYEES OR MORE THAT YOU

                    ALREADY MAY BE USING A PAYROLL SYSTEM OR YOU'VE GOT SYSTEMS IN PLACE

                    TO BE ABLE TO HANDLE THE ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITIES THAT

                    THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  WE THOUGHT ABOUT THAT AND

                    WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT IT WAS -- IT WAS THE RIGHT SIZE FOR THAT.  WE

                    CERTAINLY DO RECOGNIZE THAT THE NEED IS CERTAINLY WELL BEYOND THOSE

                    BUSINESSES THAT ARE BEYOND TEN EMPLOYEES -- BELOW TEN EMPLOYEES.  WE

                    THINK THAT THIS CERTAINLY SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE TO ALL -- ALL

                    EMPLOYEES IN -- ACROSS THE STATE WHO DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO A RETIREMENT

                    SAVINGS PROGRAM, BUT CERTAINLY FELT TEN WAS A GREAT PLACE TO START TO

                    BEGIN TO REALLY MAKING -- MAKE THIS AVAILABLE IN A WIDESPREAD WAY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO I JUST WANT TO BACK UP FOR

                    ONE QUICK MINUTE.  WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT HOW THE SYSTEM EXISTS RIGHT

                    NOW, WAS -- WAS THERE -- CAN YOU GENERALIZE OR TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE

                    -- THE AMOUNT OF PARTICIPATION IN THE PROGRAM AS IT WAS ESTABLISHED IN

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THE 2018-'19 BUDGET OF EMPLOYERS AT -- NUMBER OF EMPLOYERS OR

                    PERCENTAGE OF ALL EMPLOYERS AND LIKE WHAT SIZE THEY WERE?  ANYTHING

                    LIKE THAT THAT YOU THAT YOU COULD -- YOU COULD SAY?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  WELL, I THINK IT MIGHT BE MORE

                    HELPFUL TO LOOK AT WHAT'S CURRENTLY OUT THERE IN TERMS OF EXISTING

                    RETIREMENT SAVINGS PROGRAMS THAT ARE MODELED -- THAT WE ARE MODELED

                    AFTER, PARTICULARLY AFTER THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE THREE STATES THAT I

                    MENTIONED HAVE APPROXIMATELY 300,000 EMPLOYEES AMONGST THEM THAT

                    ARE PARTICIPATING IN SECURE CHOICE SAVINGS PROGRAMS OR THEY'RE --

                    THEY'RE BRANDED, YOU KNOW, A PARTNER IN THOSE STATES.  SO I THINK THAT'S

                    REPRESENTATIVE OF THE AMOUNT OF PEOPLE THAT COULD INITIALLY BE

                    PARTICIPATING ON -- ON DAY ONE HERE.  AND I THINK WHAT'S REPRESENTATIVE

                    OF THE STATUS QUO OR WHAT, YOU KNOW, MIGHT EXIST IN THE LEGISLATION IS --

                    IS ZERO.  I MEAN, I THINK THE VOLUNTARY OPTION PROVEN BOTH IN TERMS OF

                    RESPONSIVENESS IN -- IN -- IN STATES THAT AREN'T UTILIZING THAT MODEL AND IN

                    TERMS OF WHAT WE SEE HERE NOW, BECAUSE I THINK WHAT WE'RE SUGGESTING

                    IS THAT, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE GOING OUT AND GETTING IRAS ON THEIR OWN IS

                    NOT THE BEST METHOD TO BE ABLE TO CREATE RETIREMENT SAVINGS OVER TIME.

                    ON THE CONTRARY, WE KNOW THAT AN EMPLOYEE-SPONSORED PROGRAM IN --

                    IN ANY FORM IS MUCH MORE PRODUCTIVE IN TERMS OF GETTING PARTICIPATION

                    AND GROWING RETIREMENT SAVINGS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  VERY GOOD.  NOW, UNDER THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION, I -- I WANT TO TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE EMPLOYEES' ABILITY TO

                    OPT OUT.  SO, THE OPT-OUT HAS TO BE OFFERED TO THE EMPLOYEE, CORRECT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND IS THAT ONLY AT THE OUTSET?  AT THE

                    BEGINNING OF THE PLAN BEING OFFERED WITHIN A PARTICULAR COMPANY, OR

                    HOW -- HOW OFTEN OR HOW MAY AN EMPLOYEE OPT OUT?  COULD THEY --

                    COULD THEY OPT OUT AFTER A PERIOD OF TIME?  MAYBE THEY PARTICIPATED FOR

                    A WHILE AND THEN THEY DON'T WANT TO ANYMORE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THEY ABSOLUTELY CAN.  WE LEFT

                    THE TIMING OF THOSE PROVISIONS ON OPT OUT TO THE BOARD.  WHAT WE DID

                    INCLUDE IN THIS LEGISLATION IS ALLOW FOR 30 DAYS - WE'LL CALL IT A WAITING

                    PERIOD - FOR -- FOR THE EMPLOYER TO DECIDE IF THEY WANTED TO REMAIN

                    PARTICIPATE IN THEIR -- TO REMAIN PARTICIPATING OR TO OPT OUT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  NOW, IF -- IF AN EMPLOYEE DOES NOT OPT

                    OUT, WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THEIR EARNINGS WILL BE PLACED INTO THIS

                    EMPLOYER-CREATED --

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THE DEFAULT IS SET AT 3 PERCENT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  PARDON ME?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THE DEFAULT IS SET AT 3 PERCENT

                    CONTRIBUTION.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THE DEFAULT IS 3 PERCENT.  CAN AN

                    EMPLOYEE OPT TO CHANGE THAT AROUND, THAT PERCENTAGE?  COULD HE DROP IT

                    DOWN TO 1 PERCENT OR BRING IT UP AGAIN?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  SURE.  SURE THAT OPTIONALITY IS --

                    IS BUILT INTO THE PROGRAM AND -- AND THE BOARD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PUTTING

                    IN PLACE THE -- THE MECHANISMS TO ALLOW FOR THE EMPLOYEE TO DO THAT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO, AS I SAID EARLIER, I -- I THANK THE

                    SPONSOR FOR HIS ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS.  I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, WE

                    ALL UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, IF WE TAKE A LOOK AT PEOPLE NOT ONLY IN

                    OUR STATE BUT AROUND THE COUNTRY, NOT ONLY ARE PEOPLE LIVING LONGER, BUT

                    I THINK IT'S LIKE OVER HALF OF AMERICAN HOUSEHOLDS HAVE SAVED, YOU

                    KNOW, VERY, VERY LITTLE FOR RETIREMENT.  I CAN'T REMEMBER WHAT THE EXACT

                    STATISTIC WAS.  IT'S PRETTY -- IT'S PRETTY LOW.  PART OF THE PROBLEM IS THAT,

                    YOU KNOW, THERE ARE A LOT OF -- THERE ARE A LOT OF EMPLOYEES THAT ARE

                    REALLY LIVING PAYCHECK TO PAYCHECK.  SO, EVEN THOUGH, YOU KNOW,

                    3 PERCENT MIGHT NOT SOUND LIKE A LOT, BUT FOR SOME PEOPLE THAT COULD BE

                    A BIG DEAL FOR THEM TO HAVE THAT TAKEN OUT OF YOUR PAYCHECK EVERY

                    SINGLE WEEK.  WE KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, COMPOUND INTEREST IS A

                    BEAUTIFUL THING AND -- AND, YOU KNOW, WE ALL KNOW WITH OUR OWN

                    RETIREMENT SAVINGS THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU WANT TO HAVE PEOPLE START EARLY

                    AND HAVE IT BUILD.  BUT I THINK MY -- MY BIGGER ISSUE WITH THE BILL IS

                    REALLY THE MANDATE THAT IT IMPOSES UPON REALLY QUITE SMALL EMPLOYERS

                    WHO ALREADY HAVE A LOT THAT THEY HAVE TO TRACK AND KEEP TRACK OF.  AND I

                    DON'T KNOW THAT IT'S A REASONABLE ASSUMPTION THAT AN EMPLOYER WITH TEN

                    OR MORE EMPLOYEES IS NECESSARILY GOING TO HAVE THE KIND OF

                    ADMINISTRATIVE BACKUP AND SUPPORT WITHIN THEIR ORGANIZATION TO BE ABLE

                    TO DO ALL OF THESE -- TO BE ABLE ACCOUNT FOR THESE MONIES COMING IN AND

                    OUT AND -- AND TO BE ABLE TO, YOU KNOW, TRACK AND EXECUTE THIS PROGRAM.

                    SO I JUST THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, NEW YORK DOES MAKE IT REALLY HARD ON

                                         67



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    BUSINESSES AND INCLUDING SMALL BUSINESSES.  AND ALTHOUGH I THINK THAT

                    IT'S A -- IT'S A LAUDABLE INTENT -- INTENT TO ENCOURAGE PEOPLE TO SAVE FOR

                    RETIREMENT, I WOULD RATHER SEE IT AS AN ENCOURAGEMENT RATHER AS -- RATHER

                    THAN AS A MANDATE.

                                 SO, FOR THOSE REASONS, I DON'T THINK I'M GOING TO BE

                    SUPPORTING THIS BILL.  BUT I THANK THE SPONSOR FOR HIS ANSWERS.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THANK YOU -- THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A QUESTION -- A COUPLE OF QUICK

                    QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU,

                    BOBBY.  IT'S BEEN A WHILE SINCE WE'VE HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS,

                    BUT I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY SOME THINGS.  WHO WILL -- WHO WILL GOVERN

                    THIS PROGRAM, AND WHO WILL ESTABLISH IT, WHO WILL MANAGE IT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  SO CURRENTLY WE, IN THE ORIGINAL

                    PROVISION, CREATE A BOARD WITH NUMEROUS APPOINTEES, SOME OF WHICH

                    HAVE TO -- ALL OF WHICH HAVE TO HAVE FINANCIAL EXPERIENCE TO MANAGE THE

                    -- THE BOARD.  AND IT --

                                         68



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  WHEN YOU SAY "WE," WHO IS

                    WE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  SAY AGAIN.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THE LEGISLATURE?  OR --

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YEAH, IT'S -- IT'S WRITTEN IN THE

                    LEGISLATION, CORRECT.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THE LEGISLATURE WILL CHOOSE

                    THE -- THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  LET ME REFER BACK TO THE -- TO THE

                    BILL ON THE ORIGINAL FORMATION OF THE BOARD.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 CORRECT.  THERE ARE LEGISLATIVE APPOINTEES AND

                    GUBERNATORIAL APPOINTEES ON THAT BOARD.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  AND -- AND HOW MANY TOTAL?

                    AND -- AND HOW MANY FROM THE GOVERNOR, HOW MANY FROM THE

                    LEGISLATURE?  AND WILL THE MINORITY HAVE ANY APPOINTMENTS?

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  WHILE I'M GETTING THAT

                    INFORMATION, ARE THERE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS I CAN ADDRESS?

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  YEAH, THE -- WITH REGARD TO

                    INVESTMENTS, NOW THE BOARD, ONCE CONSTITUTED, YOU ARE GIVING THEM THE

                    AUTHORITY TO CHOOSE THE INVESTMENT MIX?  AM I CORRECT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THE INVESTMENT MANAGERS --

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  MAKES INVESTMENTS AVAILABLE

                    TO THE PARTICIPANTS.  OKAY.  SO THERE'S NO LANGUAGE IN THE -- IN THE

                                         69



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    LEGISLATION THAT WOULD REQUIRE, SAY, AN INDEX FUND OR A BOND FUND OR A

                    CERTAIN ASSET ALLOCATION OR A TARGET DATE FUND, FOR EXAMPLE, TO OFFER

                    PEOPLE?  SIMILAR TO WHAT WE HAVE IN OUR 457.  DOES -- DOES THE

                    LEGISLATION COVER ANY OF THAT OR DOES IT LEAVE IT ENTIRELY INTO THE HANDS --

                    IN THE HANDS OF THIS SOON-TO-BE-CONSTITUTED BOARD?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.  IT DOES LEAVE IT TO THE --

                    TO THE BOARD TO DO THAT.  AND -- AND IN PARTICULAR, YOU KNOW, WE

                    RECOGNIZE THAT THEY HAVE FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITIES AS MEMBERS OF THAT

                    BOARD TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS, YOU KNOW, AND -- AND PUT FORWARD

                    PLANS THAT ARE SUITABLE FOR THE INDIVIDUALS THAT ARE -- THAT ARE

                    PARTICIPANTS.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK.  OKAY.  WITH -- WITH REGARD TO

                    FEES, ARE THOSE CHARGED TO THE PARTICIPANTS?  WHO WILL COVER THOSE AND

                    TRANSPARENCY OF THOSE FEES AS WELL AS FEES THAT ARE MADE BY THE

                    INVESTMENT HOUSES THAT MAY OFFER INVESTMENTS?  WILL THERE BE TOTAL

                    TRANSPARENCY WITH REGARD TO THOSE FEES?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES, THERE -- THERE -- IT IS OUR

                    EXPECTATION THAT THERE WILL BE TRANSPARENCY ON ALL FEES.  AND THAT -- THAT

                    INFORMATION SHOULD AND WILL BE REPORTED.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  OKAY.  AND THESE ACCOUNTS

                    WILL BE PORTABLE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES.  THESE ARE DESIGNED TO BE

                    PORTABLE.  IF THE INDIVIDUAL MOVES TO DIFFERENT JOBS THEY'RE ABLE TO

                    CONTINUE AND/OR ROLL OVER THOSE INTO DIFFERENT EMPLOYEE-SPONSORED

                    PLANS, YOU KNOW, SHOULD THEY MOVE INTO -- INTO JOBS AND POSITIONS THAT

                                         70



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THEIR EMPLOYER -- THEIR NEW EMPLOYER DOES HAVE AN EMPLOYER-BASED

                    RETIREMENT PLAN.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  OKAY.  SO, WHEN -- YOU KNOW,

                    MANY, MANY SMALL EMPLOYERS WILL USE, YOU KNOW, PAYROLL SERVICES, AND

                    THOSE PAYROLL SERVICES OFFER -- OFFER ADDITIONAL SERVICES SUCH AS 401(K)

                    PLANS AND OTHER TYPES OF RETIREMENT PLANS.  WHICH -- WITH -- WITH REGARD

                    TO SETTING UP THE PLAN, MANAGING THAT PLAN, WHAT RESPONSIBILITY WILL THE

                    EMPLOYER HAVE, AND WHAT COST IS THE EMPLOYER EXPECTED TO BEAR IN

                    ESTABLISHING AND MANAGING THIS PROGRAM?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THAT'S A REALLY IMPORTANT

                    QUESTION AND POINT.  THE EMPLOYER BEARS NO RESPONSIBILITY ON THAT.

                    THAT IS THE STATE'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENACT THAT, AND I THINK IS ONE OF THE

                    FEATURES OF -- OF THE BILL THAT'S SO IMPORTANT.  WHEN WE LOOK AT, YOU

                    KNOW, THE -- THE TECHNICAL MECHANISM OF MAKING THAT WITHDRAWAL, YOU

                    KNOW, SIMILAR TO SOCIAL SECURITY OR SIMILAR TO MEDICAID, IT'S THAT SAME

                    KIND OF PROCESS.  BUT THE WORK OF SETTING UP THE PLAN, ADMINISTERING THE

                    PLAN, CREATING INVESTMENT VEHICLES, MAKING SURE THAT PARTICIPANTS CAN

                    ACCESS IT ONLINE, THAT'S THE PART THAT -- THAT IS OUT OF THEIR HANDS.  THAT IS

                    ACTUALLY A BENEFIT FOR SMALL BUSINESSES TO BE ABLE TO OFFER THIS WITHOUT

                    HAVING TO TAKE ON ANY OF THOSE -- THOSE COSTS OR EXPENSES.  SO I -- I

                    THINK WHAT WE'RE PROVIDING IS A SERVICE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES AND -- AND

                    -- AND IN DOING SO, AT THE SAME TIME ALLOWING LOW-INCOME NEW

                    YORKERS, WHO USUALLY DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO THIS, THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE

                    ABLE TO PARTICIPATE -- PARTICIPATE AND CREATE SOME SORT OF SAVINGS.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  SO LET ME ASK YOU ANOTHER

                                         71



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    QUESTION, BOBBY, ON THIS VERY IMPORTANT -- IN -- IN CERTAIN RETIREMENT

                    PLANS THE EMPLOYER, WHEN THEY DESIGN THE PLAN DOCUMENT, AS IT'S CALLED,

                    MAY ALLOW BORROWING BY THE PARTICIPANT AGAINST THEIR ACCOUNT UP TO A

                    CERTAIN PERCENTAGE.  IS IT YOUR INTENTION TO ALLOW PARTICIPANTS TO BORROW

                    AGAINST THEIR ACCOUNT?  AND BEFORE YOU ANSWER, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO

                    OFFER MY OPINION.  I THINK IT IS A BAD IDEA TO ALLOW FOR BORROWING.  AS

                    YOU KNOW, I SPENT MANY YEARS IN THE BUSINESS DOING RETIREMENT PLANS,

                    AND SOME OF THE -- FIELDS SUCH AS THE HOSPITALITY INDUSTRY, PARTICULARLY

                    RESTAURANTS, AUTO -- AUTOMOBILE DEALERSHIPS, HAD A HIGH NUMBER OF

                    EMPLOYEES THAT SOUGHT TO BORROW AGAINST THEIR ACCOUNT WHICH REALLY

                    DEFEATS THE PURPOSE OF SAVING FOR RETIREMENT.  THE LOAN HAS TO BE

                    REPAID.  IT ALSO INVOLVES ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATION TO HANDLE THAT.  IS --

                    IS IT YOUR INTENTION TO ALLOW OR NOT ALLOW BORROWING IN THIS -- IN THIS

                    PROGRAM?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  SO, I THINK MANY OF --

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THE -- THE RIGHT ANSWER IS DON'T

                    ALLOW IT.

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  OKAY.  SO I THINK WE -- WE LEFT

                    THAT TO THE BOARD, AND I --

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  -- THINK TO -- TO ULTIMATELY MAKE

                    THAT DECISION.  I WANT TO CIRCLE BACK TO FILL IN SOME OF THOSE GAPS ON THE

                    -- ON THE BOARD THAT WERE RAISED EARLIER.  SO, RIGHT NOW, WE HAVE IN

                    TERMS OF APPOINTEES THAT ARE OUTLINED IN THE LAW, TWO BY THE GOVERNOR,

                                         72



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ONE BY THE SENATE, ONE BY THE ASSEMBLY AND THEN THREE OTHERS, WHICH

                    ARE THE COMPTROLLER, COMMISSIONER OF TAX AND THE SUPERINTENDENT OF

                    DFS.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  OKAY.  THAT'S A GOOD -- OKAY.

                    VERY GOOD.  THAT'S FAIR.  THANK YOU, BOBBY.  I APPRECIATE YOUR -- YOUR

                    ANSWERS.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    FITZPATRICK.  EVEN THOUGH YOU'VE ESTABLISHED YOUR POSITION PRETTY CLEAR

                    IN QUESTIONING.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  I SPENT MANY YEARS WORKING IN

                    THE RETIREMENT FIELD AND IT'S -- THOSE WERE GREAT YEARS.  AND YOU REALLY

                    HAVE AN ABILITY TO HELP PEOPLE SAVE, BUILD WEALTH, SAVE FOR RETIREMENT

                    AND SAVE FOR A PROSPEROUS FUTURE.  I -- I THINK GIVEN THE -- THE MAKEUP

                    OR THE PROPOSED MAKEUP OF THE BOARD, IT'S -- IT'S VERY IMPORTANT -- I

                    KNOW THEY WILL HAVE FIDUCIARY RESPONSIBILITY, KEEPING THE INVESTMENT

                    MIX SOMEWHAT SIMPLE.  I WOULD SUGGEST THAT THEY OFFER TARGET DATE

                    FUNDS, WHICH MAKE IT VERY EASY FOR PEOPLE TO SAVE IN A DIVERSIFIED

                    PORTFOLIO FOR THE FUTURE.  BORROWING IS A POTENTIAL PROBLEM.  IF IT CAN BE

                    AVOIDED, THAT WOULD BE PREFERRED.

                                 BUT I APPLAUD THE SPONSOR FOR PROPOSING THIS.  I PLAN

                    TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT, AND I WANT TO THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR ALLOWING

                    ME TO SPEAK.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    FITZPATRICK.

                                         73



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW TECHNICAL QUESTIONS, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES, I WILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK -- THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR.

                    RODRIGUEZ.  I REALLY APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THIS

                    -- THIS LEGISLATION HERE.  MAYBE I MISSED IT A BIT EARLIER, THIS IS A NEW

                    BILL BUT IT CAME IN BEFORE I JOINED THE BODY, SO I'M NOT AS FAMILIAR WITH

                    IT AS -- AS SOME ARE.  HOW MANY NEW YORKERS HAVE AVAILED THEMSELVES

                    OF THE VOLUNTARY PROGRAM SINCE ITS INCEPTION UNTIL TODAY?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CURRENTLY, THOUGH, THE PROGRAM

                    IS NOT UP AND RUNNING NOW.  IN THIS PAST BUDGET, WE PASSED AN

                    EXTENSION TO ALLOW FOR MORE TIME.  AND I THINK THE -- THE PURPOSE OF THE

                    LEGISLATION IS TO MODEL US MORE CLOSELY TO STATES THAT ARE UP AND RUNNING

                    AND ARE SUCCESSFUL, AND THAT'S -- THAT'S WHY WE'RE -- WE'RE MOVING THIS

                    BILL NOW.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  SO WE HAVEN'T REALLY RUN --

                    RUN THE PILOT TEST OF GETTING THE -- THE MECHANICS OF THE PROGRAM UP AND

                    RUNNING WITH -- WITH VOLUNTEERS, WITH PEOPLE WHO ARE OFFERED THE

                    PROGRAM BUT HAVE OPTED INTO IT VOLUNTARILY.  BUT -- SO NOW THAT WE'RE

                    GOING -- WE'RE GOING TO PASS THIS BILL, AND I -- AND I ASSUME IT WILL PASS

                    AND WE'LL HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY FOR PEOPLE TO -- TO SAVE IN A MANDATORY

                    FASHION.  WHAT IS YOUR ESTIMATE OF HOW MANY NEW YORKERS WILL BE

                                         74



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ELIGIBLE FOR THIS PROGRAM BASED ON THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES IN A

                    BUSINESS AND THE CURRENT NUMBER OF NEW YORK'S SMALL BUSINESSES?

                    BECAUSE THIS IS REALLY GOING TO AFFECT NEW YORK'S SMALL BUSINESSES

                    SIGNIFICANTLY.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I THINK OUR INITIAL ESTIMATES

                    SHOW THAT ABOUT 3.5 MILLION NEW YORKERS HAVE NO ACCESS TO ANY

                    PROGRAM.  NOW, THOSE ARE ACROSS A VARIETY OF FIELDS.  I THINK WE COULD

                    PROBABLY EXTRACT A SIMILAR LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION AS WE'VE SEEN IN MAYBE

                    SOME OF THE THREE OTHER STATES THAT HAVE SIMILAR PROGRAMS UP AND

                    RUNNING.  SO, I WOULD -- I WOULD SAY THAT'S MAYBE A COMPARABLE

                    NUMBER.  BUT THE NUMBER OF EMPLOYERS, MAYBE AROUND 6,000 INITIALLY

                    IN -- IN THE -- IN THE FIRST COUPLE OF YEARS.  SO IT REALLY DOES -- THAT'S --

                    THAT'S, FOR EXAMPLE, WHAT IS BEING UTILIZED IN -- IN ILLINOIS, 10,000

                    APPROXIMATELY IN CALIFORNIA.  ILLINOIS, WHICH HAS BEEN RUNNING MUCH

                    LONGER, IS AROUND 16- OR 17,000, SO I THINK THAT'S MAYBE A GOOD PROXY

                    FOR WHERE WE COULD BE IN A FEW -- IN A FEW YEARS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND THANK YOU FOR THAT.  NOW, ARE

                    THOSE STATES, ARE THEY ACTUALLY REQUIRING ENROLLMENT OR ARE THEY ACTUALLY

                    JUST TAKING VOLUNTEERS?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THOSE THREE STATES HAVE THE

                    SIMILAR MODEL TO WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING AND PASSING TODAY WITH THE

                    MANDATORY PARTICIPATION FOR -- FOR BUSINESSES AND -- AND EMPLOYEE OPT

                    OUT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND HOW LONG HAVE THEY BEEN IN --

                    IN EFFECT?  IT SEEMS A -- QUITE A SMALL NUMBER FOR A GREAT STATE LIKE

                                         75



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    CALIFORNIA TO HAVE SO FEW PEOPLE IF IT WERE MANDATORY.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I THINK OREGON HAS BEEN THE

                    LONGEST, APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS, AND I THINK CALIFORNIA HAS BEEN

                    TWO, HAVING WORKED THROUGH A NUMBER OF -- OF LEGAL CHALLENGES TO GET

                    THERE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  VERY GOOD.  WELL, THANK YOU VERY

                    MUCH FOR -- FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  MY CONCERN IS TESTING THIS OUT.

                    YOU KNOW, I -- I THINK THIS IS A -- HAS POTENTIAL FOR INTRODUCING

                    CAPITALISM TO MANY PARTS OF -- OF NEW YORK STATE AGAINST PEOPLE'S WILL,

                    WHICH IS SOMETHING -- KIND OF A CURIOUS SORT OF SITUATION THAT WE FIND

                    OURSELF IN HERE.  AND I -- HAVING NOT BEING ABLE TO KNOW HOW MANY

                    NEW YORKERS THIS IS ACTUALLY GOING TO AFFECT IF IT'S PASSED, THAT LEAVES

                    ME GREAT CONCERN BECAUSE WE HAVEN'T REALLY GOT THE SYSTEM UP AND

                    RUNNING AND PILOTED IT.

                                 SO, FOR -- FOR THOSE CONCERNS, I HAVE SOME RESERVATIONS

                    ABOUT VOTING IN FAVOR OF THIS BILL.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A QUESTION?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                         76



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ

                    YIELDS, SIR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, ASSEMBLYMAN.

                    JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS FROM THE AG SIDE OF THIS.  I KNOW UP IN MY

                    DISTRICT WE HAVE A LOT OF FRUIT GROWERS AND WE HAVE MANY, MANY

                    EMPLOYEES COMING IN ESPECIALLY AT HARVEST TIME.  HOW WOULD THIS

                    AFFECT THEM?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  ARE THOSE FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES?

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  NO. SOME ARE, SOME NOT.  IS

                    THIS ONLY FOR FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I -- I BELIEVE THAT'S THE -- THE

                    MEASURE THAT WE'RE USING FOR -- FOR SMALL BUSINESSES, CORRECT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ARE YOU SURE OF THAT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  OKAY.  TEN EMPLOYEES.  IT'S A

                    CORRECTION.  SO, MR. MANKTELOW, ARE YOU -- ARE YOU SUGGESTING THAT

                    THOSE -- THOSE ARE TEN FOLKS THAT ARE OPERATING YEAR-ROUND?

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO -- SO, I DIDN'T KNOW IF YOU

                    ANSWERED THE QUESTION.  SO, IS THIS ONLY FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  NO.  IT'S TEN EMPLOYEES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  SO, IN THE FALL TIME

                    WHEN HARVEST STARTS UP IN OUR -- OUR AREA, YOU MAY HAVE 50 EMPLOYEES

                    THAT ARE WORKING ON A FARM, THEY COME IN TO HARVEST THE CROP.  SO, THE

                    EMPLOYER WILL THEN HAVE TO OFFER THIS TO EACH ONE OF THOSE EMPLOYEES

                    EVEN THOUGH THEY'RE -- THEY DON'T LIVE HERE IN NEW YORK?

                                         77



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YEAH, THAT -- WE DON'T -- THERE'S

                    NO CARVEOUT FOR ANY PARTICULAR SECTOR.  SO, IF THEY HAD 50 EMPLOYEES,

                    THEN YES.  AND -- AND OBVIOUSLY THOSE EMPLOYEES COULD OPT OUT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  IS THERE ANY TAX INCENTIVES FOR

                    THESE EMPLOYERS TO -- TO HELP THEM BY DOING THIS?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  NOT AT THIS TIME.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU

                    WOULD CONSIDER DOING, MOVING FORWARD?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  SURE.  WE'RE ALWAYS OPEN TO

                    IDEAS AND SUGGESTIONS.  SURE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AND I THINK MY -- MY

                    COLLEAGUE JUST BEFORE ME HAD TALKED ABOUT A POSSIBLE PILOT PROGRAM.  IS

                    THERE ANY CONSIDERATION IN DOING THAT AS WELL?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  WELL, I THINK IN THAT RESPECT WE

                    HAVE PILOT PROGRAMS.  THEY'RE BEING PILOTED BY TWO -- THREE OTHER STATES

                    AND COUNTING.  I THINK IT'S -- WE'RE -- WE'RE IN A POSITION WHERE THIS IS

                    CLEARLY SUCCESSFUL AND HAPPENING IN OTHER PLACES AND -- AND, YOU KNOW,

                    WE'RE -- WE'RE NOT GOING TO BE OFF THE GROUND FOR AT LEAST ANOTHER TWO

                    YEARS BY THE TIME WE'RE ALL UP AND RUNNING.  SO, I THINK THAT'S A

                    DETRIMENT, YOU KNOW, TO -- TO CONTINUING TO WAIT AND -- AND MAKE ANY

                    DELAY FOR A PILOT PROGRAM WHEN WE CAN LOOK AND CLEARLY SEE THAT, YOU

                    KNOW, STATES WITH, YOU KNOW, SMALLER -- I WOULD ARGUE SMALLER

                    POPULATIONS, BUT, YOU KNOW, ARE -- ARE MOVING AHEAD SUCCESSFULLY.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  SO, IF IT'S NOT GOING TO

                    TAKE EFFECT FOR ANOTHER TWO YEARS, WOULD -- WOULD YOU CONSIDER

                                         78



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MEETING WITH SOME OF THE FARMING COMMUNITIES OR SOME OF THE FARM

                    BUSINESSOWNERS AND TALKING WITH THEM BEFORE THIS IS ACTUALLY

                    IMPLEMENTED INTO PLACE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  WELL, I THINK WHAT'S IMPORTANT IS

                    THAT WE BUILT THE STRUCTURE WHICH ALLOWED FOR THE BOARD TO PROVIDE

                    FEEDBACK AND -- AND ENACT REGULATIONS THAT -- THAT WORK AND -- AND

                    PROVIDE FEEDBACK.  SO, THAT'S SOMETHING WE COULD CERTAINLY FIX IF IT

                    WERE A PROBLEM OR IF SOMETHING WERE REQUIRED IN THE FUTURE.  BUT I

                    THINK, YOU KNOW, MOVING AHEAD WITH THIS LEGISLATION, BECAUSE WE ARE

                    ALREADY DELAYED IN IMPLEMENTING, YOU KNOW, IS -- IS CRITICAL, AND SO TO

                    MAKING SURE THAT WE -- WE GET SOMETHING ON THE GROUND FOR THE 3.5

                    MILLION NEW YORKERS WHO HAVE ACCESS TO NOTHING RIGHT NOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  AND I -- I THINK IT IS

                    IMPORTANT TO GET IT ON THE GROUND, BUT I THINK AT THE SAME TIME IT'S ALSO

                    IMPORTANT TO TAKE BABY STEPS AND NOT JUST DO SOMETHING RADICAL ALL OF A

                    SUDDEN ACROSS THE BOARD.  BECAUSE I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, THE LITTLE BIT

                    I READ ON THE LEGISLATION AND LISTENING TO THE OTHER COLLEAGUES ABOUT THIS

                    BILL, I -- I DO HAVE CONCERNS THAT, AGAIN, THAT WE'RE ASKING OUR

                    EMPLOYERS TO DO ANOTHER STEP, AND ESPECIALLY IN OUR AG COMMUNITIES

                    WHERE A LOT OF THESE EMPLOYEES ARE ONLY HERE FOR TWO TO THREE MONTHS,

                    JUST TO DO THAT MUCH WORK, THAT LEGWORK UPFRONT BEFORE THEY EVEN GET

                    HERE OR ONCE THEY GET HERE AND ARE EMPLOYED, THAT'S A LOT OF WORK THAT

                    WE'RE ADDING TO THE EMPLOYERS AGAIN.  SO I JUST A -- JUST A CONSIDERATION

                    AND I ASK YOU TO -- TO THINK ABOUT THAT.  AND IF YOU WANT TO, I'D BE MORE

                    THAN WILLING TO SIT DOWN WITH YOU AND -- AND WORK THROUGH THAT FOR THE

                                         79



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    AG COMMUNITY.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  WELL, WE'RE CERTAINLY OPEN.  AND

                    -- AND JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY, HOW ARE THE -- THESE FARMERS HANDLING TAX

                    WITHHOLDINGS, SOCIAL SECURITY WITHHOLDINGS, MEDICAID WITHHOLDINGS?

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WELL, THAT'S -- THAT'S ALREADY

                    DONE.  BUT NOW WE'RE ASK -- ADDING ANOTHER STEP, AND I WOULD THINK

                    THAT -- YOU KNOW, BEING A FORMER FRUIT FARMER WORKING WITH THE

                    WORKERS THAT HARVESTED OUR CROPS, WHAT THEY WANT TO DO IS THEY WANT TO

                    SEND AS MUCH MONEY BACK HOME.  THEY --  THEY DON'T WANT TO BE

                    INVOLVED IN RETIREMENT.  I -- I THINK IT'S GOOD TO TALK TO THEM AND I THINK

                    IT'S GOOD FOR THE FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES TO HAVE THAT OPTION.  BUT BECAUSE

                    WE'RE NOT ALLOWING ANY SORT OF DISCONNECT FOR PART-TIMERS OTHER THAN

                    THEY CAN OPT OUT, WE'RE STILL GOING TO PUT A LOT OF WORK BACK ON THE

                    EMPLOYER TO -- TO GET THIS MESSAGE ACROSS.  THOSE -- THOSE ARE JUST SOME

                    OF MY CONCERNS.  BUT I -- I THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THE BILL FORWARD.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WOULD THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. RODRIGUEZ.  IN MY

                                         80



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    COUNTY WE HAVE A NUMBER OF SEASONAL EMPLOYEES -- EMPLOYERS.  WE

                    HAVE A LOT OF TOURISM, AND SO, AN EMPLOYER MIGHT HAVE, YOU KNOW, ONE

                    OR TWO EMPLOYEES IN THE WINTER AND HAVE 30 TO 40 EMPLOYEES IN THE

                    SUMMER.  IF THIS PROGRAM GOES MANDATORY, WOULD THAT EMPLOYER BE

                    OBLIGATED TO OFFER THIS PROGRAM WHEN HE CROSSES OVER TEN EMPLOYEES,

                    THAT WHEN HE CROSSES THAT THRESHOLD, WHENEVER THAT MIGHT BE DURING THE

                    SEASON?  AND THE COROLLARY QUESTION IS, WHEN HE DROPS BELOW TEN CAN

                    HE THEN DROP IT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YEAH, SO I THINK THE ANSWER

                    WOULD BE YES.  DURING THAT PERIOD OF TIME THEY -- THEY WOULD BE

                    REQUIRED TO OPEN -- TO OFFER THAT AND -- AND THE EMPLOYEE CAN OPT OUT.

                    AND I THINK THAT'S AN IMPORTANT POINT OF THE -- OF THE -- OF THE PROGRAM

                    IS THAT WE HAVE SOMETIMES THE LOW-WAGE EARNERS, SEASONAL WORKERS,

                    AND DURING THAT PERIOD OF TIME THEY CAN BE PARTICIPATING WHILE THEY'RE

                    EARNING, AND THEN OTHER PERIODS OF TIME NOT BE -- BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE,

                    BUT THEN POTENTIALLY PICK THAT UP THE FOLLOWING SEASON.  SO, I THINK

                    THAT'S -- THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'VE CREATED PORTABLE BENEFITS

                    AND THIS OPPORTUNITY FOR IT TO -- TO FOLLOW THEM IN -- IN -- IN -- DURING

                    THOSE TIME PERIODS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AM I CORRECT THIS LEGISLATION DOES

                    NOT DISTINGUISH BETWEEN PART-TIME OR FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES, IT'S JUST A

                    HEAD COUNT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT, IT'S JUST A HEAD COUNT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO, A -- A COMPANY THAT HAS TEN

                    FULL-TIME EMPLOYEES WOULD FACE THE SAME OBLIGATIONS AS THE COMPANY

                                         81



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THAT MIGHT HAVE ONE FULL-TIME AND NINE PART-TIME?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WE TALKED A LITTLE BIT ABOUT THE

                    APPOINTEES FOR THIS GOVERNING BOARD.  AND IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING IT'S THE

                    COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION, WHO'S APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR,

                    SUPERINTENDANT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES, APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR,

                    STATE COMPTROLLER, TWO APPOINTMENTS BY THE MAJORITY, A REPRESENTATIVE

                    OF THE EMPLOYER APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR, A REPRESENTATIVE EMPLOYEE

                    APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE PARTICIPANTS

                    APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR.  SO, THE GOVERNOR REALLY CONTROLS FIVE OUT

                    OF THE SEVEN SEATS, CORRECT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  IS THERE ANY REASON WHY THERE'S NO

                    APPOINTMENTS BY THE MINORITY ON THIS COMMITTEE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I BELIEVE WHEN WE ORIGINALLY

                    PASSED THE LEGISLATION THAT WAS THE AGREEMENT THAT WAS ARRIVED TO WITH

                    THE EXECUTIVE.  AND, MR. GOODELL, JUST TO GO BACK TO ONE OF YOUR

                    EARLIER QUESTIONS, OR SUGGESTIONS.  WE -- WE CHECKED THE LEGISLATION

                    AND THE EMPLOYER HAS TO HAVE HAD -- HAVE EMPLOYED TEN EMPLOYEES AT

                    ALL TIMES DURING THE PREVIOUS YEAR.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.  ALTHOUGH THEY COULD BE TEN

                    PART-TIME EMPLOYEES?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  MM-HMM.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  YOU MENTIONED THAT THE VOLUNTARY

                    PROGRAM THAT WE IMPLEMENTED HAS NO PARTICIPANTS.  THIS PROGRAM

                                         82



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    WOULD CHANGE IT FROM THE SECURE CHOICE PROGRAM TO THE SECURE NO

                    CHOICE PROGRAM, RIGHT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I WOULD SAY A SECURE MORE

                    CHOICES FOR MORE PEOPLE BY PARTICIPATING.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.  AND YOU INDICATED THAT

                    POTENTIALLY 3.5 MILLION PEOPLE WOULD BE ELIGIBLE TO PARTICIPATE?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  NO.  THAT -- THAT'S THE NUMBER OF

                    PEOPLE THAT ARE NOT OFFERED ANYTHING IN THE STATE THROUGH ANY

                    WORKFORCE PROGRAM.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  NOT THE NUMBER THAT ARE -- ARE IN

                    SMALL BUSINESSES --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND HOW MANY EMPLOYEES DO WE

                    HAVE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK THAT WORK FOR A COMPANY THAT'S TEN OR

                    MORE EMPLOYEES?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CAN YOU REPEAT THAT?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  HOW MANY PEOPLE DO WE HAVE

                    WORKING IN NEW YORK STATE FOR TEN OR MORE -- EMPLOYED IN A COMPANY

                    THAT HIRES TEN OR MORE EMPLOYEES?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  LET ME SEE IF I CAN GET THAT --

                    THAT INFORMATION FOR YOU, MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.  NOW, RIGHT NOW EMPLOYEES

                    ARE REQUIRED TO PAY FICA.  THAT COMES OUT OF THEIR SHARE, RIGHT?  I

                    THINK THAT'S 6.75 PERCENT.  EMPLOYEES ARE REQUIRED TO PAY OR MAY BE

                    REQUIRED TO PAY THE ENTIRE COST OF PAID FAMILY LEAVE.  THAT'S A PAYROLL

                                         83



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    DEDUCTION.  OF COURSE THEY'RE OBLIGATED TO PAY FEDERAL INCOME TAX.

                    THAT'S A PAYROLL DEDUCTION.  THEY'RE OBLIGATED TO PAY NEW YORK STATE

                    INCOME TAX.  THAT'S A PAYROLL DEDUCTION.  HOW MUCH DO ALL THESE

                    PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS, INCLUDING THIS 3 PERCENT AMOUNT AS -- AS A

                    THRESHOLD, HOW MUCH DOES THAT ALL ADD UP?  I MEAN, HOW MUCH DO

                    EMPLOYEES ACTUALLY GET TO TAKE HOME AFTER A HARD DAY AT WORK?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I MEAN, I THINK AN IMPORTANT

                    DISTINCTION THERE IS IN THOSE YOU'RE PAYING TAXES OR SOME OTHER ISSUE.

                    WITH THE PROGRAM THAT WE'RE SUGGESTING, YOU'RE PAYING YOURSELF.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WELL --

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  YOU ARE INVESTING IN YOURSELF

                    AND IN YOUR OWN RETIREMENT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  ISN'T THAT THE THEORY --

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  IT'S YOUR OWN MONEY TO --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  ISN'T THAT THE THEORY FOR FICA?  I

                    MEAN, THAT'S THE -- -- THAT'S THE THEORY, RIGHT, FOR SOCIAL SECURITY.  THE

                    6.75 PERCENT IS GOING FOR SOCIAL SECURITY, RIGHT?

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  CORRECT.  REFERRING TO SOMEONE

                    --  (INAUDIBLE)

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND SO WHAT YOU'RE BASICALLY

                    SAYING IS THAT 6.75 PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, WE SHOULD BE LOOKING CLOSER

                    TO 10 PERCENT.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  IN TERMS OF INDIVIDUAL RETIREMENT

                    SAVINGS?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  YES.

                                         84



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  I'M SURE IT'S -- YOU KNOW --WE

                    ALLOW MORE THAN THAT ON 401(K)S, RIGHT?  SO CERTAINLY, THE -- THE

                    RECOMMENDED AMOUNT IS WHAT -- WHAT -- IS AS MUCH AS YOU CAN -- YOU

                    CAN DO.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. RODRIGUEZ.  I

                    APPRECIATE YOUR QUESTIONS.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO, A FEW YEARS AGO WE WERE

                    PRESENTED WITH A SECURE CHOICE PROGRAM AND IT REALLY WAS A CHOICE, IT

                    WAS ENTIRELY VOLUNTARY.  IT WAS VOLUNTARY ON THE PART OF EMPLOYERS AND

                    IT WAS VOLUNTARY ON THE PART OF EMPLOYEES.  AND -- AND WE HEARD -- WE

                    HEARD BACK FROM EMPLOYERS AND WE HEARD BACK FROM EMPLOYEES, AND

                    IRONY -- IRONICALLY, APPARENTLY NO ONE HAS OPTED INTO THIS PROGRAM.  AND

                    SO WHEN PEOPLE DIDN'T DO WHAT WE WANTED TO DO ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS,

                    WE TURN AROUND AND THIS BILL WOULD MAKE IT MANDATORY.  ONE MORE

                    BURDEN ON ALL THE EMPLOYERS AND EMPLOYEES IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                    FOR EMPLOYERS, IT MEANS ONE MORE PAYROLL DEDUCTION, ONE MORE

                    SEPARATE PAYMENT ON TOP OF THE TAX WITHHOLDING FROM THE STATE, TAX

                    WITHHOLDING FOR THE FEDERAL, THE TAX WITHHOLDING FOR SOCIAL SECURITY,

                    THE PAYROLL WITHHOLDING FOR PAID FAMILY LEAVE AND ALL THE OTHER

                    EXPENSES THAT WE IMPOSE ON EMPLOYERS AND EXPECT THEM TO COLLECT.  I

                    LIKE VOLUNTARY.  THE REASON I LIKE VOLUNTARY IS WE LEAVE IT UP TO THE

                    INDIVIDUALS TO SELECT WHAT THEY WANT TO DO IN THEIR BEST INTEREST.  SO I'M

                                         85



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    HESITANT TO IMPOSE ONE MORE EXPENSIVE MANDATE ON OUR EMPLOYERS AS

                    THEY ARE STRUGGLING TO RECOVER AND PUT EMPLOYEES WHO FAIL TO OPT OUT

                    INTO A PROGRAM THAT TAKES ANOTHER 3 PERCENT OUT OF THEIR PAY.

                                 SO FOR THOSE REASONS, WHILE I SUPPORTED THE INITIAL

                    VOLUNTARY PROGRAM, I WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING THIS ADDITIONAL MANDATE.

                    THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 3213-A.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE WILL BE GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION, BUT THOSE

                    WHO SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  OUR DEMOCRATIC COLLEAGUES WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.  HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE SOME EXCEPTIONS AND THOSE

                    MEMBERS SHOULD FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT THE

                                         86



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    PREVIOUSLY-GIVEN NUMBER AND WE WILL PROPERLY RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.  THANK

                    YOU, MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. RODRIGUEZ:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR THE

                    OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I WANT TO CERTAINLY THANK A NUMBER OF

                    DIFFERENT PARTICIPANTS WHO HAVE BEEN WORKING ON THIS LEGISLATION FOR

                    QUITE SOME TIME, INCLUDING AARP.  I THINK WHAT'S IMPORTANT HERE IS WE

                    ARE IN A RETIREMENT CRISIS.  ONE THAT IS DISPROPORTIONATELY IMPACTING

                    BLACK AND BROWN COMMUNITIES WHO DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO A WORKPLACE

                    EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT SAVINGS PROGRAM.  WE KNOW THAT 67 PERCENT OF

                    HISPANICS HAVE NO WAY TO SAVE.  THE NUMBER IS OVER 50 PERCENT OF

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND OVER 60 PERCENT OF ASIANS.  AND WE KNOW THAT

                    THE RATE OF SAVINGS IS 15 TIMES HIGHER IF YOU HAVE AN EMPLOYER-BASED

                    PROGRAM.  NOW, WE HAVE SIGNIFICANT MODELS THAT ARE OUT THERE THAT ARE

                    WORKING, THAT ARE PREDOMINANTLY FOCUSED ON LOW-INCOME COMMUNITIES.

                    THEY ARE NOT SAVING TONS.  THIS IS NOT GOING TO MAKE THEM RICH, BUT THIS

                    WILL MAKE SURE THAT THEY DON'T GO BROKE.  THE AVERAGE CONTRIBUTION IS

                    ROUGHLY $150 A MONTH.  BUT COMPOUNDING INTEREST IS GOING TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT THEY HAVE SOMETHING AT THE END OF THE DAY.  AND OF COURSE

                    THIS IS AN OPTIONAL PROGRAM.  THE EMPLOYEE CAN OPT OUT IF THEY CHOOSE

                    NOT TO PARTICIPATE.  BUT WE KNOW THAT BY ABLE -- BY BEING ABLE TO SAVE,

                    BY BEING ABLE TO DO THAT AND BUDGET AROUND THIS 3 PERCENT, YOU KNOW,

                    YOU WILL BE ABLE TO SEE SOMETHING AT THE END OF THE DAY WITH RESPECT TO

                                         87



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THE NEST EGG GROWING.

                                 THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF CONVERSATION ABOUT THE COST TO

                    THE SMALL BUSINESS.  LITERALLY, IT IS A PUSH OF A BUTTON.  IF THEY HAVE

                    QUICKBOOKS OR ADP, IF THEY ARE DOING WITHHOLDINGS FOR OTHER THINGS,

                    THIS IS LITERALLY A TOGGLE IN THAT -- IN THAT APPLICATION IN WHICH THEY

                    MANAGE THEIR BOOKS.  SO, WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS NOT AN

                    OVERBURDENSOME MANDATE ON SMALL BUSINESSES.  WE ARE GETTING THEM

                    OUT OF THE BUSINESS OF TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO OFFER A 401(K), WE ARE

                    PUTTING THEM IN THE BUSINESS OF PROVIDING A BENEFIT TO THEIR EMPLOYEES

                    THAT THEY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO DO INDIVIDUALLY.  AND I HOPE THAT WE'RE

                    ABLE TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS QUICKLY, AND -- AND PUT THIS IN PLACE IN

                    NEW YORK STATE SO THAT WE JOIN ILLINOIS, OREGON AND CALIFORNIA AND

                    MAKE SURE WE PROVIDE BENEFITS -- RETIREMENT BENEFITS TO ALL WORKERS IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RODRIGUEZ IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  MY COLLEAGUES, WE NEED TO HELP PEOPLE SAVE MONEY

                    FOR RETIREMENT.  THIS PROGRAM IS WORTH A TRY.  I SPENT 16 YEARS IN THE

                    RETIREMENT BUSINESS.  AND NOTHING GAVE ME A BIGGER SENSE OF

                    SATISFACTION THAN SITTING DOWN WITH A NEW EMPLOYEE, SOMEONE WHO WAS

                    NOT SOPHISTICATED IN THE FIELD OF INVESTING, BUT TEACHING THAT PERSON

                    HOW THE PROGRAM WORKED AND HOW GIVEN TIME -- GIVEN TIME AND THE

                    MIRACLE OF COMPOUNDING, THEY COULD SAVE MONEY AND HAVE A NEST EGG

                                         88



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    20, 30 OR 40 MORE YEARS DOWN THE ROAD.  THIS IS IMPORTANT.  AND I HAVE

                    EVERY TRUST IN COMPTROLLER DINAPOLI AND THE OTHERS WHO WILL OVERSEE

                    THIS THAT THEY WILL BE GOOD FIDUCIARIES, THAT THEY WILL HAVE A -- AN AMPLE

                    INVESTMENT MIX, ESPECIALLY USING TARGET DATE FUNDS, WHICH ARE A

                    WONDERFUL CREATION TO HELP PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT SOPHISTICATED SAVE IN A

                    DIVERSIFIED PORTFOLIO.  THIS HAS THE POTENTIAL TO BE A VERY, VERY GOOD

                    THING FOR THE PEOPLE OF NEW YORK WHO DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TODAY TO

                    SMALL RETIREMENT PLANS.  RUNNING A 401(K) CAN BE EXPENSIVE.  BUT THIS

                    IS A WAY TO OFFER A GOOD PLAN TO PEOPLE AT A REASONABLE COST.  AND

                    AGAIN, THE FIDUCIARIES MUST KEEP AN EYE ON FEES, ON COSTS.  BUT THIS HAS

                    THE POTENTIAL TO BE A GREAT THING AND I WISH IT WELL.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. FITZPATRICK IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO MY

                    COLLEAGUES WHO ARE HERE ON THE FLOOR AND VOTED DIRECTLY, PLEASE RECORD

                    MR. BROWN IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AS WELL AS MR. FITZPATRICK, MR.

                    MORINELLO, MR. NORRIS AND MR. WALCZYK.  ALSO, MR. BYRNE -- I'M -- I

                    APOLOGIZE.  MS. BYRNES AND MR. GANDOLFO.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                         89



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 PAGE 19, CALENDAR NO. 226, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S01630-A, CALENDAR NO.

                    226, SENATOR SAVINO (A04651, ABBATE, MCDONALD, ZEBROWSKI, OTIS,

                    WOERNER).  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    THIRD-PARTY DELIVERY SERVICES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THIS LEGISLATION REQUIRES ANY FOOD

                    DELIVERY SERVICE TO HAVE A WRITTEN CONTRACT THAT CONTAINS VARIOUS TERMS

                    AND CONDITIONS AS A CONDITION OF LISTING OR ADVERTISING, PROMOTING OR

                    SELLING ANY PARTICULAR FOOD FROM A RESTAURANT, INCLUDING PROVISIONS THAT

                    RELATE TO INDEMNIFICATION.  AND AS AN ATTORNEY, I ALWAYS LIKE TO HAVE

                    WRITTEN CONTRACTS.  BUT I AM A LITTLE CONCERNED THAT WE MAY BE

                    MICROMANAGING THIS INDUSTRY AND THAT IT SHOULD BE UP TO THE PARTIES TO

                    DECIDE HOW TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.  KEEP IN MIND THAT A RESTAURANT THAT

                    DOESN'T HAVE ANY CONTRACT FOR A FOOD DELIVERY SERVICE HAS NO OBLIGATION

                    TO PAY IT.  THE ENTIRE COST WILL BE BORNE BY THE CONSUMER.  THIS CHANGES

                    THAT ARRANGEMENT AND REQUIRES A WRITTEN CONTRACT.  A LOT OF US WILL BE

                    SUPPORTING THIS BECAUSE WE LIKE CONTRACTS, ESPECIALLY US LAWYERS WHO

                    WRITE THEM, BUT SOME WILL BE CONCERNED THAT WE'RE MICROMANAGING

                    BUSINESSES.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR.

                                         90



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. MCDONALD.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I WANT

                    TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS LEGISLATION.  AND I UNDERSTAND THE POINT

                    ABOUT POTENTIALLY MICROMANAGING BUSINESSES.  BUT ON THE SAME TOKEN, I

                    JUST WANT TO SHARE WHAT HAPPENED IN MY DISTRICT, WHICH IS ONE OF THE

                    REASONS WHY I SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION.  WE HAVE BUSINESSES WHERE

                    THEIR MENUS OFF THEIR WEBSITE WERE LITERALLY BEING ELECTRONICALLY

                    SCRAPED, PRICES WERE BEING EDITED ON TOP OF IT.  AND CUSTOMERS WERE

                    COMING IN, QUESTIONING WHY THE PRICES WERE CHANGING SO MUCH.  IT GOT

                    INTO A BUSINESS REPUTATION ISSUE.  AND, YOU KNOW, FROM MY PERSPECTIVE,

                    THIS IS WHY I SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION.  WE LIKE CONTRACTS.  IT'S BASICALLY

                    THE TERMS OF ENGAGEMENT.  IT'S HOW THINGS ARE TO BE DONE.  AND I THINK

                    IT'S A PROPER WAY TO MOVE FORWARD IN THIS SITUATION AS THIS INDUSTRY

                    CONTINUES TO GROW AND EVOLVE.  AND I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR AND

                    THE CHAIR FOR THEIR EFFORTS IN THIS ENDEAVOR.  AND I WILL BE SUPPORTING

                    IT --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  -- AS YOU CAN TELL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?

                                 OH, EXCUSE ME.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 60TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                                         91



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 1630-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. ABBATE TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. ABBATE:  THANK YOU -- THANK YOU VERY MUCH

                    TO MY COLLEAGUES.  THIS IS AN IMPORTANT BILL, ESPECIALLY TO OUR LOCAL

                    RESTAURANTS WHO ARE REALLY FEELING THE PINCH AND THEY'RE -- AND I KNOW

                    WE'RE NOT ALLOWED TO USE OUR COLLEAGUES' NAMES ON THE FLOOR, BUT TO MY

                    COLLEAGUE IN SUFFOLK COUNTY, I JUST WANTED TO LET HIM KNOW IT WASN'T A

                    GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEE BILL, THIS ONE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU FOR

                    FOLLOWING THE RULES SO CLOSELY, MR. ABBATE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  IN

                    ADDITION TO MYSELF, PLEASE RECORD MR. ANGELINO IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK

                    YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU.  MR.

                                         92



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    SPEAKER, IF WE CAN NOW CALL OUR ATTENTION TO PAGE 18, WE'RE GOING TO

                    TAKE UP TWO BILLS ON THAT PAGE, CALENDAR NO. 206 AND 207.  BOTH OF

                    THEM ARE SPONSORED BY MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06046, CALENDAR NO.

                    206, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, THIELE, CARROLL, QUART, DICKENS, GALEF.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE ELECTION LAW, IN RELATION TO ELECTRONIC APPLICATIONS

                    FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS

                    UPON THE EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  EXPLANATION ON THIS BILL.  THIS BILL WOULD PROVIDE AN

                    ADDITIONAL METHOD OF QUALIFIED VOTERS REQUESTING ABSENTEE BALLOTS

                    THROUGH ELECTRONIC MEANS.  THIS WILL INCREASE VOTER PARTICIPATION,

                    PROMOTING A LEVEL OF SAFETY DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC.  SECTION

                    1, PARAGRAPH (D) OF SUBDIVISION 2 OF SECTION 8-400 OF THE ELECTION LAW

                    AS SEPARATELY AMENDED BY CHAPTERS 97 AND 104 OF THE LAWS OF 2010 IS

                    AMENDED TO ALLOW VOTERS TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT FROM THE BOARD

                    OF ELECTIONS WHICH ELIMINATE THE REQUIREMENT TO SIGN THE ABSENTEE

                    APPLICATION TO GET A VOTER.  IN 2020 IN LIGHT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

                    EMERGENCY, WE PASSED SEVERAL ELECTION REFORM BILLS, INCLUDING

                    LEGISLATION ALLOWING VOTERS TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT THROUGH A

                    ELECTRONIC PORTAL.  THAT BILL HAS SINCE EXPIRED AS OF DECEMBER 31ST,

                    2020.  BUT THE EXTENUATING NATURE OF THE COVID-19 EMERGENCY HAS

                                         93



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    NECESSITATED AN EXTENSION OF THE LAWS.  BY EXTENDING THESE LAWS WE

                    WILL ALLOW MORE QUALIFIED VOTERS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE UPCOMING 2021

                    NEW YORK CITY ELECTIONS AND NEW YORK STATE ELECTIONS.  THIS

                    LEGISLATION ALSO ALLOWS A TEMPORARY EXTENSION OF THE PROVISIONS TO

                    ALLOW A BALLOT TO BE SUBMITTED ELECTRONICALLY THROUGH THE END OF THE

                    YEAR.  THE BILLS ARE A TEMPORARY HOLDOVER TO GET US THROUGH NEW YORK

                    CITY 2021 ELECTION CYCLE AFTER WHICH MY COLLEAGUE'S BILL, WALKER'S BILL,

                    A.6970 WHICH ESTABLISHES A PERMANENT ELECTRONIC ABSENTEE BALLOT

                    APPLICATION TRANSMITTAL SYSTEM WOULD TAKE EFFECT, IF IT BECOMES LAW.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. NORRIS.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD JUST FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. BICHOTTE --

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  -- HERMELYN, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I JUST WANT TO

                    CLARIFY THAT FOR THIS BILL THAT WILL BE AN EXTENSION THROUGH THE END OF THE

                    YEAR, IF SOMEONE MAKES AN APPLICATION FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT THROUGH

                    THE PORTAL OR BY A LETTER OR BY AN APPLICATION PROCESS, THEY DO NOT HAVE

                    TO SIGN WITH THEIR SIGNATURE VERIFYING THE INFORMATION.  WOULD THAT BE

                    CORRECT?

                                         94



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YES, THAT WOULD BE

                    CORRECT.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  WHY DON'T WE REQUIRE A SIGNATURE ON

                    THIS APPLICATION TO VERIFY THE IDENTITY OF THE VOTER?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  BECAUSE ONCE THE

                    VOTER RECEIVES THE ACTUAL BALLOT, THERE IS AN ENVELOPE THAT CAN VERIFY THE

                    PERSON'S IDENTITY.  MANY TIMES, LIKE MY LATE MOTHER WAS NOT ABLE TO

                    REQUEST HER OWN ABSENTEE BALLOT, AND I WOULD HAVE TO DO IT ON HER

                    BEHALF.  AND THERE -- AND BECAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC, SIGNATURES WERE

                    ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE.  THERE ARE PEOPLE IN HOUSEHOLDS WHO DON'T HAVE THE

                    ELECTRONIC MEANS TO SCAN A SIGNATURE AND SO FORTH.  SO THIS, AGAIN, IS A

                    PORTAL THAT WOULD JUST ALLOW ANYONE TO REQUEST FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT,

                    BUT THE ACTUAL BALLOT WHEN YOU'RE SENDING IT, WE VERIFY THE PERSON'S

                    IDENTITY.  THEY HAVE A SIGNATURE ON IT.  AND IF YOU KNOW, LAST YEAR A LOT

                    OF THE MAIL-IN BALLOTS WERE NOT VALID BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE DIDN'T EVEN

                    SIGN THE BALLOT, THEY DIDN'T KNOW.  OF WHICH WE THEN AMENDED -- NOT

                    AMENDED, BUT WE REDESIGNED THE ENVELOPE TO PUT A BIG RED X SO THAT

                    PEOPLE KNOW TO SIGN THEIR ENVELOPES, THEIR BALLOT ENVELOPES.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  NOW, INDIVIDUAL SIGNATURES DO CHANGE

                    OVER TIME.  I MEAN, MINE HAS CHANGED SINCE I FIRST REGISTERED TO VOTE

                    WHEN I WAS 18.  SO THAT'S ONE OF THE REASONS WHY IT'S IMPORTANT, I

                    BELIEVE, TO HAVE THE SIGNATURE WHEN SOMEONE APPLIES FOR THE ABSENTEE

                    BALLOT IN CURRENT TIME AND THEN BE ABLE TO CHECK AND VERIFY THAT

                    SIGNATURE ON THE BACK AND WHEN THEY SIGN IN FRONT OF THAT BIG X WHICH

                    WE -- I BELIEVE WE VOTED FOR AND SUPPORTED IN LAST YEAR'S -- FOLLOWING

                                         95



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    LAST YEAR'S ELECTIONS.  SO WOULD YOU AGREE THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE A

                    RELIABLE SIGNATURE IN AT LEAST CURRENT TIME FOR -- FOR CANDIDATES AND

                    OTHERS TO VERIFY THAT IT IS THE ACTUAL VOTER WHO'S FILLING OUT THAT ABSENTEE

                    BALLOT APPLICATION AND THEN SUBSEQUENTLY FILLING OUT THE ABSENTEE BALLOT

                    ITSELF?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  WELL, AGAIN, IT

                    DOESN'T MATTER IF YOU'RE REQUESTING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT.  IT'S THE ACTUAL

                    BALLOT ITSELF THAT WE NEED TO VERIFY.  AND EVEN IF YOUR SIGNATURE HAS

                    CHANGED, TYPICALLY IF THERE'S ANY TYPE OF DISPUTE, YOU CAN CERTAINLY

                    MATCH IT AGAINST THE VOTER CARD OR YOU UPDATE THE VOTER CARD WITH YOUR

                    MOST -- YOUR MOST RECENT SIGNATURE.  BUT EVEN IF YOUR SIGNATURE

                    CHANGES, YOU KNOW, IF WE WERE TO HIRE A FORENSIC EXPERT, YOUR STROKES,

                    THE STROKES OF YOUR SIGNATURES REMAIN THE SAME.  YOU MAY HAVE A

                    DIFFERENT SWERVE OR CURVE, BUT IT DOESN'T CHANGE MUCH.  AND AGAIN, THAT

                    SHOULD NOT -- THAT SHOULD NOT BE A REASON FOR NOT HAVING YOUR SIGNATURE.

                    I MEAN, WE ARE -- WE ARE REQUIRING YOUR SIGNATURES TO BE ON THE

                    ENVELOPE.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  ON THE ENVELOPE.  BUT NOT ON THE

                    APPLICATION TO MAKE SURE IT'S ONE IN THE SAME, VERY SIMILAR IN CURRENT

                    TIME.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  NO.  I MEAN, LIKE, IF

                    YOU HAD TO REQUEST BALLOTS FOR YOUR -- YOUR PARENTS, AND LET'S SAY YOUR

                    PARENT WASN'T ABLE TO SIGN OR DIDN'T HAVE ANY MEANS TO SIGN, YOU KNOW,

                    THAT WOULD BE PUTTING A BURDEN.  THAT WOULD BE PUTTING A BURDEN.  AS

                    YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, VOTING IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT AND WE HAVE A

                                         96



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    NUMBER OF CASES THAT WOULD RESTRICT ANY TYPE OF ELECTION QUALIFICATION

                    LAW THAT WOULD PUT A BURDEN ON SOMEONE -- ACCESS TO A BALLOT, SOMEONE

                    AN OPPORTUNITY TO VOTE.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  SO SOMEONE CAN GO IN ON THE PORTAL,

                    PUT IN THE INFORMATION, THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS WILL THEN JUST

                    AUTOMATICALLY SEND TO THAT HOUSEHOLD A BALLOT, IS THAT CORRECT?  WITHOUT

                    -- WITHOUT ANY SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ON AN ABSENTEE BALLOT FOR THIS YEAR

                    UNDER THIS PROPOSED LEGISLATION THAT YOU PUT FORTH?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  RIGHT.  AND IT

                    WORKED ACTUALLY PRETTY WELL LAST YEAR.  SO WE'RE NOT CHANGING ANYTHING.

                    WE -- I MEAN, WE DO HAVE A STUDY THAT SHOWS THAT, YOU KNOW, WE DIDN'T

                    FIND ANY FRAUD, THERE WERE NO CASE OF FRAUDS.  IT -- IT -- AGAIN, IT ALLOWED

                    A LOT OF PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO VOTE AND RECEIVE THEIR BALLOTS.  LAST YEAR

                    THE GOVERNOR ISSUED AN EXECUTIVE ORDER WHERE EVERYBODY JUST GOT A

                    BALLOT.  SO, I MEAN, WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE WITH WHAT HE DID AND

                    SOMEONE REQUESTING A BALLOT VIA THE WEB PORTAL?  I MEAN, EVERYBODY

                    GOT A BALLOT.  AND YOU CAN MAKE THAT SAME ARGUMENT WHERE, OKAY WELL,

                    WE DON'T KNOW IF THE, YOU KNOW, THAT PERSON IN THAT HOUSEHOLD RECEIVED

                    THE RIGHT BALLOT OR IS COMMITTING SOME TYPE OF FRAUDULENT ACT AND

                    MAKING BELIEVE THAT THEY'RE SOMEONE THAT THEY'RE NOT.  AT THE END OF THE

                    DAY, AGAIN, THE SIGNATURE OF THE ENVELOPE AND THE BALLOT IS WHAT'S USED

                    TO VERIFY THE IDENTITY OF THE PERSON.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  YEAH, I BELIEVE LAST YEAR IN THE

                    GOVERNOR'S EXECUTIVE ORDER FOR SCHOOL BOARD ELECTIONS THEY ALL

                    RECEIVED THEIR BALLOTS.  I THINK FOR THE PRIMARIES THEY RECEIVED

                                         97



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    APPLICATIONS TO FILL OUT WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THEIR SIGNATURE WHEN THEY

                    WENT BACK TO THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS.  SO THERE WERE APPLICATIONS BY THE

                    EXECUTIVE ORDER SENT OUT BY THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS WOULD STILL REQUIRE

                    THAT SIGNATURE.  I --

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  NO, ACTUALLY --

                    ACTUALLY -- I'M SORRY, ASSEMBLYMEMBER NORRIS, WHEN -- WHEN THE

                    GOVERNOR ACTUALLY SENT OUT THE APPLICATION, IT WASN'T -- IT WASN'T

                    ACTUALLY BALLOTS, IT WAS ACTUALLY APPLICATIONS.  AND AGAIN, THE SAME

                    PROCESS AS THE WEB PORTAL, ALL OF THE RECIPIENTS OF THE STATE OF NEW

                    YORK DID NOT NEED TO SIGN FOR AN APPLICATION.  DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

                    SO...

                                 MR. NORRIS:  OKAY.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  I'M HAPPY YOU

                    BROUGHT THAT UP.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  I HAD TO CLARIFY THAT.  I JUST KNOW THAT

                    IN MY AREA THEY SENT OUT THE APPLICATIONS BECAUSE WE DIDN'T HAVE A

                    PORTAL, AT LEAST IN NIAGARA COUNTY, FROM MY UNDERSTANDING.

                                 SO ANYWAY, THE POINT OF THE MATTER IS -- AND IF I COULD

                    JUST GO ON THE BILL, MR. SPEAKER, BECAUSE I KNOW MY TIME IS -- IS

                    RUNNING SHORT.  THE POINT OF THE MATTER IS IT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT THAT

                    WE HAVE VERIFICATION OF THE IDENTITY OF THE VOTER WHEN THEY MAKE AN

                    APPLICATION FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT.  I ALSO BELIEVE, I KNOW IT'S NOT

                    EXACTLY ON POINT FOR THIS, BUT WHEN YOU GO INTO A VOTING BOOTH, IT'S MY

                    BELIEF WE SHOULD HAVE VERIFICATION AT THE VOTING BOOTH.  FOR EXAMPLE, I

                    GO OUT TO A LIQUOR STORE OR A CONVENIENCE STORE AND I HAVE TO SHOW MY

                                         98



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ID TO GET, YOU KNOW, AN ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE, IF I WERE TO PURCHASE IT.  IF

                    I GO TO A SCHOOL, FOR EXAMPLE, I HAVE TO SHOW MY IDENTIFICATION TO GET

                    INTO THE SCHOOL.  WHEN I GOT MY COVID VACCINATION, I HAD TO SHOW MY

                    ID THERE.  SO GENERALLY, I JUST THINK IT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT WE DO HAVE VERIFICATION THAT THE ACTUAL PERSON THAT'S GOING

                    INTO THE VOTING BOOTH, THAT IT'S VERIFIABLE, THAT IT'S THERE -- THAT IT'S THEM.

                    OR IF THEY'RE VOTING BY ABSENTEE BALLOT, OBVIOUSLY, IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO

                    SHOW A PROOF OF ID FOR THAT.  BUT THE ONE WAY WE CAN ENSURE THE

                    SANCTITY AND THE INTEGRITY OF THE PROCESS IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE HAVE A

                    VERIFIABLE SIGNATURE.  BECAUSE OVER TIME, LIKE I MENTIONED EARLIER ON,

                    SIGNATURES DO CHANGE.  SO IT'S GOOD TO HAVE A -- A SIGNATURE THAT IS THE

                    MOST CURRENT SO THAT WHEN THE BALLOT COMES BACK WE CAN ALSO HAVE A

                    SIGNATURE THAT MATCHES.  BECAUSE I THINK ALL OF US WANT TO MAKE SURE

                    THAT WE HAVE FAIR ELECTIONS.  YOU KNOW, I JUST SUPPORTED THE NO-EXCUSE

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT PROPOSAL TO GO FORWARD BECAUSE I'VE HAD EXPERIENCES

                    WHEN I WAS THE ELECTIONS COMMISSIONER WHERE I KNOW PEOPLE WERE

                    NOT ABLE TO GET BALLOTS.  WHEN THE INSTITUTION WAS RIGHT IN AT NIAGARA

                    UNIVERSITY ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COUNTY, THEY COULDN'T GET A BALLOT

                    WHEN THERE WERE STUDENTS THERE.  SO I BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD HAVE THE

                    ACCESS TO VOTING.  IT'S VERY, VERY IMPORTANT.  LIKE THE SPONSOR SAID, IT'S

                    OUR SACRED RIGHT.  IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE ALL SHARE EQUALLY AND WE GET

                    ONE VOTE TO DO IT.  WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT IT'S FAIR, THAT IT'S

                    EQUAL AND THAT THE PEOPLE WHO ARE ACTUALLY VOTING IS THAT IT'S VERIFIABLE

                    WHETHER MY OPINION THROUGH ID IF IT'S AT THE POLLS, OR IN THIS CASE WITH

                    THE ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION THAT THERE'S A SIGNATURE FOR THAT

                                         99



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    VERIFICATION.  AND AS WE MOVE FORWARD -- AND I'M VERY PLEASED TO SEE

                    GOING FORWARD THAT THE VACCINATIONS ARE WORKING, THAT PEOPLE ARE BEING

                    MORE -- ARE GETTING VACCINATED, WE'RE STARTING TO MOVE AROUND A LITTLE

                    BIT BETTER IN OUR COMMUNITIES, I CERTAINLY THINK DEFINITELY PAST THE

                    PRIMARY WE'LL BE ABLE -- A LITTLE BIT MORE OPEN PROCESS AT THE VOTING SITE.

                                 SO, WITH THAT, MR. SPEAKER, I DO HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT

                    THE VERIFICATION OF THE LACK OF SIGNATURES FOR THE ABSENTEE BALLOT

                    APPLICATIONS IN THIS UPCOMING ELECTION UNDER THIS PROPOSAL AND I URGE

                    MY COLLEAGUES TO PLEASE OPPOSE THIS BILL.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    AND THANK YOU, MS. SPONSOR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MS. GIGLIO.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  MR. SPEAKER, WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD

                    FOR A QUESTION?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. BICHOTTE

                    HERMELYN, WILL YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YES.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  I'M CURIOUS AS TO WHETHER OR NOT YOU

                    WERE ON THE REMOTE NOTARIZATION HEARING THAT TOOK PLACE THIS LAST FRIDAY

                    WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  NO.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  OKAY.  BECAUSE THERE WERE SEVERAL

                    CONCERNS FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ABOUT FRAUD BY PUTTING LEGAL

                    DOCUMENTS AND DEED TRANSFERS AND THINGS LIKE THAT ONLINE WHERE THE

                    PROCESS HAD TO BE REALLY FINE-TUNED BEFORE IT COULD BE EFFECTIVE TO

                                         100



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    PROTECT PEOPLE.  AND I -- SO, I JUST THINK THAT THIS IS A WAY OF PEOPLE

                    GOING ONLINE, APPLYING FOR ABSENTEE BALLOTS, THE ABSENTEE BALLOTS GET TO

                    THE HOUSE AND THEN THERE'S -- THERE'S NOBODY THERE TO SIGN IT.  SO -- AND

                    SEND IN THE ACTUAL BALLOT.  AND THE SIGNATURES CAN'T BE COMPARED.  SO I

                    JUST THINK THAT THERE'S TOO MUCH ROOM FOR FRAUD WITH THIS, AND I THINK

                    THAT THE ABSENTEE BALLOT THE WAY IT WORKS NOW, IT'S -- IT'S WORKING.  AND

                    IN SPEAKING TO THE COMMISSIONER OF THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS IN MY

                    COUNTY, THIS IS -- THIS IS FRIGHTENING TO THEM BECAUSE THEY DON'T HAVE THE

                    STAFFING AND THEY DON'T HAVE THE RESOURCES TO HANDLE ALL OF THESE

                    ABSENTEE BALLOTS.  AND I JUST THINK THAT -- IS -- IS THERE ANY FUNDING FOR

                    THIS FOR LOCAL BOARD OF ELECTIONS?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  SO CURRENTLY, JUST SO

                    YOU KNOW, ONLY THREE COUNTIES DID THIS WEB PORTAL.  AND SO WITH THE

                    WALKER BILL, WHICH WILL BE A MORE COMPREHENSIVE BILL, HOPEFULLY

                    INSTITUTED BY NEXT YEAR, WILL COME ALONG WITH, YOU KNOW, FUNDING AND

                    SO FORTH.  FUNDING -- THERE'S FUNDING ALLOCATED FOR THIS, YES.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  YEAH, BECAUSE WITH THE EARLY VOTING,

                    YOU KNOW, THAT PUT A REAL STRAIN ON THE BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND ON THE

                    COUNTIES AS FAR AS HAVING THE PEOPLE THERE AND ACTUALLY VERIFYING

                    SIGNATURES.  I THINK FOR YEARS REPUBLICANS AND DEMOCRATS HAVE BOTH

                    AGREED THAT SHOWING UP AND VOTING IS A -- IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF BEING

                    AN AMERICAN CITIZEN.  SO I JUST FEEL THAT WE'RE CHANGING TOO MANY OF

                    THE LAWS WHEN IT COMES TO VOTING AND THERE'S TOO MUCH FOR FRAUD -- TOO

                    MUCH ROOM FOR FRAUD.

                                 SO, MR. SPEAKER, WITH THAT I WILL BE VOTING ON -- IN THE

                                         101



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL AND I ASK MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE ON THE BILL.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YES.  THANK YOU,

                    MR. SPEAKER.  ON THE BILL.  SO, THE RIGHT TO VOTE IS A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT.

                    THE 15TH AMENDMENT SAY THAT THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES

                    TO VOTE SHALL NOT BE DENIED OR ABRIDGED BY THE UNITED STATES OR BY THE

                    STATE ON ACCOUNT OF RACE, COLOR OR PREVIOUS CONDITIONS OF SERVITUDE.

                    THE 19TH AMENDMENT ADOPTED IN 1920 EXTENDED THE RIGHT TO VOTE TO

                    WOMEN.  THE 24TH AMENDMENT RATIFIED IN 1964 PROHIBITS POLL TAXES IN

                    ELECTIONS FOR FEDERAL OFFICES.  THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES

                    TO VOTE SHALL NOT BE DENIED OR ABRIDGED BY THE UNITED STATES OR ANY

                    STATE REASON OF FAILURE TO PAY ANY POLL TAX OR OTHER TAX.  THE 26TH

                    AMENDMENT ADOPTED IN 1971 EXTENDS THE RIGHT TO VOTE TO ALL CITIZENS

                    WHO ARE 18 YEARS OF AGE OR OLDER.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, VOTING IS ESSENTIAL TO OUR DEMOCRATIC

                    SOCIETY.  THESE ARE ALL LISTED IN THE CONSTITUTION DEEMING VOTING AS A

                    FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT PROTECTED UNDER THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE AND

                    THAT ESTABLISHED -- AND THESE WERE ESTABLISHED LAWS INFRINGING ON, DENY

                    OR LIMIT THE RIGHT TO VOTE MUST MEET STRICT SCRUTINY AND CAN BE DEEMED

                    UNCONSTITUTIONAL.  HERE, THIS LAW IS NOT INFRINGING ON ANYONE TO VOTE,

                    NOR IS IT CREATING OPPORTUNITIES FOR FRAUDULENT [SIC].  WE ARE SIMPLY

                    MAKING IT EASIER FOR CITIZENS TO EXERCISE THEIR FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO VOTE

                    BY MAKING IT EASIER TO JUST GET ACCESS TO THE BALLOT, OKAY?  VOTER

                                         102



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    QUALIFICATION LAWS HAVE BEEN SET IN OUR STATE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY'RE

                    AN UNDUE BURDEN, OKAY?  SO I KNOW MY COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE

                    ARE CONCERNED WITH FRAUDULENT ACTIVITIES, BUT THERE HAVE BEEN NO

                    EVIDENCE OF FRAUD.  WE DID THIS LAST YEAR, AND AGAIN, THERE WERE NO

                    EVIDENCE.  FALSE CLAIMS ALLEGING THAT ABSENTEE VOTING IS PRONE TO

                    WIDESPREAD VOTER FRAUD ARE UNTRUE, UNFOUNDED AND NOT BASED ON FACT.

                    AMERICANS ARE MORE LIKELY TO BE STRUCK BY LIGHTENING THAN COMMIT MAIL

                    VOTING FRAUD.  IN NEW YORK STATE THERE WERE FEWER THAN 30 CASES OF

                    VOTER FRAUD BETWEEN THE 1980S AND 2018.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, IT IS NECESSARY THAT WE MAKE THESE

                    ELECTION REFORM LAWS.  STATEWIDE ABOUT 2.5 MILLION NEW YORK VOTERS

                    REQUESTED A MAIL-IN BALLOT IN THE 2020 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.  THAT IS

                    FIVE TIMES AS MANY AS IN 2016.  AND IN NEW YORK CITY MORE THAN 1.1

                    MILLION VOTERS REQUESTED A MAIL-IN BALLOT, OR ABOUT 19.8 PERCENT OF THE

                    5.6 MILLION REGISTERED VOTERS THERE.  WITH ELECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE

                    STATE LESS THAN TWO MONTHS AWAY, WE MUST DO ALL WE CAN TO MAKE

                    VOTING CONVENIENT AND SAFE FOR OUR ELIGIBLE VOTERS.  THE

                    IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS BILL WOULD PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL METHOD FOR

                    VOTERS TO REQUEST ABSENTEE BALLOTS.  IT SHOULD BE OUR GOAL TO MAKE

                    VOTING AS EASY AND SAFE AS POSSIBLE FOR EVERY NEW YORKER.  THESE

                    CHANGES ARE NECESSARY TO SAFELY AND EFFECTIVELY ADMINISTER THIS

                    ELECTION.  BY PASSING THIS LEGISLATION WE WILL ENSURE A MORE INCLUSIVE

                    AND ACCURATE ELECTION.  ALTHOUGH THE VOTING RIGHTS IN THIS LEGISLATION

                    AFFECT ALL NEW YORKERS, WE CANNOT DIVORCE THE ISSUE OF RACIAL DISPARITY

                    FROM THE EQUATION.  PASSING THIS BILL IS ESPECIALLY CRITICAL BECAUSE BLACK

                                         103



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    AND HISPANIC AND POOR COMMUNITIES DISPROPORTIONATELY WERE

                    CONTRACTED AND LOST THEIR LIVES TO COVID-19.  VOTING SHOULD NOT COST

                    ANYONE THEIR LIFE.  BY MAKING IT EASIER AND SAFER FOR ALL ELIGIBLE VOTERS

                    TO REQUEST AN ABSENTEE BALLOT WILL ALSO BE PROVIDING PEOPLE WHO WE

                    KNOW TO BE MOST RISK OF GETTING SICK AND SUFFERING FACILITIES WITH

                    MULTIPLE OPTIONS OF CASTING BALLOT, WHICH THIS LEGISLATION ACCOMPLISHES.

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT IS SECURE AND RELIABLE, NECESSARY AND WIDESPREAD

                    SUPPORTED.  WHILE VOTING BY MAIL HAS NOT CHANGED ELECTION RESULTS, IT

                    HAS INCREASED OUR VOTER TURNOUT.  WE MUST HELP NEW YORKERS

                    PARTICIPATE IN OUR DEMOCRACY TO THE FULLEST EXTENT POSSIBLE.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND I

                    URGE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 6046.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION, BUT THOSE

                    WHO SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE SO THAT WE

                    CAN RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                         104



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON

                    THIS ONE.  SHOULD COLLEAGUES DESIRE TO BE AN EXCEPTION, THEY SHOULD FEEL

                    FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT THE PREVIOUSLY-GIVEN

                    NUMBER AND THEIR VOTE WILL BE PROPERLY RECORDED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. LAWLER TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I THOUGHT

                    THIS WAS ABOUT THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC AND THE NEED TO MAKE IT EASIER

                    FOR PEOPLE TO VOTE AS A RESULT OF COVID-19.  BUT AFTER LISTENING TO THE

                    SPONSOR, IT'S CLEAR THAT THIS IS NOT ABOUT COVID-19.  THIS IS ABOUT

                    USING COVID-19 AS A VEHICLE BY WHICH TO ULTIMATELY CHANGE THE

                    PROCESS.  THE SPONSOR TALKED ABOUT SIGNING AN APPLICATION FOR A PARENT

                    IN ORDER TO APPLY FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT.  THAT APPLICATION HAS A WITNESS

                    SIGNATURE SPOT.  THAT WITNESS SPOT IS NOT AVAILABLE IN THE ONLINE PORTAL.

                    AND CERTAINLY THROUGH AN E-MAIL YOU HAVE NO WAY OF KNOWING WHO'S --

                    WHO IS SENDING THAT E-MAIL.  YOU HAVE NO WAY OF VERIFYING THAT.  WE

                    SEE FAKE E-MAILS ALL THE TIME.  WE SEE FAKE PROFILES ALL THE TIME.  YOU

                    HAVE NO WAY OF VERIFYING IT.  HAVING AN ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION TO

                    ENSURE THAT THE ACTUAL VOTER WHO IS REQUESTING THE ABSENTEE BALLOT IS THE

                                         105



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ONE WHO SIGNED IT IS LOGICAL.  IT'S COMMONSENSE.  AND THE IDEA THAT

                    WE'RE USING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC TO DO AWAY WITH THAT, AND EVEN

                    THOUGH THIS SAYS DECEMBER 31ST, 2021, WE ALL KNOW WE'LL BE BACK HERE

                    NEXT YEAR PASSING A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT MAKES IT PERMANENT.  THAT

                    IS WHAT THIS IS DESIGNED TO DO.  THE SPONSOR OF THIS BILL PRETTY MUCH

                    MADE THAT CLEAR IN HER ANSWER.

                                 SO FOR THAT REASON, I ABSOLUTELY WILL BE VOTING AGAINST

                    THIS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAWLER IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 18, CALENDAR NO. 207, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06047-A, CALENDAR

                    NO. 207, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, THIELE, CARROLL, QUART, DICKENS, GALEF.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE ELECTION LAW, IN RELATION TO THE MAILING AND

                    RECEIPT OF ABSENTEE BALLOTS; AND TO PROVIDE FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH

                    PROVISIONS UPON EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. NORRIS.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. BICHOTTE

                    HERMELYN, WILL YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YES.

                                         106



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THANK YOU

                    TO THE SPONSOR.  I JUST WANT TO ASK A QUESTION REGARDING THIS.  SO, IF

                    SOMEONE SENDS A LETTER IN ASKING FOR AN ABSENTEE BALLOT, THEY DON'T HAVE

                    TO HAVE THAT LETTER SIGNED OR NOW COMPLETE AN ABSENTEE BALLOT

                    APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THEIR ABSENTEE BALLOT TO BE COUNTED, IS THAT

                    CORRECT?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  IF THEY GO THROUGH

                    THE WEB PORTAL IT DOESN'T GIVE YOU THAT OPTION.  BUT IF YOU RECEIVE AN

                    APPLICATION, THERE ARE INSTRUCTIONS OF -- OF, YOU KNOW, GETTING THE

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  SO IF THEY JUST SEND A LETTER TO -- FROM

                    MY READING OF THE ACTUAL TEXT, IF THEY SEND A LETTER IN AND THEY SAY, I

                    WOULD LIKE TO HAVE AN ABSENTEE BALLOT SENT TO ME AND EVEN UNSIGNED,

                    THEY JUST ASK FOR IT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO COMPLETE NOW THE ACTUAL

                    ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION AFFIRMING THE REASON, WHICH WOULD ALSO

                    INCLUDE TEMPORARY ILLNESS, I KNOW, BECAUSE THAT WAS EXTENDED THROUGH

                    2000 -- THE END OF THE YEAR.  BUT THEY STILL HAVE TO FILL OUT THE

                    APPLICATION NORMALLY TO DO THAT.  SO I JUST WANTED TO VERIFY.  THEY DON'T

                    HAVE TO FILL OUT THE APPLICATION IN ORDER FOR THEIR BALLOT TO BE COUNTED

                    NOW?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  I'M NOT AWARE OF

                    WHAT LETTER YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT.  THERE'S -- THERE'S A SPECIFIC

                    APPLICATION THAT EVERYBODY HAS TO FILL OUT.  OUR COLLEAGUE VANEL HAD

                    MENTIONED A BILL THAT WE JUST PASSED WHICH WAS A NO-EXCUSE ABSENTEE

                                         107



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    BALLOT, WHICH IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM THIS, SO THAT WILL BE A FUTURE THING.

                    BUT AS OF NOW, AS OF TODAY, YOU HAVE TO FILL OUT SOMETHING, WHETHER IT'S

                    THE WEB PORTAL OR THE APPLICATION THAT YOU GET IN THE MAIL TO REQUEST.  I

                    DON'T KNOW ABOUT THE LETTER.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  OKAY.  I JUST WANTED TO READ FOR THE

                    RECORD.  SO THE TEXT IS ACTUALLY IN THERE.  AND THIS IS IN SECTION 1,

                    SUBDIVISION 1 OF SECTION 814 AS AMENDED.  THE FOLLOWING LANGUAGE

                    WOULD BE STRUCK OUT UNDER THE BILL.  EXCEPT THAT THE ABSENTEE BALLOT OF A

                    VOTER WHO REQUESTED SUCH BALLOT BY LETTER, COMMA, RATHER THAN

                    APPLICATION SHALL NOT BE COUNTED UNDER -- UNLESS A VALID ABSENTEE

                    APPLICATION FORM, COMMA, SIGNED BY SUCH VOTER IS RECEIVED BY THE

                    BOARD OF ELECTIONS FOR SUCH BALLOT.  THAT LANGUAGE IS BEING STRUCK FROM

                    THE CURRENT LAW, WHICH I WOULD INTERPRET MEANING IF THEY JUST SEND IN A

                    LETTER WHICH IS UNSIGNED, THEY DON'T HAVE TO COMPLETE THE ACTUAL

                    APPLICATION ANYMORE IN ORDER FOR THEIR BALLOT TO BE COUNTED.  SO THAT --

                    THAT'S JUST WHAT I WANT A LITTLE BIT OF CLARIFICATION ON.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YEAH.  I THINK THIS

                    BILL WAS A LITTLE BIT -- LITTLE BIT COMPLICATED BECAUSE WHAT WE WERE REALLY

                    TRYING TO ADDRESS WAS THAT THE MILITARY BALLOT -- BECAUSE THIS BILL WOULD

                    ALSO ALLOW ABSENTEE BALLOTS WITH A POSTMARK AND CANCELLATION MARK, SO

                    WE WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT ALL THE DIFFERENT TYPES OF BALLOT WOULD

                    HAVE THAT SAME OPPORTUNITY TO SUBMIT IN THE ACTUAL BALLOT ON THE DAY OF

                    ELECTION.  AND WE WERE TRYING TO MAKE THAT PORTION PERMANENT,

                    KNOWING THAT WE HAVE THE WALKER'S BILL.  WE WERE TAKING THAT PORTION

                    OUT BECAUSE IT'S ADDRESSED IN THE -- THE FIRST BILL IN TERMS OF GETTING A

                                         108



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    PERMANENT -- GETTING A TEMPORARY WEB PORTAL FOR THIS YEAR AND IT WILL

                    EXPIRE BY THE END OF THIS YEAR.  AND THEN WE WILL HAVE THE WALKER BILL

                    THAT WILL MAKE IT PERMANENT.  SO IT LOOKS --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. -- MS. HERMELYN

                    -- MS. BICHOTTE, PLEASE, THE RULES OF THE HOUSE -- WE WOULD ASK YOU TO

                    REFRAIN FROM USING OTHER MEMBERS' NAMES.  YOU'VE DONE IT A FEW TIMES.

                    SO IF YOU WOULD REFER BACK TO A COLLEAGUE OR ANOTHER BILL BY NUMBER,

                    BUT WE ASK YOU NOT TO USE MEMBERS' NAMES.  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  I APOLOGIZE ABOUT

                    THAT.  BUT ASSEMBLYMEMBER NORRIS, DO YOU UNDERSTAND?  IT'S A -- IT'S A

                    LITTLE BIT COMPLICATED, SO WE'RE -- WE'RE -- WE'RE JUST TAKING THAT PORTION

                    OUT BECAUSE IT'S BEING ADDRESSED IN THE EARLIER BILL THAT WE JUST PASSED.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  I -- I -- I DO UNDERSTAND, AND I THANK

                    YOU FOR THE EXPLANATION.

                                 I HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION.  NOW, JUST FOR CERTAIN

                    BALLOTS, THE FEDERAL BALLOTS, THE MILITARY BALLOTS, THERE'S BEEN A -- THERE'S

                    BEEN A CHANGE HERE UNDER THE -- THIS LANGUAGE WHICH WOULD SAY THAT IF

                    A BALLOT WAS NOT -- WAS -- WAS NOT POSTMARKED -- I'M SORRY, IF IT WAS

                    ACTUALLY -- IT WAS NOT POSTMARKED BEFORE ELECTION DAY, FOR EXAMPLE, IT

                    WAS POSTMARKED ON ELECTION DAY, THAT THAT WOULD BE COUNTED.  WOULD

                    THAT BE CORRECT?

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  YES.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  OKAY.  AND THESE BALLOTS ARE COMING

                    FROM ALL AROUND THE WORLD, THEY'RE COMING FROM DIFFERENT STATES, MAYBE

                    EVEN ON THE WEST COAST, PLACES LIKE THAT.  WOULD THAT BE CORRECT?

                                         109



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  OKAY.  SO JUST SO YOU KNOW MY

                    CONCERN ABOUT THAT AND WHY PREVIOUSLY IT'S BEEN IN THE STATUTE FOR THE

                    DAY BEFORE ELECTION DAY THAT THEORETICALLY ELECTION RESULTS WOULD COME

                    IN AT 9:00, PEOPLE COULD SEE IF THESE ELECTIONS ARE CLOSE OR NOT AND THEN

                    THEY CAN SEND IN THEIR BALLOT AT THAT POINT IN TIME THROUGH A DIFFERENT

                    FACILITY.  SO THAT'S JUST BEEN MY CONCERN BY WHY WE ACCEPT POSTMARKS

                    ON THE DAY OF ELECTION, BECAUSE IN CERTAIN PLACES, POST OFFICES MAY BE

                    STILL OPEN AFTER WE CLOSE OUR POLLS AT 9:00, PARTICULARLY WITH TIME

                    CHANGES AROUND THE WORLD, PARTICULARLY ON THE WEST COAST.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  WE COULD -- WE

                    COULD MAKE THE SAME -- I MEAN, MR. NORRIS, WE CAN MAKE THE SAME

                    ARGUMENT IF SOMEONE COULD BE, LET'S SAY, IN AN ADJACENT STATE AND THEY

                    JUST DRIVE OVER TO THE OTHER STATE AND MAKE THEIR VOTE.  I MEAN, RIGHT

                    NOW WE ALLOW PEOPLE TO SUBMIT THEIR BALLOT IN ON THE SAME DAY.  SO I

                    CAN DRIVE LIKE TWO OR THREE HOURS, KNOWING WHAT THE ELECTION IS AND

                    MAKE -- STILL -- YOU KNOW, STILL VOTE ON THAT DAY BECAUSE THE RULE ALLOWS

                    THAT.  SO I DON'T KNOW WHAT DIFFERENCE WOULD THAT MAKE.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  I -- I JUST BELIEVE THAT THE SAFEGUARD IS

                    -- AND I SAID THIS IN LAST YEAR'S DEBATE -- THAT WE SHOULD STILL KEEP IT THE

                    DAY BEFORE ELECTION DAY BECAUSE THERE ARE POTENTIAL FOR THOSE BALLOTS TO

                    BE CAST AFTER OUR POLLS CLOSE AT 9:00, EITHER THROUGH A POST OFFICE THAT IS

                    OPEN OR IF THEY'RE, FOR EXAMPLE, ON THE WEST COAST WHERE THERE'S A TIME

                    DIFFERENCE.  THEY CAN SEE IF IT'S A CLOSE -- BECAUSE THESE BALLOTS APPLY

                    FOR, YOU KNOW -- EXCEPT FOR THE FEDERAL BALLOTS -- FOR -- WELL, I GUESS

                                         110



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    THEY WOULD, TOO, IF IT WAS VERY CLOSE AS WE SAW WITH THE CONGRESSIONAL

                    RACE -- FOR TOWN BOARD RACES AND THINGS LIKE THIS AS WELL.  SO, YOU

                    KNOW, THERE ARE VERY, VERY CLOSE ELECTIONS OUT THERE AND THAT'S JUST A

                    CONCERN OF MINE THAT I RAISE HERE ON THE RECORD AGAIN.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  IT WOULD BE -- IT

                    WOULD BE NOT EQUITABLE, RIGHT, IF I HAVE THE RIGHT TO WALK IN MY VOTE

                    AND SOMEONE WHO'S NOT ABLE TO WALK IN THEIR VOTE BUT BE ABLE TO GO TO

                    THE MAILBOX, ESPECIALLY, YOU KNOW, UNDER THESE UNPRECEDENTED TIMES.  I

                    FEEL THAT THERE WILL BE SOME TYPE OF INEQUITY.  YOU KNOW, THIS PERSON

                    HAVE A RIGHT BUT I CAN'T.  YOU KNOW, THIS PERSON HAS THE ABILITY TO WALK

                    TO -- TO A POLL SITE TO GIVE IN THEIR BALLOT, BUT I CAN'T.  WHAT IF I HAVE

                    DIFFICULTIES AND I JUST CAN'T?  THAT'S NOT FAIR.  SO I THINK TO BE -- TO BE

                    EVEN-HANDED -- AND WHEN WE DO THESE LAWS WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT

                    IT'S EVEN-HANDED.  AND AS YOU KNOW FROM CASES IN THE PAST, YOU KNOW,

                    VOTER QUALIFICATION TYPE OF LAWS, JUST AS LONG AS IT'S NOT PUTTING A BURDEN

                    ON A PERSON TO VOTE, ARE CONSTITUTIONAL.  AND AGAIN, WE HAVE -- GIVE ME

                    THE PROOF.  GIVE ME THE PROOF ON ANY STATE THAT THIS IS HAPPENING.  THAT

                    THERE'S THIS BIG CONSPIRACY, OH, WE'RE GOING TO WAIT UNTIL THE LAST HOUR

                    AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO CAST OUR VOTE, YOU KNOW, IN A DIFFERENT STATE OR

                    WE'RE GOING TO MAIL IN OUR BALLOT.  IT JUST -- WE JUST DON'T HAVE PROOF OF

                    THESE CASES.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  THAT WOULD BE A MAIL-IN.  YOU KNOW

                    THAT WOULD BE A MAIL-IN FROM ARIZONA OR FROM CALIFORNIA OR PLACES LIKE

                    THAT WHERE OUR POLLS HAVE CLOSED, THEY MIGHT HAVE MORE TIME TO GET IN

                    THERE.  IT JUST -- MY POINT IS BEFORE THE STATUTE READ THE DAY BEFORE THE

                                         111



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    ELECTION DAY THAT ENSURED THAT THERE WAS NO POTENTIAL FOR FRAUD, AND

                    THAT'S MY POINT, FOR THE RECORD.  WE RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE ON THAT, AND

                    THAT'S -- THAT'S CERTAINLY FINE.

                                 NOW IF I CAN JUST GO ON THE BILL, MR. SPEAKER.  AND

                    THANK YOU TO THE SPONSOR FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. NORRIS:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  AS I

                    MENTIONED IN MY PREVIOUS DEBATE ON THE PREVIOUS BILL, I JUST DO HAVE

                    CONCERNS ABOUT THE SIGNATURE VERIFICATION ON THESE APPLICATIONS AND THE

                    LACK OF NOW HAVING THE ACTUAL APPLICATION BEING PUT FORTH AS A

                    REQUIREMENT FOR THAT BALLOT TO BE COUNTED.  AND ALSO AS I RAISED MY

                    CONCERN BEFORE ABOUT CHANGING THE CANCELLATION POSTMARK DATE JUST IN

                    TIME.

                                 SO FOR THOSE REASONS, I BELIEVE THAT IT DOES POSE A

                    POTENTIAL FOR FRAUD AND FOR THE LACK OF VERIFICATION, PARTICULARLY IN THE

                    SIGNATURES, BY NOT HAVING THAT ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION WITH THOSE

                    SIGNATURES OR EVEN A LETTER WITH A SIGNATURE, AS -- AS IS CURRENTLY

                    REQUIRED IN THE STATUTE AND THIS WOULD CHANGE.  SO FOR THOSE REASONS I

                    ENCOURAGE ALL MY COLLEAGUES TO PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THIS LEGISLATION, AND

                    I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD TODAY.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY, SIR.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.

                                         112



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  UNDER THIS BILL,

                    A6047-A, THE LAST DATE FOR BALLOTS TO BE COUNTED IS PERMANENTLY

                    CHANGED TO CONFORM TO THE HAND-DELIVERED BALLOT DEADLINE.  AGAIN, TO

                    CONFORM TO THE HAND-DELIVERED BALLOT DEADLINE.  THIS UPDATES THE LAW TO

                    GIVE VOTERS ONE ADDITIONAL DAY TO MAIL THEIR BALLOT.  THIS BILL ALSO, AS I

                    MENTIONED, ALSO TEMPORARILY ALLOWS VOTERS FLEXIBILITY WHEN ASKING FOR

                    AN ABSENTEE BALLOT DURING THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC BY PERMITTING A

                    BALLOT TO BE REQUESTED WITHOUT A SIGNED ABSENTEE BALLOT APPLICATION.  IN

                    SUMMATION, THIS BILL ALLOWS ABSENTEE BALLOTS WITH A POSTMARK,

                    CANCELLATION MARK BY THE DAY OF ELECTION TO BE RENDERED A TIMELY -- TO

                    BE RENDERED A TIMELY BALLOT.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, WE SHOULD BE REMOVING BARRIERS TO

                    VOTING, AGAIN, IN LIGHT OF THE RECORD NUMBER OF BALLOTS BEING CAST BY

                    MAIL AND ONGOING CONCERNS ABOUT THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC.  IT'S

                    ESPECIALLY CRITICAL TO FOSTERING A STRONG DEMOCRACY.  BY PASSING THIS BILL

                    WE ARE ENSURING ACCURACY AND IN OUR ELECTION.  WE'RE ENSURING THAT WE

                    HAVE GUIDELINES IN PLACE TO PREVENT BALLOTS FROM BEING INVALIDATED FOR

                    REASONS BEYOND VOTERS' CONTROL.  IN 2020 WE ALL HELD OUR BREATH HEARING

                    STORIES OF POSTAL SERVICE DELAYS THAT THREATENED TO DISENFRANCHISE VOTERS

                    ACROSS AMERICA.  WE MUST NOT ALLOW THAT FEAR TO BE REPEATED IN FUTURE

                    ELECTIONS.  DISENFRANCHISEMENT BECAUSE OF BAD POLICY AND THIRD-PARTY

                    ERROR IS ENTIRELY PREVENTABLE AND AVOIDABLE.  ALTHOUGH THIS IS NOT A

                    COMPLETE FIX, IT IS A MUCH NEEDED -- IT IS A MUCH-NEEDED REFORM.  WE

                                         113



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    MUST URGENTLY PASS THIS BILL TO FACILITATE A HEALTHY 2021 ELECTION WHILE

                    WE CONTINUE STRIVING TOWARDS A MORE PROGRESSIVE VOTING SYSTEM.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND I

                    ENCOURAGE ALL MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 6047 [SIC].  THIS IS A FAST -- THIS IS A

                    PARTY VOTE.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO

                    THEIR CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE'LL RECORD

                    YOUR VOTE PROPERLY.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY COLLEAGUES WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON

                    THIS ONE.  SHOULD THERE BE ANY COLLEAGUES THAT DESIRE TO VOTE AS AN

                    EXCEPTION, THEY CAN FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT

                    THE NUMBER PREVIOUSLY GIVEN AND YOUR VOTE WILL BE RECORDED.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                         114



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. LAWLER TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  JUST TO

                    CLARIFY.  HAND-DELIVERED IS CONSIDERED TIMELY BECAUSE IT IS

                    HAND-DELIVERED BEFORE 9:00 P.M. ON ELECTION DAY.  THE REASON THAT

                    MAILING A BALLOT ON ELECTION DAY MIGHT NOT BE CONSIDERED TIMELY IS

                    BECAUSE AS MY COLLEAGUE POINTED OUT, IT COULD BE POSTMARKED AFTER 9:00

                    P.M., THEREFORE AFTER THE ELECTION.  THE REASON THAT ABSENTEE BALLOTS

                    PREVIOUSLY POSTMARKED PRIOR TO THE DAY OF ELECTION ARE CONSIDERED VALID

                    EVEN IF THEY COME IN AFTER THE ELECTION IS BECAUSE THEY ARE POSTMARKED

                    BEFORE 9:00 P.M. ON ELECTION DAY.  SO THERE IS A BIG DIFFERENCE

                    BETWEEN HAND-DELIVERED AND MAILING A BALLOT ON ELECTION DAY.  BEYOND

                    THAT, IN SIX DAYS WE'RE ALL GOING TO BE PAYING OUR TAXES - AT LEAST I HOPE

                    EVERYONE IS PAYING THEIR TAXES - AND WE'RE ALL GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO

                    SIGN OUR TAX RETURNS WITH A SIGNATURE.  YOU APPLY TO REGISTER TO VOTE,

                    YOU NEED A SIGNATURE.  I'M REALLY NOT FOLLOWING WHY WE ARE LOOKING TO

                    ELIMINATE A SIGNATURE REQUIREMENT ON APPLYING TO VOTE BY ABSENTEE

                    BALLOT.  IT REALLY MAKES NO SENSE.  THERE'S NO RATIONAL EXPLANATION AS TO

                    WHY WE WOULD NOT WANT TO VERIFY WHO IS APPLYING FOR AN ABSENTEE

                    BALLOT.  I DON'T CARE WHAT THEIR REASON IS.  THEY CAN VOTE, AS I VOTED FOR

                    THE LEGISLATION EARLIER TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO VOTE WITHOUT AN EXCUSE.  BUT

                    WE SHOULD KNOW WHO IS VOTING AND WHO IS REQUESTING THAT BALLOT AND

                    ENSURE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL THAT WILL VOTE WITH THAT BALLOT IS, IN FACT, THE

                    ONE WHO REQUESTED IT.

                                 THEREFORE, I VOTE NO.

                                         115



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAWLER IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, COLLEAGUES,

                    WE HAVE ABOUT 14 OR SO MORE DAYS TO BE IN SESSION.  WE HAVE A TON OF

                    LEGISLATION.  QUITE A BIT OF IT NEEDS TO BE DEBATED.  AND WE HAVE 42

                    RESOLUTIONS AND THEY STILL KEEP COMING IN EVERY DAY.  SO IF WE'RE GOING

                    TO SPEND AN HOUR DISCUSSING RESOLUTIONS THAT -- SOMETHING WE'RE ASKING

                    THE GOVERNOR TO DO IS NOT A GOOD USE OF OUR TIME.  AND SO I WANT TO

                    ENCOURAGE COLLEAGUES AND MOTIVATE YOU TO PLEASE, IF WE CAN KEEP OUR

                    COMMENTS TO A MINIMUM OR TO ZERO ON RESOLUTIONS WE WOULD HAVE

                    MORE TIME TO DEBATE.  AND I DON'T WANT TO MINIMIZE THE VALUE OF

                    RESOLUTIONS BECAUSE I KNOW THEY'RE IMPORTANT.  THEY MEAN A LOT TO THE

                    PEOPLE WHO PRESENT THEM.  AND I GET IT.  BUT WE ALSO ONLY HAVE 14

                    MORE DAYS TO WORK ON YOUR LEGISLATION AND OUR DEBATABLE BILLS.  AND SO

                    I JUST WANT TO ENCOURAGE US NOT TO USE SO MUCH TIME DOING THAT.

                                 SECONDLY, MR. SPEAKER, DO YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER

                    HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WELL, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES WE CERTAINLY HAVE RESOLUTIONS.  AND ONE OF THEM IS

                    PRIVILEGED.  RESOLUTION 283, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 283, MS.

                                         116



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    BUTTENSCHON.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING AUGUST 2021, AS

                    KAREN AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. BUTTENSCHON ON

                    THE RESOLUTION.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 I THINK YOU SCARED HER OFF, MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 SO WE WILL INCLUDE THAT IN THE RESOLUTIONS THAT I'M

                    HOLDING UP, WHICH IS THE FASTEST WAY TO DO RESOLUTIONS.  THESE

                    RESOLUTIONS ARE ALL SPONSORED BY MEMBERS.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTIONS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ADOPTED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 284-286

                    WERE UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED.)

                                 I'M SORRY, BACK TO THE RESOLUTION 283, THE CLERK WILL

                    READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 283, MS.

                    BUTTENSCHON.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING AUGUST 2021, AS

                    KAREN AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. BUTTENSCHON ON

                    THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. BUTTENSCHON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    ON BEHALF OF THE RESIDENTS OF THE 119TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT, WHICH HAS A

                                         117



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                          MAY 11, 2021

                    LARGE POPULATION OF THE WONDERFUL AMERICAN KARENS, I WOULD LIKE TO

                    CELEBRATE AUGUST AS KAREN -- OR EXCUSE ME, KAREN AMERICAN HERITAGE

                    MONTH.  AND CLEARLY WHAT WE SEE IS SO MANY INDIVIDUALS THAT HAVE

                    DEDICATED THEMSELVES TO A PART OF THE AMERICAN CULTURE AND PROVIDING

                    SO MUCH TO OUR ECONOMIC CONCERNS THAT WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST YEAR

                    WITH THE COVID CRISIS AND THE STEADFAST WORK OF SO MANY OF THESE

                    INDIVIDUALS THAT WORK SO HARD TO SUPPORT OUR COMMUNITIES.

                                 SO ON BEHALF OF -- OF THOSE WITHIN MY DISTRICT AS WELL

                    AS ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW YORK, I ASK MY COLLEAGUES TO JOIN AS WE

                    HONOR THE KAREN POPULATION AS KAREN AMERICAN HERITAGE MONTH IN

                    AUGUST OF 2021.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I NOW

                    MOVE THAT THE ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED UNTIL 10:45, WEDNESDAY, MAY

                    THE 12TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE ASSEMBLY STANDS

                    ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 6:07 P.M., THE HOUSE STOOD ADJOURNED

                    UNTIL WEDNESDAY, MAY 12TH AT 10:45 A.M., THAT BEING A SESSION DAY.)







                                         118