TUESDAY, JUNE 8, 2021                                                                        12:52 P.M.



                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE HOUSE WILL COME

                    TO ORDER.

                                 IN THE ABSENCE OF CLERGY, LET US PAUSE FOR A MOMENT OF

                    SILENCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, A MOMENT OF SILENCE WAS OBSERVED.)

                                 VISITORS ARE INVITED TO JOIN THE MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE

                    OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY LED VISITORS AND

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF MONDAY, JUNE 7TH.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I MOVE

                    THAT WE DISPENSE WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF MONDAY,

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    JUNE THE 7TH AND ASK THAT THE SAME STAND APPROVED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WITHOUT OBJECTION,

                    SO ORDERED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  COLLEAGUES, I WANT TO FIRST OF ALL SAY THAT, YOU KNOW, TODAY IS

                    THE SECOND SESSION OF THE 24TH WEEK OF THE 244TH LEGISLATIVE SESSION.

                    AND I'D LIKE TO SHARE A QUOTE ON THIS DAY THAT COMES FROM NONE OTHER

                    THAN SHIRLEY CHISHOLM, WHO WAS AN AMERICAN POLITICIAN AND AN

                    EDUCATOR.  SHE ACTUALLY WAS THE FIRST BLACK WOMAN EVER ELECTED TO

                    CONGRESS, AND SHE'S REPRESENTING -- WAS REPRESENTING THE NEW YORK'S

                    12 CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT.  BY THE WAY, THREE OF OUR COLLEAGUES NOW

                    REPRESENT THAT DISTRICT AS ASSEMBLYMEMBERS; ASSEMBLYMEMBER

                    WALKER, ASSEMBLYMEMBER RICHARDSON AND ASSEMBLYMEMBER

                    ZINERMAN.  MRS. CHISHOLM'S QUOTE FOR US TODAY -- MRS. CHISHOLM'S

                    QUOTE FOR US TODAY IS THAT, "WE MUST REJECT NOT ONLY THE STEREOTYPES THAT

                    OTHERS HOLD OF US, BUT ALSO THE STEREOTYPES THAT WE HOLD OF OURSELVES."

                    AGAIN, MR. SPEAKER, THE HONORABLE SHIRLEY CHISHOLM'S WORDS FOR US

                    TODAY.

                                 MEMBERS DO HAVE ON THEIR DESKS A MAIN CALENDAR AS

                    WELL AS AN A-CALENDAR.  MR. SPEAKER, I WOULD BE PLEASED IF YOU WOULD

                    NOW ADVANCE THAT A-CALENDAR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES' MOTION, THE A-CALENDAR IS ADVANCED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 AFTER HOUSEKEEPING AND INTRODUCTIONS WE'RE GOING TO

                    START BY TAKING UP THE TEN RESOLUTIONS THAT ARE ON PAGE 3 OF OUR MAIN

                    CALENDAR, OF WHICH SOME OF OUR COLLEAGUES WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK, I

                    BELIEVE.  OUR MAJOR FOCUS OF TODAY WILL BE TO GO THROUGH OUR DEBATE LIST

                    IMMEDIATELY AFTER WE CONSENT THE A-CALENDAR.

                                 THAT, MR. SPEAKER, IS THE GENERAL OUTLINE OF WHERE

                    WE'RE GOING TO GO TODAY.  IF YOU HAVE ANY INTRODUCTIONS AND/OR

                    HOUSEKEEPINGS, NOW WOULD BE A GREAT TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE HAVE NEITHER,

                    MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES, SO WE WILL PROCEED DIRECTLY TO PAGE 3 ON THE


                    MAIN, ASSEMBLY NO. 412.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 412, MS.

                    HYNDMAN.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM JUNE 13-19, 2021, AS SICKLE CELL

                    DISEASE AWARENESS WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 413, MR.

                    DURSO.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM JUNE 17, 2021, AS SANITATION WORKERS

                    DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. DURSO ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THANK YOU

                    FOR PUTTING FORWARD THIS RESOLUTION TODAY.  TODAY WE HONOR THE

                    SANITATION WORKERS HERE IN NEW YORK STATE.  THESE MEN AND WOMEN

                    ARE A SPECIAL GROUP OF PEOPLE THAT I DON'T FEEL GET ENOUGH CREDIT FOR ALL

                    THAT THEY DO, DESPITE THE WEATHER, FREEZING RAIN, COLD DAYS, EXTREME

                    HEAT.  THEY ANSWER THE CALL EVERY DAY TO DO THEIR JOBS AND LITERALLY KEEP

                    OUR STREETS CLEAN AND SAFE.  IN A YEAR WHERE THE PANDEMIC SHUT DOWN SO

                    MANY -- MANY BUSINESSES SHUT DOWN, PEOPLE SHELTERED IN PLACE, THESE

                    BRAVE ESSENTIAL WORKERS CANNOT ZOOM INTO WORK EVERY DAY.  THEY HAVE

                    TO GO TO WORK PHYSICALLY.  THEY SHOWED UP EVERY DAY TO DO THEIR JOBS

                    AND WE DESERVE TO GIVE THEM THE RECOGNITION.  UP UNTIL THIS JANUARY

                    WHEN I TOOK OFFICE I GOT TO SEE THESE WORKERS UP CLOSE AND FIRSTHAND.

                    FOR THE PAST 15 YEARS I WAS A SANITATION WORKER WITH THE TOWN OF

                    OYSTER BAY SANITATION.  I PROUDLY REPRESENTED THESE SANITATION WORKERS

                    AND RECYCLING WORKERS AS THEIR SHOP STEWARD FOR A TIME, AND ALWAYS DID

                    WHAT I COULD TO KEEP THEM SAFE AND REPRESENT THEM AT CONTRACT TIME.

                    INJURIES OCCUR EVERY DAY IN THIS BUSINESS, SOME SERIOUS, SOME NOT SO

                    SERIOUS.  BUT TO UNDERSTAND THE DANGERS THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THIS

                    JOB, LET ME POINT OUT TO YOU TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT IT IS THEY GO

                    THROUGH EACH DAY.  THERE'S EVERYTHING FROM ROTATOR CUFF INJURIES, KNEE

                    AND BACK ISSUES, TORN MUSCLES, TORN ACHILLE'S TENDONS.  AND SO THESE

                    ARE SOME THAT I'VE SEEN.  NOT TO MENTION THE OCCASIONAL HEAT STROKE,

                    FINGER OR TWO MISSING, NEEDLE STICKS FROM POORLY-DISPOSED-OF NEEDLES

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    IN THE GARBAGE.  PEOPLE BEING HIT BY CARS AND, YES, THE OCCASIONAL DEATH.

                    UNFORTUNATELY, THESE ARE SOME OF THE DANGERS OF BEING A SANITATION

                    WORKER HERE IN NEW YORK STATE, AND DESPITE ALL THESE OUR MEN AND

                    WOMEN COME TO WORK EVERY DAY TO DO THEIR JOB.  I'M SO PROUD OF MY

                    SANITATION WORKER BROTHERS AND SISTERS, PROUD TO BRING FORWARD THIS

                    RESOLUTION AND PROUD TO HONOR THEM.  PLEASE REMEMBER, IT'S NOT A MAGIC

                    TRICK WHEN YOU PUT YOUR GARBAGE OUT AT THE CURB EACH DAY.  IT JUST

                    DOESN'T DISAPPEAR.  SOMEONE COMES AND PICKS IT UP EVERY MORNING.

                    JUST A QUICK HELLO AND THE OCCASIONAL THANK YOU GOES A LONG WAY FOR

                    THESE WORKERS.  AND PLEASE REMEMBER, WHEN YOU SEE A SANITATION TRUCK,

                    PLEASE SLOW DOWN.  THERE'S PEOPLE WORKING.

                                 THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 414, MR.

                    KIM.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM JUNE 15, 2021, AS ELDER ABUSE

                    AWARENESS DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 415, MRS.

                    GUNTHER.

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM JUNE 2021, AS POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS

                    INJURY AWARENESS MONTH, AND JUNE 27, 2021 AS POST-TRAUMATIC STRESS

                    INJURY AWARENESS DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 416, MS.

                    SOLAGES.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM JULY, 2021, AS PLASTIC-FREE MONTH IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 417, MR.

                    MAGNARELLI.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM SEPTEMBER 27-OCTOBER 3, 2021, AS

                    DIAPER NEED AWARENESS WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 418, MR.

                    BYRNE.

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 6-12, 2021, AS PHYSICIAN'S

                    [SIC] ASSISTANT WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 419, MS.

                    MILLER.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2021, AS COCKAYNE SYNDROME

                    AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. MILLER ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. MILLER, YOU NEED TO UNMUTE YOURSELF.

                                 MS. MILLER:  CAN YOU HEAR ME?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  NOW WE CAN HEAR

                    YOU.

                                 MS.  MILLER:  OKAY.  THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO

                    SPEAK ON THIS RESOLUTION.  COCKAYNE SYNDROME IS A NEUROLOGICAL

                    DISEASE THAT CAUSES RAPID AGING.  IT'S AN ORPHAN DISEASE, ONE OF THOSE

                    THAT REALLY DOESN'T GET ENOUGH ATTENTION BECAUSE IT'S SO RARE.  NOT

                    GETTING ATTENTION TO A RARE DISEASE MEANS THAT LITTLE TO NO FUNDING GOES

                    TOWARDS FINDING A CURE.  FOR THE FAMILIES OF THESE CHILDREN AFFECTED

                    WITH COCKAYNE SYNDROME, IT DOESN'T FEEL RARE.  MY DAUGHTER MELANIE

                    DIED FROM THIS DISEASE WHEN SHE WAS SEVEN YEARS OLD.  MELANIE WAS AN

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    OLD SOUL.  SHE WAS ALWAYS SMILING, HAPPY AND SO VERY BRAVE.  SHE WAS

                    THE LIGHT OF OUR LIVES.  BUT SHE SUFFERED TERRIBLY, ESPECIALLY AT THE END OF

                    HER LIFE.  SHE DESERVED BETTER THAN WHAT THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY COULD

                    GIVE HER.  TWENTY-PLUS YEARS LATER, THESE KIDS ARE STILL SUFFERING AT THE

                    END OF THEIR SHORT LIVES.  I AM THANKFUL FOR THIS RESOLUTION MAKING

                    OCTOBER, THE MONTH THAT MELANIE WAS BORN AND THE MONTH THAT SHE

                    DIED, COCKAYNE SYNDROME AWARENESS MONTH BECAUSE AWARENESS CAN

                    BRING RESEARCH.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ALL THOSE IN FAVOR OF

                    THE RESOLUTION PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 420, MR.

                    BRABENEC.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2021, AS GERMAN-AMERICAN

                    HERITAGE MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL

                    THOSE IN FAVOR PLEASE SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 421, MS.

                    ROSENTHAL.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    ANDREW M. CUOMO TO PROCLAIM NOVEMBER 2021, AS PANCREATIC --

                    PANCREATIC CANCER AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ALL THOSE IN FAVOR

                    SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.

                                 WE WILL GO TO THE A-CALENDAR ON CONSENT, PAGE 3,

                    RULES REPORT NO. 515.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00289-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 515, GOTTFRIED, PAULIN, SOLAGES, WEPRIN, ABINANTI, COOK,

                    GALLAGHER, GALEF, GUNTHER, JACOBSON, REYES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE INSURANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO ENHANCING

                    COVERAGE AND CARE FOR MEDICALLY-FRAGILE CHILDREN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A -- ON A MOTION

                    BY MR. GOTTFRIED, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL

                    IS ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00324-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 516, ZEBROWSKI, ENGLEBRIGHT, CRUZ, BUTTENSCHON, SAYEGH,

                    J. RIVERA, COLTON, SIMON, STIRPE, TAYLOR, GALEF, DICKENS, HYNDMAN,

                    GRIFFIN, GLICK, WALLACE, WEPRIN, STECK, FALL, FERNANDEZ, FAHY, HEVESI,

                    ROZIC, LAVINE, LUPARDO, JOYNER, QUART, GOTTFRIED, SEAWRIGHT,

                    DINOWITZ, NIOU, ABINANTI, PAULIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PENAL LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO COERCION IN THE THIRD DEGREE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    ZEBROWSKI, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY -- SENATE PRINT 2986-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL

                    CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS

                    REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 FIRST VOTE OF THE DAY, MEMBERS.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00350-C, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 517 WAS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED ON THIRD READING.


                                 ASSEMBLY NO. A00464, RULES REPORT NO. 518, ROZIC,

                    COLTON, ENGLEBRIGHT, SIMON, GRIFFIN, BARRON, WOERNER, LUPARDO,

                    FORREST.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CIVIL SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO ENACTING

                    THE "NEW YORK STATE TELEWORKING EXPANSION ACT."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00499-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 519, CARROLL, HEVESI, L. ROSENTHAL, BENEDETTO, COLTON,

                    CYMBROWITZ, DINOWITZ, GOTTFRIED, WEPRIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, IN RELATION TO ENACTING

                    THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS COMMUNITY

                    ACCOUNTABILITY ACT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00530-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 520, L. ROSENTHAL, PERRY, LUPARDO, BICHOTTE HERMELYN,

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    VANEL, GRIFFIN, COLTON, SILLITTI, BARRON, OTIS.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO

                    DIRECTING THE URBAN DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION TO CONDUCT A STUDY

                    REGARDING THE ASSISTANCE NEEDED TO ENCOURAGE WOMEN AND MINORITIES TO

                    PURSUE TECHNOLOGY CAREERS IN SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY, ENGINEERING AND

                    MATHEMATICS (STEM).

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    ROSENTHAL, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 531-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00743-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 521, WALLACE.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO CERTAIN CONTRACTS INVOLVING INDUSTRIAL PAINTING AND INDUSTRIAL

                    COATINGS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 743-A.  THIS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00754-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 522, PHEFFER AMATO.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL

                    BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING THE SALE OF WHIPPED CREAM

                    CHARGERS TO PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF 21.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    PHEFFER AMATO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 30TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 2819-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00760-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 523, SEAWRIGHT, OTIS, QUART, NIOU, GOTTFRIED, GALEF,

                    L. ROSENTHAL, EPSTEIN, GRIFFIN, ROZIC, NOLAN, ABINANTI, BARNWELL,

                    DINOWITZ, THIELE, ASHBY, STERN, ANDERSON, FAHY, BARRON, JACOBSON,

                    MEEKS, O'DONNELL, SIMON, MAGNARELLI, RAJKUMAR.  CONCURRENT

                    RESOLUTION OF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO

                    SECTION 11 OF ARTICLE I OF THE CONSTITUTION, IN RELATION TO EQUAL

                    PROTECTION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00898-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 524, WOERNER, WALSH, FAHY, WILLIAMS, REYES, HUNTER,

                    GUNTHER, JEAN-PIERRE, SIMON, GALEF, HYNDMAN, SOLAGES, DAVILA,

                    BUTTENSCHON, SEAWRIGHT, DICKENS, GLICK, MCMAHON, M. MILLER, NIOU,

                    QUART, CUSICK, ASHBY, BRABENEC, WALCZYK, BYRNES, SMULLEN, FRIEND,

                    MONTESANO, J.M. GIGLIO, BLANKENBUSH, MANKTELOW, HAWLEY, GOODELL,

                    BYRNE, DIPIETRO, MORINELLO, ROZIC, LUPARDO, DARLING, WALKER, HEVESI,

                    COOK, WALLACE, WEPRIN, L. ROSENTHAL, STIRPE, CRUZ, BRAUNSTEIN.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS LAW AND THE FAMILY COURT ACT,

                    IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING A LIVING ALLOWANCE FOR ADULTS WITH

                    DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 898-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I AM

                    ABSOLUTELY DELIGHTED TO SEE THIS BILL COME TO THE FLOOR NOW FOR THE THIRD

                    YEAR.  THE LAST TWO TIMES IT CAME TO THE FLOOR THIS BODY SUPPORTED IT

                    UNANIMOUSLY.  THIS YEAR WE HAVE A NEW SENATE SPONSOR AND OUR HOPE

                    IS THAT WE'LL FINALLY HAVE THIS BILL PASS THE FINISH LINE.  I WANT TO THANK

                    THE SPONSOR, MS. WOERNER, FOR HELPING THIS BILL TO GET TO THE FLOOR, AND

                    I'D LIKE TO THANK MY CHIEF-OF-STAFF SAMANTHA TORREY FOR ALL THE WORK

                    THAT SHE'S DONE SINCE 2018 TO TRY TO GET THIS BILL PASSED.  THIS BILL WILL

                    GIVE JUDGES AND SUPPORT MAGISTRATES DISCRETION TO -- TO CONTINUE CHILD

                    SUPPORT PAYMENTS AS A LIVING ALLOWANCE FOR ADULT DEPENDENTS WITH

                    DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES UP TO THE AGE OF 26.  UNFORTUNATELY, THE

                    DIVORCE RATE FOR FAMILIES WHO HAVE A CHILD WITH DISABILITIES IS VERY

                    HIGH.  AND WE KNOW THAT IT TAKES BOTH PARENTS WORKING TOGETHER

                    EMOTIONALLY AND FINANCIALLY TO MAKE SURE THAT THE BEST OUTCOMES ARE

                    REACHED FOR CHILDREN AS THEY BECOME ADULTS AND MOVE INTO MATURITY.

                                 SO I'M SO GRATEFUL THAT THIS BILL IS MOVING FORWARD.  I

                    WOULD APPRECIATE THE SUPPORT OF ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES ONCE AGAIN THIS

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YEAR.  I'LL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01034-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 525, BRONSON, JACOBSON, LUNSFORD.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW, IN RELATION TO ATTORNEY'S FEES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    BRONSON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01106-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 526, BRONSON, OTIS, BURDICK, SAYEGH, JACOBSON, GALEF.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE LABOR LAW, IN RELATION TO THE PAYMENT OF PREVAILING

                    WAGE FOR WORK INVOLVING THE DELIVERY TO AND HAULING OF AGGREGATE

                    SUPPLY CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    BRONSON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED AND THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01121-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 527, BUTTENSCHON, GALEF, JACKSON, FALL.  AN ACT TO AMEND

                    THE PENAL LAW, IN RELATION TO CREATING THE CERTAIN OFFENSES AND

                    PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE UNLAWFUL DISSEMINATION OF A PERSONAL IMAGE;

                    AND TO AMEND THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW, IN RELATION TO CREATING A PRIVATE

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RIGHT OF ACTION FOR SUCH OFFENSES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01160-C, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 528, BRONSON, BARRON, CLARK, COOK, CRUZ, CUSICK,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, EPSTEIN, FAHY, PERRY, SEAWRIGHT, SIMON, WOERNER,

                    MEEKS, JENSEN, JACKSON, MITAYNES, LUNSFORD, RAMOS, RICHARDSON,

                    AUBRY, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, GOTTFRIED, ANDERSON, WALLACE, FRONTUS,

                    REYES, BRAUNSTEIN, DINOWITZ, MCDONALD, HUNTER, WEPRIN, JEAN-PIERRE,

                    DARLING, GUNTHER, SMITH, DAVILA, HEVESI, COLTON, RA, ZINERMAN.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING AN

                    ADVISORY COUNCIL TO EFFECTUATE A REDUCTION IN CHILD POVERTY IN THE STATE;

                    AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS UPON EXPIRATION

                    THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MR. BRONSON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE

                    THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01171-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 529, BRONSON, CLARK, LUNSFORD, MEEKS, WALLACE,

                    BUTTENSCHON, ROZIC, SANTABARBARA, LUPARDO, HUNTER, GUNTHER, STECK,

                    STIRPE, JONES, MAGNARELLI, FAHY, MCMAHON, BARRETT, WOERNER, WEPRIN,

                    GOTTFRIED, CRUZ, CARROLL, MCDONALD.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE INSURANCE

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE OF OUTPATIENT CARE

                    PROVIDED BY A MENTAL HEALTH PRACTITIONER AND A CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER;

                    AND TO REPEAL CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF SUCH LAW RELATING THERETO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01340-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 530, MAGNARELLI, COOK, STECK, PEOPLES-STOKES, LUPARDO.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE ELECTION LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING THAT ALL

                    PRINTED POLITICAL CAMPAIGN MAILING PIECES, CONTAINING OR MADE OF

                    RECYCLABLE MATERIAL, INCLUDE A MESSAGE ABOUT RECYCLING THE PRINTED

                    MATERIALS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01396, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 531, GOTTFRIED, CAHILL, DARLING, DINOWITZ, EPSTEIN, GRIFFIN, STERN,

                    TAGUE, TAYLOR, THIELE, ZEBROWSKI, WEPRIN, L. ROSENTHAL, CYMBROWITZ,

                    HUNTER, GUNTHER, GALEF, MCDONOUGH, RA, BYRNES, SEAWRIGHT,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, JONES, SIMON, BARRETT, JEAN-PIERRE, NORRIS, OTIS, LUPARDO,

                    MORINELLO, BUTTENSCHON, WALLACE, BRONSON, STECK, MONTESANO,

                    ABINANTI.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGERS; TO AMEND THE INSURANCE LAW, IN RELATION

                    TO REGISTRATION AND LICENSING OF PHARMACY BENEFIT MANAGERS; AND TO

                    REPEAL CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW RELATING THERETO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    GOTTFRIED, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01587, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 532, GOTTFRIED, CARROLL, RAMOS, PAULIN, SIMON, SEAWRIGHT,

                    DICKENS, CAHILL, ABINANTI, BARRON, J. RIVERA, J.D. RIVERA.  AN ACT TO

                    AMEND THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW, IN RELATION TO SCHOOL-BASED HEALTH

                    CENTERS FOR PURPOSES OF MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS UNDER MEDICAID.

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    GOTTFRIED, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 2127.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01935, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 533, PERRY.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE BANKING LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    MODIFYING DELINQUENT HOME LOANS AND SINGLE POINT OF CONTACT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    PERRY, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 671.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02111, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 534, SIMON, GRIFFIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE TAX LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PROVIDING TAXPAYER GIFTS FOR GUN VIOLENCE RESEARCH; AND TO AMEND THE

                    STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE GUN VIOLENCE

                    RESEARCH FUND.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 2111.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. SIMON TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. SIMON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THE PASSAGE

                    OF THIS GUN VIOLENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE BILL WILL ENSURE THAT WE WILL BE

                    ABLE TO STUDY IN GREAT DEPTH THE PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS THAT EXISTS WITH

                    REGARD TO GUN VIOLENCE.  WE NEED TO KNOW SO MUCH MORE ABOUT WHY

                    GUN VIOLENCE OCCURS, HOW EASY IT IS TO GET A WEAPON, WHAT WE CAN DO TO

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    TREAT OUR COMMUNITIES AND SURVIVORS OF GUN VIOLENCE.  ALL OF THESE

                    THINGS ARE THINGS THAT ARE IMPROVED BY RESEARCH.  JUST AS SEAT BELTS WERE

                    IMPROVED BY RESEARCH.  JUST AS MOTHERS AGAINST DRUNK DRIVING

                    SHOWED THE EFFECTS OF ALCOHOL BEHIND THE WHEEL.  WE NEED THAT KIND OF

                    FOCUSED RESEARCH ON GUN VIOLENCE, AND I'M VERY PROUD TO BE VOTING IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. SIMON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO THE

                    NEGATIVE VOTES ON THE FLOOR, PLEASE RECORD MY COLLEAGUES MR.

                    BRABENEC, MR. DIPIETRO, MR. FITZPATRICK AND MR. FRIEND IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 MR. TAGUE TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE.  JUST AS MY COLLEAGUES THAT WERE JUST MENTIONED, I WILL ALSO BE

                    VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ARE THERE -- MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  ACTUALLY, MR. SPEAKER, I

                    WOULD LIKE FOR YOU TO PUT OUR COLLEAGUE CARRIE WOERNER IN THE NEGATIVE

                    ON THIS ONE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02300-C, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 535, JEAN-PIERRE, RAMOS, OTIS.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING A DEDICATED TELEPHONE LINE

                    FOR COMPLAINANTS OF HOUSING DISCRIMINATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    JEAN-PIERRE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 120TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 3437-C.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02316-A, RULES

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REPORT NO. 536, SIMON, FORREST.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE VEHICLE AND

                    TRAFFIC LAW AND THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING A

                    DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM ON INTERSTATE ROUTE 278 IN KINGS COUNTY TO

                    ENFORCE VEHICLE WEIGHT RESTRICTION ON SUCH INTERSTATE BY MEANS OF

                    MOBILE OR STATIONARY WEIGH-IN MOTION SYSTEMS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE

                    REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS UPON EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    SIMON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 2740-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02349-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 537, RODRIGUEZ, CAHILL, ROZIC, J. RIVERA.  AN ACT TO AMEND

                    THE INSURANCE LAW, THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW, THE TAX LAW AND THE

                    VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW, IN RELATION TO ENACTING THE PEER-TO-PEER CAR

                    SHARING PROGRAM ACT.

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    RODRIGUEZ, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 90TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6715.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02591-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 538, CARROLL, DICKENS, RODRIGUEZ, GOTTFRIED, ABINANTI,

                    STIRPE, FAHY, BARRON, DAVILA, NIOU, L. ROSENTHAL, EPSTEIN, ANDERSON,

                    PAULIN, DINOWITZ, REYES, COLTON, DE LA ROSA, GALEF, OTIS, JACKSON,

                    GALLAGHER, PERRY, THIELE, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, STERN, ZEBROWSKI, ROZIC,

                    QUART.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PROVISIONS IN STATE PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS INVOLVING THE USE OF

                    LOW-EMBODIED CARBON CONCRETE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT JANUARY 1ST.

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 2591-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. GLICK TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. GLICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  ON THIS

                    MEASURE, WHILE THERE HAVE BEEN SOME IMPROVEMENTS SUCH AS THE

                    ELIMINATION OF FLY ASH IN BOTH THE PRODUCT AND IN GENERATING ENERGY FOR

                    THIS, THIS STILL ALLOWS FOR THE BURNING OF TIRES IN ORDER TO POWER THE

                    PRODUCTION AND ALLOWS FOR THE USE OF SLAG IN THE MATERIAL ITSELF.  AND SO

                    AT THE MOMENT, UNTIL THERE'S A LITTLE BIT MORE ADJUSTMENT TO THE BILL, AT

                    THE MOMENT I WILL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. GLICK IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02619-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 539, BARRON, PRETLOW, DICKENS, AUBRY, WALKER, WILLIAMS,

                    RICHARDSON, SOLAGES, PICHARDO, RODRIGUEZ, PEOPLES-STOKES, COOK,

                    J. RIVERA, DE LA ROSA, PERRY, VANEL, HYNDMAN, CAHILL, JEAN-PIERRE,

                    BICHOTTE HERMELYN, TAYLOR, DILAN, DARLING, JOYNER, BENEDETTO,

                    EPSTEIN, REYES, FRONTUS, SIMON, RAMOS, FERNANDEZ, CRUZ, NOLAN,

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    O'DONNELL, ZINERMAN, JACKSON, FORREST, BURGOS.  AN ACT TO

                    ACKNOWLEDGE THE FUNDAMENTAL INJUSTICE, CRUELTY, BRUTALITY AND

                    INHUMANITY OF SLAVERY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND THE STATE OF NEW

                    YORK; TO ESTABLISH THE NEW YORK STATE COMMUNITY COMMISSION ON

                    REPARATIONS REMEDIES, TO EXAMINE THE INSTITUTION OF SLAVERY,

                    SUBSEQUENTLY DE JURE AND DE FACTO RACIAL AND ECONOMIC DISCRIMINATION

                    AGAINST AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND THE IMPACT OF THESE FORCES ON LIVING

                    AFRICAN-AMERICANS AND TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS REGARDING

                    COMPENSATION; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS UPON

                    EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02670-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 540, HYNDMAN.  AN ACT TO DIRECT THE NEW YORK STATE

                    DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO CONDUCT A STUDY ON THE INCIDENCES OF ASTHMA

                    IN CITIES AND TOWNS HAVING A POPULATION OF MORE THAN 90,000.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    HYNDMAN, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 646-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03058, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 541, FAHY, MCDONALD.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO THE RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF

                    ALBANY; AND TO AMEND CHAPTER 454 OF THE LAWS OF 2010 AMENDING THE

                    VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW RELATING TO AUTHORIZING A PILOT RESIDENTIAL

                    PARKING PERMIT SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF ALBANY, IN RELATION TO MAKING

                    SUCH PROVISIONS PERMANENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    FAHY, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.

                    HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 6428.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03184, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 542, DINOWITZ, PEOPLES-STOKES, PAULIN, GOTTFRIED, L. ROSENTHAL,

                    ZEBROWSKI, WEPRIN, GALEF, CAHILL, COLTON, ABINANTI, HEVESI, COOK,

                    STIRPE, STECK, LUPARDO, GUNTHER, PERRY, SANTABARBARA, JEAN-PIERRE,

                    JOYNER, FAHY, OTIS, HUNTER, BARRETT, SEAWRIGHT, LAVINE, TAYLOR, RA,

                    MONTESANO, SMITH, ENGLEBRIGHT, SIMON, GRIFFIN, BENEDETTO.  AN ACT TO

                    AMEND THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO CREATING THE STATE OFFICE

                    OF THE UTILITY CONSUMER ADVOCATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    DINOWITZ, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03491-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 543, GALEF, ABINANTI, MAGNARELLI, SEAWRIGHT, J. RIVERA,

                    HYNDMAN, WILLIAMS, COOK, STIRPE, WALLACE.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE REAL

                    PROPERTY TAX LAW AND THE REAL PROPERTY LAW, IN RELATION TO THE

                    TAXATION OF PROPERTY OWNED BY A COOPERATIVE CORPORATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03573, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 544, CYMBROWITZ, STERN, LAVINE, HUNTER, SEAWRIGHT, MAGNARELLI,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, SIMON, MCDONALD, ABBATE, DICKENS, ANDERSON, BURDICK,

                    TAYLOR, SILLITTI, GALEF, JACKSON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE INSURANCE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO CERTAIN VOIDABLE TRANSFERS AFFECTING A FEDERAL HOME LOAN

                    BANK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 3573.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03946, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 545, M. MILLER, MCDONOUGH.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE VEHICLE AND

                    TRAFFIC LAW, IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING A RESIDENTIAL PARKING SYSTEM IN

                    CERTAIN PARTS OF THE HAMLET OF OCEANSIDE IN THE TOWN OF HEMPSTEAD.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    MILLER, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 624.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  MRS.

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MS. WEINSTEIN AND MR. CAHILL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE ON ASSEMBLY BILL 3946.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04010-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 546, THIELE, BYRNES, GRIFFIN, JACOBSON, PALMESANO.  AN ACT

                    TO AMEND THE TRANSPORTATION LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO ANNUALLY PREPARE AND SUBMIT TO THE

                    LEGISLATURE CERTAIN HIGHWAY PAVEMENT AND BRIDGE CONDITION REPORTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON BILL 4010-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04044, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 547, FRIEND.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE COUNTY LAW AND THE TAX LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF TIOGA TO IMPOSE AN ADDITIONAL

                    SURCHARGE TO PAY FOR THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UPDATING THE

                    TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT AND TELEPHONE SERVICES NEEDED TO

                    PROVIDE AN ENHANCED 911 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM TO SERVE SUCH

                    COUNTY; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS UPON

                    EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  HOME RULE

                    MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY BILL 4044.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO THE

                    NEGATIVE VOTES ON THE FLOOR, PLEASE RECORD ASSEMBLYMAN FITZPATRICK IN

                    THE NEGATIVE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  SO NOTED, SIR.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MS. WALLACE, MS.

                    MCMAHON, MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, MS. FAHY, MR. STIRPE, MR. BARNWELL AND

                    MR. SANTABARBARA AS A NEGATIVE ON 4044.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04277, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 549, WALKER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    THE REQUIREMENTS FOR NOTARIES PUBLIC AND COMMISSIONERS OF DEEDS

                    RELATING TO CERTAIN INSTRUMENTS AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  THE BILL IS LAID

                    ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04637, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 550, ENGLEBRIGHT, LAVINE, GRIFFIN, COLTON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO LIMITING THE

                    EXCEPTIONS TO CERTAIN EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS IN NASSAU AND SUFFOLK

                    COUNTIES AND REQUIRING CERTAIN ELIGIBLE PROJECTS FOR STATE AID INVOLVING

                    WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND AGREEMENTS TO TAKE

                    COUNTY-WIDE OR REGIONAL WASTEWATER PLANNING INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN

                    DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER PICHARDO:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON A.4637.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04675, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 551, TAGUE.  AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE COUNTY OF COLUMBIA TO OFFER

                    AN OPTIONAL 20-YEAR RETIREMENT PLAN TO THEODORE BLANK, A DEPUTY

                    SHERIFF EMPLOYED BY SUCH COUNTY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    TAGUE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4404.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04742-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 552, WOERNER, ENGLEBRIGHT, OTIS, MCMAHON, LUPARDO,

                    ABINANTI, JONES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PARKS, RECREATION AND HISTORIC

                    PRESERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE "NEW YORK STATE

                    250TH COMMEMORATION ACT"; TO AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE NEW YORK STATE 250TH COMMEMORATION

                    COMMISSION FUND; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS

                    UPON EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 4742-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04753, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 553, WALCZYK.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE HIGHWAY LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    EXTENDING THE THOUSAND ISLANDS-SEAWAY WINE TRAIL.

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    WALCZYK, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 2241.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04817-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 554, RA.  AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE FAMILY AND CHILDREN'S

                    ASSOCIATION TO RECEIVE RETROACTIVE REAL PROPERTY TAX-EXEMPTION [SIC]

                    STATUS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    RA, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 329-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04982-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 555, HEVESI, EPSTEIN, SIMON, ABINANTI, SEAWRIGHT, AUBRY,

                    GOTTFRIED, JACKSON, MITAYNES, FORREST, QUART, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, MEEKS

                    MAMDANI, PERRY, BURDICK, DICKENS, WALKER, BARRON, LUNSFORD.  AN ACT

                    TO AMEND THE FAMILY COURT ACT, THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW AND THE

                    EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO RAISING THE LOWER AGE OF JUVENILE

                    DELINQUENCY JURISDICTION FROM AGE 7 TO AGE 12 AND TO ESTABLISH

                    DIFFERENTIAL RESPONSE PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN UNDER THE AGE OF 12.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05264-C, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 556, RICHARDSON, DE LA ROSA, JACKSON, FORREST, SIMON,

                    GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, PERRY, BARRON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CRIMINAL

                    PROCEDURE LAW AND THE CIVIL PRACTICE LAW AND RULES, IN RELATION TO

                    DETAINING PERSONS FOR LONGER THAN 24 HOURS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    RICHARDSON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05339, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 557, PAULIN, GOTTFRIED, CAHILL, COOK, GALEF, GUNTHER, MAGNARELLI,

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LUPARDO, DINOWITZ, BENEDETTO, ABINANTI, BARRON, MEEKS, JENSEN,

                    SILLITTI, KELLES, LUNSFORD.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO FUNDING EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES; AND TO REPEAL CERTAIN

                    PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW AND THE INSURANCE LAW RELATING

                    THERETO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT JANUARY 1,

                    2022.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 5339.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE.  THIS IS A GREAT BILL.  IT RELATES TO FUNDING FOR EARLY

                    INTERVENTION SERVICES WHICH ARE SO CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TO GET OUR

                    YOUNG, SOMETIMES INFANTS, TO VERY YOUNG CHILDREN, PRESCHOOL KIDS IN SO

                    THAT THEY CAN RECEIVE THE BEST SERVICES, WHETHER IT'S SPEECH, OT, PT,

                    ANY KIND OF SERVICE THAT THEY NEED.  IT'S AT NO COST TO THE PARENTS AND THE

                    RESULTS ONCE THEY GET INTO SCHOOL ARE GOING TO BE SO MUCH BETTER.  THIS

                    BILL CHANGES THE WAY THAT THESE EARLY INTERVENTION SERVICES WILL BE

                    FUNDED.  AND SO I ALSO LOVE THIS BILL BECAUSE IT MAY RESULT IN A POTENTIAL

                    COST SAVINGS FOR MUNICIPALITIES WHO CURRENTLY BEAR MUCH OF THE COST OF

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    PROVIDING THESE IMPORTANT SERVICES.

                                 SO FOR ALL OF THOSE REASONS I'LL BE SUPPORTING THIS BILL,

                    AS I SUSPECT MANY OF MY COLLEAGUES WILL AS WELL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. CAHILL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. CAHILL:  MR. SPEAKER, I WOULD LIKE TO LAY THE

                    BILL ASIDE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.

                    ROLL CALL IS WITHDRAWN.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05434, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 558 REILLY, CUSICK, FALL, TANNOUSIS.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC

                    AUTHORITIES LAW, IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE DORMITORY AUTHORITY TO

                    PROVIDE FINANCING TO THE SANDY GROUND HISTORICAL MUSEUM.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    REILLY, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 30TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5991.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05461-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 559, THIELE.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE FLANDERS,

                    RIVERSIDE AND NORTHAMPTON COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, INC. TO FILE AN

                    APPLICATION FOR A PARTIAL EXEMPTION FROM REAL PROPERTY TAXES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 5461-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05465-D, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 560, O'DONNELL, BRONSON, GLICK, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, TAYLOR,

                    SIMON, QUART, EPSTEIN, SEAWRIGHT, LAVINE, GOTTFRIED, LUPARDO,

                    FERNANDEZ, DINOWITZ, HYNDMAN, BURDICK, GALLAGHER, OTIS, HEVESI,

                    REYES, JACKSON, DAVILA, LUNSFORD, FORREST, CRUZ, DE LA ROSA, PERRY,

                    THIELE, SILLITTI, DICKENS, ZINERMAN, ENGLEBRIGHT, STECK, MAMDANI,

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    FAHY, KELLES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW, THE VEHICLE AND

                    TRAFFIC LAW AND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO ENACTING THE

                    "GENDER RECOGNITION ACT"; AND TO REPEAL SUBDIVISION 1 OF SECTION 502

                    OF THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW RELATING TO DRIVER'S LICENSES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    O'DONNELL, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05489-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 561, SOLAGES, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, NOLAN, SEAWRIGHT,

                    SILLITTI, DINOWITZ, FERNANDEZ, BARRON, GOTTFRIED, ZINERMAN,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, GLICK, DAVILA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO REQUIRING THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH TO DEVELOP AN

                    INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET FOR PATIENTS UNDERGOING PELVIC EXAMINATIONS

                    AND TO MAKE THE INFORMATIONAL PAMPHLET AVAILABLE FOR USE BY MEDICAL

                    PRACTITIONERS PERFORMING PELVIC EXAMINATIONS AND TO REQUIRE MEDICAL

                    PRACTITIONERS PERFORMING PELVIC EXAMS TO DISSEMINATE SUCH PAMPHLETS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    SOLAGES, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 100TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 210-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05517-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 562, SOLAGES, GOTTFRIED, HEVESI, JACOBSON, WALLACE,

                    SIMON, FERNANDEZ, DESTEFANO, NOLAN, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, SEAWRIGHT,

                    SILLITTI, DINOWITZ, BARRON, GALEF, ZINERMAN, ENGLEBRIGHT, L. ROSENTHAL,

                    DAVILA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PROHIBITING VIRGINITY EXAMINATIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 5517-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05549, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 563, RICHARDSON, HYNDMAN, DE LA ROSA, WALKER, DAVILA,

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    FERNANDEZ, CRUZ, DICKENS, JACKSON, ZINERMAN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    CORRECTION LAW AND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO CERTIFICATES UPON

                    DISCHARGE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05577, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 564, BYRNES.  AN ACT GRANTING RETROACTIVE MEMBERSHIP OF THE NEW

                    YORK STATE LOCAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO SHAWN COVENY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    BYRNES, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 3594.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05679-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 565, DARLING, BICHOTTE HERMELYN.  AN ACT TO DECLARE RACISM

                    A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS AND TO ESTABLISH A WORKING GROUP TO PROMOTE

                    RACIAL EQUITY THROUGHOUT THE STATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DARLING, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED AND THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05705-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 566, JOYNER, BURDICK, D. ROSENTHAL, DINOWITZ, ZINERMAN,

                    REYES, SIMON, DE LA ROSA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CORRECTION LAW AND

                    THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO WORK RELATED LABOR PROTESTS NOT BEING

                    CONSIDERED A PAROLE VIOLATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05752, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 567, JOYNER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO YOUTHFUL OFFENDER DETERMINATIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05823-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 568, L. ROSENTHAL, GOTTFRIED, LAVINE, MCDONALD, SIMON,

                    FAHY.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EDUCATION LAW, IN RELATION TO MANDATING

                    THE REPORTING OF SUSPECTED ANIMAL CRUELTY BY VETERINARIANS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    ROSENTHAL, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05891-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 569, JOYNER, SIMON, DICKENS, CARROLL, AUBRY, BARRON,

                    O'DONNELL, DINOWITZ, FORREST, JACKSON, HEVESI.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    FAMILY COURT ACT AND THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW, IN RELATION TO THE

                    CUSTODIAL INTERROGATION OF JUVENILES BY LAW ENFORCEMENT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05965, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 570, MR. GIGLIO.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE HIGHWAY LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AS THE "SERGEANT

                    DAVID LOCKWOOD MEMORIAL BRIDGE."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    GIGLIO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE SENATE PRINT 1752.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06021, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 571, HAWLEY, ANGELINO, SMULLEN, BYRNES, MCDONOUGH, SALKA, B.

                    MILLER, MONTESANO.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE HIGHWAY LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AS THE "SP4 C. JAY

                    HALL MEMORIAL BRIDGE."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    HAWLEY, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6150.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06054, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 572, HUNTER, MAMDANI, EPSTEIN, GALEF.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW AND THE PENAL LAW, IN RELATION TO ABOLISHING

                    CITIZEN'S ARRESTS; AND TO REPEAL CERTAIN PROVISIONS OF THE CRIMINAL

                    PROCEDURE LAW AND THE FAMILY COURT ACT RELATING THERETO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    HUNTER, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED AND THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06121-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 573, JEAN-PIERRE, FAHY, PALMESANO, STECK, SCHMITT, B.

                    MILLER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EDUCATION LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING

                    MEMBERS OF A BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PUBLIC, FREE ASSOCIATION AND INDIAN

                    LIBRARIES TO COMPLETE TWO HOURS OF TRUSTEE EDUCATION ANNUALLY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    JEAN-PIERRE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4435-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THIS BILL REQUIRES

                    THAT VOLUNTEER MEMBERS OR THE TRUSTEES OF LOCAL LIBRARIES UNDERGO TWO

                    HOURS OF TRAINING EVERY YEAR.  AND I AM CONCERNED THAT WE KEEP ADDING

                    TRAINING REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS AND MANDATES ON

                    VOLUNTEERS.  THE VOLUNTEERS THAT SERVE ON THESE HOSPITAL BOARDS STEP

                    FORWARD, THEY DON'T GET ANY COMPENSATION, THEY BRING THEIR BEST FOOT

                    FORWARD AND THEY DO THE BEST THEY CAN.  AND WHILE I APPRECIATE THE

                    SPONSOR'S DESIRE TO ENSURE THAT HOS -- THAT THE LIBRARY TRUSTEES ARE WELL

                    EDUCATED, I WOULD POINT OUT THAT OFTENTIMES, A REALLY GOOD BOARD OF

                    TRUSTEES HAS PEOPLE WITH EXPERTISE IN DIFFERENT AREAS.  ONE MIGHT BE ON

                    LIBRARY -- LIBRARY BOOK ACQUISITIONS, ONE MIGHT BE ON COMMUNITY

                    SERVICE, ONE MIGHT BE LEGAL ISSUES, ONE MIGHT BE INSURANCE ISSUES, ONE

                    MIGHT BE FINANCE ISSUES.  AND FOR US AS A STATE LEGISLATURE TO MANDATE

                    FINANCIAL TRAINING, TWO HOURS EVERY SINGLE YEAR FOR VOLUNTEERS IS AN

                    OVERREACH IN MY OPINION AND THAT'S WHY I WILL BE VOTING NO.  THANK

                    YOU, SIR.

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR.  GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD MY

                    COLLEAGUE, MR. DIPIETRO, IN THE NEGATIVE ALONG WITH THOSE WHO HAVE

                    VOTED NO ON THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06184, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 574, BROWN.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE ASSESSOR OF THE

                    TOWN OF HUNTINGTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, TO ACCEPT FROM THE LEAGUE FOR

                    ANIMAL PROTECTION OF HUNTINGTON, INC. AN APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION

                    FROM REAL PROPERTY TAXES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    BROWN, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY -- ON SENATE PRINT 1092.  THIS IS A FAST

                    ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS

                    REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 AND, MR. BROWN, CONGRATULATIONS; YOU HAVE JOINED

                    THE FAMILY OF THE (INAUDIBLE).

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06187, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 575, M. MILLER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE HIGHWAY LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AS THE "PETER V.

                    SOBOL MEMORIAL BRIDGE."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    MILLER, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4651.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER IN THE -- AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY -- ASSEMBLY NO.

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    A06213-A, RULES REPORT NO. 576, LUNSFORD.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO

                    AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF WEBSTER, COUNTY OF MONROE, TO ALIENATE

                    CERTAIN LANDS USED AS PARKLAND AND TO DEDICATE CERTAIN OTHER LANDS AS

                    PARKLANDS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    LUNSFORD, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5127-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. HYNDMAN:  MR. SPEAKER, PLEASE RECORD OUR

                    COLLEAGUES IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL:  MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, MR. CAHILL,

                    MRS. BARRETT, MR. COLTON, MR. DILAN, MS. SIMON, MS. ROSENTHAL, MS.

                    WILLIAMS, MS. NIOU, AND MR. CARROLL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 MS. HYNDMAN:  PLEASE ADD MS. WALKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06215-A, RULES

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REPORT NO. 577, NIOU, EPSTEIN, OTIS.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE STATE

                    TECHNOLOGY LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING THE OFFICE OF INFORMATION

                    TECHNOLOGY SERVICES TO COOPERATE WITH ALL STATE AGENCIES IN THE

                    IMPLEMENTATION OF LANGUAGE TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    NIOU, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED

                    AND THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06221, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 578, MONTESANO.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE NASSAU

                    COUNTY ASSESSOR TO ACCEPT AN APPLICATION FROM THE TOWN OF OYSTER

                    BAY FOR A REAL PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    MONTESANO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4645.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06237-A, RULES

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REPORT NO. 579, MS. GIGLIO.  AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE TOWN OF

                    BROOKHAVEN, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK, TO ALIENATE AND DISCONTINUE THE USE OF

                    CERTAIN PARKLANDS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    GIGLIO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4608-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, MR. CAHILL, MRS. BARRETT,

                    MR. COLTON, MR. DILAN, MS. SIMON, MS. LINDA ROSENTHAL, MRS.

                    WILLIAMS, MR. BARNWELL, AND MS. FAHY IN THE NEGATIVE ON 6237.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MS. GIGLIO, PLEASE RISE AND TAKE YOUR APPLAUSE.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06295-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 580, LUPARDO, BRONSON, ABBATE, BUTTENSCHON, CRUZ,

                    EPSTEIN, SIMON, TAYLOR, PALMESANO, DESTEFANO, MIKULIN, MCDONOUGH,

                    SALKA, SCHMITT, WALCZYK, FAHY, GALLAHAN, LAWLER, WALLACE.  AN ACT TO

                    AMEND THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW AND THE TRANSPORTATION LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO ESTABLISHING A COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE (CDL) CLASS A

                    YOUNG ADULT TRAINING PROGRAM.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 6295-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06340, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 581, FRIEND.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO PERMITTING THE OWEGO APALACHIN CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT TO

                    ESTABLISH AN INSURANCE RESERVE FUND.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    FRIEND, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5380.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06384-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 582, ABBATE, ENGLEBRIGHT.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE RETIREMENT

                    AND SOCIAL SECURITY LAW, IN RELATION TO INCLUDING CERTAIN EMPLOYEES

                    WHO WERE EMPLOYED IN PUBLIC SERVICE BUT BECAME MEMBERS OF A

                    RETIREMENT SYSTEM AT A LATER DATE FOR ELIGIBILITY FOR THOSE WHO

                    PARTICIPATED IN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER RESCUE, RECOVERY, OR CLEANUP

                    OPERATIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    ABBATE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4961-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06397, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 583, GANDOLFO.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING CHABAD OF ISLIP

                    TOWNSHIP INC. TO FILE AN APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FROM REAL PROPERTY

                    TAXES FOR CERTAIN ASSESSMENT ROLLS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    GANDOLFO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5402.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06506, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 584, GUNTHER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE MENTAL HYGIENE LAW, IN

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RELATION TO REQUIRING MONTHLY STATUS REPORTS OF COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS

                    AND THE IMPACT ON INPATIENT CENSUS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 6506.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06553, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 585, MCDONALD.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE TAX LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    AUTHORIZING A GIFT FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER EDUCATION AND RECOVERY ON

                    PERSONAL INCOME TAX RETURNS; TO AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER EDUCATION AND

                    RECOVERY FUND; AND TO AMEND THE MENTAL HYGIENE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PROVIDING GRANTS FOR SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER EDUCATION AND RECOVERY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    MCDONALD, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 4086.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBER PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06668-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 586, THIELE.  AN ACT AUTHORIZING THE TOWN OF

                    SOUTHAMPTON, COUNTY OF SUFFOLK TO ALIENATE CERTAIN PARCELS OF LAND

                    USED AS PARKLAND.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    THIELE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE THIS -- ON SENATE PRINT 5985-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, MR. CAHILL, MRS. BARRETT,

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MR. COLTON, MR. DILAN, MS. SIMON, MS. LINDA ROSENTHAL, MRS.

                    WILLIAMS, MS. WEINSTEIN, AND MR. BARNWELL IN THE NEGATIVE ON 6668.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06670, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 587, GUNTHER.  AN ACT GRANTING RETROACTIVE TIER IV MEMBERSHIP IN

                    THE NEW YORK STATE AND LOCAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM TO

                    DAVID GOODMAN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                    GUNTHER, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY [SIC] PRINT 5691.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    PLEASE RECORD ASSEMBLYMAN FITZPATRICK IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU,

                    MADAM.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THANK YOU, MR.

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GOODELL.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06709-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 588, L. ROSENTHAL, BARRON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE SOCIAL

                    SERVICES LAW, IN RELATION TO EXEMPTING CERTAIN INCOME AND RESOURCES

                    PROVIDED TO PERSONS ENROLLED IN CERTAIN PILOT PROGRAMS WITH DIRECT CASH

                    TRANSFERS IN DETERMINING ELIGIBILITY FOR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE BENEFITS; AND

                    PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS UPON EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06735, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 589, TAGUE.  AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE THE VILLAGE OF ATHENS, IN THE

                    COUNTY OF GREENE, TO OFFER AN OPTIONAL 20-YEAR RETIREMENT PLAN TO

                    POLICE OFFICER EDWARD TERCASIO, JR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    TAGUE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  A HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-4779.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    THE MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06740-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 590, CONRAD.  AN -- AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 560 OF THE

                    LAWS OF 1998, AMENDING THE NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION LAW AND

                    OTHER LAWS, RELATING TO COMBINATIONS OF CEMETERY CORPORATIONS AND

                    FUNERAL ENTITIES, AND THE SALE OF MONUMENTS AND MEMORIALS, IN RELATION

                    TO FUNERAL ENTITIES AND THE OPERATION OF ANY CREMATORY OR CREMATORIUM.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    CONRAD, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-6171-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06762-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 591, FAHY, ANDERSON, BURDICK, DINOWITZ, SEAWRIGHT,

                    SILLITTI, TAYLOR, L. ROSENTHAL, CARROLL, JACOBSON, STECK, THIELE, PERRY,

                    DARLING, EPSTEIN, OTIS, SIMON, DAVILA, MEEKS, BARRON, HEVESI, PAULIN,

                    LAVINE, J. RIVERA, COLTON, DICKENS, DILAN, JEAN-PIERRE, PICHARDO, CRUZ,

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GRIFFIN, GOTTFRIED, SOLAGES, ABINANTI, GALEF, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, KELLES.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO THE DANGERS

                    TO SAFETY AND HEALTH AND CREATION OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE CAUSED BY THE

                    SALE, MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, IMPORTING, AND MARKETING OF

                    FIREARMS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06866, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 592, JEAN-PIERRE.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE REAL PROPERTY LAW AND THE

                    STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE ANTI-DISCRIMINATION

                    IN HOUSING FUND AND ALLOCATING MONEYS FROM FINES THERETO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    JEAN-PIERRE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 60TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-945-B.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I'LL

                    BE VOTING AGAINST THIS BILL.  THE BILL HAS GOOD COMPONENTS.  THE FIRST

                    COMPONENT ESTABLISHES A ANTI-DISCRIMINATION IN HOUSING FUND.  I

                    CERTAINLY SUPPORT THAT CONCEPT.  UNFORTUNATELY, THE BILL ALSO GOES ON TO

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DOUBLE THE FINES THAT WOULD APPLY TO REALTORS.  AND I THINK WE HAVE

                    ENOUGH FINES AND PENALTIES THAT APPLY TO ALL OF OUR PROFESSIONS AND NOW

                    IS NOT THE TIME TO DOUBLE THEM.  SO FOR THAT REASON, I'LL BE VOTING

                    AGAINST IT, BUT IF THIS FUND WERE FUNDED IN A DIFFERENT WAY USING OUR

                    GENERAL FUND, IT WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE MY SUPPORT.  THANK YOU,

                    MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. TAGUE.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. TAGUE:  CAN YOU HEAR ME, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  WE CAN.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  OH, OKAY.  THANK YOU.  TO EXPLAIN MY

                    VOTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  GO AHEAD, MR. TAGUE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  MADAM SPEAKER, FOR THE SAME REASONS

                    THAT MY ESTEEMED COLLEAGUE JUST MENTIONED, I, TOO, WILL BE VOTING IN THE

                    NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  MR. TAGUE IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I

                    FULLY SUPPORT THE -- THE GOAL OF THE LEGISLATION, BUT LIKE MY OTHER

                    COLLEAGUE, AND I BELIEVE NOW IS NOT THE RIGHT TIME TO DOUBLE FINES.  A

                    THOUSAND IS MORE THAN -- MORE THAN ADEQUATE.  DOUBLING IT RIGHT NOW I

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DO NOT THINK IS A GOOD IDEA.  BUT I DO SUPPORT THE -- THE OVERALL PURPOSE

                    OF THE BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  MR. FITZPATRICK IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  IN

                    ADDITION TO THE NO VOTES ON THE FLOOR, PLEASE RECORD ASSEMBLYMAN

                    HAWLEY IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  IN

                    ADDITION TO THE NAMES I ANNOUNCED EARLIER, PLEASE RECORD MR.

                    BLANKENBUSH, MR. BRABENEC, MR. DIPIETRO, AND MR. FRIEND IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06885, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 593, BARCLAY.  AN ACT RELATING TO LEGALIZING, VALIDATING, RATIFYING

                    AND CONFIRMING A TRANSPORTATION CONTRACT OF THE FULTON CITY SCHOOL

                    DISTRICT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    BARCLAY, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-1867.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06896-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 594, NIOU, KIM, DE LA ROSA, ROZIC, L. ROSENTHAL,

                    WEPRIN, RICHARDSON, FITZPATRICK, ENGLEBRIGHT, FRONTUS, SOLAGES,

                    REYES, FERNANDEZ, BRAUNSTEIN, GOTTFRIED, MITAYNES, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS,

                    EPSTEIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO REQUIRING

                    THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION BY CERTAIN STATE

                    AGENCIES, BOARDS, DEPARTMENTS AND COMMISSIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06947, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 595, BARRETT.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE TAX LAW AND THE REAL PROPERTY

                    TAX LAW, IN RELATION TO A TAX CREDIT AND TAX EXEMPTION FOR THE

                    REHABILITATION OF HISTORIC BARNS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                    BARRETT, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 120TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-6042.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06953-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 596, KELLES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE TAX LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF CORTLAND TO IMPOSE A TAX ON REAL ESTATE

                    TRANSFERS; AND PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF SUCH PROVISIONS UPON

                    EXPIRATION THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS

                    AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON A-6953-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES WILL BE CONCERNED WITH THIS BILL BECAUSE IT'S AN

                    ACTUAL INCREASE IN LOCAL TAXES.  IT'S AN INCREASE OF $2 PER $1,000 ON REAL

                    ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES.  THAT $2 PER $1,000 APPLIES TO THE PURCHASE PRICE

                    IN CORTLAND COUNTY.  I KNOW SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES ARE OPPOSED TO TAX

                    INCREASES, I'LL BE SUPPORTING IT BECAUSE IT'S A LOCAL BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 AND CAN WE HAVE QUIET IN THE CHAMBER, PLEASE?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    PLEASE RECORD IN THE NEGATIVE THE FOLLOWING COLLEAGUES:  MR. DIPIETRO,

                    MR. FITZPATRICK, MR. MIKULIN, MR. NORRIS, IN ADDITION TO THOSE WHO

                    HAVE VOTED NO ON THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. CAHILL, MR. BARNWELL, MR. STIRPE, AND

                    MS. MCMAHON IN THE NEGATIVE ON 6953.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD PLEASE ADD OUR COLLEAGUE, MR. SANTABARBARA, TO THAT LIST OF NOES.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THANK YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07025-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 597, DURSO, B. MILLER.  AN ACT RELATING TO LEGALIZING,

                    VALIDATING, RATIFYING, AND CONFIRMING A CERTAIN CONTRACT OF THE WEST

                    ISLIP UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    DURSO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-6188-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07031, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 598, BYRNES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE HIGHWAY LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AS THE "CHIEF

                    WARRANT OFFICER 4 CHRISTIAN J. KOCH MEMORIAL HIGHWAY."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    BYRNES, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THE VOTE ON S-5399.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07088-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 599, KELLES.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE REAL PROPERTY TAX LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING A CONSERVATION EASEMENT AGREEMENT

                    EXEMPTION IN A TOWN HAVING A CERTAIN POPULATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON A-7088-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07183, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 600, PEOPLES-STOKES.  AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 108 OF THE LAWS

                    OF 2016, AMENDING THE VEHICLE AND TRAFFIC LAW RELATING TO AUTHORIZING

                    A PILOT RESIDENTIAL PARKING PERMIT SYSTEM IN THE CITY OF BUFFALO, IN

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RELATION TO THE EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  A HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-6410.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MS. WEINSTEIN AND MR.

                    CAHILL IN THE NEGATIVE ON A-7183.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  INDEED.  THANK YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07243, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 601, RICHARDSON, SIMON, GALEF, ENGLEBRIGHT, JACOBSON,

                    MCMAHON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    REQUIRING THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES AND THE DIVISION OF

                    STATE POLICE TO PUBLISH QUARTERLY REPORTS PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATED

                    TO FIREARMS, RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS USED IN THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                         67



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. ROZIC:  ON -- ON A MOTION BY MS. RICHARDSON,

                    THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED AND

                    THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07259, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 602, TANNOUSIS, CUSICK, REILLY, FALL.  AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER

                    759 OF THE LAWS OF 1973 RELATING TO THE TRANSFER OF LANDS TO THE UNITED

                    STATES FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE GATEWAY NATIONAL RECREATION AREA,

                    IN RELATION TO THE TIME PERIOD IN WHICH LANDS MAY BE CONVEYED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    TANNOUSIS, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE S-6054.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO

                    BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 AND CONGRATULATIONS, MR. TANNOUSIS, ON YOUR FIRST

                    BILL.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07286, RULES REPORT

                                         68



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NO. 603, RODRIGUEZ.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO ELIMINATING UNCONSTITUTIONAL LANGUAGE RELATING TO

                    THE PRE-AUDIT OF EXPENDITURES FROM THE STATE INSURANCE FUND BY THE

                    STATE COMPTROLLER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON A-7286.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 AND IF WE CAN HAVE SOME QUIET IN THE CHAMBER.

                                 WITHDRAW THE ROLL CALL.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MR. RODRIGUEZ, THE SENATE BILL IS

                    BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER ROZIC:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON S-7177.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES

                    TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR

                    MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07292, RULES REPORT

                                         69



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NO. 604, DARLING.  AN ACT IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY OF

                    NASSAU TO TRANSFER OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN PARKLAND TO THE VILLAGE OF

                    FREEPORT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    DARLING, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 1372.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU WILL

                    PLEASE RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, MR. CAHILL, MRS. BARRETT,

                    MR. COLTON, MR. DILAN, MS. SIMON, MS. LINDA ROSENTHAL, MRS.

                    WILLIAMS, MS. NIOU, MR. CARROLL, AND MS. WALKER IN THE NEGATIVE ON

                    7292.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO, NOTED.  THANK

                    YOU, MA'AM.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07302, RULES REPORT

                                         70



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NO. 605, SIMON, ZINERMAN, RICHARDSON, EPSTEIN, MEEKS, ANDERSON,

                    GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, BURGOS.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EDUCATION LAW AND THE

                    STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO CREATING A FIREARM VIOLENCE RESEARCH

                    INSTITUTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    SIMON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  THE BILL IS LAID ASIDE.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. 6 -- A07362-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 606, THIELE.  AN ACT TO AMEND PART B OF CHAPTER 173 OF THE

                    LAWS OF 2013 RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF SECURITIZED RESTRUCTURING

                    BONDS TO REFINANCE THE OUTSTANDING DEBT OF THE LONG ISLAND POWER

                    AUTHORITY, IN RELATION TO THE UTILITY DEBT SECURITIZATION AUTHORITY; AND IN

                    RELATION TO PERMITTING THE ISSUANCE OF SECURITIZED RESTRUCTURING BONDS TO

                    FINANCE SYSTEM RESILIENCY COSTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    THIELE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6455-C.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                         71



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07419-A. RULES

                    REPORT NO. 607, JACKSON, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, ZINERMAN, ENGLEBRIGHT,

                    STECK, BURDICK, REYES, SEPTIMO, ASHBY.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE MENTAL

                    HYGIENE LAW, IN RELATION TO OPERATING COSTS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSE

                    PROVIDERS RECEIVING FEDERAL AID.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    JACKSON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5066-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR THE MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07463, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 608, STECK.  AN ACT TO AUTHORIZE AND LEGALIZE CERTAIN ACTS AND

                    PROCEEDINGS OF ALBANY COUNTY RELATING TO THE ISSUANCE OF OBLIGATIONS

                    FOR THE ADVANCE REFUNDING OF CERTAIN SERIAL BONDS PREVIOUSLY ISSUED BY

                    ALBANY COUNTY.

                                         72



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    STECK, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6798.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07509, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 609, PRETLOW.  AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 62 OF THE LAWS OF 2015

                    AMENDING THE TAX LAW RELATING TO THE IMPOSITION OF AN OCCUPANCY TAX

                    IN THE CITY OF YONKERS, IN RELATION TO EXTENDING THE EFFECTIVENESS

                    THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    PRETLOW, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6531.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                                         73



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  IN

                    ADDITION TO THE NO VOTES ON THE FLOOR, PLEASE RECORD MR. SCHMITT IN THE

                    NEGATIVE ON THIS LEGISLATION.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. ENGLEBRIGHT, MR.

                    BARNWELL, MR. SANTABARBARA, AND MR. STIRPE IN THE NEGATIVE ON 7509.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07509, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 609, PRETLOW.  AN ACT TO AMEND CHAPTER 62 OF THE LAWS OF 2015.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 I'LL READ THAT AGAIN.


                                 ASSEMBLY NO. A07547-A, RULES REPORT NO. 610,

                    THIELE, GRIFFIN, BUTTENSCHON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL

                    CONSERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO PERMITTING KELP CULTIVATION IN

                                         74



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    UNDERWATER LANDS AT GARDINER'S AND PECONIC BAYS AND COMMERCIAL

                    FISHING LICENSES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    THIELE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE SENATE PRINT 6532-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07567-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 611, MCMAHON, LUPARDO, STIRPE, ZINERMAN, SIMON.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    ALTERNATIVE FUEL STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 60TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 7567.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                                         75



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07578-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 612, PAULIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY

                    AND ITS SUBSIDIARIES TO FINGERPRINT APPLICANTS FOR EMPLOYMENT AND TO

                    OBTAIN CRIMINAL HISTORIES OF SUCH APPLICANTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 7578-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07594, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 613, PRETLOW.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE TAX LAW AND CHAPTER 535 OF

                    THE LAWS OF 1987, AMENDING THE TAX LAW RELATING TO THE CITY OF

                                         76



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YONKERS PERSONAL INCOME TAX SURCHARGE, IN RELATION TO EXTENDING THE

                    EXPIRATION DATE OF THE PERSONAL INCOME TAX SURCHARGE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    PRETLOW, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6797.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO MY

                    COLLEAGUES WHO ARE VOTING NO ON THE FLOOR, PLEASE RECORD THE FOLLOWING

                    COLLEAGUES IN THE NEGATIVE:  MR. DIPIETRO, MR. NORRIS, AND MR.

                    SCHMITT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF YOU CAN

                    RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. BARNWELL, MR. SANTABARBARA, MS.

                    BUTTENSCHON, AND MR. STIRPE IN THE NEGATIVE ON 7594.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES, SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                         77



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07616, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 614, ANGELINO.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE HIGHWAY LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    DESIGNATING A PORTION OF THE STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM AS THE "SP4

                    RICHARD F. WALTON, JR. MEMORIAL HIGHWAY."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    ANGELINO, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6799.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 AND THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MR. ANGELINO, I HEAR A RUMOR THIS IS YOUR FIRST BILL.

                    CONGRATULATIONS.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 GOOD LUCK, MR. ANGELINO.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07640, RULES REPORT

                                         78



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NO. 615, ABBATE, CUSICK, GRIFFIN, COLTON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    RETIREMENT AND SOCIAL SECURITY LAW, IN RELATION TO DETERMINATION OF

                    SALARY BASE FOR MEMBERS OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK FIRE DEPARTMENT

                    PENSION FUND.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    ABBATE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  HOME RULE MESSAGE IS AT THE DESK.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6405.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07644-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 616, LUNSFORD, WALLACE.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE REAL

                    PROPERTY TAX LAW, IN RELATION TO PROVIDING A TAX EXEMPTION ON REAL

                    PROPERTY OWNED BY MEMBERS OF VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANIES OR VOLUNTARY

                    AMBULANCE SERVICES IN A CERTAIN COUNTY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    LUNSFORD, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         79



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON JANUARY

                    1ST.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6676.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07645, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 617, MCMAHON.  AN ACT TO INCORPORATE THE EAST AMHERST FIRE --

                    FIRE DEPARTMENT BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION, AND PROVIDING FOR ITS POWERS

                    AND DUTIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    MCMAHON, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6702.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         80



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07649, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 618, DAVILA, HEVESI.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE FAMILY COURT ACT, IN

                    RELATION TO EXPIRATION DATES OF ORDERS OF PROTECTION AND THE DURATION OF

                    TEMPORARY ORDERS OF PROTECTION IN JUVENILE DELINQUENCY CASES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 7649.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07654, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 619, LAVINE.  AN ACT TO AMEND PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW AND THE

                    GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE NORTH SHORE

                    WATER AUTHORITY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MR.

                    LAVINE, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         81



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6707.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. MONTESANO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. MONTESANO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I JUST WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR SHIFTING THIS BILL

                    THROUGH, IT'S BEEN LONG AWAITED IN THE DISTRICTS FOR MYSELF AND MY OTHER

                    COLLEAGUE FROM NASSAU.  THIS HAS BEEN A DIRE SITUATION FOR THE PEOPLE

                    IN THE -- IN NASSAU COUNTY, ESPECIALLY IN THE 15TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT

                    AND ADJOINING DISTRICTS.  IT'S BEEN A FINANCIAL HARDSHIP ON MANY, MANY

                    PEOPLE, SO THIS BILL WILL GO A LONG WAY TO REMEDY THAT SITUATION.  SO I'M

                    THANKFUL FOR THAT -- FOR THE SPEAKER FOR GETTING THIS FORWARD, FOR THE

                    SPONSOR FOR GETTING THIS THROUGH, AND I'M PROUD TO BE A COSPONSOR OF

                    THIS BILL.  SO I'LL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. MONTESANO IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. RA TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I ALSO WANT TO

                    THANK THE SPONSOR, THANK MY COLLEAGUES BOTH HERE IN THE ASSEMBLY AND

                    SENATOR GAUGHRAN DOWN THE HALL FOR THEIR WORK ON THIS.  THIS IS A LONG

                    TIME COMING TO FINALLY SET THESE RESIDENTS ON A PATH TO HAVING PUBLIC

                                         82



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WATER.  THEY'VE BEEN UNDER THE THUMB OF NEW YORK AMERICAN WATER

                    FOR TOO LONG, THEY'VE PAID EXORBITANT RATES FOR WHAT IS AN ESSENTIAL

                    NATURAL RESOURCE, AND THIS IS GOING TO FINALLY PUT US ON THE RIGHT PATH,

                    BUT IT DEFINITELY TOOK A LOT OF WORK TO GET THERE, A LOT COMING TOGETHER

                    AND IRONING OUT DIFFERENCES.  SO -- SO KUDOS TO -- TO THE SPONSOR.  I AM

                    VERY PROUD AND HAPPY TO CAST MY VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RA IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07684, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 620, GUNTHER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    PROVIDING LICENSED FACILITIES A SUMMARY OF FINAL SUBSTANTIATED REPORTS

                    OF CATEGORY 2 CONDUCT OF AN EMPLOYEE OR VOLUNTEER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                    GUNTHER, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 7108.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                                         83



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07685, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 621, BARRETT, MCDONALD, JONES, BUTTENSCHON, GRIFFIN, SILLITTI,

                    FAHY, ABBATE, GOTTFRIED, LAVINE, STERN, DAVILA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    EDUCATION LAW, IN RELATION TO MILITARY ENHANCED RECOGNITION, INCENTIVE

                    AND TRIBUTE ("MERIT") SCHOLARSHIPS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                    BARRETT, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5543-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MRS. BARRETT TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MRS. BARRETT:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I WOULD

                    LIKE TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE SPEAKER AND THE

                    CHAIRS OF BOTH HIGHER ED AND WAYS AND MEANS FOR MOVING THIS

                                         84



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SIGNIFICANT LEGISLATION FORWARD.  SINCE 2006, LEGISLATORS IN THIS HOUSE

                    HAVE BEEN TRYING TO PASS BILLS TO EXPAND ELIGIBILITY FOR THE DEPENDENTS

                    OF MORE DISABLED VETERANS, FOR GOLD STAR FAMILIES AND FOR THOSE

                    MISSING IN ACTION TO ALLOW THEM TO FOLLOW THEIR EDUCATIONAL DREAMS.

                    THIS BILL WILL MAKE A REAL DIFFERENCE FOR THOSE MILITARY FAMILIES IN MY

                    DISTRICT AND IN ALL OF YOURS WHO'VE ALREADY PAID A VERY STEEP PRICE.

                                 I'M PROUD TO VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  MR. SPEAKER,

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. BARRETT IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. HAWLEY TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. HAWLEY:  WELL, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  AND

                    THANK YOU, MRS. BARRETT, FOR REVIVING THE BILL THAT I'VE HAD FOR 11 YEARS.

                    OUR GOLD STAR FAMILIES CERTAINLY DESERVE TO BE TREATED AND RESPECTED

                    AND ADMIRED AND THANKED FOR THEIR LOVED ONES' SERVICE TO OUR COUNTRY,

                    THOSE THAT HAVE PAID THE ULTIMATE SACRIFICE OR THOSE THAT HAVE BEEN

                    PERMANENTLY AND SEVERELY DISABLED WHILE SERVING OUR GREAT COUNTRY.

                    I'M GLAD TO SEE THIS BILL BECOME A LAW, AS OPPOSED TO THE GOVERNOR JUST

                    MOVING MONEY FROM ONE PART OF THE BUDGET TO ANOTHER.  I COMMEND

                    YOU FOR THAT AND THANK YOU AS WELL.

                                 GOD BLESS OUR VETERANS AND GOD BLESS THIS COUNTRY.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. HAWLEY IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                         85



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07716, RULES REPORT

                    NO --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ONE MINUTE, PLEASE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF WE COULD SWITCH GEARS JUST A LITTLE BIT.  I DO HEAR A LITTLE

                    THUNDER OUTSIDE.  IT LOOKS A LITTLE DARK BUT IT'S LIGHT HERE, WE'RE STILL

                    WORKING.  SO IF WE CAN TURN OUR ATTENTION TO OUR DEBATE LIST AND WE'RE

                    GOING TO START WITH RULES REPORT NO. 89.  IT'S ASSEMBLY BILL 3807 AND

                    IT IS CARRIED BY MR. CYMBROWITZ.  FOLLOWED BY RULES REPORT NO. 193,


                    ASSEMBLY NO. 5854 AND IT'S CARRIED BY MS. JOYNER.  AND RULES REPORT

                    NO. 194, ASSEMBLY BILL 5915 AND IT IS CARRIED BY MS. ZINERMAN.

                    FOLLOWED BY RULES REPORT NO. 239, ASSEMBLY BILL 7386.  THAT ONE IS

                    CARRIED BY MS. WILLIAMS.  RULES REPORT NO. 250, ASSEMBLY BILL 7488

                    IS CARRIED BY MR. JONATHAN RIVERA.  AND FINALLY ON THIS LIST, MR.

                    SPEAKER, IF WE COULD GO TO RULES REPORT NO. 281.  THAT ONE IS

                    ASSEMBLY BILL 229-C, AND THAT ONE IS CARRIED BY MS. PAULIN.  IF WE

                    COULD GO IN THAT ORDER, MR. SPEAKER, WE WILL ADD ADDITIONAL ONES UPON

                    COMPLETION.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 PAGE 5, RULES REPORT NO. 89, THE CLERK WILL READ.

                                         86



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03807-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 89, CYMBROWITZ, OTIS, RODRIGUEZ, SIMON, HYNDMAN.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HOUSING LAW, IN RELATION TO AN AFFORDABLE

                    HOUSING FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 ONE MINUTE FIRST.  FIRST, WE ARE ON DEBATE.  WE WOULD

                    APPRECIATE IF THERE WAS SOME QUIET.  STAFF SHOULD NOT BE IN THE AISLES

                    WHILE WE ARE ON DEBATE.  MEMBERS IN THEIR SEATS.

                                 WE'RE NOT THERE YET, MR. GOODELL.  WE'RE WORKING ON

                    IT.  THANK YOU.

                                 ONE MINUTE, MR. GOODELL.  WE HAVE A SUB -- WE HAVE

                    A SUB FOR THIS.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MR. CYMBROWITZ, THE SENATE BILL IS

                    BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THIS LEGISLATION REQUIRES THE

                    GOVERNOR TO SUBMIT TO THE LEGISLATURE ON A FIVE-YEAR PERIOD A

                    STATEWIDE CAPITAL PLAN TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT AND PRESERVATION OF

                                         87



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AFFORDABLE HOUSING.  AND THE LEGISLATION GOES ON TO LIST A NUMBER OF

                    TOPICS THAT NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE PLAN, INCLUDING ASPECTS RELATING

                    TO SENIOR CITIZENS, THE PROMOTION OF HOMEOWNERSHIP, REPAIR OF

                    MANUFACTURED HOUSING AND OTHER ITEMS.  AND IN GENERAL, I THINK THE

                    LEGISLATION IS A GREAT IDEA TO HAVE A FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN FOCUSING ON

                    AFFORDABLE HOUSING.  BUT I WOULD POINT OUT TO MY COLLEAGUES THAT AT THE

                    BEGINNING OF THIS SESSION WE SWORE AN OATH TO UPHOLD THE NEW YORK

                    STATE CONSTITUTION, AND THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION GIVES THE

                    GOVERNOR EXCLUSIVE AUTHORITY IN SETTING UP THE EXECUTIVE BUDGET.  AND

                    SO WHILE I THINK THIS IS A GREAT IDEA AND I WOULD CERTAINLY RECOMMEND

                    THIS LEGISLATION FOR THE GOVERNOR, IT IS UP TO THE GOVERNOR, NOT THE

                    LEGISLATURE, TO DECIDE WHAT'S IN THE EXECUTIVE PLAN UNDER THE STATE

                    CONSTITUTION AND TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH IT.

                                 I'D ALSO NOTE THAT UNDER OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FRAME OF

                    GOVERNMENT IT'S VERY CLEAR THAT ONE LEGISLATURE AND ONE GOVERNOR

                    CANNOT FIND FUTURE GOVERNORS OR FUTURE LEGISLATURES, WITH A FEW

                    EXCEPTIONS THAT DON'T APPLY IN THIS CASE.  SO BECAUSE OF THE

                    CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES I'M COMPELLED TO VOTE AGAINST IT, BUT I WOULD

                    CERTAINLY RECOMMEND THAT THE GOVERNOR CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE

                    RECOMMENDATIONS AS CONTAINED IN THIS LEGISLATION.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                         88



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 2193-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD MR.

                    DIPIETRO AS THE ONLY OTHER ASSEMBLYMAN CONCERNED ABOUT THE

                    CONSTITUTION AND VOTING NO.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 7, RULES REPORT NO. 193, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05854-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 193, JOYNER, COOK, AUBRY, LAVINE, RODRIGUEZ, SIMON,

                    STECK, GALEF, GOTTFRIED, GRIFFIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE INSURANCE LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO THE PURCHASE OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    JOYNER, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 AND MS. JOYNER, AN EXPLANATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. JOYNER:  YES.  THIS BILL WOULD CLARIFY AND

                    STRENGTHEN PROVISIONS IN THE CURRENT LAW TO ENSURE THAT CONSUMERS HAVE

                                         89



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THE OPTION TO ACCESS EVERY COVERED MEDICATION FROM A LOCAL NETWORK

                    PARTICIPATING PHARMACY AND NOT BE FORCED INTO MANDATORY MAIL ORDER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RA.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD FOR QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. JOYNER, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. JOYNER:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. JOYNER YIELDS,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  SO AS -- AS MANY OF

                    US ARE AWARE - AND I RECALL THIS VERY WELL BECAUSE IT WAS MY FIRST YEAR

                    HERE IN THE LEGISLATURE - BACK IN 2011 THERE WAS A LOT OF PUSH FROM

                    MANY OF OUR LOCAL PHARMACIES TELLING US ABOUT THIS ISSUE, HOW THEY HAD

                    PATIENTS THAT WERE BEING, YOU KNOW, MANDATED TO GET DRUGS BY MAIL

                    ORDER AND THIS BILL WAS PASSED TO ALLOW LOCAL PHARMACIES TO FILL THAT AND

                    -- AND NOT -- NOT MAKE IT POSSIBLE FOR THE -- THOSE PATIENTS BE FORCED TO

                    GET THESE DRUGS THROUGH MAIL ORDER.  AND AT THAT TIME, AFTER THAT BILL

                    WAS PASSED, THE GOVERNOR SIGNED THE BILL INTO LAW BUT REQUESTED, AS HE

                    OFTEN DOES, A CHAPTER AMENDMENT.  AND AT -- AT THAT TIME WHAT HE ASKED

                    FOR AND WAS ULTIMATELY PASSED INTO LAW WAS LANGUAGE -- HE -- HE SAID

                    THAT A CHAPTER AMENDMENT REQUIRED THAT THE RETAIL PHARMACY MUST AGREE

                    IN ADVANCE TO ACCEPT THE SAME REIMBURSEMENT RATE AND APPLICABLE TERMS

                    AND CONDITIONS ESTABLISHED FOR MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES.

                                 NOW, MS. JOYNER, AM I CORRECT, WHAT THIS BILL DOES IS

                                         90



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    IT TAKES OUT SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE, CORRECT?

                                 MS. JOYNER:  YES.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  NOW SO IN DOING THAT, IS THERE A

                    CONCERN THAT THIS WILL NOW NO LONGER MEET, YOU KNOW, THE PURPOSES OR

                    -- OR THE DESIGN THAT THE GOVERNOR HAD IN ASKING FOR THAT AMENDMENT

                    THAT WAS PASSED BACK IN 2012?

                                 MS. JOYNER:  WELL, IN 2011 THERE WAS REQUESTED

                    LANGUAGE ABOUT ADDRESSING THE REIMBURSEMENT RATE.

                                 (AUDIO CUTS OUT.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  HOLD ON ONE MINUTE,

                    MS. JOYNER.  MS. JOYNER, CAN YOU HEAR US?

                                 MR. RA, IF YOU COULD READ LIPS YOU'RE GOING TO GET YOUR

                    ANSWER.

                                 MR. RA:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SOMEBODY LET MS.

                    JOYNER KNOW THAT THE SOUND WAS KNOCKED OFF SO WE CAN GO BACK TO HER

                    AGAIN.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 I THINK MS. JOYNER THINKS IT'S HER.  TELL HER IT'S US.

                                 MR. RA:  IT'S -- IT'S -- IT'S US THAT HAS THE PROBLEM, MS.

                    JOYNER, IF YOU CAN HEAR ME.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE ARE GOING TO

                    RECYCLE THE SOUND SYSTEM AND IT WILL TAKE A MOMENT, SO EVERYBODY JUST

                    RELAX.  AS IF YOU'RE NOT.

                                         91



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 LET'S TRY IT AGAIN, MR. RA.  WHY DON'T YOU START FROM

                    THE BEGINNING.  MS. JOYNER, YOU HAVE BEEN ASKED TO YIELD.

                                 MS. JOYNER:  OKAY, YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THERE YOU GO.  LET'S

                    TRY IT AGAIN.

                                 MR. RA:  ALL RIGHT.  THAT WAS -- THAT WAS INTERESTING.

                    I GUESS LIGHTENING STRUCK LITERALLY HERE.

                                 SO, WHAT WE WERE TALKING ABOUT WAS THE -- THE CHAPTER

                    AMENDMENT THE GOVERNOR HAD ASKED FOR AND JUST WHETHER THIS CHANGE

                    IN LANGUAGE WILL ALLOW THIS SYSTEM TO CONTINUE TO FUNCTION AS DESIGNED.

                    AND YOU WERE GIVING WHAT I'M SURE WAS A GREAT EXPLANATION AND THE

                    SOUND CUT OUT AND WE COULDN'T HEAR IT.  SO IF YOU WANT TO PICK UP THERE,

                    AND THEN I JUST HAVE ONE OTHER QUESTION FOR YOU.

                                 MS. JOYNER:  OKAY, SURE.  SO, THIS BILL INCLUDES THE

                    CHAPTER AMENDMENT OF THE 2011 LANGUAGE WHICH IS ABOUT

                    REIMBURSEMENT RATES BEING THE SAME FOR LOCAL PHARMACIES AND MAIL

                    ORDERS, AND THEN THE 2012 LANGUAGE REGARDING TERMS AND CONDITIONS.  IT

                    CREATED A LOOPHOLE THAT BASICALLY INTERRUPTED AND INTERFERED WITH PATIENT

                    CHOICE AND ALSO NEGATIVELY IMPACTED THE LOCAL PHARMACIES.  SO THAT --

                    THAT LANGUAGE HAS BEEN ADDRESSED AND -- WITH THIS BILL, AND I BELIEVE AT

                    THIS POINT IT SHOULD BE READY TO BE SIGNED INTO LAW.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  THANK YOU.  THE -- THE OTHER ISSUE

                    THAT SEEMS TO BE -- BE ADDED BY THIS, THERE IS SOME LANGUAGE, I GUESS,

                    REGARDING COLLECTIVE -- COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AND EXEMPTION.  AM I

                                         92



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CORRECT THAT THAT IS DESIGNED TO DEAL WITH ANY PREEMPTION UNDER --

                    UNDER ERISA THAT WE WOULD HAVE UNDER THOSE TYPES OF PLANS?

                                 MS. JOYNER:  YES.  AND WE DIDN'T WANT TO FORCE

                    ANY UNIONS TO UNILATERALLY CHANGE THEIR -- THEIR -- BASICALLY, THEIR

                    BENEFITS UNTIL THE EXPIRATION OF ANY CBA.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. JOYNER.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR. RA.

                                 LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, SHH.

                                 MR. RA:  I THANK MY COLLEAGUE.  IT'S CERTAINLY BEEN AN

                    -- AN INTERESTING YEAR FOR ALL OF US.  I THINK NOW THAT I -- I HAD ONE TIME

                    THIS YEAR THAT I HAD TO REPEAT A DEBATE BECAUSE THE STREAM WASN'T GOING

                    UP, AND THEN -- AND THEN THAT INCIDENT.  SO, INTERESTING.  BUT I JUST WANT

                    TO QUICKLY TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT SOME OF THE CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN

                    RAISED WITH THIS BILL.  LIKE I SAID, WHEN THIS ISSUE FIRST CAME UP MY FIRST

                    YEAR I HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK TO MANY OF MY LOCAL PHARMACISTS,

                    AND WHAT THEY WERE LOOKING TO DO WAS ALLOW THEIR PATIENTS TO CHOOSE TO

                    GET THE DRUGS, THEIR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS AT THEIR LOCAL PHARMACY INSTEAD

                    OF IN -- IN MANY CASES BEING MANDATED TO GET THEM BY MAIL ORDER.  BUT

                    OBVIOUSLY, WHEN THERE'S A CHANGE IN THE LAW LIKE THAT, AND -- AND I THINK

                    THAT WAS A VERY BROADLY-SUPPORTED BILL BY INDIVIDUALS, BUT WHEN THERE'S

                    A CHANGE WITH REGARD TO SOMETHING THAT IS DEALING WITH THE HEALTH PLAN,

                    OBVIOUSLY, THERE BECOMES A QUESTION OF -- OF COST.  AND -- AND IS -- IF

                    YOU'RE FILLING SOMETHING WITH ONE ENTITY OR ANOTHER, DO THEY HAVE TO

                    TAKE THE SAME RATES AND ALL OF THAT, AND CERTAINLY THAT GETS INTO THINGS

                                         93



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LIKE HEALTHCARE NETWORKS AND -- AND DEALING WITH THE COST SIDE OF THINGS

                    BECAUSE OBVIOUSLY FOR MANY OF THE PLANS THEY FELT UTILIZING MAIL ORDER

                    WAS A COST SAVINGS.  AND AS I SAID, THE GOVERNOR ASKED FOR SOME

                    LANGUAGE WHEN HE SIGNED THIS BILL AND A CHAPTER AMENDMENT THAT

                    REQUIRED THE SAME REIMBURSEMENT RATE TO BE ACCEPTED AS WELL AS

                    APPLICABLE TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES, AND THIS

                    DOES TAKE OUT SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE.  NOW -- NOW IT WILL READ -- RATHER

                    THAN IN ADVANCE, IT WILL JUST SAY NON-MAIL ORDER RETAIL AGREES TO THE

                    SAME REIMBURSEMENT AMOUNT AND TAKES OUT THAT LANGUAGE ABOUT THE

                    TERMS AND CONDITIONS.  SO THAT DOES RAISE SOME CONCERNS FROM THE

                    PROVIDER SIDE IN TERMS OF WHAT THE RATES ARE GOING TO BE AND -- AND NOT

                    HAVING THE CERTAINTY OF DEALING WITH -- WITH THE LOCAL PHARMACIES.

                                 OVERALL, I AM GOING TO SUPPORT THE BILL.  BUT LIKE I

                    SAID, IT DOES TAKE AWAY SOME OF THAT LANGUAGE THAT THE GOVERNOR

                    INSISTED UPON.  I GUESS WE WILL SEE IF THIS IS PASSED IN BOTH HOUSES

                    WHETHER -- WHETHER THE GOVERNOR FEELS THAT THIS FRUSTRATES THE PURPOSE

                    -- OF THAT CHAPTER AMENDMENT.  BUT -- BUT I THINK GOING FORWARD WE

                    NEED TO DO WHAT WE CAN BOTH WITH REGARD TO THIS BILL AND -- AND SO

                    MANY OTHER PIECES OF LEGISLATION PENDING BEFORE THIS HOUSE TO STRIKE

                    THAT BALANCE WITH PATIENT CHOICE, CONTROLLING COSTS.  YOU KNOW, WE'VE

                    SAID IT MANY TIMES ON DIFFERENT BILLS THAT PRESCRIPTION DRUGS ARE ONE OF

                    THE BIG COST DRIVERS AND INDIVIDUALS ARE -- ARE REALLY CONCERNED ABOUT

                    BEING ABLE TO AFFORD THEIR PRESCRIPTION DRUGS, BUT ALSO MAKE SURE THAT

                    THEY HAVE THE RIGHT CONSUMER EXPERIENCE.

                                 ONE OF THE OTHER CONCERNS THAT HAS BEEN RAISED IS

                                         94



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WHETHER THE LOCAL PHARMACY, BECAUSE IT DOESN'T TALK ABOUT TERMS AND

                    CONDITIONS AND -- AND THAT PIECE OF IT, WHETHER THEY WILL HAVE TO ABIDE

                    BY THE SAME TYPES OF THINGS AS, YOU KNOW, MAIL ORDER PHARMACIES IN

                    TERMS OF HAVING ACCESS FOR THE PATIENT TO, YOU KNOW, CALL A 24/7 HOTLINE

                    AND GET A CONSULTATION AND ALL OF THAT.  SO LIKE I SAID, I'M GOING TO BE

                    CASTING MY VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE, BUT -- BUT I DO HAVE SOME CONCERNS

                    THAT WE MAKE SURE THAT WE PROTECT PATIENT CHOICE AS WELL AS KEEP THESE

                    DRUGS AFFORDABLE.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR. RA.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 3566.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 7, RULES REPORT NO. 194, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S01566-A, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 194, SENATOR SANDERS (A05915-A, ZINERMAN, PICHARDO, ABINANTI,

                    LAVINE, DURSO, SILLITTI, TAYLOR, NOLAN, DICKENS, JACKSON, GOTTFRIED,

                                         95



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GALEF, FERNANDEZ).  AN ACT TO AMEND THE BANKING LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    REQUIRING BANKS TO PROVIDE WRITTEN NOTIFICATION THAT ACCEPTING AN

                    ALTERNATIVE LOAN PAYMENT SCHEDULE MAY HAVE A NEGATIVE IMPACT ON

                    CREDIT SCORES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO, THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE THAT BANKS

                    -- STATE-CHARTERED BANKS AND TRUST COMPANIES PROVIDE WRITTEN

                    DISCLOSURE TO ANY CUSTOMER THAT'S OFFERED AN ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT

                    SCHEDULE, LETTING THEM KNOW IN WRITING THAT ACCEPTANCE OF THIS

                    ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT SCHEDULE COULD NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE BORROWER'S

                    CREDIT SCORE.  SO I WANTED TO JUST POINT OUT A COUPLE THINGS ABOUT THIS

                    BILL THAT I THINK YOU MIGHT WANT TO KNOW.  THE FIRST IS THAT WHEN IT SAYS

                    "WRITTEN NOTIFICATION TO THE CONSUMER," YOU SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS IS

                    THREE SEPARATE WRITTEN NOTIFICATIONS THAT THE CONSUMER GETS THAT THE --

                    THAT THE STATE-CHARTED BANK OR TRUST COMPANY MUST PROVIDE.  THE FIRST --

                    WHEN -- THE FIRST AT THE TIME THAT THE LOAN APPLICATION IS MADE.  THE

                    SECOND AT THE TIME THAT THE LOAN IS GRANTED.  AND THEN A THIRD TIME AT THE

                    TIME THAT THE CUSTOMER REQUESTS AN ALTERNATIVE PAYMENT SCHEDULE.  SO

                    THAT'S THREE DIFFERENT NOTICES THAT HAVE TO BE MADE.  THIS IS IN ADDITION

                    TO ALL OF THE RULES AND REGULATIONS THAT ARE -- THAT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW

                    THROUGH THE FEDERAL LOAN DISCLOSURE, WHICH IF ANY OF YOU HAVE BEEN

                                         96



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THROUGH, YOU KNOW, LOAN PAPERWORK YOU KNOW HOW EXTENSIVE THAT

                    DISCLOSURE CAN BE.  YOU KNOW, THESE STATE-CHARTERED BANKS ARE SMALL.

                    THEY'RE SMALL IN NUMBER AND THEY'RE SMALL IN SIZE.  THERE ARE PROBABLY

                    JUST OVER 2,000 OF THEM SPREAD ACROSS OUR STATE.  THEY TEND TO BE THE

                    SMALLER COMMUNITY BANKS.  AND I JUST THINK THAT WHEN WE LOOK TO

                    IMPOSE ANOTHER RULE OR REGULATION ON A STATE-CHARTERED BANK, THINK

                    ABOUT IT.  BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, IT'S ALMOST LIKE THE DEATH BY A THOUSAND

                    CUTS FOR SOME OF THESE.  IT -- THEY'RE DWINDLING.  THERE -- I THINK WITHIN

                    THE DATA I LOOKED AT SHOWED THAT THERE ARE A COUPLE HUNDRED LESS THAN

                    THERE WERE THE LAST TIME I LOOKED.  SO WE HAVE TO BE CAREFUL.  WE'RE

                    GOING TO DRIVE THESE PLACES, YOU KNOW, INTO JUST MORE AND MORE

                    ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN.  SO THAT -- THAT'S THE PRIMARY CONCERNS WITH THIS

                    PIECE OF LEGISLATION.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IN 90 DAYS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 1566-A.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                                         97



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE WHO WANT

                    TO BE AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE POSITION ARE ENCOURAGED TO CALL

                    THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE SO WE CAN PROPERLY RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  HOWEVER, SHOULD THERE BE COLLEAGUES THAT DESIRE

                    TO BE AN EXCEPTION THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY

                    LEADER'S OFFICE AND THEIR VOTE WILL BE PROPERLY RECORDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MS. ZINERMAN TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. ZINERMAN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS IS

                    A SIMPLE, STRAIGHTFORWARD CONSUMER PROTECTION BILL.  WE JUST WANT TO

                    MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE ARE FULLY AWARE OF WHAT MIGHT IMPACT THEIR CREDIT

                    IF THEY ACCEPT AN ALTERNATIVE LOAN PAYMENT.  SPECIFICALLY, WE WANT TO

                    MAKE SURE THAT PEOPLE ARE NOT IMPACTED, THEIR CREDIT ISN'T IMPACTED.  WE

                    KNOW THAT PEOPLE END UP PAYING MORE FOR LOANS IN THE -- IN THE FUTURE IF

                    THEY HAVE A BAD -- BAD CREDIT SCORE.  SOMETIMES THE INSURANCE

                    PREMIUMS WILL GO UP, AND THEY COULD ALSO IMPACT JUST ONE BUILDING

                    WITH REGARD TO THEIR PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND HOMEOWNERSHIP.  SO

                    NOTIFICATIONS OF SIMPLY SAYING THAT, YOUR CREDIT MIGHT BE IMPACTED -

                                         98



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AND WE COULD DO THAT THROUGH E-MAIL - IS NOT GOING TO BE OVERLY

                    BURDENSOME TO THESE FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS WHEN COMMUNICATING WITH

                    OUR CONSUMERS IN NEW YORK STATE.

                                 SO I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS BILL AND ENCOURAGE

                    MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ZINERMAN IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WE HAVE NO EXCEPTIONS TO REPORT.

                    THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 9, RULES REPORT NO. 239, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07386, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 239, WILLIAMS, ZEBROWSKI.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO PROVIDING THAT THERE IS NO EXEMPTION FROM THE

                    REQUIREMENT OF NONDISCRIMINATION IN ADVERTISEMENTS AND INQUIRIES FOR

                    THE RENTAL OF AN APARTMENT IN AN OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-UNIT DWELLING, OR

                    FOR THE RENTAL OF ROOMS IN AN OWNER-OCCUPIED DWELLING, AND THAT

                    ENGAGING IN DISCRIMINATORY ADVERTISING OR INQUIRIES WILL CAUSE THE

                    PROPERTY TO NO LONGER BE EXEMPT FROM FULL COVERAGE BY THE

                    NONDISCRIMINATION PROVISIONS OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  ON A MOTION BY MRS.

                                         99



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WILLIAMS, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 AN EXPLANATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  THANK YOU, MR. [SIC] SPEAKER.

                    THE PURPOSE OF THIS BILL IS TO CLARIFY THAT THE LAW NO LONGER EXEMPTS

                    RENTAL PROPERTIES FROM THE REQUIREMENT OF NONDISCRIMINATION IN

                    ADVERTISEMENTS AND INQUIRIES IN AN OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-UNIT DWELLING.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MR. MORINELLO.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A

                    COUPLE OF QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  THANK YOU.  AS I READ THIS, IT

                    APPEARS THAT THERE ARE TWO CUT-OUTS; ONE BEING A PUBLICATION, THE

                    SUMMATION OF INFORMATION, ADVERTISING, CIRCULATES OR CAUSE TO BE

                    PRINTED.  AM I CORRECT?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  OKAY.  AND THE HOPE -- THE

                    FUNCTION AND PURPOSE IS TO AVOID ANY DISCRIMINATION IN RENTALS.  THAT'S

                    HOW I READ IT.  AM I CORRECT?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  BUT NOW THERE'S A SECOND --

                    THERE'S ONE WORD IN THERE THAT IS THE TROUBLING PART.  IT HAS NOTHING TO DO

                    WITH TRYING TO AVOID DISCRIMINATION OR ELIMINATE DISCRIMINATION, BUT THE

                                         100



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WORD IS "INQUIRY."  NOW, AN INQUIRY IS A VERBAL COMMUNICATION.

                    WOULD I NOT BE CORRECT?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES, THAT'S CORRECT.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  OKAY.  SO AM I TO UNDERSTAND

                    THAT WHAT THIS BILL DOES IS, IF THERE'S AN OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-FAMILY

                    HOME AND THEY JUST PUT OUT A FOR RENT SIGN, IF SOMEONE COMES, THEY DO

                    NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO INQUIRE WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE CHILDREN,

                    WHETHER OR NOT THEY HAVE FAMILIES OR WHO IS GOING TO BE RESIDING THERE?

                    AM I CORRECT?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  (INAUDIBLE)

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  I'M SORRY, I COULDN'T HEAR YOUR

                    REPLY.

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  OH, I'M SORRY.  I SAID IF IT'S AN

                    OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-UNIT DWELLING, THEN THE ANSWER IS YES.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  OKAY.  SO, IF I HAVE AN ELDERLY

                    INDIVIDUAL THAT WANTS TO RENT EITHER ONE ROOM OR PART OF THE RESIDENCE,

                    THEY CANNOT INQUIRE IF THERE'S CHILDREN THERE.  THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION

                    UNDER THIS LAW, CORRECT?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  ARE YOU SPEAKING ABOUT A

                    MULTI-UNIT DWELLING?

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  NO, I'M TALKING ABOUT A

                    TWO-FAMILY, OWNER-OCCUPIED.  TWO UNITS.  AND THAT'S WHAT THIS

                    ADDRESSES, IS A TWO-UNIT.  I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT A MULTIPLE-UNIT

                    BUILDING, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT A FOUR-PLEX.  I'M TALKING ABOUT AN

                    OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-UNIT RENTAL.

                                         101



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES.  THE ANSWER IS YES.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  ALL RIGHT.  SO BASICALLY WHAT THIS

                    BILL DOES IS IT ELIMINATES ANY EXEMPTION FOR AN OWNER, IN THEIR OWN

                    HOME, IF THEY HAVE EVEN JUST ONE OTHER UNIT TO RENT, CORRECT?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  I MEAN, BASICALLY, THE LAW -- YOU

                    KNOW, THE PROVISION IN THIS IS JUST FOR THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW THAT'S

                    RELATED TO ADVERTISEMENT, THAT THE DISCRIMINATION WILL NOW APPLY TO

                    OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-UNIT DWELLINGS.  SO IT'S REALLY JUST BRINGING THE

                    LAW -- BRINGING IT UP TO SPEED WITH THE HUMAN RIGHTS LAW.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  ALL RIGHT.  SO WHAT YOU'VE DONE

                    IS YOU'VE TAKEN AWAY THE ABILITY FOR AN OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-FAMILY TO

                    HAVE ANY ABILITY TO ENJOY THEIR PREMISES.  RIGHT NOW THIS IS AN

                    EXEMPTION, AND THE QUESTION AND THE FOCUS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH

                    ADVERTISING.  IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH DISSEMINATING INFORMATION THAT

                    WOULD BE NEGATIVE THAT WOULD BE A VIOLATION.  THIS IS -- THE ONLY AREA OF

                    CONCERN IS THE WORD "INQUIRY", WHICH IS NORMALLY CONSIDERED A

                    FACE-TO-FACE QUESTIONING.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. MORINELLO:  OWNER-OCCUPIED TWO-FAMILY

                    RESIDENCES HAVE FOREVER BEEN PROTECTED FROM THE FEDERAL AND STATE

                    REGULATIONS BECAUSE THEY HAVE CERTAIN RIGHTS TO ENJOY THEIR PREMISES.

                    NO ONE HAS A RIGHT TO DISCRIMINATE.  NO ONE ARGUES THE FACT YOU CANNOT

                    PUT SOMETHING OUT IN AN ADVERTISEMENT.  HOWEVER, TO TAKE AWAY THE

                    ABILITY FOR SOMEONE WHO IS RENTING A ROOM, FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS ONE

                                         102



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SPOUSE OR PARTY THAT WORKS NIGHTS THAT WANTS PEACE AND QUIET DURING THE

                    DAY WHILE THEY SLEEP, THIS BILL TAKES THAT AWAY FROM THEM.  THE WORD

                    "INQUIRY" IS THE TROUBLING WORD THAT I WOULD SUGGEST BE TAKEN OUT OF

                    THIS BILL.  THIS -- MY -- MY CONCERNS ARE NOT TO TRY AND AVOID ANY

                    NONDISCRIMINATION, BUT JUST TO PROTECT A HOMEOWNER IN THEIR OWN HOME

                    WHO MAY HAVE A TWO-FAMILY UNIT THAT THEY NEED SOME RESTRICTIONS.

                                 THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MS. GIGLIO.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES, I YIELD.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  SO, IF SOMEONE COMES TO YOUR HOME

                    AND THEY WANT TO RENT A ROOM OR THEY WANT TO RENT A FLOOR, CAN YOU ASK

                    THEM HOW MANY PEOPLE WOULD BE OCCUPYING THAT SPACE?

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES, YOU CAN.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  YOU CAN.

                                 MRS. WILLIAMS:  YES.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  OKAY.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THIS WILL BE A PARTY

                    VOTE.  THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 6886.  ANY

                                         103



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE WILL BE GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.

                    THOSE WHO WISH TO SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S

                    OFFICE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR -- THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  YES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  WE DON'T HAVE

                    EXCEPTIONS IF THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR.  YOU WANT OUR NEXT BILL,

                    OR...

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  WHAT IS THE PARTY

                    POSITION?

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  COLLEAGUES, THIS IS A

                    PARTY VOTE.  THE MAJORITY OF OUR CONFERENCE WILL BE VOTING IN FAVOR OF

                    THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION AS WE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST.  HOWEVER, SHOULD

                    COLLEAGUES DESIRE TO BE AN EXCEPTION THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO CONTACT

                    THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE WILL SO PROPERLY RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                                         104



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    PLEASE RECORD MY COLLEAGUES MS. MILLER AND MR. RA IN THE AFFIRMATIVE

                    ON THIS LEGISLATION.

                                 THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  SO NOTED, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 WE WILL NOW GO TO PAGE 5 [SIC], RULES REPORT NO.

                    250.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07488, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 250, J.D. RIVERA, DINOWITZ, HEVESI, RODRIGUEZ, MEEKS, MAMDANI,

                    SEAWRIGHT, JACKSON, GALEF, GOTTFRIED, FAHY, MCMAHON, CLARK, SALKA,

                    SIMON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE INSURANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING

                    THE EXCLUSION OF COVERAGE FOR LOSSES OR DAMAGES CAUSED BY EXPOSURE TO

                    LEAD-BASED PAINT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED, MR. RIVERA.

                                 MR. J.D. RIVERA:  THANK YOU.  THIS BILL WOULD

                    PROHIBIT A LEAD POISONING EXCLUSION THAT'S CURRENTLY FOUND IN MOST

                    GENERAL LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICIES.

                                         105



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  CAN YOU REPEAT THAT,

                    MR. RIVERA?

                                 MR. J.D. RIVERA:  SURE.  THIS BILL WOULD PROHIBIT A

                    LEAD POISONING EXCLUSION THAT'S CURRENTLY FOUND IN MOST GENERAL

                    LIABILITY INSURANCE POLICIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MR. HAWLEY.

                                 MR. HAWLEY:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  AND

                    JUST TO REITERATE WHAT MR. RIVERA, THE SPONSOR, INDICATED, THIS BILL WOULD

                    PROHIBIT INSURANCE COMPANIES FROM EXCLUDING COVERAGE IN RENTAL

                    INSURANCE LIABILITY POLICIES FOR LOSSES CAUSED BY EXPOSURE TO LEAD-BASED

                    PAINT.  THERE ARE OBVIOUSLY VERY SERIOUS CONCERNS WITH THIS LEGISLATION

                    FROM A VARIETY OF STANDPOINTS AND VIEWPOINTS.  IT CAN CERTAINLY HAVE A --

                    A NEGATIVE EFFECT ON CONSUMERS AND CAN HAVE A CHILLING EFFECT ON THE

                    RENTAL INDUSTRY OVERALL IN OUR STATE OF NEW YORK.  TO BE CLEAR, WHILE I

                    SHARE CONCERNS, AND WE ALL DO, ABOUT THE HEALTH IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH

                    EXPOSURE TO LEAD PAINT, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THIS LEGISLATURE OR THIS

                    LEGISLATION WOULD SOLVE THE PROBLEM AND, IN FACT, COULD LEAD TO

                    UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES.  REQUIRING INSURERS TO COVER ALL LOSSES

                    ASSOCIATED WITH EXPOSURE TO LEAD PAINT COULD HAVE A DRAMATIC IMPACT

                    ON THE AFFORDABILITY, AND JUST AS IMPORTANT, THE AVAILABILITY OF LIABILITY

                    POLICIES FOR RENTAL POLICIES FOR PROPERTY OWNERS.  ULTIMATELY, THESE

                    POTENTIALLY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES WOULD NOT ONLY IMPACT SAID PROPERTY

                    OWNERS, BUT ALSO FOR CONSUMERS WHO COULD SEE AN IMPACT ON THEIR

                    RENTAL COSTS AS A RESULT.  THIS IS PARTICULARLY CONCERNING AS IT WOULD

                    DISPROPORTIONATELY AFFECT LOWER-INCOME INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE LEAST ABLE

                                         106



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    TO ABSORB THESE ADDITIONAL RENTAL COSTS.  THIS BILL WILL SIGNIFICANTLY

                    INCREASE PREMIUMS, AS I SAID, AND IT WILL REDUCE AVAILABILITY OF

                    HABITATIONAL COVERAGE FOR ONE- TO FOUR-FAMILY RENTAL PROPERTIES.  LEAD

                    EXPOSURE EXCLUSIONS ARE WIDELY USED BECAUSE THE HIGH EXPECTED LOSSES

                    ASSOCIATED WITH SUCH COVERAGE AND THE DIFFICULTY TO CONCLUSIVELY

                    IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF EXPOSURE THAT WOULD NECESSITATE EVEN HIGHER

                    PREMIUMS.  IF INSURERS ARE FORCED TO COVER LEAD EXPOSURE CLAIMS, MANY

                    CARRIERS ARE LIKELY TO CONCLUDE THAT THE RISKS ARE TOO GREAT AND WILL ELECT

                    NOT TO OFFER HABITATIONAL COVERAGE.  ULTIMATELY, THE IMPACTS OF HIGHER

                    INSURANCE PREMIUMS AND LESS AVAILABILITY WILL BE PASSED DOWN TO

                    RENTERS WHO CAN LEAST AFFORD IT.  ABATEMENT AND REMOVAL OF LEAD PAINT

                    MUST BE THE -- MUST BE A PRIORITY FOR ALL OF US, AND THE FEDERAL

                    ASSISTANCE MAY SOON BE FORTHCOMING.  SENATOR KIRSTEN GILLIBRAND ON

                    MAY 5TH, JUST ONE MONTH AGO, INTRODUCED THE HOME LEAD SAFETY TAX

                    CREDIT ACT OF 2021.  THIS WOULD CREATE FLEXIBLE TAX CREDITS WORTH UP TO

                    $4,000 TO COVER THE COST OF ABATING LEAD HAZARDS IN PAINT, PIPES OR SOIL.

                    FURTHERMORE, THE BIDEN ADMINISTRATION HAS PROPOSED THE COMPLETE

                    ELIMINATION OF LEAD WATER PIPES AND LEAD PAINT ABATEMENT PROGRAMS

                    MAY BE PART OF THE FORTHCOMING INFRASTRUCTURE PACKAGE.  IN LIGHT OF THIS,

                    NEW YORK SHOULD ABSOLUTELY NOT RUSH TO ADOPT SUCH A SIGNIFICANT AND

                    DESTABILIZING CHANGE TO THE INSURANCE MARKETPLACE.  JUST TO REITERATE,

                    REQUIRING INSURANCE CARRIERS TO PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR THESE POTENTIAL

                    DAMAGES WILL DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE ONGOING ISSUES

                    RELATED TO LEAD-BASED PAINT WHILE CAUSING MASSIVE INSURANCE

                    MARKETPLACE DISRUPTION THAT WOULD DISPROPORTIONATELY HARM THE POOREST

                                         107



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NEIGHBORHOODS IN NEW YORK.  INSURANCE COMPANIES WOULD NOT NEED TO

                    PROVIDE COVERAGE FOR NEIGHBORHOODS WITH LEAD-BASED PAINT RISKS, AND

                    THEY WOULD ALMOST CERTAINLY WITHDRAW FROM THOSE AREAS IF THIS

                    LEGISLATION PASSES.  THE POTENTIAL COST TO PROVIDING THESE COVERAGES

                    WOULD DRIVE UP PREMIUM COSTS, AS I REFERRED TO BEFORE, MAKING --

                    MAKING HOUSING MORE EXPENSIVE FOR PEOPLE LIVING WITH THESE RISKS.

                    INSURANCE COMPANIES BEING MANDATED TO COVER DAMAGES CAUSED BY

                    LEAD-BASED PAINT EXPOSURE WOULD SIMPLY DRIVE UP THE COSTS OF HOUSING

                    WITHOUT FIXING THE ISSUE OF LEAD-BASED PAINT IN THESE STRUCTURES.

                    ALTHOUGH LEAD-BASED PAINT CONTINUES TO POSE A RISK FOR MANY NEW

                    YORKERS, THIS LEGISLATION FAILS TO ADDRESS THE ISSUE AND WOULD GREATLY

                    HARM THOSE EXPOSED TO LEAD-BASED PAINT THROUGHOUT OUR STATE.

                                 FOR THESE REASONS AND MANY OTHERS, I OPPOSE THIS

                    LEGISLATION AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES TO OPPOSE IT AS

                    WELL.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  ABSOLUTELY.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  MY COLLEAGUE SORT OF COVERED THE WHOLE NEGATIVE PART -- PARTS

                    OF THIS BILL THAT I WAS GOING TO SPEAK ABOUT.  THE ONE THING I KNOW IS

                    THAT MOST OF MY ADULT LIFE - I CAN'T EVEN TELL YOU THE YEAR THAT I WAS

                    LICENSED - I RAN AN INDEPENDENT INSURANCE COMPANY.  AND IN THAT

                    COMPANY, IN MY COMPANY, I HAVE THE BIG -- SOME OF THE BIG BOYS IN THE

                    INSURANCE WORLD.  BUT I ALSO HAVE SEVERAL CO-OP COMPANIES.  CO-OP

                    COMPANIES ARE SMALLER.  THEY DON'T HAVE THE ASSETS THAT THE BIG BOYS

                                         108



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    HAVE.  BUT EACH OF THOSE CO-OP COMPANIES HAVE AN NICHED MARKET THAT

                    THEY'RE GOOD IN, AND ONE OF THEM IS RENTAL UNITS.  THOSE CO-OPS ARE

                    GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE A REAL HARD LOOK AT WHETHER THEY WANT TO GET OUT

                    OF THE MARKET.  MY OPINION IS AFTER WORKING WITH THEM ALL MY LIFE, ALL

                    MY ADULT LIFE, IS THEY'RE GOING TO TAKE A REAL CLOSE LOOK AT THE LOSS LEADER

                    AND MAKE -- MAKE A DECISION OF PULLING THOSE FROM THEIR PORTFOLIO,

                    ESPECIALLY ONE TO FOUR UNITS.  IT'S -- IT'S SOMETHING THAT I COULD GUARANTEE

                    THIS BODY THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.  DRASTIC INCREASE IN PREMIUMS, AS MY

                    -- AS MY FRIEND WHO IS ALSO IN THE INSURANCE BUSINESS JUST SPOKE ABOUT

                    -- I CALLED SEVERAL OF MY COMPANIES ASKING THEM, IS THIS GOING TO

                    INCREASE PREMIUMS $100?  IS IT GOING TO INCREASE PREMIUMS $1,000?

                    WHAT -- WHAT ARE -- THE ONLY THING THEY COULD SAY -- AND EACH ONE OF

                    THEM TOLD ME THIS, THAT THIS IS GOING TO BE A DRASTIC CHANGE.  IT'S GOING

                    TO BE A DRASTIC PREMIUM CHANGE, NOT A LITTLE.  SO THE BIGGER COMPANIES

                    WHO ARE GOING TO PROBABLY STAY IN THE MARKET ARE GOING INCREASE THESE

                    PREMIUMS TO A POINT WHERE THE LANDLORDS ARE NOW GOING TO HAVE TO DO

                    WHAT?  THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PASS THAT PREMIUM INCREASE DOWN TO

                    THE RENTERS.  AND IT'S GOING -- IT'S GOING TO HAVE AN EFFECT ALL ACROSS OUR

                    BIGGER CITIES AND OUR INNER CITIES WHERE THE OLDER HOMES THAT HAVE BEEN

                    TURNED OVER TO AS RENTAL UNITS.  THE ONES THAT ARE IN THE INNER CITIES THAT

                    ARE THE OLDER ESTABLISHED HOMES WHERE THE LEAD -- LEAD PAINT IS COMMON

                    IN.  THIS LEGISLATION ISN'T GOING TO HELP REMOVE LEAD PAINT.  BUT WHAT IT

                    IS GOING TO DO AND THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS IS GOING TO HURT EVERY ONE

                    OF YOUR -- YOUR PEOPLE THAT YOU REPRESENT IN THIS HOUSE.  EVERYONE

                    ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW YORK.  AND I -- I WOULD ASSUME EVEN -- MAYBE

                                         109



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    EVEN MORE IN NEW YORK CITY.  SO BEFORE WE PASS THIS BILL, JUST REALIZE

                    WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO BE DOING TO YOUR PEOPLE IN YOUR DISTRICTS WHO ARE

                    RENTING HOMES, THAT MAY BE RENTING HOMES THAT ARE OLDER.  THIS IS NOT

                    GOING TO BE GOOD, AND IT'S NOT GOING TO TAKE CARE OF THE LEAD PAINT

                    PROBLEM.  BUT IT IS GOING TO INCREASE PREMIUMS, CHASE INSURANCE

                    COMPANIES OUT AND NOT EVEN ISSUE THEM.  AND BY THE WAY, IF THE

                    COMPANIES PULL OUT OF THAT MARKET, I COULD EXPLAIN IT JUST -- IT'S GOING TO

                    GO TO A THIRD MARKET.  NOW, THAT MARKET IS LIKE IF YOU UNDERSTAND

                    AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE AND THE ASSIGNED RISK POLICIES, THEY'RE GOING TO

                    GO TO A HOMEOWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY THAT'S AN ASSIGNED RISK

                    HOMEOWNERS.  DRASTIC INCREASE IN PREMIUMS.  PEOPLE ARE NOT GOING TO

                    BE ABLE TO AFFORD IT WITHOUT PASSING THOSE PREMIUMS DOWN TO THE

                    RENTERS.

                                 SO I AM, AGAIN, TOTALLY AGAINST THIS BILL.  I -- I HOPE

                    THAT WE DON'T PASS IT BECAUSE IN A FEW YEARS I'LL BE STANDING RIGHT HERE

                    TELLING EACH ONE OF YOU THAT YOU PUT IT TO YOUR PEOPLE, THE RENTERS IN

                    YOUR DISTRICT.  YOU'RE THE ONES THAT DID IT.  SO I'M -- I'M TOTALLY AGAINST

                    THIS AND I HOPE OUR PEOPLE REALLY THINK ABOUT WHAT THEY'RE DOING WITH

                    THIS BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 7488.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THEIR

                                         110



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONFERENCE POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY

                    LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE

                    WHO SUPPORT IT ARE ENCOURAGED TO CALL THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND

                    WE WILL PROPERLY RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  HOWEVER, SHOULD COLLEAGUES DESIRE TO BE AN

                    EXCEPTION THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE

                    AND YOUR VOTE WILL BE PROPERLY RECORDED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  AS

                    YOU KNOW, AND AS ALL OF US KNOW, LEAD PAINT HAS BEEN BANNED IN HOUSES

                    SINCE THE 1970'S.  AND WITH VERY FEW EXCEPTIONS, ALL HOUSES THAT ARE

                    CURRENTLY ON THE MARKET HAVE BEEN REPAINTED SEVERAL TIMES, AND AS A

                    RESULT, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THOSE HOUSES THAT ARE IN BAD CONDITION,

                    LEAD EXPOSURE HAS DROPPED DRAMATICALLY.  AND IN FACT, FROM 1988 TO

                    2004 THERE WAS AN 84 PERCENT REDUCTION IN LEAD EXPOSURE BEING

                    MEASURED IN CHILDREN.  SO IN SOME RESPECTS THIS IS LEGISLATION THAT'S

                                         111



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LOOKING FOR A PROBLEM.  BUT IT WOULD, AS MY COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE SPENT

                    THEIR ENTIRE LIVES IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY NOTED, CREATE LARGE PROBLEMS.

                    THE COUNCIL OF INSURANCE BROKERS, FOR EXAMPLE, IN NEW YORK STATE

                    SAID, WE EXPECT TO SEE A LARGE INCREASE IN NON-RENEWAL OF POLICIES FROM

                    (INAUDIBLE).  AND OTHER INDUSTRY EXPERTS PREDICT A SUBSTANTIAL INCREASE

                    IN PREMIUMS RATES, WHICH OF COURSE WOULD BE PASSED ON TO THE RENTERS

                    OR WOULD RESULT IN LANDLORDS SIMPLY CANCELING THE POLICIES.  AND

                    UNFORTUNATELY, FOR THOSE LANDLORDS THAT RENT LOW-INCOME HOUSES, THEY

                    OFTEN PUT THEM IN AN LLC, A SEPARATE CORPORATION, AND THIS IS ONE MORE

                    REASON WE'RE GOING TO SEE THESE HOUSES WITHOUT ADEQUATE INSURANCE

                    COVERAGE, CREATING OTHER PROBLEMS THROUGHOUT THE COMMUNITY.

                                 SO FOR THOSE REASONS I'LL BE VOTING AGAINST IT AND

                    RECOMMEND THAT MY COLLEAGUES DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  LET ME FIRST START BY

                    COMMENDING MY COLLEAGUE FOR INTRODUCING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION,

                    AND REMINDING SOME OF MY OTHER COLLEAGUES THAT AT SOMEWHERE AROUND

                    1925 AND 1947 AMERICA COULD HAVE MADE A DECISION NOT TO ALLOW LEAD

                    PAINT TO BE -- LEAD TO BE USED IN PAINT.  A LOT OF OTHER COUNTRIES DID,

                    INCLUDING CUBA.  BUT FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES AND EXPEDIENCY, WE DID

                    ALLOW THAT.  AND SINCE THEN IT HAS BEEN DISCOVERED - AND WE KNOW THIS

                                         112



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    FOR A FACT - THAT CHILDREN WHO ARE NEGATIVELY IMPACTED BY LEAD BETWEEN

                    THE AGES OF 1 OR ZERO AND 3 IMPACTS THEIR NEUROLOGICAL SYSTEM, THEREBY

                    IMPACTING THEIR ABILITY TO DO WELL IN SCHOOL, THEREBY IMPACTING OUR TAX

                    BASE TO PAY MORE FOR EDUCATION IN SCHOOL.  AND SO NOBODY WANTS TO BE

                    RESPONSIBLE.  NOBODY WANTS TO BE RESPONSIBLE.  THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY,

                    NOT THE BUSINESS INDUSTRY, NOT THE LANDLORDS, NOT ANYONE.  SOMEBODY

                    NEED TO BE RESPONSIBLE.

                                 I THINK IT'S TIME AND I REALLY DO COMMEND MY

                    COLLEAGUE AND I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO VOTING YES ON THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. JONATHAN RIVERA TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. J.D. RIVERA:  THANK YOU.  I WANT TO THANK ALL

                    MY COLLEAGUES THAT ARE SUPPORTIVE OF THIS -- OF THIS ITEM, AND JUST WANT

                    TO SAY A FEW POINTS ON IT.  NUMBER ONE, THIS EXEMPTION YEARS AGO DIDN'T

                    EVEN EXIST.  IN MY LIFETIME THIS EXEMPTION DIDN'T EXIST.  SO THE IDEA THAT

                    INSURANCE POLICIES AND PREMIUMS ARE GOING TO SUDDENLY SKYROCKET IS

                    IRONIC CONSIDERING THAT WHEN WE TOOK AWAY THE ABILITY TO -- TO PURSUE

                    THIS, PREMIUMS DIDN'T SUDDENLY GO DOWN.  SO THE IDEA THAT WE'RE

                    SUDDENLY GOING TO START PAYING SO MUCH MORE IS -- IS ODD WHEN YOU

                    THINK ABOUT, WELL, WE'RE ALREADY PAYING SO MUCH BECAUSE WE PAID FOR

                    THIS COVERAGE BEFORE IT WAS TAKEN AWAY.  I ALSO KNOW THAT AT THE END OF

                    THE DAY THE COST OF LEAD POISONING IS NOT GOING TO BE REFLECTED IN

                    PREMIUMS AND OUR INSURANCE POLICIES, IT'S GOING TO BE REFLECTED IN HOW

                                         113



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MUCH OUR SCHOOL SYSTEMS HAVE TO PREPARE PROGRAMS FOR CHILDREN THAT

                    ARE SUFFERING FROM LEAD POISONING.  IT HAS TO DO WITH EVERY OTHER EFFORT

                    THAT WE HAVE TO PURSUE AS GOVERNMENT TO TAKE CARE OF THIS DILEMMA THAT

                    IS ABSOLUTELY AVOIDABLE AND CAN COME TO AN END IN OUR LIFETIME.

                                 SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  MR. RIVERA IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  NO, ACTUALLY, I'M NOT HERE TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE, I'M HERE TO, MADAM SPEAKER, RECORD OUR COLLEAGUE MR.

                    SCHMITT IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS BILL.  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    WOULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUE MR. CYMBROWITZ AS A NEGATIVE ON THIS ONE.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER KELLES:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 WE WILL NOW MOVE TO PAGE 11, RULES REPORT NO. 281.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00229-C, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 281, PAULIN, HUNTER, JACOBSON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    MUNICIPAL HOME RULE LAW, IN RELATION TO THE DIVISION OF A COUNTY INTO

                                         114



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DISTRICTS FOR THE APPORTIONMENT OF MEMBERS OF ITS LOCAL LEGISLATIVE

                    BODY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MS. PAULIN.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  BE HAPPY TO.  THIS BILL UPDATES THE

                    STANDARDS FOR REDISTRICTING FOUND IN MUNICIPAL HOME RULE LAW 10 --

                    SECTION 10 WHICH APPLIES TO NON-CHARTERED COUNTIES AND MUNICIPALITIES,

                    AND THEN ADDS THE IDENTICAL PROVISIONS TO SECTION 34 WHICH APPLIES TO

                    CHARTERED COUNTIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  I WOULD BE VERY HAPPY TO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MS. PAULIN.  AND I

                    WOULD BE REMISS -- I WOULD BE REMISS IF I DIDN'T SAY THAT I, IN GENERAL,

                    SUPPORT THE GUIDELINES THAT YOU'VE RECOMMENDED IN TERMS OF BEING FAIR

                    AND EQUITABLE AND CONCISE BOUNDARIES AND NOT BENEFITTING ONE PARTY OR

                    THE OTHER OR HELPING OR HURTING ANY INCUMBENT.  AND I CERTAINLY HOPE TO

                    THE EXTENT THAT YOU OR ANY OF US HAVE AN INFLUENCE ON THAT, THAT WE

                    RECOMMEND THAT THE INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION THAT'S

                    LOOKING AT OUR DISTRICTS FOLLOW THESE SAME GUIDELINES.  IS THAT YOUR

                    UNDERSTANDING THAT THEY SHOULD BE?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT FAIR

                    REDISTRICTING LEADS TO FAIR LINES WHICH IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL PEOPLE.

                                         115



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THAT WOULD BE SWEET.  IT WOULD BE

                    UNUSUAL, BUT IT WOULD BE GREAT.  AREN'T THERE FEDERAL GUIDELINES THAT

                    APPLY NOT ONLY TO THE STATE GOVERNMENT BUT EVERY LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN

                    TERMS OF REDISTRICTING TO ENSURE ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE AND TO PREVENT

                    ANY RACIAL OR OTHER INAPPROPRIATE BIAS?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  I'M SORRY.  I DIDN'T HEAR THE VERY FIRST

                    PART OF YOUR QUESTION.  YOU SAID AREN'T THERE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  FEDERAL --

                                 MS. PAULIN:  OH, FEDERAL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  -- GUIDELINES THAT APPLY

                    IRRESPECTIVE OF WHETHER YOU'RE A LOCAL GOVERNMENT OR A CHARTER

                    GOVERNMENT OR EVEN THE STATE ITSELF, RIGHT?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  SO THERE WERE COURT CASES, YOU KNOW,

                    THAT HAD -- THAT REALLY DEFINED THAT.  YOU KNOW, ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE

                    CLEARLY IS THE FIRST AND MOST IMPORTANT, WHICH IS WHAT WE ALSO IDENTIFY

                    HERE.  AND THEN THE FEDERAL CASES HAVE ALSO INDICATED THAT RACIAL

                    DISPARITIES AND THAT THAT SHOULD BE TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION ALMOST AS A

                    SECOND WHICH IS, AGAIN, WHAT WE HAVE IN THIS BILL.  AND THEN IF YOU GO

                    THROUGH THE COURT CASES, YOU KNOW, COMMUNITIES OF INTEREST WHICH,

                    AGAIN, YOU KNOW, IS A LOWER PRIORITY BUT AN IMPORTANT ONE SO WE

                    IDENTIFY HERE.  SO WE TRIED TO TAKE WHAT WE HAVE SEEN AS A COMBINATION

                    OF WHAT WE HAD IN THE LAW BEFORE, UPDATING THAT TO REFLECT FEDERAL COURT

                    CASES, AND TO LIST THAT IN THAT SAME ORDER SO THAT IT'S VERY CLEAR WHEN

                    COUNTIES DO THEIR REDISTRICTING THIS TIME.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE LIST THAT'S

                                         116



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONTAINED IN THIS STATUTORY LANGUAGE THAT IS NOT COVERED BY EXISTING

                    FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  I THINK THAT THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS

                    FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS.  YOU KNOW, WE HAVE STATE REQUIREMENTS THAT

                    WE'VE HAD IN THE LAW FOR (INAUDIBLE).  BUT THE -- THE FEDERAL STATUTE --

                    THERE'S NO FEDERAL STATUTE.  THERE'S -- THERE'S CERTAINLY THE NEW YORK

                    STATE CONSTITUTION.  THE ONLY GUIDANCE THAT COUNTIES WOULD HAVE ARE

                    COURT CASES WHICH, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THEM MIGHT NOT BE AS

                    SOPHISTICATED AS OTHERS IN INTERPRETING THOSE, SO I THINK THAT WHAT WE'VE

                    TRIED TO DO HERE IS TO LAY IT OUT VERY CONCRETELY SO THAT IT'S VERY CLEAR AND

                    CONSISTENT WITH THOSE FEDERAL CASES TO MAKE IT EASIER FOR COUNTIES.

                    AND, YOU KNOW, THE MUNICIPAL RULE LAW SECTION 10 ALREADY DOES THAT,

                    BUT IT DOES IT WITH -- FOR NON-CHARTERED COUNTIES.  AND, YOU KNOW, WHAT

                    WE'VE SEEN IS WE HAVE COUNTIES IN THIS STATE THAT HAVE VIOLATED THE LAW

                    BECAUSE OF THE IMPRACTICALITY OF SOME OF THE STANDARDS THAT WE HAVE IN

                    THE CURRENT LAW.  SO AT LEAST FOR THOSE NON-CHARTERED COUNTIES, WE HAVE

                    TO UPDATE OUR PROVISIONS SO THAT THEY'RE NOT OUT OF COMPLIANCE BECAUSE

                    THEY CAN'T PRACTICALLY BE IN COMPLIANCE.  AND THAT'S THE ONE THAT HAS TO

                    DO WITH 110 PERCENT KEEPING MUNICIPAL LINES.  AND I CAN IDENTIFY SOME

                    OF THE COUNTIES, PRIMARILY IN THE UPSTATE AREA THAT, YOU KNOW, HAVE

                    VIOLATED THE LAW BECAUSE IT'S NOT PRACTICAL.  IN THE -- IN THE NEW BILL WE

                    ACTUALLY ADD THE WORDS -- WE MAKE THE STANDARD A LITTLE LESS SEVERE SO

                    WE CAN ABIDE BY THE ONE PERSON, ONE VOTE RULE A LITTLE MORE

                    SUBSTANTIALLY AND WE GIVE SOME FLEXIBILITY TO THOSE COUNTIES THAT HAVE

                    NONE OR HAD NONE IN THE -- IN THE CURRENT LAW.

                                         117



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. GOODELL:  YOU MENTIONED THAT YOU THOUGHT

                    THERE WERE SOME COUNTIES THAT VIOLATED THE LAW.  I ASSUME THAT'S -- YOUR

                    OPINION IS BASED UPON COURT CASES THAT SO RULED?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  WHAT IT -- WHAT IT IS IT'S BASED ON IS

                    THAT THE LAW IS VERY CLEAR AND IT SAYS IT HAS TO BE 110 PERCENT AND THEN

                    THERE ARE COUNTIES THAT HAVE SPLIT MUNICIPALITIES.  SO IT'S MY

                    INTERPRETATION BASED ON LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, WHAT -- WHERE THEY'VE

                    SPLIT, KNOWING THEY'VE SPLIT THOSE MUNICIPALITIES -- OR TOWNS INTO -- INTO

                    SMALLER UNITS THAN ABIDING BY THAT 110 PERCENT.  SO IT'S MY

                    INTERPRETATION.  I DON'T THINK ANYONE'S CHALLENGED THEM THAT I KNOW OF.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. PAULIN.

                    I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO, MAYBE I'M SHOWING MY AGE BUT

                    TEN YEARS AGO I WENT THROUGH A REAPPORTIONMENT PROCESS FOR THE STATE

                    LEGISLATURE, AND BACK THEN OUR GOVERNOR WAS TAKING THE HIGH ROAD AND

                    SAYING ALL THE THINGS THAT YOU HAD HOPED THAT A GOVERNOR WOULD SAY.

                    HE SAID, YOU KNOW, DURING THE REAPPORTIONMENT THERE OUGHT TO BE

                    COMPACT DISTRICTS.  THEY OUGHT TO BE FAIR, THEY OUGHT TO BE EQUITABLE.

                    THEY OUGHT TO MAKE GEOGRAPHIC AND POLITICAL SENSE.  AND HE WAS QUITE

                    ELOQUENT, TO BE HONEST.  AND THEN WE CAME OUT WITH A PLAN THAT WE

                    ADOPTED, AND ONE OF MY COLLEAGUE'S DISTRICT IS ONE TOWN WIDE AND RUNS

                    FOR SEVEN COUNTIES.  IT STARTS IN CENTRAL NEW YORK AND RUNS ALL THE WAY

                                         118



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DOWN ALMOST TO NEW YORK CITY.  YOU NEED A GYROCOPTER TO TRAVEL THAT

                    DISTRICT.  AND I HAD AN INTERN, SO I GAVE HER A FUN LITTLE TASK.  I SAID,

                    COME UP WITH PICTURES THAT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE REAPPORTIONMENT

                    PLAN THAT WE WERE ADOPTING.  AND SO OVER BY SYRACUSE -- AND IT USED TO

                    BE SAM ROBERTS' DISTRICT -- IT WAS GREAT.  IT LOOKS JUST LIKE A SCORPION.

                    YOU KNOW, YOU'VE GOT THIS BIG BLOCK AND THEN YOU'VE GOT THIS LITTLE LINE

                    THAT COMES UP AND AROUND AND PICKS UP SOME DOWNTOWN SYRACUSE TO

                    MAKE SURE IT'S A DEMOCRATIC DISTRICT.  AND THEN WE HAD A DISTRICT OVER

                    IN BUFFALO, YOU KNOW, THAT WENT FOR ABOUT THREE MILES THROUGH AN

                    ABANDONED INDUSTRIAL AREA JUST TO PICK UP ANOTHER REPUBLICAN'S DISTRICT

                    AND TIE IT INTO DOWNTOWN BUFFALO.  AND THE PICTURES THAT CAME OUT

                    WERE GREAT.  WE HAD ONE LOOKED LIKE CATDOG.  YOU KNOW, ANOTHER ONE

                    LOOKED LIKE A MUSKRAT.  I MENTIONED THE SCORPION.  AND SO I TOOK ALL

                    THESE PICTURES AND I WROTE A LETTER TO THE GOVERNOR AND I SAID,

                    GOVERNOR, YOU OBVIOUSLY DON'T KNOW HOW REDISTRICTING IS DONE.  HERE

                    IS A REDISTRICTING GUIDE FOR THE ASSEMBLY.  AND I HAD ALL OF THOSE

                    HILARIOUS CARTOONS AND MAPS AND I LAID IT OUT TO HIM.  AND I DELIVERED IT

                    TO ONE OF THE GOVERNOR'S STAFF PERSONS SINCE SHE READ THE COVER LETTER

                    AND SHE THOUGHT I WAS SERIOUS AND SHE SAID, ARE YOU SURE YOU WANT TO

                    SEND THIS TO THE GOVERNOR?

                                 SO I REALLY DO APPRECIATE ALL OF THESE GREAT LOFTY GOALS

                    THAT WE WANT TO IMPOSE ON OTHER GOVERNMENTS THAT ARE ALREADY IN THE

                    MIDDLE OF A REDISTRICTING PROCESS.  BUT IRONICALLY, MOST OF THOSE

                    GOVERNMENTS DO A HECK OF A LOT BETTER JOB THAN WE DO IN COMING UP

                    WITH APPROPRIATE DISTRICTS.  AND THAT'S WHY THERE WAS CONSIDERABLE

                                         119



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    OPPOSITION IN MY CONFERENCE.  NOT BECAUSE WE DON'T LIKE THESE GOALS,

                    BUT BECAUSE WE THINK THE LOCAL GOVERNMENTS ARE ALREADY DOING THEM.

                    AND IT'S JUST A LITTLE HYPOCRITICAL FOR US, AS THE STATE LEGISLATURE, THAT

                    ROUTINELY IGNORES AND VIOLATES THESE STANDARDS, TO MANDATE HOW OTHER

                    GOVERNMENTS OUGHT TO OPERATE.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT A.2289-C.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. PAULIN TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WHEN I

                    CAME TO THE LEGISLATURE (INAUDIBLE) A VERY LONG TIME AGO, THIS WAS THE

                    VERY, VERY FIRST BILL THAT I HAD THE IDEA OF.  I WOULDN'T SAY I INTRODUCED IT

                    RIGHT AWAY BECAUSE IT WAS COMPLICATED TO FIGURE OUT, BUT IT WAS THE

                    VERY, VERY FIRST BILL IDEA THAT I HAD AND IT'S TAKEN ME 20 YEARS.  IT CAME

                    OUT OF A LAWSUIT WHERE I WAS PRESIDENT OF THE LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS

                    BACK IN '92 I BELIEVE, AND WE SUED BECAUSE THEY SPLIT MY TOWN OF

                    SCARSDALE INTO THREE PARTS WHEN THEY DID REDISTRICTING.  AND SO WE WENT

                    TO COURT, WE LOST.  IT WENT ALL THE WAY UP TO THE COURT OF APPEALS.  AND

                    WHEN I CAME TO THE LEGISLATURE I SAID, I'M GOING TO FIX THAT.

                                         120



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 AND SO I AM VERY, VERY PROUD TODAY THAT THIS BILL IS

                    PASSING THIS HOUSE WHICH WILL MAKE FAIR REDISTRICTING THROUGHOUT THE

                    STATE FOR ALL -- ALL COUNTIES AND ALL OF THE PEOPLE.  IT'S A GOOD

                    GOVERNMENT BILL AND I AM VERY PROUD TO FINALLY GET IT DONE.  THANK YOU.

                    WITH THAT I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. PAULIN IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. LAWLER TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  AND I

                    THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL.  I DO THINK IT'S A GOOD GOVERNMENT BILL

                    AND I DO THINK THE INTENTION IS RIGHT.  AS MY COLLEAGUE FROM WESTERN

                    NEW YORK POINTED OUT, THOUGH, IT'S ANOTHER ONE OF THESE BILLS WHERE WE

                    PASS AND WE MANDATE DOWN ONTO OTHERS WHAT THEY SHOULD BE DOING

                    WHILE WE OURSELVES NEVER DO THAT.  AND I -- I CERTAINLY HOPE AS WE

                    MOVE FORWARD WITH REDISTRICTING -- AND ON GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS THIS

                    MORNING WE HAD A -- A BILL THAT WOULD BASICALLY GIVE THE LEGISLATURE

                    AUTHORITY TO -- TO DRAW THE LINES AGAIN IF THE INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING

                    COMMISSION DOES NOT PRODUCE MAPS IN A VOTE WITHIN TEN DAYS.  SO

                    OBVIOUSLY, THE INTENTION SEEMS TO BE FOR THE LEGISLATURE TO DRAW THE

                    MAPS ONCE AGAIN.  BUT I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT THE LEGISLATURE USES THESE

                    STANDARDS OUTLINED BY THE SPONSOR IN DRAWING THE MAPS MOVING

                    FORWARD.  AND -- BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT'S GOING TO

                    HAPPEN.  SO IT WILL BE VERY INTERESTING TO SEE HOW THESE MAPS TURN OUT,

                    AND HOPEFULLY THIS BILL IS APPLIED TO US IN THE FUTURE.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                         121



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ABINANTI TO

                    EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. ABINANTI:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I'M VERY

                    PLEASED TO SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION, ALTHOUGH IT'S COME ABOUT 30 YEARS

                    LATE.  IT WAS MY ELECTION TO THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY BOARD OF

                    LEGISLATORS IN 1991 THAT CAUSED THIS LAWSUIT IN THE COURT OF APPEALS,

                    AND THEN IT CAUSED ASSEMBLYWOMAN PAULIN TO -- TO BRING THIS

                    LEGISLATION.  BUT AS THEY SAY, BETTER LATE THAN NEVER.

                                 SO I'M VERY PLEASED TO SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION.

                    HOPEFULLY IT WILL BENEFIT OTHERS IN THE FUTURE AND MAKE THINGS FAIRER IN

                    THE LOCAL ELECTIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ABINANTI IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  PLEASE RECORD MY

                    COLLEAGUE MR. SCHMITT IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED, SIR.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU WOULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUE MR. STECK IN THE NEGATIVE

                    ON THIS ONE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                         122



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 PAGE -- MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.  EXCUSE ME.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  AND LET ME THANK OUR COLLEAGUES FOR THUS FAR ALL THE DUE

                    DILIGENCE WE'VE BEEN PUTTING IN TODAY ON THE FLOOR.  THERE'S A LITTLE BIT

                    MORE TO GO.  I'M GOING TO GIVE OFF A LIST OF THOSE, MR. SPEAKER.  IF WE

                    CAN START WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 613 BY MS. ROSENTHAL.  IT'S RULES REPORT

                    NO. 409.  AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO TO ASSEMBLY BILL 2666 BY MR.

                    LAVINE.  IT'S RULES REPORT NO. 423.  FOLLOWED BY ASSEMBLY BILL 6522

                    BY MR. STERN.  THAT ONE IS RULES REPORT NO. 454.  FOLLOWED BY

                    ASSEMBLY BILL 6762 BY MS. FAHY.  THAT ONE IS RULES REPORT NO. 591.

                    AND THEN WE'RE GOING TO GO TO ASSEMBLY BILL 6198 BY MS. PAULIN.

                    THAT ONE IS CALENDAR NO. 370.  AND THEN BACKWARDS TO RULES REPORT

                    NO. 601.  THAT'S ASSEMBLY BILL 7243 BY MS. RICHARDSON.  FOLLOWED BY

                    ASSEMBLY BILL 7957 BY MS. RICHARDSON.  THAT ONE IS RULES REPORT NO.

                    652.  AND LASTLY, BUT CERTAINLY NOT LEAST, MR. SPEAKER, WE'RE GOING TO GO

                    TO RULES REPORT NO. 605.  IT IS ASSEMBLY BILL 7302.  THAT ONE IS BY

                    MS. SIMON.  IN THAT ORDER, MR. SPEAKER, AND THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 ON THE MAIN CALENDAR, PAGE 16, RULES REPORT NO.

                    409, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S00014-A, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 409, SENATOR HOYLMAN (A00613-A, L. ROSENTHAL, DINOWITZ, STERN,

                    SIMON, GRIFFIN, PAULIN, OTIS, JACOBSON, SEAWRIGHT, BURDICK, SILLITTI,

                    GALEF, ZEBROWSKI, JEAN-PIERRE, THIELE, CARROLL, PERRY, EPSTEIN,

                                         123



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RICHARDSON, ZINERMAN).  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PENAL LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    ENACTING THE JOSE WEBSTER UNTRACEABLE FIREARMS ACT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS BILL WOULD AMEND THE PENAL

                    LAW TO ENACT THE JOSE WEBSTER UNTRACEABLE FIREARMS ACT TO PROHIBIT

                    THE POSSESSION AND THE SALE OF GHOST GUNS IN NEW YORK STATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL

                    YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MS. ROSENTHAL.  I JUST

                    WANTED TO WALK THROUGH A BILL A LITTLE BIT SO WE ALL UNDERSTAND WHAT THE

                    BILL DOES OR DOESN'T DO.  AS I UNDERSTAND IT, IT REQUIRES THAT ALL GUNS

                    MANUFACTURED AFTER 1968 BE SERIALIZED; THAT IS TO HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  EXCUSE ME.  WAIT ONE SECOND.

                                 YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IN LOOKING AT THE ACTUAL

                    LANGUAGE OF THE BILL ON PAGE 1, IT DEFINES SERIALIZED AS BEING -- BEARING

                    A VISIBLE IDENTIFICATION NUMBER OR SYMBOL IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE

                                         124



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REQUIREMENTS IMPOSE ON LICENSED IMPORTERS AND LICENSED MANUFACTURERS

                    UNDER TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO, THIS LAW BY ITS VERY NATURE ONLY

                    APPLIES TO GUNS THAT HAVE TO BE SERIALIZED UNDER FEDERAL LAW, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  SORRY, THIS WOULD APPLY TO

                    WHAT?  SAY IT AGAIN.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THIS BILL BY ITS VERY LANGUAGE ONLY

                    APPLIES TO GUNS THAT HAVE TO HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER UNDER FEDERAL LAW,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, WE ARE MAKING IT UNDER

                    STATE LAW.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT IT -- IT ONLY APPLIES TO THOSE

                    GUNS THAT HAVE TO BE -- HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER UNDER FEDERAL LAW, RIGHT?

                    I MEAN, THAT'S THE OPENING STATEMENT AND THE DEFINITION OF SERIALIZED,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE ALL GHOST

                    GUNS IN NEW YORK STATE TO BE SERIALIZED.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND ARE THERE ANY GUNS IN NEW

                    YORK STATE WITHOUT A SERIAL NUMBER THAT WERE MANUFACTURED AFTER 1968

                    THAT AREN'T ALREADY REQUIRED TO HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER UNDER FEDERAL LAW?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS BILL IS REALLY ABOUT GHOST

                    GUNS, THE ONES THAT ARE UNSERIALIZED RIGHT NOW.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  RIGHT.  AND MY QUESTION IS, ARE

                    THERE ANY GHOST GUNS IN NEW YORK STATE MANUFACTURED AFTER 1968 THAT

                                         125



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AREN'T REQUIRED TO HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER UNDER FEDERAL LAW?  I MEAN, CAN

                    YOU LEGALLY HAVE A GHOST GUN IN NEW YORK STATE UNDER CURRENT LAW?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.  UNDER -- IN NEW YORK

                    STATE, YES YOU CAN.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  CONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAW?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  FEDERAL LAW -- FEDERAL LAW IS

                    BEING CHANGED ABOUT THAT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.  AND I SEE THAT ONE OF THE

                    REMEDIES IF YOU HAVE A GUN THAT IS NOT -- DOESN'T HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER IS

                    THAT YOU CAN TURN IT IN, RIGHT?  TURN IT IN TO THE POLICE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND YOU HAVE A CERTAIN TIME FRAME,

                    SIX MONTHS, I THINK, TO DO SO?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IF YOU TURN IT INTO THE POLICE,

                    ARE YOU COMPENSATED FOR THE FAIR MARKET VALUE OF THAT GUN?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I DON'T BELIEVE SO, NO.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO HOW IS THAT CONSISTENT WITH THE

                    DUE PROCESS CLAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION THAT REQUIRES GOVERNMENT TO PAY

                    FAIR COMPENSATION IF THEY CONFISCATE PRIVATE PROPERTY?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IT IS ILLEGAL TO HAVE A GHOST GUN

                    IN THE FIRST PLACE, SO YOU'RE NOT GOING TO BE COMPENSATED FOR HAVING

                    SOMETHING THAT'S ILLEGAL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.  I THOUGHT THAT WAS THE CASE.

                    I THOUGHT IT WAS ILLEGAL TO HAVE A GHOST GUN IN THE FIRST PLACE, AND THAT

                                         126



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CERTAINLY WOULD ADDRESS THE CONSTITUTIONAL DUE PROCESS ISSUE.  I NOTE

                    THAT THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION IN TALKING ABOUT OUR STATUTORY

                    AUTHORITY SPECIFICALLY PRECLUDES US FROM INCORPORATING OTHER LAWS BY

                    REFERENCE.  AND I'M REFERRING TO ARTICLE III, SECTION 16 THAT SAYS NO ACT

                    SHALL BE PASSED WHICH SHALL PROVIDE THAT ANY EXISTING LAW SHALL BE

                    MADE OR DEEMED TO BE MADE PART OF SUCH ACT EXCEPT BY INSERTING IT.

                    BUT THIS BILL IS BASED ENTIRELY ON WHAT FEDERAL LAW SAYS, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO, IT'S NOT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT UNDER THE DEFINITION OF

                    SERIALIZED IS AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL CODE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  ISN'T THAT AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL

                    CROSS-REFERENCE OR AN INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND WHY NOT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  BECAUSE WE -- WE IN THE STATE

                    ARE ALLOWED TO MAKE LAWS LIKE THIS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I -- I CERTAINLY AGREE WE'RE ALLOWED

                    TO MAKE LAWS, BUT WE HAVE TO DO IT IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NEW YORK

                    STATE CONSTITUTION, WOULDN'T YOU AGREE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS ONE DOES -- IS ACCORDING TO

                    THE NEW YORK STATE CONSTITUTION.  IT IS ALLOWED.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  OKAY.  I GUESS WE'LL JUST HAVE TO

                    AGREE TO DISAGREE.

                                 AS YOU KNOW, THOSE THAT ARE ENGAGED IN THE SPORT OF

                                         127



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    COMPETITIVE SHOOTING OFTEN BUY PARTS THAT THEY THEN ASSEMBLE THEIR GUN

                    WITH.  AND THEY TAKE GREAT CARE AND IT'S VERY, VERY HIGHLY TECHNICAL IN

                    PUTTING THOSE GUNS TOGETHER TO OBTAIN A GUN THAT'S NOT ONLY CUSTOM

                    MADE, BUT EXTRAORDINARILY ACCURATE.  SOME OF THOSE CHANGES WOULD

                    REQUIRE GETTING AN UNFINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  MM-HMM.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  IS THAT --  DOES THIS BILL THEN BAR ALL

                    OF THOSE COMPETITIVE SPORTS SHOOTERS FROM BEING ABLE TO GET AN

                    UNFINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER -- OR UNFINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER THAT

                    THEY MIGHT ACTUALLY HAVE TO DO MORE MILLING OR DRILLING OR -- OR SHAPING

                    IN ORDER TO GET IT INTO A FINAL PRODUCT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, THERE IS A COMPANION BILL

                    THAT WE WILL BE DISCUSSING LATER ON THE FLOOR.  HOWEVER, IF SOMEBODY

                    PUTS TOGETHER A GUN WHERE THE RECEIVER IS UNSERIALIZED, THAT WILL BE

                    ILLEGAL AND THEY HAVE TO GET IT SERIALIZED BY A GUNSMITH.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND THIS BILL ITSELF, THOUGH, TALKS

                    ABOUT A FINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER OR AN UNFINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER.

                    I'M REFERRING TO PAGE 2, LINES 32 AND 33, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND SO WHAT IS THE PUBLIC POLICY

                    FOR PROHIBITING SPORTSMEN THAT ENGAGE IN COMPETITIVE SHOOTING FROM

                    BEING ABLE TO PURCHASE AND FINISH TO THEIR EXACTING STANDARDS AN

                    UNFINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER?  ESPECIALLY IF THE GUN THAT THEY START WITH

                    IS SERIALIZED.  IS THERE ANY REASON WHY THEY SHOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DO THAT

                    IF THEIR GUN IS SERIALIZED?

                                         128



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I MEAN, IF THEIR -- IF THEIR GUN IS

                    SERIALIZED AND -- AND IT IS REGISTERED, THEN THEY'RE ALLOWED TO HAVE IT AS

                    LONG AS THEY GO THROUGH A BACKGROUND CHECK AND -- AND GET A PERMIT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MS. ROSENTHAL.  I

                    APPRECIATE YOUR CLARIFICATION ON THIS BILL.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AS -- AS IS CLEAR FROM THE LANGUAGE

                    OF THIS BILL, THIS BILL JUST PIGGYBACKS ON EXISTING FEDERAL LAW.  SO

                    EXISTING FEDERAL LAW AS SET FORTH IN TITLE 18 OF THE U.S. CODE REQUIRES

                    ALL GUNS TO BE SERIALIZED IF THEY WERE MANUFACTURED AFTER 1968.  AND OF

                    COURSE IT DOESN'T APPLY TO EARLIER GUNS OR ANTIQUE GUNS.  AND SINCE WE

                    ALREADY HAVE IT ALREADY COVERED UNDER FEDERAL LAW, I REALLY SEE VERY

                    LITTLE REASON TO DUPLICATE FEDERAL LAW, ESPECIALLY BY REFERENCING FEDERAL

                    LAW BY INCORPORATION, WHICH IS AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL WAY UNDER OUR STATE

                    CONSTITUTION TO EVEN DRAFT LEGISLATION.  AND THEN WE PUT ON THERE AN

                    OBLIGATION FOR PEOPLE TO TURN IN THEIR GUNS WITHOUT COMPENSATION.  AND

                    CERTAINLY THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE POWER TO CONFISCATE PRIVATE PROPERTY,

                    BUT WHEN THEY DO SO THEY NEED TO PAY A FAIR MARKET VALUE.  AND LAST,

                    THIS LEGISLATION, IN MY OPINION, FAILS TO REFLECT THE FACT THAT WE HAVE A

                    NUMBER OF VERY COMPETITIVE, HIGHLY-SKILLED SPORTSMEN THAT WORK WITH

                    UNFINISHED FRAMES AND UNFINISHED RECEIVERS AND THEY ACTUALLY MILL THEM

                    AND DRILL THEM AND SHAPE THEM TO BE AN EXTRAORDINARY CUSTOMIZED GUN

                    WHICH THEY USE IN COMPETITIVE TARGET SHOOTING.  THAT'S NOT EXCLUDED

                                         129



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    UNDER THIS BILL AND IT CERTAINLY SHOULD.

                                 AND FOR THOSE REASONS I WOULD RECOMMEND AGAINST

                    THIS LEGISLATION.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL, THANK

                    YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 ONE MORE MINUTE, I'M SORRY.

                                 MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  YES, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR FROM THE 67TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT ALLOW ME TO ASK A

                    FEW QUESTIONS, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WILL YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I THINK MY

                    -- MY COLLEAGUE HAS -- HAS COVERED A LOT OF THE QUESTIONS HERE, BUT I JUST

                    -- I HAVE A BIT OF A -- WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I HEARD EVERYTHING

                    CORRECTLY.  ARE HISTORICAL FIREARMS EXEMPTED FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS

                    LAW?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IF -- IF A PERSON IS UNAWARE THAT

                    THE -- THEY ARE -- HAVE A REQUIREMENT TO SERIALIZE THEM, THEN -- I THINK

                    ACTUALLY -- SAY IT AGAIN.  THE HISTORICAL -- SAY IT AGAIN, I'M SORRY.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  ARE HISTORICAL FIREARMS EXEMPTED

                    FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THIS LAW?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.  YES, THEY ARE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND DOES THAT INCLUDE ALL THE

                                         130



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ATTACHMENTS AND EVERYTHING THAT GOES ALONG WITH, LIKE, MILITARY HISTORY

                    COLLECTORS THAT I'M VERY FAMILIAR WITH.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  SO IF YOU HAD AN -- AN

                    ANTIQUE RIFLE, THE BAYONET WITH IT WOULD BE EXEMPTED FROM HAVING TO BE

                    SERIALIZED, THUS RUINING ITS, YOU KNOW, HISTORICAL VALUE TO -- TO

                    COLLECTION.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS BILL IS NOT ABOUT -- IS ABOUT

                    GUNS THAT ARE CURRENTLY USED, NOT ONES THAT ARE IN POSSESSION TO DISPLAY

                    FOR HISTORICAL PURPOSES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND -- AND YOU MENTIONED -- AND

                    THIS APPLIES TO ALL RIFLES, PISTOLS, SHOTGUNS, WHATEVER -- WHATEVER CLASS

                    OF FIREARMS THERE ARE.  THERE'S NO OTHER EXCEPTIONS OTHER THAN HISTORICAL

                    FIREARMS.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND WHEN -- WHEN THAT HAPPENS, IF

                    THERE ARE DIFFERENT PIECES OR PARTS OR DIFFERENT COMPONENTS OF A FIREARM,

                    AN UPPER RECEIVER OR A LOWER RECEIVER, I THINK WE'RE GOING TO DISCUSS

                    THIS IN SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATION BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO CLARIFY HERE.

                    SERIALIZATION BY A GUNSMITH WOULD THEN MAKE IT OKAY TO POSSESS THE

                    VARIOUS PARTS OF CURRENT FIREARMS THAT ARE LEGALLY POSSESSED BY CITIZENS?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, THIS PERTAINS TO GUNS THAT

                    ARE ASSEMBLED BY THE OWNER AND ARE NOT SERIALIZED.  THIS DOESN'T

                    PERTAIN -- THIS DOESN'T TOUCH ON ILLEGAL GUNS OR -- YEAH.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I THINK IT DOES.  I THINK IT -- IT

                                         131



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    TOUCHES ON THE VARIOUS COMPONENTS OF FIREARMS.  IF -- IF YOU LOOK AT THE

                    VARIOUS CLASSES OF RIFLES, PISTOLS AND SHOTGUNS, THEY'RE MADE OF VERY,

                    VERY DIFFERENT PIECES AND PARTS.  AND IS YOUR INTENTION IS WHAT THIS BILL

                    IS SAYING IS THAT EVERY PIECE AND EVERY PART HAS TO HAVE A SERIAL NUMBER

                    IF IT'S SOLD SEPARATELY FROM A GUN MANUFACTURER?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO, I'M SAYING THAT ONCE IT'S

                    ASSEMBLED IT HAS TO BE SERIALIZED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  ONE IT'S ASSEMBLED.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND DOES THAT INCLUDE JUST ONE

                    SERIAL NUMBER FOR THE ASSEMBLED FIREARM?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.  I MEAN, WHATEVER --

                    WHATEVER IS ACCORDING TO LAW, YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  ACCORDING TO CURRENT FEDERAL LAW.

                    IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE SAYING?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO BUT AREN'T FIREARMS ALREADY

                    REQUIRED TO BE SERIALIZED UNDER FEDERAL LAW?

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 THE BILL MENTIONS FEDERAL LAW SEVERAL TIMES.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WE ARE NOT -- WE ARE NOT -- THE

                    FEDERAL LAW DOESN'T -- DOESN'T ADDRESS GHOST GUNS, WHICH IS WHY THERE'S

                    NOW A REGULATION THAT THE GOVERNMENT -- THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IS

                    PUTTING FORTH ABOUT GHOST GUN SERIALIZATION.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO WHY DO YOU MENTION FEDERAL

                                         132



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LAW IN YOUR SPONSOR'S MEMO THEN?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  FEDERAL LAW, YES, REQUIRES THE

                    SERIALIZATION.  SERIALIZATION -- WE'RE ADDRESSING GUNS THAT ARE ASSEMBLED

                    BY SOMEONE WHO PURCHASES A KIT.  WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT GUNS THAT

                    YOU BUY FINISHED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  RIGHT.  IN THAT CONTEXT, THEN, IT'S --

                    IT'S -- THAT'S ALREADY COVERED UNDER FEDERAL LAW WHERE IT REQUIRES THAT A

                    FIREARM HAS TO BE SERIALIZED UNDER FEDERAL LAW.  SO I GUESS -- ISN'T IT

                    ALREADY REQUIRED?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THERE -- THERE -- ON ONE THAT'S

                    ALREADY ASSEMBLED.  WE'RE TALKING ABOUT UNSERIALIZED PARTS THAT A

                    PERSON IS PUTTING TOGETHER.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND DOES THIS LAW ADDRESS WHICH

                    PART NEEDS TO BE SERIALIZED TO MAKE IT A FIREARM?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES, IT TALKS ABOUT EITHER THE

                    FRAME ON A HANDGUN OR A RECEIVER ON A LONG GUN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO ARE -- BUT ARE WE GOING TO TALK

                    IN MORE DETAIL ABOUT THAT IN THE NEXT BILL?  IS THAT YOUR INTENTION, THAT

                    THESE TWO BILLS ARE --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES, THE NEXT BILL DELVES INTO THE

                    FRAME OR RECEIVER PART OF THIS PACKAGE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO -- SO THESE TWO BILLS ARE ACTUALLY

                    LINKED BUT THEY'RE SEPARATE PIECES OF LEGISLATION.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES, CORRECT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  LAST QUESTION, WHAT DOES

                                         133



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    VOLUNTARILY SURRENDER MEAN TO A CITIZEN?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, I THINK IT -- IT MEANS THE

                    SAME TO ANYBODY.  YOU -- YOU HAVE SIX MONTHS IN WHICH TO RELINQUISH

                    YOUR ILLEGAL GUN, SELF-ASSEMBLED, UNSERIALIZED, UNREGISTERED GUN TO LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THIS IS A VERY CONFUSING LAW IN

                    MANY WAYS.  I -- I UNDERSTAND THE INTENTION BEHIND IT, BUT IT'S IN

                    DIRECTION CONTRAVENTION TO MANY ASPECTS OF OUR EXISTING STATE LAWS AND

                    EXISTING FEDERAL LAWS WHICH ARE ALREADY VERY STRICT.  NEW YORK ALREADY

                    HAS SOME OF THE TOUGHEST GUN CONTROL LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES, AND

                    THIS -- THIS LAW IN PARTICULAR IS DESIGNED TO CONFUSE AND TO MAKE AN

                    ALREADY CHAOTIC SITUATION FOR LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS EVEN MORE CHAOTIC.

                    I'LL TALK A LITTLE BIT MORE ON THE NEXT BILL THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, BUT ALL

                    THESE BILLS ARE INDEED LINKED.  SINCE THE SAFE ACT IN THE 2012-'13 ERA

                    MOVING FORWARD, ALL THESE BILLS ARE LINKED TOGETHER AND THE INTENTION IS

                    TO RESTRICT LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS' RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS AND I THINK

                    THAT'S SIMPLY WRONG.

                                 I THINK THIS BILL IS UNNECESSARY AND I URGE ALL MY

                    COLLEAGUES, IN A BIPARTISAN MANNER, TO MAKE SURE THAT AS YOU VOTE AND

                    AS YOU THINK ABOUT THESE THINGS, WHAT DO YOUR CONSTITUENTS REALLY THINK

                    AND KNOW AND FEEL ABOUT THESE -- ABOUT THESE LAWS?  BECAUSE WHEN YOU

                    PUT IT ALL TOGETHER IT'S -- IT'S A VIOLATION OF THE -- THE SECOND AMENDMENT

                                         134



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RIGHTS OF OUR CITIZENS IN NEW YORK STATE.  MR. SPEAKER, THANK YOU VERY

                    MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. SALKA.

                                 MR. SALKA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A QUESTION OR TWO?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SPONSOR, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. SALKA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  LET'S TALK A

                    LITTLE BIT ABOUT NUMBERS.  DO -- AND ULTIMATELY WHAT THIS WHOLE PACKAGE

                    OF GUN CONTROL BILLS IS ABOUT IS TO DECREASE GUN VIOLENCE, WHICH EVERY

                    GUN OWNER, EVERY SELF-RESPECTING CITIZEN WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE

                    MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF GUN VIOLENCE THAT PLAGUES OUR COMMUNITIES, IN

                    PARTICULAR OUR COMMUNITIES OF COLOR.  AND OF COURSE THE ROOT OF THE

                    PROBLEM IS MUCH MORE COMPLICATED THAN JUST GUN CONTROL.  BUT DO YOU

                    HAVE ANY IDEA -- AND WE KEEP VERY CLOSE RECORDS, FBI KEEPS CLOSE

                    RECORDS, JUSTICE KEEPS CLOSE RECORDS, DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA HOW MANY

                    GUNS, GHOST GUNS WHICH WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, ARE ACTUALLY USED IN

                    CRIMES?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  LET ME JUST GET THAT INFORMATION

                    FOR YOU.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 IN APRIL 2020 THE ROCKEFELLER INSTITUTE OF

                                         135



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GOVERNMENT REPORTED THAT NEW YORK STATE RECOVERED 220 GHOST GUNS.

                    IN 2019 THERE WERE 72.  IN 2018 THERE WERE 38, WHICH SHOWS THAT WE'VE

                    SEEN A 479 PERCENT INCREASE IN THE PROLIFERATION OF GHOST GUNS.  AND

                    THIS IS A TREND THAT IS ALSO BEING SEEN IN OTHER STATES BECAUSE THE PEOPLE

                    WHO SEND AWAY FOR KITS AND ASSEMBLE THEIR OWN GUNS ARE MAINLY

                    INDIVIDUALS WHO COULD NOT PASS A BACKGROUND CHECK TO LEGALLY OBTAIN A

                    GUN.

                                 MR. SALKA:  SO -- SO THOSE WERE THE NUMBER OF

                    GUNS THAT WERE RECOVERED, NOT NECESSARILY THE NUMBER OF GUNS THAT

                    WERE USED IN AN ACTUAL CRIME.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, YES.  AND THERE'S THAT'S --

                    THAT'S THE CRUX OF THE ISSUE, IS THAT GUNS THAT ARE NOT SERIALIZED ARE ALSO

                    UNTRACEABLE AND ARE ALSO -- YOU CAN'T -- YOU CAN'T SEE WHO THEY BELONG

                    TO.  AND, YOU KNOW, IN FURTHER TO YOUR EARLIER QUESTION, IN 20 -- IN

                    MARCH, NEW YORK STATE POLICE ARRESTED AN ULSTER COUNTY MAN FOR

                    ROBBERY WITH A GHOST GUN.  IN JUNE OF THIS MONTH, SCHENECTADY POLICE

                    FOUND A MAN IN POSSESSION OF A GHOST GUN AND A STOLEN GUN.  SO THIS IS

                    AN ISSUE THAT IS RISING TO THE FORE, ESPECIALLY DURING THIS PAST YEAR OF

                    LOCKDOWN THE REQUESTS FOR GHOST GUN KITS HAVE BEEN OFF THE CHARTS.

                                 MR. SALKA:  OKAY.  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU FOR

                    ANSWERING THOSE QUESTIONS.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR JUST A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS?

                                         136



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MADAM.  JUST --

                    JUST A COUPLE OF QUICK QUESTIONS.  YOU JUST STATED THAT THE REQUESTS FOR

                    GHOST GUN KITS OR -- OR GUN KITS HAVE GONE UP IN THE PAST YEAR OR SO

                    BECAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I SAID DURING THE PANDEMIC, I

                    DIDN'T SAY BECAUSE OF THE PANDEMIC.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY, I -- I APOLOGIZE.  DURING

                    THE PANDEMIC.  ISN'T THAT ABOUT THE SAME TIME WHEN BAIL REFORM CAME

                    INTO PLAY, DEFUNDING OUR POLICE OFFICERS?  ISN'T THAT ALL ABOUT THE SAME

                    TIME?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  SIR, YOU ARE CONFLATING TWO

                    SEPARATE ISSUES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  PARDON ME?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YOU ARE CONFLATING TWO SEPARATE

                    ISSUES.  AND PLEASE DO THAT ON SOMEONE ELSE'S BILL BECAUSE THAT HAS

                    NOTHING TO DO WITH THE EARLIER LAWS WE PASSED.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WELL, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT,

                    MA'AM, THIS IS PART OF THIS BILL BECAUSE I AM A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN AND I

                    HAVE THIS RIGHT TO PUT A GUN TOGETHER.  WHAT IS YOUR ULTIMATE GOAL WITH

                    -- WITH YOUR BILL?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS

                                         137



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONVEYED THAT THEY NEED ALL GUNS TO BE TRACEABLE AND SERIALIZED.  WHEN

                    PEOPLE BUILD GHOST GUNS FROM KITS AT HOME, THEY CREATE A FIREARM THAT

                    CANNOT BE TRACED IF THEY DO NOT BRING IT TO A GUNSMITH TO BE SERIALIZED.

                    SO THIS IS A TOOL THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT WANTS TO HELP IN THEIR

                    ENFORCEMENT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WHAT LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    AGENCIES REACHED OUT TO YOU TO TELL YOU THAT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  VARIOUS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  CAN YOU JUST GIVE ME ONE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  NO?  OKAY, NO PROBLEM.  SO I

                    -- I'M A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN, AS I SAID --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  LAW ENFORCEMENT ACROSS THE

                    STATE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  EXCUSE ME?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  LAW ENFORCEMENT ACROSS THE

                    STATE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  SO, I'M A -- I'M A

                    LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN.  IF I PUT A GUN TOGETHER I WOULD ABSOLUTELY GO AND

                    HAVE IT SERIALIZED.  WHAT WILL THIS BILL DO TO AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WOULD

                    NOT DO THAT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IT DEPENDS.  IF THAT PERSON

                    KNOWS OR SHOULD KNOW THAT THIS GUN NEEDS TO BE SERIALIZED, THEN THERE

                    ARE VARIOUS PENALTIES.  IF, FOR EXAMPLE, YOU GO INTO YOUR ATTIC OR

                    BASEMENT AND YOU'RE NOT A LAWMAKER SO YOU DON'T KNOW OR YOU JUST

                                         138



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DON'T KNOW ABOUT THIS LAW WHEN IT GETS SIGNED -- THIS BILL WHEN IT GETS

                    SIGNED INTO LAW THEN, YOU KNOW, YOU GET A PASS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO DO YOU -- DO YOU BELIEVE

                    THAT SOMEBODY THAT WANTS TO COMMIT A CRIME AND CANNOT GET A -- A

                    FIREARM LEGALLY, DO YOU FEEL THIS BILL WILL HELP LOWER THOSE NUMBERS OF

                    GUN-RELATED ISSUES?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  HOW DO YOU -- HOW DO YOU

                    PLAN ON TELLING THE PERSON THAT'S GOING TO COMMIT THE CRIME WHO DOESN'T

                    FOLLOW THESE LAWS ANYWAY, HOW ARE YOU GOING TO GET THAT MESSAGE TO

                    THEM?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, I MEAN, THEY'RE ALREADY

                    WOULD BE -- THERE -- THERE ARE MANY WAYS, AS YOU KNOW, OF INFORMING

                    THE PUBLIC ABOUT NEWLY-ENACTED LAWS.  THERE ARE NEWSPAPER ARTICLES,

                    THERE'S A LOT OF SOCIAL MEDIA.  THERE'S NEWSLETTERS.  THERE ARE MANY

                    WAYS THAT WE ENSURE THAT THE PUBLIC IS AWARE OF BILLS THAT WE -- THAT WE

                    PASS INTO LAW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  AND I SAID -- AS I SAID

                    EARLIER, MADAM, THAT AS A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN I WILL ABIDE BY THOSE

                    LAWS.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THAT'S GOOD.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  BUT AN INDIVIDUAL THAT DOESN'T

                    REALLY CARE WILL NOT DO ANYTHING.  WE'LL CONTINUE TO MOVE IN THE

                    DIRECTION THEY WANT TO GO.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I SUPPOSE, THEN, THEY'LL HAVE

                                         139



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ADDITIONAL PENALTIES TO CONTEND WITH.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  I'M SORRY, I COULDN'T HEAR YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I SAID I IMAGINE THEY'LL HAVE

                    DIFFERENT PENALTIES TO CONTEND WITH, THEN.  ADDITIONAL PENALTIES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  BUT IF -- IF WE KNOW -- IF WE

                    DON'T KNOW THAT THEY HAVE THESE GUNS, HOW ARE WE GOING TO GO AFTER

                    THEM?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I SUGGEST YOU ASK LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT.  THEY HAVE A VERY ROBUST SYSTEM OF GOING AFTER PEOPLE

                    WHO USE GUNS, PEOPLE WHO -- YES, WE DO HAVE A ROBUST SYSTEM.  I'M

                    GOING TO TURN OFF MY VIDEO BECAUSE MY -- MY INTERNET IS -- MY VIDEO IS

                    -- IS LAGGING BEHIND MY VOICE.  SO, YOU KNOW, LAW ENFORCEMENT'S JOB IS

                    TO FIND FIREARMS, WHETHER THEY'RE -- AND WHEN THEY'RE USED TO TRY TO

                    TRACE THEM BACK TO THE PERPETRATOR.  AND SO LAW ENFORCEMENT WILL HAVE

                    TASKED TO THEM FINDING THESE GUNS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES

                    JUST A WEEK OR SO AGO SPOKE ON -- HE WAS A FORMER POLICE OFFICER, AND

                    THE DEFUNDING OF THEIR DEPARTMENT DOES NOT ALLOW THEIR CRIME UNIT TO

                    GO OUT AND LOOK FOR THOSE GUNS NOW.  AGAIN, WHAT WE'RE PUTTING A TASK

                    ON A POLICE OFFICER OR A POLICE DEPARTMENT OR THE STATE POLICE OR

                    WHOEVER WITHOUT ANY DIRECTION, AND WE'RE IN THE MINDSET OF -- OF THIS

                    COUNTRY AND THIS -- PARTIALLY IN THIS STATE OF DEFUNDING THESE POLICE

                    OFFICERS, AND I JUST DON'T SEE HOW THIS IS GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

                                 SO I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.  I -- I -- THANK YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I'LL EXPLAIN IT TO YOU, BUT THIS HAS

                                         140



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NOTHING TO DO WITH FUNDING OR DEFUNDING POLICE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  BUT -- BUT MADAM --

                    ASSEMBLYMEMBER ROSENTHAL, YOU JUST SAID WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THE

                    POLICE OFFICERS GO OUT AND DO THIS JOB.  HOW ARE THEY GOING TO DO THAT

                    WITHOUT FUNDING AND WITHOUT HAVING ENOUGH POLICE OFFICERS IN PLACE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THAT'S ALREADY -- THAT'S ALREADY

                    THEIR JOB.  IT'S ALREADY THEIR JOB.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  I -- I THANK YOU FOR

                    YOUR TIME, MADAM.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AS I STATED, MR. SPEAKER, THIS

                    BILL IS GREAT FOR LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS BECAUSE A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN LIKE

                    MANY, MANY GUN OWNERS WILL ABSOLUTELY DO THE RIGHT THING.  THIS BILL

                    DOES NOT ADDRESS ANYBODY THAT DOES THE WRONG THING.  AND WE CAN SEE

                    THAT THROUGHOUT OUR COUNTRY.  WE LOOK AT CHICAGO WHERE THERE ARE NO

                    GUNS ALLOWED IN CHICAGO, AND ABSOLUTELY ONE OF THE WORST MURDER RATES

                    IN OUR COUNTRY.  WE'RE NOT ADDRESSING THE ISSUE.  AGAIN, WE'RE BLAMING

                    THE GUN.  IT'S NOT THE GUN, IT'S THE SOCIAL DISFUNCTION OVER PEOPLE THAT

                    WANT TO SHOOT PEOPLE.  AND I'M SORRY, I CANNOT SUPPORT THIS BILL.  IT'S

                    GOING TO TAKE AGAIN ANOTHER ONE OF MY SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS

                    AWAY FROM ME BECAUSE IT'S GOING TO BE SO DIFFICULT.

                                 SO I WILL URGE MY COLLEAGUES ON THIS FLOOR TO REALLY

                    CONSIDER THIS.  THIS IS ABOUT -- YOU KNOW, WE TALK ABOUT OUR SECOND

                    AMENDMENT RIGHTS HERE ON THIS FLOOR, AND LOTS OF TIMES WE GET LAUGHED

                                         141



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AT, WE GET, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE SAY NOT SO NICE THINGS TO US.  JUST THINK

                    ABOUT THIS.  IF THIS COUNTRY DIDN'T HAVE GUNS WHEN WE BECAME A

                    COUNTRY, WE WOULD NOT BE A COUNTRY TODAY.  REALLY THINK ABOUT THAT.

                    AND THIS MORNING ON THE NEWS 100,000 INDIVIDUALS CAME ACROSS THE

                    BORDER IN MEXICO.  HOW MANY OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS ARE TERRORISTS?

                    HOW MANY OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS WANT TO HURT AMERICA?  I HOPE NONE OF

                    THEM, BUT THE POSSIBILITY IS THERE.  WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO DEFEND

                    OURSELVES.  WE NEED -- WE NEED TO BE ABLE TO DEFEND THIS COUNTRY.  SO

                    AGAIN, I JUST ASK, PLEASE CONSIDER THAT THIS DOESN'T FIX THE PROBLEM.

                    WE'RE JUST TRYING TO -- THIS WILL TAKE -- LEGAL GUN OWNERS, IT WILL TAKE

                    SOME OF THEIR GUNS AWAY.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. DIPIETRO.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  OKAY.  CAN YOU HEAR ME?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YES, WE CAN.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  OKAY, THANK YOU.  WOULD THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?  YOU NEED TO TURN UP YOUR SOUND OR SOMEBODY NEEDS TO

                    ACCELERATE YOUR SOUND, PLEASE.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  I AM ALL THE WAY UP.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  OKAY.  WE'LL SEE

                    WHAT WE CAN DO.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  YES.  I AM ALL THE WAY UP.  CAN YOU

                    HEAR ME?

                                         142



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YES.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL, WILL YOU YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL

                    YIELDS.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  THANK YOU, MRS. ROSENTHAL.  I'M

                    HAPPY TO HEAR THAT --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  MS. -- MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  SORRY, MS. ROSENTHAL.  I'M HAPPY TO

                    HEAR THAT HISTORICAL FIREARMS ARE EXEMPT IN THIS BILL.  THAT WOULD CAUSE

                    A LOT OF PROBLEMS.  A COUPLE THINGS THAT YOU MENTIONED.  YOU

                    MENTIONED THAT MOST PEOPLE THAT GET THESE GUNS CAN'T PASS A NICS

                    CHECK.  DO YOU HAVE ANY FACTS THAT CAN BACK UP THAT STATEMENT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WHAT I SAID WAS A -- WAS A FACT.

                    THAT IS WHY THEY ARE NOT OBTAINING A GUN THROUGH NORMAL MEANS,

                    NORMAL LEGAL MEANS.  THEY ARE CONSTRUCTING GUNS THAT CAN'T BE TRACED TO

                    THEM BECAUSE THEY COULD NOT PASS A BACKGROUND CHECK.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  BUT DO YOU HAVE FACTS THAT PEOPLE

                    THAT HAVE BEEN, SAY, ARRESTED WITH THOSE COULD NOT PASS A BACKGROUND

                    CHECK?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I CAN GET THAT FOR YOU.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  I WOULD LOVE IT.  I WOULD LOVE IT.

                    BECAUSE I DID SOME RESEARCH MYSELF ON THAT.

                                 ANOTHER QUESTION.  WE ALWAYS TALK ABOUT ASSAULT

                    RIFLES, ARS.  THE TERM AR, JUST OFF CHANCE, DO YOU KNOW WHAT AR

                                         143



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    STANDS FOR?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  ASSAULT RIFLE.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  INCORRECT.  BUT THAT'S OKAY.

                    NINETY-NINE PERCENT OF PEOPLE WHO HEAR THE TERM AR, THAT'S EXACTLY --

                    THEY SAY ASSAULT RIFLE OR AUTOMATIC RIFLE.  THE FACT IS IT STANDS FOR

                    ARMALITE RIFLE, WHICH IS THE NAME OF THE COMPANY BACK IN THE '40S --

                    OR LATE '30S OR '40S THAT ACTUALLY PRODUCED THE RIFLE.  SO IT'S -- IT'S

                    REPRESENTATIVE OF THE COMPANY ARMALITE THAT MAKES THE RIFLE.  BUT

                    THAT'S 99 PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE THINK IT STANDS FOR ASSAULT RIFLE OR

                    AUTOMATIC RIFLE, SO...  I APPRECIATE THAT.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    DIPIETRO.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  THIS IS JUST ANOTHER BLATANT ATTACK

                    ON OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS, SIR.  I FEEL THAT IT'S A DEATH OF A

                    THOUSAND CUTS AS WE KEEP GOING AFTER THE SECOND AMENDMENT.  YET I

                    LOOK AT PLACES LIKE CHICAGO AND NEW YORK CITY WHERE WE'VE CUT AND

                    DEFUNDED POLICE, WE'VE TAKEN AWAY THE RIGHTS OF OUR OFFICERS, OF THOSE

                    WHO TRY TO PROTECT US, AND ESPECIALLY IN NEW YORK STATE WE ARE

                    CONTINUALLY GIVING THE RIGHTS BACK TO THE -- NOT THE VICTIMS, BUT TO THE

                    PEOPLE WHO WILL ASSAULT US AND CAUSE US HARM INSTEAD OF LOCKING THEM

                    UP, WHERE I FEEL THEY SHOULD BE.  NEW YORK CITY HAS AN INCREDIBLE

                    AMOUNT OF -- OF VIOLENCE RIGHT NOW AND WE'RE NOT ATTACKING THE CAUSE.

                    BECAUSE YOU'RE NOT ALLOWED PISTOLS IN NEW YORK CITY, THESE WEAPONS

                    IN WESTERN NEW YORK.  I CAN'T TELL YOU HOW MANY MURDERS ARE NOT DONE

                                         144



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WITH LEGAL GUNS YET WE'RE TRYING TO TELL PEOPLE THAT IT'S THE LEGAL GUN

                    OWNER, AGAIN, WHO'S ALWAYS TO BLAME WHEN IT'S NOT.  IT'S BAD PEOPLE DO

                    BAD THINGS.

                                 ALSO, ON THIS BILL I TALKED TO A NUMBER OF GUN GROUPS

                    OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS WITH THIS BILL.  NO ONE'S BEEN CONTACTED.

                    THERE WAS NO GROUPS THAT WERE ABLE TO WEIGH IN ON THE PROCESS, ON THE

                    BILL ITSELF.  EVEN THE SPONSOR HERSELF COULDN'T ANSWER SOME OF THE

                    QUESTIONS.  AND I THINK IT'S NOT HER FAULT.  I THINK THERE'S A BASIC

                    MISUNDERSTANDING BETWEEN PEOPLE WHO ARE LEGITIMATE GUN OWNERS LIKE

                    MYSELF AND PEOPLE WHO JUST BLAME THE GUN FOR EVERYTHING.  UNTIL YOU

                    GET DOWN TO THE REAL MILLIONS AND MILLIONS AND MILLIONS OF GUN OWNERS

                    ARE TOTALLY LEGAL AND HAVE NEVER DONE A THING.  BUT WHEN YOU GET TO BAD

                    PEOPLE, THAT'S WHERE WE SHOULD BE CONCENTRATING OUR EFFORTS AT.  AND

                    AGAIN, AS I SAID, MOST PEOPLE, 99 PERCENT OF THE PEOPLE THINK AN AR

                    STANDS FOR AN AUTOMATIC RIFLE AND IT DOESN'T.  IT'S ACTUALLY THE NAME OF

                    THE COMPANY THAT PRODUCED THE RIFLE AND DESIGNED IT.  AND THAT'S -- I

                    THINK THAT GOES RIGHT BACK TO THE BASIC IGNORANCE OF FIREARMS.  AND TRUST

                    ME, AS I GO AROUND THE STATE AND HAVE BEEN SINCE I WAS ELECTED AND

                    ACTUALLY BEFORE I WAS ELECTED AS AN ADVOCATE FOR THE SECOND

                    AMENDMENT, I HAVE DEBATED THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE ON THIS ISSUE AND ON

                    FIREARMS AND IT'S JUST -- IT'S SAD BECAUSE A LOT OF PEOPLE JUST DON'T

                    UNDERSTAND WHAT THE REAL ISSUE IS.  WE HAVE -- MOST PEOPLE, I CAN TELL

                    YOU WHEN -- WHEN IT'S SAID THAT THESE PEOPLE CANNOT PASS NICS CHECKS

                    OR BACKGROUND CHECKS, THAT'S A BLATANT LIE BECAUSE I KNOW PEOPLE WHO

                    HAVE THESE.  A, YOU'VE GOT A LOT OF SPORTSMEN WHO ARE VERY

                                         145



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    COMPETITIVE, WHO ACTUALLY WILL MANUFACTURE THEIR OWN PROCESSES TO

                    MAKE THEIR FIREARM A LITTLE BIT BETTER.  AND YOU ALSO JUST HAVE THOSE WHO

                    ARE SO -- ESPECIALLY IN NEW YORK WHO ARE SO SICK AND TIRED OF THE

                    GOVERNMENT.  THEY DON'T WANT TO BE TRACED ON ANYTHING.  THEY CAN PASS

                    A NICS CHECK.  THEY WOULD PREFER NOT TO DO SOMETHING THROUGH THE

                    GOVERNMENT BECAUSE ONCE THEY DO, THE GOVERNMENT HAS THE ABILITY TO

                    COME AND TRACK THEM.  AND WE'VE SEEN THAT OVER AND OVER AND OVER

                    AGAIN.  SO, VOLUNTARY SURRENDER, I JUST DON'T UNDERSTAND WHERE THAT EVEN

                    COMES -- COMES INTO PLAY ON THIS BECAUSE IF YOU CAN'T TRACE BACK THESE

                    PARTS TO THE DIFFERENT GUN OWNERS WHO -- WHO USE THEM, THAT'S

                    RIDICULOUS.  THE -- WHAT ELSE DID WE HAVE HERE?  WHEN WE LOOK AT THE

                    NUMBER OF MURDERS IN NEW YORK STATE, NEW YORK CITY ESPECIALLY, WE

                    HAVE FOUND OUT THAT GHOST GUNS ARE NOT THE PROBLEM.  NAME ME HOW

                    MANY MURDERS WERE COMMITTED WITH GHOST GUNS BECAUSE I DON'T THINK

                    THERE'S HARDLY ANY.  ILLEGAL GUNS, YES.  AND THAT'S PROBABLY WHERE WE

                    NEED TO START, AND THAT'S GETTING ILLEGAL GUNS OUT OF THE HANDS OF PEOPLE

                    AND FINDING OUT HOW THEY'RE GETTING ILLEGAL GUNS.  BUT NOT AT THE

                    EXPENSE OF THE LEGAL GUN OWNER.  WE ALWAYS TALK ABOUT RIGHTS IN NEW

                    YORK STATE.  BUT YET WHEN IT COMES TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS,

                    ALL OF A SUDDEN OUR COUNTERPARTS TURN A BLIND AND DEAF EYE -- A DEAF EAR

                    TO ANY OF OUR RIGHTS WHEN IT COMES TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT.  AND

                    THAT'S VERY DISTURBING ALSO BECAUSE IT'S VERY HYPOCRITICAL.

                                 WE'VE GOT -- I JUST WANT TO SAY THAT THIS IS A BAD BILL.  I

                    DON'T THINK IT HOLDS ANY MERIT.  IF YOU WANTED TO GET RID OF THESE TYPES

                    OF FIREARMS THERE ARE OTHER WAYS YOU COULD HAVE DONE IT.  AND TO ME,

                                         146



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THIS BILL IS JUST ANOTHER BLATANT ATTACK ON OUR SECOND AMENDMENT

                    RIGHTS.  I WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING IT.  THERE'S -- IT'S LIKE SWISS CHEESE.  IT'S

                    FULL OF HOLES AND THERE'S NOTHING BEHIND IT.  AND I WILL BE URGING ALL OF

                    MY COLLEAGUES ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE TO RETHINK THE ENTIRE PROCESS

                    ABOUT LEGAL GUN OWNERS AND THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND WHAT IT

                    ACTUALLY STANDS FOR IN OUR COUNTRY.  LIKE I SAID, THE NUMBER ONE

                    PROBLEM IS IGNORANCE, AND IT'S JUST -- PEOPLE ARE NOT EDUCATED ENOUGH TO

                    REALIZE THAT IT STARTS WITH -- WHEN I JUST ASKED PEOPLE WHAT DOES AR --

                    AN AR-15, WHAT DOES THAT STAND FOR.  AND AGAIN, THAT'S A VERY BASIC

                    QUESTION BUT PEOPLE DON'T UNDERSTAND IT AND CAN'T ANSWER THAT QUESTION.

                    I'M GLAD TO AT LEAST BE ABLE TO TELL PEOPLE THAT WHEN THEY HEAR THE TERM

                    AR IT STANDS FOR ARMALITE.  IT'S THE COMPANY, IT'S NOT AN ASSAULT RIFLE.

                    AND ALSO MOST EVERYTHING ON -- ON AN AR-15 THAT WE BUY HAS NOTHING

                    TO DO WITH ASSAULT RIFLES OR A LEGAL DEFINITION OF A MILITARY-GRADE STYLE

                    WEAPON.

                                 SO I WISH -- I WISH MY COLLEAGUES WOULD VOTE THIS

                    DOWN AND PUT A MESSAGE AND GO BACK TO THE DRAWING BOARD.  THANK

                    YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  READ THE

                    LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE 14-A.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE POSITION

                                         147



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE WHO WOULD

                    LIKE TO VOTE IN FAVOR OF IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE

                    AND WE'LL MAKE SURE YOUR VOTE IS PROPERLY RECORDED.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SO NOTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN SUPPORT OF THIS

                    ITEM; HOWEVER, SHOULD COLLEAGUES DESIRE TO BE AN EXCEPTION THEY

                    SHOULD FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE WILL

                    PROPERLY RECORD YOUR VOTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I RISE

                    TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  JOSE WEBSTER IS NOT HERE TO TELL YOU ABOUT THE

                    NIGHT HE WAS MURDERED, SO I WILL.  JOSE WAS A 16-YEAR-OLD LIVING IN THE

                    BRONX WITH HIS MOTHER WHEN HE WAS SHOT 15 TIMES WHILE HE WALKED HIS

                    GIRLFRIEND HOME.  IT DIDN'T MATTER THAT IT WASN'T EVEN 9:00 P.M. AND THAT

                    THE WALK WAS ONE HE HAD TAKEN SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE.  HE WAS SHOT BY

                    TWO MEN WHO WERE EACH ARMED WITH A GUN.  I WOULD LOVE TO SAY THAT

                    JOSE WAS AN ANOMALY, THAT CHILDREN ARE SAFE FROM GUN VIOLENCE, BUT WE

                                         148



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    KNOW THAT IS NOT TRUE.  EVEN IN A GLOBAL PANDEMIC, THERE WERE 19,379

                    GUN VIOLENCE DEATHS IN THIS COUNTRY.  THIS YEAR, NINE FRESHMEN AT

                    MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS WHO WERE MURDERED IN SCHOOL WOULD HAVE

                    JOINED THEIR CLASSMATES TODAY TO GRADUATE FROM HIGH SCHOOL.  INSTEAD,

                    THEIR -- THEIR FAMILIES ARE MOURNING THEIR DEATH ONCE AGAIN.

                                 IN NEW YORK STATE, WE HAVE A DUTY AND A

                    RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT ALL GUNS ARE SERIALIZED AND TRACEABLE, THAT

                    PEOPLE CANNOT HARBOR ASSEMBLED GUNS THAT THEY WILL USE TO COMMIT

                    CRIMES AND THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT CANNOT TRACE.  THIS IS NOT ABOUT WHO'S

                    CROSSING THE BORDER AND THIS IS NOT ABOUT THE SECOND AMENDMENT.  THIS

                    IS ABOUT KEEPING NEW YORKERS SAFE FROM GUN VIOLENCE.  I HAVE

                    CONFERRED DEEPLY WITH A LOT OF GROUPS AND I WOULD LIKE TO THANK NEW

                    YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE, EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY, BRADY

                    UNITED, GIFFORDS, AND MOMS DEMAND ACTION FOR GUN SENSE IN

                    AMERICA, AS WELL AS UNITED NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSES FOR INVESTING THEIR

                    TIME, ENERGY, AND INTELLECT IN TRYING TO RID US OF THE SCOURGE OF GUN

                    VIOLENCE.  I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  THANK YOU, SIR.  ON THE -- TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YES, SIR.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT ALL THE

                    GROUPS THAT I HAVE SPOKEN WITH FROM THE NRA TO A NUMBER OF LOCAL

                                         149



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GUN GROUPS, TO THE NEW GROUP IN ROCHESTER THAT'S COMING TO NEW YORK

                    STATE FROM AROUND THE COUNTRY THAT THEY ARE ALL OPPOSED TO THIS, AND I

                    WOULD JUST LIKE TO REFERENCE THAT THE -- THE GROUPS THAT WERE JUST

                    MENTIONED, EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS AN ANTI-GUN GROUP.  NEW

                    YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE IS AN EXTREMELY LEFTIST LIBERAL ANTI-GUN

                    GROUP.  I'VE HAD THEM IN MY OFFICE, I'VE SPOKEN WITH THEM.  THEY

                    WOULD NEVER -- THEY WOULD NEVER SUPPORT ANY PRO-GUN INITIATIVE.

                                 SO I'D JUST LIKE TO SAY THAT AGAIN, WHEN THERE'S ONLY 30

                    TO 70 TO WHATEVER THERE WERE, GHOST GUNS IN NEW YORK STATE OR AROUND

                    THE COUNTRY, THOSE ARE NOT THE PROBLEM.  THERE'S OTHER ISSUES, AND I

                    WOULD JUST LIKE OUR MEMBERS TO VOTE NO AGAINST THIS.  AS I REITERATED

                    EARLIER, THIS IS A HORRIBLE BILL AND IT IS A DEFINITE, DEFINITE, DEFINITE ATTACK

                    ON OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN

                    HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  BY THE

                    DEFINITION PROVIDED IN THE BILL, A GHOST GUN IS IDENTIFIED AS AN

                    UNSERIALIZED FIREARM.  IT IS ALREADY ILLEGAL TO POSSESS AN UNREGISTERED

                    FIREARM UNDER THE PENAL LAW AS A CLASS E FELONY.  AS A GHOST GUN HAS

                    NO SERIAL NUMBER, IT WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO BE REGISTERED, THUS ANYONE IN

                    POSSESSION OF A GHOST GUN UNDER THIS BILL'S OWN DEFINITION WOULD

                    ALREADY BE IN VIOLATION OF A CLASS E FELONY OFFENSE.  IT IS UNCLEAR WHAT

                    THIS BILL ACCOMPLISHES THAT THE CURRENT LAW DOES NOT.  I'LL BE VOTING IN

                    THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH IN THE

                                         150



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU WOULD PLEASE RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. SANTABARBARA

                    AND MRS. BARRETT IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS ONE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  THANK

                    YOU, MA'AM.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE VOTES ON THE FLOOR, PLEASE RECORD MR. RA AND MR. SMITH IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED, THANK YOU.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 17, RULES REPORT NO. 423, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S00013-A, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 423, SENATOR KAPLAN (LAVINE, STERN, STECK, GRIFFIN, PAULIN, SIMON,

                    RAMOS, DINOWITZ, BENEDETTO, HEVESI, CYMBROWITZ, GALEF, NOLAN,

                    JACOBSON, SEAWRIGHT, BURDICK, THIELE, SILLITTI, GOTTFRIED, ENGLEBRIGHT,

                    ZEBROWSKI, L. ROSENTHAL, CARROLL, JEAN-PIERRE, OTIS, EPSTEIN, PERRY,

                    FAHY, ABINANTI, ZINERMAN, RICHARDSON--A02666A).  AN ACT TO AMEND

                    THE PENAL LAW, IN RELATION TO ENACTING THE "SCOTT J. BEIGEL UNFINISHED

                    RECEIVER ACT" IN RELATION TO UNFINISHED FRAMES OR RECEIVERS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. -- EXPLANATION IS

                                         151



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REQUESTED, MR. LAVINE.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  CERTAINLY.  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU

                    VERY MUCH.  SO TRADITIONAL FIREARMS ARE MADE BY LICENSED COMPANIES

                    AND THEY ARE THEN PURCHASED FROM LICENSED GUN DEALERS.  ALL GUNS

                    MANUFACTURED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND EVERY FIREARM THAT'S

                    IMPORTED IS -- ARE LEGALLY REQUIRED, THEY ARE LEGALLY REQUIRED TO HAVE TO

                    SERIAL NUMBERS AFFIXED TO THEM.  IN CONTRAST, A GHOST GUN IS

                    MANUFACTURED IN PARTS AND CAN BE ASSEMBLED AT THE HOME OF AN

                    UNLICENSED BUYER.  THERE IS NO NEED TO PASS A BACKGROUND CHECK TO

                    OBTAIN THE COMPONENTS OF A GHOST GUN.  THEY ARE SOLD ONLINE IN

                    DO-IT-YOURSELF KITS.  THE KEY SELLING POINT FOR MANY PURCHASERS IS THAT

                    GHOST GUNS DON'T HAVE SERIAL NUMBERS, THE CRITICAL PIECE OF INFORMATION

                    THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES USE TO TRACE THE GUN FROM THE

                    MANUFACTURER TO THE DEALER TO THE ORIGINAL PURCHASERS.  GHOST GUNS ARE

                    UNTRACEABLE AND BECAUSE OF HOW THEY ARE SOLD AS PARTS THAT NEED TO BE

                    ASSEMBLED, UNDER CURRENT RULES THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO,

                    FIREARMS AND EXPLOSIVES DOES NOT, I REPEAT, DOES NOT TREAT THEM AS IT

                    WOULD TRADITIONAL FIREARMS.  THESE ARE EASY TO ASSEMBLE AND THEY ARE

                    CHEAP.  AN AR-15 BUILD KIT CAN COST AS LITTLE AS $345.  INTERESTINGLY

                    ENOUGH, THE TOP FIVE INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEOS ON YOUTUBE FOR BUILDING A

                    GHOST GUN HAVE DRAWN MORE FOR THREE MILLION VIEWERS.

                                 MANY GHOST GUNS -- WELL, LET ME SAY THIS:  BACK IN

                    FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR WHEN WE HAD OUR BUDGET HEARING WITH THE STATE

                    SENATE, IT WAS ON FEBRUARY THE 10TH, THE DIRECTOR -- THE SUPERINTENDENT,

                    RATHER, OF THE NEW YORK STATE DIVISION OF POLICE, KEVIN BRUEN, SAID

                                         152



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THAT IF THIS WAS YEARS AGO, HE WOULDN'T BE CONCERNED ABOUT GHOST GUNS.

                    BUT HE'S VERY CONCERNED TODAY ABOUT GHOST GUNS.  AS OF YESTERDAY

                    AFTERNOON, 256 MASS SHOOTINGS HAD OCCURRED IN OUR COUNTRY THIS YEAR,

                    LEAVING 291 DEAD AND 1,055 WOUNDED, INCLUDING A TEN-YEAR-OLD ON A --

                    IN HIS HOME IN FAR ROCKAWAY IN QUEENS.  WE CAN SEE THE WRITING ON

                    THE WALL.  THE WRITING IS THERE, AND THE WRITING IS NOT PLEASANT.  BUT THE

                    WRITING PRESENTS A CLEAR AND A PRESENT AND AN IMMINENT DANGER TO

                    EVERYONE IN OUR NATION, AND THAT'S WHY THIS BILL HAS BEEN INTRODUCED.

                                 THE SPECIFICS OF THE BILL ARE THAT IT'S CALLED THE SCOTT J.

                    BEIGEL UNFINISHED RECEIVER ACT.  IT ADDS A NEW SUBDIVISION TO THE

                    PENAL LAW DEFINING AN UNFINISHED FRAME OR RECEIVER.  IT MAKES IT

                    ILLEGAL, IT MAKES IT A MISDEMEANOR TO HAVE ONE OF THESE THINGS UNLESS

                    SOMEONE'S A LICENSED GUNSMITH, AND IT ALSO MAKES IT ILLEGAL TO SELL

                    THEM.  SO ANYONE WHO SELLS UP TO NINE OF THEM IS GOING TO BE CONVICTED

                    OF AN E FELONY, PUNISHABLE BY UP TO FOUR YEARS IN JAIL, AND ANYONE WHO

                    SELLS TEN OR MORE IS GOING TO BE CONVICTED OF A CLASS D FELONY,

                    PUNISHABLE BY UP TO SEVEN YEARS IN JAIL.

                                 SO I THINK THAT, IN SUM AND SUBSTANCE, DESCRIBES OUR

                    PRESENT PLIGHT, AND IT IS A TRAGEDY THAT IS OCCURRING IN THE UNITED STATES

                    OF AMERICA, AND IT DESCRIBES THE PORTIONS AND SECTIONS OF THIS PARTICULAR

                    BILL.  ANY QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GALLAHAN.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL

                    MR. LAVINE YIELD?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  OF COURSE.

                                         153



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAVINE, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  OF COURSE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAVINE YIELDS,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU, SIR.  READING THIS,

                    I'M CONFUSED.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, LET ME DO WHAT I CAN TO EASE

                    YOUR --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  IT'S ABOUT -- YEAH, IT'S ABOUT AS

                    CLEAR AS MUD.  I HAVE SOME QUESTIONS THAT YOU CAN HOPEFULLY CLARIFY FOR

                    ME.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I THINK SO.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  IF I WANT TO BUY CURRENTLY ON THE

                    BLACK MARKET OR WHEREVER, A GHOST RECEIVER, HOW DO I GO ABOUT DOING

                    THAT?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU CAN DO IT ONLINE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  SO I CAN HAVE A GHOST RECEIVER

                    MAILED TO ME ORDERING ONLINE?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  IT'S EASY TO ASSEMBLE.  THEY COME IN

                    KITS, THEN SOMETIMES THEY COME WITH --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I UNDERSTAND THAT, I UNDERSTAND

                    THAT.  I JUST WANT TO KNOW --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I'M SORRY, SIR.  I'M SORRY.  MAY I FINISH

                                         154



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ANSWER THE QUESTION -- ANSWERING THE QUESTION?

                                 THEY ARE CHEAP, THEY COME IN KITS, THEY COME WITH

                    JIGS THAT YOU CAN USE TO ASSIST YOU TO DRAW THE -- TO DRILL THE HOLES IN THE

                    RIGHT POSITIONS.  IT'S VERY EASY --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I UNDERSTAND ALL THAT.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THE COMPANY --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I UNDERSTAND ALL THAT.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THE COMPANIES ADVERTISE -- THE

                    COMPANIES ADVERTISE ONLINE YOU CAN DO THIS IN 15 MINUTES --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I UNDERSTAND ALL THAT --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  -- DO YOU THINK IT'S A GOOD IDEA?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I UNDER -- I UNDERSTAND THAT

                    COMPLETELY.  I DON'T KNOW, I PERSONALLY, BEING A LAW-ABIDING CITIZEN, I

                    DON'T KNOW WHERE TO GET A GHOST RECEIVER.  BUT I DO KNOW WHERE I CAN

                    GET A RECEIVER, OBTAIN A RECEIVER, PUT A FIREARM TOGETHER MYSELF, A

                    RECEIVER THAT'S GOT A SERIAL NUMBER ON IT THROUGH AN FFL.  DO YOU KNOW

                    WHAT FFL IS?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I'M -- I'M SORRY.  CAN YOU SPEAK UP?

                    YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT A FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSE?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  YES, SIR.  SO YOU CAN --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YES, I AM.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  SO YOU CAN RECEIVE -- YOU BUY A

                    LOWER -- YOU BUY A LOWER FROM A FEDERAL FIREARMS DEALER.  THE LOWER --

                    THE LOWER IS -- IS NOT FINISHED.  THE REASON IT'S NOT FINISHED IS BECAUSE

                    THE -- THE SHOOTER, AND I'M GOING TO TALK ABOUT A SHOOTER THAT IS

                                         155



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    COMPETITION SHOOTING.  HE'S GOT A 6.5 MILLIMETER CREEDMOOR AND HE'S

                    SHOOTING 1,000 YARDS IN A COMPETITION.  HE NEEDS THAT GUN AS ACCURATE

                    AS HE CAN GET IT.  SO HE ORDERS THE LOWER THROUGH HIS FFL.  IT'S NOT

                    FINISHED.  THE LOWER IS NOT FINISHED.  HE'S GOING TO FINISH THE LOWER OR

                    SHE'S GOING TO FINISH THE LOWER HERSELF.  BUT THE LOWER HAS ACTUALLY GOT A

                    SERIAL NUMBER ON IT.  IS THAT CONSIDERED, UNDER THIS BILL, PART OF A GHOST

                    GUN KIT?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU KNOW THAT'S -- THAT'S A QUESTION

                    THAT EVENTUALLY IS GOING TO HAVE TO BE, I SUPPOSE, ANSWERED BY A -- BY A

                    JUDGE.  AND I DON'T WANT TO PREJUDGE WHAT A -- WHAT A JUDGE IS GOING TO

                    DO.  I THINK THE IMPORTANT THRUST OF WHAT WE ARE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH

                    HERE, IN ADDITION TO SAVING LIVES, IS TO MAKE SURE THAT FIREARMS ARE

                    SERIALIZED.  AND I THINK YOU'D AGREE WITH ME THAT THAT'S A GOOD IDEA,

                    WOULDN'T YOU?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  ALL MY FIREARMS ARE SERIALIZED,

                    EVERY ONE OF THEM, EVERY FIREARM I OWN.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT ALL YOUR --

                    YOUR FIREARMS, BECAUSE I DON'T KNOW THAT I HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT YOU.

                    BUT THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE WE HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  SO I -- I --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU AND I --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I HAVE A FEW MORE QUESTIONS --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU AND I -- YOU AND I SHARE THAT

                    OPINION.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  A FEW MORE QUESTIONS I HAVE.

                                         156



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THE NEXT QUESTION I HAVE IS, SO I OBTAIN THAT LOWER AND I ORDER MY

                    TRIGGER KIT, AND I DUST UP MY TRIGGER KIT TO MAKE SURE IT'S GOT A ONE --

                    ONE-AND-A-HALF POUND PULL ON IT.  AND I HAVE TO ASSEMBLE THAT INTO THE

                    ASSEMBLY THAT I ORDERED WHICH, BY THE WAY, HAS A SERIAL NUMBER ON IT.

                    SO I HAVE TO MODIFY THAT.  SO THAT -- THAT -- THAT LOWER COMES AND I HAVE

                    TO MODIFY IT TO GET MY TRIGGER KIT INTO THAT LOWER.  AND THEN I HAVE TO

                    PUT A FIRING PIN IN IT.  AND YOU CAN OWN A MULTITUDE OF DIFFERENT FIRING

                    PINS, WITH COATING ON THEM SO THAT THEY DON'T DETERIORATE AS QUICKLY AS A

                    STANDARD FIRING PIN, BECAUSE IN COMPETITION YOU'RE SHOOTING TENS OF

                    THOUSANDS OF ROUNDS.  SO WHEN I ORDER THESE COMPONENT PARTS, ARE

                    THESE COMPONENT PARTS GOING TO BE CONSIDERED ILLEGAL TO PUT INTO MY

                    RECEIVER THAT I HAVE TO MODIFY TO PUT THESE COMPONENT PARTS INTO?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, THAT MIGHT DEPEND ON YOUR --

                    ON THE PARTICULAR INTENT OF ANY PARTICULAR INDIVIDUAL.  BUT I WOULD TEND

                    TO THINK THAT THE THRUST, AS I HAVE DISCUSSED WITH YOU JUST MOMENTS AGO,

                    OF THIS BILL IS TO MAKE SURE THAT FIREARMS ARE SERIALIZED.  AND YOU AGREE

                    WITH ME ON THAT, DO YOU NOT?  I'M SURE YOU DO.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  MY NEXT QUESTION WOULD BE, I GO

                    FROM A 6.5 CREEDMOOR TO A .22 LONG RIFLE COMPETITION WITH THE SAME

                    FRAME AND I COULD CHANGE -- INTERCHANGE THAT LOWER WITH THE SAME

                    FRAME TO SHOOT THE .22 WHICH I'M GOING TO BUY AND PUT INTO THAT LOWER.

                    ARE THOSE PARTS ALSO GOING TO BE CONSIDERED ILLEGAL?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I THINK IF YOU READ THE BILL YOU'LL

                    COME TO YOUR OWN CONCLUSION, WHICH MIGHT ACTUALLY GIVE YOU SOME

                    MEASURE OF -- OF COMFORT.

                                         157



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I READ THE BILL.  THE BILL TO ME IS

                    CLEAR AS MUD, SO IT DIDN'T DO ME ANY GOOD.  IT -- IT CERTAINLY MAKES IT

                    DIFFICULT FOR A SHOOTER TO GAIN A COMPETITIVE EDGE IF HE CAN'T GET HIS

                    COMPONENTS LEGALLY.  THAT'S -- THAT IS A HUGE INDUSTRY THAT'S OUT THERE.

                    THERE'S TENS OF THOUSANDS OF SHOOTERS ACROSS THIS COUNTRY.  THERE'S

                    THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF THEM RIGHT HERE IN NEW YORK WITH GUN

                    RANGES -- RANGING FROM BUFFALO TO -- TO WESTCHESTER.  SO IT -- IT DIDN'T

                    REALLY MAKE ANY -- ANY SENSE TO ME.  THIS -- THIS -- IT WOULD PREVENT

                    COMPETITIVE SHOOTERS FROM MODIFYING THEIR FIREARMS THE WAY I LOOK AT

                    IT.  AND -- AND I'M -- I'M ALSO WONDERING, HAVE YOU -- HAVE YOU SPOKE

                    TO ANY MEMBERS OR ANY OFFICIALS FROM S.C.O.P.E. ABOUT -- ABOUT THIS?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU KNOW, I AM NOT SURE BECAUSE I'VE

                    SPOKEN TO MANY PEOPLE ABOUT THIS PARTICULAR BILL AND MANY ARE -- AND

                    HAVE BEEN MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION, AND ALMOST

                    EVERYONE I'VE SPOKEN WITH FAVORS THIS PARTICULAR BILL.  BUT LET ME RETURN

                    JUST FOR A MOMENT TO YOUR OBSERVATION THAT YOU HAD READ THE BILL AND IT'S

                    AS CLEAR AS MUD AND THEN YOU WERE CONCERNED AROUND REPLACING FIRING

                    PINS AND USE A -- GOING FROM A .22 LONG FROM SOME OTHER FIREARM.  I'D

                    SIMPLY SUGGEST, MY FRIEND, THAT YOU READ THE BILL AGAIN.  AND YOU MAY

                    WANT TO REST EASY BECAUSE I DON'T THINK THE BILL INTERFERES WITH YOUR

                    SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT OR ANYONE ELSE'S SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I -- I THINK THE BILL IS -- IS OVERLY

                    VAGUE AND -- AND I -- I DON'T THINK IT'S A GOOD BILL AT ALL.  HAVE YOU --

                    YOU DID -- YOU SAY -- YOU MENTIONED YOU HAD SPOKE WITH -- WITH THE

                    NRA.  CAN -- DO YOU KNOW -- DO YOU KNOW WHO YOU SPOKE WITH?

                                         158



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I HAVE SPOKEN TO MANY -- MANY

                    MEMBERS OF THE NRA WHO ARE CERTAINLY NOT IN FAVOR OF THE NRA'S

                    POSITIONS, AND I'M SURE YOU HAVE AS WELL, HAVE YOU NOT?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I -- I AM A -- I'M ACTUALLY ON THE

                    BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR S.C.O.P.E. AND EVERY SINGLE PERSON THAT I'VE

                    SPOKEN TO FROM S.C.O.P.E. IS AGAINST THIS LEGISLATION.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  SO --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I'M A LIFE MEMBER OF THE NRA

                    AND MANY MEMBERS THAT I TALK TO ON A REGULAR BASIS, THE E-MAILS THAT I'M

                    GETTING IN MY DISTRICT OFFICE, I HAVE NOT HAD ONE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    LEGISLATION.  I'M ALSO A MEMBER OF THE NEW YORK STATE PISTOL AND RIFLE

                    ASSOCIATION.  I'M WONDERING IF YOU HAVE -- MAY HAVE TALKED TO THOSE

                    FOLKS?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, THAT'S THE -- THE NRA'S

                    WHOLLY-OWNED NEW YORK STATE SUBSIDIARY.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  YEAH --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  HAVE YOU SPOKEN WITH THEM?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE?  I HAVE -- I AM

                    SURE I HAVE SPOKEN --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THERE'S A BIG DIFFERENCE.  THEY'RE

                    LOCATED RIGHT HERE IN NEW YORK STATE --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YEAH -- YES.  YES.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THEY REPRESENT PEOPLE FROM NEW

                    YORK STATE, THAT'S WHY THEY CALL IT THE NEW YORK STATE PISTOL AND RIFLE

                                         159



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ASSOCIATION.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  BUT YOUR PHILOSOPHY, WHICH IS THE

                    PHILOSOPHY THAT ADVANCES THE NRA'S NO COMPROMISE POSITION IS THE

                    PHILOSOPHY THAT IS KILLING THOUSANDS OF NEW YORKERS AND THOUSANDS OF

                    -- EXCUSE ME, THOUSANDS OF AMERICANS.  IS THIS YOUR ANSWER -- IS THIS

                    YOUR ANSWER TO THIS CRISIS THAT WE FACE?  MORE GUNS?  HOW LONG IS IT

                    GOING TO TAKE US TO LEARN THE LESSON THAT THERE ARE TOO MANY GUNS?  TOO

                    MANY GUNS.  AND WHEN YOU HAVE TOO MANY GUNS, TOO MANY ARE GOING

                    TO FALL INTO THE HANDS OF PEOPLE WHO SHOULD NEVER BE NEAR A GUN IN THE

                    FIRST PLACE.  NEVER NEAR A FIREARM.  SO WHAT'S YOUR ANSWER TO THIS

                    DILEMMA?  MORE GUNS?

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  WHAT'S -- WHAT'S YOUR ANSWER TO

                    MORE GUNS?  HOW DO YOU -- HOW -- WHAT'S YOUR ANSWER TO JUST STOPPING

                    MORE GUNS?  WHAT'S YOUR ANSWER TO THAT?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I DON'T -- I DON'T UNDER --

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THIS BILL?  THIS BILL?  THIS BILL?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THIS BILL WILL MAKE IT MUCH MORE

                    DIFFICULT FOR PEOPLE TO ASSEMBLE THESE DO-IT-YOURSELF FIREARMS AT HOME.

                    THE IDEA IS THAT -- OBVIOUSLY, YOU AGREE WITH THIS, WE WANT TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT FIREARMS ARE SERIALIZED.  YOU KNOW, A PREVIOUS SPEAKER HAD

                    SPOKEN AND -- AND I DIDN'T HEAR YOU OR ANYONE ELSE TAKE ISSUE WITH HIM

                    WITH RESPECT TO PEOPLE HATING THE GOVERNMENT.  AND THE -- THAT THEY --

                    THEY DON'T WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO KNOW HOW MANY GUNS THEY'VE GOT.

                    YOU KNOW, I COULD USE THE OLD GROUCHO MARX LINE HERE, I REST MY CASE.

                    THERE'S A CRISIS IN THIS COUNTRY.  WHAT IS YOUR SOLUTION?

                                         160



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THERE IS A

                    CRISIS --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU HAVE NONE.  YOU HAVE NONE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  -- IN THIS COUNTRY.  THE CRISIS IN

                    THIS COUNTRY IS NOT GUNS.  THE CRISIS IN THIS COUNTRY IS EDUCATION.  AND

                    -- AND PLAIN AND SIMPLE, IF IN NEW YORK STATE, FOR EXAMPLE, IF WE HAD

                    MANDATORY FIREARMS TRAINING EDUCATION IN EVERY SCHOOL, YOU WOULD SEE

                    THIS -- THIS CRISIS THAT YOU'RE REFERRING TO DIMINISH GREATLY.  IT WOULD

                    DIMINISH GREATLY.  EDUCATION IS -- IS THE -- IS THE ANSWER TO MOST OF THE

                    PROBLEMS THAT WE FACE AND IF WE COULD EDUCATE OUR YOUNG CHILDREN AND

                    OUR -- AND OUR MIDDLE-AGED FOLKS THAT ARE OUT THERE WITH GUNS BEFORE

                    THEY -- BEFORE THEY GO OUT AND -- AND COME TO THE RANGE, WHEN THEY

                    COME TO THE RANGE THEY HAVE TO BE EDUCATED.  THEY HAVE TO GO THROUGH

                    TRAINING.  TRAINING AND EDUCATION IS PARAMOUNT IN SOLVING THIS PROBLEM.

                    THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU.  I -- I THINK THAT THIS

                    BILL IS -- IS WAY TOO VAGUE.  IT WILL MAKE A CRIMINAL -- THE WAY I READ IT,

                    IT'LL MAKE A CRIMINAL OUT OF ME, JUST TRYING TO PUT TOGETHER WHAT I --

                    WHAT I CURRENTLY HAVE AND MAINTAIN WHAT I CURRENTLY HAVE IN ORDER TO

                    COMPETITIVELY SHOOT.  I -- I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THIS IS -- ON A LOWER

                    THAT I BUY FROM AN FFL THAT'S GOT A SERIAL NUMBER ON IT BUT IS NOT

                    FINISHED MAKES ME A CRIMINAL.  AND THERE'S -- THERE'S TOO MANY

                                         161



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LOOPHOLES THAT I SEE IN THIS BILL AND I CERTAINLY CAN'T SUPPORT IT AND I

                    WOULD ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE ASSEMBLYMAN FROM THE 13TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT FROM NASSAU

                    COUNTY YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAVINE, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THE ASSEMBLYMEMBER FROM THE 13TH

                    ASSEMBLY DISTRICT IN NASSAU COUNTY WHO GREW UP HUNTING AND

                    SHOOTING IN THE UPPER PENINSULA OF MICHIGAN, SIR, WILL BE HAPPY TO

                    ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, I'M -- I'M SURE THOSE LAWS IN

                    MICHIGAN ARE A BIT DIFFERENT THAN WE HAVE IN NEW YORK STATE AND --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, EVERY STATE -- EVERY STATE --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND THAT -- THAT LIGHT OF A -- THAT

                    TIME HAS LAPSED SINCE YOUR CHILDHOOD, I'M SURE.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  AS YOU KNOW, THE FIREARMS LAWS IN

                    EVERY STATE ARE -- ARE DIFFERENT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  INDEED.  WELL, THANK YOU VERY

                    MUCH FOR ALLOWING ME TO ASK A FEW QUESTIONS.  I WANT TO SPECIFICALLY

                    DIG INTO SOME OF THE TECHNICAL DETAILS OF THE BILL, BECAUSE THIS IS

                    ACTUALLY QUITE A TECHNICAL BILL, IF YOU WILL.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YES, IT IS.

                                         162



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  NOW, YOU JUST MENTIONED GROWING

                    UP IN MICHIGAN, BUT WHERE DID YOU GET YOUR EXPERTISE IN FIREARMS

                    NOMENCLATURE IN ORDER TO CRAFT THIS BILL?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, LET ME SHARE THIS WITH YOU, MY

                    FRIENDS.  I -- I WAS HUNTING MANY TIMES AS A YOUNGER PERSON, BUT NOW

                    THAT THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS HAS RUN, NEVER LEGALLY.  AS A MATTER OF

                    FACT -- WELL, I'LL SAVE THOSE STORIES FOR ANOTHER TIME.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, THANK YOU.  I'D CERTAINLY

                    INVITE YOU TO THE ADIRONDACKS ON A HUNTING TRIP IF YOU'D LIKE TO TAKE UP

                    THE PASTIMES OF YOUR YOUTH --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  NO, I'VE BEEN AT BEAR CAMPS, I GET IT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  IT'D BE VERY -- IT'D BE VERY

                    BENEFICIAL.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  I GET IT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND THE REASON I SAY THAT IS IS THAT

                    I -- I HAVE SOME -- SOME REAL CONCERNS ABOUT THIS IS, IN YOUR MIND WHAT

                    IS A RECEIVER UNDER THIS BILL?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  IF YOU READ THE BILL --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I -- I'VE READ IT TEN TIMES.  I -- I

                    WANT YOU TO SAY IN PUBLIC WHAT A RECEIVER IS, SIR.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THEN I THINK WHAT YOU WANT TO DO IS

                    YOU WANT TO READ LINES 5 TO 12 OF THE BILL AND I THINK THAT YOU'LL BE ABLE

                    TO READILY UNDERSTAND WHAT A RECEIVER IS.  I SUSPECT YOU KNOW WHAT A

                    RECEIVER IS; AM I CORRECT?

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I AM, IN FACT I -- I DO HAVE A LITTLE

                                         163



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    BIT OF EXPERIENCE WITH -- WITH WEAPONS AND WEAPONS SYSTEMS BECAUSE

                    --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, WE'RE -- WE'RE TALKING -- TALKING

                    ABOUT FIREARMS HERE.  VERY OFTEN WHEN I USE THAT WORD WEAPONS IN A

                    DISCUSSION WITH A -- A GUN -- GUN ADVOCATES, I'M CORRECTED.  SO I WANT

                    TO MAKE SURE THAT -- ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT FIREARMS OR WEAPONS OR

                    BOTH?

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  UNDER NEW YORK STATE LAW I'M

                    SPEAKING OF FIREARMS.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  GOOD.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  HOW -- NOW, HOW DO YOU ALSO NET

                    THIS -- NEST THIS UNDER FEDERAL LAW, BECAUSE YOU ACTUALLY DO MENTION

                    FEDERAL LAW IN YOUR BILL.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU KNOW, THAT'S AN INTERESTING POINT.

                    AND IT'S NOT AS IF WE HAVE NOT DONE THAT BEFORE ANY NUMBER OF TIMES IN

                    LEGISLATION IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.  AND I'D DIRECT YOUR ATTENTION,

                    ALTHOUGH I HAVEN'T HAD A CHANCE TO FULLY RESEARCH THIS, BUT JUST, MY

                    FRIEND, OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD, WHEN WE DEFINE DRUG OFFENSES, WE ALSO

                    REFER TO FEDERAL... SCHEDULES OF -- OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.  THAT'S

                    CORRECT, ISN'T IT?

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO IF WE'RE GOING TO FOLLOW FEDERAL

                    LAW IN TERMS OF HOW WE DESCRIBE OFFENSES AND HOW WE ARE GOING TO

                    LOOK AT THESE -- THESE ACTUAL -- THESE FIREARMS, WHY DON'T WE JUST FOLLOW

                    THE EXISTING FEDERAL AND STATE LAW?  WOULDN'T THAT SUFFICE IN THIS CASE?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL, YOU KNOW VERY WELL THAT THE

                                         164



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ATF, NOW IT'S THE BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, FIREARMS AND

                    EXPLOSIVES, DOES NOT VIEW THESE GHOST -- GHOST GUN KITS AS BEING

                    ILLEGAL, AND THEY'RE NOT ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK STATE --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  ARE THEY?  I MEAN, I HEARD FROM ONE

                    OF YOUR COLLEAGUES THAT THEY WERE ILLEGAL AND THEN I HEARD FROM ANOTHER

                    OF YOUR COLLEAGUES THAT THEY WEREN'T ILLEGAL.  SO PERHAPS I'M CONFUSED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, CERTAINLY FIREARMS WITHOUT

                    SERIAL NUMBERS ARE NOT LEGAL IN NEW YORK STATE.  THAT'S -- THAT'S A FACT.

                    THAT'S WHAT -- WHAT ACTUALLY EXISTS TODAY.  NOW, YOU'D MENTIONED 256

                    MASS SHOOTINGS.  HOW MANY OF THOSE WERE BY -- WERE DONE WITH GHOST

                    GUNS?

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YOU KNOW, IT'S INTERESTING THAT YOU

                    ASKED THAT QUESTION, AND I DO HAVE TO SAY THAT I BELIEVE YOU ASKED THAT

                    QUESTION EARLIER.  SO I DON'T REALLY HAVE AT MY DISPOSAL THE ANSWER TO

                    THAT -- TO THAT QUESTION --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  BUT IN TERMS OF --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  -- THAT'S FINE.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  BUT I -- I THINK YOU'RE DRIVING AT HOW

                    MANY TIMES HAVE PEOPLE BEEN KILLED WITH GHOST GUNS?

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  NO, NOT -- NOT AT ALL.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  YOU MENTIONED A STATISTIC -- A

                    NATIONAL STATISTIC, BUT YOU FAILED TO BACK IT UP WITH EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE

                                         165



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AS TO WHAT --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WELL --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  -- GHOST GUNS WERE USED AT THE

                    NATIONAL LEVEL.  SO WE'RE TALKING ABOUT NEW YORK HERE --

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THEN LET ME GIVE YOU SOME --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I'D LIKE TO CONTINUE TO QUESTION YOU

                    ON THE SERIALIZATION OF --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  GENTLEMEN,

                    GENTLEMEN.  YOU ASK A QUESTION, YOU LET IT ANSWER.  YOU ASK A QUESTION.

                    THIS CONSTANT TALKING OVER EACH OTHER IS NOT PART OF WHAT WE DO IN THIS

                    HOUSE, OKAY?  NO MATTER HOW CONTENTIOUS THE ISSUE.  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THERE'S CERTAINLY NOTHING

                    CONTENTIOUS GOING ON HERE, MR. SPEAKER, I JUST HAVE LIMITED TIME

                    BECAUSE OUR DEBATE IS LIMITED TO 15 MINUTES.  MAY I HAVE 30?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WELL, YOU STILL CAN'T

                    BREAK THE RULES BECAUSE THE TIME IS 15 MINUTES, ALL RIGHT?  THANK YOU.

                    PROCEED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I'M OFFERING HIM THE OPPORTUNITY TO

                    -- TO ANSWER IF HE WOULD CHOOSE.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  WHAT IS THE QUESTION?

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  LET ME MOVE ON THEN IF THAT'S OKAY.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  OH.  I CAN -- I THINK THAT I CAN GIVE

                    YOU THE INFORMATION THAT YOU WANT IN TERMS OF SHOOTINGS WITH GHOST

                    GUNS.  BUT BEAR WITH ME.  AND IT'S A FAIRLY EXHAUSTIVE SCHEDULE.  AND IF

                    AT SOME POINT YOU GET A LITTLE BIT BORED WITH WHAT I'M SAYING, JUST GIVE

                                         166



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ME A SIGN.  SO LET'S GO BACK TO JUNE 7TH, 2013.  JOHN ZAWAHRI CARRIED

                    OUT A SHOOTING SPREE --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  MR. SPEAKER.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  -- KILLED FOUR PEOPLE INCLUDING HIS --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  MAY I ASK THAT THE -- THE SPONSOR

                    AGAIN YIELD SO I CAN QUESTION HIM AS OPPOSED TO USING MY TIME UP

                    INEFFICIENTLY?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YOU'RE ASKING FOR...

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  OKAY.  ON THE BILL.

                    MAYBE THAT'S THE BEST WAY TO PROCEED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I DO APPRECIATE IT.  I'VE GOT LOT OF

                    QUESTIONS AND I DO HAVE LIMITED TIME --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  RIGHT, GO AHEAD.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  -- BECAUSE OF THE CURRENT RULES OF

                    THE HOUSE.  I'VE GOT A LOT OF CONCERNS ABOUT THIS BILL AND SPECIFICALLY,

                    THE TECHNICAL ASPECTS OF IT, WHICH I DON'T THINK ARE -- ARE FACTORED INTO.

                    THIS BILL IS GOING TO VERY DEFINITELY HURT COMPETITION SHOOTERS IN NEW

                    YORK STATE.  THESE ARE LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS WHO HAVE A HOBBY AND A

                    SPORT THAT THEY'RE VERY PASSIONATE ABOUT.  AND WHAT THEY DO IS THEY

                    HAVE A LOT OF PIECES AND PARTS TO VARIOUS FIREARMS WHICH ARE LEGALLY

                    REGISTERED, WHICH THEY OWN AND WHICH THEY USE IN A SAFE MANNER ON

                    SHOOTING RANGES AND FOR HUNTING AND FOR THE VARIOUS OTHER LEGAL

                    PURPOSES IN NEW YORK STATE.  THIS -- THIS BILL SPECIFICALLY IS GOING HURT

                    THEM BECAUSE IT HAS TO DO WITH THE SERIALIZATION OF PARTS, WHETHER

                                         167



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THEY'RE FRAMES OR THEY'RE RECEIVERS OR THEY'RE BARRELS OR THEY'RE VARIOUS

                    ATTACHMENTS THAT GO ON TO THIS.  I THINK THE INTENTION BEHIND THIS BILL IS

                    TO REQUIRE THE SERIALIZATION OF ALMOST EVERY PART IN A WEAPON, A FIREARM,

                    IN A SYSTEM THAT -- THAT WORKS TOGETHER IN FUNCTIONS AS DESIGNED.  AND

                    -- AND I THINK THAT'S A BAD THING BECAUSE WHAT IT DOES IS IT PUNISHES

                    LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS FOR THE CRIMES OF THOSE PEOPLE WHO ARE ALREADY

                    EVADING THE LAW THAT THEY COMMIT WITH GHOST GUNS.  AND I'M -- I'M

                    AGAINST UNSERIALIZED FIREARMS IN NEW YORK STATE, BUT I THINK IT'S

                    ALREADY ADEQUATELY COVERED UNDER NEW YORK STATE LAW.

                                 TECHNOLOGY IS AN EVER-EVOLVING AND AN EVER-CHANGING

                    SORT OF ENDEAVOR; IN FACT, THERE ARE 3D PRINTERS NOW THAT ALLOW PEOPLE

                    TO PRINT VARIOUS THINGS AT HOME WHICH, AGAIN, WOULDN'T BE -- WOULDN'T

                    BE SERIALIZED.  BUT WHAT THIS IS DOING IS THIS IS ESSENTIALLY SWITCHING ALL

                    OF THE RESPONSIBILITY ON TO THE GUNSMITHS IN NEW YORK STATE AND THE

                    FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSEES THAT SELL FIREARMS IN NEW YORK STATE.  AND

                    I -- I DON'T THINK THAT THAT'S A -- A VERY GOOD PROPOSITION WHEN IN REALITY

                    WE'RE TRYING TO TARGET CRIMINALS, PEOPLE THAT COMMIT CRIMES WITH GUNS,

                    PEOPLE THAT WOULD GO AHEAD AND UNSCRUPULOUSLY BUY A GHOST GUN AND

                    THEN USE IT TO COMMIT A CRIME.  THOSE ARE THE PEOPLE THAT WE SHOULD BE

                    AFTER THAT, NOT THE LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS.  BECAUSE AS I EXPLAINED IN OUR

                    PREVIOUS BILL AND -- AND I WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO IN THE BILLS THAT ARE

                    COMING UP, IS THIS -- THIS STRATEGY OF A DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS CAUSES

                    CHAOS IN THE LEGAL GUN OWNING COMMUNITY IN NEW YORK STATE, WHICH

                    IT'S THEIR RIGHT TO DO SO UNDER THE SECOND AMENDMENT, THAT THE RIGHT

                    KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

                                         168



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 SO INDEED THIS, TO ME, IS AN INFRINGEMENT AND IT MUST

                    BE RECOGNIZED AS SUCH.  FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS, NEW YOUR STATE HAS

                    CONTINUED TO LEGISLATE TO RESTRICT GUN OWNERS' RIGHTS, TO EXERCISE THEIR

                    CONSTITUTIONAL LIBERTY UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.  IT'S NOTHING MORE THAN

                    THAT.  AND IT'S A -- IT'S A -- IT'S A CONCERTED EFFORT TO DO SO AND I THINK IT'S

                    FUNDAMENTALLY WRONG TO THE BELIEFS THAT WE HAVE IN THE CONSTITUTION.  IF

                    WE WANT TO GO AFTER CRIMINALS, WHICH I THINK WE SHOULD, THEN LET'S DO

                    SO.  BUT LET'S DON'T DO IT AT THE EXPENSE OF LAW-ABIDING GUN OWNERS AND

                    SPECIFICALLY IN THIS BILL, COMPETITION SHOOTERS WHO WILL HAVE THE -- THE

                    CHANCE THAT THEIR ACTIVITIES ARE CRIMINALIZED FOR NO OTHER REASON THAN

                    THEY -- THE GOALPOST HAS BEEN MOVED TO THEM IN THEIR RIGHTS UNDER THE

                    SECOND AMENDMENT UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, THANK YOU VERY MUCH AND I DO

                    APPRECIATE THE -- THE EXCHANGE BACK AND FORTH WITH THE SPONSOR, BUT

                    WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT I HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPRESS MY FIRST

                    AMENDMENT RIGHTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITIZENS OF MY DISTRICT.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER THIELE:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 120TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER THIELE:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE ON SENATE BILL 13-A.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE POSITION IS

                    REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                         169



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE

                    WHO WOULD LIKE TO SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S

                    OFFICE AND WE'LL RECORD YOUR VOTE ACCORDINGLY.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER THIELE:  MS. HYNDMAN.

                                 MS. HYNDMAN:  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  MAJORITY

                    MEMBERS WILL BE RECORD IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  IF THERE ARE ANY EXCEPTIONS,

                    WE ASK MAJORITY MEMBERS TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AT

                    THE NUMBER PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED AND THEIR NAMES WILL BE ANNOUNCED

                    ACCORDINGLY.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER THIELE:  MR. LAVINE TO

                    EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THANK YOU.  THIS BILL IS NAMED FOR

                    SCOTT BEIGEL.  SCOTT BEIGEL WAS AND IS AN AMERICAN HERO.  HE DIED AT

                    MARJORY STONEMAN DOUGLAS HIGH SCHOOL IN PARKLAND, FLORIDA,

                    SHIELDING HIS STUDENTS FROM -- FROM A MURDERER.  HE GAVE HIS LIFE DOING

                    THAT.  IT IS FITTING THAT THIS LEGISLATION IS NAMED IN HIS MEMORY AND THAT IT

                    IS NAMED IN HIS HONOR, BECAUSE ONCE ENACTED, THIS LEGISLATION WILL ALSO

                    SAVE LIVES.  NOW IS THE TIME FOR AMERICANS OF GOOD FAITH TO BE INSPIRED

                    BY SCOTT'S LIFE.  BY THE WAY, SCOTT'S PARENTS ARE VERY DEAR FRIENDS.  NOW

                    IS THE TIME FOR US TO BE INSPIRED BY THEIR SON'S LIFE.  LET US UNITE TO

                    PROTECT OUR FAMILIES, OUR COMMUNITIES, AND THE SOUL OF OUR NATION FROM

                    THE CLEAR, PRESENT, AND IMMINENT DANGER PRESENTED BY FAR TOO EASY

                    ACCESS TO FIREARMS, INCLUDING FAR TOO EASY ACCESS TO HOME MANUFACTURED

                                         170



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WEAPONS.  I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAVINE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. WALCZYK.

                                 MR. WALCZYK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  SO WE -- OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS WE'VE DONE A

                    LOT OF WORK IN -- IN THIS CHAMBER.  I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF IT, BUT

                    WE'RE NOW SEEING THE RESULT OF WHAT WE FEARED.  WE TOOK DISCRETION

                    AWAY FROM JUDGES, MR. SPEAKER.  WE RELEASED FELONS EARLY.  WE

                    ELIMINATED CASH BAIL, WE CLOSED PRISONS, WE PUT DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AT A

                    DISADVANTAGE, WE PUT OUR THUMBS ON THE SCALE OF JUSTICE FOR CRIMINALS.

                    WE HAVE A LACK OF SUPPORT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT AND WE HAVE

                    UNEMPLOYMENT THAT IS CAUSED BY GOVERNMENT LOCKDOWN WHICH HAS

                    RESULTED IN WHAT YOU KNOW, THE NEW YORK CITY MAYOR'S RACE RIGHT

                    NOW, THE TOP ISSUE IN THAT RACE IS, WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT THE

                    CRIME WAVE?  AND THIS IS THE SOLUTION.  I DON'T KNOW HOW THIS SELLS

                    BACK TO NEW YORK CITY RESIDENTS.  GOOD LUCK.  WE'RE GOING TO PUT

                    SERIALS ON -- ON THE LOWER RECEIVERS, THAT'S THE SOLUTION.

                                 I GOT -- I GOT A DIFFERENT SOLUTION, MR. SPEAKER.  I'M

                    GOING TO VOTE NO ON THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION, BUT I WOULD SAY GIVE

                    DISCRETION BACK TO JUDGES, PUT THE FELONS BACK IN PRISON, STOP CLOSING

                    PRISONS, PUT CASH BAIL BACK IN PLACE, LET DISTRICT ATTORNEYS AND LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS DO THEIR JOBS WITH YOUR SUPPORT.  THAT SELLS A LOT

                    BETTER BECAUSE IT ACTUALLY WORKS AND WAS WORKING IN THE STATE.  SO WITH

                    THAT, MR. SPEAKER, I VOTE NO ON THIS BILL THAT IS GOING TO DO ABSOLUTELY

                                         171



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NOTHING TO ADDRESS THE PROBLEM THAT EXISTS IN NEW YORK CITY RIGHT

                    NOW.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. WALCZYK VOTES

                    NO.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  IN ADDITION TO THE

                    FLOOR VOTE, PLEASE ADD MR. DESTEFANO AND MR. SMITH IN SUPPORT OF THIS

                    LEGISLATION.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED, THANK YOU.

                                 MS. HYNDMAN.

                                 MS. HYNDMAN:  MR. SPEAKER, PLEASE RECORD OUR

                    COLLEAGUE, MR. SANTABARBARA, IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MS.

                    HYNDMAN.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 19, RULES REPORT NO. 454, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06522, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 454, STERN, GRIFFIN, SIMON, EPSTEIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND TO THE PENAL

                    LAW, IN RELATION TO REDEFINING THE TERM "DISGUISED GUN" TO INCLUDE ANY

                    RIFLE, PISTOL, SHOTGUN OR MACHINE-GUN RESEMBLING A TOY GUN AND

                    PROHIBITING THE POSSESSION, MANUFACTURE OR DESIGN THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. STERN.

                                         172



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. STERN:  YES, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  IN A

                    VERY DISTURBING TREND ALL ACROSS OUR COUNTRY, IT'S GETTING TOUGHER THESE

                    DAYS TO TELL THE REAL GUNS FROM TOYS.  REAL GUNS THAT ARE INTENTIONALLY

                    DISGUISED AS TOYS PUT ALL OF US AT RISK, ESPECIALLY OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    WHEN FACED WITH A DIFFICULT AND POTENTIALLY DEADLY CHOICE TO MAKE.  SO

                    THIS LEGISLATION, MR. SPEAKER, WOULD PROHIBIT THE DESIGN, MANUFACTURE

                    AND POSSESSION OF DISGUISED GUNS IN NEW YORK STATE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. REILLY.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. STERN, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STERN:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. STERN YIELDS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MR. STERN.  SO JUST FOR

                    CLARIFICATION PURPOSES, ON LINE 7 AND 8 OF THE BILL, IT SAYS, INCLUDE BUT

                    NOT BE LIMITED TO ANY RIFLE, PISTOL, SHOTGUN, OR MACHINE GUN DISPLAYING

                    A COLOR FINISH OTHER THAN THE ORIGINAL MANUFACTURED COLOR.  THE REASON

                    WHY I READ THAT IS I WAS LOOKING FOR A CLARIFICATION BECAUSE I DIDN'T SEE

                    IT IN THE BILL, LAW ENFORCEMENT DURING TRAINING EXERCISES USE RED BARREL

                    FIREARMS.  WHAT THAT INDICATES IS TO LET THE -- THE OFFICERS WHO ARE BEING

                    TRAINED KNOW THAT THAT IS A NON-OPERABLE FIREARM.  IS THERE ANYTHING THAT

                    WILL CLARIFY AND ENSURE THAT THOSE FIREARMS USED IN TRAINING EXERCISES

                    WOULD NOT BE ILLEGAL UNDER THIS LEGISLATION?

                                 MR. STERN:  SURE.  WELL, FIRST OF ALL, I'M VERY PROUD

                                         173



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    OF THE FACT THAT THIS LEGISLATION HAS THE SUPPORT OF LOCAL LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT, AS WELL AS THE NEW YORK STATE PBA.  AND THE REASON

                    WHY IS, AND IT GOES TO YOUR QUESTION, WHEN YOU READ THE NEW LANGUAGE

                    IN THE TOTALITY, IT IS -- THERE HAS TO BE AN INTENT THAT WITH THESE CHANGES

                    USED AS EXAMPLES, THERE HAS TO BE AN INTENT THAT THE GUN PRESENTS AS A

                    TOY GUN.  SO GOING TO YOUR EXAMPLE, IN THE CASE WHERE THERE IS AN

                    INOPERABLE GUN THAT'S UTILIZED BY LAW ENFORCEMENT CERTAINLY NOT

                    INTENDED TO PRESENT AS A TOY GUN, I DON'T BELIEVE WOULD COME UNDER THIS

                    LEGISLATION.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MR. STERN.  TOUCHING ON

                    THAT AGAIN, IF YOU HAVE A -- I KNOW THAT IN THE LEGISLATION FOR HUNTING

                    THERE WAS -- IF IT'S PAINTED CAMOUFLAGE THERE -- THERE'S AN EXEMPTION.

                                 MR. STERN:  YEAH.

                                 MR. REILLY:  IF THERE'S -- IS THERE ANYTHING IN HERE

                    ABOUT EXEMPTIONS FOR THE SPORT SHOOTER WHERE MAYBE THERE'S A FIREARM

                    THAT IS A RIFLE THAT MAY BE PAINTED WITH LIKE AN AMERICAN FLAG OR

                    DECORATION LIKE THAT.

                                 MR. STERN:  WELL, AGAIN, THE -- THE LANGUAGE OF THE

                    BILL STATES PRETTY CLEARLY THAT THERE HAS TO BE, NUMBER ONE, AN INTENT, AND

                    THAT DUE TO THE ALTERATION, WHETHER IT'S COLOR OR DESIGN, THAT IT'S INTENDED

                    TO PRESENT AS A TOY GUN.  OF COURSE THE REASON FOR THAT AND WHAT WE'RE

                    SEEING ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY IN ALARMING NUMBERS THESE DAYS IS THAT

                    CRIMINALS ARE TAKING THEIR GUNS AND THEY ARE MAKING THEM APPEAR AS TOY

                    GUNS, AND WHETHER THEY'RE ACTUALLY USING THEM FOR CRIMINAL ACTIVITY OR

                    WHEN FACED WITH AN OFFICER BY DESIGN, BECAUSE IT PRESENTS AS A TOY GUN,

                                         174



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AUTOMATICALLY IT'S GOING TO -- THE INTENT THERE IS TO GET THE POLICE OFFICER

                    IN A CONFRONTATION TO PAUSE.  AND YOU KNOW VERY WELL, WE KNOW, THAT IF

                    YOU ARE NOT GOING TO GET SHOT FIRST, THEN YOU ARE THAT MUCH MORE LIKELY

                    TO TAKE THE FIRST SHOT AND THAT'S WHAT THIS LEGISLATION SEEKS TO PREVENT.

                                 MR. REILLY:  MR. STERN, ONE LAST QUESTION.  THE --

                    POSSESSING A FIREARM LIKE THIS, WOULD IT -- WOULD IT BE A CLASS D

                    FELONY?

                                 MR. STERN:  POSSESSION AT 2 --  PENAL LAW 265

                    SPEAKS TO THE DEFINITION -- CRIMINAL POSSESSION IS -- IS DEALT WITH UNDER

                    265.02.  THIS WOULD BE A THIRD DEGREE CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF -- OF A

                    WEAPON.  SUB 6 OF 265.02 GOES TO POSSESSION OF A DISGUISED GUN, THAT

                    IS A CLASS D FELONY.

                                 MR. REILLY:  D AS IN DAVID.  THANK YOU.  THANK

                    YOU, MR. STERN.

                                 MS. -- MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO I -- I LIKE THE INTENT OF THE BILL.  AS

                    A FORMER NEW YORK CITY POLICE OFFICER, I'VE DEALT FIRST HAND WITH

                    FIREARMS THAT WERE DISGUISED TO LOOK LIKE TOY GUNS.  AND FOR OFFICERS'

                    SAFETY, I CAN TELL YOU THAT EXPLANATION THAT MR. STERN GAVE US WHERE IT'S

                    -- THAT HESITATION CAN COST AN OFFICER OR A CIVILIAN THAT'S NOT INVOLVED IN

                    THE INCIDENT THEIR LIVES IN A SPLIT SECOND.  I WAS FORTUNATE ENOUGH THAT I

                    NEVER FIRED MY WEAPON IN THE LINE OF DUTY EXCEPT FOR TRAINING, BUT I

                    CAME VERY CLOSE.  AND I RELIVE THOSE NIGHTS IN MY DREAMS BECAUSE IT'S

                    NOT AN EASY DECISION WHEN YOU HAVE THAT LAST CHANCE TO WHETHER YOU'RE

                                         175



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GOING TO PROTECT YOUR OWN LIFE AND THE CIVILIANS AROUND YOU OR IF YOU'RE

                    GOING TO SHOOT SOMEONE AND BE SECOND-GUESSED BECAUSE IT MIGHT BE A

                    TOY.  THERE WERE MANY INCIDENTS WHERE I WAS INVOLVED IN INVESTIGATING

                    ROBBERIES ON THE STREET THAT WERE DONE WITH FAKE FIREARMS TO LOOK LIKE

                    TOYS AND BUT FOR THE GRACE OF GOD, NOTHING HAPPENED WHEN I WAS

                    INVOLVED IN IT.

                                 SO HAVING CLARIFIED THAT TRAINING FIREARMS USED BY LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT TO SHOW THAT THEY'RE INOPERABLE, I THINK THAT'S A GOOD THING

                    THAT WE DEFINED HERE ON DEBATE.  I THINK THAT SETS THE PRECEDENT OF THE

                    RECORD THAT WE NEED IN REGARDS TO THIS LEGISLATION BECAUSE AS I'VE

                    SPOKEN ABOUT SEVERAL TIMES ON THE FLOOR, MANY TIMES WE PUT LANGUAGE

                    IN LEGISLATION THAT DOES NOT TRANSITION TO THE STREET THE WAY IT WAS

                    INTENDED.  SO I THANK THE SPONSOR FOR CLARIFYING THAT AND I THANK ALL THE

                    EFFORTS TO ENSURE THAT WE PROTECT LAW ENFORCEMENT WHEN THEY'RE TRYING

                    TO COMBAT THE ILLEGAL FIREARMS.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. SALKA.

                                 MR. SALKA:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR A QUESTION OR TWO?

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. SALKA:  YOU LOOK THROUGH DIFFERENT MAGAZINES

                    THAT SELL FIREARMS, YOU KNOW, LIST FIREARMS, DESCRIBE FIREARMS, DO TESTING

                    ON FIREARMS.  A LOT OF MANUFACTURERS OFFER FROM THE MANUFACTURER

                    DIFFERENT COLORED GUNS; SOME WOMEN SHOOTERS LIKE TO HAVE BLUE OR PINK

                    GUNS.  WOULD THIS, IN FACT, PROHIBIT THE SALE OF THOSE GUNS IN NEW YORK

                                         176



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AND IF IT WOULD, WILL THE GUNS THAT ARE IN CIRCULATION AT THIS POINT BE

                    GRANDFATHERED IN?

                                 MR. STERN:  SO THE ANSWER TO THE FIRST QUESTION IS IT

                    CERTAINLY COULD; YET, I GO BACK TO THE DEFINITION IN THIS LEGISLATION THAT

                    THIS KIND OF ALTERATION, WHETHER IT BE COLOR OR IN SUBSTANCE OR BY DESIGN,

                    IF IT IS INTENDED THAT IT RESULT IN LOOKING LIKE A TOY GUN, THAT WOULD COME

                    UNDER THIS BILL.  THE EFFECTIVE DATE RIGHT NOW IS I BELIEVE NEXT

                    NOVEMBER, IF ENACTED NOW.  THERE IS NO GRANDFATHERING CLAUSE.  THIS IS

                    A -- A POSSESSION, OR AT LEAST IN PART, A POSSESSION OFFENSE.  AND SO --

                    AND THAT'S THE IDEA IS IF THERE IS A FIREARM THAT HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN

                    ALTERED TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY GUN, THEN POSSESSION OF IT, OF COURSE,

                    MANUFACTURER AND DESIGN AND SALE COMES UNDER THIS LEGISLATION AS WELL.

                    BUT THE INTENT IS THAT THESE TYPES OF FIREARMS THAT BECAUSE OF THE

                    POTENTIAL SITUATION THAT WE'VE BEEN DISCUSSING TODAY CAN BE INHERENTLY

                    DANGEROUS PARTICULARLY TO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT, WOULD COME UNDER THIS

                    LEGISLATION.

                                 MR. SALKA:  SO MOST GUNS THAT ARE SOLD ARE EITHER

                    BLACK OR A METALLIC COLOR, OKAY, DIFFERENT -- ALUMINUM OR STEEL, STAINLESS

                    STEEL, WHATEVER, BUT AGAIN, THOSE GUNS THAT ARE MANUFACTURED BY -- BY

                    THAT -- BY THAT PARTICULAR MANUFACTURER OF A COLOR THAT ISN'T BLACK OR ISN'T

                    SILVER OR STAINLESS STEEL, THOSE WILL, IN FACT, BE ILLEGAL IN NEW YORK

                    STATE.

                                 MR. STERN:  THAT COULD BE IF UNDER THE FACTS AND

                    CIRCUMSTANCES THAT MANUFACTURER BY DESIGN INTENTIONALLY MANUFACTURED

                    OR DESIGNED THAT FIREARM TO LOOK LIKE A TOY GUN.

                                         177



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. SALKA:  SO I'M JUST A LITTLE CONCERNED THAT THE

                    INTENTION.  A -- A GUN MANUFACTURER ISN'T GOING TO INTENTIONALLY DISGUISE

                    A GUN TO LOOK LIKE A TOY, AT LEAST IN THAT RESPECT THAT, YOU KNOW, FROM

                    THE UTILITY STANDPOINT.  I JUST AM A LITTLE WORRIED AND A LITTLE NERVOUS

                    ABOUT THE FACT THAT THERE'S A GUN OF A VERY POPULAR COLOR, LIKE I SAID,

                    THEY HAVE PINK, THEY HAVE DIFFERENT COLORS, THAT THOSE ARE, IN FACT, GOING

                    TO BE -- NOT ALLOWED TO BE SOLD IN NEW YORK STATE.  SO THAT'S GOING TO

                    ELIMINATE THE MARKET FOR ANY COLOR -- COLORED WEAPON THAT'S NOT

                    STANDARD COLOR, IF THERE'S -- EVEN BE CLASSIFIED AS A STANDARD COLOR OF

                    BLACK OR SILVER OR STAINLESS STEEL.

                                 MR. STERN:  THE -- THE INTENT OF THIS LEGISLATION IS

                    THAT A GUN SHOULD LOOK LIKE A GUN --

                                 MR. SALKA:  AND THEY DO.

                                 MR. STERN:  AND THAT'S -- THAT'S WHAT PARTICULARLY

                    IMPORTANT AND AGAIN, I'LL -- I'LL REFER TO OUR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, NEW

                    YORK STATE PBA AS WELL --

                                 MR. SALKA:  SURE.

                                 MR. STERN:  -- THAT THEY BELIEVE BY SUPPORTING

                    LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVE, THAT BY HAVING THIS LAW IN NEW YORK STATE THAT WE

                    WOULD BE TAKING INHERENTLY DANGEROUS FIREARMS OFF THE STREETS AND

                    PUTTING THEM AT A DISADVANTAGE.

                                 MR. SALKA:  OKAY.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                                         178



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STERN:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. STERN.  AS YOU

                    KNOW, GUNS ARE PROTECTED BY THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE U.S.

                    CONSTITUTION, BUT TOYS ARE NOT.  AND TOYS HAVE NO

                    CONSTITUTIONALLY-PROTECTED STATUS IN THE UNITED STATES.  WHY NOT BAN

                    TOYS THAT LOOK LIKE GUNS INSTEAD OF BANNING GUNS THAT LOOK LIKE TOYS?

                                 MR. STERN:  WELL, THAT IS, IN FACT, ALREADY THE CASE.

                    THERE IS FEDERAL LAW THAT SPEAKS TO THAT.  THERE IS STATE LAW AND -- AND

                    ADDITIONAL STATE LAW THAT'S BEING PROPOSED TO GO TO THAT.  THIS IS THE

                    INVERSE OF THAT ARGUMENT.  BUT THAT IS AN IMPORTANT CASE TO MAKE AS

                    WELL.  THAT'S NOT THIS ONE, BUT -- BUT I WOULD AGREE, THE FEDERAL LAW

                    WOULD AGREE, NEW YORK STATE LAW WOULD AGREE THAT THAT IS -- THAT IS --

                    THAT'S AN IMPORTANT ISSUE AND ALSO INHERENTLY DANGEROUS AS WELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND SO ARE YOU SAYING NEW YORK

                    STATE CURRENTLY BANS TOYS THAT LOOK LIKE GUNS?

                                 MR. STERN:  THERE IS A -- THERE IS -- THERE'S INTENT, I

                    BELIEVE THAT THERE IS PROPOSED LEGISLATION TO DO -- TO DO THAT AS WELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT NOT EXISTING LEGISLATION.

                                 MR. STERN:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND YOU AND I WOULD BOTH AGREE IF

                    YOU BAN TOYS THAT LOOK LIKE GUNS, THERE'S NO CONSTITUTIONAL SECOND

                    AMENDMENT RIGHTS ISSUES, RIGHT?

                                 MR. STERN:  TO BAN THE TOYS THAT ARE MADE TO LOOK

                                         179



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LIKE GUNS, IS THAT A SECOND AMENDMENT VIOLATION?  I WOULD GUESS NOT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I WOULD -- I WOULD AGREE WITH YOU.

                    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL -- NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL DID A

                    DETAILED STUDY CALLED TARGET ON TRAFFICKING, A NEW YORK CRIME GUN

                    ANALYSIS.  AND THEY INDICATED THAT THERE WERE 52,915 GUNS RECOVERED

                    BETWEEN 2010 AND 2015.  HOW MANY OF THOSE 52,915 GUNS LOOK LIKE

                    TOYS?

                                 MR. STERN:  THAT I -- THAT I DON'T HAVE STATISTICS ON.

                    BUT WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS THAT RARELY NOW IF YOU DO A SEARCH NOT JUST

                    ABOUT THIS ISSUE IN NEW YORK STATE, BUT ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY, YOU WILL

                    COME UP WITH -- WITH DOZENS OF NEW STORIES THAT SHOW THESE GUNS THAT

                    WERE INTENDED TO LOOK LIKE TOYS, AND THEY'RE PRETTY CREATIVE, THERE ARE

                    THE NERF SUPER SOAKERS AND -- AND THE OTHERS THAT NORMALLY SHOOT THE --

                    THE FOAM ROCKETS THAT NOW ENCASE THESE GUNS.  GUNS THAT ARE PAINTED UP

                    TO LOOK LIKE THE NINTENDO TOY GUNS THAT YOU USE IN VIDEO GAMES.  AND

                    THAT'S WHAT THIS LEGISLATION GOES TO BECAUSE THOSE GUNS I WOULD

                    CHARACTERIZE AS FIRST STRIKE WEAPONS ON OUR STREETS.  THEY ARE

                    INTENTIONALLY MADE TO LOOK LIKE TOYS WITH THE IDEA THAT IF FACED IN A

                    DANGEROUS CONFRONTATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT, THEN THE COP ON THE

                    STREET IS GOING TO HESITATE NOT WANTING TO TAKE A SHOT, AND NOT WANTING

                    TO RISK THE FACT THAT IT'S A TOY AND THEN PUT HIM OR HERSELF IN AN

                    INHERENTLY DANGEROUS SITUATION.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I -- I APPRECIATE THAT LONG ANSWER,

                    BUT MY QUESTION WAS REALLY VERY SPECIFIC.  RATHER THAN A HALF A DOZEN

                    ARTICLES FROM AROUND THE ENTIRE NATION GIVING EXAMPLES, DO WE HAVE ANY

                                         180



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DATA IN NEW YORK STATE ON HOW MANY CRIME GUNS HAVE BEEN RECOVERED

                    THAT LOOK LIKE TOYS?

                                 MR. STERN:  I AM NOT AWARE OF THAT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.  AND -- AND I DIDN'T SEE

                    ANYTHING IN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL'S REPORT, BY THE WAY, BUT I -- TO BE

                    HONEST WITH YOU, I -- I DIDN'T READ IT REALLY CAREFULLY, I JUST LOOKED AT THE

                    HIGHLIGHTS.

                                 MR. STERN:  I'M NOT AWARE OF THOSE NUMBERS, BUT I

                    AM AWARE OF THE CONVERSATIONS I'VE HAD WITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    AND -- AND NEW YORK STATE PBA THAT ARE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS

                    ISSUE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND JUST SO I UNDERSTAND, WE'RE NOT

                    BANNING TOYS THAT LOOK LIKE GUNS, WHICH WE ALL AGREE WOULD BE

                    CONSTITUTIONAL, WE DON'T HAVE ANY DATA THAT ANY GUNS THAT LOOKED LIKE

                    TOYS WERE ACTUALLY INVOLVED IN CRIMES, ALTHOUGH THERE ARE ANECDOTAL

                    STORIES FROM ACROSS THE NATION, OF COURSE.  AM I RIGHT WHEN I READ THIS

                    BILL THAT MY SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS WOULD DEPEND ON WHETHER OR

                    NOT I SPRAY PAINT MY GUN A DIFFERENT COLOR?

                                 MR. STERN:  I SUPPOSE I WOULD ANSWER IT WITH --

                    WITH A QUESTION AND I GUESS THE QUESTION IS WHETHER OR NOT REASONABLE

                    REGULATION TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR PUBLIC AND OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    THAT'S CONCERNED ABOUT THIS POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS ISSUE BY DEFINITION

                    IMPEDES ON ONE'S SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  HERE, THIS LEGISLATION

                    DOESN'T GO TO ANYONE'S RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS IN ANY WAY.  IT IS A REASONABLE

                    REGULATION ON WHAT THAT ARM -- WHAT THAT FIREARM APPEARS LIKE SO THAT IN

                                         181



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    A CONFRONTATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT, OUR COPS ARE NOT PUT AT A

                    DANGEROUS DISADVANTAGE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. STERN.  I APPRECIATE

                    YOUR COMMENTS.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR -- MA'AM.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  AS I

                    MENTIONED, THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL DID A COMPREHENSIVE

                    STUDY OF GUNS RECOVERED AT CRIME SCENES, AND THEY FOUND THAT 52,915

                    GUNS WERE RECOVERED AT CRIME SCENES OVER A FIVE YEAR PERIOD FROM 2010

                    TO '15.  OF THAT, 86 PERCENT OF THEM ORIGINATED OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK

                    STATE.  ONLY 6 PERCENT, BY THE WAY, WERE ACTUALLY PURCHASED BY THE

                    PERSON THAT HAD THE GUN.  NONE OF THEM WERE IDENTIFIED AS APPEARING TO

                    BE TOYS.

                                 NOT EVERYONE AGREES WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO

                    THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION THAT GIVES US THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS.

                    CURRENTLY, THE SUPREME COURT AGREES WITH THAT.  AND THIS BILL TAKES A

                    UNIQUE APPROACH AND SAYS IF I SPRAY PAINT A GUN, I LOSE MY SECOND

                    AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  NOW, THINK ABOUT THAT.  DID OUR FRAMERS OF OUR

                    CONSTITUTION SAY YOU HAVE A RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS UNLESS YOUR GUN IS A

                    DIFFERENT COLOR?  NOW, WE CAN CERTAINLY PASS LEGISLATION TO MAKE IT

                    CLEAR THAT TOY GUNS CANNOT LOOK LIKE REAL GUNS, RIGHT?  WE CAN DO THAT.

                    WE COULD PROBABLY EVEN BAN TOY GUNS.  BUT WHAT WE CAN'T DO IS SAY

                    YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS DEPEND ON THE COLOR OF YOUR GUN, AND THAT'S

                    WHAT THIS BILL DOES.  AND, THEREFORE, I CANNOT SUPPORT IT.  THANK YOU,

                                         182



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MADAM SPEAKER.  AND AGAIN, THANK YOU TO MY COLLEAGUE FOR -- FOR YOUR

                    ANSWERS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. BYRNES.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STERN:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  THANK YOU KINDLY, SIR.  I JUST WANT TO

                    GO BACK BECAUSE I THOUGHT I UNDERSTOOD THE -- AN ARGUMENT AND THEN I

                    WAS CONFUSED BY SOME OF THE RESPONSES TO QUESTIONS.  GOING BACK TO

                    THE CONCEPT OF ALTERATION, BECAUSE YOU HAD INDICATED ONE OF THE PRIMARY

                    ELEMENTS OF IT BECOMING A "TOY," QUOTE/UNQUOTE, OR LOOKING LIKE A TOY IS

                    THAT IT HAD TO HAVE BEEN ALTERED.  BUT, YET, THEN THERE WAS DISCUSSION

                    THAT COMING FROM A MANUFACTURER THAT MIGHT BE CONSIDERED ALTERED.  I

                    WOULD THINK THAT ALTERED WOULD BE A POST-MANUFACTURING CHANGE LIKE

                    WAS TALKED ABOUT; MAYBE YOU SPRAY PAINT A GUN YOURSELF TO BE A COLOR.

                    BUT MY QUESTION IS WHEN A GUN COMES FROM A MANUFACTURER IN A

                    SPECIFIC PRE-DESIGNED, PRE-TESTED, PRE-APPROVED COLOR, IS THAT AN

                    ALTERATION?  I -- I DON'T UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF IT BEING ALTERED WHEN

                    THAT'S HOW IT WAS MADE TO BEGIN WITH AND DESIGNED.

                                 MR. STERN:  THIS LEGISLATION GOES TO NOT JUST

                    POSSESSION BUT -- BUT DESIGN AND MANUFACTURE.  WHEN I REFER TO

                    ALTERATION, WHAT I'M SAYING HERE IS A COLOR THAT IS DIFFERENT THAN WHAT IS

                                         183



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    TRADITIONALLY UTILIZED TO MAKE A GUN.  AND WE ALL KNOW WHAT -- WHAT

                    THAT MEANS.  AND SO THIS GOES TO, IF YOU USE THE TERM ALTERATION, TAKING

                    WHAT HAD BEEN MANUFACTURED AS A FIREARM AND COLORING IT, DESIGNING IT,

                    ALTERING IT IN SOME WAY TO LOOK LIKE A TOY.  BUT TO BE CLEAR, IF YOU WERE

                    GOING TO CREATE A FIREARM FROM SCRATCH AND THE ORIGINAL DESIGN THAT YOU

                    CREATE IS IN A COLOR OR DESIGN THAT BY DEFINITION IS GOING TO MAKE IT LOOK

                    LIKE A TOY GUN, THEN THAT WOULD BE COVERED UNDER THIS BILL.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  THERE'S AN ASIDE ON THAT, SIR.  YOU DO

                    INDICATE THAT CAMOUFLAGE OR I BELIEVE THAT CAMOUFLAGE PATTERNS ON

                    HUNTING RIFLES OR SHOTGUNS IS NOT A VIOLATION OF THE PROVISION.  WHAT

                    ABOUT CAMOUFLAGE PATTERNS ON HANDGUNS?  THEY'RE ALSO PREVALENT ON

                    HANDGUNS AS WELL.  WOULD THAT ALSO BE A EXCEPTION TO THIS RULE?

                                 MR. STERN:  YES.  THE -- THE IDEA ON THE

                    CAMOUFLAGE WAS TO PROTECT OUR HUNTING COMMUNITY.  AND SO -- SO WHAT

                    IT -- IT DISCUSSES CAMOUFLAGE, YES, BUT -- BUT THAT GOES TO A SPECIFIC

                    UTILIZATION BY OUR -- BY OUR FRIENDS THAT -- THAT ARE HUNTERS.  IN YOUR

                    EXAMPLE, IF IT IS SIMPLY A HANDGUN THAT IS CAMOUFLAGED BUT NOT UTILIZED

                    FOR HUNTING, THEN THAT WOULD NOT HAVE THE SAME EXEMPTION.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  ALL RIGHT.  IF THE CAMO ON THE GUNS --

                    RIFLES OR SHOTGUNS IS PINK, BECAUSE WE DO HAVE PINK CAMO AND IT'S VERY

                    POPULAR AMONG WOMEN HUNTERS AND WILL THAT -- THE CAMO, DOES IT ONLY

                    HAVE TO BE GREEN OR BROWN OR BEIGE IN TRADITIONAL OR -- I MEAN, LIKE AT

                    THIS POINT EVERY -- ALMOST ALL THE LADIES I KNOW WEAR PINK CAMO.  I

                    MEAN, THAT IS A FASHION STATEMENT.  IT'S A STYLE.

                                 MR. STERN:  SO I'M SORRY TO MY COLLEAGUE BUT -- I --

                                         184



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    I UNDERSTAND THE POINT, BUT I -- I DON'T KNOW IF I HEARD THE QUESTION.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  WELL, WHEN IT COMES TO YOU ALLOW

                    CAMO ON HUNTING RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS, DOES THAT ALSO INCLUDE PINK

                    CAMO?

                                 MR. STERN:  I -- I -- LOOK, THE -- THE BILL DOESN'T GO

                    TO SPECIFIC COLOR ARRANGEMENT, BUT -- AND -- BUT I'M GOING TO TAKE A

                    GUESS THAT PINK CAMO IS PROBABLY NOT THE BEST TO -- TO USE ON A SHOTGUN

                    OR A RIFLE FOR HUNTING PURPOSES, YOU KNOW, OUT -- OUT IN THE FOREST.  BUT

                    THE -- THE BILL DOES NOT GO TO SPECIFIC COLOR.  AGAIN, THE INTENT HERE --

                                 MS. BYRNES:  ALL RIGHT, BUT YOU TALK --

                                 MR. STERN:  AGAIN, THE INTENT HERE --

                                 MS. BYRNES:  TALK ABOUT COLORS --

                                 MR. STERN:  THE INTENT HERE -- THE INTENT IS TO MAKE

                    -- IF IT IS THE INTENT IS THAT THE -- THE INTENT TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY.

                    AND SO THIS IS A FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES CONSIDERATION.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  THERE ARE MANY WOMEN THAT SHOOT

                    BOTH HUNTING SHOTGUNS, HANDGUNS, WHERE THIS ISN'T TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE

                    A TOY.  IT IS A STYLISTIC, FOR WHATEVER REASON, IT'S NOT -- PINK IS NOT MY

                    COLOR, BUT IT IS A VERY STYLISTIC THING ON THE PART OF WOMEN WHO MAKE UP

                    ALMOST 50 PERCENT OF THE SHOOTERS AND HANDGUN PURCHASERS.  AND SO

                    WHILE COLOR IS IRRELEVANT ON A SHOTGUN, BUT PINK CAMO -- BUT IF PINK

                    CAMO ON A COLOR BECOMES RELEVANT WHEN IT'S ON A HANDGUN, DON'T YOU

                    THINK THAT THAT'S A -- AN INCONSISTENCY, SIR, THAT IS PROBLEMATIC TO A

                    WHOLE SEGMENT OF OUR SOCIETY WHO JUST PREFERS THINGS TO BE IN ONE

                    COLOR RATHER THAN ANOTHER?  I MEAN, HOW ARE YOU TO DICTATE WHAT'S THE

                                         185



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RIGHT COLOR THAT A GIRL SHOULD WEAR WITH HER GUN?

                                 MR. STERN:  I AM NOT, AND THAT'S WHY THIS IS A FACTS

                    AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND INTENT-BASED TEST.  THE QUESTION IS -- IS THE

                    FIREARM MANUFACTURED, DESIGNED, OR ALTERED IN A WAY TO PRESENT AS A TOY

                    GUN WITH THE IDEA THAT OUT ON OUR STREETS WHETHER THEY ARE AVAILABLE TO

                    YOUNG CHILDREN TO PICK UP BECAUSE IT IS ATTRACTIVE TO THEM, OR TO BE USED

                    AS AN OFFENSIVE FIRST STRIKE WEAPON IN A CONFRONTATION WITH OUR LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT, WHERE EVERY SECOND COUNTS IN MAKING A SPLIT-SECOND

                    DECISION WHICH CAN RESULT IN LIFE OR DEATH IN A MOMENT.  THAT IS WHAT

                    THIS LEGISLATION GOES TO.  NOBODY IS PICKING A COLOR.  NOBODY IS

                    INTENDING TO -- TO DECIDE WHAT IS AN APPROPRIATE COLOR OR NOT.  THE IDEA

                    HERE IS THAT A FIREARM THAT IS INTENTIONALLY DESIGNED OR ALTERED TO LOOK

                    LIKE A TOY IS AN INHERENTLY DANGEROUS FIREARM TO HAVE OUT ON OUR STREETS.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  AND SINCE THEY CAN BE DIFFERENT

                    COLORS RIGHT NOW MANUFACTURED, ISN'T THAT VERY ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS

                    IN ORDER TO EVEN TRY TO INDICATE THAT COLORS CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE WHEN

                    YOU'RE NOT EVEN DEFINING WHAT THE COLOR IS, LEAVING IT TOTALLY UP TO THE

                    COURTS SO THAT SOMEBODY WOULD HAVE TO BE ARRESTED AND THEN HAVE TO

                    DEFEND THEMSELVES IN A COURT OF LAW BEFORE THIS COULD BE DEFINED.  THAT

                    DOES SEEM VERY ARBITRARY, SIR.

                                 MR. STERN:  I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD SUGGEST THAT,

                    THAT IT'S ARBITRARY FOR OUR POLICY TO BE THAT A GUN -- A REAL FIREARM SHOULD

                    LOOK LIKE A REAL FIREARM.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  HAVE YOU SEEN A PINK GUN, OR A BLUE

                    ONE OR OTHER COLORS?

                                         186



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. STERN:  I HAVE.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  THEY LOOK LIKE --

                                 MR. STERN:  I'VE SEEN THEM -- I'VE SEEN THEM MANY

                    TIMES AND I CAN ALSO TELL YOU THAT WHETHER THEY ARE A DIFFERENT COLOR,

                    THEY ARE A DIFFERENT PATTERN, WHETHER THEY ARE PACKAGED IN PLASTIC,

                    WHETHER THEY ARE MADE TO LOOK LIKE CHILDREN'S TOYS, IT IS A REAL CONCERN,

                    PARTICULARLY ON THE PART OF OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT THEY NOT BE PUT IN A

                    DISADVANTAGE, THAT THEY NOT BE PLACED IN AN INHERENTLY DANGEROUS

                    SITUATION, TO HAVE TO MAKE A SPLIT-SECOND DECISION AND DECIDE WHETHER

                    OR NOT THEY'RE TAKING A SHOT AT SOMEONE WHO IS JUST WIELDING AROUND A

                    TOY, OR A REAL FIREARM AND ALLOWING THEM TO GET THE FIRST SHOT OF THEM.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL, MA'AM.

                                 MS. BYRNES:  I ABSOLUTELY UNDERSTAND WHERE THE

                    SPONSOR IS COMING FROM.  I'M VERY DEVOTED TO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT.  I

                    SHARE CONCERNS ABOUT TRYING TO KEEP THEM AND ANYBODY ELSE, ANY

                    LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS AS SAFE AS HUMANLY POSSIBLE THROUGHOUT THIS STATE

                    AND OUR ENTIRE COUNTRY.  BUT I DO BELIEVE THIS BILL IS TOO -- IS JUST -- IT'S

                    VAGUE.  YOU ARE POTENTIALLY TAKING FIREARMS, LEGALLY MANUFACTURED,

                    LEGALLY SOLD, THAT LOOK LIKE FIREARMS, THAT ARE KNOWN TO BE FIREARMS AND

                    POTENTIALLY ARBITRARILY MAKING THEM INTO AND SOUND LIKE SOMETHING THAT

                    IS -- IS AND SHOULD BE ILLEGAL.  I JUST AM A LITTLE BIT OFFENDED THAT THIS

                    COULD POTENTIALLY BE INTERPRETED IN A WAY THAT WOULD HINDER LEGAL AND

                    VALID LADIES OR GUYS WHO CHOOSE FOR WHATEVER STYLISTIC OR PREFERENCE

                                         187



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REASONS TO HAVE AND OWN A GUN OTHER THAN STRICT GUNMETAL GRAY OR

                    BLACK.  I THINK THAT WE'VE LIVED IN A WORLD RIGHT NOW WHERE WE ALWAYS

                    TALK ABOUT DIVERSITY, THE IMPORTANCE OF DIVERSITY AND THE IMPORTANCES OF

                    HAVING ALL DIFFERENT ASPECTS OF OUR LIVES IN EVERY WAY CELEBRATED AND

                    CARED ABOUT.  WELL, THE FACT THAT THE GUN COMMUNITY MAY HAVE OTHER

                    PREFERENCES FOR WHAT THEIR FIREARMS SHOULD LOOK LIKE THAT DON'T LOOK LIKE

                    TOYS, I THINK THAT THAT'S VERY HARMFUL TO THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS

                    AND I WILL BE OPPOSING THIS LEGISLATION.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, AND I DO

                    THANK THE SPONSOR.  I UNDERSTAND AND AGREE WITH THE INTENT, I JUST THINK

                    IT'S TOO VAGUE.  THANK YOU, SIR [SIC].

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. ANGELINO.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STERN:  YES, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, SIR.  I'VE HAD MY LIGHT

                    ON AND OFF AND EVERY TIME I'M LISTENING TO THE CONVERSATION, MY

                    QUESTION GETS ANSWERED BUT THEN A NEW ONE COMES UP.  EARLIER YOU SAID

                    THEY SHOULD LOOK LIKE A TRADITIONAL FIREARM COLOR.  WHAT'S A TRADITIONAL

                    FIREARM COLOR TO YOU?

                                 MR. STERN:  I CAN TELL YOU, I DON'T NECESSARILY

                    BELIEVE THAT IT MATTERS WHAT IS TRADITIONAL TO ME, BUT I WILL SHARE WITH

                                         188



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YOU IN MY CONVERSATIONS WITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THOSE

                    PROFESSIONALS AT THE STATE LEVEL, THEY WILL SAY WHAT COMES TO MIND IS

                    PROBABLY WHAT COMES TO MIND FOR MOST OF US, WHETHER IT'S BLACK OR

                    METALLIC, ET CETERA, I'M SURE THAT WE ALL HAVE AN IDEA AS TO WHAT

                    TRADITIONAL FIREARM IS PROBABLY MANUFACTURED ORIGINALLY TO LOOK LIKE.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THE -- AND THE REASON I ASK IS WE

                    THINK OF GUNMETAL GRAY, BLACK, BUT THE FIRST HANDGUN I EVER PURCHASED

                    WAS NICKEL, WHICH LOOKS LIKE CHROME BUT DON'T CALL IT CHROME, IT WAS

                    NICKEL.  BUT IT WAS VERY SHINY AND GLOSSY AND THAT WAS MANUFACTURED BY

                    COLT IN 1960.  HAVE YOU EVER SEEN A TAN COLORED HANDGUN?

                                 MR. STERN:  I HAVE.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  YEAH, THOSE ARE VERY POPULAR,

                    AFTER DESERT STORM AND OUR INCURSIONS IN THE MID EAST.

                                 MR. STERN:  YES.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THOSE TURN OUT TO BE A VERY

                    POPULAR COLOR, THEY WERE -- THEY CAMOUFLAGE.  SO THERE'S TAN.  AND ONE

                    OF THE MORE POPULAR TRADITIONAL HANDGUN COLORS IS KNOWN AS BLUE AND

                    I'M SORRY TO THE STENOGRAPHER, I'LL USE THE QUOTE MARKS "BLUE" BECAUSE

                    IT'S THAT GRAYISH BLUE COLOR, SO THAT'S A TRADITIONAL COLOR, BUT YOU CAN

                    ALSO BUY BLUE, PINK, WE'VE HEARD ABOUT THAT.  SO IN YOUR -- IN THE

                    WORDING IT SAYS, ALTERING OR CONCEALING THE ORIGINAL COLOR.  SO THAT

                    MEANS THOSE PINKS AND LIME GREEN, THOSE ARE GOING TO BE ILLEGAL?

                                 MR. STERN:  YOU'D HAVE TO -- YOU'D HAVE TO READ --

                    FIRST OF ALL, READ THE LEGISLATION IN ITS TOTALITY, OKAY.  AND SO IT STARTS OFF

                    BY SAYING WITH THE INTENT TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY.

                                         189



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. STERN:  SO TO GO TO YOUR QUESTION WHETHER WE

                    TALK ABOUT TAN OR BLUE OR PINK OR ANY OTHER, AND THE LEGISLATION DOESN'T

                    GO TO ANY PARTICULAR COLOR OR LACK THEREOF.  IT IS A FACTS AND

                    CIRCUMSTANCES BASED TEST WITH THE INTENT TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.  SO EXISTING GUNS OUT THERE

                    THAT SOMEBODY HAD ALREADY PURCHASED, THE LADY GLOCK THAT IS PINK, NOT

                    MY CUP OF TEA, BUT THEY'RE OUT THERE, THAT'S NOT INTENDED TO BE DISGUISED.

                    I'M AWARE THAT PINK HANDGUNS EXIST, SO THAT'S NOT A PROBLEM?

                                 MR. STERN:  I'M NOT GOING TO SAY YES OR NO.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. STERN:  I THINK, AGAIN, I WOULD GO BACK TO MY

                    -- MY-- MY STATEMENT EARLIER WHICH IS IT'S GOING TO BE BASED ON FACTS

                    AND CIRCUMSTANCES AND WHETHER THE INTENT WAS TO MAKE THE FIREARM

                    LOOK LIKE A TOY GUN.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  MA'AM, I -- I WANT THE OFFICERS TO

                    BE AS SAFE AS POSSIBLE AND I TOTALLY GET THE HESITATION AND I THINK THE

                    INTENT OF THIS A FEW YEARS AGO WAS A DISGUISED HANDGUN AND THAT WAS

                    FINE.  THAT WAS BACK WHEN THE FEDERAL LAW SAID ANY TOY GUN HAS TO

                    HAVE AN ORANGE TIP.  AND I HAVE ENCOUNTERED GUNS ON THE STREET THAT

                    WERE REAL AND HAD THE MUZZLE PAINTED ORANGE, AND THAT IS DEFINITELY

                    DISGUISED TO LOOK LIKE A TOY AND TO GIVE THAT OFFICER HESITATION.  AND IT

                                         190



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WAS TERRIFYING TO SEE THAT HANDGUN AND REALIZE THAT THE OFFICER GOT IT

                    BEFORE IT WAS IN ANYBODY'S HANDS BECAUSE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN TRAGIC FOR

                    BOTH SIDES.

                                 BUT I'M JUST CONCERNED THAT WE ENACT THIS AND WE TELL

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ALL OVER THE STATE THAT NOW WE HAVE A CRIME

                    OF CONCEALING A FIREARM AND IT'S GOING TO CAUSE THEM TO HESITATE FURTHER.

                    THEY'RE GOING TO BE LOOKING AT AND SPENDING TIME IN THEIR BRAIN, EVEN IF

                    IT'S ONLY, YOU KNOW, A NANOSECOND OF HESITATION.  WHILE THERE'S A LAW

                    AGAINST THAT, SO THAT'S GOT TO BE A TOY DISGUISED, OR IT HAS TO BE A REAL

                    GUN DISGUISED AS A TOY OR A -- THERE'S JUST CONFUSION OUT THERE.  I -- I GET

                    IT, BUT WHEN THE SPONSOR WAS ASK -- ANSWERING QUESTIONS, THERE IS NO

                    SPECIFIC COLOR.  IT'S LEFT UP TO CHARGES TO BE -- CHARGES TO BE BROUGHT AND

                    A JUDGE TO DECIDE.  AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S THE SITUATION, IT'S THE TOTALITY,

                    AND IF I WERE EXPLAINING MY VOTE I'D PROBABLY VOTE YES ON THIS ONLY

                    BECAUSE I -- THE INTENT IS TO HELP LAW ENFORCEMENT, BUT I THINK IT'S -- IT'S

                    A LITTLE MORE CONFUSING AND I'M NOT EXACTLY SURE WHAT I'M GOING TO DO.

                    HOPEFULLY THERE'S MORE DEBATE SO I CAN LISTEN.



                                 THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    COULD I ASK THE SPONSOR FOR YIELD FOR A COUPLE QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                         191



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. STERN:  YES, OF COURSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. STERN.  JUST A

                    QUESTION.  A LOT OF OUR MUSEUMS AROUND THE STATE -- I'M SORRY.  A LOT OF

                    OUR MUSEUMS AROUND THE STATE, THEY HAVE REPLICAS, REPLICA GUNS.  HOW

                    DOES THIS FALL -- FALL TO THEM?

                                 MR. STERN:  I'M SORRY, I DIDN'T HEAR THE BEGINNING.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  REPLICA GUNS.  AROUND THE

                    STATE, WE HAVE MANY MUSEUMS AND WE USE REPLICA GUNS, FIREARMS IN

                    DIFFERENT WAYS.  HOW IS THIS GOING TO PLAY INTO THIS?

                                 MR. STERN:  IF IT'S A REPLICA GUN, THEN I'M ASSUMING

                    THAT BY DEFINITION IT'S NOT A REAL GUN, AND THIS LEGISLATION ONLY GOES TO --

                    TO ACTUAL REAL FIREARMS THAT ARE MADE TO LOOK LIKE TOY GUNS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  SO JUST -- I JUST WANTED

                    CLARIFICATION.  SO A REPLICA GUN THAT REALLY LOOKS LIKE A REAL FIREARM,

                    THAT'S OKAY?

                                 MR. STERN:  THAT'S NOT COVERED UNDER THIS BILL.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. STERN:  YUP.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE GENTLEMAN FROM THE 10TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT FROM SUFFOLK

                    COUNTY YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                                         192



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STERN:  I WILL.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  A LOT OF THE

                    DEBATE HERE HAS BROUGHT UP SOME -- SOME FAIRLY SPECIFIC QUESTIONS THAT

                    I'VE GOT HAVING TO DO WITH THE ACTUAL LANGUAGE IN THE BILL.  AS SOME OF

                    MY COLLEAGUES POINT OUT, IT'S NOT THE INTENT BEHIND THE LEGISLATION, IT'S

                    ACTUALLY THE LANGUAGE WHICH THEN GETS IMPLEMENTED.  AND I DID NOTICE

                    IN THE -- IN THE BILL THAT YOU SPECIFICALLY CALL OUT RIFLES, PISTOLS, SHOTGUNS

                    AND MACHINE GUNS; WHY DID YOU DO THAT?  PURSUANT TO OUR PREVIOUS

                    DEBATE, THE QUESTION UNDER FEDERAL LAW, ARE THEY FIREARMS THAT YOU'RE

                    TRYING TO LEGISLATE HERE, YOU'RE TRYING TO LEGISLATE TOY FIREARMS.

                                 MR. STERN:  WE ARE -- THIS BILL GOES TO REAL FIREARMS

                    THAT ARE DISGUISED TO LOOK LIKE TOYS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  SO FOR INSTANCE, AND WE'RE

                    TALKING ABOUT LANGUAGE HERE, YOU SPECIFICALLY SAY MACHINE GUNS.  DON'T

                    YOU HAVE TO HAVE A FEDERAL FIREARMS LICENSE TO OWN A MACHINE GUN?

                                 MR. STERN:  I MEAN BY DEFINITION, MACHINE GUNS ARE

                    -- ARE -- ARE PROHIBITED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  FOR A CERTAIN CLASS OF OWNERSHIP

                    THAT IS SPECIFICALLY VETTED AND HAS BACKGROUND DONE FOR THAT PARTICULAR

                    THING, BECAUSE THEY'RE -- A LOT OF THEM ARE HISTORICAL FIREARMS.  SO WE

                    WERE TALKING A BIT EARLIER ABOUT THE DIFFERENCE IN THE VARIOUS

                    CAMOUFLAGE COLORS AND WHATNOT.  DO YOU KNOW WHY BLAZE ORANGE IS

                    USED BY HUNTERS IN THE WOODS?

                                 MR. STERN:  I'M SORRY, THE --

                                         193



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  DO YOU KNOW WHY BLAZE ORANGE IS

                    USED BY HUNTERS IN THE WOODS?  SO OTHER HUNTERS CAN SEE THEM, BUT THE

                    ANIMALS CANNOT --

                                 MR. STERN:  OF COURSE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  -- BECAUSE OF COLOR BLINDNESS.

                                 MR. STERN:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  IT'S ACTUALLY -- IT'S -- PEOPLE,

                    HUNTERS WITH BLAZE ORANGE STICK OUT IN THE WOODS.  THE SAME THING

                    WHY PINK CAMOUFLAGE IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE IN HUNTING APPLICATIONS.

                    YOU KNOW, A PINK CAMOUFLAGE PATTERN, THE DEER CAN'T SEE IT BUT OTHER

                    PEOPLE CAN SEE IT BECAUSE IT STICKS OUT FROM THE -- THE NATURAL COLORS OF

                    THE FOREST.

                                 MR. STERN:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND I DID NOTICE THAT YOU, IN THE

                    BILL, AND THIS IS A GOOD PART OF THE BILL, THAT IT SAYS HUNTING CAMOUFLAGE

                    IS SPECIFICALLY CARVED OUT IN THIS.  SO IF YOU HAVE -- IF YOU'RE A TURKEY

                    HUNTER AND YOU HAVE YOUR -- YOUR WEAPON THAT'S A -- SHOTGUN HAS

                    DIFFERENT PATTERNS ON IT, THAT'S PERFECTLY LEGAL UNDER THIS BILL, IS THAT

                    CORRECT?

                                 MR. STERN:  THAT IS CORRECT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  OKAY.  I DO APPRECIATE THAT.  SO ONE

                    OF THE THINGS THAT'S MENTIONED IS ARTICLE 11 UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL

                    CONSERVATION LAW IN YOUR BILL.  DOES -- DOES THIS BILL, IS THERE GOING TO

                    BE FURTHER LEGISLATION THAT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO ALTER ARTICLE 11 OF THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW HAVING TO DO WITH CAMOUFLAGE?

                                         194



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. STERN:  NO, NO.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO THIS IS -- THIS IS SPECIFICALLY TOY

                    GUNS FOR YOU'RE COUCHING IT, MY WORDS, BUT TOWARDS POLICE APPLICATIONS

                    ON THE STREET OF ESCALATION OF FORCE SITUATIONS WHERE THE -- THE POLICE

                    OFFICER HAS TO MAKE A SPLIT-SECOND DECISION AT WHAT LEVEL OF FORCE TO USE

                    IN A -- IN A, YOU KNOW, SOME SORT OF TIME COMPRESSED SITUATION.

                                 MR. STERN:  THAT IS CORRECT.  AND WHILE THE --

                    CERTAINLY THE ATTEMPT TO MAKE THAT CLEAR IS HERE IN THE STATUTE, I

                    APPRECIATE YOUR CLARIFICATION ON THE FLOOR HERE BECAUSE THAT IS CERTAINLY

                    THE INTENT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I'M SORRY, I COULDN'T HEAR YOU.  I

                    HAVE TROUBLE HEARING.

                                 MR. STERN:  I'M AGREEING WITH YOU.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU.  NOW THE APPLICATION

                    OF THIS LAW, THIS WILL BE ACROSS NEW YORK STATE IF -- IF WE PASS IT AND

                    IT'S SIGNED BY THE GOVERNOR, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MR. STERN:  THAT IS CORRECT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  ISN'T THIS ALREADY THE LAW IN NEW

                    YORK CITY?  IS THIS NOT ALREADY THE LAW IN NEW YORK CITY?

                                 MR. STERN:  THE INTENT HERE IS TO HAVE STATEWIDE

                    APPLICABILITY.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO IF WE'RE LOOKING AT THE -- THE

                    AMOUNT OF POPULATION IN NEW YORK STATE, SOME, SAY, 20 MILLION

                    PEOPLE, IN NEW YORK CITY WHERE THE BULK OF THESE SITUATIONS WOULD

                    OCCUR, ARE ALREADY COVERED UNDER NEW YORK CITY LAW.

                                         195



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. STERN:  I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD MAKE THE

                    ASSUMPTION THAT THIS IS WHERE THE BULK OF EITHER THESE CASES HAVE

                    OCCURRED OR WILL OCCUR IN THE FUTURE, BUT CERTAINLY THE GOAL HERE IS TO

                    HAVE STATEWIDE APPLICABILITY.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND WHY DO WE NEED STATEWIDE

                    APPLICATION FOR THAT IF THE BULK OF THE SITUATIONS WHERE IT'S ALREADY

                    HAPPENING IN THE CITY, IT'S ALREADY THE LAW, WHY DO WE NEED IT IN

                    HAMILTON COUNTY, NEW YORK?

                                 MR. STERN:  WELL, LOOK.  IF IT WAS -- IF IT WAS ONLY A

                    CITY ISSUE, I PROBABLY WOULD HAVE ONLY HEARD FROM NYPD.  IF IT WAS

                    ONLY A LONG ISLAND ISSUE, I MIGHT HAVE ONLY HEARD FROM MY FRIENDS IN

                    THE NASSAU OR SUFFOLK COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENTS.  THE FACT IS I HAVE

                    HEARD FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT FROM ALL OVER THE STATE.  AS I HAD

                    MENTIONED EARLIER, NEW YORK STATE PBA HAS NOT ONLY WEIGHED IN ON

                    THIS ISSUE, WAS NOT ONLY VERY HELPFUL IN UNDERSTANDING THIS ISSUE AND

                    DEVELOPING THIS AS AN INITIATIVE, BUT ALSO CAME OUT IN WRITTEN SUPPORT OF

                    THIS INITIATIVE.  AND SO I'M GOING TO SAY -- I'M GOING TO SUGGEST,

                    ANYWAY, THAT THE NEW YORK STATE PBA COMING OUT IN -- IN WRITTEN

                    SUPPORT OF THIS INITIATIVE BELIEVES THAT THIS IS A STATEWIDE ISSUE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  IT -- IT -- IT VERY WELL COULD BE.  SO

                    HOW MANY INSTANCES OF THIS HAPPENED IN NEW YORK STATE?

                                 MR. STERN:  I DON'T HAVE THOSE STATISTICS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO WITHOUT EVIDENCE, IT'S NONE TO

                    YOUR KNOWLEDGE.

                                 MR. STERN:  I'M GOING TO SUGGEST THAT IF THIS IS AN

                                         196



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ISSUE THAT IS THAT IMPORTANT, THAT IS DEEMED TO BE THAT URGENT TO OUR LOCAL

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT, THEN THIS -- THAT THIS IS AN IMPORTANT POLICY INITIATIVE

                    FOR OUR STATE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  AND HOW MANY INCIDENTS OF

                    SWATTING HAVE HAPPENED IN NEW YORK -- YOU KNOW WHAT SWATTING IS,

                    WHERE SOMEONE GETS THE POLICE TO ENGAGE THEM BECAUSE THEY HAVE A,

                    YOU KNOW, THEY WANT TO END THEIR OWN LIFE.  HOW MANY INCIDENTS OF

                    SWATTING HAVE HAPPENED IN NEW YORK STATE?

                                 MR. STERN:  I DON'T KNOW.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I DON'T EITHER.  I MEAN, THIS IS AN

                    ESCALATION OF FORCE SCENARIO THAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO THE REVERSE OF

                    SWATTING BUT WITHOUT ANY -- I CAN'T SEE ANY EVIDENCE THAT IT'S -- THAT IT'S

                    HAPPENING.  HOW MANY INSTANCES OF WHERE SOMETIMES CHILDREN, THEY

                    HAVE TOY GUNS THAT ARE IN -- THRUST INTO THESE SITUATIONS WHERE THEY'VE

                    HAD A TOY GUN, AN ACTUAL TOY GUN AND THEN HAVE BEEN -- THE FORCE HAS

                    BEEN ESCALATED AGAINST THEM WHERE THEY'VE EITHER BEEN SHOT OR KILLED?

                                 MR. STERN:  I DON'T HAVE THE STATISTICS, BUT WE KNOW

                    THAT THAT HAS BEEN A MAJOR PROBLEM NOT JUST LOCALLY IN NEW YORK STATE,

                    BUT ALL ACROSS THE COUNTRY.  WE'RE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THAT.  AND THIS

                    IS THE INVERSE OF THAT AND, BY THE WAY, IF THE NEXT QUESTION IS, YOU

                    KNOW, HAS -- HAS THERE BEEN AN INSTANCE OF A CASE WHERE THERE'S BEEN A

                    REAL GUN DISGUISED AS A TOY THAT'S BEEN AN ATTRACTIVE, YOU KNOW, TO A

                    YOUNG CHILD, I CAN CITE AN INSTANCE JUST A COUPLE OF BLOCKS FROM OUR

                    CAPITOL JUST A COUPLE OF MONTHS AGO THAT WAS ALL OVER THE ALBANY PRESS.

                    THANK GOD NOBODY WAS KILLED, BUT IT HAPPENED JUST A FEW BLOCKS AWAY.

                                         197



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  CERTAINLY.  AND I REALLY APPRECIATE

                    YOUR ANSWERS.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  I DO APPRECIATE THE SPONSOR'S INTENT

                    BEHIND IT AND THE DESIRE OF THE LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNITY TO HAVE US

                    LEGISLATE WHAT SHOULD BE, YOU KNOW, I THINK ALREADY COMMON SENSE AND

                    IN THE LAW.  WHAT I DON'T GET IS THE -- THE ACTUAL LANGUAGE OF THE LAW AND

                    ITS APPLICATION TO MANY AREAS OF UPSTATE NEW YORK THAT HAVE DIFFERENT

                    POLICING ARRANGEMENTS THAN SOME OF THE DENSE URBAN AREAS.  SO I WOULD

                    BE GLAD TO WORK WITH THE SPONSOR TO TRY TO IRON OUT THE LANGUAGE, TO

                    AMEND IT.  CERTAINLY I BELIEVE IT WILL PROBABLY PASS HERE AS PART OF THIS

                    PACKAGE OF GUN CONTROL BILLS, BUT I WOULD BE HAPPY TO WORK WITH THE

                    SPONSOR TO -- TO IRON OUT ALL OF THE SPECIFICS, INCLUDING THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, THE ARTICLE 11 APPLICATION SO WE

                    CAN GET THIS RIGHT FOR THE ENTIRE STATE.  SO -- BECAUSE WHAT I SEE HERE IS

                    WE'RE TAKING A -- WE HAVE A PROBLEM AND WE'RE FLIPPING IT ON THE ENTIRE

                    STATE WITHOUT REGARD FOR THE CONCERNS OF SOME OF THE VARIOUS

                    COMMUNITIES IN THOSE PARTS OF THE STATE.

                                 SO FOR THAT REASON, I WON'T BE SUPPORTING THIS BILL BUT

                    WOULD BE GLAD TO WORK WITH THE SPONSOR TO CORRECT WHAT I SEE ARE THE

                    DEFICIENCIES.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                         198



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STERN:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE ONE PART I'M

                    TRYING TO WRAP MY HEAD AROUND IS I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT.  WHO -- SO

                    TWO THINGS:  WHO MAKES THE DETERMINATION THAT IT LOOKS LIKE A TOY GUN

                    IF THERE'S AN INCIDENT?

                                 MR. STERN:  I WOULD SUGGEST THAT INITIALLY THAT

                    DETERMINATION WOULD BE MADE BY LAW ENFORCEMENT, WHETHER IT'S FOUND

                    TO BE IN SOMEONE'S POSSESSION, WHETHER IT'S BEING USED IN THE

                    COMMISSION OF -- OF A CRIME.  THAT'S GOING TO BE THE -- THE ARRESTING

                    OFFICER IS GOING TO MAKE THAT INITIAL DETERMINATION.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  RIGHT, IN THE INCIDENT ITSELF, BUT

                    THEN IT'LL GO TO THE COURT.  WILL THE JUDGE -- THEN THE JUDGE WILL HAVE TO

                    DECIDE IF THAT WAS SOUND JUDGMENT OR NOT?

                                 MR. STERN:  I ASSUME THAT WOULD BE THE CASE.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  OKAY, BECAUSE -- ALL RIGHT.  THEN

                    NEXT QUESTION.  SO THE MAIN POINT I'M SEEING IS TO MAKE SURE YOU DON'T

                    ALTER A GUN TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY, BUT I HAVEN'T HEARD WHAT DOES --

                    WHAT ARE SOME OF THE THINGS -- WHAT DOES A TOY GUN LOOK LIKE?  WHAT

                    ARE WE TRYING TO STOP EXACTLY THESE REGULAR GUNS TO LOOK LIKE, BECAUSE I

                    HAVE A TOY PISTOL, A LUGER THAT'S ACTUALLY A CIGARETTE LIGHTER.  I'VE GOT A

                    NUMBER OF THOSE LITTLE, LIKE, THINGS AND THEY LOOK SORT OF REAL, BUT WHAT

                                         199



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DOES A TOY GUN LOOK LIKE VERSUS A REGULAR ONE, THAT'S MY...

                                 MR. STERN:  TO MY COLLEAGUE, IT'S A GOOD QUESTION

                    AND I -- YOU KNOW, THIS IS ONE OF THOSE INSTANCES WHERE I WISH THAT WE

                    COULD USE VISUALS IN THE -- IN THE CHAMBER BECAUSE I HAVE PLENTY OF

                    PICTURES THAT WERE PROVIDED TO ME BY MY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND BY

                    NEW YORK STATE PBA AS TO SOME PRETTY COMPELLING EXAMPLES OF WHAT

                    IT IS WE'RE TRYING TO GET TO, BUT I'LL TELL YA, YOU COULD GO ONLINE AND YOU

                    COULD EASILY FIND DOZENS AND DOZENS OF EXAMPLES OF WHAT IT IS WE'RE

                    TRYING TO GET AT.  FOR EXAMPLE, IF YOU ARE FAMILIAR WITH, YOU KNOW, THE

                    SUPER SOAKER, YOU KNOW, AND SOME OF THE NERF, YOU KNOW, TOY GUNS

                    THAT SHOOT THE, YOU KNOW, THE FOAM DARTS.  THESE ARE THE KINDS OF THINGS

                    THAT ARE BEING UTILIZED TO DRESS UP AND DISGUISE REAL FIREARMS, SPECIAL

                    KINDS OF PAINT JOBS THAT MAKE REAL FIREARMS LOOK LIKE THE KIND OF GUNS

                    YOU USE WHEN YOU'RE PLAYING A NINTENDO VIDEO GAME.  THEY -- THEY

                    ACTUALLY CALL IT THE GLOCKTENDO, WHICH IS ONE OF THESE DISGUISED GUNS

                    THAT'S MADE TO LOOK LIKE A TOY.

                                 SO -- SO I DON'T HAVE AN EXAMPLE TO BE ABLE TO SHOW

                    YOU GIVEN OUR RULES, BUT IN THE BACK OF THE ROOM I HAVE PLENTY OF

                    EXAMPLES AND YOU CAN GO ONLINE AND, AGAIN, THERE WOULD BE DOZENS OF

                    EXAMPLES OF WHAT IS SUCH A SERIOUS CONCERN TO OUR PUBLIC AND, MOST

                    IMPORTANTLY, TO OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  OKAY.  NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT AND

                    I'VE SEEN SOME OF THOSE.  THE ONLY ISSUE I HAD WITH THAT AND I'VE SEEN

                    SOME THAT ACTUALLY ARE BIZARRE LOOKING, BUT A BUNCH OF THEM ACTUALLY

                    LOOK LIKE REAL -- REAL HANDGUNS THAT YOU CAN GET FROM THE MANUFACTURER

                                         200



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    BECAUSE OF THE NEW TECHNOLOGIES.  I HAPPEN TO -- I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE

                    EVER HAD A -- ACTUALLY HAD A CUSTOM FIREARM BUILT.  MY DAD WENT FROM

                    REMINGTON ARMS BEFORE THEY MOVED AND YOU CAN GET THE STOCK IN ANY

                    COLOR, SAY.  SO THE BARREL, YOU CAN -- THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT WAYS YOU

                    CAN DO IT.  WHAT -- IS IT THE TOTAL GUN OR IS IT -- WHAT IS PROBABLY THE

                    MOST PREVALENT PART THAT IS ACTUALLY ALTERED FROM YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH

                    PUTTING THE BILL TOGETHER?  IS IT THE STOCK, IS IT THE BARREL, IS IT THE -- WHAT

                    -- WHAT IS IT?

                                 MR. STERN:  I -- I -- I'VE SEEN ALL KINDS AND IT REALLY

                    DEPENDS ON HOW THEY'RE DESIGNED, WHO DESIGNS THEM AND HOW THEY

                    MIGHT BE ALTERED AFTER THE ACTUAL MANUFACTURER, NOW THEY'RE OUT THERE ON

                    THE STREETS.  BUT AGAIN, THESE -- THESE PHOTOGRAPHS WILL SHOW YOU

                    LITERALLY ALL OF -- ALL OF THE ABOVE.  I DON'T KNOW IF I WOULD NAME ONE

                    PART OF THE FIREARM THAT'S MORE PREVALENT THAN THE OTHERS, IT DEPENDS ON

                    WHERE AND HOW AND WHO, BUT WHAT I CAN TELL YOU IS THAT IF YOU SPEND

                    TIME RESEARCHING THIS ISSUE, IF YOU SPEND TIME SPEAKING WITH OUR LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT PROFESSIONALS AND THEY SHOW YOU THE EXAMPLES, IT'S REALLY

                    THE ENTIRE SPECTRUM, BUT I CAN SEE IT BECAUSE THEY LOOK LIKE GUNS,

                    THEY'RE MADE TO LOOK LIKE GUNS AND THAT'S THE CONCERN IS THAT WITH THE

                    INTENTION TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY, IT BECOMES INHERENTLY DANGEROUS TO

                    OUR PUBLIC AND, MOST PARTICULARLY, TO OUR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO

                    ARE IN THAT -- THAT THE POTENTIALLY DANGEROUS CONFRONTATION.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  OKAY.  NO, I APPRECIATE THAT

                    BECAUSE I HAVE CONCERNS ALSO, BUT I ALSO -- I HAVE SOME RESERVATIONS ON

                    IT.  SO I APPRECIATE YOUR COMMENTS, SIR.

                                         201



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ON THE BILL, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. DIPIETRO:  YES.  THERE'S A LOT IN THIS BILL, BUT I

                    THINK A LOT OF IT'S VAGUE.  I HAVE HAD GUNS MANUFACTURED, CUSTOMIZED.

                    YOU CAN GET YOUR STOCK, PER SE, IN ANY COLOR.  YOU'D START WITH A

                    YELLOW, YOU CAN GET A BRIGHT YELLOWISH, OKAY, THAT LOOKS REALLY VIBRANT

                    YELLOW ALL THE WAY DOWN TO AN ORANGE.  THESE ARE -- THESE ARE CUSTOM

                    MADE RIGHT FROM REMINGTON OR ANY OTHER MANUFACTURER.  LIKE THE

                    BARRELS CAN -- YOU CAN HAVE BLUE, YOU CAN HAVE GOLD, YOU CAN HAVE

                    SILVER.  THERE'S A LOT OF DIFFERENT THINGS THAT CAN MAKE -- YOU CAN HAVE

                    THIS -- THE CAMO, THE LIME GREEN NOW THAT'S VERY PREVALENT, THE BLAZE

                    ORANGE IS REALLY SUPER COMMON RIGHT NOW.  PINK IS VERY COMMON.  MY

                    WIFE HAS A PINK .22, A RUGER .22; THEY'RE -- THEY'RE VERY COMMON.

                    NOW, SOME OF THE -- AND SOME OF THE THINGS THAT YOU PUT ON THESE,

                    MAYBE NOT ON A NORMAL GUN, BUT SAY A THUMBHOLE OR DIFFERENT DEVICES

                    THAT YOU PUT ON FOR HANDICAPPED INDIVIDUALS.  THAT MIGHT -- THOSE

                    THINGS MIGHT MAKE IT LOOK LIKE A TOY GUN, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU GET IT

                    CUSTOM MADE BECAUSE SOME OF THOSE ARE CUSTOM MADE FOR OUR

                    HANDICAPPED THAT ENJOY THE SPORT OF -- OF SHOOTING.  SO THERE'S A LOT TO

                    IT.

                                 I HAVE A PROBLEM JUST BECAUSE THE ARBITRARY PART OF

                    WHO MAKES THE DECISION THAT IT LOOKS LIKE A TOY GUN AND THEN THAT GOES

                    TO THE JUDGE WHERE WE DON'T KNOW WHAT THESE PEOPLE -- I KNOW THERE

                    ARE SOME THAT LOOK BIZARRE AND I'VE SEEN THEM ONLINE, BUT I THINK MOST

                    OF THEM ARE JUST MODIFIED THROUGH THE MANUFACTURER OR THE INDIVIDUAL.

                                         202



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THE LANGUAGE IS -- IS -- IT'S VERY VAGUE.  I AGREE WITH MY OTHER

                    ASSEMBLY PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN MENTIONING THAT, THAT IT'S CAPRICIOUS,

                    IT REALLY PUTS THE ONUS ON EVENTUALLY THE JUDGE, BUT WHAT I THINK

                    HAPPENS HERE IS THIS GIVES A VERY FALSE HOPE TO OUR BRAVE AND DEDICATED

                    OFFICERS ON THE STREET TO MAKE IT SOUND AS IF WHEN WE PASS THIS THAT ALL

                    OF A SUDDEN, THESE TOY GUNS, THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE A LITTLE BIT MORE

                    LEEWAY AND THAT THEY'RE GOING TO MAGICALLY DISAPPEAR WHEN THEY ARE

                    NOT.  AND I THINK THIS JUST -- THERE'S JUST TOO MANY, TOO MANY

                    OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS WITH THIS LEGISLATION FOR MY LIKING.  AGAIN, I

                    WOULD HAVE RATHER SEEN SOMETHING A LITTLE BIT MORE DEFINITIVE,

                    ESPECIALLY ONE THAT SAYS WHAT DOES A TOY GUN LOOK LIKE, WHAT ARE WE

                    ACTUALLY LEGISLATING AGAINST BECAUSE WHILE THERE ARE SOME OUT THERE THAT

                    HAVE BEEN MODIFIED AND LOOK LIKE A NERF GUN, THE FACT IS THERE IS NO SET

                    DEFINITION.  SO IT COULD BE AN OFFICER COULD SAY THAT SOMETHING WITH --

                    THAT'S BEEN MODIFIED FOR A DISABLED PERSON AND HAS BEEN PAINTED, THAT

                    COULD LOOK LIKE A TOY GUN TO HIM BUT COULD BE A FULLY FUNCTIONING

                    FIREARM FOR THE PERSON THAT LOVES IT AND IS USING IT.

                                 SO FOR THOSE REASONS, UNFORTUNATELY I CAN'T SUPPORT THIS

                    AS MUCH AS I WANT TO SUPPORT OUR MEN AND WOMEN IN BLUE AND THAT

                    DEFEND US.  THERE'S -- I DON'T WANT TO GIVE THEM THE FALSE HOPE THAT THIS

                    LEGISLATION IS GOING TO CLEAR UP A PROBLEM WHICH IS -- IS -- IT'S VERY

                    TOUGH, IT'S VERY TOUGH TO -- TOUGH TO WRAP MY HEAD AROUND IT WITH THE

                    LANGUAGE THAT THE BILL PRESENTS.  I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF THE SPONSOR

                    AND I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF OUR OFFICERS BUT AT THIS POINT, I DON'T SEE

                    THIS BILL ACTUALLY DOING WHAT IT'S SUPPOSED TO DO.  THERE'S -- IT DOESN'T

                                         203



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ANSWER TOO MANY QUESTIONS.  SO WITH THAT, I'LL BE URGING MY COLLEAGUES

                    TO VOTE IN THE NEGATIVE, AND I THANK YOU.  AND I THANK THE SPONSOR OF

                    THE BILL FOR HIS -- FOR HIS ANSWERS.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT NOVEMBER

                    1ST.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT 6522.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE

                    POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE

                    NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS.  THOSE MEMBERS WHO SUPPORT

                    IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE SO WE CAN PROPERLY

                    RECORDED YOUR VOTE.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.  OF COURSE WE WOULD ADVISE OUR COLLEAGUES WHO LIKE TO BE

                    AN EXCEPTION TO PLEASE CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE'LL

                    HAVE YOUR VOTE PROPERLY RECORDED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU SO MUCH,

                    MA'AM.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         204



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  AS WE'VE HEARD

                    EXTENSIVELY, THERE'S TWO GENERAL TRAINS OF THOUGHT THAT HAVE BEEN

                    ARTICULATED EXTENSIVELY.  ONE DEALS WITH THE SECOND AMENDMENT AND

                    THAT IS FAIRLY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS DON'T

                    DEPEND ON WHAT COLOR YOUR GUN IS.  I MEAN, THERE'S NOTHING IN THE U.S.

                    CONSTITUTION THAT SUGGESTS THAT IF YOU PAINT YOUR GUN, YOU LOSE YOUR

                    SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  AND WE'VE HEARD EXTENSIVELY THAT THERE ARE

                    MANY PEOPLE THAT BUY DIFFERENT COLORED GUNS AND SOMETIMES PUT

                    STICKERS ON THEM OR WHATEVER FOR WHATEVER STYLISTIC REASONS THEY -- THEY

                    SO DESIRE.  AND JUST BECAUSE YOU BUY A DIFFERENT COLOR GUN OR PUT A

                    STICKER ON IT, YOU SHOULDN'T LOSE YOUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.

                                 ON THE OTHER HAND, WE'VE HEARD A LOT OF LEGITIMATE

                    CONCERNS RAISED BY THOSE IN LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT IT'S VERY DIFFICULT

                    SOMETIMES TO TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A TOY GUN AND A REAL GUN, AND

                    THAT THERE ARE SOME CRIMINALS THAT WILL MAKE THEIR REAL GUN LOOK LIKE A

                    TOY GUN.  I'M NOT SURE HOW EFFECTIVE THAT IS IF YOU'RE HOLDING UP A LIQUOR

                    STORE IF YOUR GUN LOOKS LIKE A TOY GUN, BUT I SUPPOSE IF YOU'RE MORE

                    INTERESTED IN A DRIVE-BY SHOOTING OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, IT MIGHT BE

                    EASIER TO DISGUISE WHAT APPEARS TO BE A TOY GUN.  AND OBVIOUSLY, WE ALL

                    HAVE A GREAT DESIRE TO MAKE SURE THAT WE PROTECT OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

                                 THE PROBLEM WITH THE LEGISLATION, HOWEVER, IS THAT, BY

                    AND LARGE, EXPERIENCE HAS SHOWN US THAT CRIMINALS GENERALLY DON'T

                    FOLLOW THE LAW.  THERE'S SOMETHING INHERENTLY ABOUT THAT CONCEPT.  AND

                                         205



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SO WE PASS A LAW THAT SAYS YOU CAN'T HAVE A GUN THAT LOOKS LIKE A TOY,

                    WELL, THE LAW-ABIDING PEOPLE WILL -- WILL STOP AND THE CRIMINALS WILL

                    CONTINUE BECAUSE THAT'S -- THEY TEND TO IGNORE THE LAW.  SO MAYBE OUR

                    REAL FOCUS SHOULDN'T BE TO TRY TO SHORTCHANGE OUR SECOND AMENDMENT

                    RIGHTS, BUT TRY TO DEAL WITH TOY GUNS THAT LOOK LIKE REAL GUNS AND BACK

                    OUR OFFICERS ON THE STREET SO THEY CAN BE SAFE.  FOR THAT REASON, I'M

                    LEANING TOWARDS VOTING NO, BUT I'M CERTAINLY APPRECIATIVE OF THE

                    COUNTERARGUMENTS.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    MAYBE NO.

                                 MR. WALCZYK.

                                 MR. WALCZYK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  SO WHEN THEY WROTE THE BILL OF RIGHTS IN 1791 AND

                    ADDED THOSE TO OUR UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION, I'M REALLY GLAD THAT THE

                    FIRST AMENDMENT THEY WROTE IN A WAY THAT THE PRESS AND THE CITIZENRY

                    WOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO REDRESS OF THEIR GOVERNMENT AND THAT WE WOULD

                    GUARANTEE THAT THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO CRITICIZE US.  AND I'M ALSO GLAD

                    THAT THEY WROTE THE SECOND AMENDMENT WHICH STANDS UP TO SPRAY

                    PAINT.  SO I'LL BE VOTING NO AND I WOULD ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO

                    SOMETHING VERY REAL ABOUT THE CRIME WAVE IN NEW YORK CITY.

                    SOMETHING VERY REAL WOULD LOOK LIKE STANDING BEHIND LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT, EMPOWERING DISTRICT ATTORNEYS, GIVING JUDGES DISCRETION

                    BACK THAT THIS BODY TOOK AWAY FROM THEM, AND STOP PLAYING AROUND

                    WITH LEGISLATION THAT SAYS LIKE, OH, A STAMP OF A FEW NUMBERS ON A -- ON

                    A RECEIVER OR SPRAY PAINT ON A GUN IS WHAT'S GOING TO MAKE THE HUGE

                                         206



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DIFFERENCE FOR THE NEW YORK CITY CRIME WAVE HERE.  WE'VE WASTED TOO

                    MUCH TIME.  BRING US SOMETHING REAL.  AND I VOTE NO, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. REILLY.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE.  AS I MENTIONED DURING THE DEBATE EARLIER, I KNOW FIRSTHAND

                    WHAT THE DANGERS ARE ON THE STREETS IN NEW YORK CITY, ACROSS THE STATE,

                    AND ACROSS THE NATION OF WHAT LAW ENFORCEMENT IS DEALING WITH.  THERE

                    IS A REAL DANGER OUT THERE WITH GUNS BEING DISGUISED, BUT LET'S NOT LOSE

                    THE REAL DANGER HERE.  THE REAL DANGER IS THAT WE'RE NOT EMPOWERING OUR

                    CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TO HOLD THOSE WHO HAVE ILLEGAL FIREARMS

                    BECAUSE OF THINGS THAT WE PASSED HERE LIKE BAIL REFORM.  WE NEED TO

                    LOOK BACK AND CORRECT THAT, AND THAT WILL HELP US CURE GUN VIOLENCE IN

                    NEW YORK CITY AND ALL OUR URBAN CENTERS ACROSS NEW YORK STATE.  FOR

                    THE PROTECTION OF POLICE OFFICERS, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. REILLY IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. STERN TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. STERN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  FIRST, LET ME

                    THANK MY COLLEAGUES FOR -- FOR THIS DISCUSSION, MANY OF WHOM I KNOW

                    WELL ARE -- ARE FROM A LAW ENFORCEMENT AND MILITARY, AND I APPRECIATE

                    ALL OF THEIR COMMENTS.  THE QUESTION THAT WAS ASKED EARLIER, YOU KNOW,

                    WHO DID YOU SPEAK TO ABOUT A PRIOR BILL TO MAKE THIS DETERMINATION?  I

                    CAN TELL YOU WHO I SPOKE WITH.  I SPOKE WITH MY LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.

                    I SPOKE WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT THROUGHOUT ALL OF NEW YORK STATE.  AS I

                    MENTIONED, THERE ARE WRITTEN MEMORANDUMS OF SUPPORT FROM LAW

                                         207



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ENFORCEMENT ALL THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    LEGISLATION.  THEY ASKED ME TO IMAGINE THE SITUATION THAT THIS

                    LEGISLATION GOES TO, A DANGEROUS CONFRONTATION WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS

                    DISGUISED A REAL FIREARM TO LOOK LIKE A TOY GUN.  THEY ASKED ME TO

                    IMAGINE THAT IN THAT MOMENT OF HESITATION WHERE THAT SPLIT-SECOND

                    DECISION NEEDS TO BE MADE, KILL OR BE KILLED, THAT THEY CAN'T AFFORD TO

                    SECOND-GUESS THEMSELVES.  THEY SHARED WITH ME THAT THOSE WERE

                    EXPERIENCES THAT THEY KNOW OF, THAT THEY'VE HAD, AND THEY BELIEVE THAT

                    THIS IS AN IMPORTANT INITIATIVE THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE THAT, AGAIN,

                    OUR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IS LOOKING TO MAKE POLICY THROUGHOUT.  I

                    THANK THEM FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE IN BRINGING THIS FORWARD.  THIS IS

                    LEGISLATION THAT WILL SAVE LIVES, MR. SPEAKER.  I WILL BE SUPPORTING IT.  I

                    ASK ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES TO JOIN ME IN DOING THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. STERN IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  IN

                    ADDITION TO MY COLLEAGUES ON THE FLOOR THAT HAVE VOTED IN FAVOR OF THIS,

                    PLEASE RECORD MR. DESTEFANO, MR. MIKULIN, MS. MILLER, MR.

                    MONTESANO, MR. RA, AND MR. SMITH IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU VERY

                    MUCH, SO NOTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU COULD PLEASE RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MS. LUPARDO, MR.

                                         208



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MAMDANI, AND MS. MITAYNES IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS ONE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 19, RULES REPORT NO. 591 ON THE A-CALENDAR,

                    THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06762-B, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 591, FAHY, ANDERSON, BURDICK, DINOWITZ, SEAWRIGHT,

                    SILLITTI, TAYLOR, L. ROSENTHAL, CARROLL, JACOBSON, STECK, THIELE, PERRY,

                    DARLING, EPSTEIN, OTIS, SIMON, DAVILA, MEEKS, BARRON, HEVESI, PAULIN,

                    LAVINE, J. RIVERA, COLTON, DICKENS, DILAN, JEAN-PIERRE, PICHARDO, CRUZ,

                    GRIFFIN, GOTTFRIED, SOLAGES, ABINANTI, GALEF, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, KELLES.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO THE DANGERS

                    TO SAFETY AND HEALTH AND CREATING OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE CAUSED BY THE

                    SALE, MANUFACTURING, DISTRIBUTION, IMPORTING AND MARKETING OF FIREARMS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    FAHY, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS ADVANCED.

                    AND, MS. FAHY, AN EXPLANATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS BILL

                    IS INTENDED TO HELP ADDRESS AND HOLD ACCOUNTABLE SOME BAD ACTORS, IF

                    YOU WILL, AND HELP STEM -- IDEALLY HELP STEM THE FLOW OF, PARTICULARLY,

                    ILLEGAL GUNS INTO -- INTO THIS STATE.  WE HAVE SEEN SOME HORRIFIC RISE IN

                    GUN VIOLENCE, ESPECIALLY OVER THE LAST YEAR, RIGHT HERE EVEN IN MY HOME

                                         209



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CITY OF ALBANY AND, YET, THROUGHOUT THE STATE, THROUGHOUT THIS COUNTRY.

                    AND MANY OF THESE GUNS ARE BEING BROUGHT INTO NEW YORK FROM

                    OUT-OF-STATE AND USED IN VIOLENT CRIMES, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS THE IRON

                    PIPELINE THAT WE'VE ALL HEARD ABOUT FOR DECADES.  A COUPLE OF THESE

                    GUNS HAVE BEEN USED JUST IN THE LAST -- GUNS FROM OUT-OF-STATE HAVE

                    BEEN USED JUST IN THE LAST COUPLE OF MONTHS HERE, AGAIN, IN -- IN MY

                    HOMETOWN HERE IN -- IN ALBANY.

                                 THE ATTORNEY GENERAL IN A PREVIOUS REPORT HAS STATED

                    OVER 74 PERCENT OF FIREARMS ARE OFTEN RECOVERED IN VIOLENT SHOOTINGS

                    WERE -- ARE BEING ILLEGALLY TRAFFICKED INTO NEW YORK.  AND EVEN WHERE

                    THE GUN INDUSTRY MEMBERS OR ACTORS ARE SELLING FIREARMS TO -- TO STRAW

                    PURCHASERS OR WITH SLOPPY PRACTICES, THEY HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY

                    SHIELDED FROM LAWSUITS BY VICTIMS OF GUN VIOLENCE BECAUSE OF THIS

                    FEDERAL PROTECTION, A LAW THAT WAS PASSED IN 2005, FEDERAL PROTECTION

                    OF LAWFUL COMMERCE IN ARMS, OTHERWISE KNOWN AS PLCAA.

                                 SO THIS BILL ALLOWS COURTS TO APPLY THE SAME PUBLIC

                    NUISANCE LAW THAT COVERS VIRTUALLY EVERY OTHER INDUSTRY AND, IN THIS

                    CASE, APPLY TO MANUFACTURERS AND DEALERS.  THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT EVERY

                    VICTIM OF GUN VIOLENCE WILL GET A SETTLEMENT OR BE ABLE TO BRING SUIT, BUT

                    IT DOES MEAN THAT GUN INDUSTRIES -- WHERE THE GUN INDUSTRY HAS CREATED

                    OR HELPED CREATE AN UNTENABLE RISK OF HARM THROUGH SLOPPY BUSINESS

                    PRACTICES OR -- OR OTHERWISE, THAT THEY -- VICTIMS CAN BEGIN TO HOLD THEM

                    ACCOUNTABLE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. MILLER.

                                 MR. MILLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                                         210



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY YIELDS, SIR.

                                 MR. MILLER:  THANK YOU.  MS. FAHY, I HAVE SOME

                    QUESTIONS HERE ON THE BILL.  I JUST WANT TO GO OVER THIS ONE MORE TIME

                    WITH YOU.  IF SOMEONE LEGALLY PURCHASES A FIREARM FROM A FEDERALLY

                    LEGAL LICENSED MANUFACTURE THROUGH A LICENSED DEALER TO AN INDIVIDUAL

                    WHO USES THE FIREARM IN A CRIME, HOW IS IT -- THAT -- ALL THE LIABILITY GOES

                    BACK TO THE MANUFACTURER ON THIS, OR COULD GO BACK TO THE

                    MANUFACTURER.

                                 MS. FAHY:  IT -- IT REALLY, IN THIS CASE, IT DOES DEPEND

                    ON THE FACTS OF THE CASE AND IT DEPENDS ON WHAT IT -- HOW THAT WAS SOLD

                    AND WHETHER -- WHAT TYPE OF PRACTICE.  SO IN OTHER WORDS, ONE OF THE

                    GOALS OF THIS LEGISLATION IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S VIDEO SURVEILLANCE

                    OF GUN SALES, RECORDING OF ALL SALES, TRAINING OF RETAILERS TO PREVENT ANY

                    TYPE OF STRAW PURCHASES WHICH CONTINUES TO BE A PROBLEM IN CERTAIN

                    INSTANCES, AS WELL AS BETTER RECORDKEEPING AND REGULAR MONITORING OF

                    SHIPMENTS AND SALES.  SO THERE'S A VERY HIGH THRESHOLD HERE AND, AGAIN,

                    IT WOULD DEPEND ON -- ON MORE OF THE FACTS OF THE CASE.  BUT NO, JUST THE

                    FACT THAT A GUN WAS USED IN A -- IN A HOMICIDE DOES NOT IMMEDIATELY --

                    WOULD NOT MAKE IT SUBJECT TO THIS PROVISION TO -- THIS PUBLIC NUISANCE

                    PROVISION.

                                 MR. MILLER:  BUT AREN'T ALL THOSE FACTORS TO GET THE

                                         211



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    FIREARM ALONG THE WAY ALREADY BEING FOLLOWED BY THE MANUFACTURERS

                    AND THE DEALERS?

                                 MS. FAHY:  NO.  AND -- AND, QUITE FRANKLY, A NUMBER

                    OF THE GUN VIOLENCE ADVOCATES REALLY BELIEVE THAT IN NOT ALL -- NOT IN ALL

                    CASES.  AND WHILE WE HAVE MADE GREAT STRIDES HERE IN THIS STATE IN

                    PARTICULAR, WE KNOW THAT THIS IRON PIPELINE IS COMING PRIMARILY FROM A

                    FEW STATES UP INTO -- INTO NEW YORK, AND THIS WOULD ALLOW, JUST AS IF --

                    IF THERE WAS POLLUTION, SERIOUS POLLUTION IN -- IN IOWA THAT WENT DOWN

                    THE MISSISSIPPI AND -- AND CAUSED SOME SERIOUS HARM IN LOUISIANA, IT'S

                    A -- KIND OF A SIMILAR -- A SIMILAR THRESHOLD HERE WHERE THERE WERE

                    SLOPPY PRACTICES, WHERE THERE WAS A RECKLESSNESS ON BEHALF OF THE

                    DEALER, THERE THEN COULD BE -- THE FACTS COULD ALLOW FOR -- FOR

                    ENFORCEMENT TO BRING A -- A NUISANCE SUIT, A PUBLIC NUISANCE SUIT.  BUT IT

                    DOES NOT GUARANTEE A FAVORABLE JUDGMENT BY ANY -- BY ANY MEANS.  IT

                    WOULD HAVE TO SHOW -- THIS IS, AGAIN, CIVIL LIABILITY.  IT WOULD HAVE TO

                    SHOW RECKLESSNESS AND UNKNOWING -- UNKNOWING OF -- OF AN ILLEGAL

                    SALE.

                                 MR. MILLER:  OKAY.  HOW MANY OTHER STATES HAVE A

                    SIMILAR BILL THAT YOU KNOW OF?

                                 MS. FAHY:  NO OTHER STATE AT THIS POINT.  THIS WOULD

                    BE A FIRST IN THE COUNTRY AND, AGAIN, SOME OF THIS IS TO GO AT WHAT WAS

                    IMMUNITY, ESSENTIALLY, SUCH STRONG IMMUNITY, A RATHER UNPRECEDENTED

                    IMMUNITY THAT WAS PASSED IN 2005, AGAIN, BY FEDERAL -- FEDERAL STATUTE,

                    THE PLCAA, WHICH IS, AGAIN, THE PROTECTION OF LAWFUL COMMERCE AND

                    ARMS ACT.  SO NO OTHER STATE HAS BEEN ABLE TO -- TO FIND THIS NARROW

                                         212



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WINDOW, IF YOU WILL, EVEN THOUGH IT DID CONTAIN IN THAT LAW -- DID

                    CONTAIN A PREDICATE EXEMPTION, OR EXCEPTION, IF YOU WILL, AND WE

                    BELIEVE THAT THIS BILL BY USING THE PUBLIC NUISANCE LAW, THAT WE CAN

                    CREATE A PREDICATE STATUTE TO HELP REINSTATE SOME OF THE LIABILITY THAT HAS

                    BEEN LOST SINCE 2005 IN THIS STATE, LET ALONE NATIONALLY.  AND I SHOULD

                    ADD THE BIDEN ADMIN -- THE PRESIDENT HIMSELF, PRESIDENT BIDEN, HAS

                    REPEATEDLY AND VERY RECENTLY TALKED ABOUT TRYING TO MAKE THESE CHANGES

                    AT THE FEDERAL LEVEL, BUT THERE HAS BEEN CONSIDERABLE PARALYSIS IN

                    CONGRESS ON THIS ISSUE.

                                 MR. MILLER:  OKAY.  BACK TO THE DEALER, OR, OKAY --

                    THIS GOES BACK TO THE MANUFACTURERS NOW, AND YOU SAID THE DEALERS WILL

                    BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IF THIS LAW IS PASSED, ALSO.  SO -- SO THERE'S A -- A

                    FAST BUTTON HIT WHEN A CRIME'S COMMITTED THAT OF COURSE YOU HAVE THE

                    PERSON WHO COMMITTED THE CRIME AND EVERYBODY WHO WAS ASSOCIATED

                    WITH ANY PART OF THAT CRIME AND ANYTHING THAT WAS EVER USED IN THE

                    CRIME RIGHT BACK TO THE MANUFACTURER, CORRECT?  IS THAT WHAT THIS BILL IS

                    TELLING ME?  THIS, IN A NUTSHELL.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THIS -- AGAIN -- THIS WOULD -- AGAIN, THIS

                    WOULD BE FOR THE COURTS TO DECIDE AND IT WOULD NEED -- WE WOULD --

                    THERE WOULD NEED TO BE A DEMONSTRATION OF UNTENABLE RISK OF HARM THAT

                    WAS CREATED THROUGH THE BUSINESS PRACTICES, THROUGH RECKLESS TYPES OF

                    BUSINESS PRACTICES THAT DID LEAD TO THE -- THE DOWNSTREAM, IF YOU WILL, OR

                    PROBLEMS THROUGH THE SALE OF GUNS.  SO WHETHER IT'S THE MANUFACTURERS

                    OR THE DEALERS, THIS IS A -- THE FACTS WOULD HAVE TO SPEAK FOR THE CASE

                    AND, QUITE FRANKLY, YOU KNOW, THIS IS A RATHER HIGH THRESHOLD.  THIS IS A

                                         213



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NARROW WINDOW, BUT WE DO THINK THERE IS AN EFFORT TO GO AFTER WHAT ARE

                    REALLY VERY FEW BAD ACTORS IN TERMS OF SELLING GUNS THAT END UP AS PART

                    OF THIS IRON PIPELINE AND END UP ON OUR STREETS AND -- AND, AS WE KNOW,

                    HAVE BEEN PROLIFERATING IN RECENT YEARS.

                                 MR. MILLER:  OKAY.  CAN YOU GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE

                    HOW THIS WOULD GO BACK TO A MANUFACTURER?

                                 MS. FAHY:  FOR INSTANCE, IF THE STRAW -- THE STRAW

                    SALES THAT I MENTIONED, OR IF -- OH, THERE WAS A -- THERE WAS A CASE PRIOR

                    TO PLCAA BEING PASSED IN THE EARLY 2000S WHERE THE GUN INDUSTRY WAS

                    HELD ACCOUNTABLE AND THAT WAS -- SORRY.  IT WAS AS A RESULT OF A SNIPER, A

                    VERY SERIOUS SNIPER SHOOTING AND BOTH SHOOTERS HAD BEEN PROHIBITED

                    FROM BUYING GUNS; YET, IN THIS CASE, THE MANUFACTURER, IN THIS CASE IT

                    WAS BUSHMASTER, CHOSE TO SELL THESE ASSAULT WEAPONS THROUGH A WHAT

                    WAS CONSIDERED A KNOWINGLY CORRUPT DEALER WHO HAD REPEATEDLY

                    VIOLATED THE LAW IN THE PAST, YET SOLD OVER 200 GUNS AND KEPT NO RECORD

                    OF SALE AND THE GUNS ARE PRESUMED TO HAVE BEEN SOLD OFF THE BOOKS, IF

                    YOU WILL.  SO IN THAT CASE, THE -- THE SNIPER'S GUN HAD BEEN UNACCOUNTED

                    FOR.  AGAIN, THEY WEREN'T JUST SLOPPY PRACTICES, IT WAS A -- IT WAS A

                    RECKLESS PRACTICE AND IN THIS CASE, BUSHMASTER DID SETTLE OUT OF COURT

                    FOR $2.5 MILLION TO THE -- TO THE VICTIMS.  IN -- FAST FORWARD THOUGH,

                    SINCE PLCAA HAS PASSED IN 2005, GIVEN THE CURRENT STANDARD AND

                    GIVEN THE CURRENT IMMUNITY THAT THEY HAVE HAD AT A NATIONAL LEVEL,

                    BUSHMASTER UNDER -- HAD THIS BEEN BROUGHT TO COURT SINCE 2005, THEY

                    PROBABLY WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN HELD LIABLE, THE MANUFACTURER NOR THE

                    DEALER FOR THOSE TYPES OF RECKLESS PRACTICES.

                                         214



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. MILLER:  THANK YOU, MR. [SIC] FAHY.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. MILLER:  I'VE READ THROUGH THIS BILL, WE'VE

                    TALKED ABOUT IT THROUGH THE COMMUNITY WHERE I LIVE IN AND THE DISTRICT

                    THAT I LIVE IN.  I HAVE REMINGTON ARMS, AS WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE

                    BUSHMASTER HERE, I HAVE REMINGTON ARMS IN MY BACKYARD.  THEY'RE

                    THE OLDEST, CONTINUOUS MANUFACTURER IN THE UNITED STATES, I BELIEVE

                    THEY'RE 206 YEARS OLD, AND THEY'RE ALSO ONE OF THE LEADING SPORTING ARM

                    MANUFACTURERS IN THE WORLD.  SO I'M JUST VERY CONCERNED AT HOW THIS ALL

                    GOES BACK TO THE MANUFACTURER.  YOU KNOW, A LOT OF THE -- A LOT OF THE

                    RESPONSES, I'M SURE THEY MADE A LOT OF SENSE TO ME, BUT THEN THEY -- BUT

                    THEN THEY DIDN'T.  YOU KNOW, IT'S LIKE ME WALKING INTO A CELL PHONE

                    STORE, PICKING UP A CELL PHONE WHICH I CAN TEXT ON VERY WELL, AND MOST

                    OF US CAN TEXT ON -- WHILE WE'RE DRIVING AND WE'RE BREAKING THE LAW, BUT

                    THERE'S NOTHING THERE THAT SAYS TO -- TO THE CELL PHONE MANUFACTURER THAT

                    YOU CAN'T TEXT, AND SAY I'M TEXTING, I GET THE CELL PHONE, I'M ALL EXCITED,

                    I'M TEXTING ON THE CELL PHONE, I LOSE CONTROL OF MY CAR AND I RUN

                    THROUGH A BUS STOP AND I INJURE AND KILL A GROUP OF PEOPLE.

                                 I BELIEVE WE'RE GOING DOWN A SLIPPERY SLOPE WITH THIS,

                    NOT JUST WITH THE GUN MANUFACTURERS, WHAT THIS BILL IS ALL ABOUT, BUT THIS

                    CAN GO ANYWHERE, OKAY.  WE CAN LOOK AT THE CELL PHONE, WE CAN LOOK AT

                    THE CAR MANUFACTURER, BUT THIS JUST DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.  YOU KNOW,

                    IT ALL GOES BACK INTO WHAT POINT IN OUR SOCIETY THAT WE TAKE OUT ALL

                    PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND JUST LOOK TO GO BACK ON -- ON A

                                         215



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MANUFACTURER.

                                 AGAIN, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, AND I WANT TO THANK --

                    THANK THE SPONSOR FOR ALLOWING ME TO ASK QUESTIONS, AND I WILL URGE ALL

                    OF MY -- ALL OF MY ASSEMBLY PEOPLE THERE TO VOTE NO ON THIS BILL.

                    THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. ANGELINO.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR MY QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY YIELDS, SIR.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU.  THIS -- THIS BILL HAS

                    SOME PRETTY BROAD WORDS IN THERE.  THE ONES I'M KEYING IN ON ARE

                    MANUFACTURING AND MARKETING.  AND I HEARD YOU SAY "SLOPPY" A COUPLE

                    OF TIMES AND I AGREE WITH YOU.  PROBABLY THE POINT OF SALE EITHER IN

                    NEW YORK OR ANOTHER STATE IS PROBABLY SLOPPY, AND THAT'S WHERE THE

                    PROBLEMS ARE OCCURRING.  CAN YOU GIVE ME SOME EXAMPLES?  MAYBE THE

                    WORST TWO OR THREE EXAMPLES OF SLOPPY MANUFACTURER OR SLOPPY

                    MARKETING?

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT PROBABLY WASN'T THE BEST CHOICE OF

                    WORDS.  IN MANY CASES WHAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS RECKLESSNESS.  AND

                    THAT IS WHERE, AGAIN, THERE IS A STRAW PURCHASE OR WHERE THERE IS NOT

                    TIGHT SECURITY IN THE GUN DEALER'S SHOP SUCH THAT IF IT WERE BROKEN INTO

                                         216



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THERE WOULD BE NO WAY TO TRACE IT.  THERE'S NOT VIDEO CAMERAS TO TRACE

                    WHERE GUNS MAY BE STOLEN OR SALES OUT THE BACK DOOR THAT AREN'T PART OF

                    THE TRACING.  SOME OF THE THINGS THAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR IS BETTER

                    PHYSICAL SECURITY MEASURES TO PREVENT THEFT OR -- OR SECURE STORAGE THAT

                    ARE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE AND RECORDING OF SALES.  BETTER TRAINING OF RETAIL

                    CLERKS, WHICH WE TALKED A LOT ABOUT IN THIS BODY ABOUT, THAT ARE TRAINED

                    TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE WHO SHOULDN'T BE BUYING GUNS ARE -- COULD BE

                    BETTER IDENTIFIED, AS WELL AS THOSE WHO ARE ATTEMPTING A STRAW PURCHASE.

                    AND -- OR THOSE WHO MAY BE IN CRISIS AS WELL AS A BETTER RECORDKEEPING,

                    MONITORING INVENTORY, THE -- THE DATA, YOU KNOW, TRYING TO GET TRACING,

                    THE DATA TRACING AS WELL AS REFUSING TO WORK WITH DISTRIBUTORS AND

                    RETAILERS.  IT IS -- ONE OF THE BETTER EXAMPLES IS THE -- THE DRUGS, WHAT WE

                    SAW WITH THE OPIOID CRISIS AND WHERE THERE WAS -- ULTIMATELY, THERE

                    WERE MANUFACTURERS WHO WERE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR SOME RECKLESS

                    PRACTICES.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THAT'S WHERE I STARTED MY

                    QUESTION.  I AGREE THAT THERE ARE SLOPPY SALES AND -- AT THE POINT OF --

                    POINT OF SALE, WHERE THE POTENTIAL PURCHASERS, STRAW PURCHASER OR

                    WHATEVER, VIDEO CAMERAS, THOSE ARE ALL GOOD IDEAS.  PROBABLY

                    EXPENSIVE, BUT THAT'S ALL POINT OF SALE.  I'M LOOKING AT THE BROAD WORDS

                    THAT GO INTO MARKETING AND MANUFACTURE.  I DON'T GET HOW MARKETING

                    YOUR PRODUCT SOMEHOW IS A PROBLEM IN THE PIPELINE OF IRON.

                                 MS. FAHY:  JUST -- JUST AS WE SAW WITH THE OPIOID

                    CRISIS AND THE DRUG MANUFACTURERS, THEY HAD TO DEMONSTRATE -- THERE WAS

                    QUITE A THRESHOLD, AND IF YOU CAN RECALL, JUST A FEW YEARS AGO MANY OF

                                         217



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    US WERE SKEPTICAL THAT THEY WOULD BE EVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.  BUT

                    THERE -- THERE WAS A DEMONSTRATION THAT THEIR MARKETING LED TO RECKLESS

                    AND ENDANGERMENT AND ULTIMATELY IN MANY CASES TO -- TO THOUSANDS OF

                    OPIOID DEATHS.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  BUT NO --

                                 MS. FAHY:  SO, AGAIN, IT'S A THRESHOLD.  AND THE FACTS

                    WOULD HAVE TO -- YOU KNOW, WE -- WE DON'T DENY THAT THERE'S A VERY

                    HIGH THRESHOLD HERE, AND THE FACTS WOULD HAVE TO BE PRESENTED.  IT'S THE

                    COURTS THAT WOULD HAVE TO DETERMINE THIS AND SHOW THAT THERE WAS AN

                    UNTENABLE RISK OF HARM OR KNOWINGLY AND RECKLESSLY HAVE SOLD THOSE

                    GUNS.  SO AGAIN, THERE IS A -- THERE'S A PRETTY HIGH THRESHOLD HERE.  AND

                    PART OF THAT, BY THE WAY, I SHOULD ADD, IS BECAUSE WE KNOW THAT IT'S --

                    IT'S A FEW BAD ACTORS HERE.  BUT AS IN SO MANY INDUSTRIES, IT'S A FEW BAD

                    ACTORS.  AND THE VAST MAJORITY OF -- OF GUNS COMING UP THIS IRON

                    PIPELINE IS -- THE BRADY -- THE BRADY CENTER FOR GUN VIOLENCE HAS --

                    HAS ESTIMATED THAT ROUGHLY 5 PERCENT OF GUN DEALERS, 5 PERCENT ARE

                    SUPPLYING OVER 90 PERCENT OF THE ILLEGAL GUNS IN NEW YORK.  SO, YOU

                    KNOW, THIS IS NOT A TARGETING OF REMINGTON OR -- OR ANY OTHER PARTICULAR

                    MANUFACTURER OR DEALER, FOR THAT MATTER.  THIS IS TRYING TO MAKE SURE

                    THAT WE ARE GOING AFTER THOSE WITH RECKLESS PRACTICES.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  BUT WE'RE GOING AFTER THAT SMALL

                    PERCENTAGE BY ENACTING A LAW THAT IMPACTS EVERYONE.  AND THAT -- THAT --

                    A LOT OF PEOPLE THINK THAT'S AN INFRINGEMENT.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT'S -- IT -- I -- I'M AFRAID I WOULDN'T

                    NECESSARILY AGREE WITH THAT BECAUSE THE -- THOSE WHO ARE... WHAT'S THE

                                         218



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    LINE I WAS GOING TO -- I'LL -- I'LL USE A LINE THAT THE SENATE SPONSOR HAS

                    USED MANY TIMES AND I THINK IT'S AN APPROPRIATE ONE:  RESPONSIBLE GUN

                    COMPANIES, JUST LIKE RESPONSIBLE DRUG COMPANIES, IN THIS CASE THE

                    PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES, DIDN'T NEED SPECIAL PROTECTION FROM

                    LAWSUITS.  BUT THE IRRESPONSIBLE ONES, YOU KNOW, DO NOT DESERVE IT.

                    AND I THINK THAT'S, AGAIN, PART OF WHAT WE ARE SEEKING HERE.  THIS HAS

                    BECOME A PUBLIC NUISANCE IN MANY WAYS, TO PUT IT MILDLY.  AND THE

                    OTHER PART OF THIS IS THAT SINCE 2005, BECAUSE THE GUN INDUSTRY HAS HAD

                    SUCH UNPRECEDENTED PROTECTIONS FROM ANY CIVIL LIABILITY, THEY HAVE --

                    REALLY HAD NO INCENTIVE TO INCREASE SAFETY MEASURES ON -- ON GUNS AND

                    -- OR WITH THEIR DEALERS AND TO -- TO WATCH THAT SUPPLY CHAIN AND TO GO

                    AFTER THAT SUPPLY CHAIN.  AND WE'VE SEEN THIS IN ENVIRONMENTAL

                    LEGISLATION, WE'VE NOW SEEN IT WITH PHARMACEUTICALS.  WE'VE EVEN SEEN

                    THIS WITH COVID MANUFACTURERS HAVING TO WATCH, YOU KNOW, WHERE

                    THEY'RE -- WHERE THEY'RE BUYING -- YOU KNOW, WHO IS MANUFACTURING

                    OVERSEAS.  SO WE HAVE SEEN THIS IN OTHER INDUSTRIES, AND THIS IS THE ONLY

                    INDUSTRY, AS BEST WE KNOW, THAT HAS HAD SUCH COMPLETE IMMUNITY FROM

                    WATCHING THAT SUPPLY CHAIN.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  DO YOU THINK THAT IMMUNITY IS

                    BECAUSE THIS IS ONE OF THE FEW INDUSTRIES THAT'S ENUMERATED IN OUR

                    CONSTITUTION?

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT'S -- I'M SORRY, THAT'S WHAT?

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THIS IS OF THE FEW INDUSTRIES THAT'S

                    ENUMERATED IN OUR CONSTITUTION.

                                 MS. FAHY:  IT IS -- THIS IS -- YEAH, THIS IS NOT -- THIS IS

                                         219



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    NOT A SECOND AMENDMENT ISSUE.  I -- I'VE PASSED LEGISLATION HERE TO --

                    THAT HAS HELPED EXPAND HUNTING AND -- AND HERE IN -- IN ALBANY COUNTY

                    WHERE I LIVE.  THIS IS -- I'M FULLY RESPECTFUL OF LEGITIMATE GUN OWNERS

                    AND THEY -- THEIR ABILITY TO OWN AND -- OWN AND PURCHASE GUNS AND

                    HUNTING PARAPHERNALIA.  IT IS -- THIS IS NOT ABOUT GOING AFTER INDIVIDUAL

                    USERS AND IT IS NOT ABOUT -- THIS IS NOT A SECOND AMENDMENT PROPOSAL.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, MADAM.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ANGELINO, ON THE

                    BILL.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, SIR.  I CAN'T HELP BUT

                    NOTICE THAT THESE ARE -- ALL THESE GUN SAFETY BILLS OR INFRINGEMENT BILLS

                    ARE COMING UP AT THE SAME TIME THAT CRIME IS RUNNING RAMPANT IN ALL THE

                    URBAN AREAS OF NEW YORK STATE, FROM BUFFALO, ROCHESTER, SYRACUSE,

                    ALBANY RIGHT DOWN THE HUDSON RIVER TO NEW YORK CITY.  IT SHOULD

                    COME AS NO SURPRISE THAT ALL THIS IS HAPPENING AFTER A FEW YEARS OF

                    UNDERMINING THE NEW YORK STATE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, THE LAST

                    COUPLE OF YEARS GOING RIGHT AFTER LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS, MAKING

                    THEIR JOB ALREADY TOUGH EVEN HARDER TO DO.  THIS BODY ALWAYS REACTS IN

                    A WAY THAT NEVER LIMITS CRIMINALS FROM POSSESSING AND USING ILLEGAL

                    FIREARMS, BUT ALWAYS INFRINGES UPON LAWFUL GUN OWNERS AND THEIR RIGHT

                    TO POSSESS FIREARMS.  AND WHEN WE ENACT AND PASS THESE BILLS, WHAT WE

                    END UP DOING IS MAKING THE LAWFUL PEOPLE INADVERTENT CRIMINALS AND

                    THEY DON'T EVEN KNOW IT.

                                         220



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 I URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO VOTE NO ON THIS AND THAT'S

                    WHAT I'LL BE DOING AND I ASK THEM TO DO LIKEWISE.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR FROM THE 109TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT IN ALBANY CARE TO

                    ANSWER A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I -- I REALLY

                    APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO REALLY GET TO THE HEART OF THIS ISSUE.  HOW

                    DID YOU ARRIVE AT THE TERM IN QUOTATION, "GUN INDUSTRY MEMBERS",

                    UNQUOTE, PERSON, FIRM, CORPORATIONS, COMPANY, PARTNERSHIP, SOCIETY OR

                    JOINT STOCK -- WHERE DID -- WHERE DID THAT COME FROM?

                                 MS. FAHY:  I THINK THAT WAS A WAY TO CAPTURE THOSE

                    WHO MAY BE SUBJECT TO -- TO THE PROVISIONS OF THIS BILL.  AND IT WAS

                    TRYING TO CAPTURE AS MANY OF -- YOU KNOW, IT -- IT WAS TRYING TO CAPTURE

                    AS MUCH OF THE INDUSTRY AS POSSIBLE, AGAIN, TO MAKE SURE THAT WE --

                    THERE IS THE ABILITY TO GO AFTER THE BAD ACTORS THAT WE DISCUSSED EARLIER.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO THIS INCLUDES EVERYONE IN THE

                    INDUSTRY, BOTH UPSTREAM, THE MANUFACTURERS, ALL THE WAY DOWN TO THE

                    DISTRIBUTORS, THE SALES, THE REPAIR.  ANYBODY WHO TOUCHES A GUN IS

                    SUBJECT TO THIS LAW.

                                         221



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. FAHY:  AGAIN, THE COURTS WOULD HAVE TO DECIDE,

                    YOU KNOW --

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WHAT IS YOUR INTENT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  -- DECIDE THE -- THE CASE.  BUT KEEP IN

                    MIND THAT PLCAA, THE FEDERAL LAW THAT WAS PASSED IN 2005, GAVE

                    BROAD, BROAD IMMUNITY TO THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY.  HENCE, WE ARE TRYING TO

                    GO BACK AT THAT AND DEFINE THE ENTIRE INDUSTRY AND AGAIN MAKE SURE THAT

                    THOSE WHO NEED TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE HERE CAN BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.

                    AGAIN, FOR THE KNOWLEDGE OR RECKLESSNESS OF -- YOU KNOW, THERE IS THAT

                    THRESHOLD OF LIABILITY THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DEMONSTRATED HERE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO, IF THE -- THE FEDERAL LAW THAT

                    YOU'VE DESCRIBED HAS BEEN THE LAW OF THE LAND FOR ABOUT 18 YEARS NOW,

                    IS THAT ABOUT RIGHT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  I'D SAY 16, BUT CLOSE ENOUGH.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  WELL, IN -- IN --

                                 MS. FAHY:  2005.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  IF IT'S -- IF IT'S SUCH A BAD LAW WHY

                    HASN'T IT BEEN OVERTURNED OR CHALLENGED IN COURT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  IT -- IT HAS BEEN CHALLENGED.  AND AS YOU

                    KNOW, THERE HAS BEEN A GOOD DEAL OF PARALYSIS AS WE SPOKE EARLIER, A

                    GOOD DEAL OF PARALYSIS IN CONGRESS.  YOU HAVE JUST A COUPLE OF MONTHS

                    AGO HEARD PRESIDENT BIDEN SPEAK QUITE FORCEFULLY, ACTUALLY, THAT HIS

                    GOAL IS TO BEGIN TO OVERTURN THIS TYPE OF IMMUNITY, AGAIN, BECAUSE IT'S

                    SO UNPRECEDENTED.  SO THERE IS THE GOAL TO OVERTURN IT, BUT IT WAS A -- IT

                    WAS A VERY FAR-REACHING AND BROAD LAW THAT WAS ADOPTED IN 2005.  AND

                                         222



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SO THIS IS ONE OF A NUMBER OF EFFORTS THAT HAVE BEEN UNDER WAY TO TRY TO

                    MORE NARROWLY HOLD THOSE WHO SHOULD BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE

                    ACCOUNTABLE.  YOU KNOW, AS -- AS YOU HAVE SEEN TONIGHT, SINCE I FIRST

                    CAME HERE IN 2013 WE HAVE -- I'M ALSO THE SPONSOR OF THE BUMP STOCK

                    LEGISLATION.  EVERY -- WE ARE LOOKING AT NUMEROUS AVENUES TO TRY TO

                    CLOSE AS MANY LOOPHOLES AS POSSIBLE AND -- AND AS LONG AS I CAN

                    REMEMBER, WE HAVE TALKED ABOUT AN IRON PIPELINE.  SO, WE MAY HAVE

                    SOME OF THE STRICTEST GUN LAWS IN THE COUNTRY; HOWEVER, WE STILL HAVE A

                    FIERCE IRON PIPELINE THAT HAS BEEN IN PLACE, IF YOU WILL, FOR DECADES.  SO

                    WHILE WE MAY HAVE DONE I THINK YEOMAN'S WORK IN TERMS OF CLOSING

                    DOWN LOOPHOLES AND -- AND WE -- WE DON'T HAVE AS MANY OF THE BAD

                    ACTORS THAT YOU HEARD ME REFER TO EARLIER, BUT WE KNOW THAT THERE ARE

                    DISTRIBUTORS AND DEALERS IN OTHER STATES THAT ARE NOT -- HAVE NOT BEEN AS

                    VIGILANT.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO IT'S YOUR INTENT TO CIRCUMVENT

                    FEDERAL LAW IN THIS CASE WITH A STATE LAW.

                                 MS. FAHY:  YEAH, IT'S -- IT'S CERTAINLY NOT TO -- I

                    WOULDN'T CALL IT CIRCUMVENT.  AT THAT TIME WHEN THE LAW WAS PASSED,

                    AGAIN UNDER PLCAA IN 2005, IT DID CONTAIN A NARROW PREDICATE

                    EXCEPTION.  AND IT SAID THAT THE STATES CAN PASS A PREDICATE STATUTE TO

                    REINSTATE SOME LIABILITY.  THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT THIS PROPOSAL DOES, TO TAKE

                    THE NUISANCE LAW AND -- AND WALK THAT NARROW PATH, IF YOU WILL, TO GO

                    AFTER WHAT IN -- WHAT WE REALLY THINK ARE VERY FEW BAD ACTORS.  THIS IS

                    NOT A -- THIS IS NOT A BROAD-BASED BILL.  AGAIN, IF THE BRADY -- THEY'VE

                    BEEN -- NO DOUBT WHAT SIDE OF THE FENCE THEY'RE ON, BRADY -- THE -- THE

                                         223



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    BRADY COALITION AND THE BRADY CENTER FOR -- AGAINST -- THE BRADY

                    CENTER FOR GUN VIOLENCE PREVENTION, THEY'RE THE ONES THAT HAVE

                    ESTIMATED IT IS ABOUT 5 PERCENT OF GUN DEALERS WHO ARE SUPPLYING ABOUT

                    90 PERCENT OF THE ILLEGAL GUNS COMING INTO NEW YORK.  SO -- AND THAT'S,

                    YOU KNOW, THAT'S FROM A --A, YOU KNOW, A RECOGNIZED BIASED GROUP, IF

                    YOU WILL.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO HOW IS THIS A PUBLIC NUISANCE?

                    CAN YOU EXPLAIN WHY YOUR BILL RESTS ITSELF ON -- ON PUBLIC NUISANCE

                    OVER SOME SORT OF CRIMINALITY?

                                 MS. FAHY:  IT'S -- IT IS -- BECAUSE THIS IS USING -- IT'S

                    CIVIL LIABILITY, AND THAT IS THE COMMON APPROACH THAT WE'VE SEEN TO --

                    WITH OTHER INDUSTRIES SUCH AS -- AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, SUCH AS WITH THE

                    PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AND -- AND OTHERS.  IT IS THE -- THE PUBLIC

                    NUISANCE LAW THAT HAS BEEN APPLIED.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  BUT -- BUT THE ULTIMATE GOAL IS TO

                    STOP CRIMINALS FROM USING GUNS TO KILL PEOPLE.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT'S ONE OF THE GOALS, AND -- AND THE

                    MORE WE CAN STOP THE SUPPLY -- IT'S A MULTI-PRONGED APPROACH THAT

                    YOU'VE HEARD, AGAIN, SO MUCH OF TONIGHT AS WELL AS OVER THE LAST FEW

                    YEARS.  I DID THE BUMP STOCK BILL A FEW YEARS AGO.  IT IS TO -- TO TRY TO

                    TIGHTEN UP AS MANY AVENUES AS POSSIBLE.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO IN THIS CASE HOW DOES THIS

                    PREVENT CRIMINALS FROM ACTUALLY COMMITTING CRIMES?  BECAUSE IT'S

                    ACTUALLY -- IT'S A PERSON THAT COMMITS A CRIME, NOT A GUN.  IT'S THE PERSON

                    USING A GUN THAT COMMITS A CRIME.

                                         224



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. FAHY:  WELL, FIRST OF ALL, IF WE CAN STOP -- IF WE

                    CAN STOP THE FLOW THERE'S NOT AS EASY AN ACCESS OF -- YOU JUST HEARD IN

                    THE LAST DEBATE ABOUT A COMMUNITY GUN THAT WAS FOUND HERE IN THE CITY

                    -- IN THE CITY OF ALBANY.  THE LESS GUNS THAT ARE ON THE STREETS, THE --

                    THE LESS OPPORTUNITY FOR WHAT ARE OFTEN CRIMES OF PASSION.  SO THE --

                    AND -- AND WE KNOW THAT THIS COUNTRY, MORE THAN ANY OTHER COUNTRY IN

                    THE WORLD, HAS A PROLIFERATION OF --  OF GUNS AND WE HAVE THE HIGHEST

                    NUMBERS OF GUN VIOLENCE.  BY THE WAY, I SHOULD ADD THAT THIS MAY HELP

                    WITH THE GUNS IN THE HOME IF -- IF WE HAD MORE SAFETY PROTECTIONS.

                    AGAIN, I MENTIONED THAT THIS MAY INCENTIVIZE OTHER SAFETY -- OTHER

                    SAFETY MEASURES AND THAT MAY PROTECT PEOPLE IN THEIR OWN HOME.

                    WE'VE -- WE'VE ALL HEARD OF INCIDENCES AND ALL HAD INCIDENCES IN OUR

                    COMMUNITIES WHERE CHILDREN HAVE HAD ACCESS TO GUNS AND UN --

                    UNKNOWINGLY OR UNINTENTIONALLY CREATED GREAT HARM TO THEMSELVES OR

                    OTHERS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO --

                                 MS. FAHY:  SO AGAIN, THIS IS JUST TO STEM THE FLOW OF

                    AND STOP THE RECKLESS PRACTICES THAT HAVE LED TO THE PROLIFERATION OF

                    ILLEGAL GUNS INTO OUR COMMUNITIES.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  BUT THIS -- BUT THIS ISN'T A CRIMINAL

                    STATUTE.  IT DOESN'T STOP PEOPLE WHO ARE -- ARE ACTUALLY COMMITTING

                    CRIMES FROM DOING THOSE CRIMES.  IT'S -- IT'S AN ATTEMPT USING THIS -- THE

                    SUPPLY FUNCTION TO REDUCE THE NUMBER THAT THEY HAVE AVAILABLE.  WHAT

                    IS YOUR GOAL?  IS IT TO HAVE ZERO GUNS IN AMERICA?

                                 MS. FAHY:  NO.  I'VE ACTUALLY -- FIRST OF ALL, THAT IS

                                         225



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    EXACTLY -- YOUR EARLIER STATEMENT IS EXACTLY THE INTENT.  IT IS TO -- TO TRY TO

                    LIMIT THE SUPPLY, AGAIN, ESPECIALLY OF THE ILLEGAL GUNS AND TO GO AFTER

                    BAD ACTORS, BAD PRACTICES OR RECKLESS PRACTICES.  IN TERMS OF -- SO -- SO IT

                    IS -- IT IS TO GO AFTER THE SUPPLY.  THAT SAID, AGAIN, THIS IS PART OF -- THIS

                    IS ONE MEASURE TO ADDRESS A PROBLEM THAT HAS FUELED THE CRISIS, IN MY

                    VIEW.  ESPECIALLY SINCE 2005 WHEN -- WHEN THIS INDUSTRY -- YOU KNOW,

                    NO OTHER INDUSTRY THAT I CAN POINT TO HAS HAD SUCH IMMUNITY.  AND

                    AGAIN, WE -- WE ACTUALLY THOUGHT THE -- THE PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY

                    WOULD HAVE MORE IMMUNITY AND EVEN THEY HAVE BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE

                    FOR SOME OF THE RECKLESS PRACTICES THAT DID HELP FUEL THE OPIOID CRISIS

                    THAT WE'RE STILL GRAPPLING WITH.  EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT DIRECT, IT WAS A

                    MORE INDIRECT, BUT THEN IN MANY CASES THEY KNOWINGLY DEALT WITH A

                    SLOPPY SUPPLY CHAIN - THERE I GO WITH SLOPPY - A RECKLESS SUPPLY CHAIN.

                    AND IT IS, AGAIN, THE SAME CASE HERE.  SO, YES, IT IS TO ADDRESS THE

                    SUPPLY, BUT THIS IS NOT A STANDALONE.  WE HAVE MANY OTHER MEASURES

                    THAT WE ARE ADOPTING HERE TONIGHT AND MANY OTHER MEASURES THAT WE

                    HAVE ADOPTED OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS.  AND WHILE WE'VE SEEN A MASSIVE

                    SPIKE IN CRIME AND IN GUN VIOLENCE THIS LAST YEAR, GENERALLY, THERE IS --

                    AND THERE'S BEEN GREAT DATA ON THIS -- GENERALLY WE HAVE ONE OF THE SAFER

                    STATES FOR GUN VIOLENCE BECAUSE OFTEN THE TOUGHER THE GUN LAWS --

                    THERE'S AN INVERSE RELATIONSHIP.  THE TOUGHER THE GUN LAWS, THE LESS THE

                    GUN VIOLENCE.  AND SO WE DO KNOW THROUGH DEMONSTRATED DATA OVER THE

                    LAST FEW DECADES THAT IT DOES HELP TO STEM GUN VIOLENCE WHEN WE HAVE

                    STRONGER GUN PROTECTIONS.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  ALL RIGHT.  I GUESS THAT'S -- THAT'S

                                         226



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CERTAINLY DEBATABLE.  BUT JUST TO SUMMARIZE, IN ORDER TO PREVENT

                    CRIMINALS FROM COMMITTING CRIMES WITH GUNS THAT ARE PRIMARILY ILLEGAL,

                    AND WE -- WE WENT THROUGH THE NUMBERS IN -- IN THE PREVIOUS PARTS OF

                    OUR BILLS AND OUR DEBATE TONIGHT -- WE'RE GOING TO GO -- WE'RE GOING TO

                    GO AFTER LEGAL MEMBERS OF THE ENTIRE GUN INDUSTRY TO TRY TO TARGET SOME

                    BAD ACTORS IN A -- IN A SMALL NUMBER TO -- TO DO THAT.  SO WE'RE GOING TO

                    TRAMPLE ON THE RIGHTS OF MANY IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF GUNS

                    WHEN, IN FACT, IT MAY NOT EVEN WORK AT ALL SORT OF THING.

                                 SO, I REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR -- YOUR TIME IN -- IN

                    ANSWERING QUESTIONS HERE TONIGHT.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SMULLEN:  SO, WHAT -- WHAT THE SPONSOR HAS IN

                    MIND IS AN INDIRECT APPROACH TO A DIRECT PROBLEM.  THE PROBLEM IS

                    CRIMINALS COMMITTING CRIMES WITH GUNS.  BUT WE'RE GOING TO GO AFTER

                    THE SUPPLY CHAIN IN AN INDIRECT FASHION THAT MAY OR MAY NOT HAVE ANY

                    CORRELATION TO RESULTS.  AND I JUST -- I JUST SAY AGAIN, THIS IS AN EXAMPLE

                    OF A DEATH BY A THOUSAND CUTS STRATEGY ON LEGITIMATE LAW-ABIDING GUN

                    OWNERS WHO FOLLOW THE -- THE RULE OF LAW, WHO ARE RESPONSIBLE

                    MEMBERS OF THEIR COMMUNITY AND WHO OWN GUNS FOR VARIOUS PURPOSES

                    TO INCLUDE HUNTING, PERSONAL PROTECTION, COLLECTING, AND WE'RE GOING TO

                    MAKE IT HARDER AND HARDER ON THEM.  IN FACT, WE'RE GOING TO MAKE IT

                    HARDER ON EVEN THE PEOPLE THAT MANUFACTURE AND DISTRIBUTE THOSE GUNS

                    LEGALLY IN NEW YORK STATE.  PROBABLY SO MUCH SO THAT THEY'RE GOING TO

                    CHOOSE TO GO ELSEWHERE WHERE THEY'RE MORE WELCOME.  AND THAT'S --

                                         227



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THAT'S A REAL SHAME BECAUSE MANY OF THOSE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN MAKING

                    THOSE FIREARMS LEGALLY FOR -- FOR GOOD PURPOSES TO SUPPORT THE SECOND

                    AMENDMENT IN MY DISTRICT.  AND THEY DON'T TAKE IT KINDLY OR LIGHTLY THAT

                    -- THAT THEIR RIGHTS WHICH ARE ACTUALLY ENSHRINED IN NOT ONLY THE

                    CONSTITUTION BUT IN SPECIFIC FEDERAL LAW, ARE NOW JUXTAPOSED AGAINST AN

                    IDEOLOGY OF GUN CONTROL THAT HAS NO BEARING WHATSOEVER ON THE VAST

                    MAJORITY OF THE AREAS OF NEW YORK STATE.

                                 FOR THAT REASON AND FOR MANY OTHERS I'LL BE OPPOSING

                    THIS LEGISLATION AND URGE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES TO THINK THIS THROUGH ON A

                    BIPARTISAN LEVEL.  IF -- IF THIS WAS A LAW BEING PASSED TO TARGET YOU, WHAT

                    WOULD YOU THINK ABOUT IT IF IT WERE SOME OTHER ISSUE?  MR. SPEAKER,

                    THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. TAGUE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A QUICK QUESTION?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU.  AND THANK YOU, MS. --

                    MS. FAHY.  JUST -- I'D LIKE YOU TO CLARIFY FOR ME AGAIN, BECAUSE I'M

                    HAVING TROUBLE WRAPPING MYSELF AROUND THIS.  IN WHAT SCENARIO WOULD A

                    GUN SHOP OWNER OR A MANUFACTURER BE RESPONSIBLE?

                                 MS. FAHY:  KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS BILL DOES NOT

                                         228



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GUARANTEE A FAVORABLE JUDGMENT.  IT JUST -- JUST BECAUSE SOMEBODY HAS

                    BEEN HARMED BY A GUN.  THIS IS A CIVIL LIABILITY.  THIS IS OPENING UP THE

                    DOOR FOR CIVIL LIABILITY CASES UNDER THE NUISANCE LAW -- PUBLIC NUISANCE

                    LAW.  CIVIL CASES ARE EXTREMELY FACT-BASED, SO ANY SUIT BROUGHT UNDER

                    THIS WOULD HAVE TO DEMONSTRATE A PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE THAT THE

                    GUN INDUSTRY, OR, YOU KNOW, IN THIS CASE A PARTICULAR ACTOR CREATED AN

                    UNTENABLE RISK OF HARM THAT LED TO THE VIOLATION OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE SET

                    FORTH IN THIS BILL.  SO, I -- I GAVE A COUPLE OF EXAMPLES EARLIER AND I'M

                    HAPPY TO -- TO REITERATE THOSE AGAIN.  FOR INSTANCE, WHERE A DEALER OR

                    GUN STORE HAD LAXED PHYSICAL SECURITY MEASURES THAT MAY -- THAT DID NOT

                    PREVENT THEFTS, SUCH AS SECURE STORAGE PLACES OR ALARMS -- SERIOUS ALARM

                    SYSTEMS, VIDEO SURVEILLANCE OF AND A RECORDING OF THE SALES, THE TRAINING

                    OF RETAILERS AND EMPLOYEES TO IDENTIFY STRAW PURCHASERS OR THOSE IN

                    CRISIS OR IN DANGER, IF YOU WILL, AND ENSURING RECORDKEEPING OF ALL

                    TRANSACTIONS AS WELL AS MONITORING INVENTORY AND SHIPMENTS, AND AS

                    WELL AS TRACING DATA.  SO, IT IS -- IT IS INTENDED TO HELP MAKE SURE THAT

                    THERE IS A -- A VIGILANCE WITHIN THE INDUSTRY TO -- TO MONITOR THEMSELVES

                    AND TO MAKE SURE THAT MANUFACTURERS OR DEALERS ARE DEALING WITH

                    LEGITIMATE STOREOWNERS OR OTHER DISTRIBUTORS.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  OKAY.  LET ME ASK YOU THIS QUESTION.

                    DO YOU KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED IN THE UNITED STATES LAST

                    YEAR BY ILLEGAL GUNS AND HOW MANY PEOPLE WERE KILLED IN THE UNITED

                    STATES LAST YEAR IN AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENTS?

                                 MS. FAHY:  UM, I -- I HAD -- BY ILLEGAL GUNS, I DON'T

                    HAVE THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF ME, BUT IT IS -- IT'S IN THE TENS OF THOUSANDS.

                                         229



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    AND YES, AUTOMOBILES ARE -- ARE STILL -- IT'S STILL A HIGHER NUMBER OF

                    THOSE KILLED IN AUTOMOBILES.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  WELL, LISTEN, WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, I

                    APPRECIATE YOU ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.  I HAVE A LOT OF RESPECT FOR

                    YOU.  I COMPLETELY DISAGREE WITH YOU ON THIS BILL, BUT WE'VE WORKED

                    TOGETHER ON OTHER -- ON OTHER THINGS AND I DO DISAGREE WITH YOU THAT THIS

                    ISN'T AN ATTACK ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT.  BUT AGAIN, I APPRECIATE

                    YOUR TIME, THE RESPECT AND THE ANSWERS.

                                 ON THE BILL, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    TAGUE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  YOU KNOW, THIS REALLY BRINGS TO

                    QUESTION LAWSUITS ACROSS THE COUNTRY.  THIS WILL SET A PRECEDENCE

                    REGARDLESS OF WHAT -- HOW IT'S IN THE BILL OR NOT, WHENEVER THERE'S AN

                    INCIDENT WE'LL NOW BE SUING MANUFACTURERS -- GUN MANUFACTURERS AND

                    GUN SHOP OWNERS.  THIS IS -- THIS IS THE EXACT PROBLEM THAT'S RUNNING

                    RAMPANT IN OUR COUNTRY.  SO I ASK THE QUESTION, IF YOU BUY A VEHICLE AND

                    YOU GO OUT AND DRIVE DRUNK AND YOU -- AND YOU END UP IN AN ACCIDENT,

                    ARE YOU GOING TO TURN AROUND AND SUE THE MANUFACTURER OF THE CAR?

                    WE'RE JUST GETTING CARRIED AWAY WITH THIS.  IT'S RIDICULOUS.

                                 FOR THOSE REASONS, I'LL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE AND I

                    URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  LET'S PUT SOME COMMON SENSE

                    BEHIND THESE BILLS, NUMBER ONE.  AND SECONDLY, WHAT ABOUT PERSONAL

                    RESPONSIBILITY?  PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY TO BE A GUN OWNER, TO DRIVE A

                                         230



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    VEHICLE, TO DO ALL THOSE TYPES OF THINGS TAKE PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

                    WE CANNOT LEGISLATE COMMON SENSE AND PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY.

                    AGAIN, I'LL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE, URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE

                    SAME.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. LEMONDES.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  HAPPY TO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY YIELDS.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  THANK YOU.  I HEARD SEVERAL TIMES

                    DURING THIS DEBATE THE WORD "BAD ACTORS" AND "RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT",

                    ET CETERA AS A STANDARD THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE PROVEN.  THERE'S ONE WORD

                    OF EVERYTHING IN THE -- IN THE -- IN THE BILL THAT BOTHERS ME THE MOST, AND

                    THAT IS THE WORD "PERSON."  WHEN YOU -- WHEN YOU WALK INTO

                    RESPONSIBILITY FOR THOSE WHO WOULD BE LIABLE UNDER THIS BILL DOWN TO

                    THE PERSON LEVEL, THAT MAKES ME THINK OF PEOPLE ON ASSEMBLY LINES

                    WORKING AT THEIR JOB, PERHAPS NOT WELL PAID, BUT HAVING FAMILIES.

                    GOOD, HARDWORKING NEW YORKERS WORKING AT A JOB THAT THEY BELIEVE IN,

                    WORKING IN A PLACE THAT IS -- THAT IS PART OF OUR AMERICAN HISTORY THAT

                    HAS -- AND IN MANY OF THEM RIGHT HERE IN NEW YORK SUPPLIED OUR

                    MILITARY WITH WEAPONS FOR THEIR ENTIRE EXISTENCE.  SO WHEN WE USE THE

                    WORD -- AND I WANT TO COME BACK TO THE WORDS PERSON, FIRM,

                                         231



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CORPORATION, COMPANY, PARTNERSHIP, SOCIETY, JOINT STOCK COMPANY OR

                    ANY OTHER ENTITY OR ASSOCIATION ENGAGED IN THE SALE, MANUFACTURING,

                    DISTRIBUTION, IMPORTING OR MARKETING OF FIREARMS, ET CETERA, ET CETERA, ET

                    CETERA.  THAT SEEMS VERY ALL -- TOTALLY ENCOMPASSING TO ME THAT THE

                    INTENT OF THIS IS TO REACH DOWN, GO INTO THE FACTORY, AND -- AND ASSESS

                    RESPONSIBILITY AND LIABILITY ON INDIVIDUAL WORKERS, AS WELL AS EVERYBODY

                    ABOVE THEM.  IS THAT THE INTENT OF THIS?

                                 MS. FAHY:  KEEP -- NO.  KEEP IN MIND -- NO.  KEEP

                    IN MIND THAT, AGAIN, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE FACT-BASED.  THIS WOULD GO

                    BEFORE THE COURTS AND THE BILL ITSELF DOES NOT GUARANTEE A FAVORABLE

                    JUDGMENT.  AGAIN, RESPONSIBLE GUN COMPANIES, JUST LIKE RESPONSIBLE

                    DRUG COMPANIES, HAVE NOT NEEDED SPECIAL PROTECTIONS.  IT IS THE

                    IRRESPONSIBLE ONES, RIGHT?  AND IN THE CASE OF A PERSON -- THAT IS IN THE

                    STATUTE, AS YOU POINT OUT -- IS IN THE BILL, AS YOU POINT OUT, IS -- IT IS A

                    PERSON WORKING IN A -- IN A DEALER OR IN A DISTRIBUTOR'S SHOP AND THAT

                    PERSON IS KNOWINGLY OR RECKLESSLY SELLING TO STRAW PURCHASERS OUTSIDE --

                    OUT THE BACK DOOR OR ON THE SIDE OR WHATEVER THE CASE MAY BE, THERE

                    COULD BE SOME LIABILITY THERE.  AGAIN, ALL OF THIS -- THE FACTS WOULD HAVE

                    TO BEAR IT OUT.  BUT THERE COULD BE SOME LIABILITY, ESPECIALLY IF THE

                    OWNERS OF THAT DEALERSHIP OR THAT DISTRIBUTOR DID NOT PUT IN THE PHYSICAL

                    SECURITY MEASURES, THE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE AND THE TRAINING AS WELL AS

                    OTHER MEASURES.  THERE ARE A FEW -- IT IS -- AS IN SO MANY OTHER

                    INDUSTRIES, THERE ARE A FEW BAD ACTORS.  WE'VE MADE GREAT STRIDES, RIGHT?

                    BUT WE STILL HAVE A FIERCE IRON PIPELINE.  SO WE KNOW THAT THERE ARE STILL

                    RECKLESS PRACTICES UNDERWAY.  AND WE ALSO KNOW THAT BECAUSE THE

                                         232



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    PLCAA THAT WAS ADOPTED IN 2005, THE INDUSTRY -- BECAUSE THE INDUSTRY

                    AS A WHOLE, WHICH INCLUDES THE ENTIRE LIST THAT YOU JUST NAMED, PERSONS

                    COMPANIES, PARTNERSHIPS, CORPORATIONS AND FIRMS, THEY WERE GRANTED

                    UNPRECEDENTED IMMUNITY FROM CIVIL LIABILITY.  SO BECAUSE OF THAT, WE

                    ARE NOW TRYING TO SAY THAT WHERE THERE IS A RECKLESS -- A PRACTICE, THEY,

                    TOO, MAY BE HELD LIABLE.  AND WE ALSO KNOW THAT BECAUSE THEY'VE HAD

                    THIS IMMUNITY THEY HAVE NOT HAD THE INCENTIVES TO PUT IN SERIOUS SAFETY

                    MEASURES.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  THANK YOU.  I -- I -- I WANT TO

                    UNDERSTAND YOUR PERSPECTIVE, BUT I -- I WANT TO PUT ON THE RECORD I DON'T

                    AGREE WITH IT ALL.

                                 MS. FAHY:  SURE.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  AND I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THIS,

                    AMONG MANY OTHER THINGS THAT WE'VE DONE IN THIS CHAMBER, RESULTS IN

                    CHASING PEOPLE OUT OF NEW YORK STATE.  WE'VE LOST 1.5 MILLION PEOPLE

                    IN THE LAST TEN YEARS.  THE EXPANSION OF THE ARMS MANUFACTURER IN ILION,

                    NEW YORK SEVERAL YEARS AGO THAT DID NOT HAPPEN, WAS ACCEPT -- WAS

                    TAKEN UP IN ALABAMA.  THAT CONTRACT AND THAT BUSINESS WENT TO

                    ALABAMA.  ALABAMA WELCOMED THAT BUSINESS.  AND THAT PERIPHERAL

                    ECONOMIC VALUE OF THAT ONE EXPANSION WAS APPROXIMATELY, IF I

                    REMEMBER CORRECTLY, IN THE REALM OF $4 MILLION TO THAT LOCAL

                    COMMUNITY.  AND NOT TO MENTION THE NUMBER OF JOBS THAT IT ADDED

                    LOCALLY.  THE -- THAT -- THAT STATE WELCOMED THAT -- THAT EXPANSION.

                                 MS. FAHY:  IF I COULD ASK --

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  BUT WHEN WE -- WHEN WE COME

                                         233



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    BACK TO THIS AND WE TALK ABOUT BAD ACTORS AND WE TALK ABOUT HOLDING

                    THEM ACCOUNTABLE WHILE WE WATCHED NEW YORK GET DESTROYED BY RIOTS

                    OVER THE LAST YEAR, BUSINESSES DESTROYED LEFT AND RIGHT, POLICE OFFICERS

                    UNABLE TO DO THEIR JOBS, NOT ABLE TO DO WHAT THEY HAVE SWORN THAT THEY

                    WOULD, NOT ABLE TO PROTECT AND DEFEND BECAUSE PEOPLE DISEMPOWERED

                    THEM INTENTIONALLY.  AND YET WE WANT TO GO AFTER LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS,

                    HARDWORKING AMERICANS, HARDWORKING NEW YORKERS RIGHT HERE IN OUR

                    STATE AND TELL THEM THAT THEY'RE DOING SOMETHING BAD.

                                 MS. FAHY:  I -- I'M AFRAID I DO DISAGREE ON THAT.

                    AND AGAIN, THE INTENT OF THIS -- WE -- THE -- THE BEST EXAMPLE -- AND I

                    KEEP GOING BACK TO IT IS, AGAIN, BECAUSE IT'S SO RECENT WITH THE

                    PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY.  AT ONE POINT MOST OF US WERE RATHER SKEPTICAL

                    THAT THEY WOULD EVER BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR SOME OF THE PRACTICES.

                    BUT IT WAS A FEW BAD ACTORS, NOT ALL.  AND IT TOOK YEARS OF LITIGATION,

                    AND SOME OF IT'S STILL IN THE WORKS OF COURSE.  AND SO THERE IS A HIGH

                    STANDARD HERE, A HIGH THRESHOLD.  THIS IS NOT TO GO AFTER RESPONSIBLE GUN

                    COMPANIES AND I THINK THOSE THAT KNOW WHO THEY'RE DEALING WITH, THOSE

                    THAT -- IF A -- YOU KNOW, IF A STORE IS ONLY PRODUCING OR SHOWING RECORDS

                    OF 10,000 SALES, YET THEY'RE SUPPLYING THEM 20,000, THERE'S GOT TO BE A

                    RECONCILING.  AND AS I'VE SAID, THIS IS REALLY TO GET AT THAT IRON PIPELINE

                    THAT WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO GET AT FOR THE LAST FEW DECADES, DESPITE ALL

                    THE EFFORTS - AND THERE HAVE BEEN COUNTLESS EFFORTS HERE - THIS IS THE ONE

                    AREA THAT WE KNOW HAS MADE THIS MORE CHALLENGING TO GET AT THIS ILLEGAL

                    FLOW OF GUNS INTO NEW YORK.  SO, I DON'T THINK THIS IS TO HURT JOBS IN

                    NEW YORK STATE.  IF ANYTHING, IT IS TO GO AFTER SOME PRACTICES

                                         234



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    OUT-OF-STATE, ALTHOUGH I'M NOT TELLING YOU THAT -- THAT IT WOULD BE

                    EXCLUSIVELY OUT-OF-STATE BY ANY MEANS.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  YES.  THANK YOU.  I -- I -- I

                    UNDERSTAND THAT.  BUT WHEN WE TALK ABOUT THE FLOW OF SOMETHING INTO

                    NEW YORK THAT SHOULDN'T BE, IT MAKES ME THINK OF OUR SOUTHERN BORDER

                    WHERE THAT WAS JUST OPENED UP.  WIDE OPEN FOR DRUGS TO COME THROUGH,

                    NARCOTICS TO COME THROUGH, WEAPONS TO COME THROUGH, ET CETERA, ET

                    CETERA, AS WELL AS MILLIONS OF PEOPLE.

                                 SO I APPRECIATE YOUR RESPONSES.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. LEMONDES:  DUE TO THE INVASIVE NATURE AND

                    DETRIMENTAL IMPACTS AND INFRINGEMENT ON THE SECOND AMENDMENT AS

                    WELL AS THE POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES AND HARDWORKING

                    NEW YORKERS, I CAN ONLY URGE ALL -- ALL MEMBERS OF THE ASSEMBLY TO

                    PLEASE VOTE AGAINST THIS, AS I WILL, BECAUSE IT IS TARGETING THE WRONG

                    PEOPLE.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. SALKA.

                                 MR. SALKA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A QUESTION OR TWO?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  CERTAINLY.

                                         235



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY YIELDS, SIR.

                                 MR. SALKA:  THANK YOU, MS. FAHY.  DRUG DEALERS

                    AREN'T LEGITIMATE BUSINESSES FOR THE MOST PART.  THEY -- THEY WANT TO

                    MAKE A LIVING, AND EACH BUSINESS HAS A PARTICULAR CLASS OF LIABILITY.

                    YOU NAME IT WITH BUSINESS, IT'S A BUSINESS THAT HAS TO PAY A CERTAIN

                    AMOUNT OF -- OF LIABILITY INSURANCE.  NOW, THIS MIGHT BE SOMETHING THAT

                    MY COLLEAGUES IN THE INSURANCE INDUSTRY MIGHT BE ABLE TO ANSWER BETTER

                    THAN YOU MIGHT BE ABLE TO, BUT IT SEEMS TO ME AS WE INCREASE THE RISK

                    FACTORS TO THESE BUSINESSES, LIKE GUN DEALERS, NOW THAT WE ARE GOING

                    FORTH, HOPEFULLY IT WON'T, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE WE'RE GOING TO PASS A LAW THAT

                    WILL INCREASE THEIR LIABILITY BECAUSE NOW THEY'LL BE MORE SUSCEPTIBLE, IF

                    YOU WILL, TO LAWSUITS.  THEIR PROBABILITY OF BEING SUED IS GOING TO BE

                    HIGHER IF BY THIS LAW WE'RE ALLOWING THAT TO HAPPEN.  DO YOU THINK -- I

                    MEAN, GIVEN THE FACT THAT MOSTLY LIKELY THEIR LIABILITY IS GOING TO GO UP,

                    DO YOU THINK THAT THERE WILL BE SOME -- MAYBE SOME OF THESE

                    BUSINESSES ARE GOING TO HAVE TO SAY, WE JUST SIMPLY CAN'T DO BUSINESS

                    IN NEW YORK STATE ANYMORE BECAUSE OF LIABILITY?  THAT SOME WILL, IN

                    FACT, PROBABLY HAVE TO CLOSE.  BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE -- THESE DEALERS ARE

                    LIKE ANY OTHER BUSINESS, THEIR PROFITS AREN'T EXCEEDINGLY HIGH, THEY'RE

                    JUST TRYING TO MAKE A LIVING.  SO IT SEEMS TO ME AT LEAST THAT IF YOU

                    INCREASE THE LIABILITY BY ALLOWING THIS TO HAPPEN, THEN SOME OF THOSE

                    BUSINESSES ARE PROBABLY GOING TO GO UNDER.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THIS -- THIS DOESN'T STOP AT THE NEW

                    YORK STATE BORDER.  SO, NO, I -- I -- I DON'T THINK THIS WILL NECESSARILY

                    HAVE A DIRECT EFFECT ON BUSINESSES RIGHT HERE IN -- IN THIS STATE.

                                         236



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. SALKA:  SO I -- I -- I GUESS I DRAW THE ANALOGY

                    THAT WHEN YOU PAY A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF AUTO INSURANCE, IF YOU'VE BEEN

                    IN A COUPLE OF ACCIDENTS YOUR RATES ARE GOING TO GO UP, OKAY?  OR

                    MAYBE EVEN IF LIKE FOR INSTANCE WITH YOUNGER PEOPLE, THEIR ODDS ARE

                    THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN AN ACCIDENT -- THEY MIGHT NOT NECESSARILY

                    HAVE BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT, BUT THEIR ODDS ARE THEY'RE GOING TO BE IN AN

                    ACCIDENT SO THEY PAY HIGHER RATES.  SO, NOW YOU HAVE A BUSINESS, RIGHT,

                    THAT SELLS FIREARMS THAT NOW HAS A HIGHER PROBABILITY OF BEING SUED,

                    SOMETIMES I WOULD IMAGINE THERE WILL BE FRIVOLOUS LAWSUITS WHICH THEY

                    WILL HAVE TO DEFEND NONETHELESS AND SPEND MONEY ON LAWYERS TO DO IT.

                    SO BY THAT LAW BEING PASSED, IT INCREASES THEIR LIABILITY NOW.  IT MUST.

                                 MS. FAHY:  AGAIN, THERE IS A HIGH THRESHOLD HERE.

                    WE TALKED ABOUT HOW NARROW THIS IS GIVEN HOW BROAD THE FEDERAL

                    EXEMPTION -- OR HOW BROAD THE -- THE CURRENT IMMUNITY IS.  SO, YOU

                    KNOW -- YOU KNOW, IF THAT'S THE CASE THAT MAY BE ONE SCENARIO.  BUT I

                    DON'T THINK, AGAIN, THIS IS NOT TARGETED AT ANY PARTICULAR NEW YORK STATE

                    BUSINESSES.  IF ANYTHING -- IF ANYTHING, WHAT WE'RE HOPING TO DO IS -- IS

                    GO AFTER THOSE OUT-OF-STATE BECAUSE THAT'S WHERE WE KNOW, WE KNOW

                    WE'VE HAD A DECADES-LONG PROBLEM WITH THAT IRON PIPELINE.  SO I --

                                 MR. SALKA:  BUT --

                                 MS. FAHY:  AND AGAIN, KEEP IN MIND THE -- YOU

                    KNOW, I'VE USED THE PHARMACEUTICAL ANALOGY, BUT -- BUT WHEN -- YOU

                    KNOW, WE'VE DONE THIS WITH POLLUTION AS WELL, RIGHT?  WHEN WE SEE A

                    COMPANY THAT HAS DUMPED SERIOUS POLLUTANTS - A COMPANY IN IOWA -

                    INTO THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER, THEY HAVE NOT BEEN IMMUNE JUST BECAUSE

                                         237



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THE POLLUTION OR THE -- THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THAT END UP IN LOUISIANA OR

                    -- OR MISSISSIPPI.  SO -- SO, THERE IS -- AGAIN, IN OTHER INDUSTRIES THERE IS

                    NOT THIS BLANKET IMMUNITY THAT WE HAVE SEEN SINCE 2005 IN THE GUN

                    INDUSTRY.

                                 MR. SALKA:  SO WHAT YOU'RE SAYING IS THAT DEALERS

                    IN NEW YORK STATE WILL NOT BE LIABLE OR WILL NOT BE HELD LIABLE IN A

                    LAWSUIT.  IN OTHER WORDS -- AND LET'S SAY, FOR INSTANCE, YOU HAVE DEALER

                    A AND HE -- YOU KNOW, IT WAS NOW AN OFFENSE UNDER THIS LAW AND HE

                    GETS SUED FOR $10 MILLION AND THE INSURANCE COMPANY HAS TO PAY THE

                    $10 MILLION OR WHATEVER THEY DECIDE TO PAY.  INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE

                    BUSINESSES.  THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DISTRIBUTE THOSE EXPENSES

                    THROUGHOUT ALL THEIR CLIENTS.  SO, IT'S INEVITABLY GOING TO DRIVE -- DRIVE

                    UP LIABILITY RATES BECAUSE SOMEBODY'S GOING TO GET SUED.  SO INEVITABLY

                    IT'S GOING TO DRIVE UP LIABILITY RATES FOR ALL THE DEALERS.

                                 MS. FAHY:  BUT KEEP IN MIND, AGAIN, THE BILL DOESN'T

                    GUARANTEE ANY TYPE OF FAVORABLE JUDGMENT.  CIVIL CASES ARE -- HAVE

                    BEEN EXTREMELY -- THEY'RE MORE CHALLENGING, THEY ARE -- THEY ARE

                    DEFINITELY FACT-BASED.  AGAIN, THERE WOULD HAVE TO -- THERE WOULD HAVE

                    TO BE A DEMONSTRATION OF A PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE THAT A GUN

                    INDUSTRY MEMBER OR ACTOR OR ANY OF THOSE THAT YOU DESCRIBED HAD

                    CREATED THIS UNTENABLE RISK OF HARM THAT LED TO THE VIOLATION OF THE

                    PUBLIC NUISANCE LAW THAT WE HAVE SET FORTH IN THIS BILL.  SO, THIS IS --

                    BELIEVE ME, IF I THOUGHT THAT THIS WOULD LEAD TO A PROLIFERATION OF

                    LAWSUITS AND PUT EVERY GUN DEALER IN NEW YORK STATE OUT OF BUSINESS, I

                    WOULD SAY IT, BECAUSE I -- YOU KNOW, I -- BUT THAT'S NOT THE CASE.  THIS IS

                                         238



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    A VERY NARROW PROVISION TO GO AFTER WHAT HAS BEEN A PERSISTENT AND

                    SERIOUS PROBLEM FOR DECADES IN THIS STATE DESPITE, DESPITE THE YEARS OF

                    LEGISLATION AND -- AND DESPITE HOW AGGRESSIVE -- AND I'M QUITE PROUD TO

                    HAVE BEEN A PART OF THAT -- DESPITE HOW AGGRESSIVE WE HAVE BEEN TO GET

                    GUNS OFF THE STREETS.  THIS IS ONE AREA WE HAVE NOT BEEN SUCCESSFUL ON

                    BECAUSE OF THIS UNPRECEDENTED IMMUNITY THAT THE GUN INDUSTRY HAS HAD.

                                 MR. SALKA:  AND -- AND ONE OTHER QUESTION OR

                    STATEMENT THAT I -- I FOUND SOMEWHAT PERPLEXING IS THAT YOU MADE A

                    STATEMENT THAT THERE'S AN INVERSE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GUN LAWS AND THE

                    NUMBER OF GUN DEATHS.  NOW, IF YOU LOOK AT THE CITY OF CHICAGO, SOME

                    OF THE MOST RESTRICTIVE GUN LAWS IN THE COUNTRY.  NEW YORK CITY, SPIKE

                    IN GUN DEATHS, GUN CRIME, SOME OF THE MOST RESTRICTIVE LAWS.  LOS

                    ANGELES.  SOME OF THESE CITIES THAT HAVE -- SOME OF THE -- AND STATES

                    THAT HAVE SOME OF THE MOST RESTRICTIVE GUN LAWS, IN FACT, HAVE HIGHER

                    THAN AVERAGE GUN VIOLENCE AND DEATHS.  SO I -- I'M NOT SURE WHETHER OR

                    NOT I'M COMFORTABLE WITH -- WITH THAT STATEMENT THAT THERE WAS AN

                    INVERSE RELATIONSHIP HERE --

                                 MS. FAHY:  IT'S --

                                 MR. SALKA:  -- BECAUSE MORE LAWS, LESS -- LESS

                    VIOLENCE.

                                 MS. FAHY:  AS I -- AS I MENTIONED, THAT'S NATIONAL

                    DATA.  AND NEW YORK STATE -- NEW YORK CITY, BY THE WAY, I -- I DON'T

                    HAVE THE CURRENT DATA FOR THIS YEAR, BUT PRIOR TO THIS YEAR WHEN WE HAVE

                    SEEN AN EXPLOSION IN GUN VIOLENCE, NEW YORK CITY ACTUALLY WAS

                    CONSIDERED ONE OF THE SAFER CITIES IN THIS COUNTRY WITH -- WITH GUN

                                         239



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    VIOLENCE, AGAIN, GIVEN ITS SIZE.  AND YES, STATISTICALLY THERE HAS BEEN AN

                    INVERSE RELATIONSHIP WHERE THOSE STATES, AND IT'S -- IT'S STATEWIDE DATA,

                    BUT STATES WITH THE TOUGHEST GUN LAWS HAVE GENERALLY HAD THE LOWEST

                    LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE.  AND THIS IS PARTICULARLY TRUE WITH -- IN DOMESTIC

                    VIOLENCE SITUATIONS.  AND -- AND THAT'S -- THAT'S WHERE WE -- WE SEE A LOT

                    OF THIS.  BUT -- BUT THAT IS NATIONAL DATA AND IT IS DONE ON A STATEWIDE

                    BASIS.  BUT STATES, AGAIN, THAT HAVE THE HIGHEST -- THAT HAVE THE TOUGHEST

                    GUN LAWS OFTEN HAVE THE LOWEST GUN VIOLENCE.  I -- I DON'T HAVE -- YOU

                    KNOW, IT'S -- AS WE KNOW, THESE LAST THREE MONTHS OR MORE HAS LED TO

                    EXPLOSIVE GROWTH IN GUN VIOLENCE ACROSS THE COUNTRY.  I DON'T HAVE THE

                    MOST RECENT DATA FOR THAT, BUT I WILL SAY NEW YORK CITY HAS HAD

                    CERTAINLY ITS SHARE OF GUN VIOLENCE ESPECIALLY THESE LAST FEW MONTHS

                    WHERE THERE HAS BEEN A VERY SERIOUS UPTICK -- UPTICK IN VIOLENCE.  BUT

                    AGAIN WE KNOW FROM OTHER STUDIES THAT THE VAST MAJORITY OF THOSE GUNS

                    ARE ILLEGAL GUNS COMING UP THIS PIPELINE.  AND THAT'S SO -- SO AS

                    AGGRESSIVE AS WE HAVE BEEN, QUITE FRANKLY, IT'S BEEN FRUSTRATING TO THINK

                    THAT WE CAN PASS ALL THE LAWS WE WANT BUT WE'RE STILL NOT STEMMING THE

                    FLOW OF ILLEGAL GUNS INTO THIS STATE.

                                 MR. SALKA:  THANK YOU, MS. FAHY --

                                 MS. FAHY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. SALKA:  -- AND I APPRECIATE ANSWERS.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. SALKA:  MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. SALKA:  MR. SPEAKER, FOR THE PAST PROBABLY

                                         240



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    25-30 YEARS, WE'VE SEEN A SYSTEM -- SYSTEMATICALLY -- WE HAVE SEEN A

                    SYSTEMATIC DISMANTLING OF OUR SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS.  AND I AGREE

                    WITH MY COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE SAID THE ANALOGY HERE IS DEATH BY A

                    THOUSAND CUTS.  YOU DON'T OUTRIGHT THE GUN -- BAN THE GUN, BUT YOU BAN

                    THE AMMO.  OR YOU DON'T OUTRIGHTLY TRY TO CONFISCATE WEAPONS, YOU CAN

                    -- YOU DO VOLUNTARY BUYBACKS, WHICH TO ME IS JUST A ROAD TO

                    CONFISCATION, ALL RIGHT?  YOU WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE GUNS ARE

                    REGISTERED, UNIVERSAL GUN REGISTRATION SO THAT THE GOVERNMENT KNOWS

                    WHATEVER YOU'VE -- YOU'VE GOT.  IT -- IT'S, YOU KNOW, OVER THE -- OVER THE

                    PAST VERY SHORT AMOUNT OF TIME, IN THIS CHAMBER WE'VE SEEN THE

                    SYSTEMATIC DISMANTLING OF THE JUDICIAL PROCESS, OF THE ELECTORAL PROCESS

                    AND NOW THE SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS THAT WE HAVE AS NEW YORKERS

                    AND AMERICAN CITIZENS.

                                 SO, I HAVE A REAL ISSUE WITH THIS BILL.  I'LL BE VOTING IN

                    THE NEGATIVE ON IT AND I WOULD URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD JUST FOR A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. FAHY:  CERTAINLY.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MS. FAHY.  I

                    CONTINUALLY HEAR YOU TALK ABOUT THE IRON PIPELINE.  COULD YOU TELL ME

                    AGAIN WHAT THAT IS?

                                         241



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. FAHY:  IT IS CONSIDERED TO BE -- PARTICULARLY IN

                    NEW YORK IT'S -- IT'S CONSIDERED TO BE THE -- THE ILLEGAL FLOW OF GUNS

                    COMING IN FROM OUT-OF-STATE, PARTICULARLY STATES TO THE SOUTH OF US,

                    COMING UP THE I-95 OFTEN AND INTO -- INTO NEW YORK.  AND THE VAST

                    MAJORITY OF GUNS THAT ARE USED IN -- IN HOMICIDES HAVE BEEN GUNS THAT

                    ARE -- WELL, THE LAST DATA THAT WE HAVE IS FROM 2015 WHERE THE ATTORNEY

                    GENERAL SAID OVER 74 PERCENT OF FIREARMS THAT ARE RECOVERED IN VIOLENT

                    SHOOTINGS OR CRIMES IN NEW YORK STATE HAVE BEEN ILLEGALLY TRAFFICKED

                    FROM OTHER STATES.  SO THAT -- THAT IS WHAT WE ARE REFERRING TO AS THE IRON

                    PIPELINE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY, THANK YOU.  AND EARLIER

                    YOU HAD SAID SOMETHING ABOUT BAD DEALERS.

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.  WHO ARE RECKLESS -- YOU KNOW,

                    THOSE WHO -- YES, THOSE WHO KNOWINGLY ARE -- ARE RECKLESSLY, YOU

                    KNOW, TURN -- TURN THE OTHER WAY.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  AND WHAT -- WHAT WAS

                    THAT PERCENTAGE?  WAS IT 5 PERCENT?  IS IT -- DID I REMEMBER THAT RIGHT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT WAS ROUGHLY -- AGAIN, THESE ARE

                    ROUGH -- IT'S ROUGH DATA BECAUSE THE NUMBERS ARE -- ARE HARD TO MEASURE

                    HERE.  BUT THE BRADY CENTER ESTIMATES THAT ROUGHLY 5 PERCENT OF GUN

                    DEALERS SUPPLY OVER 90 PERCENT OF THE ILLEGAL GUNS IN -- IN NEW YORK

                    STATE.  SO THAT -- THAT IS THEIR ESTIMATE BASED ON SOME PREVIOUS NATIONAL

                    DATA.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO -- SO OF THOSE 5 PERCENT OF

                    THE DEALERS, HOW MANY OF THOSE ARE IN NEW YORK STATE?

                                         242



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. FAHY:  THEY HAVE -- THEY HAVE SAID IT IS -- THEY

                    THINK IT IS A -- A FEW, AND THEY THINK IT'S MOSTLY OUT-OF-STATE.  AGAIN, IT'S

                    TO -- TO GET AT THAT -- THAT OUT OF -- THAT IRON PIPELINE.  WE'VE -- WE'VE --

                    AS YOU KNOW THROUGH MANY MEASURES THAT HAVE BEEN PASSED ALMOST

                    EVERY YEAR HERE, WE HAVE SOME OF THE VERY TIGHT SECURITY MEASURES THAT

                    YOU HEARD ME DESCRIBE THAT ARE NOT NECESSARILY FOUND IN OTHER STATES.

                    SOME OF THE PHYSICAL SECURITY, THE STORAGE, THE VIDEO SURVEILLANCE, THE

                    TRAINING.  WE PASSED A NUMBER OF THINGS ABOUT TRAINING RETAILERS AND

                    RETAIL EMPLOYEES.  WE'VE DONE A LOT OF THAT HERE.  SO, IT'S -- I'M NOT --

                    I'M NOT TELLING YOU THIS WOULD ONLY BE OUT-OF-STATE.  I'M NOT GOING --

                    I'M NOT TRYING TO MISLEAD ANYBODY, BUT I AM TRYING TO SAY WHAT -- WHAT

                    THE -- THE GOAL IN THIS HAS BEEN FOR ME, IS TO GET AT THIS VERY MADDENING

                    PIPELINE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SURE, ABSOLUTELY.  AND MAYBE

                    I DIDN'T HEAR YOU RIGHT OR MAYBE I -- I MISSED IT.  SO, OF THOSE -- OF

                    THOSE BAD DEALERS, APPROXIMATELY, AGAIN, HOW MANY ARE IN NEW YORK?

                                 MS. FAHY:  THEY -- IT'S -- IT'S -- THEY HAVE NOT PUT A

                    PRECISE NUMBER ON THAT.  THEY THINK IT IS A FEW, BUT HOW YOU WOULD

                    DEFINE FEW I'M -- I -- I HAVE NOT GOTTEN A SPECIFIC NUMBER ON THAT.  BUT

                    -- BUT AGAIN, IT IS -- IT IS A -- THE BOTTOM LINE, IT IS A VERY SMALL

                    PERCENTAGE.  IT -- AND THIS IS COMING FROM THE -- SOME OF THE NATIONAL

                    ADVOCATES, A SMALL PERCENTAGE CREATING A MONSTROUS PROBLEM.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ABSOLUTELY.  OF THE ONES IN

                    NEW YORK STATE THAT WE KNOW OF, HOW -- HOW MANY OF THOSE DEALERS

                    HAVE BEEN SHUT DOWN?

                                         243



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. FAHY:  IN NEW YORK STATE I HAVE -- I DON'T

                    KNOW OF ANY PARTICULAR DEALERS IN NEW YORK STATE THAT ARE THE TARGET OF

                    THIS AT THIS TIME.  I'M NOT -- AGAIN, I'M NOT TRYING TO MISLEAD.  I'M NOT

                    SAYING THERE IS ANYTHING THAT MIGHT NOT BE TIED UP IN THIS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO --

                                 MS. FAHY:  I KNOW REMINGTON A NUMBER OF YEARS

                    AGO WAS SUED ON -- I THINK AFTER SANDY HOOK.  BUT -- BUT I -- BUT AT THIS

                    POINT, NO, THERE'S NO PARTICULAR TARGET OF THIS LEGISLATION FOR ANY DEALER

                    IN NEW YORK AT THIS TIME.  THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THERE WOULDN'T BE IN

                    THE FUTURE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  YOU -- YOU TALK ABOUT

                    REMINGTON BEING SUED, BUT I'M JUST TALKING ABOUT THE DEALERS.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT WAS A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO AND THAT

                    WAS AFTER SANDY HOOK.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO, RIGHT NOW IF I -- IF I'M

                    CORRECT, WE KNOW OF NO BAD DEALERS IN NEW YORK STATE, CORRECT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  I, AGAIN, I -- I DON'T -- THERE IS NO

                    PARTICULAR TARGET OF THIS LEGISLATION TO ANY PARTICULAR DEALER IN NEW

                    YORK STATE, BUT I -- I'M NOT HERE TO MISLEAD ANYBODY.  THAT DOESN'T

                    MEAN -- THAT DOESN'T MEAN THAT THERE ARE -- THERE MIGHT BE A PRACTICE

                    THAT COULD ULTIMATELY LEAD TO A SUIT.  THERE'S A -- RIGHT, AGAIN, THERE'S A

                    VERY HIGH THRESHOLD THAT WOULD HAVE TO BE DEMONSTRATED IN COURT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  YEAH, I -- I'M MORE CONCERNED

                    ABOUT IF WE DO HAVE BAD APPLES HERE IN NEW YORK, LET'S GET THEM OUT,

                    FIRST OF ALL.

                                         244



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. FAHY:  I APPRECIATE THAT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  BUT WOULD THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION WHERE ABOUT 90 PERCENT OF THE ILLEGAL GUNS ARE COMING FROM

                    OUT OF NEW YORK STATE, HOW -- HOW DOES THIS BILL ADDRESS STOPPING

                    THOSE ILLEGAL GUNS COMING FROM OUT-OF-STATE?

                                 MS. FAHY:  BECAUSE THEY'D BE -- THEY'D BE -- THEY

                    COULD POTENTIALLY BE LIABLE AND -- FOR NOT HAVING ANY OF THE SAFEGUARDS

                    THAT I'M HAPPY TO REITERATE AGAIN.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  NO --

                                 MS. FAHY:  SO, FOR INSTANCE, IF THEY'RE -- IF THEY'RE

                    NOT MONITORING THE PRACTICES, IF THERE IS A MANUFACTURER WHO IS SELLING

                    TO A DEALER WHO IS ONLY SHOWING, AGAIN, 10,000 GUNS BEING SOLD ON THE

                    BOOKS, YET THEY'RE DELIVERING THEM 20,000 A YEAR AND THEY'RE NOT

                    RECONCILING THOSE NUMBERS, THERE MAY BE STRAW PURCHASES THAT THEY'RE

                    NOT FOLLOWING UP ON.  AND IT'S -- AGAIN, IT'S SIMILAR TO THE

                    PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES WHERE, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS A LOOKING OF

                    THE OTHER WAY, THERE WERE BED -- AND -- AND THERE WERE RECKLESS

                    PRACTICES THAT HELPED TO FUEL THE OPIOID CRISIS AND -- AND ULTIMATELY THEY

                    ARE BEING HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR THAT.  AND THIS THE SAME TYPE OF

                    ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES -- OR A SIMILAR TYPE OF ACCOUNTABILITY MEASURES

                    THAT WE ARE LOOKING FOR HERE.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  I -- MY ONLY CONCERN IS,

                    I'M NOT SURE WHAT THE MECHANICS WILL BE FOR NEW YORK STATERS OR NEW

                    YORK TO GO AFTER THESE BAD DEALERS OR THESE BAD PEOPLE OUTSIDE OF NEW

                    YORK STATE.  HOW -- HOW -- ARE WE GOING TO GO TO ANOTHER STATE AND

                                         245



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    INDICT THEM?  ARE WE GOING TO -- HOW -- HOW DOES THAT WORK?

                                 MS. FAHY:  SO, IF THERE IS A CRIME -- I MENTIONED A

                    COUPLE HERE JUST IN -- IN ALBANY JUST IN THE LAST FEW MONTHS WHERE THE

                    GUNS WERE -- ONE WAS FROM SOUTH CAROLINA, ANOTHER ONE WAS FROM

                    ALABAMA.  WE DON'T HAVE ALL THE FACTS OF THOSE CASES.  THEY'RE VERY,

                    VERY RECENT.  BUT IF IT -- IF IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED, AGAIN, IN A COURT OF

                    LAW THAT THEY WERE UNLAWFULLY BROUGHT HERE AND USED TO SHOOT AND KILL

                    TWO YOUNG PEOPLE HERE THAT WE -- WE KNOW WERE SHOT AND KILLED ON THE

                    STREETS OF ALBANY HERE, MY HOMETOWN, THEY COULD POTENTIALLY BE LIABLE.

                    SO AGAIN, THE INCIDENT MAY HAVE OCCURRED HERE ON THE STREETS HERE OR

                    ELSEWHERE IN THE STATE, BUT THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE THE -- THE FACTS AND

                    THE EVIDENCE BROUGHT FORWARD IN ORDER TO -- TO SHOW THAT THE -- THAT THE

                    GUN INDUSTRY HAD -- IN THIS CASE, YOU KNOW, IN THIS CASE A DEALER IN --

                    CLEARLY IN SOUTH CAROLINA OR ALABAMA, THAT THEY ACTED IN SOME TYPE OF

                    RECKLESS -- KNOWINGLY ACTED IN A -- IN A RECKLESS MANNER THAT HELPED A

                    FEW OF THOSE GUNS TO BE -- END UP ON THE STREETS HERE WITH THE DEATHS OF

                    A COUPLE OF A YOUNG PEOPLE, I'M AFRAID.  BUT THAT -- THAT WOULD BE THE

                    TIE-IN.  OBVIOUSLY THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE SOME -- SOME INCIDENT HERE

                    IN -- IN NEW YORK STATE THAT WOULD LEAD TO THE TRACING OF -- OF

                    PROBLEMATIC PRACTICES, EITHER BY A MANUFACTURER OR A DEALER.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  OKAY.  BECAUSE I WOULD THINK

                    THAT IF I WAS GOING TO COME TO NEW YORK STATE AS A BAD PERSON AND --

                    AND DO A CRIME, PROBABLY THE FIRST THING I'M GOING TO DO WOULD BE TO --

                    TO FILE OFF THE SERIAL NUMBER SO THEY CAN'T TRACE IT BACK.  AND I'M JUST

                    WONDERING, YOU KNOW, OF THE 90 PERCENT OF THE -- OF THE GUNS COMING

                                         246



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    HERE ILLEGALLY, YOU KNOW, HOW MANY OF THEM HAVE SERIAL NUMBERS?

                    HOW ARE -- I'M JUST -- I'M JUST NOT SURE OF THE MECHANICS.  THAT'S ALL.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THAT'S -- THAT'S ANOTHER WHAT WE WOULD

                    HOPE WOULD BE SOMEWHAT OF AN INDIRECT GOAL OF THIS LEGISLATION, IS THAT

                    -- THAT IT WOULD HELP TO INCENTIVIZE MANUFACTURERS AND DEALERS TO PUT IN

                    MORE SAFETY MEASURES.  AND AS YOU KNOW, THERE IS TECHNOLOGY THAT CAN

                    BE USED AND IT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED HERE ON THE FLOOR ABOUT MAKING THAT

                    HARDER TO SCRAPE OFF SERIAL NUMBERS OR ADDING IN MICRO -- MICRO --

                    THROUGH THE USE OF MICROSTAMPING OR -- OR OTHER MEASURES THAT COULD

                    LEAD TO BETTER TRACING AND BETTER TRACKING OF GUNS.  SO, AGAIN, WE WOULD

                    HOPE THAT THIS WOULD LEAD TO SAFER PRECAUTIONS AND INCENTIVIZE THAT TO

                    PREVENT LAWSUITS.  WE WANT GOOD PRACTICES.  THIS IS NOT TO -- THIS IS --

                    THIS DOES NOT AFFECT AN INDIVIDUAL OWNER.  THIS DOES NOT AFFECT AN

                    INDIVIDUAL'S LEGAL RIGHTS TO BUY A LAWFUL GUN.  THAT IS NOT THE GOAL OF

                    THIS LEGISLATION AT ALL.  AND AS I'VE SAID, I'VE SPONSORED MEASURES HERE

                    THAT HAVE EXPANDED AND -- AND AUTHORIZED HUNTING AND -- HERE IN -- IN

                    THE COUNTY OF ALBANY.  SO THAT IS NOT THE GOAL OF THIS LEGISLATION.  IT IS

                    -- IT IS TO HELP INCENTIVIZE BETTER PRACTICES.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AND I THINK FROM THE

                    MANUFACTURING STANDPOINT AND THE -- THE REPUTABLE PLACES OF SALES AND

                    GUN DEALERS, I THINK THEY ARE DOING THE RIGHT THING.  I'M JUST -- I'M JUST

                    AFRAID THAT SOMEHOW THE MANUFACTURER IS GOING TO BE HELD LIABLE FOR

                    SOMETHING THAT'S TOTALLY OUT OF -- OUT OF THEIR CONTROL.  IF I SELL YOU A

                    GUN, I'M THE MANUFACTURER, I SELL IT TO YOU, MS. FAHY, AND FOR SOME

                    REASON SOMEBODY TAKES THEIR GUN AND GOES TO KILL SOMEBODY, THAT'S NOT

                                         247



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YOUR FAULT, THAT'S NOT MY FAULT, THAT'S THEIR FAULT.  AND THERE'S A POINT

                    WHERE, AS SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES HAVE SAID, THERE -- THERE'S A POINT THAT

                    WE NEED TO BE RESPONSIBILE.  AND THOSE ARE JUST SOME OF MY POINTS.  I

                    MEAN, I CAN JUST SEE MY CHILD COMING HOME SOMEDAY AND SAYING, HEY

                    DAD, I FAILED THE TEST AT SCHOOL, BUT IT WASN'T BECAUSE OF THE TEST, IT WAS

                    BECAUSE OF THE PENCIL.  I'M JUST GIVING THAT EXAMPLE THAT SOMETIMES

                    THERE'S -- I JUST DON'T WANT TO SEE THIS GO THE OTHER WAY.  I -- I APPLAUD

                    YOU FOR YOUR COMMITMENT TO THIS AND I -- I THINK SOME OF THESE POINTS

                    ARE -- ARE VERY WELL-TAKEN.  I'M JUST CONCERNED ABOUT THE MECHANICS OF

                    HOW THIS WOULD WORK.

                                 SO, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR TIME.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THANK YOU.  AND AGAIN, THAT IS -- THAT IS

                    NOT THE DIRECT INTENT OF THIS.  THIS TRULY IS TO GO AFTER THOSE WHO ARE

                    FAILING TO MONITOR THAT DOWNSTREAM DISTRIBUTION.  AND AGAIN, WE HAVE

                    SEEN THIS IN OTHER INDUSTRIES.  THE GUN INDUSTRY HAS HAD THIS RATHER

                    UNIQUE LEVEL OF IMMUNITY AND THAT WE ARE -- WE ARE TRYING TO FORGE

                    AHEAD HERE TO ADDRESS WHAT HAS BEEN A PERNICIOUS, PERSISTENT PROBLEM

                    FOR DECADES DESPITE ALL THE OTHER MEASURES THAT WE HAVE PASSED.  SO...

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AND MORE THAN LIKELY THIS BILL

                    WILL PASS ON THE FLOOR, AND IF IT IS SIGNED INTO LAW I'D BE MORE THAN

                    WILLING TO WORK WITH YOU DOWN THE LINE ON THE MECHANICS OF FOLLOWING

                    IT UP, WHERE ARE WE AT.  AS I SAID, I JUST HAVE CONCERNS AND -- AND I

                    DON'T WANT OUR GUN RIGHTS AND I DON'T WANT PEOPLE TO BE HELD LIABLE FOR

                    SOMETHING THEY DIDN'T DO.  SO THANK YOU AGAIN.

                                 MS. FAHY:  AGREED.  AND -- AND HAPPY TO CONTINUE

                                         248



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    TO WORK WITH YOU ON THAT.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR

                    TIME.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY YIELDS.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU.  I HONESTLY WASN'T

                    INTENDING TO SPEAK ON THIS, BUT I'M A LITTLE CONFUSED BY SOME OF THE

                    EXCHANGES SO I JUST WANT TO TRY AND GET SOME CLARITY.  WE TALKED ABOUT

                    CORRELATION AND YOU WERE MAKING THE POINT, AND PLEASE CORRECT ME IF

                    I'M MISSTATING YOUR POINT, BUT YOU WERE MAKING THE POINT THAT

                    GENERALLY SPEAKING WHERE THERE ARE STRICTER GUN LAWS, THERE ARE LESS

                    SHOOTINGS, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  LESS GUN VIOLENCE, ESPECIALLY -- WHERE

                    I'M MOST FAMILIAR WITH THE DATA IS WITH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE CASES.  WHEN

                    A GUN IS IN A HOME, A WOMAN IS - IN THIS CASE, IT'S WOMEN - ARE MUCH

                    MORE -- HAVE A MUCH HIGHER PERCENTAGE OF DYING AT THE HANDS OF A GUN

                    THAN WHEN A GUN IS NOT IN THE HOME.  SO YES, GENERALLY THERE IS AN

                    INVERSE RELATIONSHIP HERE, AND IT'S NATIONAL DATA.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO -- BUT JUST, FOR INSTANCE, IN

                    THE CITY OF CHICAGO WHICH DOES HAVE VERY STRICT GUN LAWS AND, IN FACT,

                    SOME OF THE STRICTEST IN THE COUNTRY, THEY DON'T ALLOW FOR -- THERE'S NO

                                         249



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GUN SHOP IN THE CITY OF CHICAGO.  AS OF JUNE 3RD OF THIS YEAR, THEY

                    HAVE 1,418 SHOOTINGS, WHICH IS 166 MORE THAN ALL OF 2020.  SO WHERE'S

                    THE CORRELATION?

                                 MS. FAHY:  THIS -- FIRST OF ALL, THIS BILL IS TO TARGET

                    NEW YORK, OR IS A NEW YORK BILL.  IN CHICAGO, KEEP IN MIND A LOT --

                    YOU'RE RIGHT, CHICAGO DOES HAVE RATHER STRICT GUN LAWS AND EVEN THERE

                    THE ILLEGAL TRAFFICKING OF GUNS IS A CONTINUAL PROBLEM, AS WELL.  THE CITY

                    OF CHICAGO ENDS RIGHT ON THE INDIANA BORDER AND I'M NOT HERE TO PICK

                    ON EITHER OF THEM, BUT THERE IS A TRAFFIC -- TRAFFICKING OF ILLEGAL GUNS

                    THERE, AS WELL.  AND CERTAINLY CHICAGO, I HAPPEN TO HAVE BEEN BORN

                    THERE, IS AN ANOMALY AND HAS HAD, FOR THE LAST HALF DOZEN YEARS OR MORE,

                    HAS HAD VERY, VERY SERIOUS GUN VIOLENCE ACROSS THE BOARD.  BUT THESE --

                    THE STATISTICS I WAS ALSO REFERRING TO WERE STATE -- THEY ARE STATEWIDE,

                    BUT EVEN CHICAGO I KNOW HAS A TRAFFICKING ISSUE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO LET'S JUST SEGUE TO NEW

                    YORK THEN.

                                 MS. FAHY:  SURE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO 2019, THERE WERE LESS THAN 800

                    SHOOTINGS IN NEW YORK CITY.  AS OF LAST YEAR, THERE WERE OVER 1,400

                    SHOOTINGS IN NEW YORK CITY.  IS THERE ANY CORRELATION BETWEEN THE RISE

                    IN SHOOTINGS IN NEW YORK CITY AND THE STRICT GUN LAWS THAT WE HAVE

                    PASSED IN THIS STATE AND NEW YORK CITY CERTAINLY HAS PASSED OVER THE

                    YEARS?

                                 MS. FAHY:  I THINK IF YOU LOOK AT THAT DATA OVER THE

                    LAST, I THINK IT'S TEN TO 20 YEARS, NEW YORK CITY HAD A DRAMATIC DROP IN

                                         250



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    GUN VIOLENCE.  YES THERE HAS BEEN AN UPTICK IN THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS

                    THAT CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO A WHOLE HOST OF MEASURES BUT, QUITE FRANKLY, I

                    THINK THE FACT THAT WE AS A STATE HAVE BEEN AGGRESSIVE ABOUT TRYING TO

                    GET GUNS OFF THE STREET, IT HAS -- GENERALLY IT HAS HELPED AND IF YOU

                    COMPARE NEW YORK CITY TO MOST OTHER LARGE URBAN AREAS IN THIS

                    COUNTRY, NOT INTERNATIONALLY, NEW YORK CITY IS CONSIDERED A MUCH SAFER

                    CITY AND HAS MUCH -- PROPORTIONATELY LESS, BUT I -- BUT I DON'T DISPUTE

                    THAT IT HAS GONE UP.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  WOULD YOU AGREE -- WOULD YOU

                    AGREE THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT PLAYED A SIGNIFICANT ROLE IN THAT REDUCTION

                    IN SHOOTINGS FROM LET'S SAY 2010 UNTIL 2019?

                                 MS. FAHY:  JUST AS THIS BILL IS ONLY ONE PART OF A

                    PRONG TO TRY TO GET AT GUN VIOLENCE ALONG WITH DOZENS OF OTHER

                    MEASURES THAT WE HAVE PASSED OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS, CERTAINLY LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT SHOULD BE CREDITED WITH A LOT OF THEIR EFFORTS OVER THE LAST

                    FEW YEARS IN THE STATE -- IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, AS WELL, BUT IT'S -- IT'S

                    -- IT IS A MULTI-PRONGED EFFORT AND -- AND UP UNTIL THE LAST YEAR OR SO HAS

                    BEEN QUITE SUCCESSFUL.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  MOVING TO ANOTHER POINT.

                    THE FIRST SENTENCE IN YOUR JUSTIFICATION MEMO SAYS, VIRTUALLY EVERY

                    ILLEGAL FIREARM WAS ONCE LEGAL, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  I'M SORRY, REPEAT -- VIRTUALLY EVERY, WHAT

                    WAS THAT?

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THE FIRST -- THE FIRST SENTENCE IN YOUR

                    JUSTIFICATION MEMO ON THE BILL SAYS, VIRTUALLY EVERY ILLEGAL FIREARM WAS

                                         251



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ONCE LEGAL, IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY, SO...

                                 MS. FAHY:  I MEAN IT'S -- WELL, THAT PROBABLY WAS A

                    LITTLE BIT OF AN OVERSTATEMENT, BUT CLOSE TO IT YES, OTHER THAN YOU HEARD A

                    LOT OF DEBATE TONIGHT ABOUT GHOST GUNS AND THOSE THAT CAN BE

                    MANUFACTURED OR ASSEMBLED ILLEGALLY OR -- OR SORRY, PARTS CAN BE

                    PURCHASED AND THEN LEGAL -- AND THEN ASSEMBLED, SO THERE'S...

                                 MR. LAWLER:  I -- I WAS GOING TO MAKE MENTION OF

                    THE GHOST GUNS THAT KIND OF CONTRADICTED THAT SENTENCE, BUT --

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES, THE GHOST -- RIGHT.  SO GIVEN -- YES.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  -- EVEN -- BUT EVEN STILL, IF A GUN WAS

                    LEGAL WHEN IT FIRST STARTED, OKAY, ONCE IT IS MANUFACTURED AND IT IS LEGAL,

                    HOW DOES IT BECOME ILLEGAL IN YOUR MIND?  WHERE -- WHERE DOES IT GO

                    FROM BEING LEGAL TO ILLEGAL?

                                 MS. FAHY:  BY BEING ILLEGALLY TRAFFICKED OR ILLEGALLY

                    SOLD.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO WHEN IT'S ILLEGALLY TRAFFICKED OR

                    ILLEGALLY SOLD, THE MANUFACTURER IS NO LONGER LIABLE, CORRECT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  NO, THAT -- THAT WOULD REALLY DEPEND

                    BECAUSE OF -- AND AGAIN, WE'VE SEEN THIS IN OTHER INDUSTRIES WHERE --

                    WHERE THE MANUFACTURER WAS RECKLESS IN WHO THEY WERE SELLING THEIR

                    GUNS TO, WHAT SUPPLIERS THEY WERE DEALING WITH, THEY -- THERE IS A LEVEL

                    OF ACCOUNTABILITY THERE AS WELL.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO -- OKAY.  I JUST -- LET'S TRY --

                                         252



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    BECAUSE THIS CONVERSATION HAS BEEN VERY BROAD AND REALLY NOT PROVIDED

                    MUCH SPECIFICS, SO I'M JUST TRYING TO NARROW IT DOWN A LITTLE BIT.  SO IF A

                    MANUFACTURER CREATES A GUN AND THE GUN IS GIVEN TO A

                    FEDERALLY-LICENSED DEALER AND THE DEALER SELLS TO SOMEBODY WHO LEGALLY

                    PURCHASES THE GUN, AND THEN SOMEHOW THAT GUN ENDS UP IN THE HANDS OF

                    A CRIMINAL WHO USES THAT FOR ILLEGAL PURPOSES.  IS THE MANUFACTURER

                    LIABLE FOR THAT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  IN THE WAY YOU ARE LAYING OUT THOSE

                    FACTS, IF THEY ARE THAT STRAIGHTFORWARD, THE FACTS JUST WOULDN'T HOLD UP IN

                    COURT.  SO NO, THERE WOULDN'T -- I DON'T SEE WHERE THERE WOULD BE -- I'M

                    NOT TRYING TO PLAY JUDGE AND JURY, BUT THE FACTS WOULD HAVE TO BEAR THIS

                    OUT.  THERE HAS TO BE, YOU KNOW, PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE TO SHOW

                    THAT THERE WAS RECKLESS, RECKLESS INTENT HERE AND -- THAT CREATED THIS

                    UNTENABLE RISK OF HARM AND THE WAY YOU'VE LAID OUT THOSE FACTS, I DON'T

                    SEE THE LIABILITY.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE --

                    THERE WOULD HAVE TO BE INTENT?

                                 MS. FAHY:  SORRY, RECKLESS -- I SHOULDN'T HAVE SAID

                    INTENT.  RECKLESSNESS, KNOWING -- YES, IT'S THE SAME -- IT'S THE SAME

                    STANDARD THAT IS APPLIED FOR OTHER PUBLIC NUISANCE LAWS.  IT IS KNOWINGLY

                    AND RECKLESS -- SORRY, I DON'T HAVE THE WORDS RIGHT IN FRONT OF ME.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO -- OKAY.  SO IN OTHER

                    WORDS, IF SOMEONE WITHIN THE GUN INDUSTRY, AND I WON'T REHASH WHAT

                    THAT IS DEFINED AS, BUT IF SOMEBODY WITHIN THE GUN INDUSTRY WAS

                    RECKLESS, WHAT SHOULD HAPPEN TO THEM UNDER THIS BILL, OR WHAT WOULD

                                         253



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    YOU LIKE TO SEE HAPPEN TO THEM?

                                 MS. FAHY:  IF SOMEBODY WERE RECKLESS?

                                 MR. LAWLER:  YEAH.

                                 MS. FAHY:  TO BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE.  TO BE HELD

                    ACCOUNTABLE IN A COURT OF LAW --

                                 MR. LAWLER:  CIVIL.

                                 MS. FAHY:  SUCH THAT IT LEADS TO MUCH, MUCH SAFER

                    PRACTICES INCLUDING DOWNSTREAM AND INCLUDING THROUGH THEIR

                    DISTRIBUTORS.  AND JUST AS WE HAVE SEEN WITH POLLUTION, WE HAVE SEEN

                    THIS WITH CERTAINLY WITH THE CAR INDUSTRY, WE HAVE SEEN THIS WITH

                    PHARMACEUTICALS, WE HAVE SEEN THIS WHERE THERE IS -- WHERE THERE IS

                    RECKLESSNESS, THERE HAS BEEN ACCOUNTABILITY FOUND OR ACCOUNTABILITY

                    HELD IN OTHER INDUSTRIES AND THIS IS THE ONE INDUSTRY THAT HAS BEEN

                    GRANTED AN UNPRECEDENTED LEVEL OF IMMUNITY.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SO...

                                 MS. FAHY:  KNOWINGLY AND RECKLESSLY, THAT'S THE

                    WORDS I WAS LOOKING FOR.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  SHOULD THERE -- WHEN -- WHEN --

                    BASICALLY WHAT WOULD CAUSE THIS IS IF THERE WAS GUN VIOLENCE, CORRECT?

                    GUN VIOLENCE WOULD BE THE CATALYST FOR A CAUSE OF ACTION --

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THERE HAS TO BE GUN VIOLENCE.

                                 MS. FAHY:  IN NEW YORK.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  IN NEW YORK STATE.

                                 MS. FAHY:  YES.

                                         254



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SHOULD THE PERSON WHO

                    ACTUALLY PULLS THE TRIGGER BEAR THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY OR NO?

                                 MS. FAHY:  IN -- THAT'S A -- THAT WOULD BE A CRIMINAL

                    -- THERE IS CRIMINAL LIABILITY --

                                 MR. LAWLER:  LET'S SAY I WAS THE VICTIM OF GUN

                    VIOLENCE.  SHOULD I NOT BE ABLE TO HOLD THAT INDIVIDUAL CIVILLY LIABLE?

                                 MS. FAHY:  OH, YOU -- YEAH, YOU MIGHT -- YEAH, YOU

                    MIGHT BE ABLE TO, BUT CERTAINLY, CERTAINLY THAT PERSON WOULD BE OPEN TO

                    CRIMINAL LIABILITY, OR SHOULD BE.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  BUT -- AND SO YOUR BILL DOES

                    NOT IN ANY WAY TRY TO HOLD SOMEBODY LIKE A MANUFACTURER OR SOMEBODY

                    WITHIN THE GUN INDUSTRY CRIMINALLY LIABLE?

                                 MS. FAHY:  ABSOLUTELY NOT.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THIS IS ONLY CIVIL LIABILITY.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  SO I KNOW IT WAS ASKED

                    EARLIER, BUT THE STATS WEREN'T THERE SO I LOOKED THEM UP, ROUGHLY 38,000

                    PEOPLE DIE EACH YEAR IN A CAR ACCIDENT AND AS OF 2018, THE LAST NUMBER

                    THAT I COULD FIND, 38,390 AMERICANS DIED FROM GUNS.  SO GIVEN WHAT

                    THIS CONSTRUCT IS THAT YOU HAVE KIND OF OUTLINED HERE, AND YOU TALKED

                    ABOUT THE OPIOID INDUSTRY AND -- AND OTHERS BEING HELD LIABLE, DO YOU

                    THINK THAT INDIVIDUALS SHOULD HAVE THE RIGHT TO BRING ACTION AGAINST THE

                    AUTOMOBILE INDUSTRY FOR RECKLESSNESS, OR NO?

                                 MS. FAHY:  REMEMBER, THAT RIGHT IS ALREADY THERE IF,

                    IF THEY CAN DEMONSTRATE THAT THERE WAS KNOWINGLY AND RECKLESSLY SOME

                                         255



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    TYPE OF PRACTICE.  THE FAMOUS CASE THAT MAYBE YOU WOULDN'T RECALL, BUT

                    THE PINTO, THE FORD PINTO FROM THE -- I THINK IT WAS THE 1970S OR '80S

                    WHERE THEY KNOWINGLY HAD A GAS TANK THAT WAS A -- THAT THEY CONTINUED

                    TO USE KNOWING THAT IT WAS HIGHLY FLAMMABLE AND THEY WERE HELD

                    ACCOUNTABLE FOR THAT.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  OKAY.  THANK YOU FOR YOUR

                    RESPONSES.

                                 ON THE BILL, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    LAWLER.

                                 MR. LAWLER:  THANK YOU.  IN 2011, SHOOTINGS IN

                    NEW YORK CITY WERE ABOUT 1,500.  IN 2019, SHOOTINGS IN NEW YORK

                    CITY WERE JUST UNDER 800.  AS OF LAST YEAR, THEY WERE BACK AROUND

                    1,500.  THE CORRELATION IS A VERY SIMPLE ONE:  THIS BODY TIED THE HANDS

                    OF LAW ENFORCEMENT THROUGH NUMEROUS POLICY DECISIONS.  WE TALK ABOUT

                    CORRELATION, THE CORRELATION IS VERY CLEAR.  WHEN YOU ELIMINATE THE

                    ANTI-CRIME UNIT IN NEW YORK CITY AS THE MAYOR AND THE CITY COUNCIL

                    DID, WHICH'S PRIMARY FOCUS IS ON GETTING ILLEGAL GUNS OFF THE STREETS,

                    WHEN YOU ELIMINATE THAT, WHEN YOU DEFUND THE POLICE BY $1 BILLION,

                    WHEN YOU CONTINUALLY TRY TO REDUCE THE ENFORCEMENT OF PETTY CRIMES IN

                    THE CITY OF NEW YORK, WHEN YOU ALLOW FOR PAROLE FOR UNREPENTANT

                    RAPISTS AND MURDERERS, AND WHEN YOU PROVIDE CASHLESS BAIL FOR VIOLENT

                    OFFENDERS, NOT JUST NON-VIOLENT OFFENDERS, BUT VIOLENT OFFENDERS, THE

                    CORRELATION IS ABUNDANTLY CLEAR.  WHAT YOU GET IS A RAPID AND DRAMATIC

                    RISE IN VIOLENT CRIME AND GUN VIOLENCE.

                                         256



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 SO WHILE I APPRECIATE VERY MUCH THE SPONSOR'S

                    INTENTION AND I APPRECIATE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE FOR

                    THEIR SINCERITY IN WANTING TO COMBAT GUN VIOLENCE, NOBODY IN THIS

                    CHAMBER WANTS TO SEE ANYBODY DIE FROM GUN VIOLENCE, NOBODY.  BUT

                    LET'S ALL BE CLEAR THAT THERE IS A CORRELATION BETWEEN THE POLICY DECISIONS

                    THAT HAVE BEEN MADE IN THIS BODY AND DOWN IN NEW YORK CITY AND THE

                    RAPID RISE IN GUN VIOLENCE THAT I KNOW IS IMPACTING EACH OF YOUR

                    COMMUNITIES.  IT'S IMPACTING MINE.  I'VE SEEN MORE GUN VIOLENCE IN THE

                    LAST YEAR-AND-A-HALF IN MY COMMUNITY THAN IN MY ENTIRE LIFETIME OF

                    LIVING IN ROCKLAND COUNTY.  IT IS INSANE.  IT'S HAPPENING ALL ACROSS THE

                    STATE, NOT JUST IN URBAN AREAS, IT'S NOT JUST IN NEW YORK CITY, IT'S

                    HAPPENING ALL ACROSS THE STATE AND IT IS DIRECTLY ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE

                    POLICIES THAT THIS BODY IS PASSING.

                                 SO I APPRECIATE THE INTENTION, BUT THIS IS NOT WHAT'S

                    GOING TO SOLVE GUN VIOLENCE IN THIS STATE.  WHAT'S GOING TO SOLVE GUN

                    VIOLENCE IS UNTYING THE HANDS OF LAW ENFORCEMENT TO DO THEIR JOBS, AND

                    THAT'S WHAT WE SHOULD BE DOING TO ENSURE THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EVERY

                    NEW YORKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. STIRPE.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  EVERYONE SEEMS TO BE LOOKING FOR A

                    CORRELATION.  WELL, HERE'S A CORRELATION:  GUN SALES IN 2020 WERE DOUBLE

                    WHAT THEY WERE IN 2019.  THAT'S THE CORRELATION.  MORE GUNS, MORE

                                         257



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHOOTINGS.  MORE GUNS, MORE SUICIDES.  MORE GUNS,

                    MORE MASS SHOOTINGS.  THROW IN 15 MONTHS IN, YOU KNOW, SHUT DOWN

                    SOCIETY AND THAT'S WHAT YOU'VE GOT.  TRYING TO IGNORE THAT MORE GUNS

                    CAUSED MORE PROBLEMS IS RIDICULOUS.  IT'S LIKE SAYING LIGHTENING DOESN'T

                    CAUSE FOREST FIRES.  I MEAN, LET'S BE SERIOUS.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  MR.

                    STIRPE.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS -- THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT

                    IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 7196.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE

                    POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE

                    NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION.  THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT SHOULD CONTACT THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE WILL

                    RECORD YOUR SUPPORT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A FEW THAT WANT TO BE AN EXCEPTION.

                                         258



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SHOULD THAT BE THE CASE, THEY SHOULD CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S

                    OFFICE AND WE WILL BE HAPPY TO MAKE SURE THAT THEIR VOTE IS PROPERLY

                    RECORDED.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I WILL BE OPPOSING THIS VOTE -- THIS BILL AND I ENCOURAGE MY

                    COLLEAGUES TO ALSO OPPOSE IT.  AS HAS BEEN EXPLAINED IN GREAT DEAL BY

                    OUR COLLEAGUES, THERE'S A LOT OF GUNS THAT COME INTO NEW YORK STATE

                    FROM OTHER STATES AND, OF COURSE, A GUN DEALER WHO IS UNSCRUPULOUS IN A

                    DIFFERENT STATE WHO SELLS TO SOMEBODY IN A DIFFERENT STATE IS OUTSIDE THE

                    JURISDICTION OF NEW YORK STATE.  AND IF THE PERSON THEY SELL IT TO,

                    WHETHER IT'S A STRAW BUYER OR A CRIMINAL OR SOMEONE ELSE THAT SHOULDN'T

                    HAVE IT AND THEY ILLEGALLY CROSS INTO NEW YORK STATE IN VIOLATION OF

                    FEDERAL LAW WHICH PREVENTS -- OR OUTLAWS THAT TYPE OF INTERSTATE

                    TRANSPORTATION OF GUNS, THERE'S NOTHING WE CAN DO.

                                 SO WHEN WE PASS A BILL THAT IMPOSES CIVIL LIABILITY ON

                    GUN MANUFACTURES AND DEALERS, THE ONLY ONES THAT COULD POSSIBLY BE

                    IMPACTED ARE NEW YORK GUN DEALERS AND NEW YORK GUN DEALERS.  AND

                    AS MY COLLEAGUE REPEATEDLY POINTED OUT, THEY'RE NOT THE PROBLEM.  NOR

                    DOES IT PREVENT ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES, BECAUSE IT DOESN'T MAKE ANYTHING

                    THAT'S NOT ALREADY ILLEGAL MORE ILLEGAL, BUT IT DOES IMPOSE CIVIL LIABILITY

                    ON THOSE WHO ARE OTHERWISE ENGAGING IN A LAWFUL BUSINESS.  AND, IN

                                         259



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    FACT, IT SAYS, AND I QUOTE ON PAGE 2, LINE 55, "THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC

                    NUISANCE," WHICH GIVES RISE TO THE CIVIL LIABILITY, "SHALL NOT DEPEND ON

                    WHETHER THE GUN INDUSTRY MEMBER ACTED FOR THE PURPOSE OF CAUSING

                    HARM TO THE PUBLIC."  WELL, THAT'S A PRETTY STARTLING STATEMENT.  SO MAKE

                    NO MISTAKE ABOUT IT, THIS IS DESIGNED TO CREATE CIVIL LIABILITY ON NEW

                    YORK MANUFACTURERS AND NEW YORK DEALERS FOR THE INABILITY OF THIS

                    LEGISLATURE AND OTHERS TO PREVENT VIOLENT GUN CRIME IN OTHER PARTS OF

                    THE STATE.  FOR THAT REASON, I'M OPPOSING IT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. WALCZYK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. WALCZYK:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  JUST A

                    QUICK REMINDER:  WE -- WE STOOD IN THIS CHAMBER AND SAID, I SOLEMNLY

                    SWEAR THAT I WILL SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES.  THE

                    SECOND AMENDMENT OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES SAYS, THE

                    RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

                    INFRINGED, IN CASE ANYBODY GOT CONFUSED FROM WHEN WE SWORE THAT

                    OATH A FEW MONTHS AGO, IS TO ACT SO AS TO LIMIT OR UNDERMINE SOMETHING

                    OR ENCROACH ON IT.

                                 I APPRECIATE THE SPONSOR BRINGING THIS BILL FORWARD

                    BECAUSE I KNOW THE SPONSOR HAS A CRIME WAVE RIGHT HERE IN THE CITY OF

                    ALBANY.  A COUPLE OF WEEKS AGO, I HEADED DOWN CENTRAL AVENUE

                    WALKING TO ONE OF MY FAVORITE MEXICAN RESTAURANTS IN TOWN, AND SAW A

                    CANDLELIGHT VIGIL GOING ON WHERE A SHOP OWNER HAD BEEN MURDERED A

                    COUPLE OF DAYS PRIOR.  SO I KNOW THAT THE FIVE HOMICIDES HERE IN THE

                    CITY OF ALBANY JUST IN THE MONTH OF MAY IS A REAL PROBLEM, A SERIOUS

                                         260



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CONCERN TO THE LEGISLATOR THAT CARRIED THIS BILL BEFORE US TODAY, BUT I'M

                    CONCERNED, MR. SPEAKER, THAT THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION REALLY ISN'T GOING

                    TO ADDRESS THE HEART OF THE ISSUE HERE IN ALBANY OR THE ISSUE GOING ON IN

                    NEW YORK CITY.  THE CHANCE OF BEING INVOLVED IN A VIOLENT CRIME OR

                    PROPERTY CRIME IN ALBANY IS 1 IN 26.  ALBANY HAS A CRIME CRISIS, IT HAS A

                    HIGHER CRIME RATE THAN 90 PERCENT OF AMERICAN CITIES.  IT INCREASED 21

                    PERCENT AFTER WE IMPOSED BAIL REFORM.  AND WHAT'S THE ANSWER?  I

                    MEAN, WHAT'S THE ANSWER THAT THE GOVERNMENT BRINGS THE PEOPLE,

                    BECAUSE WE ELIMINATED CASH BAIL, WE TOOK DISCRETION FROM JUDGES, WE

                    CLOSED PRISONS, WE SQUEEZED DAS, WE CUT LAW ENFORCEMENT AND WE PUT

                    OUR THUMB ON THE SCALES OF LIBERTY IN FAVOR OF THE CRIMINALS.

                                 BUT TODAY THE SOLUTION THAT WE BRING THEM, AND THIS IS

                    WHY I VOTE NO, MR. SPEAKER, IS WE LET THE LAWYERS GET RICH SUING THE

                    MANUFACTURERS AND THE MARKETING COMPANIES FOR GLOCK AND BERETTA?

                    THAT'S THE SOLUTION?  NO, WE NEED A REVERSE COURSE.  I VOTE NO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  MR.

                    WALCZYK IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  FIRST,

                    I'D LIKE TO COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL.  UNFORTUNATELY IN MY

                    DISTRICT IN THE CITY OF POUGHKEEPSIE AND THE CITY OF NEWBURGH, WE

                    HAVE SHOOTINGS.  BUT NOT ONE OF THE BILLS -- NOT ONE OF THE GUNS THAT ARE

                    USED WERE MADE IN EITHER NEWBURGH OR POUGHKEEPSIE.  AND YES, THE

                    BEST WAY THIS COULD BE ADDRESSED WOULD BE A NATIONAL POLICY, BUT WE

                    DON'T HAVE A NATIONAL POLICY.  SO WE TRY TO PASS LAWS IN NEW YORK

                                         261



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    STATE.

                                 UNFORTUNATELY AS WE KNOW, THERE'S ILLEGAL GUN

                    TRAFFICKING AND IF GUN MANUFACTURERS, ACCORDING TO THE BILL, KNOWINGLY

                    AND RECKLESSLY KNOW THAT WHEN THEY SELL HUNDREDS OF GUNS IN PLACES

                    SUCH AS SOUTH CAROLINA AND THEN THEY GET SHIPPED UP TO NEW YORK AND

                    THEY KNOW THAT IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN, MAYBE THEN THEY'LL BE HELD LIABLE

                    AND THEN MAYBE THEY'LL TAKE ACTION.  THE SAME THING HAPPENED WITH THE

                    CAR INDUSTRY.  THEY WERE SUED FOR SAFETY REASONS.  AND WHAT DO YOU

                    KNOW?  AFTER ENOUGH LAWSUITS, THEY ENDED UP MAKING CARS MUCH SAFER.

                    SO MAYBE THE -- THE MANUFACTURERS WILL TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND SEE

                    WHAT WE CAN DO.  YES, IT'S MULTIFACETED, BUT THE ILLEGAL GUNS THAT ARE

                    COMING FROM OTHER STATES MUST BE ADDRESSED AND I HOPE THAT ATTORNEY

                    GENERAL WORKS WITH OTHER STATE ATTORNEY GENERALS UP AND DOWN ROUTE

                    95, INTERSTATE 95, TO END THIS ILLEGAL GUN TRAFFICKING.

                                 SO I COMMEND THE -- THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL.  IT'S

                    ANOTHER STEP THAT MAYBE WE CAN GET SOME CONTROL ON THIS AND THAT

                    MAYBE WE CAN GET SOME PROGRESS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. JACOBSON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. TAGUE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  PROCEED.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  YES.  IT WAS MENTIONED JUST A MINUTE

                    AGO IN THE DEBATE THAT THE INCREASE IN GUN SALES IN NEW YORK STATE IS

                                         262



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    MUCH HIGHER THAN PREVIOUS YEARS.  WELL, THE REASON FOR THAT IS BILLS LIKE

                    THIS AND THE FEAR OF PEOPLE WHO -- WHO ARE SECOND AMENDMENT PEOPLE

                    THAT THEY WON'T HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO BUY GUNS ANYMORE IN NEW YORK

                    STATE.  SO I WILL BRING -- I'LL BRING THAT ISSUE UP AND, SECONDLY, THE ALSO

                    -- THE ATTACK ON LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE FEAR THAT PEOPLE HAVE AND

                    WANT TO BE ABLE TO PROTECT THEMSELVES.  SO YOU KNOW, THE GUN IS NOT

                    RESPONSIBLE FOR THE KILLING.  IT'S THE PERSON, AND IT'S PERSONAL

                    RESPONSIBILITY.  I'LL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. TAGUE IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MS. WALKER TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALKER:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  LIKE SO

                    MANY OF MY COLLEAGUES, I TOOK AN OATH, TOO, TO SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION

                    BOTH WHEN I BECAME AN ADMITTED ATTORNEY AS WELL AS WHEN I BECAME A

                    MEMBER OF THIS GREAT BODY.  AND HOWEVER, YOU DON'T GET AN

                    OPPORTUNITY TO DECIDE WHICH PORTIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION YOU SUPPORT

                    AND WHICH ONES YOU DON'T.  AND THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT DICTATES THAT

                    BAIL SHOULD NOT BE CRUEL, UNUSUAL OR EXCESSIVE.  BUT I ALSO RECOGNIZE

                    THAT EVEN WHEN YOU DO HAVE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, THOSE RIGHTS ARE NOT

                    UNFETTERED.  THERE'S SOMETHING CALLED A PREEMPTION --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALKER, MS.

                    WALKER.  WE'RE GOING TO STOP YOU.  PLEASE, WE HAVE A RULE, YOU HAVE TO

                    HAVE THE MASK ON WHEN YOU'RE IN THE CHAMBER, AND WE WON'T TAKE

                    AWAY YOUR TIME.  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. WALKER:  SORRY ABOUT THAT.  THERE IS ALSO -- I

                                         263



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RECLAIM MY TIME NOW.

                                 THERE'S ALSO A RULE CALLED THE PREEMPTION DOCTRINE

                    WHICH DICTATES THAT WHEN A STATE HAS A SIGNIFICANT RIGHT AND AN INTEREST

                    TO SUPERCEDE FEDERAL LAW, INCLUDING CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, THAT THE STATE

                    CAN DO SO IF THEY SO CHOOSE TO.  AND SO I WOULD LIKE TO THANK THE

                    SPONSOR FOR INTRODUCING THIS BILL.  NOT ONLY WAS I PERSONALLY A VICTIM OF

                    GUN VIOLENCE IN LOSING MY BROTHER WHEN HE WAS 19 YEARS OLD BEING

                    SHOT SEVEN TIMES IN HIS TORSO, BUT JUST YESTERDAY -- JUST A FEW WEEKS

                    AGO, I ALSO WITNESSED A YOUNG LADY WHO WAS SHOT DOWN IN FRONT OF MY

                    MOM'S DOOR.  AND I THINK ABOUT ALL OF THOSE VICTIMS, MANY OF THEM

                    WHO HAPPEN TO LIVE IN MY DISTRICT, WE NEEDED THIS MOMENT.  AND

                    WHATEVER IT TAKES IN ORDER TO GET US TO A POINT WHERE OUR CITIES, OUR

                    STREETS ARE A SAFE PLACE TO LIVE, PLAY, AND RAISE A FAMILY, WHATEVER IT

                    TAKES TO GET US TO THAT POINT I'M WITH YOU ALL THE WAY.  I VOTE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALKER IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. FAHY TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. FAHY:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS HAS BEEN

                    A LONG TIME IN COMING.  SOME OF YOU KNOW I SPENT MANY YEARS IN D.C.

                    AND I CAN REMEMBER 30 YEARS AGO CONVERSATIONS ABOUT TRYING TO HOLD

                    MORE OF THE INDUSTRY ACCOUNTABLE AND THEN 16 YEARS AGO, THEY WERE

                    GIVE UNPRECEDENTED IMMUNITY.  SO THIS IS THE ABILITY OR THE -- THE EFFORT

                    HERE IS TO TRY AND MAKE GUNS LESS TRANSFERRABLE, THAT'S A LOT OF WHAT WE

                    TALKED ABOUT TONIGHT, IS TO TRY TO MAKE THEM LESS TRANSFERRABLE, TO STOP

                                         264



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    THE IRON PIPELINE AND TO INCENTIVIZE SAFER MEASURES, AS WELL AS SMART

                    TECHNOLOGY AND BETTER -- BETTER SECURITY, DATA REPORTING AND MORE.

                                 THERE HAS BEEN -- THIS IS PART -- THIS IS ONE SMALL

                    MEASURE THAT IS PART OF A MULTI-PRONGED EFFORT AND WE KNOW WE HAVE A

                    LOT OF WORK TO DO, AS SO MANY OTHERS HAVE POINTED OUT HOW MUCH WORK

                    WE NEED TO DO TO MAKE OUR STREETS SAFER HERE AND -- AND THROUGHOUT THE

                    COUNTRY.  BUT I'M INCREDIBLY PROUD OF THE WORK THAT WE HAVE DONE HERE

                    IN NEW YORK, AND I JUST WANT TO THANK THE SENATE SPONSOR FOR HIS

                    PATIENCE AND HIS -- HIS CHAMPIONING OF THIS -- THIS MEASURE IN THE

                    SENATE, AS WELL AS THE SPEAKER AND ALL OF HIS STAFF THAT HAVE WORKED SO

                    DILIGENTLY ON THIS OVER THE LAST FEW WEEKS.  IN PARTICULAR, MY INCREDIBLE

                    TEAM THAT HAS HELPED ON THIS, AS WELL AS THE BLACK AND HISPANIC CAUCUS

                    WHO REALLY HELPED CHAMPION THIS IN THE LAST COUPLE OF WEEKS.  AND THEN

                    FINALLY, ALL THE NATIONAL GROUPS WHO HAVE SPENT, AS WELL, SPENT YEARS

                    AND YEARS TRYING TO BRING THESE ISSUES FORWARD INCLUDING BRADY,

                    GIFFORDS, EVERY TOWN AND THEN THE MOMS WHO DEMAND ACTION.  YES,

                    THIS IS ONE SMALL PIECE OF NEEDED MEASURES, BUT I DO HOPE THAT THIS WILL

                    BEGIN TO TURN THE TIDE, PARTICULARLY IN WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE IN NEW

                    YORK.  THANK YOU.  AND WITH THAT, MR. SPEAKER, I VOTE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. FAHY IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. SIMON TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. SIMON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TO EXPLAIN

                    MY VOTE.  CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION.  EVERY LAWYER, EVERY TEACHER,

                                         265



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    EVERY STATISTICIAN KNOWS THAT.  MOVING MONEY FROM ONE PART OF THE

                    POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ANOTHER IS NOT ACTUALLY CUTTING THEIR FUNDING, AS

                    HAPPENED IN NEW YORK CITY LAST YEAR.  THE SECOND AMENDMENT IS NOT

                    CARTE BLANCHE.  IT DOES NOT GIVE ANYBODY UNFETTERED ACCESS TO WEAPONS.

                    JUSTICE SCALIA'S DECISION IN THE HELLER CASE STATES THAT EXPLICITLY.  I

                    FOLLOWED THE HELLER CASE VERY CLOSELY.  HE USED TO BE MY LANDLORD.  MY

                    ROOMMATE AND I LEFT BECAUSE HE WAS TOO INFATUATED WITH HIS GUNS.  TO

                    HIS CREDIT, HE WAS A RESPONSIBLE AND SAFE GUN OWNER.  TOO MANY OTHERS,

                    HOWEVER, ARE NOT, AND THE GUN MANUFACTURERS DON'T CARE.  THEY JUST

                    KEEP PUMPING OUT PRODUCT BECAUSE THEY MAKE MONEY BY SELLING THAT

                    PRODUCT THROUGH THE IRON PIPELINE AND OUR CITIZENS ARE SUFFERING AS A

                    RESULT.  I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. SIMON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I, AS A CARD CARRYING

                    PERMIT OWNER, I BELIEVE THAT THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS SOME OF THE

                    BEST GUN REFORM LEGISLATION IN THE COUNTRY.  I'M HONORED TO BE A PART OF

                    THIS BODY THAT HAS CREATED SOME OF THAT, AND I DON'T THINK ANY OF THIS

                    DISCUSSION THAT WE'VE HAD TODAY ABOUT THIS LEGISLATION TAMPERS WITH THAT

                    OR TAMPERS WITH ANYBODY'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.  IN FACT, THE IRON

                    PIPELINE IS REAL.  IT'S A BUSINESS.  AND JUST LIKE EVERY BUSINESS, THEY'RE

                    ALWAYS SEARCHING A NEW MARKET.  AND THEY UNDERSTAND THAT TO GET A

                    MARKET IN NEW YORK STATE, YOU CAN'T DO IT LEGALLY.  YOU GOT TO BRING A

                                         266



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    CARLOAD OF GUNS FROM SOUTH CAROLINA OR OHIO OR PENNSYLVANIA, AND YOU

                    GOT TO PULL THEM UP INTO A NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE YOU KNOW PEOPLE WILL

                    BUY THEM, AND THAT'S WHAT HAPPENS.  SOMEBODY'S GOT TO BE RESPONSIBLE

                    FOR THAT.

                                 WE'VE DONE WHAT WE SHOULD DO AS NEW YORKERS IN

                    MAKING OUR GUN OWNERS ABLE TO GET A VERY SAFE MANNER HAVE ACCESS TO

                    PERMITS AND THE WEAPONS OF THEIR CHOICE, BUT WE HAVE NOT BEEN ABLE TO

                    STOP TRUCKLOADS AND CARLOADS OF PEOPLE PULLING WEAPONS UP IN FRONT OF

                    OUR HIGH SCHOOLS, SELLING THEM TO YOUNG PEOPLE AND, IN FACT, SELLING

                    THEM TO SOME OLDER PEOPLE WHO DON'T HAVE THE WHEREWITHAL OR THE

                    ABILITY TO GET A PERMIT LEGALLY IN THE STATE.  IT'S A MARKET, MR. SPEAKER,

                    THAT NEEDS TO BE CONTROLLED.  THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO BEGIN THAT

                    PROCESS.  I WANT TO APPLAUD THE SPONSOR FOR THIS LEGISLATION AND VOTE IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  SO THIS,

                    WITH GREAT RESPECT TO THE SPONSOR WHO -- AND I KNOW THAT -- I KNOW THAT

                    HER HEART IS IN THE RIGHT PLACE AND I KNOW SHE HAS WORKED HARD FOR THIS

                    BILL, THIS BILL CREATES A PRIVATE RIGHT OF ACTION SO THAT ANY PERSON THAT'S

                    BEEN DAMAGED AS A RESULT OF A GUN INDUSTRY MEMBERS ACTS OR OMISSIONS

                    IN VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE ENTITLED TO BRING AN ACTION FOR

                    RECOVERY OF DAMAGES.  SO THAT'S MY -- ONE OF MY PROBLEMS WITH THE

                    BILL.

                                         267



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 YOU KNOW, ALCOHOL KILLS A LOT OF PEOPLE, TOO.  IF YOU

                    HAVE SOMEBODY WHO HAS BEEN INJURED BY ALCOHOL, THEY CAN GO BACK AND

                    THEY CAN, THROUGH THE DRAM SHOP LAW, GO BACK AND SUE THE BAR THAT

                    OVERSERVED THEM, RIGHT, BUT THEY CAN'T SUE SEAGRAMS.  AND I JUST THINK

                    THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE HAVE BEEN EXCEPTIONS THAT HAVE BEEN CARVED OUT

                    FOR OPIOIDS OR FOR TOBACCO AND FOR OTHER THINGS, TO DO THAT FOR THIS,

                    THOUGH, I THINK REALLY MY FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM, AND IT'S BEEN EXPRESSED

                    BY OTHER OF MY COLLEAGUES, IS I JUST THINK THAT THIS APPROACH MISSES THE

                    MARK AND DOES NOT ASSIGN RESPONSIBILITY WHERE IT EXISTS.  THERE ARE SO

                    MANY GUNS ALREADY -- FIREARMS ALREADY OUT THERE, COMMUNITY FIREARMS

                    ACCESSIBLE BY PEOPLE LIVING ANYWHERE IN THE CITY OF ALBANY WHO WANTS

                    ONE TO COMMIT A CRIME OR ANY PLACE ELSE.  WE ALREADY HAVE THE FIREARMS

                    OUT THERE TO CREATE THE NEXT SANDY HOOK OR THE NEXT COLUMBINE.  I JUST

                    THINK THAT WHAT WE NEED IS TO -- TO RE-EMPOWER AND RESPECT OUR LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT.  I THINK THAT THAT IS THE WAY THAT WE NEED TO GO HERE, NOT

                    -- THIS IS NOT THE DIRECTION THAT I WOULD PREFER TO GO IN.  I'LL BE VOTING NO

                    ON THIS BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, THANK YOU

                    FOR RECORDING OUR COLLEAGUES MS. LUPARDO, MR. BRONSON, MRS. BARRETT,

                    MR. SANTABARBARA, AND MR. STIRPE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS ONE.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                         268



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 40, CALENDAR NO. 370 ON THE MAIN CALENDAR, THE

                    CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06198-B, CALENDAR

                    NO. 370, PAULIN, FAHY, OTIS, GRIFFIN, ZINERMAN, SEAWRIGHT,

                    ENGLEBRIGHT, STECK, THIELE, GOTTFRIED, DINOWITZ, GALEF, EPSTEIN,

                    MEEKS, ANDERSON, RICHARDSON, SIMON, L. ROSENTHAL, LAVINE, STERN,

                    BURGOS, DAVILA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PENAL LAW, IN RELATION TO THE

                    PURCHASE AND DISPOSAL OF FIREARMS, RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    PAULIN, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  UNDER CURRENT LAW, IF YOU HAVE A

                    CERTAIN FELONY OR OTHER CRIMINAL CONVICTIONS, YOU ARE INELIGIBLE TO OWN

                    A GUN OR TO BUY A GUN.  AND MOST OF US AGREE, I THINK, WITH THOSE

                    RESTRICTIONS.  THIS BILL TAKES IT ONE STEP FURTHER AND SAYS YOU CANNOT BUY

                                         269



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    A GUN NOR CAN ANYONE SELL YOU A GUN IF THERE'S AN OUTSTANDING WARRANT

                    FOR YOUR ARREST FOR A FELONY.  AND MOST OF US ARE FAMILIAR WITH THE

                    CONCEPT OF INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY AND, THEREFORE, MOST OF THE TIME

                    WE ONLY REMOVE CIVIL LIBERTIES AND RIGHTS UPON CONVICTION, NOT UPON THE

                    ISSUANCE OF AN ARREST WARRANT.  AND SO MANY OF MY COLLEAGUES ARE

                    CONCERNED THAT WE'RE IMPAIRING SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHTS FOR

                    INDIVIDUALS WHO HAVE NOT HAD ANY OPPORTUNITY IN COURT TO DEFEND

                    THEMSELVES MERELY BECAUSE A JUDGE HAS ISSUED A WARRANT BASED ON A

                    VERY LOW STANDARD OF PROBABLE CAUSE AND NOT BASED ON ANY HIGHER

                    STANDARD SUCH AS EVEN PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE OR BEYOND ANY

                    REASONABLE DOUBT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT JULY 1, 2021.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 5000-B.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE

                    POSITION IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE

                    NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS LEGISLATION, BUT THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT ARE ENCOURAGED TO CALL THE MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE SO WE

                    CAN RECORD YOUR SUPPORT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                         270



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  OUR MAJORITY COLLEAGUES

                    WILL GENERALLY BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, SHOULD

                    ANY DECIDE TO BE AN EXCEPTION, THEY SHOULD CONTACT THE MAJORITY

                    LEADER'S OFFICE AND WE WILL BE HAPPY TO RECORD THEIR VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. PAULIN TO EXPLAIN

                    HER VOTE.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  I'LL MAKE ONE POINT OF CLARIFICATION.

                    IT'S ALREADY AGAINST -- IT'S ALREADY A FEDERAL PROHIBITOR, IT MEANS FEDERAL

                    LAW THAT SAYS THAT A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE, WHICH IS WHAT SOMEONE IS

                    THAT -- WHERE THERE'S AN OUTSTANDING WARRANT WHEN YOU COMMITTED A

                    FELONY OR SERIOUS OFFENSE, YOU CAN'T GET A GUN.  SO IT'S ALREADY A FEDERAL

                    STATUTE.  WHAT THIS BILL DOES IS IT CLEARS UP A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE FBI

                    AND ATF.  THE FBI SAID THAT IF YOU'RE A FUGITIVE FROM JUSTICE, IF YOU --

                    IF YOU HAVE AN OUTSTANDING WARRANT WITHIN THE STATE OR OUTSIDE OF THE

                    STATE, AND THE ATF SAID NO, IT'S ONLY THE OUTSIDE OF THE STATE.  AND

                    WHAT THAT CONFUSION DID WAS IT LED DCJS IN NEW YORK STATE AND OTHER

                    STATES FROM PUTTING WHAT IS ALREADY A FEDERAL PROHIBITOR INTO THE NICS

                    DATABASE.

                                 SO ALL THIS BILL DOES IS IT MAKES NEW YORK STATE IN

                    COMPLIANCE WITH THE FEDERAL LAW WHICH ALREADY STATES THAT A FUGITIVE

                    FROM JUSTICE, SOMEONE WHO HAS AN OUTSTANDING WARRANT FOR HAVING BEEN

                    ALLEGED TO HAVE COMMITTED A FELONY OR A SERIOUS CRIME IS -- IS, INDEED,

                    PROHIBITED FROM GETTING A GUN.  SO ALL IT DOES IS IT CLARIFIES THAT AND IT

                                         271



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ALLOWS DCJS TO PROTECT NEW YORKERS FROM THOSE CRIMINALS.  SO WITH

                    THAT, I WITHDRAW MY -- I VOTE IN THE POSITIVE, WHATEVER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  ARE THERE ANY OTHER

                    VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 ON THE A-CALENDAR, PAGE 21, RULES REPORT NO. 601,

                    THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07243, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 601, RICHARDSON, SIMON, GALEF, ENGLEBRIGHT, JACOBSON,

                    MCMAHON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    REQUIRING THE DIVISION OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES AND THE DIVISION OF

                    STATE POLICE TO PUBLISH QUARTERLY REPORTS PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATED

                    TO FIREARMS, RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS USED IN THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THIS BILL REQUIRES THE DIVISION OF

                    CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES TO PUBLISH QUARTERLY REPORTS RELATED TO

                    FIREARMS, RIFLES AND SHOTGUNS USED IN THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES.  AND

                    WHILE I THINK THAT DATA IS HELPFUL AND, INDEED, WE'VE HAD NUMEROUS

                    MEMBERS MENTION REPORTS FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THAT HAD THAT DATA

                    AND, IN FACT, IF YOU GO ON AND LOOK, YOU CAN FIND THIS DATA.  THE CURRENT

                                         272



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DATA IS CORRELATED ON AN ANNUAL BASIS RATHER THAN A QUARTERLY BASIS.  AND

                    MOST OF US THINK THAT ANNUAL REPORTS ARE PROBABLY ADEQUATE FOR US TO

                    MONITOR WHAT'S GOING ON AND GET A HANDLE ON IT AND THIS, WE THINK, JUST

                    REQUIRES MORE REPORTING THAN IS NECESSARY AND THE COROLLARY, FOUR TIMES

                    MORE THE COST.  AND THAT'S THE ONLY REAL ISSUE WE HAD WITH THIS BILL.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE 1251.  THIS IS A PARTY VOTE.  ANY MEMBER

                    WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED AS AN EXCEPTION TO THE CONFERENCE POSITION

                    IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS

                    PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS QUARTERLY REPORTING

                    REQUIREMENT.  THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT SHOULD CERTAINLY CONTACT THE

                    MINORITY LEADER'S OFFICE SO WE CAN PROPERLY RECORD YOUR VOTE.  THANK

                    YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY GOING TO BE IN SUPPORT

                    OF MAINTAINING THIS DATA ON A QUARTERLY BASIS.  SHOULD ANY COLLEAGUES

                                         273



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DESIRE TO BE AN EXCEPTION, FEEL FREE TO CONTACT THE MAJORITY LEADER'S

                    OFFICE AND THEIR VOTE WILL BE PROPERLY RECORDED.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  THANK YOU.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 31, RULES REPORT NO. 652, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07957, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 652, RICHARDSON, L. ROSENTHAL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE DOMESTIC

                    RELATIONS LAW, IN RELATION TO AUTHORIZING THE COURT TO DETERMINE THE

                    SEARCH AND SEIZURE ORDERS OF FIREARMS IN CONNECTION WITH ORDERS OF

                    PROTECTION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED, MS. RICHARDSON.

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  MR. SPEAKER, BEFORE I BEGIN, I

                    WOULD LIKE TO SAY GOOD EVENING TO YOU AS WELL AS MY COLLEAGUES AND TO

                    THE 43RD ASSEMBLY DISTRICT WHO IS PROUDLY WATCHING US DEBATE THIS BILL

                    IN THIS MOMENT.  THIS BILL WOULD AMEND THE DOMESTIC RELATIONS LAW TO

                    AUTHORIZE THE STATE SUPREME COURT TO ISSUE SEARCH AND SEIZURE ORDERS

                    RELATED TO FIREARMS POSSESSED IN THE VIOLATION OF ORDERS OF PROTECTION

                    ISSUED IN MATRIMONIAL PROCEEDINGS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                         274



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  ABSOLUTELY, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.  I JUST HAVE A

                    COUPLE OF QUESTIONS.  MY -- MY FIRST QUESTION IS IN THE LANGUAGE OF THE

                    BILL ITSELF, AND I'M LOOKING ON PAGE 1 AROUND LINE 20 OR SO, IT TALKS

                    ABOUT A WILLFUL -- WILFULLY REFUSES TO SURRENDER SUCH FIREARM, RIFLE, ET

                    CETERA.  WHAT WOULD YOU THINK WOULD CONSTITUTE, KIND OF, WILLFUL

                    CONDUCT?  IT'S MORE THAN FOOT DRAGGING, RIGHT, NOT DOING IT IN A TIMELY

                    WAY?  OR WHAT DO YOU THINK WILLFULLY WOULD MEAN?

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  IT IS UP TO THE JUDGE TO

                    DETERMINE WHAT WILLFULLY CONSTITUTES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO YOU WOULD LEAVE THAT TO THE

                    DISCRETION OF THE COURT TO FIGURE THAT OUT, THAT'S VERY GOOD.  NOW, IS THIS

                    -- IN YOUR VIEW, DOES THIS BILL REPRESENT A MODIFICATION OR AMENDMENT

                    OR ADDITION TO THE RED FLAG LAW THAT WE -- THAT THIS BODY PASSED A

                    COUPLE YEARS AGO?

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  YES.  IN 2020, WE DID PASS

                    WHAT IS CALLED THE RED FLAG LAW AND SO WE'VE MADE SOME ADJUSTMENTS

                    TO THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW AND THE FAMILY COURT ACT, BUT WE DID

                    NOT MAKE THE APPROPRIATE PARITY FOR SUPREME COURT IN MATRIMONIAL

                    PROCEEDINGS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  ALL RIGHT.  SO WHAT THIS DOES IS IT TAKES

                    THE RED FLAG LAW AND IT JUST MAKES IT -- BRINGS IT INTO STATE SUPREME

                    COURT WHEN THEIR HANDLING MATRIMONIAL MATTERS INVOLVING AN ORDER OF

                    PROTECTION, EITHER TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ORDER OF PROTECTION, IS THAT

                                         275



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    RIGHT?

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  WELL, I'M GETTING CLARITY HERE

                    FROM LEGAL COUNSEL.  IT'S NOT THE RED FLAG LAW.  WHEN WE START

                    REFERRING TO ALL THESE LAWS BY NAMES, RICHARDSON GETS A BIT CONFUSED.

                    BUT I CAN SAY THIS TO YOU, MA'AM:  IN THE 2020 BUDGET, CHAPTER 55 OF

                    THE LAWS IN 2020, THE LEGISLATURE AMENDED THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

                    LAW AND THE FAMILY COURT ACT WHICH AUTHORIZED COURTS TO ISSUE SEARCH

                    AND SEIZURE ORDERS REGARDING FIREARMS IN CONNECTIONS WITH ORDER OF

                    PROTECTION.  SO WE DID IT IN THOSE TWO PARTICULAR AREAS, BUT WE DID NOT

                    BRING THE PARITY HERE TO THIS SUBSECTION OF THE LAW.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY SO -- BUT THIS DOESN'T HAVE TO DO

                    WITH THE EXTREME RISK PROTECTION ORDERS, CORRECT?

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  NO, IT DOES NOT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  I JUST -- THANK YOU FOR THAT

                    CLARIFICATION.  SO I GUESS MY QUESTION IS I WAS SPEAKING EARLIER WITH A

                    JUDGE THAT I KNOW VERY WELL AND WHO IS A SUPREME COURT JUDGE AND HE

                    SAID THAT THIS IS BEING DONE ALL THE TIME ALREADY.  SO WHY DO WE NEED

                    THIS BILL, THEN, IF THIS IS ALREADY BEING DONE BY OUR SUPREME COURT

                    JUDGES?

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  THIS MAKES IT VERY CLEAR IN THE

                    STATUTE THAT THE JUDGE HAVE THE INHERENT POWER.  AND SO WHAT WE WANT

                    IS CONSISTENCY ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW YORK WITH NO CONFUSION, AND

                    WITH THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION, WE PROVIDE THAT CLARITY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  VERY GOOD.  THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR

                    YOUR ANSWERS.

                                         276



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MS. WALSH:  I APPRECIATE THE SPONSOR'S ANSWERS TO

                    MY QUESTIONS.  I WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS BILL TO THE EXTENT THAT THERE IS

                    ANY CONFUSION ACROSS THE STATE THAT SUPREME COURT JUDGES ALREADY

                    HAVE AND HAD AND DID EXERCISE THIS ABILITY TO FORCE A LITIGANT THAT IS THE

                    SUBJECT OF A TEMPORARY ORDER OF PROTECTION OR AN ORDER OF PROTECTION IN

                    A MATRIMONIAL MATTER WHO IS WILLFULLY REFUSING OR WILL NOT GIVE UP THEIR

                    FIREARMS, RIFLES, OR SHOTGUNS, THAT THE COURT MAY ORDER THE SEIZURE OF

                    SUCH WEAPONS IN APPROPRIATE CIRCUMSTANCES WHEN FOUND IN THE JUDGE'S

                    DISCRETION TO BE AN APPROPRIATE CASE.  SO I'LL BE SUPPORTING THIS BILL AND

                    I THANK THE SPONSOR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON A-7957.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY MEMBER WHO

                    WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO CONTACT THE

                    MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. RICHARDSON TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. RICHARDSON:  MR. SPEAKER, I WANT TO SAY

                    THANK YOU TO YOU, TO THE LEADERSHIP OF THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY,

                    AS WELL AS ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES FOR US UNDERTAKING WHAT MAY HAVE BEEN

                    VERY DIFFICULT TO CONCEPTUALIZE AT THE BEGINNING OF THIS LEGISLATIVE

                                         277



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    SESSION.  IT HAS BEEN STATED ACROSS THIS EVENING SO MANY TIMES THAT GUN

                    VIOLENCE IS ON THE RISE ACROSS THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND WE HAVE PUT

                    TOGETHER THIS LEGISLATIVE PACKAGE CRAFTED WITH GREAT INTENTION TO BE

                    SOLUTION-ORIENTED AROUND THE ISSUE OF ILLEGAL GUNS COMING INTO THE STATE

                    OF NEW YORK AND BEING USED IN THE COMMISSION OF CRIMES.  BUT

                    MOREOVER, ENSURING THAT THERE IS SAFETY INSIDE HOMES WERE NECESSARY,

                    ESPECIALLY WHEN ORDER OF PROTECTIONS HAVE BEEN ISSUED.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, AGAIN, I WANT TO COMMEND MY

                    COLLEAGUES ON BOTH -- ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE WHO HAVE ALSO

                    JOINED IN WITH ME IN SUPPORTING THIS LEGISLATION.  AS WELL AS I MUST

                    UPLIFT IN THIS MOMENT THE BLACK, HISPANIC, PUERTO RICAN AND ASIAN

                    CAUCUS OF THIS GREAT STATE LEGISLATURE WHO HAS WORKED VERY TIRELESSLY

                    THIS ENTIRE LEGISLATIVE SESSION TO CRAFT SAID GUN PACKAGE THAT IS COMING

                    BEFORE US THIS EVENING.  YOU KNOW, WE DO UNDERSTAND ALTHOUGH WE ARE

                    MEMBERS OF THE BLACK CAUCUS AND WE ARE OVER 60 STRONG, THAT IT IS

                    COLLECTIVELY ACROSS COUNTY, ACROSS CULTURE, AND ACROSS THE WORLD THAT WE

                    COME TOGETHER IN THIS BODY TO REPRESENT THE DIVERSITY OF NEW YORK

                    STATE.  SO MY GRATITUDE IS OVERWHELMING, AS WELL TO THE STAFF FOR US

                    BEING IN THIS MOMENT.  AND WITH THAT, I PROUDLY VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  MS. RICHARDSON IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 21, RULES REPORT NO. 605, THE CLERK WILL READ.

                                         278



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07302, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 605, SIMON, ZINERMAN, RICHARDSON, EPSTEIN, MEEKS, ANDERSON,

                    GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, BURGOS.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EDUCATION LAW AND THE

                    STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO CREATING A FIREARM VIOLENCE RESEARCH

                    INSTITUTE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MS. SIMON:  SORRY.  IT WAS TELLING ME I COULDN'T

                    UNMUTE MYSELF.  SO ANYWAY... YES, OF COURSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUSICK:  GREAT.  THE SPONSOR

                    YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANKS, MS. SIMON.  I CAN ONLY

                    IMAGINE HOW FRUSTRATING IT IS NOT TO BE ABLE TO UNMUTE, THAT'S WHY I'M

                    ON THE FLOOR.

                                 MS. SIMON:  MAZEL TOV.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT THANK YOU FOR WILLING TO

                    ANSWER QUESTIONS.  I KNOW YOUR BILL CREATES A NEW YORK STATE FIREARM

                    VIOLENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WITHIN THE JURISDICTION OF SUNY THAT'S

                    HEADED UP BY AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.  AND I KNOW THAT THERE ARE TWO

                    AT-LARGE MEMBERS APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR, TWO MEMBERS APPOINTED

                    BY THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND TWO MEMBERS APPOINTED

                                         279



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    BY THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY.  IS THERE ANY REASON WHY THIS GUN

                    VIOLENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE HAS NO REPRESENTATIVES

                    APPOINTED FROM THE REPUBLICAN MINORITY ON EITHER THE SENATE OR THE

                    ASSEMBLY?

                                 MS. SIMON:  I'M SORRY.  COULD YOU TELL ME WHERE

                    YOU'RE LOOKING, BECAUSE I'M NOT QUITE --

                                 MR. GOODELL:  CERTAINLY.  IT'S ON PAGE 2, LINE 52

                    THROUGH 55.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MS. SIMON:  SO I'M NOT SURE I FOLLOW YOUR QUESTION

                    THAT THERE WERE MORE REPUBLICANS ON THE COMMITTEE THAN NOT?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THERE ARE NO APPOINTMENTS OF ANY

                    KIND BY THE MINORITY LEADER IN THE ASSEMBLY OR THE MINORITY LEADER

                    IN THE SENATE.  IS THERE A REASON WHY THERE ARE NO APPOINTMENTS TO THIS

                    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE FROM THE MINORITY?

                                 MS. SIMON:  I DON'T KNOW THAT THERE WAS A SPECIFIC

                    REASON FOR THAT, PERHAPS IT -- I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE SPEAKER IS LIMITED

                    BY APPOINTING ONLY DEMOCRATS, FOR EXAMPLE; HOWEVER, YOU KNOW, I

                    DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT PARTICULAR REASON WAS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.  WELL, IF WE GET AN

                    OPPORTUNITY TO REVISIT THIS, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL, IN MY OPINION, TO HAVE

                    REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE MINORITY BECAUSE THE REPUBLICAN MINORITY

                    REPRESENTS ABOUT 28 TO 30 PERCENT OF THE ENTIRE STATE AND SOME OF THE

                    ISSUES THAT WE ADDRESS, PARTICULARLY IN UPSTATE NEW YORK OR MORE RURAL

                    PARTS OF NEW YORK CAN BE DIFFERENT.  AND SO HAVING THAT BROADER

                                         280



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    PERSPECTIVE CAN BE VERY HELPFUL.  I NOTE THAT THIS BILL PROVIDES FOR AN

                    INSTITUTE DIRECTOR, PRESUMABLY A FULL-TIME EMPLOYEE; IS THAT YOUR INTENT?

                                 MS. SIMON:  YES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IT CREATES A FIREARM VIOLENCE

                    RESEARCH FUND, BUT THERE'S NO APPROPRIATION, IS THERE, IN THIS BILL?

                                 MS. SIMON:  THIS BILL WOULD APPROPRIATE $5 MILLION

                    IN THE BUDGET TO BE SPREAD OUT OVER THE NEXT FIVE YEARS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO YOU ENVISION AN AMENDMENT TO

                    THE BUDGET, IS THAT WHAT YOU ENVISION IN THIS?  OR DO YOU ENVISION THAT

                    THAT $5 MILLION WOULD BE ADDED NEXT YEAR?

                                 MS. SIMON:  THAT WOULD -- I WOULD ENVISION IT

                    BEING ADDED NEXT YEAR BECAUSE IT WOULD, YOU KNOW, BY THE TIME YOU GET

                    THIS ORGANIZED AND SET UP, THE MONEY WOULD BE ALLOCATED NEXT YEAR.

                    THERE IS SOME MINIMAL FUNDING ALREADY WITH THE GUN VIOLENCE RESEARCH

                    INSTITUTE, BUT IT HASN'T BEEN ESTABLISHED BECAUSE IT WASN'T ENOUGH.  SO

                    NOW WITH THE PROMISE OF FUNDING, WE WILL BE ABLE TO ACTUALLY GET THIS --

                    GET THIS SHOW ON THE ROAD, SO-TO-SPEAK.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MS. SIMON.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SUPPORT THE CREATION OF THIS

                    RESEARCH INSTITUTE.  I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO UNDERSTAND THAT GUN

                    VIOLENCE INVOLVES A LOT MORE THAN JUST SOMEBODY HAVING A GUN, AND

                    THAT THERE ARE A LOT OF ISSUES THAT DEAL WITH GANG VIOLENCE, THAT DEAL WITH

                    A DISRESPECT FOR HUMAN LIFE, THAT DEAL WITH A CULTURE.  AND YOU SEE THAT

                                         281



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    DRAMATICALLY WHEN YOU COMPARE, FOR EXAMPLE, TWO CITIES WITH VERY

                    SIMILAR DEMOGRAPHICS, CHICAGO THAT THE BANS ALL HANDGUNS AND DALLAS

                    THAT WELCOMES THEM.  AND THE CRIME RATES IN THOSE TWO CITIES IS

                    DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT, THE MURDER RATE IS DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT, THE

                    GUN VIOLENCE RATE IS DRAMATICALLY DIFFERENT.  AND SO THERE'S A LOT MORE

                    GOING ON THAN JUST POSSESSION OF GUNS.  AND OF COURSE, GETTING AT SOME

                    OF THOSE OTHER SOCIOLOGICAL ISSUES, CULTURAL ISSUES, GANG ISSUES, THOSE

                    ARE REALLY DIFFICULT AND TOUGH ISSUES AND HAVING AN ORGANIZATION THAT'S

                    FOCUSED ON TRYING TO FIGURE OUT THE BEST APPROACH TO BRING DOWN GUN

                    VIOLENCE, ADDRESSING THE MENTAL HEALTH ASPECTS, THE PERSONAL ASPECTS,

                    THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECTS, ALL THAT I THINK IS IMPORTANT.

                                 AND SO I WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS, BUT I DO ENCOURAGE

                    THE SPONSOR TO CONSIDER BROADENING THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO INCLUDE

                    REPRESENTATIVES APPOINTED BY THE MINORITY BECAUSE I THINK THE MINORITY

                    DOES BRING A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE, A VALUABLE PERSPECTIVE, AND ONE THAT

                    CAN FURTHER THE MISSION OF THIS INSTITUTE.  SO I WILL BE SUPPORTING IT, BUT

                    WOULD HOPE AND ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO CONSIDER AMENDING IT IN

                    THE FUTURE.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. GIGLIO.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  MR. SPEAKER, TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE -- OH,

                    ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, THAT'S A

                    GOOD IDEA.

                                 MS. GIGLIO:  OKAY, ON THE BILL.  SO I WANT TO

                                         282



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    REITERATE EVERYTHING THAT MY COLLEAGUE JUST SAID AND ALSO INCLUDE THAT A

                    LOT OF THESE CRIMES ARE PSYCHOLOGICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH, AND I DON'T SEE

                    ANYBODY ON THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE EITHER FROM LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT

                    ARE INVESTIGATING THESE CRIMES, OR FROM ANY SOCIAL WORKER OR

                    PSYCHOLOGIST THAT DEALS WITH PEOPLE THAT HAVE MENTAL ISSUES THAT CAUSE

                    THESE CRIMES, SO -- AS WELL AS A MEMBER FROM THE MINORITY.  SO I THINK

                    IT'S IMPORTANT TO BRING LAW ENFORCEMENT IN AND TO BRING SOCIAL WORKERS

                    IN AS WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ALL YEAR.

                                 AND I SEE IT SAYS THAT THERE WILL BE A VERY -- FROM

                    VARYING BACKGROUNDS WITH MEMBERS SELECTED FROM THE SCIENTIFIC

                    COMMUNITY, ACADEMIC COMMUNITY, FROM GOVERNMENT SERVICE, AND IT

                    SHALL CONSIST OF TEN MEMBERS INCLUDING THE COMMISSIONER,

                    COMMISSIONER OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE SERVICES, THE COMMISSIONER OF

                    HEALTH, THE CHANCELLOR OF THE UNIVERSITY OR THEIR DESIGNEES, TWO TO

                    AT-LARGE MEMBERS APPOINTED BY THE GOVERNOR, TWO AT-LARGE MEMBERS

                    APPOINTED BY THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND TWO APPOINTED

                    BY THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY.  I THINK IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO HAVE

                    SOCIAL WORKERS AND POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND MAYBE EVEN A

                    PRO-SECOND AMENDMENT PERSON ON THIS COMMISSION TO EXPLAIN THE

                    OTHER SIDE IN ORDER TO MAKE IT BIPARTISAN AND FAIR.

                                 SO I'M GOING TO BE SUPPORTING THIS, AS WELL, AND WILL

                    BE LOOKING FOR AMENDMENTS WHEN IT COMES TO THE ASSIGNMENT OF WHO

                    WOULD SIT ON THIS EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         283



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 90TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON SENATE PRINT 2981.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.  ANY

                    MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBER PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GALLAHAN TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GALLAHAN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I HAVE

                    MENTIONED THIS OTHER TIMES IN THE CHAMBER AND THE REASON FOR MY NO

                    VOTE IS THERE ABSOLUTELY NO REPRESENTATION PLAN FROM THE MINORITY PARTY,

                    AND THIS IS NOT THE FIRST TIME OR THE SECOND TIME OR THE THIRD TIME I HAVE

                    SEEN THIS HAPPEN.  AND, THEREFORE, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GALLAHAN IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. -- MS. SIMON TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. SIMON:  THANK YOU, TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  YOU KNOW, LITTLE IS KNOWN ABOUT THE FACTORS THAT GIVE RISE TO

                    FIREARM VIOLENCE AND ITS PREVENTION.  ITS PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL IMPACTS ARE

                    A SIGNIFICANT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY PROBLEM, AND BECOMING MORE SO.

                    NEVERTHELESS, THE FUNDING FOR RESEARCH THROUGH THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE

                    CONTROL AND PREVENTION WAS ELIMINATED BY CONGRESS IN 1996.  EFFORTS

                    TO RESTORE THAT FUNDING HAVE BEEN UNSUCCESSFUL BECAUSE OF ACTIVE AND

                                         284



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    WELL-FINANCED SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS AND IT HAS BEEN, SO FAR, ONE -- TWO

                    STEPS AHEAD AND ONE STEP BACK.

                                 UNLIKE OTHER MAJOR HEALTH AND SOCIAL CONCERNS SUCH AS

                    MOTOR VEHICLE ACCIDENTS AND CANCER AND HEART DISEASE, TOO LITTLE

                    RESEARCH HAS BEEN INVESTED IN FIREARM VIOLENCE.  ESTABLISHING THIS

                    CENTER WILL ENSURE LONG-TERM EFFORTS TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING AND

                    PREVENTING FIREARM-RELATED GUN VIOLENCE AGAINST NEW YORKERS.  AND

                    WHAT WE NEED IS NOT CONJECTURE.  WE NEED NOT FAKE STATISTICS THAT FAIL TO

                    RECOGNIZE THAT CORRELATION IS NOT CAUSATION.  CORRELATION INDICATES AN

                    AREA WHERE TWO VARIABLES INTERSECT AND MERIT FURTHER STUDY.  AND THAT IS

                    WHAT THIS RESEARCH INSTITUTE WILL DO, BECAUSE THERE IS NO OTHER SIDE TO

                    RESEARCH.

                                 THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE IS NOT SO LIMITED THAT IT

                    CANNOT HAVE A PSYCHOLOGIST, WHO IS A SCIENTIFIC PERSON, SITTING ON THE

                    EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE.  BUT IT IS ABOUT RESEARCH AND ONLY RESEARCH.  WE

                    ARE LOSING 40,000 LIVES A YEAR ANNUALLY, AND THE NUMBER IS RISING.

                    CHILDREN ARE BEING KILLED AND WE KNOW THAT BLACK CHILDREN ARE FOUR

                    TIMES LIKELY TO BE KILLED BY GUN VIOLENCE THAN WHITE CHILDREN.  WE

                    NEED TO STUDY THIS PROBLEM AND THE GUN VIOLENCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE WILL

                    DO JUST THAT AND BETTER INFORM THE LEGISLATURE ABOUT POLICY IN THE

                    FUTURE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.  MR. --

                    MS. SIMON IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. FITZPATRICK:  YES, THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                         285



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    I -- I -- WHILE THE GOAL I THINK IS -- IS NOBLE, I THINK THERE'S MORE THAN

                    ENOUGH SCHOLARSHIP ON THE CAUSES OF GUN VIOLENCE AND THE SOCIAL

                    VIOLENCE THAT IS EXPERIENCED IN THIS COUNTRY AND IN NEW YORK STATE.

                    THE LACK OF MINORITY MEMBERSHIP ON THIS -- IN THIS INSTITUTE IS NOT BY

                    ACCIDENT, IT IS INTENTIONAL AND THEREFORE, I DO NOT BELIEVE THIS IS A

                    SINCERE EFFORT TO STUDY THIS ISSUE FROM EVERY POSSIBLE ANGLE.  THIS WILL

                    CONCLUDE WHAT THE USUAL NARRATIVE THAT IT'S ALL ABOUT THE GUNS AND THE

                    MANUFACTURERS WITHOUT LOOKING AT WHAT -- WHAT REALLY IS BEHIND THE

                    CAUSE OF THIS VIOLENCE.  I WOULD POINT TO THE SCHOLARSHIP OF A GREAT

                    ECONOMIST, THOMAS SOWELL, A GREAT SOCIAL THINKER WHO HAS SOME VERY,

                    VERY GOOD IDEAS AND SCHOLARSHIP ON THE CAUSES OF GUN VIOLENCE AND

                    VIOLENCE IN SO MANY OF OUR COMMUNITIES.

                                 SO THE LACK OF AN APPOINTMENT BY THE MINORITY -- FOR

                    THE MINORITY ON THIS COMMISSION, AGAIN, IS INTENTIONAL BECAUSE THE GOAL

                    HERE IS TO CONTINUE TO DRIVE A NARRATIVE THAT WILL IGNORE THE REAL ROOT

                    CAUSES OF THIS VIOLENCE.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. FITZPATRICK IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD YOU

                    PLEASE RECORD OUR COLLEAGUES MR. DIPIETRO, MR. FITZPATRICK, MR. FRIEND,

                    MR. MILLER, MR. NORRIS, AND MR. SCHMITT ALL IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MS.

                    WALSH, SO NOTED.

                                         286



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  IF YOU COULD RECORD OUR COLLEAGUE, MR. SANTABARBARA, IN THE

                    NEGATIVE ON THIS ONE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED, MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MR. TAGUE, HOWEVER, TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  AS SO WAS

                    ELOQUENTLY SPOKEN BY MY COLLEAGUE, MR. FITZPATRICK, I AM A NEGATIVE

                    ON THIS BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    TAGUE.  MR. TAGUE IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF WE

                    COULD GO BACK TO OUR A-CALENDAR AND TAKE UP A BILL ON CONSENT THAT

                    WAS INADVERTENTLY LAID ASIDE, IT IS RULES REPORT NO. 519, ASSEMBLY BILL

                    NO. 499-A BY MR. CARROLL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  PAGE 3, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 519, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00499-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 519, CARROLL, HEVESI, L. ROSENTHAL, BENEDETTO, COLTON,

                    CYMBROWITZ, DINOWITZ, GOTTFRIED, WEPRIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                                         287



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ADMINISTRATIVE CODE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, IN RELATION TO ENACTING

                    THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS COMMUNITY

                    ACCOUNTABILITY ACT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 90TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE ON ASSEMBLY PRINT A-499-A.  THIS IS A FAST ROLL CALL.

                    ANY MEMBER WHO WISHES TO BE RECORDED IN THE NEGATIVE IS REMINDED TO

                    CONTACT THE MAJORITY OR MINORITY LEADER AT THE NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY

                    PROVIDED.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  JOINING MR.

                    EICHENSTEIN IN THE NEGATIVE IS MR. DIPIETRO.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  SO NOTED.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, DO YOU

                    HAVE ANY FURTHER HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  NO HOUSEKEEPING,

                    MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES, BUT WE DO HAVE RESOLUTIONS.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  I NOW MOVE THAT THE

                                         288



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                         JUNE 8, 2021

                    ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED UNTIL 10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY, JUNE THE 9TH,

                    TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE DO HAVE

                    RESOLUTIONS -- I KNOW, I WANT TO GO, TOO.

                                 ON THESE RESOLUTIONS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY

                    SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ADOPTED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 422-427

                    WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES, TAKE US HOME.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  CAN WE GO NOW?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  YOU CAN GO NOW.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I NOW

                    MOVE THAT THE ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED UNTIL 10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY

                    JUNE THE 9TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE ASSEMBLY STANDS

                    ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 10:08 P.M., THE ASSEMBLY STOOD

                    ADJOURNED UNTIL WEDNESDAY, JUNE 9TH AT 10:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY BEING

                    A SESSION DAY.)













                                         289