TUESDAY, MAY 9, 2023                                                     2:41 P.M.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE HOUSE WILL COME

                    TO ORDER.

                                 IN THE ABSENCE OF CLERGY, LET US PAUSE FOR A MOMENT OF

                    SILENCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, A MOMENT OF SILENCE WAS OBSERVED.)

                                 VISITORS ARE INVITED TO JOIN THE MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE

                    OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY LED VISITORS AND

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF MONDAY, MAY 8TH.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, I MOVE TO

                    DISPENSE WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF MONDAY, MAY THE

                    8TH AND THAT THE SAME STAND APPROVED.

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WITHOUT OBJECTION, SO

                    ORDERED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.  I

                    DO HAVE A QUOTE TODAY FOR OUR COLLEAGUES AS WELL AS GUESTS AND VISITORS

                    THAT ARE IN THE CHAMBERS.  THESE WORDS TODAY COME FROM ALICE

                    WALKER.  SHE'S AN AMERICAN NOVELIST, SHORT STORY WRITER AND A SOCIAL

                    ACTIVIST.  IN 1982, SHE BECAME THE FIRST AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMAN TO

                    WIN A PULITZER PRIZE FOR FICTION, WHEN SHE WAS AWARDED THE NOVEL --

                    AWARDED FOR HER NOVEL THE COLOR PURPLE.  HER WORDS FOR US TODAY, THE

                    MOST COMMON THING PEOPLE GIVE AWAY IS THEIR POWER BY THINKING THAT

                    THEY DON'T HAVE IT [SIC].  AGAIN, THESE WORDS ARE FROM RENOWNED

                    NOVELIST ALICE WALKER.

                                 MEMBERS HAVE ON THEIR DESK A MAIN CALENDAR AND A

                    DEBATE LIST.  AFTER ANY HOUSEKEEPING AND/OR INTRODUCTIONS, WE WILL BE

                    CALLING FOR A WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO MEET OFF THE FLOOR, AND

                    WE'LL BE TAKING UP RESOLUTIONS ON PAGE 3.  WE WILL THEN TAKE UP THE

                    FOLLOWING BILLS ON DEBATE:  CALENDAR NO. 24 BY MS. ROZIC, CALENDAR

                    NO. 43 BY MR. WEPRIN, CALENDAR NO. 69 BY MS. ROSENTHAL, CALENDAR

                    NO. 72 BY MS. PAULIN, CALENDAR NO. 98 BY MS. ROZIC, CALENDAR NO.

                    100 BY MR. RIVERA, AND CALENDAR NO. 168 BY MR. ZEBROWSKI.  THERE

                    MAY BE A NEED, MR. SPEAKER, TO ANNOUNCE ADDITIONAL DEBATES, BUT IF WE

                    GET TO THAT POINT WE'LL BE HAPPY TO ADVISE.

                                 THAT'S THE GENERAL OF WHERE WE'RE GOING TODAY, SIR.  IF

                    YOU HAVE HOUSEKEEPING, NOW WOULD BE A GREAT TIME.

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  THANK

                    YOU, MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MS. PAULIN, PAGE 9, CALENDAR NO. 37,

                    BILL NO. A03245-C, AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 WITHOUT OBJECTION, ON A MOTION BY MR. BURDICK TO

                    RECONSIDER THE SUBSTITUTION OF SENATE BILL NO. S02988 FOR ASSEMBLY

                    BILL NO. A00343, SAID SENATE BILL IS RECOMMITTED TO THE COMMITTEE ON

                    CORPORATIONS, AND SAID ASSEMBLY BILL IS RESTORED TO ITS PLACE ON THE

                    ORDER OF THIRD READING.  ON A MOTION BY MR. BURDICK, THE

                    AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 FOR THE PURPOSES OF A INTRODUCTION, MR. RAMOS.

                                 MR. RAMOS:  MR. SPEAKER, I RISE FOR THE PURPOSE OF

                    AN INTRODUCTION.  TODAY, I HAVE A GROUP OF WOMEN FROM AN

                    ORGANIZATION IN MY COMMUNITY CALLED SEPA MUJER.  THIS ORGANIZATION

                    DEDICATES ITSELF TO HELP WOMEN IN SITUATIONS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, BUT

                    IT GOES A LITTLE FURTHER THAN THAT, AS THEY HELP SO MANY WOMEN,

                    ESPECIALLY IMMIGRANT WOMEN WHO FIND THEMSELVES IN A SITUATION -- IN A

                    FOREIGN COUNTRY, THEY FIND THEMSELVES IN A SITUATION WHERE THERE'S

                    LANGUAGE BARRIERS, THEY DON'T KNOW WHAT THE OPTIONS ARE FOR THEM.

                    THIS ORGANIZATION IS THERE WITH HOTLINES, THEY GO ON MEDIA, THEY DO ALL

                    SORTS OF REACH -- OUTREACH TO -- TO GET PENETRATE OUR COMMUNITY TO GET TO

                    THESE WOMEN TO LET THEM KNOW WHAT THE OPTIONS ARE AND GET THEM HELP,

                    ALSO IMMIGRANT SERVICES.  BUT THEY DO A VERY INTERESTING THING.  ONCE

                    THESE WOMEN ARE BROUGHT INTO THE ORGANIZATION AND THEY ARE HELPED,

                    THE VAST MAJORITY, THEY CONVERT THEM INTO ACTIVISTS WHO ACTUALLY GO OUT

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THERE AND START GETTING INVOLVED IN CHANGING POLICY, IN HELPING OTHER

                    WOMEN.  SOME OF THEM MAN THE HOTLINES THEMSELVES, OTHERS COME UP

                    HERE AND LOBBY THE LEGISLATURE TO PASS LAWS TO HELP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

                    VICTIMS AND OTHER WOMEN'S ISSUES.

                                 AND I'D LIKE TO INTRODUCE THEM BY NAME:  WE HAVE

                    SOFIA ARGUETA, ROXANA ALPHIZAR, NOHELIA GARCIA, ANGELA GRANADA,

                    ELIDIA ALPHARO, MARCIA ESTRADA AND DILCIA ERAZO.  THEY ARE ALL FROM

                    SEPA MUJER.  MR. SPEAKER, I ASK THAT YOU PLEASE GIVE THEM A WARM

                    WELCOME AND EXTEND THEM ALL THE PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MR. RAMOS, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU

                    HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY, COMMEND YOU ON THE WORK THAT

                    YOU'RE DOING TO ASSIST OTHER INDIVIDUALS.  IT IS THE HIGHEST FORM OF

                    SERVICE WE CAN THINK OF.  WE HOPE THAT YOU WILL ENJOY YOUR VISIT,

                    CONTINUE YOUR ADVOCACY, AND KNOW THAT YOU ARE ALWAYS WELCOME HERE

                    IN THE CAPITOL OF THE STATE.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. SIMPSON FOR A INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR

                    ALLOWING ME THE PRIVILEGE AND HONOR TO INTRODUCE GUESTS FROM THE

                    114TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT ON THEIR FIRST VISIT TO THE CAPITOL AND TO THE

                    ASSEMBLY CHAMBERS, THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE.  THE FAMILIES WHO ARE

                    JOINING US TODAY INCLUDE THE MORIN FAMILY, THE CARPENTERS, THE

                    MATTHEWS, THE BAILEYS, THE SOBEKS, THE SAVARIES, HAGERS AND THE

                    SMITHS.  THESE FAMILIES ARE HERE TODAY IN PARTNERSHIP WITH SCOTT AND

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    ERICA MATTHEWS OF THE ADIRONDACK HOME EDUCATION FELLOWSHIP AS

                    PART OF HOME SCHOOL NEW YORK LOBBY DAY.

                                 PLEASE, MR. SPEAKER, ON BEHALF OF ALL OF US, WOULD YOU

                    WELCOME THESE FAMILIES TO OUR CHAMBERS AND OFFER THEM THE

                    CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MR. SIMPSON, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU

                    HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY, PLEASED THAT SUCH GREAT FAMILIES

                    HAVE COME TO JOIN US.  WE EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR,

                    HOPE YOU ENJOY THE PROCEEDINGS TODAY AND HOPE YOUR TRIP TO ALBANY

                    HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.  KNOW YOU ARE ALSO

                    ALWAYS WELCOME HERE.  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. SHIMSKY FOR THE PURPOSES OF A INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. SHIMSKY:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I'D LIKE TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE PRESENCE HERE TODAY OF

                    GREENBURGH TOWN COUNCILWOMAN GINA JACKSON.  MS. JACKSON HAS

                    BEEN A STALWART ADVOCATE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC JUSTICE AND

                    ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN ALL PARTS OF OUR LARGE AND DIVERSE TOWN.  SHE

                    IS HERE TODAY LARGELY FOR HER DAY JOB WITH THE NEW YORK POWER

                    AUTHORITY, AND SHE ATTENDED THE -- THE MWBE DISCUSSIONS TODAY WITH

                    WILLIAM CHOI, THE DIRECTOR OF SUPPLIER DIVERSITY AT THE NEW YORK

                    POWER AUTHORITY, AS WELL.  THEY'VE BEEN DOING GREAT WORK IN OUR AREA

                    AND I'M HAPPY TO HAVE THEM ACKNOWLEDGED, AND I ASK, MR. SPEAKER,

                    THAT YOU WELCOME THEM TO OUR CHAMBER AND GIVE THEM THE FULL

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    COURTESIES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MS. SHIMSKY, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU

                    BOTH HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY, EXTEND TO YOU THE

                    PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU FOR THE WORK THAT YOU DO AT HOME,

                    AS WELL FOR ALL OF US IN THE STATE, AND WE HOPE THAT YOU CONTINUE TO BE

                    SUCCESSFUL IN YOUR ENDEAVORS.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. PAULIN FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I AM VERY

                    PROUD TODAY TO RECOGNIZE THE -- WELL, WE'RE -- WE'RE ACTUALLY

                    RECOGNIZING LATER IN A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING AUGUST AS AMBULATORY

                    SURGERY CENTER MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, AND IN HONOR OF

                    PASSING THE RESOLUTION WE HAVE A GROUP WHO REPRESENT THAT CENTER.  SO,

                    AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTERS ARE A CRITICAL COMPONENT OF THE HEALTH CARE

                    SYSTEM IN NEW YORK STATE, PROVIDING ACCESS TO HIGH QUALITY AND SAFE

                    SURGICAL CARE AS WELL AS CANCER SCREENINGS.  MORE THAN 2,000 DIFFERENT

                    PROCEDURES ARE PERFORMED AT ASCS, INCLUDING THE MOST COMMON,

                    WHICH WE'LL ALL RECOGNIZE, CATARACT SURGERIES, COLONOSCOPIES,

                    ENDOSCOPIES - HOPE I'M SAYING THAT RIGHT - AND ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES.

                    ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT LESSONS OF COVID-19 IS JUST HOW IMPORTANT

                    AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTERS ARE TO ALL OF US.

                                 JOINING ME TODAY IN THE BACK OF THE CHAMBER FROM

                    THE NEW YORK STATE ASSOCIATION OF AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTERS IS JON

                    VAN VALKENBURG, WHO IS THE PRESIDENT; JEFFREY FLYNN, VICE PRESIDENT;

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    HELEN LOWENWIRTH, TREASURER; AND MEMBERS ELISA AUGUSTE, AUSTIN

                    CHANG, JOHN GOEHLE, STEVEN HOUSBERG AND SUSAN SULLIVAN.

                                 I ASK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, TO GIVE THEM THE CORDIALITIES

                    OF THE HOUSE AND WELCOME THEM TO OUR IMPRESSIVE AND FINE CHAMBER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MS. PAULIN, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU HERE

                    TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY.  WE EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF

                    THE FLOOR.  AND IT SOUNDED TO ME LIKE I NEEDED AT LEAST THREE OF THOSE

                    AMBULATORY SURGERIES AS WE STAND HERE TODAY.  THANK YOU SO VERY

                    MUCH.  CONTINUE YOUR GREAT WORK.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. SOLAGES FOR THE PURPOSES OF A INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. SOLAGES:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  LATER

                    TODAY, THE HOUSE WILL TAKE UP A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 7TH TO THE

                    13TH FIBRO -- FIBROMYALGIA AWARENESS WEEK IN NEW YORK STATE.  THIS

                    IS A COMPLEX DISORDER THAT CAN CAUSE WIDESPREAD PAIN, FATIGUE AND

                    CHRONIC DIFFICULTIES, AND IT'S OFTEN GONE UNDIAGNOSED BECAUSE THERE'S,

                    YOU KNOW, CHALLENGES WITH PROPER DIAGNOSEMENT [SIC] AND TREATMENT.

                    AND DESPITE THE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT THAT IT HAS ON PEOPLE'S LIVES, THE

                    LACK OF AWARENESS OF THIS CONDITION IS DISABLING.  AND SO IT'S MY HONOR

                    AND PRIVILEGE TO INTRODUCE NEW YORKERS THAT ARE WORKING TO RAISE

                    AWARENESS, AND ALSO TO PROVIDE ACCURATE INFORMATION TO THOSE

                    INDIVIDUALS.  SO IN THE BACK OF THE CHAMBER WE HAVE BRIAN HART, WHO

                    IS A BOARD MEMBER OF THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HUMAN

                    EMPOWERMENT; WE HAVE SUE SHIPE, WHO IS THE CHAIR OF THE

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    FIBROMYALGIA TASK FORCE OF NEW YORK STATE; SIMONE - AND I'M GOING

                    TO GET THIS WRONG -  ALBERCIOUS [SIC]; AND PHIL ALBERCIOUS [SIC], WHO IS

                    WITH INTEGRATED TISSUE DYNAMICS; AND NICOLE MCFARLAND, WHO IS THE

                    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF SENIOR HOPE.

                                 AND SO IF YOU COULD PLEASE EXTEND THE CORDIALITIES TO

                    HOUSE AND THANK THESE FINE NEW YORKERS FOR ALL THE WORK THEY'RE DOING

                    TO RAISE AWARENESS AROUND THIS CONDITION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MS. SOLAGES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME THIS

                    DISTINGUISHED GROUP HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY, EXTEND TO

                    YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU FOR THE WORK THAT YOU'RE

                    DOING IN ENSURING OTHER PEOPLE'S HEALTH.  PLEASE CONTINUE THE WORK,

                    KNOW THAT YOU ARE ALSO ALWAYS WELCOME HERE.  THANK YOU SO VERY

                    MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSES OF A

                    INTRODUCTION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU SO MUCH, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  I'M HONORED TO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTRODUCE TO YOU AND

                    ASK YOU TO OFFER HER THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE TO ELDER KELLY DIANE

                    GALLOWAY.  SHE IS THE FOUNDER OF RAMP GLOBAL MISSIONS, A CHRISTIAN

                    HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATION THAT SERVES THE NEEDS OF THE BROKEN,

                    IMPOVERISHED AND EXPLOITED AROUND THE GLOBE.  SHE ALSO SERVES AS THE

                    FOUNDER AND PRESIDENT OF MONA'S HOUSE, A HOLISTIC RESTORATIVE PROGRAM

                    THAT EXISTS TO SERVE THOSE WHO HAVE BEEN EXPLOITED THROUGH HUMAN

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    TRAFFICKING AND THOSE WHO ARE AT RISK.  SINCE 2005, SHE LOCKED ARMS

                    WITH BISHOP YOUNGER AND 40 OTHER PASSIONATE COLLEGE STUDENTS TO PLANT

                    THE RAMP CHURCH INTERNATIONAL IN A SMALL TOWN IN ALTA VISTA, VIRGINIA.

                    TODAY, THERE ARE RAMP CHURCHES AROUND THE WORLD.  WHILE ESTABLISHING

                    -- KELLY AND HER TEAM OVERSOUGHT [SIC] AND SERVED IN ORPHANAGE

                    SCHOOLS, SAFE HOUSES FOR CHILDREN IN NEEDS IN INDIA, NEPAL, PAKISTAN,

                    AND GUATEMALA.  SHE ADMITS THAT HER MOST HEARTBREAKING ENCOUNTER - IT

                    BREAKS MY HEART TO EVEN THINK ABOUT IT - WAS WHEN SHE RESCUED FOUR

                    GIRLS, THE YOUNGEST OF WHICH WAS FOUR YEARS OLD, FROM THE GARBAGE

                    DUMPS IN GUATEMALA.  THEY WERE BEING SOLD TO GARBAGE TRUCK DRIVERS

                    FOR THE FIRST AND BEST PICKINGS.  KELLY IS AN AWARD-WINNING AND HIGHLY

                    SOUGHT-AFTER INTERNATIONAL SPEAKER, HUMANITARIAN, AUTHOR, GLOBAL

                    PHILANTHROPIST AND ABOLITIONIST.  HOWEVER, HER GREATEST ACHIEVEMENTS IN

                    LIFE ARE TO BE KNOWN AS A SERVANT OF GOD AND MANKIND.  SHE HAS WITH

                    HER, MR. SPEAKER, BELLA LASRENIERE AND TEENAN BENAY (PHONETIC).

                    THEY ARE HERE TODAY ADVOCATING FOR AN ISSUE THAT'S VERY CLOSE TO MS.

                    GALLOWAY'S HEART AND IS CLOSE TO MANY OF OURS AS WELL, WHICH IS HUMAN

                    SEXUAL TRAFFICKING.

                                 PLEASE WELCOME THEM TO OUR CHAMBERS AND OFFER

                    THEM THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE

                    WELCOME THIS DISTINGUISHED GROUP OF WOMEN HERE TO THE NEW YORK

                    STATE ASSEMBLY, EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR.  OUR

                    CONGRATULATIONS ON YOUR ACCOMPLISHMENTS AND CONTINUING EFFORTS ON

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    BEHALF OF OTHERS.  CONTINUE THAT WORK.  KNOW THAT YOU ALSO ALWAYS

                    HAVE A FRIEND HERE IN ALBANY.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. DICKENS FOR THE PURPOSES OF A INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. DICKENS:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MY COLLEAGUES ASSEMBLYMEMBER REBECCA SEAWRIGHT AND ON BEHALF

                    OF ALL OF US, I WANT TO ASK YOU TO PLEASE ACKNOWLEDGE THE MWBES THAT

                    HAVE JOINED US TODAY, BECAUSE AS WE ALL KNOW THAT THAT HAS BEEN AN

                    EVER-CHANGING AND LIVING PROGRAM THAT ALL OF US HAVE FOUGHT FOR.

                    WE'VE BEEN JOINED BY - JUST SOME OF THE FEW, BUT I WANT ALL TO STAND -

                    SANDRA WILKIN, VICE CHAIR OF CUNY, CITY UNIVERSITY, IF SHE WOULD

                    STAND; CHRISTINE ROITHMAYR, PRESIDENT OF THE WOMEN'S BUSINESS

                    ASSOCIATION; SIMONE PEELE, A NEW YORK CONTRACTOR, MWBE; MARTIN

                    STURLA - PLEASE STAND UP - CHIEF PROCUREMENT AND SUPPLIER, DIVERSITY

                    OFFICER FOR THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK; MICHELLE SLOANE, CEO OF

                    THE STONER CANNIBIS LIFESTYLE BOARD.  I ACKNOWLEDGE EACH AND EVERY

                    ONE OF THEM BECAUSE THEY HAVE FOUGHT AND BEEN TO THE FOREFRONT FOR THE

                    FIGHT FOR MWBES.  PARTICULARLY, I'VE KNOWN SANDRA WILKIN FOR YEARS,

                    WHO HAS FOUGHT AND WAS ONE OF THE EARLY FIGHTERS WHO MOBILIZED

                    WOMEN TO STAND UP AND FIGHT FOR THE RIGHT TO OWN BUSINESSES AND TO BE

                    ABLE TO APPLY SUCCESSFULLY FOR BIDS FOR CONTRACTS.  BUT I WANT TO THANK

                    ALL OF THEM FOR CONTINUING THE FIGHT.  SOME OF THEM HAVE OWNED THEIR

                    BUSINESSES FOR MORE THAN 30 YEARS, AND THEY ARE REGISTERED AS MWBES

                    AND I'M SO VERY PROUD OF THEM.  AND ON BEHALF, ALSO, OF MICHAELLE

                    SOLAGES AND OUR ASSEMBLYMEMBER FROM BROOKLYN, AS WELL, I'D LIKE

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    YOU TO ALL PLEASE STAND AND BE RECOGNIZED.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, I'M ASKING FOR THE CORDIALITIES AND

                    PRIVILEGES OF THE HOUSE TO BE EXTENDED TO EACH AND EVERY ONE AS WE

                    WELCOME THEM IN THE HOUSE OF THE PEOPLE.  (INAUDIBLE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MS. DICKENS, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS AND ALL MEMBERS

                    WHO HAVE BEEN MENTIONED, WE WELCOME YOU HERE TO THE NEW YORK

                    STATE ASSEMBLY, COMMEND YOU ON THE WORK THAT YOU ARE DOING TO

                    ENHANCE THE LIVES AND THE WELL-BEING OF THOSE WHO RUN MWBE

                    BUSINESSES.  PLEASE CONTINUE THAT WORK.  KNOW THAT WE ARE GOING TO

                    ALWAYS BE SUPPORTIVE OF YOU.  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. DICKENS:  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN FOR THE PURPOSES OF A

                    INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING ME TO MAKE THIS INTRODUCTION.  TODAY WE HAVE

                    HERE MY LITTLE COUSIN, WHO I ALSO CONSIDER AS MY LITTLE NEPHEW, JEFFREY

                    DORESTANT FROM PENNSYLVANIA, WHO IS ALSO A BUSINESS CONSULTANT AND

                    HERE TODAY WITH OTHER MANY SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS WHO ARE ADVOCATING

                    MWBE.  I'M JUST SO PROUD OF HIM.  HE CAME ALSO ALONG WITH VLADIMIR

                    STERLIN, WHO'S WITH THE BROOKLYN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE.  BUT WE'RE

                    JUST REALLY SO THANKFUL THAT HE GETS TO COME TO THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE, AND

                    I'M JUST SO PROUD OF MY LITTLE CUZ.

                                 SO PLEASE, MR. SPEAKER, GIVE HIM A WARM WELCOME TO

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE (INAUDIBLE).

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  ON BEHALF

                    OF MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE

                    WELCOME YOU HERE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ASSEMBLY.  CUZ, YOU'RE

                    FAMILY BECAUSE YOU'RE A CUZ.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH, WE ARE PLEASED

                    TO HAVE YOU.  KNOW THAT YOU ARE ALWAYS WELCOME HERE, AND THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSES OF A

                    ANNOUNCEMENT.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, WOULD YOU

                    PLEASE CALL THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S

                    CONFERENCE ROOM?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  WAYS AND

                    MEANS COMMITTEE, SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM IMMEDIATELY, PLEASE.


                                 WE WILL GO TO RESOLUTIONS ON PAGE 3, ASSEMBLY NO.

                    419, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 419, MR.

                    STIRPE.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM APRIL 30 - MAY 6, 2023 AS SMALL BUSINESS

                    WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. STIRPE ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  TODAY I RISE

                    TO PRESENT THIS RESOLUTION AND TO ACKNOWLEDGE THE IMPORTANCE OF SMALL

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    BUSINESS IN NEW YORK STATE.  THERE ARE OVER 451,000 SMALL BUSINESSES

                    IN NEW YORK, AND THEY ARE A POWERHOUSE TOTALING $950 BILLION IN

                    ANNUAL RECEIPTS.  THEY PROVIDE 3.9 MILLION JOBS, WITH AN OVERALL PAYROLL

                    OF $190 BILLION.  SMALL BUSINESS IS NEW YORK STATE'S BIGGEST JOB

                    CREATOR, GENERATING APPROXIMATELY 100,000 NEW JOBS ANNUALLY.  THE

                    OWNERS OF THESE BUSINESSES INCLUDE FAMILY MEMBERS, LOCAL

                    ENTREPRENEURS, VETERANS, SERVICE DISABLED VETERANS, MINORITIES, WOMEN

                    AND IMMIGRANTS WHO BELIEVE THE AMERICAN DREAM COMES TO LIFE IN

                    NEW YORK.

                                 WHILE SMALL BUSINESSES WERE HIT HARDEST DURING THE

                    COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THEIR NEVER-ENDING ABILITY TO ADAPT AND INNOVATE

                    ALLOWED THEM TO PERSEVERE INTO A POST-PANDEMIC RECOVERY.  THE NEW

                    YORK STATE ASSEMBLY SUPPORTS THE GROWTH OF SMALL BUSINESSES BY

                    PROVIDING AND IMPLEMENTING PROGRAMS AND SERVICES THAT FACILITATE

                    ACCESS TO CAPITAL, TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE, TECHNOLOGY ASSISTANCE AND

                    VENTURE CAPITAL, BOTH THROUGH THE LEGISLATIVE AND BUDGETARY PROCESS.

                    NEW YORK'S SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTERS, EXCELSIOR JOBS

                    PROGRAM, ENHANCED GREEN CHIPS PROJECT TAX CREDITS AND SMALL

                    BUSINESS LOANS ARE JUST A FEW OF THE MANY INCENTIVES THAT ASSIST OUR

                    SMALL BUSINESSES.  THE 14 CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE AND 15 CENTERS FOR

                    ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY FOSTER COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE ACADEMIC

                    RESEARCH COMMUNITY AND BUSINESS SECTOR TO DEVELOP AND

                    COMMERCIALIZE NEW PRODUCTS AND TECHNOLOGIES, TO PROMOTE CRITICAL

                    PRIVATE SECTOR INVESTMENT IN EMERGING HIGH-TECHNOLOGY FIELDS IN NEW

                    YORK STATE, AND TO CREATE AND EXPAND TECHNOLOGY-RELATED BUSINESSES

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    AND EMPLOYMENT.  ACCORDING TO THE MOST RECENT ANNUAL REPORT, THE

                    CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE HAVE COMPLETED 136 PROJECTS, WITH 771 STUDENTS

                    ENGAGED WITH COMPANIES.  THERE ARE 801 ONGOING PROJECTS, 412 NEW

                    JOBS CREATED, AND A REVENUE INCREASE OF MORE THAN $64 MILLION.

                    ACCORDING TO THE MOST RECENT ANNUAL REPORT, THE 15 CENTERS FOR

                    ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY REPORTED 664 JOBS CREATED AND RETAINED, AND

                    OVER 284 MILLION IN ECONOMIC IMPACT.  THE SMALL BUSINESS CLIMATE IN

                    NEW YORK STATE IS BRIGHTER AND STRONGER THAN IT HAS EVER BEEN, BECAUSE

                    OF ITS ENTREPRENEURIAL SPIRIT, COUPLED WITH ITS EXTRAORDINARY RESILIENCE IN

                    THE FACE OF LARGER FORCES BEYOND ITS CONTROL.

                                 I'D LIKE TO CONGRATULATE ALL THE INDIVIDUALS AND FAMILIES

                    WITH THE COURAGE TO STRIKE OUT ON THEIR OWN IN PURSUIT OF THEIR DREAM,

                    AND THE BELIEF THEY CAN BUILD A BETTER LIFE FOR THEMSELVES AND THEIR

                    FAMILIES.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  MR. ZACCARO

                    ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. ZACCARO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  I RISE

                    TODAY IN SUPPORT OF THIS RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE IMPORTANCE THAT

                    SMALL BUSINESSES HAVE HERE IN OUR STATE.  FOR GENERATIONS IN EVERY

                    CORNER OF NEW YORK, SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS HAVE PROVIDED INVALUABLE

                    SERVICES TO OUR COMMUNITIES.  SMALL BUSINESSES ARE ALSO ESSENTIAL TO

                    THE SUSTAINED ECONOMIC GROWTH OF OUR LOCAL ECONOMIES.  RECENTLY, I

                    HAD THE PLEASURE OF MEETING WITH NUMEROUS SMALL BUSINESS OWNERS IN

                    MY DISTRICT, AND I LISTENED TO THEIR CONCERNS.  I HEARD WHAT HELPS THEIR

                    BUSINESSES THRIVE AND WHAT POLICIES THAT WE, AS LAWMAKERS, SHOULD

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    ENACT IN ORDER TO KEEP SMALL BUSINESSES THRIVING IN OUR STATE.  AND AS --

                    AND AS AN ASSEMBLYMEMBER IN THIS CHAMBER, I WILL CONTINUE TO BE

                    THEIR ADVOCATE HERE IN ALBANY, AND AS A MEMBER OF THE COMMITTEE ON

                    SMALL BUSINESSES, SUPPORT LEGISLATION THAT WILL ENABLE SMALL BUSINESSES

                    ACROSS THE BRONX AND ACROSS NEW YORK STATE TO THRIVE FOR GENERATIONS

                    TO COME.

                                 I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS TODAY, AND THANK

                    YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR GIVING ME THE TIME TO ADDRESS THIS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED.  THE

                    RESOLUTION HAS PASSED.

                                 (APPLAUSE)


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. -- ASSEMBLY

                    RESOLUTION NO. 420, MR. DURSO.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 3, 2023 AS SKILLED TRADES DAY IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 421, MS.

                    BARRETT.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 7-13, 2023 AS COMPOST AWARENESS

                    WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 422, MS.

                    BICHOTTE HERMELYN.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 9, 2023 AS MWBE ADVOCACY DAY IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  MS. BICHOTTE

                    HERMELYN ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THIS VITAL RESOLUTION THAT

                    ESTABLISHES TODAY AS -- MAY 9TH AS MWBE ADVOCACY DAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 I'M SO HAPPY TODAY TO BE HERE AMONGST SO MANY

                    MWBE STAKEHOLDERS AND ADVOCATES.  WE HAVE DEPUTY MAYOR SHEENA

                    WRIGHT WHO'S HERE AND SO MANY OTHERS OFFICIALS WHO ARE HERE

                    ADVOCATING FOR EQUITY AND EMPOWERMENT.  ADVOCACY DAY REPRESENTS

                    THE ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT FOR MINORITIES AND WOMEN WHO OWN AND

                    OPERATE A BUSINESS AND INCREASING THEIR SUCCESS AND ABILITY TO THRIVE

                    UNDER NEW YORK STATE AND NEW YORK CITY'S MWBE PROGRAM.

                    DESPITE DECADES OF LEGISLATION AND PROGRAMS IN BOTH NEW YORK CITY

                    AND NEW YORK STATE TO THE LEVEL PLAYING FIELD FOR MWBES, DISPARITIES

                    CONTINUE TO PERSIST, AND OUR MWBE COMMUNITY FACES AN UPHILL BATTLE

                    AND ROADBLOCKS TO EQUALITY IN CONTRACTING WITH THE GOVERNMENT.  IN

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    1988, THE NEW YORK STATE EXECUTIVE LAW ENACTED ARTICLE 15-A TO

                    ENSURE AND PROMOTE FAIR AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY IN MINORITY AND WOMEN

                    BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PARTICIPATION IN -- IN STATE CONTRACTS THROUGH THE

                    ESTABLISHMENT OF GOALS FOR MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS

                    PARTICIPATION.  AND IN 1989, THE U.S. SUPREME COURT RULING IN THE

                    LANDMARK CASE, CITY OF RICHMOND VS. J.A. CROSON AND OTHERS HAD

                    FOLLOWED IT AND SET LEGAL BOUNDARIES FOR MUNICIPALITIES INTENDING TO

                    CREATE MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAMS.  THEN IN 2005, NEW

                    YORK CITY ESTABLISHED A MWBE MINORITY AND WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESS

                    ENTERPRISE PROGRAM VIA LOCAL LAW 129.  THANKS TO MY COLLEAGUES

                    SENATOR SANDERS AND INEZ DICKENS, WHO WAS THEN IN THE CITY COUNCIL,

                    TO -- TO PROMOTE THE GROWTH AND SUCCESS OF MINORITY AND

                    WOMEN-OWNED BUSINESSES IN THE CITY, REQUIRING THAT A CERTAIN

                    PERCENTAGE OF CITY'S CONTRACTS FOR GOODS, SERVICES AND CON --

                    CONSTRUCTION BE AWARDED TO MWBES.  AND ON THE STATE LEVEL IN 2014,

                    NEW YORK STATE LAUNCHED AN MWBE CERTIFICATION CAMPAIGN TO

                    ENCOURAGE MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS OWNERS TO CERTIFY WITH THE

                    STATE AND TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN STATE

                    PROCUREMENT OPPORTUNITIES, AND THE GOVERNOR PLEDGED TO INCREASE

                    MWBE CERTIFICATIONS BY AN ADDITIONAL 2,000 BUSINESSES, A GOAL THAT

                    THE STATE IS STILL TO EXCEED.  IN JANUARY 2016, THEY DID SO.  AS A RESULT,

                    THE NUMBER OF STATE-CERTIFIED FIRMS HAD MORE THAN DOUBLED IN JUST FIVE

                    YEARS.  SINCE THEN, NEW YORK STATE AND NEW YORK CITY HAS BECOME A

                    NATION LEADER IN MWBE UTILIZATION.

                                 WE STILL HAVE A LOT OF WORK TO DO.  DESPITE OUR

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    PROGRESS, THE DISPARITIES ARE STILL CLEAR.  IN 2010, THE STATE FIRST

                    COMMISSIONED A DISPARITY STUDY THAT WOULD LATER BE USED TO ESTABLISH

                    STATEWIDE GOALS FOR MINORITIES AND WOMEN IN STATE CONTRACTS.  IN 2016,

                    ANOTHER STUDY WAS COMPLETED.  IT REVEALED THAT, AGAIN, A DISPARITY EXISTS

                    OF MWBES CONTINUED BEING DISENFRANCHISED.  TODAY, WE ADVOCATE FOR

                    REFORMS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GATHERED FROM THESE DISPARITY STUDIES

                    AND FEEDBACK FROM THE MWBES TO ADDRESS THESE DISPARITIES, INCLUDING

                    OUTREACH TO MWBES, IMPROVING ACCESS TO BONDING, INSURANCE, ACCESS

                    TO CAPITAL, INCREASING MENTORSHIP PROGRAMS, THE USE OF RACE-CONSCIOUS

                    AND GENDER-CONSCIOUS MEASURES IN CITY CONTRACTING, STATE LEVEL,

                    ELIMINATE THE PERSONAL NET WORTH, AND INCREASING WOMEN AND MINORITY

                    CONTRACT WORKERS.

                                 TO MARK MWBE ADVOCACY DAY, CITY AND STATE

                    AGENCIES AND MWBES AND STAKEHOLDERS WHO ARE HERE ARE MEETING AND

                    NETWORKING WITH EACH OTHER TO DISCUSS HOW WE'RE GOING TO PUSH

                    FORWARD TO INCREASE PARTICIPATION.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 423, MS.

                    BUTTENSCHON.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 9, 2023 AS TEACHER APPRECIATION DAY

                    IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  MS.

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    BUTTENSCHON ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. BUTTENSCHON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                    TODAY, WE HONOR OUR TEACHERS.  SO MANY OF US IN THIS CHAMBER CAN

                    THINK BACK TO THE DAYS WHEN SIGNIFICANT TEACHERS HAVE PLACED THOSE

                    EVERLASTING MEMORIES AND INFLUENCES ON ALL OF US.  IN FACT, MAYBE WHY

                    SOME OF US ARE HERE TODAY.  OCTOBER 5TH IN 1994, MORE THAN 100

                    DIFFERENT COUNTRIES CREATED THE FIRST WORLD TEACHER'S DAY, WHICH

                    DEDICATED NATIONAL TEACHER'S DAY AS THE FIRST FULL TUESDAY IN MAY FOR

                    EVERYONE.  THIS DAY FOCUSES ON TEACHERS WHO WORK TO MAKE OUR

                    SCHOOLS GREAT PLACES FOR LEARNING AND WISDOM AND EDUCATION, AS WELL AS

                    PHYSICAL AND SOCIAL, AS WE HAVE SEEN OVER THE LAST FEW YEARS.

                                 I WANT TO TAKE THIS TIME, AGAIN, TO THANK ALL THE

                    TEACHERS THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR ALL THEY'VE DONE AND THE

                    POSITIVE INFLUENCES THEY'VE PROVIDED NOT ONLY TO EVERYONE IN THIS ROOM,

                    BUT EVERYONE THROUGHOUT THE STATE.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  MR. EACHUS

                    ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. EACHUS:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR

                    ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON THE RESOLUTION.  WE ARE REQUESTING THAT

                    GOVERNOR KATHY HOCHUL PER -- PROCLAIM TODAY AS TEACHER

                    APPRECIATION DAY.  AND MOST OF US THINK OF TEACHERS AS THOSE FOLKS

                    STANDING IN FRONT OF A CLASSROOM WHO HAVE TAUGHT US IN THE PAST.  BUT

                    THIS IS NOT PROFESSIONAL TEACHER'S APPRECIATION DAY, IT'S TEACHER'S

                    APPRECIATION DAY.  AND EVERY ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES OUT HERE ON THE

                    FLOOR HAVE EVERY RIGHT TO THINK OF THEMSELVES AS TEACHERS.  THEY TEACH

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    FOLKS EACH AND EVERY DAY, AND I, ALONG WITH THEM, ARE VERY PROUD TO DO

                    THAT.  I SEE A LOT OF MOTHERS OUT HERE WHO ARE TEACHERS ON A MINUTE-BY-

                    MINUTE, DAY-BY-DAY BASIS, AND FATHERS OUT HERE WHO DO THE SAME THING.

                    WHAT DO WE WANT IN TERMS OF APPRECIATION DAY?  ALL THAT EVERY AND

                    ANY TEACHER WANTS IS TO BE APPRECIATED FOR WHAT THEY DO.  A LITTLE --

                    LITTLE THANK YOU IS SUFFICIENT ENOUGH AND, OF COURSE, IF YOU COULD GO

                    EVEN FARTHER THAN THAT TO WELCOME THESE TEACHERS AND TO GIVE THEM A

                    HAND IN THEIR DUTIES, IT IS HELPFUL.

                                 SO THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR THE TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  MR. SAYEGH

                    ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. SAYEGH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  ALSO WANTED

                    TO RISE, SHOW OUR APPRECIATION FOR TEACHERS ALL ACROSS OUR STATE.  AND AS

                    AN EDUCATOR FOR 40 YEARS AND HAVING SUPERVISED TEACHERS FOR NEARLY 30

                    YEARS, I CAN TELL YOU THAT WHEN TEACHING IS EFFECTIVE, TEACHING PROVIDES

                    QUALITY LEARNING.  AND I CAN TELL YOU, NEW YORK STATE, IN MY DISTRICT OF

                    YONKERS, WORKING CLOSELY WITH MY FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, I CAN

                    EXPRESS HOW MUCH APPRECIATION ALL OF US HAVE FOR THE TEACHING

                    PROFESSION AND THE IMPACT THAT TEACHERS HAVE ON NOT ONLY QUALITY

                    LEARNING, BUT SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT AND MOTIVATING STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE TO

                    THEIR MAXIMUM POTENTIAL.

                                 SO TODAY I STAND IN SUPPORT OF OUR TEACHERS AND TO

                    SHOW OUR APPRECIATION.  WE ENCOURAGE THE GOVERNOR TO SIGN OFF ON THIS

                    VERY SPECIAL RESOLUTION HONORING TEACHERS ALL ACROSS OUR STATE.  THANK

                    YOU VERY MUCH.

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 424, MS.

                    SOLAGES.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 7-13, 2023 AS FIBROMYALGIA

                    AWARENESS WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 426, MS.

                    PAULIN.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM AUGUST, 2023 AS AMBULATORY SURGERY

                    MONTH [SIC] IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE

                    OBSERVANCE OF NATIONAL AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER MONTH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON THE

                    RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE

                    RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN.

                                 MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING ME TO DO THIS INTRODUCTION TODAY.  TODAY, WE

                    HAVE THE FIRST DEPUTY MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY WITH US, MS. SHEENA

                    WRIGHT.  LET'S GIVE HER A ROUND OF APPLAUSE.

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 SHE IS CARRYING THE TORCH.  SHE IS THE FIRST BLACK

                    WOMAN TO HOLD THE POSITION OF FIRST DEPUTY MAYOR TO THE LARGEST CITY

                    IN THE NATION.  WE ARE ACTUALLY SO PROUD OF HER.  SHE IS WORKING ON A

                    NUMBER OF INITIATIVES TO PUSH OUR CITY FORWARD, ESPECIALLY AROUND

                    MWBES AND MAKING SURE THAT IT'S EQUITABLE IN OUR WORKFORCE.  WE ARE

                    JUST SO PROUD OF HER AND WE WANT YOU TO PLEASE EXTEND OUR WARM

                    GRATITUDE TO THE FIRST DEPUTY MAYOR OF NEW YORK CITY, SHEENA

                    WRIGHT.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MS. BICHOTTE HERMELYN, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE

                    WELCOME YOU TO THIS CHAMBER.  WE EXTEND THE PRIVILEGE OF THE FLOOR

                    AND HOPE YOU ENJOY THE PROCEEDINGS.  THANK YOU FOR JOINING US.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. TAPIA FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. TAPIA:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, FOR ALLOWING

                    ME THE OPPORTUNITY TO RECOGNIZE THE NEW YORK WOMEN'S CHAMBER OF

                    COMMERCE AS WE CELEBRATE TODAY W -- MWBE ADVOCACY DAY.  WE

                    HAVE WITH US TODAY QUENIA ABREU, WHO IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE

                    CHAMBER, THE NEW YORK CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WITH MORE THAN 5,000

                    MEMBERS IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK AND ALL OVER, AND GROWING.  AND IT

                    IS, YOU KNOW, ALL OF US KNOW THAT SMALL BUSINESSES ARE THE BACKBONE OF

                    OUR COMMUNITIES, AND HAVING AN ADVOCACY DAY TODAY, I THANK MS.

                    BICHOTTE -- ASSEMBLYMEMBER BICHOTTE FOR DOING THIS TODAY, THE

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    CELEBRATION OF THE SMALL BUSINESSES, AND ESPECIALLY THE MWBE

                    BUSINESSES, THE MINORITY AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISES.  AND WE

                    HAVE TODAY WITH US ANGIE PETTIS, VERSACIO; CLARABELLE PENA, MARTHA

                    FIGUERO, LEAGUE AMERICANA; YVETTE MEDRANO, VENTA VENTIUNO FAMILY

                    HAIR DESIGN; JAHIR ROSARIO, TURBO EXPRESS; MONICA -- MONIQUE

                    ALBORNOZ, CLINICAL 5S SPACE INNOVATIONS; CARLIE DELEMMA; PORSCHE

                    MARTIN, MARTIN PROFESSIONAL; ESHAWN CALDWELL, AUTISM MOMS IN

                    RELIEF; DANIELLE ITURRA, VISTA RENOVATIONS; LAJUANA ESMITH HORTNICK,

                    THE ESPA APP; AND ARITA DUNCAN, WIDE RIVER CONSULTANT (ALL

                    PHONETIC).

                                 MR. SPEAKER, SHOW THE CORDIALITY OF THE -- OF THE

                    HOUSE AND WELCOME THEM TODAY AS WE CELEBRATE MWBE ADVOCACY

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER CUNNINGHAM:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MS. TAPIA, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THIS

                    CHAMBER, EXTEND THE CORDIALITIES OF THE FLOOR AND HOPE YOU ENJOY THE

                    PROCEEDINGS.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  PAGE 8, CALENDAR NO.

                    24, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01368-A, CALENDAR

                    NO. 24, ROZIC, COLTON, RIVERA, L. ROSENTHAL, OTIS.  AN ACT TO AMEND

                    THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO THIRD-PARTY NOTIFICATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MS. ROZIC.

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MS. ROZIC:  I'M READY, MR. SPEAKER.  SO, THIS BILL

                    REQUIRES UTILITY CORPORATIONS, MUNICIPALITIES, TELEPHONE, CABLE AND CELL

                    SERVICE COMPANIES TO ALLOW CUSTOMERS TO DESIGNATE A THIRD PARTY TO

                    RECEIVE NOTICES ON THEIR BEHALF.  IT PUTS IN STATUTE THE ABILITY FOR

                    CUSTOMERS TO DESIGNATE THIRD PARTIES AND HELP CUSTOMERS LOOKING TO

                    RECEIVE ASSISTANCE FROM A TRUSTED THIRD PARTY LIKE A RELATIVE OR A FRIEND,

                    OR A DAUGHTER OR SON WITHOUT FULLY TAKING AWAY THEIR INDEPENDENCE.  I'LL

                    SAY MORE GENERALLY, THE INTENT BEHIND THIS LEGISLATION IS TO BOTH PREVENT

                    FOLKS FROM GETTING TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION OR COLLECTION, WHICH IS

                    WORSE FOR THE CONSUMER IN THE LONG TERM, WHILE ALSO MAKING SURE THAT

                    COMPANIES GET PAID TIMELY, AND PROVIDING A LONG-TERM CONTINUED

                    INDEPENDENCE FOR OUR ELDERS OR FOLKS WHO NEED IT AND CHOOSE TO OPT

                    INTO THIS PROGRAM.  AND CURRENTLY, THE STATUTE ONLY APPLIES TO TRADITIONAL

                    UTILITIES AND ALSO ONLY FOR NOTICES OF TERMINATION OF SERVICE, BUT THIS

                    ACTUALLY EXPANDS IT TO OTHER THINGS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROZIC, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROZIC YIELDS, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, I -- I

                    APPRECIATE IT.  CURRENTLY RIGHT NOW UNDER THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW,

                    RESIDENTIAL GAS, ELECTRICITY AND STEAM CORPORATIONS DO PERMIT THEIR

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    CUSTOMERS TO DESIGNATE A THIRD PARTY TO RECEIVE COPIES OF NOTICES,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  YES, FOR TERMINATION AND COLLECTION

                    ATTEMPTS ON AMOUNTS OWED BY THE CUSTOMER.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND THIS -- THIS LEGISLATION

                    WOULD EXPAND THE THIRD-PARTY NOTIFICATION TO INCLUDE NOTICES FOR ROUTINE

                    BILLS FOR PHONE, CABLE, AND INTERNET PROVIDERS, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  YES, AND IT ALSO RELATES OR EXPANDS TO

                    NOTICES DEALING WITH AMOUNTS DUE OR PAST DUE ON BILLS, IT DEALS WITH

                    AMOUNTS PAID BY THE CUSTOMER OR ON THE CUSTOMER'S BEHALF.  AND, IN

                    ADDITION, WHAT I JUST SAID --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                 MS. ROZIC:  -- TERMINATION AND COLLECTION.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ONE QUESTION I WANTED TO ASK IS

                    RELATIVE -- THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION

                    OVER MANY OF THE SERVICES THIS -- THAT'S PROVIDED FOR IN THIS BILL.  THE F

                    -- THE FCC PREEMPTS RELATIVE TO THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE CLAUSE,

                    TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES.  HOW DO YOU RECONCILE WITH THE FACT THAT

                    THE SERVICES THAT YOU'RE EXPANDING HERE ARE NOT UNDER THE JURISDICTION

                    OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION AND THEY'RE PREEMPTED BY THE FCC?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  I HAVE A SEPARATE BILL THAT WOULD

                    INCLUDE A LOT OF THOSE COMPANIES INTO THE PUBLIC SERVICE LEVEL, WE CAN

                    TALK ABOUT THAT ANOTHER DAY.  THIS IS REALLY BASED ON OTHER MODELS THAT

                    WE'VE SEEN ACROSS THE COUNTRY --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MS. ROZIC:  -- INCLUDING CONNECTICUT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW

                    ALSO SUSPENDED THE PSC'S JURISDICTION OVER CELLULAR PROVIDERS, AND SO

                    THEY WOULD NOT BE ENFORCED BY THE PSC UNDER THIS BILL, CORRECT?  WE

                    NEED TO PASS YOUR OTHER BILL, WHICH --

                                 MS. ROZIC:  YEAH, WE SHOULD PASS MY OTHER BILL

                    (INAUDIBLE) --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WELL, I DISAGREE WITH YOU ON

                    THAT.  WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT IF YOU EVER BRING THAT TO THE FLOOR, TOO.

                                 I DID WANT TO TALK ABOUT CONFIDENTIALITY ISSUES.  SO

                    NOW, LIKE RIGHT NOW, IF SOMEONE WANTED TO DESIGNATE SOMEONE, IF MY

                    MOTHER WANTED TO DESIGNATE ME, SHE COULD GET ME -- WE COULD GET

                    ONLINE AND I COULD GET ACCESS TO HER INFORMATION.  WHY CAN'T WE DO IT IN

                    A VOLUNTARY METHOD VERSUS MANDATING THAT THE -- THE

                    TELECOMMUNICATIONS COMPANIES OR THESE PROVIDERS NOW HAVE TO SEND

                    THESE AGREEMENTS TO THEM?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  SO THIS IS -- THIS IS AN OPT-IN PROGRAM.

                    IT IS MANDATORY FOR COMPANIES, BUT PEOPLE HAVE TO OPT IN, CONSUMERS

                    HAVE TO OPT IN TO THIS PROGRAM OR TO RECEIVE THE NOTICES.  SO THIS IS

                    SPECIFICALLY SPEAKING TO THAT CONCERN OF GETTING FOLKS TO ACTIVELY,

                    PROACTIVELY SAY, I WANT TO -- AND I CHOOSE THIS PERSON TO BE MY THIRD

                    PARTY NOTICE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO THE THING IS NOW, WHY DOES

                    THE TELECOMMUNICATE -- OR THE COMPANY OR PROVIDER HAVE TO ENSURE THE

                    ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION?  BECAUSE NOW, LIKE I SAID, WE COULD DO IT

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    VOLUNTARY, THEN I CAN GET SOMEONE THAT CAN ACCESS ONLINE, I CAN GET

                    THEIR -- THEIR -- THEIR BILLS, THAT TYPE OF THING.  BUT IF YOU HAVE TO VERIFY

                    THE ACCURACY OF IT, SO NOW I SEND IT IN AND I WANTED TO GET (INAUDIBLE)

                    REPORTS.  NOW, YOU HAVE -- AS A COMPANY ARE CAUGHT IN THE MIDDLE AND

                    NOW HAVE TO VERIFY THE ACCURACY AND TAKE EXTRA STEPS TO -- TO VERIFY

                    THAT.  WHY DOES THAT FALL -- WHY DOES THAT BURDEN FALL ON THE COMPANY

                    TO DO THAT?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  I WOULD HOPE THAT MOST COMPANIES

                    ALREADY DO THAT, BUT LIKE I SAID AT THE TOP, THEY ALREADY ARE MANDATED TO

                    DO THIS FOR TERMINATION AND FOR COLLECTION, SO WE'RE MERELY EXPANDING IT

                    TO OTHER NOTICES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I MEAN -- I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY

                    ANOTHER ROUTE -- AVENUE THAT PEOPLE CAN GO, WHEN YOU HAVE POWER OF

                    ATTORNEY THERE'S A LEGAL DOCUMENT THAT'S SIGNED SO THAT PERSON WOULD

                    KNOW THAT THAT INDIVIDUAL IS THE LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE VERSUS HAVING TO

                    GO BACK AND VERIFYING THAT AND TRYING TO CONFIRM THAT AND CHASING

                    PEOPLE AROUND TO VERIFY THAT -- THAT THE PERSON THAT'S BEING DESIGNATED

                    IS -- IS THE ACCURATE AND CORRECT INFORMATION, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  IS --  IS THERE A QUESTION?

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH.  WELL, I MEAN --

                                 MS. ROZIC:  SO THE -- THE -- HERE'S THE DIFFERENCE.

                    THE POWER OF ATTORNEY REQUIRES YOU TO HIRE AN ATTORNEY, HAVING A

                    NOTARY AUTHORIZE THE PAPERWORK.  IT'S POTENTIALLY COSTLY, IT'S

                    BURDENSOME.  IF THERE'S ALREADY SOMEONE WHO YOU'RE CLOSE TO, SUCH AS A

                    CHILD HELPING A PARENT, IN YOUR CASE, YOU KNOW, THIS SHOULD JUST BE

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    SOMETHING THAT THE COMPANY OFFERS TO YOU, WHICH THEY ALREADY DO IN

                    SOME CASES.  BUT THIS SHOULD BE A SERVICE THAT THEY ALREADY OFFER TO YOU.

                    IT SHOULDN'T BE THE BURDENSOME CASE THAT I HAVE TO GO HIRE AN ATTORNEY

                    IN ORDER TO GET A BILL NOTICE FOR MY MOM.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WOULDN'T IT ALSO, LIKE I SAID, BE

                    EASIER JUST TO, WHICH THEY CAN DO NOW VOLUNTARY, JUST SET UP AN ONLINE

                    WHERE YOU CAN LOOK AT THE INDIVIDUAL'S INFORMATION RIGHT ONLINE VERSUS

                    NOW, AGAIN, HAVING TO SEND OUT BILLS AND NOTICES IN WRITING TO SOMEONE

                    WHO THEY HAVE TO VERIFY.

                                 MS. ROZIC:  AND THERE ARE SOME COMPANIES THAT

                    ALREADY DO THAT, BUT NOT ALL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IS THERE ANY CONCERN ABOUT

                    SENSITIVE INFORMATION?  YOU KNOW, PHONE NUMBERS, I MEAN, YOU KNOW,

                    YOU CAN GET CASES WHERE THERE MIGHT BE ISSUES OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR

                    CUSTODY MATTERS WHERE, YOU KNOW, IT COULD HAVE SOME SENSITIVE

                    INFORMATION.  SO WHO'S SENDING THAT IN?  I MEAN, AND THAT INFORMATION

                    BEING PROVIDED TO SOMEONE ELSE.  I MEAN, ISN'T THERE ANY CONCERN ON

                    HOW YOU PROTECT THAT SENSITIVE INFORMATION?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  BECAUSE -- BECAUSE IT'S AN OPT-IN

                    PROGRAM, BOTH PARTIES HAVE TO AGREE, SO...

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  ONE OTHER -- COUPLE

                    OF OTHER QUESTIONS I WANT TO ASK YOU.  IS THERE A PROBLEM?  ARE WE

                    SEEING A PROBLEM WITH THIS?  I MEAN, I KNOW THIS BILL HAS BEEN AROUND

                    SINCE 2008, IS IT -- HAVEN'T -- HAS THERE BEEN AN UPSWING IN PROBLEMS IN

                    NEEDING TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE, ESPECIALLY KNOWING THAT THE FCC IS

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    GOING TO PREEMPT THIS?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  IT -- IT COMES FROM MANY CONSTITUENT

                    CASES THAT I HEARD OF BEFORE I GOT HERE AND NOW AS A MEMBER MYSELF.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ARE YOU -- ARE YOU -- DO YOU

                    HAVE ANY CONCERNS ABOUT -- I KNOW THIS IS ABOUT A CONSUMER-RELATED

                    BILL AND I KNOW YOU'RE CHAIR OF THE CONSUMER'S -- CONSUMER AFFAIRS

                    COMMITTEE, ABOUT THESE EXTRA MANDATES THAT ARE GOING TO BE PLACED ON

                    THESE COMPANIES, ESPECIALLY ONES WE WANT TO PROVIDE BROADBAND

                    SERVICES IN OUR RURAL AREA THAT ARE STRUGGLING.  ISN'T THERE A CONCERN

                    ABOUT COST IMPACTS WITH THESE MANDATES THAT WE CONTINUE TO PLACE ON

                    THESE BUSINESSES AND HOW THAT -- HOW DO YOU RECONCILE THAT?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  SO, IN -- IN TWO -- THERE MIGHT BE SOME

                    ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO THE COMPANY, BUT WHAT I WANT TO REMIND YOU OF

                    IS -- I GUESS THERE ARE THREE SCENARIOS, RIGHT?  ONE IS THE CUSTOMER

                    RECEIVES THE BILL; SECOND, THE CUSTOMER OPTS TO HAVE A THIRD PARTY

                    RECEIVE THE BILL; AND THEN THE THIRD OPTION IS FOR BOTH THE CUSTOMER AND

                    THE THIRD PARTY TO RECEIVE THE BILL.  SO IN THE FIRST CASE THERE'S NO EXTRA

                    CHARGE OR ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, BECAUSE YOU'RE STILL HAVING ONE BILL

                    PRINTED OR SENT.  THE SECOND OPTION IS AN IDENTICAL BILL SENT TO THE THIRD

                    PARTY, SAME THING.  AND THEN I GUESS IN THE THIRD SCENARIO THERE MIGHT

                    BE A SMALL ADMINISTRATIVE COST TO THE COMPANY TO CREATE A SECOND COPY

                    OF THE BILL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY, THANK -- THANK YOU.  I

                    APPRECIATE YOUR TIME, MS. ROZIC.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  I CERTAINLY

                    UNDERSTAND THE INTENTIONS AND WHAT THE SPONSOR IS TRYING TO DO WITH THIS

                    LEGISLATION.  I THINK I JUST HAVE SOME CONCERNS.  NUMBER ONE, THIS CAN

                    ALREADY BE DONE.  WE CAN SET THIS UP IN A VOLUNTARY MANNER, LET

                    INDIVIDUALS WORK OUT WITH THE PERSON THEY WANT TO HELP THEM TO GET --

                    GET THEIR INFORMATION ACCESSED ONLINE.  BUT NOW, WE'RE PUTTING THE --

                    THE COMPANY, THE PROVIDER IN THE MIDDLE AND NOW -- NOW THE ONUS IS

                    ON THEM TO VERIFY THE INFORMATION, THE ACCURACY OF THE INFORMATION, THE

                    ACCURACY OF THE PERSON WHO'S BEING DESIGNATED BECAUSE SOMEONE COULD

                    JUST SEND IN A NOTICE SAYING, I'M ED RA'S REPRESENTATIVE, BUT NOW THEY

                    HAVE TO GO BACK AND VERIFY THAT.  WHY SHOULD THAT ONUS BE PUT ON THE --

                    THE CORPORATION OR THE BUSINESS WHO IS PROVIDING THAT INFORMATION?  SO

                    THE ISSUE IS ALREADY THERE TO ADDRESS.

                                 ALSO, THERE'S ANOTHER ISSUE HERE, AGAIN, RELATIVE TO THE

                    FEDERAL PREEMPTION.  THE P -- THE FCC WILL PREEMPT THIS BECAUSE THE

                    PSC DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER THE SERVICES AND -- AND -- AND

                    PROVIDERS THAT THIS BILL IS TRYING TO EXPAND.  I KNOW SHE DOESN'T -- THE

                    SPONSOR HAS ANOTHER LEGISLATION WHICH WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A MUCH

                    MORE VIGOROUS DEBATE ON THE FLOOR IF THIS WERE TO COME UP, BUT THAT'S

                    PROBLEMATIC BECAUSE THE FCC CAN PREEMPT IT, THEY WILL PREEMPT IT SO

                    IT'S NOT GOING TO MOVE FORWARD ANYWAY.  IT JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE.

                    AND I THINK, YOU KNOW, COMING FROM AN UPSTATE RURAL AREA THAT'S

                    SUFFERING FROM BROADBAND COVERAGE AND NEEDS MORE COVERAGE, I'D

                    RATHER SEE US FOCUSING THE ATTENTION ON THESE -- THESE PROVIDERS TO

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    EXPAND THEIR SERVICES AND USING THEIR RESOURCES TO EXPAND THESE

                    SERVICES RATHER THAN HAVE TO SPEND RESOURCES TO -- TO -- TO ADJUST AND

                    ADHERE TO THIS COSTLY MANDATE THAT WILL BE PLACED UPON THEM.

                                 SO THERE'S A NUMBER OF REASONS, BUT FOR -- FOR THOSE

                    REASONS, MR. SPEAKER, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE AND I WOULD URGE

                    MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE I THINK IS GOING TO BE GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS.  CERTAINLY,

                    MEMBERS MAY WANT TO SUPPORT IT AND CAN DO SO BY VOTING HERE ON THE

                    FLOOR OF THE ASSEMBLY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE

                    OF LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE SOME THAT WOULD LIKE TO BE AN

                    EXCEPTION.  THEY COULD FEEL FREE TO VOTE FROM THEIR SEAT.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  I APPRECIATE THE

                    SPONSOR'S DESIRE TO HELP PEOPLE WHO NEED HELP PAYING THEIR BILLS BY

                    HAVING CELL PHONE COMPANIES AND OTHERS SEND ANOTHER NOTICE TO SOME

                    THIRD PARTY UPON REQUEST OF THE CUSTOMER.  AND I APPRECIATE THAT

                    OBJECTIVE.  THE CONCERN THAT I HAVE, HOWEVER, IS THAT CERTAIN

                    INFORMATION, PARTICULARLY CELL PHONE INFORMATION THAT IDENTIFIES EVERY

                    SINGLE PERSON THE INDIVIDUAL CALLED AND THE LENGTH AND DURATION AND

                    DATE AND TIME CAN BE VERY SENSITIVE.  AND BECAUSE IT'S SENSITIVE, IT'S

                    VERY IMPORTANT THAT THAT INFORMATION NOT GO TO THE WRONG PERSON.  AND

                    SADLY, THOSE OF US IN THE LEGAL FIELD THAT HAVE PRACTICED IN FAMILY COURT

                    ALL TOO OFTEN SEE WHERE YOU HAVE A SITUATION INVOLVING STALKING OR

                    DOMESTIC ABUSE, OR FAMILY CUSTODY ISSUES WHERE ONE PARTY WANTS THAT

                    VERY CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND IS NOT AFRAID OF SUBMITTING A

                    FRAUDULENT REQUEST TO THE PHONE COMPANY TO GET COPIES OF THAT BILL.  SO

                    WE'RE BALANCING A DESIRE TO HELP PEOPLE PAY THEIR BILL WITH A NEED TO

                    RECOGNIZE THAT THIS BILLING INFORMATION CAN BE VERY SENSITIVE.  UNDER

                    CURRENT LAW, THERE ARE TWO WAYS FOR A CUSTOMER TO GET THAT INFORMATION

                    WITHOUT WORRYING ABOUT CONFIDENTIALITY, AND ONE IS WITH A POWER OF

                    ATTORNEY THAT'S NOTARIZED.  THAT FORM, BY THE WAY, IS ONLINE.  YOU DON'T

                    NEED AN ATTORNEY, YOU CAN GO RIGHT ONLINE, IT'S A FILL-IN-THE-BLANK FORM,

                    BUT THAT PROVIDES ONE MECHANISM.  AND THE SECOND MECHANISM IS THAT

                    A CUSTOMER CAN PAY THEIR BILLS FOR EVERY ONE OF THESE COMPANIES ONLINE

                    AND THEY CAN SHARE THEIR ACCOUNT INFORMATION AND PASSWORD WITH A

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    TRUSTED FRIEND.  SO WE HAVE CURRENT WAYS TO ACCOMPLISH THIS OBJECTIVE

                    WITHOUT THAT SERIOUS RISK OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION BEING

                    INADVERTENTLY DISCLOSED.

                                 FOR THAT REASON, I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS BILL.  THANK YOU,

                    SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 9, CALENDAR 43, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04011, CALENDAR NO.

                    43, WEPRIN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE INSURANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    REQUIRING THE SUPERINTENDENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES TO PROMULGATE

                    REGULATIONS WHICH PROVIDE STANDARDIZED DEFINITIONS FOR

                    COMMONLY-USED TERMS AND PHRASES IN CERTAIN INSURANCE POLICIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED?  AN EXPLANATION IS REQUESTED, MR. WEPRIN.

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS BILL

                    AMENDS SECTION 3425 OF THE INSURANCE LAW BY ADDING A NEW

                    SUBSECTION (T) WHICH WOULD REQUIRE THE SUPERINTENDENT OF FINANCIAL

                    SERVICES TO PROMULGATE REGULATIONS WHICH PROVIDE STANDARDIZED

                    DEFINITION FOR COMMONLY-USED TERMS AND PHRASES FOUND IN

                    HOMEOWNERS POLICIES AND COMMERCIAL LINE POLICIES WHICH PROVIDE

                    COVERAGE FOR LOSS OR DAMAGE TO REAL PROPERTY, PERSONAL PROPERTY OR

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    OTHER LIABILITIES FOR LOSS OF DAMAGE TO PROPERTY, AND THEY MUST BE

                    ESTABLISHED BY JANUARY 1ST, 2025.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BLANKENBUSH.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  USING STANDARD DEFINITIONS

                    AND TERMS AND PHRASES SOUNDS LIKE A GREAT IDEA, BUT WHEN YOU LOOK AT

                    THE COMMERCIAL LINES BUSINESS, ESPECIALLY THE COMMERCIAL LINES

                    BUSINESS, EVERY BUSINESS THAT I HAVE EVER GONE INTO TO LOOK AND REVIEW

                    THEIR POLICIES, THERE'S SOMETHING UNIQUE AND DIFFERENT ABOUT EVERY

                    BUSINESS THAT YOU GO IN.  AND IF DFS IS GOING TO PUT STANDARD PHRASES

                    AND TERMS IN A POLICY, WHAT YOU'RE REALLY DOING TO THE BUSINESS OWNERS

                    IS YOU'RE TAKING AWAY THE ABILITY OF CONSUMER CHOICE.  SO IT IS A -- IT'S

                    DIFFERENT WHEN YOU COMPARE IT TO A PERSONAL AUTO POLICY WHEN YOU'RE

                    LOOKING AT A COMMERCIAL LINES POLICY.  YOU CAN -- YOU CAN TAKE A LOOK

                    AT ANY -- ANY BUSINESS, YOU CAN WALK DOWN THE STREET AND EVERY

                    BUSINESS, LIKE I SAID, HAS A UNIQUE DIFFERENCE THAT HAS TO GO OFF OF THE

                    STANDARD POLICIES.  THEY HAVE TO HAVE THE FLEXIBILITY TO PICK AND CHOOSE

                    THEIR COVERAGES, WHICH IF YOU STANDARDIZE EVERYTHING, THAT'S NOT GOING

                    TO HAPPEN.  WHAT'S REALLY GOING TO HAPPEN IS THAT THE COMMERCIAL LINES

                    OR THE BUSINESS OWNER IS GOING TO HAVE TO TAKE OR PAY FOR THINGS IN THAT

                    POLICY THAT HE OR SHE DOESN'T NEED, OR THEY NEED SOMETHING DIFFERENT

                    THAN A STANDARDIZED DEFINITION OR TERMS.  SO EVERY -- THE CONCERN IS

                    MORE ON THE COMMERCIAL LINES THAN IT REALLY IS ON -- ON PERSONAL AUTO OR

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    PERSONAL HOMEOWNERS.  AND THE ONLY THING THAT WORRIES ME ABOUT THIS

                    IS THAT OUR BUSINESS OWNERS ARE GOING TO HAVE TO PAY MORE BECAUSE

                    THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO ADD COVERAGES THEY DON'T NEED.  AND ANY TIME

                    YOU GET STANDARDIZED ANYTHING FROM DFS, THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE GOING TO

                    RUN INTO.  YOU'RE TAKING AWAY THE ABILITY OF A BUSINESS OWNER TO MATCH

                    UP ITS POLICY CONCERNS, THE COVERAGES THAT THEY NEED THAT OTHER

                    BUSINESSES DON'T NEED.

                                 SO I'M NOT IN FAVOR OF THIS BILL BECAUSE OF THOSE

                    REASONS.  EVEN THOUGH IT SOUNDS LIKE -- LIKE A GREAT IDEA, YOU'RE REALLY

                    PUTTING THE HANDCUFFS ON BUSINESSES, AND THAT'S WHAT MY CONCERN IS.

                    ONE SIZE DOESN'T FIT ALL IN COMMERCIAL LINE INSURANCE, AND THAT'S WHY

                    I'M GOING TO BE NOT IN FAVOR OF SUPPORTING THIS BILL.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ.

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ:  THANK YOU.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. WEPRIN, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WELL, WAIT UNTIL WE

                    CLEAR SOME OF THOSE FOLKS OUT OF THE WAY THERE.  PLEASE, MEMBERS, SIT

                    DOWN.  THANK YOU.

                                 GO AHEAD.

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ:  THANK YOU.  SO WILL THE

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    LANGUAGE OF COMMONLY-USED TERMS AND PHRASES, WILL THEY HAVE TO EXIST

                    WITHIN THE DECLARATIONS PAGE OF A POLICY OR JUST IN THE POLICY LANGUAGE

                    ITSELF?

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  WELL, YEAH, IT WOULD HAVE TO BE

                    THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE POLICY.  YOU KNOW, THESE PROPOSED REGULATIONS

                    WOULD BE SUBJECT TO A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD, SO THERE -- THERE ARE

                    GOING TO BE -- THERE IS GOING TO BE A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD FOR 60

                    DAYS, I BELIEVE, ON -- ON THOSE TERMS.

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ:  I MEAN, I GUESS I JUST -- I --

                    I ONLY REALLY HAVE REASON FOR CONCERN ESPECIALLY IF THE CARRIERS OR OTHER

                    INTERESTED PARTIES WOULD BE ABLE TO ENGAGE IN WHAT THEY THINK IS

                    COMMONLY USED.  I'M JUST -- I FIND IT A BIT BROAD, THE -- THE LANGUAGE

                    DEFINITIONS THAT MAY BE USED AND WHAT -- WHAT'S THE DEFINITION OF -- OF A

                    COMMONLY-USED TERM.  I MEAN, IF YOU WERE LOOKING AT AN INLAND MARINE

                    POLICY OR YOU'RE LOOKING AT A POLICY IN THE ENERGY SECTOR, TO THOSE

                    PROFESSIONALS THEY MAY BE COMMONLY USED, OR IS THIS MORE EFFORT

                    FOCUSED ON, YOU KNOW, THE RETAIL PURCHASER AND, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEY

                    MIGHT SEE WITHIN THEIR POLICY?

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  I HEAR YOU.  THIS LEGISLATION CAME OUT

                    OF SANDY.  DURING SANDY, THERE WAS A LOT OF CONFUSION AS TO, YOU KNOW,

                    WHAT TERMS MEANT AND PEOPLE -- MOST PEOPLE DON'T READ ALL THE FINE

                    PRINT IN THEIR POLICIES AND DON'T NECESSARILY KNOW WHAT SOME OF THESE

                    TERMS ARE.  THIS -- THIS IS BASICALLY SUPPOSED TO BE FOR TRANSPARENCY, TO

                    LET PEOPLE KNOW WHAT SOME OF THESE TERMS ARE.  AND AS I SAID, ANY

                    PROPOSED REGULATION THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    PROPOSES WILL BE SUBJECT TO A PUBLIC COMMENT PERIOD.  AND THIS IS

                    BASICALLY MORE FOR TRANSPARENCY BECAUSE THERE WERE MANY ISSUES THAT

                    CAME UP DURING SUPERSTORM SANDY, FOR EXAMPLE, AND -- AND OTHER

                    NATURAL DISASTERS.

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ:  OKAY.  I MEAN, I JUST -- I -- I

                    ONLY BRING CONCERN BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, YOU HIRE A BROKER TO EXPLAIN

                    THE LANGUAGE WITHIN A POLICY THAT YOU'RE PURCHASING, YOU SORT OF EXPECT

                    THAT PERSON TO GUIDE YOU THROUGH THE PROCESS.  SIMILAR TO A REAL ESTATE

                    TRANSACTION, MOST PEOPLE DON'T NECESSARILY KNOW ALL OF THE TERMS THEY

                    MIGHT EXPERIENCE, BUT THEY RELY ON THEIR -- THEIR BROKER.  I JUST -- I

                    WASN'T SURE NECESSARILY WHY -- AND I UNDERSTAND FROM A HOMEOWNER'S

                    PERSPECTIVE, BUT FOR LARGE-SCALE BUSINESSES TO HAVE TO SORT OF BRING THE

                    LANGUAGE OF A POLICY DOWN TO A LEVEL THAT I'M NOT SURE WHO WITHIN DFS

                    WOULD HAVE TO DETERMINE IS COMMONLY USED SEEMS A BIT JUST OUT OF --

                    OUT OF THE REALM OF -- OF LOGICAL IN CERTAIN INDUSTRIES.  BUT I WAS JUST

                    CURIOUS, DURING THAT PERIOD OF TIME IN WHICH THE STAKEHOLDERS CAN, YOU

                    KNOW, TESTIFY TO THE FACT THAT SOMETHING MAY OR MAY NOT BE LANGUAGE

                    THAT YOU'D WANT TO USE, WOULD -- WOULD THOSE -- WOULD THOSE CHANGES

                    BE ADDED TO WHATEVER THIS DEFINITION MIGHT BE?  IS THERE SOME

                    FLEXIBILITY WITHIN WHAT THE NEW LANGUAGE MIGHT BE AFTER THEY DETERMINE

                    WHAT IS COMMONLY USED?

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  YEAH, THERE IS A PROVISION WHERE THE

                    SUPERINTENDENT CAN APPROVE ALTERNATIVE DEFINITIONS, AND I WOULD HOPE

                    THAT THIS WOULD COME OUT DURING THE COMMENT PERIOD FOR THE PROPOSED

                    REGULATIONS.

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ:  OKAY.  AND JUST ONE MORE

                    THING, JUST TO CLARIFY, IT'S JUST THE LANGUAGE BUT THERE WOULD BE NO

                    STANDARD RATE OR STANDARD RATE SETTING WITHIN CERTAIN AREAS?

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  THAT IS CORRECT, IT'S JUST THE LANGUAGE.

                                 MR. BLUMENCRANZ:  OKAY.  ALL RIGHT.  THANK

                    YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 MR. WEPRIN:  YOU'RE WELCOME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED FOR THE REASONS STATED, BUT THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT ARE CERTAINLY ENCOURAGED TO VOTE YES HERE ON THE FLOOR OF THE

                    ASSEMBLY.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION;

                    HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A FEW EXCEPTIONS.  THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO

                    PUSH THEIR BUTTONS AT THEIR DESK.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 10, CALENDAR NO. 69, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00517, CALENDAR NO.

                    69, L. ROSENTHAL, OTIS, SIMON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO PRIVACY OF ELECTRONIC FARE AND TOLL RECORDS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 AND WE'LL WAIT UNTIL PEOPLE SETTLE DOWN A LITTLE BIT,

                    MS. ROSENTHAL.  HELLO, THAT CORNER?  LADIES AND GENTLEMEN IN THE

                    CORNER.  STAFF, IF YOU DON'T NEED TO BE THERE, YOU SHOULD REMOVE

                    YOURSELF.  I'M TALKING TO YOU GUYS.

                                 PROCEED, MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS BILL CONCERNS CASHLESS

                    TOLLING SYSTEMS, AND IT SERVES TO PROTECT THE PRIVACY OF PEOPLE BY

                    ESTABLISHING REASONABLE LIMITATIONS ON THE RELEASE AND USE OF SUCH

                    ELECTRONIC TOLL AND FARE INFORMATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 ]MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROSENTHAL YIELDS,

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    MA'AM.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  COULD -- COULD

                    YOU JUST EXPLAIN EXACTLY WHAT RECORDS WOULD BE NOT -- WHICH RECORDS

                    YOU WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO GET SHOULD THIS LEGISLATION PASS?  YOU

                    MENTIONED E-ZPASS, WHAT....

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OH, OKAY, WHICH RECORDS YOU

                    COULD NOT GET.  OKAY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  YEP.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  LET ME FIND EXACTLY WHAT THEY

                    ARE.  I'M SORRY, I JUST HAVE TO FIND MY PAPERWORK.  I'M SORRY, I'M JUST

                    LOOKING FOR THE ACTUAL WORDS.  OKAY, SO RECORDS CREATED OR MAINTAINED

                    BY A PUBLIC ENTITY OR BY CONTRACTOR ON BEHALF OF A PUBLIC ENTITY

                    CONCERNING MOTORISTS OR MOTOR VEHICLE REGARDING THE USE OF ANY

                    HIGHWAY, BRIDGE, TUNNEL OR OTHER THOROUGHFARE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT

                    LIMITED TO, E-ZPASS RECORDS.  THAT'S BASICALLY, BASICALLY IT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  NOW, AS

                    FAR AS THOSE RECORDS, ARE THERE ANY CARVEOUTS OR EXCEPTIONS IN THE

                    LEGISLATION AS FAR AS BEING ABLE TO GET SOME -- GET THEM IN SOME

                    INSTANCES?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, PEOPLE COULD SUBPOENA OR

                    BY COURT ORDER THEY COULD -- THEY COULD GET THEM.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND IN WHAT KINDS OF CASES WOULD

                    THEY BE ABLE TO SUBPOENA AND GET A COURT ORDER FOR THE RELEASE OF THAT

                    E-ZPASS INFORMATION?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IF -- IF -- IF THEY THINK THERE'S A --

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THAT A MISDEMEANOR OR FELONY WAS COMMITTED, THEN ON THE CRIMINAL

                    SIDE THEY COULD SUBPOENA FOR THAT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO IT WOULD BE IN CRIMINAL-TYPE

                    CASES.  IS THERE ANY CARVEOUT OR EXCEPTION ALLOWING THE RELEASE OF

                    E-ZPASS INFORMATION IN ANY CIVIL MATTERS UNDER THIS LEGISLATION?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.  BUT ONCE AGAIN, ONE COULD

                    TRY TO GET A COURT ORDER.  BUT THEY WOULDN'T JUST BE ABLE TO CALL UP

                    E-ZPASS AND SAY, HEY, GIVE ME MY -- MY WIFE'S DRIVING RECORD.

                                 MS. WALSH:  RIGHT.  WELL, ISN'T IT TRUE THAT UNDER

                    YOUR LEGISLATION IT'S NOT APPLICABLE IN CIVIL MATTERS AT ALL?  SO

                    MATRIMONIAL MATTERS LIKE -- LIKE YOU'RE SAYING, OR EMPLOYMENT MATTERS,

                    FOR EXAMPLE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, WHEN IT RELATES TO THE

                    COLLECTION OF TOLL REVENUES, IT COULD BE USED FOR COMMUNICATION

                    BETWEEN THE HOLDER OF THE E-ZPASS AND THE AGENCY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO IN OTHER WORDS, IF THERE'S A

                    DISPUTE ABOUT THE AMOUNT OWED --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- UNDER E-ZPASS, IN THAT INSTANCE YOU

                    COULD REVIEW THE RECORDS, TAKE A LOOK AT THEM AND FIGURE THAT PIECE OUT

                    AND WHEN A COLLECTION (INAUDIBLE).

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.  IT'S JUST ABOUT TOLL

                    REVENUES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY, VERY GOOD.  SO WHAT ABOUT AN

                    ABILITY TO FOIL FOR RECORDS IN -- IN ANY MATTER?  DOES -- IS FOIL

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    DISCUSSED OR IS FOIL APPLICABLE?  LIKE LET'S SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE

                    MEDIA WANTS TO KNOW IF WE'RE REALLY IN THE CHAMBER OR IF WE'VE

                    ALREADY LEFT TO GO HOME ON A WEDNESDAY GETAWAY DAY, CAN THEY FOIL

                    AND GET OUR RECORDS AND FIGURE OUT WHERE WE ARE REALLY, OR IF -- IF WE'RE

                    NOT PHYSICALLY IN THE CHAMBER?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY, WELL, THEY SHOULD BE

                    WATCHING US IN SESSION.  BUT --

                                 MS. WALSH:  BUT NOW THAT WE HAVE EMPTY SEAT

                    VOTING, THAT'S NOT A GUARANTEE, RIGHT?  YOU COULD BE BACK IN YOUR OFFICE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, THEY'D SEE IT THERE IF WE

                    VOTED.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THAT'S TRUE, THAT'S TRUE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IT DOESN'T SPEAK TO FOIL

                    REQUESTS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  OKAY.  SO -- OKAY, VERY GOOD.

                    I THINK WE'VE KIND OF COVERED IT.  THANK YOU FOR YOUR ANSWERS.  AND --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY, THANK YOU.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO FOR -- FOR MANY OF YOU, IF THIS

                    DEBATE SOUNDS A LITTLE BIT FAMILIAR IT'S THAT WE'VE HAD IT A FEW TIMES.

                    THIS -- THIS BILL ITSELF HAS BEEN AROUND SINCE THE 1990S.  WE'VE -- WE'VE

                    DEBATED THIS BILL A FEW TIMES.  SO, BASICALLY MY -- MY ISSUE WITH THE

                    BILL IS I'M GLAD THAT THERE IS A CARVED OUT EXCEPTION FOR CASES WHERE --

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    CRIMINAL MATTERS, LIKE THE LOCAL EXAMPLE, A BIG MURDER CASE THAT --

                    WHERE E-ZPASS RECORDS WERE USED IN PART TO PROSECUTE THE DEFENDANT

                    WAS THE PORCO MURDER TRIAL THAT ANY -- ANY OF US WHO LIVE LOCALLY

                    REMEMBER VERY WELL.  OR IF YOU WATCH LIFETIME, THERE -- THERE'S, LIKE,

                    LOTS OF LIFETIME ON THE PORCO MURDER TRIAL, WHICH WAS HORRENDOUS.  BUT

                    WHAT MY PROBLEM IS HAS TO DO WITH THE CIVIL SIDE OF THINGS.  SO WE

                    KNOW THAT THERE'S NO -- NO-FAULT DIVORCE NOW, SO THOSE INSTANCES WHERE

                    A SPOUSE IS TRYING TO PROVE WHERE THE OTHER SPOUSE WAS MAYBE ISN'T AS

                    PREVALENT, BUT CERTAINLY IN EMPLOYMENT MATTERS IF YOU HAVE, SAY, AN

                    EMPLOYEE THAT HAS BEEN THROUGH A DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING OR HAS BEEN

                    TERMINATED AND IS THEN SUED, SAYING THAT THEY WERE TERMINATED

                    IMPROPERLY, AND THE BASIS OF THAT IS EMPLOYEE SAID THAT THEY WERE THERE

                    BUT THEY REALLY WEREN'T, THEY WERE REALLY THERE AND IT COULD BE PROVED

                    THROUGH E-ZPASS RECORDS.  THERE'S NO MECHANISM UNDER THIS LEGISLATION

                    TO ALLOW THE RELEASE OF INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THAT TYPE OF LITIGATION,

                    AND I THINK THAT THAT IS -- RESPECTFULLY, I THINK THAT THAT'S A FLAW IN THE

                    LEGISLATION.  I WISH THAT IT HAD A GREATER CARVEOUT TO ALLOW FOR AN

                    OPPORTUNITY TO SEEK THOSE RECORDS IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES.  AND I'VE

                    RAISED THAT ISSUE BEFORE, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE -- AND I DIDN'T ASK THE

                    SPONSOR, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THE BILL HAS BEEN AMENDED IN ANY WAY

                    SINCE WE TOOK IT UP THE LAST TIME.

                                 SO, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT REALLY WHAT THIS BOILS DOWN

                    TO IS WHAT REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY DO WE HAVE ANYMORE?

                    YOU KNOW, WE'RE ALL CARRYING CELL PHONES, WE -- WE DON'T EXPECT THAT

                    WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TRACKER DEVICES IN OUR CARS, CERTAINLY, BUT

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    REALISTICALLY, WITH CAMERAS AND CELL PHONES AND, YOU KNOW, CAMERAS

                    PRETTY MUCH ON EVERY CORNER NOW WHEREVER WE'RE GOING, OUR

                    WHEREABOUTS ARE REALLY NOT VERY SECRETIVE OR NOT VERY PRIVATE ANYMORE.

                                 SO, I -- I DON'T -- I DON'T KNOW, I'M GOING TO CONTINUE

                    TO REMAIN IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL, AS MANY OF OUR COLLEAGUES HAVE

                    BEEN, ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE IN RECENT YEARS.  AND THAT'S -- THAT'S

                    ABOUT IT, MR. SPONSOR -- MR. SPEAKER.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MS.

                    WALSH.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS.  THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT CAN

                    CERTAINLY VOTE FOR IT HERE ON THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE

                    OF LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, SHOULD SOME DESIRE TO BE AN EXCEPTION THEY

                    SHOULD FEEL FREE TO VOTE FROM THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 11, CALENDAR NO. 72, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02741, CALENDAR NO.

                    72, PAULIN, SEPTIMO, MAGNARELLI, GUNTHER, JACOBSON, MCDONOUGH,

                    DESTEFANO, DURSO, K. BROWN.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE INSURANCE LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO SUMMARIES OF READABLE AND UNDERSTANDABLE INSURANCE

                    POLICIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. PAULIN, AN

                    EXPLANATION IS REQUESTED.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  YES, THANK YOU.  THE LEGISLATION

                    REQUIRES INSURERS TO PROVIDE AUTO AND HOMEOWNERS POLICYHOLDERS WITH

                    A SUMMARY DOCUMENT SUMMARIZING COVERAGE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BLANKENBUSH.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. PAULIN, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  I'D BE HAPPY TO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  WHAT -- WHAT'S THE

                    DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE BILL HERE AND THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A

                    DECLARATION PAGE THAT IS ALREADY ISSUED BY THE COMPANY?

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MS. PAULIN:  SO, CURRENTLY THERE ARE NO POLICY

                    SUMMARIES THAT INCLUDE WHAT THE COVERAGE DOES AND DOES NOT, MORE

                    IMPORTANTLY, INCLUDE.  SO THIS BILL CLARIFIES SO THAT HOMEOWNERS AND

                    AUTO INSURE -- INSURED PEOPLE GET -- GET THAT INFORMATION.  IT WAS

                    BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION BY THE GENERAL COUNSEL AT THE -- THE FORMER

                    GENERAL COUNSEL AT THE DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, AND HE BELIEVED THAT

                    THIS WOULD CLARIFY AND LESSEN THE CONFUSION OUT THERE.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  BY PUTTING AN -- BY PUTTING

                    AN EXTRA FORM IN THE POLICY IS GOING TO STOP THE CONFUSION?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  YES, BY PUTTING IN EXTRA INFORMATION

                    SO THAT POLICYHOLDERS WOULD HAVE THE SUMMARY OF WHAT THEIR POLICY

                    INCLUDED AND DIDN'T INCLUDE.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  THERE'S A DECLARATION --

                                 MS. PAULIN:  IT'S NOT INCLUDED CURRENTLY.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  -- DECLARATION PAGE ON AN

                    INSURANCE COMPANY -- OR AN INSURANCE POLICY RIGHT NOW LISTS THE LIMITS

                    OF INSURANCE?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  IT DOESN'T LIST IT CLEARLY AND IT'S NOT

                    REQUIRED TO LIST IT COMPLETELY.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  I'VE NEVER SEEN A DECLARATION

                    PAGE THAT DOESN'T LIST THE COVERAGES OF HOW MUCH --

                                 MS. PAULIN:  IT -- IT DOESN'T INCLUDE WHAT -- IT -- THE

                    -- THE -- IT DOESN'T INCLUDE WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED IN A POLICY.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE

                    EXCLUSIONS.

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MS. PAULIN:  YES.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  SO YOU'RE GOING TO ATTACH A

                    FORM THAT LISTS THE EXCLUSIONS OF A POLICY FOR AUTO, HOMEOWNERS.

                    COMMERCIAL LINES, TOO?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  IT -- IT'S GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO BE IN A

                    FORMAT THAT IS -- WILL BE MUCH MORE READABLE AND UNDERSTANDABLE, AND

                    ALSO INCLUDE BOTH WHAT IS INCLUDED AND WHAT IS NOT INCLUDED.  YOU

                    KNOW, SO THE EXCLUSIONS ARE NOT THOROUGH, THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO BE

                    THOROUGH.  THIS REQUIRES THEM TO BE THOROUGH, AND -- AND FRANKLY, YOU

                    KNOW, IT CAME FROM SOMEONE WHO WAS VERY FAMILIAR WITH WHAT'S

                    INCLUDED AND WHAT'S NOT INCLUDED, AND THAT RECOMMENDATION I TOOK

                    VERY SERIOUSLY BECAUSE OF THE -- YOU KNOW, BECAUSE OF THE -- BECAUSE OF

                    THE KNOWLEDGE HE HAD.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  BUT EXCLUSIONS IN A POLICY

                    ARE ALREADY WRITTEN IN THE POLICY.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  BUT THEY'RE NOT -- THEY'RE NOT

                    EXHAUSTIVE.  IN OTHER WORDS, THEY -- ALL OF THE INFORMATION THERE, IT'S NOT

                    REQUIRED TO BE AS SPECIFIC AS THIS, SO PEOPLE COULD --

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  CAN -- CAN YOU GIVE ME AN

                    EXAMPLE OF WHAT'S GOING TO -- GIVE ME AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT'S GOING TO

                    BE ON THERE THAT'S NOT ON A DECLARATION PAGE NOW.  LIKE WHAT

                    EXCLUSION?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  SO HERE, LET ME SEE IF I CAN FIND ONE.  I

                    DON'T KNOW THAT I HAVE THAT HERE, I MIGHT HAVE TO GET BACK TO YOU ON

                    THAT.  SO, IT'LL -- SO, THE -- THE PRINCIPAL EXCLUSIONS WILL BE REQUIRED TO

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    BE ON IT.  THE DECLARATION PAGE OF A POLICY HAS LIMITS, BUT NEVER

                    INDICATES THE PRINCIPAL EXCLUSIONS.  SO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T HAVE A MORE

                    -- SOMETHING MORE SPECIFIC, THIS IS WHAT WAS PROVIDED TO ME BY, YOU

                    KNOW, AGAIN, SOMEONE WHO KNOWS EXACTLY WHAT'S IN THAT.  BUT THEY

                    DON'T DISCLOSE THE EXCLUSIONS IN A POLICY AND THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE

                    THAT.  SO I'M LOOKING FOR, YOU KNOW, SOME EXAMPLES TO SEE IF I HAVE

                    ANYTHING MORE SPECIFIC.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  SO -- SO BASICALLY, THE

                    SUMMARY THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF EXCLUSIONS?

                                 MS. PAULIN:  IT'S A SUMMARY -- IT'S REALLY JUST

                    INTENDED TO INCREASE CONSUMER AWARENESS AND UNDERSTANDING OF THE

                    POLICY TERMS, TO PUT IT IN -- IN A WAY THAT CONSUMERS -- YOU KNOW, I

                    DON'T -- YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW -- YOU KNOW -- YOU KNOW, FOR

                    EXAMPLE, YOU KNOW, WE'VE DONE OTHER BILLS WHERE THERE'S A LACK OF

                    INFORMATION ON THE PART OF THE INSURED, AND I THINK THAT THOSE -- THOSE

                    FORMS ARE VERY HARD TO UNDERSTAND, THEY'RE VERY SMALL PRINT USUALLY AND

                    THEY'RE VERY HARD TO UNDERSTAND.  THIS IS AN ATTEMPT TO MAKE IT MUCH

                    MORE UNDERSTANDABLE FOR -- FOR SOMEONE.  SO YES, IT WOULD REQUIRE

                    EXTRA WORK ON THE PART OF THE INSURANCE COMPANY TO PROVIDE THAT TO

                    CONSUMERS, BUT I THINK THAT THEN IF THE CONSUMER SAW THAT, OH, IT -- IT

                    DOESN'T -- THE DEDUCTIBLE IS A CERTAIN AMOUNT, OR THE -- THE -- IT DOESN'T

                    INCLUDE JEWELRY, YOU KNOW, IT DOESN'T IN -- YOU KNOW, THAT WOULD BE A

                    PRINCIPAL EXCLUSION, FOR EXAMPLE, ON A HOMEOWNER'S POLICY.  YOU

                    KNOW, IT DOESN'T INCLUDE JEWELRY UP THROUGH THIS LIMIT.  YOU KNOW, IT

                    DOESN'T INCLUDE -- I'M TRYING TO THINK OF ANOTHER ASPECT OF A

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    HOMEOWNER'S INSURANCE.  IT -- IT DOESN'T INCLUDE --

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  BUT, THAT -- THAT'S FINE.  BUT

                    WHAT YOU'RE -- WHAT YOU'RE SAYING, THEN, IS BY THE TIME YOU LIST

                    EVERYTHING THAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, IT'S ALREADY IN THE POLICY.  THE

                    SUMMARY IS GOING TO BE AS BIG AS WHAT (INAUDIBLE).

                                 MS. PAULIN:  I THINK THAT THERE ARE GENERAL ASPECTS.

                    YOU KNOW, JEWELRY IS -- IS ACTUALLY ONE THAT I HAPPEN TO BE AWARE OF

                    BECAUSE OF MY OWN HOME INSURANCE AND WHAT IT LISTS AND WHAT IT

                    DOESN'T AND WHAT THE LIMITATIONS ARE.  SO -- BUT I WAS UNAWARE.  FOR

                    EXAMPLE, I HAD TO ASK THAT QUESTION, I HAD TO CALL THE AGENT.  SO THERE

                    ARE SOME GENERAL CATEGORIES AND, YOU KNOW, THIS IS REALLY AN ATTEMPT

                    JUST TO GET -- TO MAKE IT A LITTLE CLEARER SO THAT IF -- YOU DON'T HAVE TO

                    LOOK AT THE FINE PRINT AND THINK, OH, DOES IT INCLUDE THIS, DOESN'T IT

                    INCLUDE THIS.  THIS -- THIS WOULD JUST ADD A LITTLE CLARITY.  IT WAS, AGAIN,

                    BROUGHT TO MY ATTENTION BY SOMEONE WHO IS VERY INVOLVED AND KNOWS,

                    YOU KNOW, ABOUT ALL THE QUESTIONS THAT THE INSURANCE DEPARTMENT IS

                    ASKED, AND HE WISHED THAT THIS WAS PART OF IT SO THAT THEY WOULD HAVE

                    BEEN IN A BETTER POSITION TO BE ABLE TO ADDRESS CONSUMER ISSUES.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  A FEW YEARS AGO IN THIS

                    HOUSE, QUITE A FEW YEARS AGO IN THIS HOUSE, WE PASSED A BILL FOR

                    COMMON, SIMPLE LANGUAGE IN AN INSURANCE POLICY, IF YOU REMEMBER

                    THAT OR NOT.  BUT SINCE WE DID THAT AND THE POLICIES WERE CHANGED TO --

                    TO USE SIMPLE LANGUAGE, EASY TO READ LANGUAGE, THERE'S STILL -- THERE'S

                    STILL A DOUBT IN PEOPLE'S MINDS WHAT THE COVERAGES ARE AND SO FORTH.

                    AND THAT -- AND THAT'S WHY THE DECLARATION PAGE IS THERE, AND EVERY --

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    EVERY HOMEOWNERS POLICY, FOR EXAMPLE, COULD BE A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT.

                                 MS. PAULIN:  NO, THAT'S -- THAT'S TRUE, AND I THINK IT

                    -- THIS WILL HELP PEOPLE KNOW WHETHER THERE'S SOMETHING ELSE THEY WANT

                    TO ADD, YOU KNOW, AND -- BECAUSE IT'S LISTED ON THE EXCLUSION PAGE.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  OKAY.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  IF -- IF EVERYONE WHO LOOKS

                    AT THEIR INSURANCE POLICY AND YOU LOOK AT THE DECLARATION PAGE, THE

                    DECLARATION PAGE TELLS YOU, ONE, LIMITS OF INSURANCE, JUST WHAT THIS BILL

                    IS GOING ALSO DO.  IT ALSO WILL TELL YOU THE TERMS OF THE POLICY, THE TERM

                    OF THE POLICY, JUST LIKE THIS BILL IS GOING TO DO.  IT'S GOING TO TALK ABOUT

                    THE AMOUNT OF PREMIUM TO BE PAID, JUST LIKE THIS BILL IS GOING TO DO.  IT

                    TALKS ABOUT DEDUCTIBLES IN YOUR DECLARATION PAGE, EXACTLY WHAT THIS

                    POLICY IS GOING TO DO.  AND ALL OF THE THINGS THAT A DECLARATION PAGE

                    DOES, EXCEPT THE EXCLUSIONS WHICH ARE LISTED IN THE POLICY, GIVES YOU A

                    CLEAR SUMMARY OF RIGHT NOW WHAT YOUR POLICY DOES.  THE ONLY

                    DIFFERENCE THAT THIS OTHER -- THIS NEW BILL WILL DO, IT MAKES THE

                    INSURANCE COMPANY PUT IT IN RED INK.  THE ONLY THING IT DOES.  SO,

                    YOU'RE GOING -- INSTEAD OF HAVING A POLICY THAT LISTS EVERYTHING ON YOUR

                    DECLARATION PAGE, YOU'RE NOW GOING TO HAVE A DECLARATION PAGE IN RED.

                    AND I -- I DON'T BELIEVE THAT'S GOING TO HELP THE CONSUMER LOOK INTO AND

                    READ THE POLICY, YOU KNOW, MORE THAN WHAT THEY'RE DOING RIGHT NOW.

                                 TO ME, THIS BILL IS NOT NECESSARY BECAUSE, OBVIOUSLY,

                    IN A LEGAL CONTRACT YOU HAVE TO HAVE SOME CLARITY ON EXCLUSIONS, AND IF

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    YOU PUT EVERY EXCLUSION ON A SUMMARY PAGE, YOUR SUMMARY PAGE IS

                    GOING TO BE AS LONG AS YOUR INSURANCE PAGE.  SO, THE DECLARATION PAGE

                    DOES EXACTLY WHAT -- ALL THAT WE NEED TO DO WHICH WOULD HELP THE

                    CONSUMER.  SO I BELIEVE THAT THIS POLICY -- THIS BILL IS NOT NEEDED AND I

                    WILL BE -- I'M NOT SUPPORTING IT AND I WILL BE VOTING NO.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT OCTOBER 1ST.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED TO THIS BILL.  THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT CAN VOTE IN FAVOR ON THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION;

                    HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A FEW THAT WOULD DESIRE TO BE AN EXCEPTION.

                    THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO DO SO AT THEIR DESK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. BLANKENBUSH:  TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  I

                    FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THE PRINT ON THIS SUMMARY PAGE IS GOING TO BE IN

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    16-POINT TYPE.  SO I JUST WANT EVERYONE TO KNOW THAT THAT WOULD HAVE

                    TO BE ON AN 8X10 FOOT PIECE OF PAPER.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BLANKENBUSH IN

                    THE NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 12, CALENDAR NO. 98, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A05609, CALENDAR NO.

                    98, ROZIC, JACOBSON, COLTON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE WORKERS'

                    COMPENSATION LAW, IN RELATION TO PROVIDING LANGUAGE ACCESS SERVICES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. ROZIC:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS BILL

                    WOULD AMEND THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW TO ALIGN PROVISIONS

                    REQUIRING DOCUMENT TRANSLATION AND LANGUAGE ACCESS SERVICES WITH THE

                    REQUIREMENTS UNDER THE EXECUTIVE LAW.  THE LANGUAGE ACCESS

                    REQUIREMENTS FOR OTHER STATE AGENCIES UNDER THE EXECUTIVE LAW WAS

                    ADDED IN LAST YEAR'S EXECUTIVE BUDGET, SO THIS LARGELY REFLECTS THAT

                    CHANGE, AND EXISTING REQUIREMENTS, JUST BRINGS THAT TOWARDS THE

                    WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD.  IT DOES A BUNCH OF OTHER THINGS, BUT

                    ESSENTIALLY, IT PROVIDES CONSISTENCY BY CROSS-REFERENCING THE EXECUTIVE

                    LAW SO THAT IN THE FUTURE IF THERE WERE CHANGES MADE TO THAT PART OF THE

                    LAW, THAT IT WOULD ALSO BE REFLECTED IN THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION

                    LAW, AS WELL.

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR JUST A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROZIC, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. ROZIC YIELDS,

                    MA'AM.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU.  SO AS YOU SAID, THIS

                    WOULD AMEND WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW SECTION 17-A.  CAN YOU

                    JUST KIND OF COMPARE AND CONTRAST WHAT THE CURRENT LAW REQUIRES AND

                    WHAT YOUR LEGISLATION WOULD ADDITIONALLY REQUIRE?  THAT -- THAT'S THE

                    MAIN QUESTION THAT I'VE GOT.

                                 MS. ROZIC:  OKAY.  SO THE MAIN DIFFERENCES ARE THAT

                    -- BETWEEN THE EXECUTIVE LAW AND THE WORKERS' COMP LAW IS THAT IT

                    INCREASES FROM 10 TO 12 LANGUAGES PLUS A POTENTIAL FOR ADDITIONAL

                    LANGUAGES IF THE BOARD CHOOSES TO ADD MORE, IT CAN CHOOSE NOT TO.  THE

                    SECOND CHANGE -- THE SECOND DIFFERENCE IS THAT IT INCLUDES PROVISIONS

                    THAT RELATE TO THE DETERMINATION OF THOSE FOUR ADDITIONAL LANGUAGES AND

                    THAT A LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN NEEDS TO BE UPDATED AND REISSUED EVERY

                    TWO YEARS.  MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT THE CURRENT PROVISIONS UNDER THE

                    WORKERS' COMPENSATION LAW ALREADY REQUIRE THE LANGUAGE ACCESS

                    COORDINATOR, WE DID THAT A COUPLE OF YEARS AGO.  BUT THIS BILL WOULD

                    REPHRASE IT FOR CONSISTENCY AND CLARITY TO MAKE IT -- TO MAKE SURE THAT

                    THAT ALSO COORDINATOR ALSO WORKS WITHIN THE OFFICE OF GENERAL SERVICES

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE ACROSS THE BOARD, BECAUSE THEY CREATED THIS

                    OFFICE OF LANGUAGE ACCESS LAST YEAR IN THE BUDGET, AND SO WE WANT TO

                    MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE BEING CONSISTENT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO YEAH, SO THAT -- THANK YOU

                    FOR THAT.  THAT -- BECAUSE I -- I SAW THAT THE ADDITIONAL TWO LANGUAGES

                    WERE BEING ADDED.  WHAT ARE THOSE LANGUAGES THAT ARE BEING ADDED?

                    DO YOU HAPPEN TO KNOW?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.  I DO HAVE THAT

                    LIST.  SO ACCORDING TO THE LANGUAGE ACCESS PLAN PUBLISHED BY OGS AND

                    THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION BOARD, THE TOP 12 LANGUAGES SPOKEN BY

                    INDIVIDUALS WITH LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK

                    ARE, ONE, SPANISH; TWO, CHINESE; THREE, RUSSIAN; FOUR, YIDDISH; FIVE,

                    BENGALI; SIX, HAITIAN CREOLE; SEVEN, KOREAN; EIGHT, ITALIAN; NINE,

                    ARABIC; TEN, POLISH; 11, FRENCH; AND 12, URDU.

                                 MS. WALSH:  WHAT WAS THAT LAST ONE, I'M SORRY?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  URDU.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OH, URDU.  OKAY, OH, OKAY.  THANK

                    YOU.  I JUST -- I WAS CURIOUS TO SEE WHAT THE MOST COMMON ONES WERE.

                    LOOK, AND YOU DELIVERED, THANK YOU.

                                 AND THEN ALSO, THIS BILL TALKS ABOUT VITAL RECORDS -- OR

                    VITAL DOCUMENTS BEING TRANSLATED INTO THESE 12 MOST COMMON

                    LANGUAGES, THE -- BUT THE PREVIOUS -- THE EXISTING LAW ALREADY REQUIRES A

                    LOT OF DOCUMENTS TO BE TRANSLATED.  DOES THIS LEGISLATION EXPAND THE

                    NUMBER OR SCOPE OR BREADTH OF DOCUMENTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE

                    TRANSLATED?

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MS. ROZIC:  IT ADDS THE DEFINITION OF VITAL

                    DOCUMENTS FROM THE EXECUTIVE LAW.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.

                                 MS. ROZIC:  WHICH MEANS ANY PAPER OR DIGITAL

                    DOCUMENT THAT CONTAINS INFORMATION CRITICAL TO OBTAINING AGENCY

                    SERVICES OR BENEFITS, OR AS OTHERWISE REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED BY THE

                    LAW.  I CAN GIVE YOU MORE DETAILS ABOUT THAT, AS WELL.

                                 MS. WALSH:  NO, NO THAT'S OKAY.  I GUESS WHERE --

                    WHERE I WAS -- WHAT I WAS THINKING IS, SO YOU HAVE AN APPLICATION, SAY,

                    FOR WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS THAT NEEDS TO BE FILLED OUT BY THE

                    EMPLOYEE, AND THAT NEEDS TO BE IN A LANGUAGE THAT THE EMPLOYEE

                    UNDERSTANDS, AND I GET THAT.  AND UNDER EXISTING LAW, I THINK THAT THAT

                    DOCUMENT ALREADY HAS TO BE IN ALL OF THOSE -- WELL, TEN OF THOSE

                    LANGUAGES ANYWAY, NOW IT WILL BE 12.  BUT SO WHEN THE EMPLOYEE FILLS

                    OUT THE FORM IN THEIR NATIVE LANGUAGE AND SUBMITS IT, THEN WHO THEN

                    TRANSLATES THAT IN A WAY -- IN A WAY THAT THE EMPLOYER CAN UNDERSTAND

                    AND THEN RESPOND TO, AND THE BOARD?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  SO, THE COORDINATOR IN EACH RESPECTIVE

                    AGENCY WOULD HAVE TO FIGURE THAT OUT, BUT THIS BILL DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY

                    SPEAK TO THAT SCENARIO.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO IS -- IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THE

                    EMPLOYER WOULD HAVE TO INCUR THE EXPENSE OF GETTING THEIR OWN LIKE

                    PRIVATE-PAY TRANSLATOR OR IS THAT GOING -- DO YOU KNOW WHETHER THAT'S

                    ENCOMPASSED UNDER THE SERVICES OF THIS -- THE TRANSLATION SERVICES?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  I BELIEVE THAT -- I BELIEVE THE OFFICE OF

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    LANGUAGE SERVICES -- LANGUAGE ACCESS AND THE LANGUAGE ACCESS

                    COORDINATOR WOULD HAVE TO FIGURE THAT OUT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND -- AND DO HAPPEN TO KNOW IF THAT'S

                    PROVIDED FREE OF CHARGE TO THE EMPLOYER OR IF THERE'S A CHARGE FOR THOSE

                    SERVICES?

                                 MS. ROZIC:  I CAN CERTAINLY FIND OUT FOR YOU.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  YEAH, I WAS JUST CURIOUS ABOUT

                    THAT.  OKAY.  OKAY.  I -- I THINK THAT'S ALL, THOSE ARE THE ONLY QUESTIONS

                    I'VE GOT.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR -- FOR YOUR ANSWERS.

                                 MS. ROZIC:  THANKS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND I REALLY HAVE NOTHING ELSE TO SAY,

                    MR. SPEAKER.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY OPPOSED, BUT THOSE WHO SUPPORT IT CAN

                    CERTAINLY VOTE IN FAVOR HERE ON THE FLOOR.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS BILL;

                    HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A FEW OF US THAT WOULD LIKE TO BE AN EXCEPTION.

                    THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO DO SO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. GOODELL TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR, TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                    I THINK EVERYONE IS SENSITIVE TO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE MANY DIFFERENT

                    PEOPLE IN NEW YORK STATE THAT SPEAK MANY LANGUAGES, AND I CERTAINLY

                    APPRECIATE THAT.  YET, WE ALL HAVE A COMMON LANGUAGE, AND THAT

                    COMMON LANGUAGE HELPS HOLD US TOGETHER AND BIND US IN COMMONALITY

                    AS -- AS A SOCIETY AND AS A NATION, AND -- AND THAT COMMON LANGUAGE IS

                    ENGLISH.  AND WE RECOGNIZE THAT THERE ARE A NUMBER OF PEOPLE FOR

                    WHOM ENGLISH IS A SECOND LANGUAGE, AND WE TRY TO ACCOMMODATE THEM

                    AS BEST WE CAN BEING SENSITIVE TO THEIR LANGUAGE NEEDS.  AT THE SAME

                    TOKEN, WE RECOGNIZE THAT WHEN WE START LEGISLATING TRANSLATION SERVICES

                    FOR FORMS AND DOCUMENTS, WHAT WE END UP WITH IS SOMEONE SUBMITTING

                    AN UNEMPLOYMENT CLAIM THAT'S IN A LANGUAGE THAT'S COMPLETELY

                    INCOMPREHENSIBLE, PERHAPS, TO THE PERSONNEL OFFICE OR THE EMPLOYER

                    WHO IS NOT FAMILIAR WITH THAT PARTICULAR FOREIGN LANGUAGE.  NOT FAMILIAR

                    AT ALL.  AND THEN THE EMPLOYER RESPONDS BY WHAT, HIRING A TRANSLATOR?

                    HALF THESE LANGUAGES, YOU WOULD BE HARD-PRESSED TO FIND A TRANSLATOR IN

                    MY COUNTY.  I MEAN, IT WOULD BE EXTRAORDINARILY DIFFICULT AND

                    EXPENSIVE.  AND THE RESPONSE COMES FROM THE EMPLOYER IN ENGLISH AND

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    WE HAVE WHAT, ANOTHER TRANSLATOR?  AND THEN WE HAVE A HEARING AND

                    OTHER TRANSLATORS?  AND THE PROBLEM IS, EVERY TIME WE ADD MORE AND

                    MORE LANGUAGES THAT ARE LESS AND LESS COMMON ACROSS THE STATE, THE

                    COSTS OF THE PROCEEDING GO UP AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF MISCOMMUNICATION

                    GOES UP.  IF YOU APPLY FOR A JOB AT A NEW YORK STATE EMPLOYER AND

                    ENGLISH IS YOUR SECOND LANGUAGE AND YOU HAVE AN ISSUE, MOST PEOPLE

                    HAVE FRIENDS OR RELATIVES WHO HELP THEM.  OR, THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO

                    GET A TRANSLATION.  SO THIS OPENS THE DOOR AND SAYS FOR THE 12 MOST

                    COMMON LANGUAGES, AND IN MY COUNTY IT'S TWO, YOU HAVE TO PROVIDE

                    TRANSLATION SERVICES AND IT'S A SIGNIFICANT OBLIGATION.  AND FOR THAT

                    REASON, I WILL NOT BE SUPPORTING IT.

                                 THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. GOODELL IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  AS MANY OF YOU KNOW, I WAS A WORKERS' COMPENSATION

                    ATTORNEY FOR ABOUT A DECADE PRIOR TO COMING TO THE FLOOR OF THIS

                    CHAMBER, AND I HAD MANY OCCASIONS TO REPRESENT PEOPLE WHO REQUIRED

                    LANGUAGE ACCESS SERVICES.  OBVIOUSLY, THEY SPOKE A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE

                    OR BECAUSE THEY HAD HEARING ISSUES.  AND I'LL TELL YOU THAT BETWEEN

                    AWWS AND LWECS AND ALL THE ALPHABET SOUP WE USE AT THE COMP

                    LEVEL, IT'S PRACTICALLY A DIFFERENT LANGUAGE AS IT IS.  SO TRYING TO EXPLAIN

                    TO SOMEONE WHO HAS ANY LANGUAGE BARRIER, EVEN ENGLISH, EVEN PEOPLE

                    WHO HAD THIRD GRADE READING LEVELS, IT WAS AN ENORMOUS CHALLENGE TO

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    ENSURE THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO FULLY UNDERSTAND AND ACCESS THIS SYSTEM

                    OF JUSTICE WHICH FOR MANY PEOPLE IS THE ONLY SYSTEM THEY ARE STATUTORILY

                    ALLOWED TO ACCESS.

                                 I'M VERY HAPPY TO SUPPORT THIS BILL BECAUSE IT'S

                    ESSENTIAL THAT WE ENSURE THAT EVERY PERSON IN THIS STATE WHO IS ENTITLED

                    TO BENEFITS BECAUSE THEY WERE INJURED ON THE JOB THROUGH NO FAULT OF

                    THEIR OWN CAN UNDERSTAND THEIR RIGHTS AND ENSURE THAT THEY ARE GETTING

                    EVERYTHING THEY DESERVE.  I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU VERY

                    MUCH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MS. LUNSFORD IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 12, CALENDAR NO. 100, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01190, CALENDAR NO.

                    100, RIVERA, DINOWITZ, HEVESI, JACKSON, JACOBSON, MAMDANI,

                    SANTABARBARA, SILLITTI, SEAWRIGHT, SIMON, TANNOUSIS, CONRAD, KELLES.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO CERTAIN

                    REQUIREMENTS REGARDING BILLING FOR ELECTRIC SERVICES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. RIVERA.

                                 MR. RIVERA:  THANK YOU.  THE BILL BEFORE US IS A

                    BILL THAT WE PASSED LAST YEAR, ALSO PASSED IN THE SENATE AND WAS VETOED

                    BY THE GOVERNOR.  WE MADE SOME MINOR CHANGES TO IT, AND LOOKING

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    FORWARD TO -- TO DISCUSS IT AGAIN.  THE PURPOSE OF THE BILL IS TO PROVIDE

                    IMPROVED BILLING TRANSPARENCY FOR DEMAND-METERED CUSTOMERS BY

                    INCLUDING SPECIFIC INFORMATION ON UTILITY BILLS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. RIVERA, WILL YOU

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  OF COURSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU, MR. RIVERA.  I

                    APPRECIATE HAVING THE CONVERSATION WITH YOU AGAIN THIS YEAR.  YOU

                    MENTIONED IN YOUR OPENING COMMENTS THAT (INAUDIBLE) THE GOVERNOR

                    VETOED THIS BILL LAST YEAR, AND IN THE VETO SHE EXPRESSED EXPLICITLY THAT

                    HER CONCERN THAT THIS WILL LEAD TO COSTS TO RATEPAYERS THAT OUT --

                    OUTWEIGH THE MARGINAL BENEFIT OF THIS INFORMATION, AND ALSO CONCERNS

                    ABOUT THE ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN THIS WHICH WOULD PLACE ON UTILITIES

                    WHICH WOULD DILUTE INFORMATION THAT'S BEING PROVIDED AND ALSO

                    TRANSLATE INTO A COST INCREASE FOR RATEPAYERS.  HOW DOES YOUR BILL

                    RECONCILE AND ADDRESS THOSE SPECIFIC CONCERNS ON COSTS TO RATEPAYERS,

                    OR DO YOU BELIEVE THIS WON'T IMPACT RATEPAYERS?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  THE PRIMARY CONCERN THAT THE

                    GOVERNOR'S FOLKS HAVE BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION WAS THAT IT DIDN'T

                    SPECIFY -- I'M SORRY, IT DIDN'T EXEMPT MUNICIPALITIES THAT MAY PRODUCE

                    THEIR OWN ELECTRICITY, AND SPECIFY ONLY THAT IT BE FOR UTILITY COMPANIES.

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    SO NOW THAT'S BEEN CLARIFIED, AND THIS ONLY WILL AFFECT COMMERCIAL, YOU

                    KNOW, COMMERCIAL ENERGY PROVIDERS AS OPPOSED TO ANY MUNICIPALITY

                    THAT THEY, THEMSELVES, PRODUCE THEIR OWN ENERGY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  RIGHT NOW, CURRENTLY

                    UNDER THE PUBLIC SERVICE LAW SECTION 44, IT REQUIRES EVERY UTILITY

                    CORPORATION OR MUNICIPALITY TO ENSURE THE BILLS FOR SERVICES FOR THEIR

                    RESIDENTIAL CUSTOMERS ADEQUATELY EXPLAINS THE CHARGES FOR SERVICES THAT

                    ARE CLEAR AND UNDERSTANDABLE IN LANGUAGE.  AND THIS WOULD ALSO APPLY

                    TO DEMAND METER CUSTOMERS.  SO, IF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION

                    DETERMINED THAT THEY NEEDED TO MAKE THIS CHANGE TO BE MORE CLEAR WITH

                    CUSTOMERS, IF THEY BELIEVED THAT WAS NECESSARY, THEY WOULD HAVE THE

                    ABILITY UNDER PUBLIC SERVICE LAW TO MAKE THOSE CHANGES NOW IF THEY

                    DEEMED IT WAS HELPFUL TO HELP TRANSPARENCY FOR CUSTOMERS.  THEY COULD

                    DO THAT RIGHT NOW, THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO DO THAT UNDER -- UNDER

                    REGULATIONS, CORRECT?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I SUPPOSE THE PSC CAN ACT AT ANY

                    MOMENT UNDER THOSE SORT OF GUIDELINES, BUT WE HERE AS A LEGISLATIVE

                    BODY AREN'T SOLELY GOING TO WAIT FOR THE PSC TO DO SOMETHING ON ITS

                    OWN.  WE'RE HERE TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY DO IT WHEN WE FIND IT

                    NECESSARY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE, I UNDERSTAND THAT.  THE

                    QUESTION THAT KEEPS COMING UP WITH THIS BILL WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT IT

                    LAST YEAR AND IT'S STILL THERE, IT TALKS ABOUT A MEASURE OF A SPECIFIC LINE

                    ITEM, SPECIFIC LINE ITEM AS MEASURED OVER THE PRECEDING 52-WEEK

                    PERIOD.  SO WHAT DOES SPECIFIC LINE ITEM MEAN?  DOES THAT MEAN EVERY

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    SPECIFIC LINE ON THE BILL NOW THAT'S ON THAT CURRENT UTILITY BILL, NOW

                    THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO A 52-WEEK COMPARISON TO SHOW WHAT IT WAS

                    IN MAY OF 2022 COMPARED TO MAY OF 2023 AND VICE VERSA ON EVERY

                    LINE?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT -- AND MY

                    INTENT THAT EVERY -- EVERY MONTH A BILL GETS PRODUCED, THAT BILL NOW HAS

                    TO HAVE MORE CLARITY AROUND WHERE INDIVIDUAL CHARGES COME FROM THAT

                    THE COMPANY PASSES ON TO THE -- TO THE CONSUMER, LET THAT BE IN USAGE

                    OR IN ANY OTHER SORT OF DEMAND FEES OR ANY OTHER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH

                    HOW, WHETHER IT BE NATIONAL GRID, CON EDISON, WHOEVER, HOW THEY

                    DETERMINE HOW MUCH SOMEBODY SHOULD GET PAID, THEY -- OR HOW MUCH

                    A PERSON SHOULD PAY, THEY SHOULD SHARE THAT INFORMATION ON HOW THEY

                    ARRIVED AT THAT NUMBER, LET IT BE IN STRAIGHT USAGE OR ANY ADDITIONAL FEES

                    THAT THEY CHARGE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO WOULD THIS APPLY TO ALL

                    SERVICE CLASSES, RESIDENTIAL, SMALL BUSINESS AND COMMERCIAL?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  SO, YOU KNOW, THERE WAS ALREADY

                    EXISTING LANGUAGE HERE THAT -- THAT INCLUDED RESIDENTIALS.  THIS ADDS

                    DEMAND METERED, WHICH IS GOING TO BE MORE -- MORE OFTEN THAN NOT,

                    COMMERCIAL CUSTOMERS.  AND THIS IS GOING TO GIVE PEOPLE THE ABILITY TO

                    SAY HOW MUCH ENERGY THEY'RE CONSUMING IN A MONTH AND POTENTIALLY

                    WHERE THEY CAN CUT BACK, AND THEY'RE ABLE TO -- THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE

                    TO DETERMINE HOW MANY FEE -- HOW MUCH OF WHAT THEY'RE PAYING ARE

                    STRAIGHT FEES THAT ARE PASSED ON TO THEM OR -- AND HOW MUCH IS ACTUAL

                    USAGE.

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I WILL -- I -- I AGREE THAT ON

                    THE UTILITY -- BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT A UTILITY BILL HERE FROM NATIONAL

                    GRID AND IT HAS THE ELECTRIC USAGE, YEAR OVER YEAR, OR -- AND THEN THE GAS

                    USAGE THAT CLEARLY DEFINES OUT.  BUT ALSO LOOKING AT A BILL WHERE IT HAS A

                    BASIC SERVICE CHARGE, LEGACY TRANSITION, RDM, TRANSMISSION REVENUE

                    ADJUSTMENT, TARIFF ADJUSTMENT, SURCHARGE.  YOUR LEGISLATION WOULD

                    REQUIRE THEM, EVEN ON THOSE SPECIFIC LINE ITEMS THAT REALLY PROBABLY

                    DON'T GIVE A LOT OF INFORMATION TO A CUSTOMER ON THEIR USAGE AND ON

                    THEIR COSTS, YOU'RE GOING TO REQUIRE THEM NOW TO HAVE THE UTILITIES PUT

                    ON THESE BILLS A 12 -- A 52-WEEK COMPARISON YEAR OVER YEAR ON A ROLLING

                    BASIS?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PROVIDE THE

                    CUSTOMERS HOW THEY ARRIVE AT THE FINAL NUMBERS THAT THEY FIND.  AND AS

                    FOR THE LANGUAGE OF THE BILL, IT SAYS FOR UTILITY CORPORATIONS SUCH BILL

                    SHALL, AT A MINIMUM, INCLUDE THE QUANTITY BILLED, THE UNIT OF THE

                    MEASUREMENT AND THE HIGHEST MEASUREMENT OF A SPECIFIC LINE ITEM AS

                    MEASURED OVER THE PRECEDING 52-WEEK PERIOD.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH, AND I -- I KNOW WE GO

                    BACK TO THAT SENTENCE, SPECIFIC LINE ITEMS.  SO THE TARIFF SURCHARGE, NOW

                    THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SHOW, SO THIS MONTH SAY IT WAS $1.04, THEY'RE

                    GOING TO HAVE TO SHOW WHAT IT WAS A YEAR AGO COMPARED TO THAT?

                    THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SHOW THE TRANSMISSION REVENUE ADJUSTMENT ON

                    THE BILL COMPARED TO A YEAR AGO, THE RDM COMPARED TO A YEAR -- SO

                    YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE TO DO ALL THOSE THINGS.  I MEAN, I GET AND I SUPPORT

                    WHAT YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT USAGE.  CUSTOMERS NEED TO KNOW WHAT THE

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    USAGE IS SO THEY CAN COMPARE AND THEN THEY CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THAT

                    COST IS.  BUT YOUR BILL, THE WAY THIS IS WRITTEN, SO -- SO BROAD AND OVERLY

                    BROAD, IT'S GOING TO INUNDATE THESE -- THESE BILLS, IT'S GOING TO PROVIDE

                    MORE INFORMATION ON THE BILLS AND REALLY ISN'T GOING TO BE HELPFUL TO THE

                    CUSTOMER.  AND THAT'S WHY I THINK THE GOVERNOR VETOED IT BECAUSE IT'S

                    GOING TO BE MORE PAPERWORK, MORE TIME, AND THAT'S JUST GOING TO PASS

                    OFF RATE INCREASES TO THE CUSTOMER THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO HELP OUT BEING

                    TRANSPARENT.  SO NOW THEY'RE GOING TO BE TRANSPARENT AND SEEING A

                    HIGHER UTILITY BILL BECAUSE OF ALL THESE ADDITIONAL MANDATES, CORRECT?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I DISAGREE.  I'D SAY THAT THIS IS ALREADY

                    INFORMATION THAT UTILITY COMPANIES ARE ALREADY COLLECTING, AND IF THEY

                    WEREN'T, HOW COULD THEY BE CHARGING US?  I'D ALSO SAY THAT IT'S NOT JUST A

                    MATTER OF DETERMINING IF A -- IF A UTILITY COMPANY IS GOING TO CHARGE

                    SOMEONE -- A PERSON A FEE OR A CHARGE TODAY.  I THINK IT'S HELPFUL TO

                    HAVE A COMPARISON OF WHAT THEY CHARGED US A FEW MONTHS AGO SO WE

                    COULD KNOW WHAT WE'RE DOING AS USERS, AS RATEPAYERS AND SEE WHERE WE

                    CAN CUT BACK.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH, I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT,

                    MR. RIVERA.  I MEAN, THE THING IS WHEN I -- I (INAUDIBLE) THE COST, I

                    MEAN, THIS IS ONE -- ONE -- THIS IS LIKE PAGE TWO OF FOUR AND IT'S GOT THE

                    LINES.  NOW IT'S GOING TO HAVE ALL THESE OTHER ADDITIONAL LINES THAT ARE

                    GOING TO HAVE TO BE ON THERE.  IS IT JUST A LINE, OR DOES IT HAVE TO BE A

                    GRAPH, OR CAN IT BE ANY COMBINATION THEREOF?  AND IF IT GOES MORE THAN

                    ADDITIONAL PAGES, THAT'S GOING TO BE MORE OF A COST TO THE CUSTOMER,

                    RIGHT?  BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO PRINT IT, THEY HAVE TO MAIL IT, IT'S -- YOU

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    KNOW, IT'S ALL GOING TO BE AN ADDITIONAL COST AND TIME TO PUT INTO IT.  IT'S

                    ULTIMATELY GOING TO BE BORNE BY THE RATEPAYER, CORRECT?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I DON'T ANTICIPATE ENCYCLOPEDIA-LONG

                    BILLS EVERY MONTH COMING TO PEOPLE'S HOUSES.  I WILL SAY THAT IT SAYS,

                    YOU KNOW, PRETTY CLEARLY IN THE LANGUAGE HERE THAT, YOU KNOW, SUCH

                    CLASSIFICATIONS OF SERVICE SHALL BE INDICATED ON EACH CUSTOMER'S BILL FOR

                    ELECTRIC SERVICE AND SHALL INCLUDE A WEBSITE ADDRESS TO OTHER

                    INFORMATION DEEMED RELEVANT BY THE COMMISSION.  SO, IF THE

                    COMMISSION DEEMS RELEVANT THAT, YOU KNOW, MORE INFORMATION THAN

                    WHAT A PROVIDER IS PROVIDING TO A RATEPAYER, THEN THERE'S ALSO GOING TO

                    BE A WEBSITE THERE THAT DOESN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH PRINTING OR

                    ANYTHING YOU JUST SAID, WHERE A RATEPAYER CAN JUST ACCESS IT THAT WAY,

                    TOO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ANOTHER AREA I WANTED TO ASK

                    YOU ABOUT, WHAT ABOUT THE ESCOS, THE ENERGY SERVICE CORPORATIONS?  A

                    LOT OF TIMES THE UTILITY WILL DO THE BILLING FOR THEM, THE ESCO WILL JUST

                    PRESENT THE INFORMATION AND WHAT THEIR BILL IS.  NOW, DOES THE ESCO

                    GOT TO DO A COMPARISON TOO, OR WOULD IT BE ON THE UTILITY TO DO IT?

                    WHO'S -- WHO'S GOING TO ULTIMATELY HAVE TO PROVIDE THIS COMPARISON?

                    IS THE UTILITY GOING TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE NUMBERS FOR THE

                    ESCO OVER THE PAST YEAR, AS WELL?  BECAUSE I KNOW THE TRANSMISSION

                    AND DELIVERY, SOME OF THAT'S GOING TO BE ON THE UTILITY, BUT THE COST OF

                    THE GAS IS GOING TO FALL ON THE ESCO.  SO IS THE UTILITY NOW RESPONSIBLE

                    FOR GETTING THE RESEARCH AND PUTTING IT ON THE BILL AS WELL, TOO?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  IT'S ONLY THE UTILITY COMPANY.

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ONLY THE UTILITY, OKAY.  YOU

                    KNOW, I -- I KIND OF LIKE WHERE YOU'RE GETTING AT FROM ONE PERSPECTIVE

                    ON THIS LEGISLATION, AND I -- I WOULD AGREE IT'S GOOD TO GIVE CONSUMERS

                    INFORMATION.  I JUST THINK WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO DO HERE IS TOO OVERLY

                    BROAD.  WHY NOT ALSO, YOU KNOW, PUT IN LEGISLATION -- I MEAN, IT'S A

                    DIFFERENT ISSUE, BUT IT'S A SIGNIFICANT ISSUE -- YOU KNOW, WE'RE DOING A

                    LOT ON THESE GREEN ENERGY POLICIES THAT ARE INCREASING COSTS.  WOULDN'T

                    IT BE GOOD TO PUT ON THE ENERGY BILL, HEY, CUSTOMER, BUSINESS, FARMER,

                    SMALL -- FAMILY, SENIOR CITIZEN, HERE'S WHAT YOU'RE PAYING ON YOUR

                    UTILITY BILL FOR THESE -- THESE SO-CALLED GREEN ENERGY PROGRAMS.

                    WOULDN'T THAT BE WISE TO PUT ON THE BILL?  BECAUSE I KNOW YOU

                    PROBABLY SAW THE ARTICLE JUST A WEEK AGO THAT NATIONAL GRID JUST SAID

                    THAT THEY'RE INCREASING THEIR PRICES 17 PERCENT BECAUSE OF CLIMATE

                    POLICIES THAT NEED TO BE (INAUDIBLE).  WOULDN'T IT BE WISE -- TALK ABOUT

                    BEING TRANSPARENT, WOULDN'T THAT BE THE BEST STEP TO DO, TO SHOW THE

                    CUSTOMERS WHAT IS REALLY GOING TO IMPACT THEM, HOW MUCH IT'S GOING TO

                    COST THEM, THESE GREEN POLICIES, RATHER THAT JUST PUTTING A TARIFF-ADJUSTED

                    SURCHARGE OR THE RDM CHARGE OR THE LEGACY TRANSITION CHARGE?

                    WOULDN'T IT BE BETTER TO GIVE THEM INFORMATION THAT'S GOING TO BE MORE

                    VALUABLE TO THEM SO IT'S NOT GOING TO INCREASE THE COST TO THE RATEPAYER

                    (INAUDIBLE) AND IT IS GOING TO INCREASE IT, SO LET'S SHOW THEM WHY.

                    WOULDN'T THAT BE BETTER?  I GUESS -- IT'S A LONG QUESTION, BUT HAVE AT IT.

                                 MR. RIVERA:  YEAH.  YOU GOT SO MANY QUESTIONS,

                    YOU'VE GOT ABOUT A DOZEN BILL IDEAS THERE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  HOW -- HOW -- HOW (INAUDIBLE)

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    -- I'LL MAKE IT SIMPLE.  SHOULD WE PUT THE COST OF THE GREEN -- THE GREEN

                    CLEAN ENERGY MANDATES ON THE BILL SO THE CUSTOMER HAS A RIGHT TO KNOW

                    AND SEE THE TRANSPARENCY OF WHAT THESE POLICIES THAT WE'RE PUTTING IN

                    THIS HOUSE TO SEE -- YOU DON'T THINK THAT SHOULD GO ON THE BILL?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I'D SAY HERE, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT

                    UTILITY COMPANIES PROVIDING INFORMATION THAT THEY CHARGE US WHO,

                    EVERY MONTH WE PAY OUR BILLS AND EVERY MONTH WE USE OUR ELECTRICITY

                    AND, THEREFORE, IN REALITY, IT'S NOT AS IF NATIONAL GRID OR CON EDISON

                    DOES US ANY FAVORS.  I MEAN, WE PAY THEM EVERY MONTH TO DO WHAT THEY

                    DO.  SO IN THAT WAY, IN -- AT THE END OF THE DAY, IT'S -- IT'S -- IT'S NOT MUCH

                    TO ASK FOR A BIT OF TRANSPARENCY AND HOW THEY'RE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I -- I --

                                 MR. RIVERA:  -- CHARGING US AND THE WAY THAT

                    THEY'RE CHARGING US AND (INAUDIBLE) --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I AGREE ON THE TRANSPARENCY.

                                 MR. RIVERA: -- EVERYTHING ELSE YOU JUST SAID JUST

                    SOUNDS LIKE AN ENTIRELY DIFFERENT BILL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  I WON'T -- I WON'T

                    BANTER ANYMORE BACK AND FORTH.

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I DON'T MIND.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I APPRECIATE YOUR TIME, MR.

                    RIVERA.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. RIVERA:  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER MCDONALD:  ON THE BILL.

                                         67



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I -- I CAN CERTAINLY APPRECIATE

                    THE INTENT OF THE SPONSOR ABOUT BEING TRANSPARENT, TRYING TO LET CITIZENS

                    KNOW ABOUT THEIR BILLS.  UNFORTUNATELY, I JUST THINK THIS BILL IS SO OVERLY

                    BROAD, AND -- AND IT MIGHT SEEM SIMPLE, BUT THAT SPECIFIC ISSUE -- WELL,

                    MEASURE OF A SPECIFIC LINE ITEM MEANS EVERY LITTLE THING ON THE BILL NOW

                    WILL HAVE TO SHOW A 52-WEEK COMPARISON.  THE TARIFF SURCHARGE, THE

                    TRANSMISSION REVENUE ADJUSTMENT, RDM, HOW MANY PEOPLE KNOW WHAT

                    THAT IS?  I DON'T EVEN KNOW SOME OF THIS STUFF.  BUT WHAT DOES THAT DO TO

                    HELP THEM?  WE SEE THE SUPPLY CHARGES, THE ELECTRIC USES, THE KILOWATT

                    HOURS OR THE THERMS USING FOR GAS.  THAT'S HELPFUL FOR THEM TO COMPARE

                    SO THEY CAN MEASURE OUT THAT COST.  AND I WOULD SAY TO THE SPONSOR AND

                    TO MY COLLEAGUES IN THIS BODY, WHY NOT PUT ON THE BILL WHAT THE GREEN

                    POLICIES ARE COSTING RATEPAYERS?  I MEAN, IF THIS IS SUCH A GREAT THING IN

                    THE BEST INTEREST OF THE RATEPAYERS OF THE STATE, THE SENIOR CITIZENS WHO

                    ARE ON FIXED INCOMES, THE SMALL BUSINESSES WHO ARE CRUSHED BY

                    MANDATES AND ADDITIONAL COSTS, THE FAMILIES, WHY NOT TELL THEM ON THEIR

                    BILL, HEY, MR. SMITH, HERE'S HOW MUCH THE GREEN ENERGY POLICIES THAT

                    WE'RE PUTTING ARE GOING TO IMPACT YOU.  OH, AND BY THE WAY, IT'S NOT

                    GOING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN CLIMATE CHANGE BECAUSE WE'RE ONLY .4

                    PERCENT OF THE TOTAL GLOBAL EMISSIONS, AND CHINA IS 29 PERCENT, BUILDING

                    1,000 -- HAS 1,000 COAL PLANTS AND BUILDING MORE.  I MEAN, JUST LAST

                    MONTH COMMISSIONER SEGGOS AND PRESIDENT HARRIS ANNOUNCED THE

                    CO-CHAIRS OF THE CLIMATE ACTION COUNCIL WHO PRESENTED THE DRAFT

                    SCOPING -- THE SCOPING PLAN IN DECEMBER FOR THE TWO YEARS WHEN WE

                    WERE CALLING FOR A TRUE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, THEY DISMISSED IT.  FOR

                                         68



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    TWO YEARS WHEN WE WERE CALLING FOR A TRUE COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS, THE

                    TIMES UNION CALLS US CLIMATE DENIERS BECAUSE WE WANT TO BE

                    TRANSPARENT WITH THE PUBLIC.  FOR TWO YEARS WE'VE BEEN CALLING TO BE

                    TRANSPARENT WITH THE PUBLIC.  THIS IS NOT TRANSPARENT.  AND THEN LAST

                    MONTH, WHAT DID THEY DO?  THEY COME OUT WITH THEIR PLAN, THEY SAID

                    THE PATHWAY WE ARE ON WITH THE CLCPA IF NO CHANGES ARE MADE, GAS

                    PRICES FOR YOUR CONSTITUENTS, FOR YOUR SENIOR CITIZENS, ARE GOING TO

                    INCREASE 62 CENTS A GALLON.  NATURAL GAS PRICES ARE GOING TO INCREASE

                    80 PERCENT IF WE DON'T MAKE SOME CHANGES.  AND EVEN IF WE DID MAKE

                    THE CHANGES, THE GAS PRICES WOULD INCREASE 30-PLUS CENTS A GALLON AND

                    YOUR HOME HEATING COSTS WOULD INCREASE SIGNIFICANTLY, TOO.  LET'S TALK

                    ABOUT THAT.  IF WE WANT TO BE TRUE AND TRANSPARENT WITH CUSTOMERS -- I

                    DON'T HEAR MANY PEOPLE RUNNING AROUND TELLING YOUR CONSTITUENTS WHEN

                    WE TALK ABOUT MOVING DOWN THAT PATHWAY TO FULL ELECTRIFICATION, THAT

                    IT'S GOING TO COST THEM $35,000 TO CONVERT THEIR HOMES OVER, BECAUSE

                    THAT'S THE PATHWAY WE'RE HEADING DOWN WITH CLIMATE ACTION COUNCIL

                    AND THE LEGISLATURE.  WE'RE TAKING AWAY ENERGY CHOICE FOR CONSUMERS,

                    FOR HOW THEY HEAT THEIR HOMES, HOW THEY COOK THEIR FOOD, HOW THEY

                    POWER THEIR BUILDINGS.  AND I'M JUST -- - I'LL CONCLUDE, AGAIN, WITH

                    GOVERNOR HOCHUL, AND I -- I DON'T AGREE WITH GOVERNOR HOCHUL ON

                    MUCH.  I'M JUST GOING TO READ HER VETO AGAIN.  WHILE I'M IN FAVOR OF

                    INCREASING PUBLIC AWARENESS OF INFORMATION ON UTILITY BILLS -- AND SO

                    ARE WE, LET'S PUT THE GREEN COSTS IN THERE -- REQUIRING -- REQUIRING

                    UTILITIES TO PROVIDE THIS EXTREMELY SPECIFIC INFORMATION WOULD LEAD TO

                    COSTS TO RATEPAYERS THAT OUTWEIGH THE MARGINAL BENEFIT SUCH

                                         69



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    INFORMATION WOULD PROVIDE.  ADDITIONALLY, IT WOULD RESULT IN A

                    SIGNIFICANT ADMINISTRATIVE BURDEN FOR THE UTILITIES, PARTICULARLY THE

                    SMALLER MUNICIPAL UTILITIES, AND COULD BE COMPLICATED AND THEREFORE

                    DILUTE THIS INFORMATIONAL VALUE ON THE BILL ITSELF.  THEREFORE -- I'M JUST

                    READING THE VETO.  SO HOPEFULLY IF THE SENATE AND ASSEMBLY PASSES THIS

                    BILL AGAIN, SHE WILL VETO IT.  IF SHE TRULY WANTS TO BE TRANSPARENT, IF THIS

                    HOUSE TRULY WANTS TO BE TRANSPARENT, MAYBE WE'LL START SHOWING THE

                    CUSTOMER, THE CONSTITUENTS OF THIS STATE, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE, THE

                    COSTS OF THESE SO-CALLED GREEN POLICIES THAT YOU'RE MOVING FORWARD

                    WITH, AND IT'S NOT GREEN.  AND I WON'T GET INTO THAT; THAT'S A WHOLE OTHER

                    DISCUSSION.  SO WHY DON'T WE BE TRANSPARENT WITH THE PUBLIC, TALK TO

                    THEM ABOUT WITH THIS IS GOING TO COST THEM ON THE RATES, WHAT THIS IS

                    GOING TO COST THEM ON THEIR CONVERSION COSTS.

                                 SO AGAIN, I -- I RESPECT THE SPEAKER ON WHAT HE'S

                    TRYING TO DO ON THE TRANSPARENCY.  I DO THINK THAT WE COULD MAKE SOME

                    CHANGES ON THIS TO MAKE IT BETTER, BUT I DON'T THINK THIS -- IT'S TOO OVERLY

                    BROAD, IT'S GOING TO END UP COSTING RATEPAYERS ADDITIONAL COSTS AND I

                    DON'T THINK THAT'S WHAT WE -- THEY NEED AT THIS TIME -- POINT IN TIME

                    BECAUSE IT'S JUST -- THE COST TO THE RATEPAYER IS JUST GETTING WORSE AND

                    WORSE EACH YEAR WITH THE POLICIES THAT THIS HOUSE CONTINUES TO PUT IN

                    PLACE, AND THIS GOVERNOR.  THANK YOU.  FOR THAT REASON, MR. SPEAKER, I

                    WILL BE VOTING NO AND I SERIOUSLY URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER MCDONALD:  MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  WOULD

                                         70



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER MCDONALD:  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  YES, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER MCDONALD:  THE SPONSOR

                    YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE THE LANGUAGE OF THE BILL

                    REQUIRES THIS INFORMATION ON SPECIFIC LINE ITEMS WITH A COMPARISON

                    OVER A PRECEDING 52-WEEK PERIOD.  BUT MY UTILITY BILLS COME IN ON A

                    MONTHLY BASIS, NOT ON A WEEKLY BASIS.  HOW DO YOU ENVISION THAT A

                    UTILITY COMPANY WOULD SHOW A WEEKLY SPIKE, FOR EXAMPLE?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I TRUST THAT THE UTILITY COMPANIES THAT

                    TRACK ALL THAT SORT OF INFORMATION ON A MINUTE-TO-MINUTE BASIS ARE GOING

                    TO BE ABLE TO COMPILE THAT INFORMATION PROVIDED IN A EASILY ADJUSTABLE

                    MANNER ON A UTILITY BILL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  BUT DO YOU THEN ANTICIPATE THE

                    UTILITY COMPANIES WILL BE MEASURING USAGE ON A WEEKLY BASIS AS

                    OPPOSED TO A MONTHLY BASIS?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I DON'T EXPECT THAT AND, YOU KNOW, THE

                    LANGUAGE, AS IT SAYS THERE, IT'S -- IT'S THE HIGHEST MEASUREMENT IN THAT

                    52-WEEK PERIOD.  SO I'M NOT -- I'M NOT ANTICIPATING A BILL LOOKING LIKE

                    52 WEEKS, DAY TO DAY, HOW MUCH USAGE OF EVERY DAY.  I'M EXPECTING IT

                    TO LOOK SIMILAR TO WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE NOW, JUST WITH MORE INFORMATION

                    AS TO HOW CHARGES ARE -- ARE PASSED ON.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, THE OTHER POINT I NOTED IS THAT

                                         71



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    MANY OF MY UTILITY BILLS GO WITH AN ESTIMATED USAGE DURING A PARTICULAR

                    MONTH, BASED ON THE TEMPERATURE OR WHATEVER, AND THEY ACTUALLY MAY

                    ONLY DO A QUARTERLY READING.  WHAT -- ARE THEY GOING TO GIVE US

                    COMPARISONS BASED ON A PREVIOUS YEAR'S ESTIMATE, 12 MONTHS AGO, OR

                    ONLY FROM THE QUARTERLY READINGS IF IT'S READ QUARTERLY?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  WELL, YOU KNOW, HERE IT MENTIONS

                    DEMAND METERING, AND DEMAND METERING IS -- IS QUITE DIFFERENT.

                    DEMAND METERING LOOKS AT THE PEAK USAGE OF A -- OF A USER, AND IT --

                    AND IT MEASURES IT DIFFERENTLY.  BUT IF YOU'RE ASKING IF I ANTICIPATED

                    TAKING INTO ACCOUNT FOLKS THAT MIGHT HAVE, LIKE, PREDETERMINED SORT OF

                    ARRANGED PAYMENTS WHERE IT'S SORT OF A FIXED AMOUNT AND THEN THE

                    UTILITY COMPANY COMES BACK AFTERWARDS AND ASSESSES IT, THAT -- THAT

                    SHOULDN'T CHANGE AT ALL.  AND HOW THAT INFORMATION IS CAPTURED AND

                    PASSED ALONG IS JUST TO BE SEEN, AND -- AND THE COMMISSION IS GOING TO

                    DEEM WHATEVER INFORMATION THAT'S PROVIDED RELEVANT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, AS YOU KNOW, COMMERCIAL

                    CUSTOMERS PAY A DIFFERENT RATE, NOT ONLY BY THE DAY, BUT SOMETIMES BY

                    THE HOUR, RIGHT?  HOW IS IT THAT THE UTILITY COMPANY IS TO BREAK THAT

                    DOWN ON THIS BILL UNDER THIS -- ON THE UTILITY BILL BASED ON THIS STATUTORY

                    LANGUAGE THAT'S BEING PROPOSED?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  I -- I'D ONLY SAY THAT THE MECHANISM

                    THAT THE UTILITY COMPANY WILL USE CAN'T LOOK MUCH DIFFERENT FROM HOW

                    THEY'RE CAPTURING THE DATA CURRENTLY.  IT'S NOT INFORMATION THAT THEY DON'T

                    ALREADY HAVE.  IT'S -- IT'S UP TO THE UTILITY TO PRODUCE THAT INFORMATION IN

                    A FORMAT, LIKE I SAID, THAT'S -- THAT'S EASILY DIGEST -- DIGESTIBLE.

                                         72



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. GOODELL:  LAST, I KNOW THAT OFTENTIMES THE

                    UTILITY COMPANY WILL GO OFF OF AN ESTIMATED OR A CUSTOMER READING.

                    THEY ACTUALLY HAVE TO CALL A CUSTOMER AND SAY, TELL US WHAT YOUR UTILITY

                    -- YOUR METER SAYS.  ARE THEY THEN TO REPORT BACK TO THE CUSTOMER WHAT

                    THE HIGHEST CUSTOMER-REPORTED UTILITY READING WAS IN THE PREVIOUS 52

                    WEEKS?

                                 MR. RIVERA:  NO, IT WOULD BE THE BILLED AMOUNT.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE, THANK YOU.  THANK YOU FOR

                    YOUR COMMENTS.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 JUST A NOTE.  WHEN YOU COME TO COMMERCIAL

                    CUSTOMERS, THE ELECTRIC RATE IS AND CAN BE EXTRAORDINARILY COMPLEX.  I

                    WORKED WITH A COMPANY THAT ACTUALLY SHOWED A RACE -- IT WAS A RACE

                    TRACK COMPANY, AND SO WHEN THE QUARTZ LIGHTS WERE ON, CAN YOU

                    IMAGINE LIGHTING UP A ONE-MILE STRIP WITH QUARTZ LIGHTS BRIGHT ENOUGH

                    TO BE PICKED UP BY A CAMERA A HALF-MILE AWAY?  THAT UTILITY BILL WAS

                    ASTOUNDING FOR TWO MINUTES.  I MEAN, THE USAGE FOR TWO MINUTES WOULD

                    JUST MAKE YOUR HEAD SPIN, AND THEN ALL THE LIGHTS WENT OUT.  AND THAT --

                    THAT COMPANY PAID A DEMAND CHARGE FOR THE INFRASTRUCTURE, IT PAID A

                    CONSUMPTION CHARGE THAT WAS BASED ON THE DATE, THE TIME, THE AMOUNT.

                    I MEAN, IT WAS A COMPLEX BILL.  AND SO ON ITS SURFACE, AS MY COLLEAGUE

                    MENTIONED, IT SEEMS PRETTY STRAIGHTFORWARD.  TELL US WHAT THE RATE WAS,

                    HOW MUCH WE USED A YEAR AGO AND WHAT IT IS NOW, ALTHOUGH THAT'S NOT

                    ACTUALLY WHAT IT SAYS.  IT SAYS TELL US THE HIGHEST UTILIZATION IN THE LAST

                    52 WEEKS COMPARED TO THIS MONTHLY BILL.  WELL, FIRST OF ALL, UTILITY

                    COMPANIES DON'T MEASURE IT ON A WEEKLY BASIS.  SOMETIMES THEY DON'T

                                         73



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    MEASURE IT ON A MONTHLY BASIS.  OFTEN, THEY ONLY MEASURE IT ON A

                    QUARTERLY BASIS.  SO WE HAVE A STATUTORY REQUIREMENT REQUIRING UTILITY

                    COMPANIES TO REPORT THE HIGHEST USAGE ON A WEEKLY BASIS WHEN THEY

                    DON'T EVEN MEASURE IT.  AND WHAT'S THE CUSTOMER TO DO?  I MEAN, THE

                    CUSTOMER GETS THIS INFORMATION.  OKAY, SO 42 WEEKS AGO I HAD A SPIKE.

                    OKAY.  IT DIDN'T CHANGE MY BILL TODAY, IT DOESN'T CHANGE MY BILL FROM

                    42 WEEKS AGO.

                                 SO, YOU KNOW, I APPRECIATE THE SPONSOR'S DESIRE TO

                    HAVE MORE INFORMATION, BUT AS WRITTEN THIS IS NOT PRACTICAL BECAUSE IT

                    REQUIRES DISCLOSURE OF INFORMATION THAT UTILITY COMPANIES DON'T HAVE,

                    AND WE DON'T WANT THEM READING OUR METER WEEKLY.  FOR THAT REASON,

                    GOOD CONCEPT, NOT PRACTICAL IN OPERATION, SO I HAVE CONCERNS.  THANK

                    YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  GOOD INTENT,

                    CONCERNS ABOUT IMPLEMENTATION.  THE REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE IS

                    GENERALLY OPPOSED, BUT CERTAINLY, THERE WILL BE MEMBERS OF MY

                    CONFERENCE THAT WANT TO SUPPORT THIS BECAUSE OF THE GOOD INTENTIONS

                    THAT ARE BEHIND THIS BILL.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                         74



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS

                    CONSUMER-FRIENDLY PIECE OF LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE OTHERS

                    -- SOME OF US WHO WOULD LIKE TO BE AN EXCEPTION.  THEY SHOULD FEEL

                    FREE TO DO SO.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, MA'AM.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, IF WE COULD

                    -- AND COLLEAGUES, IF WE COULD NOW GO TO CALENDAR NO. 123 ON PAGE 14

                    BY MR. BRONSON.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  CERTAINLY.  PAGE 14,

                    CALENDAR NO. 123, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00358, CALENDAR NO.

                    123, BRONSON, SEAWRIGHT, OTIS.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE EXECUTIVE LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO REQUIRING THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN DEMOGRAPHIC

                    INFORMATION BY CERTAIN STATE AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. BRONSON.

                                         75



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. BRONSON:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS BILL WOULD

                    REQUIRE THE COLLECTION OF CERTAIN DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION BY STATE

                    AGENCIES, BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS.  IN PARTICULAR, IT WOULD REQUIRE THE

                    COLLECTION OF DATA RELATED TO INDIVIDUALS ON THE BASIS OF SEXUAL

                    ORIENTATION AS WELL AS GENDER EXPRESSION AND IDENTITY, AND IT ALSO HAS

                    AN ANNUAL REPORTING REQUIREMENT OF THAT DATA THAT'S COLLECTED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. -- EXCUSE ME.

                    MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BRONSON, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  YES I WILL, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  SO, THIS LANGUAGE REQUIRES THAT

                    EVERY STATE AGENCY, BOARD OR COMMISSION THAT COLLECTS ANY

                    DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION INVOLVING ANCESTRY OR ETHNIC USE A SELECTION

                    -- USE SEPARATE COLLECTION CATEGORIES FOR SEXUAL ORIENTATION AND GENDER

                    IDENTITY, CORRECT?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  YES.  SO IT MERELY ADDS TO THE

                    OTHER DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION THAT THESE AGENCIES ARE SEEKING,

                    AGENCIES AND COMMISSIONS ARE SEEKING, THAT THEY ADD THE

                    DEMOGRAPHICS REGARDING GENDER IDENTITY AND EXPRESSION, AS WELL AS

                    SEXUAL ORIENTATION.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, AS YOU KNOW, OVER TIME

                                         76



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT AND NUANCES IN GENDER IDENTITY AND

                    EXPRESSION.  AND SO WE NOW HAVE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, TRANSSEXUAL,

                    QUEER, QUESTIONING, PANSEXUAL, INNERSEXUAL, ANDROGYNUS, A-SEXUAL,

                    NONBINARY, AND THERE MAY BE OTHERS.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  COULD YOU GIVE THAT TO ME IN AN

                    ACRONYM, PLEASE?

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WELL, I -- I LOST TRACK.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  OKAY.  I HAVE, TOO, AND I'M A

                    MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND DO YOU -- BUT YOU ENVISION,

                    THEN, THAT THIS WOULD BE LIKE A FILL-IN-THE-BLANK, WHAT -- I MEAN, ARE YOU

                    CIS OR ARE YOU A-SEXUAL OR -- I MEAN, HOW WOULD YOU ENVISION IT?  OR

                    WOULD IT BE A CHECKLIST?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  SO, I WOULD ENVISION IT DONE

                    EXACTLY THE WAY OTHER DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS COLLECTED.  AND BY

                    THE WAY, IN 2014 THERE WAS A TASK FORCE THAT WAS CREATED IN COOPERATION

                    BETWEEN THE THEN-GOVERNOR AND SOME LGBTQ+ ORGANIZATIONS, AND A

                    NUMBER OF AGENCIES ARE ALREADY DOING THIS.  QUITE -- ACTUALLY, QUITE A

                    FEW OF THEM ARE ALREADY DOING IT; DOCS IS DOING IT, DOH, THE OFFICE

                    FOR AGING, OMH, OASAS, OTDA, OFFICE FOR [SIC] CHILDREN AND

                    FAMILY SERVICES AND OPWDD.  THIS WOULD DO A COUPLE OF THINGS.

                    NUMBER ONE, UNDER THAT TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION AND THEN THE

                    AGREEMENT WITH THE GOVERNOR, THE INFORMATION WAS SUPPOSED TO BE

                    COLLECTED AND THEN MADE IN A REPORT.  WE'VE NOT GOTTEN THE REPORTS.

                                         77



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THIS BILL WOULD REQUIRE THOSE REPORTS.  SECOND TO THAT IS THERE ARE

                    ADDITIONAL AGENCIES THAT SHOULD BE COLLECTING THIS INFORMATION.  AND, IN

                    FACT, THE TASK FORCE MET AGAIN IN 2019, THEY WERE SUPPOSED TO EXPAND

                    THE NUMBER OF AGENCIES.  THAT NEVER HAPPENED.  SO, AGENCIES THAT I --

                    ONE THAT COMES TO MIND WOULD BE THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR.  IT WOULD

                    BE VERY IMPORTANT TO KNOW WHAT'S HAPPENING WITHIN OUR COMMUNITY

                    REGARDING THE TYPE OF SERVICES, THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS

                    AND THINGS OF THAT NATURE THAT THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR ARE PROVIDING.

                    SO THAT'S WHY THIS -- THIS STATUTE IS NECESSARY.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I NOTE THAT THE -- THAT GOVERNOR

                    CUOMO VETOED THIS IN 2019.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  HE DID, BECAUSE HE USED AS THE

                    EXCUSE THAT HE HAD A TASK FORCE, AND -- AND INDEED, HE DID, AND INDEED,

                    THAT TASK FORCE HAD TAKEN STEPS FORWARD BUT IT HAS NOT COM -- COMPLETED

                    ITS WORK AND, THEREFORE, A STATUTORY REQUIREMENT IS NECESSARY.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND THEN I NOTE THAT GOVERNOR

                    HOCHUL ALSO VETOED IT LAST YEAR.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  WELL, THAT VETO MESSAGE WAS A

                    LITTLE BIT ABSURD BECAUSE IT TALKED ABOUT TASK FORCE -- TASK FORCES AND

                    COMMISSIONS AND THEM COSTING MONEY.  THIS BILL NEITHER CREATES A TASK

                    FORCE, NOR DOES IT COMMIT -- CREATE A COMMISSION.  SO WHY IT WAS

                    LUMPED IN WITH ALL THOSE OTHER BILLS -- 39 OF THEM, I BELIEVE, THAT WERE

                    VETOED -- IS BEYOND EXPLANATION.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  HAS THE BILL CHANGED ANY SINCE IT

                    WAS VETOED BY BOTH GOVERNOR CUOMO AND GOVERNOR HOCHUL?

                                         78



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. BRONSON:  IT -- IT'S CHANGED SLIGHTLY, BUT FOR

                    THE MOST PART IT'S THE SAME.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I SEE.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  SINCE THE VETO IN 2019 IT'S

                    CHANGED, BUT NOT SINCE 2022.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  NOW, IS AN INDIVIDUAL OBLIGATED TO

                    DISCLOSE THEIR SEXUAL ORIENTATION ON ANY STATE FORM?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  JUST LIKE ALL OTHER DEMOGRAPHIC

                    INFORMATION THAT'S COLLECTED BY THE STATE AND STATE AGENCIES, THIS WOULD

                    BE DONE ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE

                    LANGUAGE THAT SAYS THAT IT MUST BE VOLUNTARY?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  NO, NOR IS THERE ANYTHING IN THE

                    LANGUAGE OF THE OTHER DEMOGRAPHIC REQUIREMENTS THAT SAY IT HAS TO BE

                    VOLUNTARY.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  AND IS THERE ANY OBLIGATION IN THE

                    STATUTORY LANGUAGE THAT THE APPLICATION INDICATE THAT THIS AND OTHER

                    DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS VOLUNTARY?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  I'M SORRY, ASK THAT QUESTION AGAIN?

                                 MR. GOODELL:  CERTAINLY.  IS THERE ANY STATUTORY

                    LANGUAGE THAT'S BEING PROPOSED THAT WOULD REQUIRE THE FORMS THAT ASK

                    THIS INFORMATION TO ADVISE A PERSON WHO IS FILLING IT OUT THAT THAT

                    DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS VOLUNTARY?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  THAT'S NOT EXPRESSLY STATED IN THIS

                    -- IN THE PROPOSED LEGISLATION.

                                         79



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. GOODELL:  WHY IS THIS REQUESTED INFORMATION

                    LIMITED TO THOSE APPLICATIONS THAT ALSO REQUEST ANCESTRY OR ETHNIC

                    ORIGIN?

                                 MR. BRONSON:  THAT WAS THE MECHANISM IN THE

                    STATUTE TO CREATE THESE ADDITIONAL CATEGORIES.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I

                    APPRECIATE YOUR CLARIFICATION.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  TO BE HONEST WITH

                    YOU, I DON'T THINK A PERSON'S SEXUAL ORIENTATION IS RELEVANT TO ANYTHING.

                    I MEAN, I DON'T THINK WHETHER YOU'RE APPLYING FOR A JOB OR A PERMIT OR

                    PUBLIC BENEFITS FROM THE STATE OF NEW YORK, YOUR SEXUAL ORIENTATION

                    SHOULD NOT MAKE ANY DIFFERENCE IN HOW YOUR APPLICATION IS TREATED,

                    PROCESSED, APPROVED, DENIED OR ANYTHING ELSE.  I THINK IT'S ABSOLUTELY

                    NONE OF THE BUSINESS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK WHETHER YOU'RE STRAIGHT,

                    GAY, HOMOSEXUAL, HETEROSEXUAL, A-SEXUAL OR ANYTHING ELSE.  WHO YOU

                    LIKE OR DON'T LIKE OR WHETHER YOU LIKE EVERYONE OR NO ONE SHOULD MAKE

                    ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE IN ANY FORMAL TRANSACTION WITH THE STATE OF

                    NEW YORK.  WE SHOULD TREAT EVERY INDIVIDUAL AS A CHILD OF GOD WITH

                    ALL THE SAME RIGHTS, PRIVILEGES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

                                 SO I AM DEEPLY TROUBLED WHEN WE PUT ON APPLICATIONS,

                    WHAT IS YOUR SEXUAL ORIENTATION?  LIKE IT MEANS SOMETHING, LIKE IT'S

                                         80



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    RELEVANT.  AND THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO DO NOT WANT TO TELL YOU, WHO THINK

                    IT'S NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS.  YET WE DON'T PUT ON THE APPLICATION BY LAW

                    THAT THAT INFORMATION IS VOLUNTARILY.  SO YOU'RE SUBMITTING AN

                    APPLICATION FOR WELFARE BENEFITS AND THEY ASK YOU THAT AND YOU DON'T

                    KNOW IT'S VOLUNTARY?  WHY ARE WE ASKING FOR VERY SENSITIVE

                    INFORMATION - SENSITIVE FOR SOME PEOPLE - THAT SHOULD BE LEGALLY

                    IRRELEVANT?  NOW, THERE MAY BE SOME OF YOU, MYSELF INCLUDED, WHO

                    WILL FREELY TELL YOU WHO THEY LOVE AND WHO THEY DON'T LOVE, WHO THEY'RE

                    ATTRACTED TO OR NOT.  IF THERE ARE OTHERS, I DON'T THINK IT'S OUR BUSINESS

                    AND I WOULD AGREE WITH THEM.  WE SHOULD TREAT EVERYONE WITH DIGNITY

                    AND RESPECT, AND WE SHOULD NOT PRY INTO THEIR PERSONAL PREFERENCES AS IT

                    RELATES TO WHO THEY ARE SEXUALLY ATTRACTED TO OR WHAT GENDER IDENTITY OR

                    EXPRESSION THEY MIGHT HAVE BECAUSE THAT INQUIRY SHOULD BE IRRELEVANT

                    TO ANY STATE AGENCY.

                                 FOR THAT REASON, I RECOMMEND AGAINST THIS BILL.  THANK

                    YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  AS HAS BEEN MENTIONED, WE HAVE SEEN THIS BILL BEFORE.  AND

                    A PART OF THE REASON WHY WE SAW IT IN THE VERY BEGINNING IS BECAUSE IN

                    SPITE OF THE FACT THAT EVERYBODY SHOULD BE TREATED AS IF THEY'RE A CHILD

                    OF GOD, WITHOUT ANY RESPECT TO THEIR SEXUAL ORIENTATION, THEIR COLOR OR

                    THEIR GENDER, THE FACT IS THIS IS AMERICA, THIS IS NEW YORK STATE, AND

                    THERE ARE PEOPLE WHO WORK WITHIN OUR SYSTEMS THAT ARE BIAS [SIC].

                                         81



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    THEY MIGHT NOT WANT TO ADMIT THAT THEY'RE BIAS [SIC], BUT THEY ARE.  AND

                    BECAUSE THERE ARE -- VERY OFTEN THESE EXACT SAME PEOPLE WHO SHOULD BE

                    TREATED AS IF THEY'RE A CHILD OF GOD DO NOT GET THE SAME OPPORTUNITIES.

                    THERE IS NO WAY FOR US TO TELL THAT IF WE DON'T BEGIN TO KEEP THE DATA.

                    AND SO WE HAVE TO KEEP THE DATA, DATA IS IMPORTANT.

                                 AND SO I COMMEND THE SPONSOR OF THIS LEGISLATION.  I

                    COMMENDED HIM WHEN HE FIRST PUT IT OUT, AND IN SPITE OF TWO

                    GOVERNORS THAT HAD VETOED IT, I DISAGREE WITH THEM AND I AGREE WITH

                    HIM.  THIS IS THE RIGHT THING TO BE DOING.  WE NEED TO COLLECT DATA THAT'S

                    IMPORTANT TO -- IMPARTING TO US WHAT OUR NEXT STEP SHOULD BE AS WE

                    RELATE TO PEOPLE.  RIGHT NOW WE JUST WANT TO BE IN A STATE OF DENIAL.

                    BUT THE REAL, HARD FACTS, WE CAN'T BE IN A STATE OF DENIAL ANY LONGER.

                    THIS IS A GOOD BILL, WE SHOULD ALL BE SUPPORTING IT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 120TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  THE REPUBLICAN

                    PARTY IS GENERALLY OPPOSED, THE CONFERENCE, ANYWAY.  THOSE WHO

                    SUPPORT IT ARE CERTAINLY ENCOURAGED TO VOTE IN FAVOR HERE ON THE FLOOR.

                    THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                         82



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MR. SPEAKER, THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GENERALLY GOING TO BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF

                    PROGRESSIVE LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY SOME OF US WHO WOULD

                    DENY -- WOULD LIKE TO BE AN EXCEPTION.  THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO VOTE AT

                    THEIR DESKS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. BRONSON TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. BRONSON:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  I'D LIKE TO TAKE

                    THIS MOMENT TO EXPLAIN HOW IMPORTANT THIS BILL IS.  YOU KNOW, SOME OF

                    YOU HAVE HEARD THAT I GOVERN BY A MANTRA AND ACTUALLY LIVE BY A

                    MANTRA, AND THAT IS NO MATTER WHO YOU ARE, WHAT YOU LOOK LIKE, WHERE

                    YOU COME FROM, WHAT YOUR ABILITIES, WHO YOU LOVE OR HOW YOU IDENTIFY,

                    WE ALL HAVE DIGNITY.  AND WITH THAT DIGNITY WE DESERVE JUSTICE, RESPECT,

                    AND AN OPPORTUNITY TO SUCCEED.  THIS BILL IS ABOUT MAKING DECISIONS FOR

                    OPPORTUNITIES.  WE COLLECT DEMOGRAPHIC INFORMATION ON ALL KINDS OF

                    ISSUES; WHETHER OR NOT SOMEONE IDENTIFIES AS BEING A PERSON OF COLOR,

                    ARE THEY A MEMBER OF THE LATINX COMMUNITY.  AND THAT DATA IS

                    TRANSFERRED INTO FUNDING AND POLICY DECISIONS WE MAKE AS THE STATE.  IF

                    YOU'RE NOT COUNTED, YOU'RE INVISIBLE.  IN MY COMMUNITY, THE LGBTQ+

                    COMMUNITY, VISIBILITY IS VERY IMPORTANT.  AND SO WE'RE ASKING TO BE

                    COUNTED SO WHEN THE STATE MAKES A DECISION IN ITS BUDGET OR MAKES A

                    POLICY DECISION, IT KNOWS WHICH CITIZENS THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT AND

                    MAKING THESE DECISIONS ABOUT.  IT'S IMPORTANT THAT EVERY COMMUNITY IS

                                         83



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    COUNTED.  THIS BILL IS ABOUT BEING COUNTED, IT'S ABOUT BEING VISIBLE, AND

                    IT'S ABOUT MAKING SURE THAT THAT DATA GETS RECORDED SO WE CAN MAKE THE

                    MOST APPROPRIATE DECISIONS ABOUT PROGRAMS FOR THE LGBTQ+

                    COMMUNITY.

                                 THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. BRONSON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. ANGELINO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER, TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.  IF WE'RE GOING TO DIG DOWN THIS DEEP INTO THESE

                    PEOPLE'S PERSONAL PREFERENCES, PERHAPS WE SHOULD HAVE GONE A STEP

                    FURTHER AND INCLUDED THE POLITICAL PARTY THAT SOMEBODY MIGHT BELONG

                    TO.  BECAUSE OF THE INITIAL AFTER MY NAME, IN MANY OF THE PROCEEDINGS

                    HERE I'VE EXPERIENCED BIAS, AS HAVE ALL OF MY COLLEAGUES.

                                 I'LL BE VOTING NO ON THIS AND I ENCOURAGE MY

                    COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ANGELINO IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 19, CALENDAR NO. 168, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04386, CALENDAR NO.

                    168, ZEBROWSKI, SIMON, L. ROSENTHAL, SANTABARBARA, EACHUS.  AN ACT

                    TO AMEND THE PUBLIC AUTHORITIES LAW, IN RELATION TO DIRECTING THE NEW

                                         84



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TO PREPARE A

                    REPORT REGARDING THE REPLACEMENT OF DECOMMISSIONED OR DORMANT

                    ELECTRIC-GENERATING SITES WITH RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND

                    ENERGY STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  AN EXPLANATION IS

                    REQUESTED, MR. ZEBROWSKI.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  THANKS, MR. SPEAKER.  THIS BILL

                    WOULD REQUIRE THE NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

                    AUTHORITY, NYSERDA, TO PREPARE A REPORT IDENTIFYING

                    DECOMMISSIONED OR DORMANT ELECTRIC-GENERATING FACILITIES THAT ARE

                    SUITABLE FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND ENERGY STORAGE

                    OPPORTUNITIES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MR. SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ZEBROWSKI, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YES, I'LL YIELD.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS,

                    SIR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SORRY EVERYBODY, I'M BACK.

                    MR. ZEBROWSKI, I KNOW WHEN WE -- WE TALKED ABOUT THIS BILL IN THE

                    PAST, AND SO -- WE HAD A LOT OF YES VOTES ON OUR SIDE, I WOULD EXPECT

                    SOME.  I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF IT, BUT I DO HAVE SOME QUESTIONS FOR

                                         85



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    YOU.  FIRST OF ALL, THE GOVERNOR VETOED THIS BILL LAST YEAR, RIGHT?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND SHE CITED -- IT WAS WITH A

                    WHOLE LIST OF VETOES SAYING THE REASON WE'RE VETOING THE BILL IS BECAUSE

                    IT SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET, CORRECT?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND SO, WAS THERE ANY MONEY

                    INCLUDED IN THE BUDGET, HOW MUCH, AND WHERE -- WHERE IS IT?

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION OF

                    PUTTING ASIDE SOME MONEY FOR THE STUDY BILLS WE PASSED.  I DON'T KNOW

                    IF IT WAS INCLUDED IN THE FINAL BUDGET.  WE THINK GIVEN SOME OF THE

                    ACTIONS OF THE LEGISLATURE, SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT, QUITE FRANKLY,

                    DECADES IN THE MAKING, NOT JUST NEW, RELATING TO DECOMMISSIONED

                    ELECTRIC-GENERATING FACILITIES, ONE IN MY OWN DISTRICT, THAT THIS IS

                    NECESSARY AND WILL ACTUALLY SAVE MONEY.  SO I DON'T THINK ALL THOSE BILLS

                    SHOULD HAVE BEEN PUT INTO ONE BUCKET BY THE GOVERNOR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  SO YOU'RE NOT SURE IF

                    THERE'S MONEY IN THE BUDGET TO DO THIS OR...

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  THERE'S DEFINITELY NOT A LINE IN

                    THE BUDGET YOU'LL FIND RELATED TO THIS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  SO -- SO WE BASICALLY

                    RISK, IF WE PASS THIS, HAVE THE SAME EXPLANATION AND DOING THIS ALL OVER

                    AGAIN NEXT YEAR, POSSIBLY?  IT'S POSSIBLE.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  WELL, I INTEND ON BEING VERY

                                         86



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    CONVINCING TO THE GOVERNOR THIS TIME AROUND.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I'M SURE YOU WILL, I'M SURE YOU

                    WILL.  THE QUESTION ON -- WITH NYSERDA, DOESN'T NYSERDA ALREADY

                    HAVE STATUTORY AUTHORITY UNDER THEIR MISSION TO DO RESEARCH AND

                    ANALYSIS AND DIDN'T -- DON'T WE ALL -- ALREADY HAVE, ACTUALLY, THE BUILD-

                    READY PROGRAM THAT TALKS ABOUT HOW TO LOOK AT DIFFERENT SITES FOR

                    DEVELOPMENT, INCLUDING ABANDONED COMMERCIAL SITES OR DORMANT

                    ELECTRIC-GENERATING SITES?  SO IT'S ALREADY IN THEIR MISSION THAT THEY CAN

                    DO THIS ALREADY.  WHY DO WE NEED THIS LEGISLATION TO DO -- TO -- TO MOVE

                    FORWARD WITH THIS IF THEY CAN DO IT ALREADY AND RISK -- AND LET IT WORK

                    OUT OF THEIR OPERATING BUDGET, BECAUSE WE KNOW THEY'RE OFF THE BOOKS.

                    THEY'RE NOT BEING FUNDED THROUGH THE LEGISLATURE, SO WHY NOT LET THEM

                    WORK OUT OF THEIR BUDGET AND DEAL WITH THIS IF THIS IS WHAT, YOU KNOW,

                    THE GOAL OF THE MAJORITY IS TO DO?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YEAH, BECAUSE THEY HAVEN'T.  I

                    FIRST GOT INTO THIS ISSUE WHEN A -- TWO POWER PLANTS IN MY DISTRICT -- IN

                    ROCKLAND, I SHOULD SAY, ONE IS IN AN ADJOINING DISTRICT.  ONE WAS

                    LEVELED COMPLETELY AND -- AND THERE'S NOTHING GOING ON THERE, AND ONE

                    WAS SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCED TO A PEAKER PLANT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  AND IN AN ATTEMPT -- AND THAT'S

                    HAD SIGNIFICANT FINANCIAL RAMIFICATIONS ON THE COMMUNITY, FOLKS IN THE

                    AREA, AND IN ATTEMPTING TO MITIGATE THOSE RAMIFICATIONS WE DRAFTED THIS

                    BILL.  TO ME, IT'S FAIRLY OBVIOUS.  I WOULD, YOU KNOW, HAVE HOPED

                    NYSERDA WOULD HAVE DONE IT FOR A VARIETY OF REASONS; ONE, THE

                                         87



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    BENEFICIAL ECONOMIC ASPECTS TO THE COMMUNITY, WHICH --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  -- IN ALL HONESTY, WAS ONE OF THE

                    MAIN REASONS I FIRST DRAFTED THE BILL.  BUT IN ADDITION, AS WE ATTEMPT TO

                    BRING INCREASED GENERATION, INCREASED TRANSMISSION AS WE DEAL WITH THE

                    CHANGING ENERGY CLIMATE, I WOULD THINK THESE SITES ARE -- COULD BE

                    REALLY ADVANTAGEOUS TO THAT EFFORT, RIGHT?

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  THEY'RE ALREADY HOOKED INTO OUR

                    TRANSMISSION LINES.  SO WHILE THEY MAY BE ABLE TO DO THIS, THEY HAVEN'T,

                    SO THAT'S WHAT WE DO SOMETIMES IN THE LEGISLATURE, STATE AGENCIES.  WE

                    SAY PLEASE GO DO THIS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  I -- I CAN UNDERSTAND

                    THAT AND RESPECT THAT.  I DO HAVE A QUESTION, YOU KNOW, BECAUSE A LOT OF

                    TIMES WE SEE NATURAL GAS POWER PLANTS NOT BEING RENEWED THEIR

                    PERMITS, WE SEE NATURAL GAS POWER PLANTS GET DENIED PERMITS AND THEN,

                    OBVIOUSLY, YOU KNOW, THIS IS ABOUT DORMANT PLANTS.  BUT DO YOU HAVE

                    ANY CONCERN ON YOUR SIDE OF THE AISLE, HAVE ANY CONCERN ABOUT THE

                    REPLACEMENT OF RELIABLE GENERATION LIKE NATURAL GAS WITH INTERMITTENT,

                    UNRELIABLE GENERATION LIKE WIND AND SOLAR?  I MEAN, I KNOW THAT'S -- WE

                    WERE TRYING TO DO, MOVING -- ISN'T THERE ANY CONCERN ON THAT SIDE OF THE

                    AISLE RELATIVE TO WHEN WE TAKE THESE PLANTS OFFLINE THAT ARE RELIABLE

                    BASELOAD GENERATION AND REPLACE THEM WITH INTERMITTENT LIKE WIND AND

                    SOLAR?  ISN'T THERE ANY CONCERN ABOUT THE RELIABILITY OF THE GRID TO MEET

                    THE MANDATES THAT WERE OUT THERE?

                                         88



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  THE -- THE QUESTION REALLY ISN'T

                    GERMANE TO THIS BILL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YOU'RE CERTAINLY, YOU KNOW, FREE

                    TO TALK ON THE BILL WITH IT --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY, I WILL.

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI: --BECAUSE I WOULD SAY WITH --

                    WITH THIS BILL, IT REALLY DOESN'T ENCOURAGE OR DECOMMISSION ANYBODY.  IT

                    BASICALLY SAYS FOR THOSE THAT ARE DECOMMISSIONED, WE SHOULD BE

                    LOOKING AT THOSE FIRST TO SEE IF THEY ARE READY TO BE SET UP WITH THIS TYPE

                    OF RENEWABLE ENERGY THAT COULD BENEFIT THE COMMUNITIES, BENEFIT THE

                    OVERALL GRID, REALLY BE PERFECTLY SITUATED TO TAKE ON RENEWABLE ENERGY

                    PRODUCTS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I -- AND I AGREE WITH YOU

                    ON THAT, MR. ZEBROWSKI.  THERE'S SOME QUESTIONS, I JUST -- JUST IN TOPIC

                    IN GENERAL SO I KIND OF GO A LITTLE BIT.  JUST I MEAN, A PART OF THIS IS TO

                    LOOK FOR ENERGY STORAGE, AS WELL, RIGHT?  YOU KNOW, TO DEVELOP ENERGY

                    STORAGE, RIGHT?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  DO WE KNOW RIGHT NOW WHAT

                    PERCENTAGE -- WHAT -- HOW MUCH ENERGY STORAGE WE CURRENTLY HAVE IN

                    NEW YORK STATE, LIKE, AS FAR AS CAPACITY AND NUMBER OF GIGAWATTS?  DO

                    WE HAVE ANY IDEA ON THAT RIGHT NOW?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  I DON'T HAVE THAT INFORMATION

                    OFFHAND.

                                         89



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THAT'S -- THAT'S FINE.  BUT

                    OBVIOUSLY, THIS BILL IS TO HOPE TO HELP MEET THAT GOAL THAT NEEDS TO BE

                    ADDRESSED, RIGHT?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YEAH.  CERTAINLY, IF THESE SITES

                    COULD BE ADVANTAGEOUS TO THAT AS WELL, THEN IT SHOULD BE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    ZEBROWSKI.

                                 MR. SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  LISTEN, TO MY COLLEAGUES ON

                    BOTH SIDES, THIS ISN'T A BAD BILL.  I -- I'M GOING TO BE VOTING NO, BUT I'M

                    -- I EXPECT A NUMBER OF MY COLLEAGUES MAY BE SUPPORTING THIS

                    LEGISLATION.  MY CONCERN ABOUT THIS IS FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS.

                    NUMBER ONE, THE GOVERNOR VETOED THE BILL LAST YEAR BECAUSE SHE SAID

                    THERE WAS NO MONEY IN IT.  THAT HAPPENS OVER AND OVER AGAIN, SO

                    THERE'S -- AND SHE SAID IT NEEDS TO BE PUT IN THE BUDGET.  WE PASSED THE

                    BUDGET, THERE'S NO MONEY IN THE BUDGET TO DO IT, SO IT'S GOING TO BE KIND

                    OF A -- A VICIOUS CIRCLE, I THINK, FROM THAT PERSPECTIVE.  THE GOAL AND

                    THE INTENT I THINK IS -- IS LAUDABLE.  NYSERDA ALREADY HAS THE MISSION

                    TO DO IT.  NEW YORK STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

                    AUTHORITY, THEY HAVE THE AUTHORITY IN THEIR MISSION STATEMENT, THEY

                    HAVE THE FUNDS TO DO IT.  WE DON'T NEED TO HAVE STATE FUNDS IN THE

                    BUDGET TO DO IT, LET THE NYSERDA DO IT.  I MEAN, THEY SHOULD BE ABLE

                    TO COMPEL.  WE CAN PUT SOME PRESSURE ON THEM, JUST LIKE I KNOW YOU'RE

                                         90



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    GOING TO PUT PRESSURE ON THE GOVERNOR TO SIGN IT.  PUT SOME PRESSURE ON

                    NYSERDA MAYBE AND LET'S DO IT IN THEIR BUDGET.  BECAUSE IT MAKES

                    SENSE, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU HAVE DECOMMISSIONED PLANTS THAT YOU

                    WANT TO IDENTIFY THEM AND CLEAN THEM UP AND GET THEM BACK ON THE TAX

                    ROLL, AND IT DOES MAKE SENSE FROM A PERSPECTIVE OF CONNECTING TO THE

                    GRID.  BUT I DO HAVE A BIGGER ARGUMENT WITH THIS, I THINK, FROM MY

                    PERSPECTIVE, IS THIS PUSH TO GET RELIABLE GENERATION OFF THE SYSTEM.  I

                    MEAN, WHEN I SEE NATURAL GAS POWER PLANTS THAT AREN'T HAVING THEIR

                    PERMITS RENEWED, WHEN I SEE NATURAL GAS POWER PLANTS APPLYING FOR A

                    PERMIT AND BEING DENIED BECAUSE, QUOTE, UNQUOTE, IT DOESN'T MEET OUR

                    CLIMATE GOALS.  THIS IS VERY CONCERNING TO ME BECAUSE, AGAIN, JUST LAST

                    MONTH, COMMISSIONER SEGGOS AND PRESIDENT HARRIS, THE CLIMATE

                    ACTION COUNCIL CO-CHAIRS, ARCHITECTS OF THE DRAFT SCOPING PLAN, SAID IF

                    WE TAKE NO ACTION, IT'S GOING TO INCREASE COSTS AT THE PUMP FOR ALL OF US,

                    FOR OUR CONSUMERS, FOR OUR SENIOR CITIZENS, OUR CONSTITUENTS, OUR

                    FAMILIES, 62 CENTS A GALLON OF GAS.  DO THEY REALLY NEED THAT NOW?  THAT

                    CONCERNS ME.  DO WE NEED HOME HEATING COSTS TO INCREASE FOR NATURAL

                    GAS 80 PERCENT?  I MEAN, THAT'S A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT.  THAT'S IN

                    NYSERDA'S STUDY.  THAT'S -- YOU CAN'T -- IT'S IN PAPER, BLACK AND

                    WHITE.  THAT IS A CONCERN TO ME.  AND I THINK, LIKE I SAID, NYSERDA

                    CAN ALREADY DO THIS.  AND I THINK I JUST GET CONCERNED WHEN WE'RE

                    CONTINUING TO LOOK TO REPLACE RELIABLE ENERGY OFF THE GRID, AND COME

                    2040, THE NYISO, WHICH IS TASKED WITH MAKING SURE THE LIGHTS STAY ON,

                    THE HEAT STAYS ON AND MAKING SURE THE GRID RUNS, SAYS WE NEED 27 TO 45

                    GIGAWATTS OF DISPATCHABLE EMISSION-FREE RESOURCES BY 2040.

                                         91



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    DISPATCHABLE MEANS 24/7, LIKE A BASELOAD LIKE A NUCLEAR, LIKE NATURAL

                    GAS.  WIND AND SOLAR IS NOT DISPATCHABLE, SO THAT DOESN'T COUNT.

                    GRANTED WE NEED WIND AND SOLAR TO MEET THE MASSIVE BUILD-OUT THAT'S

                    GOING TO BE REQUIRED TO IMPLEMENT THE -- THE GREEN NEW DEAL FOR NEW

                    YORK.  BUT I HAVE VERY STRONG CONCERNS ABOUT THE DISPATCHABLE

                    EMISSION.  TWENTY-SEVEN TO 45 GIGAWATTS IS A LOT.  SO WHAT'S THE

                    TECHNOLOGY?  IT DOESN'T EXIST.  THERE IS NO TECHNOLOGY OUT THERE THAT IS

                    DISPATCHABLE EMISSION-FREE RESOURCES TO MEET THIS OUTLOOK.  SO TELL ME,

                    WHY IS THE DEC NOT APPROVING PERMITS FOR RENEWABLE -- OUR NATURAL GAS

                    POWER PLANTS?  WHY ARE THEY NOT APPROVING PERMITS FOR NEW NATURAL

                    GAS POWER PLANTS IF WE WANT TO HAVE A RELIABLE GRID?  EVEN NYISO

                    ALREADY SAID THE MARGIN OF OUR -- OUR -- OUR -- OF OUR EXTRA CAPACITY IS

                    GOING TO BE DOWN TO 100 MEGAWATTS AND -- WITHIN YEAR A YEAR OR TWO,

                    ESPECIALLY IN NEW YORK CITY.  THAT IS NOT A GOOD MARGIN TO HAVE.  THE

                    RELIABLE (INAUDIBLE) IN OUR GRID IS ALREADY THERE, AND WE'RE GOING TO BE

                    ADVANCING THE GREEN NEW DEAL, THE ELECTRIC VEHICLES.  AND OH, BY THE

                    WAY, CALIFORNIA, WHO'S ADVANCING THIS - I KNOW WE COMPETE WITH THEM

                    ALL THE TIME ON THESE GREEN POLICIES - YOU KNOW, THEY TOLD THEIR

                    CITIZENS, OH, PLEASE DON'T CHARGE YOUR ELECTRIC VEHICLES OVERNIGHT

                    BECAUSE WE DON'T WANT A BLACKOUT.  THAT'S BRILLIANT ENERGY POLICY.

                    MUST MAKE US ALL FEEL GOOD.

                                 BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS THE ENERGY POLICY THAT

                    CONTINUES TO BE PUSHED AND IMPLEMENTED IN THIS STATE, I HAVE GRAVE

                    CONCERNS ABOUT.  COST AND AFFORDABILITY AND RELIABILITY HAS NEVER BEEN A

                    PART OF THIS DISCUSSION OR EQUATION IN THIS HOUSE AND THIS MAJORITY, AND

                                         92



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    CERTAINLY NOT BY THIS EXECUTIVE.  YOU CAN SEND OUT A PRESS RELEASE ON

                    DOING IT, BUT WHEN THE POLICIES YOU'RE PUTTING IN PLACE ARE THE ONES THAT

                    DRIVE UP UTILITY BILLS, ARE GOING TO DRIVE THINGS UP FOR OTHERS IS -- IS A

                    CONCERN.  WE'RE TAKING AWAY -- IN THE BUDGET WE PASSED, WE'RE TAKING

                    AWAY CONSUMER CHOICE ON HOW THEY WANT TO HEAT THEIR HOMES, HOW

                    THEY WANT TO COOK THEIR FOOD, AND HOW THEY WANT TO POWER THEIR

                    BUILDINGS.  IT'S GOING TO BE UNSUSTAINABLE FOR THE GRID, BECAUSE WE'RE

                    LOOKING AT A MASSIVE BUILD-OUT THAT WE NEED TO TRIPLE OUR GENERATING

                    CAPACITY RIGHT NOW FROM 41 GIGA -- GIGAWATTS TO 120 GIGAWATTS.  UN --

                    INCREDIBLE BUILD-OUT.  THIS IS GOING TO LEAD REALLY, QUITE FRANKLY, LEAD TO

                    POTENTIAL BLACKOUTS, IT'S GOING TO INCREASE UTILITY COSTS, CONSTRUCTION

                    COSTS, HOUSING COSTS.  CERTAINLY, HOME AND RETROFIT AND BUSINESS

                    CONVERSION COSTS TO RETROFIT THEIR HOMES AND BUILDINGS, AND WILL

                    JEOPARDIZE THE RELIABILITY OF THE GRID.  AND IT'S GOING TO CONTINUE TO LEAD

                    TO THE EXODUS OF MORE AND MORE NEW YORK FAMILIES, FARMERS AND

                    BUSINESSES LEAVING THIS STATE.  AND JUST LAST MONTH -- JUST LAST WEEK

                    NYSEG -- NATIONAL GRID SAID THAT THEIR ENERGY BILLS ARE INCREASING

                    17 PERCENT BECAUSE OF THE CLIMATE POLICIES THAT ARE BEING ADVOCATED IN

                    THIS STATE.  AND I WILL ASSURE YOU, BUSINESSES, IF YOU TALK TO THEM, WHEN

                    YOU TALK ABOUT ENERGY POLICY THEY CARE ABOUT TWO THINGS:  AFFORDABILITY

                    AND RELIABILITY.  AND I'LL TELL YOU, IF THEY'RE NOT GIVEN AFFORDABILITY AND

                    RELIABILITY IN NEW YORK STATE, THEY'RE GOING TO GO SOMEPLACE ELSE.

                    THEY'RE GOING TO GO TO PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO, TENNESSEE.  THEY'RE GOING

                    TO GO SOMEPLACE ELSE WHERE THEY CAN GET IT.  AND I KNOW THIS IS ALL IN

                    THE FIGHT TO -- TO BATTLE CLIMATE CHANGE, THAT WE'RE GOING TO DO OUR PART.

                                         93



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    NEW YORK ALREADY DOES ITS PART.  WE DO HAVE -- WE'VE REDUCED CARBON

                    EMISSIONS SIGNIFICANTLY, THANKS IN PART TO NATURAL GAS, QUITE FRANKLY.

                    AND WE AREN'T GOING TO MAKE ANY IMPACT IN CLIMATE CHANGE AND OUR

                    GLOBAL EMISSIONS WHEN NEW YORK CONTRIBUTES JUST 0.4 PERCENT OF TOTAL

                    GLOBAL EMISSIONS, .4.  CHINA CONTRIBUTES 29 PERCENT, HAS 1,000 COAL

                    PLANTS AND BUILDING MORE; IN FACT, THEY ANNOUNCED EARLIER THIS YEAR

                    THEY'RE GOING TO EXPAND THEIR COAL CAPACITY BY 70 GIGAWATTS OVER THE

                    NEXT YEAR.  DO WE REALLY THINK THEY'RE GOING TO HELP US MEET OUR CLEAN

                    ENERGY GOALS?  OF COURSE NOT.  AND IF YOU WANT TO TACK INDIA AND CHINA

                    -- INDIA AND RUSSIA ON TOP OF IT, THOSE THREE CONTRIBUTE 40 PERCENT OF

                    THE GLOBAL EMISSIONS.

                                 AND I CAN GO THROUGH A WHOLE HOST OF OTHER ISSUES,

                    BUT I'LL DROP -- DROP DOWN TO THE ENERGY SECURITY.  WE'RE TURNING OUR

                    WHOLE ENERGY SECURITY POLICY IN THIS STATE OVER TO CHINA.  YOU CAN'T

                    ARGUE AGAINST IT, IT'S A MATTER OF FACT.  NUMBER ONE, WHY?  BECAUSE 80

                    PERCENT OF THE SOLAR IS MANUFACTURED, MADE AND PROCESSED IN CHINA AND

                    THEN THEY SELL IT TO US.  SO THEY -- WE ARE AT THEIR BEHEST.  AND ALSO, THE

                    ELEMENTS, THE COBALT, THE LITHIUM, THE CADMIUM, THE NICKEL, ALL THOSE

                    ELEMENTS THAT YOU NEED TO PRODUCE AN ELECTRIC -- A BATTERY TO POWER THE

                    ELECTRIC VEHICLE, THE ELECTRIC VEHICLE MANDATE THAT WE'RE ALL PUSHING FOR,

                    YOU'RE ALL PUSHING FOR AND THIS GOVERNOR IS PUSHING FORWARD THAT IT'S

                    GREAT FOR THE ENVIRONMENT.  CHINA CONTROLS 87 PERCENT OF THE PROCESSING

                    OF THAT MARKET.  SO THEY CONTROL 80 PERCENT OF THE SOLAR MARKET, 87-PLUS

                    PERCENT OF THE RARE EARTH AND THE MINERALS AND ELEMENTS TO PRODUCE THE

                    -- THE BATTERIES.  WE'RE TOTALLY TURNING OUR ENERGY SECURITY POLICY OVER

                                         94



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    TO CHINA.  THIS IS NOT SOUND ENERGY SECURITY POLICY.  WE SHOULD BE

                    DIVERSIFYING OUR ENERGY PORTFOLIO.  JUST LIKE YOU DON'T PUT ALL YOUR -- WE

                    SHOULD HAVE FUEL DIVERSITY, NOT JUST FULL ELECTRIFICATION.  THINK ABOUT IT,

                    YOUR 401(K), YOU DON'T PUT IT ALL IN CASH, STOCKS AND BONDS, YOU

                    DIVERSIFY IT TO PROTECT IT, TO MAKE IT RESILIENT.  WE SHOULD BE DOING THE

                    SAME THING WITH OUR ENERGY PORTFOLIO.  YES, WE SHOULD HAVE WIND,

                    SOLAR AND HYDRO, BUT WE ABSOLUTELY NEED NUCLEAR AND WE SHOULD BE

                    USING NATURAL GAS.  NATURAL GAS HAS REDUCED CARBON EMISSIONS, AND IT'S

                    RELIABLE BASELOAD.  THAT'S THE THING WE SHOULD BE LOOKING AT.

                                 SO FOR THESE CONCERNS I'M GOING TO BE VOTING NO.  I

                    KNOW MANY PEOPLE MIGHT VOTE YES, BECAUSE IT'S NOT A BAD BILL.  BUT IT'S

                    MY CONCERN ABOUT THE OVERALL ENERGY POLICY IN THIS STATE AND THAT'S WHY

                    I'M GOING TO BE VOTING NO FROM MY PERSPECTIVE.  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, SIR.  WOULD THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ZEBROWSKI, WILL

                    YOU YIELD?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. ZEBROWSKI

                    YIELDS.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU, MR. ZEBROWSKI.  I NOTE

                    THAT THIS BILL CALLS FOR THE REPORT TO BE PROVIDED TO THE GOVERNOR,

                                         95



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                    TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE AND SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY, BUT

                    NO OBLIGATION THAT A COPY OF THIS REPORT BE PROVIDED TO THE MINORITY

                    LEADER IN EITHER THE SENATE OR THE ASSEMBLY.  IS THERE A REASON WHY

                    THERE'S NO DESIRE TO PROVIDE THIS REPORT TO THE MINORITY LEADERSHIP?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  I DON'T THINK THE REPORT'S MEANT

                    TO BE SECRET, SO I THINK THE SPEAKER AND THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT ARE

                    MEANT TO REPRESENT THE ASSEMBLY AND THE SENATE AS A WHOLE.

                    CERTAINLY, IF IT BECOMES LAW I'LL MAKE SURE YOU GET A COPY.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THERE'S CERTAINLY NO REASON TO

                    EXCLUDE THEM, THE MINORITY, AS WELL, RIGHT?

                                 MR. ZEBROWSKI:  NO.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE BILL, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  ON THE BILL, MR.

                    GOODELL.

                                 MR. GOODELL:  I APPRECIATE MY COLLEAGUE'S

                    WILLINGNESS TO SHARE THAT REPORT WITH THE MINORITY AS WELL, AND I THINK

                    THAT'S ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT BECAUSE AT THE MOMENT, WITH EMPTY SEAT

                    VOTING, I THINK THERE'S ACTUALLY MORE MINORITY MEMBERS HERE ON THE

                    FLOOR OF THE ASSEMBLY THAN THERE ARE MAJORITY MEMBERS.  AND SINCE,

                    YOU KNOW, WE HAVE THE VAST MAJORITY OF OUR MEMBERS HERE, IT WOULD BE

                    NICE TO HAVE A COPY OF THESE REPORTS AS WELL, AND NOT JUST THROUGH THE

                    GRACIOUSNESS OF THE SPONSOR.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                         96



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE CLERK WILL RECORD

                    THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. LAVINE TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. LAVINE:  THANK YOU.  SO, THIS IS BILL, VERY

                    STRAIGHTFORWARD BILL.  IT SHOULDN'T BE CONTROVERSIAL, BUT IT HAS BECOME

                    CONTROVERSIAL.  AND IT SIMPLY DIRECTS THE STATE ENERGY RESEARCH AND

                    DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NYSERDA, TO PREPARE A REPORT ABOUT

                    REPLACING DECOMMISSIONED OR NOT WORKING ELECTRIC-GENERATING SITES

                    WITH RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AND ENERGY STORAGE OPPORTUNITIES.

                    THE POINT WAS MADE THAT WHY SHOULD NEW YORK DO THIS?  AFTER ALL,

                    WE'RE JUST ONE STATE.  CHINA ISN'T DOING THIS, INDIA ISN'T DOING THIS.  BUT

                    IT'S NOT JUST NEW YORK THAT'S DOING THIS.  NEW YORK IS DOING THIS, NEW

                    JERSEY'S DOING IT, CONNECTICUT IS DOING IT, CALIFORNIA IS DOING IT.  WHY

                    ARE WE DOING THIS?  BECAUSE IT IS PATENTLY OBVIOUS THAT GLOBAL WARMING

                    AND GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS WILL KILL ALL OF US.  SOME PEOPLE REFUSE

                    TO SEE THAT, LIKE OSTRICHES.  THEY BURY THEIR HEAD IN THE SAND AND LET THE

                    REST OF US DO THE DIRTY WORK TO TRY SAVE THE WORLD WHILE THEY WILL THEN

                    TAKE THEIR HEADS OUT OF THE SAND AFTER EVERYTHING IS SAFE AND COMPLAIN.

                                 I THINK THIS IS A GOOD BILL.  I'M VOTING FOR IT, I

                    COMMEND THE SPONSOR.  WE BETTER DO SOMETHING TO SAVE THE EARTH.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  MR. LAVINE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                         97



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               MAY 9, 2023

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  DO YOU HAVE ANY FURTHER

                    HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  WE DO HAVE A PIECE

                    OF HOUSEKEEPING.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MS. ROZIC, PAGE 20, CALENDAR NO.

                    174, BILL 5610-B, THE AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 WE HAVE NUMEROUS FINE RESOLUTIONS, WE WILL TAKE

                    THEM UP WITH ONE VOTE.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTIONS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ADOPTED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 427-431

                    WERE UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  I NOW MOVE THAT THE

                    ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED AND THAT WE RECONVENE AT 10:00 A.M. ON

                    WEDNESDAY, MAY THE 10TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER AUBRY:  THE ASSEMBLY STANDS

                    ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 5:52 P.M., THE ASSEMBLY STOOD

                    ADJOURNED UNTIL WEDNESDAY, MAY 10TH A 10:00 A.M., THAT BEING A

                    SESSION DAY.)

                                         98