TUESDAY, MARCH 10, 2026                                                                         2:25 P.M.



                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE HOUSE WILL

                    COME TO ORDER.

                                 GOOD AFTERNOON, COLLEAGUES AND GUESTS.

                                 IMAM TAHIR KUKAJ WILL OFFER A PRAYER.

                                 IMAM TAHIR KUKAJ:  (SPEAKING UNKNOWN

                    LANGUAGE).  IN THE NAME OF GOD, MOST GRACIOUS, MOST MERCIFUL, WE

                    THANK GOD ALMIGHTY FOR HIS COUNTLESS BLESSINGS; BLESSINGS OF THIS

                    CHAMBER, MEMBERS OF THIS GREAT INSTITUTION OF OUR GREAT STATE OF NEW

                    YORK.

                                 WE GATHER DURING THE HOLY MONTH OF RAMADAN; A TIME

                    WHEN MANY OF OUR NEIGHBORS ARE FOCUSED ON PRAYER, SELF-REFLECTION AND

                    ACTS OF SERVICE.  WE'VE BEEN CELEBRATING THIS HOLY MONTH OF RAMADAN

                    ALONG OUR NEIGHBORS; JEWISH NEIGHBORS WHERE THEY WERE CELEBRATING

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    PURIM.  OUR NEIGHBORS -- CHRISTIAN NEIGHBORS CELEBRATING LENT.  OUR

                    HINDU NEIGHBORS, NEW YORKERS CELEBRATING HOLI.  SO WE PRAY TO GOD

                    ALMIGHTY TO DERIVE FROM THE SPIRIT TODAY AS WE ACKNOWLEDGE THE VITAL

                    DEMANDING WORK OF THIS LEGISLATIVE BODY.  WE ASK FOR A SPECIAL

                    BLESSING UPON EACH MEMBER PRESENT.  GRANT THEM CLARITY OF MIND AS

                    THEY WEIGH THE COMPLEX ISSUES BEFORE THEM.  MAY THEY BE GUIDED BY A

                    SPIRIT OF GENUINE COOPERATION AND THE COURAGE TO ADVOCATE FOR THE

                    COMMON GOOD, PUTTING THE NEEDS OF THE PEOPLE ABOVE THE NOISE OF THE

                    DAY.  WE RECOGNIZE THE IMMENSE SACRIFICE AND DEDICATION INHERENT IN

                    THIS ROLE.  WE PRAY THAT YOU GRANT THEM ENDURANCE FOR THEIR LONG HOURS

                    AND HUMILITY IN THEIR AUTHORITY.  MAY THEIR WORDS IN THIS CHAMBER BE

                    USED TO BUILD BRIDGES, RESOLVE CONFLICTS, AND TO LIFT UP THOSE WHO ARE

                    MOST VULNERABLE AMONG US.  MAY THEIR DECISIONS TODAY LEAVE A LASTING

                    POSITIVE MARK ON OUR GREAT STATE OF NEW YORK, FOSTERING A FUTURE THAT

                    IS JUST, EQUITABLE AND PROSPEROUS FOR ALL.

                                 GOD ALMIGHTY, BLESS THIS ASSEMBLY, BLESS THEIR

                    DELIBERATIONS, AND MAY THEIR COMMITMENT TO PUBLIC SERVICE ALWAYS BE

                    RENEWED.  GOD ALMIGHTY, WE BLESS -- WE ASK YOU THAT YOU BLESS OUR

                    NEW YORK STATE AND OUR COUNTRY, THE GREATEST COUNTRY ON EARTH, THE

                    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

                                 IN YOUR NAME WE MAKE THIS PRAYER.  AMEN.

                                 MEMBERS:  AMEN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  VISITORS ARE INVITED

                    TO JOIN MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER LED VISITORS AND

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF MONDAY, MARCH 9TH.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  MADAM SPEAKER, I MOVE TO DISPENSE

                    WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF MONDAY, MARCH 9TH AND THAT

                    THE SAME STAND APPROVED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WITHOUT OBJECTION,

                    SO ORDERED.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  I HAVE A QUOTE TODAY FROM HARRIET

                    TUBMAN, AND THE QUOTE IS --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ONE MOMENT, MR.

                    FALL.  CAN WE HAVE QUIET IN THE CHAMBER, PLEASE?  TAKE YOUR SEATS,

                    TAKE YOUR CONVERSATIONS OUTSIDE.  THANK YOU.

                                 GO AHEAD, MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE QUOTE

                    THAT WE HAVE HERE TODAY IS FROM HARRIET TUBMAN AND IT SAYS, I WISH THE

                    CONDUCTOR OF THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FOR EIGHT YEARS -- I'M SORRY --

                    I WAS THE CONDUCTOR OF THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD FOR EIGHT YEARS, AND

                    I CAN SAY WHAT MOST CONDUCTORS CAN'T SAY:  I NEVER RAN MY TRAIN OFF THE

                    TRACK AND I NEVER LOST A PASSENGER.  AND THESE WORDS ARE FROM HARRIET

                    TUBMAN.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, MEMBERS HAVE ON THEIR DESK AN

                    A-CALENDAR [SIC].  AFTER ANY HOUSEKEEPING AND/OR INTRODUCTIONS WE

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    WILL BEGIN OUR FLOOR WORK BY TAKING UP CALENDAR RESOLUTIONS ON PAGE 3.

                    WE WILL THEN CONSENT THE FOLLOWING BILLS:  CALENDAR NO. 44 BY MS.

                    TAPIA, AND CALENDAR NO. 47 BY MS. PAULIN.  AFTER THAT WE WILL TAKE UP

                    THE FOLLOWING BILLS ON DEBATE:  RULES REPORT NO. 18 BY MS. GLICK, AND

                    RULES REPORT NO. 29 BY MS. ROSENTHAL.  I WILL ANNOUNCE ANY FURTHER

                    FLOOR ACTIVITY AS WE PROCEED.

                                 SO WITH THAT AS A GENERAL OUTLINE, MISS -- MADAM

                    SPEAKER, LET US BEGIN WITH ANY HOUSEKEEPING AND/OR INTRODUCTIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.  WE DO

                    HAVE A PIECE OF HOUSEKEEPING.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MS. ROSENTHAL, PAGE 14, CALENDAR

                    NO. 52, BILL NO. A01410, THE AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 WE WILL START WITH AN INTRODUCTION FROM YOU, MR. FALL,

                    PLEASE.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  IT IS A

                    GREAT HONOR AND A PLEASURE TO WELCOME AND INTRODUCE IMAM TAHIR

                    BACK TO THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE.  YOU KNOW, IMAM TAHIR HAS DONE THE

                    INVOCATION DURING THE MONTH OF RAMADAN FOR THE LAST EIGHT CONSECUTIVE

                    YEARS, AND I DO APPRECIATE HIM MAKING THE TRIP TO ALBANY FROM STATEN

                    ISLAND.  AND, YOU KNOW, IMAM TAHIR IS NOT ONLY THE LEADER OF THE

                    ALBANIAN CULTURAL CENTER ON STATEN ISLAND, BUT HE'S ALSO A CHAPLAIN FOR

                    THE NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT.  HE SERVES OUR COMMUNITY IN

                    SO MANY DIFFERENT WAYS.  HE ALWAYS OPENS UP HIS COMMUNITY CENTER TO

                    THE PUBLIC FOR VARIOUS EVENTS DURING EVERY PART OF THE YEAR.  AND HE'S

                    ALSO A WONDERFUL REFLECTION ON, YOU KNOW, WHAT THIS HOLY MONTH OF

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    RAMADAN MEANS.  YOU KNOW, TAKING CARE OF YOUR NEIGHBORS, GIVING

                    CHARITY AND A GOOD AMOUNT OF SELF-REFLECTION.

                                 SO IF YOU WOULD BE SO KIND TO WELCOME IMAM TAHIR

                    TO THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE IT WOULD BE GREATLY APPRECIATED, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MR.

                    FALL, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WELCOME BACK, IMAM, TO THE

                    ASSEMBLY CHAMBER.  WE EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR AND

                    HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  WE APPRECIATE YOUR ANNUAL

                    VISIT TO ALBANY TO GIVE BLESSINGS TO US FOR THIS HOLY MONTH.  THANK YOU

                    SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.  THANK YOU.

                                 IMAM TAHIR KUKAJ:  THANK YOU.  GOD BLESS YOU

                    ALL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. EACHUS THE PURPOSE OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. EACHUS:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WE

                    HAVE QUITE A BIT GOING ON IN THE HOUSE TODAY.

                                 ON BEHALF OF ASSEMBLYMAN JONATHAN JACOBSON,

                    ASSEMBLYWOMAN PAULA KAY AND MYSELF, I HAVE THE PLEASURE OF

                    INTRODUCING NURSING STUDENTS FROM SUNY ORANGE AND CUNY YORK

                    COLLEGE.  IF THEY'D STAND UP.  THERE WE GO.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 JOINING -- JOINING US ALONGSIDE THE STUDENTS ARE

                    PROFESSOR LISA ZYLBERBERG, PAMELA HYLTON, VANESSA CAREW, DR.

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    MARGARET ALEXANDRE AND DR. PATRICIA BURKE.  THESE NURSING STUDENTS

                    AND FACULTY ARE HERE TODAY MEETING WITH THE LEGISLATORS ON BEHALF OF

                    NYSNA.  NYSNA IS A UNION THAT REPRESENTS MORE THAN 42,000 NURSES

                    AND HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONALS THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 BEING THE BROTHER OF TWO RNS MYSELF, I HAVE A

                    PERSONAL CONNECTION TO NURSING.  I'M INCREDIBLY INSPIRED TO SEE SO MANY

                    YOUNG PEOPLE ABOUT SERVING THEIR COMMUNITIES, PROVIDE LIFESAVING

                    TREATMENT TO NEW YORKERS, AND JOINING ONE OF THE MOST CRITICAL AREAS OF

                    OUR WORKFORCE.

                                 NURSING IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF OUR COMMUNITIES,

                    ENSURING THE ESSENTIAL WORK OF KEEPING NEW YORKERS SAFE AND IS DONE

                    IN A SAFE WAY AND IN A PROFESSIONAL MANNER.  AS A TEACHER OF 40 YEARS, I

                    KNOW THAT STUDENTS REPRESENT OUR FUTURE.  THERE'S OUR FUTURE RIGHT THERE

                    (INDICATING) -- THANK YOU, FOLKS -- AND THE FUTURE OF NEW YORK AND

                    SHINING A BRIGHTER FUTURE BECAUSE OF THOSE THAT ARE HERE WITH US TODAY.

                                 WITH THAT I WOULD ASK, MADAM SPEAKER, THAT YOU

                    PLEASE WELCOME THE SUNY ORANGE AND CUNY YORK COLLEGE NURSING

                    STUDENTS AND FACULTY TO THE CHAMBER AND EXTEND THEM THE PRIVILEGES OF

                    THE HOUSE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON BEHALF OF MR. EACHUS, THE SPEAKER AND ALL

                    MEMBERS, WE WELCOME OUR SUNY ORANGE AND CUNY YORK COLLEGE

                    NURSING STUDENTS AS YOU TRAVELED HERE TODAY TO REPRESENT NYSNA AND

                    ALL THINGS HEALTHCARE.  THANK YOU FOR ALL OF THE WONDERFUL WORK THAT

                    YOU DO AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO IN THIS HEALTHCARE SPACE.  WE HOPE YOU

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  TODAY I RISE TO INTRODUCE A VERY SPECIAL GUEST JOINING US HERE

                    IN THE CHAMBER, MY SON MICHAEL.  HE -- HE'S JOINING US FOR TODAY'S

                    DISABILITIES RALLY.  AND BEING MICHAEL'S DAD HAS BEEN ONE OF THE

                    GREATEST BLESSINGS OF MY LIFE.  MICHAEL AND I HAVE BEEN ON OUR JOURNEY

                    TOGETHER AS HE FACED THE CHALLENGES OF AUTISM.  HE BRINGS INCREDIBLE

                    JOY, DETERMINATION AND PERSPECTIVE TO OUR FAMILY AND TO EVERYONE WHO

                    KNOWS HIM.

                                 BEFORE COMING TO THE ASSEMBLY I WORKED AS A CIVIL

                    ENGINEER.  BUT WHEN MICHAEL WAS BORN, IT CHANGED MY LIFE.  MY

                    PASSION CHANGED AND IT LED ME HERE TO THE STATE ASSEMBLY AND TO MY

                    ROLE AS CHAIR OF THE COMMITTEE ON PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES.  STILL

                    HELPING PEOPLE, BUT IN A DIFFERENT WAY; ADVOCATING FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH

                    DISABILITIES AND THEIR FAMILY, AND THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT WE DID HERE TODAY.

                    MICHAEL AND I TODAY -- TODAY JOINED SELF-ADVOCATES FROM ACROSS THE

                    STATE WHO CAME TO THE CAPITOL TO SHARE THEIR STORIES AND TO ADVOCATE

                    FOR SUPPORT FOR INDIVIDUALS WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES.

                                 MICHAEL HAS MANY INTERESTS.  HE LOVES COOKING.  HE

                    EVEN HAS HIS OWN YOUTUBE CHANNEL WHERE HE'S KNOWN AS "CHEF

                    MICHAEL."  YOU CAN FIND HIM ON YOUTUBE.  HE ENJOYS DOING PUZZLES,

                    AND HE HAS PROBABLY THE LARGEST DVD COLLECTION I HAVE EVER SEEN.  THIS

                    YEAR HE'S ALSO PLAYING BASKETBALL WITH THE SCHENECTADY PATRIOTS SPECIAL

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    OLYMPICS TEAM, WHICH WE ARE ALL VERY PROUD OF.  MORE THAN ANYTHING,

                    THOUGH, MY SON MICHAEL REMINDS ME EVERY DAY WHY INCLUSION, DIGNITY

                    AND OPPORTUNITY MUST GUIDE THE WORK THAT WE DO HERE IN THIS CHAMBER.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, I'M INCREDIBLY PROUD OF MY SON AND

                    I'M ALWAYS PLEASED WHEN HE JOINS US HERE IN THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER

                    AND I'M GRATEFUL THAT HE'S HERE WITH US TODAY.  IF YOU WOULD PLEASE

                    WELCOME HIM AND EXTEND TO HIM ALL THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    ASSEMBLYMEMBER SANTABARBARA -- DAD -- THE SPEAKER AND ALL

                    MEMBERS, WELCOME BACK, MICHAEL, TO OUR ASSEMBLY CHAMBER.  IT'S SO

                    WONDERFUL TO SEE YOU AGAIN TODAY.  WE HOPE YOU ENJOY THE TIME IN OUR

                    CHAMBER AGAIN, AS YOU ALWAYS DO, AND CONGRATULATIONS AND CONTINUED

                    SUCCESS, CHEF MICHAEL.  THANK YOU FOR JOINING US TODAY, CHEF.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  MS. CHANTEL JACKSON FOR THE

                    PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. JACKSON:  THANK YOU, MR. SPEAKER.  GUESS

                    WHAT?  WE ARE BACK, WE ARE BIGGER AND BETTER THAN EVER BECAUSE WE

                    ARE THE BRONX.  AND I HAVE A NUMBER OF LEADERS HERE FROM THE BRONX

                    I'M GOING TO HAVE THEM STAND UP, BUT YOU MAY KNOW THEY ALREADY, MR.

                    SPEAKER.  WE HAVE OUR BRONX DA.  WE HAVE OUR BRONX BOROUGH

                    PRESIDENT, DA DARCEL CLARK, BRONX BOROUGH PRESIDENT VANESSA

                    GIBSON.  WE WE ALSO HAVE LISA SORIN FROM BRONX CHAMBER OF

                    COMMERCE.  ROBERT RODRIGUEZ FROM CHASE.  WE HAVE SHERLYN SANTANA

                    FROM BRONX COMMUNITY -- BRONX COMMUNITY MANAGER AT CHASE.  WE

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    HAVE JENNIFER BERNSTEIN, ALSO PRESIDENT AND CEO OF NEW YORK

                    BOTANICAL GARDEN.  THESE ARE ALL THINGS IN THE BRONX.  MATT EAGLE [SIC],

                    PRESIDENT, LANGSAM PROPERTY SERVICE CORP.; AND MEG VENTRUDO,

                    EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF WOODLAWN CONSERVANCY.  AND THEY'RE ALL HERE

                    BECAUSE TODAY IS BRONX DAY.  AND WE HAVEN'T HAD BRONX DAY IN OVER

                    TEN YEARS, BUT LIKE I SAID WE ARE BACK, BIGGER, BETTER THAN EVER, AND I

                    HOPE THAT THEY WILL RECEIVE -- OH, I'M SORRY, AND A BUNCH OF OTHER

                    COMPANIES AND ORGANIZATIONS AND CORPORATIONS THAT MAKE THE BRONX

                    WHO IT REALLY IS.  AND I WOULD LOVE IF YOU CAN GIVE THEM ALL THE

                    CORDIALITY OF THE FLOOR, MR. SPEAKER.

                                 SPEAKER HEASTIE:  OF COURSE.  THANK YOU, MS.

                    JACKSON.  AND OF COURSE I'M HAPPY TO SEE ALL OF YOU FROM -- NO OFFENSE

                    TO THE OTHER 61 COUNTIES IN THIS GREAT STATE, BUT YA'LL ALL KNOW MY HEART

                    IS IN THE BRONX AND THE BRONX WILL ALWAYS BE FIRST AMONGST EQUALS.

                    AND I'M SO HAPPY FOR MY COLLEAGUES THAT HAVE BROUGHT BRONX DAY

                    BACK, AND TO ALL THE ELECTED OFFICIALS AND THE -- AND THE ORGANIZATIONS

                    THAT HAVE COME BACK.  IT WAS A BEAUTIFUL LUNCHEON TODAY, AND I'M

                    LOOKING FORWARD TO THE RECEPTION.

                                 SO OF COURSE YOU ALWAYS HAVE THE PRIVILEGES OF THE

                    HOUSE.  YOU'RE ALWAYS WELCOME TO COME BACK.  AND I ALSO WANT TO ADD

                    AS PART OF THAT, ONE OF THE AWARDEES TODAY WHO'S GETTING A

                    CHANGEMAKER AWARD IS ONE OF THE GREATEST DJS IN ALL OF NEW YORK

                    CITY WHO HAPPENS TO BE A CONSTITUENT.  AND YOU CAN HEAR HIM ON IRIE

                    JAM, WHICH IS THE NUMBER ONE CARIBBEAN RADIO STATION.  AND IF YOU

                    COME TO MY SUMMER BARBECUE, ANY EVENT, MY -- MY HOLIDAY PARTY, HE

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    IS ALWAYS THE DJ SO I WANTED TO GIVE A SPECIAL SHOUT OUT TO DJ MADOUT

                    AS WELL.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 SO AGAIN, THANK YOU ALL FOR SHOWING HOW MUCH WE ALL

                    LOVE THE BRONX, AND THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE.  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 AND I ALSO WANT TO THANK DJ MADOUT BECAUSE I CAN'T

                    EVER GET MY CHIEF-OF-STAFF, JEVONNI BROOKS TO COME UP HERE, BUT SHE

                    TRAVELED UP WITH -- WITH DJ MADOUT.  SO...

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. REYES FOR THE

                    PURPOSE OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. REYES:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  TODAY IT

                    IS MY HONOR TO WELCOME MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL BLACK NURSES NEW

                    YORK CHAPTER ASSOCIATION HERE.

                                 THE NEW YORK BLACK NURSES ASSOCIATION WAS

                    FOUNDED IN 1971 AS A PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATION THAT BRINGS TOGETHER

                    BLACK NURSES THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE TO SUPPORT THE HEALTH AND

                    WELL-BEING OF THEIR COMMUNITIES AND THE NURSING PROFESSION.  THROUGH

                    MENTORSHIP, SCHOLARSHIP AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT, THE NEW YORK

                    BLACK NURSES ASSOCIATION HELPS GUIDE AND UPLIFT CURRENT AND FUTURE

                    NURSES WHILE FOSTERING LEADERSHIP WITHIN THE FIELD.

                                 BEYOND THEIR WORK IN HOSPITALS, CLINICS, AND NURSING

                    EDUCATION, THE NURSES ARE ALSO DEEPLY ENGAGED IN COMMUNITY,

                    PROVIDING HEALTH EDUCATION, SCREENINGS, OUTREACH PROGRAMS AND

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    RESOURCES THAT HELP IMPROVE HEALTH OUTCOMES ACROSS THE STATE.

                                 WITH US TODAY WE HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE GREAT

                    -- GREATER NEW YORK CITY CHAPTER; ROCHESTER, HUDSON VALLEY, SUFFOLK

                    COUNTY CHAPTERS AS WELL.  DR. CATHERINE ALICIA GEORGES, PAST PRESIDENT

                    OF GREATER NEW YORK CITY CHAPTER; THE CURRENT PRESIDENT, BETTY

                    BOYLE-DUKE; CAROLYN AUSTIN-MATTISON, SECOND VICE PRESIDENT; DR.

                    THERESA LUNDY, CURRENT PRESIDENT; YOLANDA WILLIAMS-LEWIS, CURRENT

                    PRESIDENT; AND BRYANNA PATTERSON, CHAIR OF HEALTH AND POLICY FROM

                    ROCHESTER.

                                 PLEASE, MADAM SPEAKER, PLEASE EXTEND ALL THE

                    CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE TO THEM AND WELCOME OUR DISTINGUISHED

                    GUESTS TO OUR CHAMBER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MS.

                    REYES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME OUR MEMBERS OF THE

                    NEW YORK BLACK NURSES ASSOCIATION AND EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES

                    OF THE FLOOR.  HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  CONTINUED

                    SUCCESS, AND THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR ALL YOU DO FOR BEING

                    HEALTHCARE CHAMPIONS.  THANK YOU FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. EACHUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. EACHUS:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, FOR

                    ALLOWING ME TO INTERRUPT ONCE AGAIN.

                                 I RISE TODAY IN RECOGNITION OF NATIONAL SOCIAL WORKER

                    MONTH; A TIME WHEN WE HONOR THE DEDICATED PROFESSIONALS WHO WORK

                    EVERY DAY TO STRAIGHTEN -- STRENGTHEN OUR COMMUNITY, SUPPORT FAMILIES

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    AND ADVOCATE FOR THOSE WHOSE VOICES TOO OFTEN GO UNHEARD.  IF YOU'D

                    STAND.

                                 TODAY I'M PROUD TO WELCOME THE FLOOR FACULTY AND

                    STUDENTS FROM THE SOCIAL WORK PROGRAM IN DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY,

                    NEW YORK.  JOINING US ARE PROGRAM DIRECTOR MELODY HYPPOLITE AND

                    PROFESSOR RUBINA SINGH, ALONG WITH A GROUP OF OUTSTANDING SOCIAL

                    WORK STUDENTS WHO TRAVELED TO ALBANY TO LEARN MORE ABOUT THE

                    LEGISLATIVE PROCESS AND TO ADVOCATE FOR POLICIES TO PROMOTE SOCIAL

                    JUSTICE AND COMMUNITY WELL-BEING.  THESE STUDENTS REPRESENT THE NEXT

                    GENERATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE NOT ONLY LEARNING IN

                    THE CLASSROOM BUT WHO ARE ALREADY ENGAGING IN ADVOCACY AND POLICY

                    DISCUSSIONS -- ONE OF THEM HAPPENS TO BE AN INTERN IN MY OFFICE

                    CURRENTLY -- THAT WILL SHAPE STRONGER AND MORE EQUITABLE COMMUNITIES

                    ACROSS NEW YORK STATE.

                                 I WOULD ALSO LIKE TO TAKE A MOMENT TO RECOGNIZE

                    SAMANTHA MEHAN (PHONETIC), WHO HAS SERVED AS AN INTERN IN MY

                    DISTRICT OFFICE OVER THE PAST YEAR.  SAMANTHA WILL SOON GRADUATE FROM

                    DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY AND JOIN THE SOCIAL WORK PROFESSION.  HER

                    COMMITMENT TO SERVICE AND COMMUNITY HAS ALREADY MADE A

                    MEANINGFUL IMPACT IN OUR OFFICE, AND I KNOW SHE WILL CONTINUE TO MAKE

                    A DIFFERENCE IN THE LIVES OF MANY NEW YORKERS.

                                 PLEASE JOIN ME IN WELCOMING THE DOMINICAN

                    UNIVERSITY NEW YORK SOCIAL WORK FACULTY AND STUDENTS TO THE STATE

                    ASSEMBLY, AND IN RECOGNIZING THE INCREDIBLE WORK OF SOCIAL WORKERS

                    ACROSS OUR STATE DURING NATIONAL SOCIAL WORK MONTH.  THANK YOU.

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MR.

                    EACHUS, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME OUR GUESTS FROM

                    DOMINICAN UNIVERSITY, THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS, ON

                    YOUR LOBBY DAY TODAY.  WE NEED YOU NOW MORE THAN EVER, SO WE ARE SO

                    VERY GLAD TO SEE YOU TODAY, EXTENDING TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR.

                    HOPING YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  WE HOPE YOU HAD

                    MEANINGFUL DISCUSSIONS ON YOUR VISIT TODAY.  CONTINUED SUCCESS TO YOU.

                    THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. SLATER FOR THE PURPOSE OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. SLATER:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I AM

                    THRILLED TO WELCOME AND INTRODUCE THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF

                    NORTHERN WESTCHESTER WHO IS JOINING US TODAY, UP ABOVE.  THIS IS AN

                    HISTORIC ORGANIZATIONS THAT HAS BEEN SERVING OUR COMMUNITY SINCE

                    1939.  AND WE HAVE WITH US TODAY CHRIS, MARSHALL, WHO ARE OUR

                    PROGRAM DIRECTORS.  AND WE HAVE AS WELL TEN WONDERFUL MEMBERS, TEN

                    YOUTH OF OUR COMMUNITY WHO ARE HERE TO LEARN ABOUT STATE

                    GOVERNMENT, TOUR THE CAPITOL AND SEE GOVERNMENT IN ACTION.  THEY ARE

                    OUR FUTURE, IT'S FANTASTIC TO HAVE THEM HERE, AND I'D JUST REQUEST THAT YOU

                    PLEASE WELCOME THEM AND PROVIDE THE CORDIALITIES OF THE FLOOR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MR.

                    SLATER, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WELCOME, OUR NORTHERN

                    WESTCHESTER BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB HERE TODAY TO OUR ASSEMBLY

                    CHAMBER.  I CANNOT SEE YOU UP THERE, BUT WE EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    THE FLOOR TO YOU AND HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  I LOVE,

                    LOVE, LOVE THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB AND SO VERY PLEASED THAT YOU ALL ARE

                    PARTICIPANT MEMBERS, OUR FUTURE LEADERS.  IT'S JUST VERY EXCITING TO SEE

                    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB MEMBERS HERE TODAY.  SO THANK YOU UP IN OUR

                    BALCONY FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 RESOLUTIONS, PAGE 3, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 1023, MS.

                    BARRETT.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 1-7, 2026, AS SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK

                    WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE OBSERVANCE OF

                    NATIONAL SCHOOL SOCIAL WORK WEEK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 1024, MR.

                    LAVINE.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 2026, AS READING MONTH IN THE STATE

                    OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 1025, MR.

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    CONRAD.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 9-13, 2026, AS CIVIC LEARNING WEEK

                    IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 1026, MR.

                    DESTEFANO.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 2026, AS MUSIC IN OUR SCHOOLS

                    MONTH.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. DESTEFANO ON

                    THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. DESTEFANO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, FOR

                    ALLOWING ME TO SPEAK ON ONE OF MY FAVORITE RESOLUTIONS, MUSIC

                    EDUCATION [SIC] IN OUR SCHOOLS [SIC].  THEY PLAY A VITAL ROLE IN THE

                    DEVELOPMENT IN STUDENTS AND SHOULD REMAIN AN ESSENTIAL PART OF EVERY

                    SCHOOL CURRICULUM.

                                 MUSIC IS MORE THAN ENTERTAINMENT; IT IS A POWERFUL

                    EDUCATIONAL TOOL THAT SUPPORTS ACADEMIC SUCCESS, EMOTIONAL GROWTH,

                    AND SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT.  FIRST, MUSIC HELPS IMPROVE COGNITIVE SKILLS.

                    STUDIES HAVE SHOWN THAT STUDENTS WHO PARTICIPATE IN MUSIC PROGRAMS

                    ALWAYS PERFORMED BETTER IN SUBJECTS SUCH AS MATH, READING AND SCIENCE.

                    LEARNING RHYTHM PATTERNS AND TIMING STRENGTHENS BRAIN FUNCTIONS

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    RELATED TO -- AND PROBLEM-SOLVING AND CRITICAL THINKING.  PLAYING AN

                    INSTRUMENT OR READING MUSIC ALSO REQUIRES DISCIPLINE, FOCUS AND

                    PRACTICE; SKILLS THAT BENEFIT STUDENTS IN ALL AREAS OF LEARNING.

                                 SECOND, MUSIC ALLOWS STUDENTS TO EXPRESS THEMSELVES

                    CREATIVELY IN ALL SCHOOL ENVIRONMENTS WHERE MANY SUBJECTS RELY ON

                    MEMORIZATION AND TESTING.  MUSIC PROVIDES AN OUTLET FOR IMAGINATION

                    AND PERSONAL EXPRESSION.  WHETHER THROUGH SINGING, PLAYING AN

                    INSTRUMENT OR COMPOSING, STUDENTS CAN COMMUNICATE EMOTIONS AND

                    IDEAS THAT MAY BE DIFFICULT TO EXPRESS IN WORDS.

                                 MUSIC ALSO HELPS BUILD TEAMWORK AND COMRADERY IN

                    THE COMMUNITY.  BAND, ORCHESTRA AND CHOIR PRO -- PROGRAMS TEACH

                    STUDENTS HOW TO WORK TOGETHER TOWARD A COMMON GOAL.  EACH MUSICIAN

                    PLAYS A UNIQUE PART, BUT SUCCESS DEPENDS ON LISTENING TO OTHERS AND

                    COOPERATING AS A GROUP.  THESE EXPERIENCES FOSTER RESPECT,

                    RESPONSIBILITY AND COLLABORATION; SKILLS THAT STUDENTS CARRY INTO

                    ADULTHOOD.

                                 FINALLY, MUSIC ENRICHES SCHOOL CULTURE.  PERFORMANCES

                    AT CONCERTS, ASSEMBLIES AND COMMUNITY EVENTS BRINGS STUDENTS,

                    FAMILIES AND EDUCATORS TOGETHER.  THESE MOMENTS CREATE PRIDE, SCHOOL

                    SPIRIT AND SHARED EXPERIENCES THAT STRENGTHEN THE SCHOOL COMMUNITY.

                                 IN CONCLUSION, MUSIC EDUCATION SUPPORTS ACADEMIC

                    ACHIEVEMENT, ENCOURAGES CREATIVITY, BUILDS TEAMWORK, AND ENHANCES

                    THE OVERALL SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT.  BY INVESTING IN MUSIC PROGRAMS,

                    SCHOOLS HELP STUDENTS GROW NOT ONLY AS LEARNERS, BUT ALSO AS WELL-

                    ROUNDED INDIVIDUALS.

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 1027, MR.

                    DURSO.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MARCH 2026, AS YOUTH ART MONTH IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.

                                 PAGE 13, CALENDAR NO. 44, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01248-C, CALENDAR

                    NO. 44, TAPIA, ZACCARO, ALVAREZ, LAVINE, DE LOS SANTOS, SIMONE,

                    FORREST, SHIMSKY, LUCAS, CUNNINGHAM, CRUZ, SIMON, SAYEGH, BICHOTTE

                    HERMELYN, BORES, K. BROWN, CHANG, GIGLIO, PIROZZOLO, DESTEFANO,

                    PHEFFER AMATO, WEPRIN, SANTABARBARA, WALSH, REYES, SEMPOLINSKI.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING

                    THE SALE, OFFER FOR SALE, OR DELIVERY OF XYLAZINE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 90TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE CLERK WILL

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A01296-B, CALENDAR

                    NO. 47, PAULIN, SAYEGH, LUCAS, DESTEFANO, MCDONALD, OTIS, WEPRIN,

                    PIROZZOLO, NORBER, NOVAKHOV, CHANG, ALVAREZ, DINOWITZ, DILAN,

                    ROSENTHAL, WEIDER, MANKTELOW, MORINELLO, ANGELINO, KASSAY, COLTON,

                    LEMONDES, GRIFFIN, SEMPOLINSKI, STIRPE, DURSO, MIKULIN, SHIMSKY.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO ESTABLISHING THE

                    RARE DISEASE ADVISORY COUNCIL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    PAULIN, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 30TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  SO THIS THIRD READING AMENDMENT MAKE CHANGES TO THE BILL-

                    IN-CHIEF TO EXPAND THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS ON THE RARE DISEASE

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    ADVISORY COUNCIL, AND THAT AMENDMENT PROVIDES APPOINTMENTS TO THE

                    MINORITY LEADERS OF THE LEGISLATURE.  SO THIS -- THIS STARTED BACK IN

                    2020 WHEN THE LEGISLATURE ESTABLISHED THE NEW YORK STATE RARE

                    DISEASE WORKING GROUP, AND NOW THIS BILL WOULD SERVE TO MAKE

                    PERMANENT THE WORKING GROUP FIRST ESTABLISHED IN 2020 BY CREATING A

                    STANDING COUNCIL TO CONTINUE THE OVERSIGHT, AWARENESS AND ADVOCACY

                    WORK OF THE RARE DISEASE ADVISORY WORKING GROUP AND NOW THAT WILL

                    BE A COUNCIL.

                                 SO A KEY CHANGE WAS ALLOWING THE MINORITY LEADER OF

                    THE ASSEMBLY AND MINORITY LEADER OF THE SENATE TO HAVE APPOINTMENTS

                    ON THIS, WHICH I THINK IS REALLY IMPORTANT.  SOMETIMES WE DO HAVE

                    CONCERNS WHEN WE DON'T GET ANY APPOINTMENTS ONTO SOME OF THESE

                    BOARDS, AND I'M VERY GRATEFUL TO SEE THAT THE SPONSOR AMENDED HER BILL

                    IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THOSE APPOINTMENTS.

                                 WITH THAT CHANGE, MY PREVIOUS RESERVATIONS ARE GONE.

                    I WILL VERY HAPPILY SUPPORT THIS ESTABLISHMENT OF THE RARE DISEASE

                    ADVISORY COUNCIL.  AND I'D ALSO LIKE TO JUST NOTE THAT THE ALS

                    ASSOCIATION SUPPORTS THIS BILL, AND THAT MADE ME THINK OF MY GOOD

                    ANDY GILPIN, THE FORMER EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF CAPTAIN CHS IN MY

                    DISTRICT WHO IS BATTLING WITH ALS RIGHT NOW.  I THINK THAT WORKING

                    GROUPS LIKE THIS WILL REALLY HOPEFULLY MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE, ADVISORY

                    COUNCILS LIKE THIS WILL MAKE A BIG DIFFERENCE.

                                 SO I'M VERY PLEASED TO SUPPORT IT AND I WILL BE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. WALSH IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 4, RULES REPORT NO. 18, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A09511, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 18, GLICK, COLTON.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL

                    CONSERVATION LAW, RELATING TO CERTAIN LEASES RELATING TO THE

                    EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT AND PRODUCTION OF GAS OR OIL IN STATE FORESTS,

                    REFORESTATION AREAS AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    GLICK, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 MS. GLICK, AN EXPLANATION HAS BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. GLICK:  CERTAINLY.  THE CHAPTER AMENDMENT JUST

                    CLARIFIES SOME OF THE LIMITATIONS ON OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION LEASES ON

                    STATE FORESTS, REFORESTATION AREAS, WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS AND

                    UNIQUE AREAS.  AND WHILE IT ALLOWS FOR THE MODIFICATION, TRANSFER OR

                    ASSIGNMENT OF EXISTING OIL AND GAS LEASES IN THESE AREAS, IT PROHIBITS

                    INCREASING THE ACREAGE OR EXPANDING THE EXISTING WELLS OR DRILLING NEW

                    WELLS.  AND THE EXISTING WELLS ARE ALLOWED TO CONTINUE 'TIL THEY ARE --

                    UNTIL THE LEASE EXPIRES, AND PROHIBITS RENEWALS IN THOSE AREAS, BUT

                    ALLOWS THE CONTINUATION AND EVEN MODIFICATION AND TRANSFER, BUT NOT

                    EXPANSION OF THE AREA OR DRILLING NEW LEASES ON THAT AREA.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. SIMPSON.

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. GLICK:  ABSOLUTELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THANK YOU.  AND I THINK YOU JUST

                    MENTIONED THAT THIS ALLOWS FOR MODIFICATION -- IT DOESN'T ALLOW OR IT

                    DOES ALLOW FOR MODIFICATION OF THE EXISTING LEASES?

                                 MS. GLICK:  IT ALLOWS FOR MODIFICATION, TRANSFER

                    ASSIGNMENT WHILE THE LEASES ARE STILL CURRENT.  IT WOULD NOT ALLOW FOR IT

                    TO GO BEYOND THE TIME OF THE LEASE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  DOES -- WOULD THIS ALLOW FOR A

                    TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP?

                                 MS. GLICK:  WELL, I -- I THINK THAT'S -- THAT IS WHAT IS

                    INTENDED, YES.  BUT THE TRANSFER --

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  YOU THINK -- I'M UNCLEAR.  YOU THINK

                    IT ALLOWS --

                                 MS. GLICK:  YES.  THE TRANSFER, BUT THE TRANSFER

                    WOULD NOT RESTART THE LEASE TERMS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THE LEASE TERMS.  OKAY.  DO YOU

                    KNOW -- HAVE YOU LOOKED AT THE TERMS OF THE LEASE?  HOW LONG THE

                    VARIED -- VARIED WELLS --

                                 MS. GLICK:  WE DID NOT GET A COMPLETE RUNDOWN OF

                    ALL OF THE LEASES.  SOME OF THE -- SOME OF THE LANGUAGE ALSO WAS

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    INTENDED TO CLARIFY THAT THIS WOULD NOT PREVENT PLUGGING OF OLD LEASE --

                    OLD WELLS BECAUSE THAT IS A PROBLEM.  BUT WE -- IN SOME INSTANCES THERE

                    ARE LOTS OF ABANDONED WELLS AND WE DON'T HAVE LEASES THAT RELATE TO

                    WHERE THEY -- THEY ARE.  SO KNOWING THE LEASES THAT EXIST, I'M SURE THERE

                    IS -- THOUGH WE DON'T HAVE THAT NUMBER TODAY FOR YOU -- BUT THERE ARE

                    MANY ABANDONED WELLS ALL OVER THE STATE AND THEY ARE PROBABLY IN THE

                    THOUSANDS.  THEY'RE NOT ACTIVE, BUT THEY NEED TO BE PLUGGED.  SO PART OF

                    OUR LANGUAGE NEEDED TO BE CLEANED UP SO THAT THERE COULD CONTINUE TO

                    BE ACTIVITY THAT WOULD BE PLUGGING THOSE OLD WELLS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  WOULD THIS AFFECT -- WOULD THIS BILL

                    AFFECT THE ABILITY FOR MAYBE DOWN THE ROAD THERE'S NEW TECHNOLOGY,

                    THERE'S -- FOR SOME REASON -- I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'VE SEEN

                    LANDMAN, BUT THEY'VE GONE IN ON ABANDONED WELLS AND GONE IN AND HIT

                    IT BIG.  AND IS THAT -- WOULD THIS BILL ALLOW FOR THAT OR IS THIS THE END OF

                    THOSE --

                                 MS. GLICK:  NOT IN THESE AREAS.  IF YOU -- AS I'M SURE

                    YOU KNOW, WE'RE LOOKING AT 30X30.  AND THESE ARE STATE FORESTLANDS,

                    WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS, AREAS OF UNIQUE SIGNIFICANCE.  AND

                    CURRENTLY, LIKE REFORESTATION AREAS ARE DEFINED AS LANDS DEVOTED TO

                    WATERSHED PROTECTION, THE PRODUCTION OF TIMBER AND OTHER FOREST

                    PRODUCTS AND FOR RECREATION AND SIMILAR ACTIVITIES.  SO IT'S NOT

                    NECESSARILY CONSISTENT WITH THAT TO HAVE OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION, WHICH

                    REQUIRES MORE INFRASTRUCTURE THEN WOULD BE CONSISTENT WITH THESE USES.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  SO DO YOU KNOW WHEN THE

                    LAST REQUEST FOR A MODIFICATION OR EXPANSION OF ONE OF THESE WELLS

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    WERE?

                                 MS. GLICK:  NOT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  DO YOU KNOW OF ANYTHING RECENT

                    OR...

                                 MS. GLICK:  I DON'T HAVE THAT IN FRONT OF ME.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  DO YOU KNOW IF THERE'S ANY

                    APPLICATIONS PENDING?

                                 MS. GLICK:  I'M SORRY, COULD YOU REPEAT THAT?

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  DO YOU KNOW IF THERE'S ANY

                    APPLICATIONS PENDING RIGHT NOW CURRENTLY?

                                 MS. GLICK:  NO.  THERE ARE NO -- AND THE LEASE TERMS

                    ARE 10-YEAR TERMS, SO CURRENTLY WE DON'T HAVE ANY APPLICATIONS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THEY'RE ALL 10-YEAR LEASE TERMS?

                                 MS. GLICK:  YES.  BUT IN THE PAST THEY WERE

                    RENEWALS, AND THIS WOULD AT THAT -- AT THE END OF THE LEASE TERM IN THESE

                    AREAS, NOT EVERYWHERE BUT IN THESE SPECIFIC AREAS, ONCE THE LEASE TERM

                    IS EXPIRED, THEN THERE WOULD NOT BE A RENEWAL ALLOWED.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  IS -- IS -- CAN THE SAME THING BE

                    ACQUIRED THROUGH CURRENT REGULATION FROM DEC OR AGENCY GUIDANCE?

                    IN OTHER WORDS, DEC HAS THE ABILITY TO ISSUE A PERMIT OR NOT ISSUE A

                    PERMIT, AND I BELIEVE THERE'S BEEN LEGISLATION IN THE PAST THAT HAS

                    BANNED CERTAIN ACTIVITIES, FRACKING BEING ONE OF THEM.  SO ESSENTIALLY,

                    MY QUESTION IS, IS THIS ALREADY BANNED UNDER THE --

                                 MS. GLICK:  NO.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  -- PRIOR LEGISLATION THAT WAS PASSED?

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. GLICK:  NO.  IT -- IT -- IT'S NOT -- THERE ARE NO --

                    THERE'S NO STATUTE THAT BANS IT.  WE ARE DOING THAT IN THIS BILL.  THERE IS

                    NO, TO MY UNDERSTANDING, ANY RESTRICTION THAT WOULD PREVENT DEC FROM

                    -- IN THESE SPECIFIC AREAS.  REMEMBER, THIS IS JUST WITHIN REFORESTATION,

                    STATE FOREST OR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS.  IT'S THOSE SPECIFIC AREAS.

                    DEC IS STILL OPEN TO MAKING LEASES IN OTHER AREAS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  SO IN THESE LEASES, DO YOU

                    KNOW IF THERE WERE -- THERE WAS LANGUAGE THAT WAS CONTAINED WITHIN

                    THOSE LEASES THAT REQUIRED REMEDIATION?

                                 MS. GLICK:  I THINK ALL -- (CONFERENCING).  I'M -- I'M

                    MORE FAMILIAR WITH THE ABSOLUTE MINING REGULATIONS THAT DO REQUIRE IT.

                    BUT APPARENTLY, YES.  IN THESE THERE ARE RECLAMATION.  AND PROBABLY ONE

                    WOULD THINK THAT THERE ARE ALSO PLUGGING OF WELLS.  IT'S JUST THAT LOTS OF

                    WELLS WERE ABANDONED LONG BEFORE THERE WERE REGULATIONS REQUIRING

                    RECLAMATION.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  SO I WANT TO ASK YOU ABOUT THE

                    PLUGGING.  THERE -- THEY -- THERE ARE WELLS THAT ARE NOT PLUGGED THAT ARE

                    JUST SITTING THERE NOT BEING USED, OR...

                                 MS. GLICK:  OH, YES.  OH, YES.  IT IS A DECIDED

                    PROBLEM.  THERE -- WE HAD SOME FEDERAL DOLLARS -- AND THESE ARE --

                    THESE ARE WELLS FROM, YOU KNOW, DECADES AGO.  SO THE RECORDS ARE A

                    LITTLE UNCLEAR AND THEY ARE -- THEY'RE IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF TOPOGRAPHY.

                    SO WHAT -- THERE'S NO SPECIFIC AMOUNT THAT, OH, IT ONLY COSTS X-AMOUNT

                    TO PLUG A WELL.  IT REQUIRES FINDING THEM, AND THEN THE TOPOGRAPHY

                    MIGHT MAKE IT MORE EXPENSIVE IN ONE AREA FROM ANOTHER.  AND SO IT'S

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    AN EXPENSIVE OPERATION.  AND DEC HAS BEEN WORKING ON THIS, AND WE

                    DID HAVE, FROM THE LAST ADMINISTRATION, SOME RESOURCES SO THAT IT

                    WASN'T COMING OUT OF STATE DOLLARS.  BUT IT -- AND THEY'RE FINDING IT

                    BASICALLY BECAUSE PEOPLE SAY, OH, YOU KNOW, THERE'S SOME WELLS BACK

                    OUT THERE, WHICH IS NOT NECESSARILY THE BEST WAY TO DO IT.  BUT WITH OLD

                    RECORDS OR NON-EXISTENT VERY OLD RECORDS, IT'S A BIG JOB AND THERE ARE A

                    LOT OF THEM.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  SO -- AND THIS IS --

                                 MS. GLICK:  AND SOME -- AND LET ME JUST CLARIFY.

                    SOME MAY ACTUALLY BE EMITTING METHANE.  SOME MAY JUST BE ADMITTING

                    BRINE.  BUT IF THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, NEAR SOMEONE'S -- NOT FAR FROM A WELL

                    THAT SOMEBODY HAS DRILLED FOR THEIR WATER AND THERE'S BRINE SEEPING OUT

                    OF AN OLD WELL, THAT'S NOT A GOOD THING FOR THOSE FOLKS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THIS IS -- JUST SO I AM CLEAR.  THIS

                    BILL IS -- IS DOING TWO THINGS:  IT'S EFFECTIVELY ENDING ANY FUTURE USE OF

                    WELLS THAT ARE PRODUCING GAS AND OIL, GAS OR OIL, AND ALSO ATTEMPTING TO

                    IDENTIFY UNCAPPED, UNPLUGGED --

                                 MS. GLICK:  IT'S NOT TO IDENTIFY.  IT'S TO -- IT WAS

                    CLEANING UP LANGUAGE THAT WOULD NOT -- THAT MIGHT HAVE PREVENTED --

                    INADVERTENTLY MIGHT HAVE PREVENTED THE CAPPING OF WELLS.  SO THAT IS --

                    IT'S NOT IDENTIFYING THEM.  THAT IS NOT THE SUBJECT OF THIS.  IT WAS JUST

                    CLEANING UP LANGUAGE TO ENSURE THAT WE DID NOT INADVERTENTLY MAKE IT

                    MORE COMPLICATED TO CAP WELLS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  SO I COULD REASONABLY ASSUME THAT

                    WITHIN TEN YEARS OR LESS THAT THERE WILL BE NO MORE OIL OR GAS EXTRACTION

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    FROM ANY WELLS IN THESE AREAS IDENTIFIED IN THIS BILL?

                                 MS. GLICK:  YEAH, I WOULD SAY THAT'S FAIR.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  MADAM SPEAKER, WE'RE IN THE MIDST

                    OF AN ENERGY CRISIS IN NEW YORK, AND YES, IT BEGAN BEFORE THE IRAN

                    CONFLICT.  RESIDENTS ARE SEEING UTILITY BILLS SKYROCKET INTO THOUSANDS OF

                    DOLLARS FOR SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES.  I SPOKE TO A BUSINESS JUST OUTSIDE OF

                    MY DISTRICT THAT GOT A $15,000 INCREASE IN THEIR ENERGY BILL FROM THE

                    MONTH PRIOR TO THIS MONTH.  OUR GOVERNOR HAS SPOKEN ABOUT EMBRACING

                    WHAT MANY OF US IN THE MINORITY CONFERENCE HAVE BEEN ADVOCATING

                    FOR:  AN ALL-AND-ABOVE APPROACH TOWARDS ACHIEVING OUR CLIMATE GOALS.

                    GOALS BORNE BOTH ON ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP AND WHAT WE WERE

                    TOLD SINCE THE BEGINNING PASSAGE OF THE CLCPA, IN THE NAME OF

                    AFFORDABILITY.  I DON'T THINK WE'VE SEEN AFFORDABILITY AT ALL.

                                 THIS BILL TYPIFIES THE CONTRADICTORY APPROACH THIS STATE

                    HAS HAD WITH ITS CONFLICTING POLICY GOALS.  WE HAVE MASSIVE PROVEN

                    RESERVES OF NATURAL GAS BENEATH OUR FEET IN THE SOUTHERN TIER THAT IS

                    DISPATCHABLE.  WE PROVIDE JOBS, GENERATE WEALTH AND ENERGY SECURITY IN

                    NEW YORK WHILE ENABLING NEW YORK RESIDENTS LOWER ENERGY COSTS.  IN

                    PENNSYLVANIA JUST ACROSS THE BORDER WHICH, BY THE WAY, WE PURCHASE

                    GAS AND ELECTRIC FROM, THEY'RE SEEING A 40 PERCENT LESS COST IN THEIR

                    ENERGY.  INSTEAD, WE'RE GONNA CONTRADICT THESE GOALS WITH RENEWABLE

                    ENERGY SITING ON OUR FARMS, OUR FIELDS, ECOLOGICALLY-SENSITIVE AREAS,

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    IGNORING CONSERVATION GOALS, INCREASING COSTS AND, MORE IMPORTANTLY,

                    IGNORING COMMUNITIES WHO DO NOT WANT BATTERY STORAGE, INDUSTRIAL

                    SOLAR ARRAYS AND WINDMILLS IN THEIR COMMUNITIES.  THIS SEEMINGLY

                    BENIGN BILL IS ONE MORE ROADBLOCK THAT RESTRICTS OPPORTUNITIES AND

                    PUSHES MORE AGENDA POLICIES ON OUR HURTING RESIDENTS.

                                 THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. ARI BROWN.

                                 MR. A. BROWN:  THANK YOU -- THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. GLICK:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. A. BROWN:  THANK YOU.  GOOD AFTERNOON.

                                 I THINK WE HEARD FROM MY COLLEAGUE WE CAN ALL AGREE

                    THERE'S AFFORDABILITY ISSUES, SPECIFICALLY WHEN IT COMES TO ENERGY IN THIS

                    STATE.  SO I ASK, IF A GAS WELL FALLS IN THE FOREST AND NO ONE'S ALLOWED TO

                    DRILL IT, DOES IT STILL REDUCE HEATING COSTS?

                                 MS. GLICK:  THE -- AS NEAR AS WE COULD TELL, THERE'S

                    LESS THAN 1 PERCENT OF PRODUCTION THAT COMES OUT OF ALL OF THESE WELLS,

                    AS BEST AS WE COULD GATHER FROM DEC.  SO THIS IS NOT A SIGNIFICANT

                    CONTRIBUTOR TO THE GAS PRODUCTION.  AND IT IS -- IT SHOULD BE CLEAR TO

                    EVERYONE THAT RENEWABLE ENERGY IS ACTUALLY NOW COSTING LESS THAN FOSSIL

                    FUELS AND CREATING LESS POLLUTION.  SO THIS IS A -- NOT JUST A MINOR BILL,

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    BUT A TRULY BENIGN BILL IN THAT VERY, VERY LITTLE PRODUCTION COMES OUT OF

                    THESE EXISTING SITES.  AND WE ARE MAKING A DECISION THAT OUR STATE

                    FORESTS, OUR WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS WHICH INCLUDE, YOU KNOW,

                    WATERSHED PROTECTION AREAS, SHOULD NOT BE THE SITE OF INDUSTRIAL OIL AND

                    GAS PRODUCTION.  WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT RESTRICTING OPPORTUNITY IN OTHER

                    PLACES.  THIS IS JUST THOSE TYPES OF AREAS THAT THE STATE IS TRYING TO

                    PRESERVE FOR THE PURPOSES I PREVIOUSLY STATED.

                                 MR. A. BROWN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPONSOR.  I --

                    I WAS TRYING TO READ THE BILL AND TRY TO SEE WHAT WAS ALLOWED AND NOT

                    ALLOWED.  SO LET ME JUST TRY TO GET THIS STRAIGHT.  WE'RE ALLOWED TO PLANT

                    NEW WINDMILLS ON THESE STATE LANDS, BUT NOT DRILL FOR NEW GAS WELLS.

                    SO DOES THAT MEAN THIS ENERGY POLICY NOW DEPENDS ON HOW THE WIND

                    BLOWS?

                                 MS. GLICK:  I WOULD SAY THAT IN SOME OF THESE

                    INSTANCES THERE MAY BE AN EDGE -- I MEAN, WIND HAS TO BE -- YOU'RE

                    GENERALLY ON A RIDGE.  YOU'RE NOT STICKING A WINDMILL IN THE MIDDLE OF

                    TREES BECAUSE THAT DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.  SO SOME OF THAT'S A LITTLE BIT

                    OF A SPECIOUS ARGUMENT.

                                 MR. A. BROWN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPONSOR.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL, PLEASE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. A. BROWN:  SO THE WAY I SEE IT, THIS BILL IS

                    ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF ALBANY POTENTIALLY SAYING NO TO THE VERY RESOURCES

                    THAT KEEP OUR HOME WARM AND OUR ECONOMY RUNNING.  WE SEEM TO

                    THINK THAT IF WE BAN DRILLING IN NEW YORK THE FUEL WILL MAGICALLY

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    APPEAR FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE, CLEANER, CHEAPER AND GUILT-FREE.  AND IF,

                    IN FACT, A GAS WELL DOES FALL IN THE FOREST AND NO ONE'S ALLOWED TO DRILL

                    IT, YOU KNOW WHAT?  IT STILL COULD HAVE LOWERED THE HEATING COSTS OF

                    HARDWORKING AMERICAN FAMILIES.

                                 NEW YORK SHOULD BE LEADING WITH BALANCE, NOT BANS.

                    CONSERVATION SHOULD BE SMART STEWARDSHIP, NOT SHUTTING THE DOORS TO

                    AMERICAN ENERGY.  CONSERVATION SHOULDN'T MEAN CONFISCATION OF

                    OPPORTUNITY.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, NEW YORK CAN PROTECT ITS FORESTS

                    AND FUEL ITS FUTURE.  WE DON'T HAVE TO PRETEND IT'S ONE OR THE OTHER.  AND

                    FOR THAT REASON I WILL BE VOTING NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR PLEASE YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. GLICK:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  THANK YOU, MS. GLICK.  OUT OF

                    CURIOSITY, ARE YOU ABLE TO THEN GUARANTEE THAT ORES IS NOT SITING WIND

                    AND SOLAR ON ANY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED IN YOUR LEGISLATION?

                                 MS. GLICK:  I CAN'T GUARANTEE A WHOLE A LOT MORE

                    THAN WHAT COMES OUT OF MY MOUTH.  I BELIEVE THAT, AS I SAID BEFORE, THAT

                    IT'S POSSIBLE THAT THERE IS A RIDGE LINE THAT IS WITHIN THE STATE FORESTLAND

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    THAT IS AN APPROPRIATE LOCATION BECAUSE IT IS THE RIDGE LINE WHERE THERE

                    IS WIND AND WHERE THERE ARE NO TREES.  SO I DON'T WANT TO CATEGORICALLY

                    SAY THAT THERE WOULD BE NO RENEWABLE ENERGY ON A RIDGE LINE AND THAT

                    THAT LAND IS NOT STATE FOREST LAND.  SO I -- I CAN'T GUARANTEE THAT.  BUT I

                    WOULD SAY THAT IT DOES NOT MAKE SENSE FOR MOST OF THESE AREAS, WHICH

                    ARE LARGELY FORESTED OR REFORESTED, TO HAVE EITHER OIL AND GAS OR

                    RENEWABLES BECAUSE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE NEEDED TO SUPPORT EITHER.  BUT

                    IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE IS A RIDGE LINE THAT IS STATE FOREST LAND THAT IS

                    APPROPRIATE FOR A -- FOR WINDMILLS.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  SO IN THE INTEREST OF THAT GOAL, YOU

                    KNOW, IN THE INTEREST OF TRANSPARENCY, WOULD YOU AGREE THAT IT'S

                    IMPORTANT THAT ORES IS FORTHCOMING AND TRANSPARENT IN OBVIOUSLY

                    SITING AND TELLING US WHERE THEY ARE PUTTING RENEWABLES.  AND I

                    UNDERSTAND THAT THAT'S NOT NECESSARILY PART OF THE ACTUAL CHAPTER THAT

                    WE'RE DISCUSSING RIGHT NOW.  BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT BECAUSE AS WE'RE

                    TALKING ABOUT ENERGY AS A WHOLE, I DO THINK THAT THE PUBLIC -- YOU

                    KNOW, AS WE'RE DOING HERE WITH -- WITH GAS AND OIL -- KNOW SPECIFICALLY

                    WHERE RENEWABLES ARE GOING AND IF THEY ARE IN CONTRARY TO ANY OF THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONS THAT WE IN THIS BUILDING CLAIM TO BE TRYING TO

                    SAVE.

                                 MS. GLICK:  I AGREE THAT ORES, WHICH HAS TO GO

                    THROUGH A SITING PROCESS, SHOULD BE MORE RESPONSIVE.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  GOOD.  WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH

                    FOR -- FOR THE -- ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  YOU KNOW, FOR THE BETTER PART OF A

                    DECADE AS A STAFFER FOR A LONG TIME OF IT, I HAVE WATCHED THIS BODY

                    SYSTEMATICALLY REDUCE OUR ENERGY SUPPLY THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE STATE.

                    AND THEN ON THE EXACT SAME TOKEN WE HAVE INCREASED OUR ELECTRIC

                    DEMAND WHEN 50 PERCENT OF OUR ELECTRICITY STILL COMES FROM NATURAL

                    GAS.

                                 PEOPLE, WHEN YOU DECREASE SUPPLY AND INCREASE

                    DEMAND, PRICES SKYROCKET AND THAT'S WHAT WE'RE EXPERIENCING RIGHT

                    NOW.  THAT'S NOT POLITICS, THAT'S BASIC ECONOMICS.  SO I WOULD URGE

                    EVERYONE AS WE CONTINUE TO ACTUALLY HEED THE WORDS OF THE GOVERNOR

                    AND ACTUALLY TRULY EMBRACE AN ALL-OF-THE-ABOVE PLATFORM.  BECAUSE THE

                    ONLY THING THAT WE HAVE DONE IN THE PAST DECADE IS SYSTEMATICALLY

                    REDUCE AND ELIMINATE NATURAL GAS FROM OUR ENERGY PORTFOLIO AND CHIP

                    AWAY AT IT PIECE BY PIECE BY PIECE WHILE GIVING ORGAN -- AGENCIES LIKE

                    ORES CARTE BLANCHE TO SITE THINGS WHEREVER THEY WANT.

                                 SO WITH THAT, I WILL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK

                    YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. GLICK ON THE BILL.

                                 MS. GLICK:  JUST TO CLOSE, I -- I WANT TO BE CLEAR THAT

                    THE AREAS THAT ARE COVERED BY THE BILL ARE STATE FORESTLANDS AND OUR

                    FORESTS WHICH ARE CONTAINED AND SEQUESTER CARBON ARE IMPORTANT, AND

                    YET UNDER THREAT FROM CLIMATE CHANGE STRESSING A LOT OF DIFFERENT

                    SPECIES THROUGHOUT THE STATE.  AND THAT THERE ARE, BECAUSE OF CLIMATE

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    CHANGE, MORE INVASIVES.  SO THE STATE FORESTLANDS, WHICH ARE REALLY

                    IMPORTANT TO PRODUCE OXYGEN AT THE SAME TIME THAT THEY ARE

                    SEQUESTERING CARBON, WE SHOULD BE PROTECTING THEM AND THAT'S THE

                    PURPOSE OF THIS.  AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT AREAS AND REFORESTATION

                    AREAS, THOSE AREAS ARE ABOUT PROTECTING WATERSHED.  THERE IS -- YOU

                    KNOW, WE ARE BLESSED IN THAT WE HAVE A LOT OF FRESH WATER WHICH MOST

                    OF THE OTHER STATES ENVY.  AND YET, WE SHOULD BE PROTECTING THOSE

                    RESOURCES FROM WHAT IS A MINIMAL, A DE MINIMUS AMOUNT OF OIL AND GAS

                    PRODUCTION.  TO ARGUE THAT SOMEHOW ENDING THESE LEASES OVER THE NEXT

                    NUMBER OF YEARS IS IN ANY WAY A PART OF UNDERMINING OUR ALL-OF-THE-

                    ABOVE AGENDA IS, A, RIDICULOUS, AND B, I WOULD HOPE THAT WE WOULD NOT

                    SEE PEOPLE CONTINUE TO OPPOSE THE EXPANSION OF RENEWABLE ENERGY

                    WHICH IS CHEAPER, PRODUCES LESS EMISSIONS, AND IS SAFE.  THE ARGUMENT

                    IT'S NOT ALWAYS RELIABLE BECAUSE IT RAINS SOMETIMES OR IT'S -- THE WIND

                    ISN'T BLOWING.  SO NOW THE ARGUMENT IS WE CAN'T HAVE ANY BATTERY

                    STORAGE, WHICH WOULD ANSWER THE RELIABILITY ISSUE, AND THAT, AS -- AS IF

                    GAS NEVER CATCHES ON FIRE OR BLOWS UP A HOUSE, WHERE BATTERY STORAGE

                    HAS VERY, VERY DEFINED PROTECTIONS FOR THE PUBLIC AND FOR THOSE

                    FACILITIES.

                                 SO I -- I HOPE THAT PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THAT THIS IS TRULY

                    JUST A MINOR FIX AND A MINOR BILL THAT PROTECTS KEY AREAS OF THE STATE

                    AND DOES NOT UNDERMINE ENERGY PRODUCTION IN ANY SIGNIFICANT WAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MINORITY CONFERENCE WILL, GENERALLY SPEAKING, BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON

                    THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  BUT IF THERE ARE MEMBERS WHO WISH TO VOTE

                    YES, NOW WOULD BE THE TIME TO DO SO AT THEIR SEATS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  FOR

                    THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION, THEY CAN DO SO AT

                    THEIR DESKS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  SO, I

                    APPRECIATE THE DIALOGUE AND THE DEBATE THAT OCCURRED.  I JUST WANT TO

                    MAKE A COUPLE OF POINTS FOR THE BENEFIT OF -- OF US ALL.

                                 LAST YEAR WHEN WE TOOK UP THE BILL-IN-CHIEF WE HAD

                    BIPARTISAN OPPOSITION.  WE HAD 48 NO VOTES.  THIS WAS A CHAPTER

                    AMENDMENT THAT WAS INSISTED UPON BY THE GOVERNOR AS A CONDITION TO

                    HER SIGNING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  SO I DO TAKE IT -- I -- I DID THINK IT

                    WAS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT WHILE THE GOVERNOR HAS SIGNALED THAT SHE'S

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    LOOKING FOR AN ALL-OF-THE ABOVE APPROACH, THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT

                    DOES THE OPPOSITE.  IT -- IT DOES NOT -- IT -- IT CURTAILS ANY DEVELOPMENT

                    OF A CERTAIN KIND OF ENERGY THAT -- SO IT'S NOT -- IT'S NOT LOOKING AT AN ALL-

                    OF-THE-ABOVE APPROACH.  IT'S ACTUALLY LIMITING PRODUCTION.

                                 NOW, WE KNOW THAT FRACKING IS ALREADY BANNED IN

                    NEW YORK, AND SOME INDUSTRY FOLKS HAVE SAID THAT EVEN IF IT WASN'T,

                    INDUSTRY WOULD NOT LEASE IN THESE PARTICULAR AREAS.  BUT STILL, JUST BASED

                    ON JUST THE PRINCIPLE OF IT, I THINK THAT TO BASICALLY ALLOW AN

                    ORGANIZATION LIKE ORES TO TRAMPLE ON LOCAL CONTROL AND TO PUT SOLAR

                    AND WIND IN SENSITIVE AREAS IF IT'S THEIR IDEA, BUT THEN AT THE SAME TOKEN

                    ON THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT FURTHER RESTRICT WHERE OTHER KINDS OF ENERGY

                    DEVELOPMENT CAN OCCUR JUST DOESN'T MAKE SENSE TO ME.  I MEAN, IF YOU

                    JUST LOOK AT THE ADIRONDACK PARK, IT'S NOT JUST A STATE FOREST.  IT'S A SIX

                    MILLION-ACRE PATCHWORK OF PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAND.  AND I -- I CAN'T SAY

                    THAT IN THAT ENTIRE AREA OF OVER SIX MILLION ACRES YOU COULDN'T

                    RESPONSIBLY HAVE SOME KIND OF DEVELOPMENT OCCURRING SOME PLACE AT

                    SOME POINT IN THE FUTURE.

                                 SO I -- I JUST CAN'T SUPPORT THIS.  AND I REALLY THINK THAT

                    THE GOVERNOR NEEDS TO KIND OF GET HER STORY STRAIGHT IF SHE'S FOR IT OR

                    AGAINST IT.  I'LL BE VOTING NO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. WALSH IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. NOVAKHOV TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. NOVAKHOV:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 FIRST OF ALL, I -- I CAN'T SUPPORT SOMETHING THAT MAKES

                    THE LIVES OF NEW YORKERS LESS AFFORDABLE.  NEW YORK IS FACING A

                    GROWING ENERGY CRISIS.  TOO MANY NEW YORKERS ARE PAYING HUNDREDS,

                    SOMETIMES THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS PER MONTH JUST TO KEEP THE LIGHTS ON

                    AND THEIR HOMES WARM.  NATURAL GAS REMAINS THE CLEANEST AND MOST

                    RELIABLE LARGE-SCALE ENERGY OPTION AVAILABLE TO OUR STATE TODAY.  IT

                    PRODUCES FAR FEWER EMISSIONS THAN COAL AND OIL, AND IT CAN POWER OUR

                    HOMES AND BUSINESSES AT A MUCH MORE AFFORDABLE RATE.  WHILE WE

                    CONTINUE DEVELOPING RENEWABLE ENERGY -- AND NO ONE IS AGAINST IT --

                    NATURAL GAS MUST REMAIN PART OF THE SOLUTION TO KEEP ENERGY RELIABLE

                    AND AFFORDABLE FOR NEW YORKERS.

                                 ONCE AGAIN, I CANNOT SUPPORT SOMETHING THAT MAKES

                    THE LIVES OF NEW YORKERS LESS AFFORDABLE.  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. NOVAKHOV IN

                    THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. CHANG TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. CHANG:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I'D LIKE

                    TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE AS A NEGATIVE.  YOU NEVER KNOW, NEW TECHNOLOGIES

                    MIGHT MATURE THAT MIGHT MAKE IT EVEN MORE EFFICIENT.  EVEN THOUGH

                    FRACKING HAS BEEN IN THE TECHNOLOGY FOR DECADES, BUT EVEN PRIOR TO THAT

                    A USELESS WELL BECAME VERY, VERY USEFUL.  AND -- AND YOU NEVER KNOW

                    THAT WE HAVE THERM -- GEOTHERMAL ENERGY THAT MIGHT BE IN THOSE -- IN

                    THOSE LEASED LAND THAT WE CAN UTILIZE THAT.

                                 UNTIL WE GET COMMERCIALLY-GRADE [SIC] FUSION ENERGY,

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    WE MUST MAINTAIN ALL SOURCES OF ALTERNATE ENERGY, ALL SOURCES, TO KEEP

                    OUR ENERGY AFFORDABLE.  AND MY CONSTITUENTS ARE COMPLAINING ABOUT

                    WHY OUR ELECTRIC RATES IS [SIC] UP, AND ARE ALSO QUESTIONING ABOUT

                    RENEWABLE ENERGY AS BEING AFFORDABLE BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF TAX

                    CREDITS, A LOT OF ENERGY -- RENEWABLES ENERGY COMPANY ALWAYS ASKS FOR

                    THE STATE FOR SOME SUBSIDIES.  SO REALLY, I THINK THERE'S A LOT OF

                    ACCOUNTING TRICKS THAT WOULD ACCOUNT FOR AFFORDABLE.  GAS AND -- AND

                    FOSSIL FUEL IS A MATURE INDUSTRY, OVER 100 YEARS OLD.  DO YOU KNOW

                    WHAT THE PRICING WOULD BE AND DO YOU KNOW HOW TO GET THAT?

                                 SO I REALLY QUESTION ABOUT WHAT'S AFFORDABILITY ON

                    RENEWABLE ENERGY.  LET THE MARKET FORCES DICTATE.  LET THE MARKET FORCE

                    UNDERSTAND WHERE WE WANT -- WHERE WE NEED OUR ENERGY.  AND I

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE AS NO.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. CHANG IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. TAGUE TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. TAGUE:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I JUST

                    CANNOT BELIEVE THE HYPOCRITICAL NATURE OF THIS BILL.  WHILE WE ARE USING

                    UP HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF PRODUCTIVE, TILLABLE PRIME FARMLAND IN

                    UPSTATE NEW YORK, PEOPLE IN THIS BODY SUPPORTED THAT.  TODAY WE'RE

                    TAKING UP A BILL NOT TO USE PROPERTY FOR NATURAL GAS.  I -- I JUST DO NOT GET

                    IT.  I JUST DO NOT GET IT.  WHILE PEOPLE AT HOME HAVE WENT FROM $150

                    ELECTRIC BILLS UP TO $500 IN THE LAST SEVERAL MONTHS BECAUSE OF THE

                    POLICIES THAT HAVE COME OUT OF THIS CHAMBER, THAT CHAMBER, AND THE

                    GOVERNOR'S OFFICE, OUR PEOPLE ARE STRUGGLING.  IT'S REALLY A SHAME WHEN

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    WE HAVE THESE RESOURCES RIGHT HERE AT HOME IN NEW YORK STATE TO TAKE

                    CARE OF THE PEOPLE THAT WE REPRESENT AND MAKE THEIR LIVES MORE

                    AFFORDABLE, AND WE DO THIS.

                                 AGAIN, I VOTE NO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. TAGUE IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 4, RULES REPORT NO. 29, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A09460, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 29, ROSENTHAL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW, IN

                    RELATION TO ACTIONS INVOLVING COERCED DEBTS; AND TO AMEND A CHAPTER OF

                    THE LAWS OF 2025 AMENDING THE GENERAL BUSINESS LAW RELATING TO

                    ESTABLISHING A RIGHT OF ACTION FOR CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF COERCED DEBTS, AS

                    PROPOSED IN LEGISLATIVE BILLS NUMBERS S.1353-B AND A.3038-B, IN

                    RELATION TO THE EFFECTIVENESS THEREOF.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON A MOTION BY MS.

                    ROSENTHAL, THE SENATE BILL IS BEFORE THE HOUSE.  THE SENATE BILL IS

                    ADVANCED.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL, AN EXPLANATION AS BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS BILL IS A CHAPTER

                    AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 710 OF THE LAWS OF 2025 WHICH ESTABLISHES

                    PROCEDURES FOR VICTIMS OF COERCED DEBT TO DISPUTE SUCH COERCED DEBT

                    WITH CREDITORS AND HOLD THEIR ABUSERS LIABLE FOR DEBTS INCURRED.

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. BOLOGNA.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  THANK YOU, MS. ROSENTHAL.  SO

                    BEFORE I BEGIN I DO JUST WANT TO MAKE SOMETHING VERY CLEAR ABOUT MY

                    INTENT HERE.  AS RANKING MEMBER ON BANKS, I'M RAISING THESE

                    QUESTIONS SOLELY TO SEEK CLARITY FOR CREDITORS AND ENSURE THE PRACTICAL

                    IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS LEGISLATION IS FULLY UNDERSTOOD.  NOTHING IN MY

                    QUESTION AND/OR REMARKS SHOULD BE INTERPRET -- INTERPRETED AS

                    DIMINISHING THE SERIOUSNESS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE AND ABUSE IN ANY

                    WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM OR VICTIMS.  SO I JUST WANT TO GET THAT OUT OF THE

                    WAY RIGHT OFF THE BAT.

                                 SO AS FAR AS THE CHAPTER IS CONCERNED, JUST SO WE'RE

                    CLEAR ABOUT THE AMENDED BILL BEFORE US, WHEN A DEBTOR CLAIMS THAT A

                    DEBT WAS INCURRED THROUGH COERCION WITHIN ONE OF THE RELATIONSHIPS

                    DEFINED IN THE BILL, THE CREDITOR MUST STOP COLLECTING REVIEW OF THAT

                    CLAIM; IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, THERE'S A -- THERE'S A WHOLE

                    PROCESS, YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  BUT FOR -- FOR THE PURPOSES

                    OF THIS, DURING THAT REVIEW PROCESS --

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA: -- THE CREDITOR MUST PAUSE ACTIVITY

                    ON THAT DEBT, CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, WITHIN TEN DAYS OF

                    RECEIVING NOTICE FROM THE DEBTOR.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO, YES.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THAT JUST GAVE YOU MORE DETAIL.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO IN THAT ONE FORM OF

                    DOCUMENTATION ALLOWED UNDER -- UNDER THE BILL, IS A SWORN STATEMENT

                    FROM A QUALIFIED THIRD-PARTY; IS THAT -- IS THAT CORRECT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  AND JUST SO I UNDERSTAND, IS

                    THAT INDIVIDUAL WHO IS THE QUALIFIED THIRD-PARTY, DO THEY -- IS THERE A

                    REQUIREMENT THAT THEY HAVE TO HAVE BEEN PRESENT FOR THE COERCED DEBT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO IT'S JUST A WRITTEN

                    STATEMENT.  IT COULD BE A WRITTEN STATEMENT OR HEARSAY?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.  IT'S -- IT'S NOT BASED ON

                    SOME CASUAL CONVERSATION THAT SOMEONE HAD WITH THEIR NEIGHBOR WHO

                    HAPPENS TO BE A LAWYER.  IT HAD TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE WITH THE -- THE

                    THIRD-PARTY ACTING IN THEIR PROFESSIONAL CAPACITY.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  BUT AGAIN, TO CLARIFY, THEY

                    DID NOT HAVE TO BE PHYSICALLY PRESENT FOR THE COERCION?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  AND IF I'M READING THE BILL

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    CORRECTLY, DURING THE CREDITOR'S REVIEW OF THE CLAIM, THE BILL RESTRICTS THE

                    CREDITOR FROM CONTACTING THE INDIVIDUAL ACCUSED OF THE COERCED ACT; IS

                    THAT ACCURATE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES, THAT IS.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO NOW WE HAVE THE

                    CREDITOR THAT HAS TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF COERCED DEBT WITHOUT

                    NECESSARILY HAVING BEEN THERE OR TALKING TO SOMEONE WHO HAS BEEN

                    THERE, IN ADDITION TO WHICH NOW THEY CAN'T TALK TO THE PEOPLE THAT

                    THEY'RE INVESTIGATING.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, GENERALLY IT TAKES PLACE

                    BETWEEN THE -- THE VICTIM AND THE ABUSER.  SO...

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO THE CREDITOR HAS TO MAKE

                    A DETERMINATION BASED ON -- BASED ON LEGALLY-DEFINED RELATIONSHIPS

                    FROM WITNESS TRANSACTIONS, AND THEY'RE PROHIBITED FROM CONTACTING

                    PEOPLE THAT ARE ACCUSED OF COERCING THE DEBT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  SO HOW -- HOW CAN A CREDITOR BE

                    RELIABLY EXPECTED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF WHETHER THAT DEBT WAS

                    ACTUALLY COERCED?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, BECAUSE THE -- THE -- THE

                    VICTIM PRESENTS DOCUMENTATION IN EVIDENCE OF THE DEBT HAVING BEEN

                    COERCED.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO RESPECTFULLY, WE'RE

                    ASKING A PRIVATE CREDITOR TO MAKE DETERMINATIONS THAT WOULD NORMALLY

                    BE MADE BY A COURT OR A SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCY IN PRETTY MUCH ANY OTHER

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    CIRCUMSTANCE, RIGHT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IT COULD BE.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  I MEAN, DO YOU SEE ANY FLAW IN

                    THAT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  DO I SEE ANY WHAT?

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  FLAW IN THAT THINKING.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THIS -- THIS BILL IS INTENDED TO

                    PROVIDE A PATHWAY WHERE NONE EXISTED BEFORE FOR VICTIMS OF COERCED

                    DEBT.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  AND I'M NOT NECESSARILY REFUTING

                    THE -- THE PATHWAY THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO CREATE.  I'M TRYING TO POINT OUT

                    -- YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THIS IS A CHAPTER AMENDMENT AND THESE THINGS WERE

                    NOT NECESSARILY AMENDED IN THIS CHAPTER.  SO FROM A PRACTICALITY

                    STANDPOINT, I'M JUST TRYING TO GAIN CLARITY ON WHAT WE'RE ACTUALLY TRYING

                    TO ACCOMPLISH HERE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I THINK -- I THINK YOU'RE

                    QUESTIONING THE BASIC PREMISE OF THE BILL AND THE CHAPTER AMENDMENT.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  I WOULD DISAGREE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  HOWEVER -- HOWEVER, THERE --

                    THERE ARE ALREADY INTERACTIONS THAT TAKE PLACE BETWEEN CREDITORS AND

                    WHO THEY THINK OWE THE MONEY.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  IF -- SO IF THE CREDITOR

                    SUSPENDS COLLECTION UPON RECEIVING DOCUMENTATION BUT THEY CAN'T FULLY

                    INVESTIGATE THE CLAIM, ARE THERE ANY SAFEGUARDS THAT EXIST TO PREVENT THE

                    MISUSE BY INDIVIDUALS SEEKING TO AVOID LEGITIMATE DEBTS?

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.  SO, I HAVE NOT HEARD OF

                    ANY CASES WHERE SOMEONE WHO'S A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, FOR

                    EXAMPLE, OR SOMEONE WHO'S BEEN TRAFFICKED OR A SENIOR WHO'S BEEN

                    TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF BY A CAREGIVER MAKING UP SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO PAY

                    SOMETHING.  MAKING THINGS UP.  THAT -- THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  I'M SORRY, I COULDN'T HEAR YOU.  DID

                    YOU SAY THAT NEVER HAPPENED?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I SAY THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN THAT

                    SURVIVORS OF THESE KINDS OF SITUATIONS MAKE THINGS UP; HOWEVER, THERE

                    ARE SEVERE PENALTIES FOR PERJURY BUILT INTO THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  ALL RIGHT.  SO ASIDE FROM GENERAL

                    PERJURY LAWS, THE BILL ITSELF DOES NOT CREATE ANY TYPE OF NEW -- NEW LAWS

                    OR CONSEQUENCES FOR SOMEBODY WHO WOULD FABRICATE A CLAIM, CORRECT?

                    OUTSIDE OF GENERAL PERJURY.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, A GENERAL PERJURY IS -- IS A

                    SERIOUS CLAIM.  SECONDLY, THE CREDITOR MAY DECIDE BASED ON WHAT

                    THEY'VE SEEN SUBMITTED THAT IT'S NOT A COERCED DEBT.  THEY HAVE THAT

                    OPTION AS WELL.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  WELL, WE'LL GET THERE.  I'M STILL

                    FOCUSING ON THE POTENTIAL OF FRAUDULENT CLAIMS AND WHAT IS -- WHAT IS

                    BEING DONE IN THIS LEGISLATION TO PREVENT THAT.  BECAUSE I'M NOT AN

                    ATTORNEY, BUT FROM MY UNDERSTANDING PERJURY CHARGES IN A CIVIL CASE ARE

                    VERY RARE.  SO AGAIN, I ASK JUST TO CLARIFY, THERE'S NOTHING IN THIS

                    LEGISLATION OUTSIDE OF THE RELIANCE ON PERJURY TO PREVENT DISHONEST

                    BEHAVIOR, CORRECT?  THERE'S NO EXTRA PUNISHMENT, NO OTHER CRIMES?

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THE SAME AS FOR ANY OTHER

                    FRAUDULENT CLAIM.  AND -- AND MY PREMISE HERE IS THAT THE SURVIVOR OF

                    ABUSE IS NOT GOING TO PUT IN THE TIME AND EFFORT AND DEALING WITH WHAT

                    THEIR ABUSER DID TO THEM, TO GET OUT OF A DEBT.  THAT'S MY PREMISE, THAT

                    THEY WILL NOT BE LYING AND CHEATING ON THIS.  BUT THERE IS THE PERJURY

                    HANGING OVER THEIR HEAD.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  TO BE VERY CLEAR, I AM NOT TALKING

                    ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE THE VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE OR COERCED

                    DEBT.  I AM TALKING ABOUT PEOPLE WHO ARE NOT VICTIMS OF ANY OF THOSE

                    CRIMES OR ANY OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHO WOULD USE NOW THIS MECHANISM

                    TO GET OUT OF A PERFECTLY REAL AND, YOU KNOW, A LEGITIMATE DEBT THAT THEY

                    OWE.  SO THERE'S NO SCENARIO IN WHICH YOU COULD SEE THAT SOMEONE

                    WOULD EVER ABUSE THIS?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, AS -- AS I SAID, THERE ARE

                    INTERNAL PROCESSES BY WHICH THE CREDITOR EXAMINES THE SUBMISSION BY

                    THE DEBTOR, AND IF THEY DECIDE THAT THEY ARE NOT VALID THEN THEY CAN SAY,

                    SORRY, YOU OWE THE MONEY.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO WITH THAT PREMISE, THEN,

                    UNDER SECTION 604-EE OF THE BILL, THE INDIVIDUAL WHO ALLEGEDLY CAUSED

                    THE COERCED DEBT IS HELD FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT DEBT; IS THAT

                    ACCURATE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  ALL RIGHT.  SO THAT MEANS THAT A

                    CREDITOR, AND POSSIBLY THE DEBTOR IF THEY'VE ALREADY MADE THE PAYMENTS,

                    COULD FILE A LAWSUIT AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL TO RECOVER THAT MONEY

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    ASSUMING IT'S WITHIN THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS.  IS THAT ALSO AN ACCURATE

                    STATEMENT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  SO TO PUT THIS IN REAL LIFE

                    TERMS, IF I'M A LENDER AND I MAKE A COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE IF

                    IT'S CHEAPER FOR ME TO JUST EAT THE COST OF A -- A DEBT THAT I LENT OUT

                    BECAUSE SOMEONE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO PAY IT BACK.  AND MY OTHER

                    OPTION IS GOING TO COURT, FILING LITIGATION; COURT FEES, LEGAL FEES.  IS IT

                    NOT POSSIBLE THAT AS A LENDER MY RESPONSE TO THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION

                    COULD BE TIGHTENING MY CREDIT STANDARDS AND LIMITING MY WILLINGNESS TO

                    -- TO MAKE LOANS OR MAKING IT MORE DIFFICULT TO GET LOANS?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I MEAN, THAT IS -- THAT IS NOT PART

                    OF THIS BILL AND IT'S NOT PART OF THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  WELL, I -- I GUESS WHAT I'M TALKING

                    ABOUT IS THE IMPLEMENT -- IM -- THE IMPLEMENTS -- THE IMPLICATIONS OF

                    THE CHAPTER AMENDMENT.  IS IT NOT POSSIBLE TO CONCEIVE THAT LENDERS,

                    BASED ON THIS IN THE SCENARIO THAT I JUST LAID OUT, WOULD -- WOULD NOT

                    MAKE CREDIT HARDER TO COME BY?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I HAVE NO IDEA.  YOU COULD

                    MAKE UP ANY KIND OF HYPOTHETICAL AND THEN THEORIZE THE CONSEQUENCES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  MS. ROSENTHAL --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK.)

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  WITH ALL DUE RESPECT, THIS ISN'T A

                    HYPOTHETICAL.

                                 (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK)

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WE ARE ASKING AND

                    ANSWERING QUESTIONS, PLEASE.  OKAY?  THANK YOU.  FOR BOTH OF YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THE CHAPTER AMENDMENT DOES

                    NOT ADDRESS THE BUSINESS PRACTICES OF A CREDITOR.  BUT THIS IS SIMILAR TO

                    PROTECTIONS THAT OTHER STATES HAVE IMPLEMENTED.  SO THE -- YOU KNOW,

                    THE LENDING COMMUNITY IS SIMILAR AND THIS IS NOT UNFAMILIAR TO THEM.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  AGAIN, RESPECTFULLY, IS IT NOT OUR

                    JOB IN THIS BUILDING TO FIGURE OUT WHAT THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE

                    LEGISLATION THAT WE PASS ARE GOING TO BE?  IS IT NOT OUR RESPONSIBILITY TO

                    ASK THOSE QUESTIONS AND HOW IT'S GOING TO IMPACT THE MARKET?  IS THAT

                    NOT LITERALLY WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I ALREADY ANSWERED.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  OKAY.  WELL, I HAVE A COUPLE MORE

                    -- AGAIN, I THANK YOU FOR BEARING WITH ME.  I'M HOPING YOU MIGHT BE

                    ABLE TO CLARIFY TWO PROVISIONS THAT APPEAR VERY CONFUSING IN THIS.  SO, AT

                    THE TOP OF PAGE 6, SECTION 604-BB --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  SUBSECTION 4 IT SAYS THAT

                    SUBMITTING A REQUEST FOR CONSIDERATION TO THE CREDITOR IS NOT REQUIRED

                    BEFORE BRINGING LEGAL ACTION.  BUT THEN AT THE BOTTOM OF PAGE 6, TOP OF

                    PAGE 7, SECTION 604-CC IT SAYS THAT LAWSUITS CANNOT BE STARTED UNLESS

                    THE DEBTOR HAS SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION.  THESE TWO

                    STATEMENTS LITERALLY SAY OPPOSITE THINGS.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.  SO THERE HAVE BEEN

                    DISCUSSIONS ABOUT THAT AND IT'S SOMETHING THAT WE'LL BE TALKING ABOUT

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    ADDRESSING AFTER THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  SO YOU'RE SUGGESTING MAKING A

                    CHAPTER TO THE CHAPTER?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO, IT WOULD BE A NEW BILL.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  A NEW BILL.  BUT YOU'RE AGREEING

                    THAT THESE TWO THINGS SAY EXACTLY THE OPPOSITE, RIGHT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IT'S INCONSISTENT, YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  IT'S INCONSISTENT.  OKAY.  SO IF IT'S

                    INCONSISTENT HERE AND WE'VE MADE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND MAYBE STAFF

                    HAS MADE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS, MAYBE FOLKS WHO THIS IS GOING TO IMPACT

                    UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S LITERALLY OPPOSING LANGUAGE IN THE ACTUAL BILL,

                    HOW IS THE LENDER SUPPOSED TO MAKE A DETERMINATION OF WHAT THEIR

                    RESPONSIBILITY IS?  I MEAN, THE -- THE TEXT IS WRONG.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  AS I SAID, WE'RE GOING TO ADDRESS

                    THAT, AND -- YES.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  MS. ROSENTHAL, IN ALL DUE RESPECT, I

                    -- I'M NOT IN A POSITION HERE TO BE VOTING ON PIECES OF LEGISLATION THAT

                    ARE LITERALLY CONTRADICTING EACH OTHER.  I -- I -- I CAN'T IN GOOD

                    CONSCIENCE END THIS DEBATE WITHOUT ASKING WHY ARE -- WHY ARE WE

                    CONSIDERING VOTING ON A PIECE OF LEGISLATION THAT WE KNOW IS WRONG

                    WITHOUT ANY TYPE OF AMEN -- AMENDMENT TO IT GOING FORWARD?  THERE'S

                    NO GUARANTEE OF AN AMENDMENT.  NOTHING IS GUARANTEED.  SO WHY

                    WOULD I SIT HERE AND LET MY COLLEAGUES VOTE ON SOMETHING THAT IS

                    KNOWINGLY WRONG?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I DON'T KNOW.  YOU VOTED FOR IT

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    IN COMMITTEE.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  BECAUSE I THOUGHT THAT IT WAS VERY

                    IMPORTANT TO HAVE THIS DISCUSSION RIGHT NOW TO BRING TO LIGHT SOME OF

                    THE ISSUES IN THIS BILL.  BECAUSE IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THAT OUR CONSTITUENTS

                    KNOW AND HAVE A VISIBLE RECORD OF WHAT IS HAPPENING.  THAT IS WHY.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I THINK YOU'RE LOSING SIGHT OF

                    WHAT THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT DOES.  I ALREADY SAID IT'S INCONSISTENT.

                    WE WILL FIX IT AND THAT REMAINS MY ANSWER.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  AND I AM NOT DISAGREEING WITH YOU

                    --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA: -- ON THE BASIS OF THE CHAPTER

                    AMENDMENT.  WHAT I AM DISAGREEING WITH YOU ON IS THE FACT THAT THIS --

                    THIS WAS AN OVERSIGHT THAT WAS NOT FIXED, AND YET WE ARE STILL HERE

                    EXPECTED TO VOTE ON IT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  FAIR ENOUGH.

                                 MADAM -- THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. BOLOGNA:  FINANCIAL COERCION AND

                    EXPLOITATION IS A VERY SERIOUS ISSUE, AND VICTIMS ABSOLUTELY DESERVE

                    PROTECTION.  HOWEVER, THIS BILL PLACES CREDITORS IN A VERY DIFFICULT

                    POSITION.  A, IT'S WRONG.  BUT, B, IT ASKS LENDERS TO DETERMINE WHETHER

                    COERCION OCCURRED WITHIN COMPLEX FAMILY AND INTIMATE RELATIONSHIPS

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    DEFINED ACROSS MULTIPLE STATUTES.  WE ARE ASKING LENDERS AND CREDITORS

                    TO ESSENTIALLY BE A COURT SYSTEM AND A SOCIAL SERVICE SYSTEM.  AT THE

                    SAME TIME, CREDITORS HAVE TO RELY ON DOCUMENTATION THAT MAY NOT RELATE

                    TO THE TRANSACTION ITSELF, AND ARE RESTRICTED FROM HAVING THE ABILITY TO

                    INVESTIGATE THOSE CLAIMS.

                                 THESE DETERMINATIONS ARE TYPICALLY MADE BY COURTS

                    AND SOCIAL SERVICE PROFESSIONALS, NOT BY CREDITORS.  AND FOR THAT REASON

                    -- AND AGAIN, IT'S WRONG -- I WILL BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.  SO I JUST WANT TO

                    JUST RUN THROUGH -- I FEEL LIKE IT HELPS ME TO UNDERSTAND THE BILL A LITTLE

                    BIT BETTER BY RUNNING THROUGH AN ACTUAL CONCRETE EXAMPLE.  SO LET'S SAY

                    THAT THERE -- I GUESS -- LET ME START -- BEFORE I GET INTO THAT I JUST WANT TO

                    CLARIFY THAT THE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE THAT IS INVOLVED COULD BE THE RESULT

                    OF A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT KINDS OF RELATIONSHIPS, CORRECT?  SO IT COULD BE

                    CHILD/PARENT, IT COULD BE ELDERLY PERSON/CAREGIVER.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.  AS -- AS I -- I THINK I SAID

                    EARLIER IN RESPONSE, THAT IT COULD BE, YOU KNOW, DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    BETWEEN A PARTNER -- BUT BETWEEN TWO PARTNERS, BUT IT COULD ALSO BE A

                    TRAFFICKING.  IT COULD ALSO BE A PARENT/CHILD.

                                 MS. WALSH:  YEAH.  AND THE GENDER IS IRRELEVANT,

                    TOO.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO LET'S JUST SAY THERE'S AN INDIVIDUAL

                    WHO GOES TO A MEMBER OF THEIR CLERGY AND SITS DOWN WITH CLERGY AND

                    SAYS, I WAS COERCED INTO APPLYING FOR A CREDIT CARD.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  RIGHT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND I WAS COERCED INTO USING THAT

                    CREDIT CARD AND I RACKED UP A LOT OF CHARGES ON THAT CREDIT CARD, BUT I

                    WOULDN'T HAVE DONE IT HAD I NOT BEEN COERCED INTO DOING IT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY?  AND THEN AT THAT POINT THE --

                    THE -- THAT PERSON WHO IS GOING TO TRY TO MAKE A CASE THAT -- THAT THE

                    DEBT WAS COERCED, AND THAT MEMBER OF THE CLERGY WOULD THEN DO SOME

                    KIND OF A SWORN AFFIDAVIT SAYING -- AND WHAT WOULD THAT AFFIDAVIT SAY?

                    LIKE, WHAT WOULD BE THE PROOF IN THAT AFFIDAVIT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I MEAN, WE'RE NOT -- WE DON'T --

                    WE DON'T SPECIFY THE LANGUAGE, BUT BASICALLY AFFIRMING THAT THE VICTIM

                    HAD TOLD THEM IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITY THAT THEY WERE COERCED.  AND SO

                    IT'S A STATEMENT BASICALLY SAYING THAT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND -- AND UNDER THE BILL, IF THE -- THEY

                    ONLY HAVE TO -- THERE'S A LIST OF THINGS THAT CAN BE PRODUCED IN SUPPORT

                    OF THE IDEA THAT IT'S COERCED.  ONLY ONE IS REQUIRED.

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO THAT -- THAT AFFIDAVIT BY THAT CLERGY

                    MEMBER COULD BE THE ONLY PIECE OF EVIDENCE SUPPORTED TO DOCUMENT

                    THE COERCIVE DEBT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.  BUT THE DEBTOR ALSO HAS

                    TO PROVIDE A STATEMENT UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY THAT THE DEBT WAS

                    COERCED.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO LET ME JUST DIRECT YOU

                    BECAUSE I DO WANNA CLEAR THIS UP FOR MYSELF.  ON PAGE 4 OF THE BILL,

                    STARTING AT AROUND LINE 9... OKAY.  SO I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING.  SO A

                    SWORN OR NOTARIZED STATEMENT BY YOU, THE ALLEGED DEBTOR --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY, THAT'S REQUIRED.  AND THEN -- AND

                    THEN IT SAYS,"... PROVIDE ADEQUATE DOCUMENTATION OF COERCED DEBT -- I'M

                    ON LINE 13 -- ONE -- "... PROVIDE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENTS", BUT

                    YOU MAY PROVIDE MORE.  AND THE ONE I'M LOOKING AT IS A NOTARIZED

                    STATEMENT, LINE 21, FROM A QUALIFIED THIRD-PARTY THAT YOU REPORTED THE

                    COERCED DEBT TO.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO THOSE ARE THE TWO AFFIDAVITS THAT

                    YOU'RE REFERRING TO --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- THAT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    DOCUMENT THE -- OR POTENTIALLY SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT THE COERCED DEBT.

                    OKAY.  BUT ISN'T THAT CLERGY MEMBER -- JUST FOLLOWING UP ON THE

                    EXAMPLE -- ISN'T THAT CLERGY MEMBER JUST REPORTING HEARSAY?  AREN'T

                    THEY JUST SAYING, THE DEBTOR TOLD ME THAT THIS WAS COERCED DEBT?

                    AREN'T -- ISN'T THAT PERSON JUST REPORTING HEARSAY FROM THE -- FROM THE

                    ALLEGE -- FROM THE DEBTOR?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I MEAN, WE -- AND THEN THERE ARE

                    EXAMPLES HERE OF SOCIAL WORKERS, ATTORNEYS, DOCTORS, NURSES, THERAPISTS,

                    EMPLOYEES FROM GOVERNMENT, NON-PROFIT AGENCIES THAT WORK WITH

                    SURVIVORS OF VIOLENCE, MEMBERS OF THE CLERGY, LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    OFFICERS.  THESE ARE PEOPLE WHO OCCUPY IMPORTANT POSITIONS IN SOCIETY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SURE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  AND -- AND SO IT'S REALLY THEIR

                    REPUTATION ON THE LINE AS WELL.

                                 MS. WALSH:  BUT -- AND I'M NOT IMPUGNING ANY OF

                    THEIR REPUTATION AT ALL, BUT ALL THEY -- YOU'VE ALREADY ESTABLISHED FROM

                    PRIOR DEBATE THAT THE INDIVIDUAL WHO'S PROVIDING THAT AFFIDAVIT DIDN'T

                    HAVE TO BE THERE AND ACTUALLY BE A WITNESS TO THE COERCION.  ALL THEY

                    HAVE TO BE A WITNESS TO IS THAT THE DEBTOR WENT TO THEM AND SAID, THIS

                    DEBT WAS COERCED.  THEY'RE JUST REPORTING WHAT THEY'VE BEEN TOLD,

                    WHICH IS WHAT HEARSAY IS.  IS -- ISN'T IT BEING -- IS IT -- HOW IS IT BEING

                    OFFERED?  IS IT BEING OFFERED FOR THE TRUTH THAT THIS WAS ACTUALLY COERCED

                    DEBT?  I MEAN, THAT'S THE DEFINITION OF HEARSAY.  WHY ARE WE EVEN

                    ALLOWING THAT TO BOLSTER A CLAIM BY -- BY A DEBTOR THAT THIS WAS COERCED

                    DEBT?

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YOU KNOW, PART OF THE PROBLEM

                    IS THAT VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE, THEY ARE BATTERED PHYSICALLY,

                    EMOTIONALLY, AND OFTEN THE SURVIVORS DON'T FEEL LIKE THEY CAN GO TO THE

                    POLICE.  THEY FEEL LIKE THE ONLY PERSON THEY CAN CONFIDE IN IS A MEMBER

                    OF THE CLERGY.  AND THAT'S WHY WE ADDED -- WE CHOSE THEM TO BE PART OF

                    THE LIST BECAUSE THEY ARE TRUSTED MEMBERS OF SOCIETY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND -- AND I DON'T HAVE ANY QUESTION

                    THAT THE INDIVIDUALS THAT YOU NAMED ARE ALL IMPORTANT PEOPLE IN THE

                    COMMUNITY WHO COULD PROVIDE WONDERFUL SUPPORT TO A PERSON WHO WAS

                    A VICTIM OF HUMAN TRAFFICKING OR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.  I DON'T QUESTION

                    THAT IN THE LEAST.  WHAT I'M QUESTIONING, THOUGH, IS WHY WE WOULD

                    ALLOW -- OR ACTUALLY REQUIRE A -- A STATEMENT, A HEARSAY STATEMENT FROM

                    ONE OF THOSE INDIVIDUALS TO BOLSTER WHAT THE PERSON IS ALLEGING AS THE

                    DEBTOR?  WHY DO WE EVEN -- WE WOULDN'T ALLOW THAT IN COURT.  WE

                    WOULDN'T -- WE WOULDN'T ALLOW THAT.  SO WHY DO WE -- WHY DO WE ALLOW

                    THAT HERE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  AS I SAID BEFORE, WE WERE

                    LOOKING FOR PEOPLE THAT A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVOR WOULD HAVE

                    CONFIDED IN.  AND WE'RE NOT ASSUMING THAT IT'S HEARSAY.  WE'RE -- WE'RE

                    SAYING HERE'S A PATH FOR A DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SURVIVOR WHO'S SURVIVED

                    MANY THINGS, INCLUDING BEING FORCED TO TAKE ON DEBT THAT IS NOT THEIRS.

                    THEY HAVE TO -- IT WOULD BE A NOTARIZED STATEMENT.  AND AS I SAID

                    EARLIER, THERE'S STILL A PROCESS.  THE CREDITOR CAN STILL SAY, WAIT A MINUTE.

                    I DON'T BELIEVE YOU.  SO THAT'S ALWAYS AN OPTION AFTER THEY DO THEIR

                    INVESTIGATION.

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO LET'S JUMP TO THAT, THEN.

                    LET'S SAY THAT THAT IS THE CREDITOR'S DECISION --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- THAT THIS -- WE DON'T FIND THIS

                    CREDIBLE.  THIS DOESN'T NEED A PREPONDERANCE OF THE EVIDENCE FOR US.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO THEY DENY IT.  AND THEN -- AND THEN

                    WHAT IS -- WHAT'S THE NEXT STEP IN THE PROCESS THEN?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.  SO -- OKAY.  SO WHAT THE

                    CREDITOR CAN DO WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF COMPLETING THEIR INVESTIGATION, THEY

                    CAN CEASE COLLECTIONS OR THEY CAN RECOMMENCE COLLECTIONS.  AND AT --

                    IF THEY DECIDE TO RECOMMENCE, THEN THE -- THE ALLEGED DEBTOR HAS AN

                    APPEAL, ONE APPEAL, AND THE DEBTOR MAY SUBMIT THAT REQUEST TO

                    RECONSIDER AND PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND IS THAT APPEAL TO THE CREDITOR?  IS

                    IT --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO IT'S NOT TO, LIKE, A COURT OR

                    ANYTHING LIKE THAT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO, NO.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  OKAY.  SO THEY CAN -- THEY CAN

                    ASK FOR RECONSIDERATION.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND -- AND THEN IF IT'S STILL FOUND TO BE

                    NOT CREDIBLE BY THE -- OR DOESN'T MEET THE STANDARD OF PROOF BY THE

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    CREDITOR, THEN THE CREDITOR CAN JUST CONTINUE TO GO AHEAD AND COLLECT THE

                    DEBT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  IS THERE ANY -- ANYTHING ELSE

                    AFTER THAT THAT CAN HAPPEN, OR ANYTHING BEYOND THAT OR DOES IT JUST END

                    THEN?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I MEAN, THE DEBTOR THEMSELVES

                    COULD GO TO COURT AND TRY TO GET A JUDGMENT AGAINST THEIR ABUSER, THE

                    PERSON WHO COERCED THE DEBT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  CAN THE -- CAN THE -- THE DEBTOR GO INTO

                    COURT AGAINST THE -- THE -- THE CREDITOR AND SAY THEY MADE A BIG MISTAKE,

                    THEY DIDN'T --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES, TO -- THEY COULD, TO GET A

                    DECLARATION FROM -- FROM THE COURT THAT THE DEBT WAS COERCED.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THAT IT WAS COERCED.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND THEN IF THAT HAPPENS --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YEAH.

                                 MS. WALSH: -- THEN DOES THE DEBTOR HAVE TO PAY

                    ATTORNEYS' FEES TO THE -- TO THE ALLEGED DEBTOR?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I BELIEVE SO.  THE -- THE DEBTOR

                    MAY BE ENTITLED TO ATTORNEYS' FEES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  BUT IN -- DOES -- IS IT --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK.)

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- WRITTEN IN THE BILL ANYWHERE?

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK)

                    SOMETHING THE COURT --

                                 MS. WALSH:  OH, I APOLOGIZE, I COULDN'T HEAR YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I'M SORRY.  BUT THAT WOULD BE

                    SOMETHING THE COURT WOULD DECIDE WHETHER TO AWARD ATTORNEYS' FEES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  I DID SEE SOMETHING IN HERE ABOUT

                    ATTORNEYS' FEES --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- AND ACTUAL DAMAGES AND THINGS LIKE

                    THAT.  THAT'S WHY I WAS ASKING.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.  BUT THE COURT

                    WOULD DETERMINE THAT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  RIGHT.  RIGHT.  IT'S NOT AUTOMATIC.  I

                    THINK IT SAYS --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO, NO.

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- SHALL HAVE A CAUSE OF ACTION AGAINST

                    THE CREDITOR TO RECOVER STATUTORY DAMAGES OF $1,000, ACTUAL DAMAGES, IF

                    ANY, AND THE COSTS AND REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES INCURRED IN BRINGING

                    SUCH ACTION.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YEAH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO THEY DO GET ATTORNEYS' FEES,

                    IT'S JUST THEY'RE GONNA BE SET BY THE COURT, WHATEVER THAT --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  I IMAGINE -- USUALLY THE ATTORNEYS WILL

                    SUBMIT A BILL AND SAYS, THIS IS WHAT I SPENT ON THE MATTER, AND THEN THE

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    COURT WILL DECIDE HOW MUCH.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  RIGHT.  AND -- AND IN MOST CASES

                    THE SURVIVOR IS -- IS RECEIVING THE VOLUN -- THE SERVICES FROM A SOCIAL

                    SERVICE AGENCY, FOR EXAMPLE.  SO IT'S PROBABLY NOT SOME HIGH-POWERED

                    WHITE-SHOE LAW FIRM, BUT, YOU KNOW, AN AGENCY THAT -- THAT -- WHOSE

                    MISSION IS TO HELP SURVIVORS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  RIGHT.  RIGHT.  YUP, UNDERSTAND.  SO IS

                    THERE ANYWHERE IN THE BILL ANYTHING THAT SAYS THAT THE CREDITOR GETS THEIR

                    ATTORNEYS' FEES BACK IF THIS WHOLE THING UNFOLDS AND -- AND THEY'RE

                    FOUND NOT TO HAVE BEEN HAVING DONE ANYTHING WRONG?  AND I WOULD

                    THINK THAT A, SAY IT'S A BANK OR A -- A CREDIT CARD COMPANY OR, I DON'T

                    KNOW, I DON'T WHO IT WOULD BE, BUT THEY -- THEY HAVE TO JUST PAY FOR

                    THEIR OWN ATTORNEYS' FEES ALL ALONG HERE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.  IF -- IT IT'S -- IF THEY ARE

                    GOING AFTER THE ABUSER, THEN THEY GET ATTORNEYS' FEES.  NOT IF THEY'RE

                    GOING AFTER THE -- THE SUR -- THE SURVIVOR, THE ALLEGED DEBTOR.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO COULD YOU SAY THAT AGAIN?

                    I'M SO SORRY.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IF THEY'RE GOING AFTER THE ABUSER,

                    THE COERCER, THEN THEY MAY BE ENTITLED TO ATTORNEYS' FEES.  IF THEY'RE

                    GOING AFTER THE ALLEGED DEBTOR, OR THE SURVIVOR, THEN THEY'RE NOT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THEN THERE'S -- THEN -- OKAY.  SO I

                    WASN'T TALKING ABOUT GOING AFTER THE ABUSER.  I WAS USING AN EXAMPLE

                    WHERE IT WAS BETWEEN THE -- THE -- THE LENDER, YOU KNOW --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YEAH, YEAH, YEAH.

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MS. WALSH: -- THE CREDITOR OR THE -- THE ALLEGED

                    DEBTOR.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.  SO, NO.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  ALL RIGHT.

                                 DO YOU HAVE ANY IDEA -- I WAS JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THIS

                    -- HOW MANY PEOPLE THIS COULD IMPACT?  I MEAN, DO YOU HAVE ANY DATA

                    OR ANYTHING THAT SHOWS HOW MUCH COERCED DEBT YOU THINK IS OUT THERE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YOU KNOW, IT'S -- IT'S REALLY HARD

                    TO PIN THAT DOWN SINCE THEY HAVEN'T HAD A PATHWAY.  SO THERE HAVE

                    BEEN -- YOU KNOW, I'M SURE SURVIVORS SPEAK TO A CREDITOR AND SAY,

                    LISTEN -- YOU KNOW, SUCH AGREEMENTS ARE MADE ALL THE TIME, SO -- BUT

                    WE DON'T HAVE DATA IT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  SO ONCE THIS GOES INTO EFFECT,

                    THEN WE CAN START THE PROCESS OF -- OF COLLECTING DATA ON THIS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  VERY GOOD.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  BUT WE DO KNOW THAT ECONOMIC

                    ABUSE AND COERCED DEBT ARE SERIOUS ISSUES WITHIN THE DV COMMUNITY.

                    AND YOU HEAR MORE AND MORE ABOUT SENIORS BEING TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF,

                    AND YOU JUST, SADLY, HEAR MORE OF THIS STUFF.  SO I THINK IT WILL HELP A

                    WIDE RANGE OF VICTIMS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR

                    ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. WALSH:  MADAM SPEAKER, VERY BRIEFLY ON THE

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO I THINK -- I DEFINITELY THINK THAT THIS

                    BILL COMES FROM A PLACE OF GOOD INTENTION.  I -- I REALLY DO.  I -- I THINK

                    SOME OF THE SADDEST CALLS THAT I HAVE GOTTEN IN MY OFFICE ARE FROM

                    ELDERLY -- ELDERLY FOLKS THAT I REPRESENT WHO HAVE BEEN TAKEN ADVANTAGE

                    OF BY FAMILY MEMBERS OR BY CAREGIVERS.  PEOPLE WHO ARE VULNERABLE

                    ANYWAY.  I -- I -- I HAD THE GREATEST AMOUNT OF SYMPATHY FOR THEM, AND I

                    DO THINK THAT THIS BILL COMES FROM THAT PLACE.  MY PROBLEM, I GUESS, IS

                    REALLY -- WAS WITH THE ORIGINAL BILL, AND ITS -- AND ALSO THIS SIGNIFICANT,

                    VERY SIGNIFICANT REWRITE IN THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT.  BECAUSE I THINK AS

                    WAS STATED IN THE PREVIOUS PORTION OF THIS DEBATE, THERE ARE SOME

                    PROBLEMS WITH THE WAY THAT THE BILL IS CURRENTLY WRITTEN, AND I REALLY -- I

                    DON'T -- I -- WHILE I DO CREDIT AND FEEL ENORMOUS SYMPATHY FOR THOSE

                    WHO HAVE TRULY BEEN TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF OR HAVE BEEN ABUSED, I DO

                    THINK THAT THE SPONSOR'S STATEMENT THAT NOBODY WOULD MAKE THIS UP,

                    YOU KNOW -- AND -- AND I'M PARAPHRASING -- BUT THE GIST WAS THAT

                    NOBODY -- YOU KNOW, NOBODY WOULD LIE ABOUT THIS.  I -- I JUST DON'T

                    AGREE WITH THAT.  I THINK THAT THIS COULD BE SOMETHING THAT COULD BE

                    TAKEN ADVANTAGE OF.

                                 SO I THINK THAT THE BILL NEEDS SOME WORK.  I DO THINK,

                    LIKE I SAID, THAT IT COMES FROM A GOOD PLACE, BUT I CAN'T SUPPORT IT IN ITS

                    CURRENT FORM.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. CHANG.

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MR. CHANG:  THANK YOU.  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD,

                    PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. CHANG:  YES.  THANK YOU.  I JUST WANTED TO

                    CLARIFY.  THE -- THE DEBTOR AND CREDITOR HAVE TO BE IN RESIDENCE OR A

                    LOCATION IN NEW YORK STATE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THE BILL DOESN'T SPECIFY.

                                 MR. CHANG:  IF WE'RE ONLY APPLYING FOR STATE LAW,

                    WHAT HAPPENED [SIC] IF THE CREDITOR IS ACROSS A DIFFERENT STATE?  WOULD

                    THIS HAVE AN APPLICATION FOR THIS COERCED DEBT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  I MEAN, IF THEY'RE DOING BUSINESS

                    IN NEW YORK THIS WOULD APPLY TO THEM.

                                 MR. CHANG:  OKAY.  NOW, WHAT HAPPENED [SIC] IF

                    THE CREDITOR SOLD THAT PAPER TO ANOTHER PARTY, LET'S SAY TO A COLLECTION

                    AGENCY OR SOME OTHER THIRD-PARTY IN A DIFFERENT STATE, WOULD THIS BE

                    APPLY [SIC] THEM?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  IF -- IF THEY'RE DOING BUSINESS IN

                    NEW YORK STATE, YES.

                                 MR. CHANG:  IF THEY'RE NOT?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THEN -- THEN THEY'RE NOT.

                                 MR. CHANG:  OKAY.  SO FOR THIS -- I APPRECIATE WHAT

                    YOU WRITE THE BILL [SIC], YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY FOR DOMESTIC VIOLENCE

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    AND -- AND I HAVE HEART FOR THAT AND WE NEED TO PROTECT THE INNOCENT

                    AND BEING COERCED.  BUT WE NEED BETTER LANGUAGE FOR THIS.  BECAUSE I --

                    BECAUSE DEBT CAN BE EASILY SOLD TO COMMERCIAL WIDELY AND FREELY.

                    THEY DON'T NEED TO HOLD THIS.  AND WHAT HAPPENED [SIC] IF THEY GO OUT

                    TO A DIFFERENT STATE AND SOLD IT AND -- TO ANOTHER COLLECTOR.  SO THEY

                    COULD IGNORE WITH COERCED DEBT.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  NO.  NO.  I MEAN, THEY'RE JUST

                    TRANSFERRING THE PROBLEM TO SOMEONE ELSE, BUT IT'S STILL PERTAINS TO

                    BUSINESS IN NEW YORK.

                                 MR. CHANG:  BUT ONLY IF IT'S NEW YORK --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  BY THE WAY, COLLECTION AGENCIES

                    ALMOST ALWAYS NEGOTIATE A DEAL, SO I THINK THEY'RE -- THEY'RE USED TO -- TO

                    THAT KIND OF INTERACTION.

                                 MR. CHANG:  BUT YOU SAY ONLY THEY DO BUSINESS IN

                    NEW YORK STATE.  THEY CAN GO TO DIFFERENT STATES AND SOLD [SIC] THE

                    PAPER.  AND HOW WOULD THAT SOLVE THIS PROBLEM TO -- TO THE -- TO THE

                    DEBTOR?  HOW DOES THE DEBTOR HAVE SOME PROTECTION?  IF IT'S COERCED IF

                    YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, THAT LANGUAGE ONLY FOR -- FOR BUSINESS IN NEW

                    YORK STATE?

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, HERE IT SAYS -- IT SAYS HERE

                    IN -- ON PAGE 5, IF THE CREDITOR IS ALSO A DEBT COLLECTOR OR DEBT COLLECTION

                    AGENCY NOTIFY -- THEY HAVE TO NOTIFY THE ORIGINAL CREDITOR THAT IT HAS

                    CEASED COLLECTION ACTIVITIES BECAUSE THE DEBT WAS FOUND TO BE COERCED.

                    SO THEY HAVE AN OBLIGATION TO TELL THE AGENCY THAT THEY'RE SELLING THE

                    DEBT TO THAT THEY HAVE THIS BUSINESS HERE IN NEW YORK.

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MR. CHANG:  BUT IT'S NOT -- SEE, YOU'RE BASED ON

                    DEBT COLLECTION.  ALL RIGHT?  THEY [SIC] DOING COLLECTION FOR THE -- FOR

                    THE CREDITOR.  WE'RE TALKING ABOUT SELLING THE PAPER.  SELLING THE PAPER

                    TO A NEW OWNERSHIP.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YES.

                                 MR. CHANG:  THEN HOW DOES [SIC] THE DEBTOR ABLE

                    TO COMMUNICATE TO THE -- TO THE NEW CREDITOR AND THE NEW CREDITOR MAY

                    BE IN A DIFFERENT STATE AND DOESN'T HAVE ANY BUSINESS IN NEW YORK.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THE SAME WAY YOU'D

                    COMMUNICATE WITH THEM -- BECAUSE MANY OF THEM YOU'D COMMUNICATE

                    BY E-MAIL, FOR EXAMPLE.  OR --

                                 MR. CHANG:  DOES THAT --

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  YOU'D CALL -- I -- I THINK THIS IS

                    ALL A HYPOTHETICAL.  I -- I SAID IF IT'S DOING -- IF THEY'RE DOING BUSINESS

                    HERE IN NEW YORK IT APPLIES TO THEM.  I THINK THAT'S SIMPLE, BUT THAT'S

                    THE ANSWER.

                                 MR. CHANG:  BUT THAT'S ONLY FOR DOING BUSINESS IN

                    NEW YORK.  FOR THE PERSON -- FOR THE CREDITOR.  SO THERE'S NO PROTECTION

                    IF -- IF ALL THAT TRANSACTION IS DONE OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK OR OUTSIDE THE

                    COUNTRY.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  WELL, I -- I THINK I'VE ANSWERED

                    THIS, AND I THINK AS I SAID EARLIER, HYPOTHETICALS WANDER INTO TERRITORY

                    THAT WE'RE NOT EVEN CONTEMPLATING.  THE BILL DOESN'T CONTEMPLATE

                    HYPOTHETICALS.  I THINK YOU'RE MAKING IT A LITTLE MORE COMPLICATED THAN

                    IT ACTUALLY IS.

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 MR. CHANG:  OKAY.  WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. CHANG:  ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. CHANG:  IN THE CURRENT FORM IT'S FLAWED, BUT

                    THANK YOU.  THE SPONSOR IS TRYING TO DO PROTECTING THE DEBTOR ITSELF FOR

                    COERCED DEBT.  BUT IT NEEDS SOME WORK ON -- ON THE BILL.  AS MY FELLOW

                    COLLEAGUE MS. WALSH SAID, THAT IT NEEDS -- IT NEEDS SOME WORK AND I

                    WILL VOTE NO ON THIS, THIS CURRENT FORM BECAUSE IT CREATES TOO MUCH

                    CONFLICT.  IF THE BILL DOES PASS, IT CREATES TOO MUCH CONFLICT FOR -- FOR

                    LAWYERS AND -- AND THE COURT TO FIGURE OUT WHAT'S -- WHAT SHOULD BE A

                    CLEAR PATH.

                                 THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MINORITY CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE SOME EXCEPTIONS, AND THOSE

                    INDIVIDUALS, THOSE PEOPLE CAN CERTAINLY VOTE YES AT THEIR SEATS AT THIS

                    TIME.

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.  FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE DIFFERENTLY, THEY CAN DO

                    SO AT THEIR DESKS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 I -- I WANT TO ENSURE THAT THE -- THE PURPOSE OF THE BILL

                    -- THE PURPOSE OF THE CHAPTER AMENDMENT IS TO HELP A VICTIM OF COERCED

                    DEBT HAVE A PATH TO CHALLENGING THE BURDENSOME DEBT THAT THEY WERE

                    FORCED TO INCUR BY THEIR ABUSER.  THE -- THE -- THAT SORT OF GOT MUDDY

                    DURING THE DEBATE.  CREDITORS HAVE ACCESS TO MANY RESOURCES, AS THEY

                    DID DURING THIS CHAPTER AMENDMENT.  IT IS THE ABUSED, THE SURVIVORS,

                    WHO NEED ASSISTANCE, AND THEIR LIVES ARE RUINED OFTEN.  THE LAST THING

                    THAT THEY ARE THINKING OF IS HOW TO FOOL A CREDITOR.  THEY'RE ACTUALLY

                    TRYING TO REBUILD THEIR LIVES AND GET OUT FROM UNDER THIS KIND OF

                    ECONOMIC ABUSE WHICH THEIR ABUSER FOIST UPON THEM TO CONTROL THEM

                    AND KEEP THEM STUCK, AND STUCK TO THEM FOREVER.  AND SO THIS PROVIDES

                    A PATH FOR THEM.  THE CREDITOR HAS ENOUGH OPPORTUNITY TO DECIDE, I

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    DON'T BELIEVE YOU, BUT THE -- THE VICTIM ALSO HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO

                    PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION THAT SAYS, THIS WAS FORCED UPON ME.

                                 SO FOR THAT REASON I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. ROSENTHAL IN

                    THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  MADAM SPEAKER, DO WE HAVE FURTHER

                    HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WE DO HAVE A PIECE

                    OF HOUSEKEEPING.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MS. WOERNER, PAGE 38, CALENDAR NO.

                    240, BILL NO. A09113-A, THE AMENDMENTS ARE RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 WE HAVE A PRIVILEGED RESOLUTION BY MR. MEEKS.  THE

                    CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 1036, MR.

                    MEEKS.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING TUESDAY, MARCH

                    10, 2026 AS HARRIET TUBMAN DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. MEEKS ON THE

                    RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. MEEKS:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, FOR AN

                    OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK ON THIS RESOLUTION.

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 WHEREAS, HARRIET ROSS TUBMAN WAS AN AMERICAN

                    HEROINE AND PATRIOT WHO FAITHFULLY SERVED HER COUNTRY AND LIBERATED HER

                    PEOPLE; HER TIRELESS EFFORTS TO ATTAIN FREEDOM FOR THOSE ENSLAVED AND HER

                    DEDICATION TO STOP THE INHUMAN -- INHUMAN PRACTICE OF SLAVERY SHOULD

                    BE RECOGNIZED AND CELEBRATED.  IT IS ONLY FITTING TO PAY TRIBUTE TO AN

                    AMERICAN HEROINE WHO SACRIFICED EVERYTHING FOR THE WELL-BEING OF

                    PEOPLE AND HER COUNTRY.

                                 AND WHEREAS, IN JUNE OF 2003, LEGISLATION TO MAKE

                    MARCH 10TH A DAY OF COMMEMORATION WAS SIGNED INTO LAW; MARCH 10TH

                    RECOGNIZES THE LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENTS AND THE HISTORICAL LEGACY

                    ESTABLISHED BY HARRIET TUBMAN AND HER MANY ACCOMPLISHMENTS

                    THROUGHOUT THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 AND WHEREAS BECAUSE OF HER COLOR AND HER STATUS AS A

                    SLAVE, HARRIET TUBMAN WAS DENIED THE OPPORTUNITY TO LEARN AND TO READ

                    OR WRITE.  NEVERTHELESS, SHE WAS ABLE TO RISE ABOVE THE LIMITATIONS

                    WHICH WERE PLACED ON HER AS A SLAVE AND AS A BLACK WOMAN.

                                 AND WHEREAS, IN THE MID-1850S, HARRIET TUBMAN

                    MADE THE ACQUAINTANCE OF UNITED STATES SENATOR, SECRETARY OF STATE

                    AND FORMER NEW YORK GOVERNOR, GOVERNOR WILLIAM H. SEWARD AND

                    HIS WIFE FRANCES IN AUBURN, NEW YORK.  IN 1857 THE SEWARDS PROVIDED

                    A HOME FOR HER IN AUBURN, WHICH SHE SOLD -- WHICH THEY SOLD TO HER

                    LATER.

                                 AND WHEREAS, THIS HOME WILL BECOME THE NEW BASE OF

                    OPERATIONS FOR THE UNDERGROUND RAILROAD.  WHEN THE CIVIL WAR BEGAN,

                    HARRIET TUBMAN WAS ABLE TO LIBERATE HUNDREDS OF HER PEOPLE TO

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                    FREEDOM THROUGH THIS EFFICIENT NETWORK.  SHE WAS PROUD TO CLAIM THAT

                    SHE NEVER RAN HER TRAIN OFF THE TRACK AND NEVER LOST A PASSENGER.

                                 WHEREAS, DURING THE CIVIL WAR HARRIET TUBMAN

                    SERVED IN THE UNION ARMY IN SOUTH CAROLINA, FIRST AS A COOK AND A

                    NURSE, AND LATER AS A SCOUT FOR RAIDING PARTIES AND A SPY BEHIND

                    CONFEDERATE LINES.  AFTER HER SERVICE IN THE UNION ARMY, SHE RETURNED

                    TO AUBURN, NEW YORK, WHERE SHE LIVED THE REMAINING YEARS OF HER LIFE.

                    IN 1903, SHE TRANSFERRED OWNERSHIP OF HER PROPERTY TO THE A.M.E. ZION

                    CHURCH.

                                 AND WHEREAS, HARRIET TUBMAN'S DEATH ON MARCH 10,

                    1913, THE CHURCH DEVELOPED AND MANAGED HER HOME AND ADJACENT --

                    ADJACENT PROPERTY IN ORDER TO SUSTAIN HER MEMORY.  SHE WAS BURIED IN

                    THE FORT HILL CEMETERY IN AUBURN, NEW YORK, WITH FULL MILITARY

                    HONORS.  CURRENTLY, THE HARRIET TUBMAN HOME AND PROPERTY ARE

                    REGISTERED AS A NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK IN AUBURN, AND THE SITE IS

                    ALSO PART OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE FREEDOM TRAIL.

                                 THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO

                    SPEAK TO OUR GREAT ANCESTOR HARRIET TUBMAN, THE GREAT WORK THAT SHE'S

                    DONE TO FREE HER PEOPLE AND TO SERVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.

                                 WE HAVE A NUMBER OF RESOLUTIONS BEFORE THE HOUSE.

                    WITHOUT OBJECTION, THESE RESOLUTIONS WILL BE TAKEN UP TOGETHER.

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                   MARCH 10, 2026

                                 ON THE RESOLUTIONS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED NO.  THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ADOPTED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 1029-1033

                    AND 1035 WERE UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTED.)

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  I NOW MOVE THAT THE ASSEMBLY STAND

                    ADJOURNED, AND THAT WE WILL RECONVENE AT 11:00 A.M., WEDNESDAY,

                    MARCH 11TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON MR. FALL'S

                    MOTION, THE HOUSE STANDS ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 4:16 P.M., THE HOUSE STOOD ADJOURNED

                    UNTIL WEDNESDAY, MARCH 11TH AT 11:00 A.M., THAT BEING A SESSION DAY.)



























                                         67