THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2025 11:13 A.M.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE HOUSE WILL
COME TO ORDER.
GOOD -- STILL MORNING. GOOD MORNING, COLLEAGUES.
THE REVEREND KENT MCHEARD WILL OFFER A PRAYER.
REVEREND MCHEARD: SHALL WE PRAY. GOOD AND
GRACIOUS GOD, THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO GATHER IN THIS CHAMBER
WITH THESE REPRESENTATIVES. THANK YOU FOR THEIR SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE
OF NEW YORK. WE PRAY THAT YOU ENABLE WISDOM UPON EACH ONE AS
THEY BECOME THE VOICE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO VOICE, BECOME STRENGTH
FOR THOSE WHO ARE WEAKENED, TO ADVOCATE FOR THE DISABLED AND THE
DISADVANTAGED AND THE FOOD DISADVANTAGED. FATHER, WE THANK YOU ALSO
FOR THE STAFF THAT DO WORK BEHIND THE SCENE. A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO
ANTHONY WHO MET ME IN THE CONCOURSE AND GUIDED ME HERE. BLESS THE
1
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WORK THAT IS TO BE DONE HERE. GIVE STRENGTH, WISDOM, AND DIRECTION,
WE PRAY IN YOUR MOST HOLY NAME. AMEN.
MEMBERS: AMEN.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: VISITORS ARE INVITED
TO JOIN THE MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.
(WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER LED VISITORS AND
MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)
A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE
JOURNAL OF WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5TH.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, I MOVE
TO DISPENSE WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF WEDNESDAY, JUNE
THE 5TH, AND THAT THE SAME STAND APPROVED.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WITHOUT OBJECTION,
SO ORDERED.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: THANK YOU SO MUCH.
GOOD MORNING, COLLEAGUES AND GUESTS THAT ARE IN THE CHAMBERS. THIS
IS A GREAT DAY TO BE ON THIS SIDE. THE SUN IS SHINING AND PRETTY MUCH
ALL IS RIGHT WITH THE WORLD. BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THIS QUOTE WITH
YOU TODAY. THIS ONE IS COMING FROM MATSHONA DHLIWAYO. SHE IS A
CANADIAN-BASED PHILOSOPHER, ENTREPRENEUR AND AN AUTHOR OF MANY
BOOKS SUCH AS THE LITTLE BOOK OF INSPIRATION. HER WORDS FOR US TODAY:
"KNOWLEDGE IS THE SEED, INTELLIGENCE IS THE STEM, UNDERSTANDING IS THE
BRANCH AND WISDOM IS THE FRUIT." AGAIN, THESE WORDS COMING FROM
MATSHONA DHLIWAYO.
2
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MADAM SPEAKER, COLLEAGUES HAVE ON THEIR DESK A
CALENDAR -- A MAIN CALENDAR AND A DEBATE LIST. BEFORE ANY
HOUSEKEEPING OR INTRODUCTIONS, WE'LL BE CALLING FOR THE FOLLOWING
COMMITTEES TO MEET: CITIES, FOLLOWED BY GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES,
FOLLOWED BY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, REAL
PROPERTY, AND CODES. I WOULD WANT TO ENCOURAGE MEMBERS WHO KNOW
THAT YOU SERVE ON THESE COMMITTEES TO BE IN AND AROUND THE CHAMBERS
TODAY, SO THAT WHEN THEY'RE CALLED, WE'RE NOT WAITING FOR YOU TO BEGIN
THE PROCEEDINGS THERE. WE'RE GONNA BEGIN OUR FLOOR WORK TODAY BY
TAKING UP THE FOLLOWING BILLS ON DEBATE: CALENDAR NO. 100 BY MR.
BURDICK, RULES REPORT NO. 256 BY MS. ROSENTHAL, RULES REPORT NO.
297 BY MR. BRAUNSTEIN, RULES REPORT NO. 301 BY MR. MCDONALD,
RULES REPORT NO. 308 BY MS. REYES, RULES REPORT NO. 313 BY MS.
GLICK AND RULES REPORT NO. 324 BY MR. JACOBSON. MAJORITY MEMBERS
SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE A NEED FOR A CONFERENCE TODAY
ONCE WE CONCLUDE OUR FLOOR WORK. OF COURSE, MADAM SPEAKER, WE
WILL CHECK WITH OUR COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE TO
DETERMINE THEIR NEEDS AS ALWAYS. THAT'S THE GENERAL OUTLINE OF WHERE
WE'RE GOING TODAY. SO, IF YOU COULD BEGIN BY CALLING THE CITIES
COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
CITIES COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO THE SPEAKER'S
CONFERENCE ROOM. PLEASE SEE CHAIR BURKE IN THE SPEAKER'S
CONFERENCE ROOM, CITIES COMMITTEE.
WE HAVE NO HOUSEKEEPING THIS MORNING, BUT SEVERAL
3
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
INTRODUCTIONS. WE WILL START WITH MR. SANTABARBARA FOR THE PURPOSES OF
AN INTRODUCTION.
MR. SANTABARBARA: THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER.
I RISE TODAY IN RECOGNITION OF REVEREND
KENT MCHEARD. HE'S FROM THE CITY OF AMSTERDAM IN MY ASSEMBLY
DISTRICT AND HE IS JOINING US TODAY TO OFFER THE OPENING PRAYER, AS HE
JUST DELIVERED JUST A FEW MOMENTS AGO. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE,
REVEREND MCHEARD. A FITTING HONOR FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS DEDICATED
HIS LIFE TO FAITH, SERVICE AND COMMUNITY.
FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS, REVEREND MCHEARD HAS LEAD
THE WOESTINA REFORMED CHURCH IN ROTTERDAM JUNCTION GUIDING HIS
CONGREGATION WITH COMPASSION, HUMILITY AND DEVOTION. AND HE HAS
BEEN A SOURCE OF COMFORT FOR SOME OF OUR MOST DIFFICULT TIMES. MOST
NOTABLY ORGANIZING A PRAYER VIGIL AFTER THE SCHOHARIE LIMOUSINE TRAGEDY
TO HELP BRING HEALING AND UNITY TO OUR COMMUNITY. HE CURRENTLY SERVES
AS PRESIDENT OF THE GREATER AMSTERDAM SCHOOL BOARD AND HAS SERVED
AS CHAPLAIN TO A NUMBER OF VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND HE'S BEEN
ACTIVE WITH BOY SCOUT TROOP 48 AND COUNTLESS COMMUNITY BOARDS AND
COMMITTEES.
REVERED MCHEARD IS A DEAR FRIEND AND HE'S ALWAYS
BEEN AVAILABLE TO ATTEND THE MANY EVENTS THROUGHOUT MY ASSEMBLY
DISTRICT AND CEREMONIES THAT I'VE HOSTED, OFFERING THE INVOCATION AND --
AND OFFERING PRAYER TO US IN OUR COMMUNITY. MOST RECENTLY, WE JUST
MET EACH OTHER OUT AT THE WOESTINA CEMETERY TO PLACE FLAGS FOR OUR
4
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
VETERANS ON MEMORIAL DAY AND HE WAS THERE, OF COURSE, TO -- TO BLESS
THE FLAGS AND ALSO TO LEND A HAND AS WELL. HE'S ALSO A PROUD HUSBAND TO
HIS WIFE COLLEEN AND TWO SONS, GARRET AND PARKER. HE IS A SCHOLAR OF
FAITH WITH DEGREES FROM WORD OF LIFE BIBLE COLLEGE, LIBERTY
UNIVERSITY AND MASTER OF DIVINITY FROM NEW BRUNSWICK SEMINARY.
I'M GRATEFUL TO HAVE HIM HERE IN THE CHAMBER WITH US.
MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE WELCOME HIM TO
THE HOUSE AND EXTEND TO HIM ALL THE CORDIALITIES OF THE CHAMBER.
THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF
MR. SANTABARBARA, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU, SIR,
TO THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR TO
YOU. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMFORTING WORDS THIS MORNING
AND ALSO THE GREAT WORKS YOU ARE DOING IN OUR COMMUNITY. HOPE YOU
ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US,
SIR.
(APPLAUSE)
REVEREND MCHEARD: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
(APPLAUSE)
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. BUTTENSCHON
FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MS. BUTTENSCHON: THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER.
I HAVE THE GREAT HONOR TO INTRODUCE THE BELLICK
(PHONETIC) FAMILY FROM UTICA, NEW YORK. ANESSA (PHONETIC) AND
5
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SANAD (PHONETIC), MOM AND DAD, AND THEIR SONS, ADAM, EMIL
(PHONETIC) AND BENJAMIN. THEY'RE HERE TODAY TO SEE THE WORKINGS
WITHIN ALBANY, AS WELL AS TO SPEND SOME TIME THROUGHOUT THE
COMMUNITY. EACH ONE OF THESE YOUNG MEN ARE NOT ONLY ACADEMICALLY
SOUND, BUT ARE ATHLETES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AND SPEND QUITE A BIT OF
TIME AT MANY EVENTS. AND BENJAMIN IS ONE THAT YOU WILL FIND AT MOST
OF OUR EVENTS AS HE SUPPORTS SO MANY THAT ARE WITHIN THE WORKING CLASS.
SO PLEASE, IF YOU COULD INTRODUCE AND WELCOME THEM
TO CHAMBERS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF
MS. BUTTENSCHON, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU THIS
MORNING TO OUR ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE
FLOOR TO YOU. AND HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY. IT'S ALWAYS
WONDERFUL TO SEE A WHOLE FAMILY COME TOGETHER TO PARTICIPATE IN CIVIC
ENGAGEMENT. SO THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.
(APPLAUSE)
MR. DURSO FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
SO TODAY I GET THE DISTINCT HONOR AND PRIVILEGE OF
INTRODUCING A GOOD FRIEND, A CONSTITUENT AND A FORMER MEMBER, MARC
HERBST IS JOINING ME TODAY. MARC SERVED FROM 1994 TO 2002 FOR
DISTRICT 14. HE'S UP HERE TODAY VISITING US AND SOME MEMBERS FROM
LONG ISLAND.
SO, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU WOULD BE SO KIND TO OFFER
HIM ALL THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR AND WELCOME HIM BACK TO ALBANY.
6
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF
MR. DURSO, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WELCOME BACK,
ASSEMBLYMEMBER. WE WELCOME YOU TO THE CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE
PRIVILEGES TO YOU. IT'S WONDERFUL TO HAVE YOU BACK IN OUR CHAMBER.
THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.
(APPLAUSE)
MR. ANDERSON FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MR. ANDERSON: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
I RISE TO MAKE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION THIS MORNING ON
BEHALF OF A CIVIC ORGANIZATION FROM THE 31ST ASSEMBLY DISTRICT. OUR
FRIENDS FROM THE 149TH STREET SOUTH OZONE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION ARE
CELEBRATING 50 YEARS THIS YEAR, MADAM SPEAKER. FIFTY YEARS OF
ADVOCACY, COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND REPRESENTATION FOR THE
NEIGHBORHOOD OF SOUTH OZONE PARK. CURRENTLY THE GROUP IS LED BY
MISS ARACELIA COOK WHO IS UP HERE WITH US TODAY, ALONG WITH HER
VARIOUS BOARD MEMBERS AND GENERAL MEMBERS. THEY ARE DEDICATED TO
PRESERVING AND ENHANCING THE BEAUTY AND RICH HISTORY OF SOUTH OZONE
PARK. THEIR EFFORTS ALSO INCLUDE WORKING CLOSELY WITH RESIDENTS,
COMMUNITY GROUPS, ELECTED OFFICIALS SUCH AS MYSELF AND CITY AND STATE
AGENCIES TO ENSURE THE COMMUNITY STAYS INFORMED ON IMPORTANT LOCAL
ISSUES. MADAM SPEAKER, THEY HAVE CONSISTENTLY SUPPORTED AND
CELEBRATED THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S DIVERSITY THROUGH THE YEARS, FOSTERING AN
INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ENCOURAGING EVERYONE TO GET INVOLVED.
AND IF YOU KNOW MS. COOK, SHE'S A WOMAN FROM THE BLOCK AND SHE
ALWAYS WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE GETTING INVOLVED AND YOU KNOW
7
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
YOUR BEST, SO THAT YOU CAN DO YOUR BEST AS A NEIGHBORHOOD.
MADAM SPEAKER, REACHING 50 YEARS IS NO SMALL FEAT
AND I WANT TO GIVE A HEARTFELT THANKS TO THIS CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR TAKING
THIS OPPORTUNITY TO TRAVEL WITH -- TRAVEL TO ALBANY TO VISIT THE STATE'S
CAPITOL, MANY FOR THEIR FIRST TIME, BUT ALSO TO CELEBRATE THIS 50 YEARS OF
ADVOCACY.
MADAM SPEAKER, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE AFFORD
THESE MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH OZONE PARK COMMUNITY THE CORDIALITIES OF
THE FLOOR OF THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF
MR. ANDERSON, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THE
ASSEMBLY CHAMBER, ESTEEMED GROUP THE 149TH STREET SOUTH OZONE
PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION. CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU FOR 50 YEARS. IT'S QUITE
AN ACCOMPLISHMENT. WE EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR TO YOU AND
HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR
JOINING US.
(APPLAUSE)
MS. LEVENBERG FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MS. LEVENBERG: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
I RISE TO INTRODUCE THREE WONDERFUL, YOUNG PEOPLE
FROM THE 95TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT, ALEC ELKIN, SADIE SPAGNOLI AND
DAHLIA BECK. THEY ARE -- EACH OF THEM GOES TO A DIFFERENT HIGH SCHOOL.
THEY ARE SENIORS AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE HEADING OFF TO COLLEGE IN THE
FALL. ALEC IS A SENIOR AT HENDRICK HUDSON HIGH SCHOOL, CLASS OF 2025
AND HE WILL BE GOING TO SUNY ALBANY IN THE FALL. SADIE IS CROTON ON
8
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
HUDSON [SIC] -- OR CROTON-HARMON HIGH SCHOOL, CLASS OF 2025 AND SHE
WILL BE GOING TO UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN IN THE FALL. AND DAHLIA
BECK IS A HALDANE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASS OF 2025 SENIOR AND SHE WILL BE
ATTENDING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IN THE FALL. WE ARE GOING
TO MISS THEM GREATLY, AS THEY HAVE ALSO DONE A LITTLE VOLUNTEER WORK IN
MY OFFICE AND I COULDN'T BE MORE GRATEFUL FOR ALL OF THEIR HARD WORK.
AND I KNOW THAT NOT HAVING LISTED THEIR ENTIRE RÉSUMÉS, THAT THEY'VE
HAD MANY ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN THEIR YOUNG LIVES AND I KNOW THAT THEY
WILL HAVE MANY MORE.
SO, PLEASE, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU COULD OFFER THEM
ALL OF THE CORDIALITIES OF THE FLOOR, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
ON BEHALF OF MS. LEVENBERG, THE SPEAKER AND ALL
MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND
CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU FOR YOUR ACADEMIC CAREER IN HIGH SCHOOL AND FOR
YOUR CONTINUED ACADEMIC SUCCESS. SOME OF YOU ARE STAYING, SOME OF
YOU ARE GOING VERY FAR AWAY, BUT WE DEFINITELY WISH YOU WELL WISHES.
WE HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY AND THANK YOU SO VERY
MUCH FOR JOINING US. GOOD LUCK TO YOU ALL.
(APPLAUSE)
MR. LASHER FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MR. LASHER: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
I RISE TODAY TO WELCOME MY SON, BENJAMIN LASHER,
WHO IS A 13-YEAR-OLD 7TH GRADER AT BOOKER T. WASHINGTON MIDDLE
SCHOOL, MS-54, IN THE 69TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT. AND BEN -- I HAVE -- I
9
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
HAVE REALLY BEEN PROUD TO WATCH BEN GET VERY INVOLVED IN MODEL
UNITED NATIONS THIS YEAR AND TAKE A REAL INTEREST BOTH IN THE AFFAIRS OF
THE WORLD AROUND HIM AND IN THE PROCESS OF DELIBERATION AND DEBATE
AND LEGISLATION. AND SO, I'M EXCITED FOR HIM TO BE HERE TODAY AND
TOMORROW TO SEE THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS FIRSTHAND AND ALSO TO -- TO KEEP
ME COMPANY IN THESE -- IN THESE WANING DAYS OF THE SESSION.
SO, I WOULD BE GRATEFUL IF YOU WOULD WELCOME HIM
AND EXTEND TO HIM THE CORDIALITIES OF THE CHAMBER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF
MR. LASHER, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WELCOME, BENJAMIN, TO
THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER. WE ARE EXTENDING PRIVILEGES TO YOU. ONE OF
THEM MAY BE UNLIMITED SNACKS IN THE MEMBERS' LOUNGE, BUT WE DO
REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR INTEREST IN CIVIS AND CONTINUATION OF ADVOCACY
FOR THINGS THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO YOU. SO, CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU
ACADEMICALLY. WE HOPE YOU ENJOY YOUR TIME HERE TODAY HANGING OUT
WITH YOUR DAD. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US TODAY.
(APPLAUSE)
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN
INTRODUCTION.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE AN INTRODUCTION. WE HAVE BEEN
JOINED IN OUR CHAMBERS BY THE HANDSOMEST YOUNG MAN IN HERE. HIS
NAME HAPPENS TO BE JACK KNIGHT AND HE'S ALMOST FOUR.
SO, IF YOU WILL PLEASE WELCOME, DEAR STAFF SON HERE,
JACK KNIGHT. HE HAS JOINED US THERE, HE'S WITH HIS DADDY. HE'S A LITTLE
10
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SHY THIS MORNING. HE WASN'T THIS SHY LAST YEAR, BUT IT'LL CHANGE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF MRS.
PEOPLES-STOKES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, IT'S ALWAYS WONDERFUL TO
SEE FAMILY MEMBERS. HI, JACK. WE HOPE YOU HAVE AN AWESOME TIME
HERE WITH US TODAY. THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.
(APPLAUSE)
WE'RE GOING TO START DEBATES.
COLLEAGUES, IF WE COULD TAKE OUR SEATS AND HAVE QUIET.
THANK YOU.
(PAUSE)
MS. CRUZ FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MS. CRUZ: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
I'M HERE JOINED TODAY BY MR. MAC PHIPPS. HE'S HERE
TO TALK TO OUR COLLEAGUES ABOUT HIS REMARKABLE STORY. MAC IS A
LEGENDARY NEW ORLEANS RAPPER WHO ROSE TO FAME IN THE LATE 1990S AFTER
SIGNING WITH THE ICONIC NO LIMIT RECORDS AND COLLABORATING WITH
ARTISTS LIKE SNOOP DOG. HE WAS BORN INTO A FAMILY OF ARTISTS. MAC
BEGAN WRITING MUSIC AT AN EARLY AGE AND WAS CELEBRATED FOR HIS LYRICAL
DEPTH AND AUTHENTICITY. IN THE 2000S, HIS CAREER WAS TRAGICALLY DERAILED
WHEN HE WAS WRONGFULLY CONVICTED OF A CRIME HE DID NOT COMMIT;
DESPITE HAVING NO CRIMINAL RECORD, NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TYING HIM TO
THE SCENE AND NO CREDIBLE WITNESSES. IN A STUNNING UNDERMINING,
MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, PROSECUTORS TWISTED HIS LYRICS, ALTERING PRONOUNS
AND SLICING LINES AND TAKING SOME LYRICS THAT WERE AS OLD AS FOUR YEARS
PRIOR TO THE CRIME TO PORTRAY HIS ART AS A CONFESSION, WHILE THE MEN WHO
11
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
CONFESSED TO THE CRIME WAS TURNED AWAY BY THE POLICE. MAC SPENT 21
YEARS BEHIND BARS BUT NEVER LOST HIS COMMITMENT TO HEALING AND
MENTORSHIP, EARNING THE HUMANITARIAN AWARD, GUIDING YOUNG MEN AND
ADVOCATING FOR JUSTICE FROM WITHIN PRISON WALLS.
IN 2021, HE WAS GRANTED CLEMENCY BY THE LOUISIANA
PAROLE BOARD AND GOVERNOR JOHN BEL EDWARDS, WHO UNANIMOUSLY
RECOGNIZED THE INJUSTICE IN HIS CASE. SINCE RETURNING HOME, MAC
DEDICATED HIS LIVE TO UPLIFTING OTHERS, MENTORING AT RISK YOUTH,
TEACHING MUSIC AND FIGHTING FOR FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS FOR ARTISTS.
HIS ALBUM, SON OF THE CITY, IS BOTH POWERFUL AND A TESTAMENT TO HIS
JOURNEY AND THE MESSAGE OF RESILIENCE. MAC'S STORY IS NOT ONLY ONE OF
INJUSTICE, IT IS ONE OF TRANSFORMATION, STRENGTH AND POWER AND THE
POWER OF USING HIS VOICE. HE'S JOINED WITH US -- HE'S JOINED -- HE'S
JOINING US TODAY WITH HIS WIFE.
SO, MADAM SPEAKER, PLEASE HELP ME WELCOME HIM
AND HIS WIFE TO OUR HOUSE AND EXTEND THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF
MS. CRUZ, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU, MR. PHIPPS,
TO THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR TO
YOU. WE APPRECIATE YOU SHARING YOUR STORY WITH US AND DO HOPE FOR
THE BEST FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU FOR JOINING
US TODAY. THANK YOU.
(APPLAUSE)
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, WOULD
12
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
YOU PLEASE CALL THE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TO THE
SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM. GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.
PAGE 24, CALENDAR NO. 100, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A04725-B, CALENDAR
100, BURDICK, SCHIAVONI, SIMONE, EPSTEIN, OTIS, ROSENTHAL,
LEVENBERG, LUNSFORD, SANTABARBARA. AN ACT TO AMEND THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING THE USE OF
DRILLING FLUIDS, BRINE AND FLOWBACK WATER FROM GAS OR OIL WELLS, POOLS,
OR FIELDS ON ANY HIGHWAY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MR. BURDICK.
MR. BURDICK: CERTAINLY.
THIS BILL WOULD AMEND SECTION 23-0305 OF THE
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF OIL AND GAS DRILLING
FLUIDS, BRINE AND FLOWBACK WATER, ON ANY HIGHWAY FOR ANY PURPOSE,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DEICING AND DUST SUPPRESSION.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. SIMPSON.
MR. SIMPSON: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
WOULD THE BILL SPONSOR YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
13
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
YIELD?
MR. BURDICK: OF COURSE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. SIMPSON: THANK YOU, MR. BURDICK.
SO, WHAT HAS CHANGED FROM PRIOR VERSIONS OF THIS BILL
WITH THE MOST RECENT ONE BEING VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR?
MR. BURDICK: SO, GREAT QUESTION.
THIS IS A DIFFERENT AND MORE FOCUSED BILL. THAT EARLIER
LEGISLATION WAS BROADER AND COULD HAVE INTERPRETED TO AFFECT OTHER
SECTORS LIKE SOLUTION MINING. AND IN RESPONSE TO CONCERNS RAISED AT
THAT TIME AND SUBSEQUENTLY WE'VE TIGHTENED THE LANGUAGE.
MR. SIMPSON: OKAY. SO, YOU MENTIONED "SOLUTION
MINING." THAT'S A NATURAL OCCURRING WELLS THAT CONTAIN SALINE OR SALT,
CORRECT?
MR. BURDICK: SO SOLUTION MINING ARE ONE OF THE
AREAS THAT WOULD NOT BE PROHIBITED UNDER THIS BILL.
MR. SIMPSON: RIGHT. BUT I -- MY QUESTION WAS,
THAT'S A NATURALLY OCCURRING WELL AND THOSE FLUIDS ARE OKAY. THEY'RE NOT
GONNA BE --
(CROSS-TALK)
MR. BURDICK: CORRECT. NATURALLY OCCURRING WELLS
ARE -- ARE NOT PART OF THE PROPOSED REGULATION HERE.
MR. SIMPSON: THEY'RE A SOURCE OF BRINE. SOLUTION
WELLS ARE A SOURCE OF BRINE, IF I'M CORRECT. DO YOU AGREE?
MR. BURDICK: I DO AGREE.
14
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. SIMPSON: SO YOUR LEGISLATION SAYS, PROHIBITS
THE USE OF DRILLING FLUIDS, BRINE AND FLOWBACK WATER. DRILLING FLUIDS,
FLOWBACK WATER FROM GAS AND OIL WELLS ARE ALREADY PROHIBITED IN NEW
YORK STATE. WE BANNED FRACKING WELLS IN 2015. SO I'M TRYING TO
DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE TERM "BRINE" AND YOU'RE SAYING THAT WELLS THAT
PRODUCE BRINE ARE -- ARE EXEMPT?
MR. BURDICK: CORRECT. BECAUSE THIS IS ONLY
DEALING WITH FRACKING WASTEWATER FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS. AND YOU'RE
CORRECT ABOUT PROHIBITIONS. HOWEVER, THIS FRACKING WASTEWATER ARE
PRODUCED BY SUPPLIERS FROM WHO -- ARE FROM OUT-OF-STATE. AND -- AND
SO THAT'S WHAT THIS IS GETTING AT.
MR. SIMPSON: WELL, THANK YOU, BECAUSE YOU'RE
GOING RIGHT DOWN THE LINE WHERE I WANTED TO GO.
SO THOSE PRODUCTS THAT ARE BEING DEVELOPED
OUT-OF-STATE AND BROUGHT INTO NEW YORK STATE ARE REGULATED BY DEC
CURRENTLY AND PERMITTED IF THEY MEET DEC REGS.
MR. BURDICK: IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT -- ARE YOU
REFERRING TO THE BENEFICIAL USE PERMITTING PROGRAM [SIC]?
MR. SIMPSON: THE -- EXCUSE ME? I DIDN'T...
MR. BURDICK: BENEFICIAL USE, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE
REFERRING TO?
MR. SIMPSON: NO. I'M -- I'M ASKING -- YOU
MENTIONED THAT SINCE THESE FLUIDS ARE ALREADY BANNED IN NEW YORK
STATE, THEY'RE BEING PRODUCED IN OTHER STATES AND BROUGHT INTO NEW
YORK STATE AND USED ON, I PRESUME, USED IN NEW YORK STATE. IF THAT'S
15
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THE CASE, THEY'RE REGULATED AND PERMITTED BY DEC CURRENTLY.
MR. BURDICK: SO, YOU KNOW, ONE THING THAT I
THINK NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED IS THE EXTENT TO WHICH THAT OCCURS. AND, YOU
KNOW, WE'VE HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THAT. AND IT'S NOT EXACTLY
AIRTIGHT, FAR FROM IT. YOU KNOW, THEIR PROCESS, FOR EXAMPLE, DOES NOT
TEST FOR RADIUM. AND, YOU KNOW, THE CONCERN THAT WE HAVE IS THAT WE
HAVE, REALLY, A LOOPHOLE HERE. AND THAT LOOPHOLE NEEDS TO BE CLOSED,
AND THAT'S THE INTENTION OF -- OF THIS LEGISLATION.
YOU KNOW, HIGH-VOLUME FRACKING FLUID PRODUCTS ARE
BANNED, BUT THIS APPLIES TO ANY FLUIDS RESULTING FROM GAS AND OIL WELLS.
AND SO, THAT'S THE REGULATORY GAP THAT WE INTEND TO ADDRESS WITH THIS
LEGISLATION.
MR. SIMPSON: LET ME REPHRASE MY QUESTION. ARE
THERE FLUIDS COMING FROM OTHER STATES FROM OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK?
BECAUSE CURRENTLY, THERE ARE NO FLUIDS THAT WE CAN USE IN NEW YORK
STATE EXPECT FOR SOLUTION MINE -- BRINE.
(PAUSE/CONFERENCING)
MR. BURDICK: YEAH, SO THE ANSWER IS YES. THERE
ARE FLUIDS THAT COME FROM OUT-OF-STATE, BUT ALSO, FLUIDS CAN BE PRODUCED
DOMESTICALLY HERE IN NEW YORK STATE.
MR. SIMPSON: FLUIDS FROM WHERE? FRACKING
MINES? FRACKING WELLS?
MR. BURDICK: SO, YOU CAN HAVE FLUIDS THAT CAN BE,
YOU KNOW, FOR EXAMPLE, BEET JUICE IS SOMETHING THAT -- THAT IS DONE
HERE IN NEW YORK STATE AND IS PERMISSIBLE AND IN FACT WOULD NOT BE
16
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AFFECTED. AND IN FACT, WE WOULD ENCOURAGE THAT AS A GOOD ALTERNATIVE
TO THESE -- THESE FLUIDS THAT ARE PUT ON THE ROADS AND -- AND REALLY ARE
PRESENTING SIGNIFICANT HEALTH HAZARDS. THE PURPOSE OF THIS BILL IS REALLY
TO HAVE THE TOOLS TO TRY TO PROHIBIT THESE PRACTICES WHERE THESE TOXIC
WASTEWATERS ARE CONTAINING CARCINOGENIC AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS, IN
MANY INSTANCES, AND THEY'RE PUTTING IT ON ROADS FOR DEICING OR FOR
SUPPRESSING DUST IN THE SUMMER. AND THIS IS TO STOP THAT PRACTICE AND
FRANKLY, IT'S -- IT'S REALLY A HEALTH MATTER AS MUCH AS ANYTHING ELSE.
MR. SIMPSON: CAN YOU CITE AN EXAMPLE OF A
CURRENT SITUATION WHERE ONE OF THESE FLUIDS THAT YOU WANT TO BAN,
PROHIBIT, OF BEING APPLIED IN NEW YORK AND USED IN NEW YORK RIGHT
NOW? THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO ESTABLISH. I'VE -- DEC CONTROLS,
REGULATES WHATEVER IS APPLIED TO OUR STATE HIGHWAYS, THE USE OF FLUIDS.
AND WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT NATURAL OCCURRING, YOU KNOW, ELEMENTS SUCH
AS, YOU SAID URANIUM MAYBE OR --
MR. BURDICK: URANIUM -- URANIUM AS WELL.
MR. SIMPSON: MATTER OF FACT, JUST FOR INFORMATION,
IT'S IN, YOU KNOW, MANY PEOPLE'S DRILLED WATER WELLS. IT'S NATURAL
OCCURRING URANIUM, DECAYING URANIUM. RADON. BUT, ASIDE FROM THAT,
IS THERE -- I'M TRYING TO GET AT THE -- THE ISSUE OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO
BAN. WHAT'S HAPPENING, WHY WE WOULD DO SOMETHING THAT WOULD
PROHIBIT SAFE FLUIDS -- FLUIDS THAT ARE TESTED, REGULATED BY DEC FROM
COMING OUT OF NEW YORK STATE -- FROM SOURCES OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK
STATE, BEING USED ECONOMICALLY IN NEW YORK?
MR. BURDICK: YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK THAT WE
17
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
NEED TO MAKE THIS TOO COMPLICATED BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY A VERY SIMPLE
BILL, ALL OF ONE SENTENCE.
(CROSS-TALK)
AGAIN, I NEED TO EMPHASIZE THAT THIS IS LIMITED TO THE
FRACKING WASTEWATER THROUGH THE PRODUCTION WITH OIL AND NATURAL GAS
WELLS. THAT -- THAT'S WHAT IT'S LIMITED TO AND I THINK YOU'RE EXPANDING
THE DISCUSSION TO BEYOND THAT. AND THIS IS WHAT IT -- THIS IS WHAT IT
INTENDS TO LIMIT.
MR. SIMPSON: WELL, I -- I DO HAVE CONCERNS. IT
SAYS BRINE. AND BRINE, YOU KNOW, AND THEN YOU TALK ABOUT FLUIDS, OR
CHEMICALS, OR MATERIALS THAT ARE COMING FROM OUT OF NEW YORK STATE,
SINCE THEY ARE BANNED HERE ALREADY. I WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM
IS, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS. IS THIS A FEAR BILL? IS THIS A BEER -- A
BILL THAT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT? IS IT CURRENT -- ARE
WE PUTTING HARMFUL CHEMICALS ON OUR ROADS RIGHT NOW THAT ARE
APPROVED BY DEC?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, YOU GOT THREE OR FOUR
QUESTIONS, SO I'LL TRY TO TAKE EACH OF THEM IN ORDER.
MR. SIMPSON: TRY TO NARROW IT DOWN.
(LAUGHTER/CROSS-TALK)
MR. BURDICK: I'M HAPPY TO DO THAT.
SO AGAIN, IT'S BRINE FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS. AND I --
YOU KNOW, LOOK. I -- I THINK THE HEART OF YOUR QUESTION GOES TO, WHY
ARE WE DOING THIS? AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE DOING THIS BECAUSE WHAT
HAPPENS WITH THIS FRACKING WASTEWATER IS THAT IT'S APPLIED TO THE ROADS,
18
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
BUT WITH RUNOFF, IT'S GONNA TO GO INTO THE SOIL, IT'S GONNA TO GO INTO THE
SURFACE WATER, IT'S GONNA GO INTO THE GROUNDWATER, IT'S GONNA GO INTO
OUR RESERVOIRS AND THEY CONTAIN THESE VERY HARMFUL, TOXIC SUBSTANCES:
ARSINIC, BARIUM, LEAD, HEAVY METALS. THEY'RE EVEN, YOU KNOW, AS -- AS
THE FLUID RETURNS TO THE SURFACE, IT CAN PICK UP THOSE HEAVY METALS AND
THEY CAN GET INTO OUR DRINKING WATER. AND THAT'S THE CONCERN HERE AND
WE FEEL THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH.
MR. SIMPSON: SO, ONE MORE TIME. I'M GONNA ASK IT
EVEN SHORTER AND MORE SIMPLER. ARE WE CURRENTLY PUTTING THAT TYPE OF
MATERIAL ON THE ROADS IN NEW YORK?
MR. BURDICK: YES, WE ARE.
MR. SIMPSON: DEC IS ALLOWING THAT? BECAUSE
THEY PERMIT, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE A PERMIT.
MR. BURDICK: IT'S NOT THE PERMIT OF ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION. IT'S THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION THAT
ISSUES THOSE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATIONS. AND, YOU KNOW, THE -- THE
PROBLEM IS THAT, YOU KNOW, AND THIS IS A NOT TO -- TO BELITTLE OR DENIGRATE
THE WORK THAT DEC DOES, BUT THEY DON'T TEST FOR EVERYTHING. AND -- AND
THE PROBLEM IS THAT SOME OF THESE DO CONTAIN, YOU KNOW, THESE TOXIC
MATERIALS. AND SO, WE FEEL THAT THE SAFEST APPROACH IS TO -- IS TO STOP
THAT PRACTICE WHEN -- AGAIN, OIL AND GAS WELLS. IT -- WE ENCOURAGE THE
SOLUTION MINING. IN FACT, THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HAS A PILOT
PROGRAM ON SOLUTION MINING AND THAT MAY BE, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE
THINGS IN THE FUTURE THAT CAN PROVIDE A SAFE ALTERNATIVE.
MR. SIMPSON: SO THERE ISN'T A PERMIT THAT IS ISSUED,
19
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
IT'S A BENEFICIAL USE. IT'S NOT ACTUALLY A, YOU KNOW, A --
MR. BURDICK: IT'S A BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION.
IT'S NOT REALLY A PERMIT, PER SE.
MR. SIMPSON: OKAY. I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY OTHER
FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR YOU, UNLESS YOU CAN CITE A CONTAMINATION EXAMPLE
SOMEWHERE. BECAUSE THAT WAS THE ONE THING THAT I -- YOU HAVEN'T BEEN
ABLE TO PROVIDE.
MR. BURDICK: RIGHT.
MR. SIMPSON: YOU'RE SAYING IT'S HAPPENING, BUT I
-- I DON'T KNOW --
MR. BURDICK: WELL, I -- I THINK -- HE -- HERE'S THE
THING. IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS, SAID
RIVERKEEPER, THERE ARE ALSO PROPRIETARY STUDIES THAT ARE DONE THAT, YOU
KNOW, WE -- WE -- WE DON'T HAVE, YOU KNOW, ACCESS TO. BUT THERE IS --
THERE'S CONSIDERABLE EVIDENCE TO INDICATE THAT IN FACT, THE CONCERNS THAT
WE HAVE OVER WHAT'S BEING APPLIED TO THE ROADS, WHAT IS GOING IN RUNOFF
AND THOSE CONCERNS ARE JUSTIFIED.
MR. SIMPSON: OKAY. THANK YOU, MR. BURDICK.
MS. BURDICK: THANK YOU, MR. SIMPSON.
MR. SIMPSON: ON THE BILL, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES
-- ON THE BILL.
MR. SIMPSON: I'D LIKE TO GO ON THE BILL. THANK
YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
YOU KNOW, WE JUST HEARD THIS DEBATE AND MY FEELING
20
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
IS THAT OUR EFFORTS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGING DEC TO TEST WHATEVER FLUIDS
ARE BEING APPLIED TO OUR ROADS, RATHER THAN MAYBE EXPAND THE
BENEFICIAL USE PERMIT, RATHER THAN BANNING CHEMICALS THAT ARE GONNA
POTENTIALLY COST COMMUNITIES MORE MONEY IN THE LONG RUN LOOKING FOR
DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES. I THINK THAT THIS IS MORE OF A SUSPECTED IMPACT --
NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT WITHOUT VERY MUCH DATA AND I
THINK THAT THIS BILL IS -- WHILE IT'S INTENDED TO BE SOMETHING THAT'S
HELPFUL, I THINK THE BETTER DIRECTION WOULD BE TO ENCOURAGE DEC TO TEST
WHATEVER FLUIDS, WHERE THEY COME FROM -- WHEREVER THEY COME FROM,
AS TO THEIR SAFETY TO OUR ENVIRONMENT, AND ALSO PROVIDE FOR
COST-EFFECTIVE MEASURES FOR ALL OF OUR COMMUNITIES.
SO, FOR THAT, I WILL VOTE NO AND ENCOURAGE MY
COLLEAGUES TO CONSIDER THAT AS WELL. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU, MR.
SIMPSON.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, WOULD
YOU CALL THE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S
CONFERENCE ROOM?
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU.
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE
ROOM. GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S
CONFERENCE ROOM.
MR. RA.
MR. RA: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WILL THE
21
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SPONSOR YIELD?
MR. BURDICK: OF COURSE.
MR. RA: SO, JUST -- THIS MAY BE SOMEWHAT REPETITIVE,
BUT JUST FOR CLARIFICATION. SO, RIGHT, WE HAVE A BAN ON FRACKING IN NEW
YORK STATE, BUT THERE ARE NON-FRACKING WELLS IN NEW YORK THAT PRODUCE
A BRINE THAT CURRENTLY CAN BE USED ON OUR ROADS AFTER THEY GO THROUGH
THIS BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION BY THE DEC, CORRECT?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, THE -- THE BAN REALLY -- IT ONLY
PERTAINS TO HIGH VOLUME FRACKING.
MR. RA: OKAY. I'M TALKING -- I'M TALKING ABOUT
CURRENT --
MR. BURDICK: SO, IT'S NOT A COMPLETE BAN IF THAT --
IF THAT'S YOUR QUESTION. SO, THEY'RE -- AND -- AND -- AND AGAIN, THAT'S
WHAT -- WHAT WE'RE AIMED AT -- AIMING AT HERE, IS THAT THEY STILL USE
CHEMICALS AND, YOU KNOW, THOSE SOLUTIONS, THE FRACKING FLUIDS AND SUCH
ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE.
MR. RA: JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, WHEN YOU JUST SAID
"THE BAN," YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT OUR BAN ON HYDRO FRACKING; THAT'S WHAT
YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT?
MR. BURDICK: RIGHT. IN OTHER WORDS, THE -- THE
BAN ON -- ON -- ON THE FRACKING --
MR. RA: YEAH.
MR. BURDICK: -- IS LIMITED TO HIGH-VOLUME
FRACKING.
MR. RA: CORRECT.
22
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. BURDICK: I -- I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT
BECAUSE SOME MAY FEEL THAT IT'S A COMPLETE PROHIBITION ON ANY KIND OF
FRACKING.
MR. RA: NO, WE HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF DRILLING THAT
DOES OCCUR IN NEW YORK STATE AND IS NOT BANNED.
MR. BURDICK: RIGHT.
MR. RA: AND BUT THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING. SO, UNDER
CURRENT LAW, A BRINE THAT COMES FROM THAT TYPE OF PROCESS CAN BE USED
ON OUR ROADS AFTER GOING THROUGH THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION BY
THE DEC, CURRENTLY?
MR. BURDICK: THAT'S CORRECT.
MR. RA: OKAY. AND IF THIS WERE ENACTED, THEY
WOULD NO LONGER BE ABLE TO UTILIZE IT.
MR. BURDICK: FOR THOSE THAT ARE COMING FROM OIL
AND GAS WELLS, THAT -- THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THEM FROM BEING USED.
MR. RA: OKAY. NOT JUST HYDROFRACKING THAT'S
CURRENTLY BANNED, BUT ANY TYPE OF OIL AND GAS DRILLING BYPRODUCT.
MR. BURDICK: THAT IS CORRECT.
MR. RA: OKAY. THANK YOU.
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: ON THE BILL.
MR. RA: SO, YOU KNOW, WE TALK A LOT IN THIS HOUSE
AND I HEAR -- I HEAR THE WORDS TALKED ABOUT VERY OFTEN THAT THERE'S THIS
IDEA THAT ON ONE SIDE OF THE AISLE WE FOLLOW SCIENCE AND IT CAN BE ON
ANYTHING. IT COULD BE ON MEDICAL SITUATIONS, IT COULD BE ON SOMETHING
23
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ENVIRONMENTAL. AND ON THE OTHER SIDE THAT WE IGNORE ALL THESE THINGS.
YET, ONCE AGAIN, AND WE'VE DONE THIS MANY TIMES BEFORE, WE HAVE AN
AGENCY THAT HAS AN EXPERTISE, THAT HAS TRAINED PEOPLE, THAT HAS PEOPLE
THAT HAVE SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUNDS THAT CAN LOOK AT THESE THINGS AND
UNLESS WE'RE ASSUMING THAT OUR NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IS ALLOWING A MATERIAL TO BE USED ON OUR
ROADS THAT IS GOING TO CONTAMINATE SOIL THROUGH RUNOFF AND -- AND -- AND
EVERYTHING, IF THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SAYING HERE, THEN WE HAVE A MUCH
BIGGER PROBLEM. BUT IF WE'RE NOT SAYING THAT, WHY ARE WE SUBSTITUTING
OUR JUDGMENT FOR THE JUDGMENT OF A STATE AGENCY THAT EXISTS TO PROTECT
OUR ENVIRONMENT? THIS IS A -- A MATERIAL THAT IN SOME WAYS IS A
BYPRODUCT. THIS IS A USE THAT HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL TO OUR LOCAL
HIGHWAYS. AND EVEN THOUGH WE JUST PASSED A STATE BUDGET THAT
INCREASED OUR SPENDING BY A LARGER PERCENTAGE THAN WE'VE DONE IN
PROBABLY 20 YEARS, WE BARELY SCRATCHED THE SURFACE WITH REGARD TO OUR
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, WITH REGARD TO FUNDING LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE. AND
HERE WE ARE BASICALLY BANNING THE USE OF A SUBSTANCE THAT IS
ECONOMICAL FOR OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHEN THEY'RE TRYING TO TREAT OUR
ROADS.
SO, I -- I WOULD URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO VOTE AGAINST
THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. THE DEC IS -- IS ABLE TO WHEN SOMEBODY
WANTS TO USE -- A LOCAL HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WANTS TO USE THIS BRINE,
THEY GO THROUGH A PROCESS, THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION AND I DON'T
BELIEVE THAT THE DEC IS -- IS GOING TO ALLOW SOMETHING TO BE USED ON
OUR ROADS THAT IS GOING TO BE HARMFUL AND I DON'T THINK THIS LEGISLATURE
24
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SHOULD SUBSTITUTE OUR JUDGMENT FOR THEIRS, GIVEN THAT THEY HAVE THE
EXPERTISE. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU, MR. RA.
MR. MANKTELOW.
MR. MANKTELOW: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS, PLEASE?
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MR. BURDICK: YES.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. MANKTELOW: THANK YOU, MR. BURDICK.
JUST -- JUST A COUPLE QUICK QUESTIONS. WHO'S ACTUALLY
ASKING FOR THIS TO BE DONE?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, I GUESS I'M THE SPONSOR OF THE
BILL, BUT IT'S ALSO SUPPORTED I THINK BY ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND,
YOU KNOW, OTHERS THAT BELIEVE THAT WE DO NEED TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC
HEALTH.
MR. MANKTELOW: SO YOU'RE THE SPONSOR OF THE
BILL, I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT IS THERE SOME GROUP THAT HAS ACTUALLY COME
TO YOU SAYING, WILL YOU MOVE THIS BILL FORWARD?
MR. BURDICK: NO.
MR. MANKTELOW: SO THIS IS BASICALLY YOUR CALL?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, IT -- YOU KNOW, THIS IS A BILL
THAT HAS SOME PREDECESSORS, THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT. AND, YOU
KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I CAN CERTAINLY LOOK INTO, AS TO WHETHER THE
25
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SPONSORS AT THAT TIME HAD SOME ORGANIZED -- SOME ORGANIZATIONS THAT
PROVIDED MEMORANDUM OF SUPPORT AND SO FORTH. I DON'T THINK THAT WE
HAVE WITH THIS BILL EITHER MEMORANDUMS OF SUPPORT OR MEMORANDUMS
OF OBJECTION.
MR. MANKTELOW: WELL, THERE ARE A FEW.
MY SECOND QUESTION: A LITTLE WHILE AGO YOU WERE
TALKING ABOUT THE TOXIC CHEMICALS. WHAT -- WHAT WERE THEY AGAIN?
MR. BURDICK: SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S -- IT'S QUITE A
LAUNDRY LIST, YOU KNOW. IT'S HEAVY METALS SUCH AS ARSENIC, BARIUM AND
LEAD. WE HAVE CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES LIKE BENZENE, TOLUENE AND
FORMALDEHYDE. THERE ARE ALSO SOME NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE
MATERIALS SUCH AS RADIUM-226 AND URANIUM. AND -- AND SO, THERE ARE
QUITE A FEW. I PROBABLY HAVEN'T EXHAUSTED THE LIST.
MR. MANKTELOW: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.
OFF OF -- OFF OF THAT, MR. BURDICK, ARE THERE ANY
ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF THESE TOXICS?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, YOU KNOW, IT'S INTERESTING
BECAUSE SOME HAD FOUND THAT, AND I THINK THAT IT'S RADIUM IN WHICH THE
LEVELS HAD BEEN FOUND TO BE EXCEEDING FEDERAL DRINKING WATER
STANDARDS BY HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF TIMES WITH RADIUM. AND SO, I --
I DON'T HAVE THE -- THE LIST OF, YOU KNOW, WHAT THOSE STANDARDS ARE. IF
THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR, I DON'T HAVE THAT IN MY FINGERTIPS.
MR. MANKTELOW: YEAH, BECAUSE I THINK IT GOES
HAND AND HAND WITH WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH. YOU'RE TRYING TO
BAN TOXIC CHEMICALS, WHICH I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND, BUT AT THE SAME
26
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
TIME SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE NATURALLY OUT THERE IN -- IN THE
ENVIRONMENT. AND I WAS JUST WONDERING WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS
BETWEEN YOUR BILL AND THOSE NUMBERS WERE COMPARED TO WHAT'S
NATURALLY IN THE GROUND.
MR. BURDICK: WELL, YOU KNOW, OVER THE LAST
SEVERAL YEARS, THIS BODY HAS COMMITTED LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS
OF DOLLARS TO REMEDIATE TOXIC SUBSTANCES THAT ARE IN OUR WATER SYSTEMS.
AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S BOTH LESS EXPENSIVE AND EASIER TO AVOID
CONTAMINATION THAN TO REMEDIATE THEM. AND, YOU KNOW, NOT TO
MENTION THE HUMAN COST OF THESE CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES THAT MAY
LEAD TO CANCER AMONG MANY IN OUR STATE AND THAT HITS BOTH A HUMAN TOLL
AS WELL AS A FINANCIAL TOLL THAT WE ALL BEAR.
MR. MANKTELOW: ALL RIGHT. SO SOMEONE THAT
DOES OPPOSE THIS IS THE NEW YORK STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF -- OR
SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION, BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME GOOD USES FOR
THIS STUFF AND THEY'RE AT ACCEPTABLE LEVELS AND DEC'S ALLOWING THEM TO
USE THAT RIGHT NOW. SO IF WE'RE GONNA BAN ALL OF THIS, WE'RE GONNA PUT
ANOTHER UNFUNDED MANDATE ONTO OUR HIGHWAYS, ONTO OUR LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS, OUR COUNTY, OUR TOWNS, OUR VILLAGES, 'CAUSE NOW THEY'RE
NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO USE THIS PRODUCT. IS THERE ANY -- WAS THERE ANY
FUNDING IN THE BUDGET TO HELP OFFSET THIS UNFUNDED MANDATE?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THIS IS AN
INSTANCE IN WHICH WE REALLY NEED TO -- NEED TO TAKE A LONGER VIEW IN
TERMS OF WHAT THE COST IS. AND THE COST OF THESE LESS EXPENSIVE
SOLUTIONS THAT COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM AS I'VE DESCRIBED. AND
27
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THEY ARE REALLY PLENTY OF AFFORDABLE OPTIONS. SOLUTION MINING, WHICH I
HAD MADE REFERENCE TO BEFORE, AND AGAIN, I'M VERY PLEASED THAT THE
DOT IS GOING FORWARD WITH A PILOT PROGRAM ON THAT. THERE ARE
HOMEMADE BRINES, THERE'S BEET JUICE, THERE'S A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE
OPTIONS. AND I -- I DON'T WANT TO BE DISINGENUOUS. YES, THE EXISTING
USE OF THESE FRACKING FLUIDS AND FRACKING WASTEWATER, YOU KNOW, WOULD
BE LESS EXPENSIVE. BUT I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE TOTAL
COST AND -- AND WHAT THAT COST WOULD BE, AS I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY.
MR. MANKTELOW: AND I BELIEVE YOU ARE A
FORMER TOWN SUPERVISOR, RIGHT?
MR. BURDICK: I WAS INDEED.
MR. MANKTELOW: SO, YOU -- YOU COMPLETELY
UNDERSTAND WHY I'M TALKING ABOUT THE UNFUNDED MANDATE BACK TO OUR
LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND WHAT THIS IS GOING TO DO TO THEM.
MR. BURDICK: WELL, I -- YOU KNOW, I'M PROUD OF
MY YEARS AS A SUPERVISOR OF THE TOWN AND FREQUENTLY WE TOOK MORE
EXPENSIVE OPTIONS BECAUSE WE FELT THAT THERE'S MORE EXPENSIVE OPTIONS,
EVEN THOUGH NOT REQUIRED BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW, WAS THE RIGHT THING TO
DO FOR OUR RESIDENTS.
MR. MANKTELOW: WELL, I -- I THANK YOU FOR YOUR
TIME, MR. BURDICK. I THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND I DO AGREE WITH
A GOOD PORTION OF THIS. I JUST WISH SOME OF THOSE NUMBERS THAT YOU
TALKED ABOUT THAT WE DON'T HAVE OR DON'T SEE, I WISH THEY WERE IN THIS
BILL SO WE COULD TAKE A REALLY GOOD, HARD LOOK AT THIS. SO, THANK YOU
FOR YOUR TIME.
28
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. BURDICK: WELL, THANK YOU, SIR.
MR. MANKTELOW: YOU'RE WELCOME.
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: ON THE BILL.
MR. MANKTELOW: AGAIN, AS I JUST SAID, WE'RE --
WE'RE MOVING FORWARD AND ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES SAID EARLIER THAT WE
HAVE DEC, WE HAVE SOME OF THE BEST PEOPLE AND ENGINEERS AND
SCIENTISTS WORKING FOR NEW YORK STATE. IF THIS BILL CAME FORWARD FROM
DEC ASKING US TO MAKE A CHANGE, I PROBABLY COULD SUPPORT IT. BUT THE
SPONSOR SAID THIS IS BASICALLY HIS IDEA, HIS BILL, HE WANTS TO PUSH IT
FORWARD. AND I'M NOT SAYING HE'S ALL WRONG, BUT I THINK WE NEED TO SEE
ALL THE NUMBERS AND ALL THE -- THE COSTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE INVOLVED TO
OUR LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND WE CONSTANTLY TALK ABOUT UNFUNDED
MANDATES AND THIS IS GONNA BE ANOTHER UNFUNDED MANDATE. WE'RE
GOING TO TAKE THIS AWAY AND AT THE SAME TIME WE'RE TRYING TO STOP
PEOPLE IN NEW YORK STATE FROM USING AS MUCH SALT ON THE HIGHWAYS AS
WELL. WHILE WE CAN'T TAKE EVERY TOOL OUT OF THE TOOLBOX AND
ACCOMPLISH THE JOB OF GETTING IT DONE. I JUST THINK WE NEED TO
SOMETIMES SLOW THINGS DOWN, MAYBE DO A PILOT PROGRAM WHERE WE'RE
NOT USING THIS. AND AGAIN, WE'RE NOT DOING IT AND IT'S NOT COMING OUT OF
THE GROUND IN NEW YORK STATE. THERE'S OTHER WAYS TO ACCOMPLISH THIS
AND MAKE IT HAPPEN.
SO, MADAM SPEAKER, I THANK YOU FOR THE TIME TO ASK
THE QUESTIONS. THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO MAKE A FEW COMMENTS
AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.
29
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU, MR.
MANKTELOW.
MR. PALMESANO.
MR. PALMESANO: YES, MADAM SPEAKER. I JUST
HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR THE SPONSOR.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MR. BURDICK: CERTAINLY.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. PALMESANO: IS -- IS IT YOUR BELIEF THAT THE
DEC OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DOES NOT REGULATE ENOUGH OR THOROUGHLY
ENOUGH?
MR. BURDICK: WELL, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, YOU KNOW,
AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, YOU KNOW, I'M NOT INTENDING TO CAST ASPERSIONS
ON THE DEC. I -- I THINK THAT THEY DO THE BEST THEY CAN. BUT, IT'S A BIG
WATERFRONT TO -- TO BE ABLE TO TRY TO -- TO DEAL WITH AND THERE HAVE BEEN
INSTANCES IN WHICH THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATIONS HAD ISSUES WITH IT
AND, YOU KNOW, WE, AGAIN, FEEL THAT IT IS -- IT IS REALLY MORE PRUDENT TO
TAKE ACTIONS WHICH WILL PREVENT THIS FROM OCCURRING. BUT AGAIN, I
REALLY DO WISH TO EMPHASIZE THAT AND -- AND I APPRECIATE THAT I'M BEING
TOLD THAT I'M THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THIS. IT HAS, YOU KNOW, QUITE A HISTORY
AS YOU ALL KNOW. BUT, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT THIS IS THE MORE PRUDENT
ACTION, BOTH FROM A PUBLIC HEALTH STANDPOINT AS WELL AS FROM THE
TAXPAYER STANDPOINT, SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO ADD RADIUM AND URANIUM
AND SOME OF THESE TOXIC CHEMICALS THAT END UP IN OUR DRINKING WATER
30
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AND THAT WE NEED TO ADD THAT TO -- TO GETTING RID OF PFAS AND THE
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS. AND BY THE WAY, THAT DOES FALL ON
MUNICIPALITIES. I KNOW, BECAUSE I AM TRYING TO GET GRANT FUNDING TO
MUNICIPALITIES THAT ARE DEALING WITH THESE CONTAMINANTS IN THEIR PUBLIC
WATER SYSTEMS.
MR. PALMESANO: I APPRECIATE THAT LONGWINDED
ANSWER.
AS MY COLLEAGUE MENTIONED, THE DEC HAS EXPERTISE,
THE DEC REGULATES THIS ISSUE NOW. IF THEY BELIEVE THIS WAS A HEALTH OR
A SAFETY ISSUE, WOULDN'T THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO INCORPORATE THIS IN
THROUGH THE REGULATIONS, THROUGH THE PROCESS? WOULDN'T THEY BE ABLE
TO DO THAT IF THEY SO CHOSE?
MR. BURDICK: YOU KNOW, THE DEC REGULATIONS
ARE NOT REALLY THE SUBJECT OF THIS BILL. IT'S REALLY ABOUT SPECIFIC USAGES
OF FRACKING WASTEWATER FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS.
MR. PALMESANO: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, SIR.
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: ON THE BILL.
MR. PALMESANO: WHEN YOU READ THE SPONSOR'S
MEMO OF SUPPORT, IT SAYS THE INTENT OF THIS BILL IS TO PREVENT
WASTEWATER FROM HIGH-VOLUME HYDROFRACKING OPERATIONS FROM BEING
USED ON HIGHWAYS IN THE STATE. THIS TYPE OF FRACKING IS NOT CURRENTLY
PERMITTED IN NEW YORK STATE. HOWEVER, THERE ARE MANY EXISTING
NON-FRACKING WELLS IN NEW YORK THAT PRODUCE BRINE. THEY'RE ONLY
USED AFTER A BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION, OR A BUD, IS APPROVED BY
31
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THE DEC. IT REQUIRES HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS TO TEST THE BRINE AND REPORT
ITS USE. THE BUD, THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION, IS NOT ISSUED
WITHOUT A THOROUGH REVIEW AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRINE. THE
DEC HAS STRICT GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS THAT THEY IMPLEMENT. IF THEY
NEEDED -- THOUGHT SOMETHING WAS NEEDED TO BE DONE TO ADDRESS THIS,
THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO SO AND WOULD DO SO. ALTHOUGH MY
COLLEAGUE SAYS THIS IS NOT ABOUT REGULATION, IT IS. AND I'VE NEVER ONCE
HEARD THAT THE DEC OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DOES NOT REGULATE
STRONGLY ENOUGH.
CURRENTLY, THE SYSTEM ALLOWS FOR THE EFFECTIVE USE OF
BRINE FOR OUR HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT
AND PUBLIC HEALTH. AN OUTRIGHT -- AN OUTRIGHT AND ARBITRARY BAN ON THE
USE OF WATER FROM WELLS, PONDS AND FIELDS REALLY FAILS TO RECOGNIZE THE
CURRENT HIGH LEVEL OF STATE REGULATION OF THESE ACTIVITIES ALREADY. THE
BENEFITS THAT WE HAVE FROM THESE SOURCES OF BRINE WATER FOR OUR
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR SAFETY, FOR DEICING AND DUST
SUPPRESSION. AND NOW FOR OUR HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS -- MY COLLEAGUE
MENTIONED THE TAXPAYERS, MUCH OF THIS WASTEWATER IS FREE, IT'S
ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE. AND TAKING AWAY THAT OPTION FROM OUR LOCAL
GOVERNMENTS WOULD REALLY FORCE THEM TO PURCHASE THIS BRINE FROM THE
COMMERCIAL SECTOR OR FORCE THEM TO MAKE THEIR OWN BRINE WITH MAKING
COSTLY INVESTMENTS. AND WE ALREADY KNOW THE COST TO OUR HIGHWAY
DEPARTMENTS HAS INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY TO OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.
ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE HIGH
CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX HAS INCREASED 70 PERCENT OVER THE PAST THREE
32
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
YEARS. YES, WE GOT A LITTLE BUMP IN CHIPS FOR US, BUT THAT'S NOT
ENOUGH. SOMETHING LIKE THIS WOULD JUST PUT MORE UNNECESSARY COSTS
ON THE PROPERTY TAXPAYERS, LEAD TO LESS WORK BEING DONE ON OUR LOCAL
ROADS, BRIDGES AND CULVERTS, AND IT ACTUALLY COSTS THE LOCAL PROPERTY TAX
-- TAXPAYERS ANYMORE.
WE HAVE A SYSTEM IN PLACE THAT'S WORKING. WE SHOULD
KEEP -- LET THIS -- THE SYSTEM WORK THE WAY IT'S DOING IT. THE DEC HAS
THE EXPERTISE, THEY HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE, AND THEY'RE THE ONES MANAGING
THIS. WE SHOULD LET THAT CONTINUE AND NOT PENALIZE OUR LOCAL
MUNICIPALITIES SO THEY CAN KEEP THEIR ROADS SAFE AND PROTECT THEIR
PROPERTY TAXPAYERS.
FOR THAT REASON, MADAM SPEAKER, I WILL BE VOTING NO
ON THIS BILL AND ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU, MR.
PALMESANO.
MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: MADAM SPEAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE
LOCAL GOVERNMENTS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM?
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM. LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.
THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH
DAY.
33
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: A PARTY VOTE HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF
LEGISLATION. SHOULD THERE BE ANY MEMBERS WHO'D WISH TO VOTE IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE, THEY MAY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.
THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF
LEGISLATION. FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION,
THEY COULD DO SO AT THEIR DESK.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU.
THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
MR. SCHIAVONI TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. SCHIAVONI: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. I --
I RISE TODAY TO SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION.
A LOT OF THE FLUIDS THAT ARE ACTUALLY IN FRACK -- FRACKING
FLUIDS IS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM COMPANIES, SO IT'S ACTUALLY VERY
DIFFICULT TO ASCERTAIN WHAT IS ACTUALLY IN THE FLUIDS. AND THE THOUGHT OF
PUTTING THEM ON ALL THE ROADS THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE IS ONE OF THE
REASONS WHY I AM COMPLETELY SUPPORTING THIS BILL.
I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. THANK YOU.
34
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: MR. SCHIAVONI IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
MR. BURDICK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. BURDICK: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. I
WANT TO THANK THE SPEAKER FOR ALLOWING THIS BILL TO COME TO THE FLOOR.
AS I MENTIONED IN THE COURSE OF THE DEBATE, I DO FEEL
THAT THIS IS A BILL THAT IN THE LONG RUN WILL BOTH PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AS
WELL AS RESULT IN LESSER EXPENSE; LESSER EXPENSE FOR STATEWIDE HEALTH
COSTS AND ACTUALLY ULTIMATELY WE'RE GONNA FIND THAT ALTERNATIVES WILL
COME DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY IN PRICE, AND THAT THOSE ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE
SAFE WILL BE ABLE TO BE USED WELL. AND AGAIN, I THINK THAT THIS IS A BILL
WHOSE TIME HAS COME. AND WE HAVE NARROWED THE SCOPE OF IT
CONSIDERABLY IN ORDER TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN
BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION.
SO, AGAIN, MY THANKS TO THE -- TO THE SPEAKER, AND I
ALSO WANT TO THANK THE CHAIR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONVERSATION
COMMITTEE, ASSEMBLYWOMAN GLICK, FOR HER SUPPORT, AND ALSO THE
WORK OF PROGRAM AND COUNSEL IN PUTTING TOGETHER THE AMENDMENTS TO
THE BILL.
I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: MR. BURDICK IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULT.)
THE BILL HAS PASSED.
35
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. FALL FOR AN INTRODUCTION.
MR. FALL: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ON BEHALF OF MEMBER LINDA ROSENTHAL, I'M PLEASED TO
INTRODUCE A GROUP OF YOUNG PEOPLE VISITING US TODAY FROM MANHATTAN'S
SCOUTING AMERICA TROOP. JOINING US ARE BOTH BOYS AND GIRLS FROM
SCOUT TROOP 1 AND CUB PACK 1, ALONG WITH THEIR DEDICATED LEADERS
TROOP SCOUTMASTER CLAUDIA BURKE, TROOP LEADER ADAM BROWN AND
CUB PACK LEADER MICHAEL BRUS.
WOULD YOU PLEASE BE SO KIND TO WELCOME THEM TO THE
PEOPLE'S HOUSE?
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU. THANK
YOU, MR. FALL.
ON BEHALF OF MR. FALL, MS. ROSENTHAL, THE SPEAKER
AND ALL OF THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THE CHAMBER, EXTEND THE
PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR, AND HOPE YOU ENJOY THE PROCEEDINGS.
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING US.
(APPLAUSE)
(PAUSE)
PAGE 8, RULES REPORT NO. 256, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A00026, RULES REPORT
NO. 256, ROSENTHAL. AN ACT TO AMEND THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW AND THE
PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING MEDICAID FROM REQUIRING
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR HIV MEDICATION.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
36
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. ROSENTHAL.
MS. ROSENTHAL: OKAY. THIS BILL WOULD ENSURE
THAT MEDICAID PROVIDERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN PRIOR AUTHORIZATION
TO PRESCRIBE ANTI-RETROVIVAL -- VIRAL PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT
OR PREVENTION OF HIV/AIDS.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU.
MR. JENSEN.
MR. JENSEN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM
SPEAKER.
ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: ON THE BILL.
MR. JENSEN: THANK YOU. AND I WANT TO THANK OUR
COLLEAGUE FROM THE UPPER WEST SIDE FOR HER EXPLANATION. AND
CERTAINLY THIS HAS BEEN A BILL WHEN IT CAME THROUGH THE HEALTH
COMMITTEE THAT I DID SUPPORT, AND CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THE NEED TO
ENSURE THAT THOSE NEW YORKERS EITHER WITH HIV OR AIDS OR MAY BE
COMING INTO CONTACT WITH -- WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO DO HAVE HIV OR
AIDS, DO HAVE ACCESS TO CRITICALLY IMPORTANT MEDICATIONS LIKE PREP,
PEP AND OTHER MEDICATIONS THAT ENSURE THAT WE LESSEN THE POTENTIAL OF
THE SPREAD OF HIV AND AIDS. AND CERTAINLY, WE WANT TO ENSURE THAT
THERE'S ACCESS TO THESE IMPORTANT MEDICATIONS. AND WHILE I AM
SUPPORTIVE OF THIS LEGISLATION TO -- TO ENSURE THAT WE DO STOP THE SPREAD
OF THOSE -- OF THOSE DISEASES, I ALSO DO HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT LESSENING
THE -- THE ROLE FOR PLANS IN UNDERGOING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION. CERTAINLY,
WITH PREP AND PEP, THERE ARE VERY IMPORTANT HEALTH METRICS FOR THOSE
37
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WHO ARE PRESCRIBED THAT MEDICATION TO GO THROUGH TO ENSURE THAT IT IS
EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF HIV AND AIDS. AND CERTAINLY,
THAT IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF ENSURING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND THE EFFICACY
OF -- OF THESE MEDICATIONS.
IN THE PAST, THIS LEGISLATURE HAS PASSED AND THE
GOVERNOR HAS SIGNED INTO LAW OTHER MEASURES THAT PROHIBIT THE USE OF
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THESE MEDICATIONS, AS WELL AS EVEN FURTHER BACK
REQUIRING THE COVERAGE OF THOSE MEDICATIONS. AND WHILE WE HAVE
THOSE LAWS ON THE BOOKS, I COULD ALSO UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN THAT THIS
LEGISLATION MAY BE DUPLICATIVE. ADJACENTLY, IF YOU LOOK AT THE STATE'S
TOTAL MEDICAID SPEND, WE ARE QUITE HIGH. AND WHILE THIS DOESN'T SPEAK
TO THE MEDICAID COVERAGE OF THIS MEDICATION OR ANY OTHER MEDICATION,
WE HAVE SEEN OUR STATE'S MEDICAID OBLIGATIONS FAR EXPAND PAST THE
REASON WHY THE PROGRAM WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED, CERTAINLY TAKING UP A
-- A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF OUR STATE BUDGET.
SO ONCE AGAIN, WHILE I AM SUPPORTIVE OF THIS BILL AND
WILL BE CASTING A YEA VOTE FOR IT, I DO THINK WE HAVE TO ENSURE THAT WE --
WE DO HAVE THE ABILITY NOT JUST TO -- TO CONTROL OUR MEDICAID SPENDING,
BUT ALSO ENSURE THAT WHEN MEDICATIONS ARE PRESCRIBED WE'RE TAKING INTO
ACCOUNT PATIENT NEEDS, THE PRESCRIBING AUTHORITY OF THE -- OF THE
PRESCRIBER, AS WELL AS THE PLAN'S ROLE IN ENSURING THAT WE'RE PRESCRIBING
AND AUTHORIZING PROPER -- PROPER PRESCRIPTIONS FOR THE BEST POSSIBLE
TREATMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS.
SO WITH THAT, ONCE AGAIN, I -- I THANK THE SPONSOR FOR
HER EXPLANATION, AND THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
38
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THANK YOU, MR.
JENSEN.
THE CLERK WILL READ -- READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH
DAY.
ACTING SPEAKER TORRES: THE CLERK WILL
RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. ROSENTHAL TO
EXPLAIN HER VOTE.
MS. ROSENTHAL: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, TO
EXPLAIN MY VOTE.
LAST YEAR, WE PASSED A LAW PROHIBITING PRIVATE
INSURERS FROM IMPOSING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION, BUT THAT LAW DID NOT EXTEND
TO MEDICAID PLANS. PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONS REQUIREMENTS HAVE CREATED
SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS TO LIFESAVING ANTIRETROVIRAL MEDICATIONS. THE AMA
SAYS THAT PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONS LEAD TO 94 PERCENT OF PATIENTS
EXPERIENCING CARE DELAYS, WITH 78 PERCENT ABANDONING TREATMENT ALL
TOGETHER. ANY DELAY IN TREATMENT UNDERMINES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF
ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY.
AND SO THIS BILL WILL -- WILL EXTEND THE -- THE NEED FOR
PRIOR AUTHORIZATION WILL BE ELIMINATED FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ON MEDICAID
WHO HAVE HIV OR AIDS. IT'S AN IMPORTANT MEASURE SO THAT EVERYBODY
CAN BENEFIT FROM THESE NEW MEDICATIONS.
AND SO I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE. THANK YOU.
39
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MS. ROSENTHAL IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: MADAM SPEAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE
REAL PROPERTY TAX [SIC] COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE
ROOM?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: REAL PROPERTY TAX
[SIC] TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM. COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR
REAL PROPERTY [SIC], SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.
PAGE 11, RULES REPORT NO. 297, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A02212, RULES REPORT
NO. 297, BRAUNSTEIN, WOERNER, STECK, PAULIN, BRABENEC, STIRPE. AN
ACT TO AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW AND THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW,
IN RELATION TO REQUIRING FULL PAYMENT FOR DELIVERED AND ACCEPTED
MATERIALS PERTAINING TO PUBLIC WORK PROJECTS; AND TO AMEND THE GENERAL
BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING THE RETENTION OF ANY PAYMENT
DUE AND OWING A MATERIAL SUPPLIER FOR A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MR. BRAUNSTEIN.
CAN WE HAVE SOME QUIET IN THE CHAMBER, PLEASE?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN.
40
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: THANK YOU. THIS BILL AMENDS
THE STATE FINANCE LAW, GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW AND GENERAL BUSINESS
LAW TO PROHIBIT RETAINAGE ON PAYMENTS OWED TO MATERIALS SUPPLIERS FOR
DELIVERED AND ACCEPTED MATERIALS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION
PROJECTS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. GANDOLFO.
MR. GANDOLFO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
WOULD THE SPONSOR PLEASE YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: SURE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. GANDOLFO: ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. AND
THANK YOU FOR YOUR EXPLANATION.
SO CURRENTLY, WHAT IS THE ALLOWABLE AMOUNT OF
RETAINAGE ON MATERIALS?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: FIVE PERCENT.
MR. GANDOLFO: FIVE PERCENT. OKAY. AND NOW
THIS, THERE CAN BE NO AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE AT ALL IN ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE
CONTRACT?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: ONLY FOR MATERIALS SUPPLIED
THAT ARE GRADED TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS OR COVERED UNDER A WARRANTY.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
AND NOW, ONE THING I WANTED TO CLARIFY, YOU
MENTIONED THAT -- THAT PROVISION THAT IF IT'S UNDER MANUFACTURER'S
41
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WARRANTY. SO FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS BILL, WHAT DOES CONSTITUTE A
MATERIAL? WOULD THIS NOT APPLY IF THERE IS NO MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY
ON THE MATERIAL DELIVERED?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: CORRECT.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. SO --
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: OR -- OR GRADED BY -- UNDER
INDUSTRY STANDARDS. THOSE TWO QUALIFY.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. SO, MATERIALS, LET'S SAY,
SOME KIND OF LUMBER THAT'S DELIVERED HAS NO MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY.
THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO THIS NEW PROHIBITION --
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: WELL, LUMBER, I BELIEVE IS
GRADED --
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY, BUT -- OKAY, LUMBER IS
GRADED.
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: YEAH.
MR. GANDOLFO: SO THAT -- SO IF IT IS GRADED, THE
PROHIBITION IS IN EFFECT. IF IT'S NOT GRADED, NOT IN EFFECT.
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: CORRECT.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
NOW, IF THERE IS SOME ISSUE THAT'S DISCOVERED WITH --
WITH THE MATERIALS THAT ARE DELIVERED AT A LATER POINT, MAYBE IT'S NOT
IMMEDIATELY NOTICEABLE, WHAT RECOURSE WOULD THE OWNER OR THE GENERAL
CONTRACTOR ON THE PROJECT HAVE WITHOUT THE RETAINAGE?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: I MEAN, THIS -- THIS WOULD BE
THE RECOURSE YOU WOULD TYPICALLY HAVE WITH ANY OTHER PRODUCT THAT YOU
42
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
BUY WHERE THERE'S NOT RETAINAGE. YOU WOULD --
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: IF THERE'S A WARRANTY, OBVIOUSLY
YOU -- YOU GO BACK AND YOU SAY, THIS IS COVERED UNDER WARRANTY.
THERE'S A DEFECT. YOU'RE REQUIRED TO -- TO FIX IT. AND WHEN -- YOU
KNOW, PRODUCTS THAT ARE GRADED ARE -- ARE TYPICALLY, YOU KNOW, MEET UP
TO STANDARDS. SO THAT WILL BE A RARE SITUATION.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. SO IF LET'S SAY THERE'S SOME
KIND OF DISPUTE WHETHER OR NOT SOMETHING THAT IS A DEFECT IS COVERED
UNDER WARRANTY OR WHETHER IT WAS, YOU KNOW, IMPROPER STORAGE OR
IMPROPERLY INSTALLED. DO YOU ANTICIPATE THAT LITIGATION WOULD BE
NECESSARY TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: I MEAN, THAT WOULD BE
NORMALLY HOW THINGS WOULD WORK. IT DOESN'T CHANGE THAT SITUATION.
MR. GANDOLFO: WELL CURRENTLY, AS I UNDERSTAND
IT, THE 5 TO 10 PERCENT RETAINAGE IS TYPICALLY USED TO ENCOURAGE A
QUICKER RESOLUTION TO THESE THINGS. IF THE MATERIAL SUPPLIER NEEDS THAT 5
OR 10 PERCENT THAT'S BEING WITHHELD, THEY MIGHT BE MORE LIKELY TO WORK
TO RESOLVE IT A LITTLE QUICKER. SO A CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS THAT WITHOUT
THE RETAINAGE YOU COULD END UP IN MORE DRAWN-OUT DISPUTES THAT MIGHT
DELAY PROJECT TIMES. IS THAT A CONCERN?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: NO. I -- I WOULD ARGUE THAT
WHEN MATERIALS ARE SUPPLIED, THE PERSON BUYING THOSE MATERIALS HAS THE
OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THEM UPON DELIVERY, RIGHT? THEY ARE PROTECTED
THAT THEY MEET INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND GRADED, OR THEY'RE PROTECTED BY A
43
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WARRANTY. LIKE ANY OTHER TRANSACTION YOU HAVE, ONCE THE MATERIAL
SUPPLIER HAS DELIVERED THE GOODS, THE BUYER HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO
INSPECT THEM, THEIR OBLIGATION IS CONCLUDED AT THAT POINT.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
NOW, I KNOW THIS -- THERE WAS A SIMILAR VERSION, IF NOT
THE SAME VERSION OF THIS BILL PASSED IN 2015 THAT WAS VETOED BY
GOVERNOR CUOMO. HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN RESPONSE TO THAT
VETO MESSAGE?
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: NO. WE'RE HOPEFUL; THERE'S A
NEW GOVERNOR NOW. SO WE'RE HOPEFUL, A DIFFERENT RESOLUTION.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. FAIR ENOUGH. THAT'S ALL I
HAVE. THANK YOU, MR. BRAUNSTEIN. THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
MR. BRAUNSTEIN: THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: READ THE LAST
SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 30TH
DAY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE CLERK WILL
RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
MR. DAIS TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. DAIS: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. I WOULD
LIKE TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL.
AS SOMEONE WHO HAS A BACKGROUND IN CONSTRUCTION,
I'M SPECIFICALLY THINKING ABOUT THE SMALL CONTRACTORS, THE MATERIALS,
44
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WHEN THEY BRING INTO A JOB SITE. THIS IS ENSURING THAT THEY GET PAYMENT
IN FULL. I HAVE BEEN ON PROJECTS, ESPECIALLY FOR MBES, WBES, VBES,
OUR VETERAN BUSINESSES, AND I'VE SEEN THE -- THE RETAINER CAN MAKE THE
DIFFERENCE OF THEM MAKING PAYROLL AND NOT MAKING PAYROLL. ESPECIALLY
WHEN WE THINK ABOUT RIGHT NOW WITH THE CURRENT TARIFF SITUATION AND
HOW THAT'S INCREASING MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTION, ENSURING THAT OUR
SUBCONTRACTORS AND OUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES WITHIN OUR GREAT STATE
CAN PAY THEIR BILLS AND PAY THEIR WORKERS IS KEY TO MAKING SURE THAT OUR
CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY REMAINS STRONG AND VIBRANT.
SO I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR AND I'M VOTING IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE. THANK -- OH, WE ALREADY VOTED, BUT THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. DAIS IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
MS. WALSH FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM
SPEAKER.
SO TODAY I'M SO GLAD TO BE JOINED BY ANOTHER GREAT
GROUP OF FOURTH GRADERS. THESE KIDS ARE FROM THE SHENENDEHOWA
SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM KARIGON ELEMENTARY. AND THEY -- I BELIEVE WE
DID -- I DIDN'T DO A HEAD COUNT, BUT I THINK THERE ARE 21, ALONG WITH
CHAPERONES AND TEACHERS TODAY. THEY ARE HERE TO VISIT THE PEOPLE'S
HOUSE TO SEE HOW WE'RE DOING OUR WORK HERE AT THE END OF SESSION.
45
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AND I WAS KIND OF EXPLAINING THE -- THE BOARD AND HOW THE VOTES GO,
AND I JUST THINK IT'S WONDERFUL THAT THEY'VE COME TO JOIN US TODAY. THEY
MAY NEVER BECOME ASSEMBLYMEMBERS, MAYBE; MAYBE THEY WILL. BUT
THEY'LL DEFINITELY BE BETTER CITIZENS FOR HAVING STOPPED BY TO SEE HOW ALL
OF THIS WORKS.
SO, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU COULD PLEASE EXTEND A
GREETING TO THESE GREAT FOURTH GRADERS AND AFFORD TO THEM ALL THE
CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE, PLEASE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF MS.
WALSH, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU YOUNG PEOPLE
FROM THE KARIGON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE
FLOOR TO YOU. VERY EXCITED TO SEE YOU HERE TODAY, LEARNING ALL ABOUT
STATE GOVERNMENT AND CIVICS, AND IT'S SUPER IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO SEE
WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE TODAY; DECISIONS THAT WE'RE MAKING, AND ONE
DAY, AS MS. WALSH SAID, YOU, TOO, COULD BE ONE OF THE PEOPLE ELECTED
INTO OFFICE. SO I'M VERY GLAD TO SEE YOU HERE TODAY. THANK YOU SO
MUCH FOR JOINING US.
(APPLAUSE)
MS. WALSH FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. IT'S --
IT'S WONDERFUL ON BEHALF OF ASSEMBLYMEMBER STEVE HAWLEY TO
INTRODUCE A GROUP THAT HAS COME TO VISIT HIM TODAY IN THE STATE
ASSEMBLY. THESE STUDENTS ARE SENIORS, I BELIEVE, FROM THE OAKFIELD-
ALABAMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT. THEY ARE -- THEY ARE MAKING A CIVICS
CLASS PRESENTATION TO ASSEMBLY AND SENATE MENTAL HEALTH COMMITTEES
46
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ON THEIR RESEARCH THAT SHOWS LINKS BETWEEN SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL
HEALTH ISSUES, WHICH I KNOW THAT AS AN ASSEMBLY BODY WE HAVE
DISCUSSED A NUMBER OF TIMES HERE ON THE FLOOR.
SO THE NAMES OF GUESTS INCLUDE PETER BEULER, WHO IS
ONE OF THE TEACHERS; LILAH BARRETT, KAYLEE BURGEL -- BURGAL MAYBE, I'M
SORRY IF I MESSED THAT UP; NEVAEH CONIBEAR, ELIANA EMERY, KENDALL
NEWBOULD, ALEXIS SMITH AND JESSICA SOSNOWSKI. THEY WERE ALL THE
STUDENTS WHO ARE HERE TODAY. AND AS I SAID, I THINK THAT IT'S WONDERFUL
TO NOT ONLY WELCOME MR. HAWLEY'S GUESTS TO THE CHAMBER, BUT ALSO TO
THANK THEM FOR TAKING A DEEP DIVE AND DOING SOME RESEARCH INTO
SOMETHING THAT IS VERY TOPICAL AND SOMETHING THAT NOT ONLY THE MENTAL
HEALTH COMMITTEES, BUT WE, AS AN ASSEMBLY, ARE DEFINITELY
CONSIDERING IN THE WORK THAT WE'RE DOING HERE.
SO I WOULD APPRECIATE IT, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU
WOULD WELCOME THEM TO THE CHAMBER AND AFFORD TO THEM ALL THE
CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF MS.
WALSH, MR. HAWLEY, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO
THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER, THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE, AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES
OF THE FLOOR TO YOU. AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMITTED WORK THAT YOU
ARE DOING RELATIVE TO MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE. IT CROSSES ALL
LINES, ALL DIVERSITIES, ALL BACKGROUNDS. EVERY PART OF OUR STATE. AND SO
IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO SEE YOUNG PEOPLE SO ACTIVELY INVOLVED ABOUT AN
ISSUE THAT REALLY PERMEATES OUR WHOLE SOCIETY. SO THANK YOU VERY
MUCH FOR ALL OF THE WORK THAT YOU'RE DOING, AND THANK YOU FOR JOINING
47
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
US TODAY.
(APPLAUSE)
MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: MADAM SPEAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE
CODES COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: CODES COMMITTEE
TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM. PLEASE SEE CHAIR DINOWITZ IN THE
SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM FOR CODES COMMITTEE.
PAGE 11, RULES REPORT NO. 301, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A02496, RULES REPORT
NO. 301, MCDONALD, BURDICK, SIMON, HEVESI, GLICK, WOERNER,
DESTEFANO, DAVILA, REYES, BENDETT, HYNDMAN, SEAWRIGHT. AN ACT TO
AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO PREFERRED SOURCE STATUS FOR
ENTITIES THAT PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES TO CERTAIN PERSONS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MR. MCDONALD.
MR. MCDONALD: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
THIS LEGISLATION WOULD ALLOW THE COMMISSIONER OF
EDUCATION TO APPROVE QUALIFIED CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ENTITIES THAT
PROVIDE VOCATIONAL AND REHABILITATION TRAINING TO FORMERLY INCARCERATED
PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM. ADDITIONALLY,
THIS LEGISLATION ALSO HAS SOME MINOR LANGUAGE CHANGES TO
ACCOMMODATE THE MODERNIZATION OF PREFERRED SOURCE SERVICES.
BUT IF I COULD JUST, AS I'M EXPLAINING, JUST TO CLARIFY.
48
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AS MANY PEOPLE KNOW, PREFERRED SOURCE WAS CREATED BY THIS
LEGISLATURE OVER 50 YEARS AGO, AND IT CONTINUES TO GROW AND EVOLVE
OVER TIME. ORIGINALLY, THOSE NOT-FOR-PROFITS THAT WE ASSUME OR THINK OF
WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PREFERRED SOURCE, WE THINK OF THE O AGENCIES; THE
OFFICE OF -- OPWDD, OMH, OASAS. ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE YEARS AGO,
THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ACTUALLY INCLUDED VETERANS' ORGANIZATIONS TO
MAKE SURE OUR VETERANS, WHEN THEY'RE ENTERING -- COMING BACK INTO
PROGRAMS HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER A REENTRY PROGRAM. REENTRY
INTO THE COMMUNITY NOT NECESSARILY FROM PRISON. SO THIS ONE BASICALLY
ADDRESSES THE FACT THAT THERE ARE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE REENTERING SOCIETY
AFTER THEIR TIME IN CARCERATION [SIC]. THEY MOVE INTO PROGRAMS THAT
PROVIDE HOUSING, BUT THE HOUSING ALSO REQUIRES THAT THEY HAVE A JOB.
AND THERE ARE NOT-FOR-PROFITS THAT TEAM UP WITH THESE REENTRY PROGRAMS
TO MAKE SURE INDIVIDUALS ARE GAINFULLY EMPLOYED, AND HOPEFULLY
BECOME A CONTRIBUTING MEMBER OF SOCIETY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. GANDOLFO.
MR. GANDOLFO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
WOULD THE SPONSOR PLEASE YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MR. MCDONALD: YES, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. GANDOLFO: THANK YOU, AND THANK YOU FOR THE
EXPLANATION.
SO FIRST, CAN WE START WITH -- I JUST WANT TO GET INTO A
49
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
LITTLE MORE WHAT THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM ACTUALLY MEANS. THAT
ALLOWS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS -- DO THEY -- ARE THEY ABLE TO BYPASS
COMPETITIVE BIDDING ON PUBLIC PROJECTS?
MR. MCDONALD: SO WHEN THEY BID ON PROJECTS,
THEY ARE GIVEN A VARIANCE OF ABOUT 15 PERCENT TO BE SELECTED. SO,
MOSTLY IT'S WITH STATE AGENCIES. A LOT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DON'T
RECOGNIZE THAT THEY, TOO, CAN PARTICIPATE WITH PREFERRED SOURCE, BUT
PRIMARILY IT'S WITH STATE AGENCIES. AND, YOU KNOW, AS YOU KNOW, THE
THREE MAIN ONES THAT WE HAVE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK ARE NYSID,
WHICH IS THE NEW YORK STATE FOR DISABILITIES [SIC]. WE HAVE CORCRAFT,
WHICH DEALS WITH THOSE INCARCERATION [SIC]. AND THE ONE FOR THE
VISUALLY IMPAIRED, WHICH I'M DRAWING A BLANK RIGHT NOW ON WHICH ONE
IT IS.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
MR. MCDONALD: BUT THOSE ARE THE THREE MAIN
ONES.
MR. GANDOLFO: SO THEY COULD BUT IN A BID, LET'S
SAY, FIVE TO TEN PERCENT HIGHER AND --
MR. MCDONALD: AND -- AND THEY WOULD BE ABLE
TO RECEIVE THAT BID. SOMETIMES THE NOT-FOR-PROFITS DO IT ON THEIR OWN.
SOMETIMES THEY ACTUALLY PARTNER UP WITH PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS AS
WELL AND THAT SEEMS TO BE A GREATER TREND, BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW, THERE'S
A GREAT DEMAND FOR MORE PEOPLE IN THE WORKFORCE FOR A LOT OF THESE
JOBS.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. NOW, WHAT IS THE BENEFIT
50
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
TO, LET'S SAY, THE STATE OR A MUNICIPALITY FROM CHOOSING ONE OF THE
ORGANIZATIONS THAT'S ON THE PREFERRED SOURCE LIST?
MR. MCDONALD: THE BENEFIT TO THE STATE IS
MULTIPLE REASONS: ONE, FIRST OF ALL, A LOT OF THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE
REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THEIR WORK PLAN. SO THEY ACTUALLY SHOW UP
FOR WORK. I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT. BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE HERE AT THE
STATE -- AND MEMBER WALSH REMEMBERS THIS VERY WELL -- ABOUT FOUR OR
FIVE YEARS AGO THE STATE THOUGHT IT WAS A GREAT IDEA TO BRING IN
(INDISCERNIBLE) FOR PRINTING FOR -- AND THEY ACTUALLY, ON THE ANNIVERSARY
OF PREFERRED SOURCE, TOOK AWAY A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT FROM
ONE OF OUR LEADING NOT-FOR-PROFITS FOR THE DISABLED IN THE CAPITAL
REGION. AND BASICALLY, IT MEANT THAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS WEREN'T GONNA
GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
MR. MCDONALD: AND AS WE KNOW, IN THE
DISABILITY COMMUNITY BUT ALSO IN THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED AND EVEN IN
OUR VETERANS' COMMUNITY, THERE IS [SIC] UNACCEPTABLY HIGH
UNEMPLOYMENT RATES. AND OUR GOAL OF THIS PROGRAM, AND ACTUALLY THE
OUTCOME OF THIS PROGRAM, IS SO WE'LL GET PEOPLE BACK TO WORK AND
CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. SO THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF
THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM WAS TO GIVE MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO THOSE
WITH DISABILITIES TO ENCOURAGE, YOU KNOW, MORE BUSINESS GOING TO THOSE
ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE GIVING THEM THAT WORK OPPORTUNITY.
MR. MCDONALD: RIGHT.
51
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
MR. MCDONALD: AND TO GET THE WORK DONE AT A
VERY REASONABLE PRICE.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. NOW --
MR. MCDONALD: AND JUST TO BE CLEAR BECAUSE,
YOU KNOW, I MENTIONED THERE'S A VARIANCE OF 15 PERCENT. THAT'S THE
THRESHOLD. BUT THERE'S MANY TIMES WHERE THEIR BIDS ACTUALLY COME IN
AND THEY'RE JUST AS COMPETITIVE ALMOST DOLLAR -- DOWN TO THE PENNY.
BUT THERE ARE TIMES THEY HAVE THAT VARIANCE THAT THEY CAN WORK WITH.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
NOW, YOU MENTIONED THAT THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
HAS EXTENDED THIS TO -- TO VETERANS AS WELL. IS THAT DISABLED VETERANS?
MR. MCDONALD: NO, ALL VETERANS.
MR. GANDOLFO: ALL VETERANS.
MR. MCDONALD: ANY -- ANY VETERAN WHO IS
REENTERING THE COMMUNITY. HERE IN ALBANY OVER ON 1ST STREET, THE VET
[SIC] HOUSE, I'VE BEEN REPRESENTING IT FOR 13 YEARS, IT'S GREAT. AND I
WOULD INVITE ANY MEMBER AT ANY TIME TO GO OVER AND VISIT THEM,
PARTICULARLY AROUND VETERAN'S DAY. THEY PUT OUT A GREAT BREAKFAST,
THEY'RE GREAT COOKS. BUT WHAT THEY DO IS THEY PROVIDE HOUSING, AND
THEY CONNECT THEM WITH THE VA FOR SERVICES. AND BY THE WAY, THE VA
CONNECTS WITH THEM FOR SERVICES TO HELP GET THESE INDIVIDUALS
EMPLOYED, GET THEM IN THE COMMUNITY. USUALLY THEY'RE IN THE VET [SIC]
HOUSE FOR ABOUT SIX TO NINE MONTHS, AND THEN THEY USUALLY SETTLE IN THE
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES AND REENGAGE WITH THEIR FAMILIES AND -- AND
52
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ALL THE GOOD THINGS. BUT IT'S NOT JUST THE DISABLED VETERANS.
MR. GANDOLFO: SO NOW, WAS THAT DONE VIA
REGULATION? BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE STATUTE WE'RE AMENDING HERE,
AND THE ONLY REFERENCES I SEE ARE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, AND WE'RE
AMENDING IT TO ADD FORMERLY INCARCERATED PERSONS.
MR. MCDONALD: THAT -- THAT'S A VERY GOOD POINT.
NO, ACTUALLY, THAT WAS DONE THROUGH REGULATION THROUGH THE EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY. SO WHY ARE WE NOT
CODIFYING THAT AS WELL?
MR. MCDONALD: I DON'T KNOW.
(PAUSE/CONFERENCING)
WELL, WE'RE -- REPEAT THE QUESTION JUST TO MAKE SURE I
UNDERSTOOD IT. WHY ARE WE JUST AMENDING --
MR. GANDOLFO: YEAH --
MR. MCDONALD: -- (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK)
VETERANS ALREADY?
MR. GANDOLFO: WELL, I'M SEEING WE'RE PUTTING
THIS IN THE STATUTE. THERE'S NO -- THERE'S NO REFERENCE IN STATUTE TO
VETERANS BEING ELIGIBLE -- VETERANS ORGANIZATIONS BEING ELIGIBLE FOR THE
PREFERRED SOURCE LIST. SO WHY ARE WE SPECIFICALLY PUTTING IN FORMERLY
INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS AND NOT SOME OF THE OTHER GROUPS AND
CODIFYING THAT INTO LAW?
(CONFERENCING)
MR. MCDONALD: I CAN'T GIVE YOU A BETTER -- I CAN'T
53
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
GIVE YOU A GOOD ANSWER, TO BE ABSOLUTELY HONEST WITH YOU.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
MR. MCDONALD: BECAUSE THEY'RE ALREADY
ACCEPTED THROUGH THE REGULATORY PROCESS, THE VETERANS.
MR. GANDOLFO: OKAY.
MR. MCDONALD: YOU KNOW, THIS IS AN
AMENDMENT TO STATE FINANCE LAW TO MAKE SURE THAT THE LEGIS -- THE
EDUCATION DEPARTMENT KNOW THAT IT'S THE LEGISLATURE'S INTENT THAT
BECAUSE WE SEE HIGH RATES OF DISABILITY IN THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED
AND WE SEE -- IN 2024 THE PRISON -- PRISON POPULATION INITIATIVE,
WHEREAS THE AVERAGE DISABILITY RATE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY IS 15
PERCENT, IN FORMERLY INCARCERATED MEN'S POPULATION, 40 PERCENT ARE
DISABLED OF THOSE BEING RELEASED, AND WOMEN ACTUALLY 50 PERCENT. SO
WE'RE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY'RE INDIVIDUALS THAT PROBABLY THROUGH THEIR
LIFE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOR WHATEVER REASON, WERE NEVER CLEARLY DIAGNOSED
AND HAVING A DISABILITY. AND AT THE SAME TOKEN, IF WE WANT THEM TO BE
CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS TO SOCIETY, WE NEED TO GET THEM INTO A PROGRAM
WHERE THEY HAVE HOUSING AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR JOB TRAINING.
MR. GANDOLFO: WOULD A CRIMINAL RECORD PREVENT
SOMEONE WHO WAS INCARCERATED WHO IS DISABLED FROM PARTICIPATING
WITH AN ORGANIZATION THAT SERVICES DISABLED PEOPLE?
MR. MCDONALD: NO. THIS -- THIS ISN'T ABOUT THAT.
THIS IS ABOUT INDIVIDUALS WHO -- I USE THE EXPRESSION, I'M SHOWING MY
AGE, HAVE PAID THEIR DEBT TO SOCIETY. THEY'VE BEEN ALLOWED TO GO BACK
INTO THE COMMUNITY. THEY HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED INTO A -- A LEGITIMATE
54
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
PROGRAM, A RECOGNIZED NOT-FOR-PROFIT THAT SED RECOGNIZES AS BEING PART
OF THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM. WE'RE JUST ALLOWING THAT NOT-FOR-
PROFIT, AFTER SCRUTINY BY THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT -- THEY SIT UNDER THE
(INDISCERNIBLE) COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JUST FOR
PEOPLE'S INFORMATION. IT GIVES THAT NOT-FOR-PROFIT TO ACTUALLY SEEK TO
RESPOND TO BIDS FOR PROCUREMENTS.
MR. GANDOLFO: RIGHT. BUT I'M -- I'M JUST TRYING
TO FIGURE OUT THE NEED TO SPECIFICALLY CODIFY FORMERLY INCARCERATED
PEOPLE HERE. SO IF THEY ARE FORMERLY INCARCERATED AND DISABLED, IS --
WHAT IS STOPPING THEM FROM RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM AN ORGANIZATION
OR WORKING WITH AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS ALREADY ELIGIBLE FOR PREFERRED
SOURCE?
MR. MCDONALD: I THINK ALL OF THE NOT-FOR-PROFITS,
YOU KNOW, THEY WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO GROW THE PROGRAM. WE'RE
NOT TALKING ABOUT COMPETING WITH THE DISABLED. WE'RE NOT TALKING
ABOUT COMPETING WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE STRUGGLING WITH SUBSTANCE
USE. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GROWING THE PROGRAM, BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE
JOBS ARE JOBS THAT ARE NOT BEING FULFILLED.
MR. GANDOLFO: RIGHT. BUT WHAT --
MR. MCDONALD: (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK). SO
THEREFORE, IF THEY COULD COMPETE FOR MORE CONTRACTS, IN OTHER WORDS,
NON-PROFIT A IS ABLE TO INCLUDE THEM -- INCLUDE THEM IN -- IN A
PROPOSAL, THEY CAN ACTUALLY GROW THE FIELD, MAKE THE PIE BIGGER.
MR. GANDOLFO: WELL, ISN'T IT INHERENTLY PUTTING
NOW ORGANIZATIONS THAT WORK WITH FORMERLY INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS IN
55
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
COMPETITION WITH, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IF THEY'RE BIDDING
ON THE SAME TYPES OF --
MR. MCDONALD: WE'RE NOT. WE'RE ACTUALLY
GROWING THE PIE. WE'RE NOT DOING THAT.
MR. GANDOLFO: YEAH, BUT HOW -- DOESN'T
GROWING THE PIE INCREASE THE COMPETITION IF YOU HAVE SEVERAL DIFFERENT
TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE ALL COMPETING FOR THE SAME CONTRACTS?
MR. MCDONALD: NO. THERE'S -- YOU KNOW, THE --
THE INTERESTING PART IS -- AND I HAVE A LIST SOMEWHERE HERE -- ALL OF THESE
ENTITIES, AND I'M NOT GOING TO GO DOWN THE LIST, BUT TRUST ME WHEN SAY
(INDISCERNIBLE) THERE'S ABOUT 30 OR 40, INCLUDING THE BUSINESS COUNCIL
OF STATE OF NEW YORK THAT'S SAYING, THIS IS A PROGRAM WE SUPPORT. WE
WANT THIS, BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES ARE GETTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK. WE DON'T WANT THEM
TO BE BASICALLY AT HOME DOING NOTHING AND NOT CONTRIBUTING TO SOCIETY.
WE DON'T WANT THEM TO BE A TAX ON -- ON THE TAXPAYERS.
MR. GANDOLFO: THANK YOU.
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL, PLEASE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. GANDOLFO: MADAM SPEAKER, I, LIKE MANY OF
MY COLLEAGUES HERE, DO SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHO WERE
FORMERLY INCARCERATED TO HELP THEM REINTEGRATE INTO SOCIETY BECAUSE OUR
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, WHILE IT DOES HAVE A PUNITIVE ELEMENT, NEEDS
TO HAVE A REHABILITATIVE ELEMENT IN ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER RECIDIVISM.
HOWEVER, WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE WITH THIS BILL IS GIVING A PREFERENCE TO
56
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
PEOPLE WHO HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD AND INTRODUCING THEM INTO A
PROGRAM THAT WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED TO HELP PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES
TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE AFFORDED WORK OPPORTUNITIES TO BE
CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS OF SOCIETY AND TO WORK WITH DIGNITY. AND BY --
BY INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE COMPETING FOR THESE
CONTRACTS ON THE PREFERRED SOURCE LIST, IT INHERENTLY IS PITTING PEOPLE
WITH DISABILITIES, VETERANS WHO ARE STRUGGLING TO FIND WORK, WITH PEOPLE
WHO HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD.
AGAIN, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH REHABILITATIVE
PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAD TROUBLES IN THEIR PAST WHO DID SPEND
TIME IN JAIL; HOWEVER, THIS IS GIVING THEM A PREFERENCE OVER LAW-
ABIDING NEW YORKERS AND PUTTING THEM ON THE SAME LEVEL AS PEOPLE
WHO REALLY DO NEED THE HAND UP THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN.
SO FOR THAT REASON I WILL BE VOTING NO ON THIS AND I
ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME. THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: A PARTY VOTE HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE
OF LEGISLATION. IF THERE IS ANYONE WHO WISHES TO VOTE AFFIRMATIVELY THEY
57
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MAY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. FOR
ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION, THEY CAN DO SO
AT THEIR DESK. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
MR. MCDONALD TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. MCDONALD: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
AND I THANK MY COLLEAGUE FOR HIS QUESTIONS.
YOU KNOW, JUST TO MAKE SURE IT'S CLEAR, THE INTENT OF
THIS PROGRAM IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GROW THE PROGRAM FOR PREFERRED
SOURCE. THIS IS A PROGRAM INCEPTED AND SUPPORTED BY THE LEGISLATURE
OVER GENERATIONS, AND AT THE SAME TOKEN, AS WE CONTINUE TO SEE
SHORTAGES IN THE WORKFORCE. AS YOU KNOW, RECENTLY THE FEDERAL
GOVERNMENT DECIDED TO ELIMINATE THE GLEN -- GLENMONT JOBS [SIC]
PROGRAM HERE IN THE CAPITOL REGION. WE HAVE MANY INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES LOOKING AT A CHANCE OF LIFE. AND AT THE SAME TOKEN,
INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE FORMERLY INCARCERATED ARE -- PAID THEIR DEBT TO
SOCIETY, THEY'RE COMING BACK TO THE WORKFORCE. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE
THEY HAVE A SEAMLESS TRANSITION IN. WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT
RECIDIVISM IS NOT A QUESTION.
58
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ONCE AGAIN, I APPRECIATE THE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
FROM THE LEGISLATURE AND ALSO APPRECIATE THE SUPPORT FROM MY
COLLEAGUES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. MCDONALD IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
SO, I ALSO APPRECIATED THE DEBATE. I JUST WANTED TO
MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT I COMPLETELY SUPPORT THE PREFERRED SOURCE
PROGRAM AS IT RELATES TO INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL AND
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, WHICH I BELIEVE WAS -- AS -- AS IT WAS
DISCUSSED, WAS THE GENESIS OF THE WHOLE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM. I
STRONGLY SUPPORT IT. WE KNOW THAT INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL AND
DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ARE SEVERELY UNEMPLOYED AND
UNDEREMPLOYED IN THE WORKPLACE, AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I HAVE
FOUGHT VERY HARD TO TRY TO ADDRESS DURING THE TIME THAT I'VE SPENT IN THE
LEGISLATURE AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO.
I BELIEVE THAT WHEN IT COMES TO FORMERLY INCARCERATED
INDIVIDUALS, IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT ALL OF THE SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS THAT
WE, AS THE STATE, MAKE IN CREATING PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHEN THEY ARE
INCARCERATED TO IDENTIFY IF THEY HAVE ANY LEARNING DISABILITIES AND
ADDRESS THEM; TO PROVIDE EDUCATION. TO PROVIDE TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES.
AND THEN WHEN THEY -- WHEN THEY LEAVE, WHEN THEY'RE NO LONGER
INCARCERATED, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY IMMEDIATELY HAVE THE DOCUMENTS
THAT THEY NEED IN ORDER TO GET THE SERVICES THAT THEY NEED IN TERMS OF
59
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
HOUSING OR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE WHEN THEY LEAVE -- WHEN THEY LEAVE THEIR
CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.
YOU KNOW, WE ALREADY HAVE ORGANIZATIONS THAT HELP
FORMERLY INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS FIND EMPLOYMENT, AND ALL OF THOSE
THINGS ARE GOOD AND I'M NOT QUESTIONING THEM. WE ALSO HAVE PASSED
LAWS SAYING THAT EMPLOYERS CAN'T EVEN ASK, REALLY, IF YOU'VE BEEN
INCARCERATED. YOU CAN'T -- YOU CAN'T ASK THEM. WE SEAL CRIMINAL
RECORDS TO MAKE SURE THAT FOLKS HAVE AS GOOD A CHANCE AS THEY CAN TO
BE -- TO GET REEMPLOYED. WE'VE DONE ALL OF THOSE THINGS. BUT I'M
SAYING THAT ON THIS BILL, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO DO IT. I DON'T THINK WE
NEED TO GO THAT EXTRA STEP AND PLACE THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED
INDIVIDUALS IN THE SAME PROGRAM THAT HELPS VETERANS WHO ARE -- HAVE
SERVED OUR COUNTRY, AND THOSE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL
DISABILITIES WHO, THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, FACE INCREDIBLY
INSURMOUNTABLE, SOMETIMES IT SEEMS INSURMOUNTABLE BARRIERS TO
EMPLOYMENT.
SO I'M IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL BECAUSE I JUST THINK
THAT WE ALREADY DO ENOUGH FOR THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED. I WISH THEM
WELL. I'LL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MS. WALSH IN THE NEGATIVE.
MR. DAIS TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. DAIS: I JUST WANT TO SAY SOMETHING VERY QUICKLY
ON THE BILL AND A PART OF THE REASON I'M VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
ONE THING WE CANNOT OVERLOOK WHEN IT COMES TO
60
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
VETERANS, A LOT OF TIMES VETERANS CAN FALL UNDER MULTIPLE CATEGORIES.
THERE'S A LOT OF OUR VETERANS WHO DEALT WITH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES FROM
PTSD, ALCOHOL, DRUG ABUSE AND OTHER ISSUES WHICH ENDS UP GETTING
THEM INCARCERATED OR IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM. AND, THEREFORE, THERE'S
ANOTHER WAY TO ENSURE THAT SPECIFICALLY THOSE VETERANS ARE ALSO NOT
FORGOTTEN ABOUT.
MENTAL HEALTH IS A BIG ISSUE WHERE A LOT OF OUR -- OUR
PEOPLE WHO ARE INCARCERATED HAVE MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES AND THAT'S THE
ONLY REASON WHY THEY ARE THERE. AND GIVING THEM A SECOND CHANCE, A
SECOND LEASE ON LIFE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THEY'LL BE MORE PRODUCTIVE
CITIZENS.
THIS IS NOT TAKING AWAY FROM ANYONE. THIS IS MAKING
SURE THAT WE CAN DO SOMETHING MORE FULFILLING TO ENSURE THOSE HAVE A
BETTER CHANCE TO BE REENTERED INTO SOCIETY AND HAVE MORE SUCCESS, AND
THAT'S THE MAJOR REASON WHY I'M SUPPORTING THIS BILL AND VOTING IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. DAIS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
MR. BURDICK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. BURDICK: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, FOR
THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.
I'M VOTING YES ON THIS LEGISLATION. I DO HAVE SOME
KNOWLEDGE OF THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC FINANCE
LAW, AND I COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR THIS VERY FORWARD-LOOKING
61
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
APPROACH TO ACTUALLY MAKING OUR SOCIETY SAFER. IT BRINGS FORMERLY
INCARCERATED BACK INTO SOCIETY IN A WAY THAT THEY CAN BE EMPLOYED AND
CAN CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY. AND AS HAS BEEN STATE -- HAS BEEN STATED,
THIS WILL REDUCE RECIDIVISM. THIS WILL MAKE OUR SOCIETY SAFER WHILE
PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT FOR THOSE WHO HAVE PAID THEIR DEBT TO SOCIETY.
SO I AGAIN COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR THE WORK THAT
HE'S DONE, AND ALSO THANK THE SPEAKER FOR ALLOWING THIS BILL TO COME TO
THE FLOOR. I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. BURDICK IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
PAGE 12, RULES REPORT NO. 308, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A03516, RULES REPORT
NO. 308, REYES, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, CHANDLER-WATERMAN,
CUNNINGHAM, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, SHIMSKY. AN ACT TO AMEND THE
EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO ENACTING THE "KEEP POLICE RADIO PUBLIC
ACT."
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION
HAVE BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. REYES.
MS. REYES: THIS BILL AMENDS THE EXECUTIVE LAW BY
ADDING A NEW SECTION 222 (A) TO REQUIRE THAT ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT
AGENCY IN NEW YORK STATE THAT ENCRYPTS ITS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS
62
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MUST PROVIDE REALTIME ACCESS TO NONSENSITIVE COMMUNICATION TO
EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AS
DEFINED BY CIVIL RIGHTS LAW 79-H. THE BILL DOES NOT PROHIBIT
ENCRYPTION, BUT RATHER ESTABLISHES A MECHANISM TO ENSURE THAT ESSENTIAL
PARTIES CAN CONTINUE TO RECEIVE REALTIME PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION
WITHOUT COMPROMISING INVESTIGATIONS OR INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. REILLY.
MR. REILLY: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WILL
THE SPONSOR YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MS. REYES: YES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. REILLY: THANK YOU, MS. REYES.
SO IN THE LEGISLATION, DOES IT HAVE A BUFFER TIME FOR
HOW IT WILL BE BROADCAST?
MS. REYES: NO, IT'S IN REALTIME.
MR. REILLY: SO IN REALTIME. SO THERE'S NO DELAYED
-- THERE'S NO DELAY IN --
MS. REYES: NO. OTHER STATES HAVE ISSUED DELAY
REGULATIONS. WE ARE SAYING REALTIME AND JUST LIMITING THE PEOPLE WHO
HAVE ACCESS TO IT.
MR. REILLY: SO WHO WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO THIS?
MS. REYES: SO, OF COURSE, LAW ENFORCEMENT.
MR. REILLY: OKAY.
63
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. REYES: EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS LIKE
IN SOME COUNTIES VOLUNTEER FIRE -- FIRE DEPARTMENTS, AMBULANCE
SERVICES, AND ALSO PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AS DEFINED BY THE CIVIL
RIGHTS LAW.
MR. REILLY: HOW WILL THEY ENSURE THAT ONLY THOSE
THAT ARE DELINEATED IN THE LEGISLATION WILL HAVE ACCESS?
MS. REYES: WE EVEN INCLUDED LANGUAGE TO PROVIDE
A CREDENTIALING PROCESS THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. SO THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL ISSUE THE CREDENTIALS TO -- TO BONA FIDE
JOURNALISTS TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THIS, AND THEN OF COURSE TO EMERGENCY
SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS.
MR. REILLY: ALL RIGHT. SO WHAT -- WHAT ARE WE
ANTICIPATING WITH THIS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD MAKE SOMEONE A BONA FIDE
JOURNALIST?
MS. REYES: SO THAT IS CLEARLY DESCRIBED IN THE LAW.
LET ME READ IT TO YOU. SO, THE NEW YORK CIVIL RIGHTS LAW 79-H, PART 6
DESCRIBES PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS. PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS SHALL MEAN
ONE, WHO, FOR GAIN OR LIVELIHOOD, IS ENGAGED IN THE GATHERING,
PREPARING, COLLECTING, WRITING, EDITING, FILMING, TAPING OR
PHOTOGRAPHING OF NEWS INTENDED FOR A NEWSPAPER, MAGAZINE, NEWS
AGENCY, PRESS ASSOCIATION OR WIRE SERVICE OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL MEDIUM
OR AGENCY WHICH HAS ONE OF ITS REGULAR FUNCTIONS -- WHICH ONE OF ITS
REGULAR FUNCTIONS IS THE PROCESSING AND THE RESEARCH OF NEWS INTENDED
FOR DISSEMINATION TO THE PUBLIC. SUCH PERSON SHALL BE SOMEONE
PERFORMING SAID FUNCTION EITHER AS A REGULAR EMPLOYEE OR AS AN
64
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
OTHERWISE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATED FOR GAIN OR LIKELIHOOD WITH SUCH A
MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION.
MR. REILLY: SO, SCANNER RADIO IS AN APP. WOULD
THEY QUALIFY UNDER THIS FOR HAVING ACCESS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT RADIO
FREQUENCIES?
MS. REYES: YOU SAID SCANNER RADIO?
MR. REILLY: SCANNER APP [SIC]. IT'S A SCANNER
RADIO -- SCANNER RADIO. IT'S AN -- IT'S AN APP WHERE IT MONITORS ACROSS
THE WORLD RADIO TRANSMISSIONS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, FOR EMS, AND FOR
OTHER AGENCIES LIKE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS.
MS. REYES: NO. THIS ISN'T -- THIS ISN'T -- THIS DOESN'T
CAPTURE THEM BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT CONSIDERED JOURNALISTS.
MR. REILLY: IF THEY COORDINATE AT SOME POINT WITH
A NEWS REPORTER, WOULD THAT QUALIFY THEM?
MS. REYES: THE -- NO, DOS IS -- IS THE ENTITY
RESPONSIBLE FOR ISSUING CREDENTIALS.
MR. REILLY: OKAY. SO WOULD DOS POTENTIALLY
GIVE THEM A CREDENTIAL IF THEY ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH -- WITH A
JOURNALIST?
MS. REYES: THAT, I'M TOLD, WOULD BE AGAINST THE
LAW. IT WOULD -- IT WOULD FLY IN THE FACE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW THAT
DEFINES A JOURNALIST.
MR. REILLY: BUT IF THEY ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT
AND THEY'RE A SUBCONTRACTOR FOR A JOURNALIST, WOULD THAT APPLY?
MS. REYES: NO.
65
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. REILLY: WHY WOULDN'T IT? SPECIFICALLY.
(PAUSE/CONFERENCING)
SO THIS -- WHY ARE YOU LOOKING FOR THAT?
MS. REYES: I HAVE A DETERMINATION FROM THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
MR. REILLY: SAY IT AGAIN?
MS. REYES: I HAVE A LETTER, A -- AN OPINION AND A
DETERMINATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE --
MR. REILLY: OKAY.
MS. REYES: -- SPEAKING OF JOURNALISTS. AND...
(CONFERENCING)
SO THEY -- THEY -- SO DOS CURRENTLY PROMULGATES THOSE
REGULATIONS.
MR. REILLY: SO -- SO WE'RE BASICALLY GIVING DOS
THE -- THEY DETERMINE WHOSE --
MS. REYES: WELL, NO, THEY -- THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT
RIGHT. THEY ALREADY -- THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT PURVIEW --
MR. REILLY: SO WE'VE ALREADY --
MS. REYES: -- TO CREDENTIAL -- TO CREDENTIAL BONA
FIDE JOURNALISTS.
MR. REILLY: ALL RIGHT. SO WE ALREADY HAVE
BLOGGERS THAT ARE CONSIDERED JOURNALISTS, RIGHT? THEY -- BECAUSE THE
EXPANSION HAS HAPPENED OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEARS WHERE WHAT WE
CONSIDER NEWS SOURCES HAS CHANGED. SO, LIKE, A BLOGGER NOW COULD BE
CONSIDERED A JOURNALIST, AND DOS IS GIVING THEM ACCESS, RIGHT, FOR THE
66
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
CREDENTIALS?
MS. REYES: THEY WOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE
CONSIDERED PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS BECAUSE THEY NEED TO BE
CREDENTIALED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE TO BE -- TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS --
MR. REILLY: I -- I -- WE'RE -- WE'RE GOING AROUND A
LITTLE BIT OF A CIRCLE THEN.
MS. REYES: YEAH.
MR. REILLY: SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS, IF THE SCANNER
RADIO APP, THE PEOPLE WHO RUN IT, DETERMINE THAT THEY ARE GONNA ENTER
INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A JOURNALIST, WOULD THEY FALL UNDER THAT
UMBRELLA AND BEING APPROVED BY DOS?
MS. REYES: SO, IF THEY WERE TO ENTER INTO AN
AGREEMENT IN THE SCENARIO THAT YOU JUST POSED WITH A JOURNALIST, THAT'S
ACTUALLY AGAINST THE LAW BECAUSE DOS CREDENTIALS THE JOURNALIST AND
NOT THE ENTITY. SO THEY, UNDER THE LAW, CAN'T DO THAT NOW; USE THE
CREDENTIALS OF A JOURNALIST.
MR. REILLY: BUT IF THEY --
MS. REYES: (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK) --
MR. REILLY: SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET HIRED -- SO
THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET HIRED BY THE JOURNALIST.
MS. REYES: WELL, THEY WOULD HAVE TO -- THEY WOULD
HAVE TO BE JOURNALISTS THAT ARE EMPLOYED BY A NEWS ORGANIZATION, A
NEWSPAPER, MAGAZINE, NEWS AGENCY, PRESS ASSOCIATION, OTHER
PROFESSIONAL MEDIUM OR AGENCY WHICH HAS ONE OF ITS REGULAR FUNCTIONS
THE PROCESSING AND RESEARCHING OF NEWS INTENDED FOR THE DISSEMINATION
67
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
OF THE PUBLIC.
MR. REILLY: WHICH SCANNER RADIO APP DOES.
THEY BROADCAST, AND NEWS -- NEW ENTITIES ALREADY USE THEM. THAT'S
WHY I'M -- THAT'S WHY I WANT TO CLARIFY.
MS. REYES: THE NEWS ENTITY USED THEM BECAUSE WE
-- THERE ARE -- THERE ARE POLICE DEPARTMENTS THAT HAVE BEGUN TO ENCRYPT
RADIO COMMUNICATIONS, AND WE'RE TRYING TO SAY -- ONE, WE'RE TRYING TO
REGULATE THIS, RIGHT? WE UNDERSTAND THAT POLICE DEPARTMENTS WANT
ENCRYPTION. BUT WE'RE TRYING TO SAY THAT FOR THE PURPOSES OF
DISSEMINATING NEWS AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC
SAFETY, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EMERGENCY SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS
HAVE ACCESS TO IT AND THAT OUR JOURNALISTS HAVE ACCESS TO IT.
MR. REILLY: OKAY. SO CAN YOU THINK OF -- CAN YOU
THINK OF ANY REASON WHY LAW ENFORCEMENT MAY WANT AN ENCRYPTED
RADIO TRANSMISSION?
MS. REYES: NO, BUT I'M SURE YOU'RE GONNA TELL ME.
MR. REILLY: OR AT LEAST A DELAYED.
MS. REYES: I'M SURE YOU'RE GONNA TELL ME.
MR. REILLY: SO IS THERE -- IS THERE -- HAS THERE BEEN
A DISCUSSION ABOUT HAVING A DELAYED FREQUENCY? LIKE, THE DELAYED
TRANSMISSIONS.
MS. REYES: WE HAVE. LIKE I SAID, OTHER STATES HAVE
-- HAVE IMPLEMENTED A DELAYED TRANSMISSION. BUT THEY'VE
IMPLEMENTED DELAYED TRANSMISSION AND STILL KEPT THE RADIOS PUBLIC FOR
THE GENERAL PUBLIC. AND WE'RE SAYING THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE AVAILABLE
68
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC, THAT IT'S ONLY GOING TO BE AVAILABLE TO EMERGENCY
SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS AND -- AND JOURNALISTS THAT ARE CREDENTIALED BY
THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
MR. REILLY: SO IS THERE -- IS THERE A POTENTIAL THAT
HAVING IT OPEN TO JOURNALISTS COULD ACTUALLY, IF THEY REPORT IT IN
REALTIME, COULD BE JEOPARDY TO THE PUBLIC?
MS. REYES: NO. WE BELIEVE -- WE BELIEVE IT TO BE A
BENEFIT TO THE PUBLIC, AND I'LL GIVE YOU SOME EXAMPLES. DURING THE
BUFFALO MASS SHOOTING IN 2022, LOCAL JOURNALISTS LOST ACCESS TO
COMMUNICATIONS THERE AND WEREN'T ABLE TO REPORT IN REALTIME. SO THERE
WERE FAMILIES THAT WERE WONDERING ABOUT THEIR LOVED ONES DURING THAT
TIME. AND IF -- IF JOURNALISTS WOULD HAVE HAD ACCESS TO THAT
INFORMATION, THEY CAN ALSO WARN REGULAR CITIZENS AS THEY BROADCAST THE
NEWS ABOUT SOMETHING EMINENT THAT'S HAPPENING, PERHAPS TO KEEP
PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR -- OUT OF THE AREA SO THAT THEY CAN STAY SAFE. AND
THESE WOULD BE CONSIDERED NONSENSITIVE UPDATES IN REALTIME.
ANOTHER EXAMPLE WHERE THE WILDFIRES IN 2018 IN
CALIFORNIA WHERE THEY HAD ENCRYPTED RADIOS AS WELL, AND THAT DELAYED
SOME OF THE EMERGENCY SERVICES BEING ABLE TO RESPOND TO THE FIRES
BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE ENCRYPTION. THERE ARE -- AGAIN, THERE ARE --
THERE ARE, LIKE IN OUR -- LIKE IN OUR STATE, COUNTIES THAT HAVE VOLUNTEER
FIREFIGHTERS AND VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT BENEFIT FROM ACCESS
TO THE -- TO THE RADIO.
MR. REILLY: THANK YOU, MADAM SPONSOR.
ON THE BILL, MADAM SPEAKER.
69
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. REILLY: SO THERE'S A COUPLE OF ISSUES HERE THAT
I'D LIKE TO RAISE ABOUT HAVING REALTIME ACCESS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT
TRANSMISSIONS, RIGHT? YEARS AGO WHILE I WAS WORKING IN MIDTOWN
NORTH FOR THE NYPD, WE HAD WHAT'S CALLED THE "YUGOS". THEY WERE A
YUGOSLAVIAN BURGLARY TEAM, AND THEY USED TO HIT THE DIAMOND DISTRICT
AND THEY USED TO CARRY RADIOS. AND EVEN IF WE'RE SAYING THAT ONLY
JOURNALISTS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THIS, IT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THOSE THAT
SHOULD NOT HAVE IT. AND WHAT HAPPENED DURING THAT TIME IS THEY WOULD
GET THE TRANSMISSIONS, AND THEY WOULD KNOW BY THE CODES WHEN AN
OFFICER WAS ASSIGNED A -- A UNIT IN THE FIELD TO RESPOND TO THAT ALARM
THAT THEY SET OFF. BY NOT HAVING A DELAY, WE WILL BE SETTING THEM UP,
LAW ENFORCEMENT, FOR FAILURE TRYING TO APPREHEND THOSE COMMITTING A
CRIME LIKE THAT.
ANOTHER ISSUE THAT WAS RAISED DURING THE DEBATE WAS
ABOUT HAVING REALTIME ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION SO THAT WE COULD STOP
PEOPLE FROM -- FROM -- OR WARN PEOPLE, RIGHT, ABOUT THE SHOOTING, ABOUT
THE WILDFIRES. I'D LIKE TO OFFER ANOTHER SCENARIO. YOU HAVE A CALL OF A
POTENTIAL OR A SUPPORTED SHOOTING, A REPORTED SHOOTING AT A SCHOOL. ALL
OF A SUDDEN THE NEWS IS PUTTING THAT OUT. THE REALITY IS, PARENTS WILL BE
RUSHING TO THAT SCHOOL. IT WILL PREVENT EMERGENCY PERSONNEL FROM
HAVING ACCESS. THAT IS WHY I ASKED IF THERE WAS A POTENTIAL TO HAVE A
DELAYED ACCESS TO THE TRANSMISSIONS. IT COULD BE 15 MINUTES, IT COULD
BE 20 MINUTES. IT COULD EVEN BE TEN MINUTES. SOME TYPE OF DELAY
WOULD HELP OUR FIRST RESPONDERS CREATE THE NECESSARY TRIAGE LOCATION,
70
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
CREATE THE NECESSARY COMMAND POST THEY NEED TO COORDINATE RESOURCES
THAT MAY HAVE TO GET TO THAT INCIDENT.
WHEN WE HAVE INFORMATION THAT'S PUT OUT IMMEDIATELY
BECAUSE THEY HEAR IT OVER A RADIO, A LAW ENFORCEMENT RADIO, IT DOES NOT
NECESSARILY MEAN IT'S CONFIRMED. SO EVEN IF THE SITUATION ISN'T
CONFIRMED, IT COULD CREATE PANIC AND IT COULD CREATE UNNECESSARY
BOTTLENECK RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENCY. THAT'S WHY I WOULD HOPE THAT
WE MAY ACTUALLY LOOK INTO THIS AND MAKE AN AMENDMENT JUST TO ADD
THAT BUFFER TIME. WE COULD STILL GIVE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND GIVE
JOURNALISTS THE ACCESS TO KEEP THE PUBLIC INFORMED, BUT WE ALSO GIVE
THAT LITTLE CUSHION TO ENSURE THAT RESOURCES THAT ARE VITAL GET TO THE
SCENE.
THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. BEEPHAN.
MR. BEEPHAN: THANK YOU. SORRY TO HAVE MY BACK
TO YOU.
SO DOES THIS FRAMEWORK --
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ARE YOU ASKING
QUESTIONS OF THE SPONSOR?
MR. BEEPHAN: WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MS. REYES: YES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
71
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. BEEPHAN: THANK YOU, MS. REYES.
DOES THIS FRAMEWORK EXIST IN ANY OTHER DEPARTMENT
ACROSS THE STATE, POLICE DEPARTMENT? ANYONE ELSE THAT --
MS. REYES: THE FRAMEWORK FOR --
MR. BEEPHAN: FOR ALLOWING JOURNALISTS TO HAVE
ACCESS TO THEIR LIVE ENCRYPTED FREQUENCIES.
MS. REYES: WELL, ENCRYPTION ONLY STARTED RECENTLY.
FOR -- HISTORICALLY, THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAS HAD ACCESS TO POLICE RADIOS.
MR. BEEPHAN: I MEAN, OUR DEPARTMENT, AS LONG AS
I'VE BEEN THERE, HAVE BEEN ENCRYPTING OUR RADIO CHANNEL. SO YOU'RE
SAYING THAT THERE'S NO POLICE DEPARTMENT OUT THERE OR ANY EMERGENCY
SERVICES THAT ARE PROVIDING ENCRYPTED ACCESS, ACCESSING ENCRYPTED
CHANNELS TO JOURNALISTS? NOT TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE?
MS. REYES: IN -- SO, IN NEW YORK THE ENCRYPTION
THAT IS HAPPENING IS ENCRYPTION FULL STOP AND THEY'RE NOT HAVING ACCESS,
WHICH IS WHY WE CRAFTED THE LEGISLATION.
MR. BEEPHAN: GOT IT. SO INSTEAD OF MAYBE GOING
THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE -- WELL, I GUESS THE DEPARTMENT OF
STATE COULD GO THROUGH LICENSING. LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT FOR A LITTLE BIT.
SO SAY IF A BONA FIDE JOURNALIST GOES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND
GETS LICENSED. WHAT'S NEXT? HOW DO THEY GET ACCESS TO THOSE
FREQUENCIES? WHO GIVES THEM THE PASSWORDS, CREDENTIALS? IS THAT THE
DEPARTMENT OR IS -- DOES THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAVE TO MAINTAIN THAT
INFORMATION?
MS. REYES: THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE IS TASKED WITH
72
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
PROMULGATING THE RULES. THEY ALREADY --
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU
COULD HAVE OUR COLLEAGUES TO SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONES.
MR. BEEPHAN: SORRY.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE
BIT DIFFICULT BECAUSE SHE'S BEHIND YOU. BUT YOU DON'T HAVE TO LOOK AT
HER, IT'S OKAY.
MR. BEEPHAN: THAT'S ALL RIGHT. THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
SHE'S TALKING BEHIND MY BACK, BUT THAT'S ALL RIGHT.
(LAUGHTER)
MS. REYES: ALL GOOD THINGS, I PROMISE.
MR. BEEPHAN: SO, YEAH. SO, WHO HAS TO MAINTAIN
THESE FREQUENCIES? WHO PROVIDES THEM TO THE -- THE NOW-CREDENTIALED
JOURNALIST?
(CONFERENCING)
MS. REYES: SO, LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS CONTROL OF
ACCESS TO THE FREQUENCIES. THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL PROMULGATE
THE RULES, AND THEY ALREADY -- I HAVE TO SAY THEY ALREADY DO
CREDENTIALING FOR JOURNALISTS. THIS IS A CRITERIA THAT ALREADY EXISTS UNDER
THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. WE'RE JUST SAYING THAT FOR THIS ENCRYPTION,
THAT THE -- THE ACCESS WOULD BE GIVEN TO THESE CATEGORIES WHO ARE
CREDENTIALED AND REGULATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE, AND LAW
ENFORCEMENT WILL HAVE -- WILL BE REQUIRED TO GIVE THEM ACCESS TO THIS,
TO -- TO THE RADIO FREQUENCY.
73
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. BEEPHAN: GOT IT. SO IT'S UP TO THE LOCAL
MUNICIPALITY, THEN. SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THE MUNICIPALITY USES A SPECIAL
TYPE OF EQUIPMENT THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO?
NOT EVERY SCANNER HAS THE ABILITY TO -- TO ACCESS TRUNKED RADIO SYSTEMS.
NOT EVERY -- YOU KNOW, WHO'S GONNA BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING
THAT EQUIPMENT? WOULD ANY OF THESE COSTS FALL ON THE MUNICIPALITY
THEMSELVES?
MS. REYES: WE DON'T REGULATE IN THE -- IN THE
LANGUAGE OF THE BILL THE TYPE OF THE -- OF EQUIPMENT THAT IS USED. AND
I'M ASSUMING THAT IF A NEWS -- AND THIS IS -- I'M ASSUMING THAT IF A NEWS
STATION WANTS TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE RADIO, UNDER THE LAW WILL HAVE TO
FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET THE EQUIPMENT.
MR. BEEPHAN: OKAY. SO SAY IF THEY -- IF THEY
CANNOT PURCHASE THE EQUIPMENT OR THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY FINDING IT, AT
ANY POINT DOES THAT BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE -- THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE TO THEM?
MS. REYES: NO. AND THAT'S NOT IN OUR BILL
LANGUAGE.
MR. BEEPHAN: OKAY.
SO SAY IF A JOURNALIST VIOLATES THE -- THE -- WHATEVER
THE RULES ARE PERTAINING TO THIS? SAY IF THEY ATTACHED IT TO THEIR OWN
BROADCAST SYSTEM, WHICH VIOLATES NOT ONLY FEDERAL LAW, BUT THE RULES OF
THIS PROGRAM. WHAT IS NOW THE REPERCUSSION FOR THAT JOURNALIST?
MS. REYES: WELL, THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE CAN --
CAN TAKE THEIR CREDENTIALS AWAY.
74
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. BEEPHAN: IS THERE A CRIMINAL CHARGE
ASSOCIATED WITH THAT?
MS. REYES: I MEAN, THAT DEPENDS ON -- THERE --
THERE ARE LAWS THAT GOVERN CONDUCT FOR JOURNALISTS, RIGHT, AND -- AND
CONDUCT IN GENERAL. SO I -- I -- RIGHT. THAT'S SPECIFIC -- THERE'S NO
PENALTIES IN THE BILL, SO THAT'S SPECIFIC TO WHATEVER SCENARIO.
MR. BEEPHAN: OKAY. AND ARE THERE ANY PENAL --
SO SAY IF A LOCAL DEPARTMENT COMES UP WITH THEIR OWN -- I UNDERSTAND
THIS IS -- THEY'RE ALLOWED TO PRECLUDE SENSITIVE INFORMATION, RIGHT?
MS. REYES: CORRECT.
MR. BEEPHAN: SO, OFTENTIMES, YES, OUR OFFICERS
WOULD LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, CALL A LANDLINE OR GET OFF THE RADIO
SOMETIMES. BUT IN A LOT OF HIGH STRESS CIRCUMSTANCES, THEY DON'T
ALWAYS HAVE THAT ABILITY WHEN THEY'RE CALLING FOR EITHER BACKUP,
TRANSMITTING INFORMATION. WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY DECIDED TO HAVE THEIR
OWN SEPARATE FREQUENCY DEDICATED FOR THOSE, YOU KNOW, SPECIAL
CIRCUMSTANCES? ARE THEY GONNA BE REQUIRED TO GIVE THAT FREQUENCY
OVER?
(CONFERENCING)
MS. REYES: THAT -- THAT WOULD FALL UNDER THE
CATEGORY OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION, SO THAT'S NOT REQUIRED TO BE SHARED.
MR. BEEPHAN: OKAY. AND WHAT IS -- WHAT
HAPPENS IF SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAPPENS TO BE SHARED ON A -- LIKE, ON
AN ENCRYPTED CHANNEL THAT THEY NOW HAVE ACCESS TO? CAN THE
DEPARTMENT GO BACK AND SAY, ALL RIGHT, MAYBE THIS IS NOT WORKING
75
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY AT ALL TIMES TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE NOT
SHARING SENSITIVE INFORMATION ON ALL THESE CHANNELS?
MS. REYES: WELL, IT'S NOT THE JOURNALIST'S FAULT IF
SOMEBODY SHARES SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN A CHANNEL WHERE THEY
SHOULDN'T BE SHARING SENSITIVE INFORMATION.
MR. BEEPHAN: YEAH, WELL WHEN -- WHEN YOU'RE IN
A HIGH STRESS ENVIRONMENT IT'S NOT -- YOU KNOW, YOU'RE NOT ALWAYS
THINKING TO CHANGE CHANNELS.
MS. REYES: I - I -- I'M CERTAIN THAT EVEN -- EVEN
UNDER STRESSFUL SITUATIONS OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT WILL MAKE
DETERMINATIONS AS TO WHETHER THEY SHOULD BE SHARING SENSITIVE
INFORMATION OVER THE RADIO. WHETHER ENCRYPTED OR NOT, BECAUSE I THINK
SENSITIVE INFORMATION MEANS THAT PERHAPS YOU SHOULDN'T BE SAYING IT
OVER THE RADIO.
MR. BEEPHAN: NOW, ARE THE JOURNALISTS HELD TO
ANY TYPE OF CONDUCT WITH THIS, ENSURING THAT THEY'RE -- THEY'RE
TRANSMITTING ALL THE UPDATED INFORMATION? BECAUSE THINGS CHANGE
FREQUENTLY ON SCENES. AND OFTENTIMES, JUST SO YOU KNOW, OUR INITIAL
REPORTS THAT WE GET ARE SOMETIMES FALSE.
(CONFERENCING)
MS. REYES: THE JOURNALISTS HAVE A CODE OF CONDUCT
AS WELL THAT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW UNDER THE LAW.
MR. BEEPHAN: OKAY. UNDERSTOOD.
NOW, AND THERE'S NO FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR
MUNICIPALITIES IF THEY NEED EQUIPMENT TO UPDATE SYSTEMS, CHANGE
76
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SYSTEMS TO ACCOMMODATE THIS?
MS. REYES: I'M SORRY?
MR. BEEPHAN: IS THERE ANY FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR
MUNICIPALITIES IF THEY NEED TO UPGRADE THEIR SYSTEMS TO ACCOMMODATE
THIS REQUEST?
MS. REYES: THAT'S NOT GERMANE TO THE BILL.
MR. BEEPHAN: I MEAN, I THINK IT IS. IF YOU'RE
TELLING A MUNICIPALITY THAT USES, SAY, A CERTAIN TYPE OF TRUNKED RADIO
SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO BROADCAST IT, YOU KNOW,
OPENLY.
MS. REYES: IF THEY ALREADY USE AN ENCRYPTION
SYSTEM THEY'RE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THOSE THAT ARE CREDENTIALED
UNDER THIS LAW.
MR. BEEPHAN: RIGHT. BUT THAT MEANS EVERYONE
ELSE HAS SIMILAR TYPE OF INTEROPERABLE EQUIPMENT. WHAT HAPPENS IF
THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE WITH GENERAL SCANNERS? ARE THEY REQUIRED TO CHANGE
--
MS. REYES: WE'RE -- WE'RE NOT MANDATING IN THE
LANGUAGE THAT MUNICIPALITIES NEED TO --
MR. BEEPHAN: GOT IT.
MS. REYES: -- BUY EQUIPMENT. WE DON'T SPECIFY
THE EQUIPMENT THAT THEY HAVE TO USE.
MR. BEEPHAN: ALL RIGHT. THAT'S ALL FROM MY END.
OH, ACTUALLY ONCE LAST QUESTION. WHAT HAPPENS IF A
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY JUST DOESN'T COMPLY?
77
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. REYES: THEN THEY'RE NOT FOLLOWING THE LAW.
MR. BEEPHAN: OKAY. WHAT'S THE PENALTY?
(CONFERENCING)
MS. REYES: IT'S LEFT UP TO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE
TO PROMULGATE RULES AS TO WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A DEPARTMENT OF LAW
ENFORCEMENT DOESN'T FOLLOW THE LAW.
MR. BEEPHAN: GOT IT. THANK YOU, MS. REYES.
ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. BEEPHAN: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
YOU KNOW, TIME AND TIME AGAIN I'VE SEEN FROM MY
EXPERIENCE AS A FIRST RESPONDER, SENSITIVE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED
ACROSS RADIOS. I'VE ALSO SEEN INCORRECT AND INACCURATE INFORMATION
TRANSMITTED ACROSS RADIOS. AND WE KNOW THAT WE ALL HAVE LOCAL
JOURNALISTS, BUFFS, EVERYONE ELSE IN BETWEEN, WHO CAN GO STRAIGHT TO
TWITTER AND FACEBOOK AND EVERYTHING ELSE IN BETWEEN, SHARING THIS
INFORMATION. WE HAVE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT TASKS [SIC] FORCE THAT
OPERATES THROUGHOUT THE STATE ON SENSITIVE CHANNELS. AND I KNOW THAT
-- THAT THERE'S A WAY TO EXEMPT THEM. BUT MY CONCERN IS IS THAT WE
CANNOT CONTROL WHAT INFORMATION IS SHARED ON EACH ONE OF THOSE
CHANNELS, ESPECIALLY HIGH STRESS ENVIRONMENTS.
I THINK THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY A DISSERVICE TO THE PUBLIC,
CREATING MASS HYSTERIA AT TIMES WHEN THINGS THAT ARE JUST FACTUALLY NOT
TRUE IS BEING PUT OUT THERE TO THE PUBLIC. AND ONCE IT'S OUT, IT'S OUT.
THERE'S NO TAKING IT BACK.
78
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
FOR THAT REASON AND SO MANY OTHERS, I'M GONNA HAVE TO
BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL. I'VE SPOKEN TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF MY
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT USE ENCRYPTED CHANNELS, AND I COULD TELL
YOU FIRSTHAND THAT THIS WILL DIRECTLY MAKE THEIR JOBS HARDER. AND I
THINK IT WILL HAVE A TREMENDOUS IMPACT ON OUR PUBLIC SAFETY AT HOME.
SO THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, AND THANK YOU TO THE
SPONSOR FOR HER TIME.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. DURSO.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WOULD
THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MS. REYES: YES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MS. REYES.
SO JUST TO DRILL DOWN A COUPLE OF THINGS. THIS -- THE
BILL LANGUAGE SAYS LAW ENFORCEMENT, CORRECT? EXCUSE ME. ALL LAW
ENFORCEMENT, CORRECT, THAT ARE USING RADIOS?
MS. REYES: CORRECT.
MR. DURSO: SO THIS ISN'T SPECIFICALLY JUST FOR OUR
STATE POLICE OR LOCAL MUNICIPAL POLICE, IT'S ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT,
CORRECT?
MS. REYES: CORRECT. I MEAN, EMERGENCIES HAPPEN
ALL OVER THE STATE.
79
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. DURSO: I'M SORRY?
MS. REYES: EMERGENCY -- EMERGENCIES HAPPEN ALL
OVER THE STATE.
MR. DURSO: CORRECT. NO, I -- I JUST WANTED TO
MAKE SURE --
MS. REYES: AND NEWS, AS WELL.
MR. DURSO: RIGHT. BUT IT'S -- IT'S NOT JUST FOR OUR
POLICE, IT'S ALSO FOR OUR CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC SAFETY,
ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE PUBLIC, CORRECT?
MS. REYES: (INDISCERNIBLE) YOUR QUESTION.
MR. DURSO: BECAUSE IT SAYS LAW ENFORCEMENT. IT
DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY POLICE DEPARTMENTS.
(PAUSE/CONFERENCING)
MS. REYES: SO, WE HAVE A DEFINITION FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE LAW.
MR. DURSO: SURE.
MS. REYES: AND IT DOESN'T SPECIFY WHETHER
CORRECTIONS IS. I'M NOT CERTAIN IF THEY'RE CAPTURED UNDER THAT DEFINITION.
MR. DURSO: SO -- SO FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, AND
-- AND JUST TO PUT IT ON THE RECORD, MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECTIONS
DEPARTMENTS WOULD FALL UNDER LAW ENFORCEMENT. AND SO MY QUESTION
WITH THAT, JUST IF IT DOES, WHY WOULD THE PUBLIC AND/OR A JOURNALIST NEED
TO KNOW RADIO DISPATCHES OR RADIO CONVERSATIONS THAT ARE TAKING PLACE
WITHIN A CORRECTIONAL FACILITY?
MS. REYES: THIS IS NOT THE INTENT OF THE LAW.
80
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. DURSO: I ASKED A --
MS. REYES: AND I DON'T -- AND I DON'T -- AND I DON'T
-- I'M NOT CERTAIN IF THAT WAS A PRACTICE EVEN BEFORE THE ISSUE OF
ENCRYPTION. IF -- IF THE PUBLIC HAD ACCESS TO --
MR. DURSO: I HAVE NO CLUE, EITHER.
MS. REYES: -- CORRECTION OFFICERS' RADIOS. BUT THIS
IS NOT THE PROBLEM WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE FOR.
MR. DURSO: UNDERSTOOD. AND I UNDERSTAND THAT'S
NOT THE INTENTION. BUT MY CONCERN, ONCE AGAIN, IS THE LANGUAGE IN THE
BILL, JUST ONE PART OF IT.
MS. REYES: DO YOU -- DO YOU KNOW IF THE
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ENCRYPTS THEIR RADIOS?
MR. DURSO: I HAVE NO CLUE.
MS. REYES: HAVE THEY STARTED ENCRYPTING RADIOS?
MR. DURSO: I -- I HAVE NO CLUE. I DIDN'T -- BUT I
ALSO -- I DIDN'T CREATE THIS BILL OR WRITE THE LANGUAGE. AND IN THE BILL IT
SAYS LAW ENFORCEMENT, WHICH TO MY UNDERSTANDING UNDER NEW YORK
STATE, LAW ENFORCEMENT -- EXCUSE ME, CORRECTIONS ARE CONSIDERED LAW
ENFORCEMENT. SO I JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT ON THE RECORD IS THAT WOULD
MAKE -- BE A BEGINNING OF A CONCERN FOR ME.
(PAUSE/CONFERENCING)
MS. REYES: THEY'RE TRYING TO DETERMINE THE CORRECT
RESPONSE.
MR. DURSO: NO, NO. IT'S OKAY. AND I -- I HAVE
OTHER QUESTIONS.
81
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. REYES: GO AHEAD.
MR. DURSO: AGAIN, I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT
WAS PUT ON RECORD, UNDERSTANDING THAT, AGAIN, SOMETHING LIKE THAT,
AGAIN, JUST USING THE TERM BROADLY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. AGAIN, I -- I --
AND AS YOU'LL SEE AT THE END, I DON'T AGREE WITH THE BILL TO BEGIN WITH,
BUT I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF IT. BUT AGAIN, THERE ARE UNINTENDED
CONSEQUENCES WHEN IT COMES TO LANGUAGE IN A BILL; THAT MAY BE ONE OF
THEM.
I KNOW ONE OF THE OTHER -- MY COLLEAGUES HAD ASKED --
MS. REYES: I JUST -- THEY'RE -- THEY'RE SAYING THAT
THEY ARE NOT INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT IN A LAW ENFORCEMENT -- LAW
ENFORCEMENT DOES NOT CAPTURE CORRECTIONS FACILITIES.
MR. DURSO: LAW ENFORCEMENT DOES NOT CAPTURE THE
CORRECTIONS OFFICERS IN IT.
MS. REYES: FACILITIES. NOT UNDER THIS BILL.
MR. DURSO: SO THE FACILITIES WON'T COUNT. OKAY.
SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, AND I -- I KNOW YOU -- YOU
HAD SAID TO ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES, WHY NOT A DELAY. AND I APOLOGIZE, I
KNOW THEY BOTH ASKED, JUST HEARING IT. WHY NOT -- I MEAN, OTHER STATES
DO HAVE THIS. OTHER MUNICIPALITIES HAVE THIS WHERE THERE'S LIKE A FIVE
MINUTE DELAY OR A TWO MINUTE DELAY. WHAT WAS YOUR REASONING FOR NOT
HAVING THE DELAY?
MS. REYES: I HAVEN'T HEARD OF A TWO MINUTE DELAY.
USUALLY, DELAYS ARE 15 MINUTES OR MORE. BUT FOR THE PURPOSES OF NEWS
REPORTING, A DELAY ISN'T NEWS, IT'S HISTORY.
82
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. DURSO: UNDERSTOOD. SO WE'RE DOING THIS
REALLY FOR JOURNALISTS?
MS. REYES: WELL, WE'RE DOING THIS FOR JOURNALISTS
AND WE ARE ALSO DOING IT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO -- AND SO WITH THAT BEING
SAID, WHY DO JOURNALISTS -- AND AGAIN, I'M ALL FOR FREE PRESS, BUT WHY DO
JOURNALISTS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EMERGENCY SITUATIONS AS THEY'RE
HAPPENING?
MS. REYES: FOR A LITANY OF REASONS. BUT REPORTING
IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT HELPS KEEP PEOPLE OUT OF THE AREA, IT MAKES
THEM AWARE THAT THERE'S SOMETHING GOING ON.
(CONFERENCING)
AND JOURNALISTS ARE OUR EYES AND EARS DURING PUBLIC
EMERGENCIES. I THINK IT IS A -- AN IMPORTANT PUBLIC SERVICE THAT THEY
PROVIDE, AND IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THEM TO CONTINUE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THIS
INFORMATION.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO -- SO --
MS. REYES: BECAUSE THEY'VE HAD IT BEFORE.
MR. DURSO: I APOLOGIZE, MA'AM.
MS. REYES: SORRY. SORRY. I SAID THEY'VE HAD IT
BEFORE. SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY CONTINUE TO HAVE ACCESS TO
THIS INFORMATION --
MR. DURSO: OKAY. AND AS ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES --
MS. REYES: -- TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NEWS.
MR. DURSO: AND AS ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES SAID THAT
83
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AT -- AT SOME TIMES DURING CERTAIN SITUATIONS, THIS COULD ACTUALLY PUT THE
PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OUR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS IN -- IN
DANGER. AGAIN, IF YOU SEE A -- IF THERE'S A HOUSE FIRE SOMEWHERE, RIGHT,
WE SEE IT ALL THE TIME, UNFORTUNATELY, BUT PEOPLE GATHER AROUND THAT
HOUSE FIRE. PEOPLE COME AND FLOCK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD. JUST LIKE IF
THERE WAS A NEWS REPORT IN REALTIME THAT THERE WAS A -- A STANDOFF IN
SOMEONE'S HOME OR A SHOOTING OR A ROBBERY IN PROGRESS OR ANYTHING
LIKE THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, THE CASE IS THAT PEOPLE FLOCK TO THOSE AREAS.
DO YOU FEEL THAT THAT PUTS LAW ENFORCEMENT, EMERGENCY RESPONDERS AND
THOSE PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THAT PUBLIC SPACE IN DANGER?
MS. REYES: SO, ONE, I THINK PEOPLE FLOCK TO THE
AREA WITHOUT NEWS REPORTING. AT --
MR. DURSO: BUT THIS WILL JUST ADD TO IT.
MS. REYES: -- LEAST THAT HAS -- THAT HAS BEEN MY
EXPERIENCE. BUT -- BUT JOURNALISTS, THEM HAVING ACCESS TO INFORMATION
IN REALTIME DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT THEY'RE REPORTING IN REALTIME.
IT MEANS THAT THEY HAVE ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN REALTIME, AND THAT
OFTEN MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY OF THE REPORTING OF THE INFORMATION THAT
THEY'RE ABLE TO GATHER TO THEN REPORT TO THE PUBLIC.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO, MOVING ON --
MS. REYES: AND I -- I'M SORRY, MR. DURSO --
MR. DURSO: NO, (INDISCERNIBLE) --
MS. REYES: I JUST ALSO WANTED TO, IN RESPONSE TO
WHAT MR. REILLY SAID THAT YOU BROUGHT UP AS WELL, WE HAVE DEFINED IN
THE LANGUAGE SENSITIVE INFORMATION, AND -- AND THAT'S LEFT UP TO THE
84
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
DISCRETION, MANY TIMES, OF LAW ENFORCEMENT. SO IN -- IN SITUATIONS
WHERE THEY ARE TRANSMITTING SENSITIVE INFORMATION THAT THEY BELIEVE
PERHAPS SHOULDN'T BE, THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO SO ON ANOTHER CHANNEL.
THROUGH ANOTHER MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION, THEY CAN STILL DO THAT.
AND THAT'S NOT REQUIRED FOR THEM TO SHARE WITH JOURNALISTS.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO I WANT TO DRILL DOWN ON THAT.
SO WHAT CHANNEL IS REQUIRED? SO IN OTHER WORDS, IS IT THE LAW
ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATION TO DISPATCH, OR IS IT OFFICER TO OFFICER?
MS. REYES: ALL OF -- ALL OF THEM THAT ARE ON THAT --
MR. DURSO: ALL OF THEM. SO -- SO WHO GETS TO
MAKE THAT DETERMINATION, WHAT'S SENSITIVE AND WHAT'S NOT?
MS. REYES: WELL, THE -- THE OFFICERS BASED ON
WHATEVER... I WOULDN'T CALL IT MISSION, WHATEVER THEY'RE WORKING ON WILL
DETERMINE WHAT'S SENSITIVE INFORMATION. WE DON'T DELINEATE WHAT
SENSITIVE INFORMATION IS. THAT'S LEFT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TO DETERMINE.
MR. DURSO: BUT -- BUT IF WE'RE MAKING A LAW
SAYING THAT THEY HAVE TO ESSENTIALLY PUBLICLY BROADCAST IT, RIGHT --
MS. REYES: I'M SORRY. AND I -- AND JUST TO CORRECT
MYSELF. THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE CAN ALSO DELINEATE WHAT IS SENSITIVE
INFORMATION. SO ANY -- ANY KIND OF, LIKE, UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS, SOME
INFORMATION THAT IS CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND PROTECTED UNDER THE LAW
SHOULDN'T BE SAID OVER THE RADIO.
MR. DURSO: RIGHT. BUT WHEN ARE THEY MAKING THAT
DETERMINATION? SO IF I AM A POLICE OFFICER OR IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND I
DETERMINE AT THAT MOMENT THAT THIS IS SENSITIVE AND I SWITCH CHANNELS --
85
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AS SIMPLE AS THAT MAY SOUND, WE'RE MAKING IT A SIMPLE WAY TO DESCRIBE
IT -- AND YOU'RE THE JOURNALIST AND YOU SAY, I WANTED TO HEAR THAT. I FEEL
THAT WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS NOT SENSITIVE. WHO MAKES THAT COMPLAINT,
AND THEN WHO MAKES THE DETERMINATION THAT IT WAS SENSITIVE OR NOT?
HOW WOULD THEY KNOW?
MS. REYES: WELL, FIRST THEY WOULD HAVE TO KNOW,
RIGHT --
MR. DURSO: HAVE TO.
MS. REYES: THEY WOULD HAVE TO KNOW THAT THERE
WAS SENSITIVE INFORMATION --
MR. DURSO: WELL, (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK) --
MS. REYES: -- BROADCASTED -- BROADCASTED THROUGH A
CHANNEL THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO IN ORDER MAKE A COMPLAINT. BUT
LET'S SAY ALL OF THOSE -- ALL OF THOSE CRITERIA ARE MET. ULTIMATELY, THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAS PURVIEW OVER...
MR. DURSO: SO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WOULD
THEN HAVE TO GET A COMPLAINT FILED TO THEM IN REGARDS TO A TRANSMISSION
THAT WENT OFFLINE. I'M -- I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS WOULD
ACTUALLY WORK. THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET A COMPLAINT FROM A JOURNALIST,
A -- OR ANOTHER EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION SAYING THAT A RADIO
TRANSMISSION WENT OFFLINE AT 3:30 A.M., AND WE WANT TO KNOW IF THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE DETERMINES THAT THAT RADIO TRANSMISSION HAD THE
RIGHT TO BE CHANGED CHANNEL -- THEY CHANGED THE CHANNEL ON IT, THAT IT'S
SENSITIVE MATERIAL. SO THERE WOULD ALMOST HAVE TO BE AN INVESTIGATION
PROCESS.
86
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. REYES: WELL, ALL THE -- ALL THE RADIO
TRANSMISSIONS ARE FOILABLE.
MR. DURSO: I -- I -- BUT THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING YOU.
SO, WHO DECIDES TO SAY, OKAY, I WANT TO KNOW WHAT WAS SAID AT THAT
TIME. WHY DID YOU CHANGE THE CHANNEL?
MS. REYES: I GUESS YOU CAN SAY IT WAS CONSIDERED
SENSITIVE INFORMATION. IT'S JUST THAT IT WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE TRANS --
TRANSMITTED IN REALTIME. BUT EVEN IF IT'S SENSITIVE INFORMATION IT CAN
STILL BE FOILED.
MR. DURSO: UNDERSTOOD. THAT'S MY QUESTION, IS IF
I AM LAW ENFORCEMENT AND I FEEL AT THAT MOMENT THAT THIS IS SENSITIVE
INFORMATION AND I DECIDE AT THAT MOMENT TO CHANGE THE CHANNEL, THAT IS
NO LONGER -- CAN BE ACCESSED BY THE JOURNAL -- THE JOURNALIST AND/OR
EMERGENCY SERVICE PERSONNEL AND I FEEL THAT IT'S SENSITIVE, HOW WOULD A
-- WHAT'S THE MECHANISM IN PLACE FOR SOMEONE TO SAY, HEY, AT 3:30
A.M. OFFICER DURSO TURNED OFF HIS RADIO BECAUSE HE FELT IT WAS SENSITIVE.
DO THEY THEN HAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE?
BECAUSE I DON'T -- I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING HOW THAT MECHANISM IS IN
PLACE AND HOW THAT GETS, YOU KNOW, MOVED FORWARD.
MS. REYES: ALL RIGHT. SO I'M GONNA READ TO YOU THE
DEFINITION OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION HERE.
MR. DURSO: GREAT.
MS. REYES: SENSITIVE INFORMATION MEANS ANY
PORTION OF A RADIO COMMUNICATION THAT IS DISCLOSE -- THAT IF DISCLOSED
WOULD, ONE, DEPRIVE A PERSON OF A RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL OR IMPARTIAL
87
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ADJUDICATION; IDENTIFY A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE OR DISCLOSE CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMATION RELATING TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION; AND THREE, REVEAL
CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES EXCEPT ROUTINE
TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE
DEFINITION OF SENSITIVE MATERIAL IS.
MS. REYES: I'M -- AND I'M -- AND I'M -- AND WHAT
I'M TRYING TO SAY IS THAT IS VERY LOOSE.
MR. DURSO: VERY. AND I UNDERSTOOD. BUT WHO,
THEN, IS GONNA SAY THAT FALLS UNDER THAT PURVIEW? AGAIN, IF I'M THE
OFFICER --
MS. REYES: ULTIMATELY, THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
MR. DURSO: OKAY.
MS. REYES: AND YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT THE
MECHANISM.
MR. DURSO: RIGHT.
MS. REYES: YOU WANT TO KNOW, LIKE, DO THEY FILE A
COMPLAINT?
MR. DURSO: SURE.
MS. REYES: CORRECT.
MR. DURSO: THEY WOULD HAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT.
MS. REYES: THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL SET UP A
PROCESS FOR THAT.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. PERFECT. THANK YOU.
SO WITH THE COUPLE OF MINUTES I HAVE LEFT... I KNOW I
88
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
HAD A LIST OF QUESTIONS. I APOLOGIZE. THIS IS FOR ALL RADIO TRANSMISSIONS,
YOU HAD SAID, RIGHT? SO IT'S NOT JUST DISPATCH, IT'S OFFICER TO OFFICER?
MS. REYES: FOR ENCRYPTED RADIO.
MR. DURSO: FOR ENCRYPTED RADIO.
MS. REYES: YEAH.
MR. DURSO: SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE, THEN, IF
LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, LET'S SAY, WAS WORKING WITH A FEDERAL ENTITY,
LET'S SAY THE FBI, IN AN INVESTIGATION. ARE THEY ALSO INCLUDED IN THIS IF
THEY'RE WORKING WITH NEW YORK STATE WITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, TO
HAVE THAT ENCRYPTED RADIO TRANSMISSION OPEN TO THE PUBLIC?
MS. REYES: IT'S ONLY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT'S --
THAT IS DESCRIBED IN THE DEFINITION. SO WE DON'T BELIEVE THAT FEDERAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FALL UNDER THERE. BUT ASSUMING THAT THEY'RE
USING ENCRYPTED NEW YORK STATE -- NEW YORK LAW ENFORCEMENT RADIOS,
THEN THAT FALLS UNDER THE PURVIEW OF WHAT SHOULD BE ALLOWED FOR
JOURNALISTS AND -- AND EMERGENCY --
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO WHETHER IT'S FOR AN
INVESTIGATION OR SOMETHING I TAKE A PART IN, WHICH IS A PRESIDENTIAL
DEBATE WHERE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IS ON THE RADIO WITH FEDERAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT -- IT -- IT WORKS. IT HAPPENS. I
ACTUALLY DID IT. SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE, WOULD THEN THAT HAVE TO BE
OPEN FOR JOURNALISTS AND/OR EMERGENCY SERVICES TO HEAR OUR
TRANSMISSIONS GOING ON AT THAT TIME?
MS. REYES: LET'S -- LET'S -- WHAT ARE -- IT DEPENDS ON
WHAT THEY'RE COMMUN -- COMMUNICATING, AND IT DEPENDS WHAT RADIO
89
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ENCRYPTION THEY'RE USING; WHETHER IT'S, YOU KNOW, NEW YORK LAW
ENFORCEMENT RADIO THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO DISCLOSE. BUT IF IT'S SENS --
IF IT'S CONSIDERED SENSITIVE INFORMATION UNDER THE DEFINITION, THEN THEY
WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DISCLOSE IT IN REALTIME.
MR. DURSO: SO IT'S REALLY MORE THE OFFICER OR THE
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY GETS TO DETERMINE AT THAT MOMENT, AND THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL MAKE A DETERMIN -- DETERMINATION LATER IF
THEY VIOLATED THIS LAW.
MS. REYES: RIGHT. COMMUNICATION HAPPENS IN
REALTIME. SO I'M ASSUMING IF YOU -- IF YOU'RE COMMUNICATING
SOMETHING THAT IS CONSIDERED SENSITIVE DATA, SENSITIVE INFORMATION, AND
YOU'RE GONNA USE ANOTHER CHANNEL BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE IT TO BE
SENSITIVE INFORMATION, IT'S NOT -- THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO IT IN REALTIME.
THIS IS -- YOU'RE QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE FACT. BUT
AFTER THE FACT, THAT INFORMATION WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE ANYWAY.
MR. DURSO: CORRECT. UNLESS THEY WANTED IT NOT TO
BE.
MS. REYES: WELL, AT THAT POINT IT'S -- IT'S OLD NEWS.
I MEAN, IT -- IT -- IT WOULDN'T MATTER.
MR. DURSO: RIGHT. BUT THE ONLY PERSON IT MATTERS
TO NOW, IN THIS CASE, IS JOURNALISTS SO THAT THEY COULD REPORT THE NEWS.
MS. REYES: NO, NO. AND EMERGENCY SERVICES. AND
--
MR. DURSO: THE POLICE WILL CONTACT (INDISCERNIBLE/
CROSS-TALK) --
90
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. REYES: -- IN MANY COUNTIES -- AND IN MANY
COUNTIES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, YOUR EMERGENCY SERVICES
ARE VOLUNTEER SERVICES THAT RELY ON PUBLIC RADIO, RIGHT? THEY NEED TO
BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT. YOU KNOW --
(BUZZER SOUNDS)
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MS. REYES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. ANGELINO.
MR. ANGELINO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MS. REYES: YES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. ANGELINO: SO I'M -- I'M GONNA TRY AND SPEAK
INTO MY MICROPHONE WHILE LOOKING AT YOU. AND I APOLOGIZE. I MISSED
YOUR EXPLANATION. I MISSED THE FIRST PORTION. I WAS IN THE CODES
COMMITTEE MEETING.
MS. REYES: WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO REPEAT IT?
MR. ANGELINO: NO. THE -- I THINK I'VE -- I'VE GOT
A LOT OF MY QUESTIONS ASKED AND ANSWERED BY MY COLLEAGUES, BUT THEN
MORE QUESTIONS CAME UP.
THIS BILL IS PROHIBITING ENCRYPTED RADIO TRANSMISSIONS
BUT NOT DIGITAL? ENCRYPTED IS --
MS. REYES: IT'S ENCRYPTED --
91
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. ANGELINO: RIGHT.
MS. REYES: -- RADIO TRANSMISSION.
MR. ANGELINO: OKAY. BECAUSE A LOT OF AGENCIES
HAVE SWITCHED FROM ANALOG OVER THE RADIO WAVES TO DIGITAL RADIO. I
RECEIVE COMPLAINTS IN MY RURAL DISTRICT, I CAN'T HEAR THE POLICE AND FIRE
ANYMORE. DID THEY GO ENCRYPTED? NO, THEY WENT DIGITAL. SO THIS --
THIS ALLOWS DIGITAL RADIO?
MS. REYES: IF IT'S THE RADIO --
MR. ANGELINO: RIGHT.
MS. REYES: -- IF IT'S THE RADIO.
MR. ANGELINO: IT'S NOT ENCRYPTED. THIS IS ONLY
ENCRYPTED.
MS. REYES: CORRECT.
MR. ANGELINO: OKAY. AND THIS IS -- IT'S RELATIVELY
SHORT IN SOME OF THE BILLS THAT WE DEBATE. IT'S ONLY 50 LINES. BUT IT
STARTS OUT TALKING ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC
ACCESS. SO IT STARTS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT, IT ENDS WITH LAW
ENFORCEMENT. BUT RIGHT THERE IN, I GUESS ON MINE IT'S -- IT'S LINE 8, AND IT
SAYS EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATION MEANS --
MS. REYES: MM-HMM.
MR. ANGELINO: -- PRIVATE, PUBLIC, VOLUNTEER OR A
GROUP THAT PROVIDES FIRE, MEDICAL, AMBULANCE, RESCUE, HOUSING, FOOD
AND OTHER SERVICES. SO IS IT JUST POLICE OR DOES IT INCLUDE ALL OF THESE
AGENCIES, ALSO?
MS. REYES: ALL OF THESE AGENCIES WOULD HAVE
92
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACCESS UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE TO THE ENCRYPTED RADIO. SO LIKE
VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS, LIKE VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL
SERVICES, LIKE THE RED CROSS.
MR. ANGELINO: OKAY. I -- I THINK I UNDERSTAND, SO
I'M JUST GONNA -- SO I -- YOU CAN SAY YES OR NO. SO THIS IS ABOUT LAW
ENFORCEMENT RADIO?
MS. REYES: YES.
MR. ANGELINO: AND THAT SECTION IS SO THAT ALL THE
OTHER ORGANIZATIONS CAN HEAR IT?
MS. REYES: THAT -- SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO
HAVE ACCESS, YES.
MR. ANGELINO: ALL RIGHT. BUT PRIVATE -- PRIVATE IS
NOT MENTIONED IN THERE. BECAUSE I HEARD A LOT ABOUT JOURNALS.
MS. REYES: SO, WE ARE -- WE ARE PROVIDING ACCESS
TO TWO CATEGORIES: TO LAW ENFORCEMENT GROUPS -- I MEAN, I'M SORRY, TO
EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS AND TO JOURNALISTS WHO ARE
CREDENTIALED UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
MR. ANGELINO: OKAY. AND THERE ARE EXEMPTIONS.
I SAW THAT, ALSO.
MS. REYES: YES.
MR. ANGELINO: AND THIS DOESN'T ANY WAY REQUIRE
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO GO BACKWARDS IN TECHNOLOGY? GOING
BACK TO ANALOG?
MS. REYES: NO.
MR. ANGELINO: OKAY. THANK YOU.
93
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. ANGELINO: SO, I KNOW I LISTENED TO ALL OF MY
COLLEAGUES ABOUT THIS, AND THE SKY IS NOT FALLING WITH THIS BILL. A LOT OF
AGENCIES ALREADY ARE THOUGHT TO BE ENCRYPTED BECAUSE THEY WENT
DIGITAL. DIGITAL RADIO IS VERY DIFFICULT TO LISTEN TO. IT TRANSMITS ON
THOUSANDS OF FREQUENCIES IN MILLISECOND CHANGES. AND TO BUY A
SCANNER OR A MONITOR DEVICE THAT LISTENS TO THAT, IT'S NEAR -- WELL, IT'S
COST PROHIBITIVE TO MOST PEOPLE. THAT'S WHY PEOPLE IN MY DISTRICT
THOUGHT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES WENT ENCRYPTED. BUT IT'S NOT
JUST LAW ENFORCEMENT, IT'S FIRE, EMS, AND EVERYBODY ELSE BECAUSE IT'S
CALLED THE TRUNK RADIO SYSTEM, USUALLY A COUNTYWIDE SYSTEM. NOBODY
CAN HEAR THAT EXCEPT OTHER PEOPLE WITH TRUNK RADIOS.
NOW, ENCRYPTION, THAT'S ANOTHER THING. LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES DO HAVE ENCRYPTED RADIOS, AND IF YOU DO HAVE
THE WHEREWITHAL TO OWN A VERY EXPENSIVE SCANNER, YOU'RE GONNA HEAR
COPS ON THE RADIO SAY -- YOU'LL HEAR THE DISPATCH, YOU'LL HEAR THE
CROSSTALK TO EACH OTHER. BUT THEN YOU WILL HEAR THEM SAY, GO TO AND
MY AGENCY, IT WAS 3. GO TO 3. THAT'S WHEN WE'RE STARTING TO TRANSMIT
SENSITIVE INFORMATION, LIKE WHAT -- WHAT IS THE KEY CODE TO GET INTO A
PERSON'S HOUSE BECAUSE WE HAVE TO CHECK THEIR WELFARE AND/OR -- OR THE
KEY IS HIDDEN UNDER THE MAILBOX. THAT IS THE SENSITIVE INFORMATION THAT
WE PASS BACK AND FORTH.
WHERE I LIVE, WE TRY TO USE OUR OPEN SOURCE RADIO TO
OUR ADVANTAGE. WE PUT OUT THE NAMES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF PEOPLE, AND
94
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SURE ENOUGH, THERE IS NO DIGNITY AMONGST THIEVES AND THEY WILL RAT ON
THEIR OTHER THIEVES -- COUNTERPARTS ALL THE TIME.
SO THIS IS NOT THE SKY IS FALLING. I REMEMBER WHEN IT
HAPPENED. NYPD WENT ENCRYPTED AND JOURNALISTS AND TV STATIONS
DOWN THERE WERE ALL UPSET BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T KNOW IT RIGHT AWAY.
BUT, IN FACT, THEY WEREN'T ACTUALLY GOING ENCRYPTED, THEY JUST WENT
DIGITAL. BUT EVERYBODY DOES HAVE THE SOURCE TO GO ENCRYPTED IF THEY
NEED TO. AND THERE'S A SENSITIVE INFORMATION EXEMPTION IN HERE, AND
WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR A QUITE A WHILE.
I -- I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M VOTING ON THIS. I THINK IT'S
GONNA BE A PARTY VOTE. BUT THIS IS NOT THE SKY IS FALLING, TO ANYBODY
WHO'S WORRIED ABOUT THIS. AND IF ANYBODY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT WANTS
TO CHALLENGE THAT, PLEASE, LOOK ME UP AND LET ME KNOW WHY.
THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. YEGER.
MR. YEGER: ON THE BILL, PLEASE, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. YEGER: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
I AGREE, THE SKY'S NOT FALLING. BUT THE -- THE MOST
SIMPLE COMPROMISE THAT WOULD ACHIEVE THE PURPOSE OF THIS BILL AND
ALSO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT PUTTING THE PUBLIC IN DANGER WOULD BE A
VERY SLIGHT DELAY, AS WAS MENTIONED ON THIS FLOOR BY SOME OF OUR
COLLEAGUES. SLIGHT. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A HALF HOUR, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO
BE AN HOUR. IT COULD BE FIVE MINUTES. BUT ENOUGH TIME FOR SOMEBODY
95
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
BACK AT THE BASE TO FLIP THE SWITCH OFF IF SOMETHING'S HAPPENING THAT
CAN'T BE RECORDED IN REALTIME. AND THERE ARE THINGS THAT HAPPEN. THERE
ARE EMERGENCIES. THE -- THE POLICE ARE CHASING SOMEBODY WHO'S TRYING
TO KILL A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT. THEY PUT THE NAME OF THE CONFIDENTIAL
INFORMANT OVER THE RADIO NOT REALIZING, OH, THEY'RE CHASING THIS GUY.
THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S SENSITIVE. IT'S SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED FROM
BEING DISCLOSED. BUT AT THAT MOMENT, THEY MAY NOT HAVE TURNED OFF THE
TRANSMIT. THEY MAY NOT HAVE SWITCHED IT OVER TO THE -- TO -- TO THE
SENSITIVE CHANNEL. THE CONFIDENTIAL CHANNEL, THE CHANNEL THAT'S
PROTECTED BY THE STATUTE.
A VERY SLIGHT DELAY. WITHOUT THAT DELAY, WE'RE
ENDANGERING LIVES. THIS BILL WILL ENDANGER LIVES. AND IT'S NOT
HYPERBOLE. IT'S THE KIND OF THING THAT, YES, WE WANT A FREE PRESS.
EVERYBODY WANTS A FREE PRESS. WE HAVE THEM RIGHT DOWN THE HALL.
THEY WATCH EVERYTHING WE DO. BUT TODAY, EVERYBODY WITH A TWITTER
ACCOUNT IS A JOURNALIST. AND THEY'RE ALL IN A HUSTLE TO PUT THAT
INFORMATION OUT BEFORE THE NEXT GUY. AND THEY HEAR SOMETHING ON THE
RADIO AS IT'S HAPPENING AND THEY TYPE, SOMETHING'S GOING DOWN. AND
ONE OF THE GENTLEMEN WHO SPOKE HERE REFERENCED, GOD FORBID,
SOMETHING HAPPENING AT A SCHOOL AND THEN ALL THE PARENTS CONVERGE ON
THE SCHOOL. THAT'S NOT SAFE. AND WE OUGHT TO USE OUR POWERS TO
REGULATE THIS IN A WISE WAY; IN A WAY THAT SAYS LET'S PUT THAT INFORMATION
OUT. LET'S MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC'S ACCESS TO INFORMATION IS NOT
HINDERED. BUT LET'S DO IT WISELY. LET'S DO IT IN A WAY THAT THE FIRST
AMENDMENT IS BEING PROTECTED AND PUBLIC SAFETY IS BEING PROTECTED,
96
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AND THOSE ARE NOT MUTUALLY INCONSISTENT VALUES.
JUST ALSO WANT TO MENTION THAT UNDER THIS BILL THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE -- NOT SURE WHY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE IS IN A
POSITION TO REGULATE ANYTHING THAT GOES ON WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT. I'M
NOT SURE WHAT EXPERTISE THEY HAVE TO REGULATE WHAT CONSTITUTES SENSITIVE
INFORMATION, WHAT DOESN'T CONSTITUTE SENSITIVE INFORMATION. THEY'RE
VERY GOOD AT PROCESSING CORPORATE DOCUMENTS. I'M NOT SURE WHAT MORE
THEY DO. THEY TAKE OUR OATHS, THEY FILE IT, THAT'S WONDERFUL. WHAT DO
THEY HAVE TO DO WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AND DETERMINING WHAT
CONSTITUTES SENSITIVE INFORMATION?
THIS BILL WILL HURT NEW YORKERS IF IT IS ADOPTED, AND I
WILL BE VOTING NO. THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS BILL [SIC] SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE
90TH DAY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: A PARTY VOTE HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
MINORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE, GENERALLY SPEAKING, ON
THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. BUT IF THERE IS ANYONE WHO WOULD WISH TO
VOTE YES THEY MAY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.
THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
97
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER. THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GONNA BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE
OF LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A FEW THAT WOULD BE DESIRE TO BE
AN EXCEPTION. THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO DO SO AT THEIR SEATS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
MR. ANGELINO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. ANGELINO: TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE, MADAM
SPEAKER.
LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ARE ALREADY DOING THIS.
THOSE THAT DON'T -- AND I UNDERSTAND NYPD IS TOTALLY ENCRYPTED -- THAT'S
GONNA BE A VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE CHANGE FOR THE LARGEST LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES, AND IF NOT THE WORLD. THE --
LIKE I SAID, IT'S ALREADY BEING DONE BY SMALLER AGENCIES, AND FOR THAT --
FOR THAT REASON I'LL BE VOTING NO. BUT ALSO, MY OTHER COLLEAGUE TO MY
LEFT MENTIONED THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WHICH WAS IN MY NOTES, AND
THAT WAS WHY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE? THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH
ANYTHING AND HAVE NO ENFORCEMENT BRANCH. SO I THINK IT WAS A
CATCH-ALL BECAUSE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT REALLY ANSWERS TO LOCAL
AUTHORITY. AND I DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO IMPOSE ANY SORT OF PENALTY
OR PUNISHMENT, AND I ALSO HAVE TO WONDER WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THAT
FOR ANY LARGE AGENCIES THAT ARE FULLY ENCRYPTED.
FOR THOSE REASONS I'LL BE A NO VOTE.
98
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. ANGELINO IN THE
NEGATIVE.
MR. DURSO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. AND I
WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR TAKING OUR QUESTIONS.
AGAIN, THE DEVIL'S IN THE DETAILS WHEN SOME OF THESE
BILLS COME UP. AND MY CONCERN IS FOR THE SAFETY NOT ONLY OF THE PUBLIC,
BUT FOR OUR OFFICERS IN GENERAL WHEN THEY ARE DOING THEIR JOB. JUST
USING THE BROAD TERM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN A BILL LIKE THIS DOESN'T JUST
INCLUDE OUR LOCAL MUNICIPAL POLICE, BUT IT WILL INCLUDE STATE TROOPERS,
ANYBODY THAT FALLS UNDER PEACE OFFICER STATUS, COURT OFFICERS,
CORRECTIONS OFFICERS AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT. SO WHEN WE HAVE A
BILL LIKE THIS THAT'S SO BROAD AND DOESN'T SPECIFY WHAT WOULD BE
SENSITIVE, WHAT WOULD NOT, AND THEN LEAVE IT UP TO AN ENTITY LATER ON,
AGAIN, I ALWAYS TAKE AND -- AND ERR ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION WITH KEEPING
OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT, OUR POLICE, OUR CORRECTIONS, OUR SHERIFFS, OUR
ENVIRONMENTAL CONVERSATION OFFICERS, THEIR SAFETY AND THE GENERAL
SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC IN MIND.
SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'LL BE VOTING NO.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. DURSO IN THE
NEGATIVE.
MR. REILLY TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. REILLY: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. JUST TO
BE BRIEF.
I'M HOPING THE GOVERNOR -- IF THIS COMES TO THE SENATE
99
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AND IT PASSES, I'M HOPING THE GOVERNOR IS LISTENING IN, I'D LIKE TO PLEA
WITH HER TO INCLUDE AN AMENDMENT, ASK FOR THAT AMENDMENT FOR A
DELAY. AS I MENTIONED DURING THE DEBATE, IT'S ABOUT THE RESPONSE TO
INCIDENTS THAT HAPPEN WHERE THE PUBLIC MAY BLOCK EMERGENCY VEHICLES
BECAUSE YOU MAY HAVE A CATASTROPHIC INCIDENT. AND BECAUSE PEOPLE
WANT TO GET THERE TO SEE IT BECAUSE THE NEWS IS REPORTING IT, I DON'T THINK
A TEN MINUTE DELAY WILL BE AN INCONVENIENCE TO THE PRESS.
SO WITH THAT, I'LL BE VOTING NO, HOPING FOR THOSE
AMENDMENTS. THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. REILLY IN THE NEGATIVE.
MS. REYES TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.
MS. REYES: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
I AM VERY PROUD OF THE WORK THAT WE'VE DONE WITH THIS
PIECE OF LEGISLATION. I BELIEVE IN TRANSPARENCY. AND I HEAR -- I HEAR
SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES' CONCERNS, PERHAPS, OF A FIVE MINUTE DELAY OR A
15 MINUTE DELAY ISN'T AN IMPEDIMENT TO JOURNALISTS, BUT I GUARANTEE
YOU, IT IS AN IMPEDIMENT IN THE LIFE OF SOMEONE IN -- IN -- WHEN WE TALK
ABOUT EMERGENCY SERVICES GETTING TO A MASS SHOOTING, GETTING TO A
SCHOOL WHO -- OR SOMEBODY WHO IS IN NEED. I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, IN
-- IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK THAT I -- IN THE DISTRICT THAT I REPRESENT, WE
HAVE, YOU KNOW, EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT WILL RESPOND IN A VERY SHORT
AMOUNT OF TIME. THAT'S NOT THE CASE FOR SOME OF OUR RURAL COUNTIES,
AND WE'VE HEARD FROM THEM HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THAT THEY HAVE ACCESS
IN REALTIME TO THIS RADIO. SO I AM ALWAYS OPEN TO THE DEBATE AND THE
100
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
DISCUSSION. BUT I BELIEVE IN TRANSPARENCY. WE HAVE GIVEN A LOT OF
LEEWAY TO LAW ENFORCEMENT. AND ALSO, I BELIEVE THAT LAW -- LAW
ENFORCEMENT IS COMPETENT AND CAPABLE TO RESPOND IN HIGH STRESS
SCENARIOS ACCURATELY TO DECIDE -- TO BE ABLE TO DECIDE. I TRUST THEM TO
DECIDE WHAT IS CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WHAT IS NOT. AND WE HAVE LEFT
THAT DISCRETION UP TO THEM AS WELL.
SO WITH THAT, OF COURSE I WILL BE VOTING IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. REYES IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN
INTRODUCTION.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTERRUPT OUR PROCEEDINGS BRIEFLY TO
INTRODUCE SOME FIFTH GRADE SCHOLARS THAT ARE IN OUR CHAMBERS TODAY.
THEY ARE FROM THE LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND THEY'RE HERE
VISITING THEIR MEMBER AND OUR COLLEAGUE, MR. JONES.
I HOPE THAT YOU WILL TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO
CONGRATULATE AND THANK THESE YOUNG PEOPLE FOR JOINING US TODAY AND
OFFER THEM THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE AND WELCOME THEM TO THE
PEOPLE'S HOUSE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON BEHALF OF MRS.
101
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
PEOPLES-STOKES, MR. JONES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME
YOU YOUNG PEOPLE FROM LAKE PLACID AND EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES
OF THE FLOOR HERE IN THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER. IT'S ALWAYS EXCITING TO SEE
YOUNG PEOPLE TRAVEL FROM SUCH A FAR DISTANCE TO COME AND LEARN ABOUT
LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT, SEE HOW LEGISLATION IS CREATED. SOMETHING
FUN YOU CAN GO BACK AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY MEMBERS THAT
YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO VISIT THE STATE'S CAPITOL. SO WE HOPE YOU
ENJOY YOUR TIME HERE TODAY, AND THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH, YOUNG
PEOPLE, FOR JOINING US TODAY.
(APPLAUSE)
(PAUSE)
CAN WE HAVE QUIET IN THE CHAMBER, PLEASE? WE'RE
GOING TO BE ON DEBATE. THANK YOU.
PAGE 13, RULES REPORT NO. 313, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A04997, RULES REPORT
NO. 313, GLICK, BURDICK, SIMON, WEPRIN, LEVENBERG, ROMERO, REYES.
AN ACT TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO
EXTENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION'S REGULATION OF CRABS, AND TO PROHIBITING
THE TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS FOR COMMERCIAL AND BIOMEDICAL
PURPOSES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. GLICK.
MS. GLICK: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
102
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THE BILL DOES TWO THINGS: IT EXTENDS THE AUTHORIZATION
FOR DEC TO REGULATE CRABS BY ITS OWN REGULATIONS, AND IT PROHIBITS THE
TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS. IT EXTENDS FOR TWO YEARS THE AUTHORITY OF THE
DEPARTMENT TO REGULATE REGULAR CRABS, INCLUDING HORSESHOE CRABS. BUT
BEGINNING IN 2026 IT PROHIBITS THE TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS EXCEPT FOR
A BONA FIDE EDUCATION OR SCIENTIFIC PURPOSE AS DETERMINED BY DEC AND
THE REGULATIONS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. JENSEN.
MR. JENSEN: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WILL
MY FRIEND, THE HONORABLE CHAIR OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, YIELD
FOR SOME QUESTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MS. GLICK: WITH GREAT PLEASURE TO MY FRIEND FROM
THE ROCHESTER AREA.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. JENSEN: YOU'RE -- YOU'RE VERY KIND, CHAIR.
AND ALMOST A YEAR TO THE DAY THAT WE HAD THIS DEBATE
LAST YEAR ABOUT MY NEW FAVORITE ANIMAL, THE HORSESHOE CRAB WHO, FOR
OUR NEW LISTENERS, IS A MAGNIFICENT CREATURE, 400 MILLION YEARS OLD; 200
MILLION YEARS BEFORE THE DINOSAURS. THEY ARE AMAZING. THEY SHOULD
BE BLESSED, WHICH I'M GLAD WE'RE HAVING THIS DEBATE.
THE BILL WE DEBATED LAST YEAR WAS SUBJECT TO A
GUBERNATORIAL VETO. WHAT HAS CHANGED, WHETHER THIS LEGISLATION OR IN
OUR HEALTH, BIO, PHARMACEUTICAL MODEL SINCE WE DISCUSSED THIS A YEAR
103
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AGO?
MS. GLICK: WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE
QUESTION.
A NUMBER OF THINGS HAVE CHANGED. AS YOU MAY
REMEMBER, THE HORSESHOE CRAB IS A VITAL KEYSTONE SPECIES THAT PROVIDES
FOR THE SUPPORT OF OTHER CREATURES. SO THE RED KNOT, THE RUDDY TONE --
TURNSTONE AND SOME OTHER MARINE BIRDS ARE QUITE DEPENDENT ON THE
HORSESHOE CRAB EGGS IN ORDER TO, AS THEY ARE MIGRATING, TO SUPPORT
THEMSELVES ON THEIR JOURNEY. SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HAS CHANGED IS
THAT THE RED KNOT IS NOW A LISTED, BY DEC ITSELF, AS A THREATENED
SPECIES. SO WE WOULD NOT WANT TO FURTHER ENDANGER THIS PARTICULAR
SPECIES BY ALLOWING THE CONTINUED TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS. THAT'S
NUMBER ONE. NUMBER TWO, ONE OF THE CREATURES FOR WHICH HORSESHOE
CRABS ARE USED AS BAIT INCLUDES THE AMERICAN EEL, WHICH NOW HAS BEEN
LISTED AS A SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN BY DEC. SO WE HAVE ONE SPECIES
THAT IS LISTED AS SPECIAL CONCERN, AND IT IS FOR THAT REASON THAT HORSESHOE
CRABS ARE CHOPPED UP INTO BAIT IN ORDER TO CAPTURE WHAT IS NOW A
SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN.
SO FOR THOSE REASONS, THOSE ARE TWO THINGS THAT HAVE
CHANGED WITHIN DEC. RECOGNIZING THAT THE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE
CRABS IN MUCH OF OUR REGION, THE NEW YORK REGION, IS LISTED AS POOR
AND WE NEED IT TO RECOVER. SO THE TAKING OF THESE HORSESHOE CRABS AT
THIS POINT IS ILL-ADVISED AND RECOGNIZED AS ILL-ADVISED BY DEC BY
HAVING REDUCED THE NUMBER OF DAYS THAT THEY CAN BE TAKEN. SO THERE'S
A RECOGNITION BY DEC THAT THE RULES THAT THEY HAD LAST YEAR THAT WE
104
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
OBJECTED TO WERE TOO LOOSE, AND SO THEY WENT AHEAD AND RESTRICTED EVEN
FURTHER BUT WITHOUT MAKING APPROPRIATE CHANGE IN PROHIBITING THE
TAKING.
MR. JENSEN: CERTAINLY -- AND I CERTAINLY
UNDERSTAND. I -- I APPRECIATE THE -- THE EXPLANATION ON THE CHANGES
SOCIETALLY SINCE -- SINCE JUNE 7TH OF LAST YEAR. BUT I REALLY WANT TO DRILL
DOWN ON THE SECONDARY PORTION OF THE LEGISLATION WHICH -- OR THE USE OF
HORSESHOE CRABS, WHICH WOULD BE FOR THE USE OF THEIR BLOOD FOR
BIOTECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL USES, WHICH FOR -- FOR PEOPLE NEW TO
THIS DEBATE, HORSESHOE CRABS -- WHICH ARE AMAZING, I JUST WANT TO MAKE
SURE THAT'S ON THE RECORD AGAIN -- HAVE BLUE BLOOD BECAUSE IT'S
COPPER-BASED RATHER THAN OUR RED BLOOD THAT IS IRON-BASED. AND WITH
THEIR BLUE BLOOD REACTING DIFFERENTLY TO CERTAIN ENZYMES, THEY ARE A
CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TESTING MECHANISM TO DETERMINE THE SAFETY OF
CERTAIN VACCINES OR DURABLE MEDICAL SUPPLIES.
SO WOULD THIS LEGISLATION DISCONTINUE THE ABILITY OF
ANY BIO -- BIOTECH COMPANY OR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY FROM BEING
ABLE TO PARTNER WITH A -- SOMEBODY WHO WOULD HARVEST THE HORSESHOE
CRAB, ENGAGED IN BLOOD LETTING, WHICH IS SOMETHING A PARLIAMENTARIAN
IN 1372 MIGHT HAVE TALKED ABOUT IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, AND USE
THEIR BLOOD FOR MEDICAL TESTING FOR THE SAFETY OF CRITICALLY IMPORTANT
MEDICINES?
MS. GLICK: WELL, I APPRECIATE YOU RAISING THE
CONCERN ABOUT THE USE OF HORSESHOE CRAB BLOOD WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO
IDENTIFY CERTAIN ENDOTOXINS. BUT THERE -- NOT ONLY HAS THERE BEEN
105
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
SYNTHETIC TESTING REAGENTS FOR SOME TIME, ELI LILLY HAS BEEN USING ITS
OWN SYNTHETIC REAGENT FOR, WELL, SINCE 2018. BUT JUST THIS YEAR -- THIS IS
ANOTHER CHANGE -- THE U.S. PHARMACOPEIA, WHICH IS A NON-PROFIT THAT
RECOMMENDS CHANGES IN PHARMACEUTICAL OPERATIONS, THEY HAVE
AUTHORIZED THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT SYNTHETICS FOR THE SAME PURPOSE.
AND WHILE WE'VE APPLAUDED ELI LILLY FOR BEING A LEADER IN THIS AREA,
THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY -- AND I WILL JUST DIGRESS AND POINT OUT THAT IN
EUROPE THEY HAVE BEEN USING THIS SYNTHETIC REAGENT EVEN LONGER. SO
THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE. AND ITS SAFETY HAS -- AND EFFECTIVENESS HAS BEEN
DEMONSTRATED BY THE FACT THAT ELI LILLY HAS BEEN USING THIS FOR A
NUMBER OF YEARS ALREADY. SO IT'S NOT BREAKING NEW GROUND, IT IS SIMPLY
SAYING THAT WE'VE REACHED A POINT WHERE THE SYNTHETIC HAS BEEN USED
OPERATIONALLY AND IS EFFECTIVE, AND THERE'S NO REASON TO CONTINUE TO
DECIMATE THE HORSESHOE CRAB POPULATION IN NEW YORK. AND I WILL ALSO
POINT OUT THAT THE STATES AROUND US HAVE BEEN PLACING MORATORIUMS
WHICH WILL ONLY PLACE GREATER STRESS ON OUR POPULATION IF WE DO NOT
TAKE THIS STEP.
MR. JENSEN: AND CERTAINLY I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT,
AND CERTAINLY YOU TALKED ABOUT THE RED -- RED FERN? WAS IT THE --
MS. GLICK: RED KNOT.
MR. JENSEN: RED KNOT. I'M SORRY. MY APOLOGIES.
RED FERN'S A PLANT. I KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY -- THEY DO FEED ON THE
EGGS OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB WHICH, ONCE AGAIN, BECAUSE THEY'RE
AMAZING, LAY 4,000 EGGS AT A TIME. SO I JUST REALLY WANTED TO TALK
ABOUT ANOTHER FUN FACT ABOUT THE HORSESHOE CRAB. BUT AS THEY ARE IN THE
106
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WATERS ALL THE WAY FROM CANCUN UP TO NOVA SCOTIA, THE QUESTION I HAVE
IS, UNDERSTANDING THAT WE HAVE THE SYNTHETICS, THE TWO SYNTHETICS WERE
NOT APPROVED FOR WIDESPREAD USAGE A YEAR AGO, WE ARE NOW WHERE THEY
ARE -- CAN BE USED UNILATERALLY FOR TESTING. WOULDN'T IT MAKE SENSE,
SINCE WE ALREADY IN THE LEGISLATION HAVE TWO SPECIFIC CARVE-OUTS FOR THE
TAKING OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB AND FOR RESEARCH, AND I'M BLANKING ON THE
SECOND METHOD.
MS. GLICK: SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.
MR. JENSEN: SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH EXCEPTIONS.
THAT WHILE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR -- OUR HEALTHCARE INNOVATORS
HAVE THE ABILITY TO ENSURE THAT MEDICATION IS SAFE FOR HUMAN USE,
WOULDN'T IT MAKE SENSE TO PUT A CARVEOUT THAT IF THERE IS A MEDICAL NEED
TO TEST MEDICATION AND THE SYNTHETICS THAT ARE CURRENTLY APPROVED
UNILATERALLY ARE NOT SUFFICIENT, THAT THEN DEC COULD ALLOW FOR THE
PERMITTING OF THE TAKING OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB FOR A VERY SPECIFIC TIME
PERIOD TO ENSURE THE VIABILITY OF THE BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS?
MS. GLICK: WELL, I BELIEVE THAT SYNTHETICS ARE
PROBABLY, IN THE LONG RUN, A MORE INEXPENSIVE WAY OF PROVIDING FOR THE
TESTING, AND DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE WILL BE A SHORTAGE AS A RESULT. IF
ANYTHING, WE COULD RUN INTO A SHORTAGE OF HORSESHOE CRABS. AND, IN
FACT, AS I SAID, WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN SEEING DEC REDUCE IT BASED ON
THE POOR QUALITY, THE AMOUNT OF -- OF HORSESHOE CRABS IN OUR WATERS.
AND FRANKLY, THEY SAY THAT THEY WILL RETURN THEM TO THE WILD, BUT THE
REALITY IS AFTER A THIRD OF THEIR BLOOD HAS BEEN DRAINED, VERY FEW OF
THEM ACTUALLY SURVIVE. AND SO MANY TIMES THEY'RE JUST CHOPPED UP FOR
107
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
BAIT. AND IT -- WHILE WE FOCUS ON A THREATENED SPECIES LIKE THE RED
KNOT, THE REALITY IS THAT THERE ARE OTHER FORAGING FISH THAT LIKEWISE
DEPEND ON HORSESHOE CRAB EGGS. AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A VIBRANT
RECREATIONAL FISHERY AS WELL, AND THOSE OTHER FISH ARE IMPORTANT AS WELL,
FOR TOURISM AND OTHER ACTIVITIES.
MR. JENSEN: AND -- AND I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND WE
-- WE WANT TO PROTECT THE HORSESHOE CRABS AND THEIR PLACE IN THE
ECOSYSTEM'S FOOD CHAIN. AND I THINK THAT'S WHY IT'S IMPORTANT AND WHY
I'M FOCUSING ON THE USE OF THEIR BLOOD. AND IT IS BETWEEN AN 80 AND 90
PERCENT SURVIVAL RATE AFTER THE BLOOD LETTING.
MS. GLICK: WELL, I -- I BEG TO DIFFER.
MR. JENSEN: WHAT WAS THAT?
MS. GLICK: THAT IS WHAT IS PRESENTED BY THE
PHARMACEUTICAL --
MR. JENSEN: CORRECT.
MS. GLICK: -- INDUSTRY. THAT IS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED
BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. AGREE TO DISAGREE ON THAT ONE.
WE AGREE THAT THEY'RE MAGNIFICENT, BUT WE'LL AGREE TO DISAGREE ON THAT
FACT.
SO WITH THAT -- THAT POINT UP FOR DEBATE, ONE OF THE
THING -- AND THAT'S WHY I FOCUSED ON THE USE OF THEIR BLOOD RATHER THAN
THE TAKING OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB FOR THEIR OTHER PURPOSES THAT CAN BE
USED IN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL OR PHARMACEUTICAL USES, WHICH WOULD BE THEIR
SHELL, WHICH DOES HAVE PROPERTIES THAT SPEED CLOTTING AS WELL AS MAKING
108
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AMAZING SUTURES, WHICH I DIDN'T KNOW UNTIL THIS YEAR, WHICH FUN --
ANOTHER FUN FACT. BUT THAT'S WHY I SAY I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE A
SPECIFIC CARVE-OUT IN THE EVENTUALITY OF NOT JUST SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH
NEEDS, BUT ALSO FOR HEALTHCARE NEEDS. SO THAT'S -- THAT'S WHY I THINK THAT
IT WOULD BE A LOGICAL AMENDMENT TO MAKE ON THIS BILL. YOU MAY, I'M
ASSUREDLY GOING TO DISAGREE WITH ME ON THAT RESPECT. AND THERE'S NO
ACTIVE PERMITS FOR THE TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS THAT DEC HAS ISSUED
AS OF TODAY, CORRECT?
MS. GLICK: THE -- FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE?
MR. JENSEN: FOR -- WELL, YES.
MS. GLICK: THEY HAVE NOT HAD, FOR A NUMBER OF
YEARS, PERMITS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL TAKING. THAT HAS BEEN THE CASE FOR
SOME YEARS. NEITHER LAST YEAR OR THE YEARS BEFORE.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. I -- I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE
ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS. I APPRECIATE IT, CHAIR GLICK.
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. JENSEN: I JUST WANT TO REITERATE FOR THE 12TH
TIME THAT HORSESHOE CRABS ARE MAGNIFICENT. THEY'VE SURVIVED FIVE
EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENTS. HOWEVER, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEIR USE FOR
BIOMEDICAL PURPOSES CONSTITUTES A SIXTH-LEVEL EXTINCTION EVENT. THEY
ARE A CRITICAL ASPECT AND SAFEGUARD IN THE ABILITY TO HAVE HUMAN-SAFE
MEDICATIONS. AND WHILE WE HAVE SYNTHETICS ON THE MARKET CURRENTLY, I
DON'T BELIEVE IT'S WISE TO DENY THE FUTURE WHERE THE SYNTHETICS MAY NOT
BE APPLICABLE AND HORSESHOE CRAB BLOOD WOULD BE THE BEST TESTING
109
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AGENT. THE REASON WHY WE USE HORSESHOE BLOOD NOW IS BECAUSE WE
USED TO TEST MEDICATION ON RABBITS, WHICH I THINK EVERYBODY IN THIS
CHAMBER WOULD AGREE THAT SHOULDN'T BE DONE AND WE MADE THAT
EVOLUTION.
SO WHILE I'M SURE SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE
VERY LARGE COMMERCIAL FISHING OPERATIONS IN THEIR DISTRICT AND WHO
UTILIZE THE HORSESHOE CRABS FOR BAITING PURPOSES MAY HAVE OTHER
THOUGHTS OR CONCERNS ON THIS LEGISLATION, I DO THANK THE CHAIR FOR HER
ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS. I UNDERSTAND THE NEED TO PROTECT OUR
HORSESHOE CRAB POPULATIONS IN THE WATERS OF NEW YORK, BUT WOULD LOVE
TO SEE SOME SORT OF CARVE-OUT FOR THE BIOMEDICAL PURPOSES OF THESE
MAGNIFICENT CREATURES.
THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR [SIC].
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: A PARTY VOTE HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. FOR ALL
OF THE EXCELLENT REASONS LAID OUT BY MY COLLEAGUE, THE MINORITY
CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION DESPITE
THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB. AND -- BUT IF ANYBODY WOULD
WISH TO VOTE YES, THEY MAY CERTAINLY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
110
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. FOR
THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE NO, THEY CAN DO SO AT THEIR DESKS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
PAGE 14, RULES REPORT NO. 324, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: SENATE NO. S02182-A, RULES REPORT
NO. 324, SENATOR HINCHEY (A05969-A, JACOBSON, EACHUS,
SANTABARBARA, SHIMSKY, SHRESTHA, KAY). AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC
SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO PERMITTING THE RENDERING OF AN ESTIMATED
BILL FROM A UTILITY CORPORATION OR MUNICIPALITY UNDER CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MR. JACOBSON.
MR. JACOBSON: THANK YOU.
THIS BILL -- CAN WE HAVE A LITTLE QUIET? THANK YOU.
THIS BILL WILL MAKE CHANGES TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE
LAW AS TO WHEN ESTIMATED BILLING IS PERMITTED. IT WILL -- IT WILL
PROHIBIT CONSECUTIVE ESTIMATED BILLING EXCEPT UNDER SPECIFIC
111
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
CIRCUMSTANCES. THE BILL WILL ALLOW SMART METERS TO BE USED AND
CONSIDERED AS ACTUAL READINGS. UTILITIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO REPORT WHAT
THEY HAVE DONE TO COMPLY WITH THIS LAW SO THAT THE PSC CAN COME UP
WITH A BEST PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGY STANDARD.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. PALMESANO.
MR. PALMESANO: YES, THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER. WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MR. JACOBSON: YES, I WILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. PALMESANO: THANK YOU, MR. JACOBSON.
I KNOW WE WENT THROUGH THIS LAST YEAR, AND I THINK
MAYBE A COUPLE OF OTHER YEARS, BUT DEFINITELY LAST YEAR. SO THE
GOVERNOR VETOED THIS BILL LAST YEAR. DID YOU MAKE ANY CHANGES TO
ADDRESS THE CONCERNS IN HER VETO AND WHAT WERE THEY?
MR. JACOBSON: ONE CHANGE WE MADE IS THAT WE --
WE MADE IT MORE CLEAR, THE BILL, AND WHAT -- SPECIFICALLY WHEN IT'S
ALLOWED. AND SO THAT THE -- WE WANTED TO ADDRESS THAT. AND SO WHEN
ESTIMATED BILLINGS ARE MADE, THEY MUST -- THEY CAN'T BE CONSECUTIVE.
THEY HAVE TO -- THE UTILITIES HAVE TO TAKE ACTIONS TO FIGURE OUT WHY THE
PROBLEM IS THERE. ALSO, WE ALLOWED THE SMART METER READINGS BECAUSE
A LOT OF UTILITIES, JUST LIKE WE HAVE FOR WATER AND SEWER READINGS, USE
THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY AND THE PSC HAD NOT ALLOWED IT BEFORE. AND SO
THIS WILL BE AVAILABLE AND WILL MAKE ESTIMATED BILLINGS MORE READ --
112
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
EASIER TO COME BY.
MR. PALMESANO: SURE.
MR. JACOBSON: ACTUAL READINGS TO BE -- NOT
ESTIMATED READINGS, BUT ACTUAL READINGS TO BE EASIER TO COME BY.
MR. PALMESANO: I UNDERSTAND.
DID YOU ADDRESS THE PART OF HER VETO WHERE SHE SAID,
AND I QUOTE, "I BELIEVE CUSTOMERS SHOULD PAY FOR THE SERVICES THEY
RECEIVED"?
(CONFERENCING)
MR. JACOBSON: HOLD ON. I GOT TO GET THE RIGHT
SECTION FOR YOU.
MR. PALMESANO: I ASKED THAT QUESTION BECAUSE
YOUR BILL WOULD BASICALLY SAY THAT UTILITIES CAN'T BILL FOR THE SERVICES IF
IT'S BEYOND TWO CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF ESTIMATED BILLING.
MR. JACOBSON: THEY CAN'T BILL WHEN THEY'RE DOING
THE ESTIMATED BILLING MORE THAN ONE MONTH IN A ROW. IN OTHER WORDS,
WE DON'T WANT TO -- WE DON'T WANT TO REWARD THEM FOR NOT DOING ACTUAL
BILLING. AND IT'S SIMILAR TO THE BILL THAT I PASSED THAT'S NOW LAW THAT
THEY HAVE TO GET BILLS OUT THE DOOR WITHIN THREE MONTHS.
MR. PALMESANO: RIGHT.
MR. JACOBSON: AND SO NOW THEY FOUND A WAY
THAT THEY'RE BILLING MORE TIMELY.
MR. PALMESANO: SURE.
MR. JACOBSON: THIS IS ANOTHER WAY TO -- TO ATTACK
THE PROBLEM OF ESTIMATED BILLING.
113
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. PALMESANO: SURE. I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT.
AND OBVIOUSLY, WHEN WE TALKED, I MEAN, YOUR -- YOUR
-- YOUR GOAL IS REALLY TO HAVE -- ENCOURAGE ACTUAL MEETING -- METER
READINGS INSTEAD OF ESTIMATED READINGS. BUT -- AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.
BUT YOU DO -- YOU DO RECOGNIZE AND UNDERSTAND THE VALUE AND
IMPORTANCE OF -- OF THE NEED FOR UTILIZING ESTIMATED BILLING AT TIMES,
CORRECT?
MR. JACOBSON: SAY THAT AGAIN?
MR. PALMESANO: YEAH, I SAID -- I SAID -- AS I SAID
BEFORE, I SAID I UNDERSTAND YOU WANT TO HAVE ACTUAL METER READINGS
INSTEAD OF ESTIMATED BILLING. BUT YOU DO -- YOU DO UNDERSTAND AND
RECOGNIZE THE VALUE AND IMPORTANCE OF ALLOWING FOR ESTIMATED BILLING
AT TIMES, TOO, CORRECT?
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, THERE'S A VALUE IN CIRCUM --
CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES. BUT EVEN AS THE LAW SAYS NOW, WHICH HAS NOT
BEEN CHANGED, IS THAT FIRST THE UTILITY HAS TO MAKE A REASONABLE EFFORT TO
GET A READING AND IS UNABLE TO DO SO, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE BEYOND
THEIR CONTROL. AND WHAT THIS BILL DOES, IT SAYS THAT THE ONLY TWO SPECIFIC
TIMES THAT WE ADDED HERE WAS THAT THE UTILITY -- I WILL READ EXACTLY IF I
GET A SECOND HERE. THAT THE UTILITY IS UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN ACTUAL
READING BECAUSE THE CUSTOMER FAILED TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCESS, OR A
STATE OF EMERGENCY RENDERED THE ABILITY -- PREVENTS THE ABILITY OF THE
UTILITY TO GET THAT READING.
MR. PALMESANO: SURE.
DOES THIS AFFECT ALL CUSTOMERS, RESIDENTIAL AND
114
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
COMMERCIAL? AND HOW MANY -- DO WE KNOW HOW MANY CUSTOMERS THIS
WOULD AFFECT STATEWIDE?
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, IT VARIES GIVEN EVERY MONTH
WHETHER THERE'S GONNA BE ESTIMATED READINGS. YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT
HOW MANY CUSTOMERS STATEWIDE, PERIOD?
MR. PALMESANO: SO, LIKE, RIGHT, STATEWIDE THERE'S
ABOUT -- I GUESS BY MY ESTIMATES IT'S ABOUT EIGHT-AND-A-HALF MILLION
CUSTOMERS STATEWIDE BETWEEN ALL THE UTILITIES. IS THAT --
MR. JACOBSON: THAT WOULD SOUND RIGHT. WE HAVE
AROUND 20 MILLION AND PEOPLE DO WORK TOGETHER AND (INDISCERNIBLE)
CUSTOMERS.
MR. PALMESANO: SO MY NEXT QUESTION. DOESN'T
THE PSC ALREADY HAVE THE AUTHORITY NOW TO IMPLEMENT OR ADJUST THE
BILLING MECHANISM THROUGH ACTUAL PROCEEDINGS WHERE THEY WORK --
THEY HAVE THIS PROCEEDING WHERE THEY WORK WITH THE UTILITY TO -- AND
THEY NEGOTIATE AND THEN TRY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES? DON'T THEY
HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THAT RIGHT NOW IF THEY SO CHOOSE, IF THEY THOUGHT
THERE NEEDED TO BE CHANGES TO THIS? THEY COULD DO THIS RIGHT NOW?
AND ISN'T IT -- HAVING THAT PROCESS THE BEST PRACTICE TO MOVE FORWARD
WITH THIS RATHER THAN JUST AN ARBITRARY MANDATE LIKE THIS?
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, WHAT THEY HAVE THEY HAVEN'T
FOLLOWED THROUGH WITH, AND THAT'S WHY WE NEED THE BILL. WE NEED THIS
BILL SO THAT CUSTOMERS WILL HAVE ACCURATE READINGS SO THAT THEY KNOW IF
THEY WANT TO CONTEST THE READING, THEY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE CONTESTING.
AND SO THE PROBLEM IS NOW IS IF YOU HAVE ESTIMATED READINGS TWO,
115
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THREE, FOUR, FIVE MONTHS IN A ROW AND THEN YOU GET AN ACTUAL READING,
YOU DON'T KNOW WHY IS THAT READING THAT WAY. AND HOW DO YOU
COMPARE IT WITH PREVIOUS BILLS? SO IT'S JUST -- IT'S A WAY SO CUSTOMERS
CAN HAVE MORE TRANSPARENCY AND SO CUSTOMERS CAN MAKE SURE THEY
KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.
MR. PALMESANO: SO CURRENTLY, UTILITIES RIGHT NOW
CAN ONLY ESTIMATE BILLS BASED ON METHODOLOGIES THAT ARE REVIEWED AND
APPROVED BY THE PSC. THERE ARE REGULATIONS THAT PROVIDE UTILITIES WITH
STRONGER DISINCENTIVES NOT TO PROLONG PERIODS OF ESTIMATED BILLING.
THERE ARE LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH UTILITIES MAY ISSUE ESTIMATED
BILLINGS. THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS THAT UTILITIES TAKE AFFIRMATIVE STEPS TO
OBTAIN ACTUAL MEETING [SIC] READINGS. YOU -- YOUR -- YOU KNOW, THOSE
ARE GUIDELINES THAT THE PSC HAS IN PLACE. YOU DON'T THINK THAT'S STRONG
ENOUGH TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED? THAT'S OBVIOUSLY YOUR --
YOUR PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT SITUATION?
MR. JACOBSON: IT HASN'T BEEN WORKING. IT HASN'T
BEEN WORKING. IF WAS WORK -- LOOK, IF IT'S -- IF IT'S BEEN WORKING AND
THE UTILITY DOESN'T DO THE ESTIMATED BILLING, THERE'S -- I MEAN, THEN
THERE'S NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT.
MR. PALMESANO: AND WHEN THEY DO THE
ESTIMATED BILLING, ISN'T IT TRADITIONALLY HISTORICALLY BASED ON THE
COMPARATIVE USE TO THE SAME TIME PERIOD FROM THAT PERIOD OF TIME
MAYBE THE YEAR BEFORE AND THEN THEY ADJUST IT BECAUSE OF THE PRICE OF
ENERGY MIGHT BE UP OR DOWN? SO THAT'S HOW THEY -- THEY ESTIMATE IT,
CORRECT?
116
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. JACOBSON: YEAH, IN THAT WAY. BUT USUALLY
IT'S A LITTLE HIGHER.
MR. PALMESANO: SO ULTIMATELY, THOUGH, WHEN
THEY -- WHEN THEY DO THE ESTIMATE, ULTIMATELY WHEN THEY COME TO GET A
READ THEY'LL -- THEY'LL ADJUST IT BECAUSE IT MIGHT BE HIGHER, IT MIGHT BE
LOWER. I MEAN, I KNOW (INDISCERNIBLE). SO ULTIMATELY, THOUGH, WHEN
THEY DO THE READ, EVEN THOUGH IF THERE MIGHT BE TWO MONTHS OR THREE
MONTHS OF ESTIMATED FOR WHATEVER REASON, ULTIMATELY THE CUSTOMER IS
ONLY GONNA PAY FOR THE ENERGY THEY USED, CORRECT? THEY'RE NOT GONNA
BE PAYING ANY MORE THAN THE ENERGY THEY USED, RIGHT?
MR. JACOBSON: HOPEFULLY NOT. BUT THE PROBLEM
IS THAT YOU -- IF YOU GET A BILL AND ALL OF A SUDDEN SAY IT'S MUCH HIGHER
BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T ESTIMATE CORRECTLY, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT PERIOD IT'S
REALLY FOR, WHICH MONTH IT'S FOR. THE WHOLE REASON IS THAT YOU WANT TO
HAVE YOUR RECORDS FOR THAT MONTH SO YOU CAN COMPARE IT TO PREVIOUS
USAGE, WHICH WAS IN THE OTHER BILL (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK) --
MR. PALMESANO: ON THAT QUESTION, YOU SAY THEY
DON'T HAVE A RECORD, ON MOST (INDISCERNIBLE) LIKE THE NYSEG, RG&E
BILL, THE NYSEG BILL I GET, IT SHOWS WHAT MY USAGE IS FOR THAT MONTH
AND THEN THEY HAVE A CHART IN THERE SHOWING WHAT MY USAGE WAS OVER
THE PAST YEAR, AND I COULD COMPARE TO LOOK AT THE USAGE OF JUNE OF THIS
YEAR COMPARED TO JUNE OF LAST YEAR. SO THERE IS A COMPARISON THAT'S
AVAILABLE TO -- EVEN IF IT'S AN ESTIMATED BILL. BECAUSE YOU CAN SAY,
OKAY, LAST YEAR I USED THIS MUCH. THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE BASING MY
ESTIMATE OFF THAT. SO IT'S GONNA BE KIND OF (INDISCERNIBLE).
117
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. JACOBSON: EXCEPT THE FACT THAT IF YOU GET
MULTIPLE MONTHS AS AN ESTIMATED BILL, IT MAKES IT THAT MUCH HARDER TO
FIGURE OUT IF EACH MONTH WAS CORRECT.
MR. PALMESANO: SURE. SO REALLY, WHAT'S THE
GENESIS OF THIS BILL? I THINK I REMEMBER THERE WAS SOME PROBLEMS WITH
CENTRAL HUDSON WHERE THEY HAD SOME BILLING PROBLEMS. WAS THAT
REALLY KIND OF THE GENESIS OF THAT -- OF THIS BILL? IS THAT -- IS THAT WHERE
THIS CAME FROM?
MR. JACOBSON: YES. AND -- AND ALL THE
CUSTOMERS OF CENTRAL HUDSON THAT ARE -- HAVE BEEN CALLING MY OFFICE.
MR. PALMESANO: YES. AND I -- AND I -- AND THE
PSC ULTIMATELY GOT INVOLVED, CORRECT --
MR. JACOBSON: YES.
MR. PALMESANO: -- AND THEY -- THEY ADDRESSED
THAT SITUATION?
MR. JACOBSON: THEY -- THEY --
MR. PALMESANO: ARE WE STILL HAVING -- ARE YOU
STILL SEEING OUTSTANDING ISSUES WITH ESTIMATED BILLING SINCE THE PSC
CAME IN AND ADDRESSED THAT ISSUE LIKE THEY'RE TASKED WITH, LIKE THEY'RE
EMPOWERED TO DO?
MR. JACOBSON: THE PSC DIDN'T GET INVOLVED WITH
ESTIMATED BILLING, THEY GOT INVOLVED WITH LATE BILLING. SO BETWEEN THE
AGREEMENT THAT CENTRAL HUDSON HAD AND -- AND OUR NEW -- NEW LAW ON
THAT, THOSE PROBLEMS HAVE GENERALLY GONE WAY.
MR. PALMESANO: RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO I KNOW
118
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
YOU'RE SAYING THIS IS ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLING. SO ARE YOU STILL HEARING
ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLING PROBLEMS IN THE CENTRAL HUDSON? IS IT -- IS IT
KIND OF PROLIFIC?
MR. JACOBSON: WE HAVE SOME. AND -- AND I
THINK THE THING IS, WE WANT TO MAKE IT -- I THINK A CUSTOMER DESERVES TO
HAVE --
MR. PALMESANO: I UNDERSTAND.
MR. JACOBSON: -- ACCURATE READINGS.
MR. PALMESANO: AND I -- MR. JACOBSON, I TOTALLY
UNDERSTAND YOUR INTENT BEHIND THE BILL. I JUST HAVE SOME PROBLEMS OF
THE MECHANISM TO MAKE IT WORK. YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I -- I -- I'LL BE
HONEST, I DON'T -- MY OFFICE ISN'T HEARING FROM OUR RATEPAYERS ABOUT
ESTIMATED BILLS. WHAT THEY ARE HEARING IS THEIR BILLS ARE TOO HIGH.
WOULDN'T YOU ARGUE -- I MEAN, WHAT I'VE ARGUED ON THIS FLOOR IS
BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE GREEN MANDATES THAT HAVE BEEN ADVANCED BY
THIS FLOOR AND THE GOVERNOR, ISN'T THAT ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'RE
SEEING THIS INCREASE IN UTILITY BILLS WHERE THE UTILITIES ARE GOING AND
ASKING FOR THESE BIG INCREASES, CORRECT?
MR. JACOBSON: NO, I DON'T THINK SO. I THINK IT'S
THE PROBLEM, THE FACT THAT THEY'RE GETTING AN EXTRA RATE OF RETURN ON
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, WHICH IS WHY WE JUST PASSED MY OTHER BILL TO
HAVE MORE DISCLOSURE. BECAUSE THEY GET A -- THEY GET A BETTER RATE OF
RETURN, THEY GET 8, 9, 9.5, 10 PERCENT ON CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, WHERE
WHEN IT'S MAINTENANCE IT'S DOLLAR-FOR-DOLLAR WHEN -- WHEN FIGURING OUT
THE RATE. SO I THINK THAT'S -- THAT'S A MAJOR PROBLEM.
119
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. PALMESANO: SO YOU DON'T THINK ANY OF THE
GREEN MANDATES THAT WE'RE PASSING IN THIS HOUSE IS CAUSING RATES TO
INCREASE? AND YOU -- AND ON THAT NOTE, YOU ARE AWARE -- AND I SAID IT
ON THE FLOOR NUMEROUS TIMES AND I'LL PROBABLY SAY IT AGAIN LATER -- THE
PSC IN JULY OF '23 PASSED $43 BILLION -- APPROVED $43 BILLION IN FUTURE
RATEPAYER INCREASES SPECIFICALLY TO PAY FOR THESE GREEN ENERGY
MANDATES. ARE YOU AWARE OF THAT JULY 23RD ARTICLE THAT WAS IN
POLITICO?
MR. JACOBSON: I WASN'T -- I WASN'T AWARE OF THAT,
BUT THIS BILL DOESN'T ADDRESS THAT.
MR. PALMESANO: OH, I KNOW THAT. BUT IF WE'RE
TALKING ABOUT UTILITIES --
MR. JACOBSON: I KNOW.
MR. PALMESANO: -- AND UTILITY COSTS, SO...
(INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK)
I KNOW YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE COST OF --
MR. JACOBSON: WE'RE JUST A COUPLE GUYS TALKING
(INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK). I UNDERSTAND.
MR. PALMESANO: SURE. NOW IN YOUR SPONSOR
MEMO IT SAYS WIDESPREAD REPORTS THAT UTILITY COMPANIES ARE RELYING
HEAVILY ON ESTIMATED BILLING. THAT'S IN YOUR SPONSOR'S MEMO.
MR. JACOBSON: YES.
MR. PALMESANO: DO YOU KNOW WHAT PERCENTAGE
OF ESTIMATED BILLS THE UTILITIES ARE USING? LET'S TAKE CENTRAL HUDSON FOR
-- FOR PERSPECTIVE. DO YOU KNOW WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THEIR BILLS ARE
120
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ESTIMATED?
MR. JACOBSON: NO, I DON'T. BUT I CAN -- I'M --
WELL, I THINK WE CAN REST ASSURED THAT WHEN YOU GET ONE COMPLAINT
THERE'S FIVE TO TEN OTHERS THAT PEOPLE DIDN'T CALL IN ON.
MR. PALMESANO: WELL, JUST -- JUST FOR THE RECORD,
IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL HUDSON HAS ESTIMATED BILLINGS OF .07
PERCENT. SO WE'RE DOING THIS BILL FOR .07 PERCENT? I UNDERSTAND WHAT
THE GOAL IS, SO THAT'S --
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, IF THAT'S THE CASE AND WE CAN
MAKE IT EVEN BETTER AND IF THEY COMPLY WITH IT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO
WORRY ABOUT ANYTHING.
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY. SO ON THAT NOTE, WHAT IS
THE RATIONALE TO PROVIDE NO CHARGE TO CUSTOMERS FOR -- FOR UTILITY
SERVICES THEY RECEIVED IF THEY RECEIVE A SECOND CONSECUTIVE BILL? SO
THEY'RE -- THEY'RE GETTING A SERVICE. THEY'RE GETTING THE ELECTRIC, THE GAS
SERVICE, BUT NOW THEY AREN'T GONNA HAVE TO PAY FOR IT BECAUSE THEY GET A
SECOND CONSECUTIVE BILL. HOW CAN -- HOW CAN THAT BE JUSTIFIED?
MR. JACOBSON: BECAUSE THIS IS -- IT'S AN INCENTIVE
FOR THE UTILITIES TO DO ACTUAL READINGS. A PROHIBITION WITHOUT A
DETERRENT -- EXCUSE ME, A PROHIBITION WITHOUT A PENALTY IS NOT A
DETERRENT. SO IF THEY DON'T HAVE A PENALTY --
MR. PALMESANO: SO --
MR. JACOBSON: -- THEY'RE JUST GONNA IGNORE THIS.
MR. PALMESANO: SO ULTIMATELY, THAT SERVICE THAT
THEY WERE PROVIDED, ULTIMATELY THAT CUSTOMER DOES NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR
121
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THAT. THAT JUST GOES AWAY, RIGHT?
MR. JACOBSON: THAT'S TRUE. JUST LIKE THE OTHER BILL
WHERE IF THEY DIDN'T BILL WITHIN THREE MONTHS.
MR. PALMESANO: AND I UNDERSTAND THAT. BUT SO
THAT -- THAT COST IS STILL THERE. ULTIMATELY -- WON'T THAT COST AFTER THE
SECOND BILLING OR THE THIRD BILLING, WON'T THAT COST ULTIMATELY BE PASSED
ALONG TO OTHER RATEPAYERS --
MR. JACOBSON: NO.
MR. PALMESANO: -- BECAUSE THEY'RE GONNA --
MR. JACOBSON: IT WON'T BE --
MR. PALMESANO: YOU DON'T THINK SO?
MR. JACOBSON: NO. THEY -- THEY HAVE -- THEY
HAVE TO EAT THAT.
MR. PALMESANO: ALL RIGHT.
MR. JACOBSON: MAYBE THEY'LL REDUCE THEIR
DIVIDENDS SLIGHTLY.
MR. PALMESANO: ALL RIGHT.
WELL, I'VE GOT A QUESTION FOR YOU, A HYPOTHETICAL
QUESTION. WHAT IF A CUSTOMER INTENTIONALLY BREAKS A METER AND
RECEIVES A SECOND ESTIMATED BILL? NOW THAT CUSTOMER WOULD BE ABLE TO
AVOID A PAYMENT ON THAT SECOND ESTIMATED BILL, CORRECT, IF THERE'S A
PROBLEM WITH THAT? IF THEY DID THAT?
MR. JACOBSON: IF IT'S CONSECUTIVE.
MR. PALMESANO: YUP. AND BUT IF -- IF THE -- IF
THE CUSTOMER BROKE THE METER, THAT --
122
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. JACOBSON: NO. IF THE CUSTOMER BROKE THE
METER, THAT MEANS THAT THEY PREVENTED THE UTILITY FROM GETTING THE
ACTUAL READING AND THAT SPECIFICALLY IS AN EXCEPTION TO THIS RULE.
MR. PALMESANO: SURE. DO -- DO YOU THINK THAT
THE -- IS IT YOUR OPINION, DO YOU THINK THIS BILL ENCOURAGES CUSTOMERS TO
AVOID METER READINGS ON A -- SO THEY GET A SECOND ESTIMATED BILL AND
THEN THEY DON'T HAVE TO MAKE THE PAYMENT? YOU DON'T THINK THAT THIS
WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE NOT READING THEIR METERS OR ALLOWING ACCESS?
MR. JACOBSON: NO.
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY.
MR. JACOBSON: BECAUSE IF THEY DO INTERFERE WITH
THE UTILITY, THEN THEY'RE ALLOWED TO MAKE THE ESTIMATED BILLING.
MR. PALMESANO: I KNOW YOU TALKED ABOUT SMART
METERS. IS YOUR BELIEF THAT THIS -- SMART METERS WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM
OF THESE ESTIMATED BILLS, CORRECT?
MR. JACOBSON: I THINK IT'LL GO A LONG WAYS.
MR. PALMESANO: DO WE KNOW WHAT THE, JUST OUT
OF CURIOSITY, WHAT THE COST OF THESE SMART METERS ARE? I THINK IN THE
DEBATE I REMEMBER LAST YEAR WITH MR. GOODELL WHERE WE TALKED ABOUT I
THINK $30 PER YEAR PER CUSTOMER?
MR. JACOBSON: YEAH. VERY LITTLE.
MR. PALMESANO: SO -- SO 30 -- 30 -- $30 A YEAR
TIMES 8.5 MILLION CUSTOMERS IS ABOUT $250 MILLION, RIGHT? PAID BY THE
RATEPAYERS.
MR. JACOBSON: I THINK $2.50 IS NOT A LOT OF MONEY
123
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
PER MONTH.
MR. PALMESANO: BUT IN TOTAL THAT WOULD BE ABOUT
$250 MILLION --
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, THE -- THE UTILITIES ARE GOING
TO HAVE TO SPEND MONEY SOME WAY TO GET THE READING. WHETHER THEY
SEND SOMEONE TO THE DOOR -- OR TO THE METER, I SHOULD SAY, OR THEY HAVE
A REMOTE SMART METER.
MR. PALMESANO: AND I UNDERSTAND THAT, TOO.
SO ON THE SMART METERS, I -- YOU KNOW -- AND I KNOW
YOU PUT THE LANGUAGE IN THERE FOR THE SMART METERS IN THERE FOR PEOPLE
TO READ. SO WOULD THIS BILL APPLY TO CUSTOMERS -- BECAUSE WE KNOW
SOME PEOPLE DON'T LIKE SMART METERS. FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY
CHOOSE NOT TO GET THEM. SO WOULD THIS BILL APPLY TO CUSTOMERS WHO
ACTUALLY OUT -- OPT OUT OF THE SMART METER? SO THEY REFUSE THE SMART
METER, WHICH WOULD DO AN ACTUAL READING, NOW THEY DON'T HAVE A SMART
METER. WOULD THIS APPLY TO THEM? WOULD THIS LANGUAGE APPLY TO
THEM? SO THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO GET THE -- NOT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE AN
ESTIMATED BILLING EVEN THOUGH THEY DECLINED THE SMART METER?
(CONFERENCING)
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, THE UTILITY CAN STILL READ IT
ANOTHER WAY. AND IF THEY'RE HAVING PROBLEMS, THEY -- THEY CAN -- THEY
CAN DO SOMETHING NOVEL AND TALK TO THE CUSTOMER AND SAY, TAKE A
PHOTO OF YOUR METER. SEND IT TO US.
MR. PALMESANO: SO THIS BILL -- I MEAN, I KNOW
YOU'RE GONNA REFER TO THE -- THE GENERAL LANGUAGE IF -- IT DOESN'T ALLOW
124
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
FOR AN EXEMPTION IF A METER READER SHOWS UP AT THE PLACE -- AND WE'RE
TALKING ABOUT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE METER READER -- SAY, FOR
EXAMPLE, THERE'S A FLOODED BASEMENT. SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'S AN
UNREACHABLE METER. ANIMALS ON THE PRESS -- PREMISES OR BROKEN
EQUIPMENT. DOES THAT -- WOULD THAT -- IS THAT SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE
DOCUMENTED? I MEAN, BUT THIS LEGISLATION DOESN'T REALLY SPECIFICALLY
EXEMPT THAT, DOES IT?
MR. JACOBSON: THAT'S IN THE EXISTING LAW.
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
AND WHAT ABOUT CUSTOMERS WHO ARE BILLED ON A
SEASONAL BASIS? HOW DOES THIS BILL --
MR. JACOBSON: THAT DOESN'T APPLY.
MR. PALMESANO: SO THEY WOULD -- THEY WOULD
NOT HAVE TO DO THE --
MR. JACOBSON: THEY STILL -- IF THEY HAVE A
SUMMER RENTAL AND IT'S -- AND THEY NORMALLY GET A BILL AT THE END OF THE
SEASON, THAT WILL CONTINUE.
MR. PALMESANO: WHAT IF THERE IS A SEVERE
WEATHER EVENT BUT IT'S NOT SPECIFICALLY A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY
LIKE YOUR -- YOUR BILL TEXT SAYS? WOULD THAT BE A REASON FOR NOT...
(CONFERENCING)
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, IF -- IF IT'S SUCH A SEVERE
WEATHER EVENT THAT IT -- A DECLARATION IS DECLARED --
MR. PALMESANO: BUT I UNDERSTAND -- THAT'S MY
POINT. THE LANGUAGE SAYS YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DECLARATION OF A STATE OF
125
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
EMERGENCY. BUT WE CAN ALL AGREE THERE ARE -- THERE ARE -- THERE ARE
WEATHER -- WEATHER EVENTS THAT A STATE OF EMERGENCY HAS BEEN DECLARED.
IT COULD BE A -- A RAINSTORM. IT COULD BE A WINDSTORM. IT COULD BE A
SNOWSTORM. IT COULD BE FLOODING THAT AN EMER -- UNDER THOSE
CIRCUMSTANCES, HOW WOULD THAT IMPACT BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT EXEMPT
FROM THIS? SHOULDN'T WE HAVE MORE CLARIFYING LANGUAGE IN THE BILL TO
ADDRESS THAT?
MR. JACOBSON: I THINK THAT'S ALREADY COVERED IN
THE EXISTING LAW THAT THIS BILL DOESN'T CHANGE --
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY.
MR. JACOBSON: -- WHERE IT SAYS CIRCUMSTANCES
BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE UTILITY MADE AN -- A READING OF THE METER
EXTREMELY DIFFICULT. SO I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE REASON.
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY.
YOUR SPONSOR'S MEMO ALSO MENTIONS EXCESSIVE
FLUCTUATIONS IN UTILITY BILLS. WOULDN'T IT TECHNICALLY BE BETTER TO -- IF
YOU -- IF YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THAT? BECAUSE, I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY THAT
CAN -- THAT COULD DEPEND ON A LOT OF THINGS; THE -- THE COST OF THE -- THE
-- THE SERVICE OR THE SUPPLY. BUT WOULDN'T IT BE BETTER TO JUST MANDATE
THAT CUSTOMERS GO ON A BUDGET PLAN? BECAUSE THEN IT'S SPREAD OUT OVER
THE COURSE OF THE YEAR, THEY KNOW WHAT IT'S GONNA BE. BUT IT ULTIMATELY
-- DON'T -- ULTIMATELY, AT THE END OF THE YEAR IT -- IT'S BASICALLY ESTIMATED
BILLING THROUGHOUT THAT PERIOD OF TIME, AND AT THE END OF THE YEAR WHEN
THE BUDGET YEAR ENDS YOU GET A RECONCILIATION BILL. SO IT MIGHT BE A
LITTLE HIGHER OR IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE LOWER THAN THAT BUDGET MONTH.
126
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WOULD IT BE A BETTER APPROACH TO SAY LET'S DO A BUDGET? LET'S DO -- LET'S
MAKE YOU DO A BUDGET BILL INSTEAD OF JUST -- OR -- OR A BUDGET PLAN OR
REQUIRING BUDGET PLANS, ESPECIALLY FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO CAN'T AFFORD IT
AND THEY -- THEN THEY DON'T -- DEFINITELY DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE
SPIKES OF THE, YOU KNOW, USING MORE GAS IN THE WINTER AND HAVE A
HIGHER COST. WOULDN'T THAT BE A BETTER APPROACH?
MR. JACOBSON: NO. BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IF
YOU GET A BILL AND YOU WANT TO COMPARE IT TO A PREVIOUS YEAR'S BILL, YOU
CAN DO IT ON A MONTHLY BASIS. IF YOU -- IF YOU GET THIS LUMP SUM AND IT
-- IT'S GONNA BE THAT MUCH MORE DIFFICULT. YOU WANT TO -- I MEAN,
PEOPLE MIGHT DECIDE THAT THEY WANT TO GO ON A BUDGET PLAN, BUT THAT
DOESN'T MEAN THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE AN ACCURATE READING, AN ACTUAL
READING EVERY MONTH.
MR. PALMESANO: I UNDERSTAND. OKAY. WELL, I
THINK I'M -- I'M NEAR THE END OF MY QUESTIONS.
I WANTED TO ASK JUST ABOUT FAILED EQUIPMENT. YOU
KNOW, I KIND OF BROUGHT THAT UP. YOU KNOW, I LOOK -- I THINK ONE
UTILITY HAS 15,000 UNITS AND THEY ESTIMATE APPROXIMATELY 4.9 MILLION
WILL FAIL BECAUSE OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS OR BATTERIES, NOT TO MENTION
OTHER ISSUES. WOULD THAT -- AND THEN THEY NEED THE DELAY AND THEY NEED
TO DO ESTIMATED BILLING ON THAT CASE. WOULD THEY STILL IN THAT SITUATION
WHERE THERE'S THOSE PROBLEMS, WOULD THEY NOT BE ABLE TO BILL THE
CUSTOMER FOR THE ESTIMATED BILLING, IN THAT CASE, FOR FAILED EQUIPMENT OR
WOULD THEY?
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, UTILITIES ARE ALWAYS MAKING
127
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
DECISIONS AND PROVISIONS TO GET THE READING. SO THIS IS NO SURPRISE.
AND A LOT OF THEM ARE FINDING WAYS TO DO IT CHEAPER.
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY.
I ACTUALLY HAVE ONE MORE. AT THE VERY END OF YOUR BILL
IT TALKS ABOUT THE -- THE REASONABLE ACTIONS THEY HAVE TO TAKE. MAYBE
MAKING AN APPOINTMENT WITH SOMEONE AFTER HOURS OR OFFERING THEM A
TELEPHONE CALL TO CALL IN THE NUMBERS. BUT ULTIMATELY, YOU'D STILL NEED
THE INDIVIDUAL TO COOPERATE WITH CALLING -- YOU KNOW, CALLING THE PHONE
NUMBER. THEY COULD BE -- IF THEY DON'T -- SHOULDN'T THE ONUS BE ON THE
INDIVIDUAL THAT'S CALLING THE PHONE NUMBER IF THEY -- IF THEY'RE NOT
GONNA BE ABLE TO DO A READING TO CALLING THE PHONE NUMBER?
(CONFERENCING)
MR. JACOBSON: WELL, THIS GIVES -- THIS GIVES THE
UTILITY MORE OPTIONS. AND IT WAS SOMETHING THAT THE GOVERNOR RAISED,
WHY CAN'T THIS BE DONE AND WE AGREED WITH THAT. WE AGREED WITH THAT
LAST YEAR.
MR. PALMESANO: OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU,
MR. JACOBSON. I APPRECIATE YOUR --
MR. JACOBSON: THANK YOU, MR. PALMESANO.
ALWAYS A PLEASURE.
MR. PALMESANO: -- TIME AS ALWAYS.
MR. JACOBSON: I'M SURE WE'LL GET THIS OPPORTUNITY
AGAIN.
MR. PALMESANO: ABSOLUTELY. HOPEFULLY WE'LL DO
IT AND HOPEFULLY THE GOVERNOR WILL VETO IT AGAIN.
128
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. PALMESANO: YES, MADAM SPEAKER AND MY
COLLEAGUES.
THIS IS A PROBLEM THAT HAPPENED, REALLY WITH THE
GENESIS OF IT, WITH CENTRAL HUDSON WHERE THEY HAD SOME PROBLEMS AND
THE PSC CAME IN AND WORKED ON THIS. THE PSC ALREADY -- THE OTHER
THING, THE PSC ALREADY HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS THIS IF IT'S A
PROBLEM THAT'S NEEDED. THEY HAVE REGULATIONS IN PLACE FOR UTILITIES TO
FOLLOW WHEN IT COMES TO ESTIMATED BILLING. THE PSC HAS THE AUTHORITY
TO INVESTIGATE, THE PSC HAS THE AUTHORITY TO FINE AND ISSUE PENALTIES.
AND THIS BILL DOES FAIL TO ADDRESS SOME CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED
ABOUT THE BILL, WHETHER IT'S -- LIKE I -- AND I TRIED TO TALK ABOUT THE, YOU
KNOW, IF YOU HAVE A DISASTER DECLARATION VERSUS OTHER EXTREME WEATHER
CONDITIONS, EMERGENCIES, EQUIPMENT FAILURE, WORK STOPPAGES. ALL
THOSE THINGS SHOULD REALLY BE EXEMPTIONS IN THIS BILL. MAINE HAS THAT IN
THEIR BILL. WE SHOULD HAVE IT IN OUR BILL. YOU GET TO THE POINT WHERE
SOMEONE IS OPTING OUT OF THE -- THE SMART METER, THAT WOULD BE
PROBLEMATIC. SO NOW THEY'RE DECLINING THE SMART METER, WHICH WILL
ACTUALLY BE AN ACTUAL METER READ, AND BY DECLINING IT NOW THEY HAVE TO
DEAL WITH THE ESTIMATED READS OR SOMEONE COMING OUT THERE. WHY --
WHY SHOULDN'T THEY BE EXEMPT BECAUSE THEY -- THEY DECLINED THE
ESTIMATED -- THE METER READ? THE SMART METER.
WE TALKED ABOUT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EMPLOYEES
GOING INTO A SITUATION WHERE YOU HAVE A FLOODED BASEMENT, YOU HAVE
129
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ANIMALS, BROKEN EQUIPMENT. YOU KNOW, UN -- UN -- UNREACHABLE
METERS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE. WE CAN GO ON AND ON ABOUT SOME OF THE
PROBLEMS. I MEAN, SOME OF THESE THINGS SHOULD HAVE LOOKED IT FOR
SOME EXEMPTIONS.
BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, MADAM SPEAKER AND MY
COLLEAGUES, THIS -- THE PROBLEM ISN'T ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLS. THAT'S NOT
WHAT I'M HEARING. I'M SURE THAT'S NOT WHAT MY -- MY COLLEAGUES ARE
HEARING. WHAT THEY'RE HEARING IS THE COST OF THEIR BILLS ARE GOING UP.
SIGNIFICANTLY. UTILITY RATES ARE RISING AND EVERY UTILITY IS ASKING FOR
SIGNIFICANT INCREASES. AND YES, I HEAR MY FRIENDS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF
THE AISLE BLAST THE UTILITY WHEN THAT HAPPENS. AND THE RATES ARE TOO
HIGH. BUT WHAT I HAVEN'T HEARD COME OUT WHEN IT COMES TO UTILITY BILLS,
WHEN THE PSC APPROVED $43 BILLION -- BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE TO
RECOGNIZE WHAT'S DRIVING UP UTILITY BILLS ARE THE GREEN ENERGY MANDATES
THAT THIS HOUSE AND THIS GOVERNOR AND IN THE HOUSE DOWN THE HALL
CONTINUES TO PUT IN PLACE. AND IT STARTED WITH THE CLCPA BACK IN
2019, AND NOW WE'RE SEEING THE SAME THINGS WE TALKED ABOUT THEN;
COSTS AND PROBLEMATICS [SIC] THERE. THESE GREEN ENERGY MANDATES ARE
(INDISCERNIBLE). SO UTILITY BILLS GO UP. IT'S EASY TO SAY IT'S THE UTILITY'S
FAULT, BUT THE REASON THEIR BILLS ARE GOING UP IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO
PAY FOR THESE MANDATES. BUT YET WHEN THE PSC APPROVED $43 BILLION
IN FUTURE RATEPAYER INCREASES TO SPECIFICALLY PAY FOR THE GREEN ENERGY
MANDATES, NO ONE SAID A WORD AND CONTINUES TO BE SILENT. THAT'S WHAT'S
COMING DOWN THE TRACKS AT OUR CONSTITUENTS.
IF WE DO NOT CHANGE THE METHODOLOGY ON HOW
130
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
EMISSIONS ARE MEASURED IN NEW YORK STATE TO MATCH EVERY OTHER STATE
PLUS ONE -- WE USE A 20-YEAR METHODOLOGY VERSUS A 100-YEAR
METHODOLOGY. STATE -- INTERNATIONAL AND THE U.S. USES A 100-YEAR
METHODOLOGY BUT WE USE A 20-YEAR. IF WE DON'T CHANGE THAT, PRICES AT
THE PUMP ARE GONNA INCREASE 63 CENTS A GALLON. NATURAL GAS AND HOME
HEATING COSTS ARE GONNA INCREASE 79 PERCENT. THOSE ARE NOT PHIL
PALMESANO'S NUMBERS, THOSE ARE STATE NUMBERS FROM NYSERDA AND
WHAT CAME OUT BEFORE.
I TALKED ABOUT (INDISCERNIBLE). TO CONVERT YOUR HOME
OVER FROM NATURAL GAS TO FULL ELECTRIC, THREE STUDIES OUT THERE. IT'S
GONNA COST CONSUMERS $35,000 TO DO THE CONVERSION BECAUSE IT'S NOT
JUST DOING THE CONVERSION, THE HEAT PUMP. (INDISCERNIBLE). YOU'RE
DOING THE SHELL OF YOUR PROPERTY. YOU'RE DOING ELECTRIC UPGRADES.
$35,000, $30- TO $50-. THAT'S KIND OF EXCESSIVE.
THEN YOU HAVE THE UNFUND -- THE MOTHER OF ALL
UNFUNDED MANDATES, THE ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUS MANDATE. HOW MUCH THE
DIFFERENCE -- THIS IS GONNA COST ON OUR ELECTRIC BILLS THAT THEY'RE PAYING.
YOU KNOW, $150,000 FOR A -- A NEAR-ZERO-EMISSION DIESEL SCHOOL BUS
VERSUS $400- FOR AN ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUS. AND IN 2019 THE COST FOR
RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY WAS 17 CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR. HERE TODAY IN
2025 IT'S 26 CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR; NEARLY 40 TO 50 PERCENT HIGHER
THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.
UNFORTUNATELY, THE POLICIES THAT CONTINUE TO GET
ADVANCED IN THIS HOUSE -- I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE SPONSOR IS TRYING TO
DO. IT'S NOT ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM THAT OUR CONSTITUENTS ARE FACING.
131
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
AFFORDABILITY, COST, RELIABILITY. AND ON RELIABILITY, PLEASE LOOK AT THE
NYISO POWER TRENDS REPORT TALKING ABOUT THE THINNESS IN THE -- THE
MARGINS OF OUR RELIABILITY FOR ENERGY. YOU KNOW, BUSINESSES CARE
ABOUT TWO THINGS: AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE ENERGY. IF THEY CAN'T GET
AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE ENERGY NOW IN NEW YORK, THEY'RE GONNA GO
ELSEWHERE. THEY WANNA HIT THAT SWITCH AND KNOW THEIR EQUIPMENT'S
GONNA WORK, THE POWER'S GONNA WORK. THOSE RELIABILITY CONCERNS ARE --
ARE CONCERNING, AND THEY SHOULD BE -- CONCERN ALL OF US, LET ALONE THE
COST.
SO COST, AFFORDABILITY, RELIABILITY, FEASIBILITY ARE NOT A
PRIORITY IN THIS HOUSE FOR THE RECKLESS ENERGY CLIMATE AGENDA BEING
ADVANCED IN THIS -- THIS STATE. AND IT'S ALL DESIGNED TO DISMANTLE THE
AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY
SYSTEM, KEEPING IN FACT THAT 60 PERCENT OF NEW YORKERS HEAT THEIR
HOMES WITH NATURAL GAS, 40 PERCENT OF OUR GENERATION COMES FROM
NATURAL GAS. IT'S TOTALLY DESIGNED TO TAKE AWAY CONSUMER CHOICE ON
HOW YOU HEAT YOUR HOME, COOK YOUR FOOD, POWER YOUR BUILDINGS AND
THE VEHICLES YOU DRIVE. AND WE CAN DO ALL THIS IN THE NAME OF GLOBAL
EMISSIONS AND CLIMATE CHANGE; IT'S NOT GONNA MAKE A DIFFERENCE
BECAUSE NEW YORK ONLY CONTRIBUTES .4 -- 0.4 PERCENT OF TOTAL GLOBAL
EMISSIONS. CHINA CONTRIBUTES 30 -- 31 PERCENT, HAS 1,000 COAL PLANTS
AND BUILDING MORE. AND, IN FACT, LAST YEAR THEY EXPANDED THEIR COAL-
GENERATING CAPACITY BY 95 GIGAWATTS. OUR TOTAL GENERATING CAPACITY
HERE IN NEW YORK IS 41 GIGAWATTS WITH ALL OF OUR SOURCES; NATURAL GAS,
NUCLEAR, HYDROGEN -- OR -- OR HYDRO, GREEN. ALL OF THAT. SO WE CAN TRY
132
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
TO, YOU KNOW, PAT OURSELVES ON THE BACK AND TRY TO GET DOWN TO ZERO,
BUT YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN GLOBAL EMISSIONS. NOT WITH
CHINA. AND IF YOU ADD IN RUSSIA, THAT'S 40 PERCENT. 0.4 IS NOT GONNA
CUT IT. BUT WHAT YOU WILL DO IS YOU WILL CONTINUE OUR NATION-LEADING
OUT MIGRATION OF MORE BUSINESSES, FAMILIES, FARMERS AND MANUFACTURERS
LEAVING THIS STATE. THAT'S SOMETHING I DON'T WANT TO SEE. I -- OUR
RESIDENTS DESERVE MORE TRANSPARENCY BETTER AND THEY NEED A MORE
AFFORDABLE ENERGY POLICY BECAUSE THIS ISN'T IT.
SO FOR THESE REASONS AND OTHERS, I WILL BE VOTING NO
AND I URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME. THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. EACHUS.
MR. EACHUS: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MR. EACHUS: AS I LISTENED TO THIS ARGUMENT, I
BELIEVE THAT THIS BILL ONLY HAS TO DO WITH ESTIMATING ELECTRIC COSTS. SO
ALL OTHER ISSUES BROUGHT UP ARE BROUGHT UP SIMPLY TO DEFLECT THIS
PARTICULAR ISSUE OF ESTIMATED BILLS.
IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE PSC HAS RULES AND
REGULATIONS. IF I RECALL CORRECTLY, THOSE RULES AND REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN
IN PLACE FOR DECADES, AND YET AS MENTIONED BY ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES, A
PARTICULAR POWER COMPANY ENDED UP COSTING CUSTOMERS THOUSANDS
UPON THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS BECAUSE THEY ESTIMATED BILLS FOR MONTHS AND
133
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MONTHS AND MONTHS. AND THAT'S THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE. THAT'S
SIMPLY THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE AND WE'RE ADDRESSING HERE.
THE FINAL THING I DO KNOW IS THAT, AGAIN, A SPECIFIC
POWER COMPANY WAS BROUGHT UP, AND THAT POWER COMPANY IS SERVICED
BY PROBABLY AT LEAST SIX OF US ASSEMBLYMEMBERS IN HERE, AND I HAPPEN
TO KNOW THAT THE SPONSOR OF THIS BILL DOESN'T KNOW HOW MANY CALLS I GET
IN MY OFFICE ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH IT. NOBODY
SHOULD. AND WE ARE STILL RECEIVING THOSE. THEY ARE STILL COMING
THROUGH, AND THEY ARE VERY, VERY PROBLEMATIC.
AND I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL. THIS BILL
HAS TO GO THROUGH, IT HAS TO BE ADOPTED, AND IT'S FOR THE GOOD OF ALL OF
OUR CUSTOMERS. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH
DAY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: A PARTY VOTE HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
MINORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF
LEGISLATION. IF ANYONE WISHES TO VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE THEY MAY DO SO
NOW AT THEIR CHAIRS.
THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
134
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. FALL.
MR. FALL: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. THE
MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION. FOR
THAT THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION, THEY COULD DO
SO AT THEIR DESK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
MR. BEEPHAN TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. BEEPHAN: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
I -- I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS THAT WERE ADDRESSED
TODAY. BUT REPRESENTING THE HUDSON VALLEY ALONG WITH MR. JACOBSON,
MR. EACHUS AND MANY OTHERS HERE, I CAN TELL YOU FIRSTHAND THE GRIEF THAT
OUR RESIDENTS WENT THROUGH OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS DEALING WITH BILLING
ISSUES. AND IF THIS, IN ITS ENTIRETY, GOES THROUGH AND -- AND CAN HELP
PREVENT ANY OTHER REGION FROM GOING THROUGH WHAT OUR REGION DID, IT'S
SOMETHING I'M GONNA HAVE TO SUPPORT.
SO ON BEHALF OF MY RESIDENTS I WILL BE VOTING IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. BEEPHAN IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
MR. JACOBSON TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.
MR. JACOBSON: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, TO
EXPLAIN MY VOTE.
THE ONLY THING WORSE -- THE ONLY THING WORSE THAN
135
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
RECEIVING YOUR UTILITY -- YOUR UTILITY BILL IS RECEIVING A BILL THAT'S
EXTREMELY HIGH BECAUSE OF ESTIMATED BILLING.
THE REASON THAT I SUBMITTED THIS BILL AND WE'RE VOTING
ON IT IS TO DEAL WITH A REAL PROBLEM, AND THE FACT THAT THE CURRENT LAWS
AND RULES OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION HAVE NOT FULLY ADDRESSED
THE PROBLEM. WHEN YOU HAVE ESTIMATED BILLING, IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO
COMPARE YOUR USAGE ON A MONTHLY BASIS TO PRIOR MONTHS. PEOPLE WANT
TO KNOW THEY'RE NOT GETTING RIPPED OFF. AND VERY SIMPLY BY HAVING
ACTUAL READINGS, THEY WILL KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY USED FOR THAT MONTH.
AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY, A PROHIBITION WITHOUT A PENALTY
IS NOT A DETERRENT. AS WE PASSED THE OTHER BILL WHICH I HAD SPONSORED
CONCERNING LATE BILLING, THE UTILITIES NOW ARE COMPLYING WITH THAT. AND
SO I BELIEVE THAT ONCE WE PASS THAT, THIS WILL HOPEFULLY WIPE OUT ALL
ESTIMATED BILLING EXCEPT FOR THOSE EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES THAT ARE IN
THE BILL, THAT ARE LISTED, OR WHEN A CUSTOMER INTERFERES WITH THE UTILITY
GETTING A READING.
SO I PROUDLY VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. JACOBSON IN THE
AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: ON OUR DEBATE LIST, WE'RE
GONNA GO TO RULES REPORT NO. 327 BY MS. LUNSFORD, AND THEN RULES
136
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
REPORT NO. 338 BY MR. STIRPE, RULES REPORT NO. 362 BY MR. OTIS, AND
RULES REPORT NO. 383 BY MR. LASHER. IN THAT ORDER, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
PAGE 14, RULES REPORT NO. 327, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A06558-A, RULES
REPORT NO. 327, LUNSFORD, SIMON, MAGNARELLI, STECK, P. CARROLL,
SAYEGH, SLATER, SHIMSKY, ROSENTHAL. AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC
HEALTH LAW AND THE AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS LAW, IN RELATION TO
REQUIRING ALLERGEN LABELING FOR PREPACKAGED FOODS.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MS. LUNSFORD.
MS. LUNSFORD: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM
SPEAKER.
THIS BILL REQUIRES THAT ANY RETAILER THAT PREPACKAGES
FOOD FOR SALE ON SITE -- SO YOUR DELIS, YOUR BAKERIES THAT MIGHT MAKE
SANDWICHES OR COOKIES IN A CLAMSHELL -- THAT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO LABEL
THOSE PACKAGES WITH ANY INGREDIENTS THAT CONSTITUTE THE SEVEN MAJOR
ALLERGENS THAT ARE DEFINED BY THE FDA.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. JENSEN.
MR. JENSEN: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WILL
OUR HONORABLE COLLEAGUE FROM THE TOWN OF PERINTON YIELD FOR SOME
QUESTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
137
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. LUNSFORD: FOR YOU, MR. JENSEN, YES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. JENSEN: YOU'RE MUCH TOO KIND.
SO WE DEBATED THIS BILL A YEAR AGO, AND HAS THERE BEEN
ANY CHANGES WITH -- WITH THIS LEGISLATION SINCE THE TOPIC PREVIOUSLY
CAME TO THE FLOOR?
MS. LUNSFORD: THERE HAS. SO GIVEN COMMENTS
THAT YOU, YOURSELF, MADE, I CLARIFIED SOME OF THE LANGUAGE, YOU WILL BE
HAPPY TO KNOW, IN ORDER TO SPECIFICALLY ENSURE THAT IT WAS WELL
UNDERSTOOD THAT WE DID NOT MEAN THAT EVERY SINGLE INGREDIENT -- AND
EVERYONE'S VERY EXCITED ABOUT MY BILL OUT THERE, PLEASE IGNORE THEM --
MR. JENSEN: OR HORSESHOE CRABS, REALLY.
MS. LUNSFORD: YES.
THAT EVERY SINGLE INGREDIENT IN A PRODUCT NEED NOT BE
LISTED, ONLY THOSE INGREDIENTS WHICH CONSTITUTE A MAJOR ALLERGEN. AND
SPECIFICALLY, LET'S SAY THAT THE PRODUCT IS BREAD. IT WOULDN'T NEED TO SAY
THAT IT CONTAINS ENRICHED FLOUR OR WHOLE WHEAT. IT WOULD SIMPLY NEED
TO SAY WHEAT.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. SO WITH THE CHANGE THAT WOULD
HAVE TO LIST -- LIST THE ALLERGENS, WHAT ARE THE SEVEN MAJOR ALLERGENS THAT
WOULD BE PERTAINED?
MS. LUNSFORD: WHEAT, EGGS, FISH, SHELLFISH, TREE
NUTS AND SESAME.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. SO --
MS. LUNSFORD: AND PEANUTS.
138
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. JENSEN: -- FOR THE LABELING REQUIREMENTS, WHAT
WOULD THE STICKER -- OR -- THAT WOULD BE AFFIXED TO THE PRODUCT HAVE TO
BE? LIKE, IF THERE'S PEANUTS IN SOMETHING, COULD THEY JUST HAVE A
PICTURE OF MR. PEANUT ON THERE AND THAT WOULD DEMONSTRATE AND SATISFY
THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LEGISLATION?
MS. LUNSFORD: SETTING ASIDE ANY COPYRIGHT ISSUES
THAT CAME WITH USING PLANTER'S MR. PEANUT, I ASSURE YOU THAT AS LONG AS
IT COULD BE CONVEYED TO THE CONSUMER THAT THE PRODUCT CONTAINED
PEANUTS, THAT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT. SO LET'S SAY IT CONTAINED PEANUT
BUTTER AND WHOLE PEANUTS. YOU WOULDN'T NEED TO SAY PEANUT BUTTER AND
WHOLE PEANUTS, YOU COULD MERELY SAY CONTAINS PEANUTS.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. SO IS -- I KNOW -- IF I'M
REMEMBERING CORRECTLY, ONE OF THE CONCERNS I HAD LAST YEAR WAS ABOUT
THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE. HAS THAT BEEN CHANGED AS WELL?
MS. LUNSFORD: YES. I BELIEVE WE DID KICK THAT
OUT TO 180 DAYS. BUT LET ME DOUBLE-CHECK FOR YOU RIGHT HERE. ONE
YEAR.
MR. JENSEN: ONE YEAR? OKAY. SO I THINK ONE OF
THE THINGS -- AND I THINK OBVIOUSLY I KNOW LAST YEAR YOU SHARED THE
STORY ABOUT YOUR SON'S ALLERGIES AND -- AND WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT. AND
I KNOW A LOT OF OUR COLLEAGUES AND A LOT OF NEW YORKERS IN GENERAL DO
HAVE ALLERGIES IN THOSE SEVEN MAJOR CLASSIFICATIONS, AND I THINK IT'S
IMPORTANT THAT CONSUMERS UNDERSTAND THINGS THAT COULD BE IN THERE.
BUT WHY HAVE THE LABELING BE ON THE PRODUCT? YOU KNOW, I'M USING
THE EXAMPLE OF THE WEGMAN'S SUB COUNTER -- THE STATE AND THE WORLD'S
139
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
GREATEST GROCERY STORE -- WHERE THEY HAVE -- THEY HAVE THE SUB COUNTER,
YOU COULD WALK UP AND YOU COULD GET A -- A SUB MADE. BUT THE EXACT
SAME SUB COULD BE PRE-PREPARED BY THE SUB STAFF AND PLACED IN THE
COOLER TEN FEET FROM THE SUB COUNTER. WOULDN'T IT MAKE MORE SENSE TO
HAVE, IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, A LIST OF ALL THE MAJOR ALLERGENS THAT MAY
BE IN THEIR BREADS, CHEESES, OTHER CONDIMENTS?
MS. LUNSFORD: WELL, IF YOU'RE ORDERING DIRECT
FROM, SAY, THE DELI OR THE BAKERY WHO'S PREPARING YOUR SUB, YOU WOULD
HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY AT THAT MOMENT TO ASK THOSE QUESTIONS IN REALTIME.
LET'S SAY YOU'RE AT WEGMAN'S, IT'S SATURDAY AT NOON. YOU ARE TRYING TO
GET YOUR CHILDREN IN A LINE TO GO GET THEIR LUNCH. IF YOU'RE PICKING UP
AN ITEM THAT'S BEEN PREPACKAGED AND NOW YOU HAVE TO SOMEHOW ASSERT
YOURSELF INTO THE DELI LINE TO ASK A QUESTION THAT THE PERSON BEHIND THE
COUNTER MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW OFF THE TOP OF THEIR HEAD, THEY MAY NOW
HAVE TO GO GET A MANAGER. IT BECOMES A HUGE ORDEAL. AND WE WANT TO
MAKE THIS AS EASY AS POSSIBLE SO THAT BUSY PARENTS AND PEOPLE WHO
HAVE ALLERGENS AREN'T NEEDING TO SPEND EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF TIME
BOTHERING OTHER CUSTOMERS WHO THEY'RE NOW BUTTING INTO THEIR TIME
WHEN SIMPLY THESE STORES WHO ARE PUTTING THESE PACKAGES TOGETHER,
THEY COULD JUST HAVE ROLLS OF STICKERS THAT SAY WHEAT, PEANUT, SESAME,
WHATEVER IT MAY BE, AND THEY JUST POP THEM ON AS THEY'RE PUTTING
TOGETHER THESE PRODUCTS.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. AND THERE -- IS THERE ANY
CARVE-OUT FOR PROPRIETORS BASED ON SIZE OR VOLUME? SO, YOU KNOW, WE
USED A GROCERY STORE -- I USED A GROCERY STORE EXAMPLE. YOU KNOW,
140
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THEY -- THEY DO A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF VOLUME. BUT YOU WALK INTO A -- A
NEIGHBORHOOD BODEGA THAT'S -- THAT MAY MAKE BREAKFAST SANDWICHES.
THEY MAY NOT HAVE -- THEY MIGHT NOT DO THE VOLUME. IS THERE ANY
CARVE-OUT FOR SIZE OR VOLUME?
MS. LUNSFORD: THERE IS NOT, BECAUSE THE REALITY IS
IS YOU'RE BUYING YOUR PRODUCT, YOU'RE BUYING YOUR PRODUCT. SO WE
WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE IS PROTECTED. ONE OF THE ISSUES WE
HAVE IS THAT YOUR SUPERMARKETS, FOR THE MOST PART THEY ALREADY HAVE
INGREDIENT LISTS. THESE SMALLER ENTITIES, THOUGH, THEY'RE SORT OF THE ONES
I'M WORRIED ABOUT THE MOST BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES WHO MAY BE
LEAST PREPARED IN THIS MOMENT TO ADDRESS THESE QUESTIONS, AND WE NEED
TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE AFFIRMATIVELY INFORMING THEMSELVES SO THAT
WHEN CUSTOMERS HAVE THESE QUESTIONS THAT WE CAN BETTER ADDRESS THEM
FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE CONCERNS.
MR. JENSEN: OKAY. I KNOW IN THE BILL -- AND
CORRECT ME IF I'M -- IF I DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION. BUT IS THERE A
REQUIREMENT THAT THEY'D HAVE TO PUT SOME SORT OF NOTICE THAT THE DOH
WOULD DEVELOP WITHIN THEIR STOREFRONT, OR IS THAT JUST THE NATURE OF
DOH HAVING TO CLARIFY THE REGULATIONS SURROUNDING THIS PROSPECTIVE
LAW?
MS. LUNSFORD: IT'S JUST THE REGULAR REQUIREMENT
THAT DOH WOULD APPLY TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE WE ARE ASKING THEM
TO OVERSEE REGULATIONS THAT WE CREATE.
MR. JENSEN: WOULD FOOD TRUCKS BE APPLIED UNDER
THE LAW?
141
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. LUNSFORD: THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.
MR. JENSEN: THANK YOU. I HAVE ONE EVERY NOW
AND AGAIN.
MS. LUNSFORD: A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT IS ANY PLACE
WHERE FOOD IS PREPARED AND INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING RETAIL
FOOD STORES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 500 OF THIS CHAPTER, WHICH I WILL TELL
YOU, I DO NOT BELIEVE A FOOD TRUCK IS. THOUGH FOOD TRUCKS FREQUENTLY
DO NOT HAVE PRE-PREPARED FOODS.
MR. JENSEN: WELL, SO I'M THINKING OF -- I KNOW A
LOT OF OUR DISTRICTS, BOTH ON THE WEST SIDE OF MONROE COUNTY AND THE
EAST SIDE OF MONROE COUNTY, WILL OFTEN HAVE FOOD TRUCK RODEOS --
MS. LUNSFORD: INDEED.
MR. JENSEN: -- WHERE YOU HAVE FOOD TRUCKS, BUT
YOU ALSO HAVE COMMUNITY-BASED PROVIDERS WHO MAY HAVE
PRE-PREPARED CAKES OR CUPCAKES OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. AND THEY MAY
OPERATE OUT OF A STOREFRONT, BUT THEY'RE NOT OPERATING UNDER THE
STOREFRONT, THEY'RE OPERATING UNDER A TENT IN THAT SPECIFIC VENUE OR
THEY'RE MAYBE AT THE PUBLIC MARKET.
MS. LUNSFORD: MM-HMM.
MR. JENSEN: WOULD THOSE -- WOULD THEY CLASSIFY AS
A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS LEGISLATION?
MS. LUNSFORD: SO, TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY -- LIKE,
A PUBLIC MARKET'S A SOMEWHAT COMPLICATED EXAMPLE. AS YOU KNOW,
WE HAVE A VERY PERMANENT PUBLIC MARKET IN ROCHESTER, THE OLDEST
OPERATING PUBLIC MARKET IN THE COUNTRY, ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE, AND THERE
142
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ARE PERMANENT STALLS THERE. IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE PERMANENT STALLS
WHERE THAT IS YOUR PLACE OF BUSINESS, I BELIEVE IT WOULD APPLY TO YOU AS
LONG AS YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 500. BUT IF YOU ARE SETTING UP A
TABLE, YOU ARE A FARMER WHO ALSO BAKES PIES, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT YOU
WOULD FALL UNDER FOOD ESTABLISHMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS.
MR. JENSEN: AND WOULD IT BE STATE DOH OR THE
LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS TASKED WITH ENFORCEMENT?
MS. LUNSFORD: I BELIEVE IT'S STATE DOH.
MR. JENSEN: STATE DOH? DO WE HAVE ENOUGH
DOH PERSONNEL TO INSPECT ESTABLISHMENTS WITH ALL THE OTHER DUTIES THEY
HAVE CURRENTLY?
MS. LUNSFORD: THIS WOULDN'T CREATE ANY NEW
SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDITING. IT'S JUST WITHIN THE NORMAL COURSE OF
WHATEVER INSPECTIONS ARE DONE. I IMAGINE LOCALS, AS WELL, WOULD HAVE
AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ENFORCE STATE POLICY. IF THEY
WERE TO DISCOVER THAT THEY WERE OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS LAW IN THE
NORMAL COURSE OF THEIR INSPECTIONS, I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE A -- AN
UNDUE BURDEN.
MR. JENSEN: THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. LUNSFORD.
I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WILL THE
SPONSOR YIELD?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
143
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. LUNSFORD: SURE THING.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. THANK YOU SO MUCH.
AND I APPRECIATE THAT AT THE --AT THE OUTSET YOU
DISCUSSED WITH THE PREVIOUS QUESTIONER ABOUT SOME CHANGES THAT YOU
MADE IN THE BILL BETWEEN LAST YEAR AND THIS YEAR, RIGHT? OKAY. SO I
HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS THAT WERE BROUGHT TO ME BY A STORE WHOSE NAME
WE WOULD ALL RECOGNIZE --
MS. LUNSFORD: (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK)
MS. WALSH: -- THAT'S IN MY DISTRICT. YEAH. AND SO
I'D LIKE TO JUST ASK YOU THOSE QUESTIONS, AND IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND
CLARIFYING IF MAYBE THAT'S A QUESTION THAT WAS ADDRESSED THROUGH
AMENDMENT OR JUST KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT.
SO IT'S INDICATED THAT THERE IS SUPPORT FOR THE PASSAGE
OF THE ALLERGEN BILL, BUT THERE'S A PROPOSAL FOR EDITS TO CLARIFY HOW TO
OPERATIONALIZE THE LABELING. AND THEY SUGGESTED LANGUAGE SPECIFICALLY
THAT SAY THAT EVERY FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SHALL LABEL ALL PREPACKAGED FOOD
WITH A WRITTEN NOTIFICATION ON THE PACKAGE OR ON A LABEL ATTACHED TO THE
PACKAGE, IDENTIFYING ANY INGREDIENT WITH WHICH A PRODUCT IS MADE THAT
CONSTITUTES A MAJOR FOOD ALLERGEN. SUCH LABEL NEED NOT IDENTIFY ANY
INGREDIENT THAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A MAJOR FOOD ALLERGEN UNDER FEDERAL
OR STATE LAW. THAT'S PROPOSED LANGUAGE. IS THAT PART OF THE AMENDMENT
THAT YOU MADE?
MS. LUNSFORD: SO, I FIND THAT PROPOSED LANGUAGE
A LITTLE CONFUSING, SO WE -- WE SORT OF DID AN AMALGAMATION JUST TO
144
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT WE JUST NEED YOU TO LABEL THE ITEM WITH ONE OF
THE SEVEN MAJOR FOOD ALLERGENS, AS IN THE EXAMPLE I GAVE, LIKE, LET'S SAY
IT'S WHOLE PEANUTS AND PEANUT BUTTER. I DON'T NEED YOU TO SAY BOTH
THINGS, YOU JUST NEED TO SAY CONTAINS PEANUTS. SO, LIKE, YOU COULD HAVE
A BIG SUPERMARKET STAR LIKE YOU HAVE LIKE WHEN SOMETHING'S ON SALE,
AND IT JUST SAYS PEANUTS AND THAT WOULD -- THAT WOULD SATISFY THE
PROVISIONS HERE.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. I GOT THAT. I UNDERSTAND THAT.
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. I APPRECIATE YOUR ANSWERS.
MS. LUNSFORD: YOU'RE VERY WELCOME. THANK
YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MR. DURSO.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WOULD
THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR JUST MAYBE TWO QUICK QUESTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MS. LUNSFORD: OF COURSE, MR. DURSO.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MS. LUNSFORD.
SO AGAIN, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT IS ANYBODY THAT'S
PRE-PACKAGED MAKING IT ON SITE YOU'RE SAYING?
MS. LUNSFORD: WELL, A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT IS
SPECIFICALLY DEFINED BY SECTION 500, BUT IT'S ANY PLACE WHERE FOOD IS
PREPARED AND INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING RETAIL FOOD STORES.
SECTION 500 CONTEMPLATES, YOU KNOW, DELIS, BAKERIES, PERMANENT
145
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ESTABLISHMENTS.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. SO -- AND -- AND JUST FOR CLARITY,
WHERE WOULD A SCHOOL FALL UNDER THIS?
MS. LUNSFORD: THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION. WHERE
WOULD A SCHOOL FALL? THEY ARE LABELING AND PREPACKAGING FOOD
INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION. I -- I DON'T HAVE STAFF WITH ME TODAY, BUT
THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION AND I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, I DON'T KNOW THE
ANSWER.
MR. DURSO: OKAY. AND -- AND -- AND IT'S -- IT'S
MORE JUST FOR CLARITY. OBVIOUSLY WITH THE FREE SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL,
WHICH I'M A BIG SUPPORTER OF, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE
LANGUAGE OF THIS BILL OBVIOUSLY WOULD INCLUDE THOSE THAT ARE
PREPACKAGING OR MAKING THOSE ON SITE, JUST HOW THEY WOULD GO ABOUT IT
TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE INCLUDED IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS, OBVIOUSLY TO
PROTECT OUR CHILDREN.
MS. LUNSFORD: YOU KNOW WHAT? UPON SECOND
THOUGHT --
MR. DURSO: OKAY.
MS. LUNSFORD: -- THIS SPECIFICALLY DEALS WITH DOH
AND AGS. SO I DON'T THINK IT WOULD INCLUDE SCHOOLS BECAUSE SCHOOLS
WOULD BE ORGANIZED UNDER SED. IT WOULD BE UNDER -- UNDER THE
EDUCATION LAW. AND BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T BE DEFINED UNDER SECTION
500 OF THE CHAPTER, I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT A SCHOOL WOULD BE INCLUDED.
HOWEVER, SOMEONE WHO SENDS THEIR KID TO SCHOOL WITH LOTS OF FOOD
ALLERGIES, THEY ARE VERY CAREFUL.
146
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. DURSO: RIGHT. SO I -- I -- JUST MORE FOR THE
CLARITY OF IT, OBVIOUSLY I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR STUDENTS THAT
ARE IN SCHOOLS HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND ARE AWARE OF WHAT IS IN THEIR
FOOD.
THANK YOU, MS. LUNSFORD, FOR ANSWERING MY
QUESTIONS. I APPRECIATE IT.
MS. LUNSFORD: YOU'RE WELCOME. THANK YOU.
MR. DURSO: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 365TH
DAY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE CLERK WILL
RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
MS. JACKSON TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.
MS. JACKSON: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. I JUST
WANT TO LET THIS STORY BE HEARD ON THE FLOOR TODAY FOR MY COLLEAGUES.
ON JANUARY 11, 2024, 25-YEAR-OLD ORLA BAXENDALE, A
WELL-KNOWN DANCER IN NEW YORK CITY, DIED FOLLOWING AN ALLERGIC
REACTION TO COOKIES SOLD IN STEWART LEONARD'S -- IN STEW LEONARD'S IN
CONNECTICUT. SHE HAD AN ALLERGIC REACTION BECAUSE PEANUTS WAS NOT
CORRECTLY LABELED. AND SO I'M SURE HER FAMILY WOULD HAVE WANTED HER
TO BE HERE AND NOT HAVE TO MEM -- HAVE A MEMORY OF HER AS A GREAT
DANCER. AND WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR ALLERGENS TO BE LISTED. AND IF YOU
147
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
HAVE A CHILD WITH A SEVERE ALLERGY SIMILAR TO ORLA, YOU WOULD WANT TO
KNOW WHAT'S IN YOUR FOOD.
AND SO I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR OF THIS BILL. I WILL
BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND I ASK THAT MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE
SAME. THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MS. JACKSON IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
PAGE 15, RULES REPORT NO. 338, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A07377, RULES REPORT
NO. 338, STIRPE. AN ACT TO AMEND THE CANAL LAW, IN RELATION TO
ESTABLISHING A STAKEHOLDER GROUP TO COORDINATE WATER RELEASE IN THE
OSWEGO RIVER BASIN.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: AN EXPLANATION HAS
BEEN REQUESTED.
MR. STIRPE.
MR. STIRPE: YES, MADAM SPEAKER, THANK YOU.
IN 2022, WE PASSED SOME LEGISLATION THAT CREATED THE
FLOOD MITIGATION TASK FORCE. IT WAS A MULTI-AGENCY GROUP, THE CANAL
CORPORATION, THE DEC, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF
AGRICULTURE AND A BUNCH OF EXPERTS ON -- ON FLOODING. AND THEIR TASK
WAS TO CREATE A REPORT BY JULY 1ST OF 2023, TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS
FOR BOTH THE MOHAWK RIVER BASIN AND THE OSWEGO RIVER BASIN TO DO
148
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THINGS TO MITIGATE FLOODING. SO, THEY DID THAT REPORT AND ONE OF THE
MAIN THINGS THAT CAME OUT OF IT WAS, THEY WANTED A WORKGROUP FOR THE
OSWEGO RIVER BASIN. OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, MUCH DIFFERENT THAN THE
MOHAWK -- MOHAWK'S STEEP ELEVATION, NO BODIES OF WATER TO ABSORB
ANY EXTRA RUNOFF, SO THE WATER RUNS HOT AND THE NEXT DAY THE FLOODING IS
USUALLY GONE. OSWEGO RIVER BASIN'S LOW LEVEL, LOTS OF BODIES OF WATER.
THE FINGER LAKES, I THINK THERE ARE TEN LAKES ALL TOGETHER. AND THOSE
FLOODS LAST FOR WEEKS, IF NOT MONTHS. SO, THE OSWEGO RIVER BASIN,
THEY WANTED THIS WORKGROUP THAT WOULD WORK TOGETHER, ALL THE EXITS
AND ENTRANCES OF WATER GOING IN AND OUT OF -- OF LAKES AND STREAMS AND
RIVERS. AND THAT'S WHAT THIS BILL DOES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. WALSH.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. WILL THE
SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WILL THE SPONSOR
YIELD?
MR. STIRPE: YES.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE SPONSOR YIELDS.
MS. WALSH: THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
SO, YEAH, JUST A FEW QUESTIONS TO JUST CLARIFY A FEW
SECTIONS OF THE BILL, WHICH, YOU KNOW, I WOULD NOTE THAT WE DID PASS
UNANIMOUSLY WHEN IT CAME UP AND THEN IT WAS VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR
IN 2024. SO, I GUESS FIRST QUESTION WOULD BE, HAS THE BILL CHANGED AT
ALL?
MR. STIRPE: NO.
149
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. WALSH: OKAY. THE GOVERNOR INDICATED IN HER
VETO MESSAGE, SHE CITED THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMISSIONS AND
TASK FORCES AND STATED THAT NONE OF THE PROPOSALS WERE ACCOUNTED FOR IN
THE FINANCIAL PLAN AND NOTED THAT THESE ARE MORE APPROPRIATELY HANDLED
IN THE BUDGET. SO, QUESTION IS, OUT OF OUR $254 BILLION ENACTED STATE
BUDGET, WAS THERE ANY MONEY APPROPRIATED THIS YEAR TO ADDRESS THIS
PARTICULAR INITIATIVE?
MR. STIRPE: WELL, TWO THINGS. FIRST OF ALL, WE
DISAGREE WITH THE GOVERNOR, HER ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF THIS. THIS IS AN
ALL-VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION. I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE YOU HAVE TO
PAY FOR COFFEE AND PASTRIES, BUT THAT'S ABOUT IT. AND A LOT OF TIMES
WHEN THIS GROUP WILL MEET, IS WHEN THERE'S AN EXTREME WEATHER EVENT,
SO IT'LL BE OVER ZOOM OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO, THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE
TO DRIVE TO A LOCATION. SECONDLY, IT'S PART OF THE CANAL CORPORATION
WHICH IS PART OF THE NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY AND I BELIEVE THERE IS
PLENTY OF FUNDING IN THOSE ORGANIZATIONS IN ORDER TO PAY FOR THE
MINUSCULE AMOUNT OF MONEY THIS IS GOING TO COST.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. SO, THE -- IT WOULD BE FAIR TO
SAY THAT NO MONEY WAS BUDGETED BECAUSE YOU WOULD SAY THAT THE
AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT IT WOULD TAKE TO CONVENE THIS STAKEHOLDER GROUP
AND TO MAKE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS IS NEGLIGIBLE.
MR. STIRPE: THAT'S CORRECT.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. SO, LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT
WHAT THE LEGISLATION WOULD REQUIRE IN TERMS OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP.
THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP WILL BE FORMED. WHO WOULD
150
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
BE MEMBERS OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP?
MR. STIRPE: THEY WOULD BE ENTITIES THAT CONTROL THE
-- THE FLOW OF WATER IN AND OUT OF THE OSWEGO RIVER BASIN. THERE ARE I
THINK, LIKE I SAID, TEN LAKES ALL TOGETHER. THEY'RE ALL CONTROLLED BY
DIFFERENT ENTITIES. CANANDAIGUA LAKE BY THE CITY OF CANANDAIGUA,
SENECA LAKE BY GRAVITY RENEWABLES, THEY'RE A POWER GENERATION
COMPANY. CAYUGA LAKE, THE CANAL CORPORATION; OWASCO LAKE, THE
CITY OF AUBURN; SKANEATELES LAKE, THE CITY OF SYRACUSE; OTISCO LAKE,
ONONDAGA COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY; ONONDAGA LAKE IS THE CANAL
CORPORATION. ONEIDA LAKE, CANAL CORPORATION AND KEUKA LAKE, THE
VILLAGE OF PENN YAN. SO, REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL OF THOSE GROUPS.
MS. WALSH: AND IN ADDITION TO THOSE GROUPS, IT
WOULD -- IT SAYS THAT THERE WOULD BE COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER GROUPS.
ANY PARTICULAR ONES THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THERE OR DID YOU ALREADY
MENTION THEM?
MR. STIRPE: I DON'T KNOW.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. IT MENTIONS THE DEC WOULD BE
A PART OF IT?
OH, I WON'T GO FORWARD, I'M SORRY. YOU'RE -- YOU'RE
CONFERRING.
(PAUSE/CONFERENCING)
MR. STIRPE: WE JUST MENTIONED THAT WE HAVEN'T
IDENTIFIED ALL OF THE COMMUNITY GROUPS YET --
MS. WALSH: OKAY.
MR. STIRPE: -- UNTIL THIS IS FORMED.
151
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MS. WALSH: FAIR ENOUGH. SO, THAT -- THAT WOULD BE
FIGURED OUT LATER.
AND THEN THE DEC IS ALSO NAMED THAT THEY WOULD BE
ON THAT -- IN THAT STAKEHOLDER GROUP, AS WELL AS SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS.
DO WE KNOW WHO THOSE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS WOULD BE YET?
MR. STIRPE: I -- I THINK A LOT OF THOSE ARE GONNA BE
THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE FLOOD MITIGATION TASK FORCE.
MS. WALSH: OKAY.
MR. STIRPE: THEY'RE PEOPLE WHO WORK IN
ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRY AND HIGHER ED, PLACES LIKE THAT --
MS. WALSH: OKAY.
MR. STIRPE: -- THAT ARE REAL SUBJECT EXPERTS.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. IS -- OUT OF THAT LIST THAT YOU
READ EARLIER, MANY OF THEM SOUNDED LIKE MUNICIPAL, CITY GOVERNMENT,
THINGS LIKE THAT. I NOTICED THAT ONE THAT WAS NOT LISTED WAS OSWEGO
COUNTY. IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON WHY OSWEGO COUNTY DIDN'T MAKE
THE CUT THERE FOR IT TO BE ON THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP?
MR. STIRPE: I DON'T THINK THEY ARE A CONTROLLED
ENTITY ON ANY OF THOSE BODIES OF WATER. NOW, THEY MIGHT BE ON SOME
RIVER, I'M NOT -- I'M NOT CERTAIN OF THAT, BUT ON THE LAKES THAT WE'VE --
WERE INCLUDED IN IT, THEY DON'T CONTROL THE FLOW AT ALL.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. I -- I WOULD JUST NOTE BASED ON
THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE, I MEAN, YOU -- YOU LIVE THERE, I DON'T. SO --
BUT THAT THE OSWEGO RIVER AND MOST OF ONEIDA LAKE ARE IN OSWEGO
COUNTY AND --
152
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. STIRPE: YES, BUT THE CANAL CORPORATION HAS
CONTROL OVER THE ONEIDA [SIC] RIVER AND THE ONEIDA LAKE, I BELIEVE.
MS. WALSH: THE OSWEGO RIVER, DID YOU MEAN?
MR. STIRPE: I AM SORRY. YEAH, THE OSWEGO RIVER.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. YEAH, I NOTED THAT THE CITY OF
OSWEGO MAY HAVE REPRESENTATION DUE TO THEIR -- THEIR HYDRO PLANT, BUT
NOT THE COUNTY. SO, I WAS JUST ASKING ABOUT THAT.
MR. STIRPE: YEAH. I MEAN, THE REAL PROBLEM WE
HAVE IS THE CANAL SYSTEM WAS DEVELOPED FOR NAVIGATION PURPOSES ONLY
BACK IN THE DAY WHEN THEY DID IT. AND SINCE THEN, WE'VE DEVELOPED
RECREATION, ENERGY GENERATION, YOU KNOW, ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT THINGS
AND IT'S JUST NOT SET UP TO HANDLE ALL OF THOSE THINGS ALL AT THE SAME TIME.
MS. WALSH: RIGHT. WELL, AS --AS YOU SAID, THE --
THE COST OF HAVING THIS STAKEHOLDER GROUP IS PROBABLY A ZOOM
MEMBERSHIP AND MAYBE A -- AN EXTRA DONUT OR TWO FOR OSWEGO COUNTY
IF THEY WERE INCLUDED. AND IT -- IT -- IT MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA SINCE IT
LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE, FROM WHAT I CAN SEE, MORE SHORELINE ON ONEIDA
LAKE. YOU KNOW, MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO CONSIDER IN TERMS OF AN
AMENDMENT TO ADD THEM TO THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP SINCE IT SEEMS THAT
THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER STAKEHOLDERS THAT HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY
NAMED. BUT, THAT WAS ONE CONCERN THAT WAS RAISED.
MR. STIRPE: OKAY.
MS. WALSH: OKAY?
MR. STIRPE: TAKEN.
MS. WALSH: SO, THERE ISN'T A SET NUMBER OF
153
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MEMBERS OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP, CORRECT?
MR. STIRPE: NO.
MS. WALSH: OKAY. AND THEN IT SAYS THAT WITHIN SIX
MONTHS AFTER THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP IS FORMED THEY MUST MAKE
RECOMMENDATIONS. WHY -- WHY IS THERE NO REQUIREMENT THAT THIS REPORT
OF RECOMMENDATIONS IS SENT TO THE MINORITY? I SEE THAT IT'S -- THERE'S A
WHOLE LIST OF, YOU KNOW, ENTITIES THAT ARE GOING TO RECEIVE IT; THE
GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE
ASSEMBLY, BUT NOT THE MINORITY. IS THERE A REASON FOR THAT? SEEING AS
WE HAVE MEMBERS OF OUR SIDE OF THE AISLE AND THE MINORITY SIDE ARE OUT
IN THAT AREA THAT WOULD BE CERTAINLY IMPACTED BY THIS.
MR. STIRPE: I THINK THE ONLY REASON IS BECAUSE
THAT'S KIND OF STANDARD LANGUAGE THAT'S ALREADY INCLUDED -- ALWAYS
INCLUDED. AND I'M SURE THAT IF YOU ASKED FOR THE REPORT, I DON'T THINK
THE SPEAKER HAS ANY REASON NOT TO SHARE IT WITH YOU OR ME, BECAUSE IT
DOESN'T MENTION ANY OF US GETTING IT EITHER. BUT I -- I THINK WE'D BE
MORE THAN WILLING TO SHARE THE REPORT.
MS. WALSH: YEAH. I THINK IT'S JUST REALLY A SIGN
OF -- A SIGN OF RESPECT. I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S -- THERE'S STANDARD
LANGUAGE AND EVERYTHING, BUT TO INCLUDE MEMBERS OF LEADERSHIP ON
BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, WHO CERTAINLY REPRESENT CONSTITUENTS THAT ARE
GOING TO BE IMPACTED BY WHATEVER THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE GOING TO
BE. SO, JUST RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THAT BE CONSIDERED AS AN
AMENDMENT OR TO THE -- TO THE POWERS THAT BE -- THAT MAY BE LISTENING
TO THIS, TO PERHAPS INCLUDE THAT IN SOME TYPE OF A CHAPTER AMENDMENT
154
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
WOULD BE LOVELY.
MR. STIRPE: ALL RIGHT. POINT WELL-TAKEN.
MS. WALSH: ALL RIGHT. WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT,
AND THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS. THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE,
MR. STIRPE, THANK YOU.
MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE BILL.
MS. WALSH: YEAH, SO, JUST VERY BRIEFLY.
AS I SAID, THIS IS A BILL THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY LAST
YEAR AND THAT SOMETIMES HAPPENS, PARTICULARLY AS WE'RE GETTING INTO
THESE LAST, YOU KNOW, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WE HAVE UNDER, YOU KNOW, TEN
DAYS OF SESSION LEFT. THE BILLS ARE GOING TO START COMING VERY QUICKLY,
SOMETIMES THINGS GET MISSED AND ON FURTHER EXAMINATION, THERE ARE
POINTS THAT WE WISH TO MAKE. AND I BELIEVE I MADE THOSE POINTS AND
THEY ARE THAT THIS STAKEHOLDER GROUP DOES NAME A NUMBER OF ENTITIES,
BUT APPEARS TO BE OMITTING OSWEGO COUNTY, WHICH IS, I WOULD SAY, AN
INTEGRAL PART OF THIS AREA. SHARES SHORELINE IS IN THE VICINITY, YOU KNOW,
THERE -- THERE WAS NO ASK FOR A HOME RULE POSITION EVEN THOUGH THIS
IMPACTS OSWEGO COUNTY MORE THAN -- THAN OTHER AREAS. SO, I THINK THAT
INCLUDING STAKEHOLDERS THAT ARE IN THAT AREA IS WISE. AND I ALSO THINK
THAT EVEN IF THE COST, I DON'T KNOW THAT I REALLY AGREE NECESSARILY WITH
WHAT THE GOVERNOR HUNG HER HAT ON IN HER VETO MESSAGE AS FAR AS THE
COST ON THE CANAL CORPORATION. BUT I DO THINK THAT WHEN THE
RECOMMENDATIONS DO COME BACK, I THINK THAT THEY OUGHT TO BE SHARED
WITH LEADERSHIP ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, ESPECIALLY AS WE'RE
155
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
CONSIDERING UPSTATE AREAS THAT ARE REPRESENTED PRETTY HEAVILY BY -- BY
OUR -- OUR SIDE. SO, I THINK -- I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M GOING TO END UP
VOTING ON THIS, BUT I DO THINK THAT THOSE ARE, YOU KNOW, CONCERNS THAT I
WANTED TO RAISE AND HAVE ON THE RECORD. SO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH,
MADAM SPEAKER. APPRECIATE IT.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
READ THE LAST SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE CLERK WILL
RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULT.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
PAGE 16, RULES REPORT NO. 362, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY NO. A08465, RULES REPORT
NO. 362, OTIS, BURDICK, SAYEGH, COLTON, SHIMSKY, JACOBSON, DURSO,
SLATER. AN ACT TO AMEND THE LABOR LAW, IN RELATION TO PREVAILING WAGE
FOR THOSE INVOLVED IN THE HAULING OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: READ THE LAST
SECTION.
THE CLERK: THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THE CLERK WILL
RECORD THE VOTE.
(THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)
156
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MR. PALMESANO TO EXPLAIN THIS VOTE.
MR. PALMESANO: YES. THANK YOU, MADAM
SPEAKER AND MY COLLEAGUES, TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.
I JUST HAVE SOME QUESTIONS, I KNOW THE BILL IS ON
CONSENT, WHICH IS FINE. BUT A COUPLE THINGS I WOULD ASK I THINK THAT
NEED TO BE ADDRESSED IS: ONE, THIS BILL DOES -- THE TERM "PUBLIC WORKS
WEBSITE" IS NOT DEFINED. I THINK THAT'S A QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO BE
ANSWERED. AND I THINK, ALSO, A QUESTION I WANT TO KNOW IS, WOULD THIS
BILL REQUIRE UTILITIES FOR PERFORMING EXCAVATION WORK UNDER LABOR LAW
224-F? WOULD THEY BE REQUIRED TO PAY PREVAILING WAGE FOR HAULING
UNDER THIS LEGISLATION? BECAUSE I THINK THE CONCERN IS, HOW THAT ADDED
COST WOULD IMPACT RATEPAYERS, BECAUSE WE KNOW RATES ARE GOING UP
ACROSS THE BOARD ON EVERYTHING ELSE AND I THINK THIS IS JUST ANOTHER AREA
WHERE EXCAVATION WORK IS DOING WORK TO PROVIDE GOOD INFRASTRUCTURE
FOR OUR UTILITIES. I JUST THINK THAT'S WHERE MY QUESTION AND CONCERN
COMES WITH THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.
SO, BECAUSE OF THOSE QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE, I -- I'M
GOING TO BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS AND I HOPE THOSE QUESTIONS
ARE ADDRESSED IN THE FUTURE. THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
MR. PALMESANO IN THE NEGATIVE.
ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES? ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.
(THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULT.)
THE BILL IS PASSED.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
157
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, COULD
WE GO NOW TO PAGE 3 AND TAKE UP OUR RESOLUTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: PAGE 3,
RESOLUTIONS, THE CLERK WILL READ.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 664, MS.
SOLAGES.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 6, 2025, AS MOTHER'S EQUAL PAY DAY IN
THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 665, MR.
RA.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 4, 2025, AS GLOBAL RUNNING DAY IN THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESO -- MR.
RA ON THE RESOLUTION.
MR. RA: SORRY. YOU CAUGHT ME BY SURPRISE THERE. I
-- I -- I JUST QUICKLY WANT TO THANK MY COLLEAGUES FOR SUPPORTING THIS.
WE'VE -- WE'VE DONE THIS THE LAST FEW YEARS. UNFORTUNATELY, WHILE
MANY OF YOU WERE SLEEPING THIS MORNING, THE ONLY ONE WHO JOINED ME
ON THE RUN AROUND THE CAPITOL WAS -- WAS OUR COLLEAGUE, MS. LEE. SO,
THE REST OF YOU HAVE MISSED OUT, BUT I LOOK FORWARD TO YOU JOINING US
158
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ON THE RUN NEXT YEAR. THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THIS RESOLUTION.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING
AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 666, MS.
LEVENBERG.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 14, 2025, AS DRAGONFLY DAY IN THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. LEVENBERG ON
THE RESOLUTION.
MS. LEVENBERG: I FORGOT ABOUT THIS ONE, BUT ONLY
BECAUSE IT HAPPENS TO BE MY SON'S BIRTHDAY THIS WEEK, ON JUNE 7TH, AND
HE WAS OBSESSED WITH DRAGONFLIES WHEN HE WAS ABOUT THREE YEARS OLD.
I AM VERY HAPPY TO JOIN MY COLLEAGUES IN PROCLAIMING JUNE 14TH AS
DRAGONFLY DAY TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS HOW IMPORTANT
THEY ARE, AS VERY -- PART OF OUR NATURAL RESOURCES AND OF OUR NATIVE
BODY. SO, THANK YOU.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: THANK YOU.
ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING
AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 667, MS.
FORREST.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 20, 2025, AS WORLD REFUGEE DAY IN
159
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 668, MS.
ROSENTHAL.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 2025, AS CYTOMEGALOVIRUS AWARENESS
MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 669, MR. P.
CARROLL.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 2025, AS MIGRAINE AND HEADACHE
AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 670, MS.
SOLAGES.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM AUGUST 2025, AS BREASTFEEDING AWARENESS
MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
160
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 672, MS.
MCMAHON.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 4, 2025, AS OSTOMY AWARENESS
DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 673, MR.
RAGA.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2025, AS FILIPINO AMERICAN
HERITAGE MONTH -- HISTORY MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 674, MS.
JACKSON.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 9, 2025, AS SNEAKERS DAY IN THE
STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
161
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 675, MR.
SMITH.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 27-31, 2025, AS STRANGER SAFETY
AND EDUCATION AWARENESS WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 676, MR.
BRABENEC.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2025, AS CZECH-AMERICAN HERITAGE
MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
ADOPTED.
THE CLERK: ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 677, MR.
SAYEGH.
LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR
KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM DECEMBER 21, 2025, AS MEDITATION DAY IN
THE STATE OF NEW YORK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON THE RESOLUTION,
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTION IS
162
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
ADOPTED.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU
COULD PLEASE CALL ON OUR COLLEAGUE, MS. CLARK.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MS. CLARK FOR THE
PURPOSES OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT.
MS. CLARK: THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER. I'M HERE
TO ANNOUNCE THAT THERE WILL BE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IMMEDIATELY
FOLLOWING SESSION IN HEARING ROOM C. MAJORITY CONFERENCE, HEARING
ROOM C.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: MAJORITY
CONFERENCE IN HEARING ROOM C AFTER THE ADJOURNMENT OF SESSION.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: MADAM SPEAKER, DO YOU
HAVE ANY FURTHER HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: WE DO HAVE SOME
HOUSEKEEPING.
WITHOUT OBJECTION, ON A MOTION BY MS. ROSENTHAL, TO
RECONSIDER THE SUBSTITUTION OF SENATE BILL NO. S03391 FOR ASSEMBLY
BILL NO. A02278, SAID SENATE BILL IS RECOMMITTED TO THE COMMITTEE ON
HIGHER EDUCATION AND SAID ASSEMBLY BILL IS RESTORED TO ITS PLACE ON THE
ORDER OF THIRD READING.
ON A MOTION BY MS. ROSENTHAL, THE AMENDMENTS ARE
RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.
WE DO HAVE A NUMBER OF RESOLUTIONS BEFORE THE
163
NYS ASSEMBLY JUNE 5, 2025
HOUSE. WITHOUT OBJECTION, THESE RESOLUTIONS WILL BE TAKEN UP TOGETHER.
ON THE RESOLUTIONS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING
AYE; OPPOSED, NO. THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ADOPTED.
(WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 678-686
WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.)
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.
MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES: I NOW MOVE THAT THE
ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED AND THAT WE RECONVENE AT 9:30 A.M., FRIDAY,
JUNE THE 6TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.
ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER: ON MRS.
PEOPLES-STOKES' MOTION, THE HOUSE STANDS ADJOURNED.
(WHEREUPON, AT 3:50 P.M., THE HOUSE STOOD ADJOURNED
UNTIL FRIDAY, JUNE 6TH AT 9:30 A.M., THAT BEING A SESSION DAY.)
164