THURSDAY, JUNE 5, 2025                                              11:13 A.M.



                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE HOUSE WILL

                    COME TO ORDER.

                                 GOOD -- STILL MORNING.  GOOD MORNING, COLLEAGUES.

                                 THE REVEREND KENT MCHEARD WILL OFFER A PRAYER.

                                 REVEREND MCHEARD:  SHALL WE PRAY.  GOOD AND

                    GRACIOUS GOD, THANK YOU FOR THIS OPPORTUNITY TO GATHER IN THIS CHAMBER

                    WITH THESE REPRESENTATIVES.  THANK YOU FOR THEIR SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE

                    OF NEW YORK.  WE PRAY THAT YOU ENABLE WISDOM UPON EACH ONE AS

                    THEY BECOME THE VOICE FOR THOSE WHO HAVE NO VOICE, BECOME STRENGTH

                    FOR THOSE WHO ARE WEAKENED, TO ADVOCATE FOR THE DISABLED AND THE

                    DISADVANTAGED AND THE FOOD DISADVANTAGED.  FATHER, WE THANK YOU ALSO

                    FOR THE STAFF THAT DO WORK BEHIND THE SCENE.  A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO

                    ANTHONY WHO MET ME IN THE CONCOURSE AND GUIDED ME HERE.  BLESS THE

                                          1



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WORK THAT IS TO BE DONE HERE.  GIVE STRENGTH, WISDOM, AND DIRECTION,

                    WE PRAY IN YOUR MOST HOLY NAME.  AMEN.

                                 MEMBERS:  AMEN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  VISITORS ARE INVITED

                    TO JOIN THE MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER LED VISITORS AND

                    MEMBERS IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE.)

                                 A QUORUM BEING PRESENT, THE CLERK WILL READ THE

                    JOURNAL OF WEDNESDAY, JUNE 5TH.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, I MOVE

                    TO DISPENSE WITH THE FURTHER READING OF THE JOURNAL OF WEDNESDAY, JUNE

                    THE 5TH, AND THAT THE SAME STAND APPROVED.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WITHOUT OBJECTION,

                    SO ORDERED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                    GOOD MORNING, COLLEAGUES AND GUESTS THAT ARE IN THE CHAMBERS.  THIS

                    IS A GREAT DAY TO BE ON THIS SIDE.  THE SUN IS SHINING AND PRETTY MUCH

                    ALL IS RIGHT WITH THE WORLD.  BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE THIS QUOTE WITH

                    YOU TODAY.  THIS ONE IS COMING FROM MATSHONA DHLIWAYO.  SHE IS A

                    CANADIAN-BASED PHILOSOPHER, ENTREPRENEUR AND AN AUTHOR OF MANY

                    BOOKS SUCH AS THE LITTLE BOOK OF INSPIRATION.  HER WORDS FOR US TODAY:

                    "KNOWLEDGE IS THE SEED, INTELLIGENCE IS THE STEM, UNDERSTANDING IS THE

                    BRANCH AND WISDOM IS THE FRUIT."  AGAIN, THESE WORDS COMING FROM

                    MATSHONA DHLIWAYO.

                                          2



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, COLLEAGUES HAVE ON THEIR DESK A

                    CALENDAR -- A MAIN CALENDAR AND A DEBATE LIST.  BEFORE ANY

                    HOUSEKEEPING OR INTRODUCTIONS, WE'LL BE CALLING FOR THE FOLLOWING

                    COMMITTEES TO MEET:  CITIES, FOLLOWED BY GOVERNMENTAL EMPLOYEES,

                    FOLLOWED BY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS, LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, REAL

                    PROPERTY, AND CODES.  I WOULD WANT TO ENCOURAGE MEMBERS WHO KNOW

                    THAT YOU SERVE ON THESE COMMITTEES TO BE IN AND AROUND THE CHAMBERS

                    TODAY, SO THAT WHEN THEY'RE CALLED, WE'RE NOT WAITING FOR YOU TO BEGIN

                    THE PROCEEDINGS THERE.  WE'RE GONNA BEGIN OUR FLOOR WORK TODAY BY

                    TAKING UP THE FOLLOWING BILLS ON DEBATE:  CALENDAR NO. 100 BY MR.

                    BURDICK, RULES REPORT NO. 256 BY MS. ROSENTHAL, RULES REPORT NO.

                    297 BY MR. BRAUNSTEIN, RULES REPORT NO. 301 BY MR. MCDONALD,

                    RULES REPORT NO. 308 BY MS. REYES, RULES REPORT NO. 313 BY MS.

                    GLICK AND RULES REPORT NO. 324 BY MR. JACOBSON.  MAJORITY MEMBERS

                    SHOULD BE AWARE THAT THERE IS GOING TO BE A NEED FOR A CONFERENCE TODAY

                    ONCE WE CONCLUDE OUR FLOOR WORK.  OF COURSE, MADAM SPEAKER, WE

                    WILL CHECK WITH OUR COLLEAGUES ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THE AISLE TO

                    DETERMINE THEIR NEEDS AS ALWAYS.  THAT'S THE GENERAL OUTLINE OF WHERE

                    WE'RE GOING TODAY.  SO, IF YOU COULD BEGIN BY CALLING THE CITIES

                    COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 CITIES COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO THE SPEAKER'S

                    CONFERENCE ROOM.  PLEASE SEE CHAIR BURKE IN THE SPEAKER'S

                    CONFERENCE ROOM, CITIES COMMITTEE.

                                 WE HAVE NO HOUSEKEEPING THIS MORNING, BUT SEVERAL

                                          3



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    INTRODUCTIONS.  WE WILL START WITH MR. SANTABARBARA FOR THE PURPOSES OF

                    AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. SANTABARBARA:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 I RISE TODAY IN RECOGNITION OF REVEREND

                    KENT MCHEARD.  HE'S FROM THE CITY OF AMSTERDAM IN MY ASSEMBLY

                    DISTRICT AND HE IS JOINING US TODAY TO OFFER THE OPENING PRAYER, AS HE

                    JUST DELIVERED JUST A FEW MOMENTS AGO.  THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE,

                    REVEREND MCHEARD.  A FITTING HONOR FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS DEDICATED

                    HIS LIFE TO FAITH, SERVICE AND COMMUNITY.

                                 FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS, REVEREND MCHEARD HAS LEAD

                    THE WOESTINA REFORMED CHURCH IN ROTTERDAM JUNCTION GUIDING HIS

                    CONGREGATION WITH COMPASSION, HUMILITY AND DEVOTION.  AND HE HAS

                    BEEN A SOURCE OF COMFORT FOR SOME OF OUR MOST DIFFICULT TIMES.  MOST

                    NOTABLY ORGANIZING A PRAYER VIGIL AFTER THE SCHOHARIE LIMOUSINE TRAGEDY

                    TO HELP BRING HEALING AND UNITY TO OUR COMMUNITY.  HE CURRENTLY SERVES

                    AS PRESIDENT OF THE GREATER AMSTERDAM SCHOOL BOARD AND HAS SERVED

                    AS CHAPLAIN TO A NUMBER OF VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS AND HE'S BEEN

                    ACTIVE WITH BOY SCOUT TROOP 48 AND COUNTLESS COMMUNITY BOARDS AND

                    COMMITTEES.

                                 REVERED MCHEARD IS A DEAR FRIEND AND HE'S ALWAYS

                    BEEN AVAILABLE TO ATTEND THE MANY EVENTS THROUGHOUT MY ASSEMBLY

                    DISTRICT AND CEREMONIES THAT I'VE HOSTED, OFFERING THE INVOCATION AND --

                    AND OFFERING PRAYER TO US IN OUR COMMUNITY.  MOST RECENTLY, WE JUST

                    MET EACH OTHER OUT AT THE WOESTINA CEMETERY TO PLACE FLAGS FOR OUR

                                          4



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    VETERANS ON MEMORIAL DAY AND HE WAS THERE, OF COURSE, TO -- TO BLESS

                    THE FLAGS AND ALSO TO LEND A HAND AS WELL.  HE'S ALSO A PROUD HUSBAND TO

                    HIS WIFE COLLEEN AND TWO SONS, GARRET AND PARKER.  HE IS A SCHOLAR OF

                    FAITH WITH DEGREES FROM WORD OF LIFE BIBLE COLLEGE, LIBERTY

                    UNIVERSITY AND MASTER OF DIVINITY FROM NEW BRUNSWICK SEMINARY.

                    I'M GRATEFUL TO HAVE HIM HERE IN THE CHAMBER WITH US.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU WOULD PLEASE WELCOME HIM TO

                    THE HOUSE AND EXTEND TO HIM ALL THE CORDIALITIES OF THE CHAMBER.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MR. SANTABARBARA, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU, SIR,

                    TO THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR TO

                    YOU.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR YOUR COMFORTING WORDS THIS MORNING

                    AND ALSO THE GREAT WORKS YOU ARE DOING IN OUR COMMUNITY.  HOPE YOU

                    ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US,

                    SIR.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 REVEREND MCHEARD:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. BUTTENSCHON

                    FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                     MS. BUTTENSCHON:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 I HAVE THE GREAT HONOR TO INTRODUCE THE BELLICK

                    (PHONETIC) FAMILY FROM UTICA, NEW YORK.  ANESSA (PHONETIC) AND

                                          5



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SANAD (PHONETIC), MOM AND DAD, AND THEIR SONS, ADAM, EMIL

                    (PHONETIC) AND BENJAMIN.  THEY'RE HERE TODAY TO SEE THE WORKINGS

                    WITHIN ALBANY, AS WELL AS TO SPEND SOME TIME THROUGHOUT THE

                    COMMUNITY.  EACH ONE OF THESE YOUNG MEN ARE NOT ONLY ACADEMICALLY

                    SOUND, BUT ARE ATHLETES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY AND SPEND QUITE A BIT OF

                    TIME AT MANY EVENTS.  AND BENJAMIN IS ONE THAT YOU WILL FIND AT MOST

                    OF OUR EVENTS AS HE SUPPORTS SO MANY THAT ARE WITHIN THE WORKING CLASS.

                                 SO PLEASE, IF YOU COULD INTRODUCE AND WELCOME THEM

                    TO CHAMBERS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MS. BUTTENSCHON, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU THIS

                    MORNING TO OUR ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE

                    FLOOR TO YOU.  AND HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  IT'S ALWAYS

                    WONDERFUL TO SEE A WHOLE FAMILY COME TOGETHER TO PARTICIPATE IN CIVIC

                    ENGAGEMENT.  SO THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. DURSO FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 SO TODAY I GET THE DISTINCT HONOR AND PRIVILEGE OF

                    INTRODUCING A GOOD FRIEND, A CONSTITUENT AND A FORMER MEMBER, MARC

                    HERBST IS JOINING ME TODAY.  MARC SERVED FROM 1994 TO 2002 FOR

                    DISTRICT 14.  HE'S UP HERE TODAY VISITING US AND SOME MEMBERS FROM

                    LONG ISLAND.

                                 SO, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU WOULD BE SO KIND TO OFFER

                    HIM ALL THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR AND WELCOME HIM BACK TO ALBANY.

                                          6



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MR. DURSO, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WELCOME BACK,

                    ASSEMBLYMEMBER.  WE WELCOME YOU TO THE CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE

                    PRIVILEGES TO YOU.  IT'S WONDERFUL TO HAVE YOU BACK IN OUR CHAMBER.

                    THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. ANDERSON FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. ANDERSON:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 I RISE TO MAKE A BRIEF INTRODUCTION THIS MORNING ON

                    BEHALF OF A CIVIC ORGANIZATION FROM THE 31ST ASSEMBLY DISTRICT.  OUR

                    FRIENDS FROM THE 149TH STREET SOUTH OZONE PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION ARE

                    CELEBRATING 50 YEARS THIS YEAR, MADAM SPEAKER.  FIFTY YEARS OF

                    ADVOCACY, COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT AND REPRESENTATION FOR THE

                    NEIGHBORHOOD OF SOUTH OZONE PARK.  CURRENTLY THE GROUP IS LED BY

                    MISS ARACELIA COOK WHO IS UP HERE WITH US TODAY, ALONG WITH HER

                    VARIOUS BOARD MEMBERS AND GENERAL MEMBERS.  THEY ARE DEDICATED TO

                    PRESERVING AND ENHANCING THE BEAUTY AND RICH HISTORY OF SOUTH OZONE

                    PARK.  THEIR EFFORTS ALSO INCLUDE WORKING CLOSELY WITH RESIDENTS,

                    COMMUNITY GROUPS, ELECTED OFFICIALS SUCH AS MYSELF AND CITY AND STATE

                    AGENCIES TO ENSURE THE COMMUNITY STAYS INFORMED ON IMPORTANT LOCAL

                    ISSUES.  MADAM SPEAKER, THEY HAVE CONSISTENTLY SUPPORTED AND

                    CELEBRATED THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S DIVERSITY THROUGH THE YEARS, FOSTERING AN

                    INCLUSIVE ENVIRONMENT AND ENCOURAGING EVERYONE TO GET INVOLVED.

                    AND IF YOU KNOW MS. COOK, SHE'S A WOMAN FROM THE BLOCK AND SHE

                    ALWAYS WANTS TO MAKE SURE THAT YOU'RE GETTING INVOLVED AND YOU KNOW

                                          7



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    YOUR BEST, SO THAT YOU CAN DO YOUR BEST AS A NEIGHBORHOOD.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, REACHING 50 YEARS IS NO SMALL FEAT

                    AND I WANT TO GIVE A HEARTFELT THANKS TO THIS CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR TAKING

                    THIS OPPORTUNITY TO TRAVEL WITH -- TRAVEL TO ALBANY TO VISIT THE STATE'S

                    CAPITOL, MANY FOR THEIR FIRST TIME, BUT ALSO TO CELEBRATE THIS 50 YEARS OF

                    ADVOCACY.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE AFFORD

                    THESE MEMBERS OF THE SOUTH OZONE PARK COMMUNITY THE CORDIALITIES OF

                    THE FLOOR OF THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MR. ANDERSON, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THE

                    ASSEMBLY CHAMBER, ESTEEMED GROUP THE 149TH STREET SOUTH OZONE

                    PARK CIVIC ASSOCIATION.  CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU FOR 50 YEARS.  IT'S QUITE

                    AN ACCOMPLISHMENT.  WE EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR TO YOU AND

                    HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR

                    JOINING US.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. LEVENBERG FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. LEVENBERG:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 I RISE TO INTRODUCE THREE WONDERFUL, YOUNG PEOPLE

                    FROM THE 95TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT, ALEC ELKIN, SADIE SPAGNOLI AND

                    DAHLIA BECK.  THEY ARE -- EACH OF THEM GOES TO A DIFFERENT HIGH SCHOOL.

                    THEY ARE SENIORS AND THEY ARE GOING TO BE HEADING OFF TO COLLEGE IN THE

                    FALL.  ALEC IS A SENIOR AT HENDRICK HUDSON HIGH SCHOOL, CLASS OF 2025

                    AND HE WILL BE GOING TO SUNY ALBANY IN THE FALL.  SADIE IS CROTON ON

                                          8



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    HUDSON [SIC] -- OR CROTON-HARMON HIGH SCHOOL, CLASS OF 2025 AND SHE

                    WILL BE GOING TO UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN IN THE FALL.  AND DAHLIA

                    BECK IS A HALDANE HIGH SCHOOL, CLASS OF 2025 SENIOR AND SHE WILL BE

                    ATTENDING UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA IN THE FALL.  WE ARE GOING

                    TO MISS THEM GREATLY, AS THEY HAVE ALSO DONE A LITTLE VOLUNTEER WORK IN

                    MY OFFICE AND I COULDN'T BE MORE GRATEFUL FOR ALL OF THEIR HARD WORK.

                    AND I KNOW THAT NOT HAVING LISTED THEIR ENTIRE RÉSUMÉS, THAT THEY'VE

                    HAD MANY ACCOMPLISHMENTS IN THEIR YOUNG LIVES AND I KNOW THAT THEY

                    WILL HAVE MANY MORE.

                                 SO, PLEASE, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU COULD OFFER THEM

                    ALL OF THE CORDIALITIES OF THE FLOOR, I WOULD APPRECIATE IT.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON BEHALF OF MS. LEVENBERG, THE SPEAKER AND ALL

                    MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND

                    CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU FOR YOUR ACADEMIC CAREER IN HIGH SCHOOL AND FOR

                    YOUR CONTINUED ACADEMIC SUCCESS.  SOME OF YOU ARE STAYING, SOME OF

                    YOU ARE GOING VERY FAR AWAY, BUT WE DEFINITELY WISH YOU WELL WISHES.

                    WE HOPE YOU ENJOY OUR PROCEEDINGS TODAY AND THANK YOU SO VERY

                    MUCH FOR JOINING US.  GOOD LUCK TO YOU ALL.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. LASHER FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. LASHER:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 I RISE TODAY TO WELCOME MY SON, BENJAMIN LASHER,

                    WHO IS A 13-YEAR-OLD 7TH GRADER AT BOOKER T. WASHINGTON MIDDLE

                    SCHOOL, MS-54, IN THE 69TH ASSEMBLY DISTRICT.  AND BEN -- I HAVE -- I

                                          9



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    HAVE REALLY BEEN PROUD TO WATCH BEN GET VERY INVOLVED IN MODEL

                    UNITED NATIONS THIS YEAR AND TAKE A REAL INTEREST BOTH IN THE AFFAIRS OF

                    THE WORLD AROUND HIM AND IN THE PROCESS OF DELIBERATION AND DEBATE

                    AND LEGISLATION.  AND SO, I'M EXCITED FOR HIM TO BE HERE TODAY AND

                    TOMORROW TO SEE THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS FIRSTHAND AND ALSO TO -- TO KEEP

                    ME COMPANY IN THESE -- IN THESE WANING DAYS OF THE SESSION.

                                 SO, I WOULD BE GRATEFUL IF YOU WOULD WELCOME HIM

                    AND EXTEND TO HIM THE CORDIALITIES OF THE CHAMBER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MR. LASHER, THE SPEAKER AND ALL THE MEMBERS, WELCOME, BENJAMIN, TO

                    THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER.  WE ARE EXTENDING PRIVILEGES TO YOU.  ONE OF

                    THEM MAY BE UNLIMITED SNACKS IN THE MEMBERS' LOUNGE, BUT WE DO

                    REALLY APPRECIATE YOUR INTEREST IN CIVIS AND CONTINUATION OF ADVOCACY

                    FOR THINGS THAT ARE VERY IMPORTANT TO YOU.  SO, CONGRATULATIONS TO YOU

                    ACADEMICALLY.  WE HOPE YOU ENJOY YOUR TIME HERE TODAY HANGING OUT

                    WITH YOUR DAD.  THANK YOU FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN

                    INTRODUCTION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE AN INTRODUCTION.  WE HAVE BEEN

                    JOINED IN OUR CHAMBERS BY THE HANDSOMEST YOUNG MAN IN HERE.  HIS

                    NAME HAPPENS TO BE JACK KNIGHT AND HE'S ALMOST FOUR.

                                 SO, IF YOU WILL PLEASE WELCOME, DEAR STAFF SON HERE,

                    JACK KNIGHT.  HE HAS JOINED US THERE, HE'S WITH HIS DADDY.  HE'S A LITTLE

                                         10



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SHY THIS MORNING.  HE WASN'T THIS SHY LAST YEAR, BUT IT'LL CHANGE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, IT'S ALWAYS WONDERFUL TO

                    SEE FAMILY MEMBERS.  HI, JACK.  WE HOPE YOU HAVE AN AWESOME TIME

                    HERE WITH US TODAY.  THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 WE'RE GOING TO START DEBATES.

                                 COLLEAGUES, IF WE COULD TAKE OUR SEATS AND HAVE QUIET.

                    THANK YOU.

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 MS. CRUZ FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. CRUZ:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 I'M HERE JOINED TODAY BY MR. MAC PHIPPS.  HE'S HERE

                    TO TALK TO OUR COLLEAGUES ABOUT HIS REMARKABLE STORY.  MAC IS A

                    LEGENDARY NEW ORLEANS RAPPER WHO ROSE TO FAME IN THE LATE 1990S AFTER

                    SIGNING WITH THE ICONIC NO LIMIT RECORDS AND COLLABORATING WITH

                    ARTISTS LIKE SNOOP DOG.  HE WAS BORN INTO A FAMILY OF ARTISTS.  MAC

                    BEGAN WRITING MUSIC AT AN EARLY AGE AND WAS CELEBRATED FOR HIS LYRICAL

                    DEPTH AND AUTHENTICITY.  IN THE 2000S, HIS CAREER WAS TRAGICALLY DERAILED

                    WHEN HE WAS WRONGFULLY CONVICTED OF A CRIME HE DID NOT COMMIT;

                    DESPITE HAVING NO CRIMINAL RECORD, NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE TYING HIM TO

                    THE SCENE AND NO CREDIBLE WITNESSES.  IN A STUNNING UNDERMINING,

                    MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE, PROSECUTORS TWISTED HIS LYRICS, ALTERING PRONOUNS

                    AND SLICING LINES AND TAKING SOME LYRICS THAT WERE AS OLD AS FOUR YEARS

                    PRIOR TO THE CRIME TO PORTRAY HIS ART AS A CONFESSION, WHILE THE MEN WHO

                                         11



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    CONFESSED TO THE CRIME WAS TURNED AWAY BY THE POLICE.  MAC SPENT 21

                    YEARS BEHIND BARS BUT NEVER LOST HIS COMMITMENT TO HEALING AND

                    MENTORSHIP, EARNING THE HUMANITARIAN AWARD, GUIDING YOUNG MEN AND

                    ADVOCATING FOR JUSTICE FROM WITHIN PRISON WALLS.

                                 IN 2021, HE WAS GRANTED CLEMENCY BY THE LOUISIANA

                    PAROLE BOARD AND GOVERNOR JOHN BEL EDWARDS, WHO UNANIMOUSLY

                    RECOGNIZED THE INJUSTICE IN HIS CASE.  SINCE RETURNING HOME, MAC

                    DEDICATED HIS LIVE TO UPLIFTING OTHERS, MENTORING AT RISK YOUTH,

                    TEACHING MUSIC AND FIGHTING FOR FIRST AMENDMENT PROTECTIONS FOR ARTISTS.

                    HIS ALBUM, SON OF THE CITY, IS BOTH POWERFUL AND A TESTAMENT TO HIS

                    JOURNEY AND THE MESSAGE OF RESILIENCE.  MAC'S STORY IS NOT ONLY ONE OF

                    INJUSTICE, IT IS ONE OF TRANSFORMATION, STRENGTH AND POWER AND THE

                    POWER OF USING HIS VOICE.  HE'S JOINED WITH US -- HE'S JOINED -- HE'S

                    JOINING US TODAY WITH HIS WIFE.

                                 SO, MADAM SPEAKER, PLEASE HELP ME WELCOME HIM

                    AND HIS WIFE TO OUR HOUSE AND EXTEND THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF

                    MS. CRUZ, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU, MR. PHIPPS,

                    TO THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR TO

                    YOU.  WE APPRECIATE YOU SHARING YOUR STORY WITH US AND DO HOPE FOR

                    THE BEST FOR YOU AND YOUR FAMILY IN THE FUTURE.  THANK YOU FOR JOINING

                    US TODAY.  THANK YOU.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, WOULD

                                         12



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    YOU PLEASE CALL THE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES COMMITTEE TO THE

                    SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  GOVERNMENT

                    EMPLOYEES TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.  GOVERNMENT

                    EMPLOYEE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.

                                 PAGE 24, CALENDAR NO. 100, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04725-B, CALENDAR

                    100, BURDICK, SCHIAVONI, SIMONE, EPSTEIN, OTIS, ROSENTHAL,

                    LEVENBERG, LUNSFORD, SANTABARBARA.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING THE USE OF

                    DRILLING FLUIDS, BRINE AND FLOWBACK WATER FROM GAS OR OIL WELLS, POOLS,

                    OR FIELDS ON ANY HIGHWAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. BURDICK.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  CERTAINLY.

                                 THIS BILL WOULD AMEND SECTION 23-0305 OF THE

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW TO REQUIRE THE DEPARTMENT OF

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF OIL AND GAS DRILLING

                    FLUIDS, BRINE AND FLOWBACK WATER, ON ANY HIGHWAY FOR ANY PURPOSE,

                    INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO DEICING AND DUST SUPPRESSION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. SIMPSON.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE BILL SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                                         13



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  OF COURSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THANK YOU, MR. BURDICK.

                                 SO, WHAT HAS CHANGED FROM PRIOR VERSIONS OF THIS BILL

                    WITH THE MOST RECENT ONE BEING VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  SO, GREAT QUESTION.

                                 THIS IS A DIFFERENT AND MORE FOCUSED BILL.  THAT EARLIER

                    LEGISLATION WAS BROADER AND COULD HAVE INTERPRETED TO AFFECT OTHER

                    SECTORS LIKE SOLUTION MINING.  AND IN RESPONSE TO CONCERNS RAISED AT

                    THAT TIME AND SUBSEQUENTLY WE'VE TIGHTENED THE LANGUAGE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  SO, YOU MENTIONED "SOLUTION

                    MINING."  THAT'S A NATURAL OCCURRING WELLS THAT CONTAIN SALINE OR SALT,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  SO SOLUTION MINING ARE ONE OF THE

                    AREAS THAT WOULD NOT BE PROHIBITED UNDER THIS BILL.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  RIGHT.  BUT I -- MY QUESTION WAS,

                    THAT'S A NATURALLY OCCURRING WELL AND THOSE FLUIDS ARE OKAY.  THEY'RE NOT

                    GONNA BE --

                                 (CROSS-TALK)

                                 MR. BURDICK:  CORRECT.  NATURALLY OCCURRING WELLS

                    ARE -- ARE NOT PART OF THE PROPOSED REGULATION HERE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THEY'RE A SOURCE OF BRINE.  SOLUTION

                    WELLS ARE A SOURCE OF BRINE, IF I'M CORRECT.  DO YOU AGREE?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  I DO AGREE.

                                         14



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  SO YOUR LEGISLATION SAYS, PROHIBITS

                    THE USE OF DRILLING FLUIDS, BRINE AND FLOWBACK WATER.  DRILLING FLUIDS,

                    FLOWBACK WATER FROM GAS AND OIL WELLS ARE ALREADY PROHIBITED IN NEW

                    YORK STATE.  WE BANNED FRACKING WELLS IN 2015.  SO I'M TRYING TO

                    DISTINGUISH BETWEEN THE TERM "BRINE" AND YOU'RE SAYING THAT WELLS THAT

                    PRODUCE BRINE ARE -- ARE EXEMPT?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  CORRECT.  BECAUSE THIS IS ONLY

                    DEALING WITH FRACKING WASTEWATER FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS.  AND YOU'RE

                    CORRECT ABOUT PROHIBITIONS.  HOWEVER, THIS FRACKING WASTEWATER ARE

                    PRODUCED BY SUPPLIERS FROM WHO -- ARE FROM OUT-OF-STATE.  AND -- AND

                    SO THAT'S WHAT THIS IS GETTING AT.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  WELL, THANK YOU, BECAUSE YOU'RE

                    GOING RIGHT DOWN THE LINE WHERE I WANTED TO GO.

                                 SO THOSE PRODUCTS THAT ARE BEING DEVELOPED

                    OUT-OF-STATE AND BROUGHT INTO NEW YORK STATE ARE REGULATED BY DEC

                    CURRENTLY AND PERMITTED IF THEY MEET DEC REGS.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT -- ARE YOU

                    REFERRING TO THE BENEFICIAL USE PERMITTING PROGRAM [SIC]?

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  THE -- EXCUSE ME?  I DIDN'T...

                                 MR. BURDICK:  BENEFICIAL USE, IS THAT WHAT YOU'RE

                    REFERRING TO?

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  NO.  I'M -- I'M ASKING -- YOU

                    MENTIONED THAT SINCE THESE FLUIDS ARE ALREADY BANNED IN NEW YORK

                    STATE, THEY'RE BEING PRODUCED IN OTHER STATES AND BROUGHT INTO NEW

                    YORK STATE AND USED ON, I PRESUME, USED IN NEW YORK STATE.  IF THAT'S

                                         15



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THE CASE, THEY'RE REGULATED AND PERMITTED BY DEC CURRENTLY.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  SO, YOU KNOW, ONE THING THAT I

                    THINK NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED IS THE EXTENT TO WHICH THAT OCCURS.  AND, YOU

                    KNOW, WE'VE HAD A CONVERSATION ABOUT THAT.  AND IT'S NOT EXACTLY

                    AIRTIGHT, FAR FROM IT.  YOU KNOW, THEIR PROCESS, FOR EXAMPLE, DOES NOT

                    TEST FOR RADIUM.  AND, YOU KNOW, THE CONCERN THAT WE HAVE IS THAT WE

                    HAVE, REALLY, A LOOPHOLE HERE.  AND THAT LOOPHOLE NEEDS TO BE CLOSED,

                    AND THAT'S THE INTENTION OF -- OF THIS LEGISLATION.

                                 YOU KNOW, HIGH-VOLUME FRACKING FLUID PRODUCTS ARE

                    BANNED, BUT THIS APPLIES TO ANY FLUIDS RESULTING FROM GAS AND OIL WELLS.

                    AND SO, THAT'S THE REGULATORY GAP THAT WE INTEND TO ADDRESS WITH THIS

                    LEGISLATION.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  LET ME REPHRASE MY QUESTION.  ARE

                    THERE FLUIDS COMING FROM OTHER STATES FROM OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK?

                    BECAUSE CURRENTLY, THERE ARE NO FLUIDS THAT WE CAN USE IN NEW YORK

                    STATE EXPECT FOR SOLUTION MINE -- BRINE.

                                 (PAUSE/CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. BURDICK:  YEAH, SO THE ANSWER IS YES.  THERE

                    ARE FLUIDS THAT COME FROM OUT-OF-STATE, BUT ALSO, FLUIDS CAN BE PRODUCED

                    DOMESTICALLY HERE IN NEW YORK STATE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  FLUIDS FROM WHERE?  FRACKING

                    MINES?  FRACKING WELLS?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  SO, YOU CAN HAVE FLUIDS THAT CAN BE,

                    YOU KNOW, FOR EXAMPLE, BEET JUICE IS SOMETHING THAT -- THAT IS DONE

                    HERE IN NEW YORK STATE AND IS PERMISSIBLE AND IN FACT WOULD NOT BE

                                         16



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AFFECTED.  AND IN FACT, WE WOULD ENCOURAGE THAT AS A GOOD ALTERNATIVE

                    TO THESE -- THESE FLUIDS THAT ARE PUT ON THE ROADS AND -- AND REALLY ARE

                    PRESENTING SIGNIFICANT HEALTH HAZARDS.  THE PURPOSE OF THIS BILL IS REALLY

                    TO HAVE THE TOOLS TO TRY TO PROHIBIT THESE PRACTICES WHERE THESE TOXIC

                    WASTEWATERS ARE CONTAINING CARCINOGENIC AND RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS, IN

                    MANY INSTANCES, AND THEY'RE PUTTING IT ON ROADS FOR DEICING OR FOR

                    SUPPRESSING DUST IN THE SUMMER.  AND THIS IS TO STOP THAT PRACTICE AND

                    FRANKLY, IT'S -- IT'S REALLY A HEALTH MATTER AS MUCH AS ANYTHING ELSE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  CAN YOU CITE AN EXAMPLE OF A

                    CURRENT SITUATION WHERE ONE OF THESE FLUIDS THAT YOU WANT TO BAN,

                    PROHIBIT, OF BEING APPLIED IN NEW YORK AND USED IN NEW YORK RIGHT

                    NOW?  THAT'S WHAT I'M TRYING TO ESTABLISH.  I'VE -- DEC CONTROLS,

                    REGULATES WHATEVER IS APPLIED TO OUR STATE HIGHWAYS, THE USE OF FLUIDS.

                    AND WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT NATURAL OCCURRING, YOU KNOW, ELEMENTS SUCH

                    AS, YOU SAID URANIUM MAYBE OR --

                                 MR. BURDICK:  URANIUM -- URANIUM AS WELL.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  MATTER OF FACT, JUST FOR INFORMATION,

                    IT'S IN, YOU KNOW, MANY PEOPLE'S DRILLED WATER WELLS.  IT'S NATURAL

                    OCCURRING URANIUM, DECAYING URANIUM.  RADON.  BUT, ASIDE FROM THAT,

                    IS THERE -- I'M TRYING TO GET AT THE -- THE ISSUE OF WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO

                    BAN.  WHAT'S HAPPENING, WHY WE WOULD DO SOMETHING THAT WOULD

                    PROHIBIT SAFE FLUIDS -- FLUIDS THAT ARE TESTED, REGULATED BY DEC FROM

                    COMING OUT OF NEW YORK STATE -- FROM SOURCES OUTSIDE OF NEW YORK

                    STATE, BEING USED ECONOMICALLY IN NEW YORK?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  YOU KNOW, I DON'T THINK THAT WE

                                         17



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    NEED TO MAKE THIS TOO COMPLICATED BECAUSE IT'S ACTUALLY A VERY SIMPLE

                    BILL, ALL OF ONE SENTENCE.

                                 (CROSS-TALK)

                                 AGAIN, I NEED TO EMPHASIZE THAT THIS IS LIMITED TO THE

                    FRACKING WASTEWATER THROUGH THE PRODUCTION WITH OIL AND NATURAL GAS

                    WELLS.  THAT -- THAT'S WHAT IT'S LIMITED TO AND I THINK YOU'RE EXPANDING

                    THE DISCUSSION TO BEYOND THAT.  AND THIS IS WHAT IT -- THIS IS WHAT IT

                    INTENDS TO LIMIT.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  WELL, I -- I DO HAVE CONCERNS.  IT

                    SAYS BRINE.  AND BRINE, YOU KNOW, AND THEN YOU TALK ABOUT FLUIDS, OR

                    CHEMICALS, OR MATERIALS THAT ARE COMING FROM OUT OF NEW YORK STATE,

                    SINCE THEY ARE BANNED HERE ALREADY.  I WANT TO KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM

                    IS, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO ADDRESS.  IS THIS A FEAR BILL?  IS THIS A BEER -- A

                    BILL THAT'S ACTUALLY GOING TO HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT?  IS IT CURRENT -- ARE

                    WE PUTTING HARMFUL CHEMICALS ON OUR ROADS RIGHT NOW THAT ARE

                    APPROVED BY DEC?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, YOU GOT THREE OR FOUR

                    QUESTIONS, SO I'LL TRY TO TAKE EACH OF THEM IN ORDER.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  TRY TO NARROW IT DOWN.

                                 (LAUGHTER/CROSS-TALK)

                                 MR. BURDICK:  I'M HAPPY TO DO THAT.

                                 SO AGAIN, IT'S BRINE FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS.  AND I --

                    YOU KNOW, LOOK.  I -- I THINK THE HEART OF YOUR QUESTION GOES TO, WHY

                    ARE WE DOING THIS?  AND, YOU KNOW, WE'RE DOING THIS BECAUSE WHAT

                    HAPPENS WITH THIS FRACKING WASTEWATER IS THAT IT'S APPLIED TO THE ROADS,

                                         18



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    BUT WITH RUNOFF, IT'S GONNA TO GO INTO THE SOIL, IT'S GONNA TO GO INTO THE

                    SURFACE WATER, IT'S GONNA GO INTO THE GROUNDWATER, IT'S GONNA GO INTO

                    OUR RESERVOIRS AND THEY CONTAIN THESE VERY HARMFUL, TOXIC SUBSTANCES:

                    ARSINIC, BARIUM, LEAD, HEAVY METALS.  THEY'RE EVEN, YOU KNOW, AS -- AS

                    THE FLUID RETURNS TO THE SURFACE, IT CAN PICK UP THOSE HEAVY METALS AND

                    THEY CAN GET INTO OUR DRINKING WATER.  AND THAT'S THE CONCERN HERE AND

                    WE FEEL THAT IT'S IMPORTANT TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC HEALTH.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  SO, ONE MORE TIME.  I'M GONNA ASK IT

                    EVEN SHORTER AND MORE SIMPLER.  ARE WE CURRENTLY PUTTING THAT TYPE OF

                    MATERIAL ON THE ROADS IN NEW YORK?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  YES, WE ARE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  DEC IS ALLOWING THAT?  BECAUSE

                    THEY PERMIT, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE REQUIRED TO HAVE A PERMIT.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  IT'S NOT THE PERMIT OF ENVIRONMENTAL

                    PROTECTION.  IT'S THE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION THAT

                    ISSUES THOSE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATIONS.  AND, YOU KNOW, THE -- THE

                    PROBLEM IS THAT, YOU KNOW, AND THIS IS A NOT TO -- TO BELITTLE OR DENIGRATE

                    THE WORK THAT DEC DOES, BUT THEY DON'T TEST FOR EVERYTHING.  AND -- AND

                    THE PROBLEM IS THAT SOME OF THESE DO CONTAIN, YOU KNOW, THESE TOXIC

                    MATERIALS.  AND SO, WE FEEL THAT THE SAFEST APPROACH IS TO -- IS TO STOP

                    THAT PRACTICE WHEN -- AGAIN, OIL AND GAS WELLS.  IT -- WE ENCOURAGE THE

                    SOLUTION MINING.  IN FACT, THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION HAS A PILOT

                    PROGRAM ON SOLUTION MINING AND THAT MAY BE, YOU KNOW, ONE OF THE

                    THINGS IN THE FUTURE THAT CAN PROVIDE A SAFE ALTERNATIVE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  SO THERE ISN'T A PERMIT THAT IS ISSUED,

                                         19



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    IT'S A BENEFICIAL USE.  IT'S NOT ACTUALLY A, YOU KNOW, A --

                                 MR. BURDICK:  IT'S A BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION.

                    IT'S NOT REALLY A PERMIT, PER SE.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  I DON'T THINK I HAVE ANY OTHER

                    FURTHER QUESTIONS FOR YOU, UNLESS YOU CAN CITE A CONTAMINATION EXAMPLE

                    SOMEWHERE.  BECAUSE THAT WAS THE ONE THING THAT I -- YOU HAVEN'T BEEN

                    ABLE TO PROVIDE.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  YOU'RE SAYING IT'S HAPPENING, BUT I

                    -- I DON'T KNOW --

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, I -- I THINK -- HE -- HERE'S THE

                    THING.  IS THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS, SAID

                    RIVERKEEPER, THERE ARE ALSO PROPRIETARY STUDIES THAT ARE DONE THAT, YOU

                    KNOW, WE -- WE -- WE DON'T HAVE, YOU KNOW, ACCESS TO.  BUT THERE IS --

                    THERE'S CONSIDERABLE EVIDENCE TO INDICATE THAT IN FACT, THE CONCERNS THAT

                    WE HAVE OVER WHAT'S BEING APPLIED TO THE ROADS, WHAT IS GOING IN RUNOFF

                    AND THOSE CONCERNS ARE JUSTIFIED.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  OKAY.  THANK YOU, MR. BURDICK.

                                 MS. BURDICK:  THANK YOU, MR. SIMPSON.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  ON THE BILL, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES

                    -- ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. SIMPSON:  I'D LIKE TO GO ON THE BILL.  THANK

                    YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 YOU KNOW, WE JUST HEARD THIS DEBATE AND MY FEELING

                                         20



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    IS THAT OUR EFFORTS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGING DEC TO TEST WHATEVER FLUIDS

                    ARE BEING APPLIED TO OUR ROADS, RATHER THAN MAYBE EXPAND THE

                    BENEFICIAL USE PERMIT, RATHER THAN BANNING CHEMICALS THAT ARE GONNA

                    POTENTIALLY COST COMMUNITIES MORE MONEY IN THE LONG RUN LOOKING FOR

                    DIFFERENT ALTERNATIVES.  I THINK THAT THIS IS MORE OF A SUSPECTED IMPACT --

                    NEGATIVE IMPACT TO THE ENVIRONMENT WITHOUT VERY MUCH DATA AND I

                    THINK THAT THIS BILL IS -- WHILE IT'S INTENDED TO BE SOMETHING THAT'S

                    HELPFUL, I THINK THE BETTER DIRECTION WOULD BE TO ENCOURAGE DEC TO TEST

                    WHATEVER FLUIDS, WHERE THEY COME FROM -- WHEREVER THEY COME FROM,

                    AS TO THEIR SAFETY TO OUR ENVIRONMENT, AND ALSO PROVIDE FOR

                    COST-EFFECTIVE MEASURES FOR ALL OF OUR COMMUNITIES.

                                 SO, FOR THAT, I WILL VOTE NO AND ENCOURAGE MY

                    COLLEAGUES TO CONSIDER THAT AS WELL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    SIMPSON.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, WOULD

                    YOU CALL THE GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S

                    CONFERENCE ROOM?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU.

                    GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE

                    ROOM.  GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S

                    CONFERENCE ROOM.

                                 MR. RA.

                                 MR. RA:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                                         21



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  OF COURSE.

                                 MR. RA:  SO, JUST -- THIS MAY BE SOMEWHAT REPETITIVE,

                    BUT JUST FOR CLARIFICATION.  SO, RIGHT, WE HAVE A BAN ON FRACKING IN NEW

                    YORK STATE, BUT THERE ARE NON-FRACKING WELLS IN NEW YORK THAT PRODUCE

                    A BRINE THAT CURRENTLY CAN BE USED ON OUR ROADS AFTER THEY GO THROUGH

                    THIS BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION BY THE DEC, CORRECT?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, THE -- THE BAN REALLY -- IT ONLY

                    PERTAINS TO HIGH VOLUME FRACKING.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  I'M TALKING -- I'M TALKING ABOUT

                    CURRENT --

                                 MR. BURDICK:  SO, IT'S NOT A COMPLETE BAN IF THAT --

                    IF THAT'S YOUR QUESTION.  SO, THEY'RE -- AND -- AND -- AND AGAIN, THAT'S

                    WHAT -- WHAT WE'RE AIMED AT -- AIMING AT HERE, IS THAT THEY STILL USE

                    CHEMICALS AND, YOU KNOW, THOSE SOLUTIONS, THE FRACKING FLUIDS AND SUCH

                    ARE PART OF THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE.

                                 MR. RA:  JUST FOR CLARIFICATION, WHEN YOU JUST SAID

                    "THE BAN," YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT OUR BAN ON HYDRO FRACKING; THAT'S WHAT

                    YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  RIGHT.  IN OTHER WORDS, THE -- THE

                    BAN ON -- ON -- ON THE FRACKING --

                                 MR. RA:  YEAH.

                                 MR. BURDICK: -- IS LIMITED TO HIGH-VOLUME

                    FRACKING.

                                 MR. RA:  CORRECT.

                                         22



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. BURDICK:  I -- I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY THAT

                    BECAUSE SOME MAY FEEL THAT IT'S A COMPLETE PROHIBITION ON ANY KIND OF

                    FRACKING.

                                 MR. RA:  NO, WE HAVE DIFFERENT TYPES OF DRILLING THAT

                    DOES OCCUR IN NEW YORK STATE AND IS NOT BANNED.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. RA:  AND BUT THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING.  SO, UNDER

                    CURRENT LAW, A BRINE THAT COMES FROM THAT TYPE OF PROCESS CAN BE USED

                    ON OUR ROADS AFTER GOING THROUGH THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION BY

                    THE DEC, CURRENTLY?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THAT'S CORRECT.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  AND IF THIS WERE ENACTED, THEY

                    WOULD NO LONGER BE ABLE TO UTILIZE IT.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  FOR THOSE THAT ARE COMING FROM OIL

                    AND GAS WELLS, THAT -- THAT WOULD PROHIBIT THEM FROM BEING USED.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  NOT JUST HYDROFRACKING THAT'S

                    CURRENTLY BANNED, BUT ANY TYPE OF OIL AND GAS DRILLING BYPRODUCT.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THAT IS CORRECT.

                                 MR. RA:  OKAY.  THANK YOU.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. RA:  SO, YOU KNOW, WE TALK A LOT IN THIS HOUSE

                    AND I HEAR -- I HEAR THE WORDS TALKED ABOUT VERY OFTEN THAT THERE'S THIS

                    IDEA THAT ON ONE SIDE OF THE AISLE WE FOLLOW SCIENCE AND IT CAN BE ON

                    ANYTHING.  IT COULD BE ON MEDICAL SITUATIONS, IT COULD BE ON SOMETHING

                                         23



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ENVIRONMENTAL.  AND ON THE OTHER SIDE THAT WE IGNORE ALL THESE THINGS.

                    YET, ONCE AGAIN, AND WE'VE DONE THIS MANY TIMES BEFORE, WE HAVE AN

                    AGENCY THAT HAS AN EXPERTISE, THAT HAS TRAINED PEOPLE, THAT HAS PEOPLE

                    THAT HAVE SCIENTIFIC BACKGROUNDS THAT CAN LOOK AT THESE THINGS AND

                    UNLESS WE'RE ASSUMING THAT OUR NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION IS ALLOWING A MATERIAL TO BE USED ON OUR

                    ROADS THAT IS GOING TO CONTAMINATE SOIL THROUGH RUNOFF AND -- AND -- AND

                    EVERYTHING, IF THAT'S WHAT WE'RE SAYING HERE, THEN WE HAVE A MUCH

                    BIGGER PROBLEM.  BUT IF WE'RE NOT SAYING THAT, WHY ARE WE SUBSTITUTING

                    OUR JUDGMENT FOR THE JUDGMENT OF A STATE AGENCY THAT EXISTS TO PROTECT

                    OUR ENVIRONMENT?  THIS IS A -- A MATERIAL THAT IN SOME WAYS IS A

                    BYPRODUCT.  THIS IS A USE THAT HAS BEEN BENEFICIAL TO OUR LOCAL

                    HIGHWAYS.  AND EVEN THOUGH WE JUST PASSED A STATE BUDGET THAT

                    INCREASED OUR SPENDING BY A LARGER PERCENTAGE THAN WE'VE DONE IN

                    PROBABLY 20 YEARS, WE BARELY SCRATCHED THE SURFACE WITH REGARD TO OUR

                    LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, WITH REGARD TO FUNDING LOCAL INFRASTRUCTURE.  AND

                    HERE WE ARE BASICALLY BANNING THE USE OF A SUBSTANCE THAT IS

                    ECONOMICAL FOR OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS WHEN THEY'RE TRYING TO TREAT OUR

                    ROADS.

                                 SO, I -- I WOULD URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO VOTE AGAINST

                    THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  THE DEC IS -- IS ABLE TO WHEN SOMEBODY

                    WANTS TO USE -- A LOCAL HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT WANTS TO USE THIS BRINE,

                    THEY GO THROUGH A PROCESS, THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION AND I DON'T

                    BELIEVE THAT THE DEC IS -- IS GOING TO ALLOW SOMETHING TO BE USED ON

                    OUR ROADS THAT IS GOING TO BE HARMFUL AND I DON'T THINK THIS LEGISLATURE

                                         24



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SHOULD SUBSTITUTE OUR JUDGMENT FOR THEIRS, GIVEN THAT THEY HAVE THE

                    EXPERTISE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU, MR. RA.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR JUST A COUPLE QUESTIONS, PLEASE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  THANK YOU, MR. BURDICK.

                                 JUST -- JUST A COUPLE QUICK QUESTIONS.  WHO'S ACTUALLY

                    ASKING FOR THIS TO BE DONE?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, I GUESS I'M THE SPONSOR OF THE

                    BILL, BUT IT'S ALSO SUPPORTED I THINK BY ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS AND,

                    YOU KNOW, OTHERS THAT BELIEVE THAT WE DO NEED TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC

                    HEALTH.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO YOU'RE THE SPONSOR OF THE

                    BILL, I UNDERSTAND THAT.  BUT IS THERE SOME GROUP THAT HAS ACTUALLY COME

                    TO YOU SAYING, WILL YOU MOVE THIS BILL FORWARD?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  NO.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO THIS IS BASICALLY YOUR CALL?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, IT -- YOU KNOW, THIS IS A BILL

                    THAT HAS SOME PREDECESSORS, THIS IS DIFFERENT FROM THAT.  AND, YOU

                    KNOW, THAT'S SOMETHING THAT I CAN CERTAINLY LOOK INTO, AS TO WHETHER THE

                                         25



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SPONSORS AT THAT TIME HAD SOME ORGANIZED -- SOME ORGANIZATIONS THAT

                    PROVIDED MEMORANDUM OF SUPPORT AND SO FORTH.  I DON'T THINK THAT WE

                    HAVE WITH THIS BILL EITHER MEMORANDUMS OF SUPPORT OR MEMORANDUMS

                    OF OBJECTION.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WELL, THERE ARE A FEW.

                                 MY SECOND QUESTION:  A LITTLE WHILE AGO YOU WERE

                    TALKING ABOUT THE TOXIC CHEMICALS.  WHAT -- WHAT WERE THEY AGAIN?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  SO, YOU KNOW, IT'S -- IT'S QUITE A

                    LAUNDRY LIST, YOU KNOW.  IT'S HEAVY METALS SUCH AS ARSENIC, BARIUM AND

                    LEAD.  WE HAVE CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES LIKE BENZENE, TOLUENE AND

                    FORMALDEHYDE.  THERE ARE ALSO SOME NATURALLY OCCURRING RADIOACTIVE

                    MATERIALS SUCH AS RADIUM-226 AND URANIUM.  AND -- AND SO, THERE ARE

                    QUITE A FEW.  I PROBABLY HAVEN'T EXHAUSTED THE LIST.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU.

                                 OFF OF -- OFF OF THAT, MR. BURDICK, ARE THERE ANY

                    ACCEPTABLE LEVELS OF THESE TOXICS?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, YOU KNOW, IT'S INTERESTING

                    BECAUSE SOME HAD FOUND THAT, AND I THINK THAT IT'S RADIUM IN WHICH THE

                    LEVELS HAD BEEN FOUND TO BE EXCEEDING FEDERAL DRINKING WATER

                    STANDARDS BY HUNDREDS OR THOUSANDS OF TIMES WITH RADIUM.  AND SO, I --

                    I DON'T HAVE THE -- THE LIST OF, YOU KNOW, WHAT THOSE STANDARDS ARE.  IF

                    THAT'S WHAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR, I DON'T HAVE THAT IN MY FINGERTIPS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  YEAH, BECAUSE I THINK IT GOES

                    HAND AND HAND WITH WHAT YOU'RE TRYING TO ACCOMPLISH.  YOU'RE TRYING TO

                    BAN TOXIC CHEMICALS, WHICH I COMPLETELY UNDERSTAND, BUT AT THE SAME

                                         26



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    TIME SOME OF THESE THINGS ARE NATURALLY OUT THERE IN -- IN THE

                    ENVIRONMENT.  AND I WAS JUST WONDERING WHAT THE DIFFERENCE IS

                    BETWEEN YOUR BILL AND THOSE NUMBERS WERE COMPARED TO WHAT'S

                    NATURALLY IN THE GROUND.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, YOU KNOW, OVER THE LAST

                    SEVERAL YEARS, THIS BODY HAS COMMITTED LITERALLY HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS

                    OF DOLLARS TO REMEDIATE TOXIC SUBSTANCES THAT ARE IN OUR WATER SYSTEMS.

                    AND, YOU KNOW, IT'S BOTH LESS EXPENSIVE AND EASIER TO AVOID

                    CONTAMINATION THAN TO REMEDIATE THEM.  AND, YOU KNOW, NOT TO

                    MENTION THE HUMAN COST OF THESE CARCINOGENIC SUBSTANCES THAT MAY

                    LEAD TO CANCER AMONG MANY IN OUR STATE AND THAT HITS BOTH A HUMAN TOLL

                    AS WELL AS A FINANCIAL TOLL THAT WE ALL BEAR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  ALL RIGHT.  SO SOMEONE THAT

                    DOES OPPOSE THIS IS THE NEW YORK STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT OF -- OR

                    SUPERINTENDENTS ASSOCIATION, BECAUSE THERE ARE SOME GOOD USES FOR

                    THIS STUFF AND THEY'RE AT ACCEPTABLE LEVELS AND DEC'S ALLOWING THEM TO

                    USE THAT RIGHT NOW.  SO IF WE'RE GONNA BAN ALL OF THIS, WE'RE GONNA PUT

                    ANOTHER UNFUNDED MANDATE ONTO OUR HIGHWAYS, ONTO OUR LOCAL

                    GOVERNMENTS, OUR COUNTY, OUR TOWNS, OUR VILLAGES, 'CAUSE NOW THEY'RE

                    NOT GOING TO BE ABLE TO USE THIS PRODUCT.  IS THERE ANY -- WAS THERE ANY

                    FUNDING IN THE BUDGET TO HELP OFFSET THIS UNFUNDED MANDATE?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, THIS IS AN

                    INSTANCE IN WHICH WE REALLY NEED TO -- NEED TO TAKE A LONGER VIEW IN

                    TERMS OF WHAT THE COST IS.  AND THE COST OF THESE LESS EXPENSIVE

                    SOLUTIONS THAT COULD CAUSE SIGNIFICANT HARM AS I'VE DESCRIBED.  AND

                                         27



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THEY ARE REALLY PLENTY OF AFFORDABLE OPTIONS.  SOLUTION MINING, WHICH I

                    HAD MADE REFERENCE TO BEFORE, AND AGAIN, I'M VERY PLEASED THAT THE

                    DOT IS GOING FORWARD WITH A PILOT PROGRAM ON THAT.  THERE ARE

                    HOMEMADE BRINES, THERE'S BEET JUICE, THERE'S A NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE

                    OPTIONS.  AND I -- I DON'T WANT TO BE DISINGENUOUS.  YES, THE EXISTING

                    USE OF THESE FRACKING FLUIDS AND FRACKING WASTEWATER, YOU KNOW, WOULD

                    BE LESS EXPENSIVE.  BUT I THINK THAT WE HAVE TO TAKE A LOOK AT THE TOTAL

                    COST AND -- AND WHAT THAT COST WOULD BE, AS I MENTIONED PREVIOUSLY.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AND I BELIEVE YOU ARE A

                    FORMER TOWN SUPERVISOR, RIGHT?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  I WAS INDEED.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  SO, YOU -- YOU COMPLETELY

                    UNDERSTAND WHY I'M TALKING ABOUT THE UNFUNDED MANDATE BACK TO OUR

                    LOCAL COMMUNITIES AND WHAT THIS IS GOING TO DO TO THEM.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, I -- YOU KNOW, I'M PROUD OF

                    MY YEARS AS A SUPERVISOR OF THE TOWN AND FREQUENTLY WE TOOK MORE

                    EXPENSIVE OPTIONS BECAUSE WE FELT THAT THERE'S MORE EXPENSIVE OPTIONS,

                    EVEN THOUGH NOT REQUIRED BY FEDERAL OR STATE LAW, WAS THE RIGHT THING TO

                    DO FOR OUR RESIDENTS.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  WELL, I -- I THANK YOU FOR YOUR

                    TIME, MR. BURDICK.  I THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMENTS AND I DO AGREE WITH

                    A GOOD PORTION OF THIS.  I JUST WISH SOME OF THOSE NUMBERS THAT YOU

                    TALKED ABOUT THAT WE DON'T HAVE OR DON'T SEE, I WISH THEY WERE IN THIS

                    BILL SO WE COULD TAKE A REALLY GOOD, HARD LOOK AT THIS.  SO, THANK YOU

                    FOR YOUR TIME.

                                         28



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  YOU'RE WELCOME.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. MANKTELOW:  AGAIN, AS I JUST SAID, WE'RE --

                    WE'RE MOVING FORWARD AND ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES SAID EARLIER THAT WE

                    HAVE DEC, WE HAVE SOME OF THE BEST PEOPLE AND ENGINEERS AND

                    SCIENTISTS WORKING FOR NEW YORK STATE.  IF THIS BILL CAME FORWARD FROM

                    DEC ASKING US TO MAKE A CHANGE, I PROBABLY COULD SUPPORT IT.  BUT THE

                    SPONSOR SAID THIS IS BASICALLY HIS IDEA, HIS BILL, HE WANTS TO PUSH IT

                    FORWARD.  AND I'M NOT SAYING HE'S ALL WRONG, BUT I THINK WE NEED TO SEE

                    ALL THE NUMBERS AND ALL THE -- THE COSTS THAT ARE GOING TO BE INVOLVED TO

                    OUR LOCAL MUNICIPALITIES AND WE CONSTANTLY TALK ABOUT UNFUNDED

                    MANDATES AND THIS IS GONNA BE ANOTHER UNFUNDED MANDATE.  WE'RE

                    GOING TO TAKE THIS AWAY AND AT THE SAME TIME WE'RE TRYING TO STOP

                    PEOPLE IN NEW YORK STATE FROM USING AS MUCH SALT ON THE HIGHWAYS AS

                    WELL.  WHILE WE CAN'T TAKE EVERY TOOL OUT OF THE TOOLBOX AND

                    ACCOMPLISH THE JOB OF GETTING IT DONE.  I JUST THINK WE NEED TO

                    SOMETIMES SLOW THINGS DOWN, MAYBE DO A PILOT PROGRAM WHERE WE'RE

                    NOT USING THIS.  AND AGAIN, WE'RE NOT DOING IT AND IT'S NOT COMING OUT OF

                    THE GROUND IN NEW YORK STATE.  THERE'S OTHER WAYS TO ACCOMPLISH THIS

                    AND MAKE IT HAPPEN.

                                 SO, MADAM SPEAKER, I THANK YOU FOR THE TIME TO ASK

                    THE QUESTIONS.  THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME TO MAKE A FEW COMMENTS

                    AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME.

                                         29



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    MANKTELOW.

                                 MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MADAM SPEAKER.  I JUST

                    HAVE ONE QUESTION FOR THE SPONSOR.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  CERTAINLY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  IS -- IS IT YOUR BELIEF THAT THE

                    DEC OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DOES NOT REGULATE ENOUGH OR THOROUGHLY

                    ENOUGH?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  WELL, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, YOU KNOW,

                    AS I MENTIONED EARLIER, YOU KNOW, I'M NOT INTENDING TO CAST ASPERSIONS

                    ON THE DEC. I -- I THINK THAT THEY DO THE BEST THEY CAN.  BUT, IT'S A BIG

                    WATERFRONT TO -- TO BE ABLE TO TRY TO -- TO DEAL WITH AND THERE HAVE BEEN

                    INSTANCES IN WHICH THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATIONS HAD ISSUES WITH IT

                    AND, YOU KNOW, WE, AGAIN, FEEL THAT IT IS -- IT IS REALLY MORE PRUDENT TO

                    TAKE ACTIONS WHICH WILL PREVENT THIS FROM OCCURRING.  BUT AGAIN, I

                    REALLY DO WISH TO EMPHASIZE THAT AND -- AND I APPRECIATE THAT I'M BEING

                    TOLD THAT I'M THE SOLE AUTHOR OF THIS.  IT HAS, YOU KNOW, QUITE A HISTORY

                    AS YOU ALL KNOW.  BUT, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT THIS IS THE MORE PRUDENT

                    ACTION, BOTH FROM A PUBLIC HEALTH STANDPOINT AS WELL AS FROM THE

                    TAXPAYER STANDPOINT, SO THAT WE DON'T HAVE TO ADD RADIUM AND URANIUM

                    AND SOME OF THESE TOXIC CHEMICALS THAT END UP IN OUR DRINKING WATER

                                         30



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AND THAT WE NEED TO ADD THAT TO -- TO GETTING RID OF PFAS AND THE

                    HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS.  AND BY THE WAY, THAT DOES FALL ON

                    MUNICIPALITIES.  I KNOW, BECAUSE I AM TRYING TO GET GRANT FUNDING TO

                    MUNICIPALITIES THAT ARE DEALING WITH THESE CONTAMINANTS IN THEIR PUBLIC

                    WATER SYSTEMS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I APPRECIATE THAT LONGWINDED

                    ANSWER.

                                 AS MY COLLEAGUE MENTIONED, THE DEC HAS EXPERTISE,

                    THE DEC REGULATES THIS ISSUE NOW.  IF THEY BELIEVE THIS WAS A HEALTH OR

                    A SAFETY ISSUE, WOULDN'T THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO INCORPORATE THIS IN

                    THROUGH THE REGULATIONS, THROUGH THE PROCESS?  WOULDN'T THEY BE ABLE

                    TO DO THAT IF THEY SO CHOSE?

                                 MR. BURDICK:  YOU KNOW, THE DEC REGULATIONS

                    ARE NOT REALLY THE SUBJECT OF THIS BILL.  IT'S REALLY ABOUT SPECIFIC USAGES

                    OF FRACKING WASTEWATER FROM OIL AND GAS WELLS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU, SIR.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WHEN YOU READ THE SPONSOR'S

                    MEMO OF SUPPORT, IT SAYS THE INTENT OF THIS BILL IS TO PREVENT

                    WASTEWATER FROM HIGH-VOLUME HYDROFRACKING OPERATIONS FROM BEING

                    USED ON HIGHWAYS IN THE STATE.  THIS TYPE OF FRACKING IS NOT CURRENTLY

                    PERMITTED IN NEW YORK STATE.  HOWEVER, THERE ARE MANY EXISTING

                    NON-FRACKING WELLS IN NEW YORK THAT PRODUCE BRINE.  THEY'RE ONLY

                    USED AFTER A BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION, OR A BUD, IS APPROVED BY

                                         31



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THE DEC.  IT REQUIRES HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS TO TEST THE BRINE AND REPORT

                    ITS USE.  THE BUD, THE BENEFICIAL USE DETERMINATION, IS NOT ISSUED

                    WITHOUT A THOROUGH REVIEW AND CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BRINE.  THE

                    DEC HAS STRICT GUIDELINES AND REGULATIONS THAT THEY IMPLEMENT.  IF THEY

                    NEEDED -- THOUGHT SOMETHING WAS NEEDED TO BE DONE TO ADDRESS THIS,

                    THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO SO AND WOULD DO SO.  ALTHOUGH MY

                    COLLEAGUE SAYS THIS IS NOT ABOUT REGULATION, IT IS.  AND I'VE NEVER ONCE

                    HEARD THAT THE DEC OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK DOES NOT REGULATE

                    STRONGLY ENOUGH.

                                 CURRENTLY, THE SYSTEM ALLOWS FOR THE EFFECTIVE USE OF

                    BRINE FOR OUR HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS WHILE PROTECTING THE ENVIRONMENT

                    AND PUBLIC HEALTH.  AN OUTRIGHT -- AN OUTRIGHT AND ARBITRARY BAN ON THE

                    USE OF WATER FROM WELLS, PONDS AND FIELDS REALLY FAILS TO RECOGNIZE THE

                    CURRENT HIGH LEVEL OF STATE REGULATION OF THESE ACTIVITIES ALREADY.  THE

                    BENEFITS THAT WE HAVE FROM THESE SOURCES OF BRINE WATER FOR OUR

                    HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS IS VERY IMPORTANT FOR SAFETY, FOR DEICING AND DUST

                    SUPPRESSION.  AND NOW FOR OUR HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS -- MY COLLEAGUE

                    MENTIONED THE TAXPAYERS, MUCH OF THIS WASTEWATER IS FREE, IT'S

                    ENVIRONMENTALLY SAFE.  AND TAKING AWAY THAT OPTION FROM OUR LOCAL

                    GOVERNMENTS WOULD REALLY FORCE THEM TO PURCHASE THIS BRINE FROM THE

                    COMMERCIAL SECTOR OR FORCE THEM TO MAKE THEIR OWN BRINE WITH MAKING

                    COSTLY INVESTMENTS.  AND WE ALREADY KNOW THE COST TO OUR HIGHWAY

                    DEPARTMENTS HAS INCREASED SIGNIFICANTLY TO OUR LOCAL GOVERNMENTS.

                    ACCORDING TO THE FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION, THE HIGH

                    CONSTRUCTION COST INDEX HAS INCREASED 70 PERCENT OVER THE PAST THREE

                                         32



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    YEARS.  YES, WE GOT A LITTLE BUMP IN CHIPS FOR US, BUT THAT'S NOT

                    ENOUGH.  SOMETHING LIKE THIS WOULD JUST PUT MORE UNNECESSARY COSTS

                    ON THE PROPERTY TAXPAYERS, LEAD TO LESS WORK BEING DONE ON OUR LOCAL

                    ROADS, BRIDGES AND CULVERTS, AND IT ACTUALLY COSTS THE LOCAL PROPERTY TAX

                    -- TAXPAYERS ANYMORE.

                                 WE HAVE A SYSTEM IN PLACE THAT'S WORKING.  WE SHOULD

                    KEEP -- LET THIS -- THE SYSTEM WORK THE WAY IT'S DOING IT.  THE DEC HAS

                    THE EXPERTISE, THEY HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE, AND THEY'RE THE ONES MANAGING

                    THIS.  WE SHOULD LET THAT CONTINUE AND NOT PENALIZE OUR LOCAL

                    MUNICIPALITIES SO THEY CAN KEEP THEIR ROADS SAFE AND PROTECT THEIR

                    PROPERTY TAXPAYERS.

                                 FOR THAT REASON, MADAM SPEAKER, I WILL BE VOTING NO

                    ON THIS BILL AND ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    PALMESANO.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  MADAM SPEAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE

                    LOCAL GOVERNMENTS COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

                    COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.  LOCAL GOVERNMENTS

                    COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                         33



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.  SHOULD THERE BE ANY MEMBERS WHO'D WISH TO VOTE IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE, THEY MAY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.  FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION,

                    THEY COULD DO SO AT THEIR DESK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. SCHIAVONI TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. SCHIAVONI:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I --

                    I RISE TODAY TO SUPPORT THIS LEGISLATION.

                                 A LOT OF THE FLUIDS THAT ARE ACTUALLY IN FRACK -- FRACKING

                    FLUIDS IS PROPRIETARY INFORMATION FROM COMPANIES, SO IT'S ACTUALLY VERY

                    DIFFICULT TO ASCERTAIN WHAT IS ACTUALLY IN THE FLUIDS.  AND THE THOUGHT OF

                    PUTTING THEM ON ALL THE ROADS THROUGHOUT NEW YORK STATE IS ONE OF THE

                    REASONS WHY I AM COMPLETELY SUPPORTING THIS BILL.

                                 I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                         34



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  MR. SCHIAVONI IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. BURDICK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I

                    WANT TO THANK THE SPEAKER FOR ALLOWING THIS BILL TO COME TO THE FLOOR.

                                 AS I MENTIONED IN THE COURSE OF THE DEBATE, I DO FEEL

                    THAT THIS IS A BILL THAT IN THE LONG RUN WILL BOTH PROTECT PUBLIC HEALTH AS

                    WELL AS RESULT IN LESSER EXPENSE; LESSER EXPENSE FOR STATEWIDE HEALTH

                    COSTS AND ACTUALLY ULTIMATELY WE'RE GONNA FIND THAT ALTERNATIVES WILL

                    COME DOWN SIGNIFICANTLY IN PRICE, AND THAT THOSE ALTERNATIVES THAT ARE

                    SAFE WILL BE ABLE TO BE USED WELL.  AND AGAIN, I THINK THAT THIS IS A BILL

                    WHOSE TIME HAS COME.  AND WE HAVE NARROWED THE SCOPE OF IT

                    CONSIDERABLY IN ORDER TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE ISSUES THAT HAVE BEEN

                    BROUGHT TO OUR ATTENTION.

                                 SO, AGAIN, MY THANKS TO THE -- TO THE SPEAKER, AND I

                    ALSO WANT TO THANK THE CHAIR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONVERSATION

                    COMMITTEE, ASSEMBLYWOMAN GLICK, FOR HER SUPPORT, AND ALSO THE

                    WORK OF PROGRAM AND COUNSEL IN PUTTING TOGETHER THE AMENDMENTS TO

                    THE BILL.

                                 I WILL BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  MR. BURDICK IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULT.)

                                 THE BILL HAS PASSED.

                                         35



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. FALL FOR AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ON BEHALF OF MEMBER LINDA ROSENTHAL, I'M PLEASED TO

                    INTRODUCE A GROUP OF YOUNG PEOPLE VISITING US TODAY FROM MANHATTAN'S

                    SCOUTING AMERICA TROOP.  JOINING US ARE BOTH BOYS AND GIRLS FROM

                    SCOUT TROOP 1 AND CUB PACK 1, ALONG WITH THEIR DEDICATED LEADERS

                    TROOP SCOUTMASTER CLAUDIA BURKE, TROOP LEADER ADAM BROWN AND

                    CUB PACK LEADER MICHAEL BRUS.

                                 WOULD YOU PLEASE BE SO KIND TO WELCOME THEM TO THE

                    PEOPLE'S HOUSE?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU.  THANK

                    YOU, MR. FALL.

                                 ON BEHALF OF MR. FALL, MS. ROSENTHAL, THE SPEAKER

                    AND ALL OF THE MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO THE CHAMBER, EXTEND THE

                    PRIVILEGES OF THE FLOOR, AND HOPE YOU ENJOY THE PROCEEDINGS.

                                 THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR JOINING US.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 PAGE 8, RULES REPORT NO. 256, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A00026, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 256, ROSENTHAL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE SOCIAL SERVICES LAW AND THE

                    PUBLIC HEALTH LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING MEDICAID FROM REQUIRING

                    PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR HIV MEDICATION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                         36



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  OKAY.  THIS BILL WOULD ENSURE

                    THAT MEDICAID PROVIDERS ARE NOT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN PRIOR AUTHORIZATION

                    TO PRESCRIBE ANTI-RETROVIVAL -- VIRAL PRESCRIPTION DRUGS FOR THE TREATMENT

                    OR PREVENTION OF HIV/AIDS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. JENSEN.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU.  AND I WANT TO THANK OUR

                    COLLEAGUE FROM THE UPPER WEST SIDE FOR HER EXPLANATION.  AND

                    CERTAINLY THIS HAS BEEN A BILL WHEN IT CAME THROUGH THE HEALTH

                    COMMITTEE THAT I DID SUPPORT, AND CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THE NEED TO

                    ENSURE THAT THOSE NEW YORKERS EITHER WITH HIV OR AIDS OR MAY BE

                    COMING INTO CONTACT WITH -- WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO DO HAVE HIV OR

                    AIDS, DO HAVE ACCESS TO CRITICALLY IMPORTANT MEDICATIONS LIKE PREP,

                    PEP AND OTHER MEDICATIONS THAT ENSURE THAT WE LESSEN THE POTENTIAL OF

                    THE SPREAD OF HIV AND AIDS.  AND CERTAINLY, WE WANT TO ENSURE THAT

                    THERE'S ACCESS TO THESE IMPORTANT MEDICATIONS.  AND WHILE I AM

                    SUPPORTIVE OF THIS LEGISLATION TO -- TO ENSURE THAT WE DO STOP THE SPREAD

                    OF THOSE -- OF THOSE DISEASES, I ALSO DO HAVE CONCERNS ABOUT LESSENING

                    THE -- THE ROLE FOR PLANS IN UNDERGOING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION.  CERTAINLY,

                    WITH PREP AND PEP, THERE ARE VERY IMPORTANT HEALTH METRICS FOR THOSE

                                         37



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WHO ARE PRESCRIBED THAT MEDICATION TO GO THROUGH TO ENSURE THAT IT IS

                    EFFECTIVE IN PREVENTING THE SPREAD OF HIV AND AIDS.  AND CERTAINLY,

                    THAT IS AN IMPORTANT PART OF ENSURING THE EFFECTIVENESS AND THE EFFICACY

                    OF -- OF THESE MEDICATIONS.

                                 IN THE PAST, THIS LEGISLATURE HAS PASSED AND THE

                    GOVERNOR HAS SIGNED INTO LAW OTHER MEASURES THAT PROHIBIT THE USE OF

                    PRIOR AUTHORIZATION FOR THESE MEDICATIONS, AS WELL AS EVEN FURTHER BACK

                    REQUIRING THE COVERAGE OF THOSE MEDICATIONS.  AND WHILE WE HAVE

                    THOSE LAWS ON THE BOOKS, I COULD ALSO UNDERSTAND THE CONCERN THAT THIS

                    LEGISLATION MAY BE DUPLICATIVE.  ADJACENTLY, IF YOU LOOK AT THE STATE'S

                    TOTAL MEDICAID SPEND, WE ARE QUITE HIGH.  AND WHILE THIS DOESN'T SPEAK

                    TO THE MEDICAID COVERAGE OF THIS MEDICATION OR ANY OTHER MEDICATION,

                    WE HAVE SEEN OUR STATE'S MEDICAID OBLIGATIONS FAR EXPAND PAST THE

                    REASON WHY THE PROGRAM WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED, CERTAINLY TAKING UP A

                    -- A TREMENDOUS AMOUNT OF OUR STATE BUDGET.

                                 SO ONCE AGAIN, WHILE I AM SUPPORTIVE OF THIS BILL AND

                    WILL BE CASTING A YEA VOTE FOR IT, I DO THINK WE HAVE TO ENSURE THAT WE --

                    WE DO HAVE THE ABILITY NOT JUST TO -- TO CONTROL OUR MEDICAID SPENDING,

                    BUT ALSO ENSURE THAT WHEN MEDICATIONS ARE PRESCRIBED WE'RE TAKING INTO

                    ACCOUNT PATIENT NEEDS, THE PRESCRIBING AUTHORITY OF THE -- OF THE

                    PRESCRIBER, AS WELL AS THE PLAN'S ROLE IN ENSURING THAT WE'RE PRESCRIBING

                    AND AUTHORIZING PROPER -- PROPER PRESCRIPTIONS FOR THE BEST POSSIBLE

                    TREATMENT FOR INDIVIDUALS.

                                 SO WITH THAT, ONCE AGAIN, I -- I THANK THE SPONSOR FOR

                    HER EXPLANATION, AND THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                         38



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THANK YOU, MR.

                    JENSEN.

                                 THE CLERK WILL READ -- READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER TORRES:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. ROSENTHAL TO

                    EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 LAST YEAR, WE PASSED A LAW PROHIBITING PRIVATE

                    INSURERS FROM IMPOSING PRIOR AUTHORIZATION, BUT THAT LAW DID NOT EXTEND

                    TO MEDICAID PLANS.  PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONS REQUIREMENTS HAVE CREATED

                    SIGNIFICANT BARRIERS TO LIFESAVING ANTIRETROVIRAL MEDICATIONS.  THE AMA

                    SAYS THAT PRIOR AUTHORIZATIONS LEAD TO 94 PERCENT OF PATIENTS

                    EXPERIENCING CARE DELAYS, WITH 78 PERCENT ABANDONING TREATMENT ALL

                    TOGETHER.  ANY DELAY IN TREATMENT UNDERMINES THE EFFECTIVENESS OF

                    ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY.

                                 AND SO THIS BILL WILL -- WILL EXTEND THE -- THE NEED FOR

                    PRIOR AUTHORIZATION WILL BE ELIMINATED FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ON MEDICAID

                    WHO HAVE HIV OR AIDS.  IT'S AN IMPORTANT MEASURE SO THAT EVERYBODY

                    CAN BENEFIT FROM THESE NEW MEDICATIONS.

                                 AND SO I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                         39



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. ROSENTHAL IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  MADAM SPEAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE

                    REAL PROPERTY TAX [SIC] COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE

                    ROOM?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  REAL PROPERTY TAX

                    [SIC] TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.  COMMITTEE MEMBERS FOR

                    REAL PROPERTY [SIC], SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.

                                 PAGE 11, RULES REPORT NO. 297, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02212, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 297, BRAUNSTEIN, WOERNER, STECK, PAULIN, BRABENEC, STIRPE.  AN

                    ACT TO AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW AND THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW,

                    IN RELATION TO REQUIRING FULL PAYMENT FOR DELIVERED AND ACCEPTED

                    MATERIALS PERTAINING TO PUBLIC WORK PROJECTS; AND TO AMEND THE GENERAL

                    BUSINESS LAW, IN RELATION TO PROHIBITING THE RETENTION OF ANY PAYMENT

                    DUE AND OWING A MATERIAL SUPPLIER FOR A CONSTRUCTION PROJECT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN.

                                 CAN WE HAVE SOME QUIET IN THE CHAMBER, PLEASE?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN.

                                         40



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  THANK YOU.  THIS BILL AMENDS

                    THE STATE FINANCE LAW, GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW AND GENERAL BUSINESS

                    LAW TO PROHIBIT RETAINAGE ON PAYMENTS OWED TO MATERIALS SUPPLIERS FOR

                    DELIVERED AND ACCEPTED MATERIALS ON PUBLIC AND PRIVATE CONSTRUCTION

                    PROJECTS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. GANDOLFO.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR PLEASE YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  SURE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU.  AND

                    THANK YOU FOR YOUR EXPLANATION.

                                 SO CURRENTLY, WHAT IS THE ALLOWABLE AMOUNT OF

                    RETAINAGE ON MATERIALS?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  FIVE PERCENT.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  FIVE PERCENT.  OKAY.  AND NOW

                    THIS, THERE CAN BE NO AMOUNT OF RETAINAGE AT ALL IN ANY PUBLIC OR PRIVATE

                    CONTRACT?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  ONLY FOR MATERIALS SUPPLIED

                    THAT ARE GRADED TO INDUSTRY STANDARDS OR COVERED UNDER A WARRANTY.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 AND NOW, ONE THING I WANTED TO CLARIFY, YOU

                    MENTIONED THAT -- THAT PROVISION THAT IF IT'S UNDER MANUFACTURER'S

                                         41



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WARRANTY.  SO FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS BILL, WHAT DOES CONSTITUTE A

                    MATERIAL?  WOULD THIS NOT APPLY IF THERE IS NO MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY

                    ON THE MATERIAL DELIVERED?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  SO --

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  OR -- OR GRADED BY -- UNDER

                    INDUSTRY STANDARDS.  THOSE TWO QUALIFY.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  SO, MATERIALS, LET'S SAY,

                    SOME KIND OF LUMBER THAT'S DELIVERED HAS NO MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTY.

                    THAT IS NOT SUBJECT TO THIS NEW PROHIBITION --

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  WELL, LUMBER, I BELIEVE IS

                    GRADED --

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY, BUT -- OKAY, LUMBER IS

                    GRADED.

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  YEAH.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  SO THAT -- SO IF IT IS GRADED, THE

                    PROHIBITION IS IN EFFECT.  IF IT'S NOT GRADED, NOT IN EFFECT.

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 NOW, IF THERE IS SOME ISSUE THAT'S DISCOVERED WITH --

                    WITH THE MATERIALS THAT ARE DELIVERED AT A LATER POINT, MAYBE IT'S NOT

                    IMMEDIATELY NOTICEABLE, WHAT RECOURSE WOULD THE OWNER OR THE GENERAL

                    CONTRACTOR ON THE PROJECT HAVE WITHOUT THE RETAINAGE?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  I MEAN, THIS -- THIS WOULD BE

                    THE RECOURSE YOU WOULD TYPICALLY HAVE WITH ANY OTHER PRODUCT THAT YOU

                                         42



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    BUY WHERE THERE'S NOT RETAINAGE.  YOU WOULD --

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  IF THERE'S A WARRANTY, OBVIOUSLY

                    YOU -- YOU GO BACK AND YOU SAY, THIS IS COVERED UNDER WARRANTY.

                    THERE'S A DEFECT.  YOU'RE REQUIRED TO -- TO FIX IT.  AND WHEN -- YOU

                    KNOW, PRODUCTS THAT ARE GRADED ARE -- ARE TYPICALLY, YOU KNOW, MEET UP

                    TO STANDARDS.  SO THAT WILL BE A RARE SITUATION.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  SO IF LET'S SAY THERE'S SOME

                    KIND OF DISPUTE WHETHER OR NOT SOMETHING THAT IS A DEFECT IS COVERED

                    UNDER WARRANTY OR WHETHER IT WAS, YOU KNOW, IMPROPER STORAGE OR

                    IMPROPERLY INSTALLED.  DO YOU ANTICIPATE THAT LITIGATION WOULD BE

                    NECESSARY TO RESOLVE THE ISSUE?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  I MEAN, THAT WOULD BE

                    NORMALLY HOW THINGS WOULD WORK.  IT DOESN'T CHANGE THAT SITUATION.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  WELL CURRENTLY, AS I UNDERSTAND

                    IT, THE 5 TO 10 PERCENT RETAINAGE IS TYPICALLY USED TO ENCOURAGE A

                    QUICKER RESOLUTION TO THESE THINGS.  IF THE MATERIAL SUPPLIER NEEDS THAT 5

                    OR 10 PERCENT THAT'S BEING WITHHELD, THEY MIGHT BE MORE LIKELY TO WORK

                    TO RESOLVE IT A LITTLE QUICKER.  SO A CONCERN THAT I HAVE IS THAT WITHOUT

                    THE RETAINAGE YOU COULD END UP IN MORE DRAWN-OUT DISPUTES THAT MIGHT

                    DELAY PROJECT TIMES.  IS THAT A CONCERN?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  NO.  I -- I WOULD ARGUE THAT

                    WHEN MATERIALS ARE SUPPLIED, THE PERSON BUYING THOSE MATERIALS HAS THE

                    OPPORTUNITY TO INSPECT THEM UPON DELIVERY, RIGHT?  THEY ARE PROTECTED

                    THAT THEY MEET INDUSTRY STANDARDS AND GRADED, OR THEY'RE PROTECTED BY A

                                         43



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WARRANTY.  LIKE ANY OTHER TRANSACTION YOU HAVE, ONCE THE MATERIAL

                    SUPPLIER HAS DELIVERED THE GOODS, THE BUYER HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO

                    INSPECT THEM, THEIR OBLIGATION IS CONCLUDED AT THAT POINT.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 NOW, I KNOW THIS -- THERE WAS A SIMILAR VERSION, IF NOT

                    THE SAME VERSION OF THIS BILL PASSED IN 2015 THAT WAS VETOED BY

                    GOVERNOR CUOMO.  HAVE THERE BEEN ANY CHANGES IN RESPONSE TO THAT

                    VETO MESSAGE?

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  NO.  WE'RE HOPEFUL; THERE'S A

                    NEW GOVERNOR NOW.  SO WE'RE HOPEFUL, A DIFFERENT RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  FAIR ENOUGH.  THAT'S ALL I

                    HAVE.  THANK YOU, MR. BRAUNSTEIN.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 MR. BRAUNSTEIN:  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 30TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. DAIS TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. DAIS:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I WOULD

                    LIKE TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL.

                                 AS SOMEONE WHO HAS A BACKGROUND IN CONSTRUCTION,

                    I'M SPECIFICALLY THINKING ABOUT THE SMALL CONTRACTORS, THE MATERIALS,

                                         44



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WHEN THEY BRING INTO A JOB SITE.  THIS IS ENSURING THAT THEY GET PAYMENT

                    IN FULL.  I HAVE BEEN ON PROJECTS, ESPECIALLY FOR MBES, WBES, VBES,

                    OUR VETERAN BUSINESSES, AND I'VE SEEN THE -- THE RETAINER CAN MAKE THE

                    DIFFERENCE OF THEM MAKING PAYROLL AND NOT MAKING PAYROLL.  ESPECIALLY

                    WHEN WE THINK ABOUT RIGHT NOW WITH THE CURRENT TARIFF SITUATION AND

                    HOW THAT'S INCREASING MATERIALS FOR CONSTRUCTION, ENSURING THAT OUR

                    SUBCONTRACTORS AND OUR CONSTRUCTION COMPANIES WITHIN OUR GREAT STATE

                    CAN PAY THEIR BILLS AND PAY THEIR WORKERS IS KEY TO MAKING SURE THAT OUR

                    CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY REMAINS STRONG AND VIBRANT.

                                 SO I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR AND I'M VOTING IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK -- OH, WE ALREADY VOTED, BUT THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. DAIS IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MS. WALSH FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 SO TODAY I'M SO GLAD TO BE JOINED BY ANOTHER GREAT

                    GROUP OF FOURTH GRADERS.  THESE KIDS ARE FROM THE SHENENDEHOWA

                    SCHOOL DISTRICT FROM KARIGON ELEMENTARY.  AND THEY -- I BELIEVE WE

                    DID -- I DIDN'T DO A HEAD COUNT, BUT I THINK THERE ARE 21, ALONG WITH

                    CHAPERONES AND TEACHERS TODAY.  THEY ARE HERE TO VISIT THE PEOPLE'S

                    HOUSE TO SEE HOW WE'RE DOING OUR WORK HERE AT THE END OF SESSION.

                                         45



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AND I WAS KIND OF EXPLAINING THE -- THE BOARD AND HOW THE VOTES GO,

                    AND I JUST THINK IT'S WONDERFUL THAT THEY'VE COME TO JOIN US TODAY.  THEY

                    MAY NEVER BECOME ASSEMBLYMEMBERS, MAYBE; MAYBE THEY WILL.  BUT

                    THEY'LL DEFINITELY BE BETTER CITIZENS FOR HAVING STOPPED BY TO SEE HOW ALL

                    OF THIS WORKS.

                                 SO, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU COULD PLEASE EXTEND A

                    GREETING TO THESE GREAT FOURTH GRADERS AND AFFORD TO THEM ALL THE

                    CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE, PLEASE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MS.

                    WALSH, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU YOUNG PEOPLE

                    FROM THE KARIGON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES OF THE

                    FLOOR TO YOU.  VERY EXCITED TO SEE YOU HERE TODAY, LEARNING ALL ABOUT

                    STATE GOVERNMENT AND CIVICS, AND IT'S SUPER IMPORTANT FOR YOU TO SEE

                    WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE TODAY; DECISIONS THAT WE'RE MAKING, AND ONE

                    DAY, AS MS. WALSH SAID, YOU, TOO, COULD BE ONE OF THE PEOPLE ELECTED

                    INTO OFFICE.  SO I'M VERY GLAD TO SEE YOU HERE TODAY.  THANK YOU SO

                    MUCH FOR JOINING US.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MS. WALSH FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN INTRODUCTION.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  IT'S --

                    IT'S WONDERFUL ON BEHALF OF ASSEMBLYMEMBER STEVE HAWLEY TO

                    INTRODUCE A GROUP THAT HAS COME TO VISIT HIM TODAY IN THE STATE

                    ASSEMBLY.  THESE STUDENTS ARE SENIORS, I BELIEVE, FROM THE OAKFIELD-

                    ALABAMA CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT.  THEY ARE -- THEY ARE MAKING A CIVICS

                    CLASS PRESENTATION TO ASSEMBLY AND SENATE MENTAL HEALTH COMMITTEES

                                         46



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ON THEIR RESEARCH THAT SHOWS LINKS BETWEEN SUBSTANCE ABUSE AND MENTAL

                    HEALTH ISSUES, WHICH I KNOW THAT AS AN ASSEMBLY BODY WE HAVE

                    DISCUSSED A NUMBER OF TIMES HERE ON THE FLOOR.

                                 SO THE NAMES OF GUESTS INCLUDE PETER BEULER, WHO IS

                    ONE OF THE TEACHERS; LILAH BARRETT, KAYLEE BURGEL -- BURGAL MAYBE, I'M

                    SORRY IF I MESSED THAT UP; NEVAEH CONIBEAR, ELIANA EMERY, KENDALL

                    NEWBOULD, ALEXIS SMITH AND JESSICA SOSNOWSKI.  THEY WERE ALL THE

                    STUDENTS WHO ARE HERE TODAY.  AND AS I SAID, I THINK THAT IT'S WONDERFUL

                    TO NOT ONLY WELCOME MR. HAWLEY'S GUESTS TO THE CHAMBER, BUT ALSO TO

                    THANK THEM FOR TAKING A DEEP DIVE AND DOING SOME RESEARCH INTO

                    SOMETHING THAT IS VERY TOPICAL AND SOMETHING THAT NOT ONLY THE MENTAL

                    HEALTH COMMITTEES, BUT WE, AS AN ASSEMBLY, ARE DEFINITELY

                    CONSIDERING IN THE WORK THAT WE'RE DOING HERE.

                                 SO I WOULD APPRECIATE IT, MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    WOULD WELCOME THEM TO THE CHAMBER AND AFFORD TO THEM ALL THE

                    CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MS.

                    WALSH, MR. HAWLEY, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME YOU TO

                    THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER, THE PEOPLE'S HOUSE, AND EXTEND THE PRIVILEGES

                    OF THE FLOOR TO YOU.  AND THANK YOU FOR YOUR COMMITTED WORK THAT YOU

                    ARE DOING RELATIVE TO MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE.  IT CROSSES ALL

                    LINES, ALL DIVERSITIES, ALL BACKGROUNDS.  EVERY PART OF OUR STATE.  AND SO

                    IT'S VERY IMPORTANT TO SEE YOUNG PEOPLE SO ACTIVELY INVOLVED ABOUT AN

                    ISSUE THAT REALLY PERMEATES OUR WHOLE SOCIETY.  SO THANK YOU VERY

                    MUCH FOR ALL OF THE WORK THAT YOU'RE DOING, AND THANK YOU FOR JOINING

                                         47



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  MADAM SPEAKER, CAN YOU PLEASE CALL THE

                    CODES COMMITTEE TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  CODES COMMITTEE

                    TO THE SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM.  PLEASE SEE CHAIR DINOWITZ IN THE

                    SPEAKER'S CONFERENCE ROOM FOR CODES COMMITTEE.

                                 PAGE 11, RULES REPORT NO. 301, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A02496, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 301, MCDONALD, BURDICK, SIMON, HEVESI, GLICK, WOERNER,

                    DESTEFANO, DAVILA, REYES, BENDETT, HYNDMAN, SEAWRIGHT.  AN ACT TO

                    AMEND THE STATE FINANCE LAW, IN RELATION TO PREFERRED SOURCE STATUS FOR

                    ENTITIES THAT PROVIDE EMPLOYMENT AND SERVICES TO CERTAIN PERSONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. MCDONALD.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 THIS LEGISLATION WOULD ALLOW THE COMMISSIONER OF

                    EDUCATION TO APPROVE QUALIFIED CHARITABLE NON-PROFIT ENTITIES THAT

                    PROVIDE VOCATIONAL AND REHABILITATION TRAINING TO FORMERLY INCARCERATED

                    PERSONS TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM.  ADDITIONALLY,

                    THIS LEGISLATION ALSO HAS SOME MINOR LANGUAGE CHANGES TO

                    ACCOMMODATE THE MODERNIZATION OF PREFERRED SOURCE SERVICES.

                                 BUT IF I COULD JUST, AS I'M EXPLAINING, JUST TO CLARIFY.

                                         48



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AS MANY PEOPLE KNOW, PREFERRED SOURCE WAS CREATED BY THIS

                    LEGISLATURE OVER 50 YEARS AGO, AND IT CONTINUES TO GROW AND EVOLVE

                    OVER TIME.  ORIGINALLY, THOSE NOT-FOR-PROFITS THAT WE ASSUME OR THINK OF

                    WHEN WE TALK ABOUT PREFERRED SOURCE, WE THINK OF THE O AGENCIES; THE

                    OFFICE OF -- OPWDD, OMH, OASAS.  ABOUT FOUR OR FIVE YEARS AGO,

                    THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ACTUALLY INCLUDED VETERANS' ORGANIZATIONS TO

                    MAKE SURE OUR VETERANS, WHEN THEY'RE ENTERING -- COMING BACK INTO

                    PROGRAMS HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY TO ENTER A REENTRY PROGRAM.  REENTRY

                    INTO THE COMMUNITY NOT NECESSARILY FROM PRISON.  SO THIS ONE BASICALLY

                    ADDRESSES THE FACT THAT THERE ARE INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE REENTERING SOCIETY

                    AFTER THEIR TIME IN CARCERATION [SIC].  THEY MOVE INTO PROGRAMS THAT

                    PROVIDE HOUSING, BUT THE HOUSING ALSO REQUIRES THAT THEY HAVE A JOB.

                    AND THERE ARE NOT-FOR-PROFITS THAT TEAM UP WITH THESE REENTRY PROGRAMS

                    TO MAKE SURE INDIVIDUALS ARE GAINFULLY EMPLOYED, AND HOPEFULLY

                    BECOME A CONTRIBUTING MEMBER OF SOCIETY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. GANDOLFO.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR PLEASE YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  YES, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  THANK YOU, AND THANK YOU FOR THE

                    EXPLANATION.

                                 SO FIRST, CAN WE START WITH -- I JUST WANT TO GET INTO A

                                         49



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    LITTLE MORE WHAT THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM ACTUALLY MEANS.  THAT

                    ALLOWS CHARITABLE ORGANIZATIONS -- DO THEY -- ARE THEY ABLE TO BYPASS

                    COMPETITIVE BIDDING ON PUBLIC PROJECTS?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  SO WHEN THEY BID ON PROJECTS,

                    THEY ARE GIVEN A VARIANCE OF ABOUT 15 PERCENT TO BE SELECTED.  SO,

                    MOSTLY IT'S WITH STATE AGENCIES.  A LOT OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS DON'T

                    RECOGNIZE THAT THEY, TOO, CAN PARTICIPATE WITH PREFERRED SOURCE, BUT

                    PRIMARILY IT'S WITH STATE AGENCIES.  AND, YOU KNOW, AS YOU KNOW, THE

                    THREE MAIN ONES THAT WE HAVE IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK ARE NYSID,

                    WHICH IS THE NEW YORK STATE FOR DISABILITIES [SIC].  WE HAVE CORCRAFT,

                    WHICH DEALS WITH THOSE INCARCERATION [SIC].  AND THE ONE FOR THE

                    VISUALLY IMPAIRED, WHICH I'M DRAWING A BLANK RIGHT NOW ON WHICH ONE

                    IT IS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  BUT THOSE ARE THE THREE MAIN

                    ONES.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  SO THEY COULD BUT IN A BID, LET'S

                    SAY, FIVE TO TEN PERCENT HIGHER AND --

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  AND -- AND THEY WOULD BE ABLE

                    TO RECEIVE THAT BID.  SOMETIMES THE NOT-FOR-PROFITS DO IT ON THEIR OWN.

                    SOMETIMES THEY ACTUALLY PARTNER UP WITH PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS AS

                    WELL AND THAT SEEMS TO BE A GREATER TREND, BECAUSE AS YOU KNOW, THERE'S

                    A GREAT DEMAND FOR MORE PEOPLE IN THE WORKFORCE FOR A LOT OF THESE

                    JOBS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  NOW, WHAT IS THE BENEFIT

                                         50



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    TO, LET'S SAY, THE STATE OR A MUNICIPALITY FROM CHOOSING ONE OF THE

                    ORGANIZATIONS THAT'S ON THE PREFERRED SOURCE LIST?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  THE BENEFIT TO THE STATE IS

                    MULTIPLE REASONS:  ONE, FIRST OF ALL, A LOT OF THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE

                    REQUIRED TO PARTICIPATE IN THEIR WORK PLAN.  SO THEY ACTUALLY SHOW UP

                    FOR WORK.  I THINK THAT'S IMPORTANT.  BECAUSE SOMETIMES WE HERE AT THE

                    STATE -- AND MEMBER WALSH REMEMBERS THIS VERY WELL -- ABOUT FOUR OR

                    FIVE YEARS AGO THE STATE THOUGHT IT WAS A GREAT IDEA TO BRING IN

                    (INDISCERNIBLE) FOR PRINTING FOR -- AND THEY ACTUALLY, ON THE ANNIVERSARY

                    OF PREFERRED SOURCE, TOOK AWAY A MULTI-MILLION DOLLAR CONTRACT FROM

                    ONE OF OUR LEADING NOT-FOR-PROFITS FOR THE DISABLED IN THE CAPITAL

                    REGION.  AND BASICALLY, IT MEANT THAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS WEREN'T GONNA

                    GET THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  AND AS WE KNOW, IN THE

                    DISABILITY COMMUNITY BUT ALSO IN THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED AND EVEN IN

                    OUR VETERANS' COMMUNITY, THERE IS [SIC] UNACCEPTABLY HIGH

                    UNEMPLOYMENT RATES.  AND OUR GOAL OF THIS PROGRAM, AND ACTUALLY THE

                    OUTCOME OF THIS PROGRAM, IS SO WE'LL GET PEOPLE BACK TO WORK AND

                    CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  SO THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF

                    THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM WAS TO GIVE MORE OPPORTUNITIES TO THOSE

                    WITH DISABILITIES TO ENCOURAGE, YOU KNOW, MORE BUSINESS GOING TO THOSE

                    ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE GIVING THEM THAT WORK OPPORTUNITY.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  RIGHT.

                                         51



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  AND TO GET THE WORK DONE AT A

                    VERY REASONABLE PRICE.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  NOW --

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  AND JUST TO BE CLEAR BECAUSE,

                    YOU KNOW, I MENTIONED THERE'S A VARIANCE OF 15 PERCENT.  THAT'S THE

                    THRESHOLD.  BUT THERE'S MANY TIMES WHERE THEIR BIDS ACTUALLY COME IN

                    AND THEY'RE JUST AS COMPETITIVE ALMOST DOLLAR -- DOWN TO THE PENNY.

                    BUT THERE ARE TIMES THEY HAVE THAT VARIANCE THAT THEY CAN WORK WITH.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 NOW, YOU MENTIONED THAT THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT

                    HAS EXTENDED THIS TO -- TO VETERANS AS WELL.  IS THAT DISABLED VETERANS?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  NO, ALL VETERANS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  ALL VETERANS.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  ANY -- ANY VETERAN WHO IS

                    REENTERING THE COMMUNITY.  HERE IN ALBANY OVER ON 1ST STREET, THE VET

                    [SIC] HOUSE, I'VE BEEN REPRESENTING IT FOR 13 YEARS, IT'S GREAT.  AND I

                    WOULD INVITE ANY MEMBER AT ANY TIME TO GO OVER AND VISIT THEM,

                    PARTICULARLY AROUND VETERAN'S DAY.  THEY PUT OUT A GREAT BREAKFAST,

                    THEY'RE GREAT COOKS.  BUT WHAT THEY DO IS THEY PROVIDE HOUSING, AND

                    THEY CONNECT THEM WITH THE VA FOR SERVICES.  AND BY THE WAY, THE VA

                    CONNECTS WITH THEM FOR SERVICES TO HELP GET THESE INDIVIDUALS

                    EMPLOYED, GET THEM IN THE COMMUNITY.  USUALLY THEY'RE IN THE VET [SIC]

                    HOUSE FOR ABOUT SIX TO NINE MONTHS, AND THEN THEY USUALLY SETTLE IN THE

                    SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES AND REENGAGE WITH THEIR FAMILIES AND -- AND

                                         52



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ALL THE GOOD THINGS.  BUT IT'S NOT JUST THE DISABLED VETERANS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  SO NOW, WAS THAT DONE VIA

                    REGULATION?  BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT THE STATUTE WE'RE AMENDING HERE,

                    AND THE ONLY REFERENCES I SEE ARE TO PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES, AND WE'RE

                    AMENDING IT TO ADD FORMERLY INCARCERATED PERSONS.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  THAT -- THAT'S A VERY GOOD POINT.

                    NO, ACTUALLY, THAT WAS DONE THROUGH REGULATION THROUGH THE EDUCATION

                    DEPARTMENT.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.  SO WHY ARE WE NOT

                    CODIFYING THAT AS WELL?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  I DON'T KNOW.

                                 (PAUSE/CONFERENCING)

                                 WELL, WE'RE -- REPEAT THE QUESTION JUST TO MAKE SURE I

                    UNDERSTOOD IT.  WHY ARE WE JUST AMENDING --

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  YEAH --

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  -- (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK)

                    VETERANS ALREADY?

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  WELL, I'M SEEING WE'RE PUTTING

                    THIS IN THE STATUTE.  THERE'S NO -- THERE'S NO REFERENCE IN STATUTE TO

                    VETERANS BEING ELIGIBLE -- VETERANS ORGANIZATIONS BEING ELIGIBLE FOR THE

                    PREFERRED SOURCE LIST.  SO WHY ARE WE SPECIFICALLY PUTTING IN FORMERLY

                    INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS AND NOT SOME OF THE OTHER GROUPS AND

                    CODIFYING THAT INTO LAW?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  I CAN'T GIVE YOU A BETTER -- I CAN'T

                                         53



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    GIVE YOU A GOOD ANSWER, TO BE ABSOLUTELY HONEST WITH YOU.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  BECAUSE THEY'RE ALREADY

                    ACCEPTED THROUGH THE REGULATORY PROCESS, THE VETERANS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  YOU KNOW, THIS IS AN

                    AMENDMENT TO STATE FINANCE LAW TO MAKE SURE THAT THE LEGIS -- THE

                    EDUCATION DEPARTMENT KNOW THAT IT'S THE LEGISLATURE'S INTENT THAT

                    BECAUSE WE SEE HIGH RATES OF DISABILITY IN THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED

                    AND WE SEE -- IN 2024 THE PRISON -- PRISON POPULATION INITIATIVE,

                    WHEREAS THE AVERAGE DISABILITY RATE THROUGHOUT THE COUNTRY IS 15

                    PERCENT, IN FORMERLY INCARCERATED MEN'S POPULATION, 40 PERCENT ARE

                    DISABLED OF THOSE BEING RELEASED, AND WOMEN ACTUALLY 50 PERCENT.  SO

                    WE'RE RECOGNIZING THAT THEY'RE INDIVIDUALS THAT PROBABLY THROUGH THEIR

                    LIFE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOR WHATEVER REASON, WERE NEVER CLEARLY DIAGNOSED

                    AND HAVING A DISABILITY.  AND AT THE SAME TOKEN, IF WE WANT THEM TO BE

                    CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS TO SOCIETY, WE NEED TO GET THEM INTO A PROGRAM

                    WHERE THEY HAVE HOUSING AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR JOB TRAINING.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  WOULD A CRIMINAL RECORD PREVENT

                    SOMEONE WHO WAS INCARCERATED WHO IS DISABLED FROM PARTICIPATING

                    WITH AN ORGANIZATION THAT SERVICES DISABLED PEOPLE?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  NO.  THIS -- THIS ISN'T ABOUT THAT.

                    THIS IS ABOUT INDIVIDUALS WHO -- I USE THE EXPRESSION, I'M SHOWING MY

                    AGE, HAVE PAID THEIR DEBT TO SOCIETY.  THEY'VE BEEN ALLOWED TO GO BACK

                    INTO THE COMMUNITY.  THEY HAVE BEEN ACCEPTED INTO A -- A LEGITIMATE

                                         54



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    PROGRAM, A RECOGNIZED NOT-FOR-PROFIT THAT SED RECOGNIZES AS BEING PART

                    OF THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM.  WE'RE JUST ALLOWING THAT NOT-FOR-

                    PROFIT, AFTER SCRUTINY BY THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT -- THEY SIT UNDER THE

                    (INDISCERNIBLE) COMPONENT OF THE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, JUST FOR

                    PEOPLE'S INFORMATION.  IT GIVES THAT NOT-FOR-PROFIT TO ACTUALLY SEEK TO

                    RESPOND TO BIDS FOR PROCUREMENTS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  RIGHT.  BUT I'M -- I'M JUST TRYING

                    TO FIGURE OUT THE NEED TO SPECIFICALLY CODIFY FORMERLY INCARCERATED

                    PEOPLE HERE.  SO IF THEY ARE FORMERLY INCARCERATED AND DISABLED, IS --

                    WHAT IS STOPPING THEM FROM RECEIVING ASSISTANCE FROM AN ORGANIZATION

                    OR WORKING WITH AN ORGANIZATION THAT IS ALREADY ELIGIBLE FOR PREFERRED

                    SOURCE?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  I THINK ALL OF THE NOT-FOR-PROFITS,

                    YOU KNOW, THEY WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO GROW THE PROGRAM.  WE'RE

                    NOT TALKING ABOUT COMPETING WITH THE DISABLED.  WE'RE NOT TALKING

                    ABOUT COMPETING WITH INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE STRUGGLING WITH SUBSTANCE

                    USE.  WE'RE TALKING ABOUT GROWING THE PROGRAM, BECAUSE A LOT OF THESE

                    JOBS ARE JOBS THAT ARE NOT BEING FULFILLED.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  RIGHT.  BUT WHAT --

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK).  SO

                    THEREFORE, IF THEY COULD COMPETE FOR MORE CONTRACTS, IN OTHER WORDS,

                    NON-PROFIT A IS ABLE TO INCLUDE THEM -- INCLUDE THEM IN -- IN A

                    PROPOSAL, THEY CAN ACTUALLY GROW THE FIELD, MAKE THE PIE BIGGER.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  WELL, ISN'T IT INHERENTLY PUTTING

                    NOW ORGANIZATIONS THAT WORK WITH FORMERLY INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS IN

                                         55



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    COMPETITION WITH, YOU KNOW, PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IF THEY'RE BIDDING

                    ON THE SAME TYPES OF --

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  WE'RE NOT.  WE'RE ACTUALLY

                    GROWING THE PIE.  WE'RE NOT DOING THAT.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  YEAH, BUT HOW -- DOESN'T

                    GROWING THE PIE INCREASE THE COMPETITION IF YOU HAVE SEVERAL DIFFERENT

                    TYPES OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE ALL COMPETING FOR THE SAME CONTRACTS?

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  NO.  THERE'S -- YOU KNOW, THE --

                    THE INTERESTING PART IS -- AND I HAVE A LIST SOMEWHERE HERE -- ALL OF THESE

                    ENTITIES, AND I'M NOT GOING TO GO DOWN THE LIST, BUT TRUST ME WHEN SAY

                    (INDISCERNIBLE) THERE'S ABOUT 30 OR 40, INCLUDING THE BUSINESS COUNCIL

                    OF STATE OF NEW YORK THAT'S SAYING, THIS IS A PROGRAM WE SUPPORT.  WE

                    WANT THIS, BECAUSE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THOSE INDIVIDUALS WITH

                    DISABILITIES ARE GETTING THE OPPORTUNITY TO WORK.  WE DON'T WANT THEM

                    TO BE BASICALLY AT HOME DOING NOTHING AND NOT CONTRIBUTING TO SOCIETY.

                    WE DON'T WANT THEM TO BE A TAX ON -- ON THE TAXPAYERS.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  THANK YOU.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL, PLEASE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. GANDOLFO:  MADAM SPEAKER, I, LIKE MANY OF

                    MY COLLEAGUES HERE, DO SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHO WERE

                    FORMERLY INCARCERATED TO HELP THEM REINTEGRATE INTO SOCIETY BECAUSE OUR

                    CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, WHILE IT DOES HAVE A PUNITIVE ELEMENT, NEEDS

                    TO HAVE A REHABILITATIVE ELEMENT IN ORDER TO PREVENT FURTHER RECIDIVISM.

                    HOWEVER, WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE WITH THIS BILL IS GIVING A PREFERENCE TO

                                         56



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    PEOPLE WHO HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD AND INTRODUCING THEM INTO A

                    PROGRAM THAT WAS ORIGINALLY DESIGNED TO HELP PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES

                    TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE AFFORDED WORK OPPORTUNITIES TO BE

                    CONTRIBUTING MEMBERS OF SOCIETY AND TO WORK WITH DIGNITY.  AND BY --

                    BY INCREASING THE AMOUNT OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE COMPETING FOR THESE

                    CONTRACTS ON THE PREFERRED SOURCE LIST, IT INHERENTLY IS PITTING PEOPLE

                    WITH DISABILITIES, VETERANS WHO ARE STRUGGLING TO FIND WORK, WITH PEOPLE

                    WHO HAVE A CRIMINAL RECORD.

                                 AGAIN, I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH REHABILITATIVE

                    PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHO HAD TROUBLES IN THEIR PAST WHO DID SPEND

                    TIME IN JAIL; HOWEVER, THIS IS GIVING THEM A PREFERENCE OVER LAW-

                    ABIDING NEW YORKERS AND PUTTING THEM ON THE SAME LEVEL AS PEOPLE

                    WHO REALLY DO NEED THE HAND UP THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN.

                                 SO FOR THAT REASON I WILL BE VOTING NO ON THIS AND I

                    ENCOURAGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    REPUBLICAN CONFERENCE WILL GENERALLY BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE

                    OF LEGISLATION.  IF THERE IS ANYONE WHO WISHES TO VOTE AFFIRMATIVELY THEY

                                         57



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    MAY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  FOR

                    ANYBODY THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION, THEY CAN DO SO

                    AT THEIR DESK.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. MCDONALD TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. MCDONALD:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    AND I THANK MY COLLEAGUE FOR HIS QUESTIONS.

                                 YOU KNOW, JUST TO MAKE SURE IT'S CLEAR, THE INTENT OF

                    THIS PROGRAM IS TO MAKE SURE THAT WE GROW THE PROGRAM FOR PREFERRED

                    SOURCE.  THIS IS A PROGRAM INCEPTED AND SUPPORTED BY THE LEGISLATURE

                    OVER GENERATIONS, AND AT THE SAME TOKEN, AS WE CONTINUE TO SEE

                    SHORTAGES IN THE WORKFORCE.  AS YOU KNOW, RECENTLY THE FEDERAL

                    GOVERNMENT DECIDED TO ELIMINATE THE GLEN -- GLENMONT JOBS [SIC]

                    PROGRAM HERE IN THE CAPITOL REGION.  WE HAVE MANY INDIVIDUALS WITH

                    DISABILITIES LOOKING AT A CHANCE OF LIFE.  AND AT THE SAME TOKEN,

                    INDIVIDUALS WHO ARE FORMERLY INCARCERATED ARE -- PAID THEIR DEBT TO

                    SOCIETY, THEY'RE COMING BACK TO THE WORKFORCE.  WE WANT TO MAKE SURE

                    THEY HAVE A SEAMLESS TRANSITION IN.  WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT

                    RECIDIVISM IS NOT A QUESTION.

                                         58



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ONCE AGAIN, I APPRECIATE THE QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS

                    FROM THE LEGISLATURE AND ALSO APPRECIATE THE SUPPORT FROM MY

                    COLLEAGUES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. MCDONALD IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MS. WALSH TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 SO, I ALSO APPRECIATED THE DEBATE.  I JUST WANTED TO

                    MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT I COMPLETELY SUPPORT THE PREFERRED SOURCE

                    PROGRAM AS IT RELATES TO INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL AND

                    DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, WHICH I BELIEVE WAS -- AS -- AS IT WAS

                    DISCUSSED, WAS THE GENESIS OF THE WHOLE PREFERRED SOURCE PROGRAM.  I

                    STRONGLY SUPPORT IT.  WE KNOW THAT INDIVIDUALS WITH INTELLECTUAL AND

                    DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES ARE SEVERELY UNEMPLOYED AND

                    UNDEREMPLOYED IN THE WORKPLACE, AND THAT IS SOMETHING THAT I HAVE

                    FOUGHT VERY HARD TO TRY TO ADDRESS DURING THE TIME THAT I'VE SPENT IN THE

                    LEGISLATURE AND WILL CONTINUE TO DO SO.

                                 I BELIEVE THAT WHEN IT COMES TO FORMERLY INCARCERATED

                    INDIVIDUALS, IF YOU TAKE A LOOK AT ALL OF THE SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENTS THAT

                    WE, AS THE STATE, MAKE IN CREATING PROGRAMS FOR PEOPLE WHEN THEY ARE

                    INCARCERATED TO IDENTIFY IF THEY HAVE ANY LEARNING DISABILITIES AND

                    ADDRESS THEM; TO PROVIDE EDUCATION.  TO PROVIDE TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES.

                    AND THEN WHEN THEY -- WHEN THEY LEAVE, WHEN THEY'RE NO LONGER

                    INCARCERATED, TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY IMMEDIATELY HAVE THE DOCUMENTS

                    THAT THEY NEED IN ORDER TO GET THE SERVICES THAT THEY NEED IN TERMS OF

                                         59



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    HOUSING OR PUBLIC ASSISTANCE WHEN THEY LEAVE -- WHEN THEY LEAVE THEIR

                    CORRECTIONAL FACILITY.

                                 YOU KNOW, WE ALREADY HAVE ORGANIZATIONS THAT HELP

                    FORMERLY INCARCERATED INDIVIDUALS FIND EMPLOYMENT, AND ALL OF THOSE

                    THINGS ARE GOOD AND I'M NOT QUESTIONING THEM.  WE ALSO HAVE PASSED

                    LAWS SAYING THAT EMPLOYERS CAN'T EVEN ASK, REALLY, IF YOU'VE BEEN

                    INCARCERATED.  YOU CAN'T -- YOU CAN'T ASK THEM.  WE SEAL CRIMINAL

                    RECORDS TO MAKE SURE THAT FOLKS HAVE AS GOOD A CHANCE AS THEY CAN TO

                    BE -- TO GET REEMPLOYED.  WE'VE DONE ALL OF THOSE THINGS.  BUT I'M

                    SAYING THAT ON THIS BILL, I DON'T THINK WE NEED TO DO IT.  I DON'T THINK WE

                    NEED TO GO THAT EXTRA STEP AND PLACE THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED

                    INDIVIDUALS IN THE SAME PROGRAM THAT HELPS VETERANS WHO ARE -- HAVE

                    SERVED OUR COUNTRY, AND THOSE WITH INTELLECTUAL AND DEVELOPMENTAL

                    DISABILITIES WHO, THROUGH NO FAULT OF THEIR OWN, FACE INCREDIBLY

                    INSURMOUNTABLE, SOMETIMES IT SEEMS INSURMOUNTABLE BARRIERS TO

                    EMPLOYMENT.

                                 SO I'M IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL BECAUSE I JUST THINK

                    THAT WE ALREADY DO ENOUGH FOR THE FORMERLY INCARCERATED.  I WISH THEM

                    WELL.  I'LL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. WALSH IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. DAIS TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. DAIS:  I JUST WANT TO SAY SOMETHING VERY QUICKLY

                    ON THE BILL AND A PART OF THE REASON I'M VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ONE THING WE CANNOT OVERLOOK WHEN IT COMES TO

                                         60



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    VETERANS, A LOT OF TIMES VETERANS CAN FALL UNDER MULTIPLE CATEGORIES.

                    THERE'S A LOT OF OUR VETERANS WHO DEALT WITH MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES FROM

                    PTSD, ALCOHOL, DRUG ABUSE AND OTHER ISSUES WHICH ENDS UP GETTING

                    THEM INCARCERATED OR IN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM.  AND, THEREFORE, THERE'S

                    ANOTHER WAY TO ENSURE THAT SPECIFICALLY THOSE VETERANS ARE ALSO NOT

                    FORGOTTEN ABOUT.

                                 MENTAL HEALTH IS A BIG ISSUE WHERE A LOT OF OUR -- OUR

                    PEOPLE WHO ARE INCARCERATED HAVE MENTAL HEALTH ISSUES AND THAT'S THE

                    ONLY REASON WHY THEY ARE THERE.  AND GIVING THEM A SECOND CHANCE, A

                    SECOND LEASE ON LIFE WILL MAKE SURE THAT THEY'LL BE MORE PRODUCTIVE

                    CITIZENS.

                                 THIS IS NOT TAKING AWAY FROM ANYONE.  THIS IS MAKING

                    SURE THAT WE CAN DO SOMETHING MORE FULFILLING TO ENSURE THOSE HAVE A

                    BETTER CHANCE TO BE REENTERED INTO SOCIETY AND HAVE MORE SUCCESS, AND

                    THAT'S THE MAJOR REASON WHY I'M SUPPORTING THIS BILL AND VOTING IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. DAIS IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. BURDICK TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. BURDICK:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, FOR

                    THE OPPORTUNITY TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 I'M VOTING YES ON THIS LEGISLATION.  I DO HAVE SOME

                    KNOWLEDGE OF THE PREFERRED SOURCE PROVISIONS OF THE PUBLIC FINANCE

                    LAW, AND I COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR THIS VERY FORWARD-LOOKING

                                         61



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    APPROACH TO ACTUALLY MAKING OUR SOCIETY SAFER.  IT BRINGS FORMERLY

                    INCARCERATED BACK INTO SOCIETY IN A WAY THAT THEY CAN BE EMPLOYED AND

                    CAN CONTRIBUTE TO SOCIETY.  AND AS HAS BEEN STATE -- HAS BEEN STATED,

                    THIS WILL REDUCE RECIDIVISM.  THIS WILL MAKE OUR SOCIETY SAFER WHILE

                    PROVIDING EMPLOYMENT FOR THOSE WHO HAVE PAID THEIR DEBT TO SOCIETY.

                                 SO I AGAIN COMMEND THE SPONSOR FOR THE WORK THAT

                    HE'S DONE, AND ALSO THANK THE SPEAKER FOR ALLOWING THIS BILL TO COME TO

                    THE FLOOR.  I VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. BURDICK IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 12, RULES REPORT NO. 308, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A03516, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 308, REYES, BICHOTTE HERMELYN, CHANDLER-WATERMAN,

                    CUNNINGHAM, GONZÁLEZ-ROJAS, SHIMSKY.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE

                    EXECUTIVE LAW, IN RELATION TO ENACTING THE "KEEP POLICE RADIO PUBLIC

                    ACT."

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION

                    HAVE BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. REYES.

                                 MS. REYES:  THIS BILL AMENDS THE EXECUTIVE LAW BY

                    ADDING A NEW SECTION 222 (A) TO REQUIRE THAT ANY LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    AGENCY IN NEW YORK STATE THAT ENCRYPTS ITS RADIO COMMUNICATIONS

                                         62



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    MUST PROVIDE REALTIME ACCESS TO NONSENSITIVE COMMUNICATION TO

                    EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS AND PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AS

                    DEFINED BY CIVIL RIGHTS LAW 79-H.  THE BILL DOES NOT PROHIBIT

                    ENCRYPTION, BUT RATHER ESTABLISHES A MECHANISM TO ENSURE THAT ESSENTIAL

                    PARTIES CAN CONTINUE TO RECEIVE REALTIME PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION

                    WITHOUT COMPROMISING INVESTIGATIONS OR INDIVIDUAL PRIVACY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. REILLY.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. REYES:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MS. REYES.

                                 SO IN THE LEGISLATION, DOES IT HAVE A BUFFER TIME FOR

                    HOW IT WILL BE BROADCAST?

                                 MS. REYES:  NO, IT'S IN REALTIME.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO IN REALTIME.  SO THERE'S NO DELAYED

                    -- THERE'S NO DELAY IN --

                                 MS. REYES:  NO.  OTHER STATES HAVE ISSUED DELAY

                    REGULATIONS.  WE ARE SAYING REALTIME AND JUST LIMITING THE PEOPLE WHO

                    HAVE ACCESS TO IT.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO WHO WOULD HAVE ACCESS TO THIS?

                                 MS. REYES:  SO, OF COURSE, LAW ENFORCEMENT.

                                 MR. REILLY:  OKAY.

                                         63



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. REYES:  EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS LIKE

                    IN SOME COUNTIES VOLUNTEER FIRE -- FIRE DEPARTMENTS, AMBULANCE

                    SERVICES, AND ALSO PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS AS DEFINED BY THE CIVIL

                    RIGHTS LAW.

                                 MR. REILLY:  HOW WILL THEY ENSURE THAT ONLY THOSE

                    THAT ARE DELINEATED IN THE LEGISLATION WILL HAVE ACCESS?

                                 MS. REYES:  WE EVEN INCLUDED LANGUAGE TO PROVIDE

                    A CREDENTIALING PROCESS THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.  SO THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL ISSUE THE CREDENTIALS TO -- TO BONA FIDE

                    JOURNALISTS TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS THIS, AND THEN OF COURSE TO EMERGENCY

                    SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  ALL RIGHT.  SO WHAT -- WHAT ARE WE

                    ANTICIPATING WITH THIS LEGISLATION THAT WOULD MAKE SOMEONE A BONA FIDE

                    JOURNALIST?

                                 MS. REYES:  SO THAT IS CLEARLY DESCRIBED IN THE LAW.

                    LET ME READ IT TO YOU.  SO, THE NEW YORK CIVIL RIGHTS LAW 79-H, PART 6

                    DESCRIBES PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS.  PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS SHALL MEAN

                    ONE, WHO, FOR GAIN OR LIVELIHOOD, IS ENGAGED IN THE GATHERING,

                    PREPARING, COLLECTING, WRITING, EDITING, FILMING, TAPING OR

                    PHOTOGRAPHING OF NEWS INTENDED FOR A NEWSPAPER, MAGAZINE, NEWS

                    AGENCY, PRESS ASSOCIATION OR WIRE SERVICE OR OTHER PROFESSIONAL MEDIUM

                    OR AGENCY WHICH HAS ONE OF ITS REGULAR FUNCTIONS -- WHICH ONE OF ITS

                    REGULAR FUNCTIONS IS THE PROCESSING AND THE RESEARCH OF NEWS INTENDED

                    FOR DISSEMINATION TO THE PUBLIC.  SUCH PERSON SHALL BE SOMEONE

                    PERFORMING SAID FUNCTION EITHER AS A REGULAR EMPLOYEE OR AS AN

                                         64



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    OTHERWISE PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATED FOR GAIN OR LIKELIHOOD WITH SUCH A

                    MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO, SCANNER RADIO IS AN APP.  WOULD

                    THEY QUALIFY UNDER THIS FOR HAVING ACCESS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT RADIO

                    FREQUENCIES?

                                 MS. REYES:  YOU SAID SCANNER RADIO?

                                 MR. REILLY:  SCANNER APP [SIC].  IT'S A SCANNER

                    RADIO -- SCANNER RADIO.  IT'S AN -- IT'S AN APP WHERE IT MONITORS ACROSS

                    THE WORLD RADIO TRANSMISSIONS FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT, FOR EMS, AND FOR

                    OTHER AGENCIES LIKE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENTS.

                                 MS. REYES:  NO.  THIS ISN'T -- THIS ISN'T -- THIS DOESN'T

                    CAPTURE THEM BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT CONSIDERED JOURNALISTS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  IF THEY COORDINATE AT SOME POINT WITH

                    A NEWS REPORTER, WOULD THAT QUALIFY THEM?

                                 MS. REYES:  THE -- NO, DOS IS -- IS THE ENTITY

                    RESPONSIBLE FOR ISSUING CREDENTIALS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  OKAY.  SO WOULD DOS POTENTIALLY

                    GIVE THEM A CREDENTIAL IF THEY ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH -- WITH A

                    JOURNALIST?

                                 MS. REYES:  THAT, I'M TOLD, WOULD BE AGAINST THE

                    LAW.  IT WOULD -- IT WOULD FLY IN THE FACE OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS LAW THAT

                    DEFINES A JOURNALIST.

                                 MR. REILLY:  BUT IF THEY ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT

                    AND THEY'RE A SUBCONTRACTOR FOR A JOURNALIST, WOULD THAT APPLY?

                                 MS. REYES:  NO.

                                         65



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. REILLY:  WHY WOULDN'T IT?  SPECIFICALLY.

                                 (PAUSE/CONFERENCING)

                                 SO THIS -- WHY ARE YOU LOOKING FOR THAT?

                                 MS. REYES:  I HAVE A DETERMINATION FROM THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SAY IT AGAIN?

                                 MS. REYES:  I HAVE A LETTER, A -- AN OPINION AND A

                    DETERMINATION FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE --

                                 MR. REILLY:  OKAY.

                                 MS. REYES:  -- SPEAKING OF JOURNALISTS.  AND...

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 SO THEY -- THEY -- SO DOS CURRENTLY PROMULGATES THOSE

                    REGULATIONS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO -- SO WE'RE BASICALLY GIVING DOS

                    THE -- THEY DETERMINE WHOSE --

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, NO, THEY -- THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT

                    RIGHT.  THEY ALREADY -- THEY ALREADY HAVE THAT PURVIEW --

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO WE'VE ALREADY --

                                 MS. REYES:  -- TO CREDENTIAL -- TO CREDENTIAL BONA

                    FIDE JOURNALISTS.

                                 MR. REILLY:  ALL RIGHT.  SO WE ALREADY HAVE

                    BLOGGERS THAT ARE CONSIDERED JOURNALISTS, RIGHT?  THEY -- BECAUSE THE

                    EXPANSION HAS HAPPENED OVER THE COURSE OF THE YEARS WHERE WHAT WE

                    CONSIDER NEWS SOURCES HAS CHANGED.  SO, LIKE, A BLOGGER NOW COULD BE

                    CONSIDERED A JOURNALIST, AND DOS IS GIVING THEM ACCESS, RIGHT, FOR THE

                                         66



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    CREDENTIALS?

                                 MS. REYES:  THEY WOULD NOT NECESSARILY BE

                    CONSIDERED PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS BECAUSE THEY NEED TO BE

                    CREDENTIALED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE TO BE -- TO BE ABLE TO ACCESS --

                                 MR. REILLY:  I -- I -- WE'RE -- WE'RE GOING AROUND A

                    LITTLE BIT OF A CIRCLE THEN.

                                 MS. REYES:  YEAH.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO WHAT I'M ASKING IS, IF THE SCANNER

                    RADIO APP, THE PEOPLE WHO RUN IT, DETERMINE THAT THEY ARE GONNA ENTER

                    INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH A JOURNALIST, WOULD THEY FALL UNDER THAT

                    UMBRELLA AND BEING APPROVED BY DOS?

                                 MS. REYES:  SO, IF THEY WERE TO ENTER INTO AN

                    AGREEMENT IN THE SCENARIO THAT YOU JUST POSED WITH A JOURNALIST, THAT'S

                    ACTUALLY AGAINST THE LAW BECAUSE DOS CREDENTIALS THE JOURNALIST AND

                    NOT THE ENTITY.  SO THEY, UNDER THE LAW, CAN'T DO THAT NOW; USE THE

                    CREDENTIALS OF A JOURNALIST.

                                 MR. REILLY:  BUT IF THEY --

                                 MS. REYES:  (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK) --

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET HIRED -- SO

                    THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET HIRED BY THE JOURNALIST.

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, THEY WOULD HAVE TO -- THEY WOULD

                    HAVE TO BE JOURNALISTS THAT ARE EMPLOYED BY A NEWS ORGANIZATION, A

                    NEWSPAPER, MAGAZINE, NEWS AGENCY, PRESS ASSOCIATION, OTHER

                    PROFESSIONAL MEDIUM OR AGENCY WHICH HAS ONE OF ITS REGULAR FUNCTIONS

                    THE PROCESSING AND RESEARCHING OF NEWS INTENDED FOR THE DISSEMINATION

                                         67



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    OF THE PUBLIC.

                                 MR. REILLY:  WHICH SCANNER RADIO APP DOES.

                    THEY BROADCAST, AND NEWS -- NEW ENTITIES ALREADY USE THEM.  THAT'S

                    WHY I'M -- THAT'S WHY I WANT TO CLARIFY.

                                 MS. REYES:  THE NEWS ENTITY USED THEM BECAUSE WE

                    -- THERE ARE -- THERE ARE POLICE DEPARTMENTS THAT HAVE BEGUN TO ENCRYPT

                    RADIO COMMUNICATIONS, AND WE'RE TRYING TO SAY -- ONE, WE'RE TRYING TO

                    REGULATE THIS, RIGHT?  WE UNDERSTAND THAT POLICE DEPARTMENTS WANT

                    ENCRYPTION.  BUT WE'RE TRYING TO SAY THAT FOR THE PURPOSES OF

                    DISSEMINATING NEWS AND FOR THE PURPOSE OF TRANSPARENCY AND PUBLIC

                    SAFETY, WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EMERGENCY SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS

                    HAVE ACCESS TO IT AND THAT OUR JOURNALISTS HAVE ACCESS TO IT.

                                 MR. REILLY:  OKAY.  SO CAN YOU THINK OF -- CAN YOU

                    THINK OF ANY REASON WHY LAW ENFORCEMENT MAY WANT AN ENCRYPTED

                    RADIO TRANSMISSION?

                                 MS. REYES:  NO, BUT I'M SURE YOU'RE GONNA TELL ME.

                                 MR. REILLY:  OR AT LEAST A DELAYED.

                                 MS. REYES:  I'M SURE YOU'RE GONNA TELL ME.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO IS THERE -- IS THERE -- HAS THERE BEEN

                    A DISCUSSION ABOUT HAVING A DELAYED FREQUENCY?  LIKE, THE DELAYED

                    TRANSMISSIONS.

                                 MS. REYES:  WE HAVE.  LIKE I SAID, OTHER STATES HAVE

                    -- HAVE IMPLEMENTED A DELAYED TRANSMISSION.  BUT THEY'VE

                    IMPLEMENTED DELAYED TRANSMISSION AND STILL KEPT THE RADIOS PUBLIC FOR

                    THE GENERAL PUBLIC.  AND WE'RE SAYING THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO BE AVAILABLE

                                         68



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC, THAT IT'S ONLY GOING TO BE AVAILABLE TO EMERGENCY

                    SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS AND -- AND JOURNALISTS THAT ARE CREDENTIALED BY

                    THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO IS THERE -- IS THERE A POTENTIAL THAT

                    HAVING IT OPEN TO JOURNALISTS COULD ACTUALLY, IF THEY REPORT IT IN

                    REALTIME, COULD BE JEOPARDY TO THE PUBLIC?

                                 MS. REYES:  NO.  WE BELIEVE -- WE BELIEVE IT TO BE A

                    BENEFIT TO THE PUBLIC, AND I'LL GIVE YOU SOME EXAMPLES.  DURING THE

                    BUFFALO MASS SHOOTING IN 2022, LOCAL JOURNALISTS LOST ACCESS TO

                    COMMUNICATIONS THERE AND WEREN'T ABLE TO REPORT IN REALTIME.  SO THERE

                    WERE FAMILIES THAT WERE WONDERING ABOUT THEIR LOVED ONES DURING THAT

                    TIME.  AND IF -- IF JOURNALISTS WOULD HAVE HAD ACCESS TO THAT

                    INFORMATION, THEY CAN ALSO WARN REGULAR CITIZENS AS THEY BROADCAST THE

                    NEWS ABOUT SOMETHING EMINENT THAT'S HAPPENING, PERHAPS TO KEEP

                    PEOPLE OUT OF THEIR -- OUT OF THE AREA SO THAT THEY CAN STAY SAFE.  AND

                    THESE WOULD BE CONSIDERED NONSENSITIVE UPDATES IN REALTIME.

                                 ANOTHER EXAMPLE WHERE THE WILDFIRES IN 2018 IN

                    CALIFORNIA WHERE THEY HAD ENCRYPTED RADIOS AS WELL, AND THAT DELAYED

                    SOME OF THE EMERGENCY SERVICES BEING ABLE TO RESPOND TO THE FIRES

                    BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE ENCRYPTION.  THERE ARE -- AGAIN, THERE ARE --

                    THERE ARE, LIKE IN OUR -- LIKE IN OUR STATE, COUNTIES THAT HAVE VOLUNTEER

                    FIREFIGHTERS AND VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT BENEFIT FROM ACCESS

                    TO THE -- TO THE RADIO.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPONSOR.

                                 ON THE BILL, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                         69



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. REILLY:  SO THERE'S A COUPLE OF ISSUES HERE THAT

                    I'D LIKE TO RAISE ABOUT HAVING REALTIME ACCESS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT

                    TRANSMISSIONS, RIGHT?  YEARS AGO WHILE I WAS WORKING IN MIDTOWN

                    NORTH FOR THE NYPD, WE HAD WHAT'S CALLED THE "YUGOS".  THEY WERE A

                    YUGOSLAVIAN BURGLARY TEAM, AND THEY USED TO HIT THE DIAMOND DISTRICT

                    AND THEY USED TO CARRY RADIOS.  AND EVEN IF WE'RE SAYING THAT ONLY

                    JOURNALISTS WILL HAVE ACCESS TO THIS, IT WILL BE AVAILABLE TO THOSE THAT

                    SHOULD NOT HAVE IT.  AND WHAT HAPPENED DURING THAT TIME IS THEY WOULD

                    GET THE TRANSMISSIONS, AND THEY WOULD KNOW BY THE CODES WHEN AN

                    OFFICER WAS ASSIGNED A -- A UNIT IN THE FIELD TO RESPOND TO THAT ALARM

                    THAT THEY SET OFF.  BY NOT HAVING A DELAY, WE WILL BE SETTING THEM UP,

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT, FOR FAILURE TRYING TO APPREHEND THOSE COMMITTING A

                    CRIME LIKE THAT.

                                 ANOTHER ISSUE THAT WAS RAISED DURING THE DEBATE WAS

                    ABOUT HAVING REALTIME ACCESS TO THE INFORMATION SO THAT WE COULD STOP

                    PEOPLE FROM -- FROM -- OR WARN PEOPLE, RIGHT, ABOUT THE SHOOTING, ABOUT

                    THE WILDFIRES.  I'D LIKE TO OFFER ANOTHER SCENARIO.  YOU HAVE A CALL OF A

                    POTENTIAL OR A SUPPORTED SHOOTING, A REPORTED SHOOTING AT A SCHOOL.  ALL

                    OF A SUDDEN THE NEWS IS PUTTING THAT OUT.  THE REALITY IS, PARENTS WILL BE

                    RUSHING TO THAT SCHOOL.  IT WILL PREVENT EMERGENCY PERSONNEL FROM

                    HAVING ACCESS.  THAT IS WHY I ASKED IF THERE WAS A POTENTIAL TO HAVE A

                    DELAYED ACCESS TO THE TRANSMISSIONS.  IT COULD BE 15 MINUTES, IT COULD

                    BE 20 MINUTES.  IT COULD EVEN BE TEN MINUTES.  SOME TYPE OF DELAY

                    WOULD HELP OUR FIRST RESPONDERS CREATE THE NECESSARY TRIAGE LOCATION,

                                         70



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    CREATE THE NECESSARY COMMAND POST THEY NEED TO COORDINATE RESOURCES

                    THAT MAY HAVE TO GET TO THAT INCIDENT.

                                 WHEN WE HAVE INFORMATION THAT'S PUT OUT IMMEDIATELY

                    BECAUSE THEY HEAR IT OVER A RADIO, A LAW ENFORCEMENT RADIO, IT DOES NOT

                    NECESSARILY MEAN IT'S CONFIRMED.  SO EVEN IF THE SITUATION ISN'T

                    CONFIRMED, IT COULD CREATE PANIC AND IT COULD CREATE UNNECESSARY

                    BOTTLENECK RESPONDING TO AN EMERGENCY.  THAT'S WHY I WOULD HOPE THAT

                    WE MAY ACTUALLY LOOK INTO THIS AND MAKE AN AMENDMENT JUST TO ADD

                    THAT BUFFER TIME.  WE COULD STILL GIVE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS AND GIVE

                    JOURNALISTS THE ACCESS TO KEEP THE PUBLIC INFORMED, BUT WE ALSO GIVE

                    THAT LITTLE CUSHION TO ENSURE THAT RESOURCES THAT ARE VITAL GET TO THE

                    SCENE.

                                 THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  THANK YOU.  SORRY TO HAVE MY BACK

                    TO YOU.

                                 SO DOES THIS FRAMEWORK --

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ARE YOU ASKING

                    QUESTIONS OF THE SPONSOR?

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. REYES:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                         71



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  THANK YOU, MS. REYES.

                                 DOES THIS FRAMEWORK EXIST IN ANY OTHER DEPARTMENT

                    ACROSS THE STATE, POLICE DEPARTMENT?  ANYONE ELSE THAT --

                                 MS. REYES:  THE FRAMEWORK FOR --

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  FOR ALLOWING JOURNALISTS TO HAVE

                    ACCESS TO THEIR LIVE ENCRYPTED FREQUENCIES.

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, ENCRYPTION ONLY STARTED RECENTLY.

                    FOR -- HISTORICALLY, THE GENERAL PUBLIC HAS HAD ACCESS TO POLICE RADIOS.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  I MEAN, OUR DEPARTMENT, AS LONG AS

                    I'VE BEEN THERE, HAVE BEEN ENCRYPTING OUR RADIO CHANNEL.  SO YOU'RE

                    SAYING THAT THERE'S NO POLICE DEPARTMENT OUT THERE OR ANY EMERGENCY

                    SERVICES THAT ARE PROVIDING ENCRYPTED ACCESS, ACCESSING ENCRYPTED

                    CHANNELS TO JOURNALISTS?  NOT TO THE BEST OF YOUR KNOWLEDGE?

                                 MS. REYES:  IN -- SO, IN NEW YORK THE ENCRYPTION

                    THAT IS HAPPENING IS ENCRYPTION FULL STOP AND THEY'RE NOT HAVING ACCESS,

                    WHICH IS WHY WE CRAFTED THE LEGISLATION.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  GOT IT.  SO INSTEAD OF MAYBE GOING

                    THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE -- WELL, I GUESS THE DEPARTMENT OF

                    STATE COULD GO THROUGH LICENSING.  LET'S TALK ABOUT THAT FOR A LITTLE BIT.

                    SO SAY IF A BONA FIDE JOURNALIST GOES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND

                    GETS LICENSED.  WHAT'S NEXT?  HOW DO THEY GET ACCESS TO THOSE

                    FREQUENCIES?  WHO GIVES THEM THE PASSWORDS, CREDENTIALS?  IS THAT THE

                    DEPARTMENT OR IS -- DOES THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAVE TO MAINTAIN THAT

                    INFORMATION?

                                 MS. REYES:  THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE IS TASKED WITH

                                         72



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    PROMULGATING THE RULES.  THEY ALREADY --

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD HAVE OUR COLLEAGUES TO SPEAK INTO THE MICROPHONES.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  SORRY.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  I KNOW IT'S A LITTLE

                    BIT DIFFICULT BECAUSE SHE'S BEHIND YOU.  BUT YOU DON'T HAVE TO LOOK AT

                    HER, IT'S OKAY.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  THAT'S ALL RIGHT.  THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

                    SHE'S TALKING BEHIND MY BACK, BUT THAT'S ALL RIGHT.

                                 (LAUGHTER)

                                 MS. REYES:  ALL GOOD THINGS, I PROMISE.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  SO, YEAH.  SO, WHO HAS TO MAINTAIN

                    THESE FREQUENCIES?  WHO PROVIDES THEM TO THE -- THE NOW-CREDENTIALED

                    JOURNALIST?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MS. REYES:  SO, LAW ENFORCEMENT HAS CONTROL OF

                    ACCESS TO THE FREQUENCIES.  THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL PROMULGATE

                    THE RULES, AND THEY ALREADY -- I HAVE TO SAY THEY ALREADY DO

                    CREDENTIALING FOR JOURNALISTS.  THIS IS A CRITERIA THAT ALREADY EXISTS UNDER

                    THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.  WE'RE JUST SAYING THAT FOR THIS ENCRYPTION,

                    THAT THE -- THE ACCESS WOULD BE GIVEN TO THESE CATEGORIES WHO ARE

                    CREDENTIALED AND REGULATED BY THE DEPARTMENT OF THE STATE, AND LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT WILL HAVE -- WILL BE REQUIRED TO GIVE THEM ACCESS TO THIS,

                    TO -- TO THE RADIO FREQUENCY.

                                         73



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  GOT IT.  SO IT'S UP TO THE LOCAL

                    MUNICIPALITY, THEN.  SO WHAT HAPPENS IF THE MUNICIPALITY USES A SPECIAL

                    TYPE OF EQUIPMENT THAT THE GENERAL PUBLIC DOES NOT HAVE ACCESS TO?

                    NOT EVERY SCANNER HAS THE ABILITY TO -- TO ACCESS TRUNKED RADIO SYSTEMS.

                    NOT EVERY -- YOU KNOW, WHO'S GONNA BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING

                    THAT EQUIPMENT?  WOULD ANY OF THESE COSTS FALL ON THE MUNICIPALITY

                    THEMSELVES?

                                 MS. REYES:  WE DON'T REGULATE IN THE -- IN THE

                    LANGUAGE OF THE BILL THE TYPE OF THE -- OF EQUIPMENT THAT IS USED.  AND

                    I'M ASSUMING THAT IF A NEWS -- AND THIS IS -- I'M ASSUMING THAT IF A NEWS

                    STATION WANTS TO HAVE ACCESS TO THE RADIO, UNDER THE LAW WILL HAVE TO

                    FIGURE OUT HOW TO GET THE EQUIPMENT.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  OKAY.  SO SAY IF THEY -- IF THEY

                    CANNOT PURCHASE THE EQUIPMENT OR THEY HAVE DIFFICULTY FINDING IT, AT

                    ANY POINT DOES THAT BECOME THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE -- THE POLICE

                    DEPARTMENT TO PROVIDE TO THEM?

                                 MS. REYES:  NO.  AND THAT'S NOT IN OUR BILL

                    LANGUAGE.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  OKAY.

                                 SO SAY IF A JOURNALIST VIOLATES THE -- THE -- WHATEVER

                    THE RULES ARE PERTAINING TO THIS?  SAY IF THEY ATTACHED IT TO THEIR OWN

                    BROADCAST SYSTEM, WHICH VIOLATES NOT ONLY FEDERAL LAW, BUT THE RULES OF

                    THIS PROGRAM.  WHAT IS NOW THE REPERCUSSION FOR THAT JOURNALIST?

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE CAN --

                    CAN TAKE THEIR CREDENTIALS AWAY.

                                         74



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  IS THERE A CRIMINAL CHARGE

                    ASSOCIATED WITH THAT?

                                 MS. REYES:  I MEAN, THAT DEPENDS ON -- THERE --

                    THERE ARE LAWS THAT GOVERN CONDUCT FOR JOURNALISTS, RIGHT, AND -- AND

                    CONDUCT IN GENERAL.  SO I -- I -- RIGHT.  THAT'S SPECIFIC -- THERE'S NO

                    PENALTIES IN THE BILL, SO THAT'S SPECIFIC TO WHATEVER SCENARIO.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  OKAY.  AND ARE THERE ANY PENAL --

                    SO SAY IF A LOCAL DEPARTMENT COMES UP WITH THEIR OWN -- I UNDERSTAND

                    THIS IS -- THEY'RE ALLOWED TO PRECLUDE SENSITIVE INFORMATION, RIGHT?

                                 MS. REYES:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  SO, OFTENTIMES, YES, OUR OFFICERS

                    WOULD LIKE TO, YOU KNOW, CALL A LANDLINE OR GET OFF THE RADIO

                    SOMETIMES.  BUT IN A LOT OF HIGH STRESS CIRCUMSTANCES, THEY DON'T

                    ALWAYS HAVE THAT ABILITY WHEN THEY'RE CALLING FOR EITHER BACKUP,

                    TRANSMITTING INFORMATION.  WHAT HAPPENS IF THEY DECIDED TO HAVE THEIR

                    OWN SEPARATE FREQUENCY DEDICATED FOR THOSE, YOU KNOW, SPECIAL

                    CIRCUMSTANCES?  ARE THEY GONNA BE REQUIRED TO GIVE THAT FREQUENCY

                    OVER?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MS. REYES:  THAT -- THAT WOULD FALL UNDER THE

                    CATEGORY OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION, SO THAT'S NOT REQUIRED TO BE SHARED.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  OKAY.  AND WHAT IS -- WHAT

                    HAPPENS IF SENSITIVE INFORMATION HAPPENS TO BE SHARED ON A -- LIKE, ON

                    AN ENCRYPTED CHANNEL THAT THEY NOW HAVE ACCESS TO?  CAN THE

                    DEPARTMENT GO BACK AND SAY, ALL RIGHT, MAYBE THIS IS NOT WORKING

                                         75



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE THE ABILITY AT ALL TIMES TO ENSURE THAT WE'RE NOT

                    SHARING SENSITIVE INFORMATION ON ALL THESE CHANNELS?

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, IT'S NOT THE JOURNALIST'S FAULT IF

                    SOMEBODY SHARES SENSITIVE INFORMATION IN A CHANNEL WHERE THEY

                    SHOULDN'T BE SHARING SENSITIVE INFORMATION.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  YEAH, WELL WHEN -- WHEN YOU'RE IN

                    A HIGH STRESS ENVIRONMENT IT'S NOT -- YOU KNOW, YOU'RE NOT ALWAYS

                    THINKING TO CHANGE CHANNELS.

                                 MS. REYES:  I - I -- I'M CERTAIN THAT EVEN -- EVEN

                    UNDER STRESSFUL SITUATIONS OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT WILL MAKE

                    DETERMINATIONS AS TO WHETHER THEY SHOULD BE SHARING SENSITIVE

                    INFORMATION OVER THE RADIO.  WHETHER ENCRYPTED OR NOT, BECAUSE I THINK

                    SENSITIVE INFORMATION MEANS THAT PERHAPS YOU SHOULDN'T BE SAYING IT

                    OVER THE RADIO.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  NOW, ARE THE JOURNALISTS HELD TO

                    ANY TYPE OF CONDUCT WITH THIS, ENSURING THAT THEY'RE -- THEY'RE

                    TRANSMITTING ALL THE UPDATED INFORMATION?  BECAUSE THINGS CHANGE

                    FREQUENTLY ON SCENES.  AND OFTENTIMES, JUST SO YOU KNOW, OUR INITIAL

                    REPORTS THAT WE GET ARE SOMETIMES FALSE.

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MS. REYES:  THE JOURNALISTS HAVE A CODE OF CONDUCT

                    AS WELL THAT THEY HAVE TO FOLLOW UNDER THE LAW.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  OKAY.  UNDERSTOOD.

                                 NOW, AND THERE'S NO FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR

                    MUNICIPALITIES IF THEY NEED EQUIPMENT TO UPDATE SYSTEMS, CHANGE

                                         76



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SYSTEMS TO ACCOMMODATE THIS?

                                 MS. REYES:  I'M SORRY?

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  IS THERE ANY FUNDING AVAILABLE FOR

                    MUNICIPALITIES IF THEY NEED TO UPGRADE THEIR SYSTEMS TO ACCOMMODATE

                    THIS REQUEST?

                                 MS. REYES:  THAT'S NOT GERMANE TO THE BILL.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  I MEAN, I THINK IT IS.  IF YOU'RE

                    TELLING A MUNICIPALITY THAT USES, SAY, A CERTAIN TYPE OF TRUNKED RADIO

                    SYSTEM THAT DOES NOT HAVE THE ABILITY TO BROADCAST IT, YOU KNOW,

                    OPENLY.

                                 MS. REYES:  IF THEY ALREADY USE AN ENCRYPTION

                    SYSTEM THEY'RE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO THOSE THAT ARE CREDENTIALED

                    UNDER THIS LAW.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  RIGHT.  BUT THAT MEANS EVERYONE

                    ELSE HAS SIMILAR TYPE OF INTEROPERABLE EQUIPMENT.  WHAT HAPPENS IF

                    THAT'S NOT POSSIBLE WITH GENERAL SCANNERS?  ARE THEY REQUIRED TO CHANGE

                    --

                                 MS. REYES:  WE'RE -- WE'RE NOT MANDATING IN THE

                    LANGUAGE THAT MUNICIPALITIES NEED TO --

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  GOT IT.

                                 MS. REYES:  -- BUY EQUIPMENT.  WE DON'T SPECIFY

                    THE EQUIPMENT THAT THEY HAVE TO USE.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  ALL RIGHT.  THAT'S ALL FROM MY END.

                                 OH, ACTUALLY ONCE LAST QUESTION.  WHAT HAPPENS IF A

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY JUST DOESN'T COMPLY?

                                         77



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. REYES:  THEN THEY'RE NOT FOLLOWING THE LAW.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  OKAY.  WHAT'S THE PENALTY?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MS. REYES:  IT'S LEFT UP TO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE

                    TO PROMULGATE RULES AS TO WHAT HAPPENS WHEN A DEPARTMENT OF LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT DOESN'T FOLLOW THE LAW.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  GOT IT.  THANK YOU, MS. REYES.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 YOU KNOW, TIME AND TIME AGAIN I'VE SEEN FROM MY

                    EXPERIENCE AS A FIRST RESPONDER, SENSITIVE INFORMATION TRANSMITTED

                    ACROSS RADIOS.  I'VE ALSO SEEN INCORRECT AND INACCURATE INFORMATION

                    TRANSMITTED ACROSS RADIOS.  AND WE KNOW THAT WE ALL HAVE LOCAL

                    JOURNALISTS, BUFFS, EVERYONE ELSE IN BETWEEN, WHO CAN GO STRAIGHT TO

                    TWITTER AND FACEBOOK AND EVERYTHING ELSE IN BETWEEN, SHARING THIS

                    INFORMATION.  WE HAVE A NUMBER OF DIFFERENT TASKS [SIC] FORCE THAT

                    OPERATES THROUGHOUT THE STATE ON SENSITIVE CHANNELS.  AND I KNOW THAT

                    -- THAT THERE'S A WAY TO EXEMPT THEM.  BUT MY CONCERN IS IS THAT WE

                    CANNOT CONTROL WHAT INFORMATION IS SHARED ON EACH ONE OF THOSE

                    CHANNELS, ESPECIALLY HIGH STRESS ENVIRONMENTS.

                                 I THINK THAT THIS IS ACTUALLY A DISSERVICE TO THE PUBLIC,

                    CREATING MASS HYSTERIA AT TIMES WHEN THINGS THAT ARE JUST FACTUALLY NOT

                    TRUE IS BEING PUT OUT THERE TO THE PUBLIC.  AND ONCE IT'S OUT, IT'S OUT.

                    THERE'S NO TAKING IT BACK.

                                         78



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 FOR THAT REASON AND SO MANY OTHERS, I'M GONNA HAVE TO

                    BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS BILL.  I'VE SPOKEN TO EVERY SINGLE ONE OF MY

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES THAT USE ENCRYPTED CHANNELS, AND I COULD TELL

                    YOU FIRSTHAND THAT THIS WILL DIRECTLY MAKE THEIR JOBS HARDER.  AND I

                    THINK IT WILL HAVE A TREMENDOUS IMPACT ON OUR PUBLIC SAFETY AT HOME.

                                 SO THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, AND THANK YOU TO THE

                    SPONSOR FOR HER TIME.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. DURSO.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. REYES:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MS. REYES.

                                 SO JUST TO DRILL DOWN A COUPLE OF THINGS.  THIS -- THE

                    BILL LANGUAGE SAYS LAW ENFORCEMENT, CORRECT?  EXCUSE ME.  ALL LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT, CORRECT, THAT ARE USING RADIOS?

                                 MS. REYES:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. DURSO:  SO THIS ISN'T SPECIFICALLY JUST FOR OUR

                    STATE POLICE OR LOCAL MUNICIPAL POLICE, IT'S ALL LAW ENFORCEMENT,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MS. REYES:  CORRECT.  I MEAN, EMERGENCIES HAPPEN

                    ALL OVER THE STATE.

                                         79



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. DURSO:  I'M SORRY?

                                 MS. REYES:  EMERGENCY -- EMERGENCIES HAPPEN ALL

                    OVER THE STATE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  CORRECT.  NO, I --  I JUST WANTED TO

                    MAKE SURE --

                                 MS. REYES:  AND NEWS, AS WELL.

                                 MR. DURSO:  RIGHT.  BUT IT'S -- IT'S NOT JUST FOR OUR

                    POLICE, IT'S ALSO FOR OUR CORRECTIONS DEPARTMENTS, PUBLIC SAFETY,

                    ANYTHING THAT WOULD BE PUBLIC, CORRECT?

                                 MS. REYES:  (INDISCERNIBLE) YOUR QUESTION.

                                 MR. DURSO:  BECAUSE IT SAYS LAW ENFORCEMENT.  IT

                    DOESN'T SPECIFICALLY SAY POLICE DEPARTMENTS.

                                 (PAUSE/CONFERENCING)

                                 MS. REYES:  SO, WE HAVE A DEFINITION FOR LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT UNDER THE LAW.

                                 MR. DURSO:  SURE.

                                 MS. REYES:  AND IT DOESN'T SPECIFY WHETHER

                    CORRECTIONS IS.  I'M NOT CERTAIN IF THEY'RE CAPTURED UNDER THAT DEFINITION.

                                 MR. DURSO:  SO -- SO FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, AND

                    -- AND JUST TO PUT IT ON THE RECORD, MY UNDERSTANDING IS CORRECTIONS

                    DEPARTMENTS WOULD FALL UNDER LAW ENFORCEMENT.  AND SO MY QUESTION

                    WITH THAT, JUST IF IT DOES, WHY WOULD THE PUBLIC AND/OR A JOURNALIST NEED

                    TO KNOW RADIO DISPATCHES OR RADIO CONVERSATIONS THAT ARE TAKING PLACE

                    WITHIN A CORRECTIONAL FACILITY?

                                 MS. REYES:  THIS IS NOT THE INTENT OF THE LAW.

                                         80



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. DURSO:  I ASKED A --

                                 MS. REYES:  AND I DON'T -- AND I DON'T -- AND I DON'T

                    -- I'M NOT CERTAIN IF THAT WAS A PRACTICE EVEN BEFORE THE ISSUE OF

                    ENCRYPTION.  IF -- IF THE PUBLIC HAD ACCESS TO --

                                 MR. DURSO:  I HAVE NO CLUE, EITHER.

                                 MS. REYES:  -- CORRECTION OFFICERS' RADIOS.  BUT THIS

                    IS NOT THE PROBLEM WE'RE TRYING TO SOLVE FOR.

                                 MR. DURSO:  UNDERSTOOD.  AND I UNDERSTAND THAT'S

                    NOT THE INTENTION.  BUT MY CONCERN, ONCE AGAIN, IS THE LANGUAGE IN THE

                    BILL, JUST ONE PART OF IT.

                                 MS. REYES:  DO YOU -- DO YOU KNOW IF THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS ENCRYPTS THEIR RADIOS?

                                 MR. DURSO:  I HAVE NO CLUE.

                                 MS. REYES:  HAVE THEY STARTED ENCRYPTING RADIOS?

                                 MR. DURSO:  I -- I HAVE NO CLUE.  I DIDN'T -- BUT I

                    ALSO -- I DIDN'T CREATE THIS BILL OR WRITE THE LANGUAGE.  AND IN THE BILL IT

                    SAYS LAW ENFORCEMENT, WHICH TO MY UNDERSTANDING UNDER NEW YORK

                    STATE, LAW ENFORCEMENT -- EXCUSE ME, CORRECTIONS ARE CONSIDERED LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT.  SO I JUST WANTED TO PUT THAT ON THE RECORD IS THAT WOULD

                    MAKE -- BE A BEGINNING OF A CONCERN FOR ME.

                                 (PAUSE/CONFERENCING)

                                 MS. REYES:  THEY'RE TRYING TO DETERMINE THE CORRECT

                    RESPONSE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  NO, NO.  IT'S OKAY.  AND I -- I HAVE

                    OTHER QUESTIONS.

                                         81



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. REYES:  GO AHEAD.

                                 MR. DURSO:  AGAIN, I JUST WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT

                    WAS PUT ON RECORD, UNDERSTANDING THAT, AGAIN, SOMETHING LIKE THAT,

                    AGAIN, JUST USING THE TERM BROADLY OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.  AGAIN, I -- I --

                    AND AS YOU'LL SEE AT THE END, I DON'T AGREE WITH THE BILL TO BEGIN WITH,

                    BUT I UNDERSTAND THE INTENT OF IT.  BUT AGAIN, THERE ARE UNINTENDED

                    CONSEQUENCES WHEN IT COMES TO LANGUAGE IN A BILL; THAT MAY BE ONE OF

                    THEM.

                                 I KNOW ONE OF THE OTHER -- MY COLLEAGUES HAD ASKED --

                                 MS. REYES:  I JUST -- THEY'RE -- THEY'RE SAYING THAT

                    THEY ARE NOT INCLUDED BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT IN A LAW ENFORCEMENT -- LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT DOES NOT CAPTURE CORRECTIONS FACILITIES.

                                 MR. DURSO:  LAW ENFORCEMENT DOES NOT CAPTURE THE

                    CORRECTIONS OFFICERS IN IT.

                                 MS. REYES:  FACILITIES.  NOT UNDER THIS BILL.

                                 MR. DURSO:  SO THE FACILITIES WON'T COUNT.  OKAY.

                                 SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, AND I -- I KNOW YOU -- YOU

                    HAD SAID TO ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES, WHY NOT A DELAY.  AND I APOLOGIZE, I

                    KNOW THEY BOTH ASKED, JUST HEARING IT.  WHY NOT -- I MEAN, OTHER STATES

                    DO HAVE THIS.  OTHER MUNICIPALITIES HAVE THIS WHERE THERE'S LIKE A FIVE

                    MINUTE DELAY OR A TWO MINUTE DELAY.  WHAT WAS YOUR REASONING FOR NOT

                    HAVING THE DELAY?

                                 MS. REYES:  I HAVEN'T HEARD OF A TWO MINUTE DELAY.

                    USUALLY, DELAYS ARE 15 MINUTES OR MORE.  BUT FOR THE PURPOSES OF NEWS

                    REPORTING, A DELAY ISN'T NEWS, IT'S HISTORY.

                                         82



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. DURSO:  UNDERSTOOD.  SO WE'RE DOING THIS

                    REALLY FOR JOURNALISTS?

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, WE'RE DOING THIS FOR JOURNALISTS

                    AND WE ARE ALSO DOING IT FOR EMERGENCY SERVICES.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO -- AND SO WITH THAT BEING

                    SAID, WHY DO JOURNALISTS -- AND AGAIN, I'M ALL FOR FREE PRESS, BUT WHY DO

                    JOURNALISTS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT EMERGENCY SITUATIONS AS THEY'RE

                    HAPPENING?

                                 MS. REYES:  FOR A LITANY OF REASONS.  BUT REPORTING

                    IS IMPORTANT BECAUSE IT HELPS KEEP PEOPLE OUT OF THE AREA, IT MAKES

                    THEM AWARE THAT THERE'S SOMETHING GOING ON.

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 AND JOURNALISTS ARE OUR EYES AND EARS DURING PUBLIC

                    EMERGENCIES.  I THINK IT IS A -- AN IMPORTANT PUBLIC SERVICE THAT THEY

                    PROVIDE, AND IT'S IMPORTANT FOR THEM TO CONTINUE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THIS

                    INFORMATION.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO -- SO --

                                 MS. REYES:  BECAUSE THEY'VE HAD IT BEFORE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  I APOLOGIZE, MA'AM.

                                 MS. REYES:  SORRY.  SORRY.  I SAID THEY'VE HAD IT

                    BEFORE.  SO WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY CONTINUE TO HAVE ACCESS TO

                    THIS INFORMATION --

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  AND AS ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES --

                                 MS. REYES:  -- TO PROTECT THE INTEGRITY OF OUR NEWS.

                                 MR. DURSO:  AND AS ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES SAID THAT

                                         83



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AT -- AT SOME TIMES DURING CERTAIN SITUATIONS, THIS COULD ACTUALLY PUT THE

                    PUBLIC AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AND OUR EMERGENCY RESPONDERS IN -- IN

                    DANGER.  AGAIN, IF YOU SEE A -- IF THERE'S A HOUSE FIRE SOMEWHERE, RIGHT,

                    WE SEE IT ALL THE TIME, UNFORTUNATELY, BUT PEOPLE GATHER AROUND THAT

                    HOUSE FIRE.  PEOPLE COME AND FLOCK TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD.  JUST LIKE IF

                    THERE WAS A NEWS REPORT IN REALTIME THAT THERE WAS A -- A STANDOFF IN

                    SOMEONE'S HOME OR A SHOOTING OR A ROBBERY IN PROGRESS OR ANYTHING

                    LIKE THAT, UNFORTUNATELY, THE CASE IS THAT PEOPLE FLOCK TO THOSE AREAS.

                    DO YOU FEEL THAT THAT PUTS LAW ENFORCEMENT, EMERGENCY RESPONDERS AND

                    THOSE PEOPLE THAT ARE IN THAT PUBLIC SPACE IN DANGER?

                                 MS. REYES:  SO, ONE, I THINK PEOPLE FLOCK TO THE

                    AREA WITHOUT NEWS REPORTING.  AT --

                                 MR. DURSO:  BUT THIS WILL JUST ADD TO IT.

                                 MS. REYES:  -- LEAST THAT HAS -- THAT HAS BEEN MY

                    EXPERIENCE.  BUT -- BUT JOURNALISTS, THEM HAVING ACCESS TO INFORMATION

                    IN REALTIME DOESN'T NECESSARILY MEAN THAT THEY'RE REPORTING IN REALTIME.

                    IT MEANS THAT THEY HAVE ACCESS TO INFORMATION IN REALTIME, AND THAT

                    OFTEN MAINTAINS THE INTEGRITY OF THE REPORTING OF THE INFORMATION THAT

                    THEY'RE ABLE TO GATHER TO THEN REPORT TO THE PUBLIC.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO, MOVING ON --

                                 MS. REYES:  AND I -- I'M SORRY, MR. DURSO --

                                 MR. DURSO:  NO, (INDISCERNIBLE) --

                                 MS. REYES:  I JUST ALSO WANTED TO, IN RESPONSE TO

                    WHAT MR. REILLY SAID THAT YOU BROUGHT UP AS WELL, WE HAVE DEFINED IN

                    THE LANGUAGE SENSITIVE INFORMATION, AND -- AND THAT'S LEFT UP TO THE

                                         84



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    DISCRETION, MANY TIMES, OF LAW ENFORCEMENT.  SO IN -- IN SITUATIONS

                    WHERE THEY ARE TRANSMITTING SENSITIVE INFORMATION THAT THEY BELIEVE

                    PERHAPS SHOULDN'T BE, THEY HAVE THE RIGHT TO DO SO ON ANOTHER CHANNEL.

                    THROUGH ANOTHER MEDIUM OF COMMUNICATION, THEY CAN STILL DO THAT.

                    AND THAT'S NOT REQUIRED FOR THEM TO SHARE WITH JOURNALISTS.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO I WANT TO DRILL DOWN ON THAT.

                    SO WHAT CHANNEL IS REQUIRED?  SO IN OTHER WORDS, IS IT THE LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATION TO DISPATCH, OR IS IT OFFICER TO OFFICER?

                                 MS. REYES:  ALL OF -- ALL OF THEM THAT ARE ON THAT --

                                 MR. DURSO:  ALL OF THEM.  SO -- SO WHO GETS TO

                    MAKE THAT DETERMINATION, WHAT'S SENSITIVE AND WHAT'S NOT?

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, THE -- THE OFFICERS BASED ON

                    WHATEVER... I WOULDN'T CALL IT MISSION, WHATEVER THEY'RE WORKING ON WILL

                    DETERMINE WHAT'S SENSITIVE INFORMATION.  WE DON'T DELINEATE WHAT

                    SENSITIVE INFORMATION IS.  THAT'S LEFT FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT TO DETERMINE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  BUT -- BUT IF WE'RE MAKING A LAW

                    SAYING THAT THEY HAVE TO ESSENTIALLY PUBLICLY BROADCAST IT, RIGHT --

                                 MS. REYES:  I'M SORRY.  AND I -- AND JUST TO CORRECT

                    MYSELF.  THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE CAN ALSO DELINEATE WHAT IS SENSITIVE

                    INFORMATION.  SO ANY -- ANY KIND OF, LIKE, UNDERCOVER OPERATIONS, SOME

                    INFORMATION THAT IS CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND PROTECTED UNDER THE LAW

                    SHOULDN'T BE SAID OVER THE RADIO.

                                 MR. DURSO:  RIGHT.  BUT WHEN ARE THEY MAKING THAT

                    DETERMINATION?  SO IF I AM A POLICE OFFICER OR IN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND I

                    DETERMINE AT THAT MOMENT THAT THIS IS SENSITIVE AND I SWITCH CHANNELS --

                                         85



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AS SIMPLE AS THAT MAY SOUND, WE'RE MAKING IT A SIMPLE WAY TO DESCRIBE

                    IT -- AND YOU'RE THE JOURNALIST AND YOU SAY, I WANTED TO HEAR THAT.  I FEEL

                    THAT WHAT YOU'RE DOING IS NOT SENSITIVE.  WHO MAKES THAT COMPLAINT,

                    AND THEN WHO MAKES THE DETERMINATION THAT IT WAS SENSITIVE OR NOT?

                    HOW WOULD THEY KNOW?

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, FIRST THEY WOULD HAVE TO KNOW,

                    RIGHT --

                                 MR. DURSO:  HAVE TO.

                                 MS. REYES:  THEY WOULD HAVE TO KNOW THAT THERE

                    WAS SENSITIVE INFORMATION --

                                 MR. DURSO:  WELL, (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSSTALK) --

                                 MS. REYES:  -- BROADCASTED -- BROADCASTED THROUGH A

                    CHANNEL THAT THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO IN ORDER MAKE A COMPLAINT.  BUT

                    LET'S SAY ALL OF THOSE -- ALL OF THOSE CRITERIA ARE MET.  ULTIMATELY, THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE HAS PURVIEW OVER...

                                 MR. DURSO:  SO THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WOULD

                    THEN HAVE TO GET A COMPLAINT FILED TO THEM IN REGARDS TO A TRANSMISSION

                    THAT WENT OFFLINE.  I'M -- I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS WOULD

                    ACTUALLY WORK.  THEY WOULD HAVE TO GET A COMPLAINT FROM A JOURNALIST,

                    A -- OR ANOTHER EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION SAYING THAT A RADIO

                    TRANSMISSION WENT OFFLINE AT 3:30 A.M., AND WE WANT TO KNOW IF THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE DETERMINES THAT THAT RADIO TRANSMISSION HAD THE

                    RIGHT TO BE CHANGED CHANNEL -- THEY CHANGED THE CHANNEL ON IT, THAT IT'S

                    SENSITIVE MATERIAL.  SO THERE WOULD ALMOST HAVE TO BE AN INVESTIGATION

                    PROCESS.

                                         86



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, ALL THE -- ALL THE RADIO

                    TRANSMISSIONS ARE FOILABLE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  I -- I -- BUT THAT'S WHAT I'M ASKING YOU.

                    SO, WHO DECIDES TO SAY, OKAY, I WANT TO KNOW WHAT WAS SAID AT THAT

                    TIME.  WHY DID YOU CHANGE THE CHANNEL?

                                 MS. REYES:  I GUESS YOU CAN SAY IT WAS CONSIDERED

                    SENSITIVE INFORMATION.  IT'S JUST THAT IT WOULDN'T HAVE TO BE TRANS --

                    TRANSMITTED IN REALTIME.  BUT EVEN IF IT'S SENSITIVE INFORMATION IT CAN

                    STILL BE FOILED.

                                 MR. DURSO:  UNDERSTOOD.  THAT'S MY QUESTION, IS IF

                    I AM LAW ENFORCEMENT AND I FEEL AT THAT MOMENT THAT THIS IS SENSITIVE

                    INFORMATION AND I DECIDE AT THAT MOMENT TO CHANGE THE CHANNEL, THAT IS

                    NO LONGER -- CAN BE ACCESSED BY THE JOURNAL -- THE JOURNALIST AND/OR

                    EMERGENCY SERVICE PERSONNEL AND I FEEL THAT IT'S SENSITIVE, HOW WOULD A

                    -- WHAT'S THE MECHANISM IN PLACE FOR SOMEONE TO SAY, HEY, AT 3:30

                    A.M. OFFICER DURSO TURNED OFF HIS RADIO BECAUSE HE FELT IT WAS SENSITIVE.

                    DO THEY THEN HAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE?

                    BECAUSE I DON'T -- I'M NOT UNDERSTANDING HOW THAT MECHANISM IS IN

                    PLACE AND HOW THAT GETS, YOU KNOW, MOVED FORWARD.

                                 MS. REYES:  ALL RIGHT.  SO I'M GONNA READ TO YOU THE

                    DEFINITION OF SENSITIVE INFORMATION HERE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  GREAT.

                                 MS. REYES:  SENSITIVE INFORMATION MEANS ANY

                    PORTION OF A RADIO COMMUNICATION THAT IS DISCLOSE -- THAT IF DISCLOSED

                    WOULD, ONE, DEPRIVE A PERSON OF A RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL OR IMPARTIAL

                                         87



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ADJUDICATION; IDENTIFY A CONFIDENTIAL SOURCE OR DISCLOSE CONFIDENTIAL

                    INFORMATION RELATING TO A CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION; AND THREE, REVEAL

                    CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION TECHNIQUES OR PROCEDURES EXCEPT ROUTINE

                    TECHNIQUES AND PROCEDURES.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE

                    DEFINITION OF SENSITIVE MATERIAL IS.

                                 MS. REYES:  I'M -- AND I'M -- AND I'M -- AND WHAT

                    I'M TRYING TO SAY IS THAT IS VERY LOOSE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  VERY.  AND I UNDERSTOOD.  BUT WHO,

                    THEN, IS GONNA SAY THAT FALLS UNDER THAT PURVIEW?  AGAIN, IF I'M THE

                    OFFICER --

                                 MS. REYES:  ULTIMATELY, THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.

                                 MS. REYES:  AND YOU'RE ASKING ABOUT THE

                    MECHANISM.

                                 MR. DURSO:  RIGHT.

                                 MS. REYES:  YOU WANT TO KNOW, LIKE, DO THEY FILE A

                    COMPLAINT?

                                 MR. DURSO:  SURE.

                                 MS. REYES:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THEY WOULD HAVE TO FILE A COMPLAINT.

                                 MS. REYES:  THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL SET UP A

                    PROCESS FOR THAT.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  PERFECT.  THANK YOU.

                                 SO WITH THE COUPLE OF MINUTES I HAVE LEFT... I KNOW I

                                         88



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    HAD A LIST OF QUESTIONS.  I APOLOGIZE.  THIS IS FOR ALL RADIO TRANSMISSIONS,

                    YOU HAD SAID, RIGHT?  SO IT'S NOT JUST DISPATCH, IT'S OFFICER TO OFFICER?

                                 MS. REYES:  FOR ENCRYPTED RADIO.

                                 MR. DURSO:  FOR ENCRYPTED RADIO.

                                 MS. REYES:  YEAH.

                                 MR. DURSO:  SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE, THEN, IF

                    LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, LET'S SAY, WAS WORKING WITH A FEDERAL ENTITY,

                    LET'S SAY THE FBI, IN AN INVESTIGATION.  ARE THEY ALSO INCLUDED IN THIS IF

                    THEY'RE WORKING WITH NEW YORK STATE WITH LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT, TO

                    HAVE THAT ENCRYPTED RADIO TRANSMISSION OPEN TO THE PUBLIC?

                                 MS. REYES:  IT'S ONLY THE LAW ENFORCEMENT THAT'S --

                    THAT IS DESCRIBED IN THE DEFINITION.  SO WE DON'T BELIEVE THAT FEDERAL LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES FALL UNDER THERE.  BUT ASSUMING THAT THEY'RE

                    USING ENCRYPTED NEW YORK STATE -- NEW YORK LAW ENFORCEMENT RADIOS,

                    THEN THAT FALLS UNDER THE PURVIEW OF WHAT SHOULD BE ALLOWED FOR

                    JOURNALISTS AND -- AND EMERGENCY --

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO WHETHER IT'S FOR AN

                    INVESTIGATION OR SOMETHING I TAKE A PART IN, WHICH IS A PRESIDENTIAL

                    DEBATE WHERE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT IS ON THE RADIO WITH FEDERAL LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT, THAT IS SOMETHING THAT -- IT -- IT WORKS.  IT HAPPENS.  I

                    ACTUALLY DID IT.  SO MY QUESTION WOULD BE, WOULD THEN THAT HAVE TO BE

                    OPEN FOR JOURNALISTS AND/OR EMERGENCY SERVICES TO HEAR OUR

                    TRANSMISSIONS GOING ON AT THAT TIME?

                                 MS. REYES:  LET'S -- LET'S -- WHAT ARE -- IT DEPENDS ON

                    WHAT THEY'RE COMMUN -- COMMUNICATING, AND IT DEPENDS WHAT RADIO

                                         89



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ENCRYPTION THEY'RE USING; WHETHER IT'S, YOU KNOW, NEW YORK LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT RADIO THEN THEY WOULD HAVE TO DISCLOSE.  BUT IF IT'S SENS --

                    IF IT'S CONSIDERED SENSITIVE INFORMATION UNDER THE DEFINITION, THEN THEY

                    WOULDN'T BE ABLE TO DISCLOSE IT IN REALTIME.

                                 MR. DURSO:  SO IT'S REALLY MORE THE OFFICER OR THE

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY GETS TO DETERMINE AT THAT MOMENT, AND THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE WILL MAKE A DETERMIN -- DETERMINATION LATER IF

                    THEY VIOLATED THIS LAW.

                                 MS. REYES:  RIGHT.  COMMUNICATION HAPPENS IN

                    REALTIME.  SO I'M ASSUMING IF YOU -- IF YOU'RE COMMUNICATING

                    SOMETHING THAT IS CONSIDERED SENSITIVE DATA, SENSITIVE INFORMATION, AND

                    YOU'RE GONNA USE ANOTHER CHANNEL BECAUSE YOU BELIEVE IT TO BE

                    SENSITIVE INFORMATION, IT'S NOT -- THEY DON'T HAVE ACCESS TO IT IN REALTIME.

                    THIS IS -- YOU'RE QUESTIONING ABOUT WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE FACT.  BUT

                    AFTER THE FACT, THAT INFORMATION WOULD BE ACCESSIBLE ANYWAY.

                                 MR. DURSO:  CORRECT.  UNLESS THEY WANTED IT NOT TO

                    BE.

                                 MS. REYES:  WELL, AT THAT POINT IT'S -- IT'S OLD NEWS.

                    I MEAN, IT -- IT -- IT WOULDN'T MATTER.

                                 MR. DURSO:  RIGHT.  BUT THE ONLY PERSON IT MATTERS

                    TO NOW, IN THIS CASE, IS JOURNALISTS SO THAT THEY COULD REPORT THE NEWS.

                                 MS. REYES:  NO, NO.  AND EMERGENCY SERVICES.  AND

                    --

                                 MR. DURSO:  THE POLICE WILL CONTACT (INDISCERNIBLE/

                    CROSS-TALK) --

                                         90



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. REYES:  -- IN MANY COUNTIES -- AND IN MANY

                    COUNTIES OUTSIDE OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK, YOUR EMERGENCY SERVICES

                    ARE VOLUNTEER SERVICES THAT RELY ON PUBLIC RADIO, RIGHT?  THEY NEED TO

                    BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE FIRE DEPARTMENT.  YOU KNOW --

                                 (BUZZER SOUNDS)

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MS. REYES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. ANGELINO.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                    WOULD THE SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. REYES:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  SO I'M -- I'M GONNA TRY AND SPEAK

                    INTO MY MICROPHONE WHILE LOOKING AT YOU.  AND I APOLOGIZE.  I MISSED

                    YOUR EXPLANATION.  I MISSED THE FIRST PORTION.  I WAS IN THE CODES

                    COMMITTEE MEETING.

                                 MS. REYES:  WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO REPEAT IT?

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  NO.  THE -- I THINK I'VE -- I'VE GOT

                    A LOT OF MY QUESTIONS ASKED AND ANSWERED BY MY COLLEAGUES, BUT THEN

                    MORE QUESTIONS CAME UP.

                                 THIS BILL IS PROHIBITING ENCRYPTED RADIO TRANSMISSIONS

                    BUT NOT DIGITAL?  ENCRYPTED IS --

                                 MS. REYES:  IT'S ENCRYPTED --

                                         91



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  RIGHT.

                                 MS. REYES:  -- RADIO TRANSMISSION.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.  BECAUSE A LOT OF AGENCIES

                    HAVE SWITCHED FROM ANALOG OVER THE RADIO WAVES TO DIGITAL RADIO.  I

                    RECEIVE COMPLAINTS IN MY RURAL DISTRICT, I CAN'T HEAR THE POLICE AND FIRE

                    ANYMORE.  DID THEY GO ENCRYPTED?  NO, THEY WENT DIGITAL.  SO THIS --

                    THIS ALLOWS DIGITAL RADIO?

                                 MS. REYES:  IF IT'S THE RADIO --

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  RIGHT.

                                 MS. REYES:  -- IF IT'S THE RADIO.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  IT'S NOT ENCRYPTED.  THIS IS ONLY

                    ENCRYPTED.

                                 MS. REYES:  CORRECT.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.  AND THIS IS -- IT'S RELATIVELY

                    SHORT IN SOME OF THE BILLS THAT WE DEBATE.  IT'S ONLY 50 LINES.  BUT IT

                    STARTS OUT TALKING ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT COMMUNICATIONS PUBLIC

                    ACCESS.  SO IT STARTS WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT, IT ENDS WITH LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT.  BUT RIGHT THERE IN, I GUESS ON MINE IT'S -- IT'S LINE 8, AND IT

                    SAYS EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATION MEANS --

                                 MS. REYES:  MM-HMM.

                                 MR. ANGELINO: -- PRIVATE, PUBLIC, VOLUNTEER OR A

                    GROUP THAT PROVIDES FIRE, MEDICAL, AMBULANCE, RESCUE, HOUSING, FOOD

                    AND OTHER SERVICES.  SO IS IT JUST POLICE OR DOES IT INCLUDE ALL OF THESE

                    AGENCIES, ALSO?

                                 MS. REYES:  ALL OF THESE AGENCIES WOULD HAVE

                                         92



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ACCESS UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE TO THE ENCRYPTED RADIO.  SO LIKE

                    VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENTS, LIKE VOLUNTEER EMERGENCY MEDICAL

                    SERVICES, LIKE THE RED CROSS.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.  I -- I THINK I UNDERSTAND, SO

                    I'M JUST GONNA -- SO I -- YOU CAN SAY YES OR NO.  SO THIS IS ABOUT LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT RADIO?

                                 MS. REYES:  YES.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  AND THAT SECTION IS SO THAT ALL THE

                    OTHER ORGANIZATIONS CAN HEAR IT?

                                 MS. REYES:  THAT -- SO THAT THEY CAN CONTINUE TO

                    HAVE ACCESS, YES.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  ALL RIGHT.  BUT PRIVATE -- PRIVATE IS

                    NOT MENTIONED IN THERE.  BECAUSE I HEARD A LOT ABOUT JOURNALS.

                                 MS. REYES:  SO, WE ARE -- WE ARE PROVIDING ACCESS

                    TO TWO CATEGORIES:  TO LAW ENFORCEMENT GROUPS -- I MEAN, I'M SORRY, TO

                    EMERGENCY SERVICES ORGANIZATIONS AND TO JOURNALISTS WHO ARE

                    CREDENTIALED UNDER THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.  AND THERE ARE EXEMPTIONS.

                    I SAW THAT, ALSO.

                                 MS. REYES:  YES.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  AND THIS DOESN'T ANY WAY REQUIRE

                    LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES TO GO BACKWARDS IN TECHNOLOGY?  GOING

                    BACK TO ANALOG?

                                 MS. REYES:  NO.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  OKAY.  THANK YOU.

                                         93



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  SO, I KNOW I LISTENED TO ALL OF MY

                    COLLEAGUES ABOUT THIS, AND THE SKY IS NOT FALLING WITH THIS BILL.  A LOT OF

                    AGENCIES ALREADY ARE THOUGHT TO BE ENCRYPTED BECAUSE THEY WENT

                    DIGITAL.  DIGITAL RADIO IS VERY DIFFICULT TO LISTEN TO.  IT TRANSMITS ON

                    THOUSANDS OF FREQUENCIES IN MILLISECOND CHANGES.  AND TO BUY A

                    SCANNER OR A MONITOR DEVICE THAT LISTENS TO THAT, IT'S NEAR -- WELL, IT'S

                    COST PROHIBITIVE TO MOST PEOPLE.  THAT'S WHY PEOPLE IN MY DISTRICT

                    THOUGHT THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES WENT ENCRYPTED.  BUT IT'S NOT

                    JUST LAW ENFORCEMENT, IT'S FIRE, EMS, AND EVERYBODY ELSE BECAUSE IT'S

                    CALLED THE TRUNK RADIO SYSTEM, USUALLY A COUNTYWIDE SYSTEM.  NOBODY

                    CAN HEAR THAT EXCEPT OTHER PEOPLE WITH TRUNK RADIOS.

                                 NOW, ENCRYPTION, THAT'S ANOTHER THING.  LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES DO HAVE ENCRYPTED RADIOS, AND IF YOU DO HAVE

                    THE WHEREWITHAL TO OWN A VERY EXPENSIVE SCANNER, YOU'RE GONNA HEAR

                    COPS ON THE RADIO SAY -- YOU'LL HEAR THE DISPATCH, YOU'LL HEAR THE

                    CROSSTALK TO EACH OTHER.  BUT THEN YOU WILL HEAR THEM SAY, GO TO AND

                    MY AGENCY, IT WAS 3.  GO TO 3.  THAT'S WHEN WE'RE STARTING TO TRANSMIT

                    SENSITIVE INFORMATION, LIKE WHAT -- WHAT IS THE KEY CODE TO GET INTO A

                    PERSON'S HOUSE BECAUSE WE HAVE TO CHECK THEIR WELFARE AND/OR -- OR THE

                    KEY IS HIDDEN UNDER THE MAILBOX.  THAT IS THE SENSITIVE INFORMATION THAT

                    WE PASS BACK AND FORTH.

                                 WHERE I LIVE, WE TRY TO USE OUR OPEN SOURCE RADIO TO

                    OUR ADVANTAGE.  WE PUT OUT THE NAMES AND DESCRIPTIONS OF PEOPLE, AND

                                         94



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SURE ENOUGH, THERE IS NO DIGNITY AMONGST THIEVES AND THEY WILL RAT ON

                    THEIR OTHER THIEVES -- COUNTERPARTS ALL THE TIME.

                                 SO THIS IS NOT THE SKY IS FALLING.  I REMEMBER WHEN IT

                    HAPPENED.  NYPD WENT ENCRYPTED AND JOURNALISTS AND TV STATIONS

                    DOWN THERE WERE ALL UPSET BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T KNOW IT RIGHT AWAY.

                    BUT, IN FACT, THEY WEREN'T ACTUALLY GOING ENCRYPTED, THEY JUST WENT

                    DIGITAL.  BUT EVERYBODY DOES HAVE THE SOURCE TO GO ENCRYPTED IF THEY

                    NEED TO.  AND THERE'S A SENSITIVE INFORMATION EXEMPTION IN HERE, AND

                    WE'VE BEEN DOING THIS FOR A QUITE A WHILE.

                                 I -- I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M VOTING ON THIS.  I THINK IT'S

                    GONNA BE A PARTY VOTE.  BUT THIS IS NOT THE SKY IS FALLING, TO ANYBODY

                    WHO'S WORRIED ABOUT THIS.  AND IF ANYBODY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT WANTS

                    TO CHALLENGE THAT, PLEASE, LOOK ME UP AND LET ME KNOW WHY.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. YEGER.

                                 MR. YEGER:  ON THE BILL, PLEASE, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. YEGER:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 I AGREE, THE SKY'S NOT FALLING.  BUT THE -- THE MOST

                    SIMPLE COMPROMISE THAT WOULD ACHIEVE THE PURPOSE OF THIS BILL AND

                    ALSO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT PUTTING THE PUBLIC IN DANGER WOULD BE A

                    VERY SLIGHT DELAY, AS WAS MENTIONED ON THIS FLOOR BY SOME OF OUR

                    COLLEAGUES.  SLIGHT.  IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE A HALF HOUR, IT DOESN'T HAVE TO

                    BE AN HOUR.  IT COULD BE FIVE MINUTES.  BUT ENOUGH TIME FOR SOMEBODY

                                         95



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    BACK AT THE BASE TO FLIP THE SWITCH OFF IF SOMETHING'S HAPPENING THAT

                    CAN'T BE RECORDED IN REALTIME.  AND THERE ARE THINGS THAT HAPPEN.  THERE

                    ARE EMERGENCIES.  THE -- THE POLICE ARE CHASING SOMEBODY WHO'S TRYING

                    TO KILL A CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT.  THEY PUT THE NAME OF THE CONFIDENTIAL

                    INFORMANT OVER THE RADIO NOT REALIZING, OH, THEY'RE CHASING THIS GUY.

                    THAT'S SOMETHING THAT'S SENSITIVE.  IT'S SPECIFICALLY EXEMPTED FROM

                    BEING DISCLOSED.  BUT AT THAT MOMENT, THEY MAY NOT HAVE TURNED OFF THE

                    TRANSMIT.  THEY MAY NOT HAVE SWITCHED IT OVER TO THE -- TO -- TO THE

                    SENSITIVE CHANNEL.  THE CONFIDENTIAL CHANNEL, THE CHANNEL THAT'S

                    PROTECTED BY THE STATUTE.

                                 A VERY SLIGHT DELAY.  WITHOUT THAT DELAY, WE'RE

                    ENDANGERING LIVES.  THIS BILL WILL ENDANGER LIVES.  AND IT'S NOT

                    HYPERBOLE.  IT'S THE KIND OF THING THAT, YES, WE WANT A FREE PRESS.

                    EVERYBODY WANTS A FREE PRESS.  WE HAVE THEM RIGHT DOWN THE HALL.

                    THEY WATCH EVERYTHING WE DO.  BUT TODAY, EVERYBODY WITH A TWITTER

                    ACCOUNT IS A JOURNALIST.  AND THEY'RE ALL IN A HUSTLE TO PUT THAT

                    INFORMATION OUT BEFORE THE NEXT GUY.  AND THEY HEAR SOMETHING ON THE

                    RADIO AS IT'S HAPPENING AND THEY TYPE, SOMETHING'S GOING DOWN.  AND

                    ONE OF THE GENTLEMEN WHO SPOKE HERE REFERENCED, GOD FORBID,

                    SOMETHING HAPPENING AT A SCHOOL AND THEN ALL THE PARENTS CONVERGE ON

                    THE SCHOOL.  THAT'S NOT SAFE.  AND WE OUGHT TO USE OUR POWERS TO

                    REGULATE THIS IN A WISE WAY; IN A WAY THAT SAYS LET'S PUT THAT INFORMATION

                    OUT.  LET'S MAKE SURE THAT THE PUBLIC'S ACCESS TO INFORMATION IS NOT

                    HINDERED.  BUT LET'S DO IT WISELY.  LET'S DO IT IN A WAY THAT THE FIRST

                    AMENDMENT IS BEING PROTECTED AND PUBLIC SAFETY IS BEING PROTECTED,

                                         96



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AND THOSE ARE NOT MUTUALLY INCONSISTENT VALUES.

                                 JUST ALSO WANT TO MENTION THAT UNDER THIS BILL THE

                    DEPARTMENT OF STATE -- NOT SURE WHY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE IS IN A

                    POSITION TO REGULATE ANYTHING THAT GOES ON WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT.  I'M

                    NOT SURE WHAT EXPERTISE THEY HAVE TO REGULATE WHAT CONSTITUTES SENSITIVE

                    INFORMATION, WHAT DOESN'T CONSTITUTE SENSITIVE INFORMATION.  THEY'RE

                    VERY GOOD AT PROCESSING CORPORATE DOCUMENTS.  I'M NOT SURE WHAT MORE

                    THEY DO.  THEY TAKE OUR OATHS, THEY FILE IT, THAT'S WONDERFUL.  WHAT DO

                    THEY HAVE TO DO WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT AND DETERMINING WHAT

                    CONSTITUTES SENSITIVE INFORMATION?

                                 THIS BILL WILL HURT NEW YORKERS IF IT IS ADOPTED, AND I

                    WILL BE VOTING NO.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS BILL [SIC] SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE

                    90TH DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MINORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE, GENERALLY SPEAKING, ON

                    THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  BUT IF THERE IS ANYONE WHO WOULD WISH TO

                    VOTE YES THEY MAY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                         97



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  THE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IS GONNA BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE

                    OF LEGISLATION; HOWEVER, THERE MAY BE A FEW THAT WOULD BE DESIRE TO BE

                    AN EXCEPTION.  THEY SHOULD FEEL FREE TO DO SO AT THEIR SEATS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. ANGELINO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. ANGELINO:  TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ARE ALREADY DOING THIS.

                    THOSE THAT DON'T -- AND I UNDERSTAND NYPD IS TOTALLY ENCRYPTED -- THAT'S

                    GONNA BE A VERY, VERY EXPENSIVE CHANGE FOR THE LARGEST LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT AGENCY IN THE UNITED STATES, AND IF NOT THE WORLD.  THE --

                    LIKE I SAID, IT'S ALREADY BEING DONE BY SMALLER AGENCIES, AND FOR THAT --

                    FOR THAT REASON I'LL BE VOTING NO.  BUT ALSO, MY OTHER COLLEAGUE TO MY

                    LEFT MENTIONED THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, WHICH WAS IN MY NOTES, AND

                    THAT WAS WHY THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE?  THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH

                    ANYTHING AND HAVE NO ENFORCEMENT BRANCH.  SO I THINK IT WAS A

                    CATCH-ALL BECAUSE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT REALLY ANSWERS TO LOCAL

                    AUTHORITY.  AND I DON'T KNOW WHO'S GOING TO IMPOSE ANY SORT OF PENALTY

                    OR PUNISHMENT, AND I ALSO HAVE TO WONDER WHO IS GOING TO PAY FOR THAT

                    FOR ANY LARGE AGENCIES THAT ARE FULLY ENCRYPTED.

                                 FOR THOSE REASONS I'LL BE A NO VOTE.

                                         98



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. ANGELINO IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. DURSO TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  AND I

                    WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR TAKING OUR QUESTIONS.

                                 AGAIN, THE DEVIL'S IN THE DETAILS WHEN SOME OF THESE

                    BILLS COME UP.  AND MY CONCERN IS FOR THE SAFETY NOT ONLY OF THE PUBLIC,

                    BUT FOR OUR OFFICERS IN GENERAL WHEN THEY ARE DOING THEIR JOB.  JUST

                    USING THE BROAD TERM OF LAW ENFORCEMENT IN A BILL LIKE THIS DOESN'T JUST

                    INCLUDE OUR LOCAL MUNICIPAL POLICE, BUT IT WILL INCLUDE STATE TROOPERS,

                    ANYBODY THAT FALLS UNDER PEACE OFFICER STATUS, COURT OFFICERS,

                    CORRECTIONS OFFICERS AND FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.  SO WHEN WE HAVE A

                    BILL LIKE THIS THAT'S SO BROAD AND DOESN'T SPECIFY WHAT WOULD BE

                    SENSITIVE, WHAT WOULD NOT, AND THEN LEAVE IT UP TO AN ENTITY LATER ON,

                    AGAIN, I ALWAYS TAKE AND -- AND ERR ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION WITH KEEPING

                    OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT, OUR POLICE, OUR CORRECTIONS, OUR SHERIFFS, OUR

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONVERSATION OFFICERS, THEIR SAFETY AND THE GENERAL

                    SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC IN MIND.

                                 SO WITH THAT BEING SAID, I'LL BE VOTING NO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. DURSO IN THE

                    NEGATIVE.

                                 MR. REILLY TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. REILLY:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  JUST TO

                    BE BRIEF.

                                 I'M HOPING THE GOVERNOR -- IF THIS COMES TO THE SENATE

                                         99



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AND IT PASSES, I'M HOPING THE GOVERNOR IS LISTENING IN, I'D LIKE TO PLEA

                    WITH HER TO INCLUDE AN AMENDMENT, ASK FOR THAT AMENDMENT FOR A

                    DELAY.  AS I MENTIONED DURING THE DEBATE, IT'S ABOUT THE RESPONSE TO

                    INCIDENTS THAT HAPPEN WHERE THE PUBLIC MAY BLOCK EMERGENCY VEHICLES

                    BECAUSE YOU MAY HAVE A CATASTROPHIC INCIDENT.  AND BECAUSE PEOPLE

                    WANT TO GET THERE TO SEE IT BECAUSE THE NEWS IS REPORTING IT, I DON'T THINK

                    A TEN MINUTE DELAY WILL BE AN INCONVENIENCE TO THE PRESS.

                                 SO WITH THAT, I'LL BE VOTING NO, HOPING FOR THOSE

                    AMENDMENTS.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. REILLY IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 MS. REYES TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. REYES:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 I AM VERY PROUD OF THE WORK THAT WE'VE DONE WITH THIS

                    PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  I BELIEVE IN TRANSPARENCY.  AND I HEAR -- I HEAR

                    SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES' CONCERNS, PERHAPS, OF A FIVE MINUTE DELAY OR A

                    15 MINUTE DELAY ISN'T AN IMPEDIMENT TO JOURNALISTS, BUT I GUARANTEE

                    YOU, IT IS AN IMPEDIMENT IN THE LIFE OF SOMEONE IN -- IN -- WHEN WE TALK

                    ABOUT EMERGENCY SERVICES GETTING TO A MASS SHOOTING, GETTING TO A

                    SCHOOL WHO -- OR SOMEBODY WHO IS IN NEED.  I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, IN

                    -- IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK THAT I -- IN THE DISTRICT THAT I REPRESENT, WE

                    HAVE, YOU KNOW, EMERGENCY SERVICES THAT WILL RESPOND IN A VERY SHORT

                    AMOUNT OF TIME.  THAT'S NOT THE CASE FOR SOME OF OUR RURAL COUNTIES,

                    AND WE'VE HEARD FROM THEM HOW IMPORTANT IT IS THAT THEY HAVE ACCESS

                    IN REALTIME TO THIS RADIO.  SO I AM ALWAYS OPEN TO THE DEBATE AND THE

                                         100



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    DISCUSSION.  BUT I BELIEVE IN TRANSPARENCY.  WE HAVE GIVEN A LOT OF

                    LEEWAY TO LAW ENFORCEMENT.  AND ALSO, I BELIEVE THAT LAW -- LAW

                    ENFORCEMENT IS COMPETENT AND CAPABLE TO RESPOND IN HIGH STRESS

                    SCENARIOS ACCURATELY TO DECIDE -- TO BE ABLE TO DECIDE.  I TRUST THEM TO

                    DECIDE WHAT IS CONSIDERED SENSITIVE AND WHAT IS NOT.  AND WE HAVE LEFT

                    THAT DISCRETION UP TO THEM AS WELL.

                                 SO WITH THAT, OF COURSE I WILL BE VOTING IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. REYES IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES FOR THE PURPOSES OF AN

                    INTRODUCTION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER, FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO INTERRUPT OUR PROCEEDINGS BRIEFLY TO

                    INTRODUCE SOME FIFTH GRADE SCHOLARS THAT ARE IN OUR CHAMBERS TODAY.

                    THEY ARE FROM THE LAKE PLACID ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, AND THEY'RE HERE

                    VISITING THEIR MEMBER AND OUR COLLEAGUE, MR. JONES.

                                 I HOPE THAT YOU WILL TAKE AN OPPORTUNITY TO

                    CONGRATULATE AND THANK THESE YOUNG PEOPLE FOR JOINING US TODAY AND

                    OFFER THEM THE CORDIALITIES OF THE HOUSE AND WELCOME THEM TO THE

                    PEOPLE'S HOUSE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON BEHALF OF MRS.

                                         101



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    PEOPLES-STOKES, MR. JONES, THE SPEAKER AND ALL MEMBERS, WE WELCOME

                    YOU YOUNG PEOPLE FROM LAKE PLACID AND EXTEND TO YOU THE PRIVILEGES

                    OF THE FLOOR HERE IN THE ASSEMBLY CHAMBER.  IT'S ALWAYS EXCITING TO SEE

                    YOUNG PEOPLE TRAVEL FROM SUCH A FAR DISTANCE TO COME AND LEARN ABOUT

                    LOCAL AND STATE GOVERNMENT, SEE HOW LEGISLATION IS CREATED.  SOMETHING

                    FUN YOU CAN GO BACK AND TELL YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY MEMBERS THAT

                    YOU HAD AN OPPORTUNITY TO VISIT THE STATE'S CAPITOL.  SO WE HOPE YOU

                    ENJOY YOUR TIME HERE TODAY, AND THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH, YOUNG

                    PEOPLE, FOR JOINING US TODAY.

                                 (APPLAUSE)

                                 (PAUSE)

                                 CAN WE HAVE QUIET IN THE CHAMBER, PLEASE?  WE'RE

                    GOING TO BE ON DEBATE.  THANK YOU.

                                 PAGE 13, RULES REPORT NO. 313, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A04997, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 313, GLICK, BURDICK, SIMON, WEPRIN, LEVENBERG, ROMERO, REYES.

                    AN ACT TO AMEND THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    EXTENDING CERTAIN PROVISIONS RELATING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF

                    ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION'S REGULATION OF CRABS, AND TO PROHIBITING

                    THE TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS FOR COMMERCIAL AND BIOMEDICAL

                    PURPOSES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. GLICK.

                                 MS. GLICK:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                         102



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 THE BILL DOES TWO THINGS:  IT EXTENDS THE AUTHORIZATION

                    FOR DEC TO REGULATE CRABS BY ITS OWN REGULATIONS, AND IT PROHIBITS THE

                    TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS.  IT EXTENDS FOR TWO YEARS THE AUTHORITY OF THE

                    DEPARTMENT TO REGULATE REGULAR CRABS, INCLUDING HORSESHOE CRABS.  BUT

                    BEGINNING IN 2026 IT PROHIBITS THE TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS EXCEPT FOR

                    A BONA FIDE EDUCATION OR SCIENTIFIC PURPOSE AS DETERMINED BY DEC AND

                    THE REGULATIONS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. JENSEN.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL

                    MY FRIEND, THE HONORABLE CHAIR OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, YIELD

                    FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. GLICK:  WITH GREAT PLEASURE TO MY FRIEND FROM

                    THE ROCHESTER AREA.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  YOU'RE -- YOU'RE VERY KIND, CHAIR.

                                 AND ALMOST A YEAR TO THE DAY THAT WE HAD THIS DEBATE

                    LAST YEAR ABOUT MY NEW FAVORITE ANIMAL, THE HORSESHOE CRAB WHO, FOR

                    OUR NEW LISTENERS, IS A MAGNIFICENT CREATURE, 400 MILLION YEARS OLD; 200

                    MILLION YEARS BEFORE THE DINOSAURS.  THEY ARE AMAZING.  THEY SHOULD

                    BE BLESSED, WHICH I'M GLAD WE'RE HAVING THIS DEBATE.

                                 THE BILL WE DEBATED LAST YEAR WAS SUBJECT TO A

                    GUBERNATORIAL VETO.  WHAT HAS CHANGED, WHETHER THIS LEGISLATION OR IN

                    OUR HEALTH, BIO, PHARMACEUTICAL MODEL SINCE WE DISCUSSED THIS A YEAR

                                         103



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AGO?

                                 MS. GLICK:  WELL, THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THE

                    QUESTION.

                                 A NUMBER OF THINGS HAVE CHANGED.  AS YOU MAY

                    REMEMBER, THE HORSESHOE CRAB IS A VITAL KEYSTONE SPECIES THAT PROVIDES

                    FOR THE SUPPORT OF OTHER CREATURES.  SO THE RED KNOT, THE RUDDY TONE --

                    TURNSTONE AND SOME OTHER MARINE BIRDS ARE QUITE DEPENDENT ON THE

                    HORSESHOE CRAB EGGS IN ORDER TO, AS THEY ARE MIGRATING, TO SUPPORT

                    THEMSELVES ON THEIR JOURNEY.  SO ONE OF THE THINGS THAT HAS CHANGED IS

                    THAT THE RED KNOT IS NOW A LISTED, BY DEC ITSELF, AS A THREATENED

                    SPECIES.  SO WE WOULD NOT WANT TO FURTHER ENDANGER THIS PARTICULAR

                    SPECIES BY ALLOWING THE CONTINUED TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS.  THAT'S

                    NUMBER ONE.  NUMBER TWO, ONE OF THE CREATURES FOR WHICH HORSESHOE

                    CRABS ARE USED AS BAIT INCLUDES THE AMERICAN EEL, WHICH NOW HAS BEEN

                    LISTED AS A SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN BY DEC.  SO WE HAVE ONE SPECIES

                    THAT IS LISTED AS SPECIAL CONCERN, AND IT IS FOR THAT REASON THAT HORSESHOE

                    CRABS ARE CHOPPED UP INTO BAIT IN ORDER TO CAPTURE WHAT IS NOW A

                    SPECIES OF SPECIAL CONCERN.

                                 SO FOR THOSE REASONS, THOSE ARE TWO THINGS THAT HAVE

                    CHANGED WITHIN DEC.  RECOGNIZING THAT THE POPULATION OF HORSESHOE

                    CRABS IN MUCH OF OUR REGION, THE NEW YORK REGION, IS LISTED AS POOR

                    AND WE NEED IT TO RECOVER.  SO THE TAKING OF THESE HORSESHOE CRABS AT

                    THIS POINT IS ILL-ADVISED AND RECOGNIZED AS ILL-ADVISED BY DEC BY

                    HAVING REDUCED THE NUMBER OF DAYS THAT THEY CAN BE TAKEN.  SO THERE'S

                    A RECOGNITION BY DEC THAT THE RULES THAT THEY HAD LAST YEAR THAT WE

                                         104



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    OBJECTED TO WERE TOO LOOSE, AND SO THEY WENT AHEAD AND RESTRICTED EVEN

                    FURTHER BUT WITHOUT MAKING APPROPRIATE CHANGE IN PROHIBITING THE

                    TAKING.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  CERTAINLY -- AND I CERTAINLY

                    UNDERSTAND.  I -- I APPRECIATE THE -- THE EXPLANATION ON THE CHANGES

                    SOCIETALLY SINCE -- SINCE JUNE 7TH OF LAST YEAR.  BUT I REALLY WANT TO DRILL

                    DOWN ON THE SECONDARY PORTION OF THE LEGISLATION WHICH -- OR THE USE OF

                    HORSESHOE CRABS, WHICH WOULD BE FOR THE USE OF THEIR BLOOD FOR

                    BIOTECHNOLOGY, PHARMACEUTICAL USES, WHICH FOR -- FOR PEOPLE NEW TO

                    THIS DEBATE, HORSESHOE CRABS -- WHICH ARE AMAZING, I JUST WANT TO MAKE

                    SURE THAT'S ON THE RECORD AGAIN -- HAVE BLUE BLOOD BECAUSE IT'S

                    COPPER-BASED RATHER THAN OUR RED BLOOD THAT IS IRON-BASED.  AND WITH

                    THEIR BLUE BLOOD REACTING DIFFERENTLY TO CERTAIN ENZYMES, THEY ARE A

                    CRITICALLY IMPORTANT TESTING MECHANISM TO DETERMINE THE SAFETY OF

                    CERTAIN VACCINES OR DURABLE MEDICAL SUPPLIES.

                                 SO WOULD THIS LEGISLATION DISCONTINUE THE ABILITY OF

                    ANY BIO -- BIOTECH COMPANY OR PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY FROM BEING

                    ABLE TO PARTNER WITH A -- SOMEBODY WHO WOULD HARVEST THE HORSESHOE

                    CRAB, ENGAGED IN BLOOD LETTING, WHICH IS SOMETHING A PARLIAMENTARIAN

                    IN 1372 MIGHT HAVE TALKED ABOUT IN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS, AND USE

                    THEIR BLOOD FOR MEDICAL TESTING FOR THE SAFETY OF CRITICALLY IMPORTANT

                    MEDICINES?

                                 MS. GLICK:  WELL, I APPRECIATE YOU RAISING THE

                    CONCERN ABOUT THE USE OF HORSESHOE CRAB BLOOD WHICH ALLOWS THEM TO

                    IDENTIFY CERTAIN ENDOTOXINS.  BUT THERE -- NOT ONLY HAS THERE BEEN

                                         105



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    SYNTHETIC TESTING REAGENTS FOR SOME TIME, ELI LILLY HAS BEEN USING ITS

                    OWN SYNTHETIC REAGENT FOR, WELL, SINCE 2018.  BUT JUST THIS YEAR -- THIS IS

                    ANOTHER CHANGE -- THE U.S. PHARMACOPEIA, WHICH IS A NON-PROFIT THAT

                    RECOMMENDS CHANGES IN PHARMACEUTICAL OPERATIONS, THEY HAVE

                    AUTHORIZED THE USE OF TWO DIFFERENT SYNTHETICS FOR THE SAME PURPOSE.

                    AND WHILE WE'VE APPLAUDED ELI LILLY FOR BEING A LEADER IN THIS AREA,

                    THIS IS AN OPPORTUNITY -- AND I WILL JUST DIGRESS AND POINT OUT THAT IN

                    EUROPE THEY HAVE BEEN USING THIS SYNTHETIC REAGENT EVEN LONGER.  SO

                    THERE IS AN ALTERNATIVE.  AND ITS SAFETY HAS -- AND EFFECTIVENESS HAS BEEN

                    DEMONSTRATED BY THE FACT THAT ELI LILLY HAS BEEN USING THIS FOR A

                    NUMBER OF YEARS ALREADY.  SO IT'S NOT BREAKING NEW GROUND, IT IS SIMPLY

                    SAYING THAT WE'VE REACHED A POINT WHERE THE SYNTHETIC HAS BEEN USED

                    OPERATIONALLY AND IS EFFECTIVE, AND THERE'S NO REASON TO CONTINUE TO

                    DECIMATE THE HORSESHOE CRAB POPULATION IN NEW YORK.  AND I WILL ALSO

                    POINT OUT THAT THE STATES AROUND US HAVE BEEN PLACING MORATORIUMS

                    WHICH WILL ONLY PLACE GREATER STRESS ON OUR POPULATION IF WE DO NOT

                    TAKE THIS STEP.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  AND CERTAINLY I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT,

                    AND CERTAINLY YOU TALKED ABOUT THE RED -- RED FERN?  WAS IT THE --

                                 MS. GLICK:  RED KNOT.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  RED KNOT.  I'M SORRY.  MY APOLOGIES.

                    RED FERN'S A PLANT.  I KNOW THAT, YOU KNOW, THEY -- THEY DO FEED ON THE

                    EGGS OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB WHICH, ONCE AGAIN, BECAUSE THEY'RE

                    AMAZING, LAY 4,000 EGGS AT A TIME.  SO I JUST REALLY WANTED TO TALK

                    ABOUT ANOTHER FUN FACT ABOUT THE HORSESHOE CRAB.  BUT AS THEY ARE IN THE

                                         106



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WATERS ALL THE WAY FROM CANCUN UP TO NOVA SCOTIA, THE QUESTION I HAVE

                    IS, UNDERSTANDING THAT WE HAVE THE SYNTHETICS, THE TWO SYNTHETICS WERE

                    NOT APPROVED FOR WIDESPREAD USAGE A YEAR AGO, WE ARE NOW WHERE THEY

                    ARE -- CAN BE USED UNILATERALLY FOR TESTING.  WOULDN'T IT MAKE SENSE,

                    SINCE WE ALREADY IN THE LEGISLATION HAVE TWO SPECIFIC CARVE-OUTS FOR THE

                    TAKING OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB AND FOR RESEARCH, AND I'M BLANKING ON THE

                    SECOND METHOD.

                                 MS. GLICK:  SCIENTIFIC AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  SCIENTIFIC AND RESEARCH EXCEPTIONS.

                    THAT WHILE WE WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR -- OUR HEALTHCARE INNOVATORS

                    HAVE THE ABILITY TO ENSURE THAT MEDICATION IS SAFE FOR HUMAN USE,

                    WOULDN'T IT MAKE SENSE TO PUT A CARVEOUT THAT IF THERE IS A MEDICAL NEED

                    TO TEST MEDICATION AND THE SYNTHETICS THAT ARE CURRENTLY APPROVED

                    UNILATERALLY ARE NOT SUFFICIENT, THAT THEN DEC COULD ALLOW FOR THE

                    PERMITTING OF THE TAKING OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB FOR A VERY SPECIFIC TIME

                    PERIOD TO ENSURE THE VIABILITY OF THE BIOTECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS?

                                 MS. GLICK:  WELL, I BELIEVE THAT SYNTHETICS ARE

                    PROBABLY, IN THE LONG RUN, A MORE INEXPENSIVE WAY OF PROVIDING FOR THE

                    TESTING, AND DO NOT BELIEVE THAT THERE WILL BE A SHORTAGE AS A RESULT.  IF

                    ANYTHING, WE COULD RUN INTO A SHORTAGE OF HORSESHOE CRABS.  AND, IN

                    FACT, AS I SAID, WE HAVE ALREADY BEEN SEEING DEC REDUCE IT BASED ON

                    THE POOR QUALITY, THE AMOUNT OF -- OF HORSESHOE CRABS IN OUR WATERS.

                    AND FRANKLY, THEY SAY THAT THEY WILL RETURN THEM TO THE WILD, BUT THE

                    REALITY IS AFTER A THIRD OF THEIR BLOOD HAS BEEN DRAINED, VERY FEW OF

                    THEM ACTUALLY SURVIVE.  AND SO MANY TIMES THEY'RE JUST CHOPPED UP FOR

                                         107



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    BAIT.  AND IT -- WHILE WE FOCUS ON A THREATENED SPECIES LIKE THE RED

                    KNOT, THE REALITY IS THAT THERE ARE OTHER FORAGING FISH THAT LIKEWISE

                    DEPEND ON HORSESHOE CRAB EGGS.  AND, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A VIBRANT

                    RECREATIONAL FISHERY AS WELL, AND THOSE OTHER FISH ARE IMPORTANT AS WELL,

                    FOR TOURISM AND OTHER ACTIVITIES.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  AND -- AND I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND WE

                    -- WE WANT TO PROTECT THE HORSESHOE CRABS AND THEIR PLACE IN THE

                    ECOSYSTEM'S FOOD CHAIN.  AND I THINK THAT'S WHY IT'S IMPORTANT AND WHY

                    I'M FOCUSING ON THE USE OF THEIR BLOOD.  AND IT IS BETWEEN AN 80 AND 90

                    PERCENT SURVIVAL RATE AFTER THE BLOOD LETTING.

                                 MS. GLICK:  WELL, I -- I BEG TO DIFFER.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  WHAT WAS THAT?

                                 MS. GLICK:  THAT IS WHAT IS PRESENTED BY THE

                    PHARMACEUTICAL --

                                 MR. JENSEN:  CORRECT.

                                 MS. GLICK:  -- INDUSTRY.  THAT IS NOT ACKNOWLEDGED

                    BY THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  AGREE TO DISAGREE ON THAT ONE.

                    WE AGREE THAT THEY'RE MAGNIFICENT, BUT WE'LL AGREE TO DISAGREE ON THAT

                    FACT.

                                 SO WITH THAT -- THAT POINT UP FOR DEBATE, ONE OF THE

                    THING -- AND THAT'S WHY I FOCUSED ON THE USE OF THEIR BLOOD RATHER THAN

                    THE TAKING OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB FOR THEIR OTHER PURPOSES THAT CAN BE

                    USED IN BIOTECHNOLOGICAL OR PHARMACEUTICAL USES, WHICH WOULD BE THEIR

                    SHELL, WHICH DOES HAVE PROPERTIES THAT SPEED CLOTTING AS WELL AS MAKING

                                         108



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AMAZING SUTURES, WHICH I DIDN'T KNOW UNTIL THIS YEAR, WHICH FUN --

                    ANOTHER FUN FACT.  BUT THAT'S WHY I SAY I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT TO HAVE A

                    SPECIFIC CARVE-OUT IN THE EVENTUALITY OF NOT JUST SCIENTIFIC OR RESEARCH

                    NEEDS, BUT ALSO FOR HEALTHCARE NEEDS.  SO THAT'S -- THAT'S WHY I THINK THAT

                    IT WOULD BE A LOGICAL AMENDMENT TO MAKE ON THIS BILL.  YOU MAY, I'M

                    ASSUREDLY GOING TO DISAGREE WITH ME ON THAT RESPECT.  AND THERE'S NO

                    ACTIVE PERMITS FOR THE TAKING OF HORSESHOE CRABS THAT DEC HAS ISSUED

                    AS OF TODAY, CORRECT?

                                 MS. GLICK:  THE -- FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE?

                                 MR. JENSEN:  FOR -- WELL, YES.

                                 MS. GLICK:  THEY HAVE NOT HAD, FOR A NUMBER OF

                    YEARS, PERMITS FOR PHARMACEUTICAL TAKING.  THAT HAS BEEN THE CASE FOR

                    SOME YEARS.  NEITHER LAST YEAR OR THE YEARS BEFORE.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  I -- I WANT TO THANK YOU FOR THE

                    ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS.  I APPRECIATE IT, CHAIR GLICK.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  I JUST WANT TO REITERATE FOR THE 12TH

                    TIME THAT HORSESHOE CRABS ARE MAGNIFICENT.  THEY'VE SURVIVED FIVE

                    EXTINCTION LEVEL EVENTS.  HOWEVER, I DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEIR USE FOR

                    BIOMEDICAL PURPOSES CONSTITUTES A SIXTH-LEVEL EXTINCTION EVENT.  THEY

                    ARE A CRITICAL ASPECT AND SAFEGUARD IN THE ABILITY TO HAVE HUMAN-SAFE

                    MEDICATIONS.  AND WHILE WE HAVE SYNTHETICS ON THE MARKET CURRENTLY, I

                    DON'T BELIEVE IT'S WISE TO DENY THE FUTURE WHERE THE SYNTHETICS MAY NOT

                    BE APPLICABLE AND HORSESHOE CRAB BLOOD WOULD BE THE BEST TESTING

                                         109



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AGENT.  THE REASON WHY WE USE HORSESHOE BLOOD NOW IS BECAUSE WE

                    USED TO TEST MEDICATION ON RABBITS, WHICH I THINK EVERYBODY IN THIS

                    CHAMBER WOULD AGREE THAT SHOULDN'T BE DONE AND WE MADE THAT

                    EVOLUTION.

                                 SO WHILE I'M SURE SOME OF MY COLLEAGUES WHO HAVE

                    VERY LARGE COMMERCIAL FISHING OPERATIONS IN THEIR DISTRICT AND WHO

                    UTILIZE THE HORSESHOE CRABS FOR BAITING PURPOSES MAY HAVE OTHER

                    THOUGHTS OR CONCERNS ON THIS LEGISLATION, I DO THANK THE CHAIR FOR HER

                    ANSWERS TO MY QUESTIONS.  I UNDERSTAND THE NEED TO PROTECT OUR

                    HORSESHOE CRAB POPULATIONS IN THE WATERS OF NEW YORK, BUT WOULD LOVE

                    TO SEE SOME SORT OF CARVE-OUT FOR THE BIOMEDICAL PURPOSES OF THESE

                    MAGNIFICENT CREATURES.

                                 THANK YOU, MADAM CHAIR [SIC].

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  FOR ALL

                    OF THE EXCELLENT REASONS LAID OUT BY MY COLLEAGUE, THE MINORITY

                    CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION DESPITE

                    THE MAGNIFICENCE OF THE HORSESHOE CRAB.  AND -- BUT IF ANYBODY WOULD

                    WISH TO VOTE YES, THEY MAY CERTAINLY DO SO NOW AT THEIR SEATS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                         110



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE SUPPORTING THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  FOR

                    THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE NO, THEY CAN DO SO AT THEIR DESKS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 14, RULES REPORT NO. 324, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  SENATE NO. S02182-A, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 324, SENATOR HINCHEY (A05969-A, JACOBSON, EACHUS,

                    SANTABARBARA, SHIMSKY, SHRESTHA, KAY).  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC

                    SERVICE LAW, IN RELATION TO PERMITTING THE RENDERING OF AN ESTIMATED

                    BILL FROM A UTILITY CORPORATION OR MUNICIPALITY UNDER CERTAIN

                    CIRCUMSTANCES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. JACOBSON.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THANK YOU.

                                 THIS BILL -- CAN WE HAVE A LITTLE QUIET?  THANK YOU.

                                 THIS BILL WILL MAKE CHANGES TO THE PUBLIC SERVICE

                    LAW AS TO WHEN ESTIMATED BILLING IS PERMITTED.  IT WILL -- IT WILL

                    PROHIBIT CONSECUTIVE ESTIMATED BILLING EXCEPT UNDER SPECIFIC

                                         111



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    CIRCUMSTANCES.  THE BILL WILL ALLOW SMART METERS TO BE USED AND

                    CONSIDERED AS ACTUAL READINGS.  UTILITIES WILL BE REQUIRED TO REPORT WHAT

                    THEY HAVE DONE TO COMPLY WITH THIS LAW SO THAT THE PSC CAN COME UP

                    WITH A BEST PRACTICES AND TECHNOLOGY STANDARD.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. PALMESANO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.  WILL THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR SOME QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  YES, I WILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  THANK YOU, MR. JACOBSON.

                                 I KNOW WE WENT THROUGH THIS LAST YEAR, AND I THINK

                    MAYBE A COUPLE OF OTHER YEARS, BUT DEFINITELY LAST YEAR.  SO THE

                    GOVERNOR VETOED THIS BILL LAST YEAR.  DID YOU MAKE ANY CHANGES TO

                    ADDRESS THE CONCERNS IN HER VETO AND WHAT WERE THEY?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  ONE CHANGE WE MADE IS THAT WE --

                    WE MADE IT MORE CLEAR, THE BILL, AND WHAT -- SPECIFICALLY WHEN IT'S

                    ALLOWED.  AND SO THAT THE -- WE WANTED TO ADDRESS THAT.  AND SO WHEN

                    ESTIMATED BILLINGS ARE MADE, THEY MUST -- THEY CAN'T BE CONSECUTIVE.

                    THEY HAVE TO -- THE UTILITIES HAVE TO TAKE ACTIONS TO FIGURE OUT WHY THE

                    PROBLEM IS THERE.  ALSO, WE ALLOWED THE SMART METER READINGS BECAUSE

                    A LOT OF UTILITIES, JUST LIKE WE HAVE FOR WATER AND SEWER READINGS, USE

                    THIS NEW TECHNOLOGY AND THE PSC HAD NOT ALLOWED IT BEFORE.  AND SO

                    THIS WILL BE AVAILABLE AND WILL MAKE ESTIMATED BILLINGS MORE READ --

                                         112



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    EASIER TO COME BY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  ACTUAL READINGS TO BE -- NOT

                    ESTIMATED READINGS, BUT ACTUAL READINGS TO BE EASIER TO COME BY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND.

                                 DID YOU ADDRESS THE PART OF HER VETO WHERE SHE SAID,

                    AND I QUOTE, "I BELIEVE CUSTOMERS SHOULD PAY FOR THE SERVICES THEY

                    RECEIVED"?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  HOLD ON.  I GOT TO GET THE RIGHT

                    SECTION FOR YOU.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I ASKED THAT QUESTION BECAUSE

                    YOUR BILL WOULD BASICALLY SAY THAT UTILITIES CAN'T BILL FOR THE SERVICES IF

                    IT'S BEYOND TWO CONSECUTIVE MONTHS OF ESTIMATED BILLING.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THEY CAN'T BILL WHEN THEY'RE DOING

                    THE ESTIMATED BILLING MORE THAN ONE MONTH IN A ROW.  IN OTHER WORDS,

                    WE DON'T WANT TO -- WE DON'T WANT TO REWARD THEM FOR NOT DOING ACTUAL

                    BILLING.  AND IT'S SIMILAR TO THE BILL THAT I PASSED THAT'S NOW LAW THAT

                    THEY HAVE TO GET BILLS OUT THE DOOR WITHIN THREE MONTHS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  AND SO NOW THEY FOUND A WAY

                    THAT THEY'RE BILLING MORE TIMELY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THIS IS ANOTHER WAY TO -- TO ATTACK

                    THE PROBLEM OF ESTIMATED BILLING.

                                         113



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.  I CAN UNDERSTAND THAT.

                                 AND OBVIOUSLY, WHEN WE TALKED, I MEAN, YOUR -- YOUR

                    -- YOUR GOAL IS REALLY TO HAVE -- ENCOURAGE ACTUAL MEETING -- METER

                    READINGS INSTEAD OF ESTIMATED READINGS.  BUT -- AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.

                    BUT YOU DO -- YOU DO RECOGNIZE AND UNDERSTAND THE VALUE AND

                    IMPORTANCE OF -- OF THE NEED FOR UTILIZING ESTIMATED BILLING AT TIMES,

                    CORRECT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  SAY THAT AGAIN?

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YEAH, I SAID -- I SAID -- AS I SAID

                    BEFORE, I SAID I UNDERSTAND YOU WANT TO HAVE ACTUAL METER READINGS

                    INSTEAD OF ESTIMATED BILLING.  BUT YOU DO -- YOU DO UNDERSTAND AND

                    RECOGNIZE THE VALUE AND IMPORTANCE OF ALLOWING FOR ESTIMATED BILLING

                    AT TIMES, TOO, CORRECT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, THERE'S A VALUE IN CIRCUM --

                    CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES.  BUT EVEN AS THE LAW SAYS NOW, WHICH HAS NOT

                    BEEN CHANGED, IS THAT FIRST THE UTILITY HAS TO MAKE A REASONABLE EFFORT TO

                    GET A READING AND IS UNABLE TO DO SO, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE BEYOND

                    THEIR CONTROL.  AND WHAT THIS BILL DOES, IT SAYS THAT THE ONLY TWO SPECIFIC

                    TIMES THAT WE ADDED HERE WAS THAT THE UTILITY -- I WILL READ EXACTLY IF I

                    GET A SECOND HERE.  THAT THE UTILITY IS UNABLE TO OBTAIN AN ACTUAL

                    READING BECAUSE THE CUSTOMER FAILED TO PROVIDE REASONABLE ACCESS, OR A

                    STATE OF EMERGENCY RENDERED THE ABILITY -- PREVENTS THE ABILITY OF THE

                    UTILITY TO GET THAT READING.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.

                                 DOES THIS AFFECT ALL CUSTOMERS, RESIDENTIAL AND

                                         114



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    COMMERCIAL?  AND HOW MANY -- DO WE KNOW HOW MANY CUSTOMERS THIS

                    WOULD AFFECT STATEWIDE?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, IT VARIES GIVEN EVERY MONTH

                    WHETHER THERE'S GONNA BE ESTIMATED READINGS.  YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT

                    HOW MANY CUSTOMERS STATEWIDE, PERIOD?

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO, LIKE, RIGHT, STATEWIDE THERE'S

                    ABOUT -- I GUESS BY MY ESTIMATES IT'S ABOUT EIGHT-AND-A-HALF MILLION

                    CUSTOMERS STATEWIDE BETWEEN ALL THE UTILITIES.  IS THAT --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THAT WOULD SOUND RIGHT.  WE HAVE

                    AROUND 20 MILLION AND PEOPLE DO WORK TOGETHER AND (INDISCERNIBLE)

                    CUSTOMERS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO MY NEXT QUESTION.  DOESN'T

                    THE PSC ALREADY HAVE THE AUTHORITY NOW TO IMPLEMENT OR ADJUST THE

                    BILLING MECHANISM THROUGH ACTUAL PROCEEDINGS WHERE THEY WORK --

                    THEY HAVE THIS PROCEEDING WHERE THEY WORK WITH THE UTILITY TO -- AND

                    THEY NEGOTIATE AND THEN TRY TO IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES?  DON'T THEY

                    HAVE THE ABILITY TO DO THAT RIGHT NOW IF THEY SO CHOOSE, IF THEY THOUGHT

                    THERE NEEDED TO BE CHANGES TO THIS?  THEY COULD DO THIS RIGHT NOW?

                    AND ISN'T IT -- HAVING THAT PROCESS THE BEST PRACTICE TO MOVE FORWARD

                    WITH THIS RATHER THAN JUST AN ARBITRARY MANDATE LIKE THIS?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, WHAT THEY HAVE THEY HAVEN'T

                    FOLLOWED THROUGH WITH, AND THAT'S WHY WE NEED THE BILL.  WE NEED THIS

                    BILL SO THAT CUSTOMERS WILL HAVE ACCURATE READINGS SO THAT THEY KNOW IF

                    THEY WANT TO CONTEST THE READING, THEY KNOW WHAT THEY'RE CONTESTING.

                    AND SO THE PROBLEM IS NOW IS IF YOU HAVE ESTIMATED READINGS TWO,

                                         115



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THREE, FOUR, FIVE MONTHS IN A ROW AND THEN YOU GET AN ACTUAL READING,

                    YOU DON'T KNOW WHY IS THAT READING THAT WAY.  AND HOW DO YOU

                    COMPARE IT WITH PREVIOUS BILLS?  SO IT'S JUST -- IT'S A WAY SO CUSTOMERS

                    CAN HAVE MORE TRANSPARENCY AND SO CUSTOMERS CAN MAKE SURE THEY

                    KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO CURRENTLY, UTILITIES RIGHT NOW

                    CAN ONLY ESTIMATE BILLS BASED ON METHODOLOGIES THAT ARE REVIEWED AND

                    APPROVED BY THE PSC.  THERE ARE REGULATIONS THAT PROVIDE UTILITIES WITH

                    STRONGER DISINCENTIVES NOT TO PROLONG PERIODS OF ESTIMATED BILLING.

                    THERE ARE LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES IN WHICH UTILITIES MAY ISSUE ESTIMATED

                    BILLINGS.  THERE ARE REQUIREMENTS THAT UTILITIES TAKE AFFIRMATIVE STEPS TO

                    OBTAIN ACTUAL MEETING [SIC] READINGS.  YOU -- YOUR -- YOU KNOW, THOSE

                    ARE GUIDELINES THAT THE PSC HAS IN PLACE.  YOU DON'T THINK THAT'S STRONG

                    ENOUGH TO DO WHAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED?  THAT'S OBVIOUSLY YOUR --

                    YOUR PERSPECTIVE ON THE CURRENT SITUATION?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  IT HASN'T BEEN WORKING.  IT HASN'T

                    BEEN WORKING.  IF WAS WORK -- LOOK, IF IT'S -- IF IT'S BEEN WORKING AND

                    THE UTILITY DOESN'T DO THE ESTIMATED BILLING, THERE'S -- I MEAN, THEN

                    THERE'S NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND WHEN THEY DO THE

                    ESTIMATED BILLING, ISN'T IT TRADITIONALLY HISTORICALLY BASED ON THE

                    COMPARATIVE USE TO THE SAME TIME PERIOD FROM THAT PERIOD OF TIME

                    MAYBE THE YEAR BEFORE AND THEN THEY ADJUST IT BECAUSE OF THE PRICE OF

                    ENERGY MIGHT BE UP OR DOWN?  SO THAT'S HOW THEY -- THEY ESTIMATE IT,

                    CORRECT?

                                         116



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  YEAH, IN THAT WAY.  BUT USUALLY

                    IT'S A LITTLE HIGHER.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO ULTIMATELY, THOUGH, WHEN

                    THEY -- WHEN THEY DO THE ESTIMATE, ULTIMATELY WHEN THEY COME TO GET A

                    READ THEY'LL -- THEY'LL ADJUST IT BECAUSE IT MIGHT BE HIGHER, IT MIGHT BE

                    LOWER.  I MEAN, I KNOW (INDISCERNIBLE).  SO ULTIMATELY, THOUGH, WHEN

                    THEY DO THE READ, EVEN THOUGH IF THERE MIGHT BE TWO MONTHS OR THREE

                    MONTHS OF ESTIMATED FOR WHATEVER REASON, ULTIMATELY THE CUSTOMER IS

                    ONLY GONNA PAY FOR THE ENERGY THEY USED, CORRECT?  THEY'RE NOT GONNA

                    BE PAYING ANY MORE THAN THE ENERGY THEY USED, RIGHT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  HOPEFULLY NOT.  BUT THE PROBLEM

                    IS THAT YOU -- IF YOU GET A BILL AND ALL OF A SUDDEN SAY IT'S MUCH HIGHER

                    BECAUSE THEY DIDN'T ESTIMATE CORRECTLY, YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT PERIOD IT'S

                    REALLY FOR, WHICH MONTH IT'S FOR.  THE WHOLE REASON IS THAT YOU WANT TO

                    HAVE YOUR RECORDS FOR THAT MONTH SO YOU CAN COMPARE IT TO PREVIOUS

                    USAGE, WHICH WAS IN THE OTHER BILL (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK) --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ON THAT QUESTION, YOU SAY THEY

                    DON'T HAVE A RECORD, ON MOST (INDISCERNIBLE) LIKE THE NYSEG, RG&E

                    BILL, THE NYSEG BILL I GET, IT SHOWS WHAT MY USAGE IS FOR THAT MONTH

                    AND THEN THEY HAVE A CHART IN THERE SHOWING WHAT MY USAGE WAS OVER

                    THE PAST YEAR, AND I COULD COMPARE TO LOOK AT THE USAGE OF JUNE OF THIS

                    YEAR COMPARED TO JUNE OF LAST YEAR.  SO THERE IS A COMPARISON THAT'S

                    AVAILABLE TO -- EVEN IF IT'S AN ESTIMATED BILL.  BECAUSE YOU CAN SAY,

                    OKAY, LAST YEAR I USED THIS MUCH.  THAT'S WHAT THEY'RE BASING MY

                    ESTIMATE OFF THAT.  SO IT'S GONNA BE KIND OF (INDISCERNIBLE).

                                         117



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  EXCEPT THE FACT THAT IF YOU GET

                    MULTIPLE MONTHS AS AN ESTIMATED BILL, IT MAKES IT THAT MUCH HARDER TO

                    FIGURE OUT IF EACH MONTH WAS CORRECT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.  SO REALLY, WHAT'S THE

                    GENESIS OF THIS BILL?  I THINK I REMEMBER THERE WAS SOME PROBLEMS WITH

                    CENTRAL HUDSON WHERE THEY HAD SOME BILLING PROBLEMS.  WAS THAT

                    REALLY KIND OF THE GENESIS OF THAT -- OF THIS BILL?  IS THAT -- IS THAT WHERE

                    THIS CAME FROM?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  YES.  AND -- AND ALL THE

                    CUSTOMERS OF CENTRAL HUDSON THAT ARE -- HAVE BEEN CALLING MY OFFICE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES.  AND I -- AND I -- AND THE

                    PSC ULTIMATELY GOT INVOLVED, CORRECT --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  YES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  -- AND THEY -- THEY ADDRESSED

                    THAT SITUATION?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THEY -- THEY --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ARE WE STILL HAVING -- ARE YOU

                    STILL SEEING OUTSTANDING ISSUES WITH ESTIMATED BILLING SINCE THE PSC

                    CAME IN AND ADDRESSED THAT ISSUE LIKE THEY'RE TASKED WITH, LIKE THEY'RE

                    EMPOWERED TO DO?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THE PSC DIDN'T GET INVOLVED WITH

                    ESTIMATED BILLING, THEY GOT INVOLVED WITH LATE BILLING.  SO BETWEEN THE

                    AGREEMENT THAT CENTRAL HUDSON HAD AND -- AND OUR NEW -- NEW LAW ON

                    THAT, THOSE PROBLEMS HAVE GENERALLY GONE WAY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  RIGHT.  ALL RIGHT.  SO I KNOW

                                         118



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    YOU'RE SAYING THIS IS ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLING.  SO ARE YOU STILL HEARING

                    ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLING PROBLEMS IN THE CENTRAL HUDSON?  IS IT -- IS IT

                    KIND OF PROLIFIC?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WE HAVE SOME.  AND -- AND I

                    THINK THE THING IS, WE WANT TO MAKE IT -- I THINK A CUSTOMER DESERVES TO

                    HAVE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  -- ACCURATE READINGS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I -- MR. JACOBSON, I TOTALLY

                    UNDERSTAND YOUR INTENT BEHIND THE BILL.  I JUST HAVE SOME PROBLEMS OF

                    THE MECHANISM TO MAKE IT WORK.  YOU KNOW, BECAUSE I -- I -- I'LL BE

                    HONEST, I DON'T --  MY OFFICE ISN'T HEARING FROM OUR RATEPAYERS ABOUT

                    ESTIMATED BILLS.  WHAT THEY ARE HEARING IS THEIR BILLS ARE TOO HIGH.

                    WOULDN'T YOU ARGUE -- I MEAN, WHAT I'VE ARGUED ON THIS FLOOR IS

                    BECAUSE OF SOME OF THE GREEN MANDATES THAT HAVE BEEN ADVANCED BY

                    THIS FLOOR AND THE GOVERNOR, ISN'T THAT ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE'RE

                    SEEING THIS INCREASE IN UTILITY BILLS WHERE THE UTILITIES ARE GOING AND

                    ASKING FOR THESE BIG INCREASES, CORRECT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO, I DON'T THINK SO.  I THINK IT'S

                    THE PROBLEM, THE FACT THAT THEY'RE GETTING AN EXTRA RATE OF RETURN ON

                    CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, WHICH IS WHY WE JUST PASSED MY OTHER BILL TO

                    HAVE MORE DISCLOSURE.  BECAUSE THEY GET A -- THEY GET A BETTER RATE OF

                    RETURN, THEY GET 8, 9, 9.5, 10 PERCENT ON CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, WHERE

                    WHEN IT'S MAINTENANCE IT'S DOLLAR-FOR-DOLLAR WHEN -- WHEN FIGURING OUT

                    THE RATE.  SO I THINK THAT'S -- THAT'S A MAJOR PROBLEM.

                                         119



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO YOU DON'T THINK ANY OF THE

                    GREEN MANDATES THAT WE'RE PASSING IN THIS HOUSE IS CAUSING RATES TO

                    INCREASE?  AND YOU -- AND ON THAT NOTE, YOU ARE AWARE -- AND I SAID IT

                    ON THE FLOOR NUMEROUS TIMES AND I'LL PROBABLY SAY IT AGAIN LATER -- THE

                    PSC IN JULY OF '23 PASSED $43 BILLION -- APPROVED $43 BILLION IN FUTURE

                    RATEPAYER INCREASES SPECIFICALLY TO PAY FOR THESE GREEN ENERGY

                    MANDATES.  ARE YOU AWARE OF THAT JULY 23RD ARTICLE THAT WAS IN

                    POLITICO?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  I WASN'T -- I WASN'T AWARE OF THAT,

                    BUT THIS BILL DOESN'T ADDRESS THAT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OH, I KNOW THAT.  BUT IF WE'RE

                    TALKING ABOUT UTILITIES --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  I KNOW.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  -- AND UTILITY COSTS, SO...

                                 (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK)

                                 I KNOW YOU'RE WORRIED ABOUT THE COST OF --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WE'RE JUST A COUPLE GUYS TALKING

                    (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK).  I UNDERSTAND.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.  NOW IN YOUR SPONSOR

                    MEMO IT SAYS WIDESPREAD REPORTS THAT UTILITY COMPANIES ARE RELYING

                    HEAVILY ON ESTIMATED BILLING.  THAT'S IN YOUR SPONSOR'S MEMO.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  YES.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  DO YOU KNOW WHAT PERCENTAGE

                    OF ESTIMATED BILLS THE UTILITIES ARE USING?  LET'S TAKE CENTRAL HUDSON FOR

                    -- FOR PERSPECTIVE.  DO YOU KNOW WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THEIR BILLS ARE

                                         120



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ESTIMATED?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO, I DON'T.  BUT I CAN -- I'M --

                    WELL, I THINK WE CAN REST ASSURED THAT WHEN YOU GET ONE COMPLAINT

                    THERE'S FIVE TO TEN OTHERS THAT PEOPLE DIDN'T CALL IN ON.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WELL, JUST -- JUST FOR THE RECORD,

                    IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING CENTRAL HUDSON HAS ESTIMATED BILLINGS OF .07

                    PERCENT.  SO WE'RE DOING THIS BILL FOR .07 PERCENT?  I UNDERSTAND WHAT

                    THE GOAL IS, SO THAT'S --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, IF THAT'S THE CASE AND WE CAN

                    MAKE IT EVEN BETTER AND IF THEY COMPLY WITH IT, THEY DON'T HAVE TO

                    WORRY ABOUT ANYTHING.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  SO ON THAT NOTE, WHAT IS

                    THE RATIONALE TO PROVIDE NO CHARGE TO CUSTOMERS FOR -- FOR UTILITY

                    SERVICES THEY RECEIVED IF THEY RECEIVE A SECOND CONSECUTIVE BILL?  SO

                    THEY'RE -- THEY'RE GETTING A SERVICE.  THEY'RE GETTING THE ELECTRIC, THE GAS

                    SERVICE, BUT NOW THEY AREN'T GONNA HAVE TO PAY FOR IT BECAUSE THEY GET A

                    SECOND CONSECUTIVE BILL.  HOW CAN -- HOW CAN THAT BE JUSTIFIED?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  BECAUSE THIS IS -- IT'S AN INCENTIVE

                    FOR THE UTILITIES TO DO ACTUAL READINGS.  A PROHIBITION WITHOUT A

                    DETERRENT -- EXCUSE ME, A PROHIBITION WITHOUT A PENALTY IS NOT A

                    DETERRENT.  SO IF THEY DON'T HAVE A PENALTY --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  -- THEY'RE JUST GONNA IGNORE THIS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO ULTIMATELY, THAT SERVICE THAT

                    THEY WERE PROVIDED, ULTIMATELY THAT CUSTOMER DOES NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR

                                         121



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THAT.  THAT JUST GOES AWAY, RIGHT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THAT'S TRUE.  JUST LIKE THE OTHER BILL

                    WHERE IF THEY DIDN'T BILL WITHIN THREE MONTHS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I UNDERSTAND THAT.  BUT SO

                    THAT -- THAT COST IS STILL THERE.  ULTIMATELY -- WON'T THAT COST AFTER THE

                    SECOND BILLING OR THE THIRD BILLING, WON'T THAT COST ULTIMATELY BE PASSED

                    ALONG TO OTHER RATEPAYERS --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  -- BECAUSE THEY'RE GONNA --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  IT WON'T BE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YOU DON'T THINK SO?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO.  THEY -- THEY HAVE -- THEY

                    HAVE TO EAT THAT.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  MAYBE THEY'LL REDUCE THEIR

                    DIVIDENDS SLIGHTLY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ALL RIGHT.

                                 WELL, I'VE GOT A QUESTION FOR YOU, A HYPOTHETICAL

                    QUESTION.  WHAT IF A CUSTOMER INTENTIONALLY BREAKS A METER AND

                    RECEIVES A SECOND ESTIMATED BILL?  NOW THAT CUSTOMER WOULD BE ABLE TO

                    AVOID A PAYMENT ON THAT SECOND ESTIMATED BILL, CORRECT, IF THERE'S A

                    PROBLEM WITH THAT?  IF THEY DID THAT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  IF IT'S CONSECUTIVE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YUP.  AND BUT IF -- IF THE -- IF

                    THE CUSTOMER BROKE THE METER, THAT --

                                         122



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO.  IF THE CUSTOMER BROKE THE

                    METER, THAT MEANS THAT THEY PREVENTED THE UTILITY FROM GETTING THE

                    ACTUAL READING AND THAT SPECIFICALLY IS AN EXCEPTION TO THIS RULE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SURE.  DO -- DO YOU THINK THAT

                    THE -- IS IT YOUR OPINION, DO YOU THINK THIS BILL ENCOURAGES CUSTOMERS TO

                    AVOID METER READINGS ON A -- SO THEY GET A SECOND ESTIMATED BILL AND

                    THEN THEY DON'T HAVE TO MAKE THE PAYMENT?  YOU DON'T THINK THAT THIS

                    WOULD ENCOURAGE PEOPLE NOT READING THEIR METERS OR ALLOWING ACCESS?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  BECAUSE IF THEY DO INTERFERE WITH

                    THE UTILITY, THEN THEY'RE ALLOWED TO MAKE THE ESTIMATED BILLING.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I KNOW YOU TALKED ABOUT SMART

                    METERS.  IS YOUR BELIEF THAT THIS -- SMART METERS WILL SOLVE THE PROBLEM

                    OF THESE ESTIMATED BILLS, CORRECT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  I THINK IT'LL GO A LONG WAYS.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  DO WE KNOW WHAT THE, JUST OUT

                    OF CURIOSITY, WHAT THE COST OF THESE SMART METERS ARE?  I THINK IN THE

                    DEBATE I REMEMBER LAST YEAR WITH MR. GOODELL WHERE WE TALKED ABOUT I

                    THINK $30 PER YEAR PER CUSTOMER?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  YEAH.  VERY LITTLE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO -- SO 30 -- 30 -- $30 A YEAR

                    TIMES 8.5 MILLION CUSTOMERS IS ABOUT $250 MILLION, RIGHT?  PAID BY THE

                    RATEPAYERS.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  I THINK $2.50 IS NOT A LOT OF MONEY

                                         123



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    PER MONTH.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  BUT IN TOTAL THAT WOULD BE ABOUT

                    $250 MILLION --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, THE -- THE UTILITIES ARE GOING

                    TO HAVE TO SPEND MONEY SOME WAY TO GET THE READING.  WHETHER THEY

                    SEND SOMEONE TO THE DOOR -- OR TO THE METER, I SHOULD SAY, OR THEY HAVE

                    A REMOTE SMART METER.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  AND I UNDERSTAND THAT, TOO.

                                 SO ON THE SMART METERS, I -- YOU KNOW -- AND I KNOW

                    YOU PUT THE LANGUAGE IN THERE FOR THE SMART METERS IN THERE FOR PEOPLE

                    TO READ.  SO WOULD THIS BILL APPLY TO CUSTOMERS -- BECAUSE WE KNOW

                    SOME PEOPLE DON'T LIKE SMART METERS.  FOR WHATEVER REASON, THEY

                    CHOOSE NOT TO GET THEM.  SO WOULD THIS BILL APPLY TO CUSTOMERS WHO

                    ACTUALLY OUT -- OPT OUT OF THE SMART METER?  SO THEY REFUSE THE SMART

                    METER, WHICH WOULD DO AN ACTUAL READING, NOW THEY DON'T HAVE A SMART

                    METER.  WOULD THIS APPLY TO THEM?  WOULD THIS LANGUAGE APPLY TO

                    THEM?  SO THEY WOULD STILL HAVE TO GET THE -- NOT BE ABLE TO RECEIVE AN

                    ESTIMATED BILLING EVEN THOUGH THEY DECLINED THE SMART METER?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, THE UTILITY CAN STILL READ IT

                    ANOTHER WAY.  AND IF THEY'RE HAVING PROBLEMS, THEY -- THEY CAN -- THEY

                    CAN DO SOMETHING NOVEL AND TALK TO THE CUSTOMER AND SAY, TAKE A

                    PHOTO OF YOUR METER.  SEND IT TO US.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO THIS BILL -- I MEAN, I KNOW

                    YOU'RE GONNA REFER TO THE -- THE GENERAL LANGUAGE IF -- IT DOESN'T ALLOW

                                         124



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    FOR AN EXEMPTION IF A METER READER SHOWS UP AT THE PLACE -- AND WE'RE

                    TALKING ABOUT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF THE METER READER -- SAY, FOR

                    EXAMPLE, THERE'S A FLOODED BASEMENT.  SAY, FOR EXAMPLE, THERE'S AN

                    UNREACHABLE METER.  ANIMALS ON THE PRESS -- PREMISES OR BROKEN

                    EQUIPMENT.  DOES THAT -- WOULD THAT -- IS THAT SOMETHING THAT HAS TO BE

                    DOCUMENTED?  I MEAN, BUT THIS LEGISLATION DOESN'T REALLY SPECIFICALLY

                    EXEMPT THAT, DOES IT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THAT'S IN THE EXISTING LAW.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  ALL RIGHT.

                                 AND WHAT ABOUT CUSTOMERS WHO ARE BILLED ON A

                    SEASONAL BASIS?  HOW DOES THIS BILL --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THAT DOESN'T APPLY.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  SO THEY WOULD -- THEY WOULD

                    NOT HAVE TO DO THE --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THEY STILL -- IF THEY HAVE A

                    SUMMER RENTAL AND IT'S -- AND THEY NORMALLY GET A BILL AT THE END OF THE

                    SEASON, THAT WILL CONTINUE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  WHAT IF THERE IS A SEVERE

                    WEATHER EVENT BUT IT'S NOT SPECIFICALLY A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY

                    LIKE YOUR -- YOUR BILL TEXT SAYS?  WOULD THAT BE A REASON FOR NOT...

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, IF -- IF IT'S SUCH A SEVERE

                    WEATHER EVENT THAT IT -- A DECLARATION IS DECLARED --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  BUT I UNDERSTAND -- THAT'S MY

                    POINT.  THE LANGUAGE SAYS YOU HAVE TO HAVE A DECLARATION OF A STATE OF

                                         125



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    EMERGENCY.  BUT WE CAN ALL AGREE THERE ARE -- THERE ARE -- THERE ARE

                    WEATHER -- WEATHER EVENTS THAT A STATE OF EMERGENCY HAS BEEN DECLARED.

                    IT COULD BE A -- A RAINSTORM.  IT COULD BE A WINDSTORM.  IT COULD BE A

                    SNOWSTORM.  IT COULD BE FLOODING THAT AN EMER -- UNDER THOSE

                    CIRCUMSTANCES, HOW WOULD THAT IMPACT BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT EXEMPT

                    FROM THIS?  SHOULDN'T WE HAVE MORE CLARIFYING LANGUAGE IN THE BILL TO

                    ADDRESS THAT?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  I THINK THAT'S ALREADY COVERED IN

                    THE EXISTING LAW THAT THIS BILL DOESN'T CHANGE --

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  -- WHERE IT SAYS CIRCUMSTANCES

                    BEYOND THE CONTROL OF THE UTILITY MADE AN -- A READING OF THE METER

                    EXTREMELY DIFFICULT.  SO I THINK THAT WOULD BE THE REASON.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 YOUR SPONSOR'S MEMO ALSO MENTIONS EXCESSIVE

                    FLUCTUATIONS IN UTILITY BILLS.  WOULDN'T IT TECHNICALLY BE BETTER TO -- IF

                    YOU -- IF YOU WANT TO ADDRESS THAT?  BECAUSE, I MEAN, OBVIOUSLY THAT

                    CAN -- THAT COULD DEPEND ON A LOT OF THINGS; THE -- THE COST OF THE -- THE

                    -- THE SERVICE OR THE SUPPLY.  BUT WOULDN'T IT BE BETTER TO JUST MANDATE

                    THAT CUSTOMERS GO ON A BUDGET PLAN?  BECAUSE THEN IT'S SPREAD OUT OVER

                    THE COURSE OF THE YEAR, THEY KNOW WHAT IT'S GONNA BE.  BUT IT ULTIMATELY

                    -- DON'T -- ULTIMATELY, AT THE END OF THE YEAR IT -- IT'S BASICALLY ESTIMATED

                    BILLING THROUGHOUT THAT PERIOD OF TIME, AND AT THE END OF THE YEAR WHEN

                    THE BUDGET YEAR ENDS YOU GET A RECONCILIATION BILL.  SO IT MIGHT BE A

                    LITTLE HIGHER OR IT MIGHT BE A LITTLE LOWER THAN THAT BUDGET MONTH.

                                         126



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WOULD IT BE A BETTER APPROACH TO SAY LET'S DO A BUDGET?  LET'S DO -- LET'S

                    MAKE YOU DO A BUDGET BILL INSTEAD OF JUST -- OR -- OR A BUDGET PLAN OR

                    REQUIRING BUDGET PLANS, ESPECIALLY FOR INDIVIDUALS WHO CAN'T AFFORD IT

                    AND THEY -- THEN THEY DON'T -- DEFINITELY DON'T HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE

                    SPIKES OF THE, YOU KNOW, USING MORE GAS IN THE WINTER AND HAVE A

                    HIGHER COST.  WOULDN'T THAT BE A BETTER APPROACH?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  NO.  BECAUSE THE PROBLEM IS IF

                    YOU GET A BILL AND YOU WANT TO COMPARE IT TO A PREVIOUS YEAR'S BILL, YOU

                    CAN DO IT ON A MONTHLY BASIS.  IF YOU -- IF YOU GET THIS LUMP SUM AND IT

                    -- IT'S GONNA BE THAT MUCH MORE DIFFICULT.  YOU WANT TO -- I MEAN,

                    PEOPLE MIGHT DECIDE THAT THEY WANT TO GO ON A BUDGET PLAN, BUT THAT

                    DOESN'T MEAN THEY SHOULDN'T HAVE AN ACCURATE READING, AN ACTUAL

                    READING EVERY MONTH.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  I UNDERSTAND.  OKAY.  WELL, I

                    THINK I'M -- I'M NEAR THE END OF MY QUESTIONS.

                                 I WANTED TO ASK JUST ABOUT FAILED EQUIPMENT.  YOU

                    KNOW, I KIND OF BROUGHT THAT UP.  YOU KNOW, I LOOK -- I THINK ONE

                    UTILITY HAS 15,000 UNITS AND THEY ESTIMATE APPROXIMATELY 4.9 MILLION

                    WILL FAIL BECAUSE OF ELECTRONIC COMPONENTS OR BATTERIES, NOT TO MENTION

                    OTHER ISSUES.  WOULD THAT -- AND THEN THEY NEED THE DELAY AND THEY NEED

                    TO DO ESTIMATED BILLING ON THAT CASE.  WOULD THEY STILL IN THAT SITUATION

                    WHERE THERE'S THOSE PROBLEMS, WOULD THEY NOT BE ABLE TO BILL THE

                    CUSTOMER FOR THE ESTIMATED BILLING, IN THAT CASE, FOR FAILED EQUIPMENT OR

                    WOULD THEY?

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, UTILITIES ARE ALWAYS MAKING

                                         127



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    DECISIONS AND PROVISIONS TO GET THE READING.  SO THIS IS NO SURPRISE.

                    AND A LOT OF THEM ARE FINDING WAYS TO DO IT CHEAPER.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.

                                 I ACTUALLY HAVE ONE MORE.  AT THE VERY END OF YOUR BILL

                    IT TALKS ABOUT THE -- THE REASONABLE ACTIONS THEY HAVE TO TAKE.  MAYBE

                    MAKING AN APPOINTMENT WITH SOMEONE AFTER HOURS OR OFFERING THEM A

                    TELEPHONE CALL TO CALL IN THE NUMBERS.  BUT ULTIMATELY, YOU'D STILL NEED

                    THE INDIVIDUAL TO COOPERATE WITH CALLING -- YOU KNOW, CALLING THE PHONE

                    NUMBER.  THEY COULD BE -- IF THEY DON'T -- SHOULDN'T THE ONUS BE ON THE

                    INDIVIDUAL THAT'S CALLING THE PHONE NUMBER IF THEY -- IF THEY'RE NOT

                    GONNA BE ABLE TO DO A READING TO CALLING THE PHONE NUMBER?

                                 (CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  WELL, THIS GIVES -- THIS GIVES THE

                    UTILITY MORE OPTIONS.  AND IT WAS SOMETHING THAT THE GOVERNOR RAISED,

                    WHY CAN'T THIS BE DONE AND WE AGREED WITH THAT.  WE AGREED WITH THAT

                    LAST YEAR.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  OKAY.  ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU,

                    MR. JACOBSON.  I APPRECIATE YOUR --

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THANK YOU, MR. PALMESANO.

                    ALWAYS A PLEASURE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  -- TIME AS ALWAYS.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  I'M SURE WE'LL GET THIS OPPORTUNITY

                    AGAIN.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  ABSOLUTELY.  HOPEFULLY WE'LL DO

                    IT AND HOPEFULLY THE GOVERNOR WILL VETO IT AGAIN.

                                         128



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES, MADAM SPEAKER AND MY

                    COLLEAGUES.

                                 THIS IS A PROBLEM THAT HAPPENED, REALLY WITH THE

                    GENESIS OF IT, WITH CENTRAL HUDSON WHERE THEY HAD SOME PROBLEMS AND

                    THE PSC CAME IN AND WORKED ON THIS.  THE PSC ALREADY -- THE OTHER

                    THING, THE PSC ALREADY HAS THE AUTHORITY TO ADDRESS THIS IF IT'S A

                    PROBLEM THAT'S NEEDED.  THEY HAVE REGULATIONS IN PLACE FOR UTILITIES TO

                    FOLLOW WHEN IT COMES TO ESTIMATED BILLING.  THE PSC HAS THE AUTHORITY

                    TO INVESTIGATE, THE PSC HAS THE AUTHORITY TO FINE AND ISSUE PENALTIES.

                    AND THIS BILL DOES FAIL TO ADDRESS SOME CONCERNS THAT HAVE BEEN RAISED

                    ABOUT THE BILL, WHETHER IT'S -- LIKE I -- AND I TRIED TO TALK ABOUT THE, YOU

                    KNOW, IF YOU HAVE A DISASTER DECLARATION VERSUS OTHER EXTREME WEATHER

                    CONDITIONS, EMERGENCIES, EQUIPMENT FAILURE, WORK STOPPAGES.  ALL

                    THOSE THINGS SHOULD REALLY BE EXEMPTIONS IN THIS BILL.  MAINE HAS THAT IN

                    THEIR BILL.  WE SHOULD HAVE IT IN OUR BILL.  YOU GET TO THE POINT WHERE

                    SOMEONE IS OPTING OUT OF THE -- THE SMART METER, THAT WOULD BE

                    PROBLEMATIC.  SO NOW THEY'RE DECLINING THE SMART METER, WHICH WILL

                    ACTUALLY BE AN ACTUAL METER READ, AND BY DECLINING IT NOW THEY HAVE TO

                    DEAL WITH THE ESTIMATED READS OR SOMEONE COMING OUT THERE.  WHY --

                    WHY SHOULDN'T THEY BE EXEMPT BECAUSE THEY -- THEY DECLINED THE

                    ESTIMATED -- THE METER READ?  THE SMART METER.

                                 WE TALKED ABOUT THE HEALTH AND SAFETY OF EMPLOYEES

                    GOING INTO A SITUATION WHERE YOU HAVE A FLOODED BASEMENT, YOU HAVE

                                         129



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ANIMALS, BROKEN EQUIPMENT.  YOU KNOW, UN -- UN -- UNREACHABLE

                    METERS, THINGS OF THAT NATURE.  WE CAN GO ON AND ON ABOUT SOME OF THE

                    PROBLEMS.  I MEAN, SOME OF THESE THINGS SHOULD HAVE LOOKED IT FOR

                    SOME EXEMPTIONS.

                                 BUT AT THE END OF THE DAY, MADAM SPEAKER AND MY

                    COLLEAGUES, THIS -- THE PROBLEM ISN'T ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLS.  THAT'S NOT

                    WHAT I'M HEARING.  I'M SURE THAT'S NOT WHAT MY -- MY COLLEAGUES ARE

                    HEARING.  WHAT THEY'RE HEARING IS THE COST OF THEIR BILLS ARE GOING UP.

                    SIGNIFICANTLY.  UTILITY RATES ARE RISING AND EVERY UTILITY IS ASKING FOR

                    SIGNIFICANT INCREASES.  AND YES, I HEAR MY FRIENDS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF

                    THE AISLE BLAST THE UTILITY WHEN THAT HAPPENS.  AND THE RATES ARE TOO

                    HIGH.  BUT WHAT I HAVEN'T HEARD COME OUT WHEN IT COMES TO UTILITY BILLS,

                    WHEN THE PSC APPROVED $43 BILLION -- BECAUSE OF THE FAILURE TO

                    RECOGNIZE WHAT'S DRIVING UP UTILITY BILLS ARE THE GREEN ENERGY MANDATES

                    THAT THIS HOUSE AND THIS GOVERNOR AND IN THE HOUSE DOWN THE HALL

                    CONTINUES TO PUT IN PLACE.  AND IT STARTED WITH THE CLCPA BACK IN

                    2019, AND NOW WE'RE SEEING THE SAME THINGS WE TALKED ABOUT THEN;

                    COSTS AND PROBLEMATICS [SIC] THERE.  THESE GREEN ENERGY MANDATES ARE

                    (INDISCERNIBLE).  SO UTILITY BILLS GO UP.  IT'S EASY TO SAY IT'S THE UTILITY'S

                    FAULT, BUT THE REASON THEIR BILLS ARE GOING UP IS BECAUSE THEY HAVE TO

                    PAY FOR THESE MANDATES.  BUT YET WHEN THE PSC APPROVED $43 BILLION

                    IN FUTURE RATEPAYER INCREASES TO SPECIFICALLY PAY FOR THE GREEN ENERGY

                    MANDATES, NO ONE SAID A WORD AND CONTINUES TO BE SILENT.  THAT'S WHAT'S

                    COMING DOWN THE TRACKS AT OUR CONSTITUENTS.

                                 IF WE DO NOT CHANGE THE METHODOLOGY ON HOW

                                         130



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    EMISSIONS ARE MEASURED IN NEW YORK STATE TO MATCH EVERY OTHER STATE

                    PLUS ONE -- WE USE A 20-YEAR METHODOLOGY VERSUS A 100-YEAR

                    METHODOLOGY.  STATE -- INTERNATIONAL AND THE U.S. USES A 100-YEAR

                    METHODOLOGY BUT WE USE A 20-YEAR.  IF WE DON'T CHANGE THAT, PRICES AT

                    THE PUMP ARE GONNA INCREASE 63 CENTS A GALLON.  NATURAL GAS AND HOME

                    HEATING COSTS ARE GONNA INCREASE 79 PERCENT.  THOSE ARE NOT PHIL

                    PALMESANO'S NUMBERS, THOSE ARE STATE NUMBERS FROM NYSERDA AND

                    WHAT CAME OUT BEFORE.

                                 I TALKED ABOUT (INDISCERNIBLE).  TO CONVERT YOUR HOME

                    OVER FROM NATURAL GAS TO FULL ELECTRIC, THREE STUDIES OUT THERE.  IT'S

                    GONNA COST CONSUMERS $35,000 TO DO THE CONVERSION BECAUSE IT'S NOT

                    JUST DOING THE CONVERSION, THE HEAT PUMP.  (INDISCERNIBLE).  YOU'RE

                    DOING THE SHELL OF YOUR PROPERTY.  YOU'RE DOING ELECTRIC UPGRADES.

                    $35,000, $30- TO $50-.  THAT'S KIND OF EXCESSIVE.

                                 THEN YOU HAVE THE UNFUND -- THE MOTHER OF ALL

                    UNFUNDED MANDATES, THE ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUS MANDATE.  HOW MUCH THE

                    DIFFERENCE -- THIS IS GONNA COST ON OUR ELECTRIC BILLS THAT THEY'RE PAYING.

                    YOU KNOW, $150,000 FOR A -- A NEAR-ZERO-EMISSION DIESEL SCHOOL BUS

                    VERSUS $400- FOR AN ELECTRIC SCHOOL BUS.  AND IN 2019 THE COST FOR

                    RESIDENTIAL ELECTRICITY WAS 17 CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR.  HERE TODAY IN

                    2025 IT'S 26 CENTS PER KILOWATT HOUR; NEARLY 40 TO 50 PERCENT HIGHER

                    THAN THE NATIONAL AVERAGE.

                                 UNFORTUNATELY, THE POLICIES THAT CONTINUE TO GET

                    ADVANCED IN THIS HOUSE -- I UNDERSTAND WHAT THE SPONSOR IS TRYING TO

                    DO.  IT'S NOT ADDRESSING THE PROBLEM THAT OUR CONSTITUENTS ARE FACING.

                                         131



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    AFFORDABILITY, COST, RELIABILITY.  AND ON RELIABILITY, PLEASE LOOK AT THE

                    NYISO POWER TRENDS REPORT TALKING ABOUT THE THINNESS IN THE -- THE

                    MARGINS OF OUR RELIABILITY FOR ENERGY.  YOU KNOW, BUSINESSES CARE

                    ABOUT TWO THINGS:  AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE ENERGY.  IF THEY CAN'T GET

                    AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE ENERGY NOW IN NEW YORK, THEY'RE GONNA GO

                    ELSEWHERE.  THEY WANNA HIT THAT SWITCH AND KNOW THEIR EQUIPMENT'S

                    GONNA WORK, THE POWER'S GONNA WORK.  THOSE RELIABILITY CONCERNS ARE --

                    ARE CONCERNING, AND THEY SHOULD BE -- CONCERN ALL OF US, LET ALONE THE

                    COST.

                                 SO COST, AFFORDABILITY, RELIABILITY, FEASIBILITY ARE NOT A

                    PRIORITY IN THIS HOUSE FOR THE RECKLESS ENERGY CLIMATE AGENDA BEING

                    ADVANCED IN THIS -- THIS STATE.  AND IT'S ALL DESIGNED TO DISMANTLE THE

                    AFFORDABLE AND RELIABLE NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPLY AND DELIVERY

                    SYSTEM, KEEPING IN FACT THAT 60 PERCENT OF NEW YORKERS HEAT THEIR

                    HOMES WITH NATURAL GAS, 40 PERCENT OF OUR GENERATION COMES FROM

                    NATURAL GAS.  IT'S TOTALLY DESIGNED TO TAKE AWAY CONSUMER CHOICE ON

                    HOW YOU HEAT YOUR HOME, COOK YOUR FOOD, POWER YOUR BUILDINGS AND

                    THE VEHICLES YOU DRIVE.  AND WE CAN DO ALL THIS IN THE NAME OF GLOBAL

                    EMISSIONS AND CLIMATE CHANGE; IT'S NOT GONNA MAKE A DIFFERENCE

                    BECAUSE NEW YORK ONLY CONTRIBUTES .4 -- 0.4 PERCENT OF TOTAL GLOBAL

                    EMISSIONS.  CHINA CONTRIBUTES 30 -- 31 PERCENT, HAS 1,000 COAL PLANTS

                    AND BUILDING MORE.  AND, IN FACT, LAST YEAR THEY EXPANDED THEIR COAL-

                    GENERATING CAPACITY BY 95 GIGAWATTS.  OUR TOTAL GENERATING CAPACITY

                    HERE IN NEW YORK IS 41 GIGAWATTS WITH ALL OF OUR SOURCES; NATURAL GAS,

                    NUCLEAR, HYDROGEN -- OR -- OR HYDRO, GREEN.  ALL OF THAT.  SO WE CAN TRY

                                         132



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    TO, YOU KNOW, PAT OURSELVES ON THE BACK AND TRY TO GET DOWN TO ZERO,

                    BUT YOU'RE NOT GONNA MAKE A DIFFERENCE IN GLOBAL EMISSIONS.  NOT WITH

                    CHINA.  AND IF YOU ADD IN RUSSIA, THAT'S 40 PERCENT.  0.4 IS NOT GONNA

                    CUT IT.  BUT WHAT YOU WILL DO IS YOU WILL CONTINUE OUR NATION-LEADING

                    OUT MIGRATION OF MORE BUSINESSES, FAMILIES, FARMERS AND MANUFACTURERS

                    LEAVING THIS STATE.  THAT'S SOMETHING I DON'T WANT TO SEE.  I -- OUR

                    RESIDENTS DESERVE MORE TRANSPARENCY BETTER AND THEY NEED A MORE

                    AFFORDABLE ENERGY POLICY BECAUSE THIS ISN'T IT.

                                 SO FOR THESE REASONS AND OTHERS, I WILL BE VOTING NO

                    AND I URGE MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE SAME.  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. EACHUS.

                                 MR. EACHUS:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MR. EACHUS:  AS I LISTENED TO THIS ARGUMENT, I

                    BELIEVE THAT THIS BILL ONLY HAS TO DO WITH ESTIMATING ELECTRIC COSTS.  SO

                    ALL OTHER ISSUES BROUGHT UP ARE BROUGHT UP SIMPLY TO DEFLECT THIS

                    PARTICULAR ISSUE OF ESTIMATED BILLS.

                                 IT WAS MENTIONED THAT THE PSC HAS RULES AND

                    REGULATIONS.  IF I RECALL CORRECTLY, THOSE RULES AND REGULATIONS HAVE BEEN

                    IN PLACE FOR DECADES, AND YET AS MENTIONED BY ONE OF MY COLLEAGUES, A

                    PARTICULAR POWER COMPANY ENDED UP COSTING CUSTOMERS THOUSANDS

                    UPON THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS BECAUSE THEY ESTIMATED BILLS FOR MONTHS AND

                                         133



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    MONTHS AND MONTHS.  AND THAT'S THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE.  THAT'S

                    SIMPLY THE PROBLEM THAT WE HAVE AND WE'RE ADDRESSING HERE.

                                 THE FINAL THING I DO KNOW IS THAT, AGAIN, A SPECIFIC

                    POWER COMPANY WAS BROUGHT UP, AND THAT POWER COMPANY IS SERVICED

                    BY PROBABLY AT LEAST SIX OF US ASSEMBLYMEMBERS IN HERE, AND I HAPPEN

                    TO KNOW THAT THE SPONSOR OF THIS BILL DOESN'T KNOW HOW MANY CALLS I GET

                    IN MY OFFICE ABOUT ESTIMATED BILLS AND THE PROBLEMS WITH IT.  NOBODY

                    SHOULD.  AND WE ARE STILL RECEIVING THOSE.  THEY ARE STILL COMING

                    THROUGH, AND THEY ARE VERY, VERY PROBLEMATIC.

                                 AND I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR FOR THIS BILL.  THIS BILL

                    HAS TO GO THROUGH, IT HAS TO BE ADOPTED, AND IT'S FOR THE GOOD OF ALL OF

                    OUR CUSTOMERS.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 180TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  A PARTY VOTE HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MINORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS PIECE OF

                    LEGISLATION.  IF ANYONE WISHES TO VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE THEY MAY DO SO

                    NOW AT THEIR CHAIRS.

                                 THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                         134



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. FALL.

                                 MR. FALL:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  THE

                    MAJORITY CONFERENCE WILL BE IN FAVOR OF THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.  FOR

                    THAT THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VOTE IN A DIFFERENT DIRECTION, THEY COULD DO

                    SO AT THEIR DESK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 THE CLERK WILL RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MR. BEEPHAN TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. BEEPHAN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 I -- I UNDERSTAND THE CONCERNS THAT WERE ADDRESSED

                    TODAY.  BUT REPRESENTING THE HUDSON VALLEY ALONG WITH MR. JACOBSON,

                    MR. EACHUS AND MANY OTHERS HERE, I CAN TELL YOU FIRSTHAND THE GRIEF THAT

                    OUR RESIDENTS WENT THROUGH OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS DEALING WITH BILLING

                    ISSUES.  AND IF THIS, IN ITS ENTIRETY, GOES THROUGH AND -- AND CAN HELP

                    PREVENT ANY OTHER REGION FROM GOING THROUGH WHAT OUR REGION DID, IT'S

                    SOMETHING I'M GONNA HAVE TO SUPPORT.

                                 SO ON BEHALF OF MY RESIDENTS I WILL BE VOTING IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. BEEPHAN IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON TO EXPLAIN HIS VOTE.

                                 MR. JACOBSON:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER, TO

                    EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 THE ONLY THING WORSE -- THE ONLY THING WORSE THAN

                                         135



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    RECEIVING YOUR UTILITY -- YOUR UTILITY BILL IS RECEIVING A BILL THAT'S

                    EXTREMELY HIGH BECAUSE OF ESTIMATED BILLING.

                                 THE REASON THAT I SUBMITTED THIS BILL AND WE'RE VOTING

                    ON IT IS TO DEAL WITH A REAL PROBLEM, AND THE FACT THAT THE CURRENT LAWS

                    AND RULES OF THE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION HAVE NOT FULLY ADDRESSED

                    THE PROBLEM.  WHEN YOU HAVE ESTIMATED BILLING, IT IS VERY DIFFICULT TO

                    COMPARE YOUR USAGE ON A MONTHLY BASIS TO PRIOR MONTHS.  PEOPLE WANT

                    TO KNOW THEY'RE NOT GETTING RIPPED OFF.  AND VERY SIMPLY BY HAVING

                    ACTUAL READINGS, THEY WILL KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY USED FOR THAT MONTH.

                                 AS I SAID PREVIOUSLY, A PROHIBITION WITHOUT A PENALTY

                    IS NOT A DETERRENT.  AS WE PASSED THE OTHER BILL WHICH I HAD SPONSORED

                    CONCERNING LATE BILLING, THE UTILITIES NOW ARE COMPLYING WITH THAT.  AND

                    SO I BELIEVE THAT ONCE WE PASS THAT, THIS WILL HOPEFULLY WIPE OUT ALL

                    ESTIMATED BILLING EXCEPT FOR THOSE EXTREME CIRCUMSTANCES THAT ARE IN

                    THE BILL, THAT ARE LISTED, OR WHEN A CUSTOMER INTERFERES WITH THE UTILITY

                    GETTING A READING.

                                 SO I PROUDLY VOTE IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. JACOBSON IN THE

                    AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  ON OUR DEBATE LIST, WE'RE

                    GONNA GO TO RULES REPORT NO. 327 BY MS. LUNSFORD, AND THEN RULES

                                         136



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    REPORT NO. 338 BY MR. STIRPE, RULES REPORT NO. 362 BY MR. OTIS, AND

                    RULES REPORT NO. 383 BY MR. LASHER.  IN THAT ORDER, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 PAGE 14, RULES REPORT NO. 327, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A06558-A, RULES

                    REPORT NO. 327, LUNSFORD, SIMON, MAGNARELLI, STECK, P. CARROLL,

                    SAYEGH, SLATER, SHIMSKY, ROSENTHAL.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE PUBLIC

                    HEALTH LAW AND THE AGRICULTURE AND MARKETS LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    REQUIRING ALLERGEN LABELING FOR PREPACKAGED FOODS.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MADAM

                    SPEAKER.

                                 THIS BILL REQUIRES THAT ANY RETAILER THAT PREPACKAGES

                    FOOD FOR SALE ON SITE -- SO YOUR DELIS, YOUR BAKERIES THAT MIGHT MAKE

                    SANDWICHES OR COOKIES IN A CLAMSHELL -- THAT THEY ARE REQUIRED TO LABEL

                    THOSE PACKAGES WITH ANY INGREDIENTS THAT CONSTITUTE THE SEVEN MAJOR

                    ALLERGENS THAT ARE DEFINED BY THE FDA.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. JENSEN.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL

                    OUR HONORABLE COLLEAGUE FROM THE TOWN OF PERINTON YIELD FOR SOME

                    QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                         137



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  FOR YOU, MR. JENSEN, YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  YOU'RE MUCH TOO KIND.

                                 SO WE DEBATED THIS BILL A YEAR AGO, AND HAS THERE BEEN

                    ANY CHANGES WITH -- WITH THIS LEGISLATION SINCE THE TOPIC PREVIOUSLY

                    CAME TO THE FLOOR?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THERE HAS.  SO GIVEN COMMENTS

                    THAT YOU, YOURSELF, MADE, I CLARIFIED SOME OF THE LANGUAGE, YOU WILL BE

                    HAPPY TO KNOW, IN ORDER TO SPECIFICALLY ENSURE THAT IT WAS WELL

                    UNDERSTOOD THAT WE DID NOT MEAN THAT EVERY SINGLE INGREDIENT -- AND

                    EVERYONE'S VERY EXCITED ABOUT MY BILL OUT THERE, PLEASE IGNORE THEM --

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OR HORSESHOE CRABS, REALLY.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  YES.

                                 THAT EVERY SINGLE INGREDIENT IN A PRODUCT NEED NOT BE

                    LISTED, ONLY THOSE INGREDIENTS WHICH CONSTITUTE A MAJOR ALLERGEN.  AND

                    SPECIFICALLY, LET'S SAY THAT THE PRODUCT IS BREAD.  IT WOULDN'T NEED TO SAY

                    THAT IT CONTAINS ENRICHED FLOUR OR WHOLE WHEAT.  IT WOULD SIMPLY NEED

                    TO SAY WHEAT.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  SO WITH THE CHANGE THAT WOULD

                    HAVE TO LIST -- LIST THE ALLERGENS, WHAT ARE THE SEVEN MAJOR ALLERGENS THAT

                    WOULD BE PERTAINED?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  WHEAT, EGGS, FISH, SHELLFISH, TREE

                    NUTS AND SESAME.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  SO --

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  AND PEANUTS.

                                         138



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. JENSEN:  -- FOR THE LABELING REQUIREMENTS, WHAT

                    WOULD THE STICKER -- OR -- THAT WOULD BE AFFIXED TO THE PRODUCT HAVE TO

                    BE?  LIKE, IF THERE'S PEANUTS IN SOMETHING, COULD THEY JUST HAVE A

                    PICTURE OF MR. PEANUT ON THERE AND THAT WOULD DEMONSTRATE AND SATISFY

                    THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE LEGISLATION?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  SETTING ASIDE ANY COPYRIGHT ISSUES

                    THAT CAME WITH USING PLANTER'S MR. PEANUT, I ASSURE YOU THAT AS LONG AS

                    IT COULD BE CONVEYED TO THE CONSUMER THAT THE PRODUCT CONTAINED

                    PEANUTS, THAT WOULD BE SUFFICIENT.  SO LET'S SAY IT CONTAINED PEANUT

                    BUTTER AND WHOLE PEANUTS.  YOU WOULDN'T NEED TO SAY PEANUT BUTTER AND

                    WHOLE PEANUTS, YOU COULD MERELY SAY CONTAINS PEANUTS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  SO IS -- I KNOW -- IF I'M

                    REMEMBERING CORRECTLY, ONE OF THE CONCERNS I HAD LAST YEAR WAS ABOUT

                    THE IMPLEMENTATION DATE.  HAS THAT BEEN CHANGED AS WELL?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  YES.  I BELIEVE WE DID KICK THAT

                    OUT TO 180 DAYS.  BUT LET ME DOUBLE-CHECK FOR YOU RIGHT HERE.  ONE

                    YEAR.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  ONE YEAR?  OKAY.  SO I THINK ONE OF

                    THE THINGS -- AND I THINK OBVIOUSLY I KNOW LAST YEAR YOU SHARED THE

                    STORY ABOUT YOUR SON'S ALLERGIES AND -- AND WHY THIS IS IMPORTANT.  AND

                    I KNOW A LOT OF OUR COLLEAGUES AND A LOT OF NEW YORKERS IN GENERAL DO

                    HAVE ALLERGIES IN THOSE SEVEN MAJOR CLASSIFICATIONS, AND I THINK IT'S

                    IMPORTANT THAT CONSUMERS UNDERSTAND THINGS THAT COULD BE IN THERE.

                    BUT WHY HAVE THE LABELING BE ON THE PRODUCT?  YOU KNOW, I'M USING

                    THE EXAMPLE OF THE WEGMAN'S SUB COUNTER -- THE STATE AND THE WORLD'S

                                         139



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    GREATEST GROCERY STORE -- WHERE THEY HAVE -- THEY HAVE THE SUB COUNTER,

                    YOU COULD WALK UP AND YOU COULD GET A -- A SUB MADE.  BUT THE EXACT

                    SAME SUB COULD BE PRE-PREPARED BY THE SUB STAFF AND PLACED IN THE

                    COOLER TEN FEET FROM THE SUB COUNTER.  WOULDN'T IT MAKE MORE SENSE TO

                    HAVE, IN THOSE CIRCUMSTANCES, A LIST OF ALL THE MAJOR ALLERGENS THAT MAY

                    BE IN THEIR BREADS, CHEESES, OTHER CONDIMENTS?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  WELL, IF YOU'RE ORDERING DIRECT

                    FROM, SAY, THE DELI OR THE BAKERY WHO'S PREPARING YOUR SUB, YOU WOULD

                    HAVE AN OPPORTUNITY AT THAT MOMENT TO ASK THOSE QUESTIONS IN REALTIME.

                    LET'S SAY YOU'RE AT WEGMAN'S, IT'S SATURDAY AT NOON.  YOU ARE TRYING TO

                    GET YOUR CHILDREN IN A LINE TO GO GET THEIR LUNCH.  IF YOU'RE PICKING UP

                    AN ITEM THAT'S BEEN PREPACKAGED AND NOW YOU HAVE TO SOMEHOW ASSERT

                    YOURSELF INTO THE DELI LINE TO ASK A QUESTION THAT THE PERSON BEHIND THE

                    COUNTER MAY OR MAY NOT KNOW OFF THE TOP OF THEIR HEAD, THEY MAY NOW

                    HAVE TO GO GET A MANAGER.  IT BECOMES A HUGE ORDEAL.  AND WE WANT TO

                    MAKE THIS AS EASY AS POSSIBLE SO THAT BUSY PARENTS AND PEOPLE WHO

                    HAVE ALLERGENS AREN'T NEEDING TO SPEND EXCESSIVE AMOUNTS OF TIME

                    BOTHERING OTHER CUSTOMERS WHO THEY'RE NOW BUTTING INTO THEIR TIME

                    WHEN SIMPLY THESE STORES WHO ARE PUTTING THESE PACKAGES TOGETHER,

                    THEY COULD JUST HAVE ROLLS OF STICKERS THAT SAY WHEAT, PEANUT, SESAME,

                    WHATEVER IT MAY BE, AND THEY JUST POP THEM ON AS THEY'RE PUTTING

                    TOGETHER THESE PRODUCTS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  AND THERE -- IS THERE ANY

                    CARVE-OUT FOR PROPRIETORS BASED ON SIZE OR VOLUME?  SO, YOU KNOW, WE

                    USED A GROCERY STORE -- I USED A GROCERY STORE EXAMPLE.  YOU KNOW,

                                         140



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THEY -- THEY DO A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF VOLUME.  BUT YOU WALK INTO A -- A

                    NEIGHBORHOOD BODEGA THAT'S -- THAT MAY MAKE BREAKFAST SANDWICHES.

                    THEY MAY NOT HAVE -- THEY MIGHT NOT DO THE VOLUME.  IS THERE ANY

                    CARVE-OUT FOR SIZE OR VOLUME?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THERE IS NOT, BECAUSE THE REALITY IS

                    IS YOU'RE BUYING YOUR PRODUCT, YOU'RE BUYING YOUR PRODUCT.  SO WE

                    WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYONE IS PROTECTED.  ONE OF THE ISSUES WE

                    HAVE IS THAT YOUR SUPERMARKETS, FOR THE MOST PART THEY ALREADY HAVE

                    INGREDIENT LISTS.  THESE SMALLER ENTITIES, THOUGH, THEY'RE SORT OF THE ONES

                    I'M WORRIED ABOUT THE MOST BECAUSE THEY ARE THE ONES WHO MAY BE

                    LEAST PREPARED IN THIS MOMENT TO ADDRESS THESE QUESTIONS, AND WE NEED

                    TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY ARE AFFIRMATIVELY INFORMING THEMSELVES SO THAT

                    WHEN CUSTOMERS HAVE THESE QUESTIONS THAT WE CAN BETTER ADDRESS THEM

                    FOR PEOPLE WHO HAVE CONCERNS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  OKAY.  I KNOW IN THE BILL -- AND

                    CORRECT ME IF I'M -- IF I DON'T HAVE ALL THE INFORMATION.  BUT IS THERE A

                    REQUIREMENT THAT THEY'D HAVE TO PUT SOME SORT OF NOTICE THAT THE DOH

                    WOULD DEVELOP WITHIN THEIR STOREFRONT, OR IS THAT JUST THE NATURE OF

                    DOH HAVING TO CLARIFY THE REGULATIONS SURROUNDING THIS PROSPECTIVE

                    LAW?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  IT'S JUST THE REGULAR REQUIREMENT

                    THAT DOH WOULD APPLY TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCE WHERE WE ARE ASKING THEM

                    TO OVERSEE REGULATIONS THAT WE CREATE.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  WOULD FOOD TRUCKS BE APPLIED UNDER

                    THE LAW?

                                         141



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU.  I HAVE ONE EVERY NOW

                    AND AGAIN.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT IS ANY PLACE

                    WHERE FOOD IS PREPARED AND INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING RETAIL

                    FOOD STORES AS DEFINED IN SECTION 500 OF THIS CHAPTER, WHICH I WILL TELL

                    YOU, I DO NOT BELIEVE A FOOD TRUCK IS.  THOUGH FOOD TRUCKS FREQUENTLY

                    DO NOT HAVE PRE-PREPARED FOODS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  WELL, SO I'M THINKING OF -- I KNOW A

                    LOT OF OUR DISTRICTS, BOTH ON THE WEST SIDE OF MONROE COUNTY AND THE

                    EAST SIDE OF MONROE COUNTY, WILL OFTEN HAVE FOOD TRUCK RODEOS --

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  INDEED.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  -- WHERE YOU HAVE FOOD TRUCKS, BUT

                    YOU ALSO HAVE COMMUNITY-BASED PROVIDERS WHO MAY HAVE

                    PRE-PREPARED CAKES OR CUPCAKES OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.  AND THEY MAY

                    OPERATE OUT OF A STOREFRONT, BUT THEY'RE NOT OPERATING UNDER THE

                    STOREFRONT, THEY'RE OPERATING UNDER A TENT IN THAT SPECIFIC VENUE OR

                    THEY'RE MAYBE AT THE PUBLIC MARKET.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  MM-HMM.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  WOULD THOSE -- WOULD THEY CLASSIFY AS

                    A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT UNDER THE TERMS OF THIS LEGISLATION?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  SO, TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY -- LIKE,

                    A PUBLIC MARKET'S A SOMEWHAT COMPLICATED EXAMPLE.  AS YOU KNOW,

                    WE HAVE A VERY PERMANENT PUBLIC MARKET IN ROCHESTER, THE OLDEST

                    OPERATING PUBLIC MARKET IN THE COUNTRY, ACTUALLY, I BELIEVE, AND THERE

                                         142



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ARE PERMANENT STALLS THERE.  IF YOU ARE ONE OF THE PERMANENT STALLS

                    WHERE THAT IS YOUR PLACE OF BUSINESS, I BELIEVE IT WOULD APPLY TO YOU AS

                    LONG AS YOU ARE SUBJECT TO SECTION 500.  BUT IF YOU ARE SETTING UP A

                    TABLE, YOU ARE A FARMER WHO ALSO BAKES PIES, I DO NOT BELIEVE THAT YOU

                    WOULD FALL UNDER FOOD ESTABLISHMENT FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  AND WOULD IT BE STATE DOH OR THE

                    LOCAL PUBLIC HEALTH DEPARTMENT IS TASKED WITH ENFORCEMENT?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  I BELIEVE IT'S STATE DOH.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  STATE DOH?  DO WE HAVE ENOUGH

                    DOH PERSONNEL TO INSPECT ESTABLISHMENTS WITH ALL THE OTHER DUTIES THEY

                    HAVE CURRENTLY?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THIS WOULDN'T CREATE ANY NEW

                    SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS FOR AUDITING.  IT'S JUST WITHIN THE NORMAL COURSE OF

                    WHATEVER INSPECTIONS ARE DONE.  I IMAGINE LOCALS, AS WELL, WOULD HAVE

                    AN OPPORTUNITY TO THE EXTENT THAT THEY ENFORCE STATE POLICY.  IF THEY

                    WERE TO DISCOVER THAT THEY WERE OUT OF COMPLIANCE WITH THIS LAW IN THE

                    NORMAL COURSE OF THEIR INSPECTIONS, I DON'T THINK THAT WOULD BE A -- AN

                    UNDUE BURDEN.

                                 MR. JENSEN:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH, MS. LUNSFORD.

                    I APPRECIATE IT.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                         143



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  SURE THING.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  THANK YOU SO MUCH.

                                 AND I APPRECIATE THAT AT THE --AT THE OUTSET YOU

                    DISCUSSED WITH THE PREVIOUS QUESTIONER ABOUT SOME CHANGES THAT YOU

                    MADE IN THE BILL BETWEEN LAST YEAR AND THIS YEAR, RIGHT?  OKAY.  SO I

                    HAVE A FEW QUESTIONS THAT WERE BROUGHT TO ME BY A STORE WHOSE NAME

                    WE WOULD ALL RECOGNIZE --

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  (INDISCERNIBLE/CROSS-TALK)

                                 MS. WALSH:  -- THAT'S IN MY DISTRICT.  YEAH.  AND SO

                    I'D LIKE TO JUST ASK YOU THOSE QUESTIONS, AND IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND

                    CLARIFYING IF MAYBE THAT'S A QUESTION THAT WAS ADDRESSED THROUGH

                    AMENDMENT OR JUST KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT.  OKAY.  ALL RIGHT.

                                 SO IT'S INDICATED THAT THERE IS SUPPORT FOR THE PASSAGE

                    OF THE ALLERGEN BILL, BUT THERE'S A PROPOSAL FOR EDITS TO CLARIFY HOW TO

                    OPERATIONALIZE THE LABELING.  AND THEY SUGGESTED LANGUAGE SPECIFICALLY

                    THAT SAY THAT EVERY FOOD ESTABLISHMENT SHALL LABEL ALL PREPACKAGED FOOD

                    WITH A WRITTEN NOTIFICATION ON THE PACKAGE OR ON A LABEL ATTACHED TO THE

                    PACKAGE, IDENTIFYING ANY INGREDIENT WITH WHICH A PRODUCT IS MADE THAT

                    CONSTITUTES A MAJOR FOOD ALLERGEN.  SUCH LABEL NEED NOT IDENTIFY ANY

                    INGREDIENT THAT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A MAJOR FOOD ALLERGEN UNDER FEDERAL

                    OR STATE LAW.  THAT'S PROPOSED LANGUAGE.  IS THAT PART OF THE AMENDMENT

                    THAT YOU MADE?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  SO, I FIND THAT PROPOSED LANGUAGE

                    A LITTLE CONFUSING, SO WE -- WE SORT OF DID AN AMALGAMATION JUST TO

                                         144



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    MAKE IT VERY CLEAR THAT WE JUST NEED YOU TO LABEL THE ITEM WITH ONE OF

                    THE SEVEN MAJOR FOOD ALLERGENS, AS IN THE EXAMPLE I GAVE, LIKE, LET'S SAY

                    IT'S WHOLE PEANUTS AND PEANUT BUTTER.  I DON'T NEED YOU TO SAY BOTH

                    THINGS, YOU JUST NEED TO SAY CONTAINS PEANUTS.  SO, LIKE, YOU COULD HAVE

                    A BIG SUPERMARKET STAR LIKE YOU HAVE LIKE WHEN SOMETHING'S ON SALE,

                    AND IT JUST SAYS PEANUTS AND THAT WOULD -- THAT WOULD SATISFY THE

                    PROVISIONS HERE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  I GOT THAT.  I UNDERSTAND THAT.

                    ALL RIGHT.  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.  I APPRECIATE YOUR ANSWERS.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  YOU'RE VERY WELCOME.  THANK

                    YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MR. DURSO.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WOULD

                    THE SPONSOR YIELD FOR JUST MAYBE TWO QUICK QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  OF COURSE, MR. DURSO.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MS. LUNSFORD.

                                 SO AGAIN, FOOD ESTABLISHMENT IS ANYBODY THAT'S

                    PRE-PACKAGED MAKING IT ON SITE YOU'RE SAYING?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  WELL, A FOOD ESTABLISHMENT IS

                    SPECIFICALLY DEFINED BY SECTION 500, BUT IT'S ANY PLACE WHERE FOOD IS

                    PREPARED AND INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION, INCLUDING RETAIL FOOD STORES.

                    SECTION 500 CONTEMPLATES, YOU KNOW, DELIS, BAKERIES, PERMANENT

                                         145



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ESTABLISHMENTS.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  SO -- AND -- AND JUST FOR CLARITY,

                    WHERE WOULD A SCHOOL FALL UNDER THIS?

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION.  WHERE

                    WOULD A SCHOOL FALL?  THEY ARE LABELING AND PREPACKAGING FOOD

                    INTENDED FOR CONSUMPTION.  I -- I DON'T HAVE STAFF WITH ME TODAY, BUT

                    THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION AND I'M GOING TO TELL YOU, I DON'T KNOW THE

                    ANSWER.

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.  AND -- AND -- AND IT'S -- IT'S

                    MORE JUST FOR CLARITY.  OBVIOUSLY WITH THE FREE SCHOOL MEALS FOR ALL,

                    WHICH I'M A BIG SUPPORTER OF, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE

                    LANGUAGE OF THIS BILL OBVIOUSLY WOULD INCLUDE THOSE THAT ARE

                    PREPACKAGING OR MAKING THOSE ON SITE, JUST HOW THEY WOULD GO ABOUT IT

                    TO MAKE SURE THEY'RE INCLUDED IN THE RULES AND REGULATIONS, OBVIOUSLY TO

                    PROTECT OUR CHILDREN.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  YOU KNOW WHAT?  UPON SECOND

                    THOUGHT --

                                 MR. DURSO:  OKAY.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD: -- THIS SPECIFICALLY DEALS WITH DOH

                    AND AGS.  SO I DON'T THINK IT WOULD INCLUDE SCHOOLS BECAUSE SCHOOLS

                    WOULD BE ORGANIZED UNDER SED.  IT WOULD BE UNDER -- UNDER THE

                    EDUCATION LAW.  AND BECAUSE THEY WOULDN'T BE DEFINED UNDER SECTION

                    500 OF THE CHAPTER, I HIGHLY DOUBT THAT A SCHOOL WOULD BE INCLUDED.

                    HOWEVER, SOMEONE WHO SENDS THEIR KID TO SCHOOL WITH LOTS OF FOOD

                    ALLERGIES, THEY ARE VERY CAREFUL.

                                         146



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. DURSO:  RIGHT.  SO I -- I -- JUST MORE FOR THE

                    CLARITY OF IT, OBVIOUSLY I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT OUR STUDENTS THAT

                    ARE IN SCHOOLS HAVE THE KNOWLEDGE AND ARE AWARE OF WHAT IS IN THEIR

                    FOOD.

                                 THANK YOU, MS. LUNSFORD, FOR ANSWERING MY

                    QUESTIONS.  I APPRECIATE IT.

                                 MS. LUNSFORD:  YOU'RE WELCOME.  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. DURSO:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT ON THE 365TH

                    DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 MS. JACKSON TO EXPLAIN HER VOTE.

                                 MS. JACKSON:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I JUST

                    WANT TO LET THIS STORY BE HEARD ON THE FLOOR TODAY FOR MY COLLEAGUES.

                                 ON JANUARY 11, 2024, 25-YEAR-OLD ORLA BAXENDALE, A

                    WELL-KNOWN DANCER IN NEW YORK CITY, DIED FOLLOWING AN ALLERGIC

                    REACTION TO COOKIES SOLD IN STEWART LEONARD'S -- IN STEW LEONARD'S IN

                    CONNECTICUT.  SHE HAD AN ALLERGIC REACTION BECAUSE PEANUTS WAS NOT

                    CORRECTLY LABELED.  AND SO I'M SURE HER FAMILY WOULD HAVE WANTED HER

                    TO BE HERE AND NOT HAVE TO MEM -- HAVE A MEMORY OF HER AS A GREAT

                    DANCER.  AND WE'RE JUST ASKING FOR ALLERGENS TO BE LISTED.  AND IF YOU

                                         147



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    HAVE A CHILD WITH A SEVERE ALLERGY SIMILAR TO ORLA, YOU WOULD WANT TO

                    KNOW WHAT'S IN YOUR FOOD.

                                 AND SO I WANT TO THANK THE SPONSOR OF THIS BILL.  I WILL

                    BE VOTING IN THE AFFIRMATIVE AND I ASK THAT MY COLLEAGUES TO DO THE

                    SAME.  THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MS. JACKSON IN THE AFFIRMATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULTS.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 15, RULES REPORT NO. 338, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A07377, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 338, STIRPE.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE CANAL LAW, IN RELATION TO

                    ESTABLISHING A STAKEHOLDER GROUP TO COORDINATE WATER RELEASE IN THE

                    OSWEGO RIVER BASIN.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  AN EXPLANATION HAS

                    BEEN REQUESTED.

                                 MR. STIRPE.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  YES, MADAM SPEAKER, THANK YOU.

                                 IN 2022, WE PASSED SOME LEGISLATION THAT CREATED THE

                    FLOOD MITIGATION TASK FORCE.  IT WAS A MULTI-AGENCY GROUP, THE CANAL

                    CORPORATION, THE DEC, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DEPARTMENT OF

                    AGRICULTURE AND A BUNCH OF EXPERTS ON -- ON FLOODING.  AND THEIR TASK

                    WAS TO CREATE A REPORT BY JULY 1ST OF 2023, TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS

                    FOR BOTH THE MOHAWK RIVER BASIN AND THE OSWEGO RIVER BASIN TO DO

                                         148



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THINGS TO MITIGATE FLOODING.  SO, THEY DID THAT REPORT AND ONE OF THE

                    MAIN THINGS THAT CAME OUT OF IT WAS, THEY WANTED A WORKGROUP FOR THE

                    OSWEGO RIVER BASIN.  OSWEGO RIVER BASIN, MUCH DIFFERENT THAN THE

                    MOHAWK -- MOHAWK'S STEEP ELEVATION, NO BODIES OF WATER TO ABSORB

                    ANY EXTRA RUNOFF, SO THE WATER RUNS HOT AND THE NEXT DAY THE FLOODING IS

                    USUALLY GONE.  OSWEGO RIVER BASIN'S LOW LEVEL, LOTS OF BODIES OF WATER.

                    THE FINGER LAKES, I THINK THERE ARE TEN LAKES ALL TOGETHER.  AND THOSE

                    FLOODS LAST FOR WEEKS, IF NOT MONTHS.  SO, THE OSWEGO RIVER BASIN,

                    THEY WANTED THIS WORKGROUP THAT WOULD WORK TOGETHER, ALL THE EXITS

                    AND ENTRANCES OF WATER GOING IN AND OUT OF -- OF LAKES AND STREAMS AND

                    RIVERS.  AND THAT'S WHAT THIS BILL DOES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. WALSH.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  WILL THE

                    SPONSOR YIELD FOR A FEW QUESTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WILL THE SPONSOR

                    YIELD?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  YES.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE SPONSOR YIELDS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

                                 SO, YEAH, JUST A FEW QUESTIONS TO JUST CLARIFY A FEW

                    SECTIONS OF THE BILL, WHICH, YOU KNOW, I WOULD NOTE THAT WE DID PASS

                    UNANIMOUSLY WHEN IT CAME UP AND THEN IT WAS VETOED BY THE GOVERNOR

                    IN 2024.  SO, I GUESS FIRST QUESTION WOULD BE, HAS THE BILL CHANGED AT

                    ALL?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  NO.

                                         149



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  THE GOVERNOR INDICATED IN HER

                    VETO MESSAGE, SHE CITED THE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMISSIONS AND

                    TASK FORCES AND STATED THAT NONE OF THE PROPOSALS WERE ACCOUNTED FOR IN

                    THE FINANCIAL PLAN AND NOTED THAT THESE ARE MORE APPROPRIATELY HANDLED

                    IN THE BUDGET.  SO, QUESTION IS, OUT OF OUR $254 BILLION ENACTED STATE

                    BUDGET, WAS THERE ANY MONEY APPROPRIATED THIS YEAR TO ADDRESS THIS

                    PARTICULAR INITIATIVE?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  WELL, TWO THINGS.  FIRST OF ALL, WE

                    DISAGREE WITH THE GOVERNOR, HER ESTIMATE OF THE COST OF THIS.  THIS IS AN

                    ALL-VOLUNTEER ORGANIZATION.  I MEAN, I DON'T KNOW, MAYBE YOU HAVE TO

                    PAY FOR COFFEE AND PASTRIES, BUT THAT'S ABOUT IT.  AND A LOT OF TIMES

                    WHEN THIS GROUP WILL MEET, IS WHEN THERE'S AN EXTREME WEATHER EVENT,

                    SO IT'LL BE OVER ZOOM OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT.  SO, THEY DON'T EVEN HAVE

                    TO DRIVE TO A LOCATION.  SECONDLY, IT'S PART OF THE CANAL CORPORATION

                    WHICH IS PART OF THE NEW YORK POWER AUTHORITY AND I BELIEVE THERE IS

                    PLENTY OF FUNDING IN THOSE ORGANIZATIONS IN ORDER TO PAY FOR THE

                    MINUSCULE AMOUNT OF MONEY THIS IS GOING TO COST.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO, THE -- IT WOULD BE FAIR TO

                    SAY THAT NO MONEY WAS BUDGETED BECAUSE YOU WOULD SAY THAT THE

                    AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT IT WOULD TAKE TO CONVENE THIS STAKEHOLDER GROUP

                    AND TO MAKE THESE RECOMMENDATIONS IS NEGLIGIBLE.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  THAT'S CORRECT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  SO, LET'S TALK A LITTLE BIT ABOUT

                    WHAT THE LEGISLATION WOULD REQUIRE IN TERMS OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP.

                                 THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP WILL BE FORMED.  WHO WOULD

                                         150



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    BE MEMBERS OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  THEY WOULD BE ENTITIES THAT CONTROL THE

                    -- THE FLOW OF WATER IN AND OUT OF THE OSWEGO RIVER BASIN.  THERE ARE I

                    THINK, LIKE I SAID, TEN LAKES ALL TOGETHER.  THEY'RE ALL CONTROLLED BY

                    DIFFERENT ENTITIES.  CANANDAIGUA LAKE BY THE CITY OF CANANDAIGUA,

                    SENECA LAKE BY GRAVITY RENEWABLES, THEY'RE A POWER GENERATION

                    COMPANY.  CAYUGA LAKE, THE CANAL CORPORATION; OWASCO LAKE, THE

                    CITY OF AUBURN; SKANEATELES LAKE, THE CITY OF SYRACUSE; OTISCO LAKE,

                    ONONDAGA COUNTY WATER AUTHORITY; ONONDAGA LAKE IS THE CANAL

                    CORPORATION.  ONEIDA LAKE, CANAL CORPORATION AND KEUKA LAKE, THE

                    VILLAGE OF PENN YAN.  SO, REPRESENTATIVES FROM ALL OF THOSE GROUPS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  AND IN ADDITION TO THOSE GROUPS, IT

                    WOULD -- IT SAYS THAT THERE WOULD BE COMMUNITY STAKEHOLDER GROUPS.

                    ANY PARTICULAR ONES THAT WOULD BE INCLUDED IN THERE OR DID YOU ALREADY

                    MENTION THEM?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  I DON'T KNOW.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  IT MENTIONS THE DEC WOULD BE

                    A PART OF IT?

                                 OH, I WON'T GO FORWARD, I'M SORRY.  YOU'RE -- YOU'RE

                    CONFERRING.

                                 (PAUSE/CONFERENCING)

                                 MR. STIRPE:  WE JUST MENTIONED THAT WE HAVEN'T

                    IDENTIFIED ALL OF THE COMMUNITY GROUPS YET --

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  -- UNTIL THIS IS FORMED.

                                         151



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MS. WALSH:  FAIR ENOUGH.  SO, THAT -- THAT WOULD BE

                    FIGURED OUT LATER.

                                 AND THEN THE DEC IS ALSO NAMED THAT THEY WOULD BE

                    ON THAT -- IN THAT STAKEHOLDER GROUP, AS WELL AS SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS.

                    DO WE KNOW WHO THOSE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS WOULD BE YET?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  I -- I THINK A LOT OF THOSE ARE GONNA BE

                    THE SAME PEOPLE THAT WERE ON THE FLOOD MITIGATION TASK FORCE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  THEY'RE PEOPLE WHO WORK IN

                    ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRY AND HIGHER ED, PLACES LIKE THAT --

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.

                                 MR. STIRPE: -- THAT ARE REAL SUBJECT EXPERTS.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  IS -- OUT OF THAT LIST THAT YOU

                    READ EARLIER, MANY OF THEM SOUNDED LIKE MUNICIPAL, CITY GOVERNMENT,

                    THINGS LIKE THAT.  I NOTICED THAT ONE THAT WAS NOT LISTED WAS OSWEGO

                    COUNTY.  IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON WHY OSWEGO COUNTY DIDN'T MAKE

                    THE CUT THERE FOR IT TO BE ON THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  I DON'T THINK THEY ARE A CONTROLLED

                    ENTITY ON ANY OF THOSE BODIES OF WATER.  NOW, THEY MIGHT BE ON SOME

                    RIVER, I'M NOT -- I'M NOT CERTAIN OF THAT, BUT ON THE LAKES THAT WE'VE --

                    WERE INCLUDED IN IT, THEY DON'T CONTROL THE FLOW AT ALL.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  I -- I WOULD JUST NOTE BASED ON

                    THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE, I MEAN, YOU -- YOU LIVE THERE, I DON'T.  SO --

                    BUT THAT THE OSWEGO RIVER AND MOST OF ONEIDA LAKE ARE IN OSWEGO

                    COUNTY AND --

                                         152



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. STIRPE:  YES, BUT THE CANAL CORPORATION HAS

                    CONTROL OVER THE ONEIDA [SIC] RIVER AND THE ONEIDA LAKE, I BELIEVE.

                                 MS. WALSH:  THE OSWEGO RIVER, DID YOU MEAN?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  I AM SORRY.  YEAH, THE OSWEGO RIVER.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  YEAH, I NOTED THAT THE CITY OF

                    OSWEGO MAY HAVE REPRESENTATION DUE TO THEIR -- THEIR HYDRO PLANT, BUT

                    NOT THE COUNTY.  SO, I WAS JUST ASKING ABOUT THAT.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  YEAH.  I MEAN, THE REAL PROBLEM WE

                    HAVE IS THE CANAL SYSTEM WAS DEVELOPED FOR NAVIGATION PURPOSES ONLY

                    BACK IN THE DAY WHEN THEY DID IT.  AND SINCE THEN, WE'VE DEVELOPED

                    RECREATION, ENERGY GENERATION, YOU KNOW, ALL SORTS OF DIFFERENT THINGS

                    AND IT'S JUST NOT SET UP TO HANDLE ALL OF THOSE THINGS ALL AT THE SAME TIME.

                                 MS. WALSH:  RIGHT.  WELL, AS --AS YOU SAID, THE --

                    THE COST OF HAVING THIS STAKEHOLDER GROUP IS PROBABLY A ZOOM

                    MEMBERSHIP AND MAYBE A -- AN EXTRA DONUT OR TWO FOR OSWEGO COUNTY

                    IF THEY WERE INCLUDED.  AND IT -- IT -- IT MIGHT BE A GOOD IDEA SINCE IT

                    LOOKS LIKE THEY HAVE, FROM WHAT I CAN SEE, MORE SHORELINE ON ONEIDA

                    LAKE.  YOU KNOW, MIGHT BE SOMETHING TO CONSIDER IN TERMS OF AN

                    AMENDMENT TO ADD THEM TO THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP SINCE IT SEEMS THAT

                    THERE ARE A NUMBER OF OTHER STAKEHOLDERS THAT HAVE BEEN SPECIFICALLY

                    NAMED.  BUT, THAT WAS ONE CONCERN THAT WAS RAISED.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  OKAY.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  TAKEN.

                                 MS. WALSH:  SO, THERE ISN'T A SET NUMBER OF

                                         153



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    MEMBERS OF THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP, CORRECT?

                                 MR. STIRPE:  NO.

                                 MS. WALSH:  OKAY.  AND THEN IT SAYS THAT WITHIN SIX

                    MONTHS AFTER THE STAKEHOLDER GROUP IS FORMED THEY MUST MAKE

                    RECOMMENDATIONS.  WHY -- WHY IS THERE NO REQUIREMENT THAT THIS REPORT

                    OF RECOMMENDATIONS IS SENT TO THE MINORITY?  I SEE THAT IT'S -- THERE'S A

                    WHOLE LIST OF, YOU KNOW, ENTITIES THAT ARE GOING TO RECEIVE IT; THE

                    GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, THE SPEAKER OF THE

                    ASSEMBLY, BUT NOT THE MINORITY.  IS THERE A REASON FOR THAT?  SEEING AS

                    WE HAVE MEMBERS OF OUR SIDE OF THE AISLE AND THE MINORITY SIDE ARE OUT

                    IN THAT AREA THAT WOULD BE CERTAINLY IMPACTED BY THIS.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  I THINK THE ONLY REASON IS BECAUSE

                    THAT'S KIND OF STANDARD LANGUAGE THAT'S ALREADY INCLUDED -- ALWAYS

                    INCLUDED.  AND I'M SURE THAT IF YOU ASKED FOR THE REPORT, I DON'T THINK

                    THE SPEAKER HAS ANY REASON NOT TO SHARE IT WITH YOU OR ME, BECAUSE IT

                    DOESN'T MENTION ANY OF US GETTING IT EITHER.  BUT I -- I THINK WE'D BE

                    MORE THAN WILLING TO SHARE THE REPORT.

                                 MS. WALSH:  YEAH.  I THINK IT'S JUST REALLY A SIGN

                    OF -- A SIGN OF RESPECT.  I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE'S -- THERE'S STANDARD

                    LANGUAGE AND EVERYTHING, BUT TO INCLUDE MEMBERS OF LEADERSHIP ON

                    BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, WHO CERTAINLY REPRESENT CONSTITUENTS THAT ARE

                    GOING TO BE IMPACTED BY WHATEVER THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE GOING TO

                    BE.  SO, JUST RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT THAT BE CONSIDERED AS AN

                    AMENDMENT OR TO THE -- TO THE POWERS THAT BE -- THAT MAY BE LISTENING

                    TO THIS, TO PERHAPS INCLUDE THAT IN SOME TYPE OF A CHAPTER AMENDMENT

                                         154



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    WOULD BE LOVELY.

                                 MR. STIRPE:  ALL RIGHT.  POINT WELL-TAKEN.

                                 MS. WALSH:  ALL RIGHT.  WELL, THANK YOU FOR THAT,

                    AND THANK YOU FOR ANSWERING MY QUESTIONS.  THAT'S REALLY ALL I HAVE,

                    MR. STIRPE, THANK YOU.

                                 MADAM SPEAKER, ON THE BILL.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE BILL.

                                 MS. WALSH:  YEAH, SO, JUST VERY BRIEFLY.

                                 AS I SAID, THIS IS A BILL THAT PASSED UNANIMOUSLY LAST

                    YEAR AND THAT SOMETIMES HAPPENS, PARTICULARLY AS WE'RE GETTING INTO

                    THESE LAST, YOU KNOW, BELIEVE IT OR NOT, WE HAVE UNDER, YOU KNOW, TEN

                    DAYS OF SESSION LEFT.  THE BILLS ARE GOING TO START COMING VERY QUICKLY,

                    SOMETIMES THINGS GET MISSED AND ON FURTHER EXAMINATION, THERE ARE

                    POINTS THAT WE WISH TO MAKE.  AND I BELIEVE I MADE THOSE POINTS AND

                    THEY ARE THAT THIS STAKEHOLDER GROUP DOES NAME A NUMBER OF ENTITIES,

                    BUT APPEARS TO BE OMITTING OSWEGO COUNTY, WHICH IS, I WOULD SAY, AN

                    INTEGRAL PART OF THIS AREA.  SHARES SHORELINE IS IN THE VICINITY, YOU KNOW,

                    THERE -- THERE WAS NO ASK FOR A HOME RULE POSITION EVEN THOUGH THIS

                    IMPACTS OSWEGO COUNTY MORE THAN -- THAN OTHER AREAS.  SO, I THINK THAT

                    INCLUDING STAKEHOLDERS THAT ARE IN THAT AREA IS WISE.  AND I ALSO THINK

                    THAT EVEN IF THE COST, I DON'T KNOW THAT I REALLY AGREE NECESSARILY WITH

                    WHAT THE GOVERNOR HUNG HER HAT ON IN HER VETO MESSAGE AS FAR AS THE

                    COST ON THE CANAL CORPORATION.  BUT I DO THINK THAT WHEN THE

                    RECOMMENDATIONS DO COME BACK, I THINK THAT THEY OUGHT TO BE SHARED

                    WITH LEADERSHIP ON BOTH SIDES OF THE AISLE, ESPECIALLY AS WE'RE

                                         155



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    CONSIDERING UPSTATE AREAS THAT ARE REPRESENTED PRETTY HEAVILY BY -- BY

                    OUR -- OUR SIDE.  SO, I THINK -- I DON'T KNOW HOW I'M GOING TO END UP

                    VOTING ON THIS, BUT I DO THINK THAT THOSE ARE, YOU KNOW, CONCERNS THAT I

                    WANTED TO RAISE AND HAVE ON THE RECORD.  SO, THANK YOU VERY MUCH,

                    MADAM SPEAKER.  APPRECIATE IT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 READ THE LAST SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULT.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 PAGE 16, RULES REPORT NO. 362, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY NO. A08465, RULES REPORT

                    NO. 362, OTIS, BURDICK, SAYEGH, COLTON, SHIMSKY, JACOBSON, DURSO,

                    SLATER.  AN ACT TO AMEND THE LABOR LAW, IN RELATION TO PREVAILING WAGE

                    FOR THOSE INVOLVED IN THE HAULING OF CONCRETE AND ASPHALT.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  READ THE LAST

                    SECTION.

                                 THE CLERK:  THIS ACT SHALL TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THE CLERK WILL

                    RECORD THE VOTE.

                                 (THE CLERK RECORDED THE VOTE.)

                                         156



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MR. PALMESANO TO EXPLAIN THIS VOTE.

                                 MR. PALMESANO:  YES.  THANK YOU, MADAM

                    SPEAKER AND MY COLLEAGUES, TO EXPLAIN MY VOTE.

                                 I JUST HAVE SOME QUESTIONS, I KNOW THE BILL IS ON

                    CONSENT, WHICH IS FINE.  BUT A COUPLE THINGS I WOULD ASK I THINK THAT

                    NEED TO BE ADDRESSED IS:  ONE, THIS BILL DOES -- THE TERM "PUBLIC WORKS

                    WEBSITE" IS NOT DEFINED.  I THINK THAT'S A QUESTION THAT NEEDS TO BE

                    ANSWERED.  AND I THINK, ALSO, A QUESTION I WANT TO KNOW IS, WOULD THIS

                    BILL REQUIRE UTILITIES FOR PERFORMING EXCAVATION WORK UNDER LABOR LAW

                    224-F?  WOULD THEY BE REQUIRED TO PAY PREVAILING WAGE FOR HAULING

                    UNDER THIS LEGISLATION?  BECAUSE I THINK THE CONCERN IS, HOW THAT ADDED

                    COST WOULD IMPACT RATEPAYERS, BECAUSE WE KNOW RATES ARE GOING UP

                    ACROSS THE BOARD ON EVERYTHING ELSE AND I THINK THIS IS JUST ANOTHER AREA

                    WHERE EXCAVATION WORK IS DOING WORK TO PROVIDE GOOD INFRASTRUCTURE

                    FOR OUR UTILITIES.  I JUST THINK THAT'S WHERE MY QUESTION AND CONCERN

                    COMES WITH THIS PIECE OF LEGISLATION.

                                 SO, BECAUSE OF THOSE QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE, I -- I'M

                    GOING TO BE VOTING IN THE NEGATIVE ON THIS AND I HOPE THOSE QUESTIONS

                    ARE ADDRESSED IN THE FUTURE.  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 MR. PALMESANO IN THE NEGATIVE.

                                 ARE THERE ANY OTHER VOTES?  ANNOUNCE THE RESULTS.

                                 (THE CLERK ANNOUNCED THE RESULT.)

                                 THE BILL IS PASSED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                         157



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, COULD

                    WE GO NOW TO PAGE 3 AND TAKE UP OUR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  PAGE 3,

                    RESOLUTIONS, THE CLERK WILL READ.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 664, MS.

                    SOLAGES.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM MAY 6, 2025, AS MOTHER'S EQUAL PAY DAY IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 665, MR.

                    RA.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 4, 2025, AS GLOBAL RUNNING DAY IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESO -- MR.

                    RA ON THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MR. RA:  SORRY.  YOU CAUGHT ME BY SURPRISE THERE.  I

                    -- I -- I JUST QUICKLY WANT TO THANK MY COLLEAGUES FOR SUPPORTING THIS.

                    WE'VE -- WE'VE DONE THIS THE LAST FEW YEARS.  UNFORTUNATELY, WHILE

                    MANY OF YOU WERE SLEEPING THIS MORNING, THE ONLY ONE WHO JOINED ME

                    ON THE RUN AROUND THE CAPITOL WAS -- WAS OUR COLLEAGUE, MS. LEE.  SO,

                    THE REST OF YOU HAVE MISSED OUT, BUT I LOOK FORWARD TO YOU JOINING US

                                         158



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ON THE RUN NEXT YEAR.  THANK YOU FOR SUPPORTING THIS RESOLUTION.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 666, MS.

                    LEVENBERG.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 14, 2025, AS DRAGONFLY DAY IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. LEVENBERG ON

                    THE RESOLUTION.

                                 MS. LEVENBERG:  I FORGOT ABOUT THIS ONE, BUT ONLY

                    BECAUSE IT HAPPENS TO BE MY SON'S BIRTHDAY THIS WEEK, ON JUNE 7TH, AND

                    HE WAS OBSESSED WITH DRAGONFLIES WHEN HE WAS ABOUT THREE YEARS OLD.

                    I AM VERY HAPPY TO JOIN MY COLLEAGUES IN PROCLAIMING JUNE 14TH AS

                    DRAGONFLY DAY TO MAKE SURE THAT EVERYBODY KNOWS HOW IMPORTANT

                    THEY ARE, AS VERY -- PART OF OUR NATURAL RESOURCES AND OF OUR NATIVE

                    BODY.  SO, THANK YOU.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  THANK YOU.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTION, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 667, MS.

                    FORREST.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 20, 2025, AS WORLD REFUGEE DAY IN

                                         159



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 668, MS.

                    ROSENTHAL.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 2025, AS CYTOMEGALOVIRUS AWARENESS

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 669, MR. P.

                    CARROLL.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM JUNE 2025, AS MIGRAINE AND HEADACHE

                    AWARENESS MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 670, MS.

                    SOLAGES.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM AUGUST 2025, AS BREASTFEEDING AWARENESS

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                         160



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 672, MS.

                    MCMAHON.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 4, 2025, AS OSTOMY AWARENESS

                    DAY IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 673, MR.

                    RAGA.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2025, AS FILIPINO AMERICAN

                    HERITAGE MONTH -- HISTORY MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 674, MS.

                    JACKSON.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 9, 2025, AS SNEAKERS DAY IN THE

                    STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                                         161



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 675, MR.

                    SMITH.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 27-31, 2025, AS STRANGER SAFETY

                    AND EDUCATION AWARENESS WEEK IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 676, MR.

                    BRABENEC.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM OCTOBER 2025, AS CZECH-AMERICAN HERITAGE

                    MONTH IN THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                    ADOPTED.


                                 THE CLERK:  ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NO. 677, MR.

                    SAYEGH.

                                 LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION MEMORIALIZING GOVERNOR

                    KATHY HOCHUL TO PROCLAIM DECEMBER 21, 2025, AS MEDITATION DAY IN

                    THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON THE RESOLUTION,

                    ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTION IS

                                         162



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    ADOPTED.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, IF YOU

                    COULD PLEASE CALL ON OUR COLLEAGUE, MS. CLARK.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MS. CLARK FOR THE

                    PURPOSES OF AN ANNOUNCEMENT.

                                 MS. CLARK:  THANK YOU, MADAM SPEAKER.  I'M HERE

                    TO ANNOUNCE THAT THERE WILL BE MAJORITY CONFERENCE IMMEDIATELY

                    FOLLOWING SESSION IN HEARING ROOM C.  MAJORITY CONFERENCE, HEARING

                    ROOM C.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  MAJORITY

                    CONFERENCE IN HEARING ROOM C AFTER THE ADJOURNMENT OF SESSION.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  MADAM SPEAKER, DO YOU

                    HAVE ANY FURTHER HOUSEKEEPING OR RESOLUTIONS?

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  WE DO HAVE SOME

                    HOUSEKEEPING.

                                 WITHOUT OBJECTION, ON A MOTION BY MS. ROSENTHAL, TO

                    RECONSIDER THE SUBSTITUTION OF SENATE BILL NO. S03391 FOR ASSEMBLY

                    BILL NO. A02278, SAID SENATE BILL IS RECOMMITTED TO THE COMMITTEE ON

                    HIGHER EDUCATION AND SAID ASSEMBLY BILL IS RESTORED TO ITS PLACE ON THE

                    ORDER OF THIRD READING.

                                 ON A MOTION BY MS. ROSENTHAL, THE AMENDMENTS ARE

                    RECEIVED AND ADOPTED.

                                 WE DO HAVE A NUMBER OF RESOLUTIONS BEFORE THE

                                         163



                    NYS ASSEMBLY                                                               JUNE 5, 2025

                    HOUSE.  WITHOUT OBJECTION, THESE RESOLUTIONS WILL BE TAKEN UP TOGETHER.

                                 ON THE RESOLUTIONS, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SIGNIFY BY SAYING

                    AYE; OPPOSED, NO.  THE RESOLUTIONS ARE ADOPTED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, ASSEMBLY RESOLUTION NOS. 678-686

                    WERE UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED.)

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES.

                                 MRS. PEOPLES-STOKES:  I NOW MOVE THAT THE

                    ASSEMBLY STAND ADJOURNED AND THAT WE RECONVENE AT 9:30 A.M., FRIDAY,

                    JUNE THE 6TH, TOMORROW BEING A SESSION DAY.

                                 ACTING SPEAKER HUNTER:  ON MRS.

                    PEOPLES-STOKES' MOTION, THE HOUSE STANDS ADJOURNED.

                                 (WHEREUPON, AT 3:50 P.M., THE HOUSE STOOD ADJOURNED

                    UNTIL FRIDAY, JUNE 6TH AT 9:30 A.M., THAT BEING A SESSION DAY.)

























                                         164